New Mexico · individual fact

New Mexico energy and electricity

Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.

Residential electricity price14.2¢/kWh2024 · #30 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.605/gal2026-08 · #43 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$92.882024 · #50 of 50 · highest first

New Mexico over time

Explore New Mexico readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. New Mexico officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a New Mexico effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a New Mexico change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Residential electricity price New Mexico · source units
New MexicoPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Residential electricity price2024: 14.2¢/kWh11.03¢/kWh14.25¢/kWh17.48¢/kWhNew Mexico, 2015: 12.47¢/kWhNew Mexico, 2016: 12.03¢/kWhNew Mexico, 2017: 12.88¢/kWhNew Mexico, 2018: 12.68¢/kWhNew Mexico, 2019: 12.51¢/kWhNew Mexico, 2020: 12.94¢/kWhNew Mexico, 2021: 13.52¢/kWhNew Mexico, 2022: 13.84¢/kWhNew Mexico, 2023: 13.85¢/kWhNew Mexico, 2024: 14.2¢/kWh201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 51National context · Energy Policy Act expands federal energy programs · 2005-08-08Energy Policy ActNational context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Energy law strengthens fuel economy, biofuels and efficiency · 2007-12-19Fuel / efficiency lawNational context · Global oil and energy prices surge · 2008-07-15Oil-price surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Recovery Act funds grid modernization and clean energy · 2009-02-17Recovery Act energyNational context · EPA signs greenhouse-gas endangerment finding · 2009-12-07GHG findingNational context · Deepwater Horizon explosion and oil spill · 2010-04-20Deepwater HorizonNational context · Fukushima accident prompts U.S. nuclear safety response · 2011-03-11Fukushima safetyNational context · Global demand and Middle East unrest pressure oil prices · 2011-04-112011 oil pressuresNational context · Hurricane Sandy disrupts electricity and fuel distribution · 2012-10-29Hurricane SandyNational context · Polar vortex strains gas supplies and power systems · 2014-01-07Polar vortexNational context · Oil supply growth and OPEC decision deepen price collapse · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Clean Power Plan announced; implementation later stayed · 2015-08-03Clean Power PlanNational context · Congress lifts longstanding crude-oil export restrictions · 2015-12-18Crude export rulesNational context · First LNG export cargo from the Lower 48 · 2016-02-24Lower 48 LNG exportsNational context · Shale development transforms U.S. oil supply · 2016-03-15Shale expansionNational context · Natural gas overtakes coal in annual electricity generation · 2016-12-31Gas overtakes coalNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · Attacks on Saudi oil facilities interrupt global supply · 2019-09-14Saudi oil attacksNational context · United States becomes an annual net total energy exporter · 2019-12-31Net energy exporterNational context · COVID-19 sharply reduces energy demand · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Expiring WTI oil futures settle below zero · 2020-04-20Negative WTI futuresNational context · Western heat wave leads to California rotating outages · 2020-08-14California outagesNational context · OPEC+ supply cuts help rebalance the pandemic oil market · 2020-09-23OPEC+ supply cutsNational context · Severe winter weather disrupts Texas and regional energy systems · 2021-02-08Winter Storm UriNational context · Cyberattack interrupts Colonial Pipeline fuel deliveries · 2021-05-07Colonial PipelineNational context · Infrastructure law funds grid and energy projects · 2021-11-15Infrastructure energyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Large Strategic Petroleum Reserve release announced · 2022-03-31SPR releaseNational context · Freeport LNG fire shuts a major export terminal · 2022-06-08Freeport LNG outageNational context · Inflation Reduction Act expands energy incentives · 2022-08-16IRA energy incentivesNational context · Winter Storm Elliott disrupts gas and power supplies · 2022-12-21Winter Storm ElliottNational context · Renewables exceed coal in annual electric power sector generation · 2022-12-31Renewables pass coalNational context · Vogtle expansion adds new nuclear generation · 2023-07-31Vogtle nuclear unitsNational context · Red Sea attacks reroute oil and gas shipping · 2024-02-01Red Sea shippingNational context · EPA finalizes new power-plant greenhouse-gas rules · 2024-04-25Power-plant GHG ruleNational context · FERC adopts long-term regional transmission planning rule · 2024-05-13Transmission planningNational context · DOE report documents growing data-center electricity demand · 2024-12-20Data-center demandNational context · President declares energy emergency and directs policy changes · 2025-01-20Energy emergencyNational context · U.S. tariff announcement changes energy trade context · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · EPA proposes repeal of power-sector greenhouse-gas rules · 2025-06-11Power-rule proposalNational context · Tax law accelerates several energy-credit expirations · 2025-07-04Energy tax changesNational context · EPA finalizes endangerment and vehicle GHG standard rescission · 2026-02-12Vehicle GHG repealNational context · EPA announces repeal of 2024 power-plant air-toxics amendments · 2026-02-20Air-toxics amendmentsNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shockNational context · IEA members agree to emergency oil-stock release · 2026-03-11Emergency oil stocksNational context · FERC and NERC report improved winter grid preparedness · 2026-09-10Winter grid reviewNew Mexico · DOE selects Farmers’ Electric Cooperative, Inc. of New Mexico grid-upgrade application · 2026-09-24Farmers’ Electric Cooperative, Inc. of New Mexico · SPARK selectionNew Mexico · DOE selects Kit Carson Electric Cooperative, Inc. grid-upgrade application · 2026-09-24Kit Carson Electric Cooperative, Inc. · SPARK selectionNew Mexico · DOE selects Pitch Aeronautics Inc. grid-upgrade application · 2026-09-24Pitch Aeronautics Inc. · SPARK selection● New Mexico Legislature · 3● U.S. Congress · New Mexico delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ New Mexico agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-09-30

