Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and New Hampshire public-safety context.
Reported violent-crime rate112.3 per 100k2024 · #49 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate928.8 per 100k2024 · #49 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage99.9%2024 · #7 of 50 · highest first
New Hampshire over time
Explore New Hampshire readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. New Hampshire officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a New Hampshire effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a New Hampshire change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Reported violent-crime rate New Hampshire · source units
New HampshirePublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
7 of 7 reviewed New Hampshire actions match · 7 date markers shown. 33 major events shown separately.
New Hampshire · 2024: 112.3 per 100k · Rank #49 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. New Hampshire's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 96.8% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
New Hampshire Reported violent-crime rate · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
New Hampshire · state comparison
Reported crime over time
Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.
New Hampshire · 2024112.3 per 100k
New Hampshire rank#49among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Reported violent-crime rate
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. New Hampshire's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 96.8% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
New Hampshire
2024 · New Hampshire: 112.3 per 100k · Rank #49 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
New Hampshire Reported violent-crime rate history
Period
New Hampshire
Compare
2015
200.4 per 100k
2016
197.3 per 100k
2017
199.3 per 100k
2018
178.1 per 100k
2019
155.6 per 100k
2020
145.6 per 100k
2021
130.3 per 100k
2022
133.7 per 100k
2023
117.7 per 100k
2024
112.3 per 100k
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.
Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Hampshire · 112.3 per 100k2024 · Rank #49 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Mexico
744.7 per 100k
—
#2
Alaska
731.9 per 100k
—
#3
Tennessee
604.3 per 100k
—
#4
Arkansas
589.6 per 100k
—
#5*
Louisiana
504.5 per 100k
82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6
Colorado
486.8 per 100k
—
#7
California
478.4 per 100k
—
#8
Kansas
474.7 per 100k
—
#9
Missouri
472.7 per 100k
—
#10
Michigan
442.6 per 100k
—
#11
South Carolina
440.8 per 100k
—
#12
Arizona
433 per 100k
—
#13
Oklahoma
429.3 per 100k
—
#14
Montana
428 per 100k
—
#15
Maryland
425.9 per 100k
—
#16
Nevada
408.6 per 100k
—
#17
Texas
397.8 per 100k
—
#18
New York
392.2 per 100k
—
#19
North Carolina
382.9 per 100k
—
#20
Alabama
380.8 per 100k
—
#21
Delaware
368.4 per 100k
—
#22*
South Dakota
356.9 per 100k
89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*
Indiana
349.2 per 100k
87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24
Oregon
341.1 per 100k
—
#25
Washington
331.8 per 100k
—
#26
Georgia
328 per 100k
—
#27
Massachusetts
317.9 per 100k
—
#28
Ohio
311.9 per 100k
—
#29
Illinois
294.5 per 100k
—
#30
Wisconsin
287.6 per 100k
—
#31
West Virginia
263.8 per 100k
—
#32*
Florida
262 per 100k
81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33
Minnesota
259.4 per 100k
—
#34
North Dakota
258 per 100k
—
#35
Pennsylvania
251.3 per 100k
—
#36
Iowa
247.2 per 100k
—
#37
Utah
237.8 per 100k
—
#38
Idaho
236.6 per 100k
—
#39
Hawaii
230.3 per 100k
—
#40
Vermont
227.1 per 100k
—
#41
Kentucky
226.7 per 100k
—
#42
Nebraska
224.6 per 100k
—
#43
Virginia
223.7 per 100k
—
#44
New Jersey
221.9 per 100k
—
#45*
Mississippi
219.6 per 100k
65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*
Wyoming
212.5 per 100k
89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47
Rhode Island
154.9 per 100k
—
#48
Connecticut
139.2 per 100k
—
#49
New Hampshire · your comparison
112.3 per 100k
—
#50
Maine
102.6 per 100k
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
New Hampshire's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 96.8% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 99.9%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
New Hampshire's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 96.8% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 99.9%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.
New Hampshire · 2024152
New Hampshire rank#44among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Firearm deaths
Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.
Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.
Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Hampshire · 1522024 · Rank #44 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
4,389
—
#2
Florida
3,191
—
#3
California
2,853
—
#4
Georgia
1,985
—
#5
North Carolina
1,835
—
#6
Ohio
1,745
—
#7
Pennsylvania
1,624
—
#8
Illinois
1,563
—
#9
Tennessee
1,448
—
#10
Arizona
1,331
—
#11
Missouri
1,234
—
#12
Michigan
1,228
—
#13
Alabama
1,212
—
#14
Indiana
1,196
—
#15
Virginia
1,153
—
#16
South Carolina
1,064
—
#17
Louisiana
1,031
—
#18
Colorado
961
—
#19
Washington
915
—
#20
New York
896
—
#21
Kentucky
870
—
#22
Mississippi
810
—
#23
Oklahoma
794
—
#24
Wisconsin
735
—
#25
Maryland
716
—
#26
Oregon
663
—
#27
Arkansas
638
—
#28
Minnesota
582
—
#28
Nevada
582
—
#30
New Mexico
563
—
#31
Utah
454
—
#32
Kansas
446
—
#33
New Jersey
393
—
#34
Iowa
389
—
#35
Idaho
331
—
#36
Massachusetts
287
—
#37
West Virginia
281
—
#38
Montana
247
—
#39
Connecticut
224
—
#40
Nebraska
218
—
#41
Alaska
182
—
#42
Maine
181
—
#43
South Dakota
159
—
#44
New Hampshire · your comparison
152
—
#45
Wyoming
143
—
#46
Delaware
123
—
#47
North Dakota
95
—
#48
Vermont
76
—
#49
Hawaii
56
—
#50
Rhode Island
55
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
7 of 7 reviewed New Hampshire actions · newest first
Rep. Susan G DeRoy · Sponsored / Rep. Glenn Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Claudine R Burnham · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas L Kaczynski · Sponsored / Rep. Rich M Nalevanko · Sponsored / Rep. David E Walker · Sponsored / Rep. John Sellers · Sponsored / Rep. Diane E. Kelley · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1670 proposes an organized retail-crime offense for acting with at least one other person to steal merchandise for resale, redistribution or return to commerce, or receiving, possessing or reselling such merchandise while knowing or believing it stolen. The proposal permits aggregation over 180 days. Its enterprise-leader provision requires the specified knowing leadership or conspiracy and financial benefit; $2,500 or more in aggregate retail value would be a class A felony, and $10,000 or more would permit up to 25 years’ imprisonment. It mandates forfeiture of property used in or derived from the enterprise, which may satisfy victim restitution. The House referred it for interim study; the latest captured docket lists a September 2, 2026 work session. Its stated start is 60 days after passage, but it has not become law and establishes no new penalties or reduction in property crime.
Full Committee Work Session: 09/02/2026 10:00 am GP 232 Referred for interim study; no enactment recorded.
Why this record is included
The FBI property-crime measure includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. Organized retail theft concerns a larceny component; receipt of stolen goods is not itself interchangeable with the reported theft count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
1 Organized Retail Crime RSA 637:10-c is repealed and reenacted to read as follows: 637:10-c Organized Retail Crime. I. A person is guilty of organized retail crime if he or she acts in concert with one or more persons to commit theft of retail merchandise from one or more mercantile establishments with the intent to resell, redistribute, or reenter such retail merchandise into commerce, or if he or she receives, possesses, or resells such retail merchandise knowing or believing it to have been stolen. II. For purposes of this section, thefts may be aggregated over an 180-day period to determine value thresholds. Prosecutions may be brought in any county where any part of the enterprise activity occurred. 2 New Section; Leader or Kingpin of an Organized Retail Crime Enterprise. Amend RSA 637 by inserting after section 10-d the following new section: 637:10-e Leader or Kingpin of an Organized Retail Crime Enterprise. I. Definitions. (a) "Organized retail crime enterprise" means 2 or more persons associated in fact, although not a legal entity, who collaborate in whole or in part to commit organized retail crime under RSA 637:10-c. (b) "Leader" means any person who knowingly organizes, directs, finances, manages, supervises, or otherwise controls, or conspires to organize, direct, finance, manage, supervise, or otherwise control, an organized retail crime enterprise, and who derives pecuniary benefit from the enterprise or from the disposition of stolen retail merchandise. A person may be convicted under this even if the person does not directly participate in the thefts, so long as the person intentionally benefits from or furthers the organized retail crime enterprise. II. A person is guilty of being a leader of an organized retail crime enterprise if, within a period of 180 days, the enterprise obtains retail merchandise with an aggregate retail value of: (a) $2,500 or more, the offense shall be a class A felony. (b) $10,000 or more, the offense shall be a class A felony, but notwithstanding RSA 651:2, punishable by up to 25 years imprisonment. III. In addition to any other penalty, the court shall order forfeiture of property used in or derived from the enterprise. Such forfeiture may be used to satisfy any restitution owed to the victim. IV.(a) Theft offenses committed by an organized retail crime enterprise may be aggregated across multiple mercantile establishments and counties during an 180-day period. (b) Venue shall be proper in any county in which any theft or act in furtherance of the enterprise occurred. V. This section shall not preclude prosecution under any other applicable statute, including RSA 629:3 and RSA 629:2. 3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 15, 2026 · HB 1365 · (Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners. · Enacted · Chapter 325New Hampshire Legislature · HB 1365
(Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners.
Jul 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 325
Rep. Donald S McFarlane · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller · Sponsored / Rep. James R Thibault · Sponsored / Rep. Erica J Layon · Sponsored / Rep. Henry R Giasson · Sponsored / Rep. Shane A Sirois · Sponsored / Rep. Tim E Mannion · Sponsored / Rep. Travis James Corcoran · Sponsored / Rep. Matt R Sabourin dit Choinière · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed pistol-license portion of HB 1365 limits application information to state form DSSP 85 as revised in March 2017 and bars requests for occupation, employer information or personal references. It prohibits consent or release language requiring disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric or other records beyond what that application expressly requires. The department must develop a consistent form through rulemaking, effective upon approval on July 15, 2026; the substantive form limits and repeal of that temporary rulemaking provision take effect January 1, 2027. This connection concerns licensing paperwork, not a new general requirement to obtain a carry license, the separate dental-board provisions or proof of a mortality effect.
