New Hampshire · individual fact

New Hampshire education

Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.

High school or higher94.4%2020–2024 · #4 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher50.5%2020–2024 · #5 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher40.6%2020–2024 · #8 of 50 · highest first

New Hampshire over time

Explore New Hampshire readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. New Hampshire officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a New Hampshire effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a New Hampshire change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Grade 4 reading New Hampshire · source units
New HampshirePublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Grade 4 reading2024: 221.5213223.5234New Hampshire, 2003: 227.8New Hampshire, 2005: 227.4New Hampshire, 2007: 229New Hampshire, 2009: 229.1New Hampshire, 2011: 230.4New Hampshire, 2013: 232New Hampshire, 2015: 231.9New Hampshire, 2017: 228.9New Hampshire, 2019: 224.3New Hampshire, 2022: 222.5New Hampshire, 2024: 221.5200320132024
✦ Major events & context · 20National context · Student-aid law ends new FFEL lending and expands Pell funding · 2010-03-30Student-aid reformNational context · Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act signed · 2014-07-22Workforce and adult educationNational context · Every Student Succeeds Act signed · 2015-12-10ESSA signedNational context · Career and technical education law reauthorized · 2018-07-31Perkins V signedNational context · FUTURE Act continues support for minority-serving institutions · 2019-12-19FUTURE Act signedNational context · Pandemic education relief through the CARES Act · 2020-03-27COVID-19 education reliefNational context · Additional pandemic relief for colleges and students · 2020-12-27Second education relief lawNational context · American Rescue Plan expands education relief · 2021-03-11Education recovery fundingNational context · Supreme Court rejects Harvard and UNC race-conscious admissions programs · 2023-06-29College-admissions rulingNational context · Supreme Court rejects the 2022 student-loan cancellation plan · 2023-06-30Student-loan rulingNational context · Pell eligibility restored for qualifying prison education programs · 2023-07-01Prison education Pell accessNational context · Federal student-loan payments resume after pandemic pause · 2023-10-01Student-loan payments resumeNational context · Executive order directs steps toward closing the Education Department · 2025-03-20Federal education orderNational context · 2025 law changes federal student aid and creates Workforce Pell · 2025-07-04Student-aid law signedNational context · Education and Treasury announce student-aid partnership · 2026-03-19Student-aid partnershipNational context · Education announces final student-loan and repayment regulations · 2026-04-30Student-loan final ruleNational context · Education Department announces Workforce Pell final rule · 2026-05-18Workforce Pell ruleNational context · Education announces earnings-accountability final rule · 2026-06-29College earnings accountabilityNational context · Main student-loan limits and new repayment plans take effect · 2026-07-01Student-loan changes beginNational context · First Workforce Pell program approved · 2026-08-04First Workforce Pell approval● New Hampshire Legislature · 2● U.S. Congress · New Hampshire delegation · 2◆ Governor · 2■ New Hampshire agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2003-12-012026-08-31

6 of 6 reviewed New Hampshire actions match · 6 date markers shown. 20 major events shown separately.

New Hampshire · 2024: 221.5 · Rank #4 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in New Hampshire. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
New Hampshire Grade 4 reading · source units
PeriodNew HampshireRankU.S. benchmark
2024221.5#4 of 50215
2022222.5#6 of 50217.5
2019224.3#7 of 50220.5
2017228.9#3 of 50221.9
2015231.9#2 of 50222.5
2013232#3 of 50221.8
2011230.4#4 of 50221.2
2009229.1#3 of 50220.9
2007229#3 of 50221
2005227.4#2 of 50219
2003227.8#2 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

New Hampshire · state comparison

Adult educational attainment

Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.

New Hampshire · 2020–202494.4%
New Hampshire rank#4among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

High school or higher

Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.

Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · 94.4%2020–2024 · Rank #4 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont94.9%—
#2Maine94.8%—
#3Montana94.6%—
#4New Hampshire · your comparison94.4%—
#5Wyoming94.2%—
#6North Dakota94%—
#7Minnesota93.9%—
#8Wisconsin93.6%—
#9Alaska93.6%—
#10Utah93.4%—
#11Iowa93.3%—
#12South Dakota93.2%—
#13Hawaii93.2%—
#14Colorado92.9%—
#15Washington92.3%—
#16Nebraska92.2%—
#17Pennsylvania92.1%—
#18Michigan92.1%—
#19Kansas92%—
#20Idaho91.9%—
#21Missouri91.9%—
#22Oregon91.8%—
#23Ohio91.8%—
#24Delaware91.7%—
#25Virginia91.6%—
#26Connecticut91.5%—
#27Massachusetts91.4%—
#28Maryland91.1%—
#29New Jersey90.7%—
#30Illinois90.5%—
#31Indiana90.4%—
#32North Carolina90.1%—
#33South Carolina90.1%—
#34Tennessee90%—
#35Florida89.9%—
#36Rhode Island89.7%—
#37Oklahoma89.4%—
#38Arizona89.4%—
#39West Virginia89.3%—
#40Georgia89.2%—
#41Kentucky88.9%—
#42Arkansas88.7%—
#43Alabama88.6%—
#44New Mexico88%—
#45New York88%—
#46Nevada87.5%—
#47Louisiana87.3%—
#48Mississippi87.1%—
#49Texas86%—
#50California84.7%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Adults with at least a high school diploma

94.4%2020–2024 estimate

Share of New Hampshire residents age 25 and older whose reported attainment is a regular high school diploma or equivalent (including GED or an alternative credential), some college, or an associate’s or higher degree.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • This is an adult educational-attainment measure, not a current high-school graduation rate or a measure of school quality.
  • A statewide estimate can obscure differences across communities and demographic groups.
New Hampshire · state comparison

Are students learning?

NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.