3 of 3 reviewed New Mexico actions match · 3 date markers shown. 51 major events shown separately.

New Mexico · 2024: 14.2¢/kWh · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside New Mexico, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
New Mexico Residential electricity price · source units
PeriodNew MexicoRankU.S. benchmark
202414.2¢/kWh#30 of 5016.48¢/kWh
202313.85¢/kWh#29 of 50Not available
202213.84¢/kWh#24 of 50Not available
202113.52¢/kWh#15 of 50Not available
202012.94¢/kWh#18 of 50Not available
201912.51¢/kWh#23 of 50Not available
201812.68¢/kWh#20 of 50Not available
201712.88¢/kWh#21 of 50Not available
201612.03¢/kWh#24 of 50Not available
201512.47¢/kWh#21 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

New Mexico · state comparison

Household energy prices

Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.

New Mexico · 202414.2¢/kWh
New Mexico rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential electricity price

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside New Mexico, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
Residential electricity price history in New Mexico11.36¢/kWh14.25¢/kWh17.15¢/kWh20152024
2024 · New Mexico: 14.2¢/kWh · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico Residential electricity price history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
201512.47¢/kWh
201612.03¢/kWh
201712.88¢/kWh
201812.68¢/kWh
201912.51¢/kWh
202012.94¢/kWh
202113.52¢/kWh
202213.84¢/kWh
202313.85¢/kWh
202414.2¢/kWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 14.2¢/kWh2024 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii42.86¢/kWh—
#2California31.97¢/kWh—
#3Massachusetts29.35¢/kWh—
#4Connecticut28.75¢/kWh—
#5Rhode Island28.65¢/kWh—
#6Alaska24.82¢/kWh—
#7New York24.43¢/kWh—
#8Maine24.29¢/kWh—
#9New Hampshire23.4¢/kWh—
#10Vermont21.9¢/kWh—
#11New Jersey19.34¢/kWh—
#12Michigan19.3¢/kWh—
#13Maryland17.86¢/kWh—
#14Pennsylvania17.77¢/kWh—
#15Wisconsin17.18¢/kWh—
#16Delaware16.57¢/kWh—
#17Ohio15.99¢/kWh—
#18Illinois15.87¢/kWh—
#19Minnesota15.45¢/kWh—
#20Alabama15.18¢/kWh—
#21West Virginia15.07¢/kWh—
#22Nevada15¢/kWh—
#23Texas14.94¢/kWh—
#24Colorado14.92¢/kWh—
#25Arizona14.91¢/kWh—
#26Indiana14.77¢/kWh—
#27Oregon14.7¢/kWh—
#28Virginia14.41¢/kWh—
#29South Carolina14.23¢/kWh—
#30New Mexico · your comparison14.2¢/kWh—
#31Kansas14.15¢/kWh—
#32Florida14.14¢/kWh—
#33North Carolina14.13¢/kWh—
#34Georgia14.08¢/kWh—
#35Iowa13.4¢/kWh—
#36Mississippi13.39¢/kWh—
#37Missouri12.91¢/kWh—
#38South Dakota12.86¢/kWh—
#39Kentucky12.79¢/kWh—
#40Montana12.66¢/kWh—
#41Wyoming12.47¢/kWh—
#42Tennessee12.42¢/kWh—
#43Arkansas12.32¢/kWh—
#44Oklahoma12.24¢/kWh—
#45Utah12.22¢/kWh—
#46Washington11.9¢/kWh—
#47Louisiana11.73¢/kWh—
#48Nebraska11.53¢/kWh—
#49Idaho11.52¢/kWh—
#50North Dakota11.51¢/kWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Gulf Coast regular gasoline price

$3.69/galWeek of September 7, 2026

Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's Gulf Coast region, including taxes. The region contains Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Texas.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Recent EIA observations

Prior week
$3.618/gal
Weekly change
+6.7¢
One year earlier
$2.733/gal
Change from one year earlier
+95.2¢
Method and limitations

FactVote uses EIA’s Gulf Coast series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes New Mexico. Changes are calculated from the published August 31, 2026 (prior week), and September 8, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.

