Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price12.91¢/kWh2024 · #37 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.893/gal2026-08 · #26 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$129.182024 · #31 of 50 · highest first
Missouri over time
Explore Missouri readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Missouri officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Missouri effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Missouri change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price Missouri · source units
MissouriPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
89 of 89 reviewed Missouri actions match · 56 date markers shown. 50 major events shown separately.
Missouri · 2024: 12.91¢/kWh · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Missouri, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Missouri Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Missouri · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
Missouri · 202412.91¢/kWh
Missouri rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Missouri, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Missouri
2024 · Missouri: 12.91¢/kWh · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Missouri Residential electricity price history
Period
Missouri
Compare
2015
11.21¢/kWh
2016
11.21¢/kWh
2017
11.63¢/kWh
2018
11.34¢/kWh
2019
11.14¢/kWh
2020
11.22¢/kWh
2021
11.42¢/kWh
2022
11.74¢/kWh
2023
12.58¢/kWh
2024
12.91¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · 12.91¢/kWh2024 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri · your comparison
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations, including taxes, in EIA's Midwest petroleum district. The district includes Missouri and 14 other states.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent EIA observations
Prior week
$3.934/gal
Weekly change
−$0.087/gal
One year earlier
$3.088/gal
Change from one year earlier
+$0.759/gal
Method and limitations
U.S. Energy Information Administration weekly retail motor-gasoline survey estimate for the Midwest region. FactVote displays the published dollars-per-gallon value and calculates changes from EIA's published prior-week and nearest year-earlier weekly observations.
EIA does not publish a current Missouri statewide weekly gasoline-price series; this Midwest regional estimate should not be read as Missouri's statewide average.
The regional estimate combines Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Missouri community.
This nominal weekly snapshot does not identify why prices changed or establish the effect of any tax, bill, executive action, or market event.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
Missouri · 2024$129.18
Missouri rank#31among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Missouri
2024 · Missouri: $129.18 · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Missouri Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
Missouri
Compare
2010
$104.66
2011
$108.39
2012
$107.8
2013
$115.21
2014
$116.47
2015
$115.8
2016
$116.63
2017
$115.6
2018
$126.79
2019
$117.82
2020
$115.35
2021
$118.55
2022
$126.46
2023
$126.09
2024
$129.18
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · $129.182024 · Rank #31 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri · your comparison
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
Missouri · 202467.6 TWh
Missouri rank#22among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Missouri, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Missouri
2024 · Missouri: 67.6 TWh · Rank #22 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Missouri Total electricity generation history
Period
Missouri
Compare
2015
83.6 TWh
2016
78.6 TWh
2017
84.6 TWh
2018
85.1 TWh
2019
78.3 TWh
2020
72.6 TWh
2021
76.9 TWh
2022
79.4 TWh
2023
66.7 TWh
2024
67.6 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · 67.6 TWh2024 · Rank #22 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri · your comparison
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Coal generation as a share of Missouri's total in-state electric-power-industry net generation.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
EIA generation totals
Coal generation
38,832,000 MWh (rounded)
Total net generation
66,875,710 MWh
Method and limitations
FactVote divided EIA's 38,832 thousand MWh of 2024 coal generation by 66,875,710 MWh of total in-state net generation and rounded the result to one decimal place.
EIA publishes the coal numerator in thousand MWh, so the displayed numerator is converted to MWh and remains rounded to the nearest thousand MWh.
In-state generation is not the same as electricity consumed in Missouri because power crosses state lines.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
Missouri · 2024212.6 min/year
Missouri rank#34among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Missouri
2024 · Missouri: 212.6 min/year · Rank #34 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Missouri Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
Missouri
Compare
2023
379 min/year
2024
212.6 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · 212.6 min/year2024 · Rank #34 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri · your comparison
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
Missouri · 2024459 trillion Btu
Missouri rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · 459 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri · your comparison
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
Missouri · 202498.03 Mt CO₂
Missouri rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · 98.03 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri · your comparison
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
89 of 89 reviewed Missouri actions · newest first
Aug 24, 2026 · Summer gasoline vapor-pressure position statement · Summer gasoline vapor-pressure position statement · Guidance issuedMissouri agencies · Summer gasoline vapor-pressure position statement
Summer gasoline vapor-pressure position statement
Aug 24, 2026 · Guidance issued
Director Chris Chinn · Administers
FactVote reviewed summary
Missouri Agriculture’s August 24 position statement applies EPA’s waived gasoline vapor-pressure tolerances statewide for the covered summer period, subject to revision or termination of the waiver.
Official agency administration record dated 2026-08-24; verified 2026-09-05.
