North Carolina · individual fact

North Carolina prices and inflation

Compare North Carolina’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide North Carolina CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level94.32024 · #30 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level96.62024 · #23 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level81.42024 · #29 of 50 · highest first

North Carolina over time

Explore North Carolina readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. North Carolina officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a North Carolina effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a North Carolina change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level North Carolina · source units
North CarolinaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 94.390.395.7101North Carolina, 2014: 93.8North Carolina, 2015: 93.6North Carolina, 2016: 93.8North Carolina, 2017: 93North Carolina, 2018: 92.9North Carolina, 2019: 91.9North Carolina, 2020: 91.3North Carolina, 2021: 93.7North Carolina, 2022: 94North Carolina, 2023: 94.4North Carolina, 2024: 94.3201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 44National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNorth Carolina · North Carolina approves its original carbon-plan and rate framework · 2021-10-13NC original carbon-plan lawNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNorth Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 7: January winter-storm emergency and transportation waivers · 2025-01-09NC Order 7North Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 9: February winter-storm emergency and transportation waivers · 2025-02-18NC Order 9North Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 10: Child Care and Early Education Task Force · 2025-03-10NC Order 10North Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 12: Western North Carolina wildfire emergency · 2025-03-26NC Order 12National context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNorth Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 14: Extension of the western wildfire emergency · 2025-04-24NC Order 14North Carolina · Governor Stein vetoes North Carolina’s Power Bill Reduction Act · 2025-07-02SB 266 governor vetoNorth Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 18: Chantal and central North Carolina severe-weather emergency · 2025-07-16NC Order 18North Carolina · North Carolina enacts SB 266 after overriding the governor’s veto · 2025-07-29SB 266 veto overrideNorth Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 20: Hurricane Erin statewide emergency and transportation waivers · 2025-08-19NC Order 20North Carolina · North Carolina ends Order 20’s Erin emergency measures at noon · 2025-08-26NC Order 22North Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 23: Energy Policy Task Force for growing electricity demand · 2025-08-26NC Order 23North Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 26: Emergency declaration and temporary transport waivers for Tropical Depression Nine · 2025-09-27NC Order 26National context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNorth Carolina · North Carolina ends Order 26’s Imelda emergency measures · 2025-10-06NC Order 28North Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 31: Emergency declaration and temporary transport waivers for the forecast January 2026 winter storm · 2026-01-21NC Order 31National context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shockNorth Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 36: Housing supply, affordability and construction-workforce coordination · 2026-05-19NC Order 36North Carolina · North Carolina issues Order 39: North Carolina Health Care Affordability Commission · 2026-06-30NC Order 39● North Carolina Legislature · 7● U.S. Congress · North Carolina delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 15■ North Carolina agencies · 12005-08-012026-06-30

23 of 23 reviewed North Carolina actions match · 23 date markers shown. 44 major events shown separately.

North Carolina · 2024: 94.3 · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare North Carolina with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
North Carolina All-items price level · source units
PeriodNorth CarolinaRankU.S. benchmark
202494.3#30 of 50100
202394.4#27 of 50100
202294#27 of 50100
202193.7#28 of 50100
202091.3#38 of 50100
201991.9#39 of 50100
201892.9#30 of 50100
201793#33 of 50100
201693.8#31 of 50100
201593.6#32 of 50100
201493.8#30 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

North Carolina · state comparison

How does North Carolina’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

North Carolina · 202494.3
North Carolina rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare North Carolina with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

North Carolina
All-items price level history in North Carolina9095.7101.320142024
2024 · North Carolina: 94.3 · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
North Carolina All-items price level history
PeriodNorth CarolinaCompare
201493.8
201593.6
201693.8
201793
201892.9
201991.9
202091.3
202193.7
202294
202394.4
202494.3

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

North Carolina · 94.32024 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina · your comparison94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

North Carolina · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

North Carolina · 20242.5%
North Carolina rank#29among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

North Carolina
Annual change in regional price deflator history in North Carolina-1.1%3.4%7.9%20152024
2024 · North Carolina: 2.5% · Rank #29 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
North Carolina Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodNorth CarolinaCompare
2015-0.1%
20161.2%
20170.9%
20181.9%
20190.3%
20200.5%
20216.8%
20226.9%
20234.2%
20242.5%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

North Carolina · 2.5%2024 · Rank #29 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina · your comparison2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

North Carolina · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

North Carolina · 2024$56,310
North Carolina rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

