North Carolina · individual fact

North Carolina education

Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.

High school or higher90.1%2020–2024 · #32 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher45.8%2020–2024 · #18 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher35.7%2020–2024 · #20 of 50 · highest first

North Carolina over time

Explore North Carolina readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. North Carolina officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a North Carolina effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a North Carolina change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Grade 4 reading North Carolina · source units
North CarolinaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Grade 4 reading2024: 213.4211.9219.6227.3North Carolina, 2003: 221.2North Carolina, 2005: 217.1North Carolina, 2007: 217.9North Carolina, 2009: 219.3North Carolina, 2011: 221.4North Carolina, 2013: 222.2North Carolina, 2015: 225.8North Carolina, 2017: 223.9North Carolina, 2019: 221.3North Carolina, 2022: 216.1North Carolina, 2024: 213.4200320132024
✦ Major events & context · 36National context · Student-aid law ends new FFEL lending and expands Pell funding · 2010-03-30Student-aid reformNational context · Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act signed · 2014-07-22Workforce and adult educationNational context · Every Student Succeeds Act signed · 2015-12-10ESSA signedNational context · Career and technical education law reauthorized · 2018-07-31Perkins V signedNorth Carolina · Florence damages North Carolina homes, schools and power systems · 2018-09-14Florence local disruptionNational context · FUTURE Act continues support for minority-serving institutions · 2019-12-19FUTURE Act signedNational context · Pandemic education relief through the CARES Act · 2020-03-27COVID-19 education reliefNational context · Additional pandemic relief for colleges and students · 2020-12-27Second education relief lawNational context · American Rescue Plan expands education relief · 2021-03-11Education recovery fundingNational context · Supreme Court rejects Harvard and UNC race-conscious admissions programs · 2023-06-29College-admissions rulingNational context · Supreme Court rejects the 2022 student-loan cancellation plan · 2023-06-30Student-loan rulingNational context · Pell eligibility restored for qualifying prison education programs · 2023-07-01Prison education Pell accessNational context · Federal student-loan payments resume after pandemic pause · 2023-10-01Student-loan payments resumeNorth Carolina · Helene disrupts western North Carolina homes, schools and power · 2024-09-27Helene western NC disruptionNorth Carolina · North Carolina issues Helene recovery Order 2: Timely Repairing Private Roads and Bridges · 2025-01-02NC recovery Order 2North Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 10: Child Care and Early Education Task Force · 2025-03-10NC Order 10National context · Executive order directs steps toward closing the Education Department · 2025-03-20Federal education orderNorth Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 11: Workforce development and apprenticeship directives · 2025-03-25NC Order 11North Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 13: Student Safety and Well-Being Advisory Council · 2025-04-07NC Order 13North Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 15: Governor’s Teacher Advisory Committee · 2025-05-06NC Order 15National context · 2025 law changes federal student aid and creates Workforce Pell · 2025-07-04Student-aid law signedNorth Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 21: Violence prevention office, community board and gang-prevention task force · 2025-08-19NC Order 21North Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 24: AI Leadership Council, state Accelerator and public AI literacy · 2025-09-02NC Order 24North Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 25: Interagency Council for homelessness and housing stability · 2025-09-10NC Order 25North Carolina · North Carolina continues its Latino Affairs Council · 2025-09-30NC Order 27North Carolina · North Carolina Latino Affairs Council holds topic committee discussions · 2026-02-18NC Latino council committeesNorth Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 34: Blue Ribbon Commission on the Future of Public Education · 2026-03-10NC Order 34National context · Education and Treasury announce student-aid partnership · 2026-03-19Student-aid partnershipNational context · Education announces final student-loan and repayment regulations · 2026-04-30Student-loan final ruleNational context · Education Department announces Workforce Pell final rule · 2026-05-18Workforce Pell ruleNorth Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 36: Housing supply, affordability and construction-workforce coordination · 2026-05-19NC Order 36North Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 38: Military community services and agency coordination · 2026-05-27NC Order 38National context · Education announces earnings-accountability final rule · 2026-06-29College earnings accountabilityNational context · Main student-loan limits and new repayment plans take effect · 2026-07-01Student-loan changes beginNational context · First Workforce Pell program approved · 2026-08-04First Workforce Pell approvalNorth Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 40: Juvenile Justice Planning Committee extension · 2026-08-26NC Order 40● North Carolina Legislature · 212● U.S. Congress · North Carolina delegation · 5◆ Governor · 13■ North Carolina agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2003-12-012026-08-31

39 of 39 reviewed North Carolina actions match · 38 date markers shown. 36 major events shown separately.

