Missouri · individual fact

Missouri prices and inflation

Compare Missouri’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide Missouri CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level90.82024 · #38 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level96.32024 · #29 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level69.92024 · #41 of 50 · highest first

Missouri over time

Explore Missouri readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Missouri officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Missouri effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Missouri change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level Missouri · source units
MissouriPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 90.889.795.4101.1Missouri, 2014: 93.4Missouri, 2015: 92.3Missouri, 2016: 91.7Missouri, 2017: 91.7Missouri, 2018: 91.8Missouri, 2019: 92.5Missouri, 2020: 92.2Missouri, 2021: 92Missouri, 2022: 91Missouri, 2023: 91.1Missouri, 2024: 90.8201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 27National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shock● Missouri Legislature · 103225422233422228214● U.S. Congress · Missouri delegation · 5◆ Governor · 2■ Missouri agencies · 32005-08-012026-08-31

113 of 113 reviewed Missouri actions match · 69 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.

Missouri · 2024: 90.8 · Rank #38 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Missouri with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Missouri All-items price level · source units
PeriodMissouriRankU.S. benchmark
202490.8#38 of 50100
202391.1#36 of 50100
202291#36 of 50100
202192#33 of 50100
202092.2#31 of 50100
201992.5#37 of 50100
201891.8#37 of 50100
201791.7#38 of 50100
201691.7#39 of 50100
201592.3#38 of 50100
201493.4#34 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Missouri · state comparison

How does Missouri’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

Missouri · 202490.8
Missouri rank#38among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Missouri with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
All-items price level history in Missouri89.495.4101.420142024
2024 · Missouri: 90.8 · Rank #38 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri All-items price level history
PeriodMissouriCompare
201493.4
201592.3
201691.7
201791.7
201891.8
201992.5
202092.2
202192
202291
202391.1
202490.8

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 90.82024 · Rank #38 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri · your comparison90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Missouri · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Missouri · 20242.3%
Missouri rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
Annual change in regional price deflator history in Missouri-2.1%2.8%7.7%20152024
2024 · Missouri: 2.3% · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodMissouriCompare
2015-1%
20160.4%
20171.8%
20182.1%
20192.2%
20200.7%
20213.9%
20225.4%
20233.9%
20242.3%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 2.3%2024 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri · your comparison2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Missouri · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

Missouri · 2024$57,850
Missouri rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
Real personal income per person history in Missouri$43.65K$52.53K$61.41K20142024
2024 · Missouri: $57,850 · Rank #27 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri Real personal income per person history
PeriodMissouriCompare
2014$45,700
2015$47,620
2016$48,744
2017$48,930
2018$49,929
2019$50,660
2020$54,269
2021$56,869
2022$55,467
2023$56,912
2024$57,850

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · $57,8502024 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri · your comparison$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Missouri candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

13 statements from 8 candidates

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Tom Schmitz

1 statement

Libertarian · U.S. House District 1 · MO

CPI / inflation mention

Libertarians believe that taxation is theft, inflation (money printing out of thin air) is theft, and that all funding of government must be voluntary.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: The Republican/Democrat uniparty has grown our government into an out of control, oppressive system, destroyed our currency, wrecked our healthcare industry, and executed a foreign policy of endless wars, bombings, death, and destruction. The Libertarian Party is the true opposition to the uniparty war machine, the only bulwark against the uniparty's spiral ever further into forced collectivism. The real debate in America is not left vs. right, but liberty vs. tyranny. Libertarians are fighting for a free society, where individuals are allowed to pursue their goals and dreams without interference from government, where the power is taken out of the hands of the monolithic state and returned to individual choice, and where values of self-ownership and freedom of conscience triumph over coercion and tyranny. I will never stop fighting for individualism and peace, and against the darkness of forced collectivism and endless war. Thank you for visiting my website and for having an open mind, I hope to earn your vote this November. -Tom Schmitz, Libertarian Party Candidate for Congress in Missouri's 1st Congressional District

Candidate campaign source

Libertarians believe that taxation is theft, inflation (money printing out of thin air) is theft, and that all funding of government must be voluntary.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Tom Schmitz — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

Wesley Bell

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · MO

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Every family deserves to keep the lights on and the heat running without having to choose between that and putting food on the table. Utility bills have skyrocketed in recent years, and Trump's energy policies are making things worse. Wesley has pushed for federal relief to help households manage ri…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Lowering Energy Costs.

