Home values, gross rent, homeownership, housing cost burdens, and the pressure from prices and incomes.
Median owner-occupied home value$230.3K2020–2024 · #39 of 50 · highest first
Median gross rent$1.03K2020–2024 · #40 of 50 · highest first
Homeownership rate68.1%2020–2024 · #21 of 50 · highest first
Missouri over time
Explore Missouri readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Missouri officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Missouri effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Missouri change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Home-price growth since 2016 Missouri · source units
MissouriPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
79 of 79 reviewed Missouri actions match · 45 date markers shown. 26 major events shown separately.
Missouri · 2025: +86.9% · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available
FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016. This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Missouri Home-price growth since 2016 · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Missouri · state comparison
Home values, rent, and homeownership
Census values are estimates for occupied housing, rather than current listing or sale prices.
Missouri · 2020–2024$230,300
Missouri rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$332,700Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Median owner-occupied home value
Median reported value of owner-occupied housing.
2024 dollars; a higher value can benefit owners and make buying harder.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · $162.6KHigher value · $839.1KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · $230,3002020–2024 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Median owner-occupied home value · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$839,100
—
#2
California
$734,700
—
#3
Washington
$564,600
—
#4
Massachusetts
$562,100
—
#5
Colorado
$539,400
—
#6
Utah
$489,400
—
#7
Oregon
$477,600
—
#8
New Jersey
$454,400
—
#9
Nevada
$435,400
—
#10
New York
$423,800
—
#11
Maryland
$419,900
—
#12
Idaho
$418,600
—
#13
Rhode Island
$404,200
—
#14
New Hampshire
$402,500
—
#15
Arizona
$394,500
—
#16
Virginia
$383,700
—
#17
Montana
$375,800
—
#18
Connecticut
$366,900
—
#19
Florida
$359,000
—
#20
Alaska
$352,900
—
#21
Delaware
$352,000
—
#22
Minnesota
$329,300
—
#23
Vermont
$316,600
—
#24
Wyoming
$309,700
—
#25
Georgia
$303,300
—
#26
Maine
$296,600
—
#27
North Carolina
$288,900
—
#28
Tennessee
$286,700
—
#29
Texas
$283,800
—
#30
Wisconsin
$266,500
—
#31
Illinois
$263,300
—
#32
South Carolina
$259,000
—
#33
South Dakota
$257,400
—
#34
Pennsylvania
$254,500
—
#35
North Dakota
$249,900
—
#36
New Mexico
$248,100
—
#37
Nebraska
$238,600
—
#38
Michigan
$231,600
—
#39
Missouri · your comparison
$230,300
—
#40
Indiana
$218,200
—
#41
Kansas
$217,200
—
#42
Louisiana
$216,500
—
#43
Ohio
$214,800
—
#44
Alabama
$209,900
—
#45
Iowa
$208,000
—
#46
Kentucky
$205,600
—
#47
Oklahoma
$199,800
—
#48
Arkansas
$188,000
—
#49
Mississippi
$169,800
—
#50
West Virginia
$162,600
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Median monthly gross rent for renter-occupied housing units paying cash rent, including contract rent plus estimated average utility and fuel costs paid by the renter.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate and expressed in 2024 dollars.
This is a multi-year statewide estimate, not a current asking-rent measure.
The median obscures differences by location, unit size, housing quality, and renter circumstances.
Compare moderate-or-severe and severe housing cost burdens for three distinct housing groups.
Missouri · 2020–202445.6%
Missouri rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark51.1%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Renters · spending at least 30% of income
Housing costs as a share of household income, excluding households for which a ratio cannot be computed.
Renters and owners have separate denominators. Ratios use the Census computed-income universe.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · 38.9%Higher value · 60.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · 45.6%2020–2024 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Renters · spending at least 30% of income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Florida
60.1%
—
#2
Hawaii
56.7%
—
#3
Nevada
55.9%
—
#4
California
55.3%
—
#5
Louisiana
54.8%
—
#6
Colorado
52.9%
—
#7
Connecticut
52.6%
—
#8
Oregon
52.5%
—
#9
Georgia
52.4%
—
#10
South Carolina
52.1%
—
#11
New York
52.1%
—
#12
Massachusetts
51.8%
—
#13
Texas
51.7%
—
#14
New Jersey
51.6%
—
#15
Maryland
51.5%
—
#16
Arizona
51.4%
—
#17
Mississippi
51.3%
—
#18
Michigan
50.4%
—
#19
New Mexico
50.2%
—
#20
Washington
49.9%
—
#21
Delaware
49.6%
—
#22
North Carolina
48.9%
—
#23
West Virginia
48.9%
—
#24
Tennessee
48.8%
—
#25
Alabama
48.8%
—
#26
Virginia
48.5%
—
#27
Maine
48.4%
—
#28
Vermont
48.4%
—
#29
New Hampshire
48.2%
—
#30
Pennsylvania
48.2%
—
#31
Minnesota
48.1%
—
#32
Indiana
48.1%
—
#33
Rhode Island
48%
—
#34
Illinois
47.9%
—
#35
Utah
47.2%
—
#36
Idaho
46.9%
—
#37
Oklahoma
46.3%
—
#38
Ohio
45.9%
—
#39
Missouri · your comparison
45.6%
—
#40
Kentucky
45.4%
—
#41
Nebraska
45.1%
—
#42
Arkansas
44.8%
—
#43
Montana
44.8%
—
#44
Alaska
44.6%
—
#45
Iowa
43.9%
—
#46
Wisconsin
43.7%
—
#47
Kansas
43.5%
—
#48
Wyoming
43.1%
—
#49
South Dakota
39.8%
—
#50
North Dakota
38.9%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Both series start at 100 in 2016. The gap describes price pressure; it is not a mortgage payment or a price-to-income ratio.
