Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price12.24¢/kWh2024 · #44 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.893/gal2026-08 · #26 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$132.052024 · #29 of 50 · highest first
Oklahoma over time
Explore Oklahoma readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Oklahoma officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Oklahoma effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Oklahoma change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price Oklahoma · source units
OklahomaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
7 of 7 reviewed Oklahoma actions match · 6 date markers shown. 49 major events shown separately.
Oklahoma · 2024: 12.24¢/kWh · Rank #44 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Oklahoma, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Oklahoma Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Oklahoma · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
Oklahoma · 202412.24¢/kWh
Oklahoma rank#44among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Oklahoma, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Oklahoma
2024 · Oklahoma: 12.24¢/kWh · Rank #44 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Oklahoma Residential electricity price history
Period
Oklahoma
Compare
2015
10.14¢/kWh
2016
10.2¢/kWh
2017
10.61¢/kWh
2018
10.3¢/kWh
2019
10.21¢/kWh
2020
10.12¢/kWh
2021
11¢/kWh
2022
12.44¢/kWh
2023
12.08¢/kWh
2024
12.24¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Oklahoma · 12.24¢/kWh2024 · Rank #44 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma · your comparison
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's Midwest region, including taxes. The region contains Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent EIA observations
Prior week
$3.934/gal
Weekly change
-8.7¢
One year earlier
$3.088/gal
Change from one year earlier
+75.9¢
Method and limitations
FactVote uses EIA’s Midwest series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes Oklahoma. Changes are calculated from the published August 24, 2026 (prior week), and September 1, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.
EIA does not publish a current Oklahoma statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This Midwest regional estimate should not be read as Oklahoma’s statewide average.
The regional average combines Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Oklahoma community.
Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
Oklahoma · 2024$132.05
Oklahoma rank#29among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Oklahoma
2024 · Oklahoma: $132.05 · Rank #29 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Oklahoma Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
Oklahoma
Compare
2010
$108.61
2011
$115.61
2012
$107.6
2013
$110.47
2014
$114.17
2015
$110.87
2016
$111.49
2017
$110.27
2018
$117.28
2019
$113.93
2020
$109.07
2021
$119.69
2022
$143.65
2023
$129.1
2024
$132.05
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Oklahoma · $132.052024 · Rank #29 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma · your comparison
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
Oklahoma · 202494.3 TWh
Oklahoma rank#18among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Oklahoma, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Oklahoma
2024 · Oklahoma: 94.3 TWh · Rank #18 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Oklahoma Total electricity generation history
Period
Oklahoma
Compare
2015
76.1 TWh
2016
78.7 TWh
2017
73.7 TWh
2018
87.2 TWh
2019
86.4 TWh
2020
83.4 TWh
2021
80.8 TWh
2022
84.6 TWh
2023
89.2 TWh
2024
94.3 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Oklahoma · 94.3 TWh2024 · Rank #18 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma · your comparison
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation
50.8%2024
Natural-gas generation as a share of Oklahoma's total in-state electric-industry net generation.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
EIA generation totals
Natural-gas generation
47,742,413 MWh
Total net generation
94,069,145 MWh
Selected generation shares
Natural gas
50.8%
Wind
40.4%
Coal
6.5%
Hydroelectric
1.7%
Method and limitations
FactVote divides the 47,742,413 MWh of natural-gas generation in U.S. Energy Information Administration Table 5 by 94,069,145 MWh of total in-state net generation and rounds to one decimal place.
The selected shares round EIA's source-specific generation totals to one decimal place and do not show every generation source.