Candidate campaign source

Every family deserves to keep the lights on and the heat running without having to choose between that and putting food on the table. Utility bills have skyrocketed in recent years, and Trump's energy policies are making things worse. Wesley has pushed for federal relief to help households manage rising energy costs and opposed Republican policies that have driven those costs higher.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Wesley Bell — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Wesley Bell
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Now, Wesley is running for reelection to continue fighting for his constituents in Washington: holding the Trump administration and MAGA Republicans accountable, expanding access to affordable health care and prescription drugs, lowering energy costs, bringing down the price of groceries, protecting…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: A strong leader for common-sense solutions. Learn more about Wesley Bell here.

Candidate campaign source

Now, Wesley is running for reelection to continue fighting for his constituents in Washington: holding the Trump administration and MAGA Republicans accountable, expanding access to affordable health care and prescription drugs, lowering energy costs, bringing down the price of groceries, protecting our rights and freedoms, and creating good-paying jobs right here in St. Louis.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Wesley Bell — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Ann Wagner

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · MO

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

She understands that the cost of groceries and gas has made life challenging for Missouri families, and she has worked to bring down the cost of living for working parents. Ann voted for the Working Families Tax Cut to prevent the largest tax increase in history and make sure you keep more of your h…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

She understands that the cost of groceries and gas has made life challenging for Missouri families, and she has worked to bring down the cost of living for working parents. Ann voted for the Working Families Tax Cut to prevent the largest tax increase in history and make sure you keep more of your hard-earned dollars by removing taxes on tips, overtime, and Social Security.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Ann Wagner — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 4 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Jordan Herrera

3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 4 · MO

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

America has a housing shortage. We are short between 4 million and 7 million homes nationwide. Missouri families feel it every day through rising rent, higher utility costs, and fewer housing options. Housing is not just about buying a home. It is about whether people can afford to live, stay, and b…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing and Cost of Living

Candidate campaign source

America has a housing shortage. We are short between 4 million and 7 million homes nationwide. Missouri families feel it every day through rising rent, higher utility costs, and fewer housing options. Housing is not just about buying a home. It is about whether people can afford to live, stay, and build a future in their own community. We cannot fix this overnight. But we can take clear, deliberate action.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jordan Herrera — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 2 more statements from Jordan Herrera
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

We are living in an era where your data, your face, your voice, your location, and your creative work can be captured, copied, sold, and monetized without your consent. Congress has failed to meet the moment. I support innovation. I support technology. I support re-engineered and better-designed dat…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Technology, Privacy, and Energy

Candidate campaign source

We are living in an era where your data, your face, your voice, your location, and your creative work can be captured, copied, sold, and monetized without your consent. Congress has failed to meet the moment. I support innovation. I support technology. I support re-engineered and better-designed data centers, AI research, broadband expansion, and next-generation energy. But I will not support a future where workers are replaced, artists are robbed, communities pay the utility bills leading to poverty and home insecurity, and corporations walk away with the profits.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jordan Herrera — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Investing in our future means confronting the reality that whether you live in a city, a small town, or rural Missouri, the pressures are the same. Housing costs are outpacing wages. Healthcare is unaffordable or too far away. Food prices are rising. Schools and infrastructure are stretched thin. Th…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Investment in our Future

Candidate campaign source

Investing in our future means confronting the reality that whether you live in a city, a small town, or rural Missouri, the pressures are the same. Housing costs are outpacing wages. Healthcare is unaffordable or too far away. Food prices are rising. Schools and infrastructure are stretched thin. These challenges do not stop at county lines or zip codes, and neither should our solutions.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jordan Herrera — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Missouri candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Missouri incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Missouri legislators and Missouri’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Missouri’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

108 matching sponsorships or proposals · 44 Missouri incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Anthony Ealy

Missouri House of Representatives, District 36 · D–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Anthony Ealy
Missouri Legislature · HB 3297

Creates several new provisions for property development

May 15, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Anthony Ealy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Developments meeting these criteria can be administratively approved if they comply with land development regulations, excluding those related to density, height, and land use, and parking requirements may be reduced if the development is near public transit. Additionally, portions of multifamily projects providing affordable housing to eligible income groups will be eligible for an ad valorem property tax exemption starting in 2027, with the exemption percentage varying based on income levels, and property owners must apply annually with specific documentation.

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Developments meeting these criteria can be administratively approved if they comply with land development regulations, excluding those related to density, height, and land use, and parking requirements may be reduced if the development is near public transit. Additionally, portions of multifamily projects providing affordable housing to eligible income groups will be eligible for an ad valorem property tax exemption starting in 2027, with the exemption percentage varying based on income levels, and property owners must apply annually with specific documentation.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Ben Keathley

Missouri House of Representatives, District 101 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Ben Keathley
Missouri Legislature · HB 2385

Prohibits local governments from requiring private property owners to accept certain types of income.