New Hampshire · 2024221.5
New Hampshire rank#4among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Grade 4 reading

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in New Hampshire. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.

NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Hampshire
Grade 4 reading history in New Hampshire212.5223.5234.520032024
2024 · New Hampshire: 221.5 · Rank #4 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Hampshire Grade 4 reading history
PeriodNew HampshireCompare
2003227.8
2005227.4
2007229
2009229.1
2011230.4
2013232
2015231.9
2017228.9
2019224.3
2022222.5
2024221.5

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · 221.52024 · Rank #4 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts224.8—
#2Wyoming221.9—
#3New Jersey221.6—
#4New Hampshire · your comparison221.5—
#5Colorado220.9—
#6Indiana220.1—
#7Utah219.3—
#8Connecticut219.2—
#9Mississippi218.5—
#10Florida218.2—
#11Kentucky218—
#12Montana217.2—
#13Rhode Island216.3—
#14Louisiana216—
#14Ohio216—
#16Hawaii215.8—
#16Pennsylvania215.8—
#18Idaho215.7—
#18Washington215.7—
#20Maryland215.6—
#21North Dakota215.5—
#22Wisconsin215.3—
#23Tennessee215.1—
#24South Carolina214.9—
#25Iowa214.6—
#25New York214.6—
#27Georgia214.4—
#27Minnesota214.4—
#29Illinois214.2—
#30South Dakota214.1—
#30Virginia214.1—
#32North Carolina213.4—
#33Alabama213.2—
#34Kansas213.1—
#34Nevada213.1—
#36Vermont212.7—
#37Missouri211.9—
#37Texas211.9—
#39California211.7—
#39Nebraska211.7—
#41Arkansas209.7—
#42Maine209.6—
#43Delaware209.5—
#44Michigan209.1—
#45Arizona208.1—
#46Oklahoma207.3—
#47Oregon207—
#48West Virginia205.9—
#49Alaska201.6—
#50New Mexico200.6—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Hampshire · state comparison

Where does school funding go?

Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.

New Hampshire · FY2024$22,978
New Hampshire rank#7among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Current spending per pupil

Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.

Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · $22,978FY2024 · Rank #7 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$31,918—
#2Vermont$28,818—
#3New Jersey$27,234—
#4Connecticut$26,316—
#5Massachusetts$24,429—
#6Hawaii$23,878—
#7New Hampshire · your comparison$22,978—
#8Delaware$22,201—
#9Rhode Island$22,110—
#10Illinois$21,776—
#11Pennsylvania$21,091—
#12Alaska$21,004—
#13California$20,791—
#14Wyoming$20,521—
#15Maryland$20,208—
#16Maine$19,962—
#17Washington$18,564—
#18Michigan$18,314—
#19Oregon$18,083—
#20New Mexico$17,664—
#21Ohio$17,257—
#22Virginia$17,104—
#23North Dakota$17,102—
#24Minnesota$17,098—
#25Nebraska$16,147—
#26Wisconsin$15,952—
#27Colorado$15,908—
#28Georgia$15,833—
#29West Virginia$15,640—
#30Louisiana$15,581—
#31Kansas$15,558—
#32South Carolina$15,060—
#33Nevada$14,812—
#34Kentucky$14,596—
#35Iowa$14,369—
#36Missouri$14,241—
#37Arkansas$13,873—
#38Montana$13,656—
#39Alabama$13,627—
#40Indiana$13,622—
#41North Carolina$12,995—
#42Texas$12,895—
#43Tennessee$12,882—
#44South Dakota$12,828—
#45Florida$12,693—
#46Mississippi$12,324—
#47Oklahoma$12,162—
#48Arizona$12,003—
#49Utah$11,347—
#50Idaho$11,060—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Hampshire · state comparison

Are students finishing school?

The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.

New Hampshire · 2021–2288%
New Hampshire rank#13among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark87%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Federal public-school cohort graduation rate

Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.

Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Hampshire
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history in New Hampshire78.7%84.5%90.4%2011–122021–22
2021–22 · New Hampshire: 88% · Rank #13 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 87% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Hampshire Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
PeriodNew HampshireCompare
2011–1286%
2012–1387%
2013–1488%
2014–1588%
2015–1688%
2016–1789%
2017–1889%
2018–1988%
2019–2088%
2020–2187%
2021–2288%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · 77%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · 88%2021–22 · Rank #13 of 48, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2021–22 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1West Virginia91%—
#2Iowa90%—
#2Kentucky90%—
#2Massachusetts90%—
#2Missouri90%—
#2Tennessee90%—
#2Texas90%—
#2Wisconsin90%—
#9Connecticut89%—
#9Kansas89%—
#9Mississippi89%—
#9Virginia89%—
#13Alabama88%—
#13Arkansas88%—
#13Delaware88%—
#13Indiana88%—
#13New Hampshire · your comparison88%—
#13Utah88%—
#19California87%—
#19Florida87%—
#19Illinois87%—
#19Nebraska87%—
#19New York87%—
#19Pennsylvania87%—
#25Hawaii86%—
#25Maine86%—
#25Maryland86%—
#25Montana86%—
#25North Carolina86%—
#25Ohio86%—
#31New Jersey85%—
#31North Dakota85%—
#33Georgia84%—
#33Minnesota84%—
#33South Carolina84%—
#33Washington84%—
#37Louisiana83%—
#37Rhode Island83%—
#37Vermont83%—
#40Colorado82%—
#40Nevada82%—
#40South Dakota82%—
#40Wyoming82%—
#44Michigan81%—
#44Oregon81%—
#46Idaho80%—
#47Alaska78%—
#48Arizona77%—
—New MexicoNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—OklahomaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Hampshire · state comparison

College costs, attendance, and earnings

Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.

New Hampshire · 2022–23$17,019
New Hampshire rank#2among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Public four-year in-state tuition and fees

Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.