Chapter 325, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality fact includes deaths across intents. Pistol-license application requirements concern firearm regulation, not a demonstrated change in access, ownership or firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
325:1 Purpose. The general court finds that the pistol/revolver license application process must protect the privacy and constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This act ensures that the form used by licensing authorities collects only the information required by law and does not compel applicants to waive rights not mandated by statute. 325:2 License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6, I(b) to read as follows: (b) The license shall be in duplicate and shall bear the name, address, description, and signature of the licensee and the name, title, and signature of the person issuing the license. The original shall be delivered to the licensee and the duplicate shall be preserved by the people issuing the same for 5 years. When required, license renewal shall take place within the month of the fifth anniversary of the license holder's date of birth following the date of issuance. The license shall be issued within 14 days after application, and, if such application is denied, the reason for such denial shall be stated in writing, the original of which such writing shall be delivered to the applicant, and a copy kept in the office of the person to whom the application was made. The fee for licenses issued to residents of the state shall be $10, which fee shall be for the use of the town or city granting said licenses; the fee for licenses granted to out-of-state residents shall be $100, which fee shall be for the use of the state. The director of state police is hereby authorized and directed to prepare forms for the licenses required under this chapter and forms for the application for such licenses and to supply the same to officials of the cities and towns authorized to issue the licenses. The form shall require no more information than was required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license, form DSSP 85, as revised in [] March 2017. The form shall not request or require disclosure of the applicant’s occupation, present employer, employer’s address, or personal references. The form shall not contain any consent or release language requiring the applicant to authorize disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric, or other records beyond what is expressly required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license. No other forms shall be used by officials of cities and towns. The cost of the forms shall be paid out of the fees received from nonresident licenses. […] 325:4 New Paragraph; License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph: IV. The department of safety shall enter into rulemaking pursuant to RSA 541-A to develop a form consistent with paragraph I. 325:5 Prospective Repeal. RSA 159:6, IV, relative to rulemaking authority to create a new form, is repealed. 325:6 Effective Date. I. Sections 1, 2, and 5 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027. II. Section 3 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2027. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 15, 2026 · HB 1365 · (Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners. · SignedGovernor · HB 1365
(Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners.
Jul 15, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Kelly Ayotte · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Kelly Ayotte signed HB 1365. The reviewed pistol-license portion of HB 1365 limits application information to state form DSSP 85 as revised in March 2017 and bars requests for occupation, employer information or personal references. It prohibits consent or release language requiring disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric or other records beyond what that application expressly requires. The department must develop a consistent form through rulemaking, effective upon approval on July 15, 2026; the substantive form limits and repeal of that temporary rulemaking provision take effect January 1, 2027. This connection concerns licensing paperwork, not a new general requirement to obtain a carry license, the separate dental-board provisions or proof of a mortality effect.
Chapter 325, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality fact includes deaths across intents. Pistol-license application requirements concern firearm regulation, not a demonstrated change in access, ownership or firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
325:1 Purpose. The general court finds that the pistol/revolver license application process must protect the privacy and constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This act ensures that the form used by licensing authorities collects only the information required by law and does not compel applicants to waive rights not mandated by statute. 325:2 License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6, I(b) to read as follows: (b) The license shall be in duplicate and shall bear the name, address, description, and signature of the licensee and the name, title, and signature of the person issuing the license. The original shall be delivered to the licensee and the duplicate shall be preserved by the people issuing the same for 5 years. When required, license renewal shall take place within the month of the fifth anniversary of the license holder's date of birth following the date of issuance. The license shall be issued within 14 days after application, and, if such application is denied, the reason for such denial shall be stated in writing, the original of which such writing shall be delivered to the applicant, and a copy kept in the office of the person to whom the application was made. The fee for licenses issued to residents of the state shall be $10, which fee shall be for the use of the town or city granting said licenses; the fee for licenses granted to out-of-state residents shall be $100, which fee shall be for the use of the state. The director of state police is hereby authorized and directed to prepare forms for the licenses required under this chapter and forms for the application for such licenses and to supply the same to officials of the cities and towns authorized to issue the licenses. The form shall require no more information than was required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license, form DSSP 85, as revised in [] March 2017. The form shall not request or require disclosure of the applicant’s occupation, present employer, employer’s address, or personal references. The form shall not contain any consent or release language requiring the applicant to authorize disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric, or other records beyond what is expressly required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license. No other forms shall be used by officials of cities and towns. The cost of the forms shall be paid out of the fees received from nonresident licenses. […] 325:4 New Paragraph; License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph: IV. The department of safety shall enter into rulemaking pursuant to RSA 541-A to develop a form consistent with paragraph I. 325:5 Prospective Repeal. RSA 159:6, IV, relative to rulemaking authority to create a new form, is repealed. 325:6 Effective Date. I. Sections 1, 2, and 5 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027. II. Section 3 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2027. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
relative to the assault of emergency room personnel.
Jul 2, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Kelly Ayotte · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Kelly Ayotte signed SB 667. SB 667 adds first-degree assault for knowingly causing serious bodily injury to emergency-room personnel acting in the line of duty, and second-degree assault for knowingly causing bodily injury to such personnel. Its definition includes listed staff and volunteers, and the law takes effect January 1, 2027. The fact connection concerns aggravated-assault components, not every injury under the law or proof of fewer offenses.
