Missouri · individual fact

Missouri income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Missouri’s tax structure.

Median household income$70.7K2020–2024 · #40 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$39.7K2020–2024 · #38 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$57.85K2024 · #27 of 50 · highest first

Missouri over time

Explore Missouri readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Missouri officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Missouri effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Missouri change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person Missouri · source units
MissouriPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $57,850$44.06K$52.53K$61KMissouri, 2014: $45,700Missouri, 2015: $47,620Missouri, 2016: $48,744Missouri, 2017: $48,930Missouri, 2018: $49,929Missouri, 2019: $50,660Missouri, 2020: $54,269Missouri, 2021: $56,869Missouri, 2022: $55,467Missouri, 2023: $56,912Missouri, 2024: $57,850201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 35National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings funding● Missouri Legislature · 147343226272221052263322122210● U.S. Congress · Missouri delegation · 7◆ Governor · 3■ Missouri agencies · 12005-09-012026-07-31

158 of 158 reviewed Missouri actions match · 86 date markers shown. 35 major events shown separately.

Missouri · 2024: $57,850 · Rank #27 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Missouri Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodMissouriRankU.S. benchmark
2024$57,850#27 of 50$59,195
2023$56,912#27 of 50$58,088
2022$55,467#28 of 50$57,104
2021$56,869#28 of 50$59,365
2020$54,269#29 of 50$56,514
2019$50,660#33 of 50$53,683
2018$49,929#32 of 50$52,242
2017$48,930#28 of 50$51,006
2016$48,744#25 of 50$49,828
2015$47,620#28 of 50$49,396
2014$45,700#30 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Missouri · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

Missouri · 2020–2024$70,702
Missouri rank#40among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · $70,7022020–2024 · Rank #40 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $70,377 – $71,027Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri · your comparison$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$70,7022020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by Missouri households, expressed in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • Income is not take-home pay and does not directly measure taxes, wealth, prices, or purchasing power.
  • A statewide median obscures regional and household differences.
Missouri · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

Missouri · 2024$57,850
Missouri rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
Real personal income per person history in Missouri$43.65K$52.53K$61.41K20142024
2024 · Missouri: $57,850 · Rank #27 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri Real personal income per person history
PeriodMissouriCompare
2014$45,700
2015$47,620
2016$48,744
2017$48,930
2018$49,929
2019$50,660
2020$54,269
2021$56,869
2022$55,467
2023$56,912
2024$57,850

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · $57,8502024 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri · your comparison$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Missouri · state comparison

How Missouri raises taxes

Missouri uses graduated individual-income-tax brackets. The current Department of Revenue table has a 4.7% top rate on Missouri taxable income over the indexed top-bracket threshold. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

Missouri · FY2024$7.75B
Missouri rank#18among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · $7.75BFY2024 · Rank #18 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri · your comparison$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky$5.02B—
#24Louisiana$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma$4.51B—
#27Kansas$4.5B—
#28Iowa$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska$2.48B—
#34Maine$2.4B—
#35Mississippi$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding Missouri income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The Missouri ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Missouri candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

57 statements from 19 candidates

2026 Missouri State Auditor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 5 statements

Quentin Wilson

2 statements

Democratic · State Auditor · MO

Taxes & tax policy

Audit and correct the state's capital-gains tax calculation before Missouri adopts additional tax policy changes.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Tax Oversight

Candidate campaign source

Audit and correct the state's capital-gains tax calculation before Missouri adopts additional tax policy changes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Quentin Wilson — Part 76 verified source ↗
View 1 more statement from Quentin Wilson
Taxes & tax policy

Dear Fellow Missourians: I’m seeking your support for State Auditor to help state, county, and local governments manage tax dollars wisely and achieve better results for citizens.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Dear Fellow Missourians: I’m seeking your support for State Auditor to help state, county, and local governments manage tax dollars wisely and achieve better results for citizens.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Quentin Wilson — candidate-owned primary source ↗

