New Hampshire · individual fact

New Hampshire income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and New Hampshire’s tax structure.

Median household income$99.03K2020–2024 · #6 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$52.8K2020–2024 · #6 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$64.63K2024 · #8 of 50 · highest first

New Hampshire over time

Explore New Hampshire readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. New Hampshire officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a New Hampshire effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a New Hampshire change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person New Hampshire · source units
New HampshirePublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $64,632$45.42K$56.99K$68.56KNew Hampshire, 2014: $52,500New Hampshire, 2015: $53,623New Hampshire, 2016: $54,017New Hampshire, 2017: $54,844New Hampshire, 2018: $57,215New Hampshire, 2019: $59,512New Hampshire, 2020: $61,489New Hampshire, 2021: $66,325New Hampshire, 2022: $60,234New Hampshire, 2023: $62,459New Hampshire, 2024: $64,632201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 35National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings funding● New Hampshire Legislature · 3● U.S. Congress · New Hampshire delegation · 2◆ Governor · 3■ New Hampshire agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-09-012026-07-31

8 of 8 reviewed New Hampshire actions match · 8 date markers shown. 35 major events shown separately.

New Hampshire · 2024: $64,632 · Rank #8 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
New Hampshire Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodNew HampshireRankU.S. benchmark
2024$64,632#8 of 50$59,195
2023$62,459#9 of 50$58,088
2022$60,234#11 of 50$57,104
2021$66,325#6 of 50$59,365
2020$61,489#6 of 50$56,514
2019$59,512#4 of 50$53,683
2018$57,215#6 of 50$52,242
2017$54,844#10 of 50$51,006
2016$54,017#11 of 50$49,828
2015$53,623#10 of 50$49,396
2014$52,500#9 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

New Hampshire · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

New Hampshire · 2020–2024$99,031
New Hampshire rank#6among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · $99,0312020–2024 · Rank #6 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $97,908 – $100,154Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire · your comparison$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$99,0312020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by New Hampshire households, expressed in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • Income is not take-home pay and does not directly measure taxes, wealth, prices, or purchasing power.
  • A statewide median obscures regional and household differences.
New Hampshire · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

New Hampshire · 2024$64,632
New Hampshire rank#8among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Hampshire
Real personal income per person history in New Hampshire$44.86K$56.99K$69.12K20142024
2024 · New Hampshire: $64,632 · Rank #8 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Hampshire Real personal income per person history
PeriodNew HampshireCompare
2014$52,500
2015$53,623
2016$54,017
2017$54,844
2018$57,215
2019$59,512
2020$61,489
2021$66,325
2022$60,234
2023$62,459
2024$64,632

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · $64,6322024 · Rank #8 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire · your comparison$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Hampshire · state comparison

How New Hampshire raises taxes

New Hampshire does not tax an individual's reported W-2 wages. The former Interest and Dividends Tax was repealed for taxable periods beginning after December 31, 2024. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

New Hampshire · FY2024$183.36M
New Hampshire rank#43among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · $183.36MFY2024 · Rank #43 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky$5.02B—
#24Louisiana$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma$4.51B—
#27Kansas$4.5B—
#28Iowa$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska$2.48B—
#34Maine$2.4B—
#35Mississippi$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire · your comparison$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding New Hampshire income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The New Hampshire ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s New Hampshire candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

17 statements from 8 candidates

2026 New Hampshire Governor General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Kelly Ayotte

2 statements

Republican · Governor · NH

Taxes & tax policy

Vetoed bills the campaign describes as hidden sales taxes, book bans, or inconsistent with New Hampshire's governing traditions.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Veto Record

Candidate campaign source

Vetoed bills the campaign describes as hidden sales taxes, book bans, or inconsistent with New Hampshire's governing traditions.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Kelly Ayotte — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Kelly Ayotte
Taxes & tax policy

Signed a balanced state budget without new taxes.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Budget Record

Candidate campaign source

Signed a balanced state budget without new taxes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Kelly Ayotte — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 New Hampshire U.S. House - District 1 General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Anthony DiLorenzo

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · NH

Income & wages

Reduce costs, increase wages, and improve quality of life.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Reduce costs, increase wages, and improve quality of life.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Anthony DiLorenzo — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Anthony DiLorenzo
Taxes & tax policy