  • EIA does not publish a current New Mexico statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This Gulf Coast regional estimate should not be read as New Mexico’s statewide average.
  • The regional average combines Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Texas, and does not represent the price at every station or in every New Mexico community.
  • Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
  • Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
New Mexico · state comparison

What are households paying for electricity?

Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.

New Mexico · 2024$92.88
New Mexico rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Average monthly residential electricity bill

State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.

Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
Average monthly residential electricity bill history in New Mexico$58.41$105.81$153.220102024
2024 · New Mexico: $92.88 · Rank #50 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico Average monthly residential electricity bill history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
2010$69.35
2011$73.57
2012$74.62
2013$76.56
2014$77.79
2015$79.23
2016$75.96
2017$79.16
2018$81.08
2019$80.04
2020$86.66
2021$87.31
2022$91.21
2023$91.2
2024$92.88

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · $92.882024 · Rank #50 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii$212.12—
#2Connecticut$199.66—
#3Alabama$173.5—
#4Massachusetts$167.2—
#5Maryland$165.87—
#6Texas$163.72—
#7Rhode Island$162.4—
#8California$160.86—
#9Arizona$160.24—
#10Florida$156.09—
#11Mississippi$154.83—
#12West Virginia$154.76—
#13Georgia$151.25—
#14Delaware$150.87—
#15South Carolina$149.51—
#16Virginia$148.77—
#17Pennsylvania$145.17—
#18New Hampshire$144.87—
#19Alaska$143.54—
#20North Carolina$143.5—
#21Tennessee$143.32—
#22Louisiana$140.96—
#23New York$139.53—
#24Nevada$139.39—
#25Ohio$135.16—
#26Kentucky$133.81—
#27Maine$133.6—
#28Indiana$133.06—
#29Oklahoma$132.05—
#30Oregon$129.62—
#31Missouri$129.18—
#32Arkansas$129.13—
#33New Jersey$128.13—
#34South Dakota$127.81—
#35Vermont$125.66—
#36Kansas$123.9—
#37Michigan$119.31—
#38North Dakota$118.38—
#39Washington$113.68—
#40Iowa$111.54—
#41Wisconsin$110.87—
#42Nebraska$110.28—
#43Minnesota$110.06—
#44Illinois$109.99—
#45Idaho$108.73—
#46Montana$107.91—
#47Wyoming$107.65—
#48Colorado$100.57—
#49Utah$94.57—
#50New Mexico · your comparison$92.88—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Mexico · state comparison

What generates New Mexico electricity?

Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.

New Mexico · 202440.5 TWh
New Mexico rank#36among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total electricity generation

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside New Mexico, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
Total electricity generation history in New Mexico31.4 TWh36.8 TWh42.1 TWh20152024
2024 · New Mexico: 40.5 TWh · Rank #36 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico Total electricity generation history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
201532.7 TWh
201632.9 TWh
201733.6 TWh
201832.7 TWh
201935.2 TWh
202034.1 TWh
202135.2 TWh
202240.9 TWh
202339.3 TWh
202440.5 TWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 40.5 TWh2024 · Rank #36 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas571.5 TWh—
#2Florida270.7 TWh—
#3California245.9 TWh—
#4Pennsylvania242.5 TWh—
#5Illinois186.7 TWh—
#6Ohio143.3 TWh—
#7Alabama142.9 TWh—
#8Georgia140.4 TWh—
#9North Carolina135.9 TWh—
#10New York133.5 TWh—
#11Michigan124.5 TWh—
#12Arizona121.5 TWh—
#13Virginia103.7 TWh—
#14Washington103 TWh—
#15South Carolina101.1 TWh—
#16Louisiana100 TWh—
#17Indiana97.4 TWh—
#18Oklahoma94.3 TWh—
#19Mississippi77.4 TWh—
#20Tennessee76.3 TWh—
#21Iowa70.9 TWh—
#22Missouri67.6 TWh—
#23Kentucky67.1 TWh—
#24Wisconsin65.6 TWh—
#25Oregon65.3 TWh—
#26New Jersey63.6 TWh—
#27Arkansas62.1 TWh—
#28Colorado60.8 TWh—
#29Minnesota59 TWh—
#30Kansas57.9 TWh—
#31West Virginia50.7 TWh—
#32Nevada47.6 TWh—
#33Connecticut46.2 TWh—
#34North Dakota42.6 TWh—
#35Wyoming40.7 TWh—
#36New Mexico · your comparison40.5 TWh—
#37Nebraska37.3 TWh—
#38Maryland36.9 TWh—
#39Utah36.1 TWh—
#40Montana27 TWh—
#41Massachusetts25 TWh—
#42South Dakota20.9 TWh—
#43Idaho20.3 TWh—
#44New Hampshire17.3 TWh—
#45Maine15.7 TWh—
#46Hawaii10.7 TWh—
#47Rhode Island10.1 TWh—
#48Alaska6.7 TWh—
#49Delaware5 TWh—
#50Vermont2.5 TWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Wind share of in-state electricity generation