Scott Fitzpatrick

3 statements

Republican · State Auditor · MO

Taxes & tax policy

We have witnessed countless attacks on our values and out of control spending from the Biden Administration and the liberals running Congress. Missourians are fiscally conservative, and we don’t take it well when politicians and bureaucrats waste our money on inefficient programs or by giving handou…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Defending Missouri Values

Candidate campaign source

We have witnessed countless attacks on our values and out of control spending from the Biden Administration and the liberals running Congress. Missourians are fiscally conservative, and we don’t take it well when politicians and bureaucrats waste our money on inefficient programs or by giving handouts to insiders. As Treasurer, when the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program (the state’s largest tax credit program), was wasting millions of dollars per year to benefit wealthy developers, I championed reforms to the program that are saving tens of millions of dollars per year for taxpayers. As Auditor, you can trust me to give you the facts, fight for reforms wherever they are needed, and not cave to pressure from lobbyists or special interest groups when those facts show they are benefiting from sweetheart deals at your expense.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Scott Fitzpatrick — candidate-owned primary source ↗
View 2 more statements from Scott Fitzpatrick
Taxes & tax policy

When I became Budget Chairman I inherited a massive budget deficit, but I went to work, cut wasteful spending, and balanced the budget. The bureaucrats and lobbyists didn’t believe it was possible to accomplish all these things at the same time. But I knew the truth – if we are willing to make diffi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Entering Public Service

Candidate campaign source

When I became Budget Chairman I inherited a massive budget deficit, but I went to work, cut wasteful spending, and balanced the budget. The bureaucrats and lobbyists didn’t believe it was possible to accomplish all these things at the same time. But I knew the truth – if we are willing to make difficult decisions and put the interests of Missourians above those of special interests, anything is possible. At the end of my time as Budget Chairman, even after making a record investment in K-12 education and passing a tax cut that put money back in Missourians’ pockets, our budget surplus was over $650 million.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Scott Fitzpatrick — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Taxes & tax policy

As House Budget Chairman, I defeated a plan hatched by Democratic Governor Jay Nixon to give illegal immigrants in-state tuition at Missouri higher education institutions by cracking down on their funding. After Democrats lost that battle, they attempted to change state regulation to allow those sam…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Blocking Taxpayer Funding for Illegal Immigrants

Candidate campaign source

As House Budget Chairman, I defeated a plan hatched by Democratic Governor Jay Nixon to give illegal immigrants in-state tuition at Missouri higher education institutions by cracking down on their funding. After Democrats lost that battle, they attempted to change state regulation to allow those same illegal immigrants to receive scholarships funded by Missouri taxpayers. Once again, I fought back against this attempted abuse of taxpayer money, and I won by passing a bill overriding those regulatory changes and leading to the override of Governor Nixon’s veto of the legislation. As Auditor, I will ensure your tax dollars are not spent providing benefits to illegal immigrants.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Scott Fitzpatrick — candidate-owned primary source ↗

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Tom Schmitz

3 statements

Libertarian · U.S. House District 1 · MO

Taxes & tax policy

Libertarians believe that taxation is theft, inflation (money printing out of thin air) is theft, and that all funding of government must be voluntary.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: The Republican/Democrat uniparty has grown our government into an out of control, oppressive system, destroyed our currency, wrecked our healthcare industry, and executed a foreign policy of endless wars, bombings, death, and destruction. The Libertarian Party is the true opposition to the uniparty war machine, the only bulwark against the uniparty's spiral ever further into forced collectivism. The real debate in America is not left vs. right, but liberty vs. tyranny. Libertarians are fighting for a free society, where individuals are allowed to pursue their goals and dreams without interference from government, where the power is taken out of the hands of the monolithic state and returned to individual choice, and where values of self-ownership and freedom of conscience triumph over coercion and tyranny. I will never stop fighting for individualism and peace, and against the darkness of forced collectivism and endless war. Thank you for visiting my website and for having an open mind, I hope to earn your vote this November. -Tom Schmitz, Libertarian Party Candidate for Congress in Missouri's 1st Congressional District

