State unemployment, employed residents, broader underutilization, and employment growth.
Annual unemployment rate3.7%2024 · #23 of 50 · highest first
Civilian employed residents5,101,6032024 · #9 of 50 · highest first
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer1.3%2025 · 11-month average · #28 of 50 · highest first
North Carolina over time
Explore North Carolina readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. North Carolina officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a North Carolina effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a North Carolina change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Annual unemployment rate North Carolina · source units
North CarolinaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
80 of 80 reviewed North Carolina actions match · 71 date markers shown. 42 major events shown separately.
North Carolina · 2024: 3.7% · Rank #23 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4%
Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages. LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
North Carolina Annual unemployment rate · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
North Carolina · state comparison
Employment and unemployment over time
LAUS annual averages measure state residents. Compare unemployment rates or the number of employed residents.
North Carolina · 20243.7%
North Carolina rank#23among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Annual unemployment rate
Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages.
LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
North Carolina
2024 · North Carolina: 3.7% · Rank #23 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
North Carolina Annual unemployment rate history
Period
North Carolina
Compare
2015
5.7%
2016
5.1%
2017
4.5%
2018
4%
2019
3.9%
2020
7.2%
2021
4.8%
2022
3.7%
2023
3.5%
2024
3.7%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · 1.8%Higher value · 5.4%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
North Carolina · 3.7%2024 · Rank #23 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Annual unemployment rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Nevada
5.4%
—
#2
California
5.3%
—
#3
Illinois
5%
—
#4
Kentucky
4.8%
—
#5
Michigan
4.7%
—
#6
New Jersey
4.6%
—
#7
Alaska
4.5%
—
#7
Washington
4.5%
—
#9
Ohio
4.4%
—
#10
Louisiana
4.3%
—
#10
Oregon
4.3%
—
#12
New York
4.2%
—
#12
Rhode Island
4.2%
—
#14
Colorado
4.1%
—
#14
New Mexico
4.1%
—
#14
South Carolina
4.1%
—
#14
Texas
4.1%
—
#14
West Virginia
4.1%
—
#19
Indiana
4%
—
#19
Massachusetts
4%
—
#21
Delaware
3.9%
—
#22
Pennsylvania
3.8%
—
#23
Arizona
3.7%
—
#23
Missouri
3.7%
—
#23
North Carolina · your comparison
3.7%
—
#26
Idaho
3.6%
—
#27
Arkansas
3.5%
—
#27
Kansas
3.5%
—
#29
Florida
3.4%
—
#29
Georgia
3.4%
—
#29
Tennessee
3.4%
—
#32
Connecticut
3.3%
—
#32
Utah
3.3%
—
#34
Iowa
3.2%
—
#34
Maryland
3.2%
—
#34
Mississippi
3.2%
—
#34
Oklahoma
3.2%
—
#38
Minnesota
3.1%
—
#38
Wyoming
3.1%
—
#40
Alabama
3%
—
#40
Maine
3%
—
#40
Montana
3%
—
#40
Wisconsin
3%
—
#44
Virginia
2.9%
—
#45
Hawaii
2.8%
—
#46
Nebraska
2.7%
—
#47
New Hampshire
2.6%
—
#48
North Dakota
2.4%
—
#49
Vermont
2.3%
—
#50
South Dakota
1.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
The reviewed 2025 CPS snapshot includes both U-3 and the broader U-6 measure. It is separate from the LAUS annual history.
North Carolina · 2025 · 11-month average1.3%
North Carolina rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer
Unemployed 15 weeks or longer as a share of the civilian labor force.
