Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price14.2¢/kWh2024 · #30 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.605/gal2026-08 · #43 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$92.882024 · #50 of 50 · highest first
New Mexico over time
Explore New Mexico readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. New Mexico officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a New Mexico effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a New Mexico change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price New Mexico · source units
New MexicoPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
3 of 3 reviewed New Mexico actions match · 3 date markers shown. 51 major events shown separately.
New Mexico · 2024: 14.2¢/kWh · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside New Mexico, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
New Mexico Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
New Mexico · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
New Mexico · 202414.2¢/kWh
New Mexico rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside New Mexico, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
New Mexico
2024 · New Mexico: 14.2¢/kWh · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
New Mexico Residential electricity price history
Period
New Mexico
Compare
2015
12.47¢/kWh
2016
12.03¢/kWh
2017
12.88¢/kWh
2018
12.68¢/kWh
2019
12.51¢/kWh
2020
12.94¢/kWh
2021
13.52¢/kWh
2022
13.84¢/kWh
2023
13.85¢/kWh
2024
14.2¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Mexico · 14.2¢/kWh2024 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico · your comparison
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's Gulf Coast region, including taxes. The region contains Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Texas.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent EIA observations
Prior week
$3.618/gal
Weekly change
+6.7¢
One year earlier
$2.733/gal
Change from one year earlier
+95.2¢
Method and limitations
FactVote uses EIA’s Gulf Coast series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes New Mexico. Changes are calculated from the published August 31, 2026 (prior week), and September 8, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.
EIA does not publish a current New Mexico statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This Gulf Coast regional estimate should not be read as New Mexico’s statewide average.
The regional average combines Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Texas, and does not represent the price at every station or in every New Mexico community.
Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
New Mexico · 2024$92.88
New Mexico rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
New Mexico
2024 · New Mexico: $92.88 · Rank #50 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
New Mexico Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
New Mexico
Compare
2010
$69.35
2011
$73.57
2012
$74.62
2013
$76.56
2014
$77.79
2015
$79.23
2016
$75.96
2017
$79.16
2018
$81.08
2019
$80.04
2020
$86.66
2021
$87.31
2022
$91.21
2023
$91.2
2024
$92.88
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Mexico · $92.882024 · Rank #50 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico · your comparison
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
New Mexico · 202440.5 TWh
New Mexico rank#36among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside New Mexico, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
New Mexico
2024 · New Mexico: 40.5 TWh · Rank #36 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
New Mexico Total electricity generation history
Period
New Mexico
Compare
2015
32.7 TWh
2016
32.9 TWh
2017
33.6 TWh
2018
32.7 TWh
2019
35.2 TWh
2020
34.1 TWh
2021
35.2 TWh
2022
40.9 TWh
2023
39.3 TWh
2024
40.5 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Mexico · 40.5 TWh2024 · Rank #36 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico · your comparison
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Wind generation as a share of electricity generated at New Mexico facilities, including estimated small-scale solar in the statewide denominator.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
EIA generation totals
Wind
15,135,568 MWh
Total, including small-scale solar
40,497,265 MWh
Other major shares
Natural gas
28.8%
Coal
20.8%
Solar
12.6%
Method and limitations
FactVote divides 15,135,568 MWh of wind generation from EIA Table 5 by 40,497,265.461 MWh: the Table 5 electric-industry total plus Table 19 estimated small-scale solar generation. Shares are rounded to one decimal place.
The shares are calculated from annual generation and rounded to one decimal; the displayed categories do not show every source.
