Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.
High school or higher88%2020–2024 · #44 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher40.1%2020–2024 · #40 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher31%2020–2024 · #40 of 50 · highest first
New Mexico over time
Explore New Mexico readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. New Mexico officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a New Mexico effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a New Mexico change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Grade 4 reading New Mexico · source units
New MexicoPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
5 of 5 reviewed New Mexico actions match · 5 date markers shown. 20 major events shown separately.
New Mexico · 2024: 200.6 · Rank #50 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215
FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in New Mexico. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
New Mexico · state comparison
Adult educational attainment
Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.
New Mexico · 2020–202488%
New Mexico rank#44among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
High school or higher
Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.
Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.
Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Mexico · 88%2020–2024 · Rank #44 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Vermont
94.9%
—
#2
Maine
94.8%
—
#3
Montana
94.6%
—
#4
New Hampshire
94.4%
—
#5
Wyoming
94.2%
—
#6
North Dakota
94%
—
#7
Minnesota
93.9%
—
#8
Wisconsin
93.6%
—
#9
Alaska
93.6%
—
#10
Utah
93.4%
—
#11
Iowa
93.3%
—
#12
South Dakota
93.2%
—
#13
Hawaii
93.2%
—
#14
Colorado
92.9%
—
#15
Washington
92.3%
—
#16
Nebraska
92.2%
—
#17
Pennsylvania
92.1%
—
#18
Michigan
92.1%
—
#19
Kansas
92%
—
#20
Idaho
91.9%
—
#21
Missouri
91.9%
—
#22
Oregon
91.8%
—
#23
Ohio
91.8%
—
#24
Delaware
91.7%
—
#25
Virginia
91.6%
—
#26
Connecticut
91.5%
—
#27
Massachusetts
91.4%
—
#28
Maryland
91.1%
—
#29
New Jersey
90.7%
—
#30
Illinois
90.5%
—
#31
Indiana
90.4%
—
#32
North Carolina
90.1%
—
#33
South Carolina
90.1%
—
#34
Tennessee
90%
—
#35
Florida
89.9%
—
#36
Rhode Island
89.7%
—
#37
Oklahoma
89.4%
—
#38
Arizona
89.4%
—
#39
West Virginia
89.3%
—
#40
Georgia
89.2%
—
#41
Kentucky
88.9%
—
#42
Arkansas
88.7%
—
#43
Alabama
88.6%
—
#44
New Mexico · your comparison
88%
—
#45
New York
88%
—
#46
Nevada
87.5%
—
#47
Louisiana
87.3%
—
#48
Mississippi
87.1%
—
#49
Texas
86%
—
#50
California
84.7%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Share of New Mexico residents age 25 and older whose reported attainment is a regular high school diploma or equivalent (including GED or an alternative credential), some college, or an associate’s or higher degree.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.
This is an adult educational-attainment measure, not a current high-school graduation rate or a measure of school quality.
A statewide estimate can obscure differences across communities and demographic groups.
NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.
New Mexico · 2024200.6
New Mexico rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Grade 4 reading
FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in New Mexico. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.
NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
New Mexico
2024 · New Mexico: 200.6 · Rank #50 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
New Mexico Grade 4 reading history
Period
New Mexico
Compare
2003
203.2
2005
206.8
2007
211.6
2009
207.6
2011
208
2013
205.8
2015
207.2
2017
207.7
2019
207.6
2022
202.1
2024
200.6
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.
Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Mexico · 200.62024 · Rank #50 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Massachusetts
224.8
—
#2
Wyoming
221.9
—
#3
New Jersey
221.6
—
#4
New Hampshire
221.5
—
#5
Colorado
220.9
—
#6
Indiana
220.1
—
#7
Utah
219.3
—
#8
Connecticut
219.2
—
#9
Mississippi
218.5
—
#10
Florida
218.2
—
#11
Kentucky
218
—
#12
Montana
217.2
—
#13
Rhode Island
216.3
—
#14
Louisiana
216
—
#14
Ohio
216
—
#16
Hawaii
215.8
—
#16
Pennsylvania
215.8
—
#18
Idaho
215.7
—
#18
Washington
215.7
—
#20
Maryland
215.6
—
#21
North Dakota
215.5
—
#22
Wisconsin
215.3
—
#23
Tennessee
215.1
—
#24
South Carolina
214.9
—
#25
Iowa
214.6
—
#25
New York
214.6
—
#27
Georgia
214.4
—
#27
Minnesota
214.4
—
#29
Illinois
214.2
—
#30
South Dakota
214.1
—
#30
Virginia
214.1
—
#32
North Carolina
213.4
—
#33
Alabama
213.2
—
#34
Kansas
213.1
—
#34
Nevada
213.1
—
#36
Vermont
212.7
—
#37
Missouri
211.9
—
#37
Texas
211.9
—
#39
California
211.7
—
#39
Nebraska
211.7
—
#41
Arkansas
209.7
—
#42
Maine
209.6
—
#43
Delaware
209.5
—
#44
Michigan
209.1
—
#45
Arizona
208.1
—
#46
Oklahoma
207.3
—
#47
Oregon
207
—
#48
West Virginia
205.9
—
#49
Alaska
201.6
—
#50
New Mexico · your comparison
200.6
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.
New Mexico · FY2024$17,664
New Mexico rank#20among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Current spending per pupil
Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.
Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.
Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Mexico · $17,664FY2024 · Rank #20 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New York
$31,918
—
#2
Vermont
$28,818
—
#3
New Jersey
$27,234
—
#4
Connecticut
$26,316
—
#5
Massachusetts
$24,429
—
#6
Hawaii
$23,878
—
#7
New Hampshire
$22,978
—
#8
Delaware
$22,201
—
#9
Rhode Island
$22,110
—
#10
Illinois
$21,776
—
#11
Pennsylvania
$21,091
—
#12
Alaska
$21,004
—
#13
California
$20,791
—
#14
Wyoming
$20,521
—
#15
Maryland
$20,208
—
#16
Maine
$19,962
—
#17
Washington
$18,564
—
#18
Michigan
$18,314
—
#19
Oregon
$18,083
—
#20
New Mexico · your comparison
$17,664
—
#21
Ohio
$17,257
—
#22
Virginia
$17,104
—
#23
North Dakota
$17,102
—
#24
Minnesota
$17,098
—
#25
Nebraska
$16,147
—
#26
Wisconsin
$15,952
—
#27
Colorado
$15,908
—
#28
Georgia
$15,833
—
#29
West Virginia
$15,640
—
#30
Louisiana
$15,581
—
#31
Kansas
$15,558
—
#32
South Carolina
$15,060
—
#33
Nevada
$14,812
—
#34
Kentucky
$14,596
—
#35
Iowa
$14,369
—
#36
Missouri
$14,241
—
#37
Arkansas
$13,873
—
#38
Montana
$13,656
—
#39
Alabama
$13,627
—
#40
Indiana
$13,622
—
#41
North Carolina
$12,995
—
#42
Texas
$12,895
—
#43
Tennessee
$12,882
—
#44
South Dakota
$12,828
—
#45
Florida
$12,693
—
#46
Mississippi
$12,324
—
#47
Oklahoma
$12,162
—
#48
Arizona
$12,003
—
#49
Utah
$11,347
—
#50
Idaho
$11,060
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.
New Mexico · 2020–2177%
New Mexico rank#47among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark86%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate
Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.
Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
New Mexico
2020–21 · New Mexico: 77% · Rank #47 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 86% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
New Mexico Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
Period
New Mexico
Compare
2011–12
70%
2012–13
70%
2013–14
69%
2014–15
69%
2015–16
71%
2016–17
71%
2017–18
74%
2018–19
75%
2019–20
77%
2020–21
77%
2021–22
Not available
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.
Lower value · 76%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Mexico · 77%2020–21 · Rank #47 of 48, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Mexico with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2020–21 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Alabama
91%
—
#1
West Virginia
91%
—
#3
Connecticut
90%
—
#3
Florida
90%
—
#3
Iowa
90%
—
#3
Kentucky
90%
—
#3
Massachusetts
90%
—
#3
Texas
90%
—
#3
Virginia
90%
—
#3
Wisconsin
90%
—
#11
Missouri
89%
—
#11
New Jersey
89%
—
#11
Tennessee
89%
—
#14
Arkansas
88%
—
#14
Indiana
88%
—
#14
Kansas
88%
—
#14
Mississippi
88%
—
#14
Nebraska
88%
—
#14
Utah
88%
—
#20
Maryland
87%
—
#20
New Hampshire
87%
—
#20
North Carolina
87%
—
#20
North Dakota
87%
—
#20
Pennsylvania
87%
—
#25
Hawaii
86%
—
#25
Maine
86%
—
#25
Montana
86%
—
#28
New York
85%
—
#28
Ohio
85%
—
#30
California
84%
—
#30
Georgia
84%
—
#30
Rhode Island
84%
—
#33
Minnesota
83%
—
#33
South Carolina
83%
—
#33
South Dakota
83%
—
#33
Vermont
83%
—
#33
Wyoming
83%
—
#38
Colorado
82%
—
#38
Louisiana
82%
—
#40
Delaware
81%
—
#40
Michigan
81%
—
#40
Nevada
81%
—
#40
Oregon
81%
—
#44
Idaho
80%
—
#44
Oklahoma
80%
—
#46
Alaska
78%
—
#47
New Mexico · your comparison
77%
—
#48
Arizona
76%
—
—
Illinois
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—
Washington
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.
New Mexico · 2022–23$7,526
New Mexico rank#43among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees
Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.
2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.
Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Mexico · $7,5262022–23 · Rank #43 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Vermont
$17,600
—
#2
New Hampshire
$17,019
—
#3
Pennsylvania
$16,217
—
#4
Connecticut
$15,763
—
#5
New Jersey
$15,265
—
#6
Illinois
$14,921
—
#7
Virginia
$14,825
—
#8
Rhode Island
$14,744
—
#9
Michigan
$14,718
—
#10
Massachusetts
$14,345
—
#11
Minnesota
$12,873
—
#12
South Carolina
$12,604
—
#13
Oregon
$12,424
—
#14
Delaware
$11,922
—
#15
Arizona
$11,768
—
#16
Kentucky
$11,299
—
#17
Alabama
$11,081
—
#18
Ohio
$10,922
—
#19
Maine
$10,813
—
#20
Hawaii
$10,484
—
#21
Tennessee
$10,437
—
#22
Iowa
$10,121
—
#23
Maryland
$10,041
—
#24
Missouri
$9,926
—
#25
Indiana
$9,886
—
#26
Louisiana
$9,843
—
#27
Colorado
$9,798
—
#28
North Dakota
$9,728
—
#29
Kansas
$9,274
—
#30
Mississippi
$9,120
—
#31
South Dakota
$9,079
—
#32
Wisconsin
$8,974
—
#33
Arkansas
$8,879
—
#34
Nebraska
$8,862
—
#35
West Virginia
$8,715
—
#36
California
$8,637
—
#37
New York
$8,575
—
#38
Oklahoma
$8,519
—
#39
Alaska
$8,291
—
#40
Texas
$8,195
—
#41
Washington
$8,006
—
#42
Idaho
$7,640
—
#43
New Mexico · your comparison
$7,526
—
#44
North Carolina
$7,327
—
#45
Montana
$7,299
—
#46
Utah
$7,215
—
#47
Georgia
$7,075
—
#48
Nevada
$6,723
—
#49
Wyoming
$5,100
—
#50
Florida
$4,540
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
5 of 5 reviewed New Mexico actions · newest first
Mar 9, 2026 · HB 124 · NEW AMERICANS DIVISION IN WSD · Enacted · Chapter 61New Mexico Legislature · HB 124
NEW AMERICANS DIVISION IN WSD
Mar 9, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 61
Cristina Parajón · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 124 creates a New Americans Division in the Workforce Solutions Department. The act defines new Americans as U.S. residents who are not citizens or were not citizens at birth; it does not impose a recent-arrival requirement. The reviewed section directs workforce and educational initiatives, identification of professional-licensing pathways, support for employers and economic sectors, and an information center that includes assistance to eligible lawful permanent residents seeking naturalization. The division’s report is due August 1, 2027, then July 1 each year, covering the preceding twelve months. These duties do not themselves grant citizenship, employment or a professional license.