2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · $17,0192022–23 · Rank #2 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont$17,600—
#2New Hampshire · your comparison$17,019—
#3Pennsylvania$16,217—
#4Connecticut$15,763—
#5New Jersey$15,265—
#6Illinois$14,921—
#7Virginia$14,825—
#8Rhode Island$14,744—
#9Michigan$14,718—
#10Massachusetts$14,345—
#11Minnesota$12,873—
#12South Carolina$12,604—
#13Oregon$12,424—
#14Delaware$11,922—
#15Arizona$11,768—
#16Kentucky$11,299—
#17Alabama$11,081—
#18Ohio$10,922—
#19Maine$10,813—
#20Hawaii$10,484—
#21Tennessee$10,437—
#22Iowa$10,121—
#23Maryland$10,041—
#24Missouri$9,926—
#25Indiana$9,886—
#26Louisiana$9,843—
#27Colorado$9,798—
#28North Dakota$9,728—
#29Kansas$9,274—
#30Mississippi$9,120—
#31South Dakota$9,079—
#32Wisconsin$8,974—
#33Arkansas$8,879—
#34Nebraska$8,862—
#35West Virginia$8,715—
#36California$8,637—
#37New York$8,575—
#38Oklahoma$8,519—
#39Alaska$8,291—
#40Texas$8,195—
#41Washington$8,006—
#42Idaho$7,640—
#43New Mexico$7,526—
#44North Carolina$7,327—
#45Montana$7,299—
#46Utah$7,215—
#47Georgia$7,075—
#48Nevada$6,723—
#49Wyoming$5,100—
#50Florida$4,540—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s New Hampshire candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

11 statements from 7 candidates

2026 New Hampshire Governor General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 5 statements

Kelly Ayotte

3 statements

Republican · Governor · NH

Schools & education

Implemented a policy removing student cellphones from New Hampshire classrooms.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: School Cellphones Record

Candidate campaign source

Implemented a policy removing student cellphones from New Hampshire classrooms.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Kelly Ayotte — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from Kelly Ayotte
Schools & education

Increased per-student education funding and provided historic state support for special education.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education Funding Record

Candidate campaign source

Increased per-student education funding and provided historic state support for special education.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Kelly Ayotte — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Prioritize fundamental reading skills and workforce development that puts more students on paths to employment.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education Priorities

Candidate campaign source

Prioritize fundamental reading skills and workforce development that puts more students on paths to employment.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Kelly Ayotte — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Stephen Villee

2 statements

Libertarian · Governor · NH

Schools & education

I still want to grandfather current residents who are not libertarian into the education funding they have now. And I'm open to the idea of incorporating this grandfathering into the CACR. But that would make the amendment quite a bit more complicated, so I'll leave that discussion for another day.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Issues

Candidate campaign source

I still want to grandfather current residents who are not libertarian into the education funding they have now. And I'm open to the idea of incorporating this grandfathering into the CACR. But that would make the amendment quite a bit more complicated, so I'll leave that discussion for another day.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Stephen Villee — validated position source ↗
View 1 more statement from Stephen Villee
Schools & education

A bill to begin the process might specify that people moving into New Hampshire after a certain date would have no positive rights. They'd be required to sign a waiver acknowledging that the government won't provide them with food, housing, health care, or education for their children. But those alr…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Issues

Candidate campaign source

A bill to begin the process might specify that people moving into New Hampshire after a certain date would have no positive rights. They'd be required to sign a waiver acknowledging that the government won't provide them with food, housing, health care, or education for their children. But those already here who aren't libertarian would be grandfathered into the benefits they have now. The goal is to avoid a sudden drastic reduction in quality of life for anyone.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Stephen Villee — validated position source ↗

2026 New Hampshire U.S. House - District 1 General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

2026 New Hampshire U.S. House - District 2 General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · NH

Schools & education

Education is a states’ rights issue, pure and simple. Moreover, here in New Hampshire, we go a step further; we believe strongly in local control, and parental control. I recognize and applaud local control, and deeply respect that long standing culture and tradition. Accordingly, it is time to elim…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and child care

Candidate campaign source

Education is a states’ rights issue, pure and simple. Moreover, here in New Hampshire, we go a step further; we believe strongly in local control, and parental control. I recognize and applaud local control, and deeply respect that long standing culture and tradition. Accordingly, it is time to eliminate the federal Department of Education and repeal all federal laws regulating K-12 education.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Lily Tang Williams — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · NH

Schools & education

Maggie will stand up against discriminatory laws and make sure that no one is targeted because of who they love, how they identify, or the color of their skin. She has been proud to defend voting rights in New Hampshire and she believes deeply that our democracy depends on giving our kids a solid ed…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Civil rights, voting rights, and education

Candidate campaign source

Maggie will stand up against discriminatory laws and make sure that no one is targeted because of who they love, how they identify, or the color of their skin. She has been proud to defend voting rights in New Hampshire and she believes deeply that our democracy depends on giving our kids a solid education. In Congress, Maggie will fight against book bans and for our teachers and our students.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Maggie Goodlander — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published New Hampshire candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

New Hampshire incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current New Hampshire legislators and New Hampshire’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from New Hampshire’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

8 matching sponsorships or proposals · 7 New Hampshire incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Joe Sweeney

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Rockingham 25 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Joe Sweeney
New Hampshire Legislature · HB 1588

(Second New Title) relative to the regulation of accessory parking for vehicles by local legislative bodies and multifamily housing within commercial districts by municipalities; establishing special assessment districts; and relative to expanding the housing infrastructure municipal grant program and making an appropriation therefor.

