State unemployment, employed residents, broader underutilization, and employment growth.
Annual unemployment rate2.7%2024 · #46 of 50 · highest first
Civilian employed residents1,048,9702024 · #36 of 50 · highest first
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer1%2025 · 11-month average · #39 of 50 · highest first
Nebraska over time
Explore Nebraska readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Nebraska officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Nebraska effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Nebraska change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Annual unemployment rate Nebraska · source units
NebraskaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
5 of 5 reviewed Nebraska actions match · 5 date markers shown. 17 major events shown separately.
Nebraska · 2024: 2.7% · Rank #46 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4%
Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages. LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Nebraska · state comparison
Employment and unemployment over time
LAUS annual averages measure state residents. Compare unemployment rates or the number of employed residents.
Nebraska · 20242.7%
Nebraska rank#46among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Annual unemployment rate
Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages.
LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Nebraska
2024 · Nebraska: 2.7% · Rank #46 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Nebraska Annual unemployment rate history
Period
Nebraska
Compare
2015
3%
2016
3.1%
2017
3%
2018
2.9%
2019
3.1%
2020
4.3%
2021
2.7%
2022
2.2%
2023
2.3%
2024
2.7%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 1.8%Higher value · 5.4%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Nebraska · 2.7%2024 · Rank #46 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Annual unemployment rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Nevada
5.4%
—
#2
California
5.3%
—
#3
Illinois
5%
—
#4
Kentucky
4.8%
—
#5
Michigan
4.7%
—
#6
New Jersey
4.6%
—
#7
Alaska
4.5%
—
#7
Washington
4.5%
—
#9
Ohio
4.4%
—
#10
Louisiana
4.3%
—
#10
Oregon
4.3%
—
#12
New York
4.2%
—
#12
Rhode Island
4.2%
—
#14
Colorado
4.1%
—
#14
New Mexico
4.1%
—
#14
South Carolina
4.1%
—
#14
Texas
4.1%
—
#14
West Virginia
4.1%
—
#19
Indiana
4%
—
#19
Massachusetts
4%
—
#21
Delaware
3.9%
—
#22
Pennsylvania
3.8%
—
#23
Arizona
3.7%
—
#23
Missouri
3.7%
—
#23
North Carolina
3.7%
—
#26
Idaho
3.6%
—
#27
Arkansas
3.5%
—
#27
Kansas
3.5%
—
#29
Florida
3.4%
—
#29
Georgia
3.4%
—
#29
Tennessee
3.4%
—
#32
Connecticut
3.3%
—
#32
Utah
3.3%
—
#34
Iowa
3.2%
—
#34
Maryland
3.2%
—
#34
Mississippi
3.2%
—
#34
Oklahoma
3.2%
—
#38
Minnesota
3.1%
—
#38
Wyoming
3.1%
—
#40
Alabama
3%
—
#40
Maine
3%
—
#40
Montana
3%
—
#40
Wisconsin
3%
—
#44
Virginia
2.9%
—
#45
Hawaii
2.8%
—
#46
Nebraska · your comparison
2.7%
—
#47
New Hampshire
2.6%
—
#48
North Dakota
2.4%
—
#49
Vermont
2.3%
—
#50
South Dakota
1.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
The reviewed 2025 CPS snapshot includes both U-3 and the broader U-6 measure. It is separate from the LAUS annual history.
Nebraska · 2025 · 11-month average1%
Nebraska rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer
Unemployed 15 weeks or longer as a share of the civilian labor force.
