Nebraska · individual fact

Nebraska prices and inflation

Compare Nebraska’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide Nebraska CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level90.12024 · #40 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level94.12024 · #44 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level75.22024 · #34 of 50 · highest first

Nebraska over time

Explore Nebraska readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Nebraska officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Nebraska effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Nebraska change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level Nebraska · source units
NebraskaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 90.188.694.9101.2Nebraska, 2014: 91.8Nebraska, 2015: 91.2Nebraska, 2016: 90.8Nebraska, 2017: 89.8Nebraska, 2018: 91.8Nebraska, 2019: 92.5Nebraska, 2020: 92.8Nebraska, 2021: 92Nebraska, 2022: 89.8Nebraska, 2023: 90.3Nebraska, 2024: 90.1201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 32National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNebraska · Nebraska issues Order 26-04: Temporary transportation-network dynamic-pricing waiver · 2026-02-05NE Order 26-04National context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shockNebraska · Nebraska approves LB1010: large-load electricity, storage and data-center rules · 2026-04-14Nebraska LB1010 approvalNebraska · Nebraska approves LB1261: Conditional eminent-domain protection for large-load private generation · 2026-04-14Nebraska LB1261Nebraska · Nebraska’s LB1010 large-load, storage-tax and data-center provisions take effect · 2026-07-18Nebraska LB1010 effectiveNebraska · Nebraska’s current section 70-670 takes effect with conditional generation protection · 2026-07-18Nebraska generation provision effective● Nebraska Legislature · 622● U.S. Congress · Nebraska delegation · 4◆ Governor · 722■ Nebraska agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-07-31

17 of 17 reviewed Nebraska actions match · 13 date markers shown. 32 major events shown separately.

Nebraska · 2024: 90.1 · Rank #40 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Nebraska with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Nebraska All-items price level · source units
PeriodNebraskaRankU.S. benchmark
202490.1#40 of 50100
202390.3#39 of 50100
202289.8#40 of 50100
202192#34 of 50100
202092.8#28 of 50100
201992.5#36 of 50100
201891.8#36 of 50100
201789.8#44 of 50100
201690.8#43 of 50100
201591.2#42 of 50100
201491.8#43 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Nebraska · state comparison

How does Nebraska’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

Nebraska · 202490.1
Nebraska rank#40among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Nebraska with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Nebraska
All-items price level history in Nebraska88.394.9101.520142024
2024 · Nebraska: 90.1 · Rank #40 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Nebraska All-items price level history
PeriodNebraskaCompare
201491.8
201591.2
201690.8
201789.8
201891.8
201992.5
202092.8
202192
202289.8
202390.3
202490.1

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nebraska · 90.12024 · Rank #40 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska · your comparison90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Nebraska · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Nebraska · 20242.4%
Nebraska rank#33among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Nebraska
Annual change in regional price deflator history in Nebraska-1.5%3%7.6%20152024
2024 · Nebraska: 2.4% · Rank #33 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Nebraska Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodNebraskaCompare
2015-0.5%
20160.6%
20170.7%
20184.4%
20192.2%
20201.4%
20213.2%
20224.1%
20234.3%
20242.4%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nebraska · 2.4%2024 · Rank #33 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska · your comparison2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Nebraska · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

Nebraska · 2024$65,297
Nebraska rank#5among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Nebraska
Real personal income per person history in Nebraska$44.94K$56.72K$68.5K20142024
2024 · Nebraska: $65,297 · Rank #5 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Nebraska Real personal income per person history
PeriodNebraskaCompare
2014$54,141
2015$56,132
2016$54,694
2017$55,285
2018$54,996
2019$55,976
2020$58,746
2021$63,655
2022$63,701
2023$65,780
2024$65,297

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nebraska · $65,2972024 · Rank #5 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska · your comparison$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Nebraska candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

9 statements from 5 candidates

2026 Nebraska State Treasurer — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Joey Spellerberg

1 statement

Republican · State Treasurer · NE

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

From our largest cities to our small, rural towns, housing affordability is a top concern for community leaders. It was a key issue during my time as mayor of Fremont. Now as the state’s chief financial officer, I believe we must address this challenge to keep Nebraska competitive.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: By Joey Spellerberg, Nebraska State Treasurer

