Nebraska · individual fact

Nebraska energy and electricity

Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.

Residential electricity price11.53¢/kWh2024 · #48 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.893/gal2026-08 · #26 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$110.282024 · #42 of 50 · highest first

Nebraska over time

Explore Nebraska readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Nebraska officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Nebraska effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Nebraska change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Residential electricity price Nebraska · source units
NebraskaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Residential electricity price2024: 11.53¢/kWh9.6¢/kWh13.54¢/kWh17.48¢/kWhNebraska, 2015: 10.6¢/kWhNebraska, 2016: 10.84¢/kWhNebraska, 2017: 10.97¢/kWhNebraska, 2018: 10.7¢/kWhNebraska, 2019: 10.77¢/kWhNebraska, 2020: 10.8¢/kWhNebraska, 2021: 10.75¢/kWhNebraska, 2022: 10.79¢/kWhNebraska, 2023: 11.2¢/kWhNebraska, 2024: 11.53¢/kWh201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 69National context · Energy Policy Act expands federal energy programs · 2005-08-08Energy Policy ActNational context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Energy law strengthens fuel economy, biofuels and efficiency · 2007-12-19Fuel / efficiency lawNational context · Global oil and energy prices surge · 2008-07-15Oil-price surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Recovery Act funds grid modernization and clean energy · 2009-02-17Recovery Act energyNational context · EPA signs greenhouse-gas endangerment finding · 2009-12-07GHG findingNational context · Deepwater Horizon explosion and oil spill · 2010-04-20Deepwater HorizonNational context · Fukushima accident prompts U.S. nuclear safety response · 2011-03-11Fukushima safetyNational context · Global demand and Middle East unrest pressure oil prices · 2011-04-112011 oil pressuresNational context · Hurricane Sandy disrupts electricity and fuel distribution · 2012-10-29Hurricane SandyNational context · Polar vortex strains gas supplies and power systems · 2014-01-07Polar vortexNational context · Oil supply growth and OPEC decision deepen price collapse · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Clean Power Plan announced; implementation later stayed · 2015-08-03Clean Power PlanNational context · Congress lifts longstanding crude-oil export restrictions · 2015-12-18Crude export rulesNational context · First LNG export cargo from the Lower 48 · 2016-02-24Lower 48 LNG exportsNational context · Shale development transforms U.S. oil supply · 2016-03-15Shale expansionNational context · Natural gas overtakes coal in annual electricity generation · 2016-12-31Gas overtakes coalNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · Attacks on Saudi oil facilities interrupt global supply · 2019-09-14Saudi oil attacksNational context · United States becomes an annual net total energy exporter · 2019-12-31Net energy exporterNational context · COVID-19 sharply reduces energy demand · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Expiring WTI oil futures settle below zero · 2020-04-20Negative WTI futuresNational context · Western heat wave leads to California rotating outages · 2020-08-14California outagesNational context · OPEC+ supply cuts help rebalance the pandemic oil market · 2020-09-23OPEC+ supply cutsNational context · Severe winter weather disrupts Texas and regional energy systems · 2021-02-08Winter Storm UriNational context · Cyberattack interrupts Colonial Pipeline fuel deliveries · 2021-05-07Colonial PipelineNational context · Infrastructure law funds grid and energy projects · 2021-11-15Infrastructure energyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Large Strategic Petroleum Reserve release announced · 2022-03-31SPR releaseNational context · Freeport LNG fire shuts a major export terminal · 2022-06-08Freeport LNG outageNational context · Inflation Reduction Act expands energy incentives · 2022-08-16IRA energy incentivesNational context · Winter Storm Elliott disrupts gas and power supplies · 2022-12-21Winter Storm ElliottNational context · Renewables exceed coal in annual electric power sector generation · 2022-12-31Renewables pass coalNebraska · Nebraska tornadoes damage homes, farms and power lines, with two surveyed injuries · 2023-05-12Nebraska May 2023 tornadoesNebraska · Nebraska windstorm and embedded tornadoes damage homes, crops and power infrastructure · 2023-07-12Nebraska July 2023 windstormNational context · Vogtle expansion adds new nuclear generation · 2023-07-31Vogtle nuclear unitsNebraska · Nebraska issues Executive Order 24-01: Emergency fuel-hauling driving-time relief during extreme cold · 2024-01-12Nebraska Order 24-01Nebraska · Nebraska issues Executive Order 24-02: Emergency electricity-production measures during extreme cold · 2024-01-17Nebraska Order 24-02National context · Red Sea attacks reroute oil and gas shipping · 2024-02-01Red Sea shippingNational context · EPA finalizes new power-plant greenhouse-gas rules · 2024-04-25Power-plant GHG ruleNebraska · Nebraska tornado outbreak damages homes, power lines and a manufacturing facility · 2024-04-26Nebraska April 2024 tornadoesNebraska · Nebraska storms damage homes, power lines and a road-supply building · 2024-05-06Nebraska May 6 stormsNational context · FERC adopts long-term regional transmission planning rule · 2024-05-13Transmission planningNebraska · Nebraska storms flood homes and roads and damage farms and power lines · 2024-05-20Nebraska May 2024 floodingNebraska · Derecho and tornadoes damage Nebraska homes, utilities and farm infrastructure · 2024-05-24Nebraska May 2024 derechoNebraska · Damaging winds affect Nebraska homes, businesses and power infrastructure · 2024-07-31Nebraska July 2024 windstormNational context · DOE report documents growing data-center electricity demand · 2024-12-20Data-center demandNational context · President declares energy emergency and directs policy changes · 2025-01-20Energy emergencyNebraska · Nebraska blizzard damages power infrastructure and closes highways · 2025-03-19Nebraska March 2025 blizzardNational context · U.S. tariff announcement changes energy trade context · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · EPA proposes repeal of power-sector greenhouse-gas rules · 2025-06-11Power-rule proposalNational context · Tax law accelerates several energy-credit expirations · 2025-07-04Energy tax changesNebraska · Nebraska storms damage homes and power infrastructure, with reported casualties · 2025-08-09Nebraska August 2025 stormsNebraska · Nebraska issues Order 26-01: Power-demand emergency measures · 2026-01-23NE Order 26-01National context · EPA finalizes endangerment and vehicle GHG standard rescission · 2026-02-12Vehicle GHG repealNational context · EPA announces repeal of 2024 power-plant air-toxics amendments · 2026-02-20Air-toxics amendmentsNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shockNational context · IEA members agree to emergency oil-stock release · 2026-03-11Emergency oil stocksNebraska · Nebraska approves LB1010: large-load electricity, storage and data-center rules · 2026-04-14Nebraska LB1010 approvalNebraska · Nebraska approves LB1261: Conditional eminent-domain protection for large-load private generation · 2026-04-14Nebraska LB1261Nebraska · Nebraska approves LB1261A: Power Review Board appropriation for LB1261 · 2026-04-14Nebraska LB1261ANebraska · Eastern Nebraska storms damage homes and farms, with reported outages and flooding · 2026-05-15Nebraska May stormsNebraska · Eastern Nebraska storms bring reported home damage, an injury and power-line damage · 2026-06-11Nebraska June stormsNebraska · Nebraska’s LB1010 large-load, storage-tax and data-center provisions take effect · 2026-07-18Nebraska LB1010 effectiveNebraska · Nebraska’s current section 70-670 takes effect with conditional generation protection · 2026-07-18Nebraska generation provision effectiveNebraska · Nebraska issues Order 26-17: Economic-development incentive review and data-center task force · 2026-07-20NE Order 26-17National context · FERC and NERC report improved winter grid preparedness · 2026-09-10Winter grid reviewNebraska · Nebraska issues Order 26-21: Temporary diesel relief and agricultural motor-fuel refund claims · 2026-09-24NE Order 26-21● Nebraska Legislature · 53● U.S. Congress · Nebraska delegation · 2◆ Governor · 103■ Nebraska agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-09-30

17 of 17 reviewed Nebraska actions match · 13 date markers shown. 69 major events shown separately.