Missouri · 2025+86.9%
Missouri rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Home-price growth since 2016
FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016.
This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Missouri
2025 · Missouri: +86.9% · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Missouri Home-price growth since 2016 history
Period
Missouri
Compare
2016
+0%
2017
+3.7%
2018
+8.6%
2019
+13.6%
2020
+19.6%
2021
+35.4%
2022
+56.7%
2023
+68.5%
2024
+78.6%
2025
+86.9%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · +38.2%Higher value · +141.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · +86.9%2025 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at the index base (0% growth); #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Home-price growth since 2016 · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Idaho
+141.7%
—
#2
Florida
+114.5%
—
#3
Maine
+113.7%
—
#4
Utah
+113.6%
—
#5
Tennessee
+112.4%
—
#6
Arizona
+112.3%
—
#7
New Hampshire
+110.1%
—
#8
Rhode Island
+108%
—
#9
Georgia
+107.6%
—
#10
North Carolina
+107.1%
—
#11
Montana
+106.7%
—
#12
Nevada
+106.1%
—
#13
South Carolina
+105.5%
—
#14
Washington
+100.2%
—
#15
Indiana
+94.5%
—
#16
Wisconsin
+94%
—
#17
Michigan
+93.7%
—
#18
Ohio
+93.3%
—
#19
Vermont
+92.6%
—
#20
New Jersey
+88.9%
—
#21
Missouri · your comparison
+86.9%
—
#22
New York
+85.9%
—
#23
Nebraska
+84.6%
—
#24
Massachusetts
+84.3%
—
#24
South Dakota
+84.3%
—
#26
Texas
+83.3%
—
#27
Kentucky
+83.2%
—
#28
Colorado
+83.1%
—
#29
Kansas
+82.5%
—
#30
New Mexico
+82.3%
—
#31
Alabama
+81.3%
—
#32
Arkansas
+80.8%
—
#33
Connecticut
+79.8%
—
#34
Pennsylvania
+78.4%
—
#35
Virginia
+76.5%
—
#36
Delaware
+75.4%
—
#37
Oregon
+74.7%
—
#38
California
+72.7%
—
#39
Oklahoma
+71.9%
—
#40
Minnesota
+70%
—
#41
Wyoming
+69.3%
—
#42
Illinois
+65.3%
—
#43
Iowa
+64.2%
—
#44
Mississippi
+63.9%
—
#45
Hawaii
+63%
—
#46
Maryland
+59.4%
—
#47
West Virginia
+58.6%
—
#48
Alaska
+51.9%
—
#49
North Dakota
+45.9%
—
#50
Louisiana
+38.2%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
State building activity, vacant units, mortgage performance, and borrowing rates are different measures.
Missouri · 202517,474
Missouri rank#25among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1,431,616Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total housing units authorized
New privately owned housing units authorized by building permits; final annual, not seasonally adjusted.
A permit is authorization, not a start or completed home. Absolute counts reflect the size of a state. Units in permit-issuing places; excludes public housing.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · 848Higher value · 210,217Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · 17,4742025 · Rank #25 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Total housing units authorized · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
210,217
—
#2
Florida
178,297
—
#3
California
103,856
—
#4
North Carolina
86,167
—
#5
Georgia
61,196
—
#6
Arizona
51,532
—
#7
South Carolina
45,862
—
#8
Tennessee
43,374
—
#9
New York
38,667
—
#10
Washington
34,913
—
#11
Colorado
33,754
—
#12
Ohio
33,640
—
#13
Virginia
33,094
—
#14
Indiana
29,076
—
#15
New Jersey
27,661
—
#16
Utah
26,775
—
#17
Pennsylvania
25,709
—
#18
Wisconsin
25,569
—
#19
Michigan
23,075
—
#20
Minnesota
20,947
—
#21
Alabama
19,061
—
#22
Illinois
18,551
—
#23
Nevada
18,540
—
#24
Idaho
17,944
—
#25
Missouri · your comparison
17,474
—
#26
Oklahoma
15,513
—
#27
Arkansas
15,492
—
#28
Kentucky
14,940
—
#29
Oregon
14,839
—
#30
Louisiana
14,203
—
#31
Iowa
13,664
—
#32
Maryland
13,358
—
#33
Massachusetts
12,477
—
#34
Nebraska
10,596
—
#35
Kansas
10,299
—
#36
Mississippi
8,405
—
#37
New Mexico
7,747
—
#38
Connecticut
7,273
—
#39
Maine
6,979
—
#40
Delaware
6,468
—
#41
South Dakota
5,305
—
#42
Montana
5,258
—
#43
New Hampshire
5,030
—
#44
West Virginia
3,962
—
#45
Hawaii
3,708
—
#46
North Dakota
2,440
—
#47
Vermont
2,294
—
#48
Wyoming
2,238
—
#49
Rhode Island
1,738
—
#50
Alaska
848
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
79 of 79 reviewed Missouri actions · newest first
Aug 27, 2026 · Attorney General action · 2026-08-27 · Settled tenant-relocation and housing-assistance claims · Official action recordedMissouri agencies · Attorney General action · 2026-08-27
Settled tenant-relocation and housing-assistance claims
Aug 27, 2026 · Official action recorded
Attorney General Catherine Hanaway · Settled
FactVote reviewed summary
Negotiated a settlement concerning the Mark Twain Hotel in St. Louis. A nonprofit will administer restitution for housing, relocation assistance, and essential resources for displaced residents. The settlement contains no admission of liability.