Protect the 2017 tax cuts and the elimination of taxes on tips, overtime, and social security.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Protect the 2017 tax cuts and the elimination of taxes on tips, overtime, and social security.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Anthony DiLorenzo — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Stefany Shaheen

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · NH

Taxes & tax policy

Expand support for first-time and middle class homebuyers, as well as the popular Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing and cost of living

Candidate campaign source

Expand support for first-time and middle class homebuyers, as well as the popular Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Stefany Shaheen — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 New Hampshire U.S. House - District 2 General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Lily Tang Williams

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · NH

Taxes & tax policy

Lower taxes on families and small businesses, the real engines of New Hampshire’s economy.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Lower taxes on families and small businesses, the real engines of New Hampshire’s economy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Lily Tang Williams — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from Lily Tang Williams
Taxes & tax policy

Lower taxes on hardworking families and small businesses so you keep more of what you earn.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Lower taxes on hardworking families and small businesses so you keep more of what you earn.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Lily Tang Williams — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Maggie Goodlander

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · NH

Taxes & tax policy

Maggie believes deeply that Congress can and must be on the frontlines of the fight for ensuring a fair deal for all Granite Staters. The fight for a fair deal means protecting Social Security, Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act. It means expanding access to affordable healthcare and prescription…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis

Candidate campaign source

Maggie believes deeply that Congress can and must be on the frontlines of the fight for ensuring a fair deal for all Granite Staters. The fight for a fair deal means protecting Social Security, Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act. It means expanding access to affordable healthcare and prescription drugs, and making childcare, elder care, and housing more affordable. It means building a tax system that works for hardworking Granite Staters by delivering tax breaks for working families – not handouts to billionaires and big corporations. It means protecting the rights of workers, including to collectively bargain, and raising the minimum wage. It also means legalizing marijuana at the federal level and delivering meaningful and much-needed criminal justice reforms.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Maggie Goodlander — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Maggie Goodlander
Taxes & tax policy

The fight for a fair deal also means combating climate change, standing up to Big Oil, and working to make America the world’s clean energy superpower. Maggie believes deeply in advancing environmental justice and was proud to help to launch the Justice Department’s first-ever Office of Environmenta…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Climate, clean energy, environmental justice, and oil taxes

Candidate campaign source

The fight for a fair deal also means combating climate change, standing up to Big Oil, and working to make America the world’s clean energy superpower. Maggie believes deeply in advancing environmental justice and was proud to help to launch the Justice Department’s first-ever Office of Environmental Justice dedicated to protecting overburdened and underserved communities across America from the harm caused by pollution, environmental crimes, and the climate crisis. In Congress, Maggie will be on the frontlines of the fight against our climate crisis and work to close the tax loopholes that have allowed Big Oil to make record profits while hardworking people are facing record prices at the pumps.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Maggie Goodlander — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published New Hampshire candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

New Hampshire incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current New Hampshire legislators and New Hampshire’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from New Hampshire’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

17 matching sponsorships or proposals · 16 New Hampshire incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Brian H Labrie

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Hillsborough 2 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Brian H Labrie
New Hampshire Legislature · SB 655

(New Title) relative to employee leasing companies, workers' compensation coverage options, and a minimum wage exemption for minor league baseball players.

Jun 12, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 146

Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. David Rochefort · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored / Sen. Howard Pearl · Sponsored / Sen. Ruth Ward · Sponsored / Sen. Tim McGough · Sponsored / Rep. Brian H Labrie · Sponsored / Rep. Katy Peternel · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed wage provision of SB 655 exempts minor league baseball players who have a playing contract and receive compensation under a collective bargaining agreement expressly covering wages and working conditions from the statutory employee definition. This minimum-wage, overtime and recordkeeping exemption took effect August 11, 2026. The relationship concerns this narrow wage rule, not the bill’s separate workers’ compensation provisions or proof of changed household income.

