North Dakota · individual fact

North Dakota education

Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.

High school or higher94%2020–2024 · #6 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher46.7%2020–2024 · #14 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher32.7%2020–2024 · #30 of 50 · highest first

North Dakota over time

Explore North Dakota readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. North Dakota officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a North Dakota effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a North Dakota change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Grade 4 reading North Dakota · source units
North DakotaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Grade 4 reading2024: 215.5213.7220.7227.7North Dakota, 2003: 221.6North Dakota, 2005: 224.8North Dakota, 2007: 226.3North Dakota, 2009: 226North Dakota, 2011: 225.6North Dakota, 2013: 224.1North Dakota, 2015: 224.7North Dakota, 2017: 221.5North Dakota, 2019: 221.2North Dakota, 2022: 217.5North Dakota, 2024: 215.5200320132024
✦ Major events & context · 20National context · Student-aid law ends new FFEL lending and expands Pell funding · 2010-03-30Student-aid reformNational context · Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act signed · 2014-07-22Workforce and adult educationNational context · Every Student Succeeds Act signed · 2015-12-10ESSA signedNational context · Career and technical education law reauthorized · 2018-07-31Perkins V signedNational context · FUTURE Act continues support for minority-serving institutions · 2019-12-19FUTURE Act signedNational context · Pandemic education relief through the CARES Act · 2020-03-27COVID-19 education reliefNational context · Additional pandemic relief for colleges and students · 2020-12-27Second education relief lawNational context · American Rescue Plan expands education relief · 2021-03-11Education recovery fundingNational context · Supreme Court rejects Harvard and UNC race-conscious admissions programs · 2023-06-29College-admissions rulingNational context · Supreme Court rejects the 2022 student-loan cancellation plan · 2023-06-30Student-loan rulingNational context · Pell eligibility restored for qualifying prison education programs · 2023-07-01Prison education Pell accessNational context · Federal student-loan payments resume after pandemic pause · 2023-10-01Student-loan payments resumeNational context · Executive order directs steps toward closing the Education Department · 2025-03-20Federal education orderNational context · 2025 law changes federal student aid and creates Workforce Pell · 2025-07-04Student-aid law signedNational context · Education and Treasury announce student-aid partnership · 2026-03-19Student-aid partnershipNational context · Education announces final student-loan and repayment regulations · 2026-04-30Student-loan final ruleNational context · Education Department announces Workforce Pell final rule · 2026-05-18Workforce Pell ruleNational context · Education announces earnings-accountability final rule · 2026-06-29College earnings accountabilityNational context · Main student-loan limits and new repayment plans take effect · 2026-07-01Student-loan changes beginNational context · First Workforce Pell program approved · 2026-08-04First Workforce Pell approval● North Dakota Legislature · 1● U.S. Congress · North Dakota delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ North Dakota agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2003-12-012026-08-31

1 of 1 reviewed North Dakota actions match · 1 date markers shown. 20 major events shown separately.

North Dakota · 2024: 215.5 · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in North Dakota. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
North Dakota Grade 4 reading · source units
PeriodNorth DakotaRankU.S. benchmark
2024215.5#21 of 50215
2022217.5#17 of 50217.5
2019221.2#20 of 50220.5
2017221.5#28 of 50221.9
2015224.7#19 of 50222.5
2013224.1#18 of 50221.8
2011225.6#9 of 50221.2
2009226#7 of 50220.9
2007226.3#9 of 50221
2005224.8#8 of 50219
2003221.6#18 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

North Dakota · state comparison

Adult educational attainment

Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.

North Dakota · 2020–202494%
North Dakota rank#6among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

High school or higher

Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.

Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Dakota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Dakota has a dark outline.

Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

North Dakota · 94%2020–2024 · Rank #6 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare North Dakota with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont94.9%—
#2Maine94.8%—
#3Montana94.6%—
#4New Hampshire94.4%—
#5Wyoming94.2%—
#6North Dakota · your comparison94%—
#7Minnesota93.9%—
#8Wisconsin93.6%—
#9Alaska93.6%—
#10Utah93.4%—
#11Iowa93.3%—
#12South Dakota93.2%—
#13Hawaii93.2%—
#14Colorado92.9%—
#15Washington92.3%—
#16Nebraska92.2%—
#17Pennsylvania92.1%—
#18Michigan92.1%—
#19Kansas92%—
#20Idaho91.9%—
#21Missouri91.9%—
#22Oregon91.8%—
#23Ohio91.8%—
#24Delaware91.7%—
#25Virginia91.6%—
#26Connecticut91.5%—
#27Massachusetts91.4%—
#28Maryland91.1%—
#29New Jersey90.7%—
#30Illinois90.5%—
#31Indiana90.4%—
#32North Carolina90.1%—
#33South Carolina90.1%—
#34Tennessee90%—
#35Florida89.9%—
#36Rhode Island89.7%—
#37Oklahoma89.4%—
#38Arizona89.4%—
#39West Virginia89.3%—
#40Georgia89.2%—
#41Kentucky88.9%—
#42Arkansas88.7%—
#43Alabama88.6%—
#44New Mexico88%—
#45New York88%—
#46Nevada87.5%—
#47Louisiana87.3%—
#48Mississippi87.1%—
#49Texas86%—
#50California84.7%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Adults with at least a high school diploma

94.0%2020–2024 estimate

Share of North Dakota residents age 25 and older whose reported attainment is a regular high school diploma or equivalent (including GED or an alternative credential), some college, or an associate’s or higher degree.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • This is an adult educational-attainment measure, not a current high-school graduation rate or a measure of school quality.
  • A statewide estimate can obscure differences across communities and demographic groups.
North Dakota · state comparison

Are students learning?

NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.

North Dakota · 2024215.5
North Dakota rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Grade 4 reading

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in North Dakota. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.

NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

North Dakota
Grade 4 reading history in North Dakota213.4220.722820032024
2024 · North Dakota: 215.5 · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
North Dakota Grade 4 reading history
PeriodNorth DakotaCompare
2003221.6
2005224.8
2007226.3
2009226
2011225.6
2013224.1
2015224.7
2017221.5
2019221.2
2022217.5
2024215.5

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Dakota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Dakota has a dark outline.

Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

North Dakota · 215.52024 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare North Dakota with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts224.8—
#2Wyoming221.9—
#3New Jersey221.6—
#4New Hampshire221.5—
#5Colorado220.9—
#6Indiana220.1—
#7Utah219.3—
#8Connecticut219.2—
#9Mississippi218.5—
#10Florida218.2—
#11Kentucky218—
#12Montana217.2—
#13Rhode Island216.3—
#14Louisiana216—
#14Ohio216—
#16Hawaii215.8—
#16Pennsylvania215.8—
#18Idaho215.7—
#18Washington215.7—
#20Maryland215.6—
#21North Dakota · your comparison215.5—
#22Wisconsin215.3—
#23Tennessee215.1—
#24South Carolina214.9—
#25Iowa214.6—
#25New York214.6—
#27Georgia214.4—
#27Minnesota214.4—
#29Illinois214.2—
#30South Dakota214.1—
#30Virginia214.1—
#32North Carolina213.4—
#33Alabama213.2—
#34Kansas213.1—
#34Nevada213.1—
#36Vermont212.7—
#37Missouri211.9—
#37Texas211.9—
#39California211.7—
#39Nebraska211.7—
#41Arkansas209.7—
#42Maine209.6—
#43Delaware209.5—
#44Michigan209.1—
#45Arizona208.1—
#46Oklahoma207.3—
#47Oregon207—
#48West Virginia205.9—
#49Alaska201.6—
#50New Mexico200.6—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

North Dakota · state comparison

Where does school funding go?

Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.

North Dakota · FY2024$17,102
North Dakota rank#23among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Current spending per pupil

Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.

Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Dakota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Dakota has a dark outline.

Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

North Dakota · $17,102FY2024 · Rank #23 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare North Dakota with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$31,918—
#2Vermont$28,818—
#3New Jersey$27,234—
#4Connecticut$26,316—
#5Massachusetts$24,429—
#6Hawaii$23,878—
#7New Hampshire$22,978—
#8Delaware$22,201—
#9Rhode Island$22,110—
#10Illinois$21,776—
#11Pennsylvania$21,091—
#12Alaska$21,004—
#13California$20,791—
#14Wyoming$20,521—
#15Maryland$20,208—
#16Maine$19,962—
#17Washington$18,564—
#18Michigan$18,314—
#19Oregon$18,083—
#20New Mexico$17,664—
#21Ohio$17,257—
#22Virginia$17,104—
#23North Dakota · your comparison$17,102—
#24Minnesota$17,098—
#25Nebraska$16,147—
#26Wisconsin$15,952—
#27Colorado$15,908—
#28Georgia$15,833—
#29West Virginia$15,640—
#30Louisiana$15,581—
#31Kansas$15,558—
#32South Carolina$15,060—
#33Nevada$14,812—
#34Kentucky$14,596—
#35Iowa$14,369—
#36Missouri$14,241—
#37Arkansas$13,873—
#38Montana$13,656—
#39Alabama$13,627—
#40Indiana$13,622—
#41North Carolina$12,995—
#42Texas$12,895—
#43Tennessee$12,882—
#44South Dakota$12,828—
#45Florida$12,693—
#46Mississippi$12,324—
#47Oklahoma$12,162—
#48Arizona$12,003—
#49Utah$11,347—
#50Idaho$11,060—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