North Carolina
Real personal income per person history in North Carolina$41.49K$51.59K$61.7K20142024
2024 · North Carolina: $56,310 · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
North Carolina Real personal income per person history
PeriodNorth CarolinaCompare
2014$43,820
2015$45,796
2016$46,302
2017$47,646
2018$48,676
2019$50,966
2020$54,346
2021$56,146
2022$54,204
2023$54,748
2024$56,310

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. North Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. North Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

North Carolina · $56,3102024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare North Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina · your comparison$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s North Carolina candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

26 statements from 13 candidates

2026 North Carolina U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Laurie Buckhout

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · NC

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Cut taxes and pursue policies that reduce the cost of living for eastern North Carolina families.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes and Costs

Candidate campaign source

Cut taxes and pursue policies that reduce the cost of living for eastern North Carolina families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Laurie Buckhout — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Laurie Buckhout
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Families in Eastern North Carolina need a champion to fight for lower costs, better jobs, a stronger economy, and lower healthcare costs. For more than a century, Democrats have made empty promises and delivered nothing. Laurie will fight to cut taxes so hardworking families can get ahead. Eastern N…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: TURNING OUR Economy AROUND

Candidate campaign source

Families in Eastern North Carolina need a champion to fight for lower costs, better jobs, a stronger economy, and lower healthcare costs. For more than a century, Democrats have made empty promises and delivered nothing. Laurie will fight to cut taxes so hardworking families can get ahead. Eastern North Carolina Families deserve a fighter who will work to pass policies that directly impact their pocketbooks and reduce their cost of living. Laurie Buckhout is that fighter.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Laurie Buckhout — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 North Carolina U.S. House — District 12 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Alma S. Adams

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 12 · NC

CPI / inflation mention

Alma will also work to increase the availability of affordable child care services. She will always ensure American workers are given a fair chance to succeed in today’s economy. She is a strong proponent of raising the minimum wage and indexing it to inflation so that people who work for a living a…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: “As a proud parent, I know how tough it can be balancing work and family responsibilities. We must do more to help our working families succeed both at work and at home.” – Alma Adams

Candidate campaign source

Alma will also work to increase the availability of affordable child care services. She will always ensure American workers are given a fair chance to succeed in today’s economy. She is a strong proponent of raising the minimum wage and indexing it to inflation so that people who work for a living are less likely to live in poverty.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alma S. Adams — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Alma S. Adams
CPI / inflation mention

Alma has always been a strong advocate for the middle class. A strong middle class means a stronger American economy. She supports giving more tax cuts to the middle class and raising the minimum wage – indexing it to the rate of inflation. By putting more money in the hands of hard-working American…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy and jobs

Candidate campaign source

Alma has always been a strong advocate for the middle class. A strong middle class means a stronger American economy. She supports giving more tax cuts to the middle class and raising the minimum wage – indexing it to the rate of inflation. By putting more money in the hands of hard-working Americans, companies can sell more products, appliances, cars, and other items that will continue to spur our economic growth.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alma S. Adams — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 North Carolina U.S. House — District 13 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 4 statements

Brad Knott

4 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 13 · NC

CPI / inflation mention

Joe Biden and his far-left allies in Congress walloped the poor and the middle class with devastating inflation. His torrent of wasteful spending gave us two trillion-dollar deficits, undercut the value of the dollar, and brought on high-interest rates. It’s time to cut spending and carefully scruti…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: ENDING WASTEFUL SPENDING

Candidate campaign source

Joe Biden and his far-left allies in Congress walloped the poor and the middle class with devastating inflation. His torrent of wasteful spending gave us two trillion-dollar deficits, undercut the value of the dollar, and brought on high-interest rates. It’s time to cut spending and carefully scrutinize every spending bill to make cuts. I support a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Brad Knott — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 3 more statements from Brad Knott
CPI / inflation mention

Inflation Ending Wasteful SpendingJoe Biden and his far-left allies in Congress walloped the poor and the middle class with devastating inflation. Their torrent of wasteful spending gave us two trillion-dollar deficits, undercut the value of the dollar, and brought high-interest rates. It’s time to …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Brad fights for the hardworking people here in North Carolina.

