New Hampshire · individual fact

New Hampshire crime

Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and New Hampshire public-safety context.

Reported violent-crime rate112.3 per 100k2024 · #49 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate928.8 per 100k2024 · #49 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage99.9%2024 · #7 of 50 · highest first

New Hampshire over time

Explore New Hampshire readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. New Hampshire officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a New Hampshire effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a New Hampshire change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Reported violent-crime rate New Hampshire · source units
New HampshirePublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Reported violent-crime rate2024: 112.3 per 100k101.7 per 100k156.4 per 100k211 per 100kNew Hampshire, 2015: 200.4 per 100kNew Hampshire, 2016: 197.3 per 100kNew Hampshire, 2017: 199.3 per 100kNew Hampshire, 2018: 178.1 per 100kNew Hampshire, 2019: 155.6 per 100kNew Hampshire, 2020: 145.6 per 100kNew Hampshire, 2021: 130.3 per 100kNew Hampshire, 2022: 133.7 per 100kNew Hampshire, 2023: 117.7 per 100kNew Hampshire, 2024: 112.3 per 100k201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 33National context · Booker makes federal sentencing guidelines advisory · 2005-01-12Federal sentencingNational context · Adam Walsh Act establishes new registration standards · 2006-07-27Adam Walsh ActNational context · Survey changes disrupt the 2006 victimization comparison · 2006-12-312006 survey breakNational context · Congress strengthens firearm background-check records · 2008-01-08NICS records lawNational context · Second Chance Act expands reentry support · 2008-04-09Second Chance ActNational context · Heller recognizes an individual firearm right · 2008-06-26Heller decisionNational context · Financial crisis deepens during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Shepard–Byrd Act expands federal hate-crime law · 2009-10-28Federal hate-crime lawNational context · McDonald applies the firearm right to the states · 2010-06-28McDonald decisionNational context · Fair Sentencing Act changes federal crack penalties · 2010-08-03Fair Sentencing ActNational context · FBI expands the rape definition · 2013-01-01Rape definition expandsNational context · Violence Against Women Act reauthorized · 2013-03-07VAWA reauthorizationNational context · DOJ publishes Ferguson policing findings · 2015-03-04Ferguson investigationNational context · Murder rates rise in 2015 and 2016 · 2016-12-312015–2016 murder riseNational context · First Step Act enacted · 2018-12-21First Step ActNational context · FBI launches national use-of-force data collection · 2019-01-01Use-of-force reportingNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · George Floyd is killed by a Minneapolis police officer · 2020-05-25George Floyd killedNational context · Murder rises sharply while property crime declines · 2020-12-312020 murder surgeNational context · FBI transitions to incident-based reporting · 2021-01-01NIBRS transitionNational context · COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act improves review and reporting · 2021-05-20Hate-crime reportingNational context · Executive order sets federal policing safeguards · 2022-05-25Federal policing orderNational context · Bruen changes the test for firearm restrictions · 2022-06-23Bruen decisionNational context · Bipartisan Safer Communities Act enacted · 2022-06-25Safer Communities ActNational context · FBI annual report again includes summary submissions · 2023-10-16Reporting coverage growsNational context · Vehicle theft rises while total property crime falls · 2023-12-31Vehicle-theft surgeNational context · Victimization survey tests a redesigned questionnaire · 2024-01-01NCVS redesign beginsNational context · Supreme Court rejects ATF’s bump-stock classification · 2024-06-14Bump-stock rulingNational context · Rahimi upholds disarmament for a credible domestic threat · 2024-06-21Domestic-threat rulingNational context · Federal policing executive order is revoked · 2025-01-20Policing order revokedNational context · Court sustains ATF’s rule covering some firearm kits · 2025-03-26Firearm-kit rulingNational context · Executive order redirects federal law-enforcement support · 2025-04-282025 policing policyNational context · FBI publishes 2025 annual crime estimates · 2026-08-142025 crime data release● New Hampshire Legislature · 4● U.S. Congress · New Hampshire delegation · 1◆ Governor · 2■ New Hampshire agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-01-012026-09-30

7 of 7 reviewed New Hampshire actions match · 7 date markers shown. 33 major events shown separately.