2025 CPS averages exclude October because data were not collected during the federal shutdown. Not strictly comparable with other-year averages. These directly surveyed CPS estimates differ from LAUS model-based estimates. All states use the same 11 months here.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 0.6%Higher value · 2.4%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Nebraska · 1%2025 · 11-month average · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer · 2025 · 11-month average · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
2.4%
—
#2
Oregon
2.2%
—
#3
Illinois
2.1%
—
#3
New York
2.1%
—
#5
Connecticut
2%
—
#5
Rhode Island
2%
—
#5
Washington
2%
—
#8
Massachusetts
1.9%
—
#8
Nevada
1.9%
—
#8
New Jersey
1.9%
—
#11
Delaware
1.8%
—
#11
Virginia
1.8%
—
#13
Louisiana
1.7%
—
#13
Michigan
1.7%
—
#13
West Virginia
1.7%
—
#16
Alaska
1.6%
—
#16
Florida
1.6%
—
#16
Mississippi
1.6%
—
#16
New Mexico
1.6%
—
#16
Ohio
1.6%
—
#16
Pennsylvania
1.6%
—
#22
Colorado
1.5%
—
#22
Kentucky
1.5%
—
#22
Maryland
1.5%
—
#22
Texas
1.5%
—
#26
Arizona
1.4%
—
#26
Georgia
1.4%
—
#28
Arkansas
1.3%
—
#28
Iowa
1.3%
—
#28
North Carolina
1.3%
—
#28
Oklahoma
1.3%
—
#28
South Carolina
1.3%
—
#33
Kansas
1.2%
—
#33
Minnesota
1.2%
—
#33
New Hampshire
1.2%
—
#33
Wisconsin
1.2%
—
#37
Tennessee
1.1%
—
#37
Utah
1.1%
—
#39
Idaho
1%
—
#39
Indiana
1%
—
#39
Nebraska · your comparison
1%
—
#42
Alabama
0.9%
—
#42
Maine
0.9%
—
#42
Missouri
0.9%
—
#42
Wyoming
0.9%
—
#46
Hawaii
0.7%
—
#46
Montana
0.7%
—
#46
South Dakota
0.7%
—
#46
Vermont
0.7%
—
#50
North Dakota
0.6%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Annual real output growth and BEA job growth provide economic context. Neither is the unemployment rate.
Nebraska · 20251.3%
Nebraska rank#41among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.3%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Annual real GDP growth
Change in annual real GDP from the prior year.
Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Nebraska
2025 · Nebraska: 1.3% · Rank #41 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.3% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Nebraska Annual real GDP growth history
Period
Nebraska
Compare
2015
3.4%
2016
1.4%
2017
1.6%
2018
1.8%
2019
1.6%
2020
-0.3%
2021
7.1%
2022
2.9%
2023
8.3%
2024
1.9%
2025
1.3%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.
Lower value · -0.4%Higher value · 5.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Nebraska · 1.3%2025 · Rank #41 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Annual real GDP growth · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Delaware
5.1%
—
#2
Alaska
4.7%
—
#3
California
3.5%
—
#4
South Carolina
3.3%
—
#5
Washington
3.2%
—
#6
Idaho
3.1%
—
#7
Kentucky
3%
—
#8
Georgia
2.9%
—
#9
Texas
2.8%
—
#10
West Virginia
2.8%
—
#11
Florida
2.8%
—
#12
Rhode Island
2.8%
—
#13
Utah
2.7%
—
#14
Illinois
2.6%
—
#15
New York
2.5%
—
#16
Connecticut
2.5%
—
#17
Ohio
2.4%
—
#18
Virginia
2.3%
—
#19
Oklahoma
2.2%
—
#20
Michigan
2.2%
—
#21
Tennessee
2.1%
—
#22
New Jersey
2%
—
#23
Nevada
2%
—
#24
Montana
2%
—
#25
Alabama
2%
—
#26
Vermont
1.9%
—
#27
Colorado
1.9%
—
#28
Indiana
1.9%
—
#29
Pennsylvania
1.8%
—
#30
North Carolina
1.8%
—
#31
New Mexico
1.8%
—
#32
South Dakota
1.8%
—
#33
New Hampshire
1.7%
—
#34
Louisiana
1.5%
—
#35
Hawaii
1.5%
—
#36
Arizona
1.5%
—
#37
Maine
1.4%
—
#38
Oregon
1.4%
—
#39
Massachusetts
1.3%
—
#40
Mississippi
1.3%
—
#41
Nebraska · your comparison
1.3%
—
#42
Missouri
1.2%
—
#43
Kansas
1%
—
#44
Arkansas
0.9%
—
#45
Wisconsin
0.8%
—
#46
Maryland
0.8%
—
#47
Minnesota
0.7%
—
#48
North Dakota
0.5%
—
#49
Wyoming
0.1%
—
#50
Iowa
-0.4%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
A state unemployment rate does not capture all unused labor or job-market turnover.