The official Attorney General announcement records this action on 2026-08-27. Later case developments are not represented by this dated action.
Why this record is included
The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – Today, Attorney General Catherine Hanaway announced a settlement agreement addressing the dangerous and unlawful conditions at the Mark Twain Hotel in downtown St. Louis. The agreement, reached with the property’s owner, Anchor Point Hotel LLC (Anchor Point), resolves claims brought by the State of Missouri involving hazardous living conditions, chronic safety failures, and persistent criminal activity at the hotel. “After years of deteriorating conditions and unchecked criminal activity at the Mark Twain Hotel, our office stepped in to help restore order and protect residents and the surrounding neighborhood,” said General Hanaway. “Today’s agreement ensures accountability, safeguards tenants, and paves the way for a safer, lawful redevelopment of this property. This is a crucial step towards improving public safety in downtown St. Louis.” General Hanaway has committed to taking decisive action to improve public safety in the downtown areas of Missouri’s cities—including St. Louis. As part of that effort, on July 9, General Hanaway demanded the owner of the Mark Twain Hotel address the dangerous conditions and persistent drug activity, which constituted a public nuisance under Missouri law. The settlement is a negotiated resolution among the State, the City of St. Louis, and Anchor Point Hotel LLC, and it resolves the dispute without any admission of liability by any party. The nonprofit Peter & Paul Community Services (Peter & Paul) will administer restitution under the settlement to provide housing, relocation assistance, and essential resources to residents displaced by the hotel. “When local and state partners work together with a shared commitment to public safety, we can deliver real results for the people of St. Louis. The Mark Twain Hotel had long created challenges for residents and the surrounding neighborhood, and through strong coordination we can ensure those affected receive the support they need while charting a path toward a safer future for this area,” said St. Louis Mayor Cara Spencer. Resolution for residents and the downtown community includes: Anchor Point will pay $500 to each individual who resided in the building on July 1, 2026, including current residents as they vacate. All payments to residents are due no later than September 1, 2026. For residents who cannot be located despite commercially reasonable efforts, Anchor Point will deposit the $500 payments into an escrow account administered by Peter & Paul and provide the names of unlocated residents to Peter & Paul and the Attorney General. Effective immediately, Anchor Point will forgive all debts of all residents and all individuals who resided in the building as of the date it assumed ownership. Anchor Point will pay $100,000 to Peter & Paul to compensate for expenses incurred relocating current residents by August 28, 2026. Effective immediately, Anchor Point will pay $1,200 owed to the City of St. Louis for outstanding building code violations. Anchor Point will install and operate security cameras, maintain long‑term security guards, and use all other commercially reasonable efforts to secure the property while it remains vacant and until redevelopment is completed. Anchor Point will continue to cooperate with Peter & Paul and allow access to assist residents with relocation until the last Current Resident has vacated. The Mark Twain Hotel had become one of the most problematic properties in downtown St. Louis, plagued by health code violations, hundreds of calls for service each year, and persistent drug and criminal activity. General Hanaway extends her appreciation to Peter & Paul Community Services, the City of St. Louis, Downtown Forward, and all partners whose efforts contributed to this resolution. The Attorney General’s Office will continue to pursue nuisance centers across Missouri, protect vulnerable residents, and support efforts to reduce violent crime in our communities. For questions about resident payments or relocation assistance, contact Peter & Paul Community Services. Peter & Paul’s press release announcing their rehousing effort can be read here.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 22, 2026 · H.R. 9011 · Vacancy to Value Act of 2026 · Proposed federal legislationU.S. Congress · Missouri delegation · H.R. 9011
Vacancy to Value Act of 2026
May 22, 2026 · Proposed federal legislation
Rep. Wesley Bell · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Would create a pilot and grant framework to transfer underutilized federal property for redevelopment, including affordable housing. Affordable housing is one eligible use; the bill does not guarantee that a particular Missouri site will produce rental units.
