Nebraska · individual fact

Nebraska housing and borrowing

Home values, gross rent, homeownership, housing cost burdens, and the pressure from prices and incomes.

Median owner-occupied home value$238.6K2020–2024 · #37 of 50 · highest first
Median gross rent$1.07K2020–2024 · #34 of 50 · highest first
Homeownership rate66.5%2020–2024 · #34 of 50 · highest first

Nebraska over time

Explore Nebraska readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Nebraska officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Nebraska effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Nebraska change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Home-price growth since 2016 Nebraska · source units
NebraskaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Home-price growth since 20162025: +84.6%-10.2%+42.3%+94.8%Nebraska, 2016: +0%Nebraska, 2017: +5.3%Nebraska, 2018: +10%Nebraska, 2019: +15.4%Nebraska, 2020: +20.5%Nebraska, 2021: +34.4%Nebraska, 2022: +53.5%Nebraska, 2023: +64.3%Nebraska, 2024: +74.9%Nebraska, 2025: +84.6%201620202025
✦ Major events & context · 40National context · Housing downturn and the Great Recession · 2007-12-01Great RecessionNational context · Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac conservatorships announced · 2008-09-07Mortgage conservatorshipNational context · Federal Reserve announces agency mortgage-bond purchases · 2008-11-25Mortgage-bond purchasesNational context · Making Home Affordable modification guidelines released · 2009-03-04Mortgage relief guidelinesNational context · Federal Reserve announces another round of mortgage-bond purchases · 2012-09-13Further mortgage supportNational context · Federal Reserve announces slower bond purchases · 2013-12-18Bond purchases slowNational context · Ability-to-Repay mortgage standards take effect · 2014-01-10Mortgage lending standardsNational context · Federal Reserve raises its target above the near-zero range · 2015-12-16Rates leave near zeroNational context · Pandemic shock and emergency mortgage-market support · 2020-03-15COVID-19 / Fed responseNational context · CARES Act introduces mortgage and renter protections · 2020-03-27CARES housing reliefNational context · CDC eviction moratorium takes effect · 2020-09-04CDC eviction protectionsNational context · Treasury launches Emergency Rental Assistance · 2021-01-05Rental assistance launchesNational context · American Rescue Plan funds additional housing assistance · 2021-03-11Additional housing reliefNational context · Supreme Court blocks the renewed CDC eviction moratorium · 2021-08-26CDC moratorium blockedNational context · Federal Reserve begins the 2022 rate-increase cycle · 2022-03-16Rate increases beginNational context · Federal Reserve begins reducing its securities holdings · 2022-06-01Fed holdings begin shrinkingNational context · Freddie Mac changes mortgage-rate measurement · 2022-11-17Mortgage survey updateNebraska · Nebraska tornadoes damage homes, farms and power lines, with two surveyed injuries · 2023-05-12Nebraska May 2023 tornadoesNebraska · Nebraska windstorm and embedded tornadoes damage homes, crops and power infrastructure · 2023-07-12Nebraska July 2023 windstormNational context · Average 30-year mortgage rate reaches 7.79% · 2023-10-26Mortgage rates reach 7.79%Nebraska · Nebraska tornado outbreak damages homes, power lines and a manufacturing facility · 2024-04-26Nebraska April 2024 tornadoesNebraska · Nebraska storms damage homes, power lines and a road-supply building · 2024-05-06Nebraska May 6 stormsNebraska · Nebraska storms flood homes and roads and damage farms and power lines · 2024-05-20Nebraska May 2024 floodingNebraska · Derecho and tornadoes damage Nebraska homes, utilities and farm infrastructure · 2024-05-24Nebraska May 2024 derechoNebraska · Nebraska storms damage homes and agricultural structures · 2024-06-15Nebraska June 15 stormsNebraska · Damaging winds affect Nebraska homes, businesses and power infrastructure · 2024-07-31Nebraska July 2024 windstormNational context · Federal Reserve lowers its policy-rate target · 2024-09-18Policy-rate cutNebraska · Tornadoes and wind-driven hail damage Nebraska homes · 2025-04-17Nebraska April 2025 stormsNebraska · Dodge County tornado damages mobile homes and campers, with one reported injury · 2025-05-19Nebraska May 2025 tornadoesNebraska · Nebraska storms damage homes and power infrastructure, with reported casualties · 2025-08-09Nebraska August 2025 stormsNational context · Federal Reserve ends the reduction of total securities holdings · 2025-12-01Fed runoff endsNational context · Federal Reserve cuts its target to 3.50–3.75% · 2025-12-10Further policy-rate cutNational context · Executive order targets federal support for institutional home purchases · 2026-01-20Institutional-buyer orderNational context · Executive order directs review of home-construction barriers · 2026-03-13Home-construction reviewNational context · Executive order directs review of mortgage-credit rules · 2026-03-13Mortgage-credit reviewNebraska · Eastern Nebraska storms damage homes and farms, with reported outages and flooding · 2026-05-15Nebraska May stormsNebraska · Eastern Nebraska storms bring reported home damage, an injury and power-line damage · 2026-06-11Nebraska June stormsNational context · 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act becomes law · 2026-07-11ROAD housing lawNational context · Federal Reserve holds its target at 3.50–3.75% · 2026-07-29Policy rate held steadyNebraska · Flooding strands vehicles and prompts rescues in Omaha and Lincoln · 2026-09-30Nebraska Sept 2026 flooding● Nebraska Legislature · 42● U.S. Congress · Nebraska delegation · 2◆ Governor · 42■ Nebraska agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2007-12-012026-09-30

10 of 10 reviewed Nebraska actions match · 8 date markers shown. 40 major events shown separately.

