Missouri · individual fact

Missouri housing and borrowing

Home values, gross rent, homeownership, housing cost burdens, and the pressure from prices and incomes.

Median owner-occupied home value$230.3K2020–2024 · #39 of 50 · highest first
Median gross rent$1.03K2020–2024 · #40 of 50 · highest first
Homeownership rate68.1%2020–2024 · #21 of 50 · highest first

Missouri over time

Explore Missouri readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Missouri officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Missouri effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Missouri change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Home-price growth since 2016 Missouri · source units
MissouriPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Home-price growth since 20162025: +86.9%-10.4%+43.4%+97.3%Missouri, 2016: +0%Missouri, 2017: +3.7%Missouri, 2018: +8.6%Missouri, 2019: +13.6%Missouri, 2020: +19.6%Missouri, 2021: +35.4%Missouri, 2022: +56.7%Missouri, 2023: +68.5%Missouri, 2024: +78.6%Missouri, 2025: +86.9%201620202025
✦ Major events & context · 26National context · Housing downturn and the Great Recession · 2007-12-01Great RecessionNational context · Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac conservatorships announced · 2008-09-07Mortgage conservatorshipNational context · Federal Reserve announces agency mortgage-bond purchases · 2008-11-25Mortgage-bond purchasesNational context · Making Home Affordable modification guidelines released · 2009-03-04Mortgage relief guidelinesNational context · Federal Reserve announces another round of mortgage-bond purchases · 2012-09-13Further mortgage supportNational context · Federal Reserve announces slower bond purchases · 2013-12-18Bond purchases slowNational context · Ability-to-Repay mortgage standards take effect · 2014-01-10Mortgage lending standardsNational context · Federal Reserve raises its target above the near-zero range · 2015-12-16Rates leave near zeroNational context · Pandemic shock and emergency mortgage-market support · 2020-03-15COVID-19 / Fed responseNational context · CARES Act introduces mortgage and renter protections · 2020-03-27CARES housing reliefNational context · CDC eviction moratorium takes effect · 2020-09-04CDC eviction protectionsNational context · Treasury launches Emergency Rental Assistance · 2021-01-05Rental assistance launchesNational context · American Rescue Plan funds additional housing assistance · 2021-03-11Additional housing reliefNational context · Supreme Court blocks the renewed CDC eviction moratorium · 2021-08-26CDC moratorium blockedNational context · Federal Reserve begins the 2022 rate-increase cycle · 2022-03-16Rate increases beginNational context · Federal Reserve begins reducing its securities holdings · 2022-06-01Fed holdings begin shrinkingNational context · Freddie Mac changes mortgage-rate measurement · 2022-11-17Mortgage survey updateNational context · Average 30-year mortgage rate reaches 7.79% · 2023-10-26Mortgage rates reach 7.79%National context · Federal Reserve lowers its policy-rate target · 2024-09-18Policy-rate cutNational context · Federal Reserve ends the reduction of total securities holdings · 2025-12-01Fed runoff endsNational context · Federal Reserve cuts its target to 3.50–3.75% · 2025-12-10Further policy-rate cutNational context · Executive order targets federal support for institutional home purchases · 2026-01-20Institutional-buyer orderNational context · Executive order directs review of home-construction barriers · 2026-03-13Home-construction reviewNational context · Executive order directs review of mortgage-credit rules · 2026-03-13Mortgage-credit reviewNational context · 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act becomes law · 2026-07-11ROAD housing lawNational context · Federal Reserve holds its target at 3.50–3.75% · 2026-07-29Policy rate held steady● Missouri Legislature · 71224235816● U.S. Congress · Missouri delegation · 6◆ Governor · 1■ Missouri agencies · 12007-12-012026-08-31

79 of 79 reviewed Missouri actions match · 45 date markers shown. 26 major events shown separately.