Official Congress record checked 2026-09-05: 2026-05-22 — Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why this record is included
The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
A BILLTo authorize the Administrator of the General Services Administration, in coordination with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, to establish a pilot program and a grant program administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development to facilitate the sale or transfer of underutilized Federal property to eligible entities for economic redevelopment, and for other purposes.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 15, 2026 · HB 2401 · Establishes provisions related to the safe storage of firearms · Did not passMissouri Legislature · HB 2401
Establishes provisions related to the safe storage of firearms
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Anthony Ealy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2401 -- STORAGE OF FIREARMS SPONSOR: Ealy This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if the person fails to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that the person owns or controls and the person knows or reasonably should know a child can gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or guardian, or knows or reasonably should know a co-tenant is ineligible to possess a firearm under law. Responsible and secure storage includes, with the exception of a concealed or openly carried firearm in as secured holster, firearms: (1) Kept unloaded until ready to use; (2) Securely stored in a manner that ensures…
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2401 -- STORAGE OF FIREARMS SPONSOR: Ealy This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if the person fails to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that the person owns or controls and the person knows or reasonably should know a child can gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or guardian, or knows or reasonably should know a co-tenant is ineligible to possess a firearm under law. Responsible and secure storage includes, with the exception of a concealed or openly carried firearm in as secured holster, firearms: (1) Kept unloaded until ready to use; (2) Securely stored in a manner that ensures the firearms are not accessible to unauthorized persons and unauthorized persons do not have access to any unlocking mechanism necessary for accessibility; and (3) That have a personalized firearm's safety characteristics activated. The requirement for the responsible and secured storage of a firearm, as specified in the bill, will not apply to the storing of an antique firearm, as defined under 18 U.S.C. Section 921, or a curio or relic, as defined under 27 CFR 478.11. The offense of unlawful storage of a firearm is punishable by a $500 fine for a first violation and punishable as a class B misdemeanor for a second or any subsequent violation. It is a defense to the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if a child gained possession of and used the firearm in a lawful act of self-defense, defense of others, or defense of livestock. Any firearms dealer must post in a conspicuous location on their premises a written notice as illustrated in the bill and to be made publicly available by the Department of Public Safety. A firearm dealer in violation of this provision may be punished by a warning for a first violation and punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for a second or subsequent violation. The Department must publish on its website, in both English and Spanish, information relating to the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm and related penalties. This bill is similar to HB 2113 (2026);
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 15, 2026 · HB 2113 · Establishes provisions related to the safe storage of firearms · Did not passMissouri Legislature · HB 2113
Establishes provisions related to the safe storage of firearms
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Kathy Steinhoff · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2113 -- STORAGE OF FIREARMS SPONSOR: Steinhoff This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if the person fails to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that the person owns or controls and the person knows or reasonably should know a child can gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or guardian or knows or reasonably should know a co-tenant is ineligible to possess a firearm under the law. Responsible and secure storage includes, with the exception of a concealed or openly carried firearm in a secured holster, firearms: (1) Kept unloaded until ready to use; (2) Securely stored in a manner that…
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2113 -- STORAGE OF FIREARMS SPONSOR: Steinhoff This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if the person fails to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that the person owns or controls and the person knows or reasonably should know a child can gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or guardian or knows or reasonably should know a co-tenant is ineligible to possess a firearm under the law. Responsible and secure storage includes, with the exception of a concealed or openly carried firearm in a secured holster, firearms: (1) Kept unloaded until ready to use; (2) Securely stored in a manner that ensures the firearms are not accessible to unauthorized persons and unauthorized persons do not have access to any unlocking mechanism necessary for accessibility; and (3) That have a personalized firearm's safety characteristics activated. The requirement for the responsible and secured storage of a firearm, as specified in the bill, will not apply to the storing of an antique firearm, as defined under 18 U.S.C. Section 921, or a curio or relic, as defined under 27 CFR 478.11. The offense of unlawful storage of a firearm is punishable by a $500 fine for a first violation and punishable as a class B misdemeanor for a second or any subsequent violation. It is a defense to the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if a child gained possession of and used the firearm in a lawful act of self-defense, defense of others, or defense of livestock. Any firearms dealer must post in a conspicuous location on their premises a written notice as illustrated in the bill and to be made publicly available by the Department of Public Safety. A firearm dealer in violation of this provision may be punished by a warning for a first violation and punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for a second or subsequent violation. The Department must publish on its website, in both English and Spanish, information relating to the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm and related penalties. This bill is similar to HB 307 (2025).