Chapter 277, approved 2026-07-02. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The FBI violent-crime measure includes aggravated assault. Serious-injury assaults and federal criminal-defense rules concern components of violent crime; simple assault and every offense within the bills are not automatically included in the FBI measure. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
277:1 Assault and Related Offenses; First Degree Assault. Amend RSA 631:1, I(e) to read as follows: (e) Knowingly causes serious bodily injury to a law enforcement officer, a paid firefighter, volunteer firefighter, on-call firefighter, or licensed emergency medical care provider as defined in RSA 153-A:2, V, acting in the line of duty; or commits such an act against a law enforcement officer whether or not the officer is on duty, where the purpose was to harm the officer because of his or her present or previous employment as a law enforcement officer[]; or (f) Knowingly causes serious bodily injury to any emergency room personnel acting in the line of duty. For purposes of this subparagraph, "emergency room personnel" means a person in a hospital emergency department who, in the course and scope of their employment or as a volunteer, provides services or medical care, or who assists in the providing of services or medical care, for the benefit of the general public, including, but not limited to, any health care professional, emergency department clerk, emergency department technician, student, and emergency department volunteer working in the hospital emergency department. 277:2 Assault and Related Offenses; Second Degree Assault. Amend RSA 631:2, I(g) to read as follows: (g) Knowingly causes bodily injury to a law enforcement officer, a paid firefighter, volunteer firefighter, on-call firefighter, or licensed emergency medical care provider as defined in RSA 153-A:2, V, acting in the line of duty; or commits such an act against a law enforcement officer whether or not the officer is on duty, where the purpose was to harm the officer because of his or her present or previous employment as a law enforcement officer[]; or (h) Knowingly causes bodily injury to any emergency room personnel acting in the line of duty. For purposes of this subparagraph, "emergency room personnel" means a person in a hospital emergency department who, in the course and scope of their employment or as a volunteer, provides services or medical care, or who assists in the providing of services or medical care, for the benefit of the general public, including, but not limited to, any health care professional, emergency department clerk, emergency department technician, student, and emergency department volunteer working in the hospital emergency department. 277:3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect January 1, 2027.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 2, 2026 · SB 667 · relative to the assault of emergency room personnel. · Enacted · Chapter 277New Hampshire Legislature · SB 667
relative to the assault of emergency room personnel.
Jul 2, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 277
Sen. Tim McGough · Sponsored / Sen. Howard Pearl · Sponsored / Sen. Kevin A. Avard · Sponsored / Sen. Bill M. Gannon · Sponsored / Sen. David Rochefort · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 667 adds first-degree assault for knowingly causing serious bodily injury to emergency-room personnel acting in the line of duty, and second-degree assault for knowingly causing bodily injury to such personnel. Its definition includes listed staff and volunteers, and the law takes effect January 1, 2027. The fact connection concerns aggravated-assault components, not every injury under the law or proof of fewer offenses.
Chapter 277, approved 2026-07-02. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The FBI violent-crime measure includes aggravated assault. Serious-injury assaults and federal criminal-defense rules concern components of violent crime; simple assault and every offense within the bills are not automatically included in the FBI measure. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
277:1 Assault and Related Offenses; First Degree Assault. Amend RSA 631:1, I(e) to read as follows: (e) Knowingly causes serious bodily injury to a law enforcement officer, a paid firefighter, volunteer firefighter, on-call firefighter, or licensed emergency medical care provider as defined in RSA 153-A:2, V, acting in the line of duty; or commits such an act against a law enforcement officer whether or not the officer is on duty, where the purpose was to harm the officer because of his or her present or previous employment as a law enforcement officer[]; or (f) Knowingly causes serious bodily injury to any emergency room personnel acting in the line of duty. For purposes of this subparagraph, "emergency room personnel" means a person in a hospital emergency department who, in the course and scope of their employment or as a volunteer, provides services or medical care, or who assists in the providing of services or medical care, for the benefit of the general public, including, but not limited to, any health care professional, emergency department clerk, emergency department technician, student, and emergency department volunteer working in the hospital emergency department. 277:2 Assault and Related Offenses; Second Degree Assault. Amend RSA 631:2, I(g) to read as follows: (g) Knowingly causes bodily injury to a law enforcement officer, a paid firefighter, volunteer firefighter, on-call firefighter, or licensed emergency medical care provider as defined in RSA 153-A:2, V, acting in the line of duty; or commits such an act against a law enforcement officer whether or not the officer is on duty, where the purpose was to harm the officer because of his or her present or previous employment as a law enforcement officer[]; or (h) Knowingly causes bodily injury to any emergency room personnel acting in the line of duty. For purposes of this subparagraph, "emergency room personnel" means a person in a hospital emergency department who, in the course and scope of their employment or as a volunteer, provides services or medical care, or who assists in the providing of services or medical care, for the benefit of the general public, including, but not limited to, any health care professional, emergency department clerk, emergency department technician, student, and emergency department volunteer working in the hospital emergency department. 277:3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect January 1, 2027.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 27, 2026 · SB 625 · (Third New Title) establishing a committee to study options for family members of intentional homicide victims where the department of justice does not file charges in a case, repealing the refugee resettlement program in the department of health and human services, and prohibiting expenditure of state funds on refugee resettlement. · Not enactedNew Hampshire Legislature · SB 625
(Third New Title) establishing a committee to study options for family members of intentional homicide victims where the department of justice does not file charges in a case, repealing the refugee resettlement program in the department of health and human services, and prohibiting expenditure of state funds on refugee resettlement.
