Oklahoma · individual fact

Oklahoma energy and electricity

Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.

Residential electricity price12.24¢/kWh2024 · #44 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.893/gal2026-08 · #26 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$132.052024 · #29 of 50 · highest first

Oklahoma over time

Explore Oklahoma readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Oklahoma officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Oklahoma effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Oklahoma change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Residential electricity price Oklahoma · source units
OklahomaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Residential electricity price2024: 12.24¢/kWh9.12¢/kWh13.3¢/kWh17.48¢/kWhOklahoma, 2015: 10.14¢/kWhOklahoma, 2016: 10.2¢/kWhOklahoma, 2017: 10.61¢/kWhOklahoma, 2018: 10.3¢/kWhOklahoma, 2019: 10.21¢/kWhOklahoma, 2020: 10.12¢/kWhOklahoma, 2021: 11¢/kWhOklahoma, 2022: 12.44¢/kWhOklahoma, 2023: 12.08¢/kWhOklahoma, 2024: 12.24¢/kWh201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 49National context · Energy Policy Act expands federal energy programs · 2005-08-08Energy Policy ActNational context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Energy law strengthens fuel economy, biofuels and efficiency · 2007-12-19Fuel / efficiency lawNational context · Global oil and energy prices surge · 2008-07-15Oil-price surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Recovery Act funds grid modernization and clean energy · 2009-02-17Recovery Act energyNational context · EPA signs greenhouse-gas endangerment finding · 2009-12-07GHG findingNational context · Deepwater Horizon explosion and oil spill · 2010-04-20Deepwater HorizonNational context · Fukushima accident prompts U.S. nuclear safety response · 2011-03-11Fukushima safetyNational context · Global demand and Middle East unrest pressure oil prices · 2011-04-112011 oil pressuresNational context · Hurricane Sandy disrupts electricity and fuel distribution · 2012-10-29Hurricane SandyNational context · Polar vortex strains gas supplies and power systems · 2014-01-07Polar vortexNational context · Oil supply growth and OPEC decision deepen price collapse · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Clean Power Plan announced; implementation later stayed · 2015-08-03Clean Power PlanNational context · Congress lifts longstanding crude-oil export restrictions · 2015-12-18Crude export rulesNational context · First LNG export cargo from the Lower 48 · 2016-02-24Lower 48 LNG exportsNational context · Shale development transforms U.S. oil supply · 2016-03-15Shale expansionNational context · Natural gas overtakes coal in annual electricity generation · 2016-12-31Gas overtakes coalNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · Attacks on Saudi oil facilities interrupt global supply · 2019-09-14Saudi oil attacksNational context · United States becomes an annual net total energy exporter · 2019-12-31Net energy exporterNational context · COVID-19 sharply reduces energy demand · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Expiring WTI oil futures settle below zero · 2020-04-20Negative WTI futuresNational context · Western heat wave leads to California rotating outages · 2020-08-14California outagesNational context · OPEC+ supply cuts help rebalance the pandemic oil market · 2020-09-23OPEC+ supply cutsNational context · Severe winter weather disrupts Texas and regional energy systems · 2021-02-08Winter Storm UriNational context · Cyberattack interrupts Colonial Pipeline fuel deliveries · 2021-05-07Colonial PipelineNational context · Infrastructure law funds grid and energy projects · 2021-11-15Infrastructure energyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Large Strategic Petroleum Reserve release announced · 2022-03-31SPR releaseNational context · Freeport LNG fire shuts a major export terminal · 2022-06-08Freeport LNG outageNational context · Inflation Reduction Act expands energy incentives · 2022-08-16IRA energy incentivesNational context · Winter Storm Elliott disrupts gas and power supplies · 2022-12-21Winter Storm ElliottNational context · Renewables exceed coal in annual electric power sector generation · 2022-12-31Renewables pass coalNational context · Vogtle expansion adds new nuclear generation · 2023-07-31Vogtle nuclear unitsNational context · Red Sea attacks reroute oil and gas shipping · 2024-02-01Red Sea shippingNational context · EPA finalizes new power-plant greenhouse-gas rules · 2024-04-25Power-plant GHG ruleNational context · FERC adopts long-term regional transmission planning rule · 2024-05-13Transmission planningNational context · DOE report documents growing data-center electricity demand · 2024-12-20Data-center demandNational context · President declares energy emergency and directs policy changes · 2025-01-20Energy emergencyNational context · U.S. tariff announcement changes energy trade context · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · EPA proposes repeal of power-sector greenhouse-gas rules · 2025-06-11Power-rule proposalNational context · Tax law accelerates several energy-credit expirations · 2025-07-04Energy tax changesNational context · EPA finalizes endangerment and vehicle GHG standard rescission · 2026-02-12Vehicle GHG repealNational context · EPA announces repeal of 2024 power-plant air-toxics amendments · 2026-02-20Air-toxics amendmentsNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shockNational context · IEA members agree to emergency oil-stock release · 2026-03-11Emergency oil stocksNational context · FERC and NERC report improved winter grid preparedness · 2026-09-10Winter grid reviewOklahoma · DOE selects Oklahoma Office of Management and Enterprise Services grid-upgrade application · 2026-09-24Oklahoma Office of Management and Enterprise Services · SPARK selection● Oklahoma Legislature · 32● U.S. Congress · Oklahoma delegation · 2◆ Governor · 2■ Oklahoma agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-09-30

7 of 7 reviewed Oklahoma actions match · 6 date markers shown. 49 major events shown separately.