2025 CPS averages exclude October because data were not collected during the federal shutdown. Not strictly comparable with other-year averages. These directly surveyed CPS estimates differ from LAUS model-based estimates. All states use the same 11 months here.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · 0.6%Higher value · 2.4%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
North Carolina · 1.3%2025 · 11-month average · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer · 2025 · 11-month average · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
2.4%
—
#2
Oregon
2.2%
—
#3
Illinois
2.1%
—
#3
New York
2.1%
—
#5
Connecticut
2%
—
#5
Rhode Island
2%
—
#5
Washington
2%
—
#8
Massachusetts
1.9%
—
#8
Nevada
1.9%
—
#8
New Jersey
1.9%
—
#11
Delaware
1.8%
—
#11
Virginia
1.8%
—
#13
Louisiana
1.7%
—
#13
Michigan
1.7%
—
#13
West Virginia
1.7%
—
#16
Alaska
1.6%
—
#16
Florida
1.6%
—
#16
Mississippi
1.6%
—
#16
New Mexico
1.6%
—
#16
Ohio
1.6%
—
#16
Pennsylvania
1.6%
—
#22
Colorado
1.5%
—
#22
Kentucky
1.5%
—
#22
Maryland
1.5%
—
#22
Texas
1.5%
—
#26
Arizona
1.4%
—
#26
Georgia
1.4%
—
#28
Arkansas
1.3%
—
#28
Iowa
1.3%
—
#28
North Carolina · your comparison
1.3%
—
#28
Oklahoma
1.3%
—
#28
South Carolina
1.3%
—
#33
Kansas
1.2%
—
#33
Minnesota
1.2%
—
#33
New Hampshire
1.2%
—
#33
Wisconsin
1.2%
—
#37
Tennessee
1.1%
—
#37
Utah
1.1%
—
#39
Idaho
1%
—
#39
Indiana
1%
—
#39
Nebraska
1%
—
#42
Alabama
0.9%
—
#42
Maine
0.9%
—
#42
Missouri
0.9%
—
#42
Wyoming
0.9%
—
#46
Hawaii
0.7%
—
#46
Montana
0.7%
—
#46
South Dakota
0.7%
—
#46
Vermont
0.7%
—
#50
North Dakota
0.6%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Annual real output growth and BEA job growth provide economic context. Neither is the unemployment rate.
North Carolina · 20251.8%
North Carolina rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.3%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Annual real GDP growth
Change in annual real GDP from the prior year.
Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
North Carolina
2025 · North Carolina: 1.8% · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.3% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
North Carolina Annual real GDP growth history
Period
North Carolina
Compare
2015
3%
2016
2.1%
2017
2%
2018
1.8%
2019
2%
2020
-0.6%
2021
5.9%
2022
4%
2023
4%
2024
3.7%
2025
1.8%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · -0.4%Higher value · 5.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
North Carolina · 1.8%2025 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Annual real GDP growth · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Delaware
5.1%
—
#2
Alaska
4.7%
—
#3
California
3.5%
—
#4
South Carolina
3.3%
—
#5
Washington
3.2%
—
#6
Idaho
3.1%
—
#7
Kentucky
3%
—
#8
Georgia
2.9%
—
#9
Texas
2.8%
—
#10
West Virginia
2.8%
—
#11
Florida
2.8%
—
#12
Rhode Island
2.8%
—
#13
Utah
2.7%
—
#14
Illinois
2.6%
—
#15
New York
2.5%
—
#16
Connecticut
2.5%
—
#17
Ohio
2.4%
—
#18
Virginia
2.3%
—
#19
Oklahoma
2.2%
—
#20
Michigan
2.2%
—
#21
Tennessee
2.1%
—
#22
New Jersey
2%
—
#23
Nevada
2%
—
#24
Montana
2%
—
#25
Alabama
2%
—
#26
Vermont
1.9%
—
#27
Colorado
1.9%
—
#28
Indiana
1.9%
—
#29
Pennsylvania
1.8%
—
#30
North Carolina · your comparison
1.8%
—
#31
New Mexico
1.8%
—
#32
South Dakota
1.8%
—
#33
New Hampshire
1.7%
—
#34
Louisiana
1.5%
—
#35
Hawaii
1.5%
—
#36
Arizona
1.5%
—
#37
Maine
1.4%
—
#38
Oregon
1.4%
—
#39
Massachusetts
1.3%
—
#40
Mississippi
1.3%
—
#41
Nebraska
1.3%
—
#42
Missouri
1.2%
—
#43
Kansas
1%
—
#44
Arkansas
0.9%
—
#45
Wisconsin
0.8%
—
#46
Maryland
0.8%
—
#47
Minnesota
0.7%
—
#48
North Dakota
0.5%
—
#49
Wyoming
0.1%
—
#50
Iowa
-0.4%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
A state unemployment rate does not capture all unused labor or job-market turnover.