Candidate campaign source

Libertarians believe that taxation is theft, inflation (money printing out of thin air) is theft, and that all funding of government must be voluntary.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Tom Schmitz — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
View 2 more statements from Tom Schmitz
Taxes & tax policy

Taxpayers should never have their money, which has been taken from them against their will, used to bailout failing corporations, banks, other business entities, or individuals, for any reason. There is no such thing as "too big to fail". In a free market, failing entities must be allowed to fail wi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Uniparty's Endless Money Printing and Forced Collectivism Are Causes of Affordability Crisis, Free Markets Are the Solution The number one problem with affordability in the United States is rampant inflation. Inflation is caused primarily by the uniparty government printing up trillions and trillions of dollars out of thin air. This dilutes the money supply and causes the dollar to rapidly lose its spending power. This uniparty inflation is an insidious regressive taxation that crushes the poor and the middle class, it hurts them the most. The uniparty government politicians will never stop printing up money, and that is the main cause of inflation. Politicians cannot be trusted to stop spending. As long as they control the printing presses, they will never stop printing money. The only solution is to take this power to manage currency away from the state and return it to the people. We must transition away from our current fiat currency system and embrace a free market, voluntary monetary system. Separating currency and state is the only way to end inflation. The next part of affordability is the state's constant destruction, interference, and stifling of the free market. This government's extensive involvement in healthcare and education industries in particular is especially destructive, as the costs of both healthcare and education have now spiraled completely out of control in accordance with the increasing level of tyrannical government control over these industries. The more the government is involved in any industry, the more prices go up and spiral out of control. We must embrace free market competition in all areas of our economy. The free market always drives prices down as far as possible, often times far exceeding expectations, and gets the most goods and services to the most people in the most efficient manner possible.

Candidate campaign source

Taxpayers should never have their money, which has been taken from them against their will, used to bailout failing corporations, banks, other business entities, or individuals, for any reason. There is no such thing as "too big to fail". In a free market, failing entities must be allowed to fail with no exceptions. Further, government should not play favorites by awarding subsidies to certain companies while not awarding subsidies to others. Subsidies are not only rooted in coercive taxation, but also unjustly provide one entity a competitive advantage over another in the marketplace.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Tom Schmitz — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Income & wages

Unions have the right to organize, collectively bargain, and strike. Organized labor is fundamental to workers being able to negotiate for a wage that reflects the value of their labor. Unions are a critical and essential part of the free market and must always be allowed to form and flourish freely…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: The Right to Keep and Bear Arms We need to vigilantly protect our right to keep an bear arms; the American people should never be helpless, defenseless victims. The right to bear arms is a human right. The 2nd Amendment is important in that it recognizes this human right, but our right to keep and bear arms does not come from government. We must resist the expansion of "red flag" laws, which are a dangerous slippery slope toward government obtaining the power to disarm American Citizens at will and without any semblance of due process.​​ Criminal Justice Reform We need real, substantive policy change in our law enforcement and criminal system. In addition to criminal prosecution, it is also essential that police officers who violate the rights of others be held personally liable in civil court. I stand for ending qualified immunity, which will allow for civil action against individual police officers who have harmed others and violated their individual rights. While this is only one of many issues that needs to be addressed, ending qualified immunity would be a small but important step in the right direction toward fighting injustice and addressing racial disparities in our justice system.​

Candidate campaign source

Unions have the right to organize, collectively bargain, and strike. Organized labor is fundamental to workers being able to negotiate for a wage that reflects the value of their labor. Unions are a critical and essential part of the free market and must always be allowed to form and flourish freely without any interference from government.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Tom Schmitz — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Wesley Bell