North Carolina · 2024: 213.4 · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in North Carolina. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
North Carolina Grade 4 reading · source units
PeriodNorth CarolinaRankU.S. benchmark
2024213.4#32 of 50215
2022216.1#26 of 50217.5
2019221.3#19 of 50220.5
2017223.9#18 of 50221.9
2015225.8#15 of 50222.5
2013222.2#28 of 50221.8
2011221.4#23 of 50221.2
2009219.3#30 of 50220.9
2007217.9#35 of 50221
2005217.1#32 of 50219
2003221.2#19 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

North Carolina · state comparison

Adult educational attainment

Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.

North Carolina · 2020–202490.1%
North Carolina rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

High school or higher

Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.

Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

North Carolina · 90.1%2020–2024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont94.9%—
#2Maine94.8%—
#3Montana94.6%—
#4New Hampshire94.4%—
#5Wyoming94.2%—
#6North Dakota94%—
#7Minnesota93.9%—
#8Wisconsin93.6%—
#9Alaska93.6%—
#10Utah93.4%—
#11Iowa93.3%—
#12South Dakota93.2%—
#13Hawaii93.2%—
#14Colorado92.9%—
#15Washington92.3%—
#16Nebraska92.2%—
#17Pennsylvania92.1%—
#18Michigan92.1%—
#19Kansas92%—
#20Idaho91.9%—
#21Missouri91.9%—
#22Oregon91.8%—
#23Ohio91.8%—
#24Delaware91.7%—
#25Virginia91.6%—
#26Connecticut91.5%—
#27Massachusetts91.4%—
#28Maryland91.1%—
#29New Jersey90.7%—
#30Illinois90.5%—
#31Indiana90.4%—
#32North Carolina · your comparison90.1%—
#33South Carolina90.1%—
#34Tennessee90%—
#35Florida89.9%—
#36Rhode Island89.7%—
#37Oklahoma89.4%—
#38Arizona89.4%—
#39West Virginia89.3%—
#40Georgia89.2%—
#41Kentucky88.9%—
#42Arkansas88.7%—
#43Alabama88.6%—
#44New Mexico88%—
#45New York88%—
#46Nevada87.5%—
#47Louisiana87.3%—
#48Mississippi87.1%—
#49Texas86%—
#50California84.7%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

North Carolina · state comparison

Are students learning?

NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.

North Carolina · 2024213.4
North Carolina rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Grade 4 reading

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in North Carolina. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.

NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

North Carolina
Grade 4 reading history in North Carolina211.5219.6227.720032024
2024 · North Carolina: 213.4 · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
North Carolina Grade 4 reading history
PeriodNorth CarolinaCompare
2003221.2
2005217.1
2007217.9
2009219.3
2011221.4
2013222.2
2015225.8
2017223.9
2019221.3
2022216.1
2024213.4

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

North Carolina · 213.42024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts224.8—
#2Wyoming221.9—
#3New Jersey221.6—
#4New Hampshire221.5—
#5Colorado220.9—
#6Indiana220.1—
#7Utah219.3—
#8Connecticut219.2—
#9Mississippi218.5—
#10Florida218.2—
#11Kentucky218—
#12Montana217.2—
#13Rhode Island216.3—
#14Louisiana216—
#14Ohio216—
#16Hawaii215.8—
#16Pennsylvania215.8—
#18Idaho215.7—
#18Washington215.7—
#20Maryland215.6—
#21North Dakota215.5—
#22Wisconsin215.3—
#23Tennessee215.1—
#24South Carolina214.9—
#25Iowa214.6—
#25New York214.6—
#27Georgia214.4—
#27Minnesota214.4—
#29Illinois214.2—
#30South Dakota214.1—
#30Virginia214.1—
#32North Carolina · your comparison213.4—
#33Alabama213.2—
#34Kansas213.1—
#34Nevada213.1—
#36Vermont212.7—
#37Missouri211.9—
#37Texas211.9—
#39California211.7—
#39Nebraska211.7—
#41Arkansas209.7—
#42Maine209.6—
#43Delaware209.5—
#44Michigan209.1—
#45Arizona208.1—
#46Oklahoma207.3—
#47Oregon207—
#48West Virginia205.9—
#49Alaska201.6—
#50New Mexico200.6—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

North Carolina · state comparison

Where does school funding go?

Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.

North Carolina · FY2024$12,995
North Carolina rank#41among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Current spending per pupil

Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.

Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

North Carolina · $12,995FY2024 · Rank #41 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$31,918—
#2Vermont$28,818—
#3New Jersey$27,234—
#4Connecticut$26,316—
#5Massachusetts$24,429—
#6Hawaii$23,878—
#7New Hampshire$22,978—
#8Delaware$22,201—
#9Rhode Island$22,110—
#10Illinois$21,776—
#11Pennsylvania$21,091—
#12Alaska$21,004—
#13California$20,791—
#14Wyoming$20,521—
#15Maryland$20,208—
#16Maine$19,962—
#17Washington$18,564—
#18Michigan$18,314—
#19Oregon$18,083—
#20New Mexico$17,664—
#21Ohio$17,257—
#22Virginia$17,104—
#23North Dakota$17,102—
#24Minnesota$17,098—
#25Nebraska$16,147—
#26Wisconsin$15,952—
#27Colorado$15,908—
#28Georgia$15,833—
#29West Virginia$15,640—
#30Louisiana$15,581—
#31Kansas$15,558—
#32South Carolina$15,060—
#33Nevada$14,812—
#34Kentucky$14,596—
#35Iowa$14,369—
#36Missouri$14,241—
#37Arkansas$13,873—
#38Montana$13,656—
#39Alabama$13,627—
#40Indiana$13,622—
#41North Carolina · your comparison$12,995—
#42Texas$12,895—
#43Tennessee$12,882—
#44South Dakota$12,828—
#45Florida$12,693—
#46Mississippi$12,324—
#47Oklahoma$12,162—
#48Arizona$12,003—
#49Utah$11,347—
#50Idaho$11,060—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

North Carolina · state comparison

Are students finishing school?

The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.

North Carolina · 2021–2286%
North Carolina rank#25among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark87%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Federal public-school cohort graduation rate

Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.

Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

North Carolina
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history in North Carolina78.8%84%89.2%2011–122021–22
2021–22 · North Carolina: 86% · Rank #25 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 87% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
North Carolina Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
PeriodNorth CarolinaCompare
2011–1280%
2012–1383%
2013–1484%
2014–1586%
2015–1686%
2016–1787%
2017–1886%
2018–1987%
2019–2088%
2020–2187%
2021–2286%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 77%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

North Carolina · 86%2021–22 · Rank #25 of 48, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare North Carolina with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2021–22 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1West Virginia91%—
#2Iowa90%—
#2Kentucky90%—
#2Massachusetts90%—
#2Missouri90%—
#2Tennessee90%—
#2Texas90%—
#2Wisconsin90%—
#9Connecticut89%—
#9Kansas89%—
#9Mississippi89%—
#9Virginia89%—
#13Alabama88%—
#13Arkansas88%—
#13Delaware88%—
#13Indiana88%—
#13New Hampshire88%—
#13Utah88%—
#19California87%—
#19Florida87%—
#19Illinois87%—
#19Nebraska87%—
#19New York87%—
#19Pennsylvania87%—
#25Hawaii86%—
#25Maine86%—
#25Maryland86%—
#25Montana86%—
#25North Carolina · your comparison86%—
#25Ohio86%—
#31New Jersey85%—
#31North Dakota85%—
#33Georgia84%—
#33Minnesota84%—
#33South Carolina84%—
#33Washington84%—
#37Louisiana83%—
#37Rhode Island83%—
#37Vermont83%—
#40Colorado82%—
#40Nevada82%—
#40South Dakota82%—
#40Wyoming82%—
#44Michigan81%—
#44Oregon81%—
#46Idaho80%—
#47Alaska78%—
#48Arizona77%—
—New MexicoNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—OklahomaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Four-year public-school graduation rate

87.7%2024–25 school year

Share of the 2021–22 entering ninth-grade cohort that graduated within four years under North Carolina's accountability methodology.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Official student-group rates

Economically disadvantaged students
83.3%
English learners
71.8%
Students with disabilities
72.6%
Method and limitations

North Carolina Department of Public Instruction statewide cohort-graduation reporting.