Nebraska · 2024: 11.53¢/kWh · Rank #48 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Nebraska, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Nebraska Residential electricity price · source units
PeriodNebraskaRankU.S. benchmark
202411.53¢/kWh#48 of 5016.48¢/kWh
202311.2¢/kWh#46 of 50Not available
202210.79¢/kWh#48 of 50Not available
202110.75¢/kWh#47 of 50Not available
202010.8¢/kWh#42 of 50Not available
201910.77¢/kWh#43 of 50Not available
201810.7¢/kWh#42 of 50Not available
201710.97¢/kWh#38 of 50Not available
201610.84¢/kWh#40 of 50Not available
201510.6¢/kWh#41 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Nebraska · state comparison

Household energy prices

Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.

Nebraska · 202411.53¢/kWh
Nebraska rank#48among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential electricity price

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside Nebraska, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Nebraska
Residential electricity price history in Nebraska9.72¢/kWh13.54¢/kWh17.36¢/kWh20152024
2024 · Nebraska: 11.53¢/kWh · Rank #48 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Nebraska Residential electricity price history
PeriodNebraskaCompare
201510.6¢/kWh
201610.84¢/kWh
201710.97¢/kWh
201810.7¢/kWh
201910.77¢/kWh
202010.8¢/kWh
202110.75¢/kWh
202210.79¢/kWh
202311.2¢/kWh
202411.53¢/kWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nebraska · 11.53¢/kWh2024 · Rank #48 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii42.86¢/kWh—
#2California31.97¢/kWh—
#3Massachusetts29.35¢/kWh—
#4Connecticut28.75¢/kWh—
#5Rhode Island28.65¢/kWh—
#6Alaska24.82¢/kWh—
#7New York24.43¢/kWh—
#8Maine24.29¢/kWh—
#9New Hampshire23.4¢/kWh—
#10Vermont21.9¢/kWh—
#11New Jersey19.34¢/kWh—
#12Michigan19.3¢/kWh—
#13Maryland17.86¢/kWh—
#14Pennsylvania17.77¢/kWh—
#15Wisconsin17.18¢/kWh—
#16Delaware16.57¢/kWh—
#17Ohio15.99¢/kWh—
#18Illinois15.87¢/kWh—
#19Minnesota15.45¢/kWh—
#20Alabama15.18¢/kWh—
#21West Virginia15.07¢/kWh—
#22Nevada15¢/kWh—
#23Texas14.94¢/kWh—
#24Colorado14.92¢/kWh—
#25Arizona14.91¢/kWh—
#26Indiana14.77¢/kWh—
#27Oregon14.7¢/kWh—
#28Virginia14.41¢/kWh—
#29South Carolina14.23¢/kWh—
#30New Mexico14.2¢/kWh—
#31Kansas14.15¢/kWh—
#32Florida14.14¢/kWh—
#33North Carolina14.13¢/kWh—
#34Georgia14.08¢/kWh—
#35Iowa13.4¢/kWh—
#36Mississippi13.39¢/kWh—
#37Missouri12.91¢/kWh—
#38South Dakota12.86¢/kWh—
#39Kentucky12.79¢/kWh—
#40Montana12.66¢/kWh—
#41Wyoming12.47¢/kWh—
#42Tennessee12.42¢/kWh—
#43Arkansas12.32¢/kWh—
#44Oklahoma12.24¢/kWh—
#45Utah12.22¢/kWh—
#46Washington11.9¢/kWh—
#47Louisiana11.73¢/kWh—
#48Nebraska · your comparison11.53¢/kWh—
#49Idaho11.52¢/kWh—
#50North Dakota11.51¢/kWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Midwest regular gasoline price

$3.89/galWeek of September 7, 2026

Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's Midwest region, including taxes. The region contains Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Recent EIA observations

Prior week
$3.847/gal
Weekly change
+4.7¢
One year earlier
$3.055/gal
Change from one year earlier
+83.9¢
Method and limitations

FactVote uses EIA’s Midwest series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes Nebraska. Changes are calculated from the published August 31, 2026 (prior week), and September 8, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.

  • EIA does not publish a current Nebraska statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This Midwest regional estimate should not be read as Nebraska’s statewide average.
  • The regional average combines Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Nebraska community.
  • Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
  • Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Nebraska · state comparison

What are households paying for electricity?

Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.

Nebraska · 2024$110.28
Nebraska rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Average monthly residential electricity bill

State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.

Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Nebraska
Average monthly residential electricity bill history in Nebraska$86.73$118.12$149.520102024
2024 · Nebraska: $110.28 · Rank #42 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Nebraska Average monthly residential electricity bill history
PeriodNebraskaCompare
2010$93.97
2011$95.92
2012$100.46
2013$106.65
2014$106.33
2015$101.96
2016$105.47
2017$104.96
2018$109.27
2019$108.08
2020$109.39
2021$108.09
2022$112.57
2023$111.52
2024$110.28

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.

Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nebraska · $110.282024 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii$212.12—
#2Connecticut$199.66—
#3Alabama$173.5—
#4Massachusetts$167.2—
#5Maryland$165.87—
#6Texas$163.72—
#7Rhode Island$162.4—
#8California$160.86—
#9Arizona$160.24—
#10Florida$156.09—
#11Mississippi$154.83—
#12West Virginia$154.76—
#13Georgia$151.25—
#14Delaware$150.87—
#15South Carolina$149.51—
#16Virginia$148.77—
#17Pennsylvania$145.17—
#18New Hampshire$144.87—
#19Alaska$143.54—
#20North Carolina$143.5—
#21Tennessee$143.32—
#22Louisiana$140.96—
#23New York$139.53—
#24Nevada$139.39—
#25Ohio$135.16—
#26Kentucky$133.81—
#27Maine$133.6—
#28Indiana$133.06—
#29Oklahoma$132.05—
#30Oregon$129.62—
#31Missouri$129.18—
#32Arkansas$129.13—
#33New Jersey$128.13—
#34South Dakota$127.81—
#35Vermont$125.66—
#36Kansas$123.9—
#37Michigan$119.31—
#38North Dakota$118.38—
#39Washington$113.68—
#40Iowa$111.54—
#41Wisconsin$110.87—
#42Nebraska · your comparison$110.28—
#43Minnesota$110.06—
#44Illinois$109.99—
#45Idaho$108.73—
#46Montana$107.91—
#47Wyoming$107.65—
#48Colorado$100.57—
#49Utah$94.57—
#50New Mexico$92.88—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Nebraska · state comparison

What generates Nebraska electricity?

Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.