North Dakota · state comparison

Are students finishing school?

The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.

North Dakota · 2021–2285%
North Dakota rank#31among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark87%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Federal public-school cohort graduation rate

Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.

Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

North Dakota
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history in North Dakota78.7%84.5%90.4%2011–122021–22
2021–22 · North Dakota: 85% · Rank #31 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 87% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
North Dakota Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
PeriodNorth DakotaCompare
2011–1287%
2012–1388%
2013–1487%
2014–1587%
2015–1688%
2016–1787%
2017–1888%
2018–1988%
2019–2089%
2020–2187%
2021–2285%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Dakota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Dakota has a dark outline.

Lower value · 77%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

North Dakota · 85%2021–22 · Rank #31 of 48, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare North Dakota with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2021–22 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1West Virginia91%—
#2Iowa90%—
#2Kentucky90%—
#2Massachusetts90%—
#2Missouri90%—
#2Tennessee90%—
#2Texas90%—
#2Wisconsin90%—
#9Connecticut89%—
#9Kansas89%—
#9Mississippi89%—
#9Virginia89%—
#13Alabama88%—
#13Arkansas88%—
#13Delaware88%—
#13Indiana88%—
#13New Hampshire88%—
#13Utah88%—
#19California87%—
#19Florida87%—
#19Illinois87%—
#19Nebraska87%—
#19New York87%—
#19Pennsylvania87%—
#25Hawaii86%—
#25Maine86%—
#25Maryland86%—
#25Montana86%—
#25North Carolina86%—
#25Ohio86%—
#31New Jersey85%—
#31North Dakota · your comparison85%—
#33Georgia84%—
#33Minnesota84%—
#33South Carolina84%—
#33Washington84%—
#37Louisiana83%—
#37Rhode Island83%—
#37Vermont83%—
#40Colorado82%—
#40Nevada82%—
#40South Dakota82%—
#40Wyoming82%—
#44Michigan81%—
#44Oregon81%—
#46Idaho80%—
#47Alaska78%—
#48Arizona77%—
—New MexicoNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—OklahomaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

North Dakota · state comparison

College costs, attendance, and earnings

Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.

North Dakota · 2022–23$9,728
North Dakota rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Public four-year in-state tuition and fees

Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.

2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Dakota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Dakota has a dark outline.

Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

North Dakota · $9,7282022–23 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare North Dakota with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont$17,600—
#2New Hampshire$17,019—
#3Pennsylvania$16,217—
#4Connecticut$15,763—
#5New Jersey$15,265—
#6Illinois$14,921—
#7Virginia$14,825—
#8Rhode Island$14,744—
#9Michigan$14,718—
#10Massachusetts$14,345—
#11Minnesota$12,873—
#12South Carolina$12,604—
#13Oregon$12,424—
#14Delaware$11,922—
#15Arizona$11,768—
#16Kentucky$11,299—
#17Alabama$11,081—
#18Ohio$10,922—
#19Maine$10,813—
#20Hawaii$10,484—
#21Tennessee$10,437—
#22Iowa$10,121—
#23Maryland$10,041—
#24Missouri$9,926—
#25Indiana$9,886—
#26Louisiana$9,843—
#27Colorado$9,798—
#28North Dakota · your comparison$9,728—
#29Kansas$9,274—
#30Mississippi$9,120—
#31South Dakota$9,079—
#32Wisconsin$8,974—
#33Arkansas$8,879—
#34Nebraska$8,862—
#35West Virginia$8,715—
#36California$8,637—
#37New York$8,575—
#38Oklahoma$8,519—
#39Alaska$8,291—
#40Texas$8,195—
#41Washington$8,006—
#42Idaho$7,640—
#43New Mexico$7,526—
#44North Carolina$7,327—
#45Montana$7,299—
#46Utah$7,215—
#47Georgia$7,075—
#48Nevada$6,723—
#49Wyoming$5,100—
#50Florida$4,540—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s North Dakota candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