North Carolina · December 2025212,000
North Carolina rank#10among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark6,550,000Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Openings · number
Number of jobs or monthly employment flows; published thousands converted to individual units.
Seasonally adjusted state JOLTS estimates, July–December 2025 as printed in the captured table. Recent estimates are preliminary and revisions can change ranks. Openings are a month-end stock; hires, quits, and layoffs are monthly flows, not distinct workers.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
North Carolina
December 2025 · North Carolina: 212,000 · Rank #10 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 6,550,000 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
North Carolina Openings · number history
Period
North Carolina
Compare
July 2025
246,000
August 2025
242,000
September 2025
239,000
October 2025
230,000
November 2025
217,000
December 2025
212,000
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11,000Higher value · 674,000Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
North Carolina · 212,000December 2025 · Rank #10 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Openings · number · December 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
674,000
—
#2
Texas
608,000
—
#3
New York
431,000
—
#4
Florida
404,000
—
#5
Ohio
287,000
—
#6
Georgia
279,000
—
#7
Pennsylvania
235,000
—
#8
Michigan
221,000
—
#9
Virginia
213,000
—
#10
North Carolina · your comparison
212,000
—
#11
Illinois
211,000
—
#12
New Jersey
172,000
—
#13
Tennessee
143,000
—
#14
Minnesota
135,000
—
#15
Massachusetts
129,000
—
#16
Missouri
128,000
—
#17
Maryland
127,000
—
#18
Indiana
123,000
—
#19
Arizona
121,000
—
#20
Wisconsin
115,000
—
#21
Washington
110,000
—
#22
South Carolina
103,000
—
#23
Louisiana
101,000
—
#23
Oklahoma
101,000
—
#25
Colorado
100,000
—
#26
Kentucky
92,000
—
#27
Alabama
91,000
—
#28
Oregon
72,000
—
#29
Connecticut
67,000
—
#30
Utah
64,000
—
#31
Kansas
61,000
—
#32
Arkansas
60,000
—
#33
Mississippi
59,000
—
#34
Iowa
57,000
—
#35
Nevada
52,000
—
#36
West Virginia
42,000
—
#37
Nebraska
38,000
—
#38
Idaho
34,000
—
#39
New Mexico
32,000
—
#40
Maine
28,000
—
#41
Delaware
23,000
—
#42
Montana
22,000
—
#42
New Hampshire
22,000
—
#42
Rhode Island
22,000
—
#45
South Dakota
20,000
—
#46
Hawaii
19,000
—
#47
North Dakota
18,000
—
#48
Alaska
16,000
—
#49
Vermont
11,000
—
#49
Wyoming
11,000
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
80 of 80 reviewed North Carolina actions · newest first
Jul 21, 2026 · H.Con.Res.114 · Recognizing the significance of equal pay and the disparity in wages paid to men and to Black women. · IntroducedU.S. Congress · North Carolina delegation · H.Con.Res.114
Recognizing the significance of equal pay and the disparity in wages paid to men and to Black women.
Jul 21, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Alma S. Adams · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development.
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's median household income.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Whereas July 21, 2026, is Black Women’s Equal Pay Day, a day of observance of the wage gap between working Black women and working white, non-Hispanic men; Whereas section 6(d) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(d)) (commonly known as the Equal Pay Act of 1963) prohibits discrimination in compensation for equal work on the basis of sex; Whereas title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.) prohibits discrimination in compensation because of race, color, religion, national…
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 2, 2026 · H.R.9571 · Living Wage for Federal Contractors Act · IntroducedU.S. Congress · North Carolina delegation · H.R.9571
Living Wage for Federal Contractors Act
Jul 2, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Alma S. Adams · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development.