Jul 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 329

Rep. Joe Sweeney · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1588 bars municipalities from requiring more than one residential parking space per unit or requiring that space to be garaged. Its multifamily provisions preserve site-plan review and state safety requirements, limit frontage, setback and height rules to those allowed for commercial development, permit qualifying conversions of nonconforming structures, and provide reasonable attorney-fee reimbursement for the specified improper denials or extra requirements. Infrastructure assessment districts require agreements with 60% of properties’ owners; assessments apply only to directly benefited properties and cannot exceed the special benefit received, with installments limited to 20 years. It expands housing-infrastructure grants to sewer, water and road upgrades but appropriates only $1 for fiscal 2027. Contingencies govern alternative section numbering and multifamily provisions. Most provisions take effect September 13, 2026; the law does not establish completed housing or lower rents.

Chapter 329, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Median gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities. Multifamily development and infrastructure rules concern rental supply and costs, without demonstrating new rental units or a change in median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

329:1 Zoning; Grant of Power; Parking Ordinances. Amend RSA 674:16, VII to read as follows: VII. In its exercise of the powers granted under this subdivision, the local legislative body of a city, town, or county in which there are located unincorporated towns or unorganized places may regulate accessory parking for vehicles, but shall not require more than one residential parking space per unit or require that the parking space per unit be garaged. 329:2 Multi-Family Residential Development on Commercially Zoned Land; Amendment to Zoning Regulations; Conversion of Multi-Family Dwelling Units Permitted. Amend RSA 674:80, IV to read as follows: IV. [] Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter municipal authority under RSA 674:43, I to require site plan review for multi-family dwelling units. Consistent with the purpose of this section, for multi-family dwelling units proposed in commercial districts existing, created, or expanded after July 1, 2026, municipalities may impose frontage, setbacks, and height requirements; provided that such requirements shall not differ from what is allowed for commercial development. Multi-family dwelling units shall be allowed as a matter of right, and municipalities shall not enforce additional requirements unless expressly authorized by this section. Nothing in this section shall prohibit enforcement of applicable state fire, building, and other requirements under RSA 153, RSA 155-A, and RSA 485-A. V. A municipality shall allow pre-existing nonconforming structures to be converted to multi-family dwelling units or mixed use provided that the structure’s envelope is not altered to further violate zoning district dimensional requirements. VI. Any owner of commercially-zoned property improperly denied an application for multi-family housing, or who is subjected to requirements beyond those allowed in this section, and who is thereby required to file suit against the municipality in order to exercise the property rights thus recognized, shall be entitled to be reimbursed reasonable attorney's fees incurred as a direct result. 329:3 New Chapter; Special Assessment Districts. Amend RSA by inserting after chapter 162-U the following new chapter:CHAPTER 162-VSPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 162-V:1 Authority. The governing body of any city or town may enter into special assessment memorandums of understanding with 60 percent of properties' owners to establish special assessment districts and spending programs for the purpose of financing public infrastructure improvements necessary to serve new development. 162-V:2 Improvements Authorized. I. Infrastructure improvements eligible for financing under this chapter shall include: (a) Roads, sidewalks, street lighting, and traffic control devices; (b) Water mains, sewer lines, stormwater management facilities, and related appurtenances; (c) Utility extensions directly serving the district; and (d) Streetscape or parking improvements incidental to development. II. General government buildings, schools, or facilities that do not directly and specially benefit parcels within the district shall not be financed under this chapter. 162-V:3 Apportionment of Costs. I. Assessments shall be levied only against properties that receive a direct and ascertainable benefit from the improvements. II. The governing body shall determine the method of apportionment, which may include frontage, lot size, number of units, assessed value, or other reasonable metric. III. No parcel shall be assessed in an amount greater than the special benefit conferred upon it. 162-V:4 Financing. I. Municipalities may issue bonds to finance improvements within the district, to be repaid solely from assessments levied under this chapter. II. Assessments may be collected in annual installments over a period not to exceed 20 years. III. Assessments shall constitute a lien on the property with the same priority and enforcement as property taxes. 162-V:5 Procedure. I. Establishment of a district shall require the governing body of any city or town to enter into special assessment memorandums of understanding with 60 percent of properties' owners. II. Notice of the proposed district shall be mailed to each affected property owner and published in a newspaper of general circulation at least 14 days prior to the hearing. 162-V:6 Appeals. Any property owner subject to an assessment may appeal the apportionment of costs to the governing body within 30 days of notice, and thereafter to the superior court pursuant to RSA 677. 162-V:7 Dissolution. A district shall dissolve upon repayment of all obligations or earlier by vote of the governing body, provided all costs have been satisfied. 329:4 Department of Business and Economic Affairs; Expansion of Housing Infrastructure Municipal Grant Program. The department of business and economic affairs shall expand its housing infrastructure municipal grant program to allow for sewer, water, and road upgrades for new housing units. 329:5 Department of Business and Economic Affairs, Appropriation. The sum of $1 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2027 is hereby appropriated to the department of business and economic affairs for the purpose of providing grants for sewer, water, and road upgrades for new housing units under its housing infrastructure municipal grant program. The governor is authorized to draw a warrant for said sums out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated. 329:6 Multi-Family Residential Development on Commercially Zoned Land; Amendment to Zoning Regulations; Conversion of Multi-Family Dwelling Units Permitted. Amend RSA 674:80, V to read as follows: V. [] Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter municipal authority under RSA 674:43, I to require site plan review for multi-family dwelling units. Consistent with the purpose of this section, for multi-family dwelling units proposed in commercial districts existing, created, or expanded after July 1, 2026, municipalities may impose frontage, setbacks, and height requirements; provided that such requirements shall not differ from what is allowed for commercial development. Multi-family dwelling units shall be allowed as a matter of right, and municipalities shall not enforce additional requirements unless expressly authorized by this section. Nothing in this section shall prohibit enforcement of applicable state fire, building, and other requirements under RSA 153, RSA 155-A, and RSA 485-A. VI. A municipality shall allow pre-existing nonconforming structures to be converted to multi-family dwelling units or mixed use provided that the structure’s envelope is not altered to further violate zoning district dimensional requirements. VII. Any owner of commercially-zoned property improperly denied an application for multi-family housing, or who is subjected to requirements beyond those allowed in this section, and who is thereby required to file suit against the municipality in order to exercise the property rights thus recognized, shall be entitled to be reimbursed reasonable attorney's fees incurred as a direct result. 329:7 Contingency. If HB 1010 of the 2026 regular legislative session becomes law, section 2 of this act shall not take effect and section 6 of this act shall take effect 60 days after its passage. If HB 1010 of the 2026 regular legislative session does not become law, section 2 of this act shall take effect 60 days after its passage and section 6 of this act shall not take effect. 329:8 Contingent Renumbering. If HB 1433 of the 2026 regular legislative session becomes law: RSA 162-V as inserted by section 3 of this act shall be renumbered as RSA 162-X. If HB 1433 of the 2026 regular legislative session does not become law: RSA 162-V as inserted by section 3 of this act shall be renumbered as RSA 162-W. 329:9 Effective Date. I. Sections 2 and 6 of this act shall take effect as provided in section 7 of this act. II. The remainder of this act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Bill M. Gannon