In-state generation is not the same as electricity consumed in New Mexico because power crosses state lines.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
New Mexico · 2024272.6 min/year
New Mexico rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
New Mexico
2024 · New Mexico: 272.6 min/year · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
New Mexico Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
New Mexico
Compare
2023
156 min/year
2024
272.6 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Mexico · 272.6 min/year2024 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico · your comparison
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
New Mexico · 202498.1 trillion Btu
New Mexico rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Mexico · 98.1 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico · your comparison
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
New Mexico · 202441.63 Mt CO₂
New Mexico rank#38among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Mexico · 41.63 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #38 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico · your comparison
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
3 of 3 reviewed New Mexico actions · newest first
Feb 17, 2026 · SB 76 · EXPAND GAS & SPECIAL FUELS TAXES · Action postponed indefinitelyNew Mexico Legislature · SB 76
EXPAND GAS & SPECIAL FUELS TAXES
Feb 17, 2026 · Action postponed indefinitely
Roberto "Bobby" J. Gonzales · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
As introduced, SB 76 proposed a gasoline excise tax of 23 cents per gallon received in New Mexico, replacing 17 cents. The special-fuel provisions are outside this fact-specific excerpt. The bill was action-postponed indefinitely; the proposed rate is not presented as the current tax or as a measured change in the regional pump price.
The official history records Action Postponed Indefinitely (API). The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not an independently dated postponement. This relationship reviews the introduced version; later substitutes and amendments are outside its selected excerpt. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
The price is EIA’s six-state Gulf Coast regular-gasoline series, including New Mexico, rather than a New Mexico statewide measurement. Gasoline taxes and the gasoline component of transportation-fuel standards concern parts of fuel costs and supply. Special fuels, aviation fuel and electricity generation are distinct. A policy connection does not establish a regional pump-price effect. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. Section 7-13-3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1971, Chapter 207, Section 3, as amended) is amended to read: "7-13-3. IMPOSITION AND RATE OF TAX--DENOMINATION AS "GASOLINE TAX".-- A. For the privilege of receiving gasoline in this state, there is imposed an excise tax at a rate provided in Subsection B of this section on each gallon of gasoline received in New Mexico. B. The tax imposed by Subsection A of this section shall be twenty-three cents ($.23) per gallon received in New Mexico. C. The tax imposed by this section may be called the "gasoline tax"."
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 7, 2025 · HB 159 · ENERGY PROJECT SITING & MILITARY BASES · Enacted · Chapter 31New Mexico Legislature · HB 159
ENERGY PROJECT SITING & MILITARY BASES
Apr 7, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 31
Debra M. Sariñana · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 159 requires a developer or owner submitting a covered FAA construction notice for a wind-energy device, solar collector or other facility to notify the state Military Base Planning Commission within 30 business days. It also requires delivery of specified federal findings within 30 days of receipt. The wind-project component concerns siting review; the act does not establish that a wind facility was approved, built or generated electricity.
Signed by Governor on 2025-04-07, Chapter 31 of the 2025 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The fact measures wind as a share of electricity generated at New Mexico facilities, not all renewable energy. The wind-project component of siting notices concerns generation development. Solar facilities, transportation fuels and electricity imported from other states are distinct from the numerator. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Wind share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. A new section of Chapter 9, Article 15 NMSA 1978 is enacted to read: "NOTIFICATION TO MILITARY BASE PLANNING COMMISSION.--When the developer or owner of a project for construction or expansion of a wind energy conversion device, solar collector or other facility submits a notice of proposed construction or alteration of a project to the federal aviation administration to initiate the review process by the United States department of defense's military aviation and installation assurance siting clearinghouse in compliance with federal law, the project developer or owner shall: A. within thirty business days, inform the chair of the military base planning commission in writing about the submitted notice and provide a description of the project's location and basic project details; and B. within thirty days of obtaining a determination from the federal aviation administration, a military compatibility letter from the siting clearinghouse or a finding of unacceptable risk from the military aviation and installation assurance siting clearinghouse, provide a copy of the finding to the chair of the commission."
The reviewed section 4 of HB 41 directs a clean transportation fuel program with rules due by July 1, 2026. It sets lifecycle carbon-intensity targets of at least 20% below 2018 levels by 2030 and 30% by 2040, with tradable credits, cost-containment mechanisms, stakeholder review and possible emergency or forecast-based deferral. These are statutory program requirements, not proof that rules were adopted, targets achieved or gasoline prices changed. The connection is to the gasoline component of transportation fuels.
