Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price14.13¢/kWh2024 · #33 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.767/gal2026-08 · #38 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$143.52024 · #20 of 50 · highest first
North Carolina over time
Explore North Carolina readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. North Carolina officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a North Carolina effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a North Carolina change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price North Carolina · source units
North CarolinaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
46 of 46 reviewed North Carolina actions match · 41 date markers shown. 67 major events shown separately.
North Carolina · 2024: 14.13¢/kWh · Rank #33 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
FactVote combines EIA annual utility-scale generation with estimated small-scale solar generation, then groups sources into seven categories. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside North Carolina, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. Small-scale solar generation is estimated by EIA. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
North Carolina Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
North Carolina · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
North Carolina · 202414.13¢/kWh
North Carolina rank#33among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
FactVote combines EIA annual utility-scale generation with estimated small-scale solar generation, then groups sources into seven categories. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside North Carolina, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. Small-scale solar generation is estimated by EIA. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
North Carolina
2024 · North Carolina: 14.13¢/kWh · Rank #33 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
North Carolina Residential electricity price history
Period
North Carolina
Compare
2015
11.28¢/kWh
2016
11.03¢/kWh
2017
10.94¢/kWh
2018
11.09¢/kWh
2019
11.42¢/kWh
2020
11.38¢/kWh
2021
11.32¢/kWh
2022
11.62¢/kWh
2023
12.93¢/kWh
2024
14.13¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
North Carolina · 14.13¢/kWh2024 · Rank #33 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina · your comparison
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations, including taxes, in EIA's Lower Atlantic petroleum subdistrict. The region includes Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent weekly prices
Prior week
$3.785/gal
Weekly change
−0.2¢
One year earlier
$2.912/gal
Change from one year earlier
+87.1¢
Method and limitations
U.S. Energy Information Administration weekly retail motor-gasoline survey estimate for the Lower Atlantic region. FactVote displays the published dollars-per-gallon value and calculates changes from EIA's published prior-week and nearest year-earlier weekly observations.
EIA does not publish a current North Carolina statewide weekly gasoline-price series; this Lower Atlantic regional estimate should not be read as North Carolina's statewide average.
The regional estimate combines six states and does not represent the price at every station or in every North Carolina community.
The series is nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns, and weekly estimates can be revised.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
North Carolina · 2024$143.5
North Carolina rank#20among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
North Carolina
2024 · North Carolina: $143.5 · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
North Carolina Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
North Carolina
Compare
2010
$125.2
2011
$118.09
2012
$117.45
2013
$120.52
2014
$126.09
2015
$125.51
2016
$121.44
2017
$113.98
2018
$125.17
2019
$123.25
2020
$118.44
2021
$120.38
2022
$124.48
2023
$127.79
2024
$143.5
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
North Carolina · $143.52024 · Rank #20 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina · your comparison
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
North Carolina · 2024135.9 TWh
North Carolina rank#9among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
FactVote combines EIA annual utility-scale generation with estimated small-scale solar generation, then groups sources into seven categories. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside North Carolina, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. Small-scale solar generation is estimated by EIA. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
North Carolina
2024 · North Carolina: 135.9 TWh · Rank #9 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
North Carolina Total electricity generation history
Period
North Carolina
Compare
2015
128.4 TWh
2016
130.8 TWh
2017
128.5 TWh
2018
134.3 TWh
2019
131.2 TWh
2020
124.4 TWh
2021
130 TWh
2022
134.3 TWh
2023
126.6 TWh
2024
135.9 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
North Carolina · 135.9 TWh2024 · Rank #9 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina · your comparison
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
North Carolina · 20241,518.1 min/year
North Carolina rank#4among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
North Carolina