Oklahoma · 2024: 12.24¢/kWh · Rank #44 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Oklahoma, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Oklahoma Residential electricity price · source units
PeriodOklahomaRankU.S. benchmark
202412.24¢/kWh#44 of 5016.48¢/kWh
202312.08¢/kWh#43 of 50Not available
202212.44¢/kWh#36 of 50Not available
202111¢/kWh#45 of 50Not available
202010.12¢/kWh#47 of 50Not available
201910.21¢/kWh#46 of 50Not available
201810.3¢/kWh#45 of 50Not available
201710.61¢/kWh#45 of 50Not available
201610.2¢/kWh#45 of 50Not available
201510.14¢/kWh#44 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Oklahoma · state comparison

Household energy prices

Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.

Oklahoma · 202412.24¢/kWh
Oklahoma rank#44among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential electricity price

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside Oklahoma, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Oklahoma
Residential electricity price history in Oklahoma9.17¢/kWh13.3¢/kWh17.43¢/kWh20152024
2024 · Oklahoma: 12.24¢/kWh · Rank #44 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Oklahoma Residential electricity price history
PeriodOklahomaCompare
201510.14¢/kWh
201610.2¢/kWh
201710.61¢/kWh
201810.3¢/kWh
201910.21¢/kWh
202010.12¢/kWh
202111¢/kWh
202212.44¢/kWh
202312.08¢/kWh
202412.24¢/kWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oklahoma · 12.24¢/kWh2024 · Rank #44 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii42.86¢/kWh—
#2California31.97¢/kWh—
#3Massachusetts29.35¢/kWh—
#4Connecticut28.75¢/kWh—
#5Rhode Island28.65¢/kWh—
#6Alaska24.82¢/kWh—
#7New York24.43¢/kWh—
#8Maine24.29¢/kWh—
#9New Hampshire23.4¢/kWh—
#10Vermont21.9¢/kWh—
#11New Jersey19.34¢/kWh—
#12Michigan19.3¢/kWh—
#13Maryland17.86¢/kWh—
#14Pennsylvania17.77¢/kWh—
#15Wisconsin17.18¢/kWh—
#16Delaware16.57¢/kWh—
#17Ohio15.99¢/kWh—
#18Illinois15.87¢/kWh—
#19Minnesota15.45¢/kWh—
#20Alabama15.18¢/kWh—
#21West Virginia15.07¢/kWh—
#22Nevada15¢/kWh—
#23Texas14.94¢/kWh—
#24Colorado14.92¢/kWh—
#25Arizona14.91¢/kWh—
#26Indiana14.77¢/kWh—
#27Oregon14.7¢/kWh—
#28Virginia14.41¢/kWh—
#29South Carolina14.23¢/kWh—
#30New Mexico14.2¢/kWh—
#31Kansas14.15¢/kWh—
#32Florida14.14¢/kWh—
#33North Carolina14.13¢/kWh—
#34Georgia14.08¢/kWh—
#35Iowa13.4¢/kWh—
#36Mississippi13.39¢/kWh—
#37Missouri12.91¢/kWh—
#38South Dakota12.86¢/kWh—
#39Kentucky12.79¢/kWh—
#40Montana12.66¢/kWh—
#41Wyoming12.47¢/kWh—
#42Tennessee12.42¢/kWh—
#43Arkansas12.32¢/kWh—
#44Oklahoma · your comparison12.24¢/kWh—
#45Utah12.22¢/kWh—
#46Washington11.9¢/kWh—
#47Louisiana11.73¢/kWh—
#48Nebraska11.53¢/kWh—
#49Idaho11.52¢/kWh—
#50North Dakota11.51¢/kWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Midwest regular gasoline price

$3.85/galWeek of August 31, 2026

Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's Midwest region, including taxes. The region contains Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Recent EIA observations

Prior week
$3.934/gal
Weekly change
-8.7¢
One year earlier
$3.088/gal
Change from one year earlier
+75.9¢
Method and limitations

FactVote uses EIA’s Midwest series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes Oklahoma. Changes are calculated from the published August 24, 2026 (prior week), and September 1, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.

  • EIA does not publish a current Oklahoma statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This Midwest regional estimate should not be read as Oklahoma’s statewide average.
  • The regional average combines Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Oklahoma community.
  • Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
  • Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Oklahoma · state comparison

What are households paying for electricity?

Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.

Oklahoma · 2024$132.05
Oklahoma rank#29among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Average monthly residential electricity bill

State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.

Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Oklahoma
Average monthly residential electricity bill history in Oklahoma$101.83$125.46$149.120102024
2024 · Oklahoma: $132.05 · Rank #29 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Oklahoma Average monthly residential electricity bill history
PeriodOklahomaCompare
2010$108.61
2011$115.61
2012$107.6
2013$110.47
2014$114.17
2015$110.87
2016$111.49
2017$110.27
2018$117.28
2019$113.93
2020$109.07
2021$119.69
2022$143.65
2023$129.1
2024$132.05

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.

Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oklahoma · $132.052024 · Rank #29 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii$212.12—
#2Connecticut$199.66—
#3Alabama$173.5—
#4Massachusetts$167.2—
#5Maryland$165.87—
#6Texas$163.72—
#7Rhode Island$162.4—
#8California$160.86—
#9Arizona$160.24—
#10Florida$156.09—
#11Mississippi$154.83—
#12West Virginia$154.76—
#13Georgia$151.25—
#14Delaware$150.87—
#15South Carolina$149.51—
#16Virginia$148.77—
#17Pennsylvania$145.17—
#18New Hampshire$144.87—
#19Alaska$143.54—
#20North Carolina$143.5—
#21Tennessee$143.32—
#22Louisiana$140.96—
#23New York$139.53—
#24Nevada$139.39—
#25Ohio$135.16—
#26Kentucky$133.81—
#27Maine$133.6—
#28Indiana$133.06—
#29Oklahoma · your comparison$132.05—
#30Oregon$129.62—
#31Missouri$129.18—
#32Arkansas$129.13—
#33New Jersey$128.13—
#34South Dakota$127.81—
#35Vermont$125.66—
#36Kansas$123.9—
#37Michigan$119.31—
#38North Dakota$118.38—
#39Washington$113.68—
#40Iowa$111.54—
#41Wisconsin$110.87—
#42Nebraska$110.28—
#43Minnesota$110.06—
#44Illinois$109.99—
#45Idaho$108.73—
#46Montana$107.91—
#47Wyoming$107.65—
#48Colorado$100.57—
#49Utah$94.57—
#50New Mexico$92.88—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Oklahoma · state comparison

What generates Oklahoma electricity?

Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.

Oklahoma · 202494.3 TWh
Oklahoma rank#18among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total electricity generation

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside Oklahoma, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Oklahoma
Total electricity generation history in Oklahoma70.6 TWh84 TWh97.4 TWh20152024
2024 · Oklahoma: 94.3 TWh · Rank #18 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Oklahoma Total electricity generation history
PeriodOklahomaCompare
201576.1 TWh
201678.7 TWh
201773.7 TWh
201887.2 TWh
201986.4 TWh
202083.4 TWh
202180.8 TWh
202284.6 TWh
202389.2 TWh
202494.3 TWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oklahoma · 94.3 TWh2024 · Rank #18 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas571.5 TWh—
#2Florida270.7 TWh—
#3California245.9 TWh—
#4Pennsylvania242.5 TWh—
#5Illinois186.7 TWh—
#6Ohio143.3 TWh—
#7Alabama142.9 TWh—
#8Georgia140.4 TWh—
#9North Carolina135.9 TWh—
#10New York133.5 TWh—
#11Michigan124.5 TWh—
#12Arizona121.5 TWh—
#13Virginia103.7 TWh—
#14Washington103 TWh—
#15South Carolina101.1 TWh—
#16Louisiana100 TWh—
#17Indiana97.4 TWh—
#18Oklahoma · your comparison94.3 TWh—
#19Mississippi77.4 TWh—
#20Tennessee76.3 TWh—
#21Iowa70.9 TWh—
#22Missouri67.6 TWh—
#23Kentucky67.1 TWh—
#24Wisconsin65.6 TWh—
#25Oregon65.3 TWh—
#26New Jersey63.6 TWh—
#27Arkansas62.1 TWh—
#28Colorado60.8 TWh—
#29Minnesota59 TWh—
#30Kansas57.9 TWh—
#31West Virginia50.7 TWh—
#32Nevada47.6 TWh—
#33Connecticut46.2 TWh—
#34North Dakota42.6 TWh—
#35Wyoming40.7 TWh—
#36New Mexico40.5 TWh—
#37Nebraska37.3 TWh—
#38Maryland36.9 TWh—
#39Utah36.1 TWh—
#40Montana27 TWh—
#41Massachusetts25 TWh—
#42South Dakota20.9 TWh—
#43Idaho20.3 TWh—
#44New Hampshire17.3 TWh—
#45Maine15.7 TWh—
#46Hawaii10.7 TWh—
#47Rhode Island10.1 TWh—
#48Alaska6.7 TWh—
#49Delaware5 TWh—
#50Vermont2.5 TWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation

50.8%2024

Natural-gas generation as a share of Oklahoma's total in-state electric-industry net generation.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

EIA generation totals

Natural-gas generation
47,742,413 MWh
Total net generation
94,069,145 MWh

Selected generation shares

Natural gas
50.8%
Wind
40.4%
Coal
6.5%
Hydroelectric
1.7%
Method and limitations

FactVote divides the 47,742,413 MWh of natural-gas generation in U.S. Energy Information Administration Table 5 by 94,069,145 MWh of total in-state net generation and rounds to one decimal place.

  • The selected shares round EIA's source-specific generation totals to one decimal place and do not show every generation source.
  • In-state generation is not the same as electricity consumed in Oklahoma because power crosses state lines.
Oklahoma · state comparison

Affordability, reliability, emissions, and demand

Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.

Oklahoma · 2024220.7 min/year
Oklahoma rank#33among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Outage minutes per customer · all events

EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.

Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Oklahoma
Outage minutes per customer · all events history in Oklahoma52.9 min/year780.1 min/year1,507.2 min/year20232024
2024 · Oklahoma: 220.7 min/year · Rank #33 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Oklahoma Outage minutes per customer · all events history
PeriodOklahomaCompare
20231,339.4 min/year
2024220.7 min/year

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.

Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oklahoma · 220.7 min/year2024 · Rank #33 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1South Carolina3,155 min/year—
#2Maine1,748.6 min/year—
#3Texas1,614.3 min/year—
#4North Carolina1,518.1 min/year—
#5Florida1,487.6 min/year—
#6Georgia1,208.1 min/year—
#7West Virginia1,165.5 min/year—
#8Virginia962.1 min/year—
#9Vermont895.8 min/year—
#10New Hampshire735.5 min/year—
#11Nebraska697.8 min/year—
#12Washington643.5 min/year—
#13Louisiana630.6 min/year—
#14Mississippi607.3 min/year—
#15Oregon579.3 min/year—
#16Kentucky537.7 min/year—
#17Arkansas527.8 min/year—
#18Ohio511 min/year—
#19Michigan481.7 min/year—
#20New York477.3 min/year—
#21Hawaii382.6 min/year—
#22Pennsylvania353.1 min/year—
#23Montana341.7 min/year—
#24Alaska323.2 min/year—
#25Indiana310 min/year—
#26Wisconsin296.8 min/year—
#27Kansas289.8 min/year—
#28Tennessee289.3 min/year—
#29California285 min/year—
#30New Mexico272.6 min/year—
#31Colorado257 min/year—
#32Minnesota222.4 min/year—
#33Oklahoma · your comparison220.7 min/year—
#34Missouri212.6 min/year—
#35Idaho204.4 min/year—
#36Iowa200.3 min/year—
#37Alabama197.7 min/year—
#38New Jersey173.3 min/year—
#39Nevada158.9 min/year—
#40Illinois158 min/year—
#41Connecticut152.8 min/year—
#42Wyoming137.8 min/year—
#43Maryland118.1 min/year—
#44Delaware117.9 min/year—
#45Utah115.4 min/year—
#46Rhode Island104.3 min/year—
#47Massachusetts103.7 min/year—
#48North Dakota102.7 min/year—
#49South Dakota85.6 min/year—
#50Arizona83.6 min/year—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Oklahoma · state comparison

Who uses energy?

Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.

Oklahoma · 2024231 trillion Btu
Oklahoma rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential energy consumption

Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).

2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.

Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oklahoma · 231 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas1,514 trillion Btu—
#2Florida1,183.3 trillion Btu—
#3California1,147.1 trillion Btu—
#4New York968.3 trillion Btu—
#5Pennsylvania819.3 trillion Btu—
#6Illinois817.1 trillion Btu—
#7Ohio767.4 trillion Btu—
#8Georgia717.1 trillion Btu—
#9North Carolina662.2 trillion Btu—
#10Michigan661.4 trillion Btu—
#11New Jersey550.1 trillion Btu—
#12Virginia526 trillion Btu—
#13Tennessee492 trillion Btu—
#14Indiana475.6 trillion Btu—
#15Missouri459 trillion Btu—
#16Arizona413.7 trillion Btu—
#17Massachusetts379 trillion Btu—
#18Wisconsin375.9 trillion Btu—
#19South Carolina370.7 trillion Btu—
#20Maryland357.2 trillion Btu—
#21Minnesota346.2 trillion Btu—
#22Alabama331.6 trillion Btu—
#23Washington330.2 trillion Btu—
#24Kentucky319 trillion Btu—
#25Colorado311.9 trillion Btu—
#26Louisiana282.6 trillion Btu—
#27Connecticut235.3 trillion Btu—
#28Oklahoma · your comparison231 trillion Btu—
#29Arkansas209.5 trillion Btu—
#30Utah190.7 trillion Btu—
#31Mississippi179.7 trillion Btu—
#32Oregon173.1 trillion Btu—
#33Kansas166.4 trillion Btu—
#34Iowa162 trillion Btu—
#35Nevada153.3 trillion Btu—
#36West Virginia141 trillion Btu—
#37Nebraska128.9 trillion Btu—
#38Idaho111.2 trillion Btu—
#39New Mexico98.1 trillion Btu—
#40New Hampshire91.8 trillion Btu—
#41Maine80.5 trillion Btu—
#42Montana73.9 trillion Btu—
#43Delaware62.6 trillion Btu—
#44North Dakota61.3 trillion Btu—
#45Rhode Island61 trillion Btu—
#46Alaska49.1 trillion Btu—
#47Wyoming45.5 trillion Btu—
#48South Dakota44.2 trillion Btu—
#49Vermont32.7 trillion Btu—
#50Hawaii29.5 trillion Btu—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Oklahoma · state comparison

Energy-related carbon emissions

Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.

Oklahoma · 202488.56 Mt CO₂
Oklahoma rank#18among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total energy-related CO₂ emissions

Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.

2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.

Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oklahoma · 88.56 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #18 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas679.93 Mt CO₂—
#2California315.98 Mt CO₂—
#3Florida230.85 Mt CO₂—
#4Pennsylvania201.57 Mt CO₂—
#5Louisiana186.89 Mt CO₂—
#6Ohio186.34 Mt CO₂—
#7Illinois163.98 Mt CO₂—
#8New York163.69 Mt CO₂—
#9Indiana152.3 Mt CO₂—
#10Michigan143.11 Mt CO₂—
#11Georgia127.83 Mt CO₂—
#12North Carolina119.07 Mt CO₂—
#13Kentucky106.87 Mt CO₂—
#14Alabama104.32 Mt CO₂—
#15Virginia99.24 Mt CO₂—
#16Missouri98.03 Mt CO₂—
#17Tennessee90.46 Mt CO₂—
#18Oklahoma · your comparison88.56 Mt CO₂—
#19New Jersey87.84 Mt CO₂—
#20Wisconsin85.12 Mt CO₂—
#21Arizona82.2 Mt CO₂—
#22Colorado79.57 Mt CO₂—
#23Minnesota77.89 Mt CO₂—
#24Washington73.81 Mt CO₂—
#25West Virginia72.28 Mt CO₂—
#26South Carolina70.81 Mt CO₂—
#27Iowa65.23 Mt CO₂—
#28Mississippi64.75 Mt CO₂—
#29Arkansas58.42 Mt CO₂—
#30Massachusetts58.07 Mt CO₂—
#31North Dakota55.15 Mt CO₂—
#32Kansas55.09 Mt CO₂—
#33Utah55.03 Mt CO₂—
#34Wyoming50 Mt CO₂—
#35Maryland48.77 Mt CO₂—
#36Alaska44.01 Mt CO₂—
#37Nebraska43.54 Mt CO₂—
#38New Mexico41.63 Mt CO₂—
#39Nevada39.28 Mt CO₂—
#40Oregon38.94 Mt CO₂—
#41Connecticut37.09 Mt CO₂—
#42Montana27.16 Mt CO₂—
#43Idaho21.11 Mt CO₂—
#44Hawaii17.96 Mt CO₂—
#45Maine15.99 Mt CO₂—
#46South Dakota15.11 Mt CO₂—
#47New Hampshire13.6 Mt CO₂—
#48Delaware11.52 Mt CO₂—
#49Rhode Island11.05 Mt CO₂—
#50Vermont5.36 Mt CO₂—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Oklahoma candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

7 statements from 6 candidates

2026 Oklahoma Governor — General Election Field

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Cyndi Munson

1 statement

Democratic · Governor · OK

Energy & electricity

Cyndi believes in protecting two of Oklahoma’s most valuable industries- energy and agriculture. She believes in an “all of the above approach” to energy, meaning that she will support oil, natural gas, and renewable energy production. She also knows that we need to balance that approach with protec…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, infrastructure, and ratepayer protection

Candidate campaign source

Cyndi believes in protecting two of Oklahoma’s most valuable industries- energy and agriculture. She believes in an “all of the above approach” to energy, meaning that she will support oil, natural gas, and renewable energy production. She also knows that we need to balance that approach with protecting the private property rights of landowners and ensuring that these industries are good stewards of our land and natural resources. Cyndi also knows that our water is a precious resource and will stand up to big corporations and others who want to waste our water.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Cyndi Munson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Robert E Brooks Sr

2 statements

Independent · Governor · OK

Energy & electricity

Families would use locally generated electricity while eligible excess production could contribute to Oklahoma’s broader electrical system.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: 1. Turn Oklahoma Homes, Farms and Businesses Into Energy Producers

Candidate campaign source

Families would use locally generated electricity while eligible excess production could contribute to Oklahoma’s broader electrical system.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Robert E Brooks Sr — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
View 1 more statement from Robert E Brooks Sr
Energy & electricity

We can support oil and gas. We can produce more electricity. We can welcome technology. We can protect our groundwater. We can create new industries. We can strengthen our cooperatives. And we can work to lower the energy burden on Oklahoma families.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, infrastructure, and ratepayer protection

Candidate campaign source

We can support oil and gas. We can produce more electricity. We can welcome technology. We can protect our groundwater. We can create new industries. We can strengthen our cooperatives. And we can work to lower the energy burden on Oklahoma families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Robert E Brooks Sr — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗

2026 Oklahoma U.S. House — District 1 — General Election Field

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

John Croisant

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · OK

Energy & electricity

Oklahoma has always been a leader in energy production, currently 3rd in wind production, and 6th in oil and gas production. We need to invest in every type of energy to have a diversified, sustainable, and strong energy economy where we aren’t dependent on foreign energy, with a shifted focus onto …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, infrastructure, and ratepayer protection

Candidate campaign source

Oklahoma has always been a leader in energy production, currently 3rd in wind production, and 6th in oil and gas production. We need to invest in every type of energy to have a diversified, sustainable, and strong energy economy where we aren’t dependent on foreign energy, with a shifted focus onto environmentally friendly energy, to be better stewards of the land.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

John Croisant — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Oklahoma U.S. House — District 4 — General Election Field

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Mitchell Jacob

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 4 · OK

Energy & electricity

We must invest in rural areas through small business programs aimed at agricultural development, eliminating food deserts, industrial development outside major metropolitan areas, and more. We must encourage the productive use of this land and invest in our rural communities. We must make Oklahoma a…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