Candidate campaign source

Inflation Ending Wasteful SpendingJoe Biden and his far-left allies in Congress walloped the poor and the middle class with devastating inflation. Their torrent of wasteful spending gave us two trillion-dollar deficits, undercut the value of the dollar, and brought high-interest rates. It’s time to cut spending and carefully scrutinize every spending bill to make cuts. I support a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Brad Knott — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
CPI / inflation mention

ENDING WASTEFUL SPENDING Joe Biden and his far-left allies in Congress walloped the poor and the middle class with devastating inflation. His torrent of wasteful spending gave us two trillion-dollar deficits, undercut the value of the dollar, and brought on high-interest rates. It’s time to cut spen…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: SUPPORTING SCHOOL CHOICE

Candidate campaign source

ENDING WASTEFUL SPENDING Joe Biden and his far-left allies in Congress walloped the poor and the middle class with devastating inflation. His torrent of wasteful spending gave us two trillion-dollar deficits, undercut the value of the dollar, and brought on high-interest rates. It’s time to cut spending and carefully scrutinize every spending bill to make cuts. I support a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Brad Knott — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
CPI / inflation mention

Joe Biden and his far-left allies in Congress walloped the poor and the middle class with devastating inflation. Their torrent of wasteful spending gave us two trillion-dollar deficits, undercut the value of the dollar, and brought high-interest rates. It’s time to cut spending and carefully scrutin…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Brad fights for the hardworking people here in North Carolina.

Candidate campaign source

Joe Biden and his far-left allies in Congress walloped the poor and the middle class with devastating inflation. Their torrent of wasteful spending gave us two trillion-dollar deficits, undercut the value of the dollar, and brought high-interest rates. It’s time to cut spending and carefully scrutinize every spending bill to make cuts. I support a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Brad Knott — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 4
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published North Carolina candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

North Carolina incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current North Carolina legislators and North Carolina’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from North Carolina’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

12 matching sponsorships or proposals · 12 North Carolina incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Donny Lambeth

North Carolina House · District 75 · R–NC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Donny Lambeth
North Carolina Legislature · HB 259

2023 Appropriations Act.

Oct 3, 2023 · Enacted · Session Law 2023-134

Rep. Donny Lambeth · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The 2023 budget law clarified the inputs and timing used in North Carolina's annual motor-fuel excise-tax formula.

HB 259 became Session Law 2023-134 on October 3, 2023.

Why this record is included

Section 42.22 of HB 259 clarified which state-population period and monthly federal energy index feed North Carolina's annual motor-fuel tax calculation, retroactive to 2017. The provision directly governs a tax included in North Carolina retail gasoline prices, but it neither sets the non-tax components of pump prices nor explains EIA's six-state regional average.

Retained North Carolina evidence context: Lower Atlantic regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The enacted budget includes a section titled 'Clarification of Motor Fuel Tax Formula' that amends G.S. 105-449.80 and preserves the 75% population and 25% energy-index weighting.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Erin Paré

North Carolina House · District 37 · R–NC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Erin Paré
North Carolina Legislature · HB 837

Study Alternative Methods for Highway Funding.

Jul 3, 2025 · In House Transportation Committee

Rep. Erin Paré · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 837 proposed a study of highway-funding alternatives that could supplement or replace North Carolina's reliance on gasoline-tax revenue.

The House re-referred HB 837 to the Transportation Committee on July 3, 2025, with additional referrals if favorable.

Why this record is included

HB 837 would direct a consultant study of highway-funding methods that supplement or replace North Carolina's predominant reliance on the gas tax, including an annual vehicle access fee in lieu of state gas-tax payments. It is connected to the long-term role of gasoline taxes but is only a study proposal, does not change the current per-gallon rate, and remained in committee.

Retained North Carolina evidence context: Lower Atlantic regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The filed bill says the study would examine alternatives to a system relying predominantly on the gas tax, including an annual access-user fee in lieu of state gas-tax payments.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Hugh Blackwell

North Carolina House · District 86 · R–NC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Hugh Blackwell
North Carolina Legislature · HB 475

Revise Certain Ballot & 48-Hour Report Reqs.

Jun 8, 2023 · Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

Rep. Hugh Blackwell · Sponsored / Rep. Neal Jackson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill would rEQUIRE TH AT PARTY DESIGNATION S ON OFFICIAL BALLOT S BE PRINTED IN ITALICS A ND TEN - POINT FONT SI ZE, TO RAISE THE THR ESHOLD AMOUNT THAT TRIGGERS THE FORTY - EIGHT - HOU R REPORT, WITH AUTOMATIC ADJUSTMENT S FOR INFLATION, UND ER CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS; and WAIVE T HE FORTY - EIGHT - HOUR REPORTING REQUIREMEN T FOR CANDIDATES WHO A RE UNOPPOSED DURING A PRIMARY ELECTION. 7.

The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on June 8, 2023: Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses voter registration, ballots, voting access, or election administration. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed turnout rate.

