Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and New Mexico public-safety context.
Reported violent-crime rate744.7 per 100k2024 · #1 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate2,890.9 per 100k2024 · #1 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage93.7%2024 · #42 of 50 · highest first
New Mexico over time
Explore New Mexico readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. New Mexico officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a New Mexico effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a New Mexico change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Reported violent-crime rate New Mexico · source units
New MexicoPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
11 of 11 reviewed New Mexico actions match · 11 date markers shown. 33 major events shown separately.
New Mexico · 2024: 744.7 per 100k · Rank #1 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. New Mexico's coverage fell below 90% from 2021 through 2023 (87.7%–89.5%), so those years are flagged as partial reporting. Coverage was 90.8% in 2020 and 93.7% in 2024. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
New Mexico Reported violent-crime rate · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
New Mexico · state comparison
Reported crime over time
Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.
New Mexico · 2024744.7 per 100k
New Mexico rank#1among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Reported violent-crime rate
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. New Mexico's coverage fell below 90% from 2021 through 2023 (87.7%–89.5%), so those years are flagged as partial reporting. Coverage was 90.8% in 2020 and 93.7% in 2024. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
New Mexico
2024 · New Mexico: 744.7 per 100k · Rank #1 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
New Mexico Reported violent-crime rate history
Period
New Mexico
Compare
2015
642.5 per 100k
2016
681.4 per 100k
2017
785.4 per 100k
2018
822.2 per 100k
2019
767.3 per 100k
2020
800 per 100k
2021
828.6 per 100k
2022
833.5 per 100k
2023
794.6 per 100k
2024
744.7 per 100k
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.
Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Mexico · 744.7 per 100k2024 · Rank #1 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Mexico · your comparison
744.7 per 100k
—
#2
Alaska
731.9 per 100k
—
#3
Tennessee
604.3 per 100k
—
#4
Arkansas
589.6 per 100k
—
#5*
Louisiana
504.5 per 100k
82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6
Colorado
486.8 per 100k
—
#7
California
478.4 per 100k
—
#8
Kansas
474.7 per 100k
—
#9
Missouri
472.7 per 100k
—
#10
Michigan
442.6 per 100k
—
#11
South Carolina
440.8 per 100k
—
#12
Arizona
433 per 100k
—
#13
Oklahoma
429.3 per 100k
—
#14
Montana
428 per 100k
—
#15
Maryland
425.9 per 100k
—
#16
Nevada
408.6 per 100k
—
#17
Texas
397.8 per 100k
—
#18
New York
392.2 per 100k
—
#19
North Carolina
382.9 per 100k
—
#20
Alabama
380.8 per 100k
—
#21
Delaware
368.4 per 100k
—
#22*
South Dakota
356.9 per 100k
89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*
Indiana
349.2 per 100k
87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24
Oregon
341.1 per 100k
—
#25
Washington
331.8 per 100k
—
#26
Georgia
328 per 100k
—
#27
Massachusetts
317.9 per 100k
—
#28
Ohio
311.9 per 100k
—
#29
Illinois
294.5 per 100k
—
#30
Wisconsin
287.6 per 100k
—
#31
West Virginia
263.8 per 100k
—
#32*
Florida
262 per 100k
81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33
Minnesota
259.4 per 100k
—
#34
North Dakota
258 per 100k
—
#35
Pennsylvania
251.3 per 100k
—
#36
Iowa
247.2 per 100k
—
#37
Utah
237.8 per 100k
—
#38
Idaho
236.6 per 100k
—
#39
Hawaii
230.3 per 100k
—
#40
Vermont
227.1 per 100k
—
#41
Kentucky
226.7 per 100k
—
#42
Nebraska
224.6 per 100k
—
#43
Virginia
223.7 per 100k
—
#44
New Jersey
221.9 per 100k
—
#45*
Mississippi
219.6 per 100k
65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*
Wyoming
212.5 per 100k
89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47
Rhode Island
154.9 per 100k
—
#48
Connecticut
139.2 per 100k
—
#49
New Hampshire
112.3 per 100k
—
#50
Maine
102.6 per 100k
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
New Mexico's coverage fell below 90% from 2021 through 2023 (87.7%–89.5%), so those years are flagged as partial reporting. Coverage was 90.8% in 2020 and 93.7% in 2024.
Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 93.7%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
New Mexico's coverage fell below 90% from 2021 through 2023 (87.7%–89.5%), so those years are flagged as partial reporting. Coverage was 90.8% in 2020 and 93.7% in 2024.
Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 93.7%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.
New Mexico · 2024563
New Mexico rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Firearm deaths
Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.
Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.
Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Mexico · 5632024 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
4,389
—
#2
Florida
3,191
—
#3
California
2,853
—
#4
Georgia
1,985
—
#5
North Carolina
1,835
—
#6
Ohio
1,745
—
#7
Pennsylvania
1,624
—
#8
Illinois
1,563
—
#9
Tennessee
1,448
—
#10
Arizona
1,331
—
#11
Missouri
1,234
—
#12
Michigan
1,228
—
#13
Alabama
1,212
—
#14
Indiana
1,196
—
#15
Virginia
1,153
—
#16
South Carolina
1,064
—
#17
Louisiana
1,031
—
#18
Colorado
961
—
#19
Washington
915
—
#20
New York
896
—
#21
Kentucky
870
—
#22
Mississippi
810
—
#23
Oklahoma
794
—
#24
Wisconsin
735
—
#25
Maryland
716
—
#26
Oregon
663
—
#27
Arkansas
638
—
#28
Minnesota
582
—
#28
Nevada
582
—
#30
New Mexico · your comparison
563
—
#31
Utah
454
—
#32
Kansas
446
—
#33
New Jersey
393
—
#34
Iowa
389
—
#35
Idaho
331
—
#36
Massachusetts
287
—
#37
West Virginia
281
—
#38
Montana
247
—
#39
Connecticut
224
—
#40
Nebraska
218
—
#41
Alaska
182
—
#42
Maine
181
—
#43
South Dakota
159
—
#44
New Hampshire
152
—
#45
Wyoming
143
—
#46
Delaware
123
—
#47
North Dakota
95
—
#48
Vermont
76
—
#49
Hawaii
56
—
#50
Rhode Island
55
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
11 of 11 reviewed New Mexico actions · newest first
May 21, 2026 · HR 1010 · BADGES for Native Communities Act · In CongressU.S. Congress · New Mexico delegation · HR 1010
BADGES for Native Communities Act
May 21, 2026 · In Congress
Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed section 202 of HR 1010 would create grants for eligible Tribal entities and qualifying state consortia to coordinate, document and improve investigations involving missing people, sexual violence and deaths of interest to Tribes. A participating state must report missing-person cases to national crime databases or have a grant-funded plan to do so; intended data sharing requires memoranda of understanding with the applicable Tribal partners. It authorizes $1 million annually for fiscal 2026–2030. This connection concerns the homicide-investigation component; missing-person cases and other death investigations are not automatically homicides. The proposal does not establish grant awards, resolved cases or a change in CDC homicide mortality.