Nebraska · December 202538,000
Nebraska rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark6,550,000Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Openings · number
Number of jobs or monthly employment flows; published thousands converted to individual units.
Seasonally adjusted state JOLTS estimates, July–December 2025 as printed in the captured table. Recent estimates are preliminary and revisions can change ranks. Openings are a month-end stock; hires, quits, and layoffs are monthly flows, not distinct workers.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Nebraska
December 2025 · Nebraska: 38,000 · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 6,550,000 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Nebraska Openings · number history
Period
Nebraska
Compare
July 2025
41,000
August 2025
44,000
September 2025
42,000
October 2025
42,000
November 2025
41,000
December 2025
38,000
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11,000Higher value · 674,000Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Nebraska · 38,000December 2025 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Openings · number · December 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
674,000
—
#2
Texas
608,000
—
#3
New York
431,000
—
#4
Florida
404,000
—
#5
Ohio
287,000
—
#6
Georgia
279,000
—
#7
Pennsylvania
235,000
—
#8
Michigan
221,000
—
#9
Virginia
213,000
—
#10
North Carolina
212,000
—
#11
Illinois
211,000
—
#12
New Jersey
172,000
—
#13
Tennessee
143,000
—
#14
Minnesota
135,000
—
#15
Massachusetts
129,000
—
#16
Missouri
128,000
—
#17
Maryland
127,000
—
#18
Indiana
123,000
—
#19
Arizona
121,000
—
#20
Wisconsin
115,000
—
#21
Washington
110,000
—
#22
South Carolina
103,000
—
#23
Louisiana
101,000
—
#23
Oklahoma
101,000
—
#25
Colorado
100,000
—
#26
Kentucky
92,000
—
#27
Alabama
91,000
—
#28
Oregon
72,000
—
#29
Connecticut
67,000
—
#30
Utah
64,000
—
#31
Kansas
61,000
—
#32
Arkansas
60,000
—
#33
Mississippi
59,000
—
#34
Iowa
57,000
—
#35
Nevada
52,000
—
#36
West Virginia
42,000
—
#37
Nebraska · your comparison
38,000
—
#38
Idaho
34,000
—
#39
New Mexico
32,000
—
#40
Maine
28,000
—
#41
Delaware
23,000
—
#42
Montana
22,000
—
#42
New Hampshire
22,000
—
#42
Rhode Island
22,000
—
#45
South Dakota
20,000
—
#46
Hawaii
19,000
—
#47
North Dakota
18,000
—
#48
Alaska
16,000
—
#49
Vermont
11,000
—
#49
Wyoming
11,000
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
5 of 5 reviewed Nebraska actions · newest first
Sep 29, 2026 · Executive Order 26-22 · Statewide economic-growth coordination working group · Signed; advisory coordination created; later deliverables unverifiedGovernor · Executive Order 26-22
Statewide economic-growth coordination working group
Order 26-22 creates the Governor’s Economic Growth Working Group as an advisory alignment body chaired by Economic Development’s director. It includes designated public, chamber and regional partners, with additional participants invited by the governor or chair and meetings called by the chair. The group is directed to co-design and publish a multi-year state economic-development plan, organize recurring regional tours and business roundtables, prioritize annual site-selection and recruitment outreach, and coordinate a shared inventory of industrial sites, commercial properties and predevelopment assets using existing law and voluntary local input. Economic Development must provide administrative support. The initial alignment framework is due December 31, 2026 and the plan by June 30, 2027, followed by annual updates and ongoing recruitment. The order is effective upon execution. It does not establish that meetings, tours or recruitment occurred, that either future deliverable has been completed, or that jobs, investment or output increased. It does not itself enact a tax change, appropriation or residential housing program; its statistical and ranking recitals await independent verification. Business recruitment and job-creator coordination provide workforce policy context; employment gains and unemployment effects are unverified.
Signed 2026-09-29. Signed; advisory coordination created; later deliverables unverified. Issuance is verified; implementation and current requirements remain separate.