May 27, 2026 · Not enacted
Sen. Regina Birdsell · Sponsored / Rep. Charles H Foote · Sponsored / Rep. Richard P Tripp · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The House-amended version of SB 625 proposed terminating department-administered refugee-resettlement contracts, barring state agencies from accepting or spending money for refugee resettlement, and repealing the state refugee-program provision. It covered specified refugee and asylee programs. The bill died at session end after no conference report was filed; these provisions did not become law. Listed bill sponsorship does not establish support for the House-added provisions.
Committee of Conference Meeting: 05/27/2026, 10:30 am, Room 153, GP Conference report not filed; official House status: DIED, SESSION ENDED. The displayed date is the latest dated docket event, not a date of enactment.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and noncitizens with many statuses. Refugee and asylee resettlement provisions concern only subsets of this population; birthplace does not establish immigration status. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born · Homicide deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
7 Termination of Refugee Program Administered Through the Department of Health and Human Services. I. In this section "refugee resettlement program" means the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) and any other federal program or nonprofit program or grant designed to settle, fund, or otherwise help refugees or asylees. II. On the effective date of this section, the department of health and human services shall, as promptly as practicable, terminate any contracts administered under a refugee resettlement program. III. No department, agency, or administrative unit of state government may accept money from any source for refugee resettlement. IV. No department, agency, or administrative unit of state government may spend money to settle, fund, or otherwise assist refugee resettlement, either directly or indirectly via payments to towns or nongovernmental organizations. 8 Severability Clause. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, the remainder shall not be affected. 9 Repeal. RSA 161:2, XVIII, relative to the New Hampshire refugee resettlement program, is repealed.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified New Hampshire officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s New Hampshire candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
2 statements from 2 candidates
2026 New Hampshire Governor General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
Maggie believes deeply that Congress can and must be on the frontlines of the fight for ensuring a fair deal for all Granite Staters. The fight for a fair deal means protecting Social Security, Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act. It means expanding access to affordable healthcare and prescription…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis
Candidate campaign source
Maggie believes deeply that Congress can and must be on the frontlines of the fight for ensuring a fair deal for all Granite Staters. The fight for a fair deal means protecting Social Security, Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act. It means expanding access to affordable healthcare and prescription drugs, and making childcare, elder care, and housing more affordable. It means building a tax system that works for hardworking Granite Staters by delivering tax breaks for working families – not handouts to billionaires and big corporations. It means protecting the rights of workers, including to collectively bargain, and raising the minimum wage. It also means legalizing marijuana at the federal level and delivering meaningful and much-needed criminal justice reforms.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published New Hampshire candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
New Hampshire incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current New Hampshire legislators and New Hampshire’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from New Hampshire’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
28 matching sponsorships or proposals · 28 New Hampshire incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Charles H Foote
New Hampshire House of Representatives, Rockingham 13 · R–NH
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Charles H FooteNew Hampshire Legislature · SB 625
(Third New Title) establishing a committee to study options for family members of intentional homicide victims where the department of justice does not file charges in a case, repealing the refugee resettlement program in the department of health and human services, and prohibiting expenditure of state funds on refugee resettlement.
May 27, 2026 · Not enacted
Sen. Regina Birdsell · Sponsored / Rep. Charles H Foote · Sponsored / Rep. Richard P Tripp · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The House-amended version of SB 625 proposed terminating department-administered refugee-resettlement contracts, barring state agencies from accepting or spending money for refugee resettlement, and repealing the state refugee-program provision. It covered specified refugee and asylee programs. The bill died at session end after no conference report was filed; these provisions did not become law. Listed bill sponsorship does not establish support for the House-added provisions.
Committee of Conference Meeting: 05/27/2026, 10:30 am, Room 153, GP Conference report not filed; official House status: DIED, SESSION ENDED. The displayed date is the latest dated docket event, not a date of enactment.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and noncitizens with many statuses. Refugee and asylee resettlement provisions concern only subsets of this population; birthplace does not establish immigration status. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born · Homicide deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
7 Termination of Refugee Program Administered Through the Department of Health and Human Services. I. In this section "refugee resettlement program" means the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) and any other federal program or nonprofit program or grant designed to settle, fund, or otherwise help refugees or asylees. II. On the effective date of this section, the department of health and human services shall, as promptly as practicable, terminate any contracts administered under a refugee resettlement program. III. No department, agency, or administrative unit of state government may accept money from any source for refugee resettlement. IV. No department, agency, or administrative unit of state government may spend money to settle, fund, or otherwise assist refugee resettlement, either directly or indirectly via payments to towns or nongovernmental organizations. 8 Severability Clause. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, the remainder shall not be affected. 9 Repeal. RSA 161:2, XVIII, relative to the New Hampshire refugee resettlement program, is repealed.