Nebraska · 2025: +84.6% · Rank #23 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016. This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Nebraska Home-price growth since 2016 · source units
PeriodNebraskaRankU.S. benchmark
2025+84.6%#23 of 50Not available
2024+74.9%#27 of 50Not available
2023+64.3%#25 of 50Not available
2022+53.5%#29 of 50Not available
2021+34.4%#26 of 50Not available
2020+20.5%#24 of 50Not available
2019+15.4%#22 of 50Not available
2018+10%#21 of 50Not available
2017+5.3%#14 of 50Not available
2016+0%#1 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Nebraska · state comparison

Home values, rent, and homeownership

Census values are estimates for occupied housing, rather than current listing or sale prices.

Nebraska · 2020–2024$238,600
Nebraska rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$332,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median owner-occupied home value

Median reported value of owner-occupied housing.

2024 dollars; a higher value can benefit owners and make buying harder.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.

Lower value · $162.6KHigher value · $839.1KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nebraska · $238,6002020–2024 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Median owner-occupied home value · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii$839,100—
#2California$734,700—
#3Washington$564,600—
#4Massachusetts$562,100—
#5Colorado$539,400—
#6Utah$489,400—
#7Oregon$477,600—
#8New Jersey$454,400—
#9Nevada$435,400—
#10New York$423,800—
#11Maryland$419,900—
#12Idaho$418,600—
#13Rhode Island$404,200—
#14New Hampshire$402,500—
#15Arizona$394,500—
#16Virginia$383,700—
#17Montana$375,800—
#18Connecticut$366,900—
#19Florida$359,000—
#20Alaska$352,900—
#21Delaware$352,000—
#22Minnesota$329,300—
#23Vermont$316,600—
#24Wyoming$309,700—
#25Georgia$303,300—
#26Maine$296,600—
#27North Carolina$288,900—
#28Tennessee$286,700—
#29Texas$283,800—
#30Wisconsin$266,500—
#31Illinois$263,300—
#32South Carolina$259,000—
#33South Dakota$257,400—
#34Pennsylvania$254,500—
#35North Dakota$249,900—
#36New Mexico$248,100—
#37Nebraska · your comparison$238,600—
#38Michigan$231,600—
#39Missouri$230,300—
#40Indiana$218,200—
#41Kansas$217,200—
#42Louisiana$216,500—
#43Ohio$214,800—
#44Alabama$209,900—
#45Iowa$208,000—
#46Kentucky$205,600—
#47Oklahoma$199,800—
#48Arkansas$188,000—
#49Mississippi$169,800—
#50West Virginia$162,600—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median gross rent

$1,072/month2020–2024 estimate

Median monthly gross rent for occupied rental units paying cash rent, including contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Other statewide housing measures

Median owner-occupied home value
$238,600
Owner costs with a mortgage
$1,736/month
Owner-occupied housing rate
66.5%
Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts estimate derived from the American Community Survey.

  • This is a statewide multi-year estimate; local rents and current asking rents can differ substantially.
  • The owner measures describe owner-occupied units and are not estimates of the current cost to purchase a home.
Nebraska · state comparison

How much income goes toward housing?

Compare moderate-or-severe and severe housing cost burdens for three distinct housing groups.

Nebraska · 2020–202445.1%
Nebraska rank#41among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark51.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Renters · spending at least 30% of income

Housing costs as a share of household income, excluding households for which a ratio cannot be computed.

Renters and owners have separate denominators. Ratios use the Census computed-income universe.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.

Lower value · 38.9%Higher value · 60.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nebraska · 45.1%2020–2024 · Rank #41 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Renters · spending at least 30% of income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Florida60.1%—
#2Hawaii56.7%—
#3Nevada55.9%—
#4California55.3%—
#5Louisiana54.8%—
#6Colorado52.9%—
#7Connecticut52.6%—
#8Oregon52.5%—
#9Georgia52.4%—
#10South Carolina52.1%—
#11New York52.1%—
#12Massachusetts51.8%—
#13Texas51.7%—
#14New Jersey51.6%—
#15Maryland51.5%—
#16Arizona51.4%—
#17Mississippi51.3%—
#18Michigan50.4%—
#19New Mexico50.2%—
#20Washington49.9%—
#21Delaware49.6%—
#22North Carolina48.9%—
#23West Virginia48.9%—
#24Tennessee48.8%—
#25Alabama48.8%—
#26Virginia48.5%—
#27Maine48.4%—
#28Vermont48.4%—
#29New Hampshire48.2%—
#30Pennsylvania48.2%—
#31Minnesota48.1%—
#32Indiana48.1%—
#33Rhode Island48%—
#34Illinois47.9%—
#35Utah47.2%—
#36Idaho46.9%—
#37Oklahoma46.3%—
#38Ohio45.9%—
#39Missouri45.6%—
#40Kentucky45.4%—
#41Nebraska · your comparison45.1%—
#42Arkansas44.8%—
#43Montana44.8%—
#44Alaska44.6%—
#45Iowa43.9%—
#46Wisconsin43.7%—
#47Kansas43.5%—
#48Wyoming43.1%—
#49South Dakota39.8%—
#50North Dakota38.9%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Nebraska · state comparison