Signed by Governor on 2026-03-09, Chapter 61 of the 2026 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and both lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. The reviewed immigration provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or determine any particular resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. Section 9-26-3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2007, Chapter 200, Section 3) is amended to read: "9-26-3. DEFINITIONS.--As used in the Workforce Solutions Department Act: A. "department" means the workforce solutions department; B. "new Americans" means people residing in the United States who are not citizens of the United States or who were not citizens of the United States at birth; and C. "secretary" means the secretary of workforce solutions." SECTION 2. Section 9-26-4 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2007, Chapter 200, Section 4) is amended to read: "9-26-4. WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS DEPARTMENT CREATED.--The "workforce solutions department" is created in the executive branch pursuant to the Executive Reorganization Act. The department is a cabinet department that includes: A. the office of the secretary; B. the administrative services division; C. the unemployment insurance division; D. the labor relations division; E. the workforce technology division; F. the workforce transition services division; and G. the new Americans division." SECTION 3. A new section of the Workforce Solutions Department Act is enacted to read: "NEW AMERICANS DIVISION--PURPOSE--DUTIES.-- A. The purpose of the new Americans division of the department is to support new Americans residing in New Mexico in achieving their maximum economic potential in New Mexico's workforce and as entrepreneurs. In furtherance of this purpose, the division shall: (1) support and expand educational, workforce training and other initiatives that improve the integration of new Americans into the state's economy; (2) identify strategies for improving licensure pathways for new Americans who have been professionally trained or licensed in another country; (3) assist businesses that employ new Americans by identifying, attracting and retaining top global talent required to remain competitive in a global economy; (4) identify and support pathways for new Americans to advance priority sectors identified in the state's workforce development and economic development plans; and (5) serve as an information center by providing resources and engagement opportunities to businesses, community-based organizations, workers, community members, state agencies and local governments on policies and legislation affecting new Americans, including supporting eligible lawful permanent residents in becoming naturalized United States citizens. B. The new Americans division shall, as deemed necessary and appropriate by the department, work with other divisions within the department, the economic development department, the higher education department, the public education department, the department of health, the health care authority, the homeland security and emergency management department, the department of public safety or the regulation and licensing department to fulfill the duties of the new Americans division. C. By August 1, 2027, and by July 1 of each year thereafter, the new Americans division shall provide a report to an interim committee that studies economic and rural development and policy, the secretary, the governor and members of the legislature on the activities of the division in the preceding twelve months, including an analysis of the economic impact, status, population and workforce numbers of new Americans in the state."
Michelle Lujan Grisham signed HB 124. HB 124 creates a New Americans Division in the Workforce Solutions Department. The act defines new Americans as U.S. residents who are not citizens or were not citizens at birth; it does not impose a recent-arrival requirement. The reviewed section directs workforce and educational initiatives, identification of professional-licensing pathways, support for employers and economic sectors, and an information center that includes assistance to eligible lawful permanent residents seeking naturalization. The division’s report is due August 1, 2027, then July 1 each year, covering the preceding twelve months. These duties do not themselves grant citizenship, employment or a professional license.
Signed by Governor on 2026-03-09, Chapter 61 of the 2026 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and both lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. The reviewed immigration provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or determine any particular resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. Section 9-26-3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2007, Chapter 200, Section 3) is amended to read: "9-26-3. DEFINITIONS.--As used in the Workforce Solutions Department Act: A. "department" means the workforce solutions department; B. "new Americans" means people residing in the United States who are not citizens of the United States or who were not citizens of the United States at birth; and C. "secretary" means the secretary of workforce solutions." SECTION 2. Section 9-26-4 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2007, Chapter 200, Section 4) is amended to read: "9-26-4. WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS DEPARTMENT CREATED.--The "workforce solutions department" is created in the executive branch pursuant to the Executive Reorganization Act. The department is a cabinet department that includes: A. the office of the secretary; B. the administrative services division; C. the unemployment insurance division; D. the labor relations division; E. the workforce technology division; F. the workforce transition services division; and G. the new Americans division." SECTION 3. A new section of the Workforce Solutions Department Act is enacted to read: "NEW AMERICANS DIVISION--PURPOSE--DUTIES.-- A. The purpose of the new Americans division of the department is to support new Americans residing in New Mexico in achieving their maximum economic potential in New Mexico's workforce and as entrepreneurs. In furtherance of this purpose, the division shall: (1) support and expand educational, workforce training and other initiatives that improve the integration of new Americans into the state's economy; (2) identify strategies for improving licensure pathways for new Americans who have been professionally trained or licensed in another country; (3) assist businesses that employ new Americans by identifying, attracting and retaining top global talent required to remain competitive in a global economy; (4) identify and support pathways for new Americans to advance priority sectors identified in the state's workforce development and economic development plans; and (5) serve as an information center by providing resources and engagement opportunities to businesses, community-based organizations, workers, community members, state agencies and local governments on policies and legislation affecting new Americans, including supporting eligible lawful permanent residents in becoming naturalized United States citizens. B. The new Americans division shall, as deemed necessary and appropriate by the department, work with other divisions within the department, the economic development department, the higher education department, the public education department, the department of health, the health care authority, the homeland security and emergency management department, the department of public safety or the regulation and licensing department to fulfill the duties of the new Americans division. C. By August 1, 2027, and by July 1 of each year thereafter, the new Americans division shall provide a report to an interim committee that studies economic and rural development and policy, the secretary, the governor and members of the legislature on the activities of the division in the preceding twelve months, including an analysis of the economic impact, status, population and workforce numbers of new Americans in the state."
The reviewed Immigrant Safety Act provisions of HB 9 prohibit public bodies from entering or renewing specified civil-immigration detention and deputization agreements and require existing covered agreements, upon the act’s effective date, to end at the earliest date allowed by their terms. For the covered section 1357(g)/287.7 agreements, public bodies must invoke a public-safety exigency termination clause where the agreement permits it. They restrict disposition of public property for that detention purpose while preserving lawful state-law detention and brief investigative stops. The signing does not establish that a particular agreement was terminated or a facility closed, and does not determine any resident’s immigration status.