Signed by Governor on 2024-03-05, Chapter 54 of the 2024 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The price is EIA’s six-state Gulf Coast regular-gasoline series, including New Mexico, rather than a New Mexico statewide measurement. Gasoline taxes and the gasoline component of transportation-fuel standards concern parts of fuel costs and supply. Special fuels, aviation fuel and electricity generation are distinct. A policy connection does not establish a regional pump-price effect. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 4. A new section of the Environmental Improvement Act is enacted to read: "CLEAN TRANSPORTATION FUEL STANDARD PROGRAM--RULES.-- A. The board shall promulgate rules to implement a clean transportation fuel standard program no later than July 1, 2026. B. Prior to the board promulgating rules pursuant to this section, the secretary shall convene an advisory committee composed of stakeholders from in-state and out-of- state producers of transportation fuels, transportation fuel distributors, local governments, utilities, tribal governments, environmental protection groups, environmental justice groups and other individuals or entities with relevant expertise to provide input and periodically review program rules. C. The clean transportation fuel standard program rules shall: (1) establish a statewide technology-neutral clean transportation fuel standard based on a schedule for annually decreasing the carbon intensity of transportation fuels used in the state; (2) apply the clean transportation fuel standard to account for the fuel lifecycle in order to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuels used in the state by at least twenty percent below 2018 carbon intensity levels by 2030 and at least thirty percent below 2018 carbon intensity levels by 2040; (3) establish technology-neutral mechanisms for generating, obtaining, trading, selling and retiring credits among transportation fuel producers, fuel distributors and other individuals or entities in the transportation fuel market, including additional credit opportunities from activities and projects that support the reduction or removal of greenhouse gas emissions associated with transportation in the state; (4) establish mechanisms, including cost- containment measures and credit holding limits, to allow credits to be banked for future compliance periods to stabilize and incentivize investment in the transportation fuel credit market, verify the validity of compliance obligations, maximize savings and limit consumer costs, ensure program compliance, trade credits and allow for market participation by persons who register in the market to facilitate credit generation; (5) require a utility that elects to participate in the program to invest all revenues from the sale of credits, not including administrative program costs, into distribution, grid modernization, infrastructure and other projects that support transportation decarbonization, with at least fifty percent of such revenues supporting low- income and underserved communities and with investor-owned utilities receiving regulatory treatment consistent with Section 62-8-12 NMSA 1978; (6) consider similar programs in other jurisdictions, allow for coordination with other jurisdictions to promote regional reductions or removal of greenhouse gas emissions and allow market participants to generate credits under any overlapping current and future federal transportation fuel regulations; (7) not discriminate against fuels solely on the basis of having originated in another state or jurisdiction; (8) establish a periodic review process that includes input from the advisory committee convened pursuant to Subsection B of this section to provide input on program rules and performance and determine potential adjustments if deemed necessary after review, including the superseding of the state program by federal legislation; (9) allow for a deferral of the program based on emergency or forecasted conditions; and (10) establish fees for the cost of the department's administration and enforcement of the program; provided that any fees are deposited in the state air quality permit fund. D. As used in this section: (1) "low-income" means annual household adjusted gross income, as defined in the Income Tax Act, of equal to or less than two hundred percent of the federal poverty level; and (2) "underserved community" means an area in this state, including a county, municipality or neighborhood, or subset of such area where the median income of the area is low-income."