New Hampshire · 2024: 112.3 per 100k · Rank #49 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. New Hampshire's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 96.8% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
New Hampshire Reported violent-crime rate · source units
PeriodNew HampshireRankU.S. benchmark
2024112.3 per 100k#49 of 50Not available
2023117.7 per 100k#49 of 50Not available
2022133.7 per 100k#49 of 50Not available
2021130.3 per 100k#48 of 50Not available
2020145.6 per 100k#49 of 50Not available
2019155.6 per 100k#49 of 50Not available
2018178.1 per 100k#49 of 50Not available
2017199.3 per 100k#48 of 50Not available
2016197.3 per 100k#48 of 50Not available
2015200.4 per 100k#46 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

New Hampshire · state comparison

Reported crime over time

Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.

New Hampshire · 2024112.3 per 100k
New Hampshire rank#49among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Reported violent-crime rate

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. New Hampshire's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 96.8% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Hampshire
Reported violent-crime rate history in New Hampshire99.1 per 100k156.4 per 100k213.6 per 100k20152024
2024 · New Hampshire: 112.3 per 100k · Rank #49 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Hampshire Reported violent-crime rate history
PeriodNew HampshireCompare
2015200.4 per 100k
2016197.3 per 100k
2017199.3 per 100k
2018178.1 per 100k
2019155.6 per 100k
2020145.6 per 100k
2021130.3 per 100k
2022133.7 per 100k
2023117.7 per 100k
2024112.3 per 100k

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · 112.3 per 100k2024 · Rank #49 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Mexico744.7 per 100k—
#2Alaska731.9 per 100k—
#3Tennessee604.3 per 100k—
#4Arkansas589.6 per 100k—
#5*Louisiana504.5 per 100k82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6Colorado486.8 per 100k—
#7California478.4 per 100k—
#8Kansas474.7 per 100k—
#9Missouri472.7 per 100k—
#10Michigan442.6 per 100k—
#11South Carolina440.8 per 100k—
#12Arizona433 per 100k—
#13Oklahoma429.3 per 100k—
#14Montana428 per 100k—
#15Maryland425.9 per 100k—
#16Nevada408.6 per 100k—
#17Texas397.8 per 100k—
#18New York392.2 per 100k—
#19North Carolina382.9 per 100k—
#20Alabama380.8 per 100k—
#21Delaware368.4 per 100k—
#22*South Dakota356.9 per 100k89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*Indiana349.2 per 100k87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24Oregon341.1 per 100k—
#25Washington331.8 per 100k—
#26Georgia328 per 100k—
#27Massachusetts317.9 per 100k—
#28Ohio311.9 per 100k—
#29Illinois294.5 per 100k—
#30Wisconsin287.6 per 100k—
#31West Virginia263.8 per 100k—
#32*Florida262 per 100k81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33Minnesota259.4 per 100k—
#34North Dakota258 per 100k—
#35Pennsylvania251.3 per 100k—
#36Iowa247.2 per 100k—
#37Utah237.8 per 100k—
#38Idaho236.6 per 100k—
#39Hawaii230.3 per 100k—
#40Vermont227.1 per 100k—
#41Kentucky226.7 per 100k—
#42Nebraska224.6 per 100k—
#43Virginia223.7 per 100k—
#44New Jersey221.9 per 100k—
#45*Mississippi219.6 per 100k65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*Wyoming212.5 per 100k89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47Rhode Island154.9 per 100k—
#48Connecticut139.2 per 100k—
#49New Hampshire · your comparison112.3 per 100k—
#50Maine102.6 per 100k—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Reported violent-crime rate

112.3 per 100,0002024

Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • New Hampshire's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 96.8% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 99.9%; this is not complete statewide reporting.

Reported property-crime rate

928.8 per 100,0002024

Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • New Hampshire's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 96.8% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 99.9%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
New Hampshire · state comparison

Firearm mortality

Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.

New Hampshire · 2024152
New Hampshire rank#44among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Firearm deaths

Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.

Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · 1522024 · Rank #44 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas4,389—
#2Florida3,191—
#3California2,853—
#4Georgia1,985—
#5North Carolina1,835—
#6Ohio1,745—
#7Pennsylvania1,624—
#8Illinois1,563—
#9Tennessee1,448—
#10Arizona1,331—
#11Missouri1,234—
#12Michigan1,228—
#13Alabama1,212—
#14Indiana1,196—
#15Virginia1,153—
#16South Carolina1,064—
#17Louisiana1,031—
#18Colorado961—
#19Washington915—
#20New York896—
#21Kentucky870—
#22Mississippi810—
#23Oklahoma794—
#24Wisconsin735—
#25Maryland716—
#26Oregon663—
#27Arkansas638—
#28Minnesota582—
#28Nevada582—
#30New Mexico563—
#31Utah454—
#32Kansas446—
#33New Jersey393—
#34Iowa389—
#35Idaho331—
#36Massachusetts287—
#37West Virginia281—
#38Montana247—
#39Connecticut224—
#40Nebraska218—
#41Alaska182—
#42Maine181—
#43South Dakota159—
#44New Hampshire · your comparison152—
#45Wyoming143—
#46Delaware123—
#47North Dakota95—
#48Vermont76—
#49Hawaii56—
#50Rhode Island55—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Firearm deaths

1522024 final data

Deaths in which firearm injury was the underlying cause, with the rate age-adjusted per 100,000 residents.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Population-adjusted measure

Age-adjusted firearm death rate
10.2 per 100,000
Method and limitations

CDC National Vital Statistics System death-certificate data.

  • The total combines firearm deaths across intents, including suicide, homicide, legal intervention, and unintentional or undetermined injury.
  • It does not measure nonfatal injuries, firearm ownership, defensive uses, or policy effects.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s New Hampshire candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

2 statements from 2 candidates

2026 New Hampshire Governor General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Kelly Ayotte

1 statement

Republican · Governor · NH

Crime & victimization

Strengthened state protections for victims of domestic violence and human trafficking.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Victim Protection Record

Candidate campaign source

Strengthened state protections for victims of domestic violence and human trafficking.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Kelly Ayotte — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 New Hampshire U.S. House - District 2 General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · NH

Policing & criminal justice context

Maggie believes deeply that Congress can and must be on the frontlines of the fight for ensuring a fair deal for all Granite Staters. The fight for a fair deal means protecting Social Security, Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act. It means expanding access to affordable healthcare and prescription…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis

Candidate campaign source

Maggie believes deeply that Congress can and must be on the frontlines of the fight for ensuring a fair deal for all Granite Staters. The fight for a fair deal means protecting Social Security, Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act. It means expanding access to affordable healthcare and prescription drugs, and making childcare, elder care, and housing more affordable. It means building a tax system that works for hardworking Granite Staters by delivering tax breaks for working families – not handouts to billionaires and big corporations. It means protecting the rights of workers, including to collectively bargain, and raising the minimum wage. It also means legalizing marijuana at the federal level and delivering meaningful and much-needed criminal justice reforms.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Maggie Goodlander — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published New Hampshire candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

New Hampshire incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current New Hampshire legislators and New Hampshire’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from New Hampshire’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

28 matching sponsorships or proposals · 28 New Hampshire incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Charles H Foote

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Rockingham 13 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Charles H Foote
New Hampshire Legislature · SB 625

(Third New Title) establishing a committee to study options for family members of intentional homicide victims where the department of justice does not file charges in a case, repealing the refugee resettlement program in the department of health and human services, and prohibiting expenditure of state funds on refugee resettlement.

May 27, 2026 · Not enacted

Sen. Regina Birdsell · Sponsored / Rep. Charles H Foote · Sponsored / Rep. Richard P Tripp · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The House-amended version of SB 625 proposed terminating department-administered refugee-resettlement contracts, barring state agencies from accepting or spending money for refugee resettlement, and repealing the state refugee-program provision. It covered specified refugee and asylee programs. The bill died at session end after no conference report was filed; these provisions did not become law. Listed bill sponsorship does not establish support for the House-added provisions.