Chapter 146, approved 2026-06-12. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Household money income includes wages before taxes. An exemption for qualifying minor league baseball players concerns a narrow earnings component, not all workers, after-tax income or a demonstrated change in the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

146:4 Minimum Wage; Overtime and Recordkeeping Exemption; Minor League Baseball Players. Amend the introductory paragraph of RSA 279:1, X to read as follows: X. "Employee" means and includes every person who may be permitted, required, or directed by any employer, in consideration of direct or indirect gain or profit, to engage in any employment, but shall not include any person exempted from the definition of employee as stated in RSA 281-A:2, VI(b)(2), (3), or (4), or RSA 281-A:2, VII(b), or any person who has entered into a contract to play baseball at a minor league level and who is compensated pursuant to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement that expressly provides for wages and working conditions, or a person providing services as part of a residential placement for individuals with developmental, acquired, or emotional disabilities, or any person who meets all of the following criteria:
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Chris Pappas

U.S. House of Representatives, New Hampshire District 1 · D–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Chris Pappas
U.S. Congress · New Hampshire delegation · HR 7919

Gas Prices Relief Act of 2026

Mar 12, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Chris Pappas · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

H.R. 7919 proposes suspending the specified federal gasoline excise tax and leaking-underground-storage-tank financing rate from enactment through September 30, 2026. It replaces trust-fund revenue from general funds and directs Treasury to use applicable powers to pass the benefit to consumers. The bill remains in Congress, so it establishes no tax holiday or price reduction. The linked gasoline fact represents New England, not New Hampshire alone.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The EIA fact is a New England regional regular-gasoline price proxy, not a New Hampshire-only price. A proposed federal gasoline-tax holiday concerns a price component across the region and nation; it does not establish enactment or consumer savings. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.2026 gasoline tax holiday (a)In generalIn the case of gasoline removed, entered, or sold on or after the date of the enactment of this Act and before October 1, 2026— (1)the rate of tax under section 4081(a)(2)(A)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be zero, and (2)the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund financing rate under section 4081(a)(2)(B) of such Code shall not apply to gasoline to which the rate under paragraph (1) applies. (b)Transfers to Trust Fund (1)In generalThe Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer from the general fund to the Highway Trust Fund established under section 9503(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund established under section 9508(a) of such Code amounts equal to the reduction in amounts credited (but for this subsection) to each such Trust Fund by reason of subsection (a). (2)Coordination rules (A)Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust FundAmounts transferred to the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund under paragraph (1) shall be treated for purposes of sections 9503(b)(1) and 9508(b)(2) of such Code as taxes received in the Treasury under section 4081 of such Code attributable to the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund financing rate. (B)Highway Trust FundAmounts transferred to the Highway Trust Fund under paragraph (1) shall be treated for purposes of section 9503(b)(1) of such Code as taxes received in the Treasury under section 4081 of such Code which are not attributable to the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund financing rate. (c)Benefits of tax reduction should be passed on to consumers (1)It is the policy of Congress that— (A)consumers immediately receive the benefit of the reduction in taxes resulting from the application of subsection (a), (B)transportation motor fuels producers and other dealers take such actions as necessary to reduce transportation motor fuels prices to reflect such reduction, and (C)transportation motor fuels producers and other dealers that fail to reduce transportation motor fuels prices to reflect such reduction shall be subject to monetary penalties which are not less than the amount of the reduction in taxes which should have been passed on to consumers. (2)EnforcementThe Secretary of the Treasury shall use all applicable authorities to ensure that the benefit of the reduction in taxes resulting from the application of subsection (a) is received by consumers.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Debra L DeSimone

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Rockingham 18 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Debra L DeSimone
New Hampshire Legislature · HB 661

relative to the department of health and human services management of social security payments, supplemental security income payments, and veterans benefits for children in foster care.

Jul 10, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 287

Rep. Mary Jane Wallner · Sponsored / Rep. Maureen C. Mooney · Sponsored / Rep. Debra L DeSimone · Sponsored / Sen. Cindy Rosenwald · Sponsored / Sen. Pat Long · Sponsored / Sen. David Rochefort · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 661 requires the department to check benefit receipt within 60 days after a child enters its care and apply when a child is not receiving benefits but may qualify. An existing representative payee remains unless unsuitable or another change is warranted under federal successor-payee rules. The department must consult the child and representative when identifying a payee, and apply to become payee only if no other suitable candidate is available. These provisions begin July 1, 2027 and apply to children in department care on or after that date. When the department is determined by the court to serve as payee, later provisions phase benefit conservation at 25% from July 2028, 50% from July 2030, 75% from July 2032 and 100% from July 2034, in addition to amounts already required to be set aside. Benefits may address unmet needs beyond costs the department must pay. Notice, annual accounting and eligibility review, suitable-account protections and release of remaining funds begin with section 2 on July 1, 2028. The law separately requires ABLE-account procedures by June 30, 2027. This link covers OASDI benefits only, excluding SSI and veterans’ benefits.

