Missouri · individual fact

Missouri energy and electricity

Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.

Residential electricity price12.91¢/kWh2024 · #37 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.893/gal2026-08 · #26 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$129.182024 · #31 of 50 · highest first

Missouri over time

Explore Missouri readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Missouri officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Missouri effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Missouri change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Residential electricity price Missouri · source units
MissouriPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Residential electricity price2024: 12.91¢/kWh10.14¢/kWh13.81¢/kWh17.48¢/kWhMissouri, 2015: 11.21¢/kWhMissouri, 2016: 11.21¢/kWhMissouri, 2017: 11.63¢/kWhMissouri, 2018: 11.34¢/kWhMissouri, 2019: 11.14¢/kWhMissouri, 2020: 11.22¢/kWhMissouri, 2021: 11.42¢/kWhMissouri, 2022: 11.74¢/kWhMissouri, 2023: 12.58¢/kWhMissouri, 2024: 12.91¢/kWh201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 50National context · Energy Policy Act expands federal energy programs · 2005-08-08Energy Policy ActNational context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Energy law strengthens fuel economy, biofuels and efficiency · 2007-12-19Fuel / efficiency lawNational context · Global oil and energy prices surge · 2008-07-15Oil-price surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Recovery Act funds grid modernization and clean energy · 2009-02-17Recovery Act energyNational context · EPA signs greenhouse-gas endangerment finding · 2009-12-07GHG findingNational context · Deepwater Horizon explosion and oil spill · 2010-04-20Deepwater HorizonNational context · Fukushima accident prompts U.S. nuclear safety response · 2011-03-11Fukushima safetyNational context · Global demand and Middle East unrest pressure oil prices · 2011-04-112011 oil pressuresNational context · Hurricane Sandy disrupts electricity and fuel distribution · 2012-10-29Hurricane SandyNational context · Polar vortex strains gas supplies and power systems · 2014-01-07Polar vortexNational context · Oil supply growth and OPEC decision deepen price collapse · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Clean Power Plan announced; implementation later stayed · 2015-08-03Clean Power PlanNational context · Congress lifts longstanding crude-oil export restrictions · 2015-12-18Crude export rulesNational context · First LNG export cargo from the Lower 48 · 2016-02-24Lower 48 LNG exportsNational context · Shale development transforms U.S. oil supply · 2016-03-15Shale expansionNational context · Natural gas overtakes coal in annual electricity generation · 2016-12-31Gas overtakes coalNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · Attacks on Saudi oil facilities interrupt global supply · 2019-09-14Saudi oil attacksNational context · United States becomes an annual net total energy exporter · 2019-12-31Net energy exporterNational context · COVID-19 sharply reduces energy demand · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Expiring WTI oil futures settle below zero · 2020-04-20Negative WTI futuresNational context · Western heat wave leads to California rotating outages · 2020-08-14California outagesNational context · OPEC+ supply cuts help rebalance the pandemic oil market · 2020-09-23OPEC+ supply cutsNational context · Severe winter weather disrupts Texas and regional energy systems · 2021-02-08Winter Storm UriNational context · Cyberattack interrupts Colonial Pipeline fuel deliveries · 2021-05-07Colonial PipelineNational context · Infrastructure law funds grid and energy projects · 2021-11-15Infrastructure energyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Large Strategic Petroleum Reserve release announced · 2022-03-31SPR releaseNational context · Freeport LNG fire shuts a major export terminal · 2022-06-08Freeport LNG outageNational context · Inflation Reduction Act expands energy incentives · 2022-08-16IRA energy incentivesNational context · Winter Storm Elliott disrupts gas and power supplies · 2022-12-21Winter Storm ElliottNational context · Renewables exceed coal in annual electric power sector generation · 2022-12-31Renewables pass coalNational context · Vogtle expansion adds new nuclear generation · 2023-07-31Vogtle nuclear unitsNational context · Red Sea attacks reroute oil and gas shipping · 2024-02-01Red Sea shippingNational context · EPA finalizes new power-plant greenhouse-gas rules · 2024-04-25Power-plant GHG ruleNational context · FERC adopts long-term regional transmission planning rule · 2024-05-13Transmission planningNational context · DOE report documents growing data-center electricity demand · 2024-12-20Data-center demandNational context · President declares energy emergency and directs policy changes · 2025-01-20Energy emergencyNational context · U.S. tariff announcement changes energy trade context · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · EPA proposes repeal of power-sector greenhouse-gas rules · 2025-06-11Power-rule proposalNational context · Tax law accelerates several energy-credit expirations · 2025-07-04Energy tax changesNational context · EPA finalizes endangerment and vehicle GHG standard rescission · 2026-02-12Vehicle GHG repealNational context · EPA announces repeal of 2024 power-plant air-toxics amendments · 2026-02-20Air-toxics amendmentsNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shockNational context · IEA members agree to emergency oil-stock release · 2026-03-11Emergency oil stocksNational context · FERC and NERC report improved winter grid preparedness · 2026-09-10Winter grid reviewMissouri · DOE selects Basin Electric Power Cooperative grid-upgrade application · 2026-09-24Basin Electric Power Cooperative · SPARK selectionMissouri · DOE selects Pitch Aeronautics Inc. grid-upgrade application · 2026-09-24Pitch Aeronautics Inc. · SPARK selection● Missouri Legislature · 8323222652522248● U.S. Congress · Missouri delegation · 2◆ Governor · 2■ Missouri agencies · 22005-08-012026-09-30

89 of 89 reviewed Missouri actions match · 56 date markers shown. 50 major events shown separately.

Missouri · 2024: 12.91¢/kWh · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Missouri, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Missouri Residential electricity price · source units
PeriodMissouriRankU.S. benchmark
202412.91¢/kWh#37 of 5016.48¢/kWh
202312.58¢/kWh#38 of 50Not available
202211.74¢/kWh#41 of 50Not available
202111.42¢/kWh#37 of 50Not available
202011.22¢/kWh#37 of 50Not available
201911.14¢/kWh#38 of 50Not available
201811.34¢/kWh#33 of 50Not available
201711.63¢/kWh#31 of 50Not available
201611.21¢/kWh#33 of 50Not available
201511.21¢/kWh#35 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Missouri · state comparison

Household energy prices

Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.