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's median household income.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Federal contractor minimum wage (a) Federal contractor minimum wage required An employee shall be paid a basic hourly rate of pay that is not less than— (1) $17.00 per hour, for the 1-year period beginning on the first day of the third month that begins after the date of enactment of this Act; (2) $19.00 per hour, for the 1-year period beginning on the last day of the 1-year period described in paragraph (1); (3) $21.00 per hour, for the 1-year period beginning on the last day of the 1-year period described in…
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 30, 2026 · Executive Order 39 · North Carolina Health Care Affordability Commission · Health-care affordability study established; first report due January 21, 2027Governor · Executive Order 39
North Carolina Health Care Affordability Commission
Jun 30, 2026 · Health-care affordability study established; first report due January 21, 2027
Gov. Josh Stein · Issued
Reviewed signed executive order
Governor Josh Stein signed Executive Order 39 on June 30, 2026. Sections 1–2 establish a Health Care Affordability Commission with seven voting members and at most 25 nonvoting members, all Governor-appointed at pleasure for renewable one-year terms. Voting members are the DHHS Secretary and State Treasurer as co-chairs, the OSBM Director, two state senators and two state representatives. Nonvoting North Carolina residents bring health-industry and cost-driver knowledge; membership should reflect geographic, professional and demographic diversity. Section 3 directs research and advice on transparency, data and records; competition and system capacity; provider shortages, especially primary care; primary-care access and use; value-based care; and rural affordability. The commission considers existing initiatives, including the Rural Health Transformation Program, and reports recommendations to the Governor. Its first report is required by January 21, 2027. Recommendations do not themselves lower premiums, expand insurance eligibility, set prices or enact competition law. Section 4 requires at least three whole-body meetings, with additional meetings at the Governor’s or co-chairs’ call, permits electronic meetings, applies the Open Meetings Act and requires a simple majority of voting members for quorum. Section 5 assigns Governor’s Office, Treasurer and DHHS staff, with unpaid members eligible for necessary travel/subsistence under state rules. Section 6 is effective immediately and states no fixed sunset; renewable one-year member terms are not a one-year termination of the commission. The HTML body header says May 27, 2026, but the signed header, witness clause and first-publication record say June 30. The HTML also omits the signed original’s recital about Medicaid and State Health Plan financial pressure. The signed instrument controls these details. Referenced SCRIPT Act provisions, underlying claims data, numerical spending/enrollment/debt-relief assertions, appointments and implementation remain unverified; those background figures are not added as measured facts. Increasing provider supply, especially primary care, is an explicit recommendation area. This does not establish recruitment accomplished or employment effects.
Signed 2026-06-30; published 2026-06-30. Health-care affordability study established; first report due January 21, 2027. Historical issuance is verified; current operation and outcomes require separate review.
Why this record is included
Increasing provider supply, especially primary care, is an explicit recommendation area. This does not establish recruitment accomplished or employment effects.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: cpi · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · health · reviewed policy context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Governor Josh Stein signed Executive Order 39 on June 30, 2026. Sections 1–2 establish a Health Care Affordability Commission with seven voting members and at most 25 nonvoting members, all Governor-appointed at pleasure for renewable one-year terms. Voting members are the DHHS Secretary and State Treasurer as co-chairs, the OSBM Director, two state senators and two state representatives. Nonvoting North Carolina residents bring health-industry and cost-driver knowledge; membership should reflect geographic, professional and demographic diversity.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 27, 2026 · Executive Order 37 · Ethics guardrails for employee participation in prediction markets · Employee ethics restrictions issued; enforcement outcomes unverifiedGovernor · Executive Order 37
Ethics guardrails for employee participation in prediction markets
Governor Josh Stein signed Executive Order 37 on May 27, 2026. Section 1 defines online prediction markets as platforms for contracts on future events and covers Executive Branch officers, employees, interns and appointees who are full-time, part-time, temporary or unpaid. State resources include time, facilities, devices, networks, funds, systems, property and services. Section 2 prohibits six forms of conduct: using nonpublic official information for personal participation; using one’s position to influence an event in which one has a prediction-market financial interest; supplying nonpublic official information to assist another participant; contracts substantially related to official duties, agency responsibilities, decision authority or nonpublic-information access; contracts tied to direct agency actions or decisions even without personal involvement; and using state resources to access, monitor, fund, facilitate or trade. The resource restriction excepts authorized lawful regulatory, enforcement, cybersecurity or research purposes. Violations may lead to discipline under applicable employment law and referral to the Ethics Commission or law enforcement; this is not a newly enacted criminal penalty or a verified conviction. Section 3 applies to Executive Branch agencies, boards, commissions and offices under the Governor to the fullest extent permitted by law. Council of State agencies, UNC, the General Assembly and Judiciary are encouraged to adopt similar standards, rather than mandated by this provision. Section 4 preserves existing law and statutory agency authority, Section 5 is severable, and Section 6 takes effect immediately until repealed, replaced or rescinded without a fixed sunset. Referenced original ethics/criminal statutes, current agency adoption and actual discipline or referrals remain unverified. Covered employees receive explicit conduct and resource-use restrictions, with employment-law discipline possible. The order does not establish job losses or change unemployment.