Home prices versus income growth

Both series start at 100 in 2016. The gap describes price pressure; it is not a mortgage payment or a price-to-income ratio.

Nebraska · 2025+84.6%
Nebraska rank#23among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Home-price growth since 2016

FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016.

This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Nebraska
Home-price growth since 2016 history in Nebraska-12.7%+42.3%+97.3%20162025
2025 · Nebraska: +84.6% · Rank #23 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Nebraska Home-price growth since 2016 history
PeriodNebraskaCompare
2016+0%
2017+5.3%
2018+10%
2019+15.4%
2020+20.5%
2021+34.4%
2022+53.5%
2023+64.3%
2024+74.9%
2025+84.6%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.

Lower value · +38.2%Higher value · +141.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nebraska · +84.6%2025 · Rank #23 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at the index base (0% growth); #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Home-price growth since 2016 · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Idaho+141.7%—
#2Florida+114.5%—
#3Maine+113.7%—
#4Utah+113.6%—
#5Tennessee+112.4%—
#6Arizona+112.3%—
#7New Hampshire+110.1%—
#8Rhode Island+108%—
#9Georgia+107.6%—
#10North Carolina+107.1%—
#11Montana+106.7%—
#12Nevada+106.1%—
#13South Carolina+105.5%—
#14Washington+100.2%—
#15Indiana+94.5%—
#16Wisconsin+94%—
#17Michigan+93.7%—
#18Ohio+93.3%—
#19Vermont+92.6%—
#20New Jersey+88.9%—
#21Missouri+86.9%—
#22New York+85.9%—
#23Nebraska · your comparison+84.6%—
#24Massachusetts+84.3%—
#24South Dakota+84.3%—
#26Texas+83.3%—
#27Kentucky+83.2%—
#28Colorado+83.1%—
#29Kansas+82.5%—
#30New Mexico+82.3%—
#31Alabama+81.3%—
#32Arkansas+80.8%—
#33Connecticut+79.8%—
#34Pennsylvania+78.4%—
#35Virginia+76.5%—
#36Delaware+75.4%—
#37Oregon+74.7%—
#38California+72.7%—
#39Oklahoma+71.9%—
#40Minnesota+70%—
#41Wyoming+69.3%—
#42Illinois+65.3%—
#43Iowa+64.2%—
#44Mississippi+63.9%—
#45Hawaii+63%—
#46Maryland+59.4%—
#47West Virginia+58.6%—
#48Alaska+51.9%—
#49North Dakota+45.9%—
#50Louisiana+38.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Nebraska · state comparison

Construction, availability, and borrowing

State building activity, vacant units, mortgage performance, and borrowing rates are different measures.

Nebraska · 202510,596
Nebraska rank#34among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1,431,616Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total housing units authorized

New privately owned housing units authorized by building permits; final annual, not seasonally adjusted.

A permit is authorization, not a start or completed home. Absolute counts reflect the size of a state. Units in permit-issuing places; excludes public housing.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.

Lower value · 848Higher value · 210,217Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nebraska · 10,5962025 · Rank #34 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Total housing units authorized · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas210,217—
#2Florida178,297—
#3California103,856—
#4North Carolina86,167—
#5Georgia61,196—
#6Arizona51,532—
#7South Carolina45,862—
#8Tennessee43,374—
#9New York38,667—
#10Washington34,913—
#11Colorado33,754—
#12Ohio33,640—
#13Virginia33,094—
#14Indiana29,076—
#15New Jersey27,661—
#16Utah26,775—
#17Pennsylvania25,709—
#18Wisconsin25,569—
#19Michigan23,075—
#20Minnesota20,947—
#21Alabama19,061—
#22Illinois18,551—
#23Nevada18,540—
#24Idaho17,944—
#25Missouri17,474—
#26Oklahoma15,513—
#27Arkansas15,492—
#28Kentucky14,940—
#29Oregon14,839—
#30Louisiana14,203—
#31Iowa13,664—
#32Maryland13,358—
#33Massachusetts12,477—
#34Nebraska · your comparison10,596—
#35Kansas10,299—
#36Mississippi8,405—
#37New Mexico7,747—
#38Connecticut7,273—
#39Maine6,979—
#40Delaware6,468—
#41South Dakota5,305—
#42Montana5,258—
#43New Hampshire5,030—
#44West Virginia3,962—
#45Hawaii3,708—
#46North Dakota2,440—
#47Vermont2,294—
#48Wyoming2,238—
#49Rhode Island1,738—
#50Alaska848—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs from FactVote’s Nebraska candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

18 statements from 8 candidates

2026 Nebraska Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Ben Steffen

1 statement

Democratic · Lieutenant Governor · NE

Housing & homeownership

Nebraskans work hard for a living and should be able to afford to take care of their families. The essentials like housing, childcare, healthcare, and groceries are too expensive. I will work with state and national leaders to address our affordability crisis.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: A Different Kind of Leader for Nebraska.