Missouri · 202412.91¢/kWh
Missouri rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential electricity price

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside Missouri, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
Residential electricity price history in Missouri10.34¢/kWh13.81¢/kWh17.28¢/kWh20152024
2024 · Missouri: 12.91¢/kWh · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri Residential electricity price history
PeriodMissouriCompare
201511.21¢/kWh
201611.21¢/kWh
201711.63¢/kWh
201811.34¢/kWh
201911.14¢/kWh
202011.22¢/kWh
202111.42¢/kWh
202211.74¢/kWh
202312.58¢/kWh
202412.91¢/kWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 12.91¢/kWh2024 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii42.86¢/kWh—
#2California31.97¢/kWh—
#3Massachusetts29.35¢/kWh—
#4Connecticut28.75¢/kWh—
#5Rhode Island28.65¢/kWh—
#6Alaska24.82¢/kWh—
#7New York24.43¢/kWh—
#8Maine24.29¢/kWh—
#9New Hampshire23.4¢/kWh—
#10Vermont21.9¢/kWh—
#11New Jersey19.34¢/kWh—
#12Michigan19.3¢/kWh—
#13Maryland17.86¢/kWh—
#14Pennsylvania17.77¢/kWh—
#15Wisconsin17.18¢/kWh—
#16Delaware16.57¢/kWh—
#17Ohio15.99¢/kWh—
#18Illinois15.87¢/kWh—
#19Minnesota15.45¢/kWh—
#20Alabama15.18¢/kWh—
#21West Virginia15.07¢/kWh—
#22Nevada15¢/kWh—
#23Texas14.94¢/kWh—
#24Colorado14.92¢/kWh—
#25Arizona14.91¢/kWh—
#26Indiana14.77¢/kWh—
#27Oregon14.7¢/kWh—
#28Virginia14.41¢/kWh—
#29South Carolina14.23¢/kWh—
#30New Mexico14.2¢/kWh—
#31Kansas14.15¢/kWh—
#32Florida14.14¢/kWh—
#33North Carolina14.13¢/kWh—
#34Georgia14.08¢/kWh—
#35Iowa13.4¢/kWh—
#36Mississippi13.39¢/kWh—
#37Missouri · your comparison12.91¢/kWh—
#38South Dakota12.86¢/kWh—
#39Kentucky12.79¢/kWh—
#40Montana12.66¢/kWh—
#41Wyoming12.47¢/kWh—
#42Tennessee12.42¢/kWh—
#43Arkansas12.32¢/kWh—
#44Oklahoma12.24¢/kWh—
#45Utah12.22¢/kWh—
#46Washington11.9¢/kWh—
#47Louisiana11.73¢/kWh—
#48Nebraska11.53¢/kWh—
#49Idaho11.52¢/kWh—
#50North Dakota11.51¢/kWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Midwest regular gasoline price

$3.85/galWeek of August 31, 2026

Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations, including taxes, in EIA's Midwest petroleum district. The district includes Missouri and 14 other states.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Recent EIA observations

Prior week
$3.934/gal
Weekly change
−$0.087/gal
One year earlier
$3.088/gal
Change from one year earlier
+$0.759/gal
Method and limitations

U.S. Energy Information Administration weekly retail motor-gasoline survey estimate for the Midwest region. FactVote displays the published dollars-per-gallon value and calculates changes from EIA's published prior-week and nearest year-earlier weekly observations.

  • EIA does not publish a current Missouri statewide weekly gasoline-price series; this Midwest regional estimate should not be read as Missouri's statewide average.
  • The regional estimate combines Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Missouri community.
  • This nominal weekly snapshot does not identify why prices changed or establish the effect of any tax, bill, executive action, or market event.
Missouri · state comparison

What are households paying for electricity?

Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.

Missouri · 2024$129.18
Missouri rank#31among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Average monthly residential electricity bill

State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.

Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
Average monthly residential electricity bill history in Missouri$99.01$123.46$147.920102024
2024 · Missouri: $129.18 · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri Average monthly residential electricity bill history
PeriodMissouriCompare
2010$104.66
2011$108.39
2012$107.8
2013$115.21
2014$116.47
2015$115.8
2016$116.63
2017$115.6
2018$126.79
2019$117.82
2020$115.35
2021$118.55
2022$126.46
2023$126.09
2024$129.18

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · $129.182024 · Rank #31 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii$212.12—
#2Connecticut$199.66—
#3Alabama$173.5—
#4Massachusetts$167.2—
#5Maryland$165.87—
#6Texas$163.72—
#7Rhode Island$162.4—
#8California$160.86—
#9Arizona$160.24—
#10Florida$156.09—
#11Mississippi$154.83—
#12West Virginia$154.76—
#13Georgia$151.25—
#14Delaware$150.87—
#15South Carolina$149.51—
#16Virginia$148.77—
#17Pennsylvania$145.17—
#18New Hampshire$144.87—
#19Alaska$143.54—
#20North Carolina$143.5—
#21Tennessee$143.32—
#22Louisiana$140.96—
#23New York$139.53—
#24Nevada$139.39—
#25Ohio$135.16—
#26Kentucky$133.81—
#27Maine$133.6—
#28Indiana$133.06—
#29Oklahoma$132.05—
#30Oregon$129.62—
#31Missouri · your comparison$129.18—
#32Arkansas$129.13—
#33New Jersey$128.13—
#34South Dakota$127.81—
#35Vermont$125.66—
#36Kansas$123.9—
#37Michigan$119.31—
#38North Dakota$118.38—
#39Washington$113.68—
#40Iowa$111.54—
#41Wisconsin$110.87—
#42Nebraska$110.28—
#43Minnesota$110.06—
#44Illinois$109.99—
#45Idaho$108.73—
#46Montana$107.91—
#47Wyoming$107.65—
#48Colorado$100.57—
#49Utah$94.57—
#50New Mexico$92.88—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Missouri · state comparison

What generates Missouri electricity?

Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.