Apr 16, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Ben Keathley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

This bill specifies that no county or city shall enact, maintain, or enforce any ordinance or resolution that prohibits landlords from refusing to lease or rent certain residential or commercial property to a person because the person's source of income includes aid from a federal housing assistance program. The bill specifies that no city or county may enact an ordinance that: (1) Prohibits landlords from using income-qualifying methods to determine whether to rent or lease a property to a prospective tenant; (2) Prohibits landlords from requesting tenant criminal records; (3) Limits the amount of security deposit required from a tenant; or (4) Requires tenants to automatically receive the…

This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-04-16: SCS Voted Do Pass (S).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

This bill specifies that no county or city shall enact, maintain, or enforce any ordinance or resolution that prohibits landlords from refusing to lease or rent certain residential or commercial property to a person because the person's source of income includes aid from a federal housing assistance program. The bill specifies that no city or county may enact an ordinance that: (1) Prohibits landlords from using income-qualifying methods to determine whether to rent or lease a property to a prospective tenant; (2) Prohibits landlords from requesting tenant criminal records; (3) Limits the amount of security deposit required from a tenant; or (4) Requires tenants to automatically receive the right of first refusal.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bennie Cook

Missouri House of Representatives, District 143 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Bennie Cook
Missouri Legislature · HB 1577

Repeals provisions relating to paid sick leave and minimum wage increases and reinstates previous minimum wage provisions

May 15, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Bennie Cook · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1577 -- EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SPONSOR: Cook This bill repeals the increase in the minimum wage rate. Currently, the minimum wage rate is $13.75 per hour with an increase in the hourly rate each year of $1.25 to $15.00 per hour beginning on January 1, 2026. Under this bill, the minimum wage rates that existed as of December 31, 2024, would apply, which means the minimum wage rate would be $12.00 per hour. Successive increases in the minimum wage rate would be adjusted based on the cost of living, as reflected in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, published by the U.S. Department of Labor. Further, this bill repeals the laws relating to paid sick leave.…

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1577 -- EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SPONSOR: Cook This bill repeals the increase in the minimum wage rate. Currently, the minimum wage rate is $13.75 per hour with an increase in the hourly rate each year of $1.25 to $15.00 per hour beginning on January 1, 2026. Under this bill, the minimum wage rates that existed as of December 31, 2024, would apply, which means the minimum wage rate would be $12.00 per hour. Successive increases in the minimum wage rate would be adjusted based on the cost of living, as reflected in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, published by the U.S. Department of Labor. Further, this bill repeals the laws relating to paid sick leave. This bill is the same as HB 715 (2025).
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Betsy Fogle

Missouri House of Representatives, District 135 · D–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Betsy Fogle
Missouri Legislature · HB 3419

Creates new provisions relating to employee compensation, reinstating certain minimum wage adjustments, implementing earned paid sick leave, and bereavement leave

May 15, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Betsy Fogle · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 3419 -- EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SPONSOR: Fogle Beginning January 1, 2027, the minimum wage is required to be increased or decreased January 1st each year based on the cost of living. This bill reinstates the provisions of law establishing a system of earned paid sick time and creates new provisions for bereavement leave. The bill provides that all applicable employees will accrue a minimum of one hour of earned paid sick time for every 30 hours worked. Employees of an employer with 15 or more employees can use up to 56 hours of time in any given year but employees of an employer with fewer than 15 employees can only use 40 hours of time in any given year. Accrual begins January 1, 2027, or…