Missouri · 2025: +86.9% · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016. This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Missouri Home-price growth since 2016 · source units
PeriodMissouriRankU.S. benchmark
2025+86.9%#21 of 50Not available
2024+78.6%#22 of 50Not available
2023+68.5%#22 of 50Not available
2022+56.7%#22 of 50Not available
2021+35.4%#23 of 50Not available
2020+19.6%#26 of 50Not available
2019+13.6%#27 of 50Not available
2018+8.6%#28 of 50Not available
2017+3.7%#30 of 50Not available
2016+0%#1 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Missouri · state comparison

Home values, rent, and homeownership

Census values are estimates for occupied housing, rather than current listing or sale prices.

Missouri · 2020–2024$230,300
Missouri rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$332,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median owner-occupied home value

Median reported value of owner-occupied housing.

2024 dollars; a higher value can benefit owners and make buying harder.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · $162.6KHigher value · $839.1KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · $230,3002020–2024 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Median owner-occupied home value · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii$839,100—
#2California$734,700—
#3Washington$564,600—
#4Massachusetts$562,100—
#5Colorado$539,400—
#6Utah$489,400—
#7Oregon$477,600—
#8New Jersey$454,400—
#9Nevada$435,400—
#10New York$423,800—
#11Maryland$419,900—
#12Idaho$418,600—
#13Rhode Island$404,200—
#14New Hampshire$402,500—
#15Arizona$394,500—
#16Virginia$383,700—
#17Montana$375,800—
#18Connecticut$366,900—
#19Florida$359,000—
#20Alaska$352,900—
#21Delaware$352,000—
#22Minnesota$329,300—
#23Vermont$316,600—
#24Wyoming$309,700—
#25Georgia$303,300—
#26Maine$296,600—
#27North Carolina$288,900—
#28Tennessee$286,700—
#29Texas$283,800—
#30Wisconsin$266,500—
#31Illinois$263,300—
#32South Carolina$259,000—
#33South Dakota$257,400—
#34Pennsylvania$254,500—
#35North Dakota$249,900—
#36New Mexico$248,100—
#37Nebraska$238,600—
#38Michigan$231,600—
#39Missouri · your comparison$230,300—
#40Indiana$218,200—
#41Kansas$217,200—
#42Louisiana$216,500—
#43Ohio$214,800—
#44Alabama$209,900—
#45Iowa$208,000—
#46Kentucky$205,600—
#47Oklahoma$199,800—
#48Arkansas$188,000—
#49Mississippi$169,800—
#50West Virginia$162,600—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median gross rent

$1,033/month2020–2024 estimate

Median monthly gross rent for renter-occupied housing units paying cash rent, including contract rent plus estimated average utility and fuel costs paid by the renter.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate and expressed in 2024 dollars.

  • This is a multi-year statewide estimate, not a current asking-rent measure.
  • The median obscures differences by location, unit size, housing quality, and renter circumstances.
Missouri · state comparison

How much income goes toward housing?

Compare moderate-or-severe and severe housing cost burdens for three distinct housing groups.

Missouri · 2020–202445.6%
Missouri rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark51.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Renters · spending at least 30% of income

Housing costs as a share of household income, excluding households for which a ratio cannot be computed.

Renters and owners have separate denominators. Ratios use the Census computed-income universe.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · 38.9%Higher value · 60.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 45.6%2020–2024 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Renters · spending at least 30% of income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Florida60.1%—
#2Hawaii56.7%—
#3Nevada55.9%—
#4California55.3%—
#5Louisiana54.8%—
#6Colorado52.9%—
#7Connecticut52.6%—
#8Oregon52.5%—
#9Georgia52.4%—
#10South Carolina52.1%—
#11New York52.1%—
#12Massachusetts51.8%—
#13Texas51.7%—
#14New Jersey51.6%—
#15Maryland51.5%—
#16Arizona51.4%—
#17Mississippi51.3%—
#18Michigan50.4%—
#19New Mexico50.2%—
#20Washington49.9%—
#21Delaware49.6%—
#22North Carolina48.9%—
#23West Virginia48.9%—
#24Tennessee48.8%—
#25Alabama48.8%—
#26Virginia48.5%—
#27Maine48.4%—
#28Vermont48.4%—
#29New Hampshire48.2%—
#30Pennsylvania48.2%—
#31Minnesota48.1%—
#32Indiana48.1%—
#33Rhode Island48%—
#34Illinois47.9%—
#35Utah47.2%—
#36Idaho46.9%—
#37Oklahoma46.3%—
#38Ohio45.9%—
#39Missouri · your comparison45.6%—
#40Kentucky45.4%—
#41Nebraska45.1%—
#42Arkansas44.8%—
#43Montana44.8%—
#44Alaska44.6%—
#45Iowa43.9%—
#46Wisconsin43.7%—
#47Kansas43.5%—
#48Wyoming43.1%—
#49South Dakota39.8%—
#50North Dakota38.9%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Missouri · state comparison