Committee of Conference Meeting: 05/27/2026, 10:30 am, Room 153, GP Conference report not filed; official House status: DIED, SESSION ENDED. The displayed date is the latest dated docket event, not a date of enactment.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and noncitizens with many statuses. Refugee and asylee resettlement provisions concern only subsets of this population; birthplace does not establish immigration status. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born · Homicide deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

7 Termination of Refugee Program Administered Through the Department of Health and Human Services. I. In this section "refugee resettlement program" means the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) and any other federal program or nonprofit program or grant designed to settle, fund, or otherwise help refugees or asylees. II. On the effective date of this section, the department of health and human services shall, as promptly as practicable, terminate any contracts administered under a refugee resettlement program. III. No department, agency, or administrative unit of state government may accept money from any source for refugee resettlement. IV. No department, agency, or administrative unit of state government may spend money to settle, fund, or otherwise assist refugee resettlement, either directly or indirectly via payments to towns or nongovernmental organizations. 8 Severability Clause. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, the remainder shall not be affected. 9 Repeal. RSA 161:2, XVIII, relative to the New Hampshire refugee resettlement program, is repealed.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Chris Pappas

U.S. House of Representatives, New Hampshire District 1 · D–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Chris Pappas
U.S. Congress · New Hampshire delegation · HR 4197

LGBTQ+ Panic Defense Prohibition Act of 2025

Jun 26, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Chris Pappas · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

H.R. 4197 proposes barring use of a nonviolent sexual advance or perceived gender, gender identity, expression or sexual orientation to excuse an offense or reduce its severity under federal criminal law. It preserves courts’ ability to admit evidence of a defendant’s past trauma and requires annual reporting. The bill remains in Congress. Its federal jurisdiction is limited; it does not rewrite every state homicide or assault case or establish fewer deaths or offenses.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The CDC measure counts resident deaths classified as homicide on death certificates. Homicide-case information procedures and federal criminal defenses concern the response to fatal violence; investigative and criminal classifications are not identical to the mortality series. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Homicide deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

3.Prohibition on panic defenses based on sexual orientation or gender identity or expression (a)In generalChapter 1 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 28.Prohibition on panic defenses based on sexual orientation or gender identity or expression (a)ProhibitionNo nonviolent sexual advance or perception or belief, even if inaccurate, of the gender, gender identity or expression, or sexual orientation of an individual may be used to excuse or justify the conduct of an individual or mitigate the severity of an offense. (b)Past traumaNotwithstanding the prohibition in subsection (a), a court may admit evidence, in accordance with the Federal Rules of Evidence, of prior trauma to the defendant for the purpose of excusing or justifying the conduct of the defendant or mitigating the severity of an offense.. (b)Technical and conforming amendmentThe table of sections for chapter 1 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 28. Prohibition on panic defenses based on sexual orientation or gender identity or expression.. (c)ReportThe Attorney General shall submit to Congress an annual report that details prosecutions in Federal court involving capital and noncapital crimes committed against LGBTQ individuals that were motivated by the victim’s gender, gender identity or expression, or sexual orientation.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Claudine R Burnham

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Strafford 2 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Claudine R Burnham
New Hampshire Legislature · HB 1670

relative to organized retail crime.

Sep 2, 2026 · Interim study

Rep. Susan G DeRoy · Sponsored / Rep. Glenn Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Claudine R Burnham · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas L Kaczynski · Sponsored / Rep. Rich M Nalevanko · Sponsored / Rep. David E Walker · Sponsored / Rep. John Sellers · Sponsored / Rep. Diane E. Kelley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1670 proposes an organized retail-crime offense for acting with at least one other person to steal merchandise for resale, redistribution or return to commerce, or receiving, possessing or reselling such merchandise while knowing or believing it stolen. The proposal permits aggregation over 180 days. Its enterprise-leader provision requires the specified knowing leadership or conspiracy and financial benefit; $2,500 or more in aggregate retail value would be a class A felony, and $10,000 or more would permit up to 25 years’ imprisonment. It mandates forfeiture of property used in or derived from the enterprise, which may satisfy victim restitution. The House referred it for interim study; the latest captured docket lists a September 2, 2026 work session. Its stated start is 60 days after passage, but it has not become law and establishes no new penalties or reduction in property crime.

Full Committee Work Session: 09/02/2026 10:00 am GP 232 Referred for interim study; no enactment recorded.