Government-published candidate material

From our largest cities to our small, rural towns, housing affordability is a top concern for community leaders. It was a key issue during my time as mayor of Fremont. Now as the state’s chief financial officer, I believe we must address this challenge to keep Nebraska competitive.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Joey Spellerberg — official Nebraska office primary source 14 ↗

2026 Nebraska U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Brinker Harding

3 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · NE

CPI / inflation mention

Grow our economy, increase wages, and keep inflation in check

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Affordability

Candidate campaign source

Grow our economy, increase wages, and keep inflation in check

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Brinker Harding — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 2 more statements from Brinker Harding
CPI / inflation mention

Grow the economy, increase wages, and keep inflation in check.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economic Affordability

Candidate campaign source

Grow the economy, increase wages, and keep inflation in check.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Brinker Harding — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Pass year-round E-15 to help lower gas prices and support Nebraska agriculture

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Agriculture and rural communities

Candidate campaign source

Pass year-round E-15 to help lower gas prices and support Nebraska agriculture

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Brinker Harding — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Nebraska U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Adrian Smith

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 3 · NE

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

As American families make travel plans and assess energy costs for their farms and businesses during the summer, it is as important as ever to champion domestic production of affordable fuels. While gasoline prices in Nebraska are down 5.6 percent from this time a year ago, and diesel prices are dow…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: More on Transportation

Candidate campaign source

As American families make travel plans and assess energy costs for their farms and businesses during the summer, it is as important as ever to champion domestic production of affordable fuels. While gasoline prices in Nebraska are down 5.6 percent from this time a year ago, and diesel prices are down 5.8 percent, tensions around the world put supply chains and energy security at risk.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Adrian Smith campaign source 24 ↗

Mark Cohen

2 statements

Independent · U.S. House District 3 · NE

CPI / inflation mention

The Inflation Reduction Act took a small step in the right direction by allowing Medicare to negotiate prices on a limited number of drugs. I support expanding that authority significantly. If the VA can negotiate drug prices, Medicare can too. The only people who benefit from the current system are…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Social Security, Medicare, and retirement

Candidate campaign source

The Inflation Reduction Act took a small step in the right direction by allowing Medicare to negotiate prices on a limited number of drugs. I support expanding that authority significantly. If the VA can negotiate drug prices, Medicare can too. The only people who benefit from the current system are the pharmaceutical companies and the politicians they fund.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Mark Cohen — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Mark Cohen
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Support expanding Medicare's authority to negotiate prescription drug prices.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Social Security, Medicare, and retirement

Candidate campaign source

Support expanding Medicare's authority to negotiate prescription drug prices.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Mark Cohen — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Nebraska candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Nebraska incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Nebraska legislators and Nebraska’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Nebraska’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

10 matching sponsorships or proposals · 9 Nebraska incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Barry DeKay

Nebraska Senate, District 40 · –NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Barry DeKay
Nebraska Legislature · LB 1261

Conditional eminent-domain protection for large-load private generation

Apr 14, 2026 · Approved by governor April 14, 2026

Barry DeKay · Introduced by request

Reviewed complete enacted law

Governor Jim Pillen approved LB1261 on April 14, 2026. Senator Barry DeKay introduced it at the governor’s request; the enacted heading also names Holdcroft and F. Meyer. The June 2 event was a ceremonial signing. The current official version of section 70-670 lists July 18, 2026 as its effective date. The new subsection protects a privately owned generation facility from acquisition by eminent domain by consumer-owned utilities only when it serves an industrial customer at a single site with new electric load greater than 1,000 megawatts and meets every stated condition. It is not limited by its text to data centers, and the threshold excludes a load of exactly 1,000 MW. The facility must be on or adjacent to the customer’s site, have an electrically equivalent grid-interconnection point and receive Nebraska Power Review Board approval. The private supplier, local retail utility, applicable wholesale supplier responsible for regional resource adequacy, and applicable transmission owner must execute the required long-term commercial agreement. The utility governing bodies must approve the contract. It must preserve retail-service and applicable wholesale contractual rights, provide benefits acceptable to the utilities, prohibit the industrial customer from reselling electricity and waive eminent domain over the generation assets for the contract’s duration. The industrial customer must pay all project-related costs, fees, congestion fees and electric-system upgrade costs incurred by covered utilities. Generation may serve only that customer unless the contracting utilities approve a waiver through their governing bodies. Eligible contracts must be entered into on or before December 31, 2031; that cutoff does not make every contract or the whole law expire that day. The new protection is subsection (5); the carried-forward powers and exceptions in subsections (1)–(4) are not all new LB1261 provisions. The current statute also incorporates LB1010’s storage amendment. LB1010’s complete enacted original and the correlated storage amendment have now been reviewed separately. The verified current identities of Rick Holdcroft and Fred Meyer, whose names appear on LB1261’s heading, do not establish primary LB1261 sponsorship. Other underlying acts, subsequent instruments and actual implementation remain separate reviews. These sources do not establish a completed project, a utility rate reduction or an end to data-center incentive eligibility. The industrial customer must pay project-related costs incurred by the covered utilities. This is electricity-cost allocation context; it does not verify lower electricity prices or a change in CPI.