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · MO

Taxes & tax policy

Government should work for everyone, not just those at the top. But Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans are slashing health care and food assistance programs, and giving even more tax breaks to billionaires and big corporations. Trump used ICE as his own unaccountable paramilitary to terrorize immigra…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Government accountability, health care, food assistance, and immigration

Candidate campaign source

Government should work for everyone, not just those at the top. But Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans are slashing health care and food assistance programs, and giving even more tax breaks to billionaires and big corporations. Trump used ICE as his own unaccountable paramilitary to terrorize immigrants and separate families. And when Congress passed bipartisan legislation to release files exposing Jeffrey Epstein's criminal network, this administration fought transparency every step of the way. In Congress, Wesley Bell is standing up to this reckless and dangerous administration at every step.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Wesley Bell — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 11 statements

Ann Wagner

7 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · MO

Taxes & tax policy

Born and raised in Missouri, Ann Wagner understands our conservative Christian family values. Working alongside her parents at their small retail carpet store in Manchester, Carpetime, she learned the value of a dollar, a strong work ethic, honesty, integrity, and that government ought to get out of…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Born and raised in Missouri, Ann Wagner understands our conservative Christian family values. Working alongside her parents at their small retail carpet store in Manchester, Carpetime, she learned the value of a dollar, a strong work ethic, honesty, integrity, and that government ought to get out of the way and off the backs of hard-working Americans. These values continue to guide her today as she works to cut taxes and eliminate burdensome regulations so local businesses, like her parents’, can grow and create more jobs and put more money in the pockets of hardworking Missourians.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Ann Wagner — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 6 more statements from Ann Wagner
Taxes & tax policy

Voted for the 2025 tax law creating a limited federal deduction for qualified tip income.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Tip Income

Candidate campaign source

Voted for the 2025 tax law creating a limited federal deduction for qualified tip income.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Ann Wagner — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Voted for the 2025 tax law creating a limited federal deduction for qualified overtime compensation.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Overtime Income

Candidate campaign source

Voted for the 2025 tax law creating a limited federal deduction for qualified overtime compensation.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Ann Wagner — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Voted for the Working Families Tax Cut.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Family Taxes

Candidate campaign source

Voted for the Working Families Tax Cut.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Ann Wagner — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Cut federal taxes so workers and businesses retain more of their income.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes

Candidate campaign source

Cut federal taxes so workers and businesses retain more of their income.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Ann Wagner — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

She understands that the cost of groceries and gas has made life challenging for Missouri families, and she has worked to bring down the cost of living for working parents. Ann voted for the Working Families Tax Cut to prevent the largest tax increase in history and make sure you keep more of your h…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

She understands that the cost of groceries and gas has made life challenging for Missouri families, and she has worked to bring down the cost of living for working parents. Ann voted for the Working Families Tax Cut to prevent the largest tax increase in history and make sure you keep more of your hard-earned dollars by removing taxes on tips, overtime, and Social Security.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Ann Wagner — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Voted for the 2025 tax law creating an additional limited deduction for eligible seniors; the law did not eliminate federal tax on Social Security benefits.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Social Security Taxes

Candidate campaign source

Voted for the 2025 tax law creating an additional limited deduction for eligible seniors; the law did not eliminate federal tax on Social Security benefits.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Ann Wagner — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Fred Wellman

4 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · MO

Income & wages

We must immediately raise the federal minimum wage, protect workers' rights to form and join unions, and ensure equal pay and paid family leave for all employees. It is imperative that we strengthen laws to end illegal union-busting, strengthen collective bargaining rights across all sectors, and in…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Unions and Labor

Candidate campaign source

We must immediately raise the federal minimum wage, protect workers' rights to form and join unions, and ensure equal pay and paid family leave for all employees. It is imperative that we strengthen laws to end illegal union-busting, strengthen collective bargaining rights across all sectors, and invest in high-quality, sustainable job creation that provides pathways for every American to support themselves and their families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Fred Wellman — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 3 more statements from Fred Wellman
Income & wages