Why this record is included

The FBI property-crime measure includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. Organized retail theft concerns a larceny component; receipt of stolen goods is not itself interchangeable with the reported theft count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

1 Organized Retail Crime RSA 637:10-c is repealed and reenacted to read as follows: 637:10-c Organized Retail Crime. I. A person is guilty of organized retail crime if he or she acts in concert with one or more persons to commit theft of retail merchandise from one or more mercantile establishments with the intent to resell, redistribute, or reenter such retail merchandise into commerce, or if he or she receives, possesses, or resells such retail merchandise knowing or believing it to have been stolen. II. For purposes of this section, thefts may be aggregated over an 180-day period to determine value thresholds. Prosecutions may be brought in any county where any part of the enterprise activity occurred. 2 New Section; Leader or Kingpin of an Organized Retail Crime Enterprise. Amend RSA 637 by inserting after section 10-d the following new section: 637:10-e Leader or Kingpin of an Organized Retail Crime Enterprise. I. Definitions. (a) "Organized retail crime enterprise" means 2 or more persons associated in fact, although not a legal entity, who collaborate in whole or in part to commit organized retail crime under RSA 637:10-c. (b) "Leader" means any person who knowingly organizes, directs, finances, manages, supervises, or otherwise controls, or conspires to organize, direct, finance, manage, supervise, or otherwise control, an organized retail crime enterprise, and who derives pecuniary benefit from the enterprise or from the disposition of stolen retail merchandise. A person may be convicted under this even if the person does not directly participate in the thefts, so long as the person intentionally benefits from or furthers the organized retail crime enterprise. II. A person is guilty of being a leader of an organized retail crime enterprise if, within a period of 180 days, the enterprise obtains retail merchandise with an aggregate retail value of: (a) $2,500 or more, the offense shall be a class A felony. (b) $10,000 or more, the offense shall be a class A felony, but notwithstanding RSA 651:2, punishable by up to 25 years imprisonment. III. In addition to any other penalty, the court shall order forfeiture of property used in or derived from the enterprise. Such forfeiture may be used to satisfy any restitution owed to the victim. IV.(a) Theft offenses committed by an organized retail crime enterprise may be aggregated across multiple mercantile establishments and counties during an 180-day period. (b) Venue shall be proper in any county in which any theft or act in furtherance of the enterprise occurred. V. This section shall not preclude prosecution under any other applicable statute, including RSA 629:3 and RSA 629:2. 3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Rockingham 17 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller
New Hampshire Legislature · HB 1365

(Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners.

Jul 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 325

Rep. Donald S McFarlane · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller · Sponsored / Rep. James R Thibault · Sponsored / Rep. Erica J Layon · Sponsored / Rep. Henry R Giasson · Sponsored / Rep. Shane A Sirois · Sponsored / Rep. Tim E Mannion · Sponsored / Rep. Travis James Corcoran · Sponsored / Rep. Matt R Sabourin dit Choinière · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed pistol-license portion of HB 1365 limits application information to state form DSSP 85 as revised in March 2017 and bars requests for occupation, employer information or personal references. It prohibits consent or release language requiring disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric or other records beyond what that application expressly requires. The department must develop a consistent form through rulemaking, effective upon approval on July 15, 2026; the substantive form limits and repeal of that temporary rulemaking provision take effect January 1, 2027. This connection concerns licensing paperwork, not a new general requirement to obtain a carry license, the separate dental-board provisions or proof of a mortality effect.

Chapter 325, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The firearm mortality fact includes deaths across intents. Pistol-license application requirements concern firearm regulation, not a demonstrated change in access, ownership or firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