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified New Mexico officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s New Mexico candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
17 statements from 9 candidates
2026 New Mexico Attorney General — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
New Mexico's land, water, and power grid are not for sale to out-of-state data center developers. Sam opposes the unchecked expansion of energy-hungry data centers that strain our resources and drive up costs for everyday New Mexicans — and will ensure any development is scrutinized under existing e…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public lands, energy, water, and environment
Candidate campaign source
New Mexico's land, water, and power grid are not for sale to out-of-state data center developers. Sam opposes the unchecked expansion of energy-hungry data centers that strain our resources and drive up costs for everyday New Mexicans — and will ensure any development is scrutinized under existing environmental regulations before our natural resources, and our wallets, pay the price.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
New Mexico has some of the highest potential of all Western states for development and deployment of wind, solar, battery storage, and transmission. This build out also means some tough adjustments for our communities. The Eastern plains of New Mexico are now dotted with large wind farms, with more …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public lands, energy, water, and environment
Candidate campaign source
New Mexico has some of the highest potential of all Western states for development and deployment of wind, solar, battery storage, and transmission. This build out also means some tough adjustments for our communities. The Eastern plains of New Mexico are now dotted with large wind farms, with more to come. Northwest and Central New Mexico are building solar fields spanning hundreds of acres. Transmission lines are fueling the increased power demand of the country. The Land Commissioner plays an important role in the future of renewable energy in New Mexico and Juan is dedicated to being a thoughtful partner with communities and companies to ensure those being impacted are brought to the table to advocate for family sustaining local jobs and investment in our people when siting new projects.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
He also recognizes the growing importance of renewable energy in New Mexico's future. As Land Commissioner, he will work to expand opportunities in wind, solar, and geothermal energy ensuring that New Mexico continues to lead the way in both traditional and renewable energy sectors.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Support for Energy, Agriculture, and Rural Economies
Candidate campaign source
He also recognizes the growing importance of renewable energy in New Mexico's future. As Land Commissioner, he will work to expand opportunities in wind, solar, and geothermal energy ensuring that New Mexico continues to lead the way in both traditional and renewable energy sectors.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Energy production plays a critical role in funding New Mexico's public schools and services. Michael supports the responsible development of oil and gas resources while ensuring land and environmental protections remain in place.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Access to Public Lands
Candidate campaign source
Energy production plays a critical role in funding New Mexico's public schools and services. Michael supports the responsible development of oil and gas resources while ensuring land and environmental protections remain in place.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Energy production plays a critical role in funding New Mexico's public schools and services. Michael supports the responsible development of oil and gas resources while ensuring land and environmental protections remain in place. He also recognizes the growing importance of renewable energy in New M…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Agriculture and rural policy
Candidate campaign source
Energy production plays a critical role in funding New Mexico's public schools and services. Michael supports the responsible development of oil and gas resources while ensuring land and environmental protections remain in place. He also recognizes the growing importance of renewable energy in New Mexico's future. As Land Commissioner, he will work to expand opportunities in wind, solar, and geothermal energy ensuring that New Mexico continues to lead the way in both traditional and renewable energy sectors. Equally important, Michael understands that New Mexico's farmers and ranchers are the backbone of our rural communities and essential to our way of life. He is committed to advocating for their rights, protecting grazing access, and ensuring that agriculture remains a vital part of our states economy and land use strategy.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Energy policy also has to look beyond generation. New Mexico needs to update our power grid. Transmission lines, substations, storage, and backup capacity all matter. Without these investments, adding new power sources won’t improve reliability. A stable grid protects households, supports hospitals …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure
Candidate campaign source
Energy policy also has to look beyond generation. New Mexico needs to update our power grid. Transmission lines, substations, storage, and backup capacity all matter. Without these investments, adding new power sources won’t improve reliability. A stable grid protects households, supports hospitals and schools, and reduces the risk of outages.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I will bring real experience to making the office of Lieutenant Governor work for all New Mexicans. I was a school teacher for 19 years and served Los Alamos for six years as a State Representative, fighting for more funding for our public schools, crime prevention, and addiction treatment. I then b…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Stephanie Garcia Richard for Lt. Governor: Fighting for our New Mexico
Candidate campaign source
I will bring real experience to making the office of Lieutenant Governor work for all New Mexicans. I was a school teacher for 19 years and served Los Alamos for six years as a State Representative, fighting for more funding for our public schools, crime prevention, and addiction treatment. I then became the first woman and first Hispana elected to be New Mexico's Commissioner of Public Lands, where I brought billions of dollars to New Mexico's public schools, increased renewable energy production sevenfold, restored stolen land back to Tribes, and protected more public land from federal land grabs than any Public Land Commissioner has done before.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
View 2 more statements from Stephanie Garcia Richard
Energy & electricity
“We view ourselves as problem solvers at the State Land Office. This groundbreaking is about meeting a community’s needs head-on. Community solar projects like this one will deliver clean electricity directly to New Mexicans who may not otherwise be able to access renewables. And this project is jus…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public lands, energy, water, and environment
Candidate campaign source
“We view ourselves as problem solvers at the State Land Office. This groundbreaking is about meeting a community’s needs head-on. Community solar projects like this one will deliver clean electricity directly to New Mexicans who may not otherwise be able to access renewables. And this project is just the first of many to come on state trust lands,” said Commissioner Garcia Richard. “Since I became Land Commissioner, the State Land Office has seen a nearly seven-fold increase in the amount of renewable energy on state lands. I will keep looking for ways to expand renewable energy production in all parts of the state to diversify our sources of revenue and meet our climate goals. I thank Affordable Solar for being great partners in our efforts to make renewable energy more attainable for New Mexicans.”
