Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price12.66¢/kWh2024 · #40 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$4.234/gal2026-08 · #9 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$107.912024 · #46 of 50 · highest first
Montana over time
Explore Montana readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Montana officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Montana effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Montana change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price Montana · source units
MontanaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
2 of 2 reviewed Montana actions match · 2 date markers shown. 49 major events shown separately.
Montana · 2024: 12.66¢/kWh · Rank #40 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Montana, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Montana Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Montana · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
Montana · 202412.66¢/kWh
Montana rank#40among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Montana, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Montana
2024 · Montana: 12.66¢/kWh · Rank #40 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Montana Residential electricity price history
Period
Montana
Compare
2015
10.88¢/kWh
2016
10.94¢/kWh
2017
10.95¢/kWh
2018
10.96¢/kWh
2019
11.13¢/kWh
2020
11.24¢/kWh
2021
11.22¢/kWh
2022
11.33¢/kWh
2023
12.54¢/kWh
2024
12.66¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Montana · 12.66¢/kWh2024 · Rank #40 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana · your comparison
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's Rocky Mountain region, including taxes. The region contains Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wyoming.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent EIA observations
Prior week
$4.266/gal
Weekly change
+4.8¢
One year earlier
$3.240/gal
Change from one year earlier
+107.4¢
Method and limitations
FactVote uses EIA’s Rocky Mountain series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes Montana. Changes are calculated from the published August 31, 2026 (prior week), and September 8, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.
EIA does not publish a current Montana statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This Rocky Mountain regional estimate should not be read as Montana’s statewide average.
The regional average combines Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wyoming, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Montana community.
Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
Montana · 2024$107.91
Montana rank#46among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Montana
2024 · Montana: $107.91 · Rank #46 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Montana Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
Montana
Compare
2010
$77.37
2011
$84.97
2012
$84.88
2013
$88.85
2014
$86.93
2015
$89.03
2016
$88.95
2017
$94.75
2018
$93.19
2019
$95.43
2020
$96.49
2021
$97.84
2022
$102.94
2023
$109.5
2024
$107.91
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Montana · $107.912024 · Rank #46 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana · your comparison
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
Montana · 202427 TWh
Montana rank#40among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Montana, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Montana
2024 · Montana: 27 TWh · Rank #40 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Montana Total electricity generation history
Period
Montana
Compare
2015
29.3 TWh
2016
27.8 TWh
2017
28.2 TWh
2018
28.2 TWh
2019
27.8 TWh
2020
23.4 TWh
2021
24.9 TWh
2022
27.1 TWh
2023
26.9 TWh
2024
27 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Montana · 27 TWh2024 · Rank #40 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana · your comparison
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
Montana · 2024341.7 min/year
Montana rank#23among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Montana
2024 · Montana: 341.7 min/year · Rank #23 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Montana Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
Montana
Compare
2023
113.9 min/year
2024
341.7 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Montana · 341.7 min/year2024 · Rank #23 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana · your comparison
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
Montana · 202473.9 trillion Btu
Montana rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Montana · 73.9 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana · your comparison
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
Montana · 202427.16 Mt CO₂
Montana rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Montana · 27.16 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana · your comparison
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
2 of 2 reviewed Montana actions · newest first
Sep 10, 2025 · Executive Order No. 6-2025 · Executive Order No. 6-2025: Creating the Energy Advisory Council · IssuedGovernor · Executive Order No. 6-2025
Executive Order No. 6-2025: Creating the Energy Advisory Council
Sep 10, 2025 · Issued
Gov. Greg Gianforte · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
Greg Gianforte’s Executive Order 6-2025 created an energy advisory council to recommend ways to increase affordable and reliable energy supply, with input from utilities, electric cooperatives, developers and consumers. It calls for an initial report by September 15, 2026 and sets an original September 30, 2027 termination unless renewed or rescinded. Issued September 10, 2025, the order establishes an advisory process; it does not approve generating plants, change electricity rates or demonstrate lower prices.
Original signed order and execution date independently verified. Later renewal, implementation and continuing effect are not established by this relationship.