325:1 Purpose. The general court finds that the pistol/revolver license application process must protect the privacy and constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This act ensures that the form used by licensing authorities collects only the information required by law and does not compel applicants to waive rights not mandated by statute. 325:2 License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6, I(b) to read as follows: (b) The license shall be in duplicate and shall bear the name, address, description, and signature of the licensee and the name, title, and signature of the person issuing the license. The original shall be delivered to the licensee and the duplicate shall be preserved by the people issuing the same for 5 years. When required, license renewal shall take place within the month of the fifth anniversary of the license holder's date of birth following the date of issuance. The license shall be issued within 14 days after application, and, if such application is denied, the reason for such denial shall be stated in writing, the original of which such writing shall be delivered to the applicant, and a copy kept in the office of the person to whom the application was made. The fee for licenses issued to residents of the state shall be $10, which fee shall be for the use of the town or city granting said licenses; the fee for licenses granted to out-of-state residents shall be $100, which fee shall be for the use of the state. The director of state police is hereby authorized and directed to prepare forms for the licenses required under this chapter and forms for the application for such licenses and to supply the same to officials of the cities and towns authorized to issue the licenses. The form shall require no more information than was required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license, form DSSP 85, as revised in [] March 2017. The form shall not request or require disclosure of the applicant’s occupation, present employer, employer’s address, or personal references. The form shall not contain any consent or release language requiring the applicant to authorize disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric, or other records beyond what is expressly required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license. No other forms shall be used by officials of cities and towns. The cost of the forms shall be paid out of the fees received from nonresident licenses. […] 325:4 New Paragraph; License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph: IV. The department of safety shall enter into rulemaking pursuant to RSA 541-A to develop a form consistent with paragraph I. 325:5 Prospective Repeal. RSA 159:6, IV, relative to rulemaking authority to create a new form, is repealed. 325:6 Effective Date. I. Sections 1, 2, and 5 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027. II. Section 3 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2027. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. David E Walker

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Strafford 19 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. David E Walker
New Hampshire Legislature · HB 1670

relative to organized retail crime.

Sep 2, 2026 · Interim study

Rep. Susan G DeRoy · Sponsored / Rep. Glenn Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Claudine R Burnham · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas L Kaczynski · Sponsored / Rep. Rich M Nalevanko · Sponsored / Rep. David E Walker · Sponsored / Rep. John Sellers · Sponsored / Rep. Diane E. Kelley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1670 proposes an organized retail-crime offense for acting with at least one other person to steal merchandise for resale, redistribution or return to commerce, or receiving, possessing or reselling such merchandise while knowing or believing it stolen. The proposal permits aggregation over 180 days. Its enterprise-leader provision requires the specified knowing leadership or conspiracy and financial benefit; $2,500 or more in aggregate retail value would be a class A felony, and $10,000 or more would permit up to 25 years’ imprisonment. It mandates forfeiture of property used in or derived from the enterprise, which may satisfy victim restitution. The House referred it for interim study; the latest captured docket lists a September 2, 2026 work session. Its stated start is 60 days after passage, but it has not become law and establishes no new penalties or reduction in property crime.

Full Committee Work Session: 09/02/2026 10:00 am GP 232 Referred for interim study; no enactment recorded.

Why this record is included

The FBI property-crime measure includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. Organized retail theft concerns a larceny component; receipt of stolen goods is not itself interchangeable with the reported theft count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

1 Organized Retail Crime RSA 637:10-c is repealed and reenacted to read as follows: 637:10-c Organized Retail Crime. I. A person is guilty of organized retail crime if he or she acts in concert with one or more persons to commit theft of retail merchandise from one or more mercantile establishments with the intent to resell, redistribute, or reenter such retail merchandise into commerce, or if he or she receives, possesses, or resells such retail merchandise knowing or believing it to have been stolen. II. For purposes of this section, thefts may be aggregated over an 180-day period to determine value thresholds. Prosecutions may be brought in any county where any part of the enterprise activity occurred. 2 New Section; Leader or Kingpin of an Organized Retail Crime Enterprise. Amend RSA 637 by inserting after section 10-d the following new section: 637:10-e Leader or Kingpin of an Organized Retail Crime Enterprise. I. Definitions. (a) "Organized retail crime enterprise" means 2 or more persons associated in fact, although not a legal entity, who collaborate in whole or in part to commit organized retail crime under RSA 637:10-c. (b) "Leader" means any person who knowingly organizes, directs, finances, manages, supervises, or otherwise controls, or conspires to organize, direct, finance, manage, supervise, or otherwise control, an organized retail crime enterprise, and who derives pecuniary benefit from the enterprise or from the disposition of stolen retail merchandise. A person may be convicted under this even if the person does not directly participate in the thefts, so long as the person intentionally benefits from or furthers the organized retail crime enterprise. II. A person is guilty of being a leader of an organized retail crime enterprise if, within a period of 180 days, the enterprise obtains retail merchandise with an aggregate retail value of: (a) $2,500 or more, the offense shall be a class A felony. (b) $10,000 or more, the offense shall be a class A felony, but notwithstanding RSA 651:2, punishable by up to 25 years imprisonment. III. In addition to any other penalty, the court shall order forfeiture of property used in or derived from the enterprise. Such forfeiture may be used to satisfy any restitution owed to the victim. IV.(a) Theft offenses committed by an organized retail crime enterprise may be aggregated across multiple mercantile establishments and counties during an 180-day period. (b) Venue shall be proper in any county in which any theft or act in furtherance of the enterprise occurred. V. This section shall not preclude prosecution under any other applicable statute, including RSA 629:3 and RSA 629:2. 3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Diane E. Kelley

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Hillsborough 32 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Diane E. Kelley
New Hampshire Legislature · HB 1670

relative to organized retail crime.