Candidate campaign source

Nebraskans work hard for a living and should be able to afford to take care of their families. The essentials like housing, childcare, healthcare, and groceries are too expensive. I will work with state and national leaders to address our affordability crisis.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Ben Steffen campaign source 1 ↗

Lynne Walz

2 statements

Democratic · Governor · NE

Housing & homeownership

As an average Nebraskan, Lynne knows just how hard it can be to make ends meet. She will work with all stakeholders to build an economy that works for everyone – not just big corporations and the wealthy. As Governor, she’ll focus on business development, supporting small family farms, lowering the …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: A Different Kind of Leader for Nebraska.

Candidate campaign source

As an average Nebraskan, Lynne knows just how hard it can be to make ends meet. She will work with all stakeholders to build an economy that works for everyone – not just big corporations and the wealthy. As Governor, she’ll focus on business development, supporting small family farms, lowering the cost of housing and daycare, and cutting taxes – not with handouts or politics, but with practical solutions and Nebraska common sense.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Lynne Walz — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from Lynne Walz
Housing & homeownership

Nebraskans work hard for a living and should be able to afford to take care of their families. The essentials like housing, childcare, healthcare, and groceries are too expensive. I will work with state and national leaders to address our affordability crisis.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Nebraskans work hard for a living and should be able to afford to take care of their families. The essentials like housing, childcare, healthcare, and groceries are too expensive. I will work with state and national leaders to address our affordability crisis.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Lynne Walz — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Nebraska State Treasurer — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Joey Spellerberg

1 statement

Republican · State Treasurer · NE

Housing & homeownership

From our largest cities to our small, rural towns, housing affordability is a top concern for community leaders. It was a key issue during my time as mayor of Fremont. Now as the state’s chief financial officer, I believe we must address this challenge to keep Nebraska competitive.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: By Joey Spellerberg, Nebraska State Treasurer

Government-published candidate material

From our largest cities to our small, rural towns, housing affordability is a top concern for community leaders. It was a key issue during my time as mayor of Fremont. Now as the state’s chief financial officer, I believe we must address this challenge to keep Nebraska competitive.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Joey Spellerberg — official Nebraska office primary source 14 ↗

2026 Nebraska U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Denise Powell

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · NE

Housing & homeownership

Build more high-quality, affordable housing that is attainable for first-time homebuyers and middle-class families.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Build more high-quality, affordable housing that is attainable for first-time homebuyers and middle-class families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Denise Powell — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs terms in retained, attributed source text from published Nebraska candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Nebraska incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Nebraska legislators and Nebraska’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Nebraska’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

6 matching sponsorships or proposals · 5 Nebraska incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Bob Hallstrom

Nebraska Senate, District 1 · –NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Bob Hallstrom
Nebraska Legislature · LB 80

Adopt the Protection Orders Act, require reporting of child abuse and neglect involving military families, provide for domestic violence victims to change rental agreements and request the changing of locks, and change provisions related to landlords and tenants

May 20, 2025 · Enacted

Bob Hallstrom · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed sections 49–50 of LB 80 allow a tenant or household member subjected to domestic violence by someone who is neither a cotenant nor an occupant of the same dwelling unit to request changed locks with qualifying documentation and written notice. The landlord must act within 24 hours after receiving the written request; if it fails, the tenant may change the locks under the stated safeguards. The landlord may charge actual, reasonable lock-changing costs. This connection concerns rental access and tenant costs, not a change in the statewide rent median.

Approved by Governor on 2025-05-20. Provisions/portions of LB267 amended into LB80 by AM801. Provisions/portions of LB141 amended into LB80 by AM801. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities and fuel. Rental utility-payment duties and notice-to-vacate rules concern tenancy and housing costs without establishing a change in the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 49. (1) When an act of domestic violence is perpetrated against a tenant or household member by someone who is not a cotenant or occupant of the same dwelling unit, the tenant may require the landlord to change the lock to the tenant's dwelling unit pursuant to section 50 of this act if the tenant or household member has: (a) Obtained a protective order, restraining order, or other similar relief which applies to the perpetrator of the act of domestic violence; or (b) Obtained certification confirming domestic violence as set forth in subdivision (5)(a)(iii) of section 76-1431. (2) To have a lock changed under this section, the tenant shall: (a) Provide the landlord a copy of the documentation described in subsection (1) of this section; and (b) Provide the landlord a written notice containing the request that the locks be changed immediately. (3) The landlord shall change the locks to the tenant's dwelling unit as provided in section 50 of this act within twenty-four hours after receiving the tenant's written request. Sec. 50. (1) A landlord required to change locks under section 48 or 49 of this act shall do so by either: (a) Replacing the entire locking mechanism with a locking mechanism of equal or better quality than the lock being replaced; or (b) If the lock is in good working condition: (i) Rekeying the lock; or (ii) In the case of a keyless electronic lock, resetting the entry code. (2)(a) If a landlord fails to change the locks as required by this section, the tenant: (i) May change the locks in a workmanlike manner with locks of similar or better quality than the original lock; (ii) Shall timely notify the landlord that the locks have been changed; and (iii) Shall, by a reasonable method agreed upon by the landlord and tenant, provide the landlord with a new key or the entry code by which to access the dwelling unit. (b) This subsection applies notwithstanding any provision in the rental agreement to the contrary. (3) A landlord who installs a new lock pursuant to this section may retain a copy of the key or entry code that opens the new lock. (4) The landlord may require the tenant to pay for the actual and reasonable cost incurred by the landlord in changing the locks under this section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Mike Flood