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 15, 2026 · HB 1665 · Prohibits homeowners' associations and other similar associations from infringing on the rights of concealed carry permit holders · Did not passMissouri Legislature · HB 1665
Prohibits homeowners' associations and other similar associations from infringing on the rights of concealed carry permit holders
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Brian Seitz · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1665 -- RIGHTS OF HOLDERS OF A CONCEALED CARRY PERMIT OR ENDORSEMENT SPONSOR: Seitz Currently, there are certain specified places that a concealed carry permit holder is prohibited from carrying a concealed firearm. This bill states that a homeowners' association, condominium owners' association, property owners' association, master association or any other similar superordinate entity cannot infringe upon the right to carry concealed firearms of any person who: (1) Is an owner or occupant of a condominium or house that is controlled by any such association or entity; and (2) Is lawfully in possession of a valid concealed carry permit, a concealed carry endorsement, or a valid concealed…
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1665 -- RIGHTS OF HOLDERS OF A CONCEALED CARRY PERMIT OR ENDORSEMENT SPONSOR: Seitz Currently, there are certain specified places that a concealed carry permit holder is prohibited from carrying a concealed firearm. This bill states that a homeowners' association, condominium owners' association, property owners' association, master association or any other similar superordinate entity cannot infringe upon the right to carry concealed firearms of any person who: (1) Is an owner or occupant of a condominium or house that is controlled by any such association or entity; and (2) Is lawfully in possession of a valid concealed carry permit, a concealed carry endorsement, or a valid concealed carry permit or endorsement issued by another state or a political subdivision of another state. This right to carry concealed firearms will extend to privately owned property, common elements, limited common elements, parking areas, and all ingress and egress routes, paths, and areas regardless of use or purpose. This bill is similar to HB 1415 (2025).
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 15, 2026 · HB 2455 · Modifies provisions relating to unlawful discriminatory practices and establishes the Missouri Fair Housing Act · Did not passMissouri Legislature · HB 2455
Modifies provisions relating to unlawful discriminatory practices and establishes the Missouri Fair Housing Act
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Elizabeth Fuchs · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
MISSOURI FAIR HOUSING ACT (Sections 213.150 to 213.188) The repealed provisions of the Missouri Human Rights Act relating to discrimination in housing practices are reenacted in substantially the same form as part of the Missouri Fair Housing Act. The bill provides that certain housing practices are unlawful when taken because of a person's race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, disability, gender identity, immigration status, or familial status. This bill is similar to HB 1395(2025) and HB 2000 (2024).
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses immigration or residents with a specified immigration status. The foreign-born population includes naturalized citizens and both lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens, so an enforcement measure addresses only a subset. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
MISSOURI FAIR HOUSING ACT (Sections 213.150 to 213.188) The repealed provisions of the Missouri Human Rights Act relating to discrimination in housing practices are reenacted in substantially the same form as part of the Missouri Fair Housing Act. The bill provides that certain housing practices are unlawful when taken because of a person's race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, disability, gender identity, immigration status, or familial status. This bill is similar to HB 1395(2025) and HB 2000 (2024).
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Missouri officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs from FactVote’s Missouri candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
44 statements from 6 candidates
2026 Missouri State Auditor — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
We have witnessed countless attacks on our values and out of control spending from the Biden Administration and the liberals running Congress. Missourians are fiscally conservative, and we don’t take it well when politicians and bureaucrats waste our money on inefficient programs or by giving handou…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Defending Missouri Values
Candidate campaign source
We have witnessed countless attacks on our values and out of control spending from the Biden Administration and the liberals running Congress. Missourians are fiscally conservative, and we don’t take it well when politicians and bureaucrats waste our money on inefficient programs or by giving handouts to insiders. As Treasurer, when the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program (the state’s largest tax credit program), was wasting millions of dollars per year to benefit wealthy developers, I championed reforms to the program that are saving tens of millions of dollars per year for taxpayers. As Auditor, you can trust me to give you the facts, fight for reforms wherever they are needed, and not cave to pressure from lobbyists or special interest groups when those facts show they are benefiting from sweetheart deals at your expense.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Every family in St. Louis deserves a safe and affordable home. However, too many families are being priced out of homeownership or struggling to afford rent, and Wesley is doing something about it. He secured nearly $7 million in federal housing grants to the district to increase housing supply and …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Making Housing More Affordable.
Candidate campaign source
Every family in St. Louis deserves a safe and affordable home. However, too many families are being priced out of homeownership or struggling to afford rent, and Wesley is doing something about it. He secured nearly $7 million in federal housing grants to the district to increase housing supply and lower costs for renters and homebuyers, and he will keep fighting until housing in St. Louis is within reach for working families.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
When devastating tornadoes destroyed over 5,000 structures in our community, Wesley pressed for a federal disaster declaration and fought to make sure families got the housing assistance, health care, and rebuilding support they urgently needed. While there’s more work to do, these resources are alr…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Supporting St. Louis After the 2025 Tornadoes.
