State unemployment, employed residents, broader underutilization, and employment growth.
Annual unemployment rate3.7%2024 · #23 of 50 · highest first
Civilian employed residents3,026,9022024 · #22 of 50 · highest first
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer0.9%2025 · 11-month average · #42 of 50 · highest first
Missouri over time
Explore Missouri readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Missouri officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Missouri effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Missouri change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Annual unemployment rate Missouri · source units
MissouriPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
68 of 68 reviewed Missouri actions match · 38 date markers shown. 15 major events shown separately.
Missouri · 2024: 3.7% · Rank #23 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4%
Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages. LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Missouri · state comparison
Employment and unemployment over time
LAUS annual averages measure state residents. Compare unemployment rates or the number of employed residents.
Missouri · 20243.7%
Missouri rank#23among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Annual unemployment rate
Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages.
LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Missouri
2024 · Missouri: 3.7% · Rank #23 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Missouri Annual unemployment rate history
Period
Missouri
Compare
2015
5.1%
2016
4.6%
2017
3.8%
2018
3.2%
2019
3.2%
2020
6.1%
2021
4.1%
2022
2.6%
2023
3.1%
2024
3.7%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · 1.8%Higher value · 5.4%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · 3.7%2024 · Rank #23 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Annual unemployment rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Nevada
5.4%
—
#2
California
5.3%
—
#3
Illinois
5%
—
#4
Kentucky
4.8%
—
#5
Michigan
4.7%
—
#6
New Jersey
4.6%
—
#7
Alaska
4.5%
—
#7
Washington
4.5%
—
#9
Ohio
4.4%
—
#10
Louisiana
4.3%
—
#10
Oregon
4.3%
—
#12
New York
4.2%
—
#12
Rhode Island
4.2%
—
#14
Colorado
4.1%
—
#14
New Mexico
4.1%
—
#14
South Carolina
4.1%
—
#14
Texas
4.1%
—
#14
West Virginia
4.1%
—
#19
Indiana
4%
—
#19
Massachusetts
4%
—
#21
Delaware
3.9%
—
#22
Pennsylvania
3.8%
—
#23
Arizona
3.7%
—
#23
Missouri · your comparison
3.7%
—
#23
North Carolina
3.7%
—
#26
Idaho
3.6%
—
#27
Arkansas
3.5%
—
#27
Kansas
3.5%
—
#29
Florida
3.4%
—
#29
Georgia
3.4%
—
#29
Tennessee
3.4%
—
#32
Connecticut
3.3%
—
#32
Utah
3.3%
—
#34
Iowa
3.2%
—
#34
Maryland
3.2%
—
#34
Mississippi
3.2%
—
#34
Oklahoma
3.2%
—
#38
Minnesota
3.1%
—
#38
Wyoming
3.1%
—
#40
Alabama
3%
—
#40
Maine
3%
—
#40
Montana
3%
—
#40
Wisconsin
3%
—
#44
Virginia
2.9%
—
#45
Hawaii
2.8%
—
#46
Nebraska
2.7%
—
#47
New Hampshire
2.6%
—
#48
North Dakota
2.4%
—
#49
Vermont
2.3%
—
#50
South Dakota
1.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
The reviewed 2025 CPS snapshot includes both U-3 and the broader U-6 measure. It is separate from the LAUS annual history.
Missouri · 2025 · 11-month average0.9%
Missouri rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer
Unemployed 15 weeks or longer as a share of the civilian labor force.
2025 CPS averages exclude October because data were not collected during the federal shutdown. Not strictly comparable with other-year averages. These directly surveyed CPS estimates differ from LAUS model-based estimates. All states use the same 11 months here.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · 0.6%Higher value · 2.4%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · 0.9%2025 · 11-month average · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer · 2025 · 11-month average · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
2.4%
—
#2
Oregon
2.2%
—
#3
Illinois
2.1%
—
#3
New York
2.1%
—
#5
Connecticut
2%
—
#5
Rhode Island
2%
—
#5
Washington
2%
—
#8
Massachusetts
1.9%
—
#8
Nevada
1.9%
—
#8
New Jersey
1.9%
—
#11
Delaware
1.8%
—
#11
Virginia
1.8%
—
#13
Louisiana
1.7%
—
#13
Michigan
1.7%
—
#13
West Virginia
1.7%
—
#16
Alaska
1.6%
—
#16
Florida
1.6%
—
#16
Mississippi
1.6%
—
#16
New Mexico
1.6%
—
#16
Ohio
1.6%
—
#16
Pennsylvania
1.6%
—
#22
Colorado
1.5%
—
#22
Kentucky
1.5%
—
#22
Maryland
1.5%
—
#22
Texas
1.5%
—
#26
Arizona
1.4%
—
#26
Georgia
1.4%
—
#28
Arkansas
1.3%
—
#28
Iowa
1.3%
—
#28
North Carolina
1.3%
—
#28
Oklahoma
1.3%
—
#28
South Carolina
1.3%
—
#33
Kansas
1.2%
—
#33
Minnesota
1.2%
—
#33
New Hampshire
1.2%
—
#33
Wisconsin
1.2%
—
#37
Tennessee
1.1%
—
#37
Utah
1.1%
—
#39
Idaho
1%
—
#39
Indiana
1%
—
#39
Nebraska
1%
—
#42
Alabama
0.9%
—
#42
Maine
0.9%
—
#42
Missouri · your comparison
0.9%
—
#42
Wyoming
0.9%
—
#46
Hawaii
0.7%
—
#46
Montana
0.7%
—
#46
South Dakota
0.7%
—
#46
Vermont
0.7%
—
#50
North Dakota
0.6%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Annual real output growth and BEA job growth provide economic context. Neither is the unemployment rate.
Missouri · 20251.2%
Missouri rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.3%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Annual real GDP growth
Change in annual real GDP from the prior year.
Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Missouri
2025 · Missouri: 1.2% · Rank #42 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.3% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Missouri Annual real GDP growth history
Period
Missouri
Compare
2015
1.4%
2016
0.1%
2017
0.9%
2018
0.9%
2019
2.3%
2020
-1.5%
2021
4.9%
2022
1.8%
2023
3.4%
2024
2.5%
2025
1.2%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · -0.4%Higher value · 5.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · 1.2%2025 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Annual real GDP growth · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Delaware
5.1%
—
#2
Alaska
4.7%
—
#3
California
3.5%
—
#4
South Carolina
3.3%
—
#5
Washington
3.2%
—
#6
Idaho
3.1%
—
#7
Kentucky
3%
—
#8
Georgia
2.9%
—
#9
Texas
2.8%
—
#10
West Virginia
2.8%
—
#11
Florida
2.8%
—
#12
Rhode Island
2.8%
—
#13
Utah
2.7%
—
#14
Illinois
2.6%
—
#15
New York
2.5%
—
#16
Connecticut
2.5%
—
#17
Ohio
2.4%
—
#18
Virginia
2.3%
—
#19
Oklahoma
2.2%
—
#20
Michigan
2.2%
—
#21
Tennessee
2.1%
—
#22
New Jersey
2%
—
#23
Nevada
2%
—
#24
Montana
2%
—
#25
Alabama
2%
—
#26
Vermont
1.9%
—
#27
Colorado
1.9%
—
#28
Indiana
1.9%
—
#29
Pennsylvania
1.8%
—
#30
North Carolina
1.8%
—
#31
New Mexico
1.8%
—
#32
South Dakota
1.8%
—
#33
New Hampshire
1.7%
—
#34
Louisiana
1.5%
—
#35
Hawaii
1.5%
—
#36
Arizona
1.5%
—
#37
Maine
1.4%
—
#38
Oregon
1.4%
—
#39
Massachusetts
1.3%
—
#40
Mississippi
1.3%
—
#41
Nebraska
1.3%
—
#42
Missouri · your comparison
1.2%
—
#43
Kansas
1%
—
#44
Arkansas
0.9%
—
#45
Wisconsin
0.8%
—
#46
Maryland
0.8%
—
#47
Minnesota
0.7%
—
#48
North Dakota
0.5%
—
#49
Wyoming
0.1%
—
#50
Iowa
-0.4%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
A state unemployment rate does not capture all unused labor or job-market turnover.
Missouri · December 2025128,000
Missouri rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark6,550,000Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Openings · number
Number of jobs or monthly employment flows; published thousands converted to individual units.
Seasonally adjusted state JOLTS estimates, July–December 2025 as printed in the captured table. Recent estimates are preliminary and revisions can change ranks. Openings are a month-end stock; hires, quits, and layoffs are monthly flows, not distinct workers.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Missouri
December 2025 · Missouri: 128,000 · Rank #16 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 6,550,000 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Missouri Openings · number history
Period
Missouri
Compare
July 2025
134,000
August 2025
133,000
September 2025
138,000
October 2025
133,000
November 2025
125,000
December 2025
128,000
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11,000Higher value · 674,000Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · 128,000December 2025 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Openings · number · December 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
674,000
—
#2
Texas
608,000
—
#3
New York
431,000
—
#4
Florida
404,000
—
#5
Ohio
287,000
—
#6
Georgia
279,000
—
#7
Pennsylvania
235,000
—
#8
Michigan
221,000
—
#9
Virginia
213,000
—
#10
North Carolina
212,000
—
#11
Illinois
211,000
—
#12
New Jersey
172,000
—
#13
Tennessee
143,000
—
#14
Minnesota
135,000
—
#15
Massachusetts
129,000
—
#16
Missouri · your comparison
128,000
—
#17
Maryland
127,000
—
#18
Indiana
123,000
—
#19
Arizona
121,000
—
#20
Wisconsin
115,000
—
#21
Washington
110,000
—
#22
South Carolina
103,000
—
#23
Louisiana
101,000
—
#23
Oklahoma
101,000
—
#25
Colorado
100,000
—
#26
Kentucky
92,000
—
#27
Alabama
91,000
—
#28
Oregon
72,000
—
#29
Connecticut
67,000
—
#30
Utah
64,000
—
#31
Kansas
61,000
—
#32
Arkansas
60,000
—
#33
Mississippi
59,000
—
#34
Iowa
57,000
—
#35
Nevada
52,000
—
#36
West Virginia
42,000
—
#37
Nebraska
38,000
—
#38
Idaho
34,000
—
#39
New Mexico
32,000
—
#40
Maine
28,000
—
#41
Delaware
23,000
—
#42
Montana
22,000
—
#42
New Hampshire
22,000
—
#42
Rhode Island
22,000
—
#45
South Dakota
20,000
—
#46
Hawaii
19,000
—
#47
North Dakota
18,000
—
#48
Alaska
16,000
—
#49
Vermont
11,000
—
#49
Wyoming
11,000
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
68 of 68 reviewed Missouri actions · newest first
Jul 13, 2026 · HB 2896 · Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education · EnactedMissouri Legislature · HB 2896
Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education
Jul 13, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Chris Brown · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SS SCS HB 2896 -- EDUCATION This bill modifies certain provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education. WORKFORCE DIPLOMA PROGRAM (Section 173.831) Current law provides for the Workforce Diploma Program to assist students with obtaining a high school diploma and developing employability and career technical skills, with such program scheduled to sunset on August 28, 2028. This bill repeals the sunset provision for this Section.
Approved by the Governor on 2026-07-13. The recorded final action was 2026-07-13: Delivered to Secretary of State (G). This is the legislative disposition; subsequent court rulings may affect enforcement.
Why this record is included
The record addresses high-school completion, equivalency, or adult education relevant to the diploma-or-higher share of adults age 25 and older. Current student programs affect only a potential future component of that adult population. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SS SCS HB 2896 -- EDUCATION This bill modifies certain provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education. WORKFORCE DIPLOMA PROGRAM (Section 173.831) Current law provides for the Workforce Diploma Program to assist students with obtaining a high school diploma and developing employability and career technical skills, with such program scheduled to sunset on August 28, 2028. This bill repeals the sunset provision for this Section.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 13, 2026 · HB 2896 · Signed HB 2896: Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education · SignedGovernor · HB 2896
Signed HB 2896: Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education
Jul 13, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Mike Kehoe · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Governor Mike Kehoe signed HB 2896 in the 2026 session. The relevant provision in the official final summary is: SS SCS HB 2896 -- EDUCATION This bill modifies certain provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education. WORKFORCE DIPLOMA PROGRAM (Section 173.831) Current law provides for the Workforce Diploma Program to assist students with obtaining a high school diploma and developing employability and career technical skills, with such program scheduled to sunset on August 28, 2028. This bill repeals the sunset provision for this Section.
The independently verified approval record documents Governor Kehoe’s signature on 2026-07-13. This entry does not establish subsequent legal enforcement or implementation.
Why this record is included
The record addresses high-school completion, equivalency, or adult education relevant to the diploma-or-higher share of adults age 25 and older. Current student programs affect only a potential future component of that adult population. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SS SCS HB 2896 -- EDUCATION This bill modifies certain provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education. WORKFORCE DIPLOMA PROGRAM (Section 173.831) Current law provides for the Workforce Diploma Program to assist students with obtaining a high school diploma and developing employability and career technical skills, with such program scheduled to sunset on August 28, 2028. This bill repeals the sunset provision for this Section.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 15, 2026 · HB 2499 · Establishes provisions relating to purpose-built student housing · Did not passMissouri Legislature · HB 2499
Establishes provisions relating to purpose-built student housing
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Kathy Steinhoff · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Renters of purpose-built student housing have specific rights as specified in the bill. Leases for purpose-built student housing must include transparent fees, conflict resolution, health disclosures taken into consideration, lease modification due to a change in academic status, information with regards to subleasing, right-of-first-refusal, lease renewal, and the provision of essential or academic services by the landlord, as defined in the bill. Penalty provisions apply to any landlord failing to provide services listed in a lease agreement. The Attorney General and the Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development will create a flyer for landlords of purpose-built student…
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Renters of purpose-built student housing have specific rights as specified in the bill. Leases for purpose-built student housing must include transparent fees, conflict resolution, health disclosures taken into consideration, lease modification due to a change in academic status, information with regards to subleasing, right-of-first-refusal, lease renewal, and the provision of essential or academic services by the landlord, as defined in the bill. Penalty provisions apply to any landlord failing to provide services listed in a lease agreement. The Attorney General and the Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development will create a flyer for landlords of purpose-built student housing to provide to student renters.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 15, 2026 · HB 1715 · Establishes tax incentives in relation to workforce and disaster recovery housing · Did not passMissouri Legislature · HB 1715
Establishes tax incentives in relation to workforce and disaster recovery housing
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Greg Sharpe · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1715 -- WORKFORCE HOUSING TAX INCENTIVES SPONSOR: Sharpe (4) This bill establishes the "Workforce Housing Tax Incentives Program" within the Department of Economic Development. To be eligible for the Program, proposed housing projects must meet at least one of three specified dwelling unit minimums; projects consist of three types of rehabilitation and two project types that relate to greenfield sites. The maximum aggregate amount of tax incentives for a housing project is $1 million. If a housing business qualifies for a higher amount than is allowed, the Department and business can negotiate an apportionment of the reduction in tax incentives between the sales tax refund and the housing…
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1715 -- WORKFORCE HOUSING TAX INCENTIVES SPONSOR: Sharpe (4) This bill establishes the "Workforce Housing Tax Incentives Program" within the Department of Economic Development. To be eligible for the Program, proposed housing projects must meet at least one of three specified dwelling unit minimums; projects consist of three types of rehabilitation and two project types that relate to greenfield sites. The maximum aggregate amount of tax incentives for a housing project is $1 million. If a housing business qualifies for a higher amount than is allowed, the Department and business can negotiate an apportionment of the reduction in tax incentives between the sales tax refund and the housing investment tax credits as long as the total aggregate amount of incentives does not exceed the amount set by the bill. The incentives must be issued on a first-come, first-served basis until the maximum amount of incentives is reached.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 15, 2026 · HB 2068 · Modifies provisions of the employment security program · Did not passMissouri Legislature · HB 2068
Modifies provisions of the employment security program
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. David Casteel · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2068 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Casteel This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding: if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test for suitable work three times. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in a method and manner determined by the division. This bill establishes the "Employment Security Program Integrity Act of 2026" and defines terms such as "Employment…
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2068 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Casteel This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding: if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test for suitable work three times. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in a method and manner determined by the division. This bill establishes the "Employment Security Program Integrity Act of 2026" and defines terms such as "Employment security rolls", "National data check system", "New-hire records", and "Welfare agency" for the purpose of this Act. This bill requires the Division to utilize a national data check system to verify that eligible claimants receive unemployment compensation benefits. Weekly checks against a list of incarcerated individuals, State death records, and new-hire records are required to ensure the accuracy of employment security rolls. The bill specifies methods for verifying the identity of unemployment compensation benefit claimants, including multi- factor authentication. This bill requires that the Division conduct eligibility reviews for suspicious or potentially improper claims, including multiple or duplicative claims from the same internet protocol address, or associated with the same mailing address or bank account or claims filed from foreign addresses. Welfare agencies are required to notify the Division when an enrolled individual becomes employed. This bill allows the Division to pursue the recovery of fraudulent or improper unemployment compensation benefits overpayment. The Division is required to provide an annual report to the General Assembly each year, by December 31st, describing improper unemployment compensation benefit payments and their recovery efforts. The Division is authorized to enter into a memorandum of understanding with other state entities to share and receive the necessary information.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 15, 2026 · HB 1824 · Modifies provisions relating to unemployment compensation and eliminates the waiting week period requirement · Did not passMissouri Legislature · HB 1824
Modifies provisions relating to unemployment compensation and eliminates the waiting week period requirement
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Tiffany Price · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1824 -- UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION SPONSOR: Price This bill eliminates the one-week waiting period in the determination of unemployment compensation benefits for a claim filed on or after January 1, 2027, with the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations. The one-week waiting period has similarly been eliminated for any new shared work benefits filed on or after January 1, 2027. To receive the one-week of unemployment compensation benefits or shared work benefits, a claimant must meet all other eligibility requirements. This bill is similar to HB 1381 (2025).
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1824 -- UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION SPONSOR: Price This bill eliminates the one-week waiting period in the determination of unemployment compensation benefits for a claim filed on or after January 1, 2027, with the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations. The one-week waiting period has similarly been eliminated for any new shared work benefits filed on or after January 1, 2027. To receive the one-week of unemployment compensation benefits or shared work benefits, a claimant must meet all other eligibility requirements. This bill is similar to HB 1381 (2025).
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Missouri officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about unemployment, jobs and workforce issues from FactVote’s Missouri candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
30 statements from 10 candidates
2026 Missouri State Auditor — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
Our kids are the future of our state and are our most precious resource. I am a product of public education, and I am proud to be the son of a lifelong schoolteacher. Many of our schools do a great job educating our children and preparing them for their next phase of life, but unfortunately, not all…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: School District Oversight
Candidate campaign source
Our kids are the future of our state and are our most precious resource. I am a product of public education, and I am proud to be the son of a lifelong schoolteacher. Many of our schools do a great job educating our children and preparing them for their next phase of life, but unfortunately, not all Missouri schools are delivering acceptable results. In 2008 the legislature passed a law to allow the Auditor to audit school districts. In the 14 years since that law took effect, only 19 audits have been conducted pursuant to that authority, despite there being 516 school districts in Missouri! Meanwhile two thirds of Missouri students aren’t proficient in math or science, and over half don’t read at grade level, despite record levels of funding for public schools. As Auditor, I’ll review administrative costs and administrator salaries and measure the performance of our schools against the investment taxpayers are making in them. I will help parents make sure their schools are doing what they’re expected to do: teach kids the things they need to learn to be prepared to join the workforce or go to college.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Missouri’s First District deserves a fighter in Washington who knows how to deliver results. Despite Republicans controlling both chambers in Congress and the White House, he secured over $12.3 million in federal funding for critical infrastructure, public safety, workforce development, and neighbor…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Bringing Federal Resources Home to St. Louis.
Candidate campaign source
Missouri’s First District deserves a fighter in Washington who knows how to deliver results. Despite Republicans controlling both chambers in Congress and the White House, he secured over $12.3 million in federal funding for critical infrastructure, public safety, workforce development, and neighborhood revitalization across St. Louis City and North County. Wesley continues to fight every day to make sure our district has the resources it needs to grow and thrive.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Climate change is a crisis, and here in Missouri, the effects are already making an impact on our way of life and the safety of our most vulnerable communities, from extreme weather events to deteriorating air and water quality. Wesley believes that confronting the climate crisis and growing our eco…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Delivering Environmental Justice.
Candidate campaign source
Climate change is a crisis, and here in Missouri, the effects are already making an impact on our way of life and the safety of our most vulnerable communities, from extreme weather events to deteriorating air and water quality. Wesley believes that confronting the climate crisis and growing our economy are not in conflict. The transition to clean energy should create good-paying union jobs right here in the First District. He has fought to protect clean air and water standards, hold polluters accountable, and ensure that the federal government lives up to its obligations to communities like those along Coldwater Creek and the Westlake Landfill that have suffered from decades of environmental neglect and contamination.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Now, Wesley is running for reelection to continue fighting for his constituents in Washington: holding the Trump administration and MAGA Republicans accountable, expanding access to affordable health care and prescription drugs, lowering energy costs, bringing down the price of groceries, protecting…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: A strong leader for common-sense solutions. Learn more about Wesley Bell here.
Candidate campaign source
Now, Wesley is running for reelection to continue fighting for his constituents in Washington: holding the Trump administration and MAGA Republicans accountable, expanding access to affordable health care and prescription drugs, lowering energy costs, bringing down the price of groceries, protecting our rights and freedoms, and creating good-paying jobs right here in St. Louis.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Born and raised in Missouri, Ann Wagner understands our conservative Christian family values. Working alongside her parents at their small retail carpet store in Manchester, Carpetime, she learned the value of a dollar, a strong work ethic, honesty, integrity, and that government ought to get out of…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Candidate statement
Candidate campaign source
Born and raised in Missouri, Ann Wagner understands our conservative Christian family values. Working alongside her parents at their small retail carpet store in Manchester, Carpetime, she learned the value of a dollar, a strong work ethic, honesty, integrity, and that government ought to get out of the way and off the backs of hard-working Americans. These values continue to guide her today as she works to cut taxes and eliminate burdensome regulations so local businesses, like her parents’, can grow and create more jobs and put more money in the pockets of hardworking Missourians.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
We must immediately raise the federal minimum wage, protect workers' rights to form and join unions, and ensure equal pay and paid family leave for all employees. It is imperative that we strengthen laws to end illegal union-busting, strengthen collective bargaining rights across all sectors, and in…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Unions and Labor
Candidate campaign source
We must immediately raise the federal minimum wage, protect workers' rights to form and join unions, and ensure equal pay and paid family leave for all employees. It is imperative that we strengthen laws to end illegal union-busting, strengthen collective bargaining rights across all sectors, and invest in high-quality, sustainable job creation that provides pathways for every American to support themselves and their families.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Every Missourian deserves the freedom to build a good life without being burdened by rising costs. Families are working harder than ever but falling further behind because the price of housing, healthcare, childcare, and groceries keeps climbing while wages stay flat. We must put working families fi…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Affordability
Candidate campaign source
Every Missourian deserves the freedom to build a good life without being burdened by rising costs. Families are working harder than ever but falling further behind because the price of housing, healthcare, childcare, and groceries keeps climbing while wages stay flat. We must put working families first by lowering costs, expanding access to good-paying jobs, and making sure every family can afford the basics — not just to survive, but to thrive.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
The Department of Defense under Donald Trump, Pete Hegseth, and the Republican Congress is out of control and in constant turmoil and has led to our nation being in grave danger and our international reputation in shambles. I will act immediately to reign in the outrageous and illegal actions by Sec…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Israel and Palestine
Candidate campaign source
The Department of Defense under Donald Trump, Pete Hegseth, and the Republican Congress is out of control and in constant turmoil and has led to our nation being in grave danger and our international reputation in shambles. I will act immediately to reign in the outrageous and illegal actions by Secretary Hegseth from his meddling in promotions, illegal religious infusion into the military, and hiring of unqualified propagandists for his personal promotion.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific unemployment, jobs and workforce issues terms in retained, attributed source text from published Missouri candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Missouri incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Missouri legislators and Missouri’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Missouri’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
64 matching sponsorships or proposals · 33 Missouri incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Bruce Sassmann
Missouri House of Representatives, District 61 · R–MO
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Bruce SassmannMissouri Legislature · HB 1281
Modifies provisions of the employment security program and establishes the "Employment Security Program Integrity Act of 2025", relating to the administration of unemployment compensation
Mar 25, 2025 · Did not pass
Rep. Bruce Sassmann · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1281 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Sassmann This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding that if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security (Division) within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in writing or by email or telephone. This bill establishes the "Employment Security Program Integrity Act of 2025" and defines terms such as "Employment security rolls", "National…
This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-03-25: HCS Voted Do Pass (H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1281 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Sassmann This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding that if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security (Division) within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in writing or by email or telephone. This bill establishes the "Employment Security Program Integrity Act of 2025" and defines terms such as "Employment security rolls", "National data check system", "New-hire records", and "Welfare agency" for the purpose of this Act. This bill requires the Division to utilize a national data check system to verify that eligible claimants receive unemployment compensation benefits. Weekly checks against a list of incarcerated individuals, State death records, and new-hire records are necessary to ensure the accuracy of employment security rolls. The bill specifies methods for verifying the identity of unemployment compensation benefit claimants, including multi-factor authentication. This bill requires that the Division conduct eligibility reviews for suspicious or potentially improper claims, including multiple or duplicative claims from the same internet protocol address, or associated with the same mailing address or bank account or claims filed from foreign addresses. Welfare agencies are required to notify the Division when an enrolled individual becomes employed. This bill allows the Division to pursue the recovery of fraudulent or improper unemployment compensation benefits overpayment. The Division is required to provide an annual report to the General Assembly each year, by December 31st, describing improper unemployment compensation benefit payments and their recovery efforts. The Division is authorized to enter into a memorandum of understanding with other state entities to share and receive the necessary information.
Modifies provisions relating to workforce development
May 7, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Bruce Sassmann · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This portion of the bill sunsets on December 31, 2030. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION (Section 288.050) The bill also revises the reasons a claimant may be disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding that if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed without good cause to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in writing or by email or telephone.
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-07: Placed on the Informal Perfection Calendar (H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
This portion of the bill sunsets on December 31, 2030. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION (Section 288.050) The bill also revises the reasons a claimant may be disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding that if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed without good cause to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in writing or by email or telephone.
Missouri House of Representatives, District 16 · R–MO
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Chris BrownMissouri Legislature · HB 2896
Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education
Jul 13, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Chris Brown · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SS SCS HB 2896 -- EDUCATION This bill modifies certain provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education. WORKFORCE DIPLOMA PROGRAM (Section 173.831) Current law provides for the Workforce Diploma Program to assist students with obtaining a high school diploma and developing employability and career technical skills, with such program scheduled to sunset on August 28, 2028. This bill repeals the sunset provision for this Section.
Approved by the Governor on 2026-07-13. The recorded final action was 2026-07-13: Delivered to Secretary of State (G). This is the legislative disposition; subsequent court rulings may affect enforcement.
Why this record is included
The record addresses high-school completion, equivalency, or adult education relevant to the diploma-or-higher share of adults age 25 and older. Current student programs affect only a potential future component of that adult population. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SS SCS HB 2896 -- EDUCATION This bill modifies certain provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education. WORKFORCE DIPLOMA PROGRAM (Section 173.831) Current law provides for the Workforce Diploma Program to assist students with obtaining a high school diploma and developing employability and career technical skills, with such program scheduled to sunset on August 28, 2028. This bill repeals the sunset provision for this Section.
Modifies provisions relating to eligibility for MO HealthNet benefits
May 13, 2022 · Did not pass
Rep. Dale Wright · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2091 -- MO HEALTHNET BENEFITS SPONSOR: Wright This bill provides that the Department of Social Services (DSS) shall develop and implement a program to allow recipients or caretakers of recipients who would otherwise lose MO HealthNet benefits eligibility due to an increase of income over the monthly allowable maximum to continue to receive such benefits by paying a premium. For recipients whose income exceeds the monthly allowable maximum by $500 or less, the premium shall be 25% of the recipients income in excess of the maximum. The bill requires DSS to develop a method for payment of premiums through payroll deduction or an alternative method. Any recipient not paying such premiums will…
This measure did not pass before the 2022 session ended. Final recorded action on 2022-05-13: Referred: Health and Mental Health Policy(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses eligibility, enrollment, or affordability of health coverage, relevant to the share of people under 65 without insurance. A service-specific benefit or provider-payment rule alone is not a change in insured status. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2091 -- MO HEALTHNET BENEFITS SPONSOR: Wright This bill provides that the Department of Social Services (DSS) shall develop and implement a program to allow recipients or caretakers of recipients who would otherwise lose MO HealthNet benefits eligibility due to an increase of income over the monthly allowable maximum to continue to receive such benefits by paying a premium. For recipients whose income exceeds the monthly allowable maximum by $500 or less, the premium shall be 25% of the recipients income in excess of the maximum. The bill requires DSS to develop a method for payment of premiums through payroll deduction or an alternative method. Any recipient not paying such premiums will lose eligibility for MO HealthNet benefits after 60 days of nonpayment. A recipient participating in this program shall be eligible for voluntary training regarding interview skills, education options, and other necessary tools to broaden employment opportunities.
Missouri House of Representatives, District 97 · R–MO
3 proposalsView proposals from Rep. David CasteelMissouri Legislature · HB 2068
Modifies provisions of the employment security program
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. David Casteel · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2068 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Casteel This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding: if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test for suitable work three times. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in a method and manner determined by the division. This bill establishes the "Employment Security Program Integrity Act of 2026" and defines terms such as "Employment…
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2068 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Casteel This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding: if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test for suitable work three times. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in a method and manner determined by the division. This bill establishes the "Employment Security Program Integrity Act of 2026" and defines terms such as "Employment security rolls", "National data check system", "New-hire records", and "Welfare agency" for the purpose of this Act. This bill requires the Division to utilize a national data check system to verify that eligible claimants receive unemployment compensation benefits. Weekly checks against a list of incarcerated individuals, State death records, and new-hire records are required to ensure the accuracy of employment security rolls. The bill specifies methods for verifying the identity of unemployment compensation benefit claimants, including multi- factor authentication. This bill requires that the Division conduct eligibility reviews for suspicious or potentially improper claims, including multiple or duplicative claims from the same internet protocol address, or associated with the same mailing address or bank account or claims filed from foreign addresses. Welfare agencies are required to notify the Division when an enrolled individual becomes employed. This bill allows the Division to pursue the recovery of fraudulent or improper unemployment compensation benefits overpayment. The Division is required to provide an annual report to the General Assembly each year, by December 31st, describing improper unemployment compensation benefit payments and their recovery efforts. The Division is authorized to enter into a memorandum of understanding with other state entities to share and receive the necessary information.
Modifies provisions of the employment security program
May 7, 2025 · Did not pass
Rep. David Casteel · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HCS HB 202 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY (Casteel) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Government Efficiency This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding that if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test for suitable work three times. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in a method and manner determined by the division . This bill establishes the "Employment Security…
This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-07: SCS Voted Do Pass (S).
Why this record is included
The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HCS HB 202 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY (Casteel) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Government Efficiency This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding that if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test for suitable work three times. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in a method and manner determined by the division . This bill establishes the "Employment Security Program Integrity Act of 2025" and defines terms such as "Employment security rolls", "National data check system", "New-hire records", and "Welfare agency" for the purpose of this Act. This bill requires the Division to utilize a national data check system to verify that eligible claimants receive unemployment compensation benefits. Weekly checks against a list of incarcerated individuals, State death records, and new-hire records are required to ensure the accuracy of employment security rolls. The bill specifies methods for verifying the identity of unemployment compensation benefit claimants, including multi-factor authentication. This bill requires that the Division conduct eligibility reviews for suspicious or potentially improper claims, including multiple or duplicative claims from the same internet protocol address, or associated with the same mailing address or bank account or claims filed from foreign addresses. Welfare agencies are required to notify the Division when an enrolled individual becomes employed. This bill allows the Division to pursue the recovery of fraudulent or improper unemployment compensation benefits overpayment. The Division is required to provide an annual report to the General Assembly each year, by December 31st, describing improper unemployment compensation benefit payments and their recovery efforts. The Division is authorized to enter into a memorandum of understanding with other state entities to share and receive the necessary information.
Modifies provisions of the employment security program
May 7, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. David Casteel · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2614. This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding that if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test three times during the same unemployment cycle. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in writing or by email.
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-07: Reported Do Pass (H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2614. This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding that if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test three times during the same unemployment cycle. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in writing or by email.
Creates new provisions governing the recovery of overpaid unemployment benefits
May 12, 2023 · Did not pass
Rep. Doug Clemens · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 597 -- UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS SPONSOR: Clemens This bill requires the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DOLIR) to waive the repayment of any unemployment benefits that were incorrectly but nonfraudulently distributed to claimants if such benefits were paid out of the State Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund, and the federal government has granted authority to the state to waive the recovery of such benefits. The bill requires any claimant who is denied a waiver to be sent a notice by DOLIR, not later than 90 days after the effective date of this bill, notifying them that they are allowed to appeal such denial. Claimants must file an appeal not later than 60 days after…
This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-05-12: Referred: Workforce and Infrastructure Development(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 597 -- UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS SPONSOR: Clemens This bill requires the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DOLIR) to waive the repayment of any unemployment benefits that were incorrectly but nonfraudulently distributed to claimants if such benefits were paid out of the State Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund, and the federal government has granted authority to the state to waive the recovery of such benefits. The bill requires any claimant who is denied a waiver to be sent a notice by DOLIR, not later than 90 days after the effective date of this bill, notifying them that they are allowed to appeal such denial. Claimants must file an appeal not later than 60 days after notifying DOLIR. The bill additionally provides that in the case of over-recovered overpaid unemployment benefits, DOLIR is required to notify claimants by certified mail within 15 days of discovery of over- recovery and must furthermore repay the funds within 30 days of such notification if the amount is less than $10,000. If the over- recovered amount is $10,000 or more, repayment of funds shall occur within a reasonable time period, as determined by agreement of DOLIR and the claimant, with interest.
Creates new provisions relating to the recovery of overpaid unemployment benefits
May 13, 2022 · Did not pass
Rep. Doug Clemens · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2513 -- RECOVERY OF OVERPAID UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS SPONSOR: Clemens This bill requires the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DOLIR) to waive the repayment of any unemployment benefits that were incorrectly but nonfraudulently distributed to claimants if such benefits were paid out of the State Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund, and the federal government has granted authority to the state to waive the recovery of such benefits. The bill requires any claimant who is denied a waiver to be sent a notice by DOLIR, not later than 90 days after the effective date of this bill, notifying them that they are allowed to appeal such denial. Claimants must file an appeal not later than…
This measure did not pass before the 2022 session ended. Final recorded action on 2022-05-13: Referred: Workforce Development(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2513 -- RECOVERY OF OVERPAID UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS SPONSOR: Clemens This bill requires the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DOLIR) to waive the repayment of any unemployment benefits that were incorrectly but nonfraudulently distributed to claimants if such benefits were paid out of the State Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund, and the federal government has granted authority to the state to waive the recovery of such benefits. The bill requires any claimant who is denied a waiver to be sent a notice by DOLIR, not later than 90 days after the effective date of this bill, notifying them that they are allowed to appeal such denial. Claimants must file an appeal not later than 60 days after notifying DOLIR. The bill additionally provides that in the case of over-recovered overpaid unemployment benefits, DOLIR is required to notify claimants by certified mail within 15 days of discovery of over- recovery and must furthermore repay the funds within 30 days of such notification if the amount is less than $10,000. If the over- recovered amount is $10,000 or more, repayment of funds shall occur within a reasonable time period, as determined by agreement of DOLIR and the claimant, with interest.
Requires the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations to waive non-fraudulent overpayments of federally supported unemployment benefits
Feb 17, 2021 · Combined into another bill
Rep. Doug Clemens · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1035 -- UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS SPONSOR: Clemens This bill prohibits the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations from recovering or attempting to recover any employment security benefits that were incorrectly but nonfraudulently distributed to claimants if such employment security benefits were directly funded by moneys received by the state of Missouri from the United States government under: (1) The federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), Pub. L.
The official House record identifies HB1083 as the parent substitute. This bill was not separately enacted. Final recorded action on 2021-02-17: Executive Session Completed (H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1035 -- UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS SPONSOR: Clemens This bill prohibits the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations from recovering or attempting to recover any employment security benefits that were incorrectly but nonfraudulently distributed to claimants if such employment security benefits were directly funded by moneys received by the state of Missouri from the United States government under: (1) The federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), Pub. L.
HB 2494 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2494 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
HB 588 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 588 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
HB 2049 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-17: Referred: General Laws(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2049 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
HB 215 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-05-12: Referred: Economic Development(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 215 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
HB 1729 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
This measure did not pass before the 2022 session ended. Final recorded action on 2022-05-13: Referred: Workforce Development(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1729 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
HB 833 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
This measure did not pass before the 2021 session ended. Final recorded action on 2021-05-14: Referred: Workforce Development(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 833 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
Only current Missouri officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Missouri statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Missouri snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Missouri, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.