Why this record is included
Business recruitment and job-creator coordination provide workforce policy context; employment gains and unemployment effects are unverified.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: real-gdp · reviewed policy context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Order 26-22 creates the Governor’s Economic Growth Working Group as an advisory alignment body chaired by Economic Development’s director. It includes designated public, chamber and regional partners, with additional participants invited by the governor or chair and meetings called by the chair.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 20, 2026 · Executive Order 26-17 · Economic-development incentive review and data-center task force · Signed July 20; administrative criteria and task force directedGovernor · Executive Order 26-17
Economic-development incentive review and data-center task force
Jul 20, 2026 · Signed July 20; administrative criteria and task force directed
Gov. Jim Pillen · Issued
Reviewed signed executive order
Order 26-17 directs Economic Development and Revenue to administer the ImagiNE Nebraska and Nebraska Advantage incentive programs consistently with their legislative policies and determination authorities. Review criteria include business investment, economic growth, employment, workforce development, transparency, accountability and environmental quality. The agencies must coordinate as appropriate and consistent with law on natural resources, energy infrastructure, agriculture, utilities and economic development. The order directs Water, Environment, and Energy to establish a data-center task force to examine water and environmental impacts and recommend resource protections and county-zoning guidelines to the Legislature in 2027. The signed order says lawful economic development and private investment are not discouraged. Its four pages do not expressly impose a blanket prohibition on approving data-center applications for ImagiNE incentives. The July 21 announcement says incentive access ends and applications are prohibited, and describes signing as occurring that day; the original execution date is July 20. Both differences remain unresolved. This account publishes the signed criteria and task-force directions without treating the announcement’s blanket-ban wording as an express signed provision. Task-force formation, agency decisions, future legislative recommendations and outcomes remain unverified. The complete enacted LB1261 and LB1261A originals now support a separate account of conditional generation protection and the two-year appropriation. LB1261 requires Board approval, utility-approved contracts and payment of project-related utility costs by the industrial customer; it does not verify actual lower rates or resolve the announcement’s blanket-incentive-ban discrepancy. Employment and workforce development are incentive-review criteria, rather than verified jobs created, hiring or unemployment changes.
Signed 2026-07-20. Signed July 20; administrative criteria and task force directed. Issuance is verified; implementation and current requirements remain separate.
Why this record is included
Employment and workforce development are incentive-review criteria, rather than verified jobs created, hiring or unemployment changes.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: energy · reviewed policy context · income-taxes · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · real-gdp · reviewed policy context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Order 26-17 directs Economic Development and Revenue to administer the ImagiNE Nebraska and Nebraska Advantage incentive programs consistently with their legislative policies and determination authorities. Review criteria include business investment, economic growth, employment, workforce development, transparency, accountability and environmental quality.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 3, 2026 · S 3968 · Housing for America’s Middle Class Act of 2026 · In CongressU.S. Congress · Nebraska delegation · S 3968
Housing for America’s Middle Class Act of 2026
Mar 3, 2026 · In Congress
Sen. Pete Ricketts · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
S 3968 would require GAO to study and report to Congress within one year after enactment on affordability obstacles for households above 80% and no more than 120% of area median family income, adjusted for family size, recommend a workforce-housing definition, and examine possible program changes if additional funding were available. This is a proposed study of broader housing affordability, including the rental component, not expanded eligibility, appropriated aid or an observed rent reduction.