2024 · North Carolina: 1,518.1 min/year · Rank #4 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
North Carolina Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
North Carolina
Compare
2023
262.5 min/year
2024
1,518.1 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
North Carolina · 1,518.1 min/year2024 · Rank #4 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina · your comparison
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
North Carolina · 2024662.2 trillion Btu
North Carolina rank#9among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
North Carolina · 662.2 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #9 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina · your comparison
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
North Carolina · 2024119.07 Mt CO₂
North Carolina rank#12among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
North Carolina · 119.07 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #12 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina · your comparison
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
46 of 46 reviewed North Carolina actions · newest first
May 27, 2026 · Executive Order 38 · Military community services and agency coordination · Cabinet coordination and economic-impact reporting directedGovernor · Executive Order 38
Military community services and agency coordination
May 27, 2026 · Cabinet coordination and economic-impact reporting directed
Gov. Josh Stein · Issued
Reviewed signed executive order
Governor Josh Stein signed Executive Order 38 on May 27, 2026. Section 1 requires each Cabinet Secretary to designate a Military Affairs Coordinator to communicate with Military and Veterans Affairs, report agency military engagements and programs, and understand effects on military communities in education, housing, entrepreneurship, technology, energy, health care, consumer protection, infrastructure and transportation. Section 2 requires Military and Veterans Affairs to convene coordinators at least quarterly to recommend strategies, coordinate services and identify quality-of-life opportunities for servicemembers and families. Council of State agencies are invited to designate coordinators and participate. Section 3 requires Cabinet agencies to cooperate with installations, consider readiness and community effects in planning, and, as appropriate, notify affected military commanders and local governing bodies of potentially relevant development, environmental and resiliency projects. Agencies collaborate with grant/permit applicants to avoid readiness harms and incompatible land uses and coordinate with the congressional delegation and federal agencies where appropriate. Section 4 requires Cabinet agencies to work with Military and Veterans Affairs, the Military Affairs Commission, Commerce and interested stakeholders to develop and release an updated Military Economic Impact on North Carolina report, without a fixed publication deadline. Section 5 is effective immediately until repealed, replaced or rescinded and supersedes earlier orders on the same subject, including the November 22, 2013 Order 34. It does not rescind the unrelated March 10, 2026 public-education Order 34. Historical military, employment, procurement and GDP figures in recitals were not independently audited. Actual coordinators, services, grants and the updated report remain unverified. Energy programs are explicitly listed in coordinator responsibilities, alongside environmental/readiness planning. No generation, price or reliability outcome is established.
Signed 2026-05-27; published 2026-05-27. Cabinet coordination and economic-impact reporting directed. Historical issuance is verified; current operation and outcomes require separate review.
Why this record is included
Energy programs are explicitly listed in coordinator responsibilities, alongside environmental/readiness planning. No generation, price or reliability outcome is established.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: energy · reviewed policy context · housing-borrowing · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · education · reviewed policy context · health · reviewed policy context · real-gdp · reviewed policy context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Governor Josh Stein signed Executive Order 38 on May 27, 2026. Section 1 requires each Cabinet Secretary to designate a Military Affairs Coordinator to communicate with Military and Veterans Affairs, report agency military engagements and programs, and understand effects on military communities in education, housing, entrepreneurship, technology, energy, health care, consumer protection, infrastructure and transportation.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 4, 2026 · SB 957 · Portable-Scale Solar Energy Devices. · Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the SenateNorth Carolina Legislature · SB 957
Portable-Scale Solar Energy Devices.
May 4, 2026 · Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
Sen. Timothy D. Moffitt · Sponsored / Sen. Michael A. Lazzara · Sponsored / Sen. Julie Mayfield · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill would aUTHORIZE THE USE OF SMALL, PO RTABLE - SCALE SOLAR E NERGY GENERATION DEVICES A ND TO EXPAND THE PUB LIC AWARENESS PROGRA M OFFERED BY THE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF ELE CTRICAL CONTRACTORS. 4.