U.S. House of Representatives, Nebraska District 1 · R–NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Mike Flood
U.S. Congress · Nebraska delegation · HR 2840

Housing Supply Frameworks Act

Apr 10, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Mike Flood · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed section 4(a)–(b) of HR 2840 would direct HUD to publish housing-production guidelines within three years after enactment and best practices for state and local zoning, with a task force and public-comment process during the first two years. This is a proposed planning step relevant to housing supply, including rental housing, not enacted zoning changes, construction or rent reductions. It remains in Congress.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities and fuel. Rental utility-payment duties and notice-to-vacate rules concern tenancy and housing costs without establishing a change in the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

4.Guidelines on State and local zoning frameworks(a)EstablishmentNot later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this section, the Assistant Secretary shall publish documents outlining guidelines and best practices to support production of adequate housing to meet the needs of communities and provide housing opportunities for individuals at every income level across communities with respect to—(1)State zoning frameworks; and(2)local zoning frameworks.(b)Consultation; public commentDuring the 2 year period beginning on the date of enactment of this section, in developing the guidelines and best practices required under the previous subsection, the Assistant Secretary shall—(1)publish draft guidelines in the Federal Register for public comment; and(2)establish a task force for the purpose of providing consultation to draft guidelines published under the previous clause, the members of which shall include—(A)planners and architects;(B)advocates with experience in affordable housing, community development efforts, and fair housing;(C)housing developers, including affordable and market-rate housing developers, manufactured housing developers, and other business interests;(D)community engagement experts and community members impacted by zoning decisions;(E)public housing authorities and transit authorities;(F)members of local zoning and planning boards and local and regional transportation planning organizations;(G)State officials responsible for housing or land use, including members of State zoning boards of appeals; (H)academic researchers; and(I)home builders.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Robert Dover

Nebraska Senate, District 19 · –NE

2 proposals
View proposals from Robert Dover
Nebraska Legislature · LB 185

Provide for electronic delivery of notices and documents under the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act and the Mobile Home Landlord and Tenant Act

Apr 7, 2025 · Enacted

Robert Dover · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed residential-tenancy provision of LB 185 permits electronic delivery of rental notices with consent, disclosure and receipt safeguards. Tenants may withdraw consent, may request paper copies, and cannot be required to accept electronic delivery as a condition of renting or renewal. The text requires other permitted delivery methods when receipt fails or an address is invalid, and leaves notice content and timing requirements intact. This changes tenancy procedures rather than setting rents.