Why this record is included
The agency statement governs which gasoline formulations may be supplied during the covered period. The current director is identified for agency administration; EPA issued the underlying federal waiver. This concerns a Missouri fuel-cost or supply component; it does not set pump prices or establish a change in EIA's 15-state Midwest average.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Missouri Agriculture’s August 24 position statement applies EPA’s waived gasoline vapor-pressure tolerances statewide for the covered summer period, subject to revision or termination of the waiver.
SB 913 extends several agricultural, energy, and freight tax credits. Its higher-ethanol fuel provision extends the existing retailer and distributor credit through December 31, 2033.
Signed by the Governor on 2026-07-09.
Why this record is included
The enacted extension preserves an incentive for selling higher-ethanol blends used as motor fuel. It is a seller income-tax credit, not a reduction in Missouri’s per-gallon gasoline excise tax. This concerns a Missouri fuel-cost or supply component; it does not set pump prices or establish a change in EIA's 15-state Midwest average.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SB 913 extends several agricultural, energy, and freight tax credits. Its higher-ethanol fuel provision extends the existing retailer and distributor credit through December 31, 2033.
SB 913 extends several agricultural, energy, and freight tax credits. Its higher-ethanol fuel provision extends the existing retailer and distributor credit through December 31, 2033.
Signed on 2026-07-09, as documented by the official Governor record.
Why this record is included
The Governor approved SB 913’s extension of the higher-ethanol seller credit through 2033. This concerns a Missouri fuel-cost or supply component; it does not set pump prices or establish a change in EIA's 15-state Midwest average.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SB 913 extends several agricultural, energy, and freight tax credits. Its higher-ethanol fuel provision extends the existing retailer and distributor credit through December 31, 2033.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 15, 2026 · HB 2657 · Modifies certain provisions relating to the renewable energy · Did not passMissouri Legislature · HB 2657
Modifies certain provisions relating to the renewable energy
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Mike Costlow · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2657 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY SPONSOR: Costlow This bill adds nuclear energy to the sources of energy considered alternative or renewable in multiple state programs. The bill also changes an electrical corporation's portfolio requirement from no less than 15% to 7.5% of electricity from renewable energy resources in each calendar year beginning 2026. An electrical corporation must reach an amount of renewable energy technology nameplate capacity equal to or greater than 7.5%, instead of 15% as currently provided, to be exempt from certain subsidies, fees, or rebates. This bill is similar to SB 838 (2025).
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2657 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY SPONSOR: Costlow This bill adds nuclear energy to the sources of energy considered alternative or renewable in multiple state programs. The bill also changes an electrical corporation's portfolio requirement from no less than 15% to 7.5% of electricity from renewable energy resources in each calendar year beginning 2026. An electrical corporation must reach an amount of renewable energy technology nameplate capacity equal to or greater than 7.5%, instead of 15% as currently provided, to be exempt from certain subsidies, fees, or rebates. This bill is similar to SB 838 (2025).
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 15, 2026 · HB 2578 · Modifies the definition of renewable energy resources · Did not passMissouri Legislature · HB 2578
Modifies the definition of renewable energy resources
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Brad Banderman · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2578 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Banderman The bill repeals the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purpose of the Renewable Energy Standard and replaces it with a definition of "alternative energy resources", which includes pumped storage from hydropower and nuclear energy. This bill is similar to HB 2475 (2026).
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2578 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Banderman The bill repeals the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purpose of the Renewable Energy Standard and replaces it with a definition of "alternative energy resources", which includes pumped storage from hydropower and nuclear energy. This bill is similar to HB 2475 (2026).
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 15, 2026 · HB 2729 · Modifies provisions for renewable energy resources · Did not passMissouri Legislature · HB 2729
Modifies provisions for renewable energy resources
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. LaDonna Appelbaum · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2729 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Appelbaum This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard and increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2026, and increases incrementally to no less than 100% by December 31, 2061.
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2729 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Appelbaum This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard and increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2026, and increases incrementally to no less than 100% by December 31, 2061.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Missouri officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Missouri candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
13 statements from 4 candidates
2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 1 — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements
Every family deserves to keep the lights on and the heat running without having to choose between that and putting food on the table. Utility bills have skyrocketed in recent years, and Trump's energy policies are making things worse. Wesley has pushed for federal relief to help households manage ri…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Lowering Energy Costs.
Candidate campaign source
Every family deserves to keep the lights on and the heat running without having to choose between that and putting food on the table. Utility bills have skyrocketed in recent years, and Trump's energy policies are making things worse. Wesley has pushed for federal relief to help households manage rising energy costs and opposed Republican policies that have driven those costs higher.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Climate change is a crisis, and here in Missouri, the effects are already making an impact on our way of life and the safety of our most vulnerable communities, from extreme weather events to deteriorating air and water quality. Wesley believes that confronting the climate crisis and growing our eco…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Delivering Environmental Justice.