Why this record is included
The EIA fact measures retail electricity revenue per kilowatthour across sectors. Recommendations on energy supply and electricity infrastructure concern affordability, but an advisory council does not set utility rates or establish cheaper electricity. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Montana evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, GREG GIANFORTE, Governor of the State of Montana, pursuant to the authority vested in me under the Constitution, Mont. Code Ann. § 2-15-122 and any other applicable statutes, do hereby authorize the creation of the Energy Advisory Council, also known as the Unleashing American-Made Energy Task Force ("Task Force"), and order as follows: PURPOSE The Task Force shall provide the Governor with short- and long-term recommendations and strategies for Montana to increase the supply of affordable and reliable energy options. In developing recommendations and strategies, the Task Force shall seek input from Montana citizens, large energy consumers, energy and transmission developers, utilities and rural electric cooperatives, members of the Montana Legislature, associations whose members are impacted by energy policy, advisory groups and researchers focused on energy supply and affordability, and other appropriate stakeholders as determined by the Task Force. COMPOSITION The Task Force shall consist of up to 20 members who shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Governor. The Director of the Department of Environmental Quality shall serve as the presiding officer of the Task Force. The Task Force shall include, but not be limited to, persons from the following categories: • members or staff of professional associations representing business, industry, and workers; • members of staff or representatives of electric utilities and rural electric cooperatives; • state agency directors, or their designees, including from the Department of Environmental Quality and the Department of Commerce; • elected officials, including state legislators and leaders from local jurisdictions; • members of state boards, councils, and commissions; • subject matter experts and researchers; and • stakeholders. The Department of Environmental Quality shall provide administrative support for the Task Force. Given the diverse composition of the Task Force, meetings may be conducted in person throughout the state and/or remotely as determined by the presiding officer. REPORT By September 15, 2026, the Task Force shall provide an initial written report to the Governor with recommendations and strategies to unleash American-made energy in Montana, specifically focusing on measures the Governor could immediately implement and those the Legislature could consider and the Governor could sign into law. The Task Force's report shall identify federal, state, regulatory, and other governmental policies that inhibit or limit increasing affordable and reliable energy supply. TERMINATION The Task Force shall cease to exist on September 30, 2027, unless rescinded earlier or renewed by subsequent executive order. COMPENSATION Council Members shall be entitled to reasonable travel expense reimbursement under Mont. Code Ann. 2-15-122. THIS ORDER is effective immediately.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 5, 2025 · HB 351 · AN ACT CLARIFYING THE POINT OF TAXATION FOR GASOLINE AND SPECIAL FUELS TAXES TO THE FIRST LICENSED DISTRIBUTOR WHO OWNS THE GASOLINE OR SPECIAL FUEL AS IT IS WITHDRAWN FROM A TERMINAL OR REFINERY IN THIS STATE OR IMPORTED INTO THIS STATE; REVISING DEFINITIONS; AMENDING SECTIONS 15-70-401, 15-70-402, 15-70-403, 15-70-404, AND 15-70-441, MCA; AND PROVIDING A DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE · Enacted · Chapter 445Montana Legislature · HB 351
AN ACT CLARIFYING THE POINT OF TAXATION FOR GASOLINE AND SPECIAL FUELS TAXES TO THE FIRST LICENSED DISTRIBUTOR WHO OWNS THE GASOLINE OR SPECIAL FUEL AS IT IS WITHDRAWN FROM A TERMINAL OR REFINERY IN THIS STATE OR IMPORTED INTO THIS STATE; REVISING DEFINITIONS; AMENDING SECTIONS 15-70-401, 15-70-402, 15-70-403, 15-70-404, AND 15-70-441, MCA; AND PROVIDING A DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE
May 5, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 445
Rep. Courtenay Sprunger · Sponsored / Rep. Ed Byrne · Co-sponsored / Rep. Frank Smith · Co-sponsored / Sen. Denley Loge · Co-sponsored / Sen. Mike Yakawich · Co-sponsored / Rep. Steve Fitzpatrick · Co-sponsored / Rep. Denise Baum · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bob Carter · Co-sponsored / Rep. Julie Darling · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 351 clarifies who is treated as distributing fuel for Montana fuel-tax purposes. For withdrawal from an in-state refinery or pipeline terminal, it generally identifies the owner immediately before withdrawal; if shipped or delivered to a licensed distributor, it identifies the first licensed distributor taking possession as shown by the bill of lading. Imports are generally attributed to the owner when unloaded after arrival and coming to rest in Montana, excluding refinery or pipeline-terminal storage. If that owner is unlicensed and a licensed distributor ships or delivers the fuel, the licensed distributor is responsible. Fuel may not be exchanged tax-free between licensed distributors more than once. The law specifies July 1, 2026 and retains the existing gasoline tax rate. This concerns collection responsibility in one state within the Rocky Mountain price region, not a rate increase, tax holiday or demonstrated consumer savings.