Subcommittee Hearings Held No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
The CDC fact counts resident deaths classified as homicide from death certificates. Police-officer murders and homicide investigations involving Indigenous people concern subsets of these deaths. Missing-person cases, unidentified remains and other death investigations are not automatically homicides, and the CDC mortality measure is distinct from FBI police-reported murder. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Homicide deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
202.Missing or murdered response coordination grant program(a)Establishment of grant programThe Attorney General shall establish within the Office of Justice Programs a grant program under which the Attorney General shall make grants to eligible entities described in subsection (b) to carry out eligible activities described in subsection (c).(b)Eligible entities(1)In generalTo be eligible to receive a grant under the grant program established under subsection (a) an entity shall be—(A)an Indian Tribe; (B)a relevant Tribal organization;(C)subject to paragraph (2), a State, in consortium with—(i)1 or more Indian Tribes; and(ii)relevant Tribal organizations, if any;(D)a consortium of 2 or more Indian Tribes or relevant Tribal organizations; or(E)subject to paragraph (2), a consortium of 2 or more States in consortium with—(i)1 or more Indian Tribes; and(ii)relevant Tribal organizations, if any.(2)State eligibilityTo be eligible under subparagraph (C) or (E) of paragraph (1), a State shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Attorney General that the State—(A)(i)reports missing persons cases in the State to the national crime information databases; or(ii)if not, has a plan to do so using a grant received under the grant program established under subsection (a); and(B)if data sharing between the State and the Indian Tribes and relevant Tribal organizations with which the State is in consortium is part of the intended use of the grant received under the grant program established under subsection (a), has entered into a memorandum of understanding with each applicable Indian Tribe and relevant Tribal organization.(c)Eligible activitiesAn eligible entity receiving a grant under the grant program established under subsection (a) may use the grant—(1)to establish a statewide or regional center—(A)to document and track—(i)missing persons cases of interest to Indian Tribes;(ii)sexual violence cases of interest to Indian Tribes; and(iii)death investigations of interest to Indian Tribes; and(B)to input information regarding missing persons cases of interest to Indian Tribes, unclaimed human remains cases of interest to Indian Tribes, and unidentified remains cases of interest to Indian Tribes into the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System and the Missing Persons File in the National Crime Information Center; (2)to establish a State or regional commission to respond to, and to improve coordination between Federal law enforcement agencies, and Tribal, State, and local law enforcement agencies of the investigation of, missing persons cases of interest to Indian Tribes, sexual violence cases of interest to Indian Tribes, and death investigations of interest to Indian Tribes; and(3)to document, develop, and disseminate resources for the coordination and improvement of the investigation of missing persons cases of interest to Indian Tribes, sexual violence cases of interest to Indian Tribes, and death investigations of interest to Indian Tribes, including to develop local or statewide rapid notification or communication systems for alerts and other information relating to those cases.(d)Authorization of appropriationsThere is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the grant program established under subsection (a)(1) $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 3, 2026 · HB 61 · AGGRAVATED BATTERY ON POLICE OFFICER · Enacted · Chapter 15New Mexico Legislature · HB 61
AGGRAVATED BATTERY ON POLICE OFFICER
Mar 3, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 15
Andrea Reeb · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed subsection C of HB 61 makes aggravated battery consisting of unlawful touching or force with intent to injure a peace officer while the officer lawfully performs official duties a second-degree felony when it inflicts great bodily harm, involves a deadly weapon, or is committed in a manner capable of inflicting great bodily harm or death. This connection concerns the serious-injury or dangerous-weapon component of FBI aggravated assault, not every lesser battery described elsewhere in the statute. No crime-rate effect is established.
Signed by Governor on 2026-03-03, Chapter 15 of the 2026 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The FBI series includes reported murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. The reviewed provision concerns aggravated battery on a peace officer involving serious injury or a deadly weapon; not every offense covered by a broader statute belongs in this series. Reporting coverage is incomplete and variable. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
A. Aggravated battery upon a peace officer consists of the unlawful touching or application of force to the person of a peace officer with intent to injure that peace officer while the officer is in the lawful discharge of the officer's duties. […] C. Whoever commits aggravated battery upon a peace officer inflicting great bodily harm, or does so with a deadly weapon or in any manner whereby great bodily harm or death can be inflicted, is guilty of a second degree felony."
Michelle Lujan Grisham signed HB 61. The reviewed subsection C of HB 61 makes aggravated battery consisting of unlawful touching or force with intent to injure a peace officer while the officer lawfully performs official duties a second-degree felony when it inflicts great bodily harm, involves a deadly weapon, or is committed in a manner capable of inflicting great bodily harm or death. This connection concerns the serious-injury or dangerous-weapon component of FBI aggravated assault, not every lesser battery described elsewhere in the statute. No crime-rate effect is established.
Signed by Governor on 2026-03-03, Chapter 15 of the 2026 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The FBI series includes reported murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. The reviewed provision concerns aggravated battery on a peace officer involving serious injury or a deadly weapon; not every offense covered by a broader statute belongs in this series. Reporting coverage is incomplete and variable. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
A. Aggravated battery upon a peace officer consists of the unlawful touching or application of force to the person of a peace officer with intent to injure that peace officer while the officer is in the lawful discharge of the officer's duties. […] C. Whoever commits aggravated battery upon a peace officer inflicting great bodily harm, or does so with a deadly weapon or in any manner whereby great bodily harm or death can be inflicted, is guilty of a second degree felony."