Missouri · 202467.6 TWh
Missouri rank#22among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total electricity generation

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside Missouri, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
Total electricity generation history in Missouri63.9 TWh75.9 TWh87.9 TWh20152024
2024 · Missouri: 67.6 TWh · Rank #22 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri Total electricity generation history
PeriodMissouriCompare
201583.6 TWh
201678.6 TWh
201784.6 TWh
201885.1 TWh
201978.3 TWh
202072.6 TWh
202176.9 TWh
202279.4 TWh
202366.7 TWh
202467.6 TWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 67.6 TWh2024 · Rank #22 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas571.5 TWh—
#2Florida270.7 TWh—
#3California245.9 TWh—
#4Pennsylvania242.5 TWh—
#5Illinois186.7 TWh—
#6Ohio143.3 TWh—
#7Alabama142.9 TWh—
#8Georgia140.4 TWh—
#9North Carolina135.9 TWh—
#10New York133.5 TWh—
#11Michigan124.5 TWh—
#12Arizona121.5 TWh—
#13Virginia103.7 TWh—
#14Washington103 TWh—
#15South Carolina101.1 TWh—
#16Louisiana100 TWh—
#17Indiana97.4 TWh—
#18Oklahoma94.3 TWh—
#19Mississippi77.4 TWh—
#20Tennessee76.3 TWh—
#21Iowa70.9 TWh—
#22Missouri · your comparison67.6 TWh—
#23Kentucky67.1 TWh—
#24Wisconsin65.6 TWh—
#25Oregon65.3 TWh—
#26New Jersey63.6 TWh—
#27Arkansas62.1 TWh—
#28Colorado60.8 TWh—
#29Minnesota59 TWh—
#30Kansas57.9 TWh—
#31West Virginia50.7 TWh—
#32Nevada47.6 TWh—
#33Connecticut46.2 TWh—
#34North Dakota42.6 TWh—
#35Wyoming40.7 TWh—
#36New Mexico40.5 TWh—
#37Nebraska37.3 TWh—
#38Maryland36.9 TWh—
#39Utah36.1 TWh—
#40Montana27 TWh—
#41Massachusetts25 TWh—
#42South Dakota20.9 TWh—
#43Idaho20.3 TWh—
#44New Hampshire17.3 TWh—
#45Maine15.7 TWh—
#46Hawaii10.7 TWh—
#47Rhode Island10.1 TWh—
#48Alaska6.7 TWh—
#49Delaware5 TWh—
#50Vermont2.5 TWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Coal share of in-state electricity generation

58.1%2024

Coal generation as a share of Missouri's total in-state electric-power-industry net generation.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

EIA generation totals

Coal generation
38,832,000 MWh (rounded)
Total net generation
66,875,710 MWh
Method and limitations

FactVote divided EIA's 38,832 thousand MWh of 2024 coal generation by 66,875,710 MWh of total in-state net generation and rounded the result to one decimal place.

  • EIA publishes the coal numerator in thousand MWh, so the displayed numerator is converted to MWh and remains rounded to the nearest thousand MWh.
  • In-state generation is not the same as electricity consumed in Missouri because power crosses state lines.
Missouri · state comparison

Affordability, reliability, emissions, and demand

Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.

Missouri · 2024212.6 min/year
Missouri rank#34among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Outage minutes per customer · all events

EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.

Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
Outage minutes per customer · all events history in Missouri145.1 min/year437.6 min/year730.1 min/year20232024
2024 · Missouri: 212.6 min/year · Rank #34 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri Outage minutes per customer · all events history
PeriodMissouriCompare
2023379 min/year
2024212.6 min/year

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 212.6 min/year2024 · Rank #34 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1South Carolina3,155 min/year—
#2Maine1,748.6 min/year—
#3Texas1,614.3 min/year—
#4North Carolina1,518.1 min/year—
#5Florida1,487.6 min/year—
#6Georgia1,208.1 min/year—
#7West Virginia1,165.5 min/year—
#8Virginia962.1 min/year—
#9Vermont895.8 min/year—
#10New Hampshire735.5 min/year—
#11Nebraska697.8 min/year—
#12Washington643.5 min/year—
#13Louisiana630.6 min/year—
#14Mississippi607.3 min/year—
#15Oregon579.3 min/year—
#16Kentucky537.7 min/year—
#17Arkansas527.8 min/year—
#18Ohio511 min/year—
#19Michigan481.7 min/year—
#20New York477.3 min/year—
#21Hawaii382.6 min/year—
#22Pennsylvania353.1 min/year—
#23Montana341.7 min/year—
#24Alaska323.2 min/year—
#25Indiana310 min/year—
#26Wisconsin296.8 min/year—
#27Kansas289.8 min/year—
#28Tennessee289.3 min/year—
#29California285 min/year—
#30New Mexico272.6 min/year—
#31Colorado257 min/year—
#32Minnesota222.4 min/year—
#33Oklahoma220.7 min/year—
#34Missouri · your comparison212.6 min/year—
#35Idaho204.4 min/year—
#36Iowa200.3 min/year—
#37Alabama197.7 min/year—
#38New Jersey173.3 min/year—
#39Nevada158.9 min/year—
#40Illinois158 min/year—
#41Connecticut152.8 min/year—
#42Wyoming137.8 min/year—
#43Maryland118.1 min/year—
#44Delaware117.9 min/year—
#45Utah115.4 min/year—
#46Rhode Island104.3 min/year—
#47Massachusetts103.7 min/year—
#48North Dakota102.7 min/year—
#49South Dakota85.6 min/year—
#50Arizona83.6 min/year—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Missouri · state comparison

Who uses energy?

Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.

Missouri · 2024459 trillion Btu
Missouri rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential energy consumption

Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).

2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 459 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas1,514 trillion Btu—
#2Florida1,183.3 trillion Btu—
#3California1,147.1 trillion Btu—
#4New York968.3 trillion Btu—
#5Pennsylvania819.3 trillion Btu—
#6Illinois817.1 trillion Btu—
#7Ohio767.4 trillion Btu—
#8Georgia717.1 trillion Btu—
#9North Carolina662.2 trillion Btu—
#10Michigan661.4 trillion Btu—
#11New Jersey550.1 trillion Btu—
#12Virginia526 trillion Btu—
#13Tennessee492 trillion Btu—
#14Indiana475.6 trillion Btu—
#15Missouri · your comparison459 trillion Btu—
#16Arizona413.7 trillion Btu—
#17Massachusetts379 trillion Btu—
#18Wisconsin375.9 trillion Btu—
#19South Carolina370.7 trillion Btu—
#20Maryland357.2 trillion Btu—
#21Minnesota346.2 trillion Btu—
#22Alabama331.6 trillion Btu—
#23Washington330.2 trillion Btu—
#24Kentucky319 trillion Btu—
#25Colorado311.9 trillion Btu—
#26Louisiana282.6 trillion Btu—
#27Connecticut235.3 trillion Btu—
#28Oklahoma231 trillion Btu—
#29Arkansas209.5 trillion Btu—
#30Utah190.7 trillion Btu—
#31Mississippi179.7 trillion Btu—
#32Oregon173.1 trillion Btu—
#33Kansas166.4 trillion Btu—
#34Iowa162 trillion Btu—
#35Nevada153.3 trillion Btu—
#36West Virginia141 trillion Btu—
#37Nebraska128.9 trillion Btu—
#38Idaho111.2 trillion Btu—
#39New Mexico98.1 trillion Btu—
#40New Hampshire91.8 trillion Btu—
#41Maine80.5 trillion Btu—
#42Montana73.9 trillion Btu—
#43Delaware62.6 trillion Btu—
#44North Dakota61.3 trillion Btu—
#45Rhode Island61 trillion Btu—
#46Alaska49.1 trillion Btu—
#47Wyoming45.5 trillion Btu—
#48South Dakota44.2 trillion Btu—
#49Vermont32.7 trillion Btu—
#50Hawaii29.5 trillion Btu—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Missouri · state comparison

Energy-related carbon emissions

Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.