We must invest in rural areas through small business programs aimed at agricultural development, eliminating food deserts, industrial development outside major metropolitan areas, and more. We must encourage the productive use of this land and invest in our rural communities. We must make Oklahoma a more attractive place to live and reduce the impact of supply-chain issues on our critical resources, such as food, electricity, water, and heat.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Mitchell Jacob — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Oklahoma candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Oklahoma incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Oklahoma legislators and Oklahoma’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Oklahoma’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

8 matching sponsorships or proposals · 6 Oklahoma incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Brad Boles

Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 51 · R–OK

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Brad Boles
Oklahoma Legislature · HB 1370

Motor Fuel Tax Code; repealer; reduction in federal excise tax on gasoline or diesel fuel; emergency.

May 18, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Brad Boles · Sponsored / Sen. Grant Green · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1370 repeals the Oklahoma provision that would replace a reduction in the federal gasoline or diesel excise tax with an equal state tax. The repeal removes that contingent tax adjustment; it does not itself establish a federal tax reduction or a measured decline in Midwest pump prices.

Signed by Kevin Stitt on 2026-05-18. Latest legislative entry: Approved by Governor 05/18/2026 (2026-05-14). Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Midwest regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee and Wisconsin. Oklahoma policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Oklahoma statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. REPEALER 68 O.S. 2021, Section 500.4A, is hereby repealed. SECTION 2. It being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health or safety, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, by reason whereof this act shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and approval.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Oklahoma Legislature · SB 480

Utilities; modifying certain exception to definition; allowing certain entities to receive electricity. Effective date. Emergency.

May 14, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Grant Green · Sponsored / Rep. Brad Boles · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 480 changes the public-utility exemption for certain private electricity producers and requires covered projects to include a natural-gas component in their generation capacity. Grid interconnection and registration obligations remain. The provision concerns generating capacity and the resource mix, not measured output.

Signed by Kevin Stitt on 2025-05-14. Latest legislative entry: Approved by Governor 05/14/2025 (2025-05-14). The original signed law confirms approval on May 14, 2025; the index’s unsigned label conflicts with that document. Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Natural-gas share is the portion of Oklahoma in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

B. Provided, that the term public utility shall not include or be taken to mean a corporation, association, company, individuals, their trustees, lessees, receivers, successors, or assignees engaged in the production of electricity, provided that such entity furnishes an electric service or commodity on the premises directly to itself, an affiliate, or tenants or indirectly by contracting with a public utility, rural electric cooperative, or municipality for the purpose of furnishing electric service to a specific customer or is an exempt wholesale generator, so long as that service or commodity is not resold as retail electric service or supplied indirectly or directly for public use. Nothing herein shall relieve such an entity of its obligation to comply with state and federal grid interconnection and registration requirements and associated costs from the applicable regional transmission organization or public utility in the state . There shall not be a requirement or an obligation for a public utility to serve any customer receiving electric service from an entity described herein. Further, it shall not limit any party from asserting a right they may otherwise be entitled to under Oklahoma law including filings with the Commission. Additionally, any project pursuant to this act shall be required to utilize a natural gas component in their power generation capacity.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Josh Brecheen

U.S. House of Representatives, Oklahoma District 2 · R–OK

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Josh Brecheen
U.S. Congress · Oklahoma delegation · HR 3330

Energy Freedom Act

May 13, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Josh Brecheen · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

H.R. 3330 proposes repealing the federal clean-electricity production credit for facilities placed in service after 2025. Josh Brecheen is the primary sponsor. Incentives for alternative generating resources concern the electricity mix, including natural gas’s share, without specifying a change in Oklahoma output. This bill has no recorded enactment.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Natural-gas share is the portion of Oklahoma in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

17. Clean electricity production credit repealed (a) In general Subpart D of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 is amended by striking section 45Y (and by striking the item relating to such section in the table of sections for such subpart). (b) Conforming amendments (1) Section 38(b), as amended by Public Law 117–169, is amended by striking paragraph (39). (2) Section 168(e)(3)(B)(viii), as added by Public Law 117–169, is amended by striking any qualified facility (as defined in section 45Y(b)(1)(A)),. (c) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall apply to facilities placed in service after December 31, 2025.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Trey Caldwell

Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 63 · R–OK

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Trey Caldwell
Oklahoma Legislature · SB 998

Public utilities; cost of transmission upgrades; modifying application process for construction of certain facilities; establishing cost recovery provisions.

May 14, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Todd Gollihare · Sponsored / Rep. Trey Caldwell · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 998 became law without the governor’s signature. It permits recovery of qualifying natural-gas generation construction costs before commercial operation and sets a 180-day decision period for covered natural-gas applications. Terminated projects require refunds of collected construction costs plus specified interest within 90 days. Firm gas-transport contracts have competitive-bidding and recoverability conditions. These provisions concern generation development and electricity charges, which can be part of tenant-paid utilities; they establish neither operating capacity nor a measured change in gross rent.