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Feb 12, 2026 · SB 17 · STOP ILLEGAL GUN TRADE ACT · Action postponed indefinitelyNew Mexico Legislature · SB 17
STOP ILLEGAL GUN TRADE ACT
Feb 12, 2026 · Action postponed indefinitely
Micaelita Debbie O'Malley · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed introduced sections 3–4 of SB 17 proposed security rules for covered federally licensed firearm dealers in New Mexico, including alarms, entry protection and at least two years of video retention. The Department of Public Safety would determine which security rules apply to gun shows. Employees handling, selling or delivering firearms would have to be at least 21 and legally eligible to possess them. The proposal requires training within 30 days of hire and annually thereafter, with training before participation in sales from December 1, 2026. Topics include unlawful purchases, self-harm warning signs, theft prevention and safe storage. Use of the federal background-check system remains contingent on federal permission. The bill was action-postponed indefinitely; these are introduced-version proposals, not enacted rules or a review of later substitutes.
The official history records Action Postponed Indefinitely (API). The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not an independently dated postponement. This relationship reviews the introduced version; later substitutes and amendments are outside its selected excerpt. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
The mortality series includes firearm deaths across intents, including suicide and homicide. Storage rules and firearm regulation concern possible components of injury prevention without proving an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
D. "dealer" means a person or business in the state that holds a federal firearms license issued in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 923(a)(3); E. "department" means the department of public safety; […] SECTION 3. A new section of Chapter 30, Article 7 NMSA 1978 is enacted to read: " REQUIRING DEALER SECURITY MEASURES TO PREVENT THEFT AND LOSS OF FIREARMS.-- A. No later than July 1, 2026, the department, in collaboration with the attorney general, shall promulgate rules governing the physical security of dealer premises and inventory. The rules shall be effective beginning December 1, 2026 and shall require: (1) installation and use of security alarm systems on dealer premises that meet quality and other standards established by the department. Eligible security alarm systems shall have the capacity to be monitored by a central station and shall provide protection and monitoring for all accessible openings and partial motion and sound detection at all other areas of the premises; (2) site hardening, including locks on doors and windows and other features. Features shall be designed to prevent unauthorized entry, which may include bars or grates, security screens and commercial-grade metal doors; (3) installation and use of video surveillance systems, including video recording devices at each point of sale and each entrance and exit to the premises, which shall be recorded from both the indoor and outdoor vantage point, and the dealer shall maintain such recordings for a period of not less than two years; and (4) other reasonable requirements, as determined by the department and the attorney general, to reduce the risk of burglaries at dealers' premises and the theft of firearms in shipment to and from dealers' premises. B. The department shall specify in rules which, if any, of the security measures identified in Subsection A of this section apply to gun shows." SECTION 4. A new section of Chapter 30, Article 7 NMSA 1978 is enacted to read: " MINIMUM AGE OF EMPLOYMENT--REQUIRING BACKGROUND CHECKS AND TRAINING FOR DEALER EMPLOYEES.-- A. A dealer shall not employ a person to handle, sell or deliver firearms unless the person is at least twenty- one years of age and is not prohibited from possessing a firearm under state, municipal, tribal or federal law. The department shall promulgate rules to address dealer employee criminal history checks no later than August 1, 2026. The rules shall direct dealers to use the national instant criminal background check system to determine eligibility for current and prospective dealer employees only if the use of the national instant criminal background check system is permitted by federal regulations. B. A dealer shall complete the training developed by the department pursuant to Subsection C of this section and shall provide the training to all new employees within thirty days of employment and to all employees annually thereafter. Beginning December 1, 2026, no employee of any dealer shall participate in the sale or disposition of firearms unless that person has first received the training required by this section. The department shall promulgate rules setting forth minimum requirements for the maintenance of records of the training no later than August 1, 2026. C. No later than August 1, 2026, the department shall develop and make available to each dealer a training course in the conduct of firearm transfers, including: (1) federal and state laws governing firearm transfers and transactions; (2) how to recognize, identify, respond to and report straw purchases, illegal purchases and fraudulent activity; (3) how to recognize, identify, respond to and report an individual who intends to use a firearm for unlawful purposes or for self-harm; (4) how to prevent, respond to and report theft or burglary of firearms and ammunition; (5) how to educate customers on gun safety practices, including the safe handling and storage of firearms and ammunition; and (6) other topics the department deems necessary and appropriate."
The reviewed Immigrant Safety Act provisions of HB 9 prohibit public bodies from entering or renewing specified civil-immigration detention and deputization agreements and require existing covered agreements, upon the act’s effective date, to end at the earliest date allowed by their terms. For the covered section 1357(g)/287.7 agreements, public bodies must invoke a public-safety exigency termination clause where the agreement permits it. They restrict disposition of public property for that detention purpose while preserving lawful state-law detention and brief investigative stops. The signing does not establish that a particular agreement was terminated or a facility closed, and does not determine any resident’s immigration status.