In-state generation is not the same as electricity consumed in Oklahoma because power crosses state lines.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
Oklahoma · 2024220.7 min/year
Oklahoma rank#33among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Oklahoma
2024 · Oklahoma: 220.7 min/year · Rank #33 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Oklahoma Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
Oklahoma
Compare
2023
1,339.4 min/year
2024
220.7 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Oklahoma · 220.7 min/year2024 · Rank #33 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma · your comparison
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
Oklahoma · 2024231 trillion Btu
Oklahoma rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Oklahoma · 231 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma · your comparison
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
Oklahoma · 202488.56 Mt CO₂
Oklahoma rank#18among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Oklahoma · 88.56 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #18 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma · your comparison
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
7 of 7 reviewed Oklahoma actions · newest first
May 18, 2026 · HB 1370 · Motor Fuel Tax Code; repealer; reduction in federal excise tax on gasoline or diesel fuel; emergency. · EnactedOklahoma Legislature · HB 1370
Motor Fuel Tax Code; repealer; reduction in federal excise tax on gasoline or diesel fuel; emergency.
May 18, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Brad Boles · Sponsored / Sen. Grant Green · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1370 repeals the Oklahoma provision that would replace a reduction in the federal gasoline or diesel excise tax with an equal state tax. The repeal removes that contingent tax adjustment; it does not itself establish a federal tax reduction or a measured decline in Midwest pump prices.
Signed by Kevin Stitt on 2026-05-18. Latest legislative entry: Approved by Governor 05/18/2026 (2026-05-14). Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Midwest regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee and Wisconsin. Oklahoma policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Oklahoma statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. REPEALER 68 O.S. 2021, Section 500.4A, is hereby repealed. SECTION 2. It being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health or safety, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, by reason whereof this act shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and approval.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 18, 2026 · HB 1370 · Motor Fuel Tax Code; repealer; reduction in federal excise tax on gasoline or diesel fuel; emergency. · SignedGovernor · HB 1370
Motor Fuel Tax Code; repealer; reduction in federal excise tax on gasoline or diesel fuel; emergency.
May 18, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Kevin Stitt · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Kevin Stitt signed HB 1370. HB 1370 repeals the Oklahoma provision that would replace a reduction in the federal gasoline or diesel excise tax with an equal state tax. The repeal removes that contingent tax adjustment; it does not itself establish a federal tax reduction or a measured decline in Midwest pump prices.
Signed by Kevin Stitt on 2026-05-18. Latest legislative entry: Approved by Governor 05/18/2026 (2026-05-14). Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Midwest regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee and Wisconsin. Oklahoma policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Oklahoma statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. REPEALER 68 O.S. 2021, Section 500.4A, is hereby repealed. SECTION 2. It being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health or safety, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, by reason whereof this act shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and approval.
S. 4016 proposes identity-document verification procedures for unemployment-compensation claimants, including federal regulations and safeguards against improper denial or delay. James Lankford is the primary sponsor. Unemployment cash benefits relate to household money income; the bill is not enacted. The identity-verification amendments would apply to initial applications received at least two years after enactment.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Verification of applicant identity(a)In generalSection 303 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 503) is amended by adding at the end the following:(n)(1)The State agency charged with the administration of the State law shall certify that the State has procedures in place to verify the identity of claimants of unemployment compensation, including requiring the claimant to provide documentation of their identity, which shall consist of—(A)at least one currently valid Federal or State government-issued identification document; and(B)one or more supporting documents, which may include utility bills, lease agreements, voter registration cards, vehicle registration, insurance documents, or other reliable documents, so long as such documents are—(i)determined by the State to be sufficient to verify the identity of the claimant; or(ii)approved by the Secretary for such purpose.(2)Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary of Labor shall promulgate regulations governing identity verification procedures for claimants of unemployment compensation used by State agencies. Such regulations shall—(A)take into account—(i)administrative costs, including for technology and cybersecurity systems; and(ii)any other factors the Secretary determines appropriate;(B)provide due process protections for claimants;(C)specify methods to ensure that the documentation required under paragraph (1)(A)—(i)is accurate, current, and reliable; and(ii)does not produce systematic mismatches that unfairly deny or delay the payment of unemployment compensation;(D)require safeguards to ensure that the procedures—(i)minimize false positive or negative rates;(ii)do not result in the flagging, denial, or delay of claims based on the personal characteristics of an individual, including race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or political affiliation or belief; and(iii)comply with applicable civil rights laws;(E)require that such procedures comply with best practices for privacy and cybersecurity, as determined by the Secretary of Labor;(F)any other factors the Secretary determines appropriate; and(G)include any other provisions necessary to ensure the proper implementation, oversight, and continuous improvement of data-matching practices under this subsection.(3)In this subsection, the term unemployment compensation has the meaning given the term in subsection (d)(2)(A)..(b)Effective dateThe amendments made by this Act shall apply, with respect to a State, to initial applications for unemployment compensation received by such State on or after the date that is 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 14, 2025 · SB 998 · Public utilities; cost of transmission upgrades; modifying application process for construction of certain facilities; establishing cost recovery provisions. · EnactedOklahoma Legislature · SB 998
Public utilities; cost of transmission upgrades; modifying application process for construction of certain facilities; establishing cost recovery provisions.