Chapter 287, approved 2026-07-10. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact counts OASDI beneficiaries. Benefit screening, applications and representative-payee protections concern a narrow group of potential or existing OASDI beneficiaries. SSI and veterans’ benefits covered by the same law are outside this fact. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

287:1 New Section; Dependent Children; Federal Benefits. Amend RSA 126-A by inserting after section 6 the following new section: 126-A:6-a Dependent Children; Eligibility For and Appointment of Representative Payee to Manage Federal Benefits. I. For all children in the care of the department, the department shall determine whether each child is receiving benefits administered by the Social Security Administration or the Veterans Administration within 60 days after the child enters the department's care. If the department determines that a child is not receiving benefits but may be eligible for federal benefits, the department shall apply for the benefits on behalf of the child. II. If a child is already receiving benefits before entering the department's care with an appointed representative payee in place, the department shall not seek to change the payee appointment unless the current payee has been deemed unsuitable or other circumstances warranting a payee change are met in accordance with the federal regulations for naming a successor payee. If there is no payee or if the department applies for benefits on behalf of the child, the department shall identify, in consultation with the child and the child's representative, a representative payee in accordance with 20 C.F.R. sections 404.2021 and 416.621 and encourage the identified individual to apply to the Social Security Administration to be appointed as the child's representative payee. The department shall apply to become the representative payee only if no other suitable candidate is available. 287:2 New Paragraphs; Use and Management of Federal Benefits. Amend RSA 126-A:6-a by inserting after paragraph II the following new paragraphs: III. If the department is determined by the court to serve as the representative payee: (a) The department shall not use the child's federal benefits, other benefits, savings, or assets to pay for or reimburse the department or this state for any of the costs of the child's care in accordance with the phase-in schedule under subparagraph (b). (b) In addition to any amount required to be set aside by the department under federal law and the division for children, youth and families policy, the department shall conserve the following amounts on behalf of the child: (1) Beginning July 1, 2028, the department shall conserve 25 percent of the child's federal benefits. (2) Beginning July 1, 2030, the department shall conserve 50 percent of the child's federal benefits. (3) Beginning July 1, 2032, the department shall conserve 75 percent of the child's federal benefits. (4) Beginning July 1, 2034, the department shall conserve 100 percent of the child's federal benefits. (c) The department may use the child's federal benefits for the child's unmet needs beyond what the department is obligated or required to pay. (d) The department shall establish an appropriate account to use and conserve the child's benefits in the child's best interest for current unmet needs and future needs in a manner consistent with federal and state asset and resource limits. The account may include any of the following: (1) A special needs trust. (2) A pooled special needs trust. (3) An Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) savings account, established pursuant to RSA 195-K and section 529A of the Internal Revenue Code. (4) Any other trust account determined not to interfere with social security or asset limitations for any other benefit program. (e) The department shall provide an annual accounting as to the use, application, or conservation of the child's federal benefits to the child, the child's representative, and the child's parents or guardians. IV. The department shall notify the child, the child's parents, unless parental rights have been terminated, the child's guardian, the child's current placement, the child’s court appointed special advocate or guardian ad litem, and the child's attorney of any application or decision related to a child's federal benefits. In providing notice of any denial of benefits, the department shall explain that there is a right to appeal, the process for filing an appeal, and the names and contact information of organizations that might be available to provide pro bono or reduced fee legal assistance. V. The department shall annually review cases of children in the department's care to determine whether a child may have become eligible for benefits after the department's initial assessment. VI. Notwithstanding any other law, on termination of the department's responsibility for the child, the department shall release any moneys remaining to the child's credit pursuant to the requirements of the funding source or, in the absence of any requirements, shall release the remaining moneys to: (a) The child, if the child is at least 18 years of age or is emancipated; or (b) The person who is responsible for the child if the child is a minor and not emancipated. VII. For purposes of this section, a "child in the care of the department" means the department has custody or guardianship over the child or the child is in a court-ordered placement or other out-of-home placement under the supervision of the department. 287:3 ABLE Accounts. The department of health and human services shall develop and complete the processes and procedures for establishing ABLE accounts for children in its custody for whom it serves as representative payee no later than June 30, 2027. The department may utilize federal Title IV-E funds it secures pursuant to the 2025, 141:310 for this purpose. 287:4 Policies and Procedures Regarding Federal Benefits for Dependent Children. The department of health and human services shall develop the necessary policies and procedures, establish process workflows, and conduct necessary staff training to facilitate implementation of this act on or before June 30, 2028. To assist in completing the tasks required to begin implementation of these requirements, the department may hire a consultant with knowledge of other states’ efforts to develop necessary policies and procedures to manage federal benefits for children in state custody. 287:5 Executive Order. In accordance with the federal executive order entitled "Fostering the Future for American Children and Families" dated November 13, 2025, the department of health and human services shall seek all available federal resources to fund the provisions of this act. 287:6 Applicability. RSA 126-A:6-a, as inserted by section 1 of this act and amended by section 2 of this act, shall apply only to children in the care of the department of health and human services on or after July 1, 2027. 287:7 Fiscal Committee Approval. The department of health and human services may request additional general funds from the fiscal committee of the general court to implement section 3 of this act, relative to establishing ABLE accounts for children in the department's custody for whom it serves as representative payee. The governor is authorized to draw a warrant for sums approved out of any funds in the treasury not otherwise appropriated. 287:8 Effective Date. I. Section 1 of this act shall take effect July 1, 2027. II. Section 2 of this act shall take effect July 1, 2028. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Joe Sweeney