The legislative docket records “Signed by Governor” and chapter 445. The displayed date is the docket timestamp, not an independently verified original execution date. Enactment does not prove implementation or current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The EIA fact is a five-state Rocky Mountain regional proxy covering Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Utah and Wyoming, not a Montana-only price. Rules identifying the distributor liable for gasoline tax concern a price component in one of those states. They do not establish a tax-rate change or consumer savings. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Montana evidence context: Rocky Mountain regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(4) (a) Except as provided in subsection (4)(b), when gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is withdrawn from a refinery or pipeline terminal in this state, the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is considered to be distributed by the distributor who is the owner of the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel prior to the time of withdrawal. (b) If gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is withdrawn for shipment or delivery to a licensed distributor, it is considered to be distributed by the first licensed distributor to take possession of the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel as shown by the bill of lading issued by the terminal or refinery. (5) Imported gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel, except for gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel placed in storage at a refinery or pipeline terminal, is considered to be distributed after it arrives and is brought to rest in this state by the person who is the owner of the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel at the time the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is unloaded from its shipping vessel. If the owner is not licensed as a Montana distributor and if the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is shipped or delivered in this state by a person who is licensed as a distributor, then the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is considered to be distributed by the licensed distributor. (6) For the purposes of the tax provided for in this section, gasoline, special fuel, and aviation fuel may not be exchanged tax-free between licensed distributors more than one time.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Montana officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Montana candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
13 statements from 5 candidates
2026 Montana Public Service Commissioner — District 1 — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements
Republican · Public Service Commissioner District 1 · MT
Energy & electricity
Montana’s energy mix must stay balanced with clean coal, natural gas, hydro, renewables, and new technology working together to keep energy reliable and affordable.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities
Candidate campaign source
Montana’s energy mix must stay balanced with clean coal, natural gas, hydro, renewables, and new technology working together to keep energy reliable and affordable.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Pattison supports modernizing transmission lines, expanding natural gas access, and improving broadband reliability so no community is left behind during outages.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities
Candidate campaign source
Pattison supports modernizing transmission lines, expanding natural gas access, and improving broadband reliability so no community is left behind during outages.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Democratic · Public Service Commissioner District 5 · MT
Energy & electricity
We in Montana have been on the cutting edge of electrical generation before, and we can be there again. Wind and solar are key, and that requires that we build storage, which we know how to do, too. The PSC has the power to guide our utilities to invest in smart, clean, reliable energy sources that …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities
Candidate campaign source
We in Montana have been on the cutting edge of electrical generation before, and we can be there again. Wind and solar are key, and that requires that we build storage, which we know how to do, too. The PSC has the power to guide our utilities to invest in smart, clean, reliable energy sources that don’t require us to give up our fresh air, beautiful waterways, or amazing public lands. Oh, and they reduce costs for consumers, too!
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Promote ‘all of the above’ energy policies supporting oil/gas/coal industries and energy production in Montana, for both domestic use and international export
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities
Candidate campaign source
Promote ‘all of the above’ energy policies supporting oil/gas/coal industries and energy production in Montana, for both domestic use and international export
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Promote a bipartisan effort to review current EU regulations and to develop a comprehensive plan for effective monitoring, with a focus on ensuring the ethical use of AI, safeguarding human rights and safety, mitigating social and economic impact, and protecting national security (i.e.: exposures to…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities
Candidate campaign source
Promote a bipartisan effort to review current EU regulations and to develop a comprehensive plan for effective monitoring, with a focus on ensuring the ethical use of AI, safeguarding human rights and safety, mitigating social and economic impact, and protecting national security (i.e.: exposures to the national power grid).
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
2. Power Consumption and Generation. This means that any proposed data center must provide for its’ own power needs, whether by novel-purchase or by new power generation. But it’s not just that – they must account for, and provide for, at least 200-300% of their expected needs to account for program…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities
Candidate campaign source
2. Power Consumption and Generation. This means that any proposed data center must provide for its’ own power needs, whether by novel-purchase or by new power generation. But it’s not just that – they must account for, and provide for, at least 200-300% of their expected needs to account for programmed growth. It is only in this way, that the local and regional consumer can be protected from higher electricity rates – nobody wants to see that happen. These assurances must be durable, and long-standing into the future for at least 10 years (with a potential guarantee-bond requirement for grid-reliability?).
