Mississippi · individual fact

Mississippi income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Mississippi’s tax structure.

Median household income$56.45K2020–2024 · #50 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$31.55K2020–2024 · #50 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$48.47K2024 · #50 of 50 · highest first

Mississippi over time

Explore Mississippi readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Mississippi officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Mississippi effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Mississippi change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person Mississippi · source units
MississippiPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $48,465$37.82K$49.75K$61.67KMississippi, 2014: $40,125Mississippi, 2015: $40,939Mississippi, 2016: $41,065Mississippi, 2017: $41,790Mississippi, 2018: $42,881Mississippi, 2019: $43,785Mississippi, 2020: $47,533Mississippi, 2021: $50,167Mississippi, 2022: $46,392Mississippi, 2023: $47,517Mississippi, 2024: $48,465201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 35National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings funding● Mississippi Legislature · 42● U.S. Congress · Mississippi delegation · 1◆ Governor · 1■ Mississippi agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-09-012026-07-31

6 of 6 reviewed Mississippi actions match · 5 date markers shown. 35 major events shown separately.

Mississippi · 2024: $48,465 · Rank #50 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Mississippi Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodMississippiRankU.S. benchmark
2024$48,465#50 of 50$59,195
2023$47,517#50 of 50$58,088
2022$46,392#50 of 50$57,104
2021$50,167#48 of 50$59,365
2020$47,533#50 of 50$56,514
2019$43,785#50 of 50$53,683
2018$42,881#50 of 50$52,242
2017$41,790#49 of 50$51,006
2016$41,065#50 of 50$49,828
2015$40,939#49 of 50$49,396
2014$40,125#48 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Mississippi · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

Mississippi · 2020–2024$56,447
Mississippi rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Mississippi stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Mississippi has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Mississippi · $56,4472020–2024 · Rank #50 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $55,908 – $56,986Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Mississippi with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi · your comparison$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$56,4472020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by Mississippi households, expressed in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • Income is not take-home pay and does not directly measure taxes, wealth, prices, or purchasing power.
  • A statewide median obscures regional and household differences.
Mississippi · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

Mississippi · 2024$48,465
Mississippi rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Mississippi
Real personal income per person history in Mississippi$37.24K$49.75K$62.25K20142024
2024 · Mississippi: $48,465 · Rank #50 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Mississippi Real personal income per person history
PeriodMississippiCompare
2014$40,125
2015$40,939
2016$41,065
2017$41,790
2018$42,881
2019$43,785
2020$47,533
2021$50,167
2022$46,392
2023$47,517
2024$48,465

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Mississippi stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Mississippi has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Mississippi · $48,4652024 · Rank #50 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Mississippi with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi · your comparison$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Mississippi · state comparison

How Mississippi raises taxes

For tax year 2026, Mississippi taxes the first $10,000 of taxable income at 0% and taxable income above $10,000 at 4%. The rate above $10,000 is scheduled to fall to 3.75% for tax year 2027. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

Mississippi · FY2024$2.33B
Mississippi rank#35among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Mississippi stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Mississippi has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Mississippi · $2.33BFY2024 · Rank #35 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Mississippi with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky$5.02B—
#24Louisiana$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma$4.51B—
#27Kansas$4.5B—
#28Iowa$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska$2.48B—
#34Maine$2.4B—
#35Mississippi · your comparison$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding Mississippi income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The Mississippi ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Mississippi candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

23 statements from 11 candidates

2026 Mississippi U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Cliff Johnson

3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · MS

Taxes & tax policy

Over the last few months, DC politicians have slashed health care from middle and working class families to fund tax cuts for the wealthy. They’ve continued to watch as hard working families work 2 and 3 jobs, while still living in poverty, even as big corporations make record profits. They continue…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: A Better Mississippi

Candidate campaign source

Over the last few months, DC politicians have slashed health care from middle and working class families to fund tax cuts for the wealthy. They’ve continued to watch as hard working families work 2 and 3 jobs, while still living in poverty, even as big corporations make record profits. They continue to watch on as a broken criminal justice system locks up more of our people than any nation – disproportionately the poor and people of color, while refusing to fund reentry and substance abuse programs to actually get at the core causes of crime and poverty.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Cliff Johnson — candidate-owned primary source ↗
View 2 more statements from Cliff Johnson
Income & wages