I will relentlessly focus on protecting Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care from privatization, while expanding mental health and suicide prevention resources, and safeguarding mandatory funding for earned benefits against budget cuts. I oppose the current Taking Care of America’s Vetera…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Veterans and Military

Candidate campaign source

I will relentlessly focus on protecting Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care from privatization, while expanding mental health and suicide prevention resources, and safeguarding mandatory funding for earned benefits against budget cuts. I oppose the current Taking Care of America’s Veterans Act (TCAVA) as written, with Section 108 taking away benefits from future veterans. The idea that the only people being required to adhere to ‘Pay-Go’ rules are veterans while the Department of Defense gets a blank check to wage wars is unacceptable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Fred Wellman — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Income & wages

Every Missourian deserves the freedom to build a good life without being burdened by rising costs. Families are working harder than ever but falling further behind because the price of housing, healthcare, childcare, and groceries keeps climbing while wages stay flat. We must put working families fi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Affordability

Candidate campaign source

Every Missourian deserves the freedom to build a good life without being burdened by rising costs. Families are working harder than ever but falling further behind because the price of housing, healthcare, childcare, and groceries keeps climbing while wages stay flat. We must put working families first by lowering costs, expanding access to good-paying jobs, and making sure every family can afford the basics — not just to survive, but to thrive.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Fred Wellman — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Income & wages

I stand squarely with working Americans and our labor unions. With American workers getting the lowest share of corporate profits since the Great Depression, wages flat, and more Americans facing uncertainty amidst the affordability crisis, we must do everything we can to better their lives. It is l…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Unions and Labor

Candidate campaign source

I stand squarely with working Americans and our labor unions. With American workers getting the lowest share of corporate profits since the Great Depression, wages flat, and more Americans facing uncertainty amidst the affordability crisis, we must do everything we can to better their lives. It is long past time for change and for passing policies to increase wages, strengthen labor rights, and protect labor unions, which have been under relentless attack by the Trump Administration and the Republican Congress.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Fred Wellman — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Missouri candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Missouri incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Missouri legislators and Missouri’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Missouri’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

154 matching sponsorships or proposals · 69 Missouri incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Adrian Plank

Missouri House of Representatives, District 47 · D–MO

3 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Adrian Plank
Missouri Legislature · HB 768

Modifies provisions for renewable energy resources

May 15, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 768 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2025, and…

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 768 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2025, and increases incrementally to no less than 100% by December 31, 2059.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1944

Modifies provisions for renewable energy resources

May 17, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1944 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31,…

This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-17: Referred: General Laws(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1944 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2024, and increases incrementally to no less than 100% by December 31, 2058.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1079

Modifies provisions for renewable energy resources

May 12, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1079 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2023 and…

This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-05-12: Referred: Utilities(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1079 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2023 and increases incrementally to no less than 100% by December 31, 2058.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Anthony Ealy

Missouri House of Representatives, District 36 · D–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Anthony Ealy
Missouri Legislature · HB 3297

Creates several new provisions for property development

May 15, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Anthony Ealy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Developments meeting these criteria can be administratively approved if they comply with land development regulations, excluding those related to density, height, and land use, and parking requirements may be reduced if the development is near public transit. Additionally, portions of multifamily projects providing affordable housing to eligible income groups will be eligible for an ad valorem property tax exemption starting in 2027, with the exemption percentage varying based on income levels, and property owners must apply annually with specific documentation.