U.S. House of Representatives, New Hampshire District 1 · D–NH
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Chris PappasU.S. Congress · New Hampshire delegation · HR 4197
LGBTQ+ Panic Defense Prohibition Act of 2025
Jun 26, 2025 · In Congress
Rep. Chris Pappas · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
H.R. 4197 proposes barring use of a nonviolent sexual advance or perceived gender, gender identity, expression or sexual orientation to excuse an offense or reduce its severity under federal criminal law. It preserves courts’ ability to admit evidence of a defendant’s past trauma and requires annual reporting. The bill remains in Congress. Its federal jurisdiction is limited; it does not rewrite every state homicide or assault case or establish fewer deaths or offenses.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
The CDC measure counts resident deaths classified as homicide on death certificates. Homicide-case information procedures and federal criminal defenses concern the response to fatal violence; investigative and criminal classifications are not identical to the mortality series. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Homicide deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
3.Prohibition on panic defenses based on sexual orientation or gender identity or expression (a)In generalChapter 1 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 28.Prohibition on panic defenses based on sexual orientation or gender identity or expression (a)ProhibitionNo nonviolent sexual advance or perception or belief, even if inaccurate, of the gender, gender identity or expression, or sexual orientation of an individual may be used to excuse or justify the conduct of an individual or mitigate the severity of an offense. (b)Past traumaNotwithstanding the prohibition in subsection (a), a court may admit evidence, in accordance with the Federal Rules of Evidence, of prior trauma to the defendant for the purpose of excusing or justifying the conduct of the defendant or mitigating the severity of an offense.. (b)Technical and conforming amendmentThe table of sections for chapter 1 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 28. Prohibition on panic defenses based on sexual orientation or gender identity or expression.. (c)ReportThe Attorney General shall submit to Congress an annual report that details prosecutions in Federal court involving capital and noncapital crimes committed against LGBTQ individuals that were motivated by the victim’s gender, gender identity or expression, or sexual orientation.
New Hampshire House of Representatives, Strafford 2 · R–NH
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Claudine R BurnhamNew Hampshire Legislature · HB 1670
relative to organized retail crime.
Sep 2, 2026 · Interim study
Rep. Susan G DeRoy · Sponsored / Rep. Glenn Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Claudine R Burnham · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas L Kaczynski · Sponsored / Rep. Rich M Nalevanko · Sponsored / Rep. David E Walker · Sponsored / Rep. John Sellers · Sponsored / Rep. Diane E. Kelley · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1670 proposes an organized retail-crime offense for acting with at least one other person to steal merchandise for resale, redistribution or return to commerce, or receiving, possessing or reselling such merchandise while knowing or believing it stolen. The proposal permits aggregation over 180 days. Its enterprise-leader provision requires the specified knowing leadership or conspiracy and financial benefit; $2,500 or more in aggregate retail value would be a class A felony, and $10,000 or more would permit up to 25 years’ imprisonment. It mandates forfeiture of property used in or derived from the enterprise, which may satisfy victim restitution. The House referred it for interim study; the latest captured docket lists a September 2, 2026 work session. Its stated start is 60 days after passage, but it has not become law and establishes no new penalties or reduction in property crime.
Full Committee Work Session: 09/02/2026 10:00 am GP 232 Referred for interim study; no enactment recorded.
Why this record is included
The FBI property-crime measure includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. Organized retail theft concerns a larceny component; receipt of stolen goods is not itself interchangeable with the reported theft count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
1 Organized Retail Crime RSA 637:10-c is repealed and reenacted to read as follows: 637:10-c Organized Retail Crime. I. A person is guilty of organized retail crime if he or she acts in concert with one or more persons to commit theft of retail merchandise from one or more mercantile establishments with the intent to resell, redistribute, or reenter such retail merchandise into commerce, or if he or she receives, possesses, or resells such retail merchandise knowing or believing it to have been stolen. II. For purposes of this section, thefts may be aggregated over an 180-day period to determine value thresholds. Prosecutions may be brought in any county where any part of the enterprise activity occurred. 2 New Section; Leader or Kingpin of an Organized Retail Crime Enterprise. Amend RSA 637 by inserting after section 10-d the following new section: 637:10-e Leader or Kingpin of an Organized Retail Crime Enterprise. I. Definitions. (a) "Organized retail crime enterprise" means 2 or more persons associated in fact, although not a legal entity, who collaborate in whole or in part to commit organized retail crime under RSA 637:10-c. (b) "Leader" means any person who knowingly organizes, directs, finances, manages, supervises, or otherwise controls, or conspires to organize, direct, finance, manage, supervise, or otherwise control, an organized retail crime enterprise, and who derives pecuniary benefit from the enterprise or from the disposition of stolen retail merchandise. A person may be convicted under this even if the person does not directly participate in the thefts, so long as the person intentionally benefits from or furthers the organized retail crime enterprise. II. A person is guilty of being a leader of an organized retail crime enterprise if, within a period of 180 days, the enterprise obtains retail merchandise with an aggregate retail value of: (a) $2,500 or more, the offense shall be a class A felony. (b) $10,000 or more, the offense shall be a class A felony, but notwithstanding RSA 651:2, punishable by up to 25 years imprisonment. III. In addition to any other penalty, the court shall order forfeiture of property used in or derived from the enterprise. Such forfeiture may be used to satisfy any restitution owed to the victim. IV.(a) Theft offenses committed by an organized retail crime enterprise may be aggregated across multiple mercantile establishments and counties during an 180-day period. (b) Venue shall be proper in any county in which any theft or act in furtherance of the enterprise occurred. V. This section shall not preclude prosecution under any other applicable statute, including RSA 629:3 and RSA 629:2. 3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.
New Hampshire House of Representatives, Rockingham 17 · R–NH
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Daniel Popovici-MullerNew Hampshire Legislature · HB 1365
(Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners.