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities and fuel. Rental utility-payment duties and notice-to-vacate rules concern tenancy and housing costs without establishing a change in the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.GAO study on workforce housing (a)In generalNot later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study and submit to the Congress a report that— (1)identifies obstacles middle-income households face when looking to secure affordable housing; (2)identifies geographic areas where housing is the most unaffordable and unavailable for middle-income households; (3)includes a list of Federal housing programs, including Federal tax credits, grants, and loan programs, that are not available to middle-income households due to their income status, including Federal housing programs designed to promote affordability; (4)recommends income and other parameters to establish a clear and consistent Federal definition for the term workforce housing for use when describing the segment of housing that could be made available to such middle-income households in Federal housing programs if funding commensurate with the additional eligibility were to be made available; and (5)analyzes how to modify or newly develop new Federal housing programs and incentives to include workforce housing if funding commensurate with the additional eligibility were to be made available. (b) Middle-Income household defined In this section, the term middle-income household means a household with an income above 80 percent but that does not exceed 120 percent of the median family income of the area, as determined by the Secretary with adjustments for smaller and larger families.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Feb 9, 2026 · LB 258 · Change provisions relating to the minimum wage under the Wage and Hour Act · EnactedNebraska Legislature · LB 258
Change provisions relating to the minimum wage under the Wage and Hour Act
Feb 9, 2026 · Enacted
Jane Raybould · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
LB 258 replaces the post-2026 general minimum-wage inflation adjustment with annual increases of 1.75% beginning January 1, 2027. It permits a $13.50 youth wage for non-emancipated employees ages 14–15, rising 1.5% on January 1, 2030 and every fifth year afterward. For qualifying new employees ages 16–19, the training wage is $13.50 through 2026 and rises 1.5% annually from 2027; youth and training increases are rounded to the nearest cent. Seasonal and migrant workers and emancipated minors are excluded from the training wage. Its initial 90-day period may be extended another 90 days for approved training, and training wages may cover no more than one-fourth of employer-paid hours. Existing-worker displacement prohibitions remain. The existing $15 general minimum for 2026 was not created by this bill. These are wage rules, not a measured household-income change.
Approved by Governor on 2026-02-09. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Census household money income is measured before taxes and includes wages and specified cash benefits. Minimum-wage provisions concern earnings; tax credits and in-kind benefits are not themselves increases in this statistic. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. Section 48-1203, Revised Statutes Cumulative Supplement, 2024, is amended to read: 48-1203 (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section and section 48-1203.01, every employer shall pay to each of his or her employees a minimum wage of: (a) Nine dollars per hour through December 31, 2022; (b) Ten dollars and fifty cents per hour on and after January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023; (c) Twelve dollars per hour on and after January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024; (d) Thirteen dollars and fifty cents per hour on and after January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025; and (e) Fifteen dollars per hour on and after January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026. (2) The minimum wage established in subdivision (1)(e) of this section shall be increased on January 1, 2027, and on January 1 of successive years, by one and three-quarters percent . No later than October 15 of each year, commencing October 15, 2026, the Nebraska Department of Labor shall calculate and publish the minimum wage rate that will take effect the following January 1. (3) For persons compensated by way of gratuities such as waitresses, waiters, hotel bellhops, porters, and shoeshine persons, the employer shall pay wages at the minimum rate of two dollars and thirteen cents per hour, plus all gratuities given to them for services rendered. The sum of wages and gratuities received by each person compensated by way of gratuities shall equal or exceed the applicable minimum wage rate provided in subsection (1) or (2) of this section. In determining whether or not the individual is compensated by way of gratuities, the burden of proof shall be upon the employer. (4) Any employer employing student-learners as part of a bona fide vocational training program shall pay such student-learners' wages at a rate of at least seventy-five percent of the minimum wage rate which would otherwise be applicable under this section. (5)(a) An employer may pay a youth minimum wage of thirteen dollars and fifty cents per hour to an employee who: (i) Is at least fourteen years of age but younger than sixteen years of age; and (ii) Is not an emancipated minor. (b) Beginning on January 1, 2030, and on January 1 of every fifth year thereafter, the youth minimum wage shall increase by one and one-half percent, rounded to the nearest cent. Sec. 2. Section 48-1203.01, Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska, is amended to read: 48-1203.01 (1) An employer may pay a new employee who is at least sixteen years