Approved April 14, 2026; enacted provisions verified. Provision-specific commencement, later changes and implementation remain separate.

Why this record is included

The industrial customer must pay project-related costs incurred by the covered utilities. This is electricity-cost allocation context; it does not verify lower electricity prices or a change in CPI.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: energy · reviewed policy context · cpi · reviewed policy context · real-gdp · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Governor Jim Pillen approved LB1261 on April 14, 2026. Senator Barry DeKay introduced it at the governor’s request; the enacted heading also names Holdcroft and F. Meyer. The June 2 event was a ceremonial signing. The current official version of section 70-670 lists July 18, 2026 as its effective date.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Bob Hallstrom

Nebraska Senate, District 1 · –NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Bob Hallstrom
Nebraska Legislature · LB 80

Adopt the Protection Orders Act, require reporting of child abuse and neglect involving military families, provide for domestic violence victims to change rental agreements and request the changing of locks, and change provisions related to landlords and tenants

May 20, 2025 · Enacted

Bob Hallstrom · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed sections 49–50 of LB 80 allow a tenant or household member subjected to domestic violence by someone who is neither a cotenant nor an occupant of the same dwelling unit to request changed locks with qualifying documentation and written notice. The landlord must act within 24 hours after receiving the written request; if it fails, the tenant may change the locks under the stated safeguards. The landlord may charge actual, reasonable lock-changing costs. This connection concerns rental access and tenant costs, not a change in the statewide rent median.

Approved by Governor on 2025-05-20. Provisions/portions of LB267 amended into LB80 by AM801. Provisions/portions of LB141 amended into LB80 by AM801. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities and fuel. Rental utility-payment duties and notice-to-vacate rules concern tenancy and housing costs without establishing a change in the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 49. (1) When an act of domestic violence is perpetrated against a tenant or household member by someone who is not a cotenant or occupant of the same dwelling unit, the tenant may require the landlord to change the lock to the tenant's dwelling unit pursuant to section 50 of this act if the tenant or household member has: (a) Obtained a protective order, restraining order, or other similar relief which applies to the perpetrator of the act of domestic violence; or (b) Obtained certification confirming domestic violence as set forth in subdivision (5)(a)(iii) of section 76-1431. (2) To have a lock changed under this section, the tenant shall: (a) Provide the landlord a copy of the documentation described in subsection (1) of this section; and (b) Provide the landlord a written notice containing the request that the locks be changed immediately. (3) The landlord shall change the locks to the tenant's dwelling unit as provided in section 50 of this act within twenty-four hours after receiving the tenant's written request. Sec. 50. (1) A landlord required to change locks under section 48 or 49 of this act shall do so by either: (a) Replacing the entire locking mechanism with a locking mechanism of equal or better quality than the lock being replaced; or (b) If the lock is in good working condition: (i) Rekeying the lock; or (ii) In the case of a keyless electronic lock, resetting the entry code. (2)(a) If a landlord fails to change the locks as required by this section, the tenant: (i) May change the locks in a workmanlike manner with locks of similar or better quality than the original lock; (ii) Shall timely notify the landlord that the locks have been changed; and (iii) Shall, by a reasonable method agreed upon by the landlord and tenant, provide the landlord with a new key or the entry code by which to access the dwelling unit. (b) This subsection applies notwithstanding any provision in the rental agreement to the contrary. (3) A landlord who installs a new lock pursuant to this section may retain a copy of the key or entry code that opens the new lock. (4) The landlord may require the tenant to pay for the actual and reasonable cost incurred by the landlord in changing the locks under this section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Myron Dorn