SB 998 became law without the governor’s signature. It permits recovery of qualifying natural-gas generation construction costs before commercial operation and sets a 180-day decision period for covered natural-gas applications. Terminated projects require refunds of collected construction costs plus specified interest within 90 days. Firm gas-transport contracts have competitive-bidding and recoverability conditions. These provisions concern generation development and electricity charges, which can be part of tenant-paid utilities; they establish neither operating capacity nor a measured change in gross rent.
Became law without the governor’s signature on 2025-05-14. Latest legislative entry: Becomes law without Governor's signature 05/14/2025 (2025-05-14). Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Oklahoma’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Median gross rent · Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The Commission shall enter an order on an application filed pursuant to this subsection within two hundred forty (240) days of the filing of the application, following notice and hearing and after consideration of reasonable alternatives, unless the electric generation facility utilizes natural gas as its primary fuel source. If the electric generation facility uses natural gas as its primary fuel source, then the Commission shall enter an order on an application filed pursuant to this subsection within one hundred eighty (180) days of the filing of the application, following notice and hearing and after consideration of reasonable alternatives. […] 6. The Commission shall permit an electric utility to begin to recover return on and return of Construction-Work-In-Progress expenses prior to commercial operation of a newly constructed electric generation facility subject to the provisions of this subsection, provided the newly constructed electric generation facility utilizes natural gas as its primary fuel source. The Commission shall permit a separate rate adjustment mechanism, adjusted periodically, to recover the costs described in this section for new capacity in natural-gas-fired electric generation facilities. The new natural-gas-fired electric generation capacity eligible for those provisions shall also include new natural-gas-fired capacity additions at an existing electric generation facility. If a public utility implements a rate adjustment mechanism pursuant to this section and subsequently terminates the initiative to construct or acquire stake in a natural gas electric generation facility, the public utility shall automatically refund customers any amounts collected through such rate adjustment mechanism plus interest at the one-year United States Treasury Bill rate through the mechanism, over a period not to exceed ninety (90) days from the effective date of the termination of the initiative. 7. For any new natural-gas-fired electric generation facility constructed pursuant to this section, an electric utility shall secure a firm contract to transport natural gas to the generating facility. Such contract shall be secured pursuant to a competitive solicitation process conducted in accordance with applicable Commission rules. The cost incurred for the contract shall be presumed recoverable by the electric utility through its applicable fuel adjustment clause. Costs assessed upon the electric utility by the Commission for non-compliance with this section shall not be recoverable from the customers of the electric utility. If the electric utility does not receive a bid for firm transportation as a result of its competitive solicitation, the electric utility shall be considered compliant with the requirements of this section provided that the Commission determines that the competitive solicitation is for a firm contract for transport of natural gas which could be reasonably provided by an available pipeline.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 14, 2025 · SB 480 · Utilities; modifying certain exception to definition; allowing certain entities to receive electricity. Effective date. Emergency. · SignedGovernor · SB 480
Utilities; modifying certain exception to definition; allowing certain entities to receive electricity. Effective date. Emergency.
May 14, 2025 · Signed
Gov. Kevin Stitt · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Kevin Stitt signed SB 480. SB 480 changes the public-utility exemption for certain private electricity producers and requires covered projects to include a natural-gas component in their generation capacity. Grid interconnection and registration obligations remain. The provision concerns generating capacity and the resource mix, not measured output.