Sep 2, 2026 · Interim study

Rep. Susan G DeRoy · Sponsored / Rep. Glenn Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Claudine R Burnham · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas L Kaczynski · Sponsored / Rep. Rich M Nalevanko · Sponsored / Rep. David E Walker · Sponsored / Rep. John Sellers · Sponsored / Rep. Diane E. Kelley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1670 proposes an organized retail-crime offense for acting with at least one other person to steal merchandise for resale, redistribution or return to commerce, or receiving, possessing or reselling such merchandise while knowing or believing it stolen. The proposal permits aggregation over 180 days. Its enterprise-leader provision requires the specified knowing leadership or conspiracy and financial benefit; $2,500 or more in aggregate retail value would be a class A felony, and $10,000 or more would permit up to 25 years’ imprisonment. It mandates forfeiture of property used in or derived from the enterprise, which may satisfy victim restitution. The House referred it for interim study; the latest captured docket lists a September 2, 2026 work session. Its stated start is 60 days after passage, but it has not become law and establishes no new penalties or reduction in property crime.

Full Committee Work Session: 09/02/2026 10:00 am GP 232 Referred for interim study; no enactment recorded.

Why this record is included

The FBI property-crime measure includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. Organized retail theft concerns a larceny component; receipt of stolen goods is not itself interchangeable with the reported theft count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

1 Organized Retail Crime RSA 637:10-c is repealed and reenacted to read as follows: 637:10-c Organized Retail Crime. I. A person is guilty of organized retail crime if he or she acts in concert with one or more persons to commit theft of retail merchandise from one or more mercantile establishments with the intent to resell, redistribute, or reenter such retail merchandise into commerce, or if he or she receives, possesses, or resells such retail merchandise knowing or believing it to have been stolen. II. For purposes of this section, thefts may be aggregated over an 180-day period to determine value thresholds. Prosecutions may be brought in any county where any part of the enterprise activity occurred. 2 New Section; Leader or Kingpin of an Organized Retail Crime Enterprise. Amend RSA 637 by inserting after section 10-d the following new section: 637:10-e Leader or Kingpin of an Organized Retail Crime Enterprise. I. Definitions. (a) "Organized retail crime enterprise" means 2 or more persons associated in fact, although not a legal entity, who collaborate in whole or in part to commit organized retail crime under RSA 637:10-c. (b) "Leader" means any person who knowingly organizes, directs, finances, manages, supervises, or otherwise controls, or conspires to organize, direct, finance, manage, supervise, or otherwise control, an organized retail crime enterprise, and who derives pecuniary benefit from the enterprise or from the disposition of stolen retail merchandise. A person may be convicted under this even if the person does not directly participate in the thefts, so long as the person intentionally benefits from or furthers the organized retail crime enterprise. II. A person is guilty of being a leader of an organized retail crime enterprise if, within a period of 180 days, the enterprise obtains retail merchandise with an aggregate retail value of: (a) $2,500 or more, the offense shall be a class A felony. (b) $10,000 or more, the offense shall be a class A felony, but notwithstanding RSA 651:2, punishable by up to 25 years imprisonment. III. In addition to any other penalty, the court shall order forfeiture of property used in or derived from the enterprise. Such forfeiture may be used to satisfy any restitution owed to the victim. IV.(a) Theft offenses committed by an organized retail crime enterprise may be aggregated across multiple mercantile establishments and counties during an 180-day period. (b) Venue shall be proper in any county in which any theft or act in furtherance of the enterprise occurred. V. This section shall not preclude prosecution under any other applicable statute, including RSA 629:3 and RSA 629:2. 3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current New Hampshire officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a New Hampshire statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.