Candidate campaign source
Climate change is a crisis, and here in Missouri, the effects are already making an impact on our way of life and the safety of our most vulnerable communities, from extreme weather events to deteriorating air and water quality. Wesley believes that confronting the climate crisis and growing our economy are not in conflict. The transition to clean energy should create good-paying union jobs right here in the First District. He has fought to protect clean air and water standards, hold polluters accountable, and ensure that the federal government lives up to its obligations to communities like those along Coldwater Creek and the Westlake Landfill that have suffered from decades of environmental neglect and contamination.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Now, Wesley is running for reelection to continue fighting for his constituents in Washington: holding the Trump administration and MAGA Republicans accountable, expanding access to affordable health care and prescription drugs, lowering energy costs, bringing down the price of groceries, protecting…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: A strong leader for common-sense solutions. Learn more about Wesley Bell here.
Candidate campaign source
Now, Wesley is running for reelection to continue fighting for his constituents in Washington: holding the Trump administration and MAGA Republicans accountable, expanding access to affordable health care and prescription drugs, lowering energy costs, bringing down the price of groceries, protecting our rights and freedoms, and creating good-paying jobs right here in St. Louis.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
We must take stake and recognize the environmental changes that are having effects on our state, from our farmers to our economy. To be prosperous we must realize how important clean air and water are and take steps to ensure we take steps to prepare for increases in weather events, with moving towa…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Voting Rights
Candidate campaign source
We must take stake and recognize the environmental changes that are having effects on our state, from our farmers to our economy. To be prosperous we must realize how important clean air and water are and take steps to ensure we take steps to prepare for increases in weather events, with moving toward renewable energy we would create new jobs and new industries.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
We must take stake and recognize the environmental changes that are having effects on our state, from our farmers to our economy. To be prosperous we must realize how important clean air and water are and take steps to ensure we take steps to prepare for increases in weather events, with moving towa…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: The Issues That Matter
Candidate campaign source
We must take stake and recognize the environmental changes that are having effects on our state, from our farmers to our economy. To be prosperous we must realize how important clean air and water are and take steps to ensure we take steps to prepare for increases in weather events, with moving toward renewable energy we would create new jobs and new industries.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
AI cannot run on slogans. It runs on electricity. If we are going to build the digital economy, we need reliable, clean, high-output energy. That means nuclear power must be part of the conversation. The ADVANCE Act, signed into law in 2024, directs the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to modernize lic…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Technology, Privacy, and Energy
Candidate campaign source
AI cannot run on slogans. It runs on electricity. If we are going to build the digital economy, we need reliable, clean, high-output energy. That means nuclear power must be part of the conversation. The ADVANCE Act, signed into law in 2024, directs the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to modernize licensing for advanced reactors and fuels while maintaining safety and security standards.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I come from technology, law, and service. I worked in biomedical technology. I studied law with a focus on entrepreneurship and technology. I understand what happens when innovation moves faster than accountability. I am not afraid of AI. I am afraid of letting billion-dollar corporations write the …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Infrastructure, Transportation, and Privacy
Candidate campaign source
I come from technology, law, and service. I worked in biomedical technology. I studied law with a focus on entrepreneurship and technology. I understand what happens when innovation moves faster than accountability. I am not afraid of AI. I am afraid of letting billion-dollar corporations write the rules while workers, artists, families, and rural communities are left to deal with the consequences. We can build the future. But we need to build it with guardrails, with worker power, with privacy rights, with clean energy, and with a simple principle at the center: The people who create value should not be the last to benefit from it.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
We are living in an era where your data, your face, your voice, your location, and your creative work can be captured, copied, sold, and monetized without your consent. Congress has failed to meet the moment. I support innovation. I support technology. I support re-engineered and better-designed dat…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Technology, Privacy, and Energy
Candidate campaign source
We are living in an era where your data, your face, your voice, your location, and your creative work can be captured, copied, sold, and monetized without your consent. Congress has failed to meet the moment. I support innovation. I support technology. I support re-engineered and better-designed data centers, AI research, broadband expansion, and next-generation energy. But I will not support a future where workers are replaced, artists are robbed, communities pay the utility bills leading to poverty and home insecurity, and corporations walk away with the profits.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Missouri candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Missouri incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Missouri legislators and Missouri’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Missouri’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
85 matching sponsorships or proposals · 29 Missouri incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Adrian Plank
Missouri House of Representatives, District 47 · D–MO
7 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Adrian PlankMissouri Legislature · HB 1902
Modifies the definition of renewable energy resources
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1902 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard to include pumped storage from hydropower. This bill is similar to HB 193 (2025) and HB 1865 (2024).