Approved by Governor on 2025-04-07. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities and fuel. Rental utility-payment duties and notice-to-vacate rules concern tenancy and housing costs without establishing a change in the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 2. Section 76-1413, Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska, is amended to read: 76-1413 (1) A person has notice of a fact if: (a) Such person has actual knowledge of it; (b) Such person has received a notice or notification of it; or (c) From all facts and circumstances known to such person at the time in question, such person has reason to know that it exists. A person knows or has knowledge of a fact if such person has actual knowledge of it. (2) A person notifies or gives a notice or notification to another by taking steps reasonably calculated to inform the other in ordinary course whether or not the other actually comes to know of it. A person receives a notice or notification when: (a) It comes to such person's attention; (b) In the case of the landlord, it is: (i) Delivered at the place of business of the landlord through which the rental agreement was made or at any place held out by the landlord as the place for receipt of the communication; or (ii) Delivered by electronic means; or (c) In the case of the tenant, it is: (i) Delivered in hand to the tenant; (ii) Mailed to the tenant at the place held out by the tenant as the place for receipt of the communication, or in the absence of such designation, to the tenant's last-known place of residence; or (iii) Delivered by electronic means. (3) Notice, knowledge, or a notice or notification received by an organization is effective for a particular transaction from the time it is brought to the attention of the individual conducting that transaction, and in any event from the time it would have been brought to such individual's attention if the organization had exercised reasonable diligence. (4) For purposes of this section, delivered by electronic means includes: (a) Delivery to an electronic mail address at which a tenant or landlord has consented to receive notices or documents; and (b) Posting on an electronic network or site accessible via the Internet, mobile application, computer, mobile device, tablet, or any other electronic device, together with separate notice of the posting, which shall be provided by electronic mail to the address at which the tenant or landlord has consented to receive notices or documents or by any other delivery method that has been consented to by the tenant or landlord. (5) Subject to the requirements of this section, any notice to a tenant or landlord or any other document required under applicable law regarding a rental agreement or that is to serve as evidence of action regarding a rental agreement may be delivered, stored, and presented by electronic means so long as it meets the requirements of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. (6) Delivery of a notice or document by electronic means in accordance with this section shall be considered equivalent to any delivery method required under applicable law, including delivery by first-class mail, registered mail, certified mail, certificate of mailing, or a commercial mail delivery service. In any instance in which proof of receipt is required for a mailing, the electronic delivery method used shall provide for verification or acknowledgment of receipt. (7) A notice or document may be delivered by electronic means by a landlord to a tenant under this section if: (a) The tenant has affirmatively consented to such method of delivery and has not withdrawn the consent; (b) The tenant, before giving consent, is provided with a clear and conspicuous statement informing the tenant of: (i) The right of the tenant to withdraw consent to have a notice or document delivered by electronic means at any time without the imposition of any conditions or consequences; (ii) The transactions and types of notices and documents to which the tenant's consent would apply; (iii) The right of a tenant to have a notice or document delivered in paper form by mail and the means, after consent is given, by which a tenant may obtain a paper copy of a notice or document delivered by electronic means; and (iv) The procedure a tenant shall follow to withdraw consent to have a notice or document delivered by electronic means or to update the tenant's electronic mail address; (c) The tenant: (i) Before giving consent, is provided with a statement of the hardware and software requirements for access to and retention of a notice or document delivered by electronic means; and (ii) Consents electronically, or confirms consent electronically, in a manner that reasonably demonstrates that the tenant can access information in the electronic form that will be used for notices or documents delivered by electronic means as to which the tenant has given consent; and (d) After the tenant consents, if there is a change in the hardware or software requirements needed to access or retain a notice or document delivered by electronic means and such change creates a material risk that the tenant will not be able to access or retain a subsequent notice or document to which the consent applies, the landlord: (i) Provides the tenant with a statement that describes: (A) The revised hardware and software requirements for access to and retention of a notice or document delivered by electronic means; and (B) The right of the tenant to withdraw consent without the imposition of any condition or consequence; and (ii) Complies with subdivision (7)(b) of this section. (8) A notice or document may be delivered by electronic means by a tenant to a landlord under this section if the landlord has consented to delivery by electronic means with respect to such tenant. (9) A landlord shall not, as part of a rental agreement or as a condition of entering into or renewing a rental agreement, require a tenant to accept delivery by electronic means. (10) This section does not affect any requirement related to the content or timing of any notice or document required under applicable law. (11)(a) If any provision of the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act or any other applicable law requiring a notice or document to be provided to a tenant or landlord expressly requires verification or acknowledgment of receipt of the notice or document, the notice or document may be delivered by electronic means only if the method used provides for verification or acknowledgment of receipt. (b)(i) For a notice or document sent by a landlord to a tenant, if verification or acknowledgment of receipt is not obtained, the notice or document shall be sent to the tenant by mail as prescribed by the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act. If two or more electronic communications to the tenant are returned as undeliverable during a thirty-day period, all future communications shall be sent to the tenant by first-class or other mail as prescribed by law unless and until the tenant consents electronically, or confirms electronically, in a manner that reasonably demonstrates that the tenant can access information in the electronic form that will be used for notices or documents delivered by electronic means as to which the tenant has given consent. (ii) For a notice or document sent by a tenant to a landlord, if verification or acknowledgment of receipt is not obtained, the tenant shall send the notice or document by any other means prescribed by law. (12) A withdrawal of consent by a tenant or landlord does not affect the legal effectiveness, validity, or enforceability of a notice or document delivered by electronic means to the tenant or landlord before the withdrawal of consent is effective. A withdrawal of consent by a tenant or landlord is effective within a reasonable period of time after receipt of the withdrawal by the other party. Failure by a landlord to comply with subdivision (7)(d) of this section may be treated, at the election of the tenant, as a withdrawal of consent for purposes of this section. (13) The changes made to this section by this legislative bill do not apply to a notice or document delivered by electronic means before the effective date of this act to a tenant or landlord who, before such date, consented to receive notices or documents by electronic means. (14) If the consent of a tenant to receive certain notices or documents by delivery by electronic means is on file with a landlord before the effective date of this act, and pursuant to this section a landlord intends to deliver by electronic means additional notices or documents to such tenant, then prior to delivering such additional notices or documents by electronic means, the landlord shall provide the tenant with a statement that describes: (a) The notices or documents that will be delivered by electronic means that were not previously delivered electronically; and (b) The tenant's right to withdraw consent to have notices or documents delivered by electronic means without the imposition of any condition or consequence. (15) A landlord or tenant shall deliver a notice or document by any other delivery method permitted by law other than electronic means if: (a) The landlord or tenant attempts to deliver the notice or document by electronic means and has a reasonable basis for believing that the notice or document has not been received by the other party; or (b) The landlord or tenant becomes aware that the electronic mail address provided by the other party is no longer valid. (16) This section shall not be construed to modify, limit, or supersede the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. 7001 et seq., as such act existed on January 1, 2025.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Nebraska Legislature · LB 266