Home prices versus income growth

Both series start at 100 in 2016. The gap describes price pressure; it is not a mortgage payment or a price-to-income ratio.

Missouri · 2025+86.9%
Missouri rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Home-price growth since 2016

FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016.

This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
Home-price growth since 2016 history in Missouri-13%+43.4%+99.9%20162025
2025 · Missouri: +86.9% · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri Home-price growth since 2016 history
PeriodMissouriCompare
2016+0%
2017+3.7%
2018+8.6%
2019+13.6%
2020+19.6%
2021+35.4%
2022+56.7%
2023+68.5%
2024+78.6%
2025+86.9%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · +38.2%Higher value · +141.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · +86.9%2025 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at the index base (0% growth); #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Home-price growth since 2016 · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Idaho+141.7%—
#2Florida+114.5%—
#3Maine+113.7%—
#4Utah+113.6%—
#5Tennessee+112.4%—
#6Arizona+112.3%—
#7New Hampshire+110.1%—
#8Rhode Island+108%—
#9Georgia+107.6%—
#10North Carolina+107.1%—
#11Montana+106.7%—
#12Nevada+106.1%—
#13South Carolina+105.5%—
#14Washington+100.2%—
#15Indiana+94.5%—
#16Wisconsin+94%—
#17Michigan+93.7%—
#18Ohio+93.3%—
#19Vermont+92.6%—
#20New Jersey+88.9%—
#21Missouri · your comparison+86.9%—
#22New York+85.9%—
#23Nebraska+84.6%—
#24Massachusetts+84.3%—
#24South Dakota+84.3%—
#26Texas+83.3%—
#27Kentucky+83.2%—
#28Colorado+83.1%—
#29Kansas+82.5%—
#30New Mexico+82.3%—
#31Alabama+81.3%—
#32Arkansas+80.8%—
#33Connecticut+79.8%—
#34Pennsylvania+78.4%—
#35Virginia+76.5%—
#36Delaware+75.4%—
#37Oregon+74.7%—
#38California+72.7%—
#39Oklahoma+71.9%—
#40Minnesota+70%—
#41Wyoming+69.3%—
#42Illinois+65.3%—
#43Iowa+64.2%—
#44Mississippi+63.9%—
#45Hawaii+63%—
#46Maryland+59.4%—
#47West Virginia+58.6%—
#48Alaska+51.9%—
#49North Dakota+45.9%—
#50Louisiana+38.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Missouri · state comparison

Construction, availability, and borrowing

State building activity, vacant units, mortgage performance, and borrowing rates are different measures.

Missouri · 202517,474
Missouri rank#25among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1,431,616Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total housing units authorized

New privately owned housing units authorized by building permits; final annual, not seasonally adjusted.