of age but younger than twenty years of age and who is not a seasonal or migrant worker or an emancipated minor a training wage rate as described in subsection (2) of this section for ninety days from the date the new employee was hired. An employer may pay such new employee the training wage rate for an additional ninety-day period while the new employee is participating in on-the-job training which (a) requires technical, personal, or other skills which are necessary for his or her employment and (b) is approved by the Commissioner of Labor. No more than one-fourth of the total hours paid by the employer shall be at the training wage rate. (2) For the purposes of this section, the training wage rate shall be: (a) Thirteen dollars and fifty cents per hour through December 31, 2026; and (b) Beginning on January 1, 2027, and on January 1 of each year thereafter, the training wage rate shall increase by one and one-half percent, rounded to the nearest cent. (3) An employer shall not pay the training wage rate if the hours of any other employee are reduced or if any other employee is laid off and the hours or position to be filled by the new employee is substantially similar to the hours or position of such other employee. An employer shall not dismiss or reduce the hours of any employee with the intention of replacing such employee or his or her hours with a new employee receiving the training wage rate.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Feb 9, 2026 · LB 258 · Change provisions relating to the minimum wage under the Wage and Hour Act · SignedGovernor · LB 258
Change provisions relating to the minimum wage under the Wage and Hour Act
Feb 9, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Jim Pillen · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Jim Pillen signed LB 258. LB 258 replaces the post-2026 general minimum-wage inflation adjustment with annual increases of 1.75% beginning January 1, 2027. It permits a $13.50 youth wage for non-emancipated employees ages 14–15, rising 1.5% on January 1, 2030 and every fifth year afterward. For qualifying new employees ages 16–19, the training wage is $13.50 through 2026 and rises 1.5% annually from 2027; youth and training increases are rounded to the nearest cent. Seasonal and migrant workers and emancipated minors are excluded from the training wage. Its initial 90-day period may be extended another 90 days for approved training, and training wages may cover no more than one-fourth of employer-paid hours. Existing-worker displacement prohibitions remain. The existing $15 general minimum for 2026 was not created by this bill. These are wage rules, not a measured household-income change.
Approved by Governor on 2026-02-09. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Census household money income is measured before taxes and includes wages and specified cash benefits. Minimum-wage provisions concern earnings; tax credits and in-kind benefits are not themselves increases in this statistic. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. Section 48-1203, Revised Statutes Cumulative Supplement, 2024, is amended to read: 48-1203 (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section and section 48-1203.01, every employer shall pay to each of his or her employees a minimum wage of: (a) Nine dollars per hour through December 31, 2022; (b) Ten dollars and fifty cents per hour on and after January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023; (c) Twelve dollars per hour on and after January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024; (d) Thirteen dollars and fifty cents per hour on and after January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025; and (e) Fifteen dollars per hour on and after January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026. (2) The minimum wage established in subdivision (1)(e) of this section shall be increased on January 1, 2027, and on January 1 of successive years, by one and three-quarters percent . No later than October 15 of each year, commencing October 15, 2026, the Nebraska Department of Labor shall calculate and publish the minimum wage rate that will take effect the following January 1. (3) For persons compensated by way of gratuities such as waitresses, waiters, hotel bellhops, porters, and shoeshine persons, the employer shall pay wages at the minimum rate of two dollars and thirteen cents per hour, plus all gratuities given to them for services rendered. The sum of wages and gratuities received by each person compensated by way of gratuities shall equal or exceed the applicable minimum wage rate provided in subsection (1) or (2) of this section. In determining whether or not the individual is compensated by way of gratuities, the burden of proof shall be upon the employer. (4) Any employer employing student-learners as part of a bona fide vocational training program shall pay such student-learners' wages at a rate of at least seventy-five percent of the minimum wage rate which would otherwise be applicable under this section. (5)(a) An employer may pay a youth minimum wage of thirteen dollars and fifty cents per hour to an employee who: (i) Is at least fourteen years of age but younger than sixteen years of age; and (ii) Is not an emancipated minor. (b) Beginning on January 1, 2030, and