Signed by Kevin Stitt on 2025-05-14. Latest legislative entry: Approved by Governor 05/14/2025 (2025-05-14). The original signed law confirms approval on May 14, 2025; the index’s unsigned label conflicts with that document. Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Natural-gas share is the portion of Oklahoma in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
B. Provided, that the term public utility shall not include or be taken to mean a corporation, association, company, individuals, their trustees, lessees, receivers, successors, or assignees engaged in the production of electricity, provided that such entity furnishes an electric service or commodity on the premises directly to itself, an affiliate, or tenants or indirectly by contracting with a public utility, rural electric cooperative, or municipality for the purpose of furnishing electric service to a specific customer or is an exempt wholesale generator, so long as that service or commodity is not resold as retail electric service or supplied indirectly or directly for public use. Nothing herein shall relieve such an entity of its obligation to comply with state and federal grid interconnection and registration requirements and associated costs from the applicable regional transmission organization or public utility in the state . There shall not be a requirement or an obligation for a public utility to serve any customer receiving electric service from an entity described herein. Further, it shall not limit any party from asserting a right they may otherwise be entitled to under Oklahoma law including filings with the Commission. Additionally, any project pursuant to this act shall be required to utilize a natural gas component in their power generation capacity.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 14, 2025 · SB 480 · Utilities; modifying certain exception to definition; allowing certain entities to receive electricity. Effective date. Emergency. · EnactedOklahoma Legislature · SB 480
Utilities; modifying certain exception to definition; allowing certain entities to receive electricity. Effective date. Emergency.
May 14, 2025 · Enacted
Sen. Grant Green · Sponsored / Rep. Brad Boles · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 480 changes the public-utility exemption for certain private electricity producers and requires covered projects to include a natural-gas component in their generation capacity. Grid interconnection and registration obligations remain. The provision concerns generating capacity and the resource mix, not measured output.
Signed by Kevin Stitt on 2025-05-14. Latest legislative entry: Approved by Governor 05/14/2025 (2025-05-14). The original signed law confirms approval on May 14, 2025; the index’s unsigned label conflicts with that document. Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Natural-gas share is the portion of Oklahoma in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
B. Provided, that the term public utility shall not include or be taken to mean a corporation, association, company, individuals, their trustees, lessees, receivers, successors, or assignees engaged in the production of electricity, provided that such entity furnishes an electric service or commodity on the premises directly to itself, an affiliate, or tenants or indirectly by contracting with a public utility, rural electric cooperative, or municipality for the purpose of furnishing electric service to a specific customer or is an exempt wholesale generator, so long as that service or commodity is not resold as retail electric service or supplied indirectly or directly for public use. Nothing herein shall relieve such an entity of its obligation to comply with state and federal grid interconnection and registration requirements and associated costs from the applicable regional transmission organization or public utility in the state . There shall not be a requirement or an obligation for a public utility to serve any customer receiving electric service from an entity described herein. Further, it shall not limit any party from asserting a right they may otherwise be entitled to under Oklahoma law including filings with the Commission. Additionally, any project pursuant to this act shall be required to utilize a natural gas component in their power generation capacity.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Oklahoma officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Oklahoma candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
7 statements from 6 candidates
2026 Oklahoma Governor — General Election Field
2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements
Cyndi believes in protecting two of Oklahoma’s most valuable industries- energy and agriculture. She believes in an “all of the above approach” to energy, meaning that she will support oil, natural gas, and renewable energy production. She also knows that we need to balance that approach with protec…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, infrastructure, and ratepayer protection
Candidate campaign source
Cyndi believes in protecting two of Oklahoma’s most valuable industries- energy and agriculture. She believes in an “all of the above approach” to energy, meaning that she will support oil, natural gas, and renewable energy production. She also knows that we need to balance that approach with protecting the private property rights of landowners and ensuring that these industries are good stewards of our land and natural resources. Cyndi also knows that our water is a precious resource and will stand up to big corporations and others who want to waste our water.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
We can support oil and gas. We can produce more electricity. We can welcome technology. We can protect our groundwater. We can create new industries. We can strengthen our cooperatives. And we can work to lower the energy burden on Oklahoma families.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, infrastructure, and ratepayer protection
Candidate campaign source
