Missouri · individual fact

Missouri education

Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.

High school or higher91.9%2020–2024 · #21 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher40.8%2020–2024 · #37 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher32.4%2020–2024 · #32 of 50 · highest first

Missouri over time

Explore Missouri readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Missouri officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Missouri effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Missouri change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Grade 4 reading Missouri · source units
MissouriPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Grade 4 reading2024: 211.9210.5217.9225.2Missouri, 2003: 222.3Missouri, 2005: 221.2Missouri, 2007: 220.8Missouri, 2009: 223.8Missouri, 2011: 220.3Missouri, 2013: 222.3Missouri, 2015: 222.7Missouri, 2017: 222.7Missouri, 2019: 218Missouri, 2022: 213.4Missouri, 2024: 211.9200320132024
✦ Major events & context · 20National context · Student-aid law ends new FFEL lending and expands Pell funding · 2010-03-30Student-aid reformNational context · Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act signed · 2014-07-22Workforce and adult educationNational context · Every Student Succeeds Act signed · 2015-12-10ESSA signedNational context · Career and technical education law reauthorized · 2018-07-31Perkins V signedNational context · FUTURE Act continues support for minority-serving institutions · 2019-12-19FUTURE Act signedNational context · Pandemic education relief through the CARES Act · 2020-03-27COVID-19 education reliefNational context · Additional pandemic relief for colleges and students · 2020-12-27Second education relief lawNational context · American Rescue Plan expands education relief · 2021-03-11Education recovery fundingNational context · Supreme Court rejects Harvard and UNC race-conscious admissions programs · 2023-06-29College-admissions rulingNational context · Supreme Court rejects the 2022 student-loan cancellation plan · 2023-06-30Student-loan rulingNational context · Pell eligibility restored for qualifying prison education programs · 2023-07-01Prison education Pell accessNational context · Federal student-loan payments resume after pandemic pause · 2023-10-01Student-loan payments resumeNational context · Executive order directs steps toward closing the Education Department · 2025-03-20Federal education orderNational context · 2025 law changes federal student aid and creates Workforce Pell · 2025-07-04Student-aid law signedNational context · Education and Treasury announce student-aid partnership · 2026-03-19Student-aid partnershipNational context · Education announces final student-loan and repayment regulations · 2026-04-30Student-loan final ruleNational context · Education Department announces Workforce Pell final rule · 2026-05-18Workforce Pell ruleNational context · Education announces earnings-accountability final rule · 2026-06-29College earnings accountabilityNational context · Main student-loan limits and new repayment plans take effect · 2026-07-01Student-loan changes beginNational context · First Workforce Pell program approved · 2026-08-04First Workforce Pell approval● Missouri Legislature · 783426252312292● U.S. Congress · Missouri delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 522■ Missouri agencies · 12003-12-012026-08-31

84 of 84 reviewed Missouri actions match · 42 date markers shown. 20 major events shown separately.

Missouri · 2024: 211.9 · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Missouri. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Missouri Grade 4 reading · source units
PeriodMissouriRankU.S. benchmark
2024211.9#37 of 50215
2022213.4#37 of 50217.5
2019218#34 of 50220.5
2017222.7#23 of 50221.9
2015222.7#27 of 50222.5
2013222.3#27 of 50221.8
2011220.3#31 of 50221.2
2009223.8#17 of 50220.9
2007220.8#29 of 50221
2005221.2#22 of 50219
2003222.3#13 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Missouri · state comparison

Adult educational attainment

Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.

Missouri · 2020–202491.9%
Missouri rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

High school or higher

Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.

Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 91.9%2020–2024 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont94.9%—
#2Maine94.8%—
#3Montana94.6%—
#4New Hampshire94.4%—
#5Wyoming94.2%—
#6North Dakota94%—
#7Minnesota93.9%—
#8Wisconsin93.6%—
#9Alaska93.6%—
#10Utah93.4%—
#11Iowa93.3%—
#12South Dakota93.2%—
#13Hawaii93.2%—
#14Colorado92.9%—
#15Washington92.3%—
#16Nebraska92.2%—
#17Pennsylvania92.1%—
#18Michigan92.1%—
#19Kansas92%—
#20Idaho91.9%—
#21Missouri · your comparison91.9%—
#22Oregon91.8%—
#23Ohio91.8%—
#24Delaware91.7%—
#25Virginia91.6%—
#26Connecticut91.5%—
#27Massachusetts91.4%—
#28Maryland91.1%—
#29New Jersey90.7%—
#30Illinois90.5%—
#31Indiana90.4%—
#32North Carolina90.1%—
#33South Carolina90.1%—
#34Tennessee90%—
#35Florida89.9%—
#36Rhode Island89.7%—
#37Oklahoma89.4%—
#38Arizona89.4%—
#39West Virginia89.3%—
#40Georgia89.2%—
#41Kentucky88.9%—
#42Arkansas88.7%—
#43Alabama88.6%—
#44New Mexico88%—
#45New York88%—
#46Nevada87.5%—
#47Louisiana87.3%—
#48Mississippi87.1%—
#49Texas86%—
#50California84.7%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Adults with at least a high school diploma

91.9%2020–2024 estimate

Share of Missouri residents age 25 and older whose reported attainment is a regular high school diploma or equivalent (including GED or an alternative credential), some college, or an associate’s or higher degree.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • This is an adult educational-attainment measure, not a current high-school graduation rate or a measure of school quality.
  • A statewide estimate can obscure differences across communities and demographic groups.
Missouri · state comparison

Are students learning?

NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.

Missouri · 2024211.9
Missouri rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Grade 4 reading

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Missouri. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.

NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
Grade 4 reading history in Missouri210.1217.9225.620032024
2024 · Missouri: 211.9 · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri Grade 4 reading history
PeriodMissouriCompare
2003222.3
2005221.2
2007220.8
2009223.8
2011220.3
2013222.3
2015222.7
2017222.7
2019218
2022213.4
2024211.9

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 211.92024 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts224.8—
#2Wyoming221.9—
#3New Jersey221.6—
#4New Hampshire221.5—
#5Colorado220.9—
#6Indiana220.1—
#7Utah219.3—
#8Connecticut219.2—
#9Mississippi218.5—
#10Florida218.2—
#11Kentucky218—
#12Montana217.2—
#13Rhode Island216.3—
#14Louisiana216—
#14Ohio216—
#16Hawaii215.8—
#16Pennsylvania215.8—
#18Idaho215.7—
#18Washington215.7—
#20Maryland215.6—
#21North Dakota215.5—
#22Wisconsin215.3—
#23Tennessee215.1—
#24South Carolina214.9—
#25Iowa214.6—
#25New York214.6—
#27Georgia214.4—
#27Minnesota214.4—
#29Illinois214.2—
#30South Dakota214.1—
#30Virginia214.1—
#32North Carolina213.4—
#33Alabama213.2—
#34Kansas213.1—
#34Nevada213.1—
#36Vermont212.7—
#37Missouri · your comparison211.9—
#37Texas211.9—
#39California211.7—
#39Nebraska211.7—
#41Arkansas209.7—
#42Maine209.6—
#43Delaware209.5—
#44Michigan209.1—
#45Arizona208.1—
#46Oklahoma207.3—
#47Oregon207—
#48West Virginia205.9—
#49Alaska201.6—
#50New Mexico200.6—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Missouri · state comparison

Where does school funding go?

Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.

Missouri · FY2024$14,241
Missouri rank#36among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Current spending per pupil

Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.

Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · $14,241FY2024 · Rank #36 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$31,918—
#2Vermont$28,818—
#3New Jersey$27,234—
#4Connecticut$26,316—
#5Massachusetts$24,429—
#6Hawaii$23,878—
#7New Hampshire$22,978—
#8Delaware$22,201—
#9Rhode Island$22,110—
#10Illinois$21,776—
#11Pennsylvania$21,091—
#12Alaska$21,004—
#13California$20,791—
#14Wyoming$20,521—
#15Maryland$20,208—
#16Maine$19,962—
#17Washington$18,564—
#18Michigan$18,314—
#19Oregon$18,083—
#20New Mexico$17,664—
#21Ohio$17,257—
#22Virginia$17,104—
#23North Dakota$17,102—
#24Minnesota$17,098—
#25Nebraska$16,147—
#26Wisconsin$15,952—
#27Colorado$15,908—
#28Georgia$15,833—
#29West Virginia$15,640—
#30Louisiana$15,581—
#31Kansas$15,558—
#32South Carolina$15,060—
#33Nevada$14,812—
#34Kentucky$14,596—
#35Iowa$14,369—
#36Missouri · your comparison$14,241—
#37Arkansas$13,873—
#38Montana$13,656—
#39Alabama$13,627—
#40Indiana$13,622—
#41North Carolina$12,995—
#42Texas$12,895—
#43Tennessee$12,882—
#44South Dakota$12,828—
#45Florida$12,693—
#46Mississippi$12,324—
#47Oklahoma$12,162—
#48Arizona$12,003—
#49Utah$11,347—
#50Idaho$11,060—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Missouri · state comparison

Are students finishing school?

The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.

Missouri · 2021–2290%
Missouri rank#2among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark87%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Federal public-school cohort graduation rate

Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.

Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history in Missouri78.5%85%91.5%2011–122021–22
2021–22 · Missouri: 90% · Rank #2 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 87% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
PeriodMissouriCompare
2011–1284%
2012–1386%
2013–1487%
2014–1588%
2015–1689%
2016–1788%
2017–1889%
2018–1990%
2019–2090%
2020–2189%
2021–2290%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · 77%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 90%2021–22 · Rank #2 of 48, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2021–22 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1West Virginia91%—
#2Iowa90%—
#2Kentucky90%—
#2Massachusetts90%—
#2Missouri · your comparison90%—
#2Tennessee90%—
#2Texas90%—
#2Wisconsin90%—
#9Connecticut89%—
#9Kansas89%—
#9Mississippi89%—
#9Virginia89%—
#13Alabama88%—
#13Arkansas88%—
#13Delaware88%—
#13Indiana88%—
#13New Hampshire88%—
#13Utah88%—
#19California87%—
#19Florida87%—
#19Illinois87%—
#19Nebraska87%—
#19New York87%—
#19Pennsylvania87%—
#25Hawaii86%—
#25Maine86%—
#25Maryland86%—
#25Montana86%—
#25North Carolina86%—
#25Ohio86%—
#31New Jersey85%—
#31North Dakota85%—
#33Georgia84%—
#33Minnesota84%—
#33South Carolina84%—
#33Washington84%—
#37Louisiana83%—
#37Rhode Island83%—
#37Vermont83%—
#40Colorado82%—
#40Nevada82%—
#40South Dakota82%—
#40Wyoming82%—
#44Michigan81%—
#44Oregon81%—
#46Idaho80%—
#47Alaska78%—
#48Arizona77%—
—New MexicoNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—OklahomaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Missouri · state comparison

College costs, attendance, and earnings

Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.

Missouri · 2022–23$9,926
Missouri rank#24among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Public four-year in-state tuition and fees

Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.

2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · $9,9262022–23 · Rank #24 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont$17,600—
#2New Hampshire$17,019—
#3Pennsylvania$16,217—
#4Connecticut$15,763—
#5New Jersey$15,265—
#6Illinois$14,921—
#7Virginia$14,825—
#8Rhode Island$14,744—
#9Michigan$14,718—
#10Massachusetts$14,345—
#11Minnesota$12,873—
#12South Carolina$12,604—
#13Oregon$12,424—
#14Delaware$11,922—
#15Arizona$11,768—
#16Kentucky$11,299—
#17Alabama$11,081—
#18Ohio$10,922—
#19Maine$10,813—
#20Hawaii$10,484—
#21Tennessee$10,437—
#22Iowa$10,121—
#23Maryland$10,041—
#24Missouri · your comparison$9,926—
#25Indiana$9,886—
#26Louisiana$9,843—
#27Colorado$9,798—
#28North Dakota$9,728—
#29Kansas$9,274—
#30Mississippi$9,120—
#31South Dakota$9,079—
#32Wisconsin$8,974—
#33Arkansas$8,879—
#34Nebraska$8,862—
#35West Virginia$8,715—
#36California$8,637—
#37New York$8,575—
#38Oklahoma$8,519—
#39Alaska$8,291—
#40Texas$8,195—
#41Washington$8,006—
#42Idaho$7,640—
#43New Mexico$7,526—
#44North Carolina$7,327—
#45Montana$7,299—
#46Utah$7,215—
#47Georgia$7,075—
#48Nevada$6,723—
#49Wyoming$5,100—
#50Florida$4,540—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s Missouri candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

47 statements from 16 candidates

2026 Missouri State Auditor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Quentin Wilson

1 statement

Democratic · State Auditor · MO

Schools & education

Create a Partnership for Performance joining universities, nonprofits, businesses, and local governments.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Partnership for Performance

Candidate campaign source

Create a Partnership for Performance joining universities, nonprofits, businesses, and local governments.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Quentin Wilson — Part 76 verified source ↗

Scott Fitzpatrick

3 statements

Republican · State Auditor · MO

Schools & education

When I became Budget Chairman I inherited a massive budget deficit, but I went to work, cut wasteful spending, and balanced the budget. The bureaucrats and lobbyists didn’t believe it was possible to accomplish all these things at the same time. But I knew the truth – if we are willing to make diffi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Entering Public Service

Candidate campaign source

When I became Budget Chairman I inherited a massive budget deficit, but I went to work, cut wasteful spending, and balanced the budget. The bureaucrats and lobbyists didn’t believe it was possible to accomplish all these things at the same time. But I knew the truth – if we are willing to make difficult decisions and put the interests of Missourians above those of special interests, anything is possible. At the end of my time as Budget Chairman, even after making a record investment in K-12 education and passing a tax cut that put money back in Missourians’ pockets, our budget surplus was over $650 million.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Scott Fitzpatrick — candidate-owned primary source ↗
View 2 more statements from Scott Fitzpatrick
Schools & education

As House Budget Chairman, I defeated a plan hatched by Democratic Governor Jay Nixon to give illegal immigrants in-state tuition at Missouri higher education institutions by cracking down on their funding. After Democrats lost that battle, they attempted to change state regulation to allow those sam…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Blocking Taxpayer Funding for Illegal Immigrants