Signed by Governor on 2026-02-05, Chapter 5 of the 2026 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and both lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. The reviewed immigration provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or determine any particular resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. DEFINITION.--As used in the Immigrant Safety Act, "public body" means a state or local government, a sheriff's department, an advisory board, a commission, an agency or an entity created by the constitution of New Mexico or any branch of government that receives public funding, including political subdivisions, special tax districts, school districts and institutions of higher education. "Public body" includes an entity or individual acting on behalf of or within the scope of the authority of the public body. SECTION 3. PROHIBITING PUBLIC BODIES FROM ENTERING INTO AGREEMENTS USED TO DETAIN INDIVIDUALS FOR FEDERAL CIVIL IMMIGRATION VIOLATIONS AND REQUIRING PUBLIC BODIES TO TERMINATE ANY SUCH EXISTING AGREEMENTS.-- A. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to be a party to an agreement to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations, including an intergovernmental services agreement to detain individuals for civil immigration violations. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to a rider, amendment, supplement or other modification to an agreement where the rider, amendment, supplement or other modification is to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations. B. A public body that is a party to an existing agreement that is used to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations shall, upon the effective date of the Immigrant Safety Act, terminate the agreement upon the earliest date permissible under the terms of the agreement, with respect to all provisions that relate to the detention of individuals for federal civil immigration violations. C. A public body shall not sell, trade, lease or otherwise dispose of any real property to be used for the detention of individuals for federal civil immigration violations. D. A public body shall not impose or continue in effect any law, ordinance, policy or regulation that violates or conflicts with the provisions of the Immigrant Safety Act. E. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ability of law enforcement personnel to detain individuals or to perform brief investigative stops as permitted by state law. SECTION 4. PROHIBITING PUBLIC BODIES FROM ENTERING INTO AGREEMENTS TO DEPUTIZE OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS TO PERFORM FUNCTIONS OF IMMIGRATION OFFICERS.-- A. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to be a party to an agreement to investigate, apprehend, detain or transport individuals pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1357(g) or 8 C.F.R. Section 287.7. B. A public body shall not agree to be a party to an agreement that deputizes officers, employees or agents of the public body to perform a function of an immigration officer in relation to the investigation, apprehension, detention or transportation of noncitizens in the United States or the removal of noncitizens from the United States. C. A public body that is a party to an existing agreement to investigate, apprehend, detain or transport individuals pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1357(g) or 8 C.F.R. Section 287.7 shall, upon the effective date of the Immigrant Safety Act, terminate the agreement upon the earliest date permissible under the terms of the agreement. Where the termination clause of the agreement permits the public body to invoke exigent circumstances involving public safety, the public body shall do so.
Michelle Lujan Grisham signed HB 9. The reviewed Immigrant Safety Act provisions of HB 9 prohibit public bodies from entering or renewing specified civil-immigration detention and deputization agreements and require existing covered agreements, upon the act’s effective date, to end at the earliest date allowed by their terms. For the covered section 1357(g)/287.7 agreements, public bodies must invoke a public-safety exigency termination clause where the agreement permits it. They restrict disposition of public property for that detention purpose while preserving lawful state-law detention and brief investigative stops. The signing does not establish that a particular agreement was terminated or a facility closed, and does not determine any resident’s immigration status.
Signed by Governor on 2026-02-05, Chapter 5 of the 2026 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and both lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. The reviewed immigration provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or determine any particular resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. DEFINITION.--As used in the Immigrant Safety Act, "public body" means a state or local government, a sheriff's department, an advisory board, a commission, an agency or an entity created by the constitution of New Mexico or any branch of government that receives public funding, including political subdivisions, special tax districts, school districts and institutions of higher education. "Public body" includes an entity or individual acting on behalf of or within the scope of the authority of the public body. SECTION 3. PROHIBITING PUBLIC BODIES FROM ENTERING INTO AGREEMENTS USED TO DETAIN INDIVIDUALS FOR FEDERAL CIVIL IMMIGRATION VIOLATIONS AND REQUIRING PUBLIC BODIES TO TERMINATE ANY SUCH EXISTING AGREEMENTS.-- A. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to be a party to an agreement to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations, including an intergovernmental services agreement to detain individuals for civil immigration violations. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to a rider, amendment, supplement or other modification to an agreement where the rider, amendment, supplement or other modification is to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations. B. A public body that is a party to an existing agreement that is used to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations shall, upon the effective date of the Immigrant Safety Act, terminate the agreement upon the earliest date permissible under the terms of the agreement, with respect to all provisions that relate to the detention of individuals for federal civil immigration violations. C. A public body shall not sell, trade, lease or otherwise dispose of any real property to be used for the detention of individuals for federal civil immigration violations. D. A public body shall not impose or continue in effect any law, ordinance, policy or regulation that violates or conflicts with the provisions of the Immigrant Safety Act. E. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ability of law enforcement personnel to detain individuals or to perform brief investigative stops as permitted by state law. SECTION 4. PROHIBITING PUBLIC BODIES FROM ENTERING INTO AGREEMENTS TO DEPUTIZE OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS TO PERFORM FUNCTIONS OF IMMIGRATION OFFICERS.-- A. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to be a party to an agreement to investigate, apprehend, detain or transport individuals pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1357(g) or 8 C.F.R. Section 287.7. B. A public body shall not agree to be a party to an agreement that deputizes officers, employees or agents of the public body to perform a function of an immigration officer in relation to the investigation, apprehension, detention or transportation of noncitizens in the United States or the removal of noncitizens from the United States. C. A public body that is a party to an existing agreement to investigate, apprehend, detain or transport individuals pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1357(g) or 8 C.F.R. Section 287.7 shall, upon the effective date of the Immigrant Safety Act, terminate the agreement upon the earliest date permissible under the terms of the agreement. Where the termination clause of the agreement permits the public body to invoke exigent circumstances involving public safety, the public body shall do so.
The reviewed HB 171 graduation provisions apply beginning with students entering ninth grade in 2025–2026. They require at least 24 units with specified English, mathematics, science, social-science, physical-education, health and elective components, including two locally set units. Algebra 2 must be offered but is not a required unit in the new sequence. The text allows qualifying career and work-based courses and requires transfer acceptance of earned local units. These requirements concern future graduates, not proof of an increase in already measured adult attainment.