Nebraska Senate, District 30 · –NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Myron Dorn
Nebraska Legislature · LB 562

Adopt the E-15 Access Standard Act and change provisions of the Beginning Farmer Tax Credit Act, the Nebraska Higher Blend Tax Credit Act, the Nebraska Investment Finance Authority Act, and the Nebraska Pure Food Act

Jun 1, 2023 · Enacted

Myron Dorn · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

LB 562 requires retail fuel sites newly built or replacing more than 80% of storage/dispensing infrastructure from January 1, 2024 to offer E-15 at at least half of qualifying dispensers. Other sites face a one-dispenser requirement from 2028 only if the statewide 2027 ethanol blend rate is below 14%, with compatibility and specified old-tank exceptions. The small-site exception requires a sworn statement and either one qualifying dispenser or average annual gasoline sales of 300,000 gallons or less during 2021–2023. Temporary infrastructure work is excused; the governor may temporarily suspend the standard for inadequate E-15 supply or price-related economic hardship. This concerns retail availability, not proof of compliance, a triggered future requirement or a change in the Midwest regular-gasoline price.

Approved by Governor on 2023-06-01. Provisions/portions of LB740 amended into LB562 by AM1563. Provisions/portions of LB116 amended into LB562 by AM1554. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regular-gasoline series, including Nebraska, rather than a Nebraska statewide estimate. E15 rules concern related retail fuel supply; E15 is not assumed to be the specific grade sampled in the regular-price series. Availability rules do not establish production, compliance, a pump-price change or causation. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 3. For purposes of the E-15 Access Standard Act, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) Department means the Department of Agriculture; (2) Director means the Director of Agriculture; (3) E-15 access standard means the requirements described in subsections (1) and (2) of section 4 of this act; (4) E-15 gasoline means a classification of ethanol blended gasoline formulated with a percentage of more than ten percent but no more than fifteen percent by volume of ethanol; (5) Ethanol has the same meaning as agricultural ethyl alcohol as defined in section 66-482; (6) Motor fuel means a substance or combination of substances which is intended to be or is capable of being used for the purpose of operating an internal combustion engine and is kept for sale or sold for that purpose; (7) Motor fuel dispenser means equipment that is the part of motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure that includes mechanical or electrical systems that operate a motor fuel pump dispensing motor fuel from a motor fuel storage tank to the end point of the equipment's nozzle; (8) Motor fuel pump means the part of motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure that is a meter or similar commercial weighing and measuring device used to measure and dispense motor fuel originating from a motor fuel storage tank, on a retail basis; (9)(a) Motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure means equipment used to: (i) Store and dispense motor fuel; or (ii) Store, blend, and dispense motor fuel. (b) Motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure includes, but is not limited to, a motor fuel storage tank, motor fuel pump, motor fuel dispenser, and associated pipes, hoses, nozzles, tubes, lines, fittings, valves, filters, seals, and covers. Motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure does not include signage not located on the motor fuel dispenser or motor fuel pump; (10) Motor fuel storage tank means the part of motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure that includes an aboveground or belowground container constituting a fixture used to store an accumulation of motor fuel; (11) Nonqualifying motor fuel dispenser means: (a) A dispenser that exclusively dispenses any of the following: (i) Aviation fuel; (ii) Diesel fuel; (iii) Kerosene; or (iv) Diesel exhaust fluid; (b) A dispenser that is part of a tank vehicle as defined in section 60-4,131 that is not used to dispense motor fuel on the premises of the retail motor fuel site; or (c) A dispenser that is part of a commercial marina; (12) Qualifying motor fuel dispenser means a motor fuel dispenser that is capable of dispensing motor fuel at all times that it is in operation. The term does not include nonqualifying motor fuel dispensers; (13) Retail dealer means a person engaged in the business of storing and dispensing motor fuel from a motor fuel pump for sale on a retail basis; and (14) Retail motor fuel site means a geographic