Missouri · 202498.03 Mt CO₂
Missouri rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total energy-related CO₂ emissions

Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.

2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 98.03 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas679.93 Mt CO₂—
#2California315.98 Mt CO₂—
#3Florida230.85 Mt CO₂—
#4Pennsylvania201.57 Mt CO₂—
#5Louisiana186.89 Mt CO₂—
#6Ohio186.34 Mt CO₂—
#7Illinois163.98 Mt CO₂—
#8New York163.69 Mt CO₂—
#9Indiana152.3 Mt CO₂—
#10Michigan143.11 Mt CO₂—
#11Georgia127.83 Mt CO₂—
#12North Carolina119.07 Mt CO₂—
#13Kentucky106.87 Mt CO₂—
#14Alabama104.32 Mt CO₂—
#15Virginia99.24 Mt CO₂—
#16Missouri · your comparison98.03 Mt CO₂—
#17Tennessee90.46 Mt CO₂—
#18Oklahoma88.56 Mt CO₂—
#19New Jersey87.84 Mt CO₂—
#20Wisconsin85.12 Mt CO₂—
#21Arizona82.2 Mt CO₂—
#22Colorado79.57 Mt CO₂—
#23Minnesota77.89 Mt CO₂—
#24Washington73.81 Mt CO₂—
#25West Virginia72.28 Mt CO₂—
#26South Carolina70.81 Mt CO₂—
#27Iowa65.23 Mt CO₂—
#28Mississippi64.75 Mt CO₂—
#29Arkansas58.42 Mt CO₂—
#30Massachusetts58.07 Mt CO₂—
#31North Dakota55.15 Mt CO₂—
#32Kansas55.09 Mt CO₂—
#33Utah55.03 Mt CO₂—
#34Wyoming50 Mt CO₂—
#35Maryland48.77 Mt CO₂—
#36Alaska44.01 Mt CO₂—
#37Nebraska43.54 Mt CO₂—
#38New Mexico41.63 Mt CO₂—
#39Nevada39.28 Mt CO₂—
#40Oregon38.94 Mt CO₂—
#41Connecticut37.09 Mt CO₂—
#42Montana27.16 Mt CO₂—
#43Idaho21.11 Mt CO₂—
#44Hawaii17.96 Mt CO₂—
#45Maine15.99 Mt CO₂—
#46South Dakota15.11 Mt CO₂—
#47New Hampshire13.6 Mt CO₂—
#48Delaware11.52 Mt CO₂—
#49Rhode Island11.05 Mt CO₂—
#50Vermont5.36 Mt CO₂—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Missouri candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

13 statements from 4 candidates

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Wesley Bell

3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · MO

Energy & electricity

Every family deserves to keep the lights on and the heat running without having to choose between that and putting food on the table. Utility bills have skyrocketed in recent years, and Trump's energy policies are making things worse. Wesley has pushed for federal relief to help households manage ri…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Lowering Energy Costs.

Candidate campaign source

Every family deserves to keep the lights on and the heat running without having to choose between that and putting food on the table. Utility bills have skyrocketed in recent years, and Trump's energy policies are making things worse. Wesley has pushed for federal relief to help households manage rising energy costs and opposed Republican policies that have driven those costs higher.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Wesley Bell — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from Wesley Bell
Energy & electricity

Climate change is a crisis, and here in Missouri, the effects are already making an impact on our way of life and the safety of our most vulnerable communities, from extreme weather events to deteriorating air and water quality. Wesley believes that confronting the climate crisis and growing our eco…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Delivering Environmental Justice.

Candidate campaign source

Climate change is a crisis, and here in Missouri, the effects are already making an impact on our way of life and the safety of our most vulnerable communities, from extreme weather events to deteriorating air and water quality. Wesley believes that confronting the climate crisis and growing our economy are not in conflict. The transition to clean energy should create good-paying union jobs right here in the First District. He has fought to protect clean air and water standards, hold polluters accountable, and ensure that the federal government lives up to its obligations to communities like those along Coldwater Creek and the Westlake Landfill that have suffered from decades of environmental neglect and contamination.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Wesley Bell — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Energy & electricity

Now, Wesley is running for reelection to continue fighting for his constituents in Washington: holding the Trump administration and MAGA Republicans accountable, expanding access to affordable health care and prescription drugs, lowering energy costs, bringing down the price of groceries, protecting…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: A strong leader for common-sense solutions. Learn more about Wesley Bell here.

Candidate campaign source

Now, Wesley is running for reelection to continue fighting for his constituents in Washington: holding the Trump administration and MAGA Republicans accountable, expanding access to affordable health care and prescription drugs, lowering energy costs, bringing down the price of groceries, protecting our rights and freedoms, and creating good-paying jobs right here in St. Louis.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Wesley Bell — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Bethany E Mann

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · MO

Energy & electricity

We must take stake and recognize the environmental changes that are having effects on our state, from our farmers to our economy. To be prosperous we must realize how important clean air and water are and take steps to ensure we take steps to prepare for increases in weather events, with moving towa…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Voting Rights

Candidate campaign source

We must take stake and recognize the environmental changes that are having effects on our state, from our farmers to our economy. To be prosperous we must realize how important clean air and water are and take steps to ensure we take steps to prepare for increases in weather events, with moving toward renewable energy we would create new jobs and new industries.​

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Bethany E Mann — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Bethany E Mann
Energy & electricity

We must take stake and recognize the environmental changes that are having effects on our state, from our farmers to our economy. To be prosperous we must realize how important clean air and water are and take steps to ensure we take steps to prepare for increases in weather events, with moving towa…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: The Issues That Matter

Candidate campaign source

We must take stake and recognize the environmental changes that are having effects on our state, from our farmers to our economy. To be prosperous we must realize how important clean air and water are and take steps to ensure we take steps to prepare for increases in weather events, with moving toward renewable energy we would create new jobs and new industries.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Bethany E Mann — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 4 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 6 statements