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 3419 -- EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SPONSOR: Fogle Beginning January 1, 2027, the minimum wage is required to be increased or decreased January 1st each year based on the cost of living. This bill reinstates the provisions of law establishing a system of earned paid sick time and creates new provisions for bereavement leave. The bill provides that all applicable employees will accrue a minimum of one hour of earned paid sick time for every 30 hours worked. Employees of an employer with 15 or more employees can use up to 56 hours of time in any given year but employees of an employer with fewer than 15 employees can only use 40 hours of time in any given year. Accrual begins January 1, 2027, or upon the commencement of employment, whichever is later. Employees may use earned paid sick time following 90 days of continuous employment, unless an employer's written policy allows the use of such leave prior to 90 days. The amount of sick time to be carried over, paid out, or transferred if employed by the same employer are specified in the bill. The bill outlines the reasons for which an employee may use earned paid sick time: (1) An employee's mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition; an employee's need for medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of a mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition; an employee's need for preventative medical care; (2) Care of a family member with a mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition; care of a family member who needs medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of a mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition; care of a family member who needs preventative medical care; (3) Closure of the employee's place of business by order of a public official due to a public health emergency, or an employee's need to care for a child whose school or place of care has been closed by order of a public official due to a public health emergency, or care for oneself or a family member when it has been determined by the health authorities having jurisdiction or by a health care provider that the employee's or family member's presence in the community may jeopardize the health of others because of his or her exposure to a communicable disease, whether or not the employee or family member has actually contracted the communicable disease; or (4) Absence necessary due to domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking, provided the leave is allowed for the employee or an employee's family member to procure one or more of the services described in the bill. Earned paid sick time shall be provided upon the request of an employee. Such request may be made orally, in writing, by electronic means, or by any other means acceptable to the employer. When possible, the request shall include the expected duration of the absence. Employees shall provide notice of the need for using earned paid sick time when the use is foreseeable. Furthermore, the bill allows certain private employees to earn paid bereavement time in the same manner as earned paid sick time is accrued. Earned paid bereavement time can be used within 90 days of the death of a family member, as defined under current law, or in connection with an event resulting in reproductive loss. Earned paid bereavement time shall begin to accrue at the commencement of employment or January 1, 2027, whichever is later. All provisions applicable to the accrual and use of earned paid sick time are applicable to the accrual and use of earned paid bereavement time under this bill. Employers may request, but not require, employees to search for or find a replacement worker to cover hours during which the employee is using earned paid sick time. Additionally, an employer may require reasonable documentation, as described in the bill, for time used on three or more consecutive work days. Each day of violation or failure to comply and each employee affected shall constitute a separate offense. Furthermore, any individual who claims to have been aggrieved by a failure of an employer to comply with any portion of this bill, including but not limited to the failure to provide earned paid sick time or to allow employees to use such time, or who claims to have suffered a retaliatory personnel action prohibited by this bill, shall have a right of action and may commence a civil action in the appropriate court of jurisdiction within three years of the accrual of the cause of action, to obtain appropriate relief with respect to such unlawful violation. Such action may be brought without first filing an administrative complaint.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bill Owen

Missouri House of Representatives, District 131 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Bill Owen
Missouri Legislature · HB 2319

Modifies provisions relating to tax credits

May 2, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Bill Owen · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill would apply a sunset provision to the Affordable Housing Tax Credit, which currently lacks one. This concerns the lifespan of a housing subsidy; it does not establish a change in Missouri’s median rent.

This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-02: Placed Back on Formal Perfection Calendar (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

occur on August 28, 2024. (2) Applying a sunset provision to those tax credits that currently lack such provision. Such tax credits include: (a) Neighborhood Assistance Tax Credit; (b) Affordable Housing Tax Credit
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bryant Wolfin

Missouri House of Representatives, District 145 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Bryant Wolfin
Missouri Legislature · HB 715

Repeals provisions relating to paid sick leave and minimum wage increases and reinstates previous minimum wage provisions

May 15, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Bryant Wolfin · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 715 -- MINIMUM WAGE SPONSOR: Wolfin This bill repeals the increase in the minimum wage rate. Currently, the minimum wage rate is $13.75 per hour and there is an increase in the hourly rate each year of $1.25 to $15.00 per hour beginning on January 1, 2026. Under the bill, the minimum wage rates that existed as of December 31, 2024 would apply, which means the minimum wage rate would be $12.00 per hour. Successive increases in the minimum wage rate would be adjusted based on the cost of living, as reflected in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers published by the U.S. Department of Labor. Further, this bill repeals the laws relating to paid sick leave.

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses wages, paid leave, or cash benefits that can form part of household money income. Census household income is measured before taxes; a tax reduction alone is not an increase in this measure. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 715 -- MINIMUM WAGE SPONSOR: Wolfin This bill repeals the increase in the minimum wage rate. Currently, the minimum wage rate is $13.75 per hour and there is an increase in the hourly rate each year of $1.25 to $15.00 per hour beginning on January 1, 2026. Under the bill, the minimum wage rates that existed as of December 31, 2024 would apply, which means the minimum wage rate would be $12.00 per hour. Successive increases in the minimum wage rate would be adjusted based on the cost of living, as reflected in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers published by the U.S. Department of Labor. Further, this bill repeals the laws relating to paid sick leave.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Missouri officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Missouri statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.