The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on May 4, 2026: Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed renewable generating capacity.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Renewable generating capacity. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 9, 2026 · H.R.7873 · Taiwan Energy Security and Anti-Embargo Act of 2026 · IntroducedU.S. Congress · North Carolina delegation · H.R.7873
Taiwan Energy Security and Anti-Embargo Act of 2026
Mar 9, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Pat Harrigan · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed renewable generating capacity.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Renewable generating capacity. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Energy infrastructure resilience capacity building (a) Requirement Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Taiwan Energy Security and Anti-Embargo Act of 2026, the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy, may seek to engage with appropriate officials of Taiwan for the purpose of cooperating with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Defense, and the head of any other applicable ministry of Taiwan…
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jan 29, 2026 · Executive Order 32 · New winter-storm emergency declaration · Separate emergency declared through the original February 20 end dateGovernor · Executive Order 32
New winter-storm emergency declaration
Jan 29, 2026 · Separate emergency declared through the original February 20 end date
Gov. Josh Stein · Issued
Reviewed signed executive order
Governor Josh Stein signed Executive Order 32 on January 29, 2026. Sections 1–5 declare a statewide emergency for another forecast winter storm starting around January 30, activate the emergency operations plan, delegate response to Public Safety and the State Emergency Response Team, designate the chief coordinating officer and authorize seeking federal disaster assistance and cost reimbursement. Its recitals report that January 24–25 freezing rain had already caused widespread power outages and hazardous conditions while below-average temperatures continued. Those are attributed statements in the signed instrument, distinct from independently measured outage counts. Section 6 takes effect immediately through February 20, 2026 unless modified, superseded or rescinded. The original does not expressly extend Order 31, list new transport or fuel-tax waivers, or contain Order 31’s explicit price-gouging clause. Full statutory effects and subsequent extensions remain open. The Governor reports earlier power outages and authorizes a new winter-emergency response. No outage count, restoration total or additional fuel-tax waiver is established by this six-section instrument.
Signed 2026-01-29; published 2026-01-29. Separate emergency declared through the original February 20 end date. Historical issuance is verified; current operation and outcomes require separate review.
Why this record is included
The Governor reports earlier power outages and authorizes a new winter-emergency response. No outage count, restoration total or additional fuel-tax waiver is established by this six-section instrument.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: energy · reviewed policy context · housing-borrowing · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · health · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Governor Josh Stein signed Executive Order 32 on January 29, 2026. Sections 1–5 declare a statewide emergency for another forecast winter storm starting around January 30, activate the emergency operations plan, delegate response to Public Safety and the State Emergency Response Team, designate the chief coordinating officer and authorize seeking federal disaster assistance and cost reimbursement.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jan 21, 2026 · Executive Order 31 · Emergency declaration and temporary transport waivers for the forecast January 2026 winter storm · Order issued; original temporary periods elapsed; later extensions unverifiedGovernor · Executive Order 31
Emergency declaration and temporary transport waivers for the forecast January 2026 winter storm
Jan 21, 2026 · Order issued; original temporary periods elapsed; later extensions unverified
Gov. Josh Stein · Issued
Reviewed signed executive order
Governor Josh Stein signed Executive Order 31 on 2026-01-21. Sections 1–5 declare a statewide emergency, activate the emergency operations plan, authorize Public Safety and the State Emergency Response Team to act, designate the chief coordinating officer and authorize seeking federal disaster assistance and cost reimbursement. Forecast risks are distinct from observed storm impacts and approved assistance. Sections 6–10 authorize specified direct-assistance driver-hours relief and agricultural transport exemptions, and specified size, weight, registration, fuel-tax filing, trip-permit and interstate IRP/IFTA relief. The order reports Council of State concurrence for the clauses requiring it; the actual member-response table has not been reviewed. DOT special permits and their conditions, posted bridge limits and other unwaived rules remain in place. This original does not impose the earlier winter orders’ specific 90,000-pound permit table. Fuel-tax rates and payment obligations are not abolished. Insurance remains required. Section 11 limits federal hours relief to direct emergency assistance and its original 14-day window. Routine commercial transport and dispatch end that exemption; an empty return from direct assistance is excepted, with a 10-hour rest safeguard when combined operation reaches the specified 14-hour limit. Section 12 retains safe-operation oversight by the Highway Patrol. Section 13 adds no firearm or alcohol restrictions. Section 14 applies price-gouging protections. Section 15 makes Section 11 effective for 14 days and the other provisions for 30 days unless modified, superseded or rescinded. The transcript’s body header incorrectly says January 21, 2025; the signed header, witness clause and publication record identify January 21, 2026. The original temporary periods have elapsed by this review date; later extensions and current operation are not independently verified. Order 32 is a separate emergency declaration and does not expressly extend these transport waivers. Emergency fuel and essential-goods delivery waivers concern energy supply. These temporary logistics provisions do not establish measured outages, production increases or a change in gasoline prices.
Signed 2026-01-21; published 2026-01-21. Order issued; original temporary periods elapsed; later extensions unverified. Historical issuance is verified; current operation and outcomes require separate review.