location in this state where a retail dealer sells and dispenses motor fuel on a retail basis. Sec. 4. (1) Beginning January 1, 2024, if a retail dealer constructs a new retail motor fuel site or replaces more than eighty percent of the motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure located at an existing retail motor fuel site, the retail dealer shall advertise for sale and sell E-15 gasoline from at least fifty percent of all qualifying motor fuel dispensers located at such retail motor fuel site unless the retail dealer has filed a statement with the department under section 8 of this act in which the retail dealer swears or affirms that the retail motor fuel site qualifies as a small retail motor fuel site. (2) If the statewide ethanol blend rate for 2027 is below fourteen percent as determined pursuant to section 9 of this act and the retail motor fuel site is not a retail motor fuel site described in subsection (1) of this section, then beginning January 1, 2028, the retail dealer shall advertise for sale and sell E-15 gasoline from at least one qualifying motor fuel dispenser located at such retail motor fuel site unless: (a) A waiver has been issued under section 6 of this act because the motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure located at the retail motor fuel site is not compatible with the use of E-15 gasoline; (b) The retail motor fuel site is exempt under section 7 of this act because all of the motor fuel storage tanks located at such site are listed with the State Fire Marshal as described in section 7 of this act; or (c) The retail dealer has filed a statement with the department under section 8 of this act in which the retail dealer swears or affirms that the retail motor fuel site qualifies as a small retail motor fuel site. (3) A retail dealer owning or operating a retail motor fuel site is not prohibited from advertising for sale and selling motor fuel from any number of nonqualifying motor fuel dispensers. (4) It is not a violation of this section if a retail dealer is out of compliance with this section while (a) temporarily maintaining, repairing, or reconditioning motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure or (b) temporarily installing, expanding, replacing, or converting motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure. The department may require that a retail dealer notify the department in advance of such actions, and the department may inspect the retail motor fuel site to determine if a violation occurred. Sec. 5. The Governor may issue or renew an executive order that temporarily suspends the E-15 access standard if there is an inadequate supply of E-15 gasoline or the market price of E-15 gasoline may cause consumers to suffer economic hardship. […] Sec. 8. (1) The E-15 access standard shall not apply to a retail motor fuel site if the retail dealer provides a statement to the Department of Agriculture in which the retail dealer swears or affirms that the retail motor fuel site qualifies under this section as a small retail motor fuel site. A retail dealer may include multiple retail motor fuel sites in one statement. (2) For purposes of this section, a retail motor fuel site shall qualify as a small retail motor fuel site if: (a) The retail motor fuel site has only one qualifying motor fuel dispenser; or (b) The retail motor fuel site's average annual gasoline gallonage was three hundred thousand gallons or less for the three-year period beginning on January 1, 2021, and ending on December 31, 2023.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Adrian Smith

U.S. House of Representatives, Nebraska District 3 · R–NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Adrian Smith
U.S. Congress · Nebraska delegation · HR 1346

To amend the Clean Air Act with respect to the ethanol waiver for Reid Vapor Pressure under that Act, and for other purposes.

May 14, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Adrian Smith · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed section 1(a) of the House-passed HR 1346 would expand specified ethanol vapor-pressure treatment to 10–15% blends and address qualifying prior state notifications. The current text and status are used rather than the earlier inventory title. The bill has not become law at the review cutoff, and the proposal does not establish a pump-price effect.

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regular-gasoline series, including Nebraska, rather than a Nebraska statewide estimate. E15 rules concern related retail fuel supply; E15 is not assumed to be the specific grade sampled in the regular-price series. Availability rules do not establish production, compliance, a pump-price change or causation. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