Signed by Governor on 2024-02-09, Chapter 2 of the 2024 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The fact measures diploma-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. Programs for younger students concern a possible future component of adult attainment rather than the previously measured population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
O. Beginning with students entering the ninth grade in the 2025-2026 school year, successful completion of a minimum of twenty-four units aligned to the state academic content and performance standards shall be required for graduation and the award of a diploma of excellence. These units shall be as follows: (1) four units in English, which shall include a three-unit sequence; provided that department- approved work-based learning, career technical education or English language development courses that meet state English or English language development academic content and performance standards may qualify as required English units; (2) four units in mathematics, two of which shall include a sequence of algebra 1 and geometry or another integrated pathway of mathematics equivalent to algebra 1 and geometry; provided that financial literacy courses or department-approved work-based learning or career technical education courses that meet state mathematics academic content and performance standards may qualify as required mathematics units; and provided further that algebra 2 shall be offered as a mathematics course; (3) three units in science, two of which shall have a laboratory component; provided that department- approved work-based learning or career technical education courses that meet state science academic content and performance standards may qualify as required science units; (4) four units in social science, which shall include United States history and geography, which course content contains New Mexico history; government and economics and personal financial literacy, which course content contains civics; and world history and geography; (5) one unit in physical education, as determined by the school district or charter school, which may include a physical education program that meets state academic content and performance standards or participation in marching band, dance programs, junior reserve officers' training corps or interscholastic sports sanctioned by the New Mexico activities association or any other co-curricular physical activity; (6) one-half unit in health education; provided that this one-half unit may be earned in either middle or high school; (7) five and one-half elective units that meet department academic content and performance standards and that shall include a two-unit pathway concentration of the student's choice in a language other than English, including American sign language; fine arts; health; military career preparation; a career technical education program; or community or service learning, a capstone course or work- based learning; provided that financial literacy, computer science, student service learning, career technical education courses and a sequence of languages other than English shall be offered as electives; and provided further that media literacy and pre-apprenticeship programs may be offered as electives; and (8) two units set by each local school board or governing body of a charter school that meet department academic content and performance standards. P. If a high school student who has taken one or both units provided in Paragraph (8) of Subsection O of this section moves from one school district or charter school to another, the receiving school district or charter school shall accept those earned units toward the student's graduation.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified New Mexico officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s New Mexico candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
55 statements from 14 candidates
2026 New Mexico Commissioner of Public Lands — General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements
The New Mexico State Land Office has a clear and dedicated mission – to protect and preserve state trust land while generating resources for our state institutions, like our public schools, hospitals, and universities. As your Land Commissioner, Juan will be first and foremost dedicated to protectin…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public lands, energy, water, and environment
Candidate campaign source
The New Mexico State Land Office has a clear and dedicated mission – to protect and preserve state trust land while generating resources for our state institutions, like our public schools, hospitals, and universities. As your Land Commissioner, Juan will be first and foremost dedicated to protecting public lands, strengthening economies by continuing to generate resources for communities, and ensuring that land and water remain in the hands of those who steward them responsibly today and will continue to do so for generations to come.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
In the last decade, New Mexico has risen to be the second largest oil producing state in the country. This industry is especially important to the State Land Office as royalties from the production of oil and gas fuel New Mexico’s Land Grant Permanent Fund, sending billions of dollars to our public …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public lands, energy, water, and environment
Candidate campaign source
In the last decade, New Mexico has risen to be the second largest oil producing state in the country. This industry is especially important to the State Land Office as royalties from the production of oil and gas fuel New Mexico’s Land Grant Permanent Fund, sending billions of dollars to our public schools and early childhood education system every year. The mineral acres leased to the industry are constitutionally held in trust for the benefit of future generations of New Mexicans. As your Commissioner, Juan will partner with the industry and the communities in which they are active to the best benefit of New Mexicans. The most prosperous industry in our state should be held to the highest standard of responsible operation in order to protect the health of our people and the health of the land.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Energy production plays a critical role in funding New Mexico's public schools and services. Michael supports the responsible development of oil and gas resources while ensuring land and environmental protections remain in place.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Access to Public Lands
Candidate campaign source
Energy production plays a critical role in funding New Mexico's public schools and services. Michael supports the responsible development of oil and gas resources while ensuring land and environmental protections remain in place.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Energy production plays a critical role in funding New Mexico's public schools and services. Michael supports the responsible development of oil and gas resources while ensuring land and environmental protections remain in place. He also recognizes the growing importance of renewable energy in New M…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Agriculture and rural policy
Candidate campaign source
Energy production plays a critical role in funding New Mexico's public schools and services. Michael supports the responsible development of oil and gas resources while ensuring land and environmental protections remain in place. He also recognizes the growing importance of renewable energy in New Mexico's future. As Land Commissioner, he will work to expand opportunities in wind, solar, and geothermal energy ensuring that New Mexico continues to lead the way in both traditional and renewable energy sectors. Equally important, Michael understands that New Mexico's farmers and ranchers are the backbone of our rural communities and essential to our way of life. He is committed to advocating for their rights, protecting grazing access, and ensuring that agriculture remains a vital part of our states economy and land use strategy.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Address the doctor shortage by joining interstate medical compacts, expanding residency programs to rural areas, and bolstering student loan repayment and housing incentives.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Address the doctor shortage by joining interstate medical compacts, expanding residency programs to rural areas, and bolstering student loan repayment and housing incentives.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Deb Haaland is a fierce leader who stood up against attacks on our rights and the millionaires and billionaires rigging the system against hard working New Mexicans. When she’s Governor, Deb will protect our communities from Donald Trump and ICE so that we can focus on our biggest challenges – reduc…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Deb Haaland is a fierce leader who stood up against attacks on our rights and the millionaires and billionaires rigging the system against hard working New Mexicans. When she’s Governor, Deb will protect our communities from Donald Trump and ICE so that we can focus on our biggest challenges – reducing crime, bettering education, and bringing down prices on everything from healthcare to weekly groceries.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Expand down payment assistance programs for first time home buyers and assistance programs for workers in critical sectors such as education, healthcare, public safety, and social work.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