We can support oil and gas. We can produce more electricity. We can welcome technology. We can protect our groundwater. We can create new industries. We can strengthen our cooperatives. And we can work to lower the energy burden on Oklahoma families.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Oklahoma has always been a leader in energy production, currently 3rd in wind production, and 6th in oil and gas production. We need to invest in every type of energy to have a diversified, sustainable, and strong energy economy where we aren’t dependent on foreign energy, with a shifted focus onto …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, infrastructure, and ratepayer protection
Candidate campaign source
Oklahoma has always been a leader in energy production, currently 3rd in wind production, and 6th in oil and gas production. We need to invest in every type of energy to have a diversified, sustainable, and strong energy economy where we aren’t dependent on foreign energy, with a shifted focus onto environmentally friendly energy, to be better stewards of the land.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
We must invest in rural areas through small business programs aimed at agricultural development, eliminating food deserts, industrial development outside major metropolitan areas, and more. We must encourage the productive use of this land and invest in our rural communities. We must make Oklahoma a…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, water, and environment
Candidate campaign source
We must invest in rural areas through small business programs aimed at agricultural development, eliminating food deserts, industrial development outside major metropolitan areas, and more. We must encourage the productive use of this land and invest in our rural communities. We must make Oklahoma a more attractive place to live and reduce the impact of supply-chain issues on our critical resources, such as food, electricity, water, and heat.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Oklahoma candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Oklahoma incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Oklahoma legislators and Oklahoma’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Oklahoma’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
8 matching sponsorships or proposals · 6 Oklahoma incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Brad Boles
Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 51 · R–OK
Motor Fuel Tax Code; repealer; reduction in federal excise tax on gasoline or diesel fuel; emergency.
May 18, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Brad Boles · Sponsored / Sen. Grant Green · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1370 repeals the Oklahoma provision that would replace a reduction in the federal gasoline or diesel excise tax with an equal state tax. The repeal removes that contingent tax adjustment; it does not itself establish a federal tax reduction or a measured decline in Midwest pump prices.
Signed by Kevin Stitt on 2026-05-18. Latest legislative entry: Approved by Governor 05/18/2026 (2026-05-14). Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Midwest regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee and Wisconsin. Oklahoma policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Oklahoma statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. REPEALER 68 O.S. 2021, Section 500.4A, is hereby repealed. SECTION 2. It being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health or safety, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, by reason whereof this act shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and approval.
Utilities; modifying certain exception to definition; allowing certain entities to receive electricity. Effective date. Emergency.
May 14, 2025 · Enacted
Sen. Grant Green · Sponsored / Rep. Brad Boles · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 480 changes the public-utility exemption for certain private electricity producers and requires covered projects to include a natural-gas component in their generation capacity. Grid interconnection and registration obligations remain. The provision concerns generating capacity and the resource mix, not measured output.
Signed by Kevin Stitt on 2025-05-14. Latest legislative entry: Approved by Governor 05/14/2025 (2025-05-14). The original signed law confirms approval on May 14, 2025; the index’s unsigned label conflicts with that document. Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Natural-gas share is the portion of Oklahoma in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
B. Provided, that the term public utility shall not include or be taken to mean a corporation, association, company, individuals, their trustees, lessees, receivers, successors, or assignees engaged in the production of electricity, provided that such entity furnishes an electric service or commodity on the premises directly to itself, an affiliate, or tenants or indirectly by contracting with a public utility, rural electric cooperative, or municipality for the purpose of furnishing electric service to a specific customer or is an exempt wholesale generator, so long as that service or commodity is not resold as retail electric service or supplied indirectly or directly for public use. Nothing herein shall relieve such an entity of its obligation to comply with state and federal grid interconnection and registration requirements and associated costs from the applicable regional transmission organization or public utility in the state . There shall not be a requirement or an obligation for a public utility to serve any customer receiving electric service from an entity described herein. Further, it shall not limit any party from asserting a right they may otherwise be entitled to under Oklahoma law including filings with the Commission. Additionally, any project pursuant to this act shall be required to utilize a natural gas component in their power generation capacity.