Nebraska · 202437.3 TWh
Nebraska rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total electricity generation

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside Nebraska, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Nebraska
Total electricity generation history in Nebraska34.6 TWh38 TWh41.5 TWh20152024
2024 · Nebraska: 37.3 TWh · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Nebraska Total electricity generation history
PeriodNebraskaCompare
201539.9 TWh
201636.5 TWh
201735.4 TWh
201837 TWh
201937.3 TWh
202036.8 TWh
202137.9 TWh
202240.7 TWh
202339.4 TWh
202437.3 TWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nebraska · 37.3 TWh2024 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas571.5 TWh—
#2Florida270.7 TWh—
#3California245.9 TWh—
#4Pennsylvania242.5 TWh—
#5Illinois186.7 TWh—
#6Ohio143.3 TWh—
#7Alabama142.9 TWh—
#8Georgia140.4 TWh—
#9North Carolina135.9 TWh—
#10New York133.5 TWh—
#11Michigan124.5 TWh—
#12Arizona121.5 TWh—
#13Virginia103.7 TWh—
#14Washington103 TWh—
#15South Carolina101.1 TWh—
#16Louisiana100 TWh—
#17Indiana97.4 TWh—
#18Oklahoma94.3 TWh—
#19Mississippi77.4 TWh—
#20Tennessee76.3 TWh—
#21Iowa70.9 TWh—
#22Missouri67.6 TWh—
#23Kentucky67.1 TWh—
#24Wisconsin65.6 TWh—
#25Oregon65.3 TWh—
#26New Jersey63.6 TWh—
#27Arkansas62.1 TWh—
#28Colorado60.8 TWh—
#29Minnesota59 TWh—
#30Kansas57.9 TWh—
#31West Virginia50.7 TWh—
#32Nevada47.6 TWh—
#33Connecticut46.2 TWh—
#34North Dakota42.6 TWh—
#35Wyoming40.7 TWh—
#36New Mexico40.5 TWh—
#37Nebraska · your comparison37.3 TWh—
#38Maryland36.9 TWh—
#39Utah36.1 TWh—
#40Montana27 TWh—
#41Massachusetts25 TWh—
#42South Dakota20.9 TWh—
#43Idaho20.3 TWh—
#44New Hampshire17.3 TWh—
#45Maine15.7 TWh—
#46Hawaii10.7 TWh—
#47Rhode Island10.1 TWh—
#48Alaska6.7 TWh—
#49Delaware5 TWh—
#50Vermont2.5 TWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Electricity generated from renewable resources

36.0%2024

Share of electricity generated at Nebraska facilities from renewable energy resources during 2024.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Recalculation inputs

Renewable generation
13.41 million MWh
Total in-state generation
37.29 million MWh

Shares of renewable generation

Wind
88.7% of renewable generation
Hydropower
8.8% of renewable generation
Solar
1.9% of renewable generation
Other biomass
0.6% of renewable generation
Method and limitations

FactVote summed EIA Table 5 utility-scale hydroelectric, wind, solar, wood, and other-biomass generation with EIA Table 19 estimated small-scale solar generation, then divided by utility-scale total generation plus small-scale solar and rounded to one decimal place.

  • This measures in-state electricity generation, not total energy consumption or the generation mix of imported electricity.
  • EIA notes that independently rounded table components may not equal published totals exactly. The resource breakdown uses renewable generation—not total generation—as its denominator, and the percentages do not by themselves measure emissions, reliability, affordability, or land use.
Nebraska · state comparison

Affordability, reliability, emissions, and demand

Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.

Nebraska · 2024697.8 min/year
Nebraska rank#11among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Outage minutes per customer · all events

EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.

Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Nebraska
Outage minutes per customer · all events history in Nebraska-24.9 min/year383.6 min/year792.1 min/year20232024
2024 · Nebraska: 697.8 min/year · Rank #11 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Nebraska Outage minutes per customer · all events history
PeriodNebraskaCompare
202369.4 min/year
2024697.8 min/year

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.

Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nebraska · 697.8 min/year2024 · Rank #11 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1South Carolina3,155 min/year—
#2Maine1,748.6 min/year—
#3Texas1,614.3 min/year—
#4North Carolina1,518.1 min/year—
#5Florida1,487.6 min/year—
#6Georgia1,208.1 min/year—
#7West Virginia1,165.5 min/year—
#8Virginia962.1 min/year—
#9Vermont895.8 min/year—
#10New Hampshire735.5 min/year—
#11Nebraska · your comparison697.8 min/year—
#12Washington643.5 min/year—
#13Louisiana630.6 min/year—
#14Mississippi607.3 min/year—
#15Oregon579.3 min/year—
#16Kentucky537.7 min/year—
#17Arkansas527.8 min/year—
#18Ohio511 min/year—
#19Michigan481.7 min/year—
#20New York477.3 min/year—
#21Hawaii382.6 min/year—
#22Pennsylvania353.1 min/year—
#23Montana341.7 min/year—
#24Alaska323.2 min/year—
#25Indiana310 min/year—
#26Wisconsin296.8 min/year—
#27Kansas289.8 min/year—
#28Tennessee289.3 min/year—
#29California285 min/year—
#30New Mexico272.6 min/year—
#31Colorado257 min/year—
#32Minnesota222.4 min/year—
#33Oklahoma220.7 min/year—
#34Missouri212.6 min/year—
#35Idaho204.4 min/year—
#36Iowa200.3 min/year—
#37Alabama197.7 min/year—
#38New Jersey173.3 min/year—
#39Nevada158.9 min/year—
#40Illinois158 min/year—
#41Connecticut152.8 min/year—
#42Wyoming137.8 min/year—
#43Maryland118.1 min/year—
#44Delaware117.9 min/year—
#45Utah115.4 min/year—
#46Rhode Island104.3 min/year—
#47Massachusetts103.7 min/year—
#48North Dakota102.7 min/year—
#49South Dakota85.6 min/year—
#50Arizona83.6 min/year—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Nebraska · state comparison

Who uses energy?

Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.

Nebraska · 2024128.9 trillion Btu
Nebraska rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential energy consumption

Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).

2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.

Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nebraska · 128.9 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas1,514 trillion Btu—
#2Florida1,183.3 trillion Btu—
#3California1,147.1 trillion Btu—
#4New York968.3 trillion Btu—
#5Pennsylvania819.3 trillion Btu—
#6Illinois817.1 trillion Btu—
#7Ohio767.4 trillion Btu—
#8Georgia717.1 trillion Btu—
#9North Carolina662.2 trillion Btu—
#10Michigan661.4 trillion Btu—
#11New Jersey550.1 trillion Btu—
#12Virginia526 trillion Btu—
#13Tennessee492 trillion Btu—
#14Indiana475.6 trillion Btu—
#15Missouri459 trillion Btu—
#16Arizona413.7 trillion Btu—
#17Massachusetts379 trillion Btu—
#18Wisconsin375.9 trillion Btu—
#19South Carolina370.7 trillion Btu—
#20Maryland357.2 trillion Btu—
#21Minnesota346.2 trillion Btu—
#22Alabama331.6 trillion Btu—
#23Washington330.2 trillion Btu—
#24Kentucky319 trillion Btu—
#25Colorado311.9 trillion Btu—
#26Louisiana282.6 trillion Btu—
#27Connecticut235.3 trillion Btu—
#28Oklahoma231 trillion Btu—
#29Arkansas209.5 trillion Btu—
#30Utah190.7 trillion Btu—
#31Mississippi179.7 trillion Btu—
#32Oregon173.1 trillion Btu—
#33Kansas166.4 trillion Btu—
#34Iowa162 trillion Btu—
#35Nevada153.3 trillion Btu—
#36West Virginia141 trillion Btu—
#37Nebraska · your comparison128.9 trillion Btu—
#38Idaho111.2 trillion Btu—
#39New Mexico98.1 trillion Btu—
#40New Hampshire91.8 trillion Btu—
#41Maine80.5 trillion Btu—
#42Montana73.9 trillion Btu—
#43Delaware62.6 trillion Btu—
#44North Dakota61.3 trillion Btu—
#45Rhode Island61 trillion Btu—
#46Alaska49.1 trillion Btu—
#47Wyoming45.5 trillion Btu—
#48South Dakota44.2 trillion Btu—
#49Vermont32.7 trillion Btu—
#50Hawaii29.5 trillion Btu—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Nebraska · state comparison

Energy-related carbon emissions

Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.