Candidate campaign source
When devastating tornadoes destroyed over 5,000 structures in our community, Wesley pressed for a federal disaster declaration and fought to make sure families got the housing assistance, health care, and rebuilding support they urgently needed. While there’s more work to do, these resources are already helping our region recover stronger and faster.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
After a lifetime of hard work, every Missourian should be able to retire with dignity and security. No one should have to choose between paying for medicine, housing, or heat in their later years. We must protect Social Security and Medicare, defend pensions, and strengthen retirement benefits so th…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Retiring with Dignity
Candidate campaign source
After a lifetime of hard work, every Missourian should be able to retire with dignity and security. No one should have to choose between paying for medicine, housing, or heat in their later years. We must protect Social Security and Medicare, defend pensions, and strengthen retirement benefits so that those who built this country can live their final years with stability and respect.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Every Missourian deserves the freedom to build a good life without being burdened by rising costs. Families are working harder than ever but falling further behind because the price of housing, healthcare, childcare, and groceries keeps climbing while wages stay flat. We must put working families fi…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Affordability
Candidate campaign source
Every Missourian deserves the freedom to build a good life without being burdened by rising costs. Families are working harder than ever but falling further behind because the price of housing, healthcare, childcare, and groceries keeps climbing while wages stay flat. We must put working families first by lowering costs, expanding access to good-paying jobs, and making sure every family can afford the basics — not just to survive, but to thrive.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
We must reverse Secretary Collins’ staffing cuts and reinstate personnel at the VA, strengthen the PACT Act to support toxic-exposed veterans, and reduce veteran homelessness while improving access to timely, high-quality medical and employment support. There is no world where reducing benefits and …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Veterans and Military
Candidate campaign source
We must reverse Secretary Collins’ staffing cuts and reinstate personnel at the VA, strengthen the PACT Act to support toxic-exposed veterans, and reduce veteran homelessness while improving access to timely, high-quality medical and employment support. There is no world where reducing benefits and support for veterans to save money will be tolerated by me. We did our duty and the American government must do its duty to provide lifetime care for our sacrifices.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Our economy should reward hard work, not connections or special interests. I believe in a strong floor and no ceiling: everyone should have the security to build a good life and the freedom to rise as far as their talent and hard work can take them. Families are working harder than ever but struggli…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Missourians deserve a fair shot at a good life. That starts with affordable healthcare, lower costs, and the freedom to build a secure future. Every family should be able to see a doctor when they are sick, afford the medicine they need, and keep a roof over their heads without being buried in debt.
Candidate campaign source
Our economy should reward hard work, not connections or special interests. I believe in a strong floor and no ceiling: everyone should have the security to build a good life and the freedom to rise as far as their talent and hard work can take them. Families are working harder than ever but struggling to keep up with the cost of housing, childcare, healthcare, and groceries. It should not take two jobs to make ends meet or a lifetime of work to retire in dignity and stability.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs terms in retained, attributed source text from published Missouri candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Missouri incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Missouri legislators and Missouri’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Missouri’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
77 matching sponsorships or proposals · 34 Missouri incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Anthony Ealy
Missouri House of Representatives, District 36 · D–MO
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Anthony EalyMissouri Legislature · HB 2401
Establishes provisions related to the safe storage of firearms
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Anthony Ealy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2401 -- STORAGE OF FIREARMS SPONSOR: Ealy This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if the person fails to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that the person owns or controls and the person knows or reasonably should know a child can gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or guardian, or knows or reasonably should know a co-tenant is ineligible to possess a firearm under law. Responsible and secure storage includes, with the exception of a concealed or openly carried firearm in as secured holster, firearms: (1) Kept unloaded until ready to use; (2) Securely stored in a manner that ensures…
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2401 -- STORAGE OF FIREARMS SPONSOR: Ealy This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if the person fails to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that the person owns or controls and the person knows or reasonably should know a child can gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or guardian, or knows or reasonably should know a co-tenant is ineligible to possess a firearm under law. Responsible and secure storage includes, with the exception of a concealed or openly carried firearm in as secured holster, firearms: (1) Kept unloaded until ready to use; (2) Securely stored in a manner that ensures the firearms are not accessible to unauthorized persons and unauthorized persons do not have access to any unlocking mechanism necessary for accessibility; and (3) That have a personalized firearm's safety characteristics activated. The requirement for the responsible and secured storage of a firearm, as specified in the bill, will not apply to the storing of an antique firearm, as defined under 18 U.S.C. Section 921, or a curio or relic, as defined under 27 CFR 478.11. The offense of unlawful storage of a firearm is punishable by a $500 fine for a first violation and punishable as a class B misdemeanor for a second or any subsequent violation. It is a defense to the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if a child gained possession of and used the firearm in a lawful act of self-defense, defense of others, or defense of livestock. Any firearms dealer must post in a conspicuous location on their premises a written notice as illustrated in the bill and to be made publicly available by the Department of Public Safety. A firearm dealer in violation of this provision may be punished by a warning for a first violation and punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for a second or subsequent violation. The Department must publish on its website, in both English and Spanish, information relating to the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm and related penalties. This bill is similar to HB 2113 (2026);
Creates several new provisions for property development
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Anthony Ealy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Developments meeting these criteria can be administratively approved if they comply with land development regulations, excluding those related to density, height, and land use, and parking requirements may be reduced if the development is near public transit. Additionally, portions of multifamily projects providing affordable housing to eligible income groups will be eligible for an ad valorem property tax exemption starting in 2027, with the exemption percentage varying based on income levels, and property owners must apply annually with specific documentation.
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Developments meeting these criteria can be administratively approved if they comply with land development regulations, excluding those related to density, height, and land use, and parking requirements may be reduced if the development is near public transit. Additionally, portions of multifamily projects providing affordable housing to eligible income groups will be eligible for an ad valorem property tax exemption starting in 2027, with the exemption percentage varying based on income levels, and property owners must apply annually with specific documentation.