37.4%2024

Wind generation as a share of electricity generated at New Mexico facilities, including estimated small-scale solar in the statewide denominator.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

EIA generation totals

Wind
15,135,568 MWh
Total, including small-scale solar
40,497,265 MWh

Other major shares

Natural gas
28.8%
Coal
20.8%
Solar
12.6%
Method and limitations

FactVote divides 15,135,568 MWh of wind generation from EIA Table 5 by 40,497,265.461 MWh: the Table 5 electric-industry total plus Table 19 estimated small-scale solar generation. Shares are rounded to one decimal place.

  • The shares are calculated from annual generation and rounded to one decimal; the displayed categories do not show every source.
  • In-state generation is not the same as electricity consumed in New Mexico because power crosses state lines.
New Mexico · state comparison

Affordability, reliability, emissions, and demand

Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.

New Mexico · 2024272.6 min/year
New Mexico rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Outage minutes per customer · all events

EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.

Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
Outage minutes per customer · all events history in New Mexico80 min/year409.3 min/year738.6 min/year20232024
2024 · New Mexico: 272.6 min/year · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico Outage minutes per customer · all events history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
2023156 min/year
2024272.6 min/year

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 272.6 min/year2024 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1South Carolina3,155 min/year—
#2Maine1,748.6 min/year—
#3Texas1,614.3 min/year—
#4North Carolina1,518.1 min/year—
#5Florida1,487.6 min/year—
#6Georgia1,208.1 min/year—
#7West Virginia1,165.5 min/year—
#8Virginia962.1 min/year—
#9Vermont895.8 min/year—
#10New Hampshire735.5 min/year—
#11Nebraska697.8 min/year—
#12Washington643.5 min/year—
#13Louisiana630.6 min/year—
#14Mississippi607.3 min/year—
#15Oregon579.3 min/year—
#16Kentucky537.7 min/year—
#17Arkansas527.8 min/year—
#18Ohio511 min/year—
#19Michigan481.7 min/year—
#20New York477.3 min/year—
#21Hawaii382.6 min/year—
#22Pennsylvania353.1 min/year—
#23Montana341.7 min/year—
#24Alaska323.2 min/year—
#25Indiana310 min/year—
#26Wisconsin296.8 min/year—
#27Kansas289.8 min/year—
#28Tennessee289.3 min/year—
#29California285 min/year—
#30New Mexico · your comparison272.6 min/year—
#31Colorado257 min/year—
#32Minnesota222.4 min/year—
#33Oklahoma220.7 min/year—
#34Missouri212.6 min/year—
#35Idaho204.4 min/year—
#36Iowa200.3 min/year—
#37Alabama197.7 min/year—
#38New Jersey173.3 min/year—
#39Nevada158.9 min/year—
#40Illinois158 min/year—
#41Connecticut152.8 min/year—
#42Wyoming137.8 min/year—
#43Maryland118.1 min/year—
#44Delaware117.9 min/year—
#45Utah115.4 min/year—
#46Rhode Island104.3 min/year—
#47Massachusetts103.7 min/year—
#48North Dakota102.7 min/year—
#49South Dakota85.6 min/year—
#50Arizona83.6 min/year—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Mexico · state comparison

Who uses energy?

Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.

New Mexico · 202498.1 trillion Btu
New Mexico rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential energy consumption

Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).