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Developments meeting these criteria can be administratively approved if they comply with land development regulations, excluding those related to density, height, and land use, and parking requirements may be reduced if the development is near public transit. Additionally, portions of multifamily projects providing affordable housing to eligible income groups will be eligible for an ad valorem property tax exemption starting in 2027, with the exemption percentage varying based on income levels, and property owners must apply annually with specific documentation.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bennie Cook

Missouri House of Representatives, District 143 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Bennie Cook
Missouri Legislature · HB 1577

Repeals provisions relating to paid sick leave and minimum wage increases and reinstates previous minimum wage provisions

May 15, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Bennie Cook · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1577 -- EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SPONSOR: Cook This bill repeals the increase in the minimum wage rate. Currently, the minimum wage rate is $13.75 per hour with an increase in the hourly rate each year of $1.25 to $15.00 per hour beginning on January 1, 2026. Under this bill, the minimum wage rates that existed as of December 31, 2024, would apply, which means the minimum wage rate would be $12.00 per hour. Successive increases in the minimum wage rate would be adjusted based on the cost of living, as reflected in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, published by the U.S. Department of Labor. Further, this bill repeals the laws relating to paid sick leave.…

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1577 -- EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SPONSOR: Cook This bill repeals the increase in the minimum wage rate. Currently, the minimum wage rate is $13.75 per hour with an increase in the hourly rate each year of $1.25 to $15.00 per hour beginning on January 1, 2026. Under this bill, the minimum wage rates that existed as of December 31, 2024, would apply, which means the minimum wage rate would be $12.00 per hour. Successive increases in the minimum wage rate would be adjusted based on the cost of living, as reflected in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, published by the U.S. Department of Labor. Further, this bill repeals the laws relating to paid sick leave. This bill is the same as HB 715 (2025).
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Betsy Fogle

Missouri House of Representatives, District 135 · D–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Betsy Fogle
Missouri Legislature · HB 3419

Creates new provisions relating to employee compensation, reinstating certain minimum wage adjustments, implementing earned paid sick leave, and bereavement leave

May 15, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Betsy Fogle · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 3419 -- EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SPONSOR: Fogle Beginning January 1, 2027, the minimum wage is required to be increased or decreased January 1st each year based on the cost of living. This bill reinstates the provisions of law establishing a system of earned paid sick time and creates new provisions for bereavement leave. The bill provides that all applicable employees will accrue a minimum of one hour of earned paid sick time for every 30 hours worked. Employees of an employer with 15 or more employees can use up to 56 hours of time in any given year but employees of an employer with fewer than 15 employees can only use 40 hours of time in any given year. Accrual begins January 1, 2027, or…

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 3419 -- EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SPONSOR: Fogle Beginning January 1, 2027, the minimum wage is required to be increased or decreased January 1st each year based on the cost of living. This bill reinstates the provisions of law establishing a system of earned paid sick time and creates new provisions for bereavement leave. The bill provides that all applicable employees will accrue a minimum of one hour of earned paid sick time for every 30 hours worked. Employees of an employer with 15 or more employees can use up to 56 hours of time in any given year but employees of an employer with fewer than 15 employees can only use 40 hours of time in any given year. Accrual begins January 1, 2027, or upon the commencement of employment, whichever is later. Employees may use earned paid sick time following 90 days of continuous employment, unless an employer's written policy allows the use of such leave prior to 90 days. The amount of sick time to be carried over, paid out, or transferred if employed by the same employer are specified in the bill. The bill outlines the reasons for which an employee may use earned paid sick time: (1) An employee's mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition; an employee's need for medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of a mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition; an employee's need for preventative medical care; (2) Care of a family member with a mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition; care of a family member who needs medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of a mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition; care of a family member who needs preventative medical care; (3) Closure of the employee's place of business by order of a public official due to a public health emergency, or an employee's need to care for a child whose school or place of care has been closed by order of a public official due to a public health emergency, or care for oneself or a family member when it has been determined by the health authorities having jurisdiction or by a health care provider that the employee's or family member's presence in the community may jeopardize the health of others because of his or her exposure to a communicable disease, whether or not the employee or family member has actually contracted the communicable disease; or (4) Absence necessary due to domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking, provided the leave is allowed for the employee or an employee's family member to procure one or more of the services described in the bill. Earned paid sick time shall be provided upon the request of an employee. Such request may be made orally, in writing, by electronic means, or by any other means acceptable to the employer. When possible, the request shall include the expected duration of the absence. Employees shall provide notice of the need for using earned paid sick time when the use is foreseeable. Furthermore, the bill allows certain private employees to earn paid bereavement time in the same manner as earned paid sick time is accrued. Earned paid bereavement time can be used within 90 days of the death of a family member, as defined under current law, or in connection with an event resulting in reproductive loss. Earned paid bereavement time shall begin to accrue at the commencement of employment or January 1, 2027, whichever is later. All provisions applicable to the accrual and use of earned paid sick time are applicable to the accrual and use of earned paid bereavement time under this bill. Employers may request, but not require, employees to search for or find a replacement worker to cover hours during which the employee is using earned paid sick time. Additionally, an employer may require reasonable documentation, as described in the bill, for time used on three or more consecutive work days. Each day of violation or failure to comply and each employee affected shall constitute a separate offense. Furthermore, any individual who claims to have been aggrieved by a failure of an employer to comply with any portion of this bill, including but not limited to the failure to provide earned paid sick time or to allow employees to use such time, or who claims to have suffered a retaliatory personnel action prohibited by this bill, shall have a right of action and may commence a civil action in the appropriate court of jurisdiction within three years of the accrual of the cause of action, to obtain appropriate relief with respect to such unlawful violation. Such action may be brought without first filing an administrative complaint.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bill Hardwick