Became law without the governor’s signature on 2025-05-14. Latest legislative entry: Becomes law without Governor's signature 05/14/2025 (2025-05-14). Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Oklahoma’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Median gross rent · Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The Commission shall enter an order on an application filed pursuant to this subsection within two hundred forty (240) days of the filing of the application, following notice and hearing and after consideration of reasonable alternatives, unless the electric generation facility utilizes natural gas as its primary fuel source. If the electric generation facility uses natural gas as its primary fuel source, then the Commission shall enter an order on an application filed pursuant to this subsection within one hundred eighty (180) days of the filing of the application, following notice and hearing and after consideration of reasonable alternatives. […] 6. The Commission shall permit an electric utility to begin to recover return on and return of Construction-Work-In-Progress expenses prior to commercial operation of a newly constructed electric generation facility subject to the provisions of this subsection, provided the newly constructed electric generation facility utilizes natural gas as its primary fuel source. The Commission shall permit a separate rate adjustment mechanism, adjusted periodically, to recover the costs described in this section for new capacity in natural-gas-fired electric generation facilities. The new natural-gas-fired electric generation capacity eligible for those provisions shall also include new natural-gas-fired capacity additions at an existing electric generation facility. If a public utility implements a rate adjustment mechanism pursuant to this section and subsequently terminates the initiative to construct or acquire stake in a natural gas electric generation facility, the public utility shall automatically refund customers any amounts collected through such rate adjustment mechanism plus interest at the one-year United States Treasury Bill rate through the mechanism, over a period not to exceed ninety (90) days from the effective date of the termination of the initiative. 7. For any new natural-gas-fired electric generation facility constructed pursuant to this section, an electric utility shall secure a firm contract to transport natural gas to the generating facility. Such contract shall be secured pursuant to a competitive solicitation process conducted in accordance with applicable Commission rules. The cost incurred for the contract shall be presumed recoverable by the electric utility through its applicable fuel adjustment clause. Costs assessed upon the electric utility by the Commission for non-compliance with this section shall not be recoverable from the customers of the electric utility. If the electric utility does not receive a bid for firm transportation as a result of its competitive solicitation, the electric utility shall be considered compliant with the requirements of this section provided that the Commission determines that the competitive solicitation is for a firm contract for transport of natural gas which could be reasonably provided by an available pipeline.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Grant Green

Oklahoma Senate, District 28 · R–OK

2 proposals
View proposals from Sen. Grant Green
Oklahoma Legislature · HB 1370

Motor Fuel Tax Code; repealer; reduction in federal excise tax on gasoline or diesel fuel; emergency.

May 18, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Brad Boles · Sponsored / Sen. Grant Green · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1370 repeals the Oklahoma provision that would replace a reduction in the federal gasoline or diesel excise tax with an equal state tax. The repeal removes that contingent tax adjustment; it does not itself establish a federal tax reduction or a measured decline in Midwest pump prices.

Signed by Kevin Stitt on 2026-05-18. Latest legislative entry: Approved by Governor 05/18/2026 (2026-05-14). Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Midwest regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee and Wisconsin. Oklahoma policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Oklahoma statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. REPEALER 68 O.S. 2021, Section 500.4A, is hereby repealed. SECTION 2. It being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health or safety, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, by reason whereof this act shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and approval.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Oklahoma Legislature · SB 480

Utilities; modifying certain exception to definition; allowing certain entities to receive electricity. Effective date. Emergency.

May 14, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Grant Green · Sponsored / Rep. Brad Boles · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 480 changes the public-utility exemption for certain private electricity producers and requires covered projects to include a natural-gas component in their generation capacity. Grid interconnection and registration obligations remain. The provision concerns generating capacity and the resource mix, not measured output.

Signed by Kevin Stitt on 2025-05-14. Latest legislative entry: Approved by Governor 05/14/2025 (2025-05-14). The original signed law confirms approval on May 14, 2025; the index’s unsigned label conflicts with that document. Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Natural-gas share is the portion of Oklahoma in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

B. Provided, that the term public utility shall not include or be taken to mean a corporation, association, company, individuals, their trustees, lessees, receivers, successors, or assignees engaged in the production of electricity, provided that such entity furnishes an electric service or commodity on the premises directly to itself, an affiliate, or tenants or indirectly by contracting with a public utility, rural electric cooperative, or municipality for the purpose of furnishing electric service to a specific customer or is an exempt wholesale generator, so long as that service or commodity is not resold as retail electric service or supplied indirectly or directly for public use. Nothing herein shall relieve such an entity of its obligation to comply with state and federal grid interconnection and registration requirements and associated costs from the applicable regional transmission organization or public utility in the state . There shall not be a requirement or an obligation for a public utility to serve any customer receiving electric service from an entity described herein. Further, it shall not limit any party from asserting a right they may otherwise be entitled to under Oklahoma law including filings with the Commission. Additionally, any project pursuant to this act shall be required to utilize a natural gas component in their power generation capacity.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. James Lankford

U.S. Senate, Oklahoma · R–OK

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. James Lankford
U.S. Congress · Oklahoma delegation · S 4016