Jordan Herrera

6 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 4 · MO

Energy & electricity

Expanding domestic manufacturing for clean energy technologies

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy and Manufacturing

Candidate campaign source

Expanding domestic manufacturing for clean energy technologies

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jordan Herrera — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 5 more statements from Jordan Herrera
Energy & electricity

AI cannot run on slogans. It runs on electricity. If we are going to build the digital economy, we need reliable, clean, high-output energy. That means nuclear power must be part of the conversation. The ADVANCE Act, signed into law in 2024, directs the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to modernize lic…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Technology, Privacy, and Energy

Candidate campaign source

AI cannot run on slogans. It runs on electricity. If we are going to build the digital economy, we need reliable, clean, high-output energy. That means nuclear power must be part of the conversation. The ADVANCE Act, signed into law in 2024, directs the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to modernize licensing for advanced reactors and fuels while maintaining safety and security standards.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jordan Herrera — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Energy & electricity

I come from technology, law, and service. I worked in biomedical technology. I studied law with a focus on entrepreneurship and technology. I understand what happens when innovation moves faster than accountability. I am not afraid of AI. I am afraid of letting billion-dollar corporations write the …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Infrastructure, Transportation, and Privacy

Candidate campaign source

I come from technology, law, and service. I worked in biomedical technology. I studied law with a focus on entrepreneurship and technology. I understand what happens when innovation moves faster than accountability. I am not afraid of AI. I am afraid of letting billion-dollar corporations write the rules while workers, artists, families, and rural communities are left to deal with the consequences. We can build the future. But we need to build it with guardrails, with worker power, with privacy rights, with clean energy, and with a simple principle at the center: The people who create value should not be the last to benefit from it.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jordan Herrera — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Energy & electricity

We are living in an era where your data, your face, your voice, your location, and your creative work can be captured, copied, sold, and monetized without your consent. Congress has failed to meet the moment. I support innovation. I support technology. I support re-engineered and better-designed dat…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Technology, Privacy, and Energy

Candidate campaign source

We are living in an era where your data, your face, your voice, your location, and your creative work can be captured, copied, sold, and monetized without your consent. Congress has failed to meet the moment. I support innovation. I support technology. I support re-engineered and better-designed data centers, AI research, broadband expansion, and next-generation energy. But I will not support a future where workers are replaced, artists are robbed, communities pay the utility bills leading to poverty and home insecurity, and corporations walk away with the profits.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jordan Herrera — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Energy & electricity

Investing in solar, wind, and advanced energy systems

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy and Manufacturing

Candidate campaign source

Investing in solar, wind, and advanced energy systems

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jordan Herrera — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Energy & electricity

Union jobs in clean energy construction and maintenance

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Technology, Privacy, and Energy

Candidate campaign source

Union jobs in clean energy construction and maintenance

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jordan Herrera — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Missouri candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Missouri incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Missouri legislators and Missouri’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Missouri’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

85 matching sponsorships or proposals · 29 Missouri incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Adrian Plank

Missouri House of Representatives, District 47 · D–MO

7 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Adrian Plank
Missouri Legislature · HB 1902

Modifies the definition of renewable energy resources

May 15, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1902 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard to include pumped storage from hydropower. This bill is similar to HB 193 (2025) and HB 1865 (2024).

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1902 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard to include pumped storage from hydropower. This bill is similar to HB 193 (2025) and HB 1865 (2024).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 193

Modifies the definition of renewable energy resources

May 15, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 193 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard to include pumped storage from hydropower. This bill is the same as HB 1865 (2024) and HB 1093(2023).

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 193 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard to include pumped storage from hydropower. This bill is the same as HB 1865 (2024) and HB 1093(2023).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 768

Modifies provisions for renewable energy resources

May 15, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 768 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2025, and…

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 768 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2025, and increases incrementally to no less than 100% by December 31, 2059.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1944

Modifies provisions for renewable energy resources

May 17, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1944 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31,…

This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-17: Referred: General Laws(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1944 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2024, and increases incrementally to no less than 100% by December 31, 2058.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1865

Modifies the definition of renewable energy resources

May 17, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1865 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard to include pumped storage from hydropower. This bill is the same as HB 1093 (2023).

This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-17: Referred: General Laws(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1865 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard to include pumped storage from hydropower. This bill is the same as HB 1093 (2023).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1093

Modifies the definition of renewable energy resources

May 12, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1093 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard to include pumped storage from hydropower.

This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-05-12: Referred: Utilities(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1093 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard to include pumped storage from hydropower.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1079

Modifies provisions for renewable energy resources

May 12, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1079 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2023 and…

This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-05-12: Referred: Utilities(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1079 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2023 and increases incrementally to no less than 100% by December 31, 2058.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bill Hardwick

Missouri House of Representatives, District 121 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Bill Hardwick
Missouri Legislature · HB 1293

Modifies provisions relating to the renewable energy standard

May 8, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Bill Hardwick · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HCS HB 1293 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARD SPONSOR: Hardwick COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Emerging Issues by a vote of 14 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 1293. This bill specifies that electric utilities with more than 250,000 but less than 1,000,000 retail customers in Missouri as of the end of 2022 with energy that meets the criteria of the renewable energy portfolio requirements and is contracted for by an accelerated renewable buyer must: (1) Have all associated renewable energy certificates retired by the accelerated renewable buyer and the certificates may not be used to meet the electric utility’s…

This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-05-08: Referred: Rules - Regulatory Oversight(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HCS HB 1293 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARD SPONSOR: Hardwick COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Emerging Issues by a vote of 14 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 1293. This bill specifies that electric utilities with more than 250,000 but less than 1,000,000 retail customers in Missouri as of the end of 2022 with energy that meets the criteria of the renewable energy portfolio requirements and is contracted for by an accelerated renewable buyer must: (1) Have all associated renewable energy certificates retired by the accelerated renewable buyer and the certificates may not be used to meet the electric utility’s portfolio requirements; (2) Be excluded from the total electric utility’s sales used to determine the portfolio requirements; and (3) Be used to offset all or a portion of its electric load to determine compliance with the portfolio requirements. The bill specifies that the accelerated renewable buyer, defined as a customer of an electric utility with an aggregate load over 80 average megawatts entering into specified contracts, is exempt from any renewable energy standard compliance costs as established by the utility and approved by the Public Service Commission. Each electric utility must certify, and verify as necessary, to the Commission that the accelerated renewable buyer has satisfied the exemption requirements as specified in the bill.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brad Banderman

Missouri House of Representatives, District 119 · R–MO

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Brad Banderman
Missouri Legislature · HB 2578

Modifies the definition of renewable energy resources

May 15, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Brad Banderman · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2578 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Banderman The bill repeals the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purpose of the Renewable Energy Standard and replaces it with a definition of "alternative energy resources", which includes pumped storage from hydropower and nuclear energy. This bill is similar to HB 2475 (2026).