Expand down payment assistance programs for first time home buyers and assistance programs for workers in critical sectors such as education, healthcare, public safety, and social work.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
No matter their background, every child in New Mexico deserves a fair shot, the chance to dream big, the ability to reach their full potential. Deb is a proud product of public schools and has a plan to make New Mexico a state where kids can find opportunity when they’re grown. That starts with educ…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
No matter their background, every child in New Mexico deserves a fair shot, the chance to dream big, the ability to reach their full potential. Deb is a proud product of public schools and has a plan to make New Mexico a state where kids can find opportunity when they’re grown. That starts with education. By working together with students, parents, teachers, businesses and unions, we can build new solutions.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Adopt and expand statewide Community School Models that provide wrap-around services like counseling, school based health care, dental, family support, and community engagement at schools so parents and caregivers have convenient services while they’re working and caring for their families.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Adopt and expand statewide Community School Models that provide wrap-around services like counseling, school based health care, dental, family support, and community engagement at schools so parents and caregivers have convenient services while they’re working and caring for their families.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
A growing economy also requires a workforce ready to step into real jobs. My plan focuses on clear, practical pathways from education into careers. That includes expanding high-quality career and technical education in high schools so students can graduate with industry-recognized certifications and…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
A growing economy also requires a workforce ready to step into real jobs. My plan focuses on clear, practical pathways from education into careers. That includes expanding high-quality career and technical education in high schools so students can graduate with industry-recognized certifications and move directly into the workforce, apprenticeships, or further training.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Public safety is the foundation for everything else we want to achieve. Safer neighborhoods lead to stronger schools, a healthier economy, and communities where families want to stay. Restoring deterrence and supporting law enforcement is how we begin building a safer, more prosperous New Mexico.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
Public safety is the foundation for everything else we want to achieve. Safer neighborhoods lead to stronger schools, a healthier economy, and communities where families want to stay. Restoring deterrence and supporting law enforcement is how we begin building a safer, more prosperous New Mexico.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Energy policy also has to look beyond generation. New Mexico needs to update our power grid. Transmission lines, substations, storage, and backup capacity all matter. Without these investments, adding new power sources won’t improve reliability. A stable grid protects households, supports hospitals …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure
Candidate campaign source
Energy policy also has to look beyond generation. New Mexico needs to update our power grid. Transmission lines, substations, storage, and backup capacity all matter. Without these investments, adding new power sources won’t improve reliability. A stable grid protects households, supports hospitals and schools, and reduces the risk of outages.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I support holding the education system accountable for results by tying a portion of funding to measurable improvements in literacy, math skills, and graduation rates. With the current formula for funding in place, this will be a challenge but working with legislators on all sides, we can make a cha…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
I support holding the education system accountable for results by tying a portion of funding to measurable improvements in literacy, math skills, and graduation rates. With the current formula for funding in place, this will be a challenge but working with legislators on all sides, we can make a change that benefits all New Mexico children. Schools that help students make real progress should be supported and rewarded. When outcomes do not improve, the system should change course. Accountability should focus on helping schools get better, not punishing students.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Strong schools depend on strong teachers and leaders. I support “grow-your-own” programs that help local students become educators and return to serve their communities, along with efforts to strengthen school leadership and retain teachers.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Strong schools depend on strong teachers and leaders. I support “grow-your-own” programs that help local students become educators and return to serve their communities, along with efforts to strengthen school leadership and retain teachers.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
My goal is an education system that empowers parents, supports teachers, holds the system accountable, and delivers real results for New Mexico students at every stage.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
My goal is an education system that empowers parents, supports teachers, holds the system accountable, and delivers real results for New Mexico students at every stage.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This strategy is about expanding opportunity, not taking anything away. A broader mix of industries, strong career pathways starting in high school, and fewer barriers to work will create a more resilient economy, steadier growth, and stronger communities. My goal is a New Mexico where innovation le…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
This strategy is about expanding opportunity, not taking anything away. A broader mix of industries, strong career pathways starting in high school, and fewer barriers to work will create a more resilient economy, steadier growth, and stronger communities. My goal is a New Mexico where innovation leads to local jobs, workers can step into high-paying careers, and businesses see the state as a place to invest for the long term.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
My approach focuses on industries where New Mexico already has a competitive advantage and room to grow. That includes research and development, where our national labs, universities, and research institutions generate world-class innovation that too often fails to turn into local businesses or jobs…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability
Candidate campaign source
My approach focuses on industries where New Mexico already has a competitive advantage and room to grow. That includes research and development, where our national labs, universities, and research institutions generate world-class innovation that too often fails to turn into local businesses or jobs. I support policies that help move ideas from the lab to the marketplace by strengthening incubators, accelerators, and manufacturing hubs so innovation creates opportunity here at home.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
It also means aligning education and training with real employer needs through stronger coordination between high schools, community colleges, universities, employers, and workforce agencies. Students and working adults should be able to see a clear path into careers that offer good pay and long-ter…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
It also means aligning education and training with real employer needs through stronger coordination between high schools, community colleges, universities, employers, and workforce agencies. Students and working adults should be able to see a clear path into careers that offer good pay and long-term growth, whether that path runs through a classroom, a shop floor, or an apprenticeship.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Families also deserve options. When schools consistently fail to meet student needs, parents and students should not be trapped with no alternatives. Responsibly expanding school choice and high-quality charter schools creates opportunity for families while encouraging improvement across the system.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Families also deserve options. When schools consistently fail to meet student needs, parents and students should not be trapped with no alternatives. Responsibly expanding school choice and high-quality charter schools creates opportunity for families while encouraging improvement across the system.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Trade school programs should prioritize hands-on, AI-resistant careers such as electricians, plumbers, HVAC technicians, welders, mechanics, and other skilled trades that cannot be outsourced or replaced by artificial intelligence.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Technology and cybersecurity