2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 98.1 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas1,514 trillion Btu—
#2Florida1,183.3 trillion Btu—
#3California1,147.1 trillion Btu—
#4New York968.3 trillion Btu—
#5Pennsylvania819.3 trillion Btu—
#6Illinois817.1 trillion Btu—
#7Ohio767.4 trillion Btu—
#8Georgia717.1 trillion Btu—
#9North Carolina662.2 trillion Btu—
#10Michigan661.4 trillion Btu—
#11New Jersey550.1 trillion Btu—
#12Virginia526 trillion Btu—
#13Tennessee492 trillion Btu—
#14Indiana475.6 trillion Btu—
#15Missouri459 trillion Btu—
#16Arizona413.7 trillion Btu—
#17Massachusetts379 trillion Btu—
#18Wisconsin375.9 trillion Btu—
#19South Carolina370.7 trillion Btu—
#20Maryland357.2 trillion Btu—
#21Minnesota346.2 trillion Btu—
#22Alabama331.6 trillion Btu—
#23Washington330.2 trillion Btu—
#24Kentucky319 trillion Btu—
#25Colorado311.9 trillion Btu—
#26Louisiana282.6 trillion Btu—
#27Connecticut235.3 trillion Btu—
#28Oklahoma231 trillion Btu—
#29Arkansas209.5 trillion Btu—
#30Utah190.7 trillion Btu—
#31Mississippi179.7 trillion Btu—
#32Oregon173.1 trillion Btu—
#33Kansas166.4 trillion Btu—
#34Iowa162 trillion Btu—
#35Nevada153.3 trillion Btu—
#36West Virginia141 trillion Btu—
#37Nebraska128.9 trillion Btu—
#38Idaho111.2 trillion Btu—
#39New Mexico · your comparison98.1 trillion Btu—
#40New Hampshire91.8 trillion Btu—
#41Maine80.5 trillion Btu—
#42Montana73.9 trillion Btu—
#43Delaware62.6 trillion Btu—
#44North Dakota61.3 trillion Btu—
#45Rhode Island61 trillion Btu—
#46Alaska49.1 trillion Btu—
#47Wyoming45.5 trillion Btu—
#48South Dakota44.2 trillion Btu—
#49Vermont32.7 trillion Btu—
#50Hawaii29.5 trillion Btu—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Mexico · state comparison

Energy-related carbon emissions

Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.

New Mexico · 202441.63 Mt CO₂
New Mexico rank#38among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total energy-related CO₂ emissions

Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.

2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 41.63 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #38 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas679.93 Mt CO₂—
#2California315.98 Mt CO₂—
#3Florida230.85 Mt CO₂—
#4Pennsylvania201.57 Mt CO₂—
#5Louisiana186.89 Mt CO₂—
#6Ohio186.34 Mt CO₂—
#7Illinois163.98 Mt CO₂—
#8New York163.69 Mt CO₂—
#9Indiana152.3 Mt CO₂—
#10Michigan143.11 Mt CO₂—
#11Georgia127.83 Mt CO₂—
#12North Carolina119.07 Mt CO₂—
#13Kentucky106.87 Mt CO₂—
#14Alabama104.32 Mt CO₂—
#15Virginia99.24 Mt CO₂—
#16Missouri98.03 Mt CO₂—
#17Tennessee90.46 Mt CO₂—
#18Oklahoma88.56 Mt CO₂—
#19New Jersey87.84 Mt CO₂—
#20Wisconsin85.12 Mt CO₂—
#21Arizona82.2 Mt CO₂—
#22Colorado79.57 Mt CO₂—
#23Minnesota77.89 Mt CO₂—
#24Washington73.81 Mt CO₂—
#25West Virginia72.28 Mt CO₂—
#26South Carolina70.81 Mt CO₂—
#27Iowa65.23 Mt CO₂—
#28Mississippi64.75 Mt CO₂—
#29Arkansas58.42 Mt CO₂—
#30Massachusetts58.07 Mt CO₂—
#31North Dakota55.15 Mt CO₂—
#32Kansas55.09 Mt CO₂—
#33Utah55.03 Mt CO₂—
#34Wyoming50 Mt CO₂—
#35Maryland48.77 Mt CO₂—
#36Alaska44.01 Mt CO₂—
#37Nebraska43.54 Mt CO₂—
#38New Mexico · your comparison41.63 Mt CO₂—
#39Nevada39.28 Mt CO₂—
#40Oregon38.94 Mt CO₂—
#41Connecticut37.09 Mt CO₂—
#42Montana27.16 Mt CO₂—
#43Idaho21.11 Mt CO₂—
#44Hawaii17.96 Mt CO₂—
#45Maine15.99 Mt CO₂—
#46South Dakota15.11 Mt CO₂—
#47New Hampshire13.6 Mt CO₂—
#48Delaware11.52 Mt CO₂—
#49Rhode Island11.05 Mt CO₂—
#50Vermont5.36 Mt CO₂—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s New Mexico candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

17 statements from 9 candidates

2026 New Mexico Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Sam Kane

1 statement

Republican · Attorney General · NM

Energy & electricity

New Mexico's land, water, and power grid are not for sale to out-of-state data center developers. Sam opposes the unchecked expansion of energy-hungry data centers that strain our resources and drive up costs for everyday New Mexicans — and will ensure any development is scrutinized under existing e…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public lands, energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

New Mexico's land, water, and power grid are not for sale to out-of-state data center developers. Sam opposes the unchecked expansion of energy-hungry data centers that strain our resources and drive up costs for everyday New Mexicans — and will ensure any development is scrutinized under existing environmental regulations before our natural resources, and our wallets, pay the price.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Sam Kane — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