Signed 2026-05-27; published 2026-05-27. Employee ethics restrictions issued; enforcement outcomes unverified. Historical issuance is verified; current operation and outcomes require separate review.
Why this record is included
Covered employees receive explicit conduct and resource-use restrictions, with employment-law discipline possible. The order does not establish job losses or change unemployment.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy context · crime · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Governor Josh Stein signed Executive Order 37 on May 27, 2026. Section 1 defines online prediction markets as platforms for contracts on future events and covers Executive Branch officers, employees, interns and appointees who are full-time, part-time, temporary or unpaid. State resources include time, facilities, devices, networks, funds, systems, property and services.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 27, 2026 · Executive Order 38 · Military community services and agency coordination · Cabinet coordination and economic-impact reporting directedGovernor · Executive Order 38
Military community services and agency coordination
May 27, 2026 · Cabinet coordination and economic-impact reporting directed
Gov. Josh Stein · Issued
Reviewed signed executive order
Governor Josh Stein signed Executive Order 38 on May 27, 2026. Section 1 requires each Cabinet Secretary to designate a Military Affairs Coordinator to communicate with Military and Veterans Affairs, report agency military engagements and programs, and understand effects on military communities in education, housing, entrepreneurship, technology, energy, health care, consumer protection, infrastructure and transportation. Section 2 requires Military and Veterans Affairs to convene coordinators at least quarterly to recommend strategies, coordinate services and identify quality-of-life opportunities for servicemembers and families. Council of State agencies are invited to designate coordinators and participate. Section 3 requires Cabinet agencies to cooperate with installations, consider readiness and community effects in planning, and, as appropriate, notify affected military commanders and local governing bodies of potentially relevant development, environmental and resiliency projects. Agencies collaborate with grant/permit applicants to avoid readiness harms and incompatible land uses and coordinate with the congressional delegation and federal agencies where appropriate. Section 4 requires Cabinet agencies to work with Military and Veterans Affairs, the Military Affairs Commission, Commerce and interested stakeholders to develop and release an updated Military Economic Impact on North Carolina report, without a fixed publication deadline. Section 5 is effective immediately until repealed, replaced or rescinded and supersedes earlier orders on the same subject, including the November 22, 2013 Order 34. It does not rescind the unrelated March 10, 2026 public-education Order 34. Historical military, employment, procurement and GDP figures in recitals were not independently audited. Actual coordinators, services, grants and the updated report remain unverified. Entrepreneurship and agency programs supporting military communities are explicit coordinator responsibilities, with workforce needs stated in the original. This is component workforce context, not verified jobs created.
Signed 2026-05-27; published 2026-05-27. Cabinet coordination and economic-impact reporting directed. Historical issuance is verified; current operation and outcomes require separate review.