Jul 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 325
Rep. Donald S McFarlane · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller · Sponsored / Rep. James R Thibault · Sponsored / Rep. Erica J Layon · Sponsored / Rep. Henry R Giasson · Sponsored / Rep. Shane A Sirois · Sponsored / Rep. Tim E Mannion · Sponsored / Rep. Travis James Corcoran · Sponsored / Rep. Matt R Sabourin dit Choinière · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed pistol-license portion of HB 1365 limits application information to state form DSSP 85 as revised in March 2017 and bars requests for occupation, employer information or personal references. It prohibits consent or release language requiring disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric or other records beyond what that application expressly requires. The department must develop a consistent form through rulemaking, effective upon approval on July 15, 2026; the substantive form limits and repeal of that temporary rulemaking provision take effect January 1, 2027. This connection concerns licensing paperwork, not a new general requirement to obtain a carry license, the separate dental-board provisions or proof of a mortality effect.
Chapter 325, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality fact includes deaths across intents. Pistol-license application requirements concern firearm regulation, not a demonstrated change in access, ownership or firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
325:1 Purpose. The general court finds that the pistol/revolver license application process must protect the privacy and constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This act ensures that the form used by licensing authorities collects only the information required by law and does not compel applicants to waive rights not mandated by statute. 325:2 License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6, I(b) to read as follows: (b) The license shall be in duplicate and shall bear the name, address, description, and signature of the licensee and the name, title, and signature of the person issuing the license. The original shall be delivered to the licensee and the duplicate shall be preserved by the people issuing the same for 5 years. When required, license renewal shall take place within the month of the fifth anniversary of the license holder's date of birth following the date of issuance. The license shall be issued within 14 days after application, and, if such application is denied, the reason for such denial shall be stated in writing, the original of which such writing shall be delivered to the applicant, and a copy kept in the office of the person to whom the application was made. The fee for licenses issued to residents of the state shall be $10, which fee shall be for the use of the town or city granting said licenses; the fee for licenses granted to out-of-state residents shall be $100, which fee shall be for the use of the state. The director of state police is hereby authorized and directed to prepare forms for the licenses required under this chapter and forms for the application for such licenses and to supply the same to officials of the cities and towns authorized to issue the licenses. The form shall require no more information than was required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license, form DSSP 85, as revised in [] March 2017. The form shall not request or require disclosure of the applicant’s occupation, present employer, employer’s address, or personal references. The form shall not contain any consent or release language requiring the applicant to authorize disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric, or other records beyond what is expressly required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license. No other forms shall be used by officials of cities and towns. The cost of the forms shall be paid out of the fees received from nonresident licenses. […] 325:4 New Paragraph; License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph: IV. The department of safety shall enter into rulemaking pursuant to RSA 541-A to develop a form consistent with paragraph I. 325:5 Prospective Repeal. RSA 159:6, IV, relative to rulemaking authority to create a new form, is repealed. 325:6 Effective Date. I. Sections 1, 2, and 5 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027. II. Section 3 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2027. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
New Hampshire House of Representatives, Strafford 19 · R–NH
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. David E WalkerNew Hampshire Legislature · HB 1670
relative to organized retail crime.
Sep 2, 2026 · Interim study
Rep. Susan G DeRoy · Sponsored / Rep. Glenn Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Claudine R Burnham · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas L Kaczynski · Sponsored / Rep. Rich M Nalevanko · Sponsored / Rep. David E Walker · Sponsored / Rep. John Sellers · Sponsored / Rep. Diane E. Kelley · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1670 proposes an organized retail-crime offense for acting with at least one other person to steal merchandise for resale, redistribution or return to commerce, or receiving, possessing or reselling such merchandise while knowing or believing it stolen. The proposal permits aggregation over 180 days. Its enterprise-leader provision requires the specified knowing leadership or conspiracy and financial benefit; $2,500 or more in aggregate retail value would be a class A felony, and $10,000 or more would permit up to 25 years’ imprisonment. It mandates forfeiture of property used in or derived from the enterprise, which may satisfy victim restitution. The House referred it for interim study; the latest captured docket lists a September 2, 2026 work session. Its stated start is 60 days after passage, but it has not become law and establishes no new penalties or reduction in property crime.
Full Committee Work Session: 09/02/2026 10:00 am GP 232 Referred for interim study; no enactment recorded.