2026 New Mexico Commissioner of Public Lands — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 6 statements

Juan Sanchez III

2 statements

Democratic · Commissioner of Public Lands · NM

Energy & electricity

New Mexico has some of the highest potential of all Western states for development and deployment of wind, solar, battery storage, and transmission. This build out also means some tough adjustments for our communities. The Eastern plains of New Mexico are now dotted with large wind farms, with more …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public lands, energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

New Mexico has some of the highest potential of all Western states for development and deployment of wind, solar, battery storage, and transmission. This build out also means some tough adjustments for our communities. The Eastern plains of New Mexico are now dotted with large wind farms, with more to come. Northwest and Central New Mexico are building solar fields spanning hundreds of acres. Transmission lines are fueling the increased power demand of the country. The Land Commissioner plays an important role in the future of renewable energy in New Mexico and Juan is dedicated to being a thoughtful partner with communities and companies to ensure those being impacted are brought to the table to advocate for family sustaining local jobs and investment in our people when siting new projects.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Juan Sanchez III — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Juan Sanchez III
Energy & electricity

Renewable Energy

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Juan's Priorities

Candidate campaign source

Renewable Energy

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Juan Sanchez III — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Michael Perry

4 statements

Republican · Commissioner of Public Lands · NM

Energy & electricity

He also recognizes the growing importance of renewable energy in New Mexico's future. As Land Commissioner, he will work to expand opportunities in wind, solar, and geothermal energy ensuring that New Mexico continues to lead the way in both traditional and renewable energy sectors.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Support for Energy, Agriculture, and Rural Economies

Candidate campaign source

He also recognizes the growing importance of renewable energy in New Mexico's future. As Land Commissioner, he will work to expand opportunities in wind, solar, and geothermal energy ensuring that New Mexico continues to lead the way in both traditional and renewable energy sectors.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Michael Perry — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 3 more statements from Michael Perry
Energy & electricity

Expand state-land opportunities for wind, solar, and geothermal energy development.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Renewable Energy

Candidate campaign source

Expand state-land opportunities for wind, solar, and geothermal energy development.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Michael Perry — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Energy & electricity

Energy production plays a critical role in funding New Mexico's public schools and services. Michael supports the responsible development of oil and gas resources while ensuring land and environmental protections remain in place.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Access to Public Lands

Candidate campaign source

Energy production plays a critical role in funding New Mexico's public schools and services. Michael supports the responsible development of oil and gas resources while ensuring land and environmental protections remain in place.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Michael Perry — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Energy & electricity

Energy production plays a critical role in funding New Mexico's public schools and services. Michael supports the responsible development of oil and gas resources while ensuring land and environmental protections remain in place. He also recognizes the growing importance of renewable energy in New M…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Agriculture and rural policy

Candidate campaign source

Energy production plays a critical role in funding New Mexico's public schools and services. Michael supports the responsible development of oil and gas resources while ensuring land and environmental protections remain in place. He also recognizes the growing importance of renewable energy in New Mexico's future. As Land Commissioner, he will work to expand opportunities in wind, solar, and geothermal energy ensuring that New Mexico continues to lead the way in both traditional and renewable energy sectors. Equally important, Michael understands that New Mexico's farmers and ranchers are the backbone of our rural communities and essential to our way of life. He is committed to advocating for their rights, protecting grazing access, and ensuring that agriculture remains a vital part of our states economy and land use strategy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Michael Perry — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 New Mexico Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 5 statements

Deb Haaland

1 statement

Democratic · Governor · NM

Energy & electricity

Invest in more renewable energy to create jobs, lower energy costs, and make New Mexico the energy capital of the country.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public lands, energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Invest in more renewable energy to create jobs, lower energy costs, and make New Mexico the energy capital of the country.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Deb Haaland — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Gregg Hull

1 statement

Republican · Governor · NM

Energy & electricity

Energy policy also has to look beyond generation. New Mexico needs to update our power grid. Transmission lines, substations, storage, and backup capacity all matter. Without these investments, adding new power sources won’t improve reliability. A stable grid protects households, supports hospitals …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure

Candidate campaign source

Energy policy also has to look beyond generation. New Mexico needs to update our power grid. Transmission lines, substations, storage, and backup capacity all matter. Without these investments, adding new power sources won’t improve reliability. A stable grid protects households, supports hospitals and schools, and reduces the risk of outages.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 11 ↗

Democratic · Lieutenant Governor · NM

Energy & electricity

I will bring real experience to making the office of Lieutenant Governor work for all New Mexicans. I was a school teacher for 19 years and served Los Alamos for six years as a State Representative, fighting for more funding for our public schools, crime prevention, and addiction treatment. I then b…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Stephanie Garcia Richard for Lt. Governor: Fighting for our New Mexico

