Mississippi · individual fact

Mississippi housing and borrowing

Home values, gross rent, homeownership, housing cost burdens, and the pressure from prices and incomes.

Median owner-occupied home value$169.8K2020–2024 · #49 of 50 · highest first
Median gross rent$9542020–2024 · #46 of 50 · highest first
Homeownership rate70%2020–2024 · #15 of 50 · highest first

Mississippi over time

Explore Mississippi readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Mississippi officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Mississippi effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Mississippi change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Home-price growth since 2016 Mississippi · source units
MississippiPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Home-price growth since 20162025: +63.9%-7.7%+31.9%+71.6%Mississippi, 2016: +0%Mississippi, 2017: +2.3%Mississippi, 2018: +4.3%Mississippi, 2019: +8%Mississippi, 2020: +12.2%Mississippi, 2021: +22.8%Mississippi, 2022: +39.4%Mississippi, 2023: +47.3%Mississippi, 2024: +54.8%Mississippi, 2025: +63.9%201620202025
✦ Major events & context · 26National context · Housing downturn and the Great Recession · 2007-12-01Great RecessionNational context · Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac conservatorships announced · 2008-09-07Mortgage conservatorshipNational context · Federal Reserve announces agency mortgage-bond purchases · 2008-11-25Mortgage-bond purchasesNational context · Making Home Affordable modification guidelines released · 2009-03-04Mortgage relief guidelinesNational context · Federal Reserve announces another round of mortgage-bond purchases · 2012-09-13Further mortgage supportNational context · Federal Reserve announces slower bond purchases · 2013-12-18Bond purchases slowNational context · Ability-to-Repay mortgage standards take effect · 2014-01-10Mortgage lending standardsNational context · Federal Reserve raises its target above the near-zero range · 2015-12-16Rates leave near zeroNational context · Pandemic shock and emergency mortgage-market support · 2020-03-15COVID-19 / Fed responseNational context · CARES Act introduces mortgage and renter protections · 2020-03-27CARES housing reliefNational context · CDC eviction moratorium takes effect · 2020-09-04CDC eviction protectionsNational context · Treasury launches Emergency Rental Assistance · 2021-01-05Rental assistance launchesNational context · American Rescue Plan funds additional housing assistance · 2021-03-11Additional housing reliefNational context · Supreme Court blocks the renewed CDC eviction moratorium · 2021-08-26CDC moratorium blockedNational context · Federal Reserve begins the 2022 rate-increase cycle · 2022-03-16Rate increases beginNational context · Federal Reserve begins reducing its securities holdings · 2022-06-01Fed holdings begin shrinkingNational context · Freddie Mac changes mortgage-rate measurement · 2022-11-17Mortgage survey updateNational context · Average 30-year mortgage rate reaches 7.79% · 2023-10-26Mortgage rates reach 7.79%National context · Federal Reserve lowers its policy-rate target · 2024-09-18Policy-rate cutNational context · Federal Reserve ends the reduction of total securities holdings · 2025-12-01Fed runoff endsNational context · Federal Reserve cuts its target to 3.50–3.75% · 2025-12-10Further policy-rate cutNational context · Executive order targets federal support for institutional home purchases · 2026-01-20Institutional-buyer orderNational context · Executive order directs review of home-construction barriers · 2026-03-13Home-construction reviewNational context · Executive order directs review of mortgage-credit rules · 2026-03-13Mortgage-credit reviewNational context · 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act becomes law · 2026-07-11ROAD housing lawNational context · Federal Reserve holds its target at 3.50–3.75% · 2026-07-29Policy rate held steady● Mississippi Legislature · 1● U.S. Congress · Mississippi delegation · 1◆ Governor · 1■ Mississippi agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2007-12-012026-07-31

3 of 3 reviewed Mississippi actions match · 3 date markers shown. 26 major events shown separately.