Stop Unemployment Fraud Act

Mar 5, 2026 · In Congress

Sen. James Lankford · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S. 4016 proposes identity-document verification procedures for unemployment-compensation claimants, including federal regulations and safeguards against improper denial or delay. James Lankford is the primary sponsor. Unemployment cash benefits relate to household money income; the bill is not enacted. The identity-verification amendments would apply to initial applications received at least two years after enactment.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Verification of applicant identity(a)In generalSection 303 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 503) is amended by adding at the end the following:(n)(1)The State agency charged with the administration of the State law shall certify that the State has procedures in place to verify the identity of claimants of unemployment compensation, including requiring the claimant to provide documentation of their identity, which shall consist of—(A)at least one currently valid Federal or State government-issued identification document; and(B)one or more supporting documents, which may include utility bills, lease agreements, voter registration cards, vehicle registration, insurance documents, or other reliable documents, so long as such documents are—(i)determined by the State to be sufficient to verify the identity of the claimant; or(ii)approved by the Secretary for such purpose.(2)Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary of Labor shall promulgate regulations governing identity verification procedures for claimants of unemployment compensation used by State agencies. Such regulations shall—(A)take into account—(i)administrative costs, including for technology and cybersecurity systems; and(ii)any other factors the Secretary determines appropriate;(B)provide due process protections for claimants;(C)specify methods to ensure that the documentation required under paragraph (1)(A)—(i)is accurate, current, and reliable; and(ii)does not produce systematic mismatches that unfairly deny or delay the payment of unemployment compensation;(D)require safeguards to ensure that the procedures—(i)minimize false positive or negative rates;(ii)do not result in the flagging, denial, or delay of claims based on the personal characteristics of an individual, including race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or political affiliation or belief; and(iii)comply with applicable civil rights laws;(E)require that such procedures comply with best practices for privacy and cybersecurity, as determined by the Secretary of Labor;(F)any other factors the Secretary determines appropriate; and(G)include any other provisions necessary to ensure the proper implementation, oversight, and continuous improvement of data-matching practices under this subsection.(3)In this subsection, the term unemployment compensation has the meaning given the term in subsection (d)(2)(A)..(b)Effective dateThe amendments made by this Act shall apply, with respect to a State, to initial applications for unemployment compensation received by such State on or after the date that is 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Todd Gollihare

Oklahoma Senate, District 12 · R–OK

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Todd Gollihare
Oklahoma Legislature · SB 998

Public utilities; cost of transmission upgrades; modifying application process for construction of certain facilities; establishing cost recovery provisions.

May 14, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Todd Gollihare · Sponsored / Rep. Trey Caldwell · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 998 became law without the governor’s signature. It permits recovery of qualifying natural-gas generation construction costs before commercial operation and sets a 180-day decision period for covered natural-gas applications. Terminated projects require refunds of collected construction costs plus specified interest within 90 days. Firm gas-transport contracts have competitive-bidding and recoverability conditions. These provisions concern generation development and electricity charges, which can be part of tenant-paid utilities; they establish neither operating capacity nor a measured change in gross rent.

Became law without the governor’s signature on 2025-05-14. Latest legislative entry: Becomes law without Governor's signature 05/14/2025 (2025-05-14). Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Oklahoma’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Median gross rent · Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The Commission shall enter an order on an application filed pursuant to this subsection within two hundred forty (240) days of the filing of the application, following notice and hearing and after consideration of reasonable alternatives, unless the electric generation facility utilizes natural gas as its primary fuel source. If the electric generation facility uses natural gas as its primary fuel source, then the Commission shall enter an order on an application filed pursuant to this subsection within one hundred eighty (180) days of the filing of the application, following notice and hearing and after consideration of reasonable alternatives. […] 6. The Commission shall permit an electric utility to begin to recover return on and return of Construction-Work-In-Progress expenses prior to commercial operation of a newly constructed electric generation facility subject to the provisions of this subsection, provided the newly constructed electric generation facility utilizes natural gas as its primary fuel source. The Commission shall permit a separate rate adjustment mechanism, adjusted periodically, to recover the costs described in this section for new capacity in natural-gas-fired electric generation facilities. The new natural-gas-fired electric generation capacity eligible for those provisions shall also include new natural-gas-fired capacity additions at an existing electric generation facility. If a public utility implements a rate adjustment mechanism pursuant to this section and subsequently terminates the initiative to construct or acquire stake in a natural gas electric generation facility, the public utility shall automatically refund customers any amounts collected through such rate adjustment mechanism plus interest at the one-year United States Treasury Bill rate through the mechanism, over a period not to exceed ninety (90) days from the effective date of the termination of the initiative. 7. For any new natural-gas-fired electric generation facility constructed pursuant to this section, an electric utility shall secure a firm contract to transport natural gas to the generating facility. Such contract shall be secured pursuant to a competitive solicitation process conducted in accordance with applicable Commission rules. The cost incurred for the contract shall be presumed recoverable by the electric utility through its applicable fuel adjustment clause. Costs assessed upon the electric utility by the Commission for non-compliance with this section shall not be recoverable from the customers of the electric utility. If the electric utility does not receive a bid for firm transportation as a result of its competitive solicitation, the electric utility shall be considered compliant with the requirements of this section provided that the Commission determines that the competitive solicitation is for a firm contract for transport of natural gas which could be reasonably provided by an available pipeline.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Oklahoma officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Oklahoma statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.