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Rockingham 25 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Joe Sweeney
New Hampshire Legislature · HB 1588

(Second New Title) relative to the regulation of accessory parking for vehicles by local legislative bodies and multifamily housing within commercial districts by municipalities; establishing special assessment districts; and relative to expanding the housing infrastructure municipal grant program and making an appropriation therefor.

Jul 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 329

Rep. Joe Sweeney · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1588 bars municipalities from requiring more than one residential parking space per unit or requiring that space to be garaged. Its multifamily provisions preserve site-plan review and state safety requirements, limit frontage, setback and height rules to those allowed for commercial development, permit qualifying conversions of nonconforming structures, and provide reasonable attorney-fee reimbursement for the specified improper denials or extra requirements. Infrastructure assessment districts require agreements with 60% of properties’ owners; assessments apply only to directly benefited properties and cannot exceed the special benefit received, with installments limited to 20 years. It expands housing-infrastructure grants to sewer, water and road upgrades but appropriates only $1 for fiscal 2027. Contingencies govern alternative section numbering and multifamily provisions. Most provisions take effect September 13, 2026; the law does not establish completed housing or lower rents.

Chapter 329, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Median gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities. Multifamily development and infrastructure rules concern rental supply and costs, without demonstrating new rental units or a change in median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

329:1 Zoning; Grant of Power; Parking Ordinances. Amend RSA 674:16, VII to read as follows: VII. In its exercise of the powers granted under this subdivision, the local legislative body of a city, town, or county in which there are located unincorporated towns or unorganized places may regulate accessory parking for vehicles, but shall not require more than one residential parking space per unit or require that the parking space per unit be garaged. 329:2 Multi-Family Residential Development on Commercially Zoned Land; Amendment to Zoning Regulations; Conversion of Multi-Family Dwelling Units Permitted. Amend RSA 674:80, IV to read as follows: IV. [] Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter municipal authority under RSA 674:43, I to require site plan review for multi-family dwelling units. Consistent with the purpose of this section, for multi-family dwelling units proposed in commercial districts existing, created, or expanded after July 1, 2026, municipalities may impose frontage, setbacks, and height requirements; provided that such requirements shall not differ from what is allowed for commercial development. Multi-family dwelling units shall be allowed as a matter of right, and municipalities shall not enforce additional requirements unless expressly authorized by this section. Nothing in this section shall prohibit enforcement of applicable state fire, building, and other requirements under RSA 153, RSA 155-A, and RSA 485-A. V. A municipality shall allow pre-existing nonconforming structures to be converted to multi-family dwelling units or mixed use provided that the structure’s envelope is not altered to further violate zoning district dimensional requirements. VI. Any owner of commercially-zoned property improperly denied an application for multi-family housing, or who is subjected to requirements beyond those allowed in this section, and who is thereby required to file suit against the municipality in order to exercise the property rights thus recognized, shall be entitled to be reimbursed reasonable attorney's fees incurred as a direct result. 329:3 New Chapter; Special Assessment Districts. Amend RSA by inserting after chapter 162-U the following new chapter:CHAPTER 162-VSPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 162-V:1 Authority. The governing body of any city or town may enter into special assessment memorandums of understanding with 60 percent of properties' owners to establish special assessment districts and spending programs for the purpose of financing public infrastructure improvements necessary to serve new development. 162-V:2 Improvements Authorized. I. Infrastructure improvements eligible for financing under this chapter shall include: (a) Roads, sidewalks, street lighting, and traffic control devices; (b) Water mains, sewer lines, stormwater management facilities, and related appurtenances; (c) Utility extensions directly serving the district; and (d) Streetscape or parking improvements incidental to development. II. General government buildings, schools, or facilities that do not directly and specially benefit parcels within the district shall not be financed under this chapter. 