Candidate campaign source
Trade school programs should prioritize hands-on, AI-resistant careers such as electricians, plumbers, HVAC technicians, welders, mechanics, and other skilled trades that cannot be outsourced or replaced by artificial intelligence.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
We have a chronic absenteeism problem in New Mexico schools. We must develop programs to tackle chronic absenteeism, working with school districts and parents to keep our kids in the classroom and off the streets.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
We have a chronic absenteeism problem in New Mexico schools. We must develop programs to tackle chronic absenteeism, working with school districts and parents to keep our kids in the classroom and off the streets.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Parents must be true partners in education. Families deserve clear, easy-to-use tools that allow them to see curriculum materials, track academic progress, communicate with teachers and staff, and stay informed. Schools should be transparent and responsive, with clear processes to address concerns r…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Parents must be true partners in education. Families deserve clear, easy-to-use tools that allow them to see curriculum materials, track academic progress, communicate with teachers and staff, and stay informed. Schools should be transparent and responsive, with clear processes to address concerns related to health, classroom content, and student privacy.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
When schools fail, it is important to not accept such failures. In recent years, New Mexico’s legislature lowered math standards (2024 HB 171). Our state continues to lower the bar when it comes to our kids, denying them the appropriate education to be successful. Under a Hull administration, we wil…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
When schools fail, it is important to not accept such failures. In recent years, New Mexico’s legislature lowered math standards (2024 HB 171). Our state continues to lower the bar when it comes to our kids, denying them the appropriate education to be successful. Under a Hull administration, we will raise the educational bar and make sure our children have the tools necessary to thrive.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
View 2 more statements from Stephanie Garcia Richard
Schools & education
I will bring real experience to making the office of Lieutenant Governor work for all New Mexicans. I was a school teacher for 19 years and served Los Alamos for six years as a State Representative, fighting for more funding for our public schools, crime prevention, and addiction treatment. I then b…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Stephanie Garcia Richard for Lt. Governor: Fighting for our New Mexico
Candidate campaign source
I will bring real experience to making the office of Lieutenant Governor work for all New Mexicans. I was a school teacher for 19 years and served Los Alamos for six years as a State Representative, fighting for more funding for our public schools, crime prevention, and addiction treatment. I then became the first woman and first Hispana elected to be New Mexico's Commissioner of Public Lands, where I brought billions of dollars to New Mexico's public schools, increased renewable energy production sevenfold, restored stolen land back to Tribes, and protected more public land from federal land grabs than any Public Land Commissioner has done before.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
✓ Tackle the CPA Workforce ShortageNew Mexico is facing a critical shortage of licensed auditors and CPAs. We’ll expand partnerships with universities and firms to build a more robust, diverse pipeline—equipping the next generation of professionals to safeguard public dollars.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Our Next Chapter: Priorities for a Stronger, Smarter Government
Candidate campaign source
✓ Tackle the CPA Workforce ShortageNew Mexico is facing a critical shortage of licensed auditors and CPAs. We’ll expand partnerships with universities and firms to build a more robust, diverse pipeline—equipping the next generation of professionals to safeguard public dollars.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published New Mexico candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
New Mexico incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current New Mexico legislators and New Mexico’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from New Mexico’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 New Mexico incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Cristina Parajón
New Mexico House of Representatives, District 25 · D–NM
HB 124 creates a New Americans Division in the Workforce Solutions Department. The act defines new Americans as U.S. residents who are not citizens or were not citizens at birth; it does not impose a recent-arrival requirement. The reviewed section directs workforce and educational initiatives, identification of professional-licensing pathways, support for employers and economic sectors, and an information center that includes assistance to eligible lawful permanent residents seeking naturalization. The division’s report is due August 1, 2027, then July 1 each year, covering the preceding twelve months. These duties do not themselves grant citizenship, employment or a professional license.
Signed by Governor on 2026-03-09, Chapter 61 of the 2026 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and both lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. The reviewed immigration provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or determine any particular resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. Section 9-26-3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2007, Chapter 200, Section 3) is amended to read: "9-26-3. DEFINITIONS.--As used in the Workforce Solutions Department Act: A. "department" means the workforce solutions department; B. "new Americans" means people residing in the United States who are not citizens of the United States or who were not citizens of the United States at birth; and C. "secretary" means the secretary of workforce solutions." SECTION 2. Section 9-26-4 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2007, Chapter 200, Section 4) is amended to read: "9-26-4. WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS DEPARTMENT CREATED.--The "workforce solutions department" is created in the executive branch pursuant to the Executive Reorganization Act. The department is a cabinet department that includes: A. the office of the secretary; B. the administrative services division; C. the unemployment insurance division; D. the labor relations division; E. the workforce technology division; F. the workforce transition services division; and G. the new Americans division." SECTION 3. A new section of the Workforce Solutions Department Act is enacted to read: "NEW AMERICANS DIVISION--PURPOSE--DUTIES.-- A. The purpose of the new Americans division of the department is to support new Americans residing in New Mexico in achieving their maximum economic potential in New Mexico's workforce and as entrepreneurs. In furtherance of this purpose, the division shall: (1) support and expand educational, workforce training and other initiatives that improve the integration of new Americans into the state's economy; (2) identify strategies for improving licensure pathways for new Americans who have been professionally trained or licensed in another country; (3) assist businesses that employ new Americans by identifying, attracting and retaining top global talent required to remain competitive in a global economy; (4) identify and support pathways for new Americans to advance priority sectors identified in the state's workforce development and economic development plans; and (5) serve as an information center by providing resources and engagement opportunities to businesses, community-based organizations, workers, community members, state agencies and local governments on policies and legislation affecting new Americans, including supporting eligible lawful permanent residents in becoming naturalized United States citizens. B. The new Americans division shall, as deemed necessary and appropriate by the department, work with other divisions within the department, the economic development department, the higher education department, the public education department, the department of health, the health care authority, the homeland security and emergency management department, the department of public safety or the regulation and licensing department to fulfill the duties of the new Americans division. C. By August 1, 2027, and by July 1 of each year thereafter, the new Americans division shall provide a report to an interim committee that studies economic and rural development and policy, the secretary, the governor and members of the legislature on the activities of the division in the preceding twelve months, including an analysis of the economic impact, status, population and workforce numbers of new Americans in the state."