Mississippi · 2025: +63.9% · Rank #44 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016. This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Mississippi Home-price growth since 2016 · source units
PeriodMississippiRankU.S. benchmark
2025+63.9%#44 of 50Not available
2024+54.8%#46 of 50Not available
2023+47.3%#45 of 50Not available
2022+39.4%#45 of 50Not available
2021+22.8%#45 of 50Not available
2020+12.2%#44 of 50Not available
2019+8%#44 of 50Not available
2018+4.3%#45 of 50Not available
2017+2.3%#41 of 50Not available
2016+0%#1 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Mississippi · state comparison

Home values, rent, and homeownership

Census values are estimates for occupied housing, rather than current listing or sale prices.

Mississippi · 2020–2024$169,800
Mississippi rank#49among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$332,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median owner-occupied home value

Median reported value of owner-occupied housing.

2024 dollars; a higher value can benefit owners and make buying harder.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Mississippi stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Mississippi has a dark outline.

Lower value · $162.6KHigher value · $839.1KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Mississippi · $169,8002020–2024 · Rank #49 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Mississippi with every state · 50 ranked
Median owner-occupied home value · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii$839,100—
#2California$734,700—
#3Washington$564,600—
#4Massachusetts$562,100—
#5Colorado$539,400—
#6Utah$489,400—
#7Oregon$477,600—
#8New Jersey$454,400—
#9Nevada$435,400—
#10New York$423,800—
#11Maryland$419,900—
#12Idaho$418,600—
#13Rhode Island$404,200—
#14New Hampshire$402,500—
#15Arizona$394,500—
#16Virginia$383,700—
#17Montana$375,800—
#18Connecticut$366,900—
#19Florida$359,000—
#20Alaska$352,900—
#21Delaware$352,000—
#22Minnesota$329,300—
#23Vermont$316,600—
#24Wyoming$309,700—
#25Georgia$303,300—
#26Maine$296,600—
#27North Carolina$288,900—
#28Tennessee$286,700—
#29Texas$283,800—
#30Wisconsin$266,500—
#31Illinois$263,300—
#32South Carolina$259,000—
#33South Dakota$257,400—
#34Pennsylvania$254,500—
#35North Dakota$249,900—
#36New Mexico$248,100—
#37Nebraska$238,600—
#38Michigan$231,600—
#39Missouri$230,300—
#40Indiana$218,200—
#41Kansas$217,200—
#42Louisiana$216,500—
#43Ohio$214,800—
#44Alabama$209,900—
#45Iowa$208,000—
#46Kentucky$205,600—
#47Oklahoma$199,800—
#48Arkansas$188,000—
#49Mississippi · your comparison$169,800—
#50West Virginia$162,600—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median gross rent

$954/month2020–2024 estimate

Median monthly gross rent for renter-occupied housing units paying cash rent, including contract rent plus estimated average utility and fuel costs paid by the renter.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate and expressed in 2024 dollars.

  • This is a multi-year statewide estimate, not a current asking-rent measure.
  • The median obscures differences by location, unit size, housing quality, and renter circumstances.
Mississippi · state comparison

How much income goes toward housing?

Compare moderate-or-severe and severe housing cost burdens for three distinct housing groups.

Mississippi · 2020–202451.3%
Mississippi rank#17among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark51.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Renters · spending at least 30% of income

Housing costs as a share of household income, excluding households for which a ratio cannot be computed.

Renters and owners have separate denominators. Ratios use the Census computed-income universe.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Mississippi stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Mississippi has a dark outline.