Fund reentry programs that address the causes of crime and poverty.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reentry Programs

Candidate campaign source

Fund reentry programs that address the causes of crime and poverty.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Cliff Johnson — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Income & wages

Fund substance-abuse programs as part of a strategy to address crime and poverty.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Substance-Use Treatment

Candidate campaign source

Fund substance-abuse programs as part of a strategy to address crime and poverty.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Cliff Johnson — candidate-owned primary source ↗

2026 Mississippi U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 5 statements

Bennie Foster

3 statements

Independent · U.S. House District 2 · MS

Taxes & tax policy

Right to Life/ Abortion As a man of strong Christian faith, Bennie Foster believes every human life is a gift from God - and is inherently valuable, and worthy of protection. He believes life begins at conception, when unique DNA is created.While Foster does not support elective abortion, he does be…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Policy Positions

Candidate campaign source

Right to Life/ Abortion As a man of strong Christian faith, Bennie Foster believes every human life is a gift from God - and is inherently valuable, and worthy of protection. He believes life begins at conception, when unique DNA is created.While Foster does not support elective abortion, he does believe exceptions should be allowed in the case of saving the life of the mother, and miscarriage.He believes rather than spending tax dollars funding organizations like planned parenthood which focus on abortion, we should invest in resources that support mothers and their babies from birth throughout postpartum, as well as removing red tape to make adoption an easier option.Additionally, Foster believes fathers must be held accountable for their part in the baby’s life - and held accountable if they pressure a mother to have an abortion. By holding men to the same standard, we encourage them to be present for the mother and their child rather than using abortion as a way to escape consequences for their actions.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Bennie Foster — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from Bennie Foster
Taxes & tax policy

We must improve our educational system by eliminating financial waste, prioritizing the needs of our students, parents, and teachers over the agendas of politicians and special interests. We must be intentional about programs that connect students with career paths and workforce opportunities as ear…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: The Foster Four Foundation

Candidate campaign source

We must improve our educational system by eliminating financial waste, prioritizing the needs of our students, parents, and teachers over the agendas of politicians and special interests. We must be intentional about programs that connect students with career paths and workforce opportunities as early as middle school. Additionally, we must ensure our education system has feasible alternatives for students who may not learn at the same pace as others or require a different environment. We have to make sure our tax dollars are working for the student and the parent, not just the government.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Bennie Foster — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

By implementing and advocating for policies and systems that create transparency from our government, we will work to restore trust and eliminate fraud waste and abuse at the local, state, and federal level. By doing this, we can increase the responsible stewardship of our tax money, saving billions…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Government Accountability

Candidate campaign source

By implementing and advocating for policies and systems that create transparency from our government, we will work to restore trust and eliminate fraud waste and abuse at the local, state, and federal level. By doing this, we can increase the responsible stewardship of our tax money, saving billions of dollars which can be invested into our district. We will also work from a Mississippi first policy, rejecting spending billions on foreign aid and wars while we have needs that are going unmet right here at home.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Bennie Foster — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · MS

Taxes & tax policy

Congressman Thompson has been a long supporter of Agriculture. On Congressman Thompson’s voting record, he has never voted against a Farm Bill during his nine terms in Congress. The Farm Bill is the primary policy tool for agriculture and food policy in the United States. Our most recent Farm Bill w…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Congressman Thompson has been a long supporter of Agriculture. On Congressman Thompson’s voting record, he has never voted against a Farm Bill during his nine terms in Congress. The Farm Bill is the primary policy tool for agriculture and food policy in the United States. Our most recent Farm Bill was enacted in May of 2008. It contains 15 titles covering support for commodity crops, horticulture and livestock production, conservation, nutrition, trade and food aid, agricultural research, farm credit, rural development, energy, forestry, and other related programs. It also includes provisions that make certain changes to tax laws, to offset some new spending initiatives in the final bill. The enacted bill succeeds the most recent 2002 farm bill and is to guide most federal farm and food policies through 2012.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Bennie G. Thompson — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