Why this record is included
Entrepreneurship and agency programs supporting military communities are explicit coordinator responsibilities, with workforce needs stated in the original. This is component workforce context, not verified jobs created.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: energy · reviewed policy context · housing-borrowing · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · education · reviewed policy context · health · reviewed policy context · real-gdp · reviewed policy context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Governor Josh Stein signed Executive Order 38 on May 27, 2026. Section 1 requires each Cabinet Secretary to designate a Military Affairs Coordinator to communicate with Military and Veterans Affairs, report agency military engagements and programs, and understand effects on military communities in education, housing, entrepreneurship, technology, energy, health care, consumer protection, infrastructure and transportation.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 19, 2026 · Executive Order 36 · Housing supply, affordability and construction-workforce coordination · Housing strategy and agency work directed; implementation unverifiedGovernor · Executive Order 36
Housing supply, affordability and construction-workforce coordination
May 19, 2026 · Housing strategy and agency work directed; implementation unverified
Gov. Josh Stein · Issued
Reviewed signed executive order
Governor Josh Stein signed Executive Order 36 on May 19, 2026. Section 1 establishes a Senior Advisor for Housing Policy in the Governor’s Office to develop goals, metrics and an implementation strategy with private, faith, tribal, local and academic partners. An initial proposal is due within 90 days, followed by semiannual progress reporting. Principal departments designate housing leads except the Highway Patrol and State Bureau of Investigation; the Advisor confers with leads within 45 days and at least annually thereafter. Governor-appointed agency heads are directed to participate, while other agency heads are strongly urged. The strategy aligns seven existing plans: the Interagency Council for Coordinating Homeless Programs plan, Strategic Housing Plan, Reentry 2030, Historic Preservation Plan, Consolidated Plan, Multisector Plan for Aging and Strategic Economic Development Plan. It does not terminate Order 25’s homelessness council. Section 2 calls for housing data, technology and NCHFA collaboration addressing underserved areas, historic rehabilitation, small developers, zoning, infrastructure, permitting and markets. Its literal reference to agencies described in Section 1.5 conflicts with that provision’s “strongly urged” treatment of non-Governor-appointed agency heads; this review preserves that tension rather than silently substituting Section 1.4 or asserting all such agencies are compelled. DOT explores housing-connectivity and economic-impact measures and local transit-oriented development, applying Complete Streets to the maximum extent feasible. Administration evaluates underused state property for housing suitability and considers government leases near residences, sidewalks and transit where feasible. These duties do not establish land transfers or completed homes. DEQ supplies flood, landslide and wildfire hazard information, water/wastewater capacity, stormwater and water-allocation coordination and mitigation technology for builders and owners. DHHS and NCHFA explore policy, processes and dashboards for supportive housing for people with mental-health, substance-use, intellectual/developmental disabilities, traumatic brain injury and complex needs, including justice-involved people. Tenant-selection work addresses people repeatedly excluded, including justice-involved, disability and voucher users; it does not itself abolish landlord screening law. Section 3 directs Commerce-led coordination of existing grant and pass-through resources, including infrastructure, with construction-workforce training, graduation and certifications for skilled trades, inspectors, appraisers and mappers. It also addresses material supply chains, innovation and production to reduce building costs and timelines. Housing creation and support receive significant weight in nominating eligible census tracts to the U.S. Treasury for Opportunity Zones. This nomination criterion does not itself approve a federal designation, change tax rates or verify any taxpayer’s benefits. Section 4 is effective immediately until June 30, 2029 unless rescinded. Background housing, income, migration, investment and jobs figures were not independently audited. Actual appointments, 45/90-day deliverables, homes, grants, designations and observed affordability changes remain unverified. Construction and inspection-related workforce development is expressly directed; staffing, certifications delivered and employment effects remain unverified.
Signed 2026-05-19; published 2026-05-19. Housing strategy and agency work directed; implementation unverified. Historical issuance is verified; current operation and outcomes require separate review.