A permit is authorization, not a start or completed home. Absolute counts reflect the size of a state. Units in permit-issuing places; excludes public housing.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · 848Higher value · 210,217Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 17,4742025 · Rank #25 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Total housing units authorized · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas210,217—
#2Florida178,297—
#3California103,856—
#4North Carolina86,167—
#5Georgia61,196—
#6Arizona51,532—
#7South Carolina45,862—
#8Tennessee43,374—
#9New York38,667—
#10Washington34,913—
#11Colorado33,754—
#12Ohio33,640—
#13Virginia33,094—
#14Indiana29,076—
#15New Jersey27,661—
#16Utah26,775—
#17Pennsylvania25,709—
#18Wisconsin25,569—
#19Michigan23,075—
#20Minnesota20,947—
#21Alabama19,061—
#22Illinois18,551—
#23Nevada18,540—
#24Idaho17,944—
#25Missouri · your comparison17,474—
#26Oklahoma15,513—
#27Arkansas15,492—
#28Kentucky14,940—
#29Oregon14,839—
#30Louisiana14,203—
#31Iowa13,664—
#32Maryland13,358—
#33Massachusetts12,477—
#34Nebraska10,596—
#35Kansas10,299—
#36Mississippi8,405—
#37New Mexico7,747—
#38Connecticut7,273—
#39Maine6,979—
#40Delaware6,468—
#41South Dakota5,305—
#42Montana5,258—
#43New Hampshire5,030—
#44West Virginia3,962—
#45Hawaii3,708—
#46North Dakota2,440—
#47Vermont2,294—
#48Wyoming2,238—
#49Rhode Island1,738—
#50Alaska848—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs from FactVote’s Missouri candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

44 statements from 6 candidates

2026 Missouri State Auditor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Republican · State Auditor · MO

Housing & homeownership

We have witnessed countless attacks on our values and out of control spending from the Biden Administration and the liberals running Congress. Missourians are fiscally conservative, and we don’t take it well when politicians and bureaucrats waste our money on inefficient programs or by giving handou…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Defending Missouri Values

Candidate campaign source

We have witnessed countless attacks on our values and out of control spending from the Biden Administration and the liberals running Congress. Missourians are fiscally conservative, and we don’t take it well when politicians and bureaucrats waste our money on inefficient programs or by giving handouts to insiders. As Treasurer, when the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program (the state’s largest tax credit program), was wasting millions of dollars per year to benefit wealthy developers, I championed reforms to the program that are saving tens of millions of dollars per year for taxpayers. As Auditor, you can trust me to give you the facts, fight for reforms wherever they are needed, and not cave to pressure from lobbyists or special interest groups when those facts show they are benefiting from sweetheart deals at your expense.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Scott Fitzpatrick — candidate-owned primary source ↗

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Wesley Bell

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · MO

Housing & homeownership

Every family in St. Louis deserves a safe and affordable home. However, too many families are being priced out of homeownership or struggling to afford rent, and Wesley is doing something about it. He secured nearly $7 million in federal housing grants to the district to increase housing supply and …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Making Housing More Affordable.

Candidate campaign source

Every family in St. Louis deserves a safe and affordable home. However, too many families are being priced out of homeownership or struggling to afford rent, and Wesley is doing something about it. He secured nearly $7 million in federal housing grants to the district to increase housing supply and lower costs for renters and homebuyers, and he will keep fighting until housing in St. Louis is within reach for working families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Wesley Bell — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Wesley Bell
Housing & homeownership

When devastating tornadoes destroyed over 5,000 structures in our community, Wesley pressed for a federal disaster declaration and fought to make sure families got the housing assistance, health care, and rebuilding support they urgently needed. While there’s more work to do, these resources are alr…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Supporting St. Louis After the 2025 Tornadoes.