39 statements from 6 candidates

2026 North Dakota Agriculture Commissioner — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Doug Goehring

1 statement

Republican · Agriculture Commissioner · ND

Schools & education

Streamlined state anhydrous-ammonia regulations and developed a related education and compliance program.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Fertilizer Regulation Record

Candidate campaign source

Streamlined state anhydrous-ammonia regulations and developed a related education and compliance program.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Doug Goehring — Part 76 verified source ↗

2026 North Dakota Public Service Commissioner — Unexpired Term — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Jill Kringstad

1 statement

Republican · Public Service Commissioner — Unexpired Term · ND

Schools & education

Jill’s passion for public service started early—volunteering for local charities and political campaigns as a young student. She served as a Legislative Page-for-a-Day, interned in Washington, D.C., for U.S. Senator John Hoeven, and worked in the North Dakota office of Congressman Rick Berg. She is …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy regulation and limited government

Candidate campaign source

Jill’s passion for public service started early—volunteering for local charities and political campaigns as a young student. She served as a Legislative Page-for-a-Day, interned in Washington, D.C., for U.S. Senator John Hoeven, and worked in the North Dakota office of Congressman Rick Berg. She is committed to continuing that tradition of principled, pro-energy leadership—supporting limited government, responsible oversight, and regulatory certainty to protect North Dakota’s economy and way of life.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jill Kringstad — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 North Dakota Secretary of State — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Michael Howe

1 statement

Republican · Secretary of State · ND

Schools & education

As a member of the Board of University and School Lands, Michael is committed to ensuring North Dakota’s educational trusts, mineral acres, and other assets are managed responsibly and efficiently. In this role, he provides oversight and guidance to support responsible trust land development, streng…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

As a member of the Board of University and School Lands, Michael is committed to ensuring North Dakota’s educational trusts, mineral acres, and other assets are managed responsibly and efficiently. In this role, he provides oversight and guidance to support responsible trust land development, strengthen trust funds, and protect long-term value that ensures sustained growth and lasting benefits for the educational and public institutions that rely on these resources.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Michael Howe — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published North Dakota candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

North Dakota incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current North Dakota legislators and North Dakota’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from North Dakota’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

12 matching sponsorships or proposals · 12 North Dakota incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Dan Ruby

North Dakota House of Representatives · R–ND

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Dan Ruby
North Dakota Legislature · HB 1200

AN ACT to amend and reenact section 15.1-21-02.2 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the waiver and substitution of one unit required for high school graduation under emergent circumstances.

Mar 26, 2025 · Enacted · Signed by governor

Rep. Scott Louser · Sponsored / Rep. Macy Bolinske · Sponsored / Sen. Randy A. Burckhard · Sponsored / Sen. Jose L. Castaneda · Sponsored / Rep. Jay Fisher · Sponsored / Rep. Pat D. Heinert · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Hoverson · Sponsored / Sen. Randy D. Lemm · Sponsored / Rep. David Richter · Sponsored / Rep. Dan Ruby · Sponsored / Rep. Matthew Ruby · Sponsored / Rep. Lori VanWinkle · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1200 allows a school district or nonpublic school, with its board’s approval, to establish a policy granting no more than one required graduation unit through an alternative course, including an elective or dual-credit course, when a student demonstrates an emergent circumstance. The provision applies to the requirements after July 31, 2025. Gov. Kelly Armstrong signed the bill March 26, 2025. This option does not automatically waive graduation requirements for every student or establish completed diplomas.

Approved by Gov. Kelly Armstrong on 2025-03-26; 2025 Session Laws chapter 190. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact measures high-school-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. A course-substitution option concerns students working toward a diploma; it does not establish completed diplomas or a change in previously measured adult attainment. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained North Dakota evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

If approved by the board of a school district or nonpublic school, a school district or nonpublic school may: […] Establish a policy to allow a student to receive credit for no more than one unit under subsection 1 for completing an alternative course, including an elective course or dual-credit course, if the student demonstrates an emergent circumstance.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. David Richter

North Dakota House of Representatives · R–ND

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. David Richter
North Dakota Legislature · HB 1200

AN ACT to amend and reenact section 15.1-21-02.2 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the waiver and substitution of one unit required for high school graduation under emergent circumstances.