Missouri House of Representatives, District 101 · R–MO
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Ben KeathleyMissouri Legislature · HB 2385
Prohibits local governments from requiring private property owners to accept certain types of income.
Apr 16, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Ben Keathley · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This bill specifies that no county or city shall enact, maintain, or enforce any ordinance or resolution that prohibits landlords from refusing to lease or rent certain residential or commercial property to a person because the person's source of income includes aid from a federal housing assistance program. The bill specifies that no city or county may enact an ordinance that: (1) Prohibits landlords from using income-qualifying methods to determine whether to rent or lease a property to a prospective tenant; (2) Prohibits landlords from requesting tenant criminal records; (3) Limits the amount of security deposit required from a tenant; or (4) Requires tenants to automatically receive the…
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-04-16: SCS Voted Do Pass (S).
Why this record is included
The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
This bill specifies that no county or city shall enact, maintain, or enforce any ordinance or resolution that prohibits landlords from refusing to lease or rent certain residential or commercial property to a person because the person's source of income includes aid from a federal housing assistance program. The bill specifies that no city or county may enact an ordinance that: (1) Prohibits landlords from using income-qualifying methods to determine whether to rent or lease a property to a prospective tenant; (2) Prohibits landlords from requesting tenant criminal records; (3) Limits the amount of security deposit required from a tenant; or (4) Requires tenants to automatically receive the right of first refusal.
Missouri House of Representatives, District 131 · R–MO
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Bill OwenMissouri Legislature · HB 2319
Modifies provisions relating to tax credits
May 2, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Bill Owen · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill would apply a sunset provision to the Affordable Housing Tax Credit, which currently lacks one. This concerns the lifespan of a housing subsidy; it does not establish a change in Missouri’s median rent.
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-02: Placed Back on Formal Perfection Calendar (H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
occur on August 28, 2024. (2) Applying a sunset provision to those tax credits that currently lack such provision. Such tax credits include: (a) Neighborhood Assistance Tax Credit; (b) Affordable Housing Tax Credit
Missouri House of Representatives, District 156 · R–MO
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Brian SeitzMissouri Legislature · HB 1665
Prohibits homeowners' associations and other similar associations from infringing on the rights of concealed carry permit holders
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Brian Seitz · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1665 -- RIGHTS OF HOLDERS OF A CONCEALED CARRY PERMIT OR ENDORSEMENT SPONSOR: Seitz Currently, there are certain specified places that a concealed carry permit holder is prohibited from carrying a concealed firearm. This bill states that a homeowners' association, condominium owners' association, property owners' association, master association or any other similar superordinate entity cannot infringe upon the right to carry concealed firearms of any person who: (1) Is an owner or occupant of a condominium or house that is controlled by any such association or entity; and (2) Is lawfully in possession of a valid concealed carry permit, a concealed carry endorsement, or a valid concealed…
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1665 -- RIGHTS OF HOLDERS OF A CONCEALED CARRY PERMIT OR ENDORSEMENT SPONSOR: Seitz Currently, there are certain specified places that a concealed carry permit holder is prohibited from carrying a concealed firearm. This bill states that a homeowners' association, condominium owners' association, property owners' association, master association or any other similar superordinate entity cannot infringe upon the right to carry concealed firearms of any person who: (1) Is an owner or occupant of a condominium or house that is controlled by any such association or entity; and (2) Is lawfully in possession of a valid concealed carry permit, a concealed carry endorsement, or a valid concealed carry permit or endorsement issued by another state or a political subdivision of another state. This right to carry concealed firearms will extend to privately owned property, common elements, limited common elements, parking areas, and all ingress and egress routes, paths, and areas regardless of use or purpose. This bill is similar to HB 1415 (2025).
Prohibits homeowners' associations and other similar associations from infringing on the rights of concealed carry permit holders
Mar 25, 2025 · Did not pass
Rep. Brian Seitz · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1415 -- RIGHTS OF MISSOURI CONCEALED CARRY HOLDER SPONSOR: Seitz Currently, there are certain specified places that a concealed carry permit holder is prohibited from carrying a concealed firearm. This bill states that a homeowners' association, condominium owners' association, property owners' association, master association or any other similar superordinate entity cannot infringe upon the right to carry concealed firearms of any person who: (1) Is an owner or occupant of a condominium or house that is controlled by any such association or entity; and (2) Is lawfully in possession of a valid concealed carry permit, a concealed carry endorsement, or a valid concealed carry permit or…
This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-03-25: Public Hearing Completed (H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1415 -- RIGHTS OF MISSOURI CONCEALED CARRY HOLDER SPONSOR: Seitz Currently, there are certain specified places that a concealed carry permit holder is prohibited from carrying a concealed firearm. This bill states that a homeowners' association, condominium owners' association, property owners' association, master association or any other similar superordinate entity cannot infringe upon the right to carry concealed firearms of any person who: (1) Is an owner or occupant of a condominium or house that is controlled by any such association or entity; and (2) Is lawfully in possession of a valid concealed carry permit, a concealed carry endorsement, or a valid concealed carry permit or endorsement issued by another state or a political subdivision of another state. This right to carry concealed firearms will extend to privately owned property, common elements, limited common elements, parking areas, and all ingress and egress routes, paths, and areas regardless of use or purpose.