Why this record is included
Emergency fuel and essential-goods delivery waivers concern energy supply. These temporary logistics provisions do not establish measured outages, production increases or a change in gasoline prices.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Lower Atlantic regular gasoline price · energy · reviewed policy context · cpi · reviewed policy context · housing-borrowing · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · health · reviewed policy context · real-gdp · reviewed policy context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy context · income-taxes · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Governor Josh Stein signed Executive Order 31 on 2026-01-21. Sections 1–5 declare a statewide emergency, activate the emergency operations plan, authorize Public Safety and the State Emergency Response Team to act, designate the chief coordinating officer and authorize seeking federal disaster assistance and cost reimbursement. Forecast risks are distinct from observed storm impacts and approved assistance.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Dec 18, 2025 · 2026 motor-fuels tax-rate notice · 2026 Motor Fuels and Alternative Fuels Tax Rate · 2026 rate in effectNorth Carolina agencies · 2026 motor-fuels tax-rate notice
2026 Motor Fuels and Alternative Fuels Tax Rate
Dec 18, 2025 · 2026 rate in effect
Revenue Secretary McKinley Wooten, Jr. · Acted
FactVote reviewed summary
North Carolina's Department of Revenue set the motor-fuel excise tax at 41.0 cents per gallon for calendar year 2026 under the statutory annual formula.
The 41.0-cent-per-gallon rate applies from January 1 through December 31, 2026.
Why this record is included
The Department of Revenue applied G.S. 105-449.80 and set the 2026 motor-fuel and alternative-fuel excise tax at 41.0 cents per gallon or gallon equivalent, with the inspection tax remaining 0.0025 cents per gallon. The excise tax is a direct North Carolina component of the tax-inclusive retail price, while the EIA fact remains a six-state regional estimate and includes many non-tax market components.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Lower Atlantic regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official December 18, 2025 memorandum states that the Secretary determined a 41.0-cent-per-gallon motor-fuel excise tax for calendar year 2026.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified North Carolina officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s North Carolina candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
20 statements from 11 candidates
2026 North Carolina U.S. House — District 10 — General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements
In addition, offshore wind energy is one the best resources in our toolbox to combat climate change and unleash the power of American clean energy. I was proud that my provision to overturn the previous administration’s 10-year moratorium on offshore wind leasing in North Carolina and other states i…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Priorities
Candidate campaign source
In addition, offshore wind energy is one the best resources in our toolbox to combat climate change and unleash the power of American clean energy. I was proud that my provision to overturn the previous administration’s 10-year moratorium on offshore wind leasing in North Carolina and other states in the Southeast was included in the historic Inflation Reduction Act.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
As a state legislator, I voted to support clean energy alternatives, halt fracking, and implement measures to reduce emissions in North Carolina. In Congress, I was proud to vote to pass the Inflation Reduction Act, the largest investment in clean energy in American history. This transformational le…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Priorities
Candidate campaign source
As a state legislator, I voted to support clean energy alternatives, halt fracking, and implement measures to reduce emissions in North Carolina. In Congress, I was proud to vote to pass the Inflation Reduction Act, the largest investment in clean energy in American history. This transformational legislation will reduce carbon pollution, bolster community resilience, and create good-paying American jobs. In fact, according to some projections, the IRA will put America back on track to meet the ambitious goal set by President Obama of reducing our greenhouse gas emissions 40 percent from 2005 levels by the end of the decade.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Donald Trump’s decision to repeal the endangerment finding and cripple our ability to fight climate change will make us sicker, cost lives, and hurt property
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Trump Ignores Climate Change, Threatens Lives
Candidate campaign source
Donald Trump’s decision to repeal the endangerment finding and cripple our ability to fight climate change will make us sicker, cost lives, and hurt property
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Deborah Ross and the national Democratic stack keep selling the blue-state model. On energy she supports only “green” sources. She has opposed nuclear as a working power source, natural gas, clean fossil fuels, clean coal, fracking, and new oil and coal leases. Massachusetts already ran a version of…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: The chart is the argument. Ross is selling the expensive column and calling fusion a power plant.