on January 1 of every fifth year thereafter, the youth minimum wage shall increase by one and one-half percent, rounded to the nearest cent. Sec. 2. Section 48-1203.01, Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska, is amended to read: 48-1203.01 (1) An employer may pay a new employee who is at least sixteen years of age but younger than twenty years of age and who is not a seasonal or migrant worker or an emancipated minor a training wage rate as described in subsection (2) of this section for ninety days from the date the new employee was hired. An employer may pay such new employee the training wage rate for an additional ninety-day period while the new employee is participating in on-the-job training which (a) requires technical, personal, or other skills which are necessary for his or her employment and (b) is approved by the Commissioner of Labor. No more than one-fourth of the total hours paid by the employer shall be at the training wage rate. (2) For the purposes of this section, the training wage rate shall be: (a) Thirteen dollars and fifty cents per hour through December 31, 2026; and (b) Beginning on January 1, 2027, and on January 1 of each year thereafter, the training wage rate shall increase by one and one-half percent, rounded to the nearest cent. (3) An employer shall not pay the training wage rate if the hours of any other employee are reduced or if any other employee is laid off and the hours or position to be filled by the new employee is substantially similar to the hours or position of such other employee. An employer shall not dismiss or reduce the hours of any employee with the intention of replacing such employee or his or her hours with a new employee receiving the training wage rate.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Nebraska officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about unemployment, jobs and workforce issues from FactVote’s Nebraska candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
22 statements from 10 candidates
2026 Nebraska Governor — General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements
We need an air horn and a VETO stamp to protect our votes from getting changed to policy we didn't vote for. They want to lower the minimum wage of our 14-16 year old child workforce from $15 an hour to $13.50......Wow......Can 14 year-olds vote for or negotiate their employee rights?? They killed i…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Government ethics, accountability, and elections
Candidate campaign source
We need an air horn and a VETO stamp to protect our votes from getting changed to policy we didn't vote for. They want to lower the minimum wage of our 14-16 year old child workforce from $15 an hour to $13.50......Wow......Can 14 year-olds vote for or negotiate their employee rights?? They killed initiative 436, our voter approved sick leave increases for young workers, seasonal, and temporary workers, while removing their rights to sue for employer violations. It's unbelievable. They block our medical cannabis, dilute our voter approved minimum wage increases, and drastically delay our Medicaid expansion.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Driving Economic Development: Faster, simplified licensing processes attract small businesses, encourage new ventures, and directly stimulate local job creation.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability
Candidate campaign source
Driving Economic Development: Faster, simplified licensing processes attract small businesses, encourage new ventures, and directly stimulate local job creation.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific unemployment, jobs and workforce issues terms in retained, attributed source text from published Nebraska candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Nebraska incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Nebraska legislators and Nebraska’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Nebraska’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
2 matching sponsorships or proposals · 2 Nebraska incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Jane Raybould
Nebraska Senate, District 28 · –NE
1 proposalView proposals from Jane RaybouldNebraska Legislature · LB 258
Change provisions relating to the minimum wage under the Wage and Hour Act
Feb 9, 2026 · Enacted
Jane Raybould · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
LB 258 replaces the post-2026 general minimum-wage inflation adjustment with annual increases of 1.75% beginning January 1, 2027. It permits a $13.50 youth wage for non-emancipated employees ages 14–15, rising 1.5% on January 1, 2030 and every fifth year afterward. For qualifying new employees ages 16–19, the training wage is $13.50 through 2026 and rises 1.5% annually from 2027; youth and training increases are rounded to the nearest cent. Seasonal and migrant workers and emancipated minors are excluded from the training wage. Its initial 90-day period may be extended another 90 days for approved training, and training wages may cover no more than one-fourth of employer-paid hours. Existing-worker displacement prohibitions remain. The existing $15 general minimum for 2026 was not created by this bill. These are wage rules, not a measured household-income change.