Candidate campaign source

As House Budget Chairman, I defeated a plan hatched by Democratic Governor Jay Nixon to give illegal immigrants in-state tuition at Missouri higher education institutions by cracking down on their funding. After Democrats lost that battle, they attempted to change state regulation to allow those same illegal immigrants to receive scholarships funded by Missouri taxpayers. Once again, I fought back against this attempted abuse of taxpayer money, and I won by passing a bill overriding those regulatory changes and leading to the override of Governor Nixon’s veto of the legislation. As Auditor, I will ensure your tax dollars are not spent providing benefits to illegal immigrants.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Scott Fitzpatrick — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Schools & education

Our kids are the future of our state and are our most precious resource. I am a product of public education, and I am proud to be the son of a lifelong schoolteacher. Many of our schools do a great job educating our children and preparing them for their next phase of life, but unfortunately, not all…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: School District Oversight

Candidate campaign source

Our kids are the future of our state and are our most precious resource. I am a product of public education, and I am proud to be the son of a lifelong schoolteacher. Many of our schools do a great job educating our children and preparing them for their next phase of life, but unfortunately, not all Missouri schools are delivering acceptable results. In 2008 the legislature passed a law to allow the Auditor to audit school districts. In the 14 years since that law took effect, only 19 audits have been conducted pursuant to that authority, despite there being 516 school districts in Missouri! Meanwhile two thirds of Missouri students aren’t proficient in math or science, and over half don’t read at grade level, despite record levels of funding for public schools. As Auditor, I’ll review administrative costs and administrator salaries and measure the performance of our schools against the investment taxpayers are making in them. I will help parents make sure their schools are doing what they’re expected to do: teach kids the things they need to learn to be prepared to join the workforce or go to college.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Scott Fitzpatrick — candidate-owned primary source ↗

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Tom Schmitz

1 statement

Libertarian · U.S. House District 1 · MO

Schools & education

Libertarians want separation of education and state. Libertarians believe that all education must be privatized completely, and that the organization and funding of a child's education is the parents' responsibility.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: The Republican/Democrat uniparty has grown our government into an out of control, oppressive system, destroyed our currency, wrecked our healthcare industry, and executed a foreign policy of endless wars, bombings, death, and destruction. The Libertarian Party is the true opposition to the uniparty war machine, the only bulwark against the uniparty's spiral ever further into forced collectivism. The real debate in America is not left vs. right, but liberty vs. tyranny. Libertarians are fighting for a free society, where individuals are allowed to pursue their goals and dreams without interference from government, where the power is taken out of the hands of the monolithic state and returned to individual choice, and where values of self-ownership and freedom of conscience triumph over coercion and tyranny. I will never stop fighting for individualism and peace, and against the darkness of forced collectivism and endless war. Thank you for visiting my website and for having an open mind, I hope to earn your vote this November. -Tom Schmitz, Libertarian Party Candidate for Congress in Missouri's 1st Congressional District

Candidate campaign source

Libertarians want separation of education and state. Libertarians believe that all education must be privatized completely, and that the organization and funding of a child's education is the parents' responsibility.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Tom Schmitz — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

Wesley Bell

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · MO

Schools & education

Every person deserves to live, work, and go to school without fear of discrimination or harm. But our LGBTQ+ neighbors, including the transgender community, are facing relentless attacks and discrimination from Trump and MAGA Republicans, who are rolling back federal protections and emboldening thos…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Fighting for LGBTQ+ Equality.

Candidate campaign source

Every person deserves to live, work, and go to school without fear of discrimination or harm. But our LGBTQ+ neighbors, including the transgender community, are facing relentless attacks and discrimination from Trump and MAGA Republicans, who are rolling back federal protections and emboldening those who want to write discrimination into law. Wesley will always fight to ensure everyone is treated with the dignity and respect they deserve, and that they have access to medical care, shelter, safety, and security. That’s why he helped introduce federal legislation to develop and implement a Transgender Bill of Rights.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Wesley Bell — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Wesley Bell
Schools & education

Everyone who works hard should have access to an education without being saddled with a lifetime of debt. The rising cost of college and vocational training is putting opportunity out of reach for too many families, and the Trump administration is making it worse. Wesley supports expanding access to…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Making Higher Education Affordable.