  • This is a cohort outcome, not a measure of academic proficiency, postsecondary readiness, or school quality by itself.
  • Subgroup differences do not establish the cause of an outcome.
North Carolina · state comparison

College costs, attendance, and earnings

Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.

North Carolina · 2022–23$7,327
North Carolina rank#44among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Public four-year in-state tuition and fees

Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.

2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

North Carolina · $7,3272022–23 · Rank #44 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont$17,600—
#2New Hampshire$17,019—
#3Pennsylvania$16,217—
#4Connecticut$15,763—
#5New Jersey$15,265—
#6Illinois$14,921—
#7Virginia$14,825—
#8Rhode Island$14,744—
#9Michigan$14,718—
#10Massachusetts$14,345—
#11Minnesota$12,873—
#12South Carolina$12,604—
#13Oregon$12,424—
#14Delaware$11,922—
#15Arizona$11,768—
#16Kentucky$11,299—
#17Alabama$11,081—
#18Ohio$10,922—
#19Maine$10,813—
#20Hawaii$10,484—
#21Tennessee$10,437—
#22Iowa$10,121—
#23Maryland$10,041—
#24Missouri$9,926—
#25Indiana$9,886—
#26Louisiana$9,843—
#27Colorado$9,798—
#28North Dakota$9,728—
#29Kansas$9,274—
#30Mississippi$9,120—
#31South Dakota$9,079—
#32Wisconsin$8,974—
#33Arkansas$8,879—
#34Nebraska$8,862—
#35West Virginia$8,715—
#36California$8,637—
#37New York$8,575—
#38Oklahoma$8,519—
#39Alaska$8,291—
#40Texas$8,195—
#41Washington$8,006—
#42Idaho$7,640—
#43New Mexico$7,526—
#44North Carolina · your comparison$7,327—
#45Montana$7,299—
#46Utah$7,215—
#47Georgia$7,075—
#48Nevada$6,723—
#49Wyoming$5,100—
#50Florida$4,540—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s North Carolina candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

84 statements from 25 candidates

2026 North Carolina U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Don Davis

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · NC

Schools & education

Expand support for schools serving eastern North Carolina.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Schools

Candidate campaign source

Expand support for schools serving eastern North Carolina.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Don Davis — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Don Davis
Schools & education

Passed state legislation providing funding for rural schools.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Rural Schools

Candidate campaign source

Passed state legislation providing funding for rural schools.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Don Davis — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 North Carolina U.S. House — District 10 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Pat Harrigan

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 10 · NC

Schools & education

We cannot hope to secure the bright future of tomorrow if we cannot secure our communities today. We must make respect for the rule of law a priority in our society. That starts with bringing federal law and state law into congruence and promoting personal responsibility through real consequences. A…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: It’s All About Opportunity

Candidate campaign source

We cannot hope to secure the bright future of tomorrow if we cannot secure our communities today. We must make respect for the rule of law a priority in our society. That starts with bringing federal law and state law into congruence and promoting personal responsibility through real consequences. And it is implemented by promoting policy and investment that adequately resources our police—not by defunding the police. And we must secure our schools.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Pat Harrigan — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
View 1 more statement from Pat Harrigan
Schools & education

There is no greater gift in life than a sound education. Unacceptably, falling test scores, grade-behind reading levels, and ideological indoctrination mark today’s public school experience for our children. We must give parents school-choice options today while elected officials at the state level …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: It’s All About Opportunity

Candidate campaign source

There is no greater gift in life than a sound education. Unacceptably, falling test scores, grade-behind reading levels, and ideological indoctrination mark today’s public school experience for our children. We must give parents school-choice options today while elected officials at the state level revamp our public school systems. Our children’s futures cannot wait on government solutions that are distant years off.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Pat Harrigan — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

Steven Feldman

2 statements

Libertarian · U.S. House District 10 · NC

Schools & education

End Federal College Subsidies and Encourage Online Higher Education

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: My Positions

Candidate campaign source

End Federal College Subsidies and Encourage Online Higher Education

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Steven Feldman — Part 62 source ↗
View 1 more statement from Steven Feldman
Schools & education

Expand Career and Technical Education Opportunities

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: My Positions

Candidate campaign source

Expand Career and Technical Education Opportunities

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Steven Feldman — Part 62 source ↗

2026 North Carolina U.S. House — District 11 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Jamie Ager

3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 11 · NC

Schools & education

As a small farmer, I believe that US agriculture should promote small farmers doing entrepreneurial agriculture. Creating a farming system that creates healthy food that people can afford means we are making the world a better place. At Hickory Nut Gap, we partnered with the NC Department of Agricul…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Supporting Local Farms and a Healthy Food System

Candidate campaign source

As a small farmer, I believe that US agriculture should promote small farmers doing entrepreneurial agriculture. Creating a farming system that creates healthy food that people can afford means we are making the world a better place. At Hickory Nut Gap, we partnered with the NC Department of Agriculture to get local grass-fed beef into local schools in our region. This can be done!