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1902 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard to include pumped storage from hydropower. This bill is similar to HB 193 (2025) and HB 1865 (2024).
Modifies the definition of renewable energy resources
May 15, 2025 · Did not pass
Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 193 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard to include pumped storage from hydropower. This bill is the same as HB 1865 (2024) and HB 1093(2023).
This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 193 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard to include pumped storage from hydropower. This bill is the same as HB 1865 (2024) and HB 1093(2023).
Modifies provisions for renewable energy resources
May 15, 2025 · Did not pass
Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 768 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2025, and…
This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 768 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2025, and increases incrementally to no less than 100% by December 31, 2059.
Modifies provisions for renewable energy resources
May 17, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1944 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31,…
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-17: Referred: General Laws(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1944 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2024, and increases incrementally to no less than 100% by December 31, 2058.
Modifies the definition of renewable energy resources
May 17, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1865 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard to include pumped storage from hydropower. This bill is the same as HB 1093 (2023).
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-17: Referred: General Laws(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1865 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard to include pumped storage from hydropower. This bill is the same as HB 1093 (2023).
Modifies the definition of renewable energy resources
May 12, 2023 · Did not pass
Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1093 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard to include pumped storage from hydropower.
This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-05-12: Referred: Utilities(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1093 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Plank This bill modifies the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purposes of the Renewable Energy Standard to include pumped storage from hydropower.
Modifies provisions for renewable energy resources
May 12, 2023 · Did not pass
Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1079 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2023 and…
This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-05-12: Referred: Utilities(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1079 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY SPONSOR: Plank Beginning January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2032, this bill authorizes a tax credit for a qualified taxpayer of 30% of residential solar property expenditures made by the taxpayer. Beginning January 1, 2033, through December 31, 2033,the authorized tax credit increases to 35% and for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2034, the tax credit increases to 40%. The program sunsets December 31st, six years after the effective date. The bill also increases the required percentages of each electric utility's sales that must come from renewable energy resources. The percentage required begins with no less than 15% by December 31, 2023 and increases incrementally to no less than 100% by December 31, 2058.
Missouri House of Representatives, District 121 · R–MO
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Bill HardwickMissouri Legislature · HB 1293
Modifies provisions relating to the renewable energy standard
May 8, 2023 · Did not pass
Rep. Bill Hardwick · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HCS HB 1293 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARD SPONSOR: Hardwick COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Emerging Issues by a vote of 14 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 1293. This bill specifies that electric utilities with more than 250,000 but less than 1,000,000 retail customers in Missouri as of the end of 2022 with energy that meets the criteria of the renewable energy portfolio requirements and is contracted for by an accelerated renewable buyer must: (1) Have all associated renewable energy certificates retired by the accelerated renewable buyer and the certificates may not be used to meet the electric utility’s…
This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-05-08: Referred: Rules - Regulatory Oversight(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HCS HB 1293 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARD SPONSOR: Hardwick COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Emerging Issues by a vote of 14 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 1293. This bill specifies that electric utilities with more than 250,000 but less than 1,000,000 retail customers in Missouri as of the end of 2022 with energy that meets the criteria of the renewable energy portfolio requirements and is contracted for by an accelerated renewable buyer must: (1) Have all associated renewable energy certificates retired by the accelerated renewable buyer and the certificates may not be used to meet the electric utility’s portfolio requirements; (2) Be excluded from the total electric utility’s sales used to determine the portfolio requirements; and (3) Be used to offset all or a portion of its electric load to determine compliance with the portfolio requirements. The bill specifies that the accelerated renewable buyer, defined as a customer of an electric utility with an aggregate load over 80 average megawatts entering into specified contracts, is exempt from any renewable energy standard compliance costs as established by the utility and approved by the Public Service Commission. Each electric utility must certify, and verify as necessary, to the Commission that the accelerated renewable buyer has satisfied the exemption requirements as specified in the bill.
Modifies the definition of renewable energy resources
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Brad Banderman · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2578 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Banderman The bill repeals the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purpose of the Renewable Energy Standard and replaces it with a definition of "alternative energy resources", which includes pumped storage from hydropower and nuclear energy. This bill is similar to HB 2475 (2026).
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2578 -- RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES SPONSOR: Banderman The bill repeals the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purpose of the Renewable Energy Standard and replaces it with a definition of "alternative energy resources", which includes pumped storage from hydropower and nuclear energy. This bill is similar to HB 2475 (2026).