Signed by Governor on 2026-02-05, Chapter 5 of the 2026 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and both lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. The reviewed immigration provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or determine any particular resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. DEFINITION.--As used in the Immigrant Safety Act, "public body" means a state or local government, a sheriff's department, an advisory board, a commission, an agency or an entity created by the constitution of New Mexico or any branch of government that receives public funding, including political subdivisions, special tax districts, school districts and institutions of higher education. "Public body" includes an entity or individual acting on behalf of or within the scope of the authority of the public body. SECTION 3. PROHIBITING PUBLIC BODIES FROM ENTERING INTO AGREEMENTS USED TO DETAIN INDIVIDUALS FOR FEDERAL CIVIL IMMIGRATION VIOLATIONS AND REQUIRING PUBLIC BODIES TO TERMINATE ANY SUCH EXISTING AGREEMENTS.-- A. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to be a party to an agreement to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations, including an intergovernmental services agreement to detain individuals for civil immigration violations. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to a rider, amendment, supplement or other modification to an agreement where the rider, amendment, supplement or other modification is to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations. B. A public body that is a party to an existing agreement that is used to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations shall, upon the effective date of the Immigrant Safety Act, terminate the agreement upon the earliest date permissible under the terms of the agreement, with respect to all provisions that relate to the detention of individuals for federal civil immigration violations. C. A public body shall not sell, trade, lease or otherwise dispose of any real property to be used for the detention of individuals for federal civil immigration violations. D. A public body shall not impose or continue in effect any law, ordinance, policy or regulation that violates or conflicts with the provisions of the Immigrant Safety Act. E. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ability of law enforcement personnel to detain individuals or to perform brief investigative stops as permitted by state law. SECTION 4. PROHIBITING PUBLIC BODIES FROM ENTERING INTO AGREEMENTS TO DEPUTIZE OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS TO PERFORM FUNCTIONS OF IMMIGRATION OFFICERS.-- A. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to be a party to an agreement to investigate, apprehend, detain or transport individuals pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1357(g) or 8 C.F.R. Section 287.7. B. A public body shall not agree to be a party to an agreement that deputizes officers, employees or agents of the public body to perform a function of an immigration officer in relation to the investigation, apprehension, detention or transportation of noncitizens in the United States or the removal of noncitizens from the United States. C. A public body that is a party to an existing agreement to investigate, apprehend, detain or transport individuals pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1357(g) or 8 C.F.R. Section 287.7 shall, upon the effective date of the Immigrant Safety Act, terminate the agreement upon the earliest date permissible under the terms of the agreement. Where the termination clause of the agreement permits the public body to invoke exigent circumstances involving public safety, the public body shall do so.
Michelle Lujan Grisham signed HB 9. The reviewed Immigrant Safety Act provisions of HB 9 prohibit public bodies from entering or renewing specified civil-immigration detention and deputization agreements and require existing covered agreements, upon the act’s effective date, to end at the earliest date allowed by their terms. For the covered section 1357(g)/287.7 agreements, public bodies must invoke a public-safety exigency termination clause where the agreement permits it. They restrict disposition of public property for that detention purpose while preserving lawful state-law detention and brief investigative stops. The signing does not establish that a particular agreement was terminated or a facility closed, and does not determine any resident’s immigration status.
Signed by Governor on 2026-02-05, Chapter 5 of the 2026 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and both lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. The reviewed immigration provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or determine any particular resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. DEFINITION.--As used in the Immigrant Safety Act, "public body" means a state or local government, a sheriff's department, an advisory board, a commission, an agency or an entity created by the constitution of New Mexico or any branch of government that receives public funding, including political subdivisions, special tax districts, school districts and institutions of higher education. "Public body" includes an entity or individual acting on behalf of or within the scope of the authority of the public body. SECTION 3. PROHIBITING PUBLIC BODIES FROM ENTERING INTO AGREEMENTS USED TO DETAIN INDIVIDUALS FOR FEDERAL CIVIL IMMIGRATION VIOLATIONS AND REQUIRING PUBLIC BODIES TO TERMINATE ANY SUCH EXISTING AGREEMENTS.-- A. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to be a party to an agreement to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations, including an intergovernmental services agreement to detain individuals for civil immigration violations. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to a rider, amendment, supplement or other modification to an agreement where the rider, amendment, supplement or other modification is to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations. B. A public body that is a party to an existing agreement that is used to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations shall, upon the effective date of the Immigrant Safety Act, terminate the agreement upon the earliest date permissible under the terms of the agreement, with respect to all provisions that relate to the detention of individuals for federal civil immigration violations. C. A public body shall not sell, trade, lease or otherwise dispose of any real property to be used for the detention of individuals for federal civil immigration violations. D. A public body shall not impose or continue in effect any law, ordinance, policy or regulation that violates or conflicts with the provisions of the Immigrant Safety Act. E. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ability of law enforcement personnel to detain individuals or to perform brief investigative stops as permitted by state law. SECTION 4. PROHIBITING PUBLIC BODIES FROM ENTERING INTO AGREEMENTS TO DEPUTIZE OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS TO PERFORM FUNCTIONS OF IMMIGRATION OFFICERS.-- A. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to be a party to an agreement to investigate, apprehend, detain or transport individuals pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1357(g) or 8 C.F.R. Section 287.7. B. A public body shall not agree to be a party to an agreement that deputizes officers, employees or agents of the public body to perform a function of an immigration officer in relation to the investigation, apprehension, detention or transportation of noncitizens in the United States or the removal of noncitizens from the United States. C. A public body that is a party to an existing agreement to investigate, apprehend, detain or transport individuals pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1357(g) or 8 C.F.R. Section 287.7 shall, upon the effective date of the Immigrant Safety Act, terminate the agreement upon the earliest date permissible under the terms of the agreement. Where the termination clause of the agreement permits the public body to invoke exigent circumstances involving public safety, the public body shall do so.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified New Mexico officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s New Mexico candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
23 statements from 11 candidates
2026 New Mexico Attorney General — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements
At a time when New Mexico has faced serious violent crime challenges, Torrez has argued that Democrats must speak honestly about crime and run on public safety. He’s emphasized targeted enforcement against repeat violent offenders, organized retail crime, fentanyl trafficking, and gun violence — lau…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Standing Up for New Mexico Families
Candidate campaign source
At a time when New Mexico has faced serious violent crime challenges, Torrez has argued that Democrats must speak honestly about crime and run on public safety. He’s emphasized targeted enforcement against repeat violent offenders, organized retail crime, fentanyl trafficking, and gun violence — launching the first statewide Crime Gun Intelligence Center housed within an AG’s office and convening tribal law enforcement leaders on violent crime in Indian Country.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Torrez has emerged as a leading voice among Democratic attorneys general in multistate litigation challenging federal overreach — from funding freezes to immigration enforcement policies to attacks on crime victims’ services. He is also the first attorney general in the country to sue Elon Musk and …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Standing Up for New Mexico Families