New Hampshire Senate, District 23 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Bill M. Gannon
New Hampshire Legislature · SB 667

relative to the assault of emergency room personnel.

Jul 2, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 277

Sen. Tim McGough · Sponsored / Sen. Howard Pearl · Sponsored / Sen. Kevin A. Avard · Sponsored / Sen. Bill M. Gannon · Sponsored / Sen. David Rochefort · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 667 adds first-degree assault for knowingly causing serious bodily injury to emergency-room personnel acting in the line of duty, and second-degree assault for knowingly causing bodily injury to such personnel. Its definition includes listed staff and volunteers, and the law takes effect January 1, 2027. The fact connection concerns aggravated-assault components, not every injury under the law or proof of fewer offenses.

Chapter 277, approved 2026-07-02. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The FBI violent-crime measure includes aggravated assault. Serious-injury assaults and federal criminal-defense rules concern components of violent crime; simple assault and every offense within the bills are not automatically included in the FBI measure. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

277:1 Assault and Related Offenses; First Degree Assault. Amend RSA 631:1, I(e) to read as follows: (e) Knowingly causes serious bodily injury to a law enforcement officer, a paid firefighter, volunteer firefighter, on-call firefighter, or licensed emergency medical care provider as defined in RSA 153-A:2, V, acting in the line of duty; or commits such an act against a law enforcement officer whether or not the officer is on duty, where the purpose was to harm the officer because of his or her present or previous employment as a law enforcement officer[]; or (f) Knowingly causes serious bodily injury to any emergency room personnel acting in the line of duty. For purposes of this subparagraph, "emergency room personnel" means a person in a hospital emergency department who, in the course and scope of their employment or as a volunteer, provides services or medical care, or who assists in the providing of services or medical care, for the benefit of the general public, including, but not limited to, any health care professional, emergency department clerk, emergency department technician, student, and emergency department volunteer working in the hospital emergency department. 277:2 Assault and Related Offenses; Second Degree Assault. Amend RSA 631:2, I(g) to read as follows: (g) Knowingly causes bodily injury to a law enforcement officer, a paid firefighter, volunteer firefighter, on-call firefighter, or licensed emergency medical care provider as defined in RSA 153-A:2, V, acting in the line of duty; or commits such an act against a law enforcement officer whether or not the officer is on duty, where the purpose was to harm the officer because of his or her present or previous employment as a law enforcement officer[]; or (h) Knowingly causes bodily injury to any emergency room personnel acting in the line of duty. For purposes of this subparagraph, "emergency room personnel" means a person in a hospital emergency department who, in the course and scope of their employment or as a volunteer, provides services or medical care, or who assists in the providing of services or medical care, for the benefit of the general public, including, but not limited to, any health care professional, emergency department clerk, emergency department technician, student, and emergency department volunteer working in the hospital emergency department. 277:3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect January 1, 2027.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. David Rochefort

New Hampshire Senate, District 1 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. David Rochefort
New Hampshire Legislature · SB 667

relative to the assault of emergency room personnel.

Jul 2, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 277

Sen. Tim McGough · Sponsored / Sen. Howard Pearl · Sponsored / Sen. Kevin A. Avard · Sponsored / Sen. Bill M. Gannon · Sponsored / Sen. David Rochefort · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 667 adds first-degree assault for knowingly causing serious bodily injury to emergency-room personnel acting in the line of duty, and second-degree assault for knowingly causing bodily injury to such personnel. Its definition includes listed staff and volunteers, and the law takes effect January 1, 2027. The fact connection concerns aggravated-assault components, not every injury under the law or proof of fewer offenses.

Chapter 277, approved 2026-07-02. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The FBI violent-crime measure includes aggravated assault. Serious-injury assaults and federal criminal-defense rules concern components of violent crime; simple assault and every offense within the bills are not automatically included in the FBI measure. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