Candidate campaign source
Deborah Ross and the national Democratic stack keep selling the blue-state model. On energy she supports only “green” sources. She has opposed nuclear as a working power source, natural gas, clean fossil fuels, clean coal, fracking, and new oil and coal leases. Massachusetts already ran a version of that experiment — high rates, tight gas, shuttered nuclear. The charts are what families pay when that model wins.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Ross will say she supports nuclear. Fusion power plants do not exist. Fission plants do, and they are being updated. Commercial fusion, if the optimistic shops are right, is still a decade-plus away. She has spent her career blocking the fission, the natural gas, the pipeline to get it here, and the…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: The chart is the argument. Ross is selling the expensive column and calling fusion a power plant.
Candidate campaign source
Ross will say she supports nuclear. Fusion power plants do not exist. Fission plants do, and they are being updated. Commercial fusion, if the optimistic shops are right, is still a decade-plus away. She has spent her career blocking the fission, the natural gas, the pipeline to get it here, and the leases that make electrical power now. Ranking member of the Energy Subcommittee can hold a fusion hearing and still leave the household on 25-cent per kWh power. I will vote to license the reactors we already know how to build. She can keep the press conference about the reactors that do not exist.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published North Carolina candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
North Carolina incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current North Carolina legislators and North Carolina’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from North Carolina’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
67 matching sponsorships or proposals · 42 North Carolina incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Apr 22, 2021 · Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
Rep. Pricey Harrison · Sponsored / Rep. Mary Belk · Sponsored / Rep. Abe Jones · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill would eSTABLISH A STATE GOAL OF ONE HUNDRED PERCENT CLEA N ENERGY BY AND T O PROMOTE THE CREATI ON OF GREEN JOBS. 3.
The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on April 22, 2021: Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed renewable generating capacity.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Renewable generating capacity. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Aisha O. DewNorth Carolina Legislature · HB 792
Clean Energy Grants.
Apr 8, 2025 · Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
Rep. Aisha O. Dew · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
AN ACT TO APPROPRIAT E FUNDS FOR CLEAN EN ERGY GRANTS. 2
The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on April 8, 2025: Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed renewable generating capacity.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Renewable generating capacity. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Allen BuansiNorth Carolina Legislature · HB 131
Reenact Solar Energy Tax Credit.
Feb 18, 2025 · Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
Rep. Allen Buansi · Sponsored / Rep. Pricey Harrison · Sponsored / Rep. Renée A. Price · Sponsored / Rep. Tim Longest · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
AN ACT TO REENACT A SOLAR ENERGY TAX CRE DIT. 2
The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on February 18, 2025: Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed renewable generating capacity.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Renewable generating capacity. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Apr 19, 2023 · Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
Rep. Allen Buansi · Sponsored / Rep. Pricey Harrison · Sponsored / Rep. Renée A. Price · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
AN ACT TO REENACT A SOLAR ENERGY TAX CRE DIT. 2
The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on April 19, 2023: Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed renewable generating capacity.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Renewable generating capacity. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Amber M. BakerNorth Carolina Legislature · HB 1123
Reenact Solar Energy Tax Credit.
May 31, 2022 · Ref to the Com on Finance, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
Rep. Pricey Harrison · Sponsored / Rep. Amber M. Baker · Sponsored / Rep. Julie von Haefen · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
AN ACT TO REENACT A SOLAR ENERGY TAX CRE DIT. 2
The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on May 31, 2022: Ref to the Com on Finance, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed renewable generating capacity.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Renewable generating capacity. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Apr 22, 2021 · Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
Rep. Julie von Haefen · Sponsored / Rep. Pricey Harrison · Sponsored / Rep. Becky Carney · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
AN ACT TO APPROPRIAT E FUNDS FOR CLEAN EN ERGY GRANTS. 2
The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on April 22, 2021: Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed renewable generating capacity.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Renewable generating capacity. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Apr 15, 2021 · Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
Rep. Brandon Lofton · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
AN ACT TO REENACT A TAX CREDIT INCENTIVE FOR INVESTING IN RE NEWABLE ENERGY PROPERTY. 3
The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on April 15, 2021: Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed renewable generating capacity.
Retained North Carolina evidence context: Renewable generating capacity. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Only current North Carolina officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a North Carolina statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
North Carolina snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to North Carolina, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.