Missouri House of Representatives, District 121 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Bill Hardwick
Missouri Legislature · HB 3070

Reestablishes the Second Amendment Preservation Act

Mar 25, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Bill Hardwick · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

FINDINGS AND DECLARATIONS (Section 1.411) The bill states certain findings about the duties, powers, and role of both the Federal and state government, as described in the bill, including the right to bear arms, as described in the bill. LIMITATION OF POWERS (Section 1.421) This bill further states that no entity or person, including anyone employed by state or local government, has the authority to enforce any of the following Federal laws or regulations: (1) Any tax imposed on firearms or any related product that might reasonably be expected to create a chilling effect on the purchase or ownership of such goods; (2) Any registration or tracking of firearms; (3) Any registration or tracking…

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-03-25: Motion to Do Pass Failed (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

FINDINGS AND DECLARATIONS (Section 1.411) The bill states certain findings about the duties, powers, and role of both the Federal and state government, as described in the bill, including the right to bear arms, as described in the bill. LIMITATION OF POWERS (Section 1.421) This bill further states that no entity or person, including anyone employed by state or local government, has the authority to enforce any of the following Federal laws or regulations: (1) Any tax imposed on firearms or any related product that might reasonably be expected to create a chilling effect on the purchase or ownership of such goods; (2) Any registration or tracking of firearms; (3) Any registration or tracking of the ownership of firearms or any related product; (4) Any act forbidding the possession, ownership, use, or transfer of a firearm or any related product; and (5) Any act ordering the confiscation of firearms or any related products from law-abiding citizens. Nothing will prohibit Missouri officials from accepting aid from Federal officials in an effort to enforce Missouri laws.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bill Owen

Missouri House of Representatives, District 131 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Bill Owen
Missouri Legislature · HB 2319

Modifies provisions relating to tax credits

May 2, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Bill Owen · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill would apply a sunset provision to the Affordable Housing Tax Credit, which currently lacks one. This concerns the lifespan of a housing subsidy; it does not establish a change in Missouri’s median rent.

This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-02: Placed Back on Formal Perfection Calendar (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

occur on August 28, 2024. (2) Applying a sunset provision to those tax credits that currently lack such provision. Such tax credits include: (a) Neighborhood Assistance Tax Credit; (b) Affordable Housing Tax Credit
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Missouri officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Missouri statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.