277:1 Assault and Related Offenses; First Degree Assault. Amend RSA 631:1, I(e) to read as follows: (e) Knowingly causes serious bodily injury to a law enforcement officer, a paid firefighter, volunteer firefighter, on-call firefighter, or licensed emergency medical care provider as defined in RSA 153-A:2, V, acting in the line of duty; or commits such an act against a law enforcement officer whether or not the officer is on duty, where the purpose was to harm the officer because of his or her present or previous employment as a law enforcement officer[]; or (f) Knowingly causes serious bodily injury to any emergency room personnel acting in the line of duty. For purposes of this subparagraph, "emergency room personnel" means a person in a hospital emergency department who, in the course and scope of their employment or as a volunteer, provides services or medical care, or who assists in the providing of services or medical care, for the benefit of the general public, including, but not limited to, any health care professional, emergency department clerk, emergency department technician, student, and emergency department volunteer working in the hospital emergency department. 277:2 Assault and Related Offenses; Second Degree Assault. Amend RSA 631:2, I(g) to read as follows: (g) Knowingly causes bodily injury to a law enforcement officer, a paid firefighter, volunteer firefighter, on-call firefighter, or licensed emergency medical care provider as defined in RSA 153-A:2, V, acting in the line of duty; or commits such an act against a law enforcement officer whether or not the officer is on duty, where the purpose was to harm the officer because of his or her present or previous employment as a law enforcement officer[]; or (h) Knowingly causes bodily injury to any emergency room personnel acting in the line of duty. For purposes of this subparagraph, "emergency room personnel" means a person in a hospital emergency department who, in the course and scope of their employment or as a volunteer, provides services or medical care, or who assists in the providing of services or medical care, for the benefit of the general public, including, but not limited to, any health care professional, emergency department clerk, emergency department technician, student, and emergency department volunteer working in the hospital emergency department. 277:3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect January 1, 2027.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Howard Pearl

New Hampshire Senate, District 17 · r–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Howard Pearl
New Hampshire Legislature · SB 667

relative to the assault of emergency room personnel.

Jul 2, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 277

Sen. Tim McGough · Sponsored / Sen. Howard Pearl · Sponsored / Sen. Kevin A. Avard · Sponsored / Sen. Bill M. Gannon · Sponsored / Sen. David Rochefort · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 667 adds first-degree assault for knowingly causing serious bodily injury to emergency-room personnel acting in the line of duty, and second-degree assault for knowingly causing bodily injury to such personnel. Its definition includes listed staff and volunteers, and the law takes effect January 1, 2027. The fact connection concerns aggravated-assault components, not every injury under the law or proof of fewer offenses.

Chapter 277, approved 2026-07-02. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The FBI violent-crime measure includes aggravated assault. Serious-injury assaults and federal criminal-defense rules concern components of violent crime; simple assault and every offense within the bills are not automatically included in the FBI measure. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

277:1 Assault and Related Offenses; First Degree Assault. Amend RSA 631:1, I(e) to read as follows: (e) Knowingly causes serious bodily injury to a law enforcement officer, a paid firefighter, volunteer firefighter, on-call firefighter, or licensed emergency medical care provider as defined in RSA 153-A:2, V, acting in the line of duty; or commits such an act against a law enforcement officer whether or not the officer is on duty, where the purpose was to harm the officer because of his or her present or previous employment as a law enforcement officer[]; or (f) Knowingly causes serious bodily injury to any emergency room personnel acting in the line of duty. For purposes of this subparagraph, "emergency room personnel" means a person in a hospital emergency department who, in the course and scope of their employment or as a volunteer, provides services or medical care, or who assists in the providing of services or medical care, for the benefit of the general public, including, but not limited to, any health care professional, emergency department clerk, emergency department technician, student, and emergency department volunteer working in the hospital emergency department. 277:2 Assault and Related Offenses; Second Degree Assault. Amend RSA 631:2, I(g) to read as follows: (g) Knowingly causes bodily injury to a law enforcement officer, a paid firefighter, volunteer firefighter, on-call firefighter, or licensed emergency medical care provider as defined in RSA 153-A:2, V, acting in the line of duty; or commits such an act against a law enforcement officer whether or not the officer is on duty, where the purpose was to harm the officer because of his or her present or previous employment as a law enforcement officer[]; or (h) Knowingly causes bodily injury to any emergency room personnel acting in the line of duty. For purposes of this subparagraph, "emergency room personnel" means a person in a hospital emergency department who, in the course and scope of their employment or as a volunteer, provides services or medical care, or who assists in the providing of services or medical care, for the benefit of the general public, including, but not limited to, any health care professional, emergency department clerk, emergency department technician, student, and emergency department volunteer working in the hospital emergency department. 277:3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect January 1, 2027.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Kevin A. Avard

New Hampshire Senate, District 12 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Kevin A. Avard
New Hampshire Legislature · SB 667

relative to the assault of emergency room personnel.

Jul 2, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 277

Sen. Tim McGough · Sponsored / Sen. Howard Pearl · Sponsored / Sen. Kevin A. Avard · Sponsored / Sen. Bill M. Gannon · Sponsored / Sen. David Rochefort · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 667 adds first-degree assault for knowingly causing serious bodily injury to emergency-room personnel acting in the line of duty, and second-degree assault for knowingly causing bodily injury to such personnel. Its definition includes listed staff and volunteers, and the law takes effect January 1, 2027. The fact connection concerns aggravated-assault components, not every injury under the law or proof of fewer offenses.

Chapter 277, approved 2026-07-02. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The FBI violent-crime measure includes aggravated assault. Serious-injury assaults and federal criminal-defense rules concern components of violent crime; simple assault and every offense within the bills are not automatically included in the FBI measure. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