Why this record is included
Construction and inspection-related workforce development is expressly directed; staffing, certifications delivered and employment effects remain unverified.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: cpi · reviewed policy context · housing-borrowing · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · education · reviewed policy context · health · reviewed policy context · real-gdp · reviewed policy context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy context · income-taxes · reviewed policy context · crime · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Governor Josh Stein signed Executive Order 36 on May 19, 2026. Section 1 establishes a Senior Advisor for Housing Policy in the Governor’s Office to develop goals, metrics and an implementation strategy with private, faith, tribal, local and academic partners. An initial proposal is due within 90 days, followed by semiannual progress reporting. Principal departments designate housing leads except the Highway Patrol and State Bureau of Investigation; the Advisor confers with leads within 45 days and at least annually thereafter. Governor-appointed agency heads are directed to participate, while other agency heads are strongly urged.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified North Carolina officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about unemployment, jobs and workforce issues from FactVote’s North Carolina candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
37 statements from 17 candidates
2026 North Carolina U.S. House — District 1 — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
The first and primary mission of the US government is to keep our citizens safe and secure. Joe Biden and the radical left abandoned that noble calling in favor of caving to the woke mob that supports them. As a Green Beret, Pat is trained to keep our people safe, and that’s what we should be doing …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Mike Simpton
Candidate campaign source
The first and primary mission of the US government is to keep our citizens safe and secure. Joe Biden and the radical left abandoned that noble calling in favor of caving to the woke mob that supports them. As a Green Beret, Pat is trained to keep our people safe, and that’s what we should be doing now. He’s working alongside President Trump to crack down on violent crime, get drug traffickers and gangs off the streets, enforce immigration laws, and put fear back in the minds of criminals. Pat is standing up to politicians who want to bring casinos and gambling to our neighborhoods, which will create more crime than jobs.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Our immigration system needs to be clear, fair, and realistic. I support reforms that treat people with dignity and give businesses the workforce they need to grow, all while keeping every community safe.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Reforming Our Immigration System
Candidate campaign source
Our immigration system needs to be clear, fair, and realistic. I support reforms that treat people with dignity and give businesses the workforce they need to grow, all while keeping every community safe.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific unemployment, jobs and workforce issues terms in retained, attributed source text from published North Carolina candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
North Carolina incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current North Carolina legislators and North Carolina’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from North Carolina’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
92 matching sponsorships or proposals · 57 North Carolina incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Aisha O. Dew
North Carolina House · District 107 · D–NC
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Aisha O. DewNorth Carolina Legislature · HB 353
Fair Minimum Wage Act.
Mar 11, 2025 · Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
The bill addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development.
The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on March 11, 2025: Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's median household income.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Allen BuansiNorth Carolina Legislature · HB 1059
Fair Minimum Wage Act.
Apr 28, 2026 · Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
Rep. Lindsey Prather · Sponsored / Rep. Tim Longest · Sponsored / Rep. Allen Buansi · Sponsored / Rep. Kanika Brown · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development.
The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on April 28, 2026: Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's median household income.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Mar 17, 2025 · Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
Rep. Jordan Lopez · Sponsored / Rep. Gloristine Brown · Sponsored / Rep. Eric Ager · Sponsored / Rep. Allen Buansi · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill would dIRECT THE LEGISLATIVE RESEARC H COMMISSION TO STUD Y AFFORDABLE HOUSING I N THE STATE; MAKE HOUSING DISCRIMINAT ION ON THE BASIS OF "SOU RCE OF INCOME" A VIO LATION OF THE STATE FAIR HOUSING ACT, TO EXPA ND WORKFORCE HOUSING BY PROVIDING CURRENT AND ONGOING FUNDING FOR THE HOUSING TRUS T FUND; PROHIBIT CREDIT REPORTING AGE NCIES FROM REPORTING LAWSUITS FOR EJECTM ENT THAT DO NOT RESULT I N A JUDGMENT FOR THE LANDLORD; and ESTABLISH THE OPTION AL CREDIT REPORTING FOR TENANTS O F SUBSIDIZED HOUSING PROGRAM. 10.