Candidate campaign source

Everyone who works hard should have access to an education without being saddled with a lifetime of debt. The rising cost of college and vocational training is putting opportunity out of reach for too many families, and the Trump administration is making it worse. Wesley supports expanding access to affordable higher education, including four-year universities, community colleges, and trade programs, and will keep fighting to make sure cost is never a barrier to opportunity for St. Louisans.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Wesley Bell — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published Missouri candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Missouri incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Missouri legislators and Missouri’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Missouri’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

78 matching sponsorships or proposals · 42 Missouri incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Barry Hovis

Missouri House of Representatives, District 146 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Barry Hovis
Missouri Legislature · HB 1183

Modifies provisions regarding adult high schools

Apr 5, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Barry Hovis · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1183 -- ADULT HIGH SCHOOLS SPONSOR: Hovis Currently, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education is required to authorize the operation of four adult high schools across the state. This bill transfers such authority to the Department of Social Services and requires each nonprofit organization to submit an annual report to the Department. In addition, the Department shall authorize a fifth adult high school to be located in a county with more than 700,000 but fewer than 800,000 inhabitants, or a contiguous county. When this bill goes into effect, this will apply to Jackson County or an adjacent county. The Department shall administer funding to the adult high schools, subject to…

This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-04-05: Referred: General Laws(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses high-school completion, equivalency, or adult education relevant to the diploma-or-higher share of adults age 25 and older. Current student programs affect only a potential future component of that adult population. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1183 -- ADULT HIGH SCHOOLS SPONSOR: Hovis Currently, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education is required to authorize the operation of four adult high schools across the state. This bill transfers such authority to the Department of Social Services and requires each nonprofit organization to submit an annual report to the Department. In addition, the Department shall authorize a fifth adult high school to be located in a county with more than 700,000 but fewer than 800,000 inhabitants, or a contiguous county. When this bill goes into effect, this will apply to Jackson County or an adjacent county. The Department shall administer funding to the adult high schools, subject to appropriations. For the existing adult high schools, the Department shall maintain authorization for the nonprofit organizations to operate the high school, provided that no more than one organization may be authorized to operate an adult high school in each of the current four locations. An organization may establish satellite campuses for any adult high school it is authorized to operate. By January 1, 2024, the Department shall select a Missouri-based nonprofit organization to operate the new adult high school, provided the organization meets current law requirements and demonstrates the ability to commit at least $500,000, rather than $2 million, for the necessary infrastructure to establish the school. The bill also provides that such organization must limit the administrative fee to no more than 10%.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Betsy Fogle

Missouri House of Representatives, District 135 · D–MO

5 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Betsy Fogle
Missouri Legislature · HB 3419

Creates new provisions relating to employee compensation, reinstating certain minimum wage adjustments, implementing earned paid sick leave, and bereavement leave

May 15, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Betsy Fogle · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 3419 -- EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SPONSOR: Fogle Beginning January 1, 2027, the minimum wage is required to be increased or decreased January 1st each year based on the cost of living. This bill reinstates the provisions of law establishing a system of earned paid sick time and creates new provisions for bereavement leave. The bill provides that all applicable employees will accrue a minimum of one hour of earned paid sick time for every 30 hours worked. Employees of an employer with 15 or more employees can use up to 56 hours of time in any given year but employees of an employer with fewer than 15 employees can only use 40 hours of time in any given year. Accrual begins January 1, 2027, or…

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 3419 -- EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SPONSOR: Fogle Beginning January 1, 2027, the minimum wage is required to be increased or decreased January 1st each year based on the cost of living. This bill reinstates the provisions of law establishing a system of earned paid sick time and creates new provisions for bereavement leave. The bill provides that all applicable employees will accrue a minimum of one hour of earned paid sick time for every 30 hours worked. Employees of an employer with 15 or more employees can use up to 56 hours of time in any given year but employees of an employer with fewer than 15 employees can only use 40 hours of time in any given year. Accrual begins January 1, 2027, or upon the commencement of employment, whichever is later. Employees may use earned paid sick time following 90 days of continuous employment, unless an employer's written policy allows the use of such leave prior to 90 days. The amount of sick time to be carried over, paid out, or transferred if employed by the same employer are specified in the bill. The bill outlines the reasons for which an employee may use earned paid sick time: (1) An employee's mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition; an employee's need for medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of a mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition; an employee's need for preventative medical care; (2) Care of a family member with a mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition; care of a family member who needs medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of a mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition; care of a family member who needs preventative medical care; (3) Closure of the employee's place of business by order of a public official due to a public health emergency, or an employee's need to care for a child whose school or place of care has been closed by order of a public official due to a public health emergency, or care for oneself or a family member when it has been determined by the health authorities having jurisdiction or by a health care provider that the employee's or family member's presence in the community may jeopardize the health of others because of his or her exposure to a communicable disease, whether or not the employee or family member has actually contracted the communicable disease; or (4) Absence necessary due to domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking, provided the leave is allowed for the employee or an employee's family member to procure one or more of the services described in the bill. Earned paid sick time shall be provided upon the request of an employee. Such request may be made orally, in writing, by electronic means, or by any other means acceptable to the employer. When possible, the request shall include the expected duration of the absence. Employees shall provide notice of the need for using earned paid sick time when the use is foreseeable. Furthermore, the bill allows certain private employees to earn paid bereavement time in the same manner as earned paid sick time is accrued. Earned paid bereavement time can be used within 90 days of the death of a family member, as defined under current law, or in connection with an event resulting in reproductive loss. Earned paid bereavement time shall begin to accrue at the commencement of employment or January 1, 2027, whichever is later. All provisions applicable to the accrual and use of earned paid sick time are applicable to the accrual and use of earned paid bereavement time under this bill. Employers may request, but not require, employees to search for or find a replacement worker to cover hours during which the employee is using earned paid sick time. Additionally, an employer may require reasonable documentation, as described in the bill, for time used on three or more consecutive work days. Each day of violation or failure to comply and each employee affected shall constitute a separate offense. Furthermore, any individual who claims to have been aggrieved by a failure of an employer to comply with any portion of this bill, including but not limited to the failure to provide earned paid sick time or to allow employees to use such time, or who claims to have suffered a retaliatory personnel action prohibited by this bill, shall have a right of action and may commence a civil action in the appropriate court of jurisdiction within three years of the accrual of the cause of action, to obtain appropriate relief with respect to such unlawful violation. Such action may be brought without first filing an administrative complaint.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 3020