277:1 Assault and Related Offenses; First Degree Assault. Amend RSA 631:1, I(e) to read as follows: (e) Knowingly causes serious bodily injury to a law enforcement officer, a paid firefighter, volunteer firefighter, on-call firefighter, or licensed emergency medical care provider as defined in RSA 153-A:2, V, acting in the line of duty; or commits such an act against a law enforcement officer whether or not the officer is on duty, where the purpose was to harm the officer because of his or her present or previous employment as a law enforcement officer[]; or (f) Knowingly causes serious bodily injury to any emergency room personnel acting in the line of duty. For purposes of this subparagraph, "emergency room personnel" means a person in a hospital emergency department who, in the course and scope of their employment or as a volunteer, provides services or medical care, or who assists in the providing of services or medical care, for the benefit of the general public, including, but not limited to, any health care professional, emergency department clerk, emergency department technician, student, and emergency department volunteer working in the hospital emergency department. 277:2 Assault and Related Offenses; Second Degree Assault. Amend RSA 631:2, I(g) to read as follows: (g) Knowingly causes bodily injury to a law enforcement officer, a paid firefighter, volunteer firefighter, on-call firefighter, or licensed emergency medical care provider as defined in RSA 153-A:2, V, acting in the line of duty; or commits such an act against a law enforcement officer whether or not the officer is on duty, where the purpose was to harm the officer because of his or her present or previous employment as a law enforcement officer[]; or (h) Knowingly causes bodily injury to any emergency room personnel acting in the line of duty. For purposes of this subparagraph, "emergency room personnel" means a person in a hospital emergency department who, in the course and scope of their employment or as a volunteer, provides services or medical care, or who assists in the providing of services or medical care, for the benefit of the general public, including, but not limited to, any health care professional, emergency department clerk, emergency department technician, student, and emergency department volunteer working in the hospital emergency department. 277:3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect January 1, 2027.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Margaret Wood Hassan

U.S. Senate, New Hampshire · D–NH

2 proposals
View proposals from Sen. Margaret Wood Hassan
U.S. Congress · New Hampshire delegation · S 3560

Closing the Contraception Coverage Gap Act

Dec 18, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Margaret Wood Hassan · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S. 3560 proposes no-cost-sharing Medicare coverage of specified contraceptive items and services furnished or ordered by a physician or qualifying practitioner, including related clinical and follow-up services. Part B coverage starts January 1, 2027; the Part C and covered Part D contraceptive-drug protections apply to plan years beginning on or after that date. The defined coverage follows the referenced contraceptive guidelines and includes qualifying items or drugs used for noncontraceptive purposes. Coverage for people eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid must be at least as comprehensive as under their state Medicaid programs. A separate study of over-the-counter contraceptive coverage does not itself require such coverage. The bill remains in Congress. Its connection to resident live births is limited to family planning for Medicare beneficiaries within reproductive ages, including some people with disabilities; it does not measure contraception use, abortions, infertility or an effect on the fertility rate.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact measures live births to New Hampshire residents per 1,000 females ages 15–44. Contraception concerns the timing or prevention of pregnancy for the narrow subset with Medicare, including younger beneficiaries with disabilities. This is a family-planning policy connection, not a measure of contraceptive access, infertility, abortions or a demonstrated effect on births. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Fertility rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Providing coverage of contraceptive items and services at no cost-sharing under the Medicare program(a)Part B coverage(1)In generalSection 1861 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x) is amended—(A)in subsection (s)(2)—(i)in subparagraph (JJ), by inserting and after the semicolon at the end; and(ii)by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:(KK)contraceptive items and services (as defined in subsection (nnn)) furnished to individuals on or after January 1, 2027;; and(B)by adding at the end the following new subsection:(nnn)Contraceptive items and services(1)In generalThe term contraceptive items and services means items and services furnished by a physician or practitioner (as defined in section 1842(b)(18)(C))—(A)that—(i)align with guidance as of January 12, 2022, issued in accordance with in section 2713(a)(4) of the Public Health Service Act (including patient-centered counseling services); and(ii)may be furnished for the purpose of contraception; or(B)that are ancillary clinical services.(2)Ancillary clinical servicesFor purposes of paragraph (1)(B), the term ancillary clinical services means—(A)clinical services that are related to the items and services described in paragraph (1)(A), including consultations, examinations, procedures, device insertion, ultrasound, pain management, patient education, referrals, and counseling; and(B)follow-up services related to the provision or use of the items and services described in paragraph (1)(A), including management of side effects, counseling for continued adherence, and device removal.(3)ClarificationThe term contraceptive items and services includes items and services described in paragraph (1) regardless of whether such items and services are actually furnished for purposes of contraception.(4)Patient-centered counseling servicesFor purposes of paragraph (1)(A), the Secretary shall issue guidance regarding the coverage of patient-centered counseling. Such guidance shall—(A)align with guidance as of January 12, 2022, issued in accordance with section 2713(a)(4) of the Public Health Service Act.; and(B)include the coverage of counseling to all patients on the full range of contraceptive items and services described in paragraph (1)..(2)PaymentSection 1833 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l) is amended—(A)in subsection (a)(1)—(i)by striking and before (HH); and(ii)by inserting the following before the semicolon: and (II) with respect to contraceptive items and services (as defined in section 1861(nnn)), the amount paid shall be an amount equal to 100 percent of the lesser of the actual charge for the items and services or the amount determined under a payment basis determined appropriate by the Secretary; and(B)in subsection (b), in the first sentence—(i)by striking , and (13) and inserting (13); and(ii)by striking 1861(n).. and inserting 1861(n), and (14) such deductible shall not apply with respect to contraceptive items and services (as defined in section 1861(nnn))..(3)Exclusion modificationSection 1862(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(a)(1)) is amended—(A)in subparagraph (O), by striking and at the end;(B)in subparagraph (P), by striking the semicolon and inserting , and; and(C)by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:(Q)in the case of contraceptive items and services (as defined in section 1861(nnn)), which are not furnished or ordered by a physician or practitioner (as defined in section 1842(b)(18)(C));.(4)Quality measuresThe Secretary of Health and Human Services may, for the purposes of ensuring quality in services, develop measures of contraceptive counseling, care, and access, including but not limited to validated survey instruments.(b)Part C cost-Sharing for contraceptive items and services(1)In generalSection 1852(a)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–22(a)(1)(B)) is amended—(A)in clause (iv)—(i)by redesignating subclause (VIII) as subclause (IX); and(ii)by inserting after subclause (VII) the following new subclause:(VIII)Contraceptive items and services (as defined in section 1861(nnn)).; and(B)in clause (v), by striking and (VI) and inserting (VI), and (VIII).(2)Effective dateThe amendments made by this subsection shall apply with respect to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2027.(c)Part D coverage and cost-Sharing for contraceptive drugs(1)CoverageSection 1860D–4(b)(3)(G) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–104(b)(3)(G)) is amended—(A)in clause (ii)(I), by adding at the end the following new sentence: Such identification shall include the drugs described in clause (iv)(VII).; and(B)in clause (iv), by adding at the end the following new subclause:(VII)Covered part D drugs described in guidelines issued pursuant to section 2713(a)(4) of the Public Health Service Act and that may be furnished for purposes of contraception (regardless of whether such drugs are actually furnished for purposes of contraception)..(2)Cost-sharingSection 1860D–2 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–102) is amended—(A)in subsection (b)—(i)in paragraph (1)(A), in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking and (9) and inserting , (9), and (10);(ii)in paragraph (2)(A), in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking and (9) and inserting , (9), and (10); and(iii)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(10)Treatment of cost-sharing for contraceptive drugsFor plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, with respect to a covered part D drug that is described in guidelines issued pursuant to section 2713(a)(4) of the Public Health Service Act and that may be furnished for purposes of contraception (regardless of whether such drug is actually furnished for purposes of contraception)—(A)the deductible under paragraph (1) shall not apply; and(B)there shall be no coinsurance or other cost-sharing under this part with respect to such drug.; and(B)in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(7)Treatment of cost-sharing for contraceptive drugsThe coverage is provided in accordance with subsection (b)(10)..(3)Conforming amendments to cost-sharing for low-income individualsSection 1860D–14(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–114(a)) is amended—(A)in paragraph (1)(D), in each of clauses (ii) and (iii), by striking paragraph (6) and inserting paragraphs (6) and (7); and(B)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(7)No application of cost-sharing or deductible for contraceptive drugsFor plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, with respect to a covered part D drug that is described in guidelines issued pursuant to section 2713(a)(4) of the Public Health Service Act and that is furnished for purposes of contraception—(A)the deductible under section 1860D–2(b)(1) shall not apply; and(B)there shall be no cost-sharing under this section with respect to such drug..(4)Effective dateThe amendments made by this subsection shall apply with respect to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2027. (d) Ensuring comparable coverage for dual eligible individuals In implementing the amendments made by this section, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall ensure that the coverage of contraceptive items and services (as defined in section 1861(nnn)) of the Social Security Act (as added by subsection (a)) and covered part D drugs described in section 1860D–4(b)(3)(G)(VII) of such Act (as added by subsection (c)(1)) with respect to individuals who are dually eligible for benefits under the Medicare program under title XVIII of such Act and for medical assistance under a State plan under title XIX of such Act (or a waiver of such plan) is at least as comprehensive as the coverage of such items and services and drugs for such individuals under such State plans (or waivers of such plans), as determined by the Secretary based on an annual review of such State plans (and waivers of such plans).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · New Hampshire delegation · S 3359