Ron Eller

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · MS

Taxes & tax policy

Economics is and will remain a challenge going forward. We need fair taxation with good representation. Too often our leadership has put self-interest first and not what’s good for the country as priority number one. An America first policy is critical in order for our families and children to have …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Economics is and will remain a challenge going forward. We need fair taxation with good representation. Too often our leadership has put self-interest first and not what’s good for the country as priority number one. An America first policy is critical in order for our families and children to have a better life.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ron Eller — candidate-owned primary source 14 ↗

2026 Mississippi U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 8 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · MS

Taxes & tax policy

Maintain globally competitive tax rates

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Maintain globally competitive tax rates

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael A. Chiaradio — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 5 more statements from Michael A. Chiaradio
Taxes & tax policy

Simply raising taxes or cutting spending does not solve our problems. We need better spending that invests in our people.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Investing in Our People

Candidate campaign source

Simply raising taxes or cutting spending does not solve our problems. We need better spending that invests in our people.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael A. Chiaradio — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

America needs a balanced tax plan that combines moderate ordinary income taxes with a corporate tax system that limits loopholes and remains competitive with other nations.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Learn more by clicking the dropdown menu:

Candidate campaign source

America needs a balanced tax plan that combines moderate ordinary income taxes with a corporate tax system that limits loopholes and remains competitive with other nations.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael A. Chiaradio — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Material tax increases should be limited in the short term while the federal government commits significant investment to form industrial capital using debt. Our focus should be to increase real domestic production enough that it will more than offset the weakening purchasing power of our currency o…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Learn more by clicking the dropdown menu:

Candidate campaign source

Material tax increases should be limited in the short term while the federal government commits significant investment to form industrial capital using debt. Our focus should be to increase real domestic production enough that it will more than offset the weakening purchasing power of our currency over time.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael A. Chiaradio — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

To help combat the excessive asset concentration that burdens our economy, our corporate tax plan should better incentivize companies to distribute cash to American citizens and, if tax rates increase, it should allow companies to avoid higher rates if they meet targets for broader stock ownership.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Learn more by clicking the dropdown menu:

Candidate campaign source

To help combat the excessive asset concentration that burdens our economy, our corporate tax plan should better incentivize companies to distribute cash to American citizens and, if tax rates increase, it should allow companies to avoid higher rates if they meet targets for broader stock ownership.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael A. Chiaradio — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Avoid rapid tax increases

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Avoid rapid tax increases

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael A. Chiaradio — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Michael Guest

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 3 · MS

Taxes & tax policy

Support free-market tax policy that lowers federal taxes.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes

Candidate campaign source

Support free-market tax policy that lowers federal taxes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Michael Guest — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Michael Guest
Taxes & tax policy

Congressman Guest was first elected to Congress in 2018, making a commitment to the people of Mississippi that he would fight for conservative values and support free market economic policies of lower taxes, fewer regulations, and promoting our Constitutional freedoms and liberties—including the rig…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: About Michael

Candidate campaign source

Congressman Guest was first elected to Congress in 2018, making a commitment to the people of Mississippi that he would fight for conservative values and support free market economic policies of lower taxes, fewer regulations, and promoting our Constitutional freedoms and liberties—including the right to life of the unborn and our 2nd Amendment rights. In Congress, he has also worked to strengthen our agricultural community, fought for stronger border security to stop illegal immigration and drugs, and promoted efforts to secure our nation from terrorist threats. Additionally, Congressman Guest is a strong supporter of our men and women in uniform serving in the Armed Forces, and he is a longtime advocate for our law enforcement officers who do the important work of public safety in our local communities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Michael Guest — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Mississippi candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Mississippi incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Mississippi legislators and Mississippi’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Mississippi’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

4 matching sponsorships or proposals · 4 Mississippi incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

C. Scott Bounds

Mississippi House of Representatives, District 44 · R–MS

1 proposal
View proposals from C. Scott Bounds
Mississippi Legislature · HB 1793

Sales tax; exempt retail sales of firearm safes during annual Mississippi Second Amendment Weekend holiday.

Apr 6, 2026 · Enacted

C. Scott Bounds · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed HB 1793 amendment adds qualifying firearm safes to the annual Second Amendment Weekend sales-tax holiday. Its definition requires a locking container or enclosure intended for firearm storage and excludes glass-faced containers. The existing holiday for firearms, ammunition and hunting supplies is not treated as a newly created exemption. This affects storage costs, not a demonstrated change in firearm deaths. Eligibility requires transfer of title or possession during the holiday, or an order paid for and accepted for immediate shipment during it; a purchaser-requested shipping delay does not qualify under that ordering rule.