Candidate campaign source

I will bring real experience to making the office of Lieutenant Governor work for all New Mexicans. I was a school teacher for 19 years and served Los Alamos for six years as a State Representative, fighting for more funding for our public schools, crime prevention, and addiction treatment. I then became the first woman and first Hispana elected to be New Mexico's Commissioner of Public Lands, where I brought billions of dollars to New Mexico's public schools, increased renewable energy production sevenfold, restored stolen land back to Tribes, and protected more public land from federal land grabs than any Public Land Commissioner has done before.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Stephanie Garcia Richard — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
View 2 more statements from Stephanie Garcia Richard
Energy & electricity

“We view ourselves as problem solvers at the State Land Office. This groundbreaking is about meeting a community’s needs head-on. Community solar projects like this one will deliver clean electricity directly to New Mexicans who may not otherwise be able to access renewables. And this project is jus…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public lands, energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

“We view ourselves as problem solvers at the State Land Office. This groundbreaking is about meeting a community’s needs head-on. Community solar projects like this one will deliver clean electricity directly to New Mexicans who may not otherwise be able to access renewables. And this project is just the first of many to come on state trust lands,” said Commissioner Garcia Richard. “Since I became Land Commissioner, the State Land Office has seen a nearly seven-fold increase in the amount of renewable energy on state lands. I will keep looking for ways to expand renewable energy production in all parts of the state to diversify our sources of revenue and meet our climate goals. I thank Affordable Solar for being great partners in our efforts to make renewable energy more attainable for New Mexicans.”

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Stephanie Garcia Richard — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Energy & electricity

Expanded renewable-energy production on New Mexico state trust lands.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Current Public-Service Record

Candidate campaign source

Expanded renewable-energy production on New Mexico state trust lands.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Stephanie Garcia Richard — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published New Mexico candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

New Mexico incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current New Mexico legislators and New Mexico’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from New Mexico’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 New Mexico incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Debra M. Sariñana

New Mexico House of Representatives, District 21 · D–NM

1 proposal
View proposals from Debra M. Sariñana
New Mexico Legislature · HB 159

ENERGY PROJECT SITING & MILITARY BASES

Apr 7, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 31

Debra M. Sariñana · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 159 requires a developer or owner submitting a covered FAA construction notice for a wind-energy device, solar collector or other facility to notify the state Military Base Planning Commission within 30 business days. It also requires delivery of specified federal findings within 30 days of receipt. The wind-project component concerns siting review; the act does not establish that a wind facility was approved, built or generated electricity.

Signed by Governor on 2025-04-07, Chapter 31 of the 2025 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact measures wind as a share of electricity generated at New Mexico facilities, not all renewable energy. The wind-project component of siting notices concerns generation development. Solar facilities, transportation fuels and electricity imported from other states are distinct from the numerator. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained New Mexico evidence context: Wind share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. A new section of Chapter 9, Article 15 NMSA 1978 is enacted to read: "NOTIFICATION TO MILITARY BASE PLANNING COMMISSION.--When the developer or owner of a project for construction or expansion of a wind energy conversion device, solar collector or other facility submits a notice of proposed construction or alteration of a project to the federal aviation administration to initiate the review process by the United States department of defense's military aviation and installation assurance siting clearinghouse in compliance with federal law, the project developer or owner shall: A. within thirty business days, inform the chair of the military base planning commission in writing about the submitted notice and provide a description of the project's location and basic project details; and B. within thirty days of obtaining a determination from the federal aviation administration, a military compatibility letter from the siting clearinghouse or a finding of unacceptable risk from the military aviation and installation assurance siting clearinghouse, provide a copy of the finding to the chair of the commission."
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Kristina Ortez

New Mexico House of Representatives, District 42 · D–NM

1 proposal
View proposals from Kristina Ortez
New Mexico Legislature · HB 41

CLEAN TRANSPORTATION FUEL STANDARDS

Mar 5, 2024 · Enacted · Chapter 54

Kristina Ortez · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed section 4 of HB 41 directs a clean transportation fuel program with rules due by July 1, 2026. It sets lifecycle carbon-intensity targets of at least 20% below 2018 levels by 2030 and 30% by 2040, with tradable credits, cost-containment mechanisms, stakeholder review and possible emergency or forecast-based deferral. These are statutory program requirements, not proof that rules were adopted, targets achieved or gasoline prices changed. The connection is to the gasoline component of transportation fuels.