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 2578 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Banderman The bill repeals the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purpose of the Renewable Energy Standard and replaces it with a definition of "alternative energy resources", which includes pumped storage from hydropower and nuclear energy. This bill is similar to HB 2475 (2026).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1059

Modifies provisions relating to utilities

Mar 5, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Brad Banderman · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The Public Service Commission or the Office of Public Counsel can request an extension for approval of 30 days upon a showing of good cause. RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARDS (Section 393.1030) This bill specifies that electric utilities with more than 250,000 but less than 1 million retail customers in Missouri as of the end of 2022 with energy that meets the criteria of the renewable energy portfolio requirements and is contracted for by an accelerated renewable buyer must: (1) Have all associated renewable energy certificates retired by the accelerated renewable buyer and the certificates can not be used to meet the electric utility’s portfolio requirements; (2) Be excluded from the total…

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-03-05: Public Hearing Completed (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The Public Service Commission or the Office of Public Counsel can request an extension for approval of 30 days upon a showing of good cause. RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARDS (Section 393.1030) This bill specifies that electric utilities with more than 250,000 but less than 1 million retail customers in Missouri as of the end of 2022 with energy that meets the criteria of the renewable energy portfolio requirements and is contracted for by an accelerated renewable buyer must: (1) Have all associated renewable energy certificates retired by the accelerated renewable buyer and the certificates can not be used to meet the electric utility’s portfolio requirements; (2) Be excluded from the total electric utility’s sales used to determine the portfolio requirements; and (3) Be used to offset all or a portion of its electric load to determine compliance with the portfolio requirements. The bill specifies that the accelerated renewable buyer is exempt from any renewable energy standard compliance costs as established by the utility and approved by the Public Service Commission. Each electric utility must certify, and verify as necessary, to the Commission that the accelerated renewable buyer has satisfied the exemption requirements as specified in the bill. The bill increases the required deferral to 90%. The cost of investments in new generating units and energy storage systems are excluded from the total investments reflected in each year's capital investment plan for which required investments in grid modernization projects are determined. The bill extends the sunset date of certain provisions relating to deferrals by electrical corporations from December 31, 2028 to December 31, 2035.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brad Pollitt

Missouri House of Representatives, District 52 · R–MO

3 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Brad Pollitt
Missouri Legislature · HB 476

Creates provisions for the closure of electric power plants

Apr 14, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Brad Pollitt · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HCS HB 476 -- CLOSURE OF ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS SPONSOR: Pollitt COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Utilities by a vote of 17 to 2, with 1 voting present. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 476. Beginning January 1, 2026, this bill specifies that prior to the closure of an existing electric generating power plant, an electrical corporation, registered and doing business in Missouri, must first certify that it has secured and placed on the electric grid an equal or greater amount of reliable electric generation as specified in the bill. Adequate transmission lines must be in place and the replacement generation fully…

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-04-14: Action Postponed (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HCS HB 476 -- CLOSURE OF ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS SPONSOR: Pollitt COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Utilities by a vote of 17 to 2, with 1 voting present. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 476. Beginning January 1, 2026, this bill specifies that prior to the closure of an existing electric generating power plant, an electrical corporation, registered and doing business in Missouri, must first certify that it has secured and placed on the electric grid an equal or greater amount of reliable electric generation as specified in the bill. Adequate transmission lines must be in place and the replacement generation fully operational concurrently with the closure of the existing electric generating plant. If the replacement electric generation uses some or all of the interconnection facilities used by the existing generation plant, the replacement facilities must be operational within 180 days of the closure of the existing plant.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 713

Modifies and creates new provisions relating to electric utilities

Feb 19, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Brad Pollitt · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 713 -- UTILITIES SPONSOR: Pollitt The bill changes the law relating to electric utilities. CLOSURE OF ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS (Section 393.401) This bill specifies that prior to the closure of an existing electric generating power plant, an electrical corporation, registered and doing business in Missouri, must first certify that it has secured and placed on the electric grid an amount equal or greater than the amount of replacement reliable electric generation as specified in the bill. Adequate transmission lines must be in place and the replacement generation fully operational concurrently with the closure of the existing electric generating plant. If the replacement electric generation…

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-02-19: Referred: Utilities(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 713 -- UTILITIES SPONSOR: Pollitt The bill changes the law relating to electric utilities. CLOSURE OF ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS (Section 393.401) This bill specifies that prior to the closure of an existing electric generating power plant, an electrical corporation, registered and doing business in Missouri, must first certify that it has secured and placed on the electric grid an amount equal or greater than the amount of replacement reliable electric generation as specified in the bill. Adequate transmission lines must be in place and the replacement generation fully operational concurrently with the closure of the existing electric generating plant. If the replacement electric generation uses some or all of the interconnection facilities used by the existing generation plant, the replacement facilities must be operational within 120 days of the closure of the existing plant. Before the official date of the existing electric generating power plant closure, the electric utility company must provide certification to the Commission, the General Assembly, and the Governor that it has met the necessary requirements. RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARD (Section 393.1030) This bill specifies that electric utilities with more than 250,000 but less than 1 million retail customers in Missouri as of the end of 2024 with energy that meets the criteria of the renewable energy portfolio requirements and is contracted for by an accelerated renewable buyer must: (1) Have all associated renewable energy certificates retired by the accelerated renewable buyer and the certificates may not be used to meet the electric utility’s portfolio requirements; (2) Be excluded from the total electric utility’s sales used to determine the portfolio requirements; and (3) Be used to offset all or a portion of its electric load to determine compliance with the portfolio requirements. The bill specifies that the accelerated renewable buyer is exempt from any renewable energy standard compliance costs as established by the utility and approved by the Public Service Commission. Each electric utility must certify, and verify as necessary, to the Commission that the accelerated renewable buyer has satisfied the exemption requirements as specified in the bill. The bill increases the required deferral to 90%. The cost of investments in new generating units and energy storage systems are excluded from the total investments reflected in each year's capital investment plan for which required investments in grid modernization projects are determined. The bill extends the sunset date of certain provisions relating to deferrals by electrical corporations from December 31, 2028 to December 31, 2035.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1753

Creates provisions for the closure of electric power plants

Apr 22, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Brad Pollitt · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HCS HB 1753 -- CLOSURE OF ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS (Pollitt) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Utilities This bill specifies that prior to the closure of an existing electric generating power plant, an electrical corporation, registered and doing business in Missouri, must first certify that it has secured and placed on the electric grid an equal or greater than the amount of replacement reliable electric generation as specified in the bill. Adequate transmission lines must be in place and the replacement generation fully operational concurrently with the closure of the existing electric generating plant. If the replacement electric generation uses some or all of the interconnection…

This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-04-22: Second read and referred: Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy and the Environment(S).