Approved by Governor on 2026-04-06. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The mortality series includes firearm deaths across intents, including suicide and homicide. Storage rules and firearm regulation concern possible components of injury prevention without proving an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Mississippi evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(af) (i) Subject to the provisions of this paragraph (af), retail sales of firearms, ammunition * * *, hunting supplies and firearm safes if sold during the annual Mississippi Second Amendment Weekend holiday beginning at 12:01 a.m. on the last Friday in August and ending at 12:00 midnight the following Sunday. For the purposes of this paragraph (af), "hunting supplies" means tangible personal property used for hunting, including, and limited to, archery equipment, firearm and archery cases, firearm and archery accessories, hearing protection, holsters, belts and slings. Hunting supplies does not include animals used for hunting. For the purposes of this paragraph (af), the term "firearm safe" means a locking container or other enclosure, excluding glass-faced containers, equipped with a padlock, key lock, combination lock, or other locking device that is designed and intended for the secure storage of one (1) or more firearms. (ii) This paragraph (af) shall apply only if one or more of the following occur: 1. Title to and/or possession of an eligible item is transferred from a seller to a purchaser; and/or 2. A purchaser orders and pays for an eligible item and the seller accepts the order for immediate shipment, even if delivery is made after the time period provided in subparagraph (i) of this paragraph (af), provided that the purchaser has not requested or caused the delay in shipment.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Fred Shanks

Mississippi House of Representatives, District 60 · R–MS

1 proposal
View proposals from Fred Shanks
Mississippi Legislature · HB 749

Ad valorem tax; extend time for partial exemption and fee-in-lieu of ad valorem tax agreement for certain renewable energy projects.

Feb 12, 2026 · Died on calendar

Fred Shanks · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 749 would extend the qualifying construction-start deadline from December 31, 2027 to December 31, 2030 and the local exemption-authorization deadline from July 1, 2026 to July 1, 2029 for the reviewed renewable-energy project tax provision. The exemption remains locally discretionary. The bill died on the calendar; it did not approve a project or change measured electricity generation. The reviewed section retains a partial exemption for one-half of the property’s true value for ten years after the qualifying fee-in-lieu arrangement expires, rather than a blanket exemption for all project taxes.

02/12 (H) Died On Calendar. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Natural-gas generation is the numerator and all Mississippi in-state electricity generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Financing conditions for renewable generation concern another component of that denominator. An exemption is not an operating plant or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Mississippi evidence context: Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. Section 27-31-46.1, Mississippi Code of 1972, is amended as follows: 27-31-46.1. A project that is eligible for an ad valorem tax exemption under Section 27-31-46, and for which initial construction begins on or after July 1, 2022, but not later than December 31, * * * 2030, may be allowed an exemption from ad valorem taxation as provided in this section. For such a project, one-half (1/2) of the true value of property of the project that is subject to a fee-in-lieu of ad valorem taxes pursuant to an agreement under Section 27-31-104 may be exempted by a county board of supervisors and/or municipal governing authorities from ad valorem taxation for a period of ten (10) years from and after the date of the expiration of such fee-in-lieu of ad valorem taxes. Any exemption from ad valorem taxation allowed under this section must be authorized by a county board of supervisors and/or municipal governing authorities before July 1, * * * 2029.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Kabir Karriem

Mississippi House of Representatives, District 41 · D–MS

1 proposal
View proposals from Kabir Karriem
Mississippi Legislature · HB 526

Minimum wage; establish at $15.00 and set requirements for exemptions and overtime.

Feb 3, 2026 · Died in committee

Kabir Karriem · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed section 2 of HB 526 proposed a $15 hourly minimum wage, a separate $3.62 tipped wage, and time-and-a-half overtime with specified eligibility and nonexempt occupations. It leaves employers and employees not specifically mentioned under the federal FLSA framework. The bill died in committee; the proposed rates did not become effective through this bill. The proposal defines tipped employees as regularly receiving more than $30 per month in tips. It expressly grants overtime eligibility to employees earning $455 or less per week, and to listed occupational or duty categories regardless of salary.