The Public Service Commission or the Office of Public Counsel can request an extension for approval of 30 days upon a showing of good cause. RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARDS (Section 393.1030) This bill specifies that electric utilities with more than 250,000 but less than 1 million retail customers in Missouri as of the end of 2022 with energy that meets the criteria of the renewable energy portfolio requirements and is contracted for by an accelerated renewable buyer must: (1) Have all associated renewable energy certificates retired by the accelerated renewable buyer and the certificates can not be used to meet the electric utility’s portfolio requirements; (2) Be excluded from the total…
This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-03-05: Public Hearing Completed (H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The Public Service Commission or the Office of Public Counsel can request an extension for approval of 30 days upon a showing of good cause. RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARDS (Section 393.1030) This bill specifies that electric utilities with more than 250,000 but less than 1 million retail customers in Missouri as of the end of 2022 with energy that meets the criteria of the renewable energy portfolio requirements and is contracted for by an accelerated renewable buyer must: (1) Have all associated renewable energy certificates retired by the accelerated renewable buyer and the certificates can not be used to meet the electric utility’s portfolio requirements; (2) Be excluded from the total electric utility’s sales used to determine the portfolio requirements; and (3) Be used to offset all or a portion of its electric load to determine compliance with the portfolio requirements. The bill specifies that the accelerated renewable buyer is exempt from any renewable energy standard compliance costs as established by the utility and approved by the Public Service Commission. Each electric utility must certify, and verify as necessary, to the Commission that the accelerated renewable buyer has satisfied the exemption requirements as specified in the bill. The bill increases the required deferral to 90%. The cost of investments in new generating units and energy storage systems are excluded from the total investments reflected in each year's capital investment plan for which required investments in grid modernization projects are determined. The bill extends the sunset date of certain provisions relating to deferrals by electrical corporations from December 31, 2028 to December 31, 2035.
Creates provisions for the closure of electric power plants
Apr 14, 2025 · Did not pass
Rep. Brad Pollitt · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HCS HB 476 -- CLOSURE OF ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS SPONSOR: Pollitt COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Utilities by a vote of 17 to 2, with 1 voting present. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 476. Beginning January 1, 2026, this bill specifies that prior to the closure of an existing electric generating power plant, an electrical corporation, registered and doing business in Missouri, must first certify that it has secured and placed on the electric grid an equal or greater amount of reliable electric generation as specified in the bill. Adequate transmission lines must be in place and the replacement generation fully…
This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-04-14: Action Postponed (H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HCS HB 476 -- CLOSURE OF ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS SPONSOR: Pollitt COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Utilities by a vote of 17 to 2, with 1 voting present. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 476. Beginning January 1, 2026, this bill specifies that prior to the closure of an existing electric generating power plant, an electrical corporation, registered and doing business in Missouri, must first certify that it has secured and placed on the electric grid an equal or greater amount of reliable electric generation as specified in the bill. Adequate transmission lines must be in place and the replacement generation fully operational concurrently with the closure of the existing electric generating plant. If the replacement electric generation uses some or all of the interconnection facilities used by the existing generation plant, the replacement facilities must be operational within 180 days of the closure of the existing plant.
Modifies and creates new provisions relating to electric utilities
Feb 19, 2025 · Did not pass
Rep. Brad Pollitt · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 713 -- UTILITIES SPONSOR: Pollitt The bill changes the law relating to electric utilities. CLOSURE OF ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS (Section 393.401) This bill specifies that prior to the closure of an existing electric generating power plant, an electrical corporation, registered and doing business in Missouri, must first certify that it has secured and placed on the electric grid an amount equal or greater than the amount of replacement reliable electric generation as specified in the bill. Adequate transmission lines must be in place and the replacement generation fully operational concurrently with the closure of the existing electric generating plant. If the replacement electric generation…
This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-02-19: Referred: Utilities(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 713 -- UTILITIES SPONSOR: Pollitt The bill changes the law relating to electric utilities. CLOSURE OF ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS (Section 393.401) This bill specifies that prior to the closure of an existing electric generating power plant, an electrical corporation, registered and doing business in Missouri, must first certify that it has secured and placed on the electric grid an amount equal or greater than the amount of replacement reliable electric generation as specified in the bill. Adequate transmission lines must be in place and the replacement generation fully operational concurrently with the closure of the existing electric generating plant. If the replacement electric generation uses some or all of the interconnection facilities used by the existing generation plant, the replacement facilities must be operational within 120 days of the closure of the existing plant. Before the official date of the existing electric generating power plant closure, the electric utility company must provide certification to the Commission, the General Assembly, and the Governor that it has met the necessary requirements. RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARD (Section 393.1030) This bill specifies that electric utilities with more than 250,000 but less than 1 million retail customers in Missouri as of the end of 2024 with energy that meets the criteria of the renewable energy portfolio requirements and is contracted for by an accelerated renewable buyer must: (1) Have all associated renewable energy certificates retired by the accelerated renewable buyer and the certificates may not be used to meet the electric utility’s portfolio requirements; (2) Be excluded from the total electric utility’s sales used to determine the portfolio requirements; and (3) Be used to offset all or a portion of its electric load to determine compliance with the portfolio requirements. The bill specifies that the accelerated renewable buyer is exempt from any renewable energy standard compliance costs as established by the utility and approved by the Public Service Commission. Each electric utility must certify, and verify as necessary, to the Commission that the accelerated renewable buyer has satisfied the exemption requirements as specified in the bill. The bill increases the required deferral to 90%. The cost of investments in new generating units and energy storage systems are excluded from the total investments reflected in each year's capital investment plan for which required investments in grid modernization projects are determined. The bill extends the sunset date of certain provisions relating to deferrals by electrical corporations from December 31, 2028 to December 31, 2035.
Creates provisions for the closure of electric power plants
Apr 22, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Brad Pollitt · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HCS HB 1753 -- CLOSURE OF ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS (Pollitt) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Utilities This bill specifies that prior to the closure of an existing electric generating power plant, an electrical corporation, registered and doing business in Missouri, must first certify that it has secured and placed on the electric grid an equal or greater than the amount of replacement reliable electric generation as specified in the bill. Adequate transmission lines must be in place and the replacement generation fully operational concurrently with the closure of the existing electric generating plant. If the replacement electric generation uses some or all of the interconnection…
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-04-22: Second read and referred: Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy and the Environment(S).
Why this record is included
The record addresses coal-fired generation or another component of electricity supply that contributes to the generation mix. Coal’s share is coal generation divided by all in-state generation; a retail-rate rule alone does not establish a change in that share. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HCS HB 1753 -- CLOSURE OF ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS (Pollitt) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Utilities This bill specifies that prior to the closure of an existing electric generating power plant, an electrical corporation, registered and doing business in Missouri, must first certify that it has secured and placed on the electric grid an equal or greater than the amount of replacement reliable electric generation as specified in the bill. Adequate transmission lines must be in place and the replacement generation fully operational concurrently with the closure of the existing electric generating plant. If the replacement electric generation uses some or all of the interconnection facilities used by the existing generation plant, the replacement facilities must be operational within 180 days of the closure of the existing plant.
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-04-29: Placed Back on Formal Perfection Calendar (H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses a Missouri gasoline-cost or supply component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy, not a Missouri statewide average; this record does not set pump prices across that region. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Missouri House of Representatives, District 124 · R–MO
7 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Don MayhewMissouri Legislature · HB 3539
Modifies provisions relating to motor fuel tax exemption
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Don Mayhew · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 3539 -- THE MOTOR FUEL TAX EXEMPTION SPONSOR: Mayhew Currently, motor fuel is exempt from fuel tax, and an exemption and refund may be claimed by a taxpayer if the tax has been paid and no refund has been previously issued. These exemptions and refunds are currently issued on a fiscal year basis.
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses a Missouri gasoline-cost or supply component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy, not a Missouri statewide average; this record does not set pump prices across that region. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 3539 -- THE MOTOR FUEL TAX EXEMPTION SPONSOR: Mayhew Currently, motor fuel is exempt from fuel tax, and an exemption and refund may be claimed by a taxpayer if the tax has been paid and no refund has been previously issued. These exemptions and refunds are currently issued on a fiscal year basis.