U.S. House of Representatives, Oklahoma District 2 · R–OK
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Josh BrecheenU.S. Congress · Oklahoma delegation · HR 3330
Energy Freedom Act
May 13, 2025 · In Congress
Rep. Josh Brecheen · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
H.R. 3330 proposes repealing the federal clean-electricity production credit for facilities placed in service after 2025. Josh Brecheen is the primary sponsor. Incentives for alternative generating resources concern the electricity mix, including natural gas’s share, without specifying a change in Oklahoma output. This bill has no recorded enactment.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Natural-gas share is the portion of Oklahoma in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
17. Clean electricity production credit repealed (a) In general Subpart D of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 is amended by striking section 45Y (and by striking the item relating to such section in the table of sections for such subpart). (b) Conforming amendments (1) Section 38(b), as amended by Public Law 117–169, is amended by striking paragraph (39). (2) Section 168(e)(3)(B)(viii), as added by Public Law 117–169, is amended by striking any qualified facility (as defined in section 45Y(b)(1)(A)),. (c) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall apply to facilities placed in service after December 31, 2025.
Public utilities; cost of transmission upgrades; modifying application process for construction of certain facilities; establishing cost recovery provisions.
SB 998 became law without the governor’s signature. It permits recovery of qualifying natural-gas generation construction costs before commercial operation and sets a 180-day decision period for covered natural-gas applications. Terminated projects require refunds of collected construction costs plus specified interest within 90 days. Firm gas-transport contracts have competitive-bidding and recoverability conditions. These provisions concern generation development and electricity charges, which can be part of tenant-paid utilities; they establish neither operating capacity nor a measured change in gross rent.
Became law without the governor’s signature on 2025-05-14. Latest legislative entry: Becomes law without Governor's signature 05/14/2025 (2025-05-14). Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Oklahoma’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Median gross rent · Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The Commission shall enter an order on an application filed pursuant to this subsection within two hundred forty (240) days of the filing of the application, following notice and hearing and after consideration of reasonable alternatives, unless the electric generation facility utilizes natural gas as its primary fuel source. If the electric generation facility uses natural gas as its primary fuel source, then the Commission shall enter an order on an application filed pursuant to this subsection within one hundred eighty (180) days of the filing of the application, following notice and hearing and after consideration of reasonable alternatives. […] 6. The Commission shall permit an electric utility to begin to recover return on and return of Construction-Work-In-Progress expenses prior to commercial operation of a newly constructed electric generation facility subject to the provisions of this subsection, provided the newly constructed electric generation facility utilizes natural gas as its primary fuel source. The Commission shall permit a separate rate adjustment mechanism, adjusted periodically, to recover the costs described in this section for new capacity in natural-gas-fired electric generation facilities. The new natural-gas-fired electric generation capacity eligible for those provisions shall also include new natural-gas-fired capacity additions at an existing electric generation facility. If a public utility implements a rate adjustment mechanism pursuant to this section and subsequently terminates the initiative to construct or acquire stake in a natural gas electric generation facility, the public utility shall automatically refund customers any amounts collected through such rate adjustment mechanism plus interest at the one-year United States Treasury Bill rate through the mechanism, over a period not to exceed ninety (90) days from the effective date of the termination of the initiative. 7. For any new natural-gas-fired electric generation facility constructed pursuant to this section, an electric utility shall secure a firm contract to transport natural gas to the generating facility. Such contract shall be secured pursuant to a competitive solicitation process conducted in accordance with applicable Commission rules. The cost incurred for the contract shall be presumed recoverable by the electric utility through its applicable fuel adjustment clause. Costs assessed upon the electric utility by the Commission for non-compliance with this section shall not be recoverable from the customers of the electric utility. If the electric utility does not receive a bid for firm transportation as a result of its competitive solicitation, the electric utility shall be considered compliant with the requirements of this section provided that the Commission determines that the competitive solicitation is for a firm contract for transport of natural gas which could be reasonably provided by an available pipeline.