Missouri House of Representatives, District 16 · R–MO
3 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Chris BrownMissouri Legislature · HB 2062
Establishes provisions relating to the use of real property
Jul 12, 2024 · Enacted
Rep. Chris Brown · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Additionally, the offense of criminal mischief for unlawful detention, occupation, or trespass upon a residential dwelling is established, which is a class A misdemeanor. MORATORIUM ON EVICTION PROCEEDINGS (Section 535.012) No county, municipality, or political subdivision shall impose or otherwise enforce a moratorium on eviction proceedings unless specifically authorized by state law. HYDRANT TESTING (Section 640.144) Currently, community water systems in certain areas are required to create a hydrant inspection program that includes annual testing of every hydrant in the system.
Approved by the Governor on 2024-07-12. The recorded final action was 2024-07-12: Delivered to Secretary of State (G). This is the legislative disposition; subsequent court rulings may affect enforcement.
Why this record is included
The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Additionally, the offense of criminal mischief for unlawful detention, occupation, or trespass upon a residential dwelling is established, which is a class A misdemeanor. MORATORIUM ON EVICTION PROCEEDINGS (Section 535.012) No county, municipality, or political subdivision shall impose or otherwise enforce a moratorium on eviction proceedings unless specifically authorized by state law. HYDRANT TESTING (Section 640.144) Currently, community water systems in certain areas are required to create a hydrant inspection program that includes annual testing of every hydrant in the system.
Establishes provisions relating to property rights
Apr 25, 2023 · Did not pass
Rep. Chris Brown · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
However, this requirement does not apply to inspections of new construction or occupancy permits. The bill prohibits any county, municipality, or political subdivision from imposing or enforcing a moratorium on eviction proceedings unless specifically authorized by state law.
This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-04-25: Taken Up for Third Reading (S).
Why this record is included
The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
However, this requirement does not apply to inspections of new construction or occupancy permits. The bill prohibits any county, municipality, or political subdivision from imposing or enforcing a moratorium on eviction proceedings unless specifically authorized by state law.
Prohibits a county, municipality, or other political subdivision from imposing or enforcing a moratorium on eviction proceedings unless authorized by state law
May 2, 2022 · Did not pass
Rep. Chris Brown · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
A homeowners' association may adopt reasonable rules regarding sale signs and remove a sale sign without liability as specified in the bill. The bill prohibits any county, municipality, or political subdivision from imposing or enforcing a moratorium on eviction proceedings unless specifically authorized by state law.
This measure did not pass before the 2022 session ended. Final recorded action on 2022-05-02: Public Hearing Held (S).
Why this record is included
The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
A homeowners' association may adopt reasonable rules regarding sale signs and remove a sale sign without liability as specified in the bill. The bill prohibits any county, municipality, or political subdivision from imposing or enforcing a moratorium on eviction proceedings unless specifically authorized by state law.
Missouri House of Representatives, District 97 · R–MO
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. David CasteelMissouri Legislature · HB 2105
Allows landlords to apportion charges to tenants for water and sewer utility service
May 6, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. David Casteel · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HCS HB 2105 -- WATER AND SEWER SERVICE FOR RENTAL PROPERTY (Casteel) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on General Laws The bill specifies that a landlord or a landlord's water and sewer service billing provider is not a public utility or water or sewer corporation for purposes of regulation by the Public Service Commission, nor will the lessees of the owner or operator of the premises be considered a customer of any public utility, sewer corporation, or water corporation. A landlord can apportion charges for water and sewer services to tenants by actually measuring individual tenant utility usage with a meter or by allocating charges through use of a mathematical formula. Landlords can…
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-06: SCS Voted Do Pass (S).
Why this record is included
The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HCS HB 2105 -- WATER AND SEWER SERVICE FOR RENTAL PROPERTY (Casteel) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on General Laws The bill specifies that a landlord or a landlord's water and sewer service billing provider is not a public utility or water or sewer corporation for purposes of regulation by the Public Service Commission, nor will the lessees of the owner or operator of the premises be considered a customer of any public utility, sewer corporation, or water corporation. A landlord can apportion charges for water and sewer services to tenants by actually measuring individual tenant utility usage with a meter or by allocating charges through use of a mathematical formula. Landlords can use a mathematical formula to apportion water and sewer charges for common areas to each tenant. If using a meter, landlords must disclose certain information about the meter readings on the tenant's bill. If using a mathematical formula, landlords must disclose the formula to a prospective tenant before entering into a lease. The total amount billed to tenants by a landlord for water and sewer service must not exceed the total amount owed by the landlord to the utility for service to the property, except that landlords can charge tenants for reasonable administrative costs, provided that the administrative costs are disclosed before the signing of a lease. Landlords can also charge late fees, which will be considered part of a tenant's rent. Landlords can use third-party billing providers to bill tenants for water and sewer service, but the providers must comply with requirements in the same manner as landlords.
Only current Missouri officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Missouri statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Missouri snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Missouri, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.