Adds additional options for photo identification needed to vote

May 15, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Betsy Fogle · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 3020 -- VOTER IDENTIFICATION SPONSOR: Fogle This bill adds a nonexpired student ID card issued by a Missouri high school or an accredited institution of higher education to the list of acceptable identification required to vote. This bill is similar to HB 1320 (2025) and HB 2379 (2024).

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses registration, access to voting, or the handling of cast ballots. Registered-voter turnout uses registered voters as its denominator, so registration and voting rules can concern different components of the displayed rate. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Registered-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 3020 -- VOTER IDENTIFICATION SPONSOR: Fogle This bill adds a nonexpired student ID card issued by a Missouri high school or an accredited institution of higher education to the list of acceptable identification required to vote. This bill is similar to HB 1320 (2025) and HB 2379 (2024).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1320

Adds additional options for photo identification needed to vote

May 15, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Betsy Fogle · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1320 -- VOTER IDENTIFICATION SPONSOR: Fogle This bill adds a nonexpired student ID card issued by a Missouri high school or an accredited institution of higher education to the list of acceptable identification required to vote. This bill is similar to HB 975 (2023) and the same as HB 2379 (2024).

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses registration, access to voting, or the handling of cast ballots. Registered-voter turnout uses registered voters as its denominator, so registration and voting rules can concern different components of the displayed rate. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Registered-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1320 -- VOTER IDENTIFICATION SPONSOR: Fogle This bill adds a nonexpired student ID card issued by a Missouri high school or an accredited institution of higher education to the list of acceptable identification required to vote. This bill is similar to HB 975 (2023) and the same as HB 2379 (2024).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 2379

Adds additional options for photo identification needed to vote

May 17, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Betsy Fogle · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2379 -- VOTER IDENTIFICATION SPONSOR: Fogle This bill adds a nonexpired student ID card issued by a Missouri high school or an accredited institution of higher education to the list of acceptable identification required to vote. This bill is similar to HB 975 (2023).

This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-17: Referred: General Laws(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses registration, access to voting, or the handling of cast ballots. Registered-voter turnout uses registered voters as its denominator, so registration and voting rules can concern different components of the displayed rate. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Registered-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 2379 -- VOTER IDENTIFICATION SPONSOR: Fogle This bill adds a nonexpired student ID card issued by a Missouri high school or an accredited institution of higher education to the list of acceptable identification required to vote. This bill is similar to HB 975 (2023).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 219

Adds additional options for photo identification needed to vote

May 12, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Betsy Fogle · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 219 -- VOTER PHOTO IDENTIFICATION SPONSOR: Fogle This bill adds a nonexpired student or employee identification card issued by a Missouri high school or institution of higher education to the list of acceptable forms of photo identification required to vote.

This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-05-12: Referred: Elections and Elected Officials(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses registration, access to voting, or the handling of cast ballots. Registered-voter turnout uses registered voters as its denominator, so registration and voting rules can concern different components of the displayed rate. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Registered-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 219 -- VOTER PHOTO IDENTIFICATION SPONSOR: Fogle This bill adds a nonexpired student or employee identification card issued by a Missouri high school or institution of higher education to the list of acceptable forms of photo identification required to vote.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bill Allen

Missouri House of Representatives, District 17 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Bill Allen
Missouri Legislature · HB 571

Modifies the offense of unlawful use of weapons by exempting commissioned school officers who carry a firearm on school property from the offense

May 5, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Bill Allen · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 571 -- FIREARMS SPONSOR: Allen This bill provides that a school officer commissioned by the district school board or a school protection officer, as described under Section 160.665, RSMo, shall not be prohibited from carrying a firearm into any school, onto any school bus, or onto the premises of any function or activity sponsored or sanctioned by school officials or the district school board. This bill is the same as HB 2806 (2022).