162-V:3 Apportionment of Costs. I. Assessments shall be levied only against properties that receive a direct and ascertainable benefit from the improvements. II. The governing body shall determine the method of apportionment, which may include frontage, lot size, number of units, assessed value, or other reasonable metric. III. No parcel shall be assessed in an amount greater than the special benefit conferred upon it. 162-V:4 Financing. I. Municipalities may issue bonds to finance improvements within the district, to be repaid solely from assessments levied under this chapter. II. Assessments may be collected in annual installments over a period not to exceed 20 years. III. Assessments shall constitute a lien on the property with the same priority and enforcement as property taxes. 162-V:5 Procedure. I. Establishment of a district shall require the governing body of any city or town to enter into special assessment memorandums of understanding with 60 percent of properties' owners. II. Notice of the proposed district shall be mailed to each affected property owner and published in a newspaper of general circulation at least 14 days prior to the hearing. 162-V:6 Appeals. Any property owner subject to an assessment may appeal the apportionment of costs to the governing body within 30 days of notice, and thereafter to the superior court pursuant to RSA 677. 162-V:7 Dissolution. A district shall dissolve upon repayment of all obligations or earlier by vote of the governing body, provided all costs have been satisfied. 329:4 Department of Business and Economic Affairs; Expansion of Housing Infrastructure Municipal Grant Program. The department of business and economic affairs shall expand its housing infrastructure municipal grant program to allow for sewer, water, and road upgrades for new housing units. 329:5 Department of Business and Economic Affairs, Appropriation. The sum of $1 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2027 is hereby appropriated to the department of business and economic affairs for the purpose of providing grants for sewer, water, and road upgrades for new housing units under its housing infrastructure municipal grant program. The governor is authorized to draw a warrant for said sums out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated. 329:6 Multi-Family Residential Development on Commercially Zoned Land; Amendment to Zoning Regulations; Conversion of Multi-Family Dwelling Units Permitted. Amend RSA 674:80, V to read as follows: V. [] Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter municipal authority under RSA 674:43, I to require site plan review for multi-family dwelling units. Consistent with the purpose of this section, for multi-family dwelling units proposed in commercial districts existing, created, or expanded after July 1, 2026, municipalities may impose frontage, setbacks, and height requirements; provided that such requirements shall not differ from what is allowed for commercial development. Multi-family dwelling units shall be allowed as a matter of right, and municipalities shall not enforce additional requirements unless expressly authorized by this section. Nothing in this section shall prohibit enforcement of applicable state fire, building, and other requirements under RSA 153, RSA 155-A, and RSA 485-A. VI. A municipality shall allow pre-existing nonconforming structures to be converted to multi-family dwelling units or mixed use provided that the structure’s envelope is not altered to further violate zoning district dimensional requirements. VII. Any owner of commercially-zoned property improperly denied an application for multi-family housing, or who is subjected to requirements beyond those allowed in this section, and who is thereby required to file suit against the municipality in order to exercise the property rights thus recognized, shall be entitled to be reimbursed reasonable attorney's fees incurred as a direct result. 329:7 Contingency. If HB 1010 of the 2026 regular legislative session becomes law, section 2 of this act shall not take effect and section 6 of this act shall take effect 60 days after its passage. If HB 1010 of the 2026 regular legislative session does not become law, section 2 of this act shall take effect 60 days after its passage and section 6 of this act shall not take effect. 329:8 Contingent Renumbering. If HB 1433 of the 2026 regular legislative session becomes law: RSA 162-V as inserted by section 3 of this act shall be renumbered as RSA 162-X. If HB 1433 of the 2026 regular legislative session does not become law: RSA 162-V as inserted by section 3 of this act shall be renumbered as RSA 162-W. 329:9 Effective Date. I. Sections 2 and 6 of this act shall take effect as provided in section 7 of this act. II. The remainder of this act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Katy Peternel

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Carroll 6 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Katy Peternel
New Hampshire Legislature · SB 655

(New Title) relative to employee leasing companies, workers' compensation coverage options, and a minimum wage exemption for minor league baseball players.