02/03 (H) Died In Committee. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Census household money income is measured before taxes and includes wages and specified cash benefits. Minimum-wage provisions concern earnings; tax credits and in-kind benefits are not themselves increases in this statistic. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Mississippi evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 2. (1) As used in this section, the following words and phrases have the following meanings, unless the context clearly requires otherwise: (a) "Tipped employee" means an employee engaged in an occupation in which the employee customarily and regularly receives more than Thirty Dollars ($30.00) a month in tips. (b) "Manual laborers" and "blue collar workers" mean workers who perform work involving repetitive operations with their hands, physical skill and energy, who gain the skills and knowledge required for performance of their routine manual and physical work through apprenticeships and on-the-job training. (2) Every employer shall pay each of its employees wages at the rate of not less than Fifteen Dollars ($15.00) per hour, except as otherwise provided in this section. (3) Every employer shall pay each of its tipped employees wages at the rate of not less than Three Dollars Sixty-two Cents ($3.62) per hour. (4) Overtime must be compensated at a rate not less than one and one-half (1-1/2) times the regular rate at which the employee is actually employed. The regular rate of pay at which the employee is employed may in no event be less than the statutory minimum wage rate established in this section. All employees who receive Four Hundred Fifty-five Dollars ($455.00) or less per week, or equivalent amounts for periods of pay longer than one (1) week, are entitled to receive overtime pay. Additionally, the following people are not exempt from receiving overtime pay, regardless of their salary: (a) Manual laborers or other blue collar workers; (b) Police officers, detectives, deputy sheriffs, state troopers, highway patrol officers, investigators, inspectors, correctional officers, parole or probation officers, park rangers, firefighters, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, ambulance personnel, rescue workers, hazardous materials workers and similar employees who perform work such as: preventing, controlling or extinguishing fires of any type; rescuing fire, crime or accident victims; preventing or detecting crimes; conducting investigations or inspections for violations of law; performing surveillance; pursuing, restraining and apprehending suspects; detaining or supervising suspected and convicted criminals, including those on probation or parole; interviewing witnesses; interrogating and fingerprinting suspects; preparing investigative reports; or other similar work; (c) An employee whose primary duty is not management of the entity in which the employee is employed; (d) An employee whose primary duty is not the performance of work directly related to the management or general business operations of the employer or the employer's customers; and (e) An employee whose primary duty is not the performance of work requiring knowledge of an advanced type in a field of science or learning customarily acquired by a prolonged course of specialized intellectual instruction or the performance of work requiring invention, imagination, originality or talent in a recognized field of artistic or creative endeavor. (5) Employers and employees who are not specifically mentioned in this section fall under the purview of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Robert L. Johnson III

Mississippi House of Representatives, District 94 · D–MS

1 proposal
View proposals from Robert L. Johnson III
Mississippi Legislature · HB 123

Medicaid; expand eligibility under federal Affordable Care Act.

Feb 3, 2026 · Died in committee

Robert L. Johnson III · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 123 proposed Medicaid eligibility for specified people under 65 who are not pregnant, not entitled to or enrolled in Medicare Parts A or B, otherwise ineligible for Medicaid, and at or below 133% of the applicable federal poverty level stated in the bill. It specifies benchmark or benchmark-equivalent coverage. The bill died in committee; it did not enact Medicaid expansion.

02/03 (H) Died In Committee. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

The fact measures people under age 65 without health insurance. Eligibility for coverage directly concerns this population; payment for a particular service for people already insured does not itself establish expanded insurance enrollment. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Mississippi evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(29) Individuals who are under sixty-five (65) years of age, are not pregnant, are not entitled to or enrolled for benefits under Part A or Part B of Medicare, are not eligible for Medicaid under any other paragraph of this section, and whose income is not more than one hundred thirty-three percent (133%) of the federal poverty level applicable to a family of the size involved. Individuals eligible under this paragraph (29) shall receive benchmark coverage described in Section 1937(b)(1) of the federal Social Security Act, as amended, or benchmark equivalent coverage described in Section 1937(b)(2) of the federal Social Security Act, as amended. The eligibility of individuals covered under this paragraph shall be determined by the Division of Medicaid.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Mississippi officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Mississippi statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.