The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on March 17, 2025: Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses rental housing, tenant protections, housing assistance, homelessness, or housing supply. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's median gross rent.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
AN ACT TO DIRECT THE LEGISLATIVE RESEARC H COMMISSION TO STUD Y AFFORDABLE HOUSING I N THE STATE, TO MAKE HOUSING DISCRIMINAT ION ON THE BASIS OF "SOU RCE OF INCOME" A VIO LATION OF THE STATE FAIR HOUSING ACT, TO EXPA ND WORKFORCE HOUSING BY PROVIDING CURRENT AND ONGOING FUNDING FOR THE HOUSING TRUS T FUND, TO PROHIBIT CREDIT REPORTING AGE NCIES FROM REPORTING LAWSUITS FOR EJECTM ENT THAT DO NOT RESULT I N A JUDGMENT FOR THE LANDLORD, AND TO ESTABLISH THE OPTION AL CREDIT REPORTING FOR TENANTS O F SUBSIDIZED…
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Allen ChesserNorth Carolina Legislature · HB 574
Workforce Development Pilot Project.
Apr 28, 2025 · Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
Rep. Cody Huneycutt · Sponsored / Rep. Kyle Hall · Sponsored / Rep. Allen Chesser · Sponsored / Rep. Heather H. Rhyne · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill would eSTABLISH A WORKFORCE DEVELOPM ENT PILOT PROJECT. 2.
The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on April 28, 2025: Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's median household income.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The bill addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development.
The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on March 11, 2025: Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's median household income.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
U.S. representative for North Carolina, District 12 · D–NC
3 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Alma S. AdamsU.S. Congress · North Carolina delegation · H.Con.Res.114
Recognizing the significance of equal pay and the disparity in wages paid to men and to Black women.
Jul 21, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Alma S. Adams · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development.
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's median household income.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Whereas July 21, 2026, is Black Women’s Equal Pay Day, a day of observance of the wage gap between working Black women and working white, non-Hispanic men; Whereas section 6(d) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(d)) (commonly known as the Equal Pay Act of 1963) prohibits discrimination in compensation for equal work on the basis of sex; Whereas title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.) prohibits discrimination in compensation because of race, color, religion, national…
U.S. Congress · North Carolina delegation · H.R.9571
Living Wage for Federal Contractors Act
Jul 2, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Alma S. Adams · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development.
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's median household income.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Federal contractor minimum wage (a) Federal contractor minimum wage required An employee shall be paid a basic hourly rate of pay that is not less than— (1) $17.00 per hour, for the 1-year period beginning on the first day of the third month that begins after the date of enactment of this Act; (2) $19.00 per hour, for the 1-year period beginning on the last day of the 1-year period described in paragraph (1); (3) $21.00 per hour, for the 1-year period beginning on the last day of the 1-year period described in…
U.S. Congress · North Carolina delegation · H.Con.Res.42
Recognizing the significance of equal pay and the disparity in wages paid to men and to Black women.
Jul 10, 2025 · Introduced
Rep. Alma S. Adams · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development.
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's median household income.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
DeSaulnier) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and WorkforceCONCURRENT RESOLUTIONRecognizing the significance of equal pay and the disparity in wages paid to men and to Black women.Whereas July 10, 2025, is Black Women’s Equal Pay Day, a day of observance of the wage gap between working Black women and working White, non-Hispanic men;Whereas section 6(d) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(d)) (commonly known as the Equal Pay Act of…
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Amos L. Quick, IIINorth Carolina Legislature · HB 540
Study Workforce Development for Refugees.
Apr 14, 2021 · Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
Rep. Amos L. Quick, III · Sponsored / Rep. Pricey Harrison · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill would dIRECT THE LEGISLATIVE RESEARC H COMMISSION TO STUD Y WORKFORCE DEVELOPMEN T ISSUES FOR REFUGEE S. 3.
The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on April 14, 2021: Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses immigration status, immigrant services, asylum, deportation, or immigration enforcement. It does not update or establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed foreign-born population share.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born · Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
AN ACT TO DIRECT THE LEGISLATIVE RESEARC H COMMISSION TO STUD Y WORKFORCE DEVELOPMEN T ISSUES FOR REFUGEE S. 3
Only current North Carolina officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a North Carolina statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
North Carolina snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to North Carolina, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.