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published New Mexico candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
New Mexico incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current New Mexico legislators and New Mexico’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from New Mexico’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 New Mexico incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Debra M. Sariñana
New Mexico House of Representatives, District 21 · D–NM
1 proposalView proposals from Debra M. SariñanaNew Mexico Legislature · HB 159
ENERGY PROJECT SITING & MILITARY BASES
Apr 7, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 31
Debra M. Sariñana · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 159 requires a developer or owner submitting a covered FAA construction notice for a wind-energy device, solar collector or other facility to notify the state Military Base Planning Commission within 30 business days. It also requires delivery of specified federal findings within 30 days of receipt. The wind-project component concerns siting review; the act does not establish that a wind facility was approved, built or generated electricity.
Signed by Governor on 2025-04-07, Chapter 31 of the 2025 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The fact measures wind as a share of electricity generated at New Mexico facilities, not all renewable energy. The wind-project component of siting notices concerns generation development. Solar facilities, transportation fuels and electricity imported from other states are distinct from the numerator. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Wind share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. A new section of Chapter 9, Article 15 NMSA 1978 is enacted to read: "NOTIFICATION TO MILITARY BASE PLANNING COMMISSION.--When the developer or owner of a project for construction or expansion of a wind energy conversion device, solar collector or other facility submits a notice of proposed construction or alteration of a project to the federal aviation administration to initiate the review process by the United States department of defense's military aviation and installation assurance siting clearinghouse in compliance with federal law, the project developer or owner shall: A. within thirty business days, inform the chair of the military base planning commission in writing about the submitted notice and provide a description of the project's location and basic project details; and B. within thirty days of obtaining a determination from the federal aviation administration, a military compatibility letter from the siting clearinghouse or a finding of unacceptable risk from the military aviation and installation assurance siting clearinghouse, provide a copy of the finding to the chair of the commission."
The reviewed section 4 of HB 41 directs a clean transportation fuel program with rules due by July 1, 2026. It sets lifecycle carbon-intensity targets of at least 20% below 2018 levels by 2030 and 30% by 2040, with tradable credits, cost-containment mechanisms, stakeholder review and possible emergency or forecast-based deferral. These are statutory program requirements, not proof that rules were adopted, targets achieved or gasoline prices changed. The connection is to the gasoline component of transportation fuels.