Candidate campaign source
Torrez has emerged as a leading voice among Democratic attorneys general in multistate litigation challenging federal overreach — from funding freezes to immigration enforcement policies to attacks on crime victims’ services. He is also the first attorney general in the country to sue Elon Musk and has taken action against DOGE. When Washington oversteps, Torrez has gone to court to protect New Mexicans’ rights and resources.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
“As Governor, I will focus every day on stopping violent crime, getting guns and drugs off our streets, and addressing the root causes of crime.” New Mexicans should feel safe and Deb knows that we have a lot of work to do to prevent and fight crime. She will work to keep violent criminals and illeg…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
“As Governor, I will focus every day on stopping violent crime, getting guns and drugs off our streets, and addressing the root causes of crime.” New Mexicans should feel safe and Deb knows that we have a lot of work to do to prevent and fight crime. She will work to keep violent criminals and illegal drugs off our streets and ensure law enforcement has the tools they need to fight crime, while addressing the root causes of crime. She will invest in mental health, substance abuse and rehabilitation programs to get people the help they need.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Make smart moves toward community policing models that supplement traditional police work. Create an Office of Community Safety staffed with social workers and counselors.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
Make smart moves toward community policing models that supplement traditional police work. Create an Office of Community Safety staffed with social workers and counselors.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Provide law enforcement with the tools and technology to arrest violent offenders, track and detain drug traffickers, and get guns out of the hands of those who should not have them.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
Provide law enforcement with the tools and technology to arrest violent offenders, track and detain drug traffickers, and get guns out of the hands of those who should not have them.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Too often, children have been returned to situations with clear danger signs. Every reunification decision should include a structured risk review that takes issues like drug use, domestic violence, and past neglect seriously.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Child welfare and family services
Candidate campaign source
Too often, children have been returned to situations with clear danger signs. Every reunification decision should include a structured risk review that takes issues like drug use, domestic violence, and past neglect seriously.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Public safety is the foundation for everything else we want to achieve. Safer neighborhoods lead to stronger schools, a healthier economy, and communities where families want to stay. Restoring deterrence and supporting law enforcement is how we begin building a safer, more prosperous New Mexico.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
Public safety is the foundation for everything else we want to achieve. Safer neighborhoods lead to stronger schools, a healthier economy, and communities where families want to stay. Restoring deterrence and supporting law enforcement is how we begin building a safer, more prosperous New Mexico.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I will push for a long-term funding commitment to make police pay competitive with neighboring states, tied to clear recruitment and retention goals so taxpayers see real results. I also support expanding grant programs that help cities and counties cover the cost of hiring new officers over several…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
I will push for a long-term funding commitment to make police pay competitive with neighboring states, tied to clear recruitment and retention goals so taxpayers see real results. I also support expanding grant programs that help cities and counties cover the cost of hiring new officers over several years, allowing departments to rebuild without sudden budget shocks.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
My plan starts with stabilizing New Mexico’s law enforcement workforce. Police departments across the state are understaffed and stretched thin, with serious recruitment and retention challenges. Vacancy rates in some communities make effective policing nearly impossible, placing added strain on the…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
My plan starts with stabilizing New Mexico’s law enforcement workforce. Police departments across the state are understaffed and stretched thin, with serious recruitment and retention challenges. Vacancy rates in some communities make effective policing nearly impossible, placing added strain on the officers who remain and limiting proactive crime prevention.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
At the same time, we must be honest about the growing list of responsibilities placed on police officers. Too often, they are asked to respond to mental health crises, addiction, and homelessness without the right tools or support. That is not fair to officers or the people they are trying to help. …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
At the same time, we must be honest about the growing list of responsibilities placed on police officers. Too often, they are asked to respond to mental health crises, addiction, and homelessness without the right tools or support. That is not fair to officers or the people they are trying to help. I support strengthening behavioral health services so trained civilian teams and medical professionals can assist on these calls, allowing police to focus on preventing crime, responding to emergencies, and enforcing the law.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I will bring real experience to making the office of Lieutenant Governor work for all New Mexicans. I was a school teacher for 19 years and served Los Alamos for six years as a State Representative, fighting for more funding for our public schools, crime prevention, and addiction treatment. I then b…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Stephanie Garcia Richard for Lt. Governor: Fighting for our New Mexico
Candidate campaign source
I will bring real experience to making the office of Lieutenant Governor work for all New Mexicans. I was a school teacher for 19 years and served Los Alamos for six years as a State Representative, fighting for more funding for our public schools, crime prevention, and addiction treatment. I then became the first woman and first Hispana elected to be New Mexico's Commissioner of Public Lands, where I brought billions of dollars to New Mexico's public schools, increased renewable energy production sevenfold, restored stolen land back to Tribes, and protected more public land from federal land grabs than any Public Land Commissioner has done before.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
✓ Ensure Audit Findings Lead to Real ConsequencesMisused funds. Fraud. Abuse of power. These aren’t just line items—they’re breaches of public trust. We are strengthening ties with law enforcement and prosecutors to make sure criminal misconduct is investigated and prosecuted without delay.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public finance, audits, and accountability
Candidate campaign source
✓ Ensure Audit Findings Lead to Real ConsequencesMisused funds. Fraud. Abuse of power. These aren’t just line items—they’re breaches of public trust. We are strengthening ties with law enforcement and prosecutors to make sure criminal misconduct is investigated and prosecuted without delay.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published New Mexico candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
New Mexico incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current New Mexico legislators and New Mexico’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from New Mexico’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
9 matching sponsorships or proposals · 7 New Mexico incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Andrea Reeb
New Mexico House of Representatives, District 64 · R–NM
2 proposalsView proposals from Andrea ReebNew Mexico Legislature · HB 61
AGGRAVATED BATTERY ON POLICE OFFICER
Mar 3, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 15
Andrea Reeb · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed subsection C of HB 61 makes aggravated battery consisting of unlawful touching or force with intent to injure a peace officer while the officer lawfully performs official duties a second-degree felony when it inflicts great bodily harm, involves a deadly weapon, or is committed in a manner capable of inflicting great bodily harm or death. This connection concerns the serious-injury or dangerous-weapon component of FBI aggravated assault, not every lesser battery described elsewhere in the statute. No crime-rate effect is established.