Why this record is included

The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HCS HB 1753 -- CLOSURE OF ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS (Pollitt) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Utilities This bill specifies that prior to the closure of an existing electric generating power plant, an electrical corporation, registered and doing business in Missouri, must first certify that it has secured and placed on the electric grid an equal or greater than the amount of replacement reliable electric generation as specified in the bill. Adequate transmission lines must be in place and the replacement generation fully operational concurrently with the closure of the existing electric generating plant. If the replacement electric generation uses some or all of the interconnection facilities used by the existing generation plant, the replacement facilities must be operational within 180 days of the closure of the existing plant.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Dane Diehl

Missouri House of Representatives, District 125 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Dane Diehl
Missouri Legislature · HB 2713

Modifies provisions relating to tax credits

Apr 29, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Dane Diehl · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

(2) Meat Processing Facilities Investment Tax Credit; (3) Higher Ethanol Fuel Tax Credit; (4) Biodiesel Retail Sale Tax Credit;

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-04-29: Placed Back on Formal Perfection Calendar (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses a Missouri gasoline-cost or supply component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy, not a Missouri statewide average; this record does not set pump prices across that region. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) Meat Processing Facilities Investment Tax Credit; (3) Higher Ethanol Fuel Tax Credit; (4) Biodiesel Retail Sale Tax Credit;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Don Mayhew

Missouri House of Representatives, District 124 · R–MO

7 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Don Mayhew
Missouri Legislature · HB 3539

Modifies provisions relating to motor fuel tax exemption

May 15, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Don Mayhew · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 3539 -- THE MOTOR FUEL TAX EXEMPTION SPONSOR: Mayhew Currently, motor fuel is exempt from fuel tax, and an exemption and refund may be claimed by a taxpayer if the tax has been paid and no refund has been previously issued. These exemptions and refunds are currently issued on a fiscal year basis.

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses a Missouri gasoline-cost or supply component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy, not a Missouri statewide average; this record does not set pump prices across that region. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 3539 -- THE MOTOR FUEL TAX EXEMPTION SPONSOR: Mayhew Currently, motor fuel is exempt from fuel tax, and an exemption and refund may be claimed by a taxpayer if the tax has been paid and no refund has been previously issued. These exemptions and refunds are currently issued on a fiscal year basis.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 2072

Modifies provisions relating to the motor fuel tax exemption

Apr 22, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Don Mayhew · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HCS HB 2072 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX EXEMPTION SPONSOR: Mayhew COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Transportation Accountability by a vote of 10 to 3. Voted "Do "Pass" by Rules-Regulatory Oversight by a vote of 6 to 2. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2072. This bill creates the "Motor Fuel Tax Fund of 2021", into which the refundable revenue up to $550 million, adjusted annually for inflation, collected under subdivision (1) of subsection 3 of Section 142.803, RSMo, will be deposited. Any money in the Fund not refunded to a motor fuel purchaser within the required time will remain in the Fund and be subject to appropriation by…

This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-04-22: Reported Do Pass (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses a Missouri gasoline-cost or supply component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy, not a Missouri statewide average; this record does not set pump prices across that region. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HCS HB 2072 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX EXEMPTION SPONSOR: Mayhew COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Transportation Accountability by a vote of 10 to 3. Voted "Do "Pass" by Rules-Regulatory Oversight by a vote of 6 to 2. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2072. This bill creates the "Motor Fuel Tax Fund of 2021", into which the refundable revenue up to $550 million, adjusted annually for inflation, collected under subdivision (1) of subsection 3 of Section 142.803, RSMo, will be deposited. Any money in the Fund not refunded to a motor fuel purchaser within the required time will remain in the Fund and be subject to appropriation by the General Assembly for road and bridge projects for state-owned infrastructure. (Section 142.803, RSMo). Beginning October 1, 2024, this bill authorizes a taxpayer to donate the motor fuel tax refund to a tax-exempt nonprofit entity by providing the entity with all required documentation and a signed statement indicating that the nonprofit is entitled to the taxpayer's refund. The nonprofit entity must submit the documentation and statement, along with proof of its tax-exempt status, to the Director of Revenue. The taxpayer is then entitled to subtract from the taxpayer's Missouri adjusted gross income the amount of the refund donated to the nonprofit (Sections 142.815 and 142.824). Currently, motor fuel is exempt from fuel tax, and an exemption and refund may be claimed by a taxpayer if the tax has been paid and no refund has been previously issued. These exemptions and refunds are currently issued on a fiscal year basis. If the amount of refunds claimed in a tax year exceeds the tax collected for the tax year, refunds shall be allowed based on the order in which they are claimed (Section 142.822). Currently, the motor fuel tax rebate under Section 142.822 is eligible only for vehicles with a gross weight of 26,000 pounds or less. This bill extends the eligibility to motor fuel delivered into a motor vehicle with a gross weight over 26,000 pounds if the motor vehicle is owned by a corporation licensed in Missouri with its primary headquarters in this state, or owned by a sole proprietor whose home office is located in Missouri; provided that the corporation or sole proprietor submits documentation that any exemption and refund claimed is based solely on fuel delivered into a motor vehicle while it was operating in Missouri. If the vehicle was operated in multiple states, the submitted documentation must separate the fuel delivered while operating in Missouri and the other states (Section 142.822). Currently, exemptions and refunds issued for any additional tax on motor fuel are based on a fiscal year. Beginning in fiscal year 2025, they will be based on the tax year.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 519

Modifies provisions relating to motor fuel tax exemption

Apr 20, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Don Mayhew · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 519 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX EXEMPTION (Mayhew) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Transportation Accountability This bill makes changes regarding the motor fuel tax exemption and refund. In its main provisions, the bill: (1) Beginning October 1, 2023, authorizes a taxpayer to donate the motor fuel tax refund to a tax-exempt nonprofit entity by providing the entity with all required documentation and a signed statement indicating that the nonprofit is entitled to the taxpayer's refund. The nonprofit entity must submit the documentation and statement, along with proof of its tax-exempt status, to the Director of Revenue. The taxpayer is then entitled to subtract from the taxpayer's…

This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-04-20: Second read and referred: Emerging Issues(S).