1.Year-Round E15 and RFS Reform(a)Ethanol waiver(1)Existing waiversSection 211(f)(4) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(f)(4)) is amended—(A)by striking (4) The Administrator, upon and inserting the following:(4)Waivers(A)In generalThe Administrator, on;(B)in subparagraph (A) (as so designated)—(i)in the first sentence—(I)by striking of this subsection each place it appears; and(II)by striking if he determines and inserting if the Administrator determines; and(ii)in the second sentence, by striking The Administrator and inserting the following:(B)Final actionThe Administrator; and(C)by adding at the end the following:(C)Reid vapor pressureA fuel or fuel additive may be introduced into commerce if—(i)(I)the Administrator determines that the fuel or fuel additive is substantially similar to a fuel or fuel additive utilized in the certification of any model year vehicle pursuant to paragraph (1)(A); or(II)the fuel or fuel additive has been granted a waiver under subparagraph (A) and meets all of the conditions of that waiver other than any limitation of the waiver with respect to the Reid Vapor Pressure of the fuel or fuel additive; and(ii)the fuel or fuel additive meets all other applicable Reid Vapor Pressure requirements under subsection (h)..(2)Reid vapor pressure limitationSection 211(h) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(h)) is amended—(A)by striking vapor pressure each place it appears and inserting Vapor Pressure;(B)in paragraph (4), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 10 percent and inserting 10 to 15 percent; and(C)in paragraph (5)(A)—(i)by striking Upon notification, accompanied by and inserting On receipt of a notification that is submitted after the date of enactment of the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026, and is accompanied by appropriate;(ii)by striking 10 percent and inserting 10 to 15 percent; and(iii)by adding at the end the following: Upon the enactment of the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026, any State for which the notification from the Governor of a State was submitted after January 1, 2022, and before the date of enactment of the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 and to which the Administrator applied the Reid Vapor Pressure limitation established by paragraph (1) shall instead have the Reid Vapor Pressure limitation established by paragraph (4) apply to all fuel blends containing gasoline and 10 to 15 percent denatured anhydrous ethanol that are sold, offered for sale, dispensed, supplied, offered for supply, transported, or introduced into commerce in the area during the high ozone season..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Mike Flood

U.S. House of Representatives, Nebraska District 1 · R–NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Mike Flood
U.S. Congress · Nebraska delegation · HR 2840

Housing Supply Frameworks Act

Apr 10, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Mike Flood · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed section 4(a)–(b) of HR 2840 would direct HUD to publish housing-production guidelines within three years after enactment and best practices for state and local zoning, with a task force and public-comment process during the first two years. This is a proposed planning step relevant to housing supply, including rental housing, not enacted zoning changes, construction or rent reductions. It remains in Congress.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities and fuel. Rental utility-payment duties and notice-to-vacate rules concern tenancy and housing costs without establishing a change in the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

4.Guidelines on State and local zoning frameworks(a)EstablishmentNot later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this section, the Assistant Secretary shall publish documents outlining guidelines and best practices to support production of adequate housing to meet the needs of communities and provide housing opportunities for individuals at every income level across communities with respect to—(1)State zoning frameworks; and(2)local zoning frameworks.(b)Consultation; public commentDuring the 2 year period beginning on the date of enactment of this section, in developing the guidelines and best practices required under the previous subsection, the Assistant Secretary shall—(1)publish draft guidelines in the Federal Register for public comment; and(2)establish a task force for the purpose of providing consultation to draft guidelines published under the previous clause, the members of which shall include—(A)planners and architects;(B)advocates with experience in affordable housing, community development efforts, and fair housing;(C)housing developers, including affordable and market-rate housing developers, manufactured housing developers, and other business interests;(D)community engagement experts and community members impacted by zoning decisions;(E)public housing authorities and transit authorities;(F)members of local zoning and planning boards and local and regional transportation planning organizations;(G)State officials responsible for housing or land use, including members of State zoning boards of appeals; (H)academic researchers; and(I)home builders.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Robert Dover

Nebraska Senate, District 19 · –NE

2 proposals
View proposals from Robert Dover
Nebraska Legislature · LB 185

Provide for electronic delivery of notices and documents under the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act and the Mobile Home Landlord and Tenant Act

Apr 7, 2025 · Enacted

Robert Dover · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed residential-tenancy provision of LB 185 permits electronic delivery of rental notices with consent, disclosure and receipt safeguards. Tenants may withdraw consent, may request paper copies, and cannot be required to accept electronic delivery as a condition of renting or renewal. The text requires other permitted delivery methods when receipt fails or an address is invalid, and leaves notice content and timing requirements intact. This changes tenancy procedures rather than setting rents.