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I support an “all of the above” energy policy that supports a wide range of domestic energy sources, including both non-renewable sources like oil, natural gas, and coal, and renewable sources such as solar, wind, hydropower and geothermal – and nuclear. The economics of energy production should be …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities
Candidate campaign source
I support an “all of the above” energy policy that supports a wide range of domestic energy sources, including both non-renewable sources like oil, natural gas, and coal, and renewable sources such as solar, wind, hydropower and geothermal – and nuclear. The economics of energy production should be trusted to determine when each may be economically viable, or which is best used in any particular region or situation.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Montana candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Montana incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Montana legislators and Montana’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Montana’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
1 matching sponsorship or proposal · 1 Montana incumbent. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Courtenay Sprunger
Montana House of Representatives, District 7 · R–MT
AN ACT CLARIFYING THE POINT OF TAXATION FOR GASOLINE AND SPECIAL FUELS TAXES TO THE FIRST LICENSED DISTRIBUTOR WHO OWNS THE GASOLINE OR SPECIAL FUEL AS IT IS WITHDRAWN FROM A TERMINAL OR REFINERY IN THIS STATE OR IMPORTED INTO THIS STATE; REVISING DEFINITIONS; AMENDING SECTIONS 15-70-401, 15-70-402, 15-70-403, 15-70-404, AND 15-70-441, MCA; AND PROVIDING A DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE
May 5, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 445
Rep. Courtenay Sprunger · Sponsored / Rep. Ed Byrne · Co-sponsored / Rep. Frank Smith · Co-sponsored / Sen. Denley Loge · Co-sponsored / Sen. Mike Yakawich · Co-sponsored / Rep. Steve Fitzpatrick · Co-sponsored / Rep. Denise Baum · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bob Carter · Co-sponsored / Rep. Julie Darling · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 351 clarifies who is treated as distributing fuel for Montana fuel-tax purposes. For withdrawal from an in-state refinery or pipeline terminal, it generally identifies the owner immediately before withdrawal; if shipped or delivered to a licensed distributor, it identifies the first licensed distributor taking possession as shown by the bill of lading. Imports are generally attributed to the owner when unloaded after arrival and coming to rest in Montana, excluding refinery or pipeline-terminal storage. If that owner is unlicensed and a licensed distributor ships or delivers the fuel, the licensed distributor is responsible. Fuel may not be exchanged tax-free between licensed distributors more than once. The law specifies July 1, 2026 and retains the existing gasoline tax rate. This concerns collection responsibility in one state within the Rocky Mountain price region, not a rate increase, tax holiday or demonstrated consumer savings.
The legislative docket records “Signed by Governor” and chapter 445. The displayed date is the docket timestamp, not an independently verified original execution date. Enactment does not prove implementation or current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The EIA fact is a five-state Rocky Mountain regional proxy covering Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Utah and Wyoming, not a Montana-only price. Rules identifying the distributor liable for gasoline tax concern a price component in one of those states. They do not establish a tax-rate change or consumer savings. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Montana evidence context: Rocky Mountain regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(4) (a) Except as provided in subsection (4)(b), when gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is withdrawn from a refinery or pipeline terminal in this state, the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is considered to be distributed by the distributor who is the owner of the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel prior to the time of withdrawal. (b) If gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is withdrawn for shipment or delivery to a licensed distributor, it is considered to be distributed by the first licensed distributor to take possession of the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel as shown by the bill of lading issued by the terminal or refinery. (5) Imported gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel, except for gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel placed in storage at a refinery or pipeline terminal, is considered to be distributed after it arrives and is brought to rest in this state by the person who is the owner of the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel at the time the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is unloaded from its shipping vessel. If the owner is not licensed as a Montana distributor and if the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is shipped or delivered in this state by a person who is licensed as a distributor, then the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is considered to be distributed by the licensed distributor. (6) For the purposes of the tax provided for in this section, gasoline, special fuel, and aviation fuel may not be exchanged tax-free between licensed distributors more than one time.
Only current Montana officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Montana statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Montana snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Montana, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.