Signed by Governor on 2026-03-03, Chapter 15 of the 2026 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The FBI series includes reported murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. The reviewed provision concerns aggravated battery on a peace officer involving serious injury or a deadly weapon; not every offense covered by a broader statute belongs in this series. Reporting coverage is incomplete and variable. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
A. Aggravated battery upon a peace officer consists of the unlawful touching or application of force to the person of a peace officer with intent to injure that peace officer while the officer is in the lawful discharge of the officer's duties. […] C. Whoever commits aggravated battery upon a peace officer inflicting great bodily harm, or does so with a deadly weapon or in any manner whereby great bodily harm or death can be inflicted, is guilty of a second degree felony."
As introduced, HB 197 proposed increasing firearm larceny below $2,500 in value from a fourth-degree to a third-degree felony. The proposal concerns stealing a firearm, which is distinct from merely receiving stolen property. The bill was action-postponed indefinitely and did not enact this proposal.
The official history records Action Postponed Indefinitely (API). The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not an independently dated postponement. This relationship reviews the introduced version; later substitutes and amendments are outside its selected excerpt. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
The FBI property-crime series includes burglary, larceny-theft and motor-vehicle theft. Theft of a firearm is a component of larceny-theft. Fraud, identity theft and possession or sale of stolen property are distinct offenses, and reporting coverage is incomplete and variable. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
H. Whoever commits larceny when the property of value stolen is a firearm is guilty of a third degree felony when its value is less than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500)."
As introduced, SB 187 proposed permitting a death sentence for the specified capital murder of a peace officer acting lawfully on duty, or targeted because of that status while not acting in the lawful discharge of official duty, with a jury finding beyond a reasonable doubt. The bill was action-postponed indefinitely. The connection concerns punishment for a subset of homicides, without claiming that the penalty was enacted, imposed or reduced homicide mortality.
The official history records Action Postponed Indefinitely (API). The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not an independently dated postponement. This relationship reviews the introduced version; later substitutes and amendments are outside its selected excerpt. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
The CDC fact counts resident deaths classified as homicide from death certificates. Police-officer murders and homicide investigations involving Indigenous people concern subsets of these deaths. Missing-person cases, unidentified remains and other death investigations are not automatically homicides, and the CDC mortality measure is distinct from FBI police-reported murder. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Homicide deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. Section 31-20A-2 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1979, Chapter 150, Section 3, as amended) is amended to read: "31-20A-2. CAPITAL FELONY--DETERMINATION OF SENTENCE.-- A. If a jury finds, beyond a reasonable doubt, that one or more aggravating circumstances exist, as enumerated in Section 31-20A-5 NMSA 1978, the defendant shall be sentenced to life imprisonment without possibility of release or parole; provided that the defendant may be sentenced to death if the aggravating circumstance was that the victim was a peace officer who was: (1) acting in the lawful discharge of an official duty when the peace officer was murdered; or (2) not acting in the lawful discharge of an official duty, but the defendant targeted the victim because of the victim's status as a peace officer. B. If the jury does not make the finding that one or more aggravating circumstances exist, as enumerated in Section 31-20A-5 NMSA 1978, the defendant shall be sentenced to life imprisonment."
The reviewed Immigrant Safety Act provisions of HB 9 prohibit public bodies from entering or renewing specified civil-immigration detention and deputization agreements and require existing covered agreements, upon the act’s effective date, to end at the earliest date allowed by their terms. For the covered section 1357(g)/287.7 agreements, public bodies must invoke a public-safety exigency termination clause where the agreement permits it. They restrict disposition of public property for that detention purpose while preserving lawful state-law detention and brief investigative stops. The signing does not establish that a particular agreement was terminated or a facility closed, and does not determine any resident’s immigration status.
Signed by Governor on 2026-02-05, Chapter 5 of the 2026 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and both lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. The reviewed immigration provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or determine any particular resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. DEFINITION.--As used in the Immigrant Safety Act, "public body" means a state or local government, a sheriff's department, an advisory board, a commission, an agency or an entity created by the constitution of New Mexico or any branch of government that receives public funding, including political subdivisions, special tax districts, school districts and institutions of higher education. "Public body" includes an entity or individual acting on behalf of or within the scope of the authority of the public body. SECTION 3. PROHIBITING PUBLIC BODIES FROM ENTERING INTO AGREEMENTS USED TO DETAIN INDIVIDUALS FOR FEDERAL CIVIL IMMIGRATION VIOLATIONS AND REQUIRING PUBLIC BODIES TO TERMINATE ANY SUCH EXISTING AGREEMENTS.-- A. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to be a party to an agreement to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations, including an intergovernmental services agreement to detain individuals for civil immigration violations. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to a rider, amendment, supplement or other modification to an agreement where the rider, amendment, supplement or other modification is to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations. B. A public body that is a party to an existing agreement that is used to detain individuals for federal civil immigration violations shall, upon the effective date of the Immigrant Safety Act, terminate the agreement upon the earliest date permissible under the terms of the agreement, with respect to all provisions that relate to the detention of individuals for federal civil immigration violations. C. A public body shall not sell, trade, lease or otherwise dispose of any real property to be used for the detention of individuals for federal civil immigration violations. D. A public body shall not impose or continue in effect any law, ordinance, policy or regulation that violates or conflicts with the provisions of the Immigrant Safety Act. E. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ability of law enforcement personnel to detain individuals or to perform brief investigative stops as permitted by state law. SECTION 4. PROHIBITING PUBLIC BODIES FROM ENTERING INTO AGREEMENTS TO DEPUTIZE OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS TO PERFORM FUNCTIONS OF IMMIGRATION OFFICERS.-- A. A public body shall not enter into, extend, renew or otherwise agree to be a party to an agreement to investigate, apprehend, detain or transport individuals pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1357(g) or 8 C.F.R. Section 287.7. B. A public body shall not agree to be a party to an agreement that deputizes officers, employees or agents of the public body to perform a function of an immigration officer in relation to the investigation, apprehension, detention or transportation of noncitizens in the United States or the removal of noncitizens from the United States. C. A public body that is a party to an existing agreement to investigate, apprehend, detain or transport individuals pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1357(g) or 8 C.F.R. Section 287.7 shall, upon the effective date of the Immigrant Safety Act, terminate the agreement upon the earliest date permissible under the terms of the agreement. Where the termination clause of the agreement permits the public body to invoke exigent circumstances involving public safety, the public body shall do so.