Prohibit political subdivisions from enacting ordinances which have the effect of imposing rent controls on private property

Apr 7, 2025 · Enacted

Robert Dover · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

LB 266 prohibits local ordinances that impose rent controls on private property, except as expressly allowed by state law. It preserves ordinances that increase affordable housing through land-use or inclusionary requirements and voluntary contractual programs restricting rents. Conflicting ordinances are declared void, including under home-rule charters. The act does not itself set a rent or demonstrate a change in median gross rent.

Approved by Governor on 2025-04-07. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities and fuel. Rental utility-payment duties and notice-to-vacate rules concern tenancy and housing costs without establishing a change in the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. (1) For purposes of this section: (a) Local government means any city, village, or county or any agency or subdivision of a city, village, or county; and (b) Ordinance means any local law, including, but not limited to, any ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulation. (2) Except as expressly permitted by other state law or by subsection (3) of this section, a local government shall not have the power to enact or enforce any ordinance which would have the effect of imposing rent controls on private property. (3) This section does not apply to an ordinance that: (a) Is adopted for the purposes of increasing the supply of affordable housing and that does so through land-use or inclusionary housing requirements; or (b) Provides for a program that a private property owner voluntarily and contractually agrees to participate in and that restricts rent and rent increases. (4) This section applies notwithstanding the provisions of any home rule charter. (5) Any ordinance in violation of this section is null and void.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Pete Ricketts

U.S. Senate, Nebraska · R–NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Pete Ricketts
U.S. Congress · Nebraska delegation · S 3968

Housing for America’s Middle Class Act of 2026

Mar 3, 2026 · In Congress

Sen. Pete Ricketts · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 3968 would require GAO to study and report to Congress within one year after enactment on affordability obstacles for households above 80% and no more than 120% of area median family income, adjusted for family size, recommend a workforce-housing definition, and examine possible program changes if additional funding were available. This is a proposed study of broader housing affordability, including the rental component, not expanded eligibility, appropriated aid or an observed rent reduction.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities and fuel. Rental utility-payment duties and notice-to-vacate rules concern tenancy and housing costs without establishing a change in the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.GAO study on workforce housing (a)In generalNot later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study and submit to the Congress a report that— (1)identifies obstacles middle-income households face when looking to secure affordable housing; (2)identifies geographic areas where housing is the most unaffordable and unavailable for middle-income households; (3)includes a list of Federal housing programs, including Federal tax credits, grants, and loan programs, that are not available to middle-income households due to their income status, including Federal housing programs designed to promote affordability; (4)recommends income and other parameters to establish a clear and consistent Federal definition for the term workforce housing for use when describing the segment of housing that could be made available to such middle-income households in Federal housing programs if funding commensurate with the additional eligibility were to be made available; and (5)analyzes how to modify or newly develop new Federal housing programs and incentives to include workforce housing if funding commensurate with the additional eligibility were to be made available. (b) Middle-Income household defined In this section, the term middle-income household means a household with an income above 80 percent but that does not exceed 120 percent of the median family income of the area, as determined by the Secretary with adjustments for smaller and larger families.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Terrell McKinney

Nebraska Senate, District 11 · –NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Terrell McKinney
Nebraska Legislature · LB 631

Change provisions relating to the Board of Parole, eligibility for parole, reentry services, post-release supervision, grant programs, and prisons, adopt the Community Work Release and Reentry Centers Act, provide for performance metrics, Parole School, book donations, and reentry career planning, and transfer the Division of Parole Supervision to the Department of Correctional Services

Apr 16, 2024 · Enacted

Terrell McKinney · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed LB 631 provisions permit the Division of Parole Supervision to place parole-eligible committed offenders in community work-release and reentry centers. NDCS may place offenders whose sentences include post-release supervision and who are within three years of release. The centers are operated by contracted nonprofit private providers; designated legislative funds may support the agreements. Required employment assistance, programming, staffing, records and individualized release plans apply, with continued correctional or parole jurisdiction. These community placements are distinct from people physically present in NDCS facilities. Authorization does not establish an actual placement, release or reduction in the measured population.