Nebraska · 202443.54 Mt CO₂
Nebraska rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total energy-related CO₂ emissions

Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.

2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.

Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nebraska · 43.54 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas679.93 Mt CO₂—
#2California315.98 Mt CO₂—
#3Florida230.85 Mt CO₂—
#4Pennsylvania201.57 Mt CO₂—
#5Louisiana186.89 Mt CO₂—
#6Ohio186.34 Mt CO₂—
#7Illinois163.98 Mt CO₂—
#8New York163.69 Mt CO₂—
#9Indiana152.3 Mt CO₂—
#10Michigan143.11 Mt CO₂—
#11Georgia127.83 Mt CO₂—
#12North Carolina119.07 Mt CO₂—
#13Kentucky106.87 Mt CO₂—
#14Alabama104.32 Mt CO₂—
#15Virginia99.24 Mt CO₂—
#16Missouri98.03 Mt CO₂—
#17Tennessee90.46 Mt CO₂—
#18Oklahoma88.56 Mt CO₂—
#19New Jersey87.84 Mt CO₂—
#20Wisconsin85.12 Mt CO₂—
#21Arizona82.2 Mt CO₂—
#22Colorado79.57 Mt CO₂—
#23Minnesota77.89 Mt CO₂—
#24Washington73.81 Mt CO₂—
#25West Virginia72.28 Mt CO₂—
#26South Carolina70.81 Mt CO₂—
#27Iowa65.23 Mt CO₂—
#28Mississippi64.75 Mt CO₂—
#29Arkansas58.42 Mt CO₂—
#30Massachusetts58.07 Mt CO₂—
#31North Dakota55.15 Mt CO₂—
#32Kansas55.09 Mt CO₂—
#33Utah55.03 Mt CO₂—
#34Wyoming50 Mt CO₂—
#35Maryland48.77 Mt CO₂—
#36Alaska44.01 Mt CO₂—
#37Nebraska · your comparison43.54 Mt CO₂—
#38New Mexico41.63 Mt CO₂—
#39Nevada39.28 Mt CO₂—
#40Oregon38.94 Mt CO₂—
#41Connecticut37.09 Mt CO₂—
#42Montana27.16 Mt CO₂—
#43Idaho21.11 Mt CO₂—
#44Hawaii17.96 Mt CO₂—
#45Maine15.99 Mt CO₂—
#46South Dakota15.11 Mt CO₂—
#47New Hampshire13.6 Mt CO₂—
#48Delaware11.52 Mt CO₂—
#49Rhode Island11.05 Mt CO₂—
#50Vermont5.36 Mt CO₂—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Nebraska candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

10 statements from 6 candidates

2026 Nebraska U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Brinker Harding

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · NE

Energy & electricity

Pass year-round E-15 to help lower gas prices and support Nebraska agriculture

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Agriculture and rural communities

Candidate campaign source

Pass year-round E-15 to help lower gas prices and support Nebraska agriculture

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Brinker Harding — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Denise Powell

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · NE

Energy & electricity

Expand clean energy production to bring down costs in the short term while protecting our environment in the long run.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Civil rights and constitutional government

Candidate campaign source

Expand clean energy production to bring down costs in the short term while protecting our environment in the long run.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Denise Powell — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Nebraska U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 6 statements

Adrian Smith

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 3 · NE

Energy & electricity

As American families make travel plans and assess energy costs for their farms and businesses during the summer, it is as important as ever to champion domestic production of affordable fuels. While gasoline prices in Nebraska are down 5.6 percent from this time a year ago, and diesel prices are dow…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: More on Transportation

Candidate campaign source

As American families make travel plans and assess energy costs for their farms and businesses during the summer, it is as important as ever to champion domestic production of affordable fuels. While gasoline prices in Nebraska are down 5.6 percent from this time a year ago, and diesel prices are down 5.8 percent, tensions around the world put supply chains and energy security at risk.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Adrian Smith campaign source 24 ↗

Mark Cohen

5 statements

Independent · U.S. House District 3 · NE

Energy & electricity

Global warming is real, it's accelerating, and it directly threatens Nebraska agriculture — your future, and your family's livelihood. Extreme weather cost Nebraska $2 billion in damages in 2024 alone. The atmospheric carbon dioxide level is higher than at any point in at least 650,000 years, and th…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Agriculture and rural communities

Candidate campaign source

Global warming is real, it's accelerating, and it directly threatens Nebraska agriculture — your future, and your family's livelihood. Extreme weather cost Nebraska $2 billion in damages in 2024 alone. The atmospheric carbon dioxide level is higher than at any point in at least 650,000 years, and the rate of increase is accelerating. This isn't political opinion; it's ice core data. You can't grow crops in dust and floodwater. I believe fossil fuels are a necessary bridge while we transition to cleaner energy, but pretending the problem doesn't exist is not a bridge — it's a cliff.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Mark Cohen — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 4 more statements from Mark Cohen
Energy & electricity

While this administration attempts to look tough by sending National Guard units to Portland and ordering our warships to blow tiny boats out of the water based on questionable evidence, America should be preparing for potential Russian EMP or cyberattacks. Our power grid is outdated and highly susc…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Technology and cybersecurity

Candidate campaign source

While this administration attempts to look tough by sending National Guard units to Portland and ordering our warships to blow tiny boats out of the water based on questionable evidence, America should be preparing for potential Russian EMP or cyberattacks. Our power grid is outdated and highly susceptible to cyberattacks, EMPs, and physical threats, which could have disastrous consequences. However, for reasons unknown, this administration suspended offensive cyber operations against Russia, raising concerns about vulnerability to cyber threats from Moscow.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Mark Cohen — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Energy & electricity

I'll be honest — I'm far more concerned about whether America is prepared for a Russian electromagnetic pulse attack on our power grid than I am about who uses which restroom. The solution is simple: build single-occupancy bathrooms in public buildings. Problem solved. We could put one in every publ…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

I'll be honest — I'm far more concerned about whether America is prepared for a Russian electromagnetic pulse attack on our power grid than I am about who uses which restroom. The solution is simple: build single-occupancy bathrooms in public buildings. Problem solved. We could put one in every public school in America for about $1.4 billion — less than what Congress routinely adds to a single defense bill without blinking. That’s a fraction of the $40 billion this administration arranged to provide to Argentinian ranchers. Let's stop using this issue to frighten people and focus on the real problems facing people in greater Nebraska.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Mark Cohen — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Energy & electricity