Jun 12, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 146

Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. David Rochefort · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored / Sen. Howard Pearl · Sponsored / Sen. Ruth Ward · Sponsored / Sen. Tim McGough · Sponsored / Rep. Brian H Labrie · Sponsored / Rep. Katy Peternel · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed wage provision of SB 655 exempts minor league baseball players who have a playing contract and receive compensation under a collective bargaining agreement expressly covering wages and working conditions from the statutory employee definition. This minimum-wage, overtime and recordkeeping exemption took effect August 11, 2026. The relationship concerns this narrow wage rule, not the bill’s separate workers’ compensation provisions or proof of changed household income.

Chapter 146, approved 2026-06-12. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Household money income includes wages before taxes. An exemption for qualifying minor league baseball players concerns a narrow earnings component, not all workers, after-tax income or a demonstrated change in the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

146:4 Minimum Wage; Overtime and Recordkeeping Exemption; Minor League Baseball Players. Amend the introductory paragraph of RSA 279:1, X to read as follows: X. "Employee" means and includes every person who may be permitted, required, or directed by any employer, in consideration of direct or indirect gain or profit, to engage in any employment, but shall not include any person exempted from the definition of employee as stated in RSA 281-A:2, VI(b)(2), (3), or (4), or RSA 281-A:2, VII(b), or any person who has entered into a contract to play baseball at a minor league level and who is compensated pursuant to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement that expressly provides for wages and working conditions, or a person providing services as part of a residential placement for individuals with developmental, acquired, or emotional disabilities, or any person who meets all of the following criteria:
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Mary Jane Wallner

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Merrimack 19 · D–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Mary Jane Wallner
New Hampshire Legislature · HB 661

relative to the department of health and human services management of social security payments, supplemental security income payments, and veterans benefits for children in foster care.

Jul 10, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 287

Rep. Mary Jane Wallner · Sponsored / Rep. Maureen C. Mooney · Sponsored / Rep. Debra L DeSimone · Sponsored / Sen. Cindy Rosenwald · Sponsored / Sen. Pat Long · Sponsored / Sen. David Rochefort · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 661 requires the department to check benefit receipt within 60 days after a child enters its care and apply when a child is not receiving benefits but may qualify. An existing representative payee remains unless unsuitable or another change is warranted under federal successor-payee rules. The department must consult the child and representative when identifying a payee, and apply to become payee only if no other suitable candidate is available. These provisions begin July 1, 2027 and apply to children in department care on or after that date. When the department is determined by the court to serve as payee, later provisions phase benefit conservation at 25% from July 2028, 50% from July 2030, 75% from July 2032 and 100% from July 2034, in addition to amounts already required to be set aside. Benefits may address unmet needs beyond costs the department must pay. Notice, annual accounting and eligibility review, suitable-account protections and release of remaining funds begin with section 2 on July 1, 2028. The law separately requires ABLE-account procedures by June 30, 2027. This link covers OASDI benefits only, excluding SSI and veterans’ benefits.

Chapter 287, approved 2026-07-10. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact counts OASDI beneficiaries. Benefit screening, applications and representative-payee protections concern a narrow group of potential or existing OASDI beneficiaries. SSI and veterans’ benefits covered by the same law are outside this fact. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