Fast Track To and Through College Act

Dec 4, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Margaret Wood Hassan · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S. 3359 proposes competitive grants to align secondary and college education. A state’s application must show adoption of a statewide early-graduation policy by all local educational agencies. That policy must offer a regular high school diploma in no more than three years, be based wholly or partly on valid, reliable assessments aligned with state academic standards, and include support for transition to postsecondary education; competency-based credit is optional. The application also must describe further alignment of diploma requirements within two years after initial funding. The bill remains in Congress; it does not establish that New Hampshire adopted a program or that diplomas were earned. This connection concerns diploma pathways, not a measured increase in adult attainment.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact measures diploma-or-higher attainment among adults 25 and older. Proposed high school graduation pathways concern future entry into that population; college credits alone are not high school completion and the proposal cannot explain the earlier adult attainment rate. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(7)Early high school graduation policyThe term early high school graduation policy means a statewide policy adopted by all local educational agencies in a State that—(A)allows students the opportunity to earn a regular high school diploma in not more than 3 years;(B)is based in whole or in part on student performance on valid and reliable assessments aligned with the challenging State academic standards required under section 1111(b)(1) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, which may include a nationally recognized high school academic assessment;(C)may permit students to earn required credit hours for a regular high school diploma through a demonstration of competency; and(D)includes support for students to ensure a successful matriculation to postsecondary education. […] (f)Application(1)In generalIn order to receive a grant under subsection (b) for any fiscal year, the Governor of a State shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may reasonably require.(2)ContentsEach application submitted by a Governor under this subsection shall include the following:(A)The vision of the eligible entity for aligning high school and higher education.(B)Signatures from the Governor, chief State school officer, and State higher education executive officer.(C)Evidence for each State within the eligible entity demonstrating adoption of—(i)an early high school graduation policy; and(ii)uniform statewide criteria for the receipt of postsecondary, nonelective credit at all public institutions of higher education in the eligible entity based on performance on Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate course examinations, and, at the discretion of the eligible entity, other assessments.(D)A description of how the eligible entity will, not later than 2 years after the date of the initial receipt of funds under this section, implement policies and activities to align high school education with postsecondary education in each State within the eligible entity, which shall include—(i)updating State requirements for a student to receive a regular high school diploma, including students who graduate high school early consistent with subparagraph (C), to align with the challenging State academic standards and entrance requirements for credit-bearing coursework as described in section 1111(b)(1)(D) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, which may include alignment with entrance requirements for credit-bearing coursework at the State’s system of 4-year institutions of higher education;(ii)verification of the alignment described in clause (i) that is signified by the signature of the Governor of the State, chief State school officer, and State higher education executive officer;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current New Hampshire officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a New Hampshire statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.