We can’t switch off fossil fuels tomorrow. Fossil fuels are a necessary bridge while we work toward cleaner energy — energy sources that don't poison our soils, pollute our waters, or cause cancer. But a bridge must lead somewhere. We need leaders who will invest in that transition honestly rather t…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure

Candidate campaign source

We can’t switch off fossil fuels tomorrow. Fossil fuels are a necessary bridge while we work toward cleaner energy — energy sources that don't poison our soils, pollute our waters, or cause cancer. But a bridge must lead somewhere. We need leaders who will invest in that transition honestly rather than pretending there's no river to cross.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Mark Cohen — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Energy & electricity

There is also a bubble risk that we must take seriously. Economists watching the AI buildout — including MIT research fellow Paul Kedrosky — compare it to prior speculative booms: prodigious capital spending, circular revenue arrangements, and an extractive model that produces declining returns over…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

There is also a bubble risk that we must take seriously. Economists watching the AI buildout — including MIT research fellow Paul Kedrosky — compare it to prior speculative booms: prodigious capital spending, circular revenue arrangements, and an extractive model that produces declining returns over time. Data center equipment depreciates on an accelerated schedule. The company captures its tax benefit early, writes down the assets, and moves on. Nebraska is left with a depleted aquifer and a stranded power grid.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Mark Cohen — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Nebraska U.S. Senate — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Dan Osborn

1 statement

Independent · U.S. Senate · NE

Energy & electricity

Ban Data Center Giveaways: Our leaders are throwing subsidies and tax incentives at data centers, which jack up energy prices for consumers and make our communities unpleasant to live in without giving anything back. There’s a reason that these data centers are so unpopular everywhere they’re being …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Technology and cybersecurity

Candidate campaign source

Ban Data Center Giveaways: Our leaders are throwing subsidies and tax incentives at data centers, which jack up energy prices for consumers and make our communities unpleasant to live in without giving anything back. There’s a reason that these data centers are so unpopular everywhere they’re being built.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Osborn — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗

Pete Ricketts

1 statement

Republican · U.S. Senate · NE

Energy & electricity

Promote safe and reliable nuclear energy as part of an all-of-the-above energy mix.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Nuclear Energy

Government-published candidate material

Promote safe and reliable nuclear energy as part of an all-of-the-above energy mix.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Pete Ricketts — official government primary source 8 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Nebraska candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Nebraska incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Nebraska legislators and Nebraska’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Nebraska’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

7 matching sponsorships or proposals · 5 Nebraska incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Barry DeKay

Nebraska Senate, District 40 · –NE

3 proposals
View proposals from Barry DeKay
Nebraska Legislature · LB 1261

Conditional eminent-domain protection for large-load private generation

Apr 14, 2026 · Approved by governor April 14, 2026

Barry DeKay · Introduced by request

Reviewed complete enacted law

Governor Jim Pillen approved LB1261 on April 14, 2026. Senator Barry DeKay introduced it at the governor’s request; the enacted heading also names Holdcroft and F. Meyer. The June 2 event was a ceremonial signing. The current official version of section 70-670 lists July 18, 2026 as its effective date. The new subsection protects a privately owned generation facility from acquisition by eminent domain by consumer-owned utilities only when it serves an industrial customer at a single site with new electric load greater than 1,000 megawatts and meets every stated condition. It is not limited by its text to data centers, and the threshold excludes a load of exactly 1,000 MW. The facility must be on or adjacent to the customer’s site, have an electrically equivalent grid-interconnection point and receive Nebraska Power Review Board approval. The private supplier, local retail utility, applicable wholesale supplier responsible for regional resource adequacy, and applicable transmission owner must execute the required long-term commercial agreement. The utility governing bodies must approve the contract. It must preserve retail-service and applicable wholesale contractual rights, provide benefits acceptable to the utilities, prohibit the industrial customer from reselling electricity and waive eminent domain over the generation assets for the contract’s duration. The industrial customer must pay all project-related costs, fees, congestion fees and electric-system upgrade costs incurred by covered utilities. Generation may serve only that customer unless the contracting utilities approve a waiver through their governing bodies. Eligible contracts must be entered into on or before December 31, 2031; that cutoff does not make every contract or the whole law expire that day. The new protection is subsection (5); the carried-forward powers and exceptions in subsections (1)–(4) are not all new LB1261 provisions. The current statute also incorporates LB1010’s storage amendment. LB1010’s complete enacted original and the correlated storage amendment have now been reviewed separately. The verified current identities of Rick Holdcroft and Fred Meyer, whose names appear on LB1261’s heading, do not establish primary LB1261 sponsorship. Other underlying acts, subsequent instruments and actual implementation remain separate reviews. These sources do not establish a completed project, a utility rate reduction or an end to data-center incentive eligibility. The law changes eminent-domain protection for qualifying privately owned generation, with Power Review Board approval, utility-contract requirements and project-cost responsibilities.

Approved April 14, 2026; enacted provisions verified. Provision-specific commencement, later changes and implementation remain separate.

Why this record is included

The law changes eminent-domain protection for qualifying privately owned generation, with Power Review Board approval, utility-contract requirements and project-cost responsibilities.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: energy · reviewed policy context · cpi · reviewed policy context · real-gdp · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Governor Jim Pillen approved LB1261 on April 14, 2026. Senator Barry DeKay introduced it at the governor’s request; the enacted heading also names Holdcroft and F. Meyer. The June 2 event was a ceremonial signing. The current official version of section 70-670 lists July 18, 2026 as its effective date.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Nebraska Legislature · LB 1261A

Power Review Board appropriation for LB1261

Apr 14, 2026 · Approved by governor April 14, 2026

Barry DeKay · Sponsored

Reviewed complete enacted law

Governor Jim Pillen approved LB1261A on April 14, 2026. Senator Barry DeKay introduced the companion appropriation bill on March 19. It appropriates $4,750 from the Nebraska Power Review Fund for FY2026–27 and $4,750 for FY2027–28 to the Nebraska Power Review Board, Program 72, to carry out LB1261. The appropriation cannot fund permanent or temporary state-employee salaries or per diems. It is a Power Review Fund appropriation, not a General Fund appropriation, a customer rebate or evidence of a payment already made. A separate commencement date for this appropriation has not been verified here. The original fiscal note estimates more hearings, with a rough average cost of $950 per hearing and a scenario of up to five applications and hearings, especially in the first two or three years. Its analyst table also estimates $4,750 for FY2028–29. Those are forecasts; the enacted companion appropriates only for FY2026–27 and FY2027–28, and does not establish that five hearings or those expenditures occurred. The appropriation supports the Power Review Board in carrying out LB1261; it does not itself approve a generation project.

Approved April 14, 2026; enacted provisions verified. Provision-specific commencement, later changes and implementation remain separate.

Why this record is included

The appropriation supports the Power Review Board in carrying out LB1261; it does not itself approve a generation project.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: energy · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Governor Jim Pillen approved LB1261A on April 14, 2026. Senator Barry DeKay introduced the companion appropriation bill on March 19. It appropriates $4,750 from the Nebraska Power Review Fund for FY2026–27 and $4,750 for FY2027–28 to the Nebraska Power Review Board, Program 72, to carry out LB1261.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Nebraska Legislature · LB 43

Change provisions relating to notice and certification requirements for electric generation facilities, transmission lines, and privately developed renewable energy generation facilities located near military installations

Feb 25, 2025 · Enacted

Barry DeKay · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed LB 43 provision requires notice or certification at least 30 days before construction of privately developed renewable-energy facilities within ten miles of a military installation. The new definition covers specified Air Force missile silos and bases through the cited federal regulations. Owners may certify continuing absence of foreign-adversary electronic equipment after vendor consultation, or use the specified NERC grid-security compliance option where its voltage and capacity conditions apply. They must notify the Nebraska Power Review Board of later noncompliance. A board-approved foreign-equipment exception requires both no reasonable procurement alternative and greater harm from nonuse. The act concerns renewable-facility development conditions, not demonstrated construction or generation.