This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-05-05: Placed on the Informal Perfection Calendar (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 571 -- FIREARMS SPONSOR: Allen This bill provides that a school officer commissioned by the district school board or a school protection officer, as described under Section 160.665, RSMo, shall not be prohibited from carrying a firearm into any school, onto any school bus, or onto the premises of any function or activity sponsored or sanctioned by school officials or the district school board. This bill is the same as HB 2806 (2022).
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bishop Davidson

Missouri House of Representatives, District 130 · R–MO

4 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Bishop Davidson
Missouri Legislature · HB 32

Lowers the age for adult high schools from 21 to 18

Mar 24, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Bishop Davidson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HCS HB 32 -- ADULT HIGH SCHOOLS (Davidson) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education Currently, to enroll in an adult high school as outline in Sections 160.2700 to 160.2725 an individual must be 21 years of age. This bill changes the age for enrollment for adult high schools in the state to 18. A student who transfers from a local education agency to an adult high school will be considered a transfer student and not a dropout student by the state for the purposes of the compiling and tracking dropout rates.

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-03-24: Second read and referred: Education(S).

Why this record is included

The record addresses high-school completion, equivalency, or adult education relevant to the diploma-or-higher share of adults age 25 and older. Current student programs affect only a potential future component of that adult population. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HCS HB 32 -- ADULT HIGH SCHOOLS (Davidson) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education Currently, to enroll in an adult high school as outline in Sections 160.2700 to 160.2725 an individual must be 21 years of age. This bill changes the age for enrollment for adult high schools in the state to 18. A student who transfers from a local education agency to an adult high school will be considered a transfer student and not a dropout student by the state for the purposes of the compiling and tracking dropout rates.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 447

Modifies provisions relating to duties of the department of elementary and secondary education

Jul 6, 2023 · Enacted

Rep. Bishop Davidson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The SBE shall adopt and implement the performance standards relating to health and family education beginning with the 2024-25 school year. ADULT HIGH SCHOOLS (Sections 160.2705, 160.2720, and 160.2725) Currently, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) is required to authorize the operation of four adult high schools across the state. This bill transfers such authority to the Department of Social Services (DSS) and requires each nonprofit organization that operates an adult high school to submit an annual report to DSS. In addition, DSS shall authorize a fifth adult high school to be located in a county with more than 700,000 but fewer than 800,000 inhabitants, or a…

Approved by the Governor on 2023-07-06. The recorded final action was 2023-07-06: Approved by Governor (G). This is the legislative disposition; subsequent court rulings may affect enforcement.

Why this record is included

The record addresses high-school completion, equivalency, or adult education relevant to the diploma-or-higher share of adults age 25 and older. Current student programs affect only a potential future component of that adult population. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The SBE shall adopt and implement the performance standards relating to health and family education beginning with the 2024-25 school year. ADULT HIGH SCHOOLS (Sections 160.2705, 160.2720, and 160.2725) Currently, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) is required to authorize the operation of four adult high schools across the state. This bill transfers such authority to the Department of Social Services (DSS) and requires each nonprofit organization that operates an adult high school to submit an annual report to DSS. In addition, DSS shall authorize a fifth adult high school to be located in a county with more than 700,000 but fewer than 800,000 inhabitants, or a contiguous county. When the bill goes into effect, this will apply to Jackson County or an adjacent county. DSS shall administer funding to the adult high schools subject to appropriations. For the existing adult high schools, DSS shall maintain authorization for the nonprofit organizations to operate the high school, provided that no more than one organization may be authorized to operate an adult high school in each of the current four locations. An organization may establish satellite campuses for any adult high school it is authorized to operate. By January 1, 2024, the DSS shall select a Missouri-based nonprofit organization to operate the new adult high school, provided the organization meets current requirements and demonstrates the ability to commit at least $500,000 for the necessary infrastructure to establish the school. GRANT AWARDS AUTHORITY (Sections 161.243 and 205.565) DESE shall provide grants directly to private entities, as defined, for the provision of early childhood education services, subject to appropriations.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 2806

Modifies the offense of unlawful use of weapons by exempting commissioned school officers who carry a firearm on school property from the offense

May 13, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Bishop Davidson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2806 -- FIREARMS SPONSOR: Davidson This bill provides that a school officer commissioned by the district school board or a school protection officer, as described under Section 160.665, RSMo, shall not be prohibited from carrying a firearm into any school, onto any school bus, or onto the premises of any function or activity sponsored or sanctioned by school officials or the district school board.