Mar 26, 2025 · Enacted · Signed by governor

Rep. Scott Louser · Sponsored / Rep. Macy Bolinske · Sponsored / Sen. Randy A. Burckhard · Sponsored / Sen. Jose L. Castaneda · Sponsored / Rep. Jay Fisher · Sponsored / Rep. Pat D. Heinert · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Hoverson · Sponsored / Sen. Randy D. Lemm · Sponsored / Rep. David Richter · Sponsored / Rep. Dan Ruby · Sponsored / Rep. Matthew Ruby · Sponsored / Rep. Lori VanWinkle · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1200 allows a school district or nonpublic school, with its board’s approval, to establish a policy granting no more than one required graduation unit through an alternative course, including an elective or dual-credit course, when a student demonstrates an emergent circumstance. The provision applies to the requirements after July 31, 2025. Gov. Kelly Armstrong signed the bill March 26, 2025. This option does not automatically waive graduation requirements for every student or establish completed diplomas.

Approved by Gov. Kelly Armstrong on 2025-03-26; 2025 Session Laws chapter 190. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact measures high-school-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. A course-substitution option concerns students working toward a diploma; it does not establish completed diplomas or a change in previously measured adult attainment. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained North Dakota evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

If approved by the board of a school district or nonpublic school, a school district or nonpublic school may: […] Establish a policy to allow a student to receive credit for no more than one unit under subsection 1 for completing an alternative course, including an elective course or dual-credit course, if the student demonstrates an emergent circumstance.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Jay Fisher

North Dakota House of Representatives · R–ND

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Jay Fisher
North Dakota Legislature · HB 1200

AN ACT to amend and reenact section 15.1-21-02.2 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the waiver and substitution of one unit required for high school graduation under emergent circumstances.

Mar 26, 2025 · Enacted · Signed by governor

Rep. Scott Louser · Sponsored / Rep. Macy Bolinske · Sponsored / Sen. Randy A. Burckhard · Sponsored / Sen. Jose L. Castaneda · Sponsored / Rep. Jay Fisher · Sponsored / Rep. Pat D. Heinert · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Hoverson · Sponsored / Sen. Randy D. Lemm · Sponsored / Rep. David Richter · Sponsored / Rep. Dan Ruby · Sponsored / Rep. Matthew Ruby · Sponsored / Rep. Lori VanWinkle · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1200 allows a school district or nonpublic school, with its board’s approval, to establish a policy granting no more than one required graduation unit through an alternative course, including an elective or dual-credit course, when a student demonstrates an emergent circumstance. The provision applies to the requirements after July 31, 2025. Gov. Kelly Armstrong signed the bill March 26, 2025. This option does not automatically waive graduation requirements for every student or establish completed diplomas.

Approved by Gov. Kelly Armstrong on 2025-03-26; 2025 Session Laws chapter 190. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact measures high-school-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. A course-substitution option concerns students working toward a diploma; it does not establish completed diplomas or a change in previously measured adult attainment. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained North Dakota evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

If approved by the board of a school district or nonpublic school, a school district or nonpublic school may: […] Establish a policy to allow a student to receive credit for no more than one unit under subsection 1 for completing an alternative course, including an elective course or dual-credit course, if the student demonstrates an emergent circumstance.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Jeff Hoverson

North Dakota House of Representatives · R–ND

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Jeff Hoverson
North Dakota Legislature · HB 1200

AN ACT to amend and reenact section 15.1-21-02.2 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the waiver and substitution of one unit required for high school graduation under emergent circumstances.

Mar 26, 2025 · Enacted · Signed by governor

Rep. Scott Louser · Sponsored / Rep. Macy Bolinske · Sponsored / Sen. Randy A. Burckhard · Sponsored / Sen. Jose L. Castaneda · Sponsored / Rep. Jay Fisher · Sponsored / Rep. Pat D. Heinert · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Hoverson · Sponsored / Sen. Randy D. Lemm · Sponsored / Rep. David Richter · Sponsored / Rep. Dan Ruby · Sponsored / Rep. Matthew Ruby · Sponsored / Rep. Lori VanWinkle · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1200 allows a school district or nonpublic school, with its board’s approval, to establish a policy granting no more than one required graduation unit through an alternative course, including an elective or dual-credit course, when a student demonstrates an emergent circumstance. The provision applies to the requirements after July 31, 2025. Gov. Kelly Armstrong signed the bill March 26, 2025. This option does not automatically waive graduation requirements for every student or establish completed diplomas.