Approved by Governor on 2025-02-25. Provisions/portions of LB35 amended into LB43 by AM215. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact measures the renewable share of electricity generated at Nebraska facilities. Siting and equipment requirements concern renewable generation development. Transportation ethanol, storage alone and electricity imported from other states are distinct from this measure. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Electricity generated from renewable resources. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(7) Electronic-related means relating to electronic devices, circuits, or similar systems, or the components of such electronic devices, circuits, or similar systems, that require electrical currents or electromagnetism to operate; (8) Foreign adversary means a foreign government or foreign nongovernment person determined to be a foreign adversary pursuant to 15 C.F.R. 791.4, as such regulation existed on February 7, 2025; (9) Military installation means: (a) A United States Air Force ballistic missile silo located within the geographic area described in 31 C.F.R. 802.211(b)(3), as such regulation existed on January 1, 2025; or (b) A United States Air Force base described in 31 C.F.R. 802.227(c), as such regulation existed on January 1, 2025; […] (b)(i) No less than thirty days prior to the commencement of construction of a privately developed renewable energy generation facility located within a ten-mile radius of a military installation, the owner of such facility shall: (A) Provide written notice to the board under subdivision (2)(b)(ii)(A) of this section; or (B) Certify in writing to the board that the facility will, upon reaching commercial operation, be in compliance with the critical infrastructure protection requirements issued by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation if such facility is connected to the transmission grid at one hundred kilovolts or higher voltage and has a nameplate rating of twenty megavolt amperes for a single generation unit or is injecting at an aggregate of seventy-five megavolt amperes or greater. The owner of such facility shall also submit written notice to the board at any time such facility is no longer in compliance with such requirements. (ii)(A) An owner of a facility choosing to proceed under subdivision (2) (b)(i)(A) of this section shall, following consultation with such owner's vendors, submit a one-time written notice to the board certifying that the facility continually contains no electronic-related equipment or electronic- related components manufactured by any foreign adversary. (B) The owner shall also submit written notice to the board at any time such facility is no longer in compliance with the certification provided under subdivision (2)(b)(ii)(A) of this section. (iii) Notwithstanding subdivisions (2)(b)(i) and (ii) of this section, the owner of a facility required to provide the certification under subsection (2) (b)(i) may use electronic-related equipment or electronic-related components manufactured by a foreign adversary if the board preapproves the use of such equipment or components after finding that: (A) There is no other reasonable option for procuring such equipment or components; and (B) Not procuring or using such equipment or components would cause a greater harm to the state than the harm associated with the equipment or components.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Myron Dorn

Nebraska Senate, District 30 · –NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Myron Dorn
Nebraska Legislature · LB 562

Adopt the E-15 Access Standard Act and change provisions of the Beginning Farmer Tax Credit Act, the Nebraska Higher Blend Tax Credit Act, the Nebraska Investment Finance Authority Act, and the Nebraska Pure Food Act

Jun 1, 2023 · Enacted

Myron Dorn · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

LB 562 requires retail fuel sites newly built or replacing more than 80% of storage/dispensing infrastructure from January 1, 2024 to offer E-15 at at least half of qualifying dispensers. Other sites face a one-dispenser requirement from 2028 only if the statewide 2027 ethanol blend rate is below 14%, with compatibility and specified old-tank exceptions. The small-site exception requires a sworn statement and either one qualifying dispenser or average annual gasoline sales of 300,000 gallons or less during 2021–2023. Temporary infrastructure work is excused; the governor may temporarily suspend the standard for inadequate E-15 supply or price-related economic hardship. This concerns retail availability, not proof of compliance, a triggered future requirement or a change in the Midwest regular-gasoline price.

Approved by Governor on 2023-06-01. Provisions/portions of LB740 amended into LB562 by AM1563. Provisions/portions of LB116 amended into LB562 by AM1554. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regular-gasoline series, including Nebraska, rather than a Nebraska statewide estimate. E15 rules concern related retail fuel supply; E15 is not assumed to be the specific grade sampled in the regular-price series. Availability rules do not establish production, compliance, a pump-price change or causation. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 3. For purposes of the E-15 Access Standard Act, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) Department means the Department of Agriculture; (2) Director means the Director of Agriculture; (3) E-15 access standard means the requirements described in subsections (1) and (2) of section 4 of this act; (4) E-15 gasoline means a classification of ethanol blended gasoline formulated with a percentage of more than ten percent but no more than fifteen percent by volume of ethanol; (5) Ethanol has the same meaning as agricultural ethyl alcohol as defined in section 66-482; (6) Motor fuel means a substance or combination of substances which is intended to be or is capable of being used for the purpose of operating an internal combustion engine and is kept for sale or sold for that purpose; (7) Motor fuel dispenser means equipment that is the part of motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure that includes mechanical or electrical systems that operate a motor fuel pump dispensing motor fuel from a motor fuel storage tank to the end point of the equipment's nozzle; (8) Motor fuel pump means the part of motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure that is a meter or similar commercial weighing and measuring device used to measure and dispense motor fuel originating from a motor fuel storage tank, on a retail basis; (9)(a) Motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure means equipment used to: (i) Store and dispense motor fuel; or (ii) Store, blend, and dispense motor fuel. (b) Motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure includes, but is not limited to, a motor fuel storage tank, motor fuel pump, motor fuel dispenser, and associated pipes, hoses, nozzles, tubes, lines, fittings, valves, filters, seals, and covers. Motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure does not include signage not located on the motor fuel dispenser or motor fuel pump; (10) Motor fuel storage tank means the part of motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure that includes an aboveground or belowground container constituting a fixture used to store an accumulation of motor fuel; (11) Nonqualifying motor fuel dispenser means: (a) A dispenser that exclusively dispenses any of the following: (i) Aviation fuel; (ii) Diesel fuel; (iii) Kerosene; or (iv) Diesel exhaust fluid; (b) A dispenser that is part of a tank vehicle as defined in section 60-4,131 that is not used to dispense motor fuel on the premises of the retail motor fuel site; or (c) A dispenser that is part of a commercial marina; (12) Qualifying motor fuel dispenser means a motor fuel dispenser that is capable of dispensing motor fuel at all times that it is in operation. The term does not include nonqualifying motor fuel dispensers; (13) Retail dealer means a person engaged in the business of storing and dispensing motor fuel from a motor fuel pump for sale on a retail basis; and (14) Retail motor fuel site means a geographic location in this state where a retail dealer sells and dispenses motor fuel on a retail basis. Sec. 4. (1) Beginning January 1, 2024, if a retail dealer constructs a new retail motor fuel site or replaces more than eighty percent of the motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure located at an existing retail motor fuel site, the retail dealer shall advertise for sale and sell E-15 gasoline from at least fifty percent of all qualifying motor fuel dispensers located at such retail motor fuel site unless the retail dealer has filed a statement with the department under section 8 of this act in which the retail dealer swears or affirms that the retail motor fuel site qualifies as a small retail motor fuel site. (2) If the statewide ethanol blend rate for 2027 is below fourteen percent as determined pursuant to section 9 of this act and the retail motor fuel site is not a retail motor fuel site described in subsection (1) of this section, then beginning January 1, 2028, the retail dealer shall advertise for sale and sell E-15 gasoline from at least one qualifying motor fuel dispenser located at such retail motor fuel site unless: (a) A waiver has been issued under section 6 of this act because the motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure located at the retail motor fuel site is not compatible with the use of E-15 gasoline; (b) The retail motor fuel site is exempt under section 7 of this act because all of the motor fuel storage tanks located at such site are listed with the State Fire Marshal as described in section 7 of this act; or (c) The retail dealer has filed a statement with the department under section 8 of this act in which the retail dealer swears or affirms that the retail motor fuel site qualifies as a small retail motor fuel site. (3) A retail dealer owning or operating a retail motor fuel site is not prohibited from advertising for sale and selling motor fuel from any number of nonqualifying motor fuel dispensers. (4) It is not a violation of this section if a retail dealer is out of compliance with this section while (a) temporarily maintaining, repairing, or reconditioning motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure or (b) temporarily installing, expanding, replacing, or converting motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure. The department may require that a retail dealer notify the department in advance of such actions, and the department may inspect the retail motor fuel site to determine if a violation occurred. Sec. 5. The Governor may issue or renew an executive order that temporarily suspends the E-15 access standard if there is an inadequate supply of E-15 gasoline or the market price of E-15 gasoline may cause consumers to suffer economic hardship. […] Sec. 8. (1) The E-15 access standard shall not apply to a retail motor fuel site if the retail dealer provides a statement to the Department of Agriculture in which the retail dealer swears or affirms that the retail motor fuel site qualifies under this section as a small retail motor fuel site. A retail dealer may include multiple retail motor fuel sites in one statement. (2) For purposes of this section, a retail motor fuel site shall qualify as a small retail motor fuel site if: (a) The retail motor fuel site has only one qualifying motor fuel dispenser; or (b) The retail motor fuel site's average annual gasoline gallonage was three hundred thousand gallons or less for the three-year period beginning on January 1, 2021, and ending on December 31, 2023.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Adrian Smith