Modifies provisions relating to the motor fuel tax exemption
Apr 22, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Don Mayhew · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HCS HB 2072 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX EXEMPTION SPONSOR: Mayhew COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Transportation Accountability by a vote of 10 to 3. Voted "Do "Pass" by Rules-Regulatory Oversight by a vote of 6 to 2. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2072. This bill creates the "Motor Fuel Tax Fund of 2021", into which the refundable revenue up to $550 million, adjusted annually for inflation, collected under subdivision (1) of subsection 3 of Section 142.803, RSMo, will be deposited. Any money in the Fund not refunded to a motor fuel purchaser within the required time will remain in the Fund and be subject to appropriation by…
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-04-22: Reported Do Pass (H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses a Missouri gasoline-cost or supply component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy, not a Missouri statewide average; this record does not set pump prices across that region. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HCS HB 2072 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX EXEMPTION SPONSOR: Mayhew COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Transportation Accountability by a vote of 10 to 3. Voted "Do "Pass" by Rules-Regulatory Oversight by a vote of 6 to 2. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2072. This bill creates the "Motor Fuel Tax Fund of 2021", into which the refundable revenue up to $550 million, adjusted annually for inflation, collected under subdivision (1) of subsection 3 of Section 142.803, RSMo, will be deposited. Any money in the Fund not refunded to a motor fuel purchaser within the required time will remain in the Fund and be subject to appropriation by the General Assembly for road and bridge projects for state-owned infrastructure. (Section 142.803, RSMo). Beginning October 1, 2024, this bill authorizes a taxpayer to donate the motor fuel tax refund to a tax-exempt nonprofit entity by providing the entity with all required documentation and a signed statement indicating that the nonprofit is entitled to the taxpayer's refund. The nonprofit entity must submit the documentation and statement, along with proof of its tax-exempt status, to the Director of Revenue. The taxpayer is then entitled to subtract from the taxpayer's Missouri adjusted gross income the amount of the refund donated to the nonprofit (Sections 142.815 and 142.824). Currently, motor fuel is exempt from fuel tax, and an exemption and refund may be claimed by a taxpayer if the tax has been paid and no refund has been previously issued. These exemptions and refunds are currently issued on a fiscal year basis. If the amount of refunds claimed in a tax year exceeds the tax collected for the tax year, refunds shall be allowed based on the order in which they are claimed (Section 142.822). Currently, the motor fuel tax rebate under Section 142.822 is eligible only for vehicles with a gross weight of 26,000 pounds or less. This bill extends the eligibility to motor fuel delivered into a motor vehicle with a gross weight over 26,000 pounds if the motor vehicle is owned by a corporation licensed in Missouri with its primary headquarters in this state, or owned by a sole proprietor whose home office is located in Missouri; provided that the corporation or sole proprietor submits documentation that any exemption and refund claimed is based solely on fuel delivered into a motor vehicle while it was operating in Missouri. If the vehicle was operated in multiple states, the submitted documentation must separate the fuel delivered while operating in Missouri and the other states (Section 142.822). Currently, exemptions and refunds issued for any additional tax on motor fuel are based on a fiscal year. Beginning in fiscal year 2025, they will be based on the tax year.
Modifies provisions relating to motor fuel tax exemption
Apr 20, 2023 · Did not pass
Rep. Don Mayhew · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 519 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX EXEMPTION (Mayhew) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Transportation Accountability This bill makes changes regarding the motor fuel tax exemption and refund. In its main provisions, the bill: (1) Beginning October 1, 2023, authorizes a taxpayer to donate the motor fuel tax refund to a tax-exempt nonprofit entity by providing the entity with all required documentation and a signed statement indicating that the nonprofit is entitled to the taxpayer's refund. The nonprofit entity must submit the documentation and statement, along with proof of its tax-exempt status, to the Director of Revenue. The taxpayer is then entitled to subtract from the taxpayer's…
This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-04-20: Second read and referred: Emerging Issues(S).
Why this record is included
The record addresses a Missouri gasoline-cost or supply component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy, not a Missouri statewide average; this record does not set pump prices across that region. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 519 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX EXEMPTION (Mayhew) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Transportation Accountability This bill makes changes regarding the motor fuel tax exemption and refund. In its main provisions, the bill: (1) Beginning October 1, 2023, authorizes a taxpayer to donate the motor fuel tax refund to a tax-exempt nonprofit entity by providing the entity with all required documentation and a signed statement indicating that the nonprofit is entitled to the taxpayer's refund. The nonprofit entity must submit the documentation and statement, along with proof of its tax-exempt status, to the Director of Revenue. The taxpayer is then entitled to subtract from the taxpayer's Missouri adjusted gross income the amount of the refund donated to the nonprofit; (2) Currently, exemptions and refunds issued for any additional tax on motor fuel are based on a fiscal year. Beginning in fiscal year 2024, they will be based on the tax year. This bill specifies that claims will be filed on or after January 15th but not later than April 15th after the close of the tax year for which the exemption and refund is claimed; (3) Requires the Department of Revenue to develop a mobile application that allows a tax refund claim to be submitted on a person’s phone at the time of the motor fuel purchase in lieu of the procedures provided by law. The application must be designed so that the person submitting the claim is required to demonstrate that he or she is at the motor fuel pump. The development and maintenance of the application will be paid with funds that come from the Fuel Tax Road Fund; (4) Currently, the motor fuel tax rebate under Section 142.822, RSMo, is eligible only for vehicles with a gross weight of 26,000 pounds or less. This bill extends the eligibility to motor fuel delivered into a motor vehicle with a gross weight over 26,000 pounds if the motor vehicle is owned by a corporation licensed in Missouri with its primary headquarters in this state, or owned by a sole proprietor whose home office is located in Missouri; provided that the corporation or sole proprietor submits documentation that any exemption and refund claimed is based solely on fuel delivered into a motor vehicle while it was operating in Missouri. If the vehicle was operated in multiple states, the submitted documentation must separate the fuel delivered while operating in Missouri and the other states; and. (5) Currently, motor fuel is exempt from fuel tax, and an exemption and refund may be claimed by a taxpayer if the tax has been paid and no refund has been previously issued. These exemptions and refunds are currently issued on a fiscal year basis.