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jamie Ager — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from Jamie Ager
Schools & education

We need more housing for owners and renters. I’ll support programs for first time home buyers and public service employees like teachers, firefighters, and first responders.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Lowering Costs

Candidate campaign source

We need more housing for owners and renters. I’ll support programs for first time home buyers and public service employees like teachers, firefighters, and first responders.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jamie Ager — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

I’ll support teaching personal finance in schools so our kids know how to save and invest their hard earned dollars.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Lowering Costs

Candidate campaign source

I’ll support teaching personal finance in schools so our kids know how to save and invest their hard earned dollars.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jamie Ager — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 5
How statements are selected

This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published North Carolina candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

North Carolina incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current North Carolina legislators and North Carolina’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from North Carolina’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

41 matching sponsorships or proposals · 33 North Carolina incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Alma S. Adams

U.S. representative for North Carolina, District 12 · D–NC

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Alma S. Adams
U.S. Congress · North Carolina delegation · H.Con.Res.42

Recognizing the significance of equal pay and the disparity in wages paid to men and to Black women.

Jul 10, 2025 · Introduced

Rep. Alma S. Adams · Sponsored

FactVote summary

The concurrent resolution recognizes the wage disparity between Black women and White, non-Hispanic men and its effects on women, families, and the United States. It reaffirms support for equal pay for equal work and reducing the gender wage gap.

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's median household income.

Retained North Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

DeSaulnier) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and WorkforceCONCURRENT RESOLUTIONRecognizing the significance of equal pay and the disparity in wages paid to men and to Black women.Whereas July 10, 2025, is Black Women’s Equal Pay Day, a day of observance of the wage gap between working Black women and working White, non-Hispanic men;Whereas section 6(d) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(d)) (commonly known as the Equal Pay Act of…
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · North Carolina delegation · H.R.3527

Real Education and Access for Healthy Youth Act of 2025

May 21, 2025 · Introduced

Rep. Alma S. Adams · Sponsored

FactVote summary

The bill would establish competitive grants for sex education at elementary and secondary schools and youth-serving organizations, institutions of higher education, and educator training, as well as grants supporting youth-friendly sexual health services for underserved young people. Grants would generally last 5 years. It would authorize $100,000,000 annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2031, transfer unobligated abstinence-only program funds, repeal that program, and require grantee reports, annual Secretary reports for 5 years, and a publicly available evaluation report within 6 years of enactment.

Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion-related services, or reproductive-health policy. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's reported resident-abortion count.

Retained North Carolina evidence context: Abortions reported for North Carolina residents. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Definitions In this Act: (1) Age and developmentally appropriate The term age and developmentally appropriate means topics, messages, and teaching methods suitable to particular ages, age groups, or developmental levels, based on cognitive, emotional, social, and behavioral capacity of most young people at that age level. (2) Consent The term consent means affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in interpersonal, physical, or sexual activity. (3) Culturally responsive The term culturally…
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Amos L. Quick, III

North Carolina House · District 58 · D–NC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Amos L. Quick, III
North Carolina Legislature · HB 182

Guilford Co. Bd. of Ed/Nonpartisan Election.

Mar 20, 2019 · Re-ref Com On Elections and Ethics Law

Rep. Amos L. Quick, III · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

AN ACT TO CHANGE THE METHOD OF ELECTION FOR MEMBERS OF THE GUILFORD COUNTY BOAR D OF EDUCATION FROM PARTISAN TO NONPARTISAN. 4

The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on March 20, 2019: Re-ref Com On Elections and Ethics Law.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses voter registration, ballots, voting access, or election administration. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed turnout rate.