U.S. House of Representatives, Nebraska District 3 · R–NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Adrian Smith
U.S. Congress · Nebraska delegation · HR 1346

To amend the Clean Air Act with respect to the ethanol waiver for Reid Vapor Pressure under that Act, and for other purposes.

May 14, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Adrian Smith · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed section 1(a) of the House-passed HR 1346 would expand specified ethanol vapor-pressure treatment to 10–15% blends and address qualifying prior state notifications. The current text and status are used rather than the earlier inventory title. The bill has not become law at the review cutoff, and the proposal does not establish a pump-price effect.

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regular-gasoline series, including Nebraska, rather than a Nebraska statewide estimate. E15 rules concern related retail fuel supply; E15 is not assumed to be the specific grade sampled in the regular-price series. Availability rules do not establish production, compliance, a pump-price change or causation. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

1.Year-Round E15 and RFS Reform(a)Ethanol waiver(1)Existing waiversSection 211(f)(4) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(f)(4)) is amended—(A)by striking (4) The Administrator, upon and inserting the following:(4)Waivers(A)In generalThe Administrator, on;(B)in subparagraph (A) (as so designated)—(i)in the first sentence—(I)by striking of this subsection each place it appears; and(II)by striking if he determines and inserting if the Administrator determines; and(ii)in the second sentence, by striking The Administrator and inserting the following:(B)Final actionThe Administrator; and(C)by adding at the end the following:(C)Reid vapor pressureA fuel or fuel additive may be introduced into commerce if—(i)(I)the Administrator determines that the fuel or fuel additive is substantially similar to a fuel or fuel additive utilized in the certification of any model year vehicle pursuant to paragraph (1)(A); or(II)the fuel or fuel additive has been granted a waiver under subparagraph (A) and meets all of the conditions of that waiver other than any limitation of the waiver with respect to the Reid Vapor Pressure of the fuel or fuel additive; and(ii)the fuel or fuel additive meets all other applicable Reid Vapor Pressure requirements under subsection (h)..(2)Reid vapor pressure limitationSection 211(h) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(h)) is amended—(A)by striking vapor pressure each place it appears and inserting Vapor Pressure;(B)in paragraph (4), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 10 percent and inserting 10 to 15 percent; and(C)in paragraph (5)(A)—(i)by striking Upon notification, accompanied by and inserting On receipt of a notification that is submitted after the date of enactment of the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026, and is accompanied by appropriate;(ii)by striking 10 percent and inserting 10 to 15 percent; and(iii)by adding at the end the following: Upon the enactment of the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026, any State for which the notification from the Governor of a State was submitted after January 1, 2022, and before the date of enactment of the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 and to which the Administrator applied the Reid Vapor Pressure limitation established by paragraph (1) shall instead have the Reid Vapor Pressure limitation established by paragraph (4) apply to all fuel blends containing gasoline and 10 to 15 percent denatured anhydrous ethanol that are sold, offered for sale, dispensed, supplied, offered for supply, transported, or introduced into commerce in the area during the high ozone season..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Deb Fischer

U.S. Senate, Nebraska · R–NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Deb Fischer
U.S. Congress · Nebraska delegation · S 593

Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025

Feb 13, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Deb Fischer · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed ethanol-waiver provisions of S 593 would extend the specified Clean Air Act vapor-pressure treatment from 10% ethanol to 10–15% blends and change treatment of prior state notifications. This concerns the availability of ethanol-blended gasoline. It remains proposed legislation and does not establish actual retail availability or a change in the Midwest regular-gasoline price.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regular-gasoline series, including Nebraska, rather than a Nebraska statewide estimate. E15 rules concern related retail fuel supply; E15 is not assumed to be the specific grade sampled in the regular-price series. Availability rules do not establish production, compliance, a pump-price change or causation. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Clean Air Act amendments(a)Ethanol waiver(1)Existing waiversSection 211(f)(4) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(f)(4)) is amended—(A)by striking (4) The Administrator, upon and inserting the following:(4)Waivers(A)In generalThe Administrator, on;(B)in subparagraph (A) (as so designated)—(i)in the first sentence—(I)by striking of this subsection each place it appears; and(II)by striking if he determines and inserting if the Administrator determines; and(ii)in the second sentence, by striking The Administrator and inserting the following:(B)Final actionThe Administrator; and(C)by adding at the end the following:(C)Reid vapor pressureA fuel or fuel additive may be introduced into commerce if—(i)(I)the Administrator determines that the fuel or fuel additive is substantially similar to a fuel or fuel additive utilized in the certification of any model year vehicle pursuant to paragraph (1)(A); or(II)the fuel or fuel additive has been granted a waiver under subparagraph (A) and meets all of the conditions of that waiver other than any limitation of the waiver with respect to the Reid Vapor Pressure of the fuel or fuel additive; and(ii)the fuel or fuel additive meets all other applicable Reid Vapor Pressure requirements under subsection (h)..(2)Reid vapor pressure limitationSection 211(h) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(h)) is amended—(A)by striking vapor pressure each place it appears and inserting Vapor Pressure;(B)in paragraph (4), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 10 percent and inserting 10 to 15 percent; and(C)in paragraph (5)(A)—(i)by striking Upon notification, accompanied by and inserting On receipt of a notification that is submitted after the date of enactment of the Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025, and is accompanied by appropriate;(ii)by striking 10 percent and inserting 10 to 15 percent; and(iii)by adding at the end the following: Upon the enactment of the Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025, any State for which the notification from the Governor of a State was submitted before the date of enactment of the Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025 and to which the Administrator applied the Reid Vapor Pressure limitation established by paragraph (1) shall instead have the Reid Vapor Pressure limitation established by paragraph (4) apply to all fuel blends containing gasoline and 10 to 15 percent denatured anhydrous ethanol that are sold, offered for sale, dispensed, supplied, offered for supply, transported, or introduced into commerce in the area during the high ozone season..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Tom Brandt