Signed by Governor on 2024-03-05, Chapter 54 of the 2024 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The price is EIA’s six-state Gulf Coast regular-gasoline series, including New Mexico, rather than a New Mexico statewide measurement. Gasoline taxes and the gasoline component of transportation-fuel standards concern parts of fuel costs and supply. Special fuels, aviation fuel and electricity generation are distinct. A policy connection does not establish a regional pump-price effect. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 4. A new section of the Environmental Improvement Act is enacted to read: "CLEAN TRANSPORTATION FUEL STANDARD PROGRAM--RULES.-- A. The board shall promulgate rules to implement a clean transportation fuel standard program no later than July 1, 2026. B. Prior to the board promulgating rules pursuant to this section, the secretary shall convene an advisory committee composed of stakeholders from in-state and out-of- state producers of transportation fuels, transportation fuel distributors, local governments, utilities, tribal governments, environmental protection groups, environmental justice groups and other individuals or entities with relevant expertise to provide input and periodically review program rules. C. The clean transportation fuel standard program rules shall: (1) establish a statewide technology-neutral clean transportation fuel standard based on a schedule for annually decreasing the carbon intensity of transportation fuels used in the state; (2) apply the clean transportation fuel standard to account for the fuel lifecycle in order to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuels used in the state by at least twenty percent below 2018 carbon intensity levels by 2030 and at least thirty percent below 2018 carbon intensity levels by 2040; (3) establish technology-neutral mechanisms for generating, obtaining, trading, selling and retiring credits among transportation fuel producers, fuel distributors and other individuals or entities in the transportation fuel market, including additional credit opportunities from activities and projects that support the reduction or removal of greenhouse gas emissions associated with transportation in the state; (4) establish mechanisms, including cost- containment measures and credit holding limits, to allow credits to be banked for future compliance periods to stabilize and incentivize investment in the transportation fuel credit market, verify the validity of compliance obligations, maximize savings and limit consumer costs, ensure program compliance, trade credits and allow for market participation by persons who register in the market to facilitate credit generation; (5) require a utility that elects to participate in the program to invest all revenues from the sale of credits, not including administrative program costs, into distribution, grid modernization, infrastructure and other projects that support transportation decarbonization, with at least fifty percent of such revenues supporting low- income and underserved communities and with investor-owned utilities receiving regulatory treatment consistent with Section 62-8-12 NMSA 1978; (6) consider similar programs in other jurisdictions, allow for coordination with other jurisdictions to promote regional reductions or removal of greenhouse gas emissions and allow market participants to generate credits under any overlapping current and future federal transportation fuel regulations; (7) not discriminate against fuels solely on the basis of having originated in another state or jurisdiction; (8) establish a periodic review process that includes input from the advisory committee convened pursuant to Subsection B of this section to provide input on program rules and performance and determine potential adjustments if deemed necessary after review, including the superseding of the state program by federal legislation; (9) allow for a deferral of the program based on emergency or forecasted conditions; and (10) establish fees for the cost of the department's administration and enforcement of the program; provided that any fees are deposited in the state air quality permit fund. D. As used in this section: (1) "low-income" means annual household adjusted gross income, as defined in the Income Tax Act, of equal to or less than two hundred percent of the federal poverty level; and (2) "underserved community" means an area in this state, including a county, municipality or neighborhood, or subset of such area where the median income of the area is low-income."
1 proposalView proposals from Roberto "Bobby" J. GonzalesNew Mexico Legislature · SB 76
EXPAND GAS & SPECIAL FUELS TAXES
Feb 17, 2026 · Action postponed indefinitely
Roberto "Bobby" J. Gonzales · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
As introduced, SB 76 proposed a gasoline excise tax of 23 cents per gallon received in New Mexico, replacing 17 cents. The special-fuel provisions are outside this fact-specific excerpt. The bill was action-postponed indefinitely; the proposed rate is not presented as the current tax or as a measured change in the regional pump price.
The official history records Action Postponed Indefinitely (API). The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not an independently dated postponement. This relationship reviews the introduced version; later substitutes and amendments are outside its selected excerpt. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
The price is EIA’s six-state Gulf Coast regular-gasoline series, including New Mexico, rather than a New Mexico statewide measurement. Gasoline taxes and the gasoline component of transportation-fuel standards concern parts of fuel costs and supply. Special fuels, aviation fuel and electricity generation are distinct. A policy connection does not establish a regional pump-price effect. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. Section 7-13-3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1971, Chapter 207, Section 3, as amended) is amended to read: "7-13-3. IMPOSITION AND RATE OF TAX--DENOMINATION AS "GASOLINE TAX".-- A. For the privilege of receiving gasoline in this state, there is imposed an excise tax at a rate provided in Subsection B of this section on each gallon of gasoline received in New Mexico. B. The tax imposed by Subsection A of this section shall be twenty-three cents ($.23) per gallon received in New Mexico. C. The tax imposed by this section may be called the "gasoline tax"."
Only current New Mexico officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a New Mexico statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
New Mexico snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to New Mexico, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.