The reviewed introduced sections 3–4 of SB 17 proposed security rules for covered federally licensed firearm dealers in New Mexico, including alarms, entry protection and at least two years of video retention. The Department of Public Safety would determine which security rules apply to gun shows. Employees handling, selling or delivering firearms would have to be at least 21 and legally eligible to possess them. The proposal requires training within 30 days of hire and annually thereafter, with training before participation in sales from December 1, 2026. Topics include unlawful purchases, self-harm warning signs, theft prevention and safe storage. Use of the federal background-check system remains contingent on federal permission. The bill was action-postponed indefinitely; these are introduced-version proposals, not enacted rules or a review of later substitutes.
The official history records Action Postponed Indefinitely (API). The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not an independently dated postponement. This relationship reviews the introduced version; later substitutes and amendments are outside its selected excerpt. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
The mortality series includes firearm deaths across intents, including suicide and homicide. Storage rules and firearm regulation concern possible components of injury prevention without proving an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
D. "dealer" means a person or business in the state that holds a federal firearms license issued in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 923(a)(3); E. "department" means the department of public safety; […] SECTION 3. A new section of Chapter 30, Article 7 NMSA 1978 is enacted to read: " REQUIRING DEALER SECURITY MEASURES TO PREVENT THEFT AND LOSS OF FIREARMS.-- A. No later than July 1, 2026, the department, in collaboration with the attorney general, shall promulgate rules governing the physical security of dealer premises and inventory. The rules shall be effective beginning December 1, 2026 and shall require: (1) installation and use of security alarm systems on dealer premises that meet quality and other standards established by the department. Eligible security alarm systems shall have the capacity to be monitored by a central station and shall provide protection and monitoring for all accessible openings and partial motion and sound detection at all other areas of the premises; (2) site hardening, including locks on doors and windows and other features. Features shall be designed to prevent unauthorized entry, which may include bars or grates, security screens and commercial-grade metal doors; (3) installation and use of video surveillance systems, including video recording devices at each point of sale and each entrance and exit to the premises, which shall be recorded from both the indoor and outdoor vantage point, and the dealer shall maintain such recordings for a period of not less than two years; and (4) other reasonable requirements, as determined by the department and the attorney general, to reduce the risk of burglaries at dealers' premises and the theft of firearms in shipment to and from dealers' premises. B. The department shall specify in rules which, if any, of the security measures identified in Subsection A of this section apply to gun shows." SECTION 4. A new section of Chapter 30, Article 7 NMSA 1978 is enacted to read: " MINIMUM AGE OF EMPLOYMENT--REQUIRING BACKGROUND CHECKS AND TRAINING FOR DEALER EMPLOYEES.-- A. A dealer shall not employ a person to handle, sell or deliver firearms unless the person is at least twenty- one years of age and is not prohibited from possessing a firearm under state, municipal, tribal or federal law. The department shall promulgate rules to address dealer employee criminal history checks no later than August 1, 2026. The rules shall direct dealers to use the national instant criminal background check system to determine eligibility for current and prospective dealer employees only if the use of the national instant criminal background check system is permitted by federal regulations. B. A dealer shall complete the training developed by the department pursuant to Subsection C of this section and shall provide the training to all new employees within thirty days of employment and to all employees annually thereafter. Beginning December 1, 2026, no employee of any dealer shall participate in the sale or disposition of firearms unless that person has first received the training required by this section. The department shall promulgate rules setting forth minimum requirements for the maintenance of records of the training no later than August 1, 2026. C. No later than August 1, 2026, the department shall develop and make available to each dealer a training course in the conduct of firearm transfers, including: (1) federal and state laws governing firearm transfers and transactions; (2) how to recognize, identify, respond to and report straw purchases, illegal purchases and fraudulent activity; (3) how to recognize, identify, respond to and report an individual who intends to use a firearm for unlawful purposes or for self-harm; (4) how to prevent, respond to and report theft or burglary of firearms and ammunition; (5) how to educate customers on gun safety practices, including the safe handling and storage of firearms and ammunition; and (6) other topics the department deems necessary and appropriate."
U.S. House of Representatives, New Mexico District 3 · D–NM
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Teresa Leger FernandezU.S. Congress · New Mexico delegation · HR 1010
BADGES for Native Communities Act
May 21, 2026 · In Congress
Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed section 202 of HR 1010 would create grants for eligible Tribal entities and qualifying state consortia to coordinate, document and improve investigations involving missing people, sexual violence and deaths of interest to Tribes. A participating state must report missing-person cases to national crime databases or have a grant-funded plan to do so; intended data sharing requires memoranda of understanding with the applicable Tribal partners. It authorizes $1 million annually for fiscal 2026–2030. This connection concerns the homicide-investigation component; missing-person cases and other death investigations are not automatically homicides. The proposal does not establish grant awards, resolved cases or a change in CDC homicide mortality.