Retained North Carolina evidence context: Eligible-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

AN ACT TO REQUIRE TH AT PARTY DESIGNATION S ON OFFICIAL BALLOT S BE PRINTED IN ITALICS A ND TEN - POINT FONT SI ZE, TO RAISE THE THR ESHOLD AMOUNT THAT TRIGGERS THE FORTY - EIGHT - HOU R REPORT, WITH AUTOMATIC ADJUSTMENT S FOR INFLATION, UND ER CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS, AND TO WAIVE T HE FORTY - EIGHT - HOUR REPORTING REQUIREMEN T FOR CANDIDATES WHO A RE UNOPPOSED DURING A PRIMARY ELECTION. 7
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Neal Jackson

North Carolina House · District 78 · R–NC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Neal Jackson
North Carolina Legislature · HB 475

Revise Certain Ballot & 48-Hour Report Reqs.

Jun 8, 2023 · Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

Rep. Hugh Blackwell · Sponsored / Rep. Neal Jackson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill would rEQUIRE TH AT PARTY DESIGNATION S ON OFFICIAL BALLOT S BE PRINTED IN ITALICS A ND TEN - POINT FONT SI ZE, TO RAISE THE THR ESHOLD AMOUNT THAT TRIGGERS THE FORTY - EIGHT - HOU R REPORT, WITH AUTOMATIC ADJUSTMENT S FOR INFLATION, UND ER CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS; and WAIVE T HE FORTY - EIGHT - HOUR REPORTING REQUIREMEN T FOR CANDIDATES WHO A RE UNOPPOSED DURING A PRIMARY ELECTION. 7.

The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on June 8, 2023: Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses voter registration, ballots, voting access, or election administration. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's displayed turnout rate.

Retained North Carolina evidence context: Eligible-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

AN ACT TO REQUIRE TH AT PARTY DESIGNATION S ON OFFICIAL BALLOT S BE PRINTED IN ITALICS A ND TEN - POINT FONT SI ZE, TO RAISE THE THR ESHOLD AMOUNT THAT TRIGGERS THE FORTY - EIGHT - HOU R REPORT, WITH AUTOMATIC ADJUSTMENT S FOR INFLATION, UND ER CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS, AND TO WAIVE T HE FORTY - EIGHT - HOUR REPORTING REQUIREMEN T FOR CANDIDATES WHO A RE UNOPPOSED DURING A PRIMARY ELECTION. 7
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Bill Rabon

North Carolina Senate · District 8 · R–NC

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Bill Rabon
North Carolina Legislature · SB 20

IRC Update/Motor Fuel Tax Changes.

Mar 31, 2015 · Enacted · Session Law 2015-2

Sen. Bill Rabon · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 20 reduced North Carolina's motor-fuel tax in scheduled steps and created the annual population-and-energy-index formula that took effect in 2017.

SB 20 became Session Law 2015-2 on March 31, 2015.

Why this record is included

SB 20 lowered North Carolina's motor-fuel excise tax in scheduled steps during 2015 and 2016, then established the population-and-energy-index formula used for annual rates beginning in 2017. Because EIA's retail gasoline estimate includes taxes, the formula directly governs a North Carolina component of prices within the Lower Atlantic region; the law does not establish or explain the full regional market price.

Retained North Carolina evidence context: Lower Atlantic regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The enacted law set flat per-gallon rates for 2015 and 2016 and established an annual formula using state-population change and the energy component of the Consumer Price Index.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Caleb Theodros

North Carolina Senate · District 41 · D–NC

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Caleb Theodros
North Carolina Legislature · SB 525

Living Wage Guarantee Act.

Mar 26, 2025 · Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

Sen. Caleb Theodros · Sponsored / Sen. Joyce Waddell · Sponsored / Sen. Val Applewhite · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill would eSTABLISH A STATE MINIMUM WAGE OF FIFTEEN DOLLARS PER HOUR, INCORPORATE AU TOMATIC INFLATION AD JUSTMENTS, AND ENSUR E ECONOMIC STABILITY F OR WORKERS IN NORTH CAROLINA. 4.

The latest official North Carolina General Assembly record shows this action on March 26, 2025: Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development. It does not establish an effect on North Carolina's median household income.

Retained North Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

AN ACT TO ESTABLISH A STATE MINIMUM WAGE OF FIFTEEN DOLLARS PER HOUR, INCORPORATE AU TOMATIC INFLATION AD JUSTMENTS, AND ENSUR E ECONOMIC STABILITY F OR WORKERS IN NORTH CAROLINA. 4
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current North Carolina officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a North Carolina statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.