Candidate campaign source

When devastating tornadoes destroyed over 5,000 structures in our community, Wesley pressed for a federal disaster declaration and fought to make sure families got the housing assistance, health care, and rebuilding support they urgently needed. While there’s more work to do, these resources are already helping our region recover stronger and faster.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Wesley Bell — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 4 statements

Fred Wellman

4 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · MO

Housing & homeownership

After a lifetime of hard work, every Missourian should be able to retire with dignity and security. No one should have to choose between paying for medicine, housing, or heat in their later years. We must protect Social Security and Medicare, defend pensions, and strengthen retirement benefits so th…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Retiring with Dignity

Candidate campaign source

After a lifetime of hard work, every Missourian should be able to retire with dignity and security. No one should have to choose between paying for medicine, housing, or heat in their later years. We must protect Social Security and Medicare, defend pensions, and strengthen retirement benefits so that those who built this country can live their final years with stability and respect.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Fred Wellman — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 3 more statements from Fred Wellman
Housing & homeownership

Every Missourian deserves the freedom to build a good life without being burdened by rising costs. Families are working harder than ever but falling further behind because the price of housing, healthcare, childcare, and groceries keeps climbing while wages stay flat. We must put working families fi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Affordability

Candidate campaign source

Every Missourian deserves the freedom to build a good life without being burdened by rising costs. Families are working harder than ever but falling further behind because the price of housing, healthcare, childcare, and groceries keeps climbing while wages stay flat. We must put working families first by lowering costs, expanding access to good-paying jobs, and making sure every family can afford the basics — not just to survive, but to thrive.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Fred Wellman — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Housing & homeownership

We must reverse Secretary Collins’ staffing cuts and reinstate personnel at the VA, strengthen the PACT Act to support toxic-exposed veterans, and reduce veteran homelessness while improving access to timely, high-quality medical and employment support. There is no world where reducing benefits and …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Veterans and Military

Candidate campaign source

We must reverse Secretary Collins’ staffing cuts and reinstate personnel at the VA, strengthen the PACT Act to support toxic-exposed veterans, and reduce veteran homelessness while improving access to timely, high-quality medical and employment support. There is no world where reducing benefits and support for veterans to save money will be tolerated by me. We did our duty and the American government must do its duty to provide lifetime care for our sacrifices.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Fred Wellman — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Housing & homeownership

Our economy should reward hard work, not connections or special interests. I believe in a strong floor and no ceiling: everyone should have the security to build a good life and the freedom to rise as far as their talent and hard work can take them. Families are working harder than ever but struggli…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Missourians deserve a fair shot at a good life. That starts with affordable healthcare, lower costs, and the freedom to build a secure future. Every family should be able to see a doctor when they are sick, afford the medicine they need, and keep a roof over their heads without being buried in debt.

Candidate campaign source

Our economy should reward hard work, not connections or special interests. I believe in a strong floor and no ceiling: everyone should have the security to build a good life and the freedom to rise as far as their talent and hard work can take them. Families are working harder than ever but struggling to keep up with the cost of housing, childcare, healthcare, and groceries. It should not take two jobs to make ends meet or a lifetime of work to retire in dignity and stability.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Fred Wellman — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs terms in retained, attributed source text from published Missouri candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Missouri incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Missouri legislators and Missouri’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Missouri’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

77 matching sponsorships or proposals · 34 Missouri incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Anthony Ealy

Missouri House of Representatives, District 36 · D–MO

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Anthony Ealy
Missouri Legislature · HB 2401

Establishes provisions related to the safe storage of firearms

May 15, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Anthony Ealy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2401 -- STORAGE OF FIREARMS SPONSOR: Ealy This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if the person fails to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that the person owns or controls and the person knows or reasonably should know a child can gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or guardian, or knows or reasonably should know a co-tenant is ineligible to possess a firearm under law. Responsible and secure storage includes, with the exception of a concealed or openly carried firearm in as secured holster, firearms: (1) Kept unloaded until ready to use; (2) Securely stored in a manner that ensures…