Retained North Carolina evidence context: Eligible-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

AN ACT TO CHANGE THE METHOD OF ELECTION FOR MEMBERS OF THE GUILFORD COUNTY BOAR D OF EDUCATION FROM PARTISAN TO NONPARTISAN. 4
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Becky Carney

North Carolina House · District 102 · D–NC

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Becky Carney
North Carolina Legislature · HB 136

Arts High School Diploma Endorsement.

Mar 8, 2023 · Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

Rep. Kyle Hall · Sponsored / Rep. Becky Carney · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill would rEQUIRE TH E STATE BOARD OF EDU CATION TO CREATE AN ARTS PROFICIENCY HIGH SCH OOL DIPLOMA ENDORSEM ENT AND TO MAKE VARIOUS CONFORMING C HANGES. 4.

The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on March 8, 2023: Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses high-school completion, diploma requirements, dropout prevention, or career and technical education. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's four-year graduation rate.

Retained North Carolina evidence context: Four-year public-school graduation rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Arts High School Diploma Endorsement.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
North Carolina Legislature · HB 394

Delay CMS Board Elections/Census Delay.

Mar 25, 2021 · Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

Rep. Mary Belk · Sponsored / Rep. Becky Carney · Sponsored / Rep. Nasif Majeed · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill would aUTHORIZE THE DELAY OF THE 202 ELECTIONS FOR THE CHARLOTTE - MECKLENBUR G BOARD OF EDUCATION IF CENSUS DATA IS N OT AVAILABLE TO THE BOA RD OF EDUCATION BY A DATE CERTAIN. 4.

The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on March 25, 2021: Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses voter registration, ballots, voting access, or election administration. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed turnout rate.

Retained North Carolina evidence context: Eligible-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE THE DELAY OF THE 202 ELECTIONS FOR THE CHARLOTTE - MECKLENBUR G BOARD OF EDUCATION IF CENSUS DATA IS N OT AVAILABLE TO THE BOA RD OF EDUCATION BY A DATE CERTAIN. 4
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. David Willis

North Carolina House · District 68 · R–NC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. David Willis
North Carolina Legislature · HB 118

Buncombe School Bd. Election.

Nov 29, 2021 · Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

Rep. David Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Dean Arp · Sponsored / Rep. Mark Brody · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill would pROVIDE TH AT SIX MEMBERS OF TH E BUNCOMBE COUNTY BO ARD OF EDUCATION BE ELEC TED BY ELIGIBLE VOTE RS FROM THE DISTRICT THOSE MEMBERS REPRES ENT. 4.

The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on November 29, 2021: Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses voter registration, ballots, voting access, or election administration. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed turnout rate.

Retained North Carolina evidence context: Eligible-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Buncombe School Bd. Election.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Dean Arp

North Carolina House · District 69 · R–NC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Dean Arp
North Carolina Legislature · HB 118

Buncombe School Bd. Election.

Nov 29, 2021 · Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

Rep. David Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Dean Arp · Sponsored / Rep. Mark Brody · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill would pROVIDE TH AT SIX MEMBERS OF TH E BUNCOMBE COUNTY BO ARD OF EDUCATION BE ELEC TED BY ELIGIBLE VOTE RS FROM THE DISTRICT THOSE MEMBERS REPRES ENT. 4.

The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on November 29, 2021: Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses voter registration, ballots, voting access, or election administration. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed turnout rate.

Retained North Carolina evidence context: Eligible-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Buncombe School Bd. Election.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Deborah K. Ross

U.S. representative for North Carolina, District 2 · D–NC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Deborah K. Ross
U.S. Congress · North Carolina delegation · H.R.5528

America’s CHILDREN Act of 2025

Sep 19, 2025 · Introduced

Rep. Deborah K. Ross · Sponsored

FactVote summary

The bill would authorize lawful permanent resident status for certain college graduates who entered the United States as children. Applicants would need to be admissible, have been lawfully present as dependent children of specified employment-based nonimmigrants for at least eight years, have at least ten years of lawful presence when applying, and have graduated from a U.S. institution of higher education. It would also provide age-out protections, employment authorization for certain dependent children, and retention of priority dates.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses immigration status, immigrant services, asylum, deportation, or immigration enforcement. It does not update or establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed foreign-born population share.

Retained North Carolina evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Min) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryA BILLTo amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize lawful permanent resident status for certain college graduates who entered the United States as children, and for other purposes. 1.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current North Carolina officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a North Carolina statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.