Approved by Governor on 2024-04-16. Provisions/portions of LB1145 amended into LB631 by AM3262. Provisions/portions of LB1126 amended into LB631 by AM3262. Provisions/portions of LB922 amended into LB631 by AM3262. Provisions/portions of LB348 amended into LB631 by AM3262. Provisions/portions of LB334 amended into LB631 by AM3262. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact measures average daily population physically present in NDCS facilities, not city or county jail inmates or people supervised in community placements. Work release and reentry concern possible placement pathways without proving a change in the measured population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Average daily state-correctional population. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 3. For purposes of the Community Work Release and Reentry Centers Act: (1) Advisory board means the Reentry Continuity Advisory Board established in section 17 of this act; (2) Board means the Board of Parole; (3) Committed offender has the same meaning as in section 83-170; (4) Community work release and reentry center or center means a residential home, halfway house, or other facility operated by a private provider pursuant to an agreement in writing either with the division or the department for providing housing and supervision of committed offenders placed in the center by the division for work release and for vocational training, education, programming, or behavioral health or mental health treatment; (5) Department means the Department of Correctional Services; (6) Division means the Division of Parole Supervision; (7) Individualized release plan means a detailed written plan outlining a committed offender's future vocational goals, training, employment, and needed treatment services following the committed offender's release from a community work release and reentry center; (8) Private provider means a partnership, corporation, association, joint venture, organization, or similar entity which is operated on a nonprofit basis and which, under a contract with either the division or the department, has agreed to operate a community work release and reentry center pursuant to the act; (9) Probation administration means the Office of Probation Administration; (10) Reentering person means an individual who is subject to supervision by the division or probation administration, not including juvenile probation, or who was recently in the custody of the department or a county jail and was released with no supervision; (11) Reentry housing means temporary housing for reentering persons, generally in the first year following a period of incarceration; and (12)(a) Reentry housing facility means a facility which is owned or operated by a private organization, whether nonprofit or for-profit, that receives direct payment from the board, division, probation administration, or department to provide reentry housing. (b) Reentry housing facility includes, but is not limited to, a community work release and reentry center. (c) Reentry housing facility does not include a health care facility as defined in section 71-413. Sec. 4. (1) The division may place a parole-eligible committed offender at a community work release and reentry center as provided in the Community Work Release and Reentry Centers Act. (2) Any parole-eligible committed offender placed at a community work release and reentry center pursuant to the act: (a) Shall be under the continuing jurisdiction and authority of the department and board as if the committed offender was selected for release on ordinary parole status as provided for in section 83-192; and (b) May be subsequently released by the board on ordinary parole status as provided for in section 83-192. (3) The department may place a committed offender whose sentence includes a term of post-release supervision and who is within three years of his or her release date at a community work release and reentry center as provided in the act. Any such committed offender placed at a center shall be under the continuing jurisdiction and authority of the department. Sec. 5. (1) The division and the department may exercise all powers and perform all duties necessary and proper for carrying out their responsibilities under the Community Work Release and Reentry Centers Act. (2) The division and the department may use designated funds provided by the Legislature to enter into agreements with private providers for the development and operation of community work release and reentry centers to be established at various locations throughout the state. Any such agreement shall require a private provider to: (a) Establish a contract with public or private employers to provide employment for committed offenders placed at the center; (b) Assist any committed offender placed at the center to obtain and maintain employment in the community; (c) Provide vocational training, education, programming, and treatment for issues related to the criminogenic needs of any committed offender placed at the center; and (d) Otherwise direct and supervise the activities and behavior of any committed offender placed at the center as provided in the act. (3) In an agreement under this section, the division or the department may include contractual requirements that obligate the private provider to offer to any committed offender placed at the center: (a) Specialized educational or vocational training; and (b) Other programming that will address the mental health, behavioral health, or substance abuse treatment needs of such committed offender. (4) An agreement under this section shall require the community work release and reentry center to establish programs, rules, and enforcement systems: (a) Regarding the behavior of committed offenders; (b) To ensure that committed offenders seek and retain continuous employment; (c) For the treatment of committed offenders for substance abuse; (d) To ensure that committed offenders only leave the center for purposes of work or for other specified and approved activities, including, but not limited to, job interviews, medical appointments, treatment, and outings to visit family; (e) To ensure that committed offenders consistently participate in all necessary therapy, programming, treatment, vocational training, and educational classes; and (f) To ensure that committed offenders maintain their scheduled work hours. Sec. 6. The division and the department shall set standards for the appropriate staffing levels of community work release and reentry centers. The division and the department shall require each center to: (1) Be under the supervision and control of a designated center director approved by the division or the department; (2) Be adequately staffed twenty-four hours per day, including on weekends and holidays; and (3) Assign an individual counselor to each committed offender assigned to the center. Sec. 7. (1) The division and the department shall require each community work release and reentry center to establish an individualized release plan for each committed offender assigned to the center. The staff of a center shall assist the division and the department in making reasonable advance preparations for the release of such committed offenders. (2) If a parole-eligible committed offender is released from a center, the offender shall be subject to parole conditions set by the board and under the supervision of a district parole officer assigned by the division pursuant to section 83-1,104. The individualized release plan for a parole-eligible committed offender shall be developed in coordination with the assigned district parole officer. (3) If a committed offender whose sentence includes a term of post-release supervision is released from a center, the offender shall be subject to the conditions of his or her order of post-release supervision and under the supervision of a district probation officer. The individualized release plan for such an offender shall be developed in coordination with the assigned district probation officer. Sec. 8. (1) The division and the department shall set requirements for the maintenance of the individual records of committed offenders assigned to a community work release and reentry center. (2) The division and the department shall require each community work release and reentry center to make periodic reports to the division and the department on the performance of each committed offender assigned to the center.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Nebraska officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Nebraska statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.