Lower value · 38.9%Higher value · 60.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Mississippi · 51.3%2020–2024 · Rank #17 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Mississippi with every state · 50 ranked
Renters · spending at least 30% of income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Florida60.1%—
#2Hawaii56.7%—
#3Nevada55.9%—
#4California55.3%—
#5Louisiana54.8%—
#6Colorado52.9%—
#7Connecticut52.6%—
#8Oregon52.5%—
#9Georgia52.4%—
#10South Carolina52.1%—
#11New York52.1%—
#12Massachusetts51.8%—
#13Texas51.7%—
#14New Jersey51.6%—
#15Maryland51.5%—
#16Arizona51.4%—
#17Mississippi · your comparison51.3%—
#18Michigan50.4%—
#19New Mexico50.2%—
#20Washington49.9%—
#21Delaware49.6%—
#22North Carolina48.9%—
#23West Virginia48.9%—
#24Tennessee48.8%—
#25Alabama48.8%—
#26Virginia48.5%—
#27Maine48.4%—
#28Vermont48.4%—
#29New Hampshire48.2%—
#30Pennsylvania48.2%—
#31Minnesota48.1%—
#32Indiana48.1%—
#33Rhode Island48%—
#34Illinois47.9%—
#35Utah47.2%—
#36Idaho46.9%—
#37Oklahoma46.3%—
#38Ohio45.9%—
#39Missouri45.6%—
#40Kentucky45.4%—
#41Nebraska45.1%—
#42Arkansas44.8%—
#43Montana44.8%—
#44Alaska44.6%—
#45Iowa43.9%—
#46Wisconsin43.7%—
#47Kansas43.5%—
#48Wyoming43.1%—
#49South Dakota39.8%—
#50North Dakota38.9%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Mississippi · state comparison

Home prices versus income growth

Both series start at 100 in 2016. The gap describes price pressure; it is not a mortgage payment or a price-to-income ratio.

Mississippi · 2025+63.9%
Mississippi rank#44among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Home-price growth since 2016

FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016.

This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Mississippi
Home-price growth since 2016 history in Mississippi-9.6%+31.9%+73.5%20162025
2025 · Mississippi: +63.9% · Rank #44 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Mississippi Home-price growth since 2016 history
PeriodMississippiCompare
2016+0%
2017+2.3%
2018+4.3%
2019+8%
2020+12.2%
2021+22.8%
2022+39.4%
2023+47.3%
2024+54.8%
2025+63.9%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Mississippi stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Mississippi has a dark outline.

Lower value · +38.2%Higher value · +141.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Mississippi · +63.9%2025 · Rank #44 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at the index base (0% growth); #1 means the highest value.

Compare Mississippi with every state · 50 ranked
Home-price growth since 2016 · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Idaho+141.7%—
#2Florida+114.5%—
#3Maine+113.7%—
#4Utah+113.6%—
#5Tennessee+112.4%—
#6Arizona+112.3%—
#7New Hampshire+110.1%—
#8Rhode Island+108%—
#9Georgia+107.6%—
#10North Carolina+107.1%—
#11Montana+106.7%—
#12Nevada+106.1%—
#13South Carolina+105.5%—
#14Washington+100.2%—
#15Indiana+94.5%—
#16Wisconsin+94%—
#17Michigan+93.7%—
#18Ohio+93.3%—
#19Vermont+92.6%—
#20New Jersey+88.9%—
#21Missouri+86.9%—
#22New York+85.9%—
#23Nebraska+84.6%—
#24Massachusetts+84.3%—
#24South Dakota+84.3%—
#26Texas+83.3%—
#27Kentucky+83.2%—
#28Colorado+83.1%—
#29Kansas+82.5%—
#30New Mexico+82.3%—
#31Alabama+81.3%—
#32Arkansas+80.8%—
#33Connecticut+79.8%—
#34Pennsylvania+78.4%—
#35Virginia+76.5%—
#36Delaware+75.4%—
#37Oregon+74.7%—
#38California+72.7%—
#39Oklahoma+71.9%—
#40Minnesota+70%—
#41Wyoming+69.3%—
#42Illinois+65.3%—
#43Iowa+64.2%—
#44Mississippi · your comparison+63.9%—
#45Hawaii+63%—
#46Maryland+59.4%—
#47West Virginia+58.6%—
#48Alaska+51.9%—
#49North Dakota+45.9%—
#50Louisiana+38.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Mississippi · state comparison

Construction, availability, and borrowing

State building activity, vