Missouri · individual fact

Missouri unemployment rate

State unemployment, employed residents, broader underutilization, and employment growth.

Annual unemployment rate3.7%2024 · #23 of 50 · highest first
Civilian employed residents3,026,9022024 · #22 of 50 · highest first
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer0.9%2025 · 11-month average · #42 of 50 · highest first

Missouri over time

Explore Missouri readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Missouri officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Missouri effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Missouri change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Annual unemployment rate Missouri · source units
MissouriPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Annual unemployment rate2024: 3.7%1.6%4.4%7.1%Missouri, 2015: 5.1%Missouri, 2016: 4.6%Missouri, 2017: 3.8%Missouri, 2018: 3.2%Missouri, 2019: 3.2%Missouri, 2020: 6.1%Missouri, 2021: 4.1%Missouri, 2022: 2.6%Missouri, 2023: 3.1%Missouri, 2024: 3.7%201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 15National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · CARES Act expands unemployment support · 2020-03-27CARES unemployment aidNational context · First U.S. COVID-19 vaccine authorization · 2020-12-11COVID vaccine authorizationNational context · American Rescue Plan extends pandemic unemployment benefits · 2021-03-11Pandemic benefits extendedNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic benefits expireNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Silicon Valley Bank failure and banking stress · 2023-03-10Banking stress / SVBNational context · UAW strikes begin at the three Detroit automakers · 2023-09-15UAW auto strikesNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-18Fed rate cuts beginNational context · Hurricanes Helene and Milton · 2024-09-26Helene & MiltonNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts unemployment data · 2025-10-01Federal shutdown / data gapNational context · BLS reports federal payroll decline as deferred resignations take effect · 2025-12-16Federal payroll departuresNational context · Federal Reserve raises rates in September 2026 · 2026-09-16September 2026 rate rise● Missouri Legislature · 6442222572375● U.S. Congress · Missouri delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 2■ Missouri agencies · 22015-12-012026-09-30

68 of 68 reviewed Missouri actions match · 38 date markers shown. 15 major events shown separately.

Missouri · 2024: 3.7% · Rank #23 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4%

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages. LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Missouri Annual unemployment rate · source units
PeriodMissouriRankU.S. benchmark
20243.7%#23 of 504%
20233.1%#28 of 50Not available
20222.6%#42 of 50Not available
20214.1%#31 of 50Not available
20206.1%#37 of 50Not available
20193.2%#31 of 50Not available
20183.2%#36 of 50Not available
20173.8%#31 of 50Not available
20164.6%#27 of 50Not available
20155.1%#25 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Missouri · state comparison

Employment and unemployment over time

LAUS annual averages measure state residents. Compare unemployment rates or the number of employed residents.

Missouri · 20243.7%
Missouri rank#23among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual unemployment rate

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages.

LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
Annual unemployment rate history in Missouri2.1%4.4%6.6%20152024
2024 · Missouri: 3.7% · Rank #23 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri Annual unemployment rate history
PeriodMissouriCompare
20155.1%
20164.6%
20173.8%
20183.2%
20193.2%
20206.1%
20214.1%
20222.6%
20233.1%
20243.7%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · 1.8%Higher value · 5.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 3.7%2024 · Rank #23 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Annual unemployment rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Nevada5.4%—
#2California5.3%—
#3Illinois5%—
#4Kentucky4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Jersey4.6%—
#7Alaska4.5%—
#7Washington4.5%—
#9Ohio4.4%—
#10Louisiana4.3%—
#10Oregon4.3%—
#12New York4.2%—
#12Rhode Island4.2%—
#14Colorado4.1%—
#14New Mexico4.1%—
#14South Carolina4.1%—
#14Texas4.1%—
#14West Virginia4.1%—
#19Indiana4%—
#19Massachusetts4%—
#21Delaware3.9%—
#22Pennsylvania3.8%—
#23Arizona3.7%—
#23Missouri · your comparison3.7%—
#23North Carolina3.7%—
#26Idaho3.6%—
#27Arkansas3.5%—
#27Kansas3.5%—
#29Florida3.4%—
#29Georgia3.4%—
#29Tennessee3.4%—
#32Connecticut3.3%—
#32Utah3.3%—
#34Iowa3.2%—
#34Maryland3.2%—
#34Mississippi3.2%—
#34Oklahoma3.2%—
#38Minnesota3.1%—
#38Wyoming3.1%—
#40Alabama3%—
#40Maine3%—
#40Montana3%—
#40Wisconsin3%—
#44Virginia2.9%—
#45Hawaii2.8%—
#46Nebraska2.7%—
#47New Hampshire2.6%—
#48North Dakota2.4%—
#49Vermont2.3%—
#50South Dakota1.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Missouri · state comparison

Behind the unemployment rate

The reviewed 2025 CPS snapshot includes both U-3 and the broader U-6 measure. It is separate from the LAUS annual history.

Missouri · 2025 · 11-month average0.9%
Missouri rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer

Unemployed 15 weeks or longer as a share of the civilian labor force.

2025 CPS averages exclude October because data were not collected during the federal shutdown. Not strictly comparable with other-year averages. These directly surveyed CPS estimates differ from LAUS model-based estimates. All states use the same 11 months here.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.6%Higher value · 2.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 0.9%2025 · 11-month average · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer · 2025 · 11-month average · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California2.4%—
#2Oregon2.2%—
#3Illinois2.1%—
#3New York2.1%—
#5Connecticut2%—
#5Rhode Island2%—
#5Washington2%—
#8Massachusetts1.9%—
#8Nevada1.9%—
#8New Jersey1.9%—
#11Delaware1.8%—
#11Virginia1.8%—
#13Louisiana1.7%—
#13Michigan1.7%—
#13West Virginia1.7%—
#16Alaska1.6%—
#16Florida1.6%—
#16Mississippi1.6%—
#16New Mexico1.6%—
#16Ohio1.6%—
#16Pennsylvania1.6%—
#22Colorado1.5%—
#22Kentucky1.5%—
#22Maryland1.5%—
#22Texas1.5%—
#26Arizona1.4%—
#26Georgia1.4%—
#28Arkansas1.3%—
#28Iowa1.3%—
#28North Carolina1.3%—
#28Oklahoma1.3%—
#28South Carolina1.3%—
#33Kansas1.2%—
#33Minnesota1.2%—
#33New Hampshire1.2%—
#33Wisconsin1.2%—
#37Tennessee1.1%—
#37Utah1.1%—
#39Idaho1%—
#39Indiana1%—
#39Nebraska1%—
#42Alabama0.9%—
#42Maine0.9%—
#42Missouri · your comparison0.9%—
#42Wyoming0.9%—
#46Hawaii0.7%—
#46Montana0.7%—
#46South Dakota0.7%—
#46Vermont0.7%—
#50North Dakota0.6%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Missouri · state comparison

Output and jobs

Annual real output growth and BEA job growth provide economic context. Neither is the unemployment rate.

Missouri · 20251.2%
Missouri rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.3%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual real GDP growth

Change in annual real GDP from the prior year.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
Annual real GDP growth history in Missouri-3.3%2.1%7.5%20152025
2025 · Missouri: 1.2% · Rank #42 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.3% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri Annual real GDP growth history
PeriodMissouriCompare
20151.4%
20160.1%
20170.9%
20180.9%
20192.3%
2020-1.5%
20214.9%
20221.8%
20233.4%
20242.5%
20251.2%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · -0.4%Higher value · 5.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 1.2%2025 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Annual real GDP growth · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Delaware5.1%—
#2Alaska4.7%—
#3California3.5%—
#4South Carolina3.3%—
#5Washington3.2%—
#6Idaho3.1%—
#7Kentucky3%—
#8Georgia2.9%—
#9Texas2.8%—
#10West Virginia2.8%—
#11Florida2.8%—
#12Rhode Island2.8%—
#13Utah2.7%—
#14Illinois2.6%—
#15New York2.5%—
#16Connecticut2.5%—
#17Ohio2.4%—
#18Virginia2.3%—
#19Oklahoma2.2%—
#20Michigan2.2%—
#21Tennessee2.1%—
#22New Jersey2%—
#23Nevada2%—
#24Montana2%—
#25Alabama2%—
#26Vermont1.9%—
#27Colorado1.9%—
#28Indiana1.9%—
#29Pennsylvania1.8%—
#30North Carolina1.8%—
#31New Mexico1.8%—
#32South Dakota1.8%—
#33New Hampshire1.7%—
#34Louisiana1.5%—
#35Hawaii1.5%—
#36Arizona1.5%—
#37Maine1.4%—
#38Oregon1.4%—
#39Massachusetts1.3%—
#40Mississippi1.3%—
#41Nebraska1.3%—
#42Missouri · your comparison1.2%—
#43Kansas1%—
#44Arkansas0.9%—
#45Wisconsin0.8%—
#46Maryland0.8%—
#47Minnesota0.7%—
#48North Dakota0.5%—
#49Wyoming0.1%—
#50Iowa-0.4%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Missouri · state comparison

Job openings, hires, layoffs, and worker groups

A state unemployment rate does not capture all unused labor or job-market turnover.

Missouri · December 2025128,000
Missouri rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark6,550,000Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Openings · number

Number of jobs or monthly employment flows; published thousands converted to individual units.

Seasonally adjusted state JOLTS estimates, July–December 2025 as printed in the captured table. Recent estimates are preliminary and revisions can change ranks. Openings are a month-end stock; hires, quits, and layoffs are monthly flows, not distinct workers.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
Openings · number history in Missouri-931,7503,647,5008,226,750July 2025December 2025
December 2025 · Missouri: 128,000 · Rank #16 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 6,550,000 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri Openings · number history
PeriodMissouriCompare
July 2025134,000
August 2025133,000
September 2025138,000
October 2025133,000
November 2025125,000
December 2025128,000

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11,000Higher value · 674,000Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 128,000December 2025 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Openings · number · December 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California674,000—
#2Texas608,000—
#3New York431,000—
#4Florida404,000—
#5Ohio287,000—
#6Georgia279,000—
#7Pennsylvania235,000—
#8Michigan221,000—
#9Virginia213,000—
#10North Carolina212,000—
#11Illinois211,000—
#12New Jersey172,000—
#13Tennessee143,000—
#14Minnesota135,000—
#15Massachusetts129,000—
#16Missouri · your comparison128,000—
#17Maryland127,000—
#18Indiana123,000—
#19Arizona121,000—
#20Wisconsin115,000—
#21Washington110,000—
#22South Carolina103,000—
#23Louisiana101,000—
#23Oklahoma101,000—
#25Colorado100,000—
#26Kentucky92,000—
#27Alabama91,000—
#28Oregon72,000—
#29Connecticut67,000—
#30Utah64,000—
#31Kansas61,000—
#32Arkansas60,000—
#33Mississippi59,000—
#34Iowa57,000—
#35Nevada52,000—
#36West Virginia42,000—
#37Nebraska38,000—
#38Idaho34,000—
#39New Mexico32,000—
#40Maine28,000—
#41Delaware23,000—
#42Montana22,000—
#42New Hampshire22,000—
#42Rhode Island22,000—
#45South Dakota20,000—
#46Hawaii19,000—
#47North Dakota18,000—
#48Alaska16,000—
#49Vermont11,000—
#49Wyoming11,000—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about unemployment, jobs and workforce issues from FactVote’s Missouri candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

30 statements from 10 candidates

2026 Missouri State Auditor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Republican · State Auditor · MO

Jobs & workforce context

Our kids are the future of our state and are our most precious resource. I am a product of public education, and I am proud to be the son of a lifelong schoolteacher. Many of our schools do a great job educating our children and preparing them for their next phase of life, but unfortunately, not all…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: School District Oversight

Candidate campaign source

Our kids are the future of our state and are our most precious resource. I am a product of public education, and I am proud to be the son of a lifelong schoolteacher. Many of our schools do a great job educating our children and preparing them for their next phase of life, but unfortunately, not all Missouri schools are delivering acceptable results. In 2008 the legislature passed a law to allow the Auditor to audit school districts. In the 14 years since that law took effect, only 19 audits have been conducted pursuant to that authority, despite there being 516 school districts in Missouri! Meanwhile two thirds of Missouri students aren’t proficient in math or science, and over half don’t read at grade level, despite record levels of funding for public schools. As Auditor, I’ll review administrative costs and administrator salaries and measure the performance of our schools against the investment taxpayers are making in them. I will help parents make sure their schools are doing what they’re expected to do: teach kids the things they need to learn to be prepared to join the workforce or go to college.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Scott Fitzpatrick — candidate-owned primary source ↗

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Wesley Bell

3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · MO

Jobs & workforce context

Missouri’s First District deserves a fighter in Washington who knows how to deliver results. Despite Republicans controlling both chambers in Congress and the White House, he secured over $12.3 million in federal funding for critical infrastructure, public safety, workforce development, and neighbor…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Bringing Federal Resources Home to St. Louis.

Candidate campaign source

Missouri’s First District deserves a fighter in Washington who knows how to deliver results. Despite Republicans controlling both chambers in Congress and the White House, he secured over $12.3 million in federal funding for critical infrastructure, public safety, workforce development, and neighborhood revitalization across St. Louis City and North County. Wesley continues to fight every day to make sure our district has the resources it needs to grow and thrive.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Wesley Bell — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from Wesley Bell
Jobs & workforce context

Climate change is a crisis, and here in Missouri, the effects are already making an impact on our way of life and the safety of our most vulnerable communities, from extreme weather events to deteriorating air and water quality. Wesley believes that confronting the climate crisis and growing our eco…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Delivering Environmental Justice.

Candidate campaign source

Climate change is a crisis, and here in Missouri, the effects are already making an impact on our way of life and the safety of our most vulnerable communities, from extreme weather events to deteriorating air and water quality. Wesley believes that confronting the climate crisis and growing our economy are not in conflict. The transition to clean energy should create good-paying union jobs right here in the First District. He has fought to protect clean air and water standards, hold polluters accountable, and ensure that the federal government lives up to its obligations to communities like those along Coldwater Creek and the Westlake Landfill that have suffered from decades of environmental neglect and contamination.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Wesley Bell — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Now, Wesley is running for reelection to continue fighting for his constituents in Washington: holding the Trump administration and MAGA Republicans accountable, expanding access to affordable health care and prescription drugs, lowering energy costs, bringing down the price of groceries, protecting…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: A strong leader for common-sense solutions. Learn more about Wesley Bell here.

Candidate campaign source

Now, Wesley is running for reelection to continue fighting for his constituents in Washington: holding the Trump administration and MAGA Republicans accountable, expanding access to affordable health care and prescription drugs, lowering energy costs, bringing down the price of groceries, protecting our rights and freedoms, and creating good-paying jobs right here in St. Louis.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Wesley Bell — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 5 statements

Ann Wagner

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · MO

Jobs & workforce context

Eliminate federal regulations the candidate considers burdensome so businesses can grow and create jobs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Regulation

Candidate campaign source

Eliminate federal regulations the candidate considers burdensome so businesses can grow and create jobs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Ann Wagner — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Ann Wagner
Jobs & workforce context

Born and raised in Missouri, Ann Wagner understands our conservative Christian family values. Working alongside her parents at their small retail carpet store in Manchester, Carpetime, she learned the value of a dollar, a strong work ethic, honesty, integrity, and that government ought to get out of…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Born and raised in Missouri, Ann Wagner understands our conservative Christian family values. Working alongside her parents at their small retail carpet store in Manchester, Carpetime, she learned the value of a dollar, a strong work ethic, honesty, integrity, and that government ought to get out of the way and off the backs of hard-working Americans. These values continue to guide her today as she works to cut taxes and eliminate burdensome regulations so local businesses, like her parents’, can grow and create more jobs and put more money in the pockets of hardworking Missourians.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Ann Wagner — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Fred Wellman

3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · MO

Jobs & workforce context

We must immediately raise the federal minimum wage, protect workers' rights to form and join unions, and ensure equal pay and paid family leave for all employees. It is imperative that we strengthen laws to end illegal union-busting, strengthen collective bargaining rights across all sectors, and in…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Unions and Labor

Candidate campaign source

We must immediately raise the federal minimum wage, protect workers' rights to form and join unions, and ensure equal pay and paid family leave for all employees. It is imperative that we strengthen laws to end illegal union-busting, strengthen collective bargaining rights across all sectors, and invest in high-quality, sustainable job creation that provides pathways for every American to support themselves and their families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Fred Wellman — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from Fred Wellman
Jobs & workforce context

Every Missourian deserves the freedom to build a good life without being burdened by rising costs. Families are working harder than ever but falling further behind because the price of housing, healthcare, childcare, and groceries keeps climbing while wages stay flat. We must put working families fi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Affordability

Candidate campaign source

Every Missourian deserves the freedom to build a good life without being burdened by rising costs. Families are working harder than ever but falling further behind because the price of housing, healthcare, childcare, and groceries keeps climbing while wages stay flat. We must put working families first by lowering costs, expanding access to good-paying jobs, and making sure every family can afford the basics — not just to survive, but to thrive.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Fred Wellman — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

The Department of Defense under Donald Trump, Pete Hegseth, and the Republican Congress is out of control and in constant turmoil and has led to our nation being in grave danger and our international reputation in shambles. I will act immediately to reign in the outrageous and illegal actions by Sec…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Israel and Palestine

Candidate campaign source

The Department of Defense under Donald Trump, Pete Hegseth, and the Republican Congress is out of control and in constant turmoil and has led to our nation being in grave danger and our international reputation in shambles. I will act immediately to reign in the outrageous and illegal actions by Secretary Hegseth from his meddling in promotions, illegal religious infusion into the military, and hiring of unqualified propagandists for his personal promotion.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Fred Wellman — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific unemployment, jobs and workforce issues terms in retained, attributed source text from published Missouri candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Missouri incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Missouri legislators and Missouri’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Missouri’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

64 matching sponsorships or proposals · 33 Missouri incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Bruce Sassmann

Missouri House of Representatives, District 61 · R–MO

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Bruce Sassmann
Missouri Legislature · HB 1281

Modifies provisions of the employment security program and establishes the "Employment Security Program Integrity Act of 2025", relating to the administration of unemployment compensation

Mar 25, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Bruce Sassmann · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1281 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Sassmann This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding that if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security (Division) within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in writing or by email or telephone. This bill establishes the "Employment Security Program Integrity Act of 2025" and defines terms such as "Employment security rolls", "National…

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-03-25: HCS Voted Do Pass (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1281 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Sassmann This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding that if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security (Division) within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in writing or by email or telephone. This bill establishes the "Employment Security Program Integrity Act of 2025" and defines terms such as "Employment security rolls", "National data check system", "New-hire records", and "Welfare agency" for the purpose of this Act. This bill requires the Division to utilize a national data check system to verify that eligible claimants receive unemployment compensation benefits. Weekly checks against a list of incarcerated individuals, State death records, and new-hire records are necessary to ensure the accuracy of employment security rolls. The bill specifies methods for verifying the identity of unemployment compensation benefit claimants, including multi-factor authentication. This bill requires that the Division conduct eligibility reviews for suspicious or potentially improper claims, including multiple or duplicative claims from the same internet protocol address, or associated with the same mailing address or bank account or claims filed from foreign addresses. Welfare agencies are required to notify the Division when an enrolled individual becomes employed. This bill allows the Division to pursue the recovery of fraudulent or improper unemployment compensation benefits overpayment. The Division is required to provide an annual report to the General Assembly each year, by December 31st, describing improper unemployment compensation benefit payments and their recovery efforts. The Division is authorized to enter into a memorandum of understanding with other state entities to share and receive the necessary information.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 2034

Modifies provisions relating to workforce development

May 7, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Bruce Sassmann · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

This portion of the bill sunsets on December 31, 2030. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION (Section 288.050) The bill also revises the reasons a claimant may be disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding that if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed without good cause to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in writing or by email or telephone.

This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-07: Placed on the Informal Perfection Calendar (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

This portion of the bill sunsets on December 31, 2030. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION (Section 288.050) The bill also revises the reasons a claimant may be disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding that if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed without good cause to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in writing or by email or telephone.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Chris Brown

Missouri House of Representatives, District 16 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Chris Brown
Missouri Legislature · HB 2896

Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education

Jul 13, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Chris Brown · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SS SCS HB 2896 -- EDUCATION This bill modifies certain provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education. WORKFORCE DIPLOMA PROGRAM (Section 173.831) Current law provides for the Workforce Diploma Program to assist students with obtaining a high school diploma and developing employability and career technical skills, with such program scheduled to sunset on August 28, 2028. This bill repeals the sunset provision for this Section.

Approved by the Governor on 2026-07-13. The recorded final action was 2026-07-13: Delivered to Secretary of State (G). This is the legislative disposition; subsequent court rulings may affect enforcement.

Why this record is included

The record addresses high-school completion, equivalency, or adult education relevant to the diploma-or-higher share of adults age 25 and older. Current student programs affect only a potential future component of that adult population. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SS SCS HB 2896 -- EDUCATION This bill modifies certain provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education. WORKFORCE DIPLOMA PROGRAM (Section 173.831) Current law provides for the Workforce Diploma Program to assist students with obtaining a high school diploma and developing employability and career technical skills, with such program scheduled to sunset on August 28, 2028. This bill repeals the sunset provision for this Section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Dale Wright

Missouri House of Representatives, District 116 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Dale Wright
Missouri Legislature · HB 2091

Modifies provisions relating to eligibility for MO HealthNet benefits

May 13, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Dale Wright · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2091 -- MO HEALTHNET BENEFITS SPONSOR: Wright This bill provides that the Department of Social Services (DSS) shall develop and implement a program to allow recipients or caretakers of recipients who would otherwise lose MO HealthNet benefits eligibility due to an increase of income over the monthly allowable maximum to continue to receive such benefits by paying a premium. For recipients whose income exceeds the monthly allowable maximum by $500 or less, the premium shall be 25% of the recipients income in excess of the maximum. The bill requires DSS to develop a method for payment of premiums through payroll deduction or an alternative method. Any recipient not paying such premiums will…

This measure did not pass before the 2022 session ended. Final recorded action on 2022-05-13: Referred: Health and Mental Health Policy(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses eligibility, enrollment, or affordability of health coverage, relevant to the share of people under 65 without insurance. A service-specific benefit or provider-payment rule alone is not a change in insured status. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 2091 -- MO HEALTHNET BENEFITS SPONSOR: Wright This bill provides that the Department of Social Services (DSS) shall develop and implement a program to allow recipients or caretakers of recipients who would otherwise lose MO HealthNet benefits eligibility due to an increase of income over the monthly allowable maximum to continue to receive such benefits by paying a premium. For recipients whose income exceeds the monthly allowable maximum by $500 or less, the premium shall be 25% of the recipients income in excess of the maximum. The bill requires DSS to develop a method for payment of premiums through payroll deduction or an alternative method. Any recipient not paying such premiums will lose eligibility for MO HealthNet benefits after 60 days of nonpayment. A recipient participating in this program shall be eligible for voluntary training regarding interview skills, education options, and other necessary tools to broaden employment opportunities.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. David Casteel

Missouri House of Representatives, District 97 · R–MO

3 proposals
View proposals from Rep. David Casteel
Missouri Legislature · HB 2068

Modifies provisions of the employment security program

May 15, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. David Casteel · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2068 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Casteel This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding: if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test for suitable work three times. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in a method and manner determined by the division. This bill establishes the "Employment Security Program Integrity Act of 2026" and defines terms such as "Employment…

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 2068 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Casteel This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding: if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test for suitable work three times. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in a method and manner determined by the division. This bill establishes the "Employment Security Program Integrity Act of 2026" and defines terms such as "Employment security rolls", "National data check system", "New-hire records", and "Welfare agency" for the purpose of this Act. This bill requires the Division to utilize a national data check system to verify that eligible claimants receive unemployment compensation benefits. Weekly checks against a list of incarcerated individuals, State death records, and new-hire records are required to ensure the accuracy of employment security rolls. The bill specifies methods for verifying the identity of unemployment compensation benefit claimants, including multi- factor authentication. This bill requires that the Division conduct eligibility reviews for suspicious or potentially improper claims, including multiple or duplicative claims from the same internet protocol address, or associated with the same mailing address or bank account or claims filed from foreign addresses. Welfare agencies are required to notify the Division when an enrolled individual becomes employed. This bill allows the Division to pursue the recovery of fraudulent or improper unemployment compensation benefits overpayment. The Division is required to provide an annual report to the General Assembly each year, by December 31st, describing improper unemployment compensation benefit payments and their recovery efforts. The Division is authorized to enter into a memorandum of understanding with other state entities to share and receive the necessary information.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 202

Modifies provisions of the employment security program

May 7, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. David Casteel · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HCS HB 202 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY (Casteel) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Government Efficiency This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding that if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test for suitable work three times. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in a method and manner determined by the division . This bill establishes the "Employment Security…

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-07: SCS Voted Do Pass (S).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HCS HB 202 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY (Casteel) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Government Efficiency This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding that if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test for suitable work three times. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in a method and manner determined by the division . This bill establishes the "Employment Security Program Integrity Act of 2025" and defines terms such as "Employment security rolls", "National data check system", "New-hire records", and "Welfare agency" for the purpose of this Act. This bill requires the Division to utilize a national data check system to verify that eligible claimants receive unemployment compensation benefits. Weekly checks against a list of incarcerated individuals, State death records, and new-hire records are required to ensure the accuracy of employment security rolls. The bill specifies methods for verifying the identity of unemployment compensation benefit claimants, including multi-factor authentication. This bill requires that the Division conduct eligibility reviews for suspicious or potentially improper claims, including multiple or duplicative claims from the same internet protocol address, or associated with the same mailing address or bank account or claims filed from foreign addresses. Welfare agencies are required to notify the Division when an enrolled individual becomes employed. This bill allows the Division to pursue the recovery of fraudulent or improper unemployment compensation benefits overpayment. The Division is required to provide an annual report to the General Assembly each year, by December 31st, describing improper unemployment compensation benefit payments and their recovery efforts. The Division is authorized to enter into a memorandum of understanding with other state entities to share and receive the necessary information.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 2614

Modifies provisions of the employment security program

May 7, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. David Casteel · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2614. This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding that if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test three times during the same unemployment cycle. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in writing or by email.

This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-07: Reported Do Pass (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2614. This bill adds to the reasons a claimant is disqualified for unemployment compensation by adding that if the designated representative of the Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations finds that a claimant failed to appear for a scheduled job interview or skills test three times during the same unemployment cycle. The bill also revises the method of notifying the claimant by deleting the current requirement of certified mail and referring to notification in writing or by email.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Doug Clemens

Missouri House of Representatives, District 72 · D–MO

3 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Doug Clemens
Missouri Legislature · HB 597

Creates new provisions governing the recovery of overpaid unemployment benefits

May 12, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Doug Clemens · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 597 -- UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS SPONSOR: Clemens This bill requires the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DOLIR) to waive the repayment of any unemployment benefits that were incorrectly but nonfraudulently distributed to claimants if such benefits were paid out of the State Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund, and the federal government has granted authority to the state to waive the recovery of such benefits. The bill requires any claimant who is denied a waiver to be sent a notice by DOLIR, not later than 90 days after the effective date of this bill, notifying them that they are allowed to appeal such denial. Claimants must file an appeal not later than 60 days after…

This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-05-12: Referred: Workforce and Infrastructure Development(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 597 -- UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS SPONSOR: Clemens This bill requires the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DOLIR) to waive the repayment of any unemployment benefits that were incorrectly but nonfraudulently distributed to claimants if such benefits were paid out of the State Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund, and the federal government has granted authority to the state to waive the recovery of such benefits. The bill requires any claimant who is denied a waiver to be sent a notice by DOLIR, not later than 90 days after the effective date of this bill, notifying them that they are allowed to appeal such denial. Claimants must file an appeal not later than 60 days after notifying DOLIR. The bill additionally provides that in the case of over-recovered overpaid unemployment benefits, DOLIR is required to notify claimants by certified mail within 15 days of discovery of over- recovery and must furthermore repay the funds within 30 days of such notification if the amount is less than $10,000. If the over- recovered amount is $10,000 or more, repayment of funds shall occur within a reasonable time period, as determined by agreement of DOLIR and the claimant, with interest.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 2513

Creates new provisions relating to the recovery of overpaid unemployment benefits

May 13, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Doug Clemens · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2513 -- RECOVERY OF OVERPAID UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS SPONSOR: Clemens This bill requires the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DOLIR) to waive the repayment of any unemployment benefits that were incorrectly but nonfraudulently distributed to claimants if such benefits were paid out of the State Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund, and the federal government has granted authority to the state to waive the recovery of such benefits. The bill requires any claimant who is denied a waiver to be sent a notice by DOLIR, not later than 90 days after the effective date of this bill, notifying them that they are allowed to appeal such denial. Claimants must file an appeal not later than…

This measure did not pass before the 2022 session ended. Final recorded action on 2022-05-13: Referred: Workforce Development(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 2513 -- RECOVERY OF OVERPAID UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS SPONSOR: Clemens This bill requires the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DOLIR) to waive the repayment of any unemployment benefits that were incorrectly but nonfraudulently distributed to claimants if such benefits were paid out of the State Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund, and the federal government has granted authority to the state to waive the recovery of such benefits. The bill requires any claimant who is denied a waiver to be sent a notice by DOLIR, not later than 90 days after the effective date of this bill, notifying them that they are allowed to appeal such denial. Claimants must file an appeal not later than 60 days after notifying DOLIR. The bill additionally provides that in the case of over-recovered overpaid unemployment benefits, DOLIR is required to notify claimants by certified mail within 15 days of discovery of over- recovery and must furthermore repay the funds within 30 days of such notification if the amount is less than $10,000. If the over- recovered amount is $10,000 or more, repayment of funds shall occur within a reasonable time period, as determined by agreement of DOLIR and the claimant, with interest.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1035

Requires the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations to waive non-fraudulent overpayments of federally supported unemployment benefits

Feb 17, 2021 · Combined into another bill

Rep. Doug Clemens · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1035 -- UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS SPONSOR: Clemens This bill prohibits the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations from recovering or attempting to recover any employment security benefits that were incorrectly but nonfraudulently distributed to claimants if such employment security benefits were directly funded by moneys received by the state of Missouri from the United States government under: (1) The federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), Pub. L.

The official House record identifies HB1083 as the parent substitute. This bill was not separately enacted. Final recorded action on 2021-02-17: Executive Session Completed (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1035 -- UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS SPONSOR: Clemens This bill prohibits the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations from recovering or attempting to recover any employment security benefits that were incorrectly but nonfraudulently distributed to claimants if such employment security benefits were directly funded by moneys received by the state of Missouri from the United States government under: (1) The federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), Pub. L.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Emily Weber

Missouri House of Representatives, District 24 · D–MO

6 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Emily Weber
Missouri Legislature · HB 2494

Extends the duration of unemployment benefits

May 15, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Emily Weber · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2494 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 2494 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 588

Extends the duration of unemployment benefits

May 15, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Emily Weber · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 588 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 588 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 2049

Extends the duration of unemployment benefits

May 17, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Emily Weber · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2049 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.

This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-17: Referred: General Laws(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 2049 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 215

Extends the duration of unemployment benefits

May 12, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Emily Weber · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 215 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.

This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-05-12: Referred: Economic Development(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 215 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1729

Extends the duration of unemployment benefits

May 13, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Emily Weber · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1729 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.

This measure did not pass before the 2022 session ended. Final recorded action on 2022-05-13: Referred: Workforce Development(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1729 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 833

Extends the duration of unemployment benefits

May 14, 2021 · Did not pass

Rep. Emily Weber · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 833 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.

This measure did not pass before the 2021 session ended. Final recorded action on 2021-05-14: Referred: Workforce Development(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 833 -- EMPLOYMENT SECURITY SPONSOR: Weber This bill changes the total amount of unemployment compensation benefits an insured worker may receive during a benefit year. Currently, that amount is limited to the lesser of 20 times his or her weekly benefit, or 33 1/3% of his or her wage credits.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Missouri officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Missouri statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.