Why this record is included

The record addresses a Missouri gasoline-cost or supply component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy, not a Missouri statewide average; this record does not set pump prices across that region. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 519 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX EXEMPTION (Mayhew) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Transportation Accountability This bill makes changes regarding the motor fuel tax exemption and refund. In its main provisions, the bill: (1) Beginning October 1, 2023, authorizes a taxpayer to donate the motor fuel tax refund to a tax-exempt nonprofit entity by providing the entity with all required documentation and a signed statement indicating that the nonprofit is entitled to the taxpayer's refund. The nonprofit entity must submit the documentation and statement, along with proof of its tax-exempt status, to the Director of Revenue. The taxpayer is then entitled to subtract from the taxpayer's Missouri adjusted gross income the amount of the refund donated to the nonprofit; (2) Currently, exemptions and refunds issued for any additional tax on motor fuel are based on a fiscal year. Beginning in fiscal year 2024, they will be based on the tax year. This bill specifies that claims will be filed on or after January 15th but not later than April 15th after the close of the tax year for which the exemption and refund is claimed; (3) Requires the Department of Revenue to develop a mobile application that allows a tax refund claim to be submitted on a person’s phone at the time of the motor fuel purchase in lieu of the procedures provided by law. The application must be designed so that the person submitting the claim is required to demonstrate that he or she is at the motor fuel pump. The development and maintenance of the application will be paid with funds that come from the Fuel Tax Road Fund; (4) Currently, the motor fuel tax rebate under Section 142.822, RSMo, is eligible only for vehicles with a gross weight of 26,000 pounds or less. This bill extends the eligibility to motor fuel delivered into a motor vehicle with a gross weight over 26,000 pounds if the motor vehicle is owned by a corporation licensed in Missouri with its primary headquarters in this state, or owned by a sole proprietor whose home office is located in Missouri; provided that the corporation or sole proprietor submits documentation that any exemption and refund claimed is based solely on fuel delivered into a motor vehicle while it was operating in Missouri. If the vehicle was operated in multiple states, the submitted documentation must separate the fuel delivered while operating in Missouri and the other states; and. (5) Currently, motor fuel is exempt from fuel tax, and an exemption and refund may be claimed by a taxpayer if the tax has been paid and no refund has been previously issued. These exemptions and refunds are currently issued on a fiscal year basis.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1366

Modifies provisions relating to motor fuel tax exemption

Apr 6, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Don Mayhew · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1366 -- FUEL TAX EXEMPTION SPONSOR: Mayhew Currently, motor fuel is exempt from fuel tax, and an exemption and refund may be claimed by a taxpayer if the tax has been paid and no refund has been previously issued. These exemptions and refunds are currently issued on a fiscal year basis.

This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-04-06: Executive Session Completed (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses a Missouri gasoline-cost or supply component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy, not a Missouri statewide average; this record does not set pump prices across that region. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1366 -- FUEL TAX EXEMPTION SPONSOR: Mayhew Currently, motor fuel is exempt from fuel tax, and an exemption and refund may be claimed by a taxpayer if the tax has been paid and no refund has been previously issued. These exemptions and refunds are currently issued on a fiscal year basis.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1354

Modifies provisions relating to motor fuel rebate eligibility

Mar 23, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Don Mayhew · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1354 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX REBATE ELIGIBILITY SPONSOR: Mayhew Currently, the motor fuel tax rebate under Section 142.822, RSMo is eligible only for vehicles with a gross weight of 26,000 pounds or less. This bill extends the eligibility to motor fuel delivered into a motor vehicle with a gross weight over 26,000 pounds if the motor vehicle is owned by a corporation licensed in Missouri with its primary headquarters in this state, or owned by a sole proprietor whose home office is located in Missouri; provided that the corporation or sole proprietor submits documentation that any exemption and refund claimed is based solely on fuel delivered into a motor vehicle while it was operating in…

This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-03-23: Referred: Special Committee on Tax Reform(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses a Missouri gasoline-cost or supply component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy, not a Missouri statewide average; this record does not set pump prices across that region. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1354 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX REBATE ELIGIBILITY SPONSOR: Mayhew Currently, the motor fuel tax rebate under Section 142.822, RSMo is eligible only for vehicles with a gross weight of 26,000 pounds or less. This bill extends the eligibility to motor fuel delivered into a motor vehicle with a gross weight over 26,000 pounds if the motor vehicle is owned by a corporation licensed in Missouri with its primary headquarters in this state, or owned by a sole proprietor whose home office is located in Missouri; provided that the corporation or sole proprietor submits documentation that any exemption and refund claimed is based solely on fuel delivered into a motor vehicle while it was operating in Missouri.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 2888

Modifies provisions relating to motor fuel tax exemption

Apr 5, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Don Mayhew · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2888 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX EXEMPTION SPONSOR: Mayhew As specified in this bill, beginning in fiscal year 2023, exemptions and refunds issued for the additional tax on motor fuel will be based on the tax year. This bill specifies that, claims will be filed on or after January 15th but not later than April 15th after the close of the tax year for which the exemption and refund is claimed.

This measure did not pass before the 2022 session ended. Final recorded action on 2022-04-05: Public Hearing Completed (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses a Missouri gasoline-cost or supply component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy, not a Missouri statewide average; this record does not set pump prices across that region. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 2888 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX EXEMPTION SPONSOR: Mayhew As specified in this bill, beginning in fiscal year 2023, exemptions and refunds issued for the additional tax on motor fuel will be based on the tax year. This bill specifies that, claims will be filed on or after January 15th but not later than April 15th after the close of the tax year for which the exemption and refund is claimed.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 2884

Modifies provisions relating to the motor fuel tax

Mar 10, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Don Mayhew · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2884 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX SPONSOR: Mayhew The motor fuel tax exemption and refund specified in Section 142.822, RSMo only applies to motor fuel delivered into a motor vehicle with a gross weight of 26,000 pounds or less. This bill removes the gross weight limit.

This measure did not pass before the 2022 session ended. Final recorded action on 2022-03-10: Referred: Special Committee on Government Oversight(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses a Missouri gasoline-cost or supply component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy, not a Missouri statewide average; this record does not set pump prices across that region. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 2884 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX SPONSOR: Mayhew The motor fuel tax exemption and refund specified in Section 142.822, RSMo only applies to motor fuel delivered into a motor vehicle with a gross weight of 26,000 pounds or less. This bill removes the gross weight limit.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Missouri officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Missouri statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.