Approved by Gov. Kelly Armstrong on 2025-03-26; 2025 Session Laws chapter 190. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact measures high-school-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. A course-substitution option concerns students working toward a diploma; it does not establish completed diplomas or a change in previously measured adult attainment. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained North Dakota evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

If approved by the board of a school district or nonpublic school, a school district or nonpublic school may: […] Establish a policy to allow a student to receive credit for no more than one unit under subsection 1 for completing an alternative course, including an elective course or dual-credit course, if the student demonstrates an emergent circumstance.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Lori VanWinkle

North Dakota House of Representatives · R–ND

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Lori VanWinkle
North Dakota Legislature · HB 1200

AN ACT to amend and reenact section 15.1-21-02.2 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the waiver and substitution of one unit required for high school graduation under emergent circumstances.

Mar 26, 2025 · Enacted · Signed by governor

Rep. Scott Louser · Sponsored / Rep. Macy Bolinske · Sponsored / Sen. Randy A. Burckhard · Sponsored / Sen. Jose L. Castaneda · Sponsored / Rep. Jay Fisher · Sponsored / Rep. Pat D. Heinert · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Hoverson · Sponsored / Sen. Randy D. Lemm · Sponsored / Rep. David Richter · Sponsored / Rep. Dan Ruby · Sponsored / Rep. Matthew Ruby · Sponsored / Rep. Lori VanWinkle · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1200 allows a school district or nonpublic school, with its board’s approval, to establish a policy granting no more than one required graduation unit through an alternative course, including an elective or dual-credit course, when a student demonstrates an emergent circumstance. The provision applies to the requirements after July 31, 2025. Gov. Kelly Armstrong signed the bill March 26, 2025. This option does not automatically waive graduation requirements for every student or establish completed diplomas.

Approved by Gov. Kelly Armstrong on 2025-03-26; 2025 Session Laws chapter 190. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact measures high-school-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. A course-substitution option concerns students working toward a diploma; it does not establish completed diplomas or a change in previously measured adult attainment. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained North Dakota evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

If approved by the board of a school district or nonpublic school, a school district or nonpublic school may: […] Establish a policy to allow a student to receive credit for no more than one unit under subsection 1 for completing an alternative course, including an elective course or dual-credit course, if the student demonstrates an emergent circumstance.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Macy Bolinske

North Dakota House of Representatives · R–ND

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Macy Bolinske
North Dakota Legislature · HB 1200

AN ACT to amend and reenact section 15.1-21-02.2 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the waiver and substitution of one unit required for high school graduation under emergent circumstances.

Mar 26, 2025 · Enacted · Signed by governor

Rep. Scott Louser · Sponsored / Rep. Macy Bolinske · Sponsored / Sen. Randy A. Burckhard · Sponsored / Sen. Jose L. Castaneda · Sponsored / Rep. Jay Fisher · Sponsored / Rep. Pat D. Heinert · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Hoverson · Sponsored / Sen. Randy D. Lemm · Sponsored / Rep. David Richter · Sponsored / Rep. Dan Ruby · Sponsored / Rep. Matthew Ruby · Sponsored / Rep. Lori VanWinkle · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1200 allows a school district or nonpublic school, with its board’s approval, to establish a policy granting no more than one required graduation unit through an alternative course, including an elective or dual-credit course, when a student demonstrates an emergent circumstance. The provision applies to the requirements after July 31, 2025. Gov. Kelly Armstrong signed the bill March 26, 2025. This option does not automatically waive graduation requirements for every student or establish completed diplomas.

Approved by Gov. Kelly Armstrong on 2025-03-26; 2025 Session Laws chapter 190. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact measures high-school-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. A course-substitution option concerns students working toward a diploma; it does not establish completed diplomas or a change in previously measured adult attainment. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained North Dakota evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

If approved by the board of a school district or nonpublic school, a school district or nonpublic school may: […] Establish a policy to allow a student to receive credit for no more than one unit under subsection 1 for completing an alternative course, including an elective course or dual-credit course, if the student demonstrates an emergent circumstance.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current North Dakota officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a North Dakota statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.