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 2401 -- STORAGE OF FIREARMS SPONSOR: Ealy This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if the person fails to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that the person owns or controls and the person knows or reasonably should know a child can gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or guardian, or knows or reasonably should know a co-tenant is ineligible to possess a firearm under law. Responsible and secure storage includes, with the exception of a concealed or openly carried firearm in as secured holster, firearms: (1) Kept unloaded until ready to use; (2) Securely stored in a manner that ensures the firearms are not accessible to unauthorized persons and unauthorized persons do not have access to any unlocking mechanism necessary for accessibility; and (3) That have a personalized firearm's safety characteristics activated. The requirement for the responsible and secured storage of a firearm, as specified in the bill, will not apply to the storing of an antique firearm, as defined under 18 U.S.C. Section 921, or a curio or relic, as defined under 27 CFR 478.11. The offense of unlawful storage of a firearm is punishable by a $500 fine for a first violation and punishable as a class B misdemeanor for a second or any subsequent violation. It is a defense to the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if a child gained possession of and used the firearm in a lawful act of self-defense, defense of others, or defense of livestock. Any firearms dealer must post in a conspicuous location on their premises a written notice as illustrated in the bill and to be made publicly available by the Department of Public Safety. A firearm dealer in violation of this provision may be punished by a warning for a first violation and punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for a second or subsequent violation. The Department must publish on its website, in both English and Spanish, information relating to the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm and related penalties. This bill is similar to HB 2113 (2026);
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 3297

Creates several new provisions for property development

May 15, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Anthony Ealy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Developments meeting these criteria can be administratively approved if they comply with land development regulations, excluding those related to density, height, and land use, and parking requirements may be reduced if the development is near public transit. Additionally, portions of multifamily projects providing affordable housing to eligible income groups will be eligible for an ad valorem property tax exemption starting in 2027, with the exemption percentage varying based on income levels, and property owners must apply annually with specific documentation.

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Developments meeting these criteria can be administratively approved if they comply with land development regulations, excluding those related to density, height, and land use, and parking requirements may be reduced if the development is near public transit. Additionally, portions of multifamily projects providing affordable housing to eligible income groups will be eligible for an ad valorem property tax exemption starting in 2027, with the exemption percentage varying based on income levels, and property owners must apply annually with specific documentation.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Ben Keathley

Missouri House of Representatives, District 101 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Ben Keathley
Missouri Legislature · HB 2385

Prohibits local governments from requiring private property owners to accept certain types of income.

Apr 16, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Ben Keathley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

This bill specifies that no county or city shall enact, maintain, or enforce any ordinance or resolution that prohibits landlords from refusing to lease or rent certain residential or commercial property to a person because the person's source of income includes aid from a federal housing assistance program. The bill specifies that no city or county may enact an ordinance that: (1) Prohibits landlords from using income-qualifying methods to determine whether to rent or lease a property to a prospective tenant; (2) Prohibits landlords from requesting tenant criminal records; (3) Limits the amount of security deposit required from a tenant; or (4) Requires tenants to automatically receive the…

This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-04-16: SCS Voted Do Pass (S).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

This bill specifies that no county or city shall enact, maintain, or enforce any ordinance or resolution that prohibits landlords from refusing to lease or rent certain residential or commercial property to a person because the person's source of income includes aid from a federal housing assistance program. The bill specifies that no city or county may enact an ordinance that: (1) Prohibits landlords from using income-qualifying methods to determine whether to rent or lease a property to a prospective tenant; (2) Prohibits landlords from requesting tenant criminal records; (3) Limits the amount of security deposit required from a tenant; or (4) Requires tenants to automatically receive the right of first refusal.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bill Owen

Missouri House of Representatives, District 131 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Bill Owen
Missouri Legislature · HB 2319

Modifies provisions relating to tax credits

May 2, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Bill Owen · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill would apply a sunset provision to the Affordable Housing Tax Credit, which currently lacks one. This concerns the lifespan of a housing subsidy; it does not establish a change in Missouri’s median rent.