Approved by Governor on 2026-02-09. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Census household money income is measured before taxes and includes wages and specified cash benefits. Minimum-wage provisions concern earnings; tax credits and in-kind benefits are not themselves increases in this statistic. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. Section 48-1203, Revised Statutes Cumulative Supplement, 2024, is amended to read: 48-1203 (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section and section 48-1203.01, every employer shall pay to each of his or her employees a minimum wage of: (a) Nine dollars per hour through December 31, 2022; (b) Ten dollars and fifty cents per hour on and after January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023; (c) Twelve dollars per hour on and after January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024; (d) Thirteen dollars and fifty cents per hour on and after January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025; and (e) Fifteen dollars per hour on and after January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026. (2) The minimum wage established in subdivision (1)(e) of this section shall be increased on January 1, 2027, and on January 1 of successive years, by one and three-quarters percent . No later than October 15 of each year, commencing October 15, 2026, the Nebraska Department of Labor shall calculate and publish the minimum wage rate that will take effect the following January 1. (3) For persons compensated by way of gratuities such as waitresses, waiters, hotel bellhops, porters, and shoeshine persons, the employer shall pay wages at the minimum rate of two dollars and thirteen cents per hour, plus all gratuities given to them for services rendered. The sum of wages and gratuities received by each person compensated by way of gratuities shall equal or exceed the applicable minimum wage rate provided in subsection (1) or (2) of this section. In determining whether or not the individual is compensated by way of gratuities, the burden of proof shall be upon the employer. (4) Any employer employing student-learners as part of a bona fide vocational training program shall pay such student-learners' wages at a rate of at least seventy-five percent of the minimum wage rate which would otherwise be applicable under this section. (5)(a) An employer may pay a youth minimum wage of thirteen dollars and fifty cents per hour to an employee who: (i) Is at least fourteen years of age but younger than sixteen years of age; and (ii) Is not an emancipated minor. (b) Beginning on January 1, 2030, and on January 1 of every fifth year thereafter, the youth minimum wage shall increase by one and one-half percent, rounded to the nearest cent. Sec. 2. Section 48-1203.01, Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska, is amended to read: 48-1203.01 (1) An employer may pay a new employee who is at least sixteen years of age but younger than twenty years of age and who is not a seasonal or migrant worker or an emancipated minor a training wage rate as described in subsection (2) of this section for ninety days from the date the new employee was hired. An employer may pay such new employee the training wage rate for an additional ninety-day period while the new employee is participating in on-the-job training which (a) requires technical, personal, or other skills which are necessary for his or her employment and (b) is approved by the Commissioner of Labor. No more than one-fourth of the total hours paid by the employer shall be at the training wage rate. (2) For the purposes of this section, the training wage rate shall be: (a) Thirteen dollars and fifty cents per hour through December 31, 2026; and (b) Beginning on January 1, 2027, and on January 1 of each year thereafter, the training wage rate shall increase by one and one-half percent, rounded to the nearest cent. (3) An employer shall not pay the training wage rate if the hours of any other employee are reduced or if any other employee is laid off and the hours or position to be filled by the new employee is substantially similar to the hours or position of such other employee. An employer shall not dismiss or reduce the hours of any employee with the intention of replacing such employee or his or her hours with a new employee receiving the training wage rate.
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Pete RickettsU.S. Congress · Nebraska delegation · S 3968
Housing for America’s Middle Class Act of 2026
Mar 3, 2026 · In Congress
Sen. Pete Ricketts · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
S 3968 would require GAO to study and report to Congress within one year after enactment on affordability obstacles for households above 80% and no more than 120% of area median family income, adjusted for family size, recommend a workforce-housing definition, and examine possible program changes if additional funding were available. This is a proposed study of broader housing affordability, including the rental component, not expanded eligibility, appropriated aid or an observed rent reduction.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities and fuel. Rental utility-payment duties and notice-to-vacate rules concern tenancy and housing costs without establishing a change in the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.GAO study on workforce housing (a)In generalNot later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study and submit to the Congress a report that— (1)identifies obstacles middle-income households face when looking to secure affordable housing; (2)identifies geographic areas where housing is the most unaffordable and unavailable for middle-income households; (3)includes a list of Federal housing programs, including Federal tax credits, grants, and loan programs, that are not available to middle-income households due to their income status, including Federal housing programs designed to promote affordability; (4)recommends income and other parameters to establish a clear and consistent Federal definition for the term workforce housing for use when describing the segment of housing that could be made available to such middle-income households in Federal housing programs if funding commensurate with the additional eligibility were to be made available; and (5)analyzes how to modify or newly develop new Federal housing programs and incentives to include workforce housing if funding commensurate with the additional eligibility were to be made available. (b) Middle-Income household defined In this section, the term middle-income household means a household with an income above 80 percent but that does not exceed 120 percent of the median family income of the area, as determined by the Secretary with adjustments for smaller and larger families.
Only current Nebraska officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Nebraska statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Nebraska snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Nebraska, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.