2 proposalsView proposals from Sen. Grant GreenOklahoma Legislature · HB 1370
Motor Fuel Tax Code; repealer; reduction in federal excise tax on gasoline or diesel fuel; emergency.
May 18, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Brad Boles · Sponsored / Sen. Grant Green · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1370 repeals the Oklahoma provision that would replace a reduction in the federal gasoline or diesel excise tax with an equal state tax. The repeal removes that contingent tax adjustment; it does not itself establish a federal tax reduction or a measured decline in Midwest pump prices.
Signed by Kevin Stitt on 2026-05-18. Latest legislative entry: Approved by Governor 05/18/2026 (2026-05-14). Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Midwest regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee and Wisconsin. Oklahoma policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Oklahoma statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. REPEALER 68 O.S. 2021, Section 500.4A, is hereby repealed. SECTION 2. It being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health or safety, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, by reason whereof this act shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and approval.
Utilities; modifying certain exception to definition; allowing certain entities to receive electricity. Effective date. Emergency.
May 14, 2025 · Enacted
Sen. Grant Green · Sponsored / Rep. Brad Boles · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 480 changes the public-utility exemption for certain private electricity producers and requires covered projects to include a natural-gas component in their generation capacity. Grid interconnection and registration obligations remain. The provision concerns generating capacity and the resource mix, not measured output.
Signed by Kevin Stitt on 2025-05-14. Latest legislative entry: Approved by Governor 05/14/2025 (2025-05-14). The original signed law confirms approval on May 14, 2025; the index’s unsigned label conflicts with that document. Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Natural-gas share is the portion of Oklahoma in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
B. Provided, that the term public utility shall not include or be taken to mean a corporation, association, company, individuals, their trustees, lessees, receivers, successors, or assignees engaged in the production of electricity, provided that such entity furnishes an electric service or commodity on the premises directly to itself, an affiliate, or tenants or indirectly by contracting with a public utility, rural electric cooperative, or municipality for the purpose of furnishing electric service to a specific customer or is an exempt wholesale generator, so long as that service or commodity is not resold as retail electric service or supplied indirectly or directly for public use. Nothing herein shall relieve such an entity of its obligation to comply with state and federal grid interconnection and registration requirements and associated costs from the applicable regional transmission organization or public utility in the state . There shall not be a requirement or an obligation for a public utility to serve any customer receiving electric service from an entity described herein. Further, it shall not limit any party from asserting a right they may otherwise be entitled to under Oklahoma law including filings with the Commission. Additionally, any project pursuant to this act shall be required to utilize a natural gas component in their power generation capacity.
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. James LankfordU.S. Congress · Oklahoma delegation · S 4016
Stop Unemployment Fraud Act
Mar 5, 2026 · In Congress
Sen. James Lankford · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
S. 4016 proposes identity-document verification procedures for unemployment-compensation claimants, including federal regulations and safeguards against improper denial or delay. James Lankford is the primary sponsor. Unemployment cash benefits relate to household money income; the bill is not enacted. The identity-verification amendments would apply to initial applications received at least two years after enactment.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Verification of applicant identity(a)In generalSection 303 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 503) is amended by adding at the end the following:(n)(1)The State agency charged with the administration of the State law shall certify that the State has procedures in place to verify the identity of claimants of unemployment compensation, including requiring the claimant to provide documentation of their identity, which shall consist of—(A)at least one currently valid Federal or State government-issued identification document; and(B)one or more supporting documents, which may include utility bills, lease agreements, voter registration cards, vehicle registration, insurance documents, or other reliable documents, so long as such documents are—(i)determined by the State to be sufficient to verify the identity of the claimant; or(ii)approved by the Secretary for such purpose.(2)Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary of Labor shall promulgate regulations governing identity verification procedures for claimants of unemployment compensation used by State agencies. Such regulations shall—(A)take into account—(i)administrative costs, including for technology and cybersecurity systems; and(ii)any other factors the Secretary determines appropriate;(B)provide due process protections for claimants;(C)specify methods to ensure that the documentation required under paragraph (1)(A)—(i)is accurate, current, and reliable; and(ii)does not produce systematic mismatches that unfairly deny or delay the payment of unemployment compensation;(D)require safeguards to ensure that the procedures—(i)minimize false positive or negative rates;(ii)do not result in the flagging, denial, or delay of claims based on the personal characteristics of an individual, including race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or political affiliation or belief; and(iii)comply with applicable civil rights laws;(E)require that such procedures comply with best practices for privacy and cybersecurity, as determined by the Secretary of Labor;(F)any other factors the Secretary determines appropriate; and(G)include any other provisions necessary to ensure the proper implementation, oversight, and continuous improvement of data-matching practices under this subsection.(3)In this subsection, the term unemployment compensation has the meaning given the term in subsection (d)(2)(A)..(b)Effective dateThe amendments made by this Act shall apply, with respect to a State, to initial applications for unemployment compensation received by such State on or after the date that is 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act.