This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-02: Placed Back on Formal Perfection Calendar (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

occur on August 28, 2024. (2) Applying a sunset provision to those tax credits that currently lack such provision. Such tax credits include: (a) Neighborhood Assistance Tax Credit; (b) Affordable Housing Tax Credit
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brian Seitz

Missouri House of Representatives, District 156 · R–MO

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Brian Seitz
Missouri Legislature · HB 1665

Prohibits homeowners' associations and other similar associations from infringing on the rights of concealed carry permit holders

May 15, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Brian Seitz · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1665 -- RIGHTS OF HOLDERS OF A CONCEALED CARRY PERMIT OR ENDORSEMENT SPONSOR: Seitz Currently, there are certain specified places that a concealed carry permit holder is prohibited from carrying a concealed firearm. This bill states that a homeowners' association, condominium owners' association, property owners' association, master association or any other similar superordinate entity cannot infringe upon the right to carry concealed firearms of any person who: (1) Is an owner or occupant of a condominium or house that is controlled by any such association or entity; and (2) Is lawfully in possession of a valid concealed carry permit, a concealed carry endorsement, or a valid concealed…

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1665 -- RIGHTS OF HOLDERS OF A CONCEALED CARRY PERMIT OR ENDORSEMENT SPONSOR: Seitz Currently, there are certain specified places that a concealed carry permit holder is prohibited from carrying a concealed firearm. This bill states that a homeowners' association, condominium owners' association, property owners' association, master association or any other similar superordinate entity cannot infringe upon the right to carry concealed firearms of any person who: (1) Is an owner or occupant of a condominium or house that is controlled by any such association or entity; and (2) Is lawfully in possession of a valid concealed carry permit, a concealed carry endorsement, or a valid concealed carry permit or endorsement issued by another state or a political subdivision of another state. This right to carry concealed firearms will extend to privately owned property, common elements, limited common elements, parking areas, and all ingress and egress routes, paths, and areas regardless of use or purpose. This bill is similar to HB 1415 (2025).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1415

Prohibits homeowners' associations and other similar associations from infringing on the rights of concealed carry permit holders

Mar 25, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Brian Seitz · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1415 -- RIGHTS OF MISSOURI CONCEALED CARRY HOLDER SPONSOR: Seitz Currently, there are certain specified places that a concealed carry permit holder is prohibited from carrying a concealed firearm. This bill states that a homeowners' association, condominium owners' association, property owners' association, master association or any other similar superordinate entity cannot infringe upon the right to carry concealed firearms of any person who: (1) Is an owner or occupant of a condominium or house that is controlled by any such association or entity; and (2) Is lawfully in possession of a valid concealed carry permit, a concealed carry endorsement, or a valid concealed carry permit or…

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-03-25: Public Hearing Completed (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1415 -- RIGHTS OF MISSOURI CONCEALED CARRY HOLDER SPONSOR: Seitz Currently, there are certain specified places that a concealed carry permit holder is prohibited from carrying a concealed firearm. This bill states that a homeowners' association, condominium owners' association, property owners' association, master association or any other similar superordinate entity cannot infringe upon the right to carry concealed firearms of any person who: (1) Is an owner or occupant of a condominium or house that is controlled by any such association or entity; and (2) Is lawfully in possession of a valid concealed carry permit, a concealed carry endorsement, or a valid concealed carry permit or endorsement issued by another state or a political subdivision of another state. This right to carry concealed firearms will extend to privately owned property, common elements, limited common elements, parking areas, and all ingress and egress routes, paths, and areas regardless of use or purpose.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Chris Brown

Missouri House of Representatives, District 16 · R–MO

3 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Chris Brown
Missouri Legislature · HB 2062

Establishes provisions relating to the use of real property

Jul 12, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. Chris Brown · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Additionally, the offense of criminal mischief for unlawful detention, occupation, or trespass upon a residential dwelling is established, which is a class A misdemeanor. MORATORIUM ON EVICTION PROCEEDINGS (Section 535.012) No county, municipality, or political subdivision shall impose or otherwise enforce a moratorium on eviction proceedings unless specifically authorized by state law. HYDRANT TESTING (Section 640.144) Currently, community water systems in certain areas are required to create a hydrant inspection program that includes annual testing of every hydrant in the system.

Approved by the Governor on 2024-07-12. The recorded final action was 2024-07-12: Delivered to Secretary of State (G). This is the legislative disposition; subsequent court rulings may affect enforcement.