Approved by Governor on 2025-04-07. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities and fuel. Rental utility-payment duties and notice-to-vacate rules concern tenancy and housing costs without establishing a change in the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 2. Section 76-1413, Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska, is amended to read: 76-1413 (1) A person has notice of a fact if: (a) Such person has actual knowledge of it; (b) Such person has received a notice or notification of it; or (c) From all facts and circumstances known to such person at the time in question, such person has reason to know that it exists. A person knows or has knowledge of a fact if such person has actual knowledge of it. (2) A person notifies or gives a notice or notification to another by taking steps reasonably calculated to inform the other in ordinary course whether or not the other actually comes to know of it. A person receives a notice or notification when: (a) It comes to such person's attention; (b) In the case of the landlord, it is: (i) Delivered at the place of business of the landlord through which the rental agreement was made or at any place held out by the landlord as the place for receipt of the communication; or (ii) Delivered by electronic means; or (c) In the case of the tenant, it is: (i) Delivered in hand to the tenant; (ii) Mailed to the tenant at the place held out by the tenant as the place for receipt of the communication, or in the absence of such designation, to the tenant's last-known place of residence; or (iii) Delivered by electronic means. (3) Notice, knowledge, or a notice or notification received by an organization is effective for a particular transaction from the time it is brought to the attention of the individual conducting that transaction, and in any event from the time it would have been brought to such individual's attention if the organization had exercised reasonable diligence. (4) For purposes of this section, delivered by electronic means includes: (a) Delivery to an electronic mail address at which a tenant or landlord has consented to receive notices or documents; and (b) Posting on an electronic network or site accessible via the Internet, mobile application, computer, mobile device, tablet, or any other electronic device, together with separate notice of the posting, which shall be provided by electronic mail to the address at which the tenant or landlord has consented to receive notices or documents or by any other delivery method that has been consented to by the tenant or landlord. (5) Subject to the requirements of this section, any notice to a tenant or landlord or any other document required under applicable law regarding a rental agreement or that is to serve as evidence of action regarding a rental agreement may be delivered, stored, and presented by electronic means so long as it meets the requirements of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. (6) Delivery of a notice or document by electronic means in accordance with this section shall be considered equivalent to any delivery method required under applicable law, including delivery by first-class mail, registered mail, certified mail, certificate of mailing, or a commercial mail delivery service. In any instance in which proof of receipt is required for a mailing, the electronic delivery method used shall provide for verification or acknowledgment of receipt. (7) A notice or document may be delivered by electronic means by a landlord to a tenant under this section if: (a) The tenant has affirmatively consented to such method of delivery and has not withdrawn the consent; (b) The tenant, before giving consent, is provided with a clear and conspicuous statement informing the tenant of: (i) The right of the tenant to withdraw consent to have a notice or document delivered by electronic means at any time without the imposition of any conditions or consequences; (ii) The transactions and types of notices and documents to which the tenant's consent would apply; (iii) The right of a tenant to have a notice or document delivered in paper form by mail and the means, after consent is given, by which a tenant may obtain a paper copy of a notice or document delivered by electronic means; and (iv) The procedure a tenant shall follow to withdraw consent to have a notice or document delivered by electronic means or to update the tenant's electronic mail address; (c) The tenant: (i) Before giving consent, is provided with a statement of the hardware and software requirements for access to and retention of a notice or document delivered by electronic means; and (ii) Consents electronically, or confirms consent electronically, in a manner that reasonably demonstrates that the tenant can access information in the electronic form that will be used for notices or documents delivered by electronic means as to which the tenant has given consent; and (d) After the tenant consents, if there is a change in the hardware or software requirements needed to access or retain a notice or document delivered by electronic means and such change creates a material risk that the tenant will not be able to access or retain a subsequent notice or document to which the consent applies, the landlord: (i) Provides the tenant with a statement that describes: (A) The revised hardware and software requirements for access to and retention of a notice or document delivered by electronic means; and (B) The right of the tenant to withdraw consent without the imposition of any condition or consequence; and (ii) Complies with subdivision (7)(b) of this section. (8) A notice or document may be delivered by electronic means by a tenant to a landlord under this section if the landlord has consented to delivery by electronic means with respect to such tenant. (9) A landlord shall not, as part of a rental agreement or as a condition of entering into or renewing a rental agreement, require a tenant to accept delivery by electronic means. (10) This section does not affect any requirement related to the content or timing of any notice or document required under applicable law. (11)(a) If any provision of the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act or any other applicable law requiring a notice or document to be provided to a tenant or landlord expressly requires verification or acknowledgment of receipt of the notice or document, the notice or document may be delivered by electronic means only if the method used provides for verification or acknowledgment of receipt. (b)(i) For a notice or document sent by a landlord to a tenant, if verification or acknowledgment of receipt is not obtained, the notice or document shall be sent to the tenant by mail as prescribed by the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act. If two or more electronic communications to the tenant are returned as undeliverable during a thirty-day period, all future communications shall be sent to the tenant by first-class or other mail as prescribed by law unless and until the tenant consents electronically, or confirms electronically, in a manner that reasonably demonstrates that the tenant can access information in the electronic form that will be used for notices or documents delivered by electronic means as to which the tenant has given consent. (ii) For a notice or document sent by a tenant to a landlord, if verification or acknowledgment of receipt is not obtained, the tenant shall send the notice or document by any other means prescribed by law. (12) A withdrawal of consent by a tenant or landlord does not affect the legal effectiveness, validity, or enforceability of a notice or document delivered by electronic means to the tenant or landlord before the withdrawal of consent is effective. A withdrawal of consent by a tenant or landlord is effective within a reasonable period of time after receipt of the withdrawal by the other party. Failure by a landlord to comply with subdivision (7)(d) of this section may be treated, at the election of the tenant, as a withdrawal of consent for purposes of this section. (13) The changes made to this section by this legislative bill do not apply to a notice or document delivered by electronic means before the effective date of this act to a tenant or landlord who, before such date, consented to receive notices or documents by electronic means. (14) If the consent of a tenant to receive certain notices or documents by delivery by electronic means is on file with a landlord before the effective date of this act, and pursuant to this section a landlord intends to deliver by electronic means additional notices or documents to such tenant, then prior to delivering such additional notices or documents by electronic means, the landlord shall provide the tenant with a statement that describes: (a) The notices or documents that will be delivered by electronic means that were not previously delivered electronically; and (b) The tenant's right to withdraw consent to have notices or documents delivered by electronic means without the imposition of any condition or consequence. (15) A landlord or tenant shall deliver a notice or document by any other delivery method permitted by law other than electronic means if: (a) The landlord or tenant attempts to deliver the notice or document by electronic means and has a reasonable basis for believing that the notice or document has not been received by the other party; or (b) The landlord or tenant becomes aware that the electronic mail address provided by the other party is no longer valid. (16) This section shall not be construed to modify, limit, or supersede the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. 7001 et seq., as such act existed on January 1, 2025.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Nebraska Legislature · LB 266