Nebraska Senate, District 32 · –NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Tom Brandt
Nebraska Legislature · LB 1010

Large-load electricity standards, storage regulation and tax rules, and data-center reporting

Apr 14, 2026 · Approved April 14, 2026; changes effective July 18, 2026

Tom Brandt · Sponsored

Reviewed complete enacted law

Governor Jim Pillen approved LB1010 on April 14, 2026. Senator Tom Brandt is its recorded primary introducer. The official history posted the approval entry on April 17 but expressly says approval occurred April 14; the enacted heading agrees. LB1010’s changes became effective July 18, as documented by the reviewed codified sections. Approval, effectiveness and implementation are distinct. The new Large Load Customer Regulation Act applies to a retail customer requesting a new or expanded interconnection whose total load at one site would exceed 20 megawatts. Exactly 20 MW does not meet that threshold. This differs from both the data-center definition’s peak demand of at least 10 MW and LB1261’s protection for generation serving new industrial load greater than 1,000 MW. Public power suppliers must establish interconnection standards including protected disclosure of competing requests, disclosure of onsite backup generation, site control and financial commitments. Initial studies require the greater of $50,000 or $1,000 per MW; additional capacity requests after the study require an additional fee based on the new request. Studies must be completed within one year after the fee is received. Suppliers may negotiate rates and operating standards that allocate costs and mitigate resource and financial risks to other customers, and must develop demand-response and emergency curtailment or backup-generation procedures. These powers do not verify any actual rate reduction. Qualifying onsite backup generation must be at least 1 MW and satisfy one of two stated conditions: inability to operate parallel with the grid for more than one-tenth of a second, or continuous parallel operation that is non-exporting and meets applicable interconnection requirements. The enacted definition does not require backup capable of serving 50% of onsite demand. The law adds storage to district eminent-domain scope and cooperative powers, and defines energy storage and associated renewable-facility storage. Associated storage must be on the renewable facility’s premises, primarily store its production, and keep aggregate output within that facility’s nameplate capacity. Reactive-power-only equipment and equipment solely providing electric energy for vehicles are excluded from the storage definition. Private storage requires Power Review Board approval before construction or acquisition, evidence of a contract for all energy and capacity maintained throughout operational life, the specified supplier consents and a joint transmission development agreement. The agreement governs construction, ownership, operation and maintenance, and private construction of needed improvements is at the private supplier’s cost. The law does not force a utility into a joint project or authorize private retail sales, distribution facilities or eminent domain. The storage-protection subsection retains the printed phrase “associated energy resource”; its relationship to the separately defined term remains a clarification question. Storage is added to applicable military-proximity certifications, termination reporting and enforcement. The military-equipment rules retain compliance exemptions and a Board-preapproval exception with stated findings. Terminating an approved project requires a reasons filing within 30 days; the Board’s hearing is advisory and does not approve or deny termination. These provisions do not eliminate contract-breach claims or establish a new criminal offense. A data center under the amended electricity section must meet the stated digital-service and equipment conditions and have peak demand of at least 10 MW. Suppliers may require fair and reasonable infrastructure-cost payments or terms protecting other retail customers, after a load study. Planned facilities must notify their local supplier and meet its interconnection requirements. Data-center owners or operators must report annually by September 30 to the Department of Water, Energy, and Environment and the Legislature’s Natural Resources Committee. The report covers ownership, size, location, electricity demand, water use, tax exemptions, incentive payments, efficiency and conservation measures, renewable-energy commitments and service life. They must bear decommissioning costs and enter community benefit agreements with affected communities. The existing crypto-operation website-reporting and interruption provisions are not blanket data-center requirements. An energy storage resource with nameplate capacity of at least 100 kW is subject to the annual $3,518-per-MW nameplate capacity tax on commissioned capacity, with the stated public-ownership/operation and customer-generator exemptions. The source measures alternating-current capacity in MW, not stored energy in MWh. Depreciable storage personal property subject to this tax is exempt from the depreciable-personal-property tax. This is not an exemption for every tax or every property associated with a storage project. Storage enters the existing tax reporting, proration, payment, penalty and county-remittance framework. Its presence or supporting infrastructure cannot be a factor in valuing or classifying underlying or adjacent real property under the stated section. Receipts are nonrestricted funds for the first five years after commissioning; that status does not waive the tax for five years. The county treasurer distributes 5% of these receipts to the community-college area where the storage resource is located and the remainder to eligible local taxing entities using the statutory levy fractions. The 5% rate already applied to qualifying renewable facilities; LB1010 extends it to storage. The law retains the prohibition on Department of Revenue retention for General Fund allocation. It does not verify actual collections, college spending or a state-debt effect. The February fiscal note addresses the introduced storage bill. The March revision addresses AM2422 and AM2387 and forecasts zero state-agency revenue and expenditure in its four-year table, while explicitly leaving the amount and timing of local taxing-district revenue effects uncertain. Power Review Board cost estimates and the State Electrical Division’s assessment concern their own agency scope. These are estimates, not proof of no local impact or actual spending; final enacted numbering and provisions control over the earlier note’s section descriptions. The current official 13-518 text also correlates LB1114 changes operative April 17, and 77-202 combines LB1010 with LB1114 and LB901 changes stated to become operative January 1, 2027. This review attributes only the storage addition verified in LB1010; it does not treat every consolidated-page difference or future-operative change as LB1010 policy already in force. The complete correlated acts and applicable historical versions still require separate review. The complete enacted LB1010 does not expressly impose a blanket ban on data-center incentives. Its reporting provisions require disclosure of exemptions and incentive payments. This does not resolve the separately retained Order26-17 announcement-versus-signed-original discrepancy, or prove an application was approved, denied or paid. New large-load, storage approval, grid reliability and data-center electricity requirements directly govern electricity infrastructure and service.

Complete enacted provisions and July 18 effective dates verified. Approval posted April 17 expressly records April 14 approval. Implementation and correlated-law review remain separate.

Why this record is included

New large-load, storage approval, grid reliability and data-center electricity requirements directly govern electricity infrastructure and service.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: energy · reviewed policy context · income-taxes · reviewed policy context · education · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · cpi · reviewed policy context · real-gdp · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Governor Jim Pillen approved LB1010 on April 14, 2026. Senator Tom Brandt is its recorded primary introducer. The official history posted the approval entry on April 17 but expressly says approval occurred April 14; the enacted heading agrees. LB1010’s changes became effective July 18, as documented by the reviewed codified sections. Approval, effectiveness and implementation are distinct.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Nebraska officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Nebraska statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.