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Additionally, the offense of criminal mischief for unlawful detention, occupation, or trespass upon a residential dwelling is established, which is a class A misdemeanor. MORATORIUM ON EVICTION PROCEEDINGS (Section 535.012) No county, municipality, or political subdivision shall impose or otherwise enforce a moratorium on eviction proceedings unless specifically authorized by state law. HYDRANT TESTING (Section 640.144) Currently, community water systems in certain areas are required to create a hydrant inspection program that includes annual testing of every hydrant in the system.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 730

Establishes provisions relating to property rights

Apr 25, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Chris Brown · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

However, this requirement does not apply to inspections of new construction or occupancy permits. The bill prohibits any county, municipality, or political subdivision from imposing or enforcing a moratorium on eviction proceedings unless specifically authorized by state law.

This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-04-25: Taken Up for Third Reading (S).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

However, this requirement does not apply to inspections of new construction or occupancy permits. The bill prohibits any county, municipality, or political subdivision from imposing or enforcing a moratorium on eviction proceedings unless specifically authorized by state law.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1682

Prohibits a county, municipality, or other political subdivision from imposing or enforcing a moratorium on eviction proceedings unless authorized by state law

May 2, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Chris Brown · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

A homeowners' association may adopt reasonable rules regarding sale signs and remove a sale sign without liability as specified in the bill. The bill prohibits any county, municipality, or political subdivision from imposing or enforcing a moratorium on eviction proceedings unless specifically authorized by state law.

This measure did not pass before the 2022 session ended. Final recorded action on 2022-05-02: Public Hearing Held (S).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

A homeowners' association may adopt reasonable rules regarding sale signs and remove a sale sign without liability as specified in the bill. The bill prohibits any county, municipality, or political subdivision from imposing or enforcing a moratorium on eviction proceedings unless specifically authorized by state law.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. David Casteel

Missouri House of Representatives, District 97 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. David Casteel
Missouri Legislature · HB 2105

Allows landlords to apportion charges to tenants for water and sewer utility service

May 6, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. David Casteel · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HCS HB 2105 -- WATER AND SEWER SERVICE FOR RENTAL PROPERTY (Casteel) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on General Laws The bill specifies that a landlord or a landlord's water and sewer service billing provider is not a public utility or water or sewer corporation for purposes of regulation by the Public Service Commission, nor will the lessees of the owner or operator of the premises be considered a customer of any public utility, sewer corporation, or water corporation. A landlord can apportion charges for water and sewer services to tenants by actually measuring individual tenant utility usage with a meter or by allocating charges through use of a mathematical formula. Landlords can…

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-06: SCS Voted Do Pass (S).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HCS HB 2105 -- WATER AND SEWER SERVICE FOR RENTAL PROPERTY (Casteel) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on General Laws The bill specifies that a landlord or a landlord's water and sewer service billing provider is not a public utility or water or sewer corporation for purposes of regulation by the Public Service Commission, nor will the lessees of the owner or operator of the premises be considered a customer of any public utility, sewer corporation, or water corporation. A landlord can apportion charges for water and sewer services to tenants by actually measuring individual tenant utility usage with a meter or by allocating charges through use of a mathematical formula. Landlords can use a mathematical formula to apportion water and sewer charges for common areas to each tenant. If using a meter, landlords must disclose certain information about the meter readings on the tenant's bill. If using a mathematical formula, landlords must disclose the formula to a prospective tenant before entering into a lease. The total amount billed to tenants by a landlord for water and sewer service must not exceed the total amount owed by the landlord to the utility for service to the property, except that landlords can charge tenants for reasonable administrative costs, provided that the administrative costs are disclosed before the signing of a lease. Landlords can also charge late fees, which will be considered part of a tenant's rent. Landlords can use third-party billing providers to bill tenants for water and sewer service, but the providers must comply with requirements in the same manner as landlords.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Missouri officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Missouri statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.