Prohibit political subdivisions from enacting ordinances which have the effect of imposing rent controls on private property

Apr 7, 2025 · Enacted

Robert Dover · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

LB 266 prohibits local ordinances that impose rent controls on private property, except as expressly allowed by state law. It preserves ordinances that increase affordable housing through land-use or inclusionary requirements and voluntary contractual programs restricting rents. Conflicting ordinances are declared void, including under home-rule charters. The act does not itself set a rent or demonstrate a change in median gross rent.

Approved by Governor on 2025-04-07. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities and fuel. Rental utility-payment duties and notice-to-vacate rules concern tenancy and housing costs without establishing a change in the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. (1) For purposes of this section: (a) Local government means any city, village, or county or any agency or subdivision of a city, village, or county; and (b) Ordinance means any local law, including, but not limited to, any ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulation. (2) Except as expressly permitted by other state law or by subsection (3) of this section, a local government shall not have the power to enact or enforce any ordinance which would have the effect of imposing rent controls on private property. (3) This section does not apply to an ordinance that: (a) Is adopted for the purposes of increasing the supply of affordable housing and that does so through land-use or inclusionary housing requirements; or (b) Provides for a program that a private property owner voluntarily and contractually agrees to participate in and that restricts rent and rent increases. (4) This section applies notwithstanding the provisions of any home rule charter. (5) Any ordinance in violation of this section is null and void.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Nebraska officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Nebraska statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.