Why this record is included
The FBI property-crime measure includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. Organized retail theft concerns a larceny component; receipt of stolen goods is not itself interchangeable with the reported theft count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
1 Organized Retail Crime RSA 637:10-c is repealed and reenacted to read as follows: 637:10-c Organized Retail Crime. I. A person is guilty of organized retail crime if he or she acts in concert with one or more persons to commit theft of retail merchandise from one or more mercantile establishments with the intent to resell, redistribute, or reenter such retail merchandise into commerce, or if he or she receives, possesses, or resells such retail merchandise knowing or believing it to have been stolen. II. For purposes of this section, thefts may be aggregated over an 180-day period to determine value thresholds. Prosecutions may be brought in any county where any part of the enterprise activity occurred. 2 New Section; Leader or Kingpin of an Organized Retail Crime Enterprise. Amend RSA 637 by inserting after section 10-d the following new section: 637:10-e Leader or Kingpin of an Organized Retail Crime Enterprise. I. Definitions. (a) "Organized retail crime enterprise" means 2 or more persons associated in fact, although not a legal entity, who collaborate in whole or in part to commit organized retail crime under RSA 637:10-c. (b) "Leader" means any person who knowingly organizes, directs, finances, manages, supervises, or otherwise controls, or conspires to organize, direct, finance, manage, supervise, or otherwise control, an organized retail crime enterprise, and who derives pecuniary benefit from the enterprise or from the disposition of stolen retail merchandise. A person may be convicted under this even if the person does not directly participate in the thefts, so long as the person intentionally benefits from or furthers the organized retail crime enterprise. II. A person is guilty of being a leader of an organized retail crime enterprise if, within a period of 180 days, the enterprise obtains retail merchandise with an aggregate retail value of: (a) $2,500 or more, the offense shall be a class A felony. (b) $10,000 or more, the offense shall be a class A felony, but notwithstanding RSA 651:2, punishable by up to 25 years imprisonment. III. In addition to any other penalty, the court shall order forfeiture of property used in or derived from the enterprise. Such forfeiture may be used to satisfy any restitution owed to the victim. IV.(a) Theft offenses committed by an organized retail crime enterprise may be aggregated across multiple mercantile establishments and counties during an 180-day period. (b) Venue shall be proper in any county in which any theft or act in furtherance of the enterprise occurred. V. This section shall not preclude prosecution under any other applicable statute, including RSA 629:3 and RSA 629:2. 3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.
New Hampshire House of Representatives, Hillsborough 32 · R–NH
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Diane E. KelleyNew Hampshire Legislature · HB 1670
relative to organized retail crime.
Sep 2, 2026 · Interim study
Rep. Susan G DeRoy · Sponsored / Rep. Glenn Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Claudine R Burnham · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas L Kaczynski · Sponsored / Rep. Rich M Nalevanko · Sponsored / Rep. David E Walker · Sponsored / Rep. John Sellers · Sponsored / Rep. Diane E. Kelley · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1670 proposes an organized retail-crime offense for acting with at least one other person to steal merchandise for resale, redistribution or return to commerce, or receiving, possessing or reselling such merchandise while knowing or believing it stolen. The proposal permits aggregation over 180 days. Its enterprise-leader provision requires the specified knowing leadership or conspiracy and financial benefit; $2,500 or more in aggregate retail value would be a class A felony, and $10,000 or more would permit up to 25 years’ imprisonment. It mandates forfeiture of property used in or derived from the enterprise, which may satisfy victim restitution. The House referred it for interim study; the latest captured docket lists a September 2, 2026 work session. Its stated start is 60 days after passage, but it has not become law and establishes no new penalties or reduction in property crime.
Full Committee Work Session: 09/02/2026 10:00 am GP 232 Referred for interim study; no enactment recorded.
Why this record is included
The FBI property-crime measure includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. Organized retail theft concerns a larceny component; receipt of stolen goods is not itself interchangeable with the reported theft count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
1 Organized Retail Crime RSA 637:10-c is repealed and reenacted to read as follows: 637:10-c Organized Retail Crime. I. A person is guilty of organized retail crime if he or she acts in concert with one or more persons to commit theft of retail merchandise from one or more mercantile establishments with the intent to resell, redistribute, or reenter such retail merchandise into commerce, or if he or she receives, possesses, or resells such retail merchandise knowing or believing it to have been stolen. II. For purposes of this section, thefts may be aggregated over an 180-day period to determine value thresholds. Prosecutions may be brought in any county where any part of the enterprise activity occurred. 2 New Section; Leader or Kingpin of an Organized Retail Crime Enterprise. Amend RSA 637 by inserting after section 10-d the following new section: 637:10-e Leader or Kingpin of an Organized Retail Crime Enterprise. I. Definitions. (a) "Organized retail crime enterprise" means 2 or more persons associated in fact, although not a legal entity, who collaborate in whole or in part to commit organized retail crime under RSA 637:10-c. (b) "Leader" means any person who knowingly organizes, directs, finances, manages, supervises, or otherwise controls, or conspires to organize, direct, finance, manage, supervise, or otherwise control, an organized retail crime enterprise, and who derives pecuniary benefit from the enterprise or from the disposition of stolen retail merchandise. A person may be convicted under this even if the person does not directly participate in the thefts, so long as the person intentionally benefits from or furthers the organized retail crime enterprise. II. A person is guilty of being a leader of an organized retail crime enterprise if, within a period of 180 days, the enterprise obtains retail merchandise with an aggregate retail value of: (a) $2,500 or more, the offense shall be a class A felony. (b) $10,000 or more, the offense shall be a class A felony, but notwithstanding RSA 651:2, punishable by up to 25 years imprisonment. III. In addition to any other penalty, the court shall order forfeiture of property used in or derived from the enterprise. Such forfeiture may be used to satisfy any restitution owed to the victim. IV.(a) Theft offenses committed by an organized retail crime enterprise may be aggregated across multiple mercantile establishments and counties during an 180-day period. (b) Venue shall be proper in any county in which any theft or act in furtherance of the enterprise occurred. V. This section shall not preclude prosecution under any other applicable statute, including RSA 629:3 and RSA 629:2. 3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.
Only current New Hampshire officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a New Hampshire statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
New Hampshire snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to New Hampshire, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.