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Todd GollihareOklahoma Legislature · SB 998
Public utilities; cost of transmission upgrades; modifying application process for construction of certain facilities; establishing cost recovery provisions.
SB 998 became law without the governor’s signature. It permits recovery of qualifying natural-gas generation construction costs before commercial operation and sets a 180-day decision period for covered natural-gas applications. Terminated projects require refunds of collected construction costs plus specified interest within 90 days. Firm gas-transport contracts have competitive-bidding and recoverability conditions. These provisions concern generation development and electricity charges, which can be part of tenant-paid utilities; they establish neither operating capacity nor a measured change in gross rent.
Became law without the governor’s signature on 2025-05-14. Latest legislative entry: Becomes law without Governor's signature 05/14/2025 (2025-05-14). Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Oklahoma’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Median gross rent · Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The Commission shall enter an order on an application filed pursuant to this subsection within two hundred forty (240) days of the filing of the application, following notice and hearing and after consideration of reasonable alternatives, unless the electric generation facility utilizes natural gas as its primary fuel source. If the electric generation facility uses natural gas as its primary fuel source, then the Commission shall enter an order on an application filed pursuant to this subsection within one hundred eighty (180) days of the filing of the application, following notice and hearing and after consideration of reasonable alternatives. […] 6. The Commission shall permit an electric utility to begin to recover return on and return of Construction-Work-In-Progress expenses prior to commercial operation of a newly constructed electric generation facility subject to the provisions of this subsection, provided the newly constructed electric generation facility utilizes natural gas as its primary fuel source. The Commission shall permit a separate rate adjustment mechanism, adjusted periodically, to recover the costs described in this section for new capacity in natural-gas-fired electric generation facilities. The new natural-gas-fired electric generation capacity eligible for those provisions shall also include new natural-gas-fired capacity additions at an existing electric generation facility. If a public utility implements a rate adjustment mechanism pursuant to this section and subsequently terminates the initiative to construct or acquire stake in a natural gas electric generation facility, the public utility shall automatically refund customers any amounts collected through such rate adjustment mechanism plus interest at the one-year United States Treasury Bill rate through the mechanism, over a period not to exceed ninety (90) days from the effective date of the termination of the initiative. 7. For any new natural-gas-fired electric generation facility constructed pursuant to this section, an electric utility shall secure a firm contract to transport natural gas to the generating facility. Such contract shall be secured pursuant to a competitive solicitation process conducted in accordance with applicable Commission rules. The cost incurred for the contract shall be presumed recoverable by the electric utility through its applicable fuel adjustment clause. Costs assessed upon the electric utility by the Commission for non-compliance with this section shall not be recoverable from the customers of the electric utility. If the electric utility does not receive a bid for firm transportation as a result of its competitive solicitation, the electric utility shall be considered compliant with the requirements of this section provided that the Commission determines that the competitive solicitation is for a firm contract for transport of natural gas which could be reasonably provided by an available pipeline.
Only current Oklahoma officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Oklahoma statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Oklahoma snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Oklahoma, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.