Subcommittee Hearings Held No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
The CDC fact counts resident deaths classified as homicide from death certificates. Police-officer murders and homicide investigations involving Indigenous people concern subsets of these deaths. Missing-person cases, unidentified remains and other death investigations are not automatically homicides, and the CDC mortality measure is distinct from FBI police-reported murder. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Homicide deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
202.Missing or murdered response coordination grant program(a)Establishment of grant programThe Attorney General shall establish within the Office of Justice Programs a grant program under which the Attorney General shall make grants to eligible entities described in subsection (b) to carry out eligible activities described in subsection (c).(b)Eligible entities(1)In generalTo be eligible to receive a grant under the grant program established under subsection (a) an entity shall be—(A)an Indian Tribe; (B)a relevant Tribal organization;(C)subject to paragraph (2), a State, in consortium with—(i)1 or more Indian Tribes; and(ii)relevant Tribal organizations, if any;(D)a consortium of 2 or more Indian Tribes or relevant Tribal organizations; or(E)subject to paragraph (2), a consortium of 2 or more States in consortium with—(i)1 or more Indian Tribes; and(ii)relevant Tribal organizations, if any.(2)State eligibilityTo be eligible under subparagraph (C) or (E) of paragraph (1), a State shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Attorney General that the State—(A)(i)reports missing persons cases in the State to the national crime information databases; or(ii)if not, has a plan to do so using a grant received under the grant program established under subsection (a); and(B)if data sharing between the State and the Indian Tribes and relevant Tribal organizations with which the State is in consortium is part of the intended use of the grant received under the grant program established under subsection (a), has entered into a memorandum of understanding with each applicable Indian Tribe and relevant Tribal organization.(c)Eligible activitiesAn eligible entity receiving a grant under the grant program established under subsection (a) may use the grant—(1)to establish a statewide or regional center—(A)to document and track—(i)missing persons cases of interest to Indian Tribes;(ii)sexual violence cases of interest to Indian Tribes; and(iii)death investigations of interest to Indian Tribes; and(B)to input information regarding missing persons cases of interest to Indian Tribes, unclaimed human remains cases of interest to Indian Tribes, and unidentified remains cases of interest to Indian Tribes into the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System and the Missing Persons File in the National Crime Information Center; (2)to establish a State or regional commission to respond to, and to improve coordination between Federal law enforcement agencies, and Tribal, State, and local law enforcement agencies of the investigation of, missing persons cases of interest to Indian Tribes, sexual violence cases of interest to Indian Tribes, and death investigations of interest to Indian Tribes; and(3)to document, develop, and disseminate resources for the coordination and improvement of the investigation of missing persons cases of interest to Indian Tribes, sexual violence cases of interest to Indian Tribes, and death investigations of interest to Indian Tribes, including to develop local or statewide rapid notification or communication systems for alerts and other information relating to those cases.(d)Authorization of appropriationsThere is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the grant program established under subsection (a)(1) $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Ben Ray LujánU.S. Congress · New Mexico delegation · S 3256
Disarm Hate Act
Nov 20, 2025 · In Congress
Sen. Ben Ray Luján · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
S 3256 would restrict firearm transfer and possession for people convicted of the defined misdemeanor hate crimes or receiving the specified enhanced misdemeanor sentences. Its definitions require covered force, weapon threats or credible physical-safety threats and preserve counsel, jury-trial and specified expungement, pardon or restoration safeguards. Ben Ray Luján is the primary sponsor. The bill remains a proposal, with no mortality effect established.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
The mortality series includes firearm deaths across intents, including suicide and homicide. Storage rules and firearm regulation concern possible components of injury prevention without proving an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained New Mexico evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Prevention of person who has been convicted of a misdemeanor hate crime, or received an enhanced sentence for a misdemeanor because of hate or bias in its commission, from obtaining a firearm(a)DefinitionsSection 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:(39)The term convicted in any court of a misdemeanor hate crime—(A)means being convicted by a court of an offense that—(i)is a misdemeanor under Federal, State, or Tribal law;(ii)has, as an element, that the conduct of the offender was motivated by hate or bias because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity (as defined in section 249), or disability of any person; and(iii)involves the use or attempted use of physical force, the threatened use of a deadly weapon, or another credible threat to the physical safety of any person; and(B)does not include—(i)a conviction of an offense described in subparagraph (A), unless—(I)the person—(aa)was represented by counsel in the case; or(bb)knowingly and intelligently waived the right to counsel in the case; and(II)in the case of a prosecution for an offense described in subparagraph (A) for which a person was entitled to a jury trial in the jurisdiction in which the case was tried—(aa)the case was tried by a jury; or(bb)the person knowingly and intelligently waived the right to have the case tried by a jury, by guilty plea or otherwise; or(ii)a conviction of an offense described in subparagraph (A) if—(I)the conviction—(aa)has been expunged or set aside; or(bb)is of an offense for which the person has been pardoned or has had civil rights restored (if the law of the applicable jurisdiction provides for the loss of civil rights under such an offense); and(II)the expungement, pardon, or restoration of civil rights does not expressly provide that the person may not ship, transport, possess, or receive firearms.(40)The term received from any court an enhanced hate crime misdemeanor sentence—(A)means a court has imposed a sentence for a misdemeanor under Federal, State, or Tribal law—(i)that involves the use or attempted use of physical force, the threatened use of a deadly weapon, or another credible threat to the physical safety of any person; and(ii)based, in whole or in part, on a judicial finding that the conduct of the offender was motivated, in whole or in part, by hate or bias for any reason referred to in paragraph (39)(A)(ii); and(B)does not include—(i)the imposition of a sentence described in subparagraph (A), unless—(I)the person—(aa)was represented by counsel in the case; or(bb)knowingly and intelligently waived the right to counsel in the case; and(II)if the sentence described in subparagraph (A) was imposed in a prosecution for an offense for which a person was entitled to a jury trial in the jurisdiction in which the case was tried—(aa)the case was tried by a jury; or(bb)the person knowingly and intelligently waived the right to have the case tried by a jury, by guilty plea or otherwise; or(ii)the imposition of a sentence described in subparagraph (A) if—(I)(aa)the conviction of the offense for which the sentence was imposed has been expunged or set aside; or(bb)the offense for which the sentence was imposed is an offense for which the person has been pardoned or has had civil rights restored (if the law of the applicable jurisdiction provides for the loss of civil rights under such an offense); and(II)the expungement, pardon, or restoration of civil rights does not expressly provide that the person may not ship, transport, possess, or receive firearms..(b)Prohibition on sale or other disposition of firearmSection 922(d) of title 18, United States Code, is amended, in the first sentence—(1)in paragraph (10), by striking or at the end;(2)by redesignating paragraph (11) as paragraph (12);(3)in paragraph (12), as so redesignated, by striking through (10) and inserting through (11); and(4)by inserting after paragraph (10) the following:(11)has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor hate crime, or has received from any court an enhanced hate crime misdemeanor sentence; or.(c)Prohibition on possession, shipment, or transport of firearmSection 922(g) of title 18, United States Code, is amended—(1)in paragraph (8), by striking or at the end;(2)in paragraph (9), by striking the comma and inserting ; or; and(3)by inserting after paragraph (9) the following:(10)who has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor hate crime, or has received from any court an enhanced hate crime misdemeanor sentence,.
Only current New Mexico officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a New Mexico statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
New Mexico snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to New Mexico, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.