Signed by Governor on 2024-03-05, Chapter 54 of the 2024 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The price is EIA’s six-state Gulf Coast regular-gasoline series, including New Mexico, rather than a New Mexico statewide measurement. Gasoline taxes and the gasoline component of transportation-fuel standards concern parts of fuel costs and supply. Special fuels, aviation fuel and electricity generation are distinct. A policy connection does not establish a regional pump-price effect. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained New Mexico evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 4. A new section of the Environmental Improvement Act is enacted to read: "CLEAN TRANSPORTATION FUEL STANDARD PROGRAM--RULES.-- A. The board shall promulgate rules to implement a clean transportation fuel standard program no later than July 1, 2026. B. Prior to the board promulgating rules pursuant to this section, the secretary shall convene an advisory committee composed of stakeholders from in-state and out-of- state producers of transportation fuels, transportation fuel distributors, local governments, utilities, tribal governments, environmental protection groups, environmental justice groups and other individuals or entities with relevant expertise to provide input and periodically review program rules. C. The clean transportation fuel standard program rules shall: (1) establish a statewide technology-neutral clean transportation fuel standard based on a schedule for annually decreasing the carbon intensity of transportation fuels used in the state; (2) apply the clean transportation fuel standard to account for the fuel lifecycle in order to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuels used in the state by at least twenty percent below 2018 carbon intensity levels by 2030 and at least thirty percent below 2018 carbon intensity levels by 2040; (3) establish technology-neutral mechanisms for generating, obtaining, trading, selling and retiring credits among transportation fuel producers, fuel distributors and other individuals or entities in the transportation fuel market, including additional credit opportunities from activities and projects that support the reduction or removal of greenhouse gas emissions associated with transportation in the state; (4) establish mechanisms, including cost- containment measures and credit holding limits, to allow credits to be banked for future compliance periods to stabilize and incentivize investment in the transportation fuel credit market, verify the validity of compliance obligations, maximize savings and limit consumer costs, ensure program compliance, trade credits and allow for market participation by persons who register in the market to facilitate credit generation; (5) require a utility that elects to participate in the program to invest all revenues from the sale of credits, not including administrative program costs, into distribution, grid modernization, infrastructure and other projects that support transportation decarbonization, with at least fifty percent of such revenues supporting low- income and underserved communities and with investor-owned utilities receiving regulatory treatment consistent with Section 62-8-12 NMSA 1978; (6) consider similar programs in other jurisdictions, allow for coordination with other jurisdictions to promote regional reductions or removal of greenhouse gas emissions and allow market participants to generate credits under any overlapping current and future federal transportation fuel regulations; (7) not discriminate against fuels solely on the basis of having originated in another state or jurisdiction; (8) establish a periodic review process that includes input from the advisory committee convened pursuant to Subsection B of this section to provide input on program rules and performance and determine potential adjustments if deemed necessary after review, including the superseding of the state program by federal legislation; (9) allow for a deferral of the program based on emergency or forecasted conditions; and (10) establish fees for the cost of the department's administration and enforcement of the program; provided that any fees are deposited in the state air quality permit fund. D. As used in this section: (1) "low-income" means annual household adjusted gross income, as defined in the Income Tax Act, of equal to or less than two hundred percent of the federal poverty level; and (2) "underserved community" means an area in this state, including a county, municipality or neighborhood, or subset of such area where the median income of the area is low-income."
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Roberto "Bobby" J. Gonzales

New Mexico Senate, District 6 · D–NM

1 proposal
View proposals from Roberto "Bobby" J. Gonzales
New Mexico Legislature · SB 76

EXPAND GAS & SPECIAL FUELS TAXES

Feb 17, 2026 · Action postponed indefinitely

Roberto "Bobby" J. Gonzales · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

As introduced, SB 76 proposed a gasoline excise tax of 23 cents per gallon received in New Mexico, replacing 17 cents. The special-fuel provisions are outside this fact-specific excerpt. The bill was action-postponed indefinitely; the proposed rate is not presented as the current tax or as a measured change in the regional pump price.

The official history records Action Postponed Indefinitely (API). The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not an independently dated postponement. This relationship reviews the introduced version; later substitutes and amendments are outside its selected excerpt. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

The price is EIA’s six-state Gulf Coast regular-gasoline series, including New Mexico, rather than a New Mexico statewide measurement. Gasoline taxes and the gasoline component of transportation-fuel standards concern parts of fuel costs and supply. Special fuels, aviation fuel and electricity generation are distinct. A policy connection does not establish a regional pump-price effect. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained New Mexico evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. Section 7-13-3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1971, Chapter 207, Section 3, as amended) is amended to read: "7-13-3. IMPOSITION AND RATE OF TAX--DENOMINATION AS "GASOLINE TAX".-- A. For the privilege of receiving gasoline in this state, there is imposed an excise tax at a rate provided in Subsection B of this section on each gallon of gasoline received in New Mexico. B. The tax imposed by Subsection A of this section shall be twenty-three cents ($.23) per gallon received in New Mexico. C. The tax imposed by this section may be called the "gasoline tax"."
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current New Mexico officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a New Mexico statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.