287:1 New Section; Dependent Children; Federal Benefits. Amend RSA 126-A by inserting after section 6 the following new section: 126-A:6-a Dependent Children; Eligibility For and Appointment of Representative Payee to Manage Federal Benefits. I. For all children in the care of the department, the department shall determine whether each child is receiving benefits administered by the Social Security Administration or the Veterans Administration within 60 days after the child enters the department's care. If the department determines that a child is not receiving benefits but may be eligible for federal benefits, the department shall apply for the benefits on behalf of the child. II. If a child is already receiving benefits before entering the department's care with an appointed representative payee in place, the department shall not seek to change the payee appointment unless the current payee has been deemed unsuitable or other circumstances warranting a payee change are met in accordance with the federal regulations for naming a successor payee. If there is no payee or if the department applies for benefits on behalf of the child, the department shall identify, in consultation with the child and the child's representative, a representative payee in accordance with 20 C.F.R. sections 404.2021 and 416.621 and encourage the identified individual to apply to the Social Security Administration to be appointed as the child's representative payee. The department shall apply to become the representative payee only if no other suitable candidate is available. 287:2 New Paragraphs; Use and Management of Federal Benefits. Amend RSA 126-A:6-a by inserting after paragraph II the following new paragraphs: III. If the department is determined by the court to serve as the representative payee: (a) The department shall not use the child's federal benefits, other benefits, savings, or assets to pay for or reimburse the department or this state for any of the costs of the child's care in accordance with the phase-in schedule under subparagraph (b). (b) In addition to any amount required to be set aside by the department under federal law and the division for children, youth and families policy, the department shall conserve the following amounts on behalf of the child: (1) Beginning July 1, 2028, the department shall conserve 25 percent of the child's federal benefits. (2) Beginning July 1, 2030, the department shall conserve 50 percent of the child's federal benefits. (3) Beginning July 1, 2032, the department shall conserve 75 percent of the child's federal benefits. (4) Beginning July 1, 2034, the department shall conserve 100 percent of the child's federal benefits. (c) The department may use the child's federal benefits for the child's unmet needs beyond what the department is obligated or required to pay. (d) The department shall establish an appropriate account to use and conserve the child's benefits in the child's best interest for current unmet needs and future needs in a manner consistent with federal and state asset and resource limits. The account may include any of the following: (1) A special needs trust. (2) A pooled special needs trust. (3) An Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) savings account, established pursuant to RSA 195-K and section 529A of the Internal Revenue Code. (4) Any other trust account determined not to interfere with social security or asset limitations for any other benefit program. (e) The department shall provide an annual accounting as to the use, application, or conservation of the child's federal benefits to the child, the child's representative, and the child's parents or guardians. IV. The department shall notify the child, the child's parents, unless parental rights have been terminated, the child's guardian, the child's current placement, the child’s court appointed special advocate or guardian ad litem, and the child's attorney of any application or decision related to a child's federal benefits. In providing notice of any denial of benefits, the department shall explain that there is a right to appeal, the process for filing an appeal, and the names and contact information of organizations that might be available to provide pro bono or reduced fee legal assistance. V. The department shall annually review cases of children in the department's care to determine whether a child may have become eligible for benefits after the department's initial assessment. VI. Notwithstanding any other law, on termination of the department's responsibility for the child, the department shall release any moneys remaining to the child's credit pursuant to the requirements of the funding source or, in the absence of any requirements, shall release the remaining moneys to: (a) The child, if the child is at least 18 years of age or is emancipated; or (b) The person who is responsible for the child if the child is a minor and not emancipated. VII. For purposes of this section, a "child in the care of the department" means the department has custody or guardianship over the child or the child is in a court-ordered placement or other out-of-home placement under the supervision of the department. 287:3 ABLE Accounts. The department of health and human services shall develop and complete the processes and procedures for establishing ABLE accounts for children in its custody for whom it serves as representative payee no later than June 30, 2027. The department may utilize federal Title IV-E funds it secures pursuant to the 2025, 141:310 for this purpose. 287:4 Policies and Procedures Regarding Federal Benefits for Dependent Children. The department of health and human services shall develop the necessary policies and procedures, establish process workflows, and conduct necessary staff training to facilitate implementation of this act on or before June 30, 2028. To assist in completing the tasks required to begin implementation of these requirements, the department may hire a consultant with knowledge of other states’ efforts to develop necessary policies and procedures to manage federal benefits for children in state custody. 287:5 Executive Order. In accordance with the federal executive order entitled "Fostering the Future for American Children and Families" dated November 13, 2025, the department of health and human services shall seek all available federal resources to fund the provisions of this act. 287:6 Applicability. RSA 126-A:6-a, as inserted by section 1 of this act and amended by section 2 of this act, shall apply only to children in the care of the department of health and human services on or after July 1, 2027. 287:7 Fiscal Committee Approval. The department of health and human services may request additional general funds from the fiscal committee of the general court to implement section 3 of this act, relative to establishing ABLE accounts for children in the department's custody for whom it serves as representative payee. The governor is authorized to draw a warrant for sums approved out of any funds in the treasury not otherwise appropriated. 287:8 Effective Date. I. Section 1 of this act shall take effect July 1, 2027. II. Section 2 of this act shall take effect July 1, 2028. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current New Hampshire officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a New Hampshire statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.