This measure did not pass before the 2022 session ended. Final recorded action on 2022-05-13: Referred: General Laws(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 2806 -- FIREARMS SPONSOR: Davidson This bill provides that a school officer commissioned by the district school board or a school protection officer, as described under Section 160.665, RSMo, shall not be prohibited from carrying a firearm into any school, onto any school bus, or onto the premises of any function or activity sponsored or sanctioned by school officials or the district school board.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 2618

Changes provisions governing adult high schools

Mar 22, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Bishop Davidson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HCS HBs 2618 & 2492 -- ADULT HIGH SCHOOLS SPONSOR: Davidson COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education by a vote of 14 to 0. This bill allows synchronous instruction connecting students to a live classroom in a Missouri adult high school to be treated the same as in-person learning. The bill defines "adult high school" to mean the same as a "secondary school system" and to be exempt from child care licensure under Section 210.211, RSMo. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing.

This measure did not pass before the 2022 session ended. Final recorded action on 2022-03-22: Executive Session Completed (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses high-school completion, equivalency, or adult education relevant to the diploma-or-higher share of adults age 25 and older. Current student programs affect only a potential future component of that adult population. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HCS HBs 2618 & 2492 -- ADULT HIGH SCHOOLS SPONSOR: Davidson COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education by a vote of 14 to 0. This bill allows synchronous instruction connecting students to a live classroom in a Missouri adult high school to be treated the same as in-person learning. The bill defines "adult high school" to mean the same as a "secondary school system" and to be exempt from child care licensure under Section 210.211, RSMo. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Chad Perkins

Missouri House of Representatives, District 40 · R–MO

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Chad Perkins
Missouri Legislature · HB 2751

Modifies provisions relating to public safety

Apr 29, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Chad Perkins · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

No offender who has been sentenced to death or life without probation or parole is eligible for good time credit, nor is any offender committed to the Department after conviction of crimes specified in the bill. The Department must award credit between five and 360 days for programs and activities to any qualifying offender who successfully: (1) Receives a high school diploma or equivalent, college diploma, or a vocational training certificate; (2) Completes an alcohol or drug abuse treatment program, excluding those treatment programs ordered by either the court or parole board;

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-04-29: Placed Back on Formal Perfection Calendar (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses high-school completion, equivalency, or adult education relevant to the diploma-or-higher share of adults age 25 and older. Current student programs affect only a potential future component of that adult population. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

No offender who has been sentenced to death or life without probation or parole is eligible for good time credit, nor is any offender committed to the Department after conviction of crimes specified in the bill. The Department must award credit between five and 360 days for programs and activities to any qualifying offender who successfully: (1) Receives a high school diploma or equivalent, college diploma, or a vocational training certificate; (2) Completes an alcohol or drug abuse treatment program, excluding those treatment programs ordered by either the court or parole board;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1505

Establishes provisions relating to public safety

May 15, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Chad Perkins · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Earned time credit will not be awarded for programs completed prior to an offender's sentence. The Department will specify the types of programs or activities for which earned time credit will be awarded, including but not limited to the following: receiving a high school diploma or equivalent, college diploma or professional certificate, or vocational training certificate, and participating in successful employment, parenting, and financial literacy courses, alcohol and drug abuse treatment programs, and restorative justice and faith-based programs. From January 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026, eligible offenders may petition for earned time credit for programs completed between January 1,…

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Action Postponed (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses high-school completion, equivalency, or adult education relevant to the diploma-or-higher share of adults age 25 and older. Current student programs affect only a potential future component of that adult population. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Earned time credit will not be awarded for programs completed prior to an offender's sentence. The Department will specify the types of programs or activities for which earned time credit will be awarded, including but not limited to the following: receiving a high school diploma or equivalent, college diploma or professional certificate, or vocational training certificate, and participating in successful employment, parenting, and financial literacy courses, alcohol and drug abuse treatment programs, and restorative justice and faith-based programs. From January 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026, eligible offenders may petition for earned time credit for programs completed between January 1, 2010 and August 28, 2025.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Chris Brown

Missouri House of Representatives, District 16 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Chris Brown
Missouri Legislature · HB 2896

Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education

Jul 13, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Chris Brown · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SS SCS HB 2896 -- EDUCATION This bill modifies certain provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education. WORKFORCE DIPLOMA PROGRAM (Section 173.831) Current law provides for the Workforce Diploma Program to assist students with obtaining a high school diploma and developing employability and career technical skills, with such program scheduled to sunset on August 28, 2028. This bill repeals the sunset provision for this Section.

Approved by the Governor on 2026-07-13. The recorded final action was 2026-07-13: Delivered to Secretary of State (G). This is the legislative disposition; subsequent court rulings may affect enforcement.

Why this record is included

The record addresses high-school completion, equivalency, or adult education relevant to the diploma-or-higher share of adults age 25 and older. Current student programs affect only a potential future component of that adult population. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SS SCS HB 2896 -- EDUCATION This bill modifies certain provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education. WORKFORCE DIPLOMA PROGRAM (Section 173.831) Current law provides for the Workforce Diploma Program to assist students with obtaining a high school diploma and developing employability and career technical skills, with such program scheduled to sunset on August 28, 2028. This bill repeals the sunset provision for this Section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Missouri officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Missouri statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.