The reviewed Immigrant Safety Act provisions of HB 9 prohibit public bodies from entering or renewing specified civil-immigration detention and deputization agreements and require existing covered agreements, upon the act’s effective date, to end at the earliest date allowed by their terms. For the covered section 1357(g)/287.7 agreements, public bodies must invoke a public-safety exigency termination clause where the agreement permits it. They restrict disposition of public property for that detention purpose while preserving lawful state-law detention and brief investigative stops. The signing does not establish that a particular agreement was terminated or a facility closed, and does not determine any resident’s immigration status.
Signed by Governor on 2026-02-05, Chapter 5 of the 2026 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and both lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. The reviewed immigration provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or determine any particular resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. DEFINITION.--As used in the Immigrant Safety Act, "public body" means a state or local government, a sheriff's department, an advisory board, a commission, an agency or an entity created by the constitution of New Mexico or any branch of government that receives public funding, including political subdivisions, special tax districts, school districts and institutions of higher education. "Public body" includes an entity or individual acting on behalf of or within the scope of the authority of the public body. SECTION 3. PROHIBITING PUBLIC BODIES FROM ENTERING INTO AGREEMENTS USED TO DETAIN INDIVIDUALS FOR FEDERAL CIVIL IMMIGRATION VIOLATIONS AND REQUIRING PUBLIC BODIES TO TERMINATE ANY SUCH EXISTING AGREEMENTS.-- A. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to be a party to an agreement to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations, including an intergovernmental services agreement to detain individuals for civil immigration violations. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to a rider, amendment, supplement or other modification to an agreement where the rider, amendment, supplement or other modification is to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations. B. A public body that is a party to an existing agreement that is used to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations shall, upon the effective date of the Immigrant Safety Act, terminate the agreement upon the earliest date permissible under the terms of the agreement, with respect to all provisions that relate to the detention of individuals for federal civil immigration violations. C. A public body shall not sell, trade, lease or otherwise dispose of any real property to be used for the detention of individuals for federal civil immigration violations. D. A public body shall not impose or continue in effect any law, ordinance, policy or regulation that violates or conflicts with the provisions of the Immigrant Safety Act. E. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ability of law enforcement personnel to detain individuals or to perform brief investigative stops as permitted by state law. SECTION 4. PROHIBITING PUBLIC BODIES FROM ENTERING INTO AGREEMENTS TO DEPUTIZE OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS TO PERFORM FUNCTIONS OF IMMIGRATION OFFICERS.-- A. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to be a party to an agreement to investigate, apprehend, detain or transport individuals pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1357(g) or 8 C.F.R. Section 287.7. B. A public body shall not agree to be a party to an agreement that deputizes officers, employees or agents of the public body to perform a function of an immigration officer in relation to the investigation, apprehension, detention or transportation of noncitizens in the United States or the removal of noncitizens from the United States. C. A public body that is a party to an existing agreement to investigate, apprehend, detain or transport individuals pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1357(g) or 8 C.F.R. Section 287.7 shall, upon the effective date of the Immigrant Safety Act, terminate the agreement upon the earliest date permissible under the terms of the agreement. Where the termination clause of the agreement permits the public body to invoke exigent circumstances involving public safety, the public body shall do so.
New Mexico House of Representatives, District 10 · D–NM
1 proposalView proposals from G. Andrés RomeroNew Mexico Legislature · HB 171
SCHOOL GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS
Feb 9, 2024 · Enacted · Chapter 2
G. Andrés Romero · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed HB 171 graduation provisions apply beginning with students entering ninth grade in 2025–2026. They require at least 24 units with specified English, mathematics, science, social-science, physical-education, health and elective components, including two locally set units. Algebra 2 must be offered but is not a required unit in the new sequence. The text allows qualifying career and work-based courses and requires transfer acceptance of earned local units. These requirements concern future graduates, not proof of an increase in already measured adult attainment.
Signed by Governor on 2024-02-09, Chapter 2 of the 2024 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The fact measures diploma-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. Programs for younger students concern a possible future component of adult attainment rather than the previously measured population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
O. Beginning with students entering the ninth grade in the 2025-2026 school year, successful completion of a minimum of twenty-four units aligned to the state academic content and performance standards shall be required for graduation and the award of a diploma of excellence. These units shall be as follows: (1) four units in English, which shall include a three-unit sequence; provided that department- approved work-based learning, career technical education or English language development courses that meet state English or English language development academic content and performance standards may qualify as required English units; (2) four units in mathematics, two of which shall include a sequence of algebra 1 and geometry or another integrated pathway of mathematics equivalent to algebra 1 and geometry; provided that financial literacy courses or department-approved work-based learning or career technical education courses that meet state mathematics academic content and performance standards may qualify as required mathematics units; and provided further that algebra 2 shall be offered as a mathematics course; (3) three units in science, two of which shall have a laboratory component; provided that department- approved work-based learning or career technical education courses that meet state science academic content and performance standards may qualify as required science units; (4) four units in social science, which shall include United States history and geography, which course content contains New Mexico history; government and economics and personal financial literacy, which course content contains civics; and world history and geography; (5) one unit in physical education, as determined by the school district or charter school, which may include a physical education program that meets state academic content and performance standards or participation in marching band, dance programs, junior reserve officers' training corps or interscholastic sports sanctioned by the New Mexico activities association or any other co-curricular physical activity; (6) one-half unit in health education; provided that this one-half unit may be earned in either middle or high school; (7) five and one-half elective units that meet department academic content and performance standards and that shall include a two-unit pathway concentration of the student's choice in a language other than English, including American sign language; fine arts; health; military career preparation; a career technical education program; or community or service learning, a capstone course or work- based learning; provided that financial literacy, computer science, student service learning, career technical education courses and a sequence of languages other than English shall be offered as electives; and provided further that media literacy and pre-apprenticeship programs may be offered as electives; and (8) two units set by each local school board or governing body of a charter school that meet department academic content and performance standards. P. If a high school student who has taken one or both units provided in Paragraph (8) of Subsection O of this section moves from one school district or charter school to another, the receiving school district or charter school shall accept those earned units toward the student's graduation.
Only current New Mexico officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a New Mexico statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
New Mexico snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to New Mexico, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.