Modifies provisions relating to motor fuel tax exemption
Apr 6, 2023 · Did not pass
Rep. Don Mayhew · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1366 -- FUEL TAX EXEMPTION SPONSOR: Mayhew Currently, motor fuel is exempt from fuel tax, and an exemption and refund may be claimed by a taxpayer if the tax has been paid and no refund has been previously issued. These exemptions and refunds are currently issued on a fiscal year basis.
This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-04-06: Executive Session Completed (H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses a Missouri gasoline-cost or supply component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy, not a Missouri statewide average; this record does not set pump prices across that region. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1366 -- FUEL TAX EXEMPTION SPONSOR: Mayhew Currently, motor fuel is exempt from fuel tax, and an exemption and refund may be claimed by a taxpayer if the tax has been paid and no refund has been previously issued. These exemptions and refunds are currently issued on a fiscal year basis.
Modifies provisions relating to motor fuel rebate eligibility
Mar 23, 2023 · Did not pass
Rep. Don Mayhew · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1354 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX REBATE ELIGIBILITY SPONSOR: Mayhew Currently, the motor fuel tax rebate under Section 142.822, RSMo is eligible only for vehicles with a gross weight of 26,000 pounds or less. This bill extends the eligibility to motor fuel delivered into a motor vehicle with a gross weight over 26,000 pounds if the motor vehicle is owned by a corporation licensed in Missouri with its primary headquarters in this state, or owned by a sole proprietor whose home office is located in Missouri; provided that the corporation or sole proprietor submits documentation that any exemption and refund claimed is based solely on fuel delivered into a motor vehicle while it was operating in…
This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-03-23: Referred: Special Committee on Tax Reform(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses a Missouri gasoline-cost or supply component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy, not a Missouri statewide average; this record does not set pump prices across that region. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1354 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX REBATE ELIGIBILITY SPONSOR: Mayhew Currently, the motor fuel tax rebate under Section 142.822, RSMo is eligible only for vehicles with a gross weight of 26,000 pounds or less. This bill extends the eligibility to motor fuel delivered into a motor vehicle with a gross weight over 26,000 pounds if the motor vehicle is owned by a corporation licensed in Missouri with its primary headquarters in this state, or owned by a sole proprietor whose home office is located in Missouri; provided that the corporation or sole proprietor submits documentation that any exemption and refund claimed is based solely on fuel delivered into a motor vehicle while it was operating in Missouri.
Modifies provisions relating to motor fuel tax exemption
Apr 5, 2022 · Did not pass
Rep. Don Mayhew · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2888 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX EXEMPTION SPONSOR: Mayhew As specified in this bill, beginning in fiscal year 2023, exemptions and refunds issued for the additional tax on motor fuel will be based on the tax year. This bill specifies that, claims will be filed on or after January 15th but not later than April 15th after the close of the tax year for which the exemption and refund is claimed.
This measure did not pass before the 2022 session ended. Final recorded action on 2022-04-05: Public Hearing Completed (H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses a Missouri gasoline-cost or supply component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy, not a Missouri statewide average; this record does not set pump prices across that region. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2888 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX EXEMPTION SPONSOR: Mayhew As specified in this bill, beginning in fiscal year 2023, exemptions and refunds issued for the additional tax on motor fuel will be based on the tax year. This bill specifies that, claims will be filed on or after January 15th but not later than April 15th after the close of the tax year for which the exemption and refund is claimed.
Modifies provisions relating to the motor fuel tax
Mar 10, 2022 · Did not pass
Rep. Don Mayhew · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2884 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX SPONSOR: Mayhew The motor fuel tax exemption and refund specified in Section 142.822, RSMo only applies to motor fuel delivered into a motor vehicle with a gross weight of 26,000 pounds or less. This bill removes the gross weight limit.
This measure did not pass before the 2022 session ended. Final recorded action on 2022-03-10: Referred: Special Committee on Government Oversight(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses a Missouri gasoline-cost or supply component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy, not a Missouri statewide average; this record does not set pump prices across that region. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2884 -- MOTOR FUEL TAX SPONSOR: Mayhew The motor fuel tax exemption and refund specified in Section 142.822, RSMo only applies to motor fuel delivered into a motor vehicle with a gross weight of 26,000 pounds or less. This bill removes the gross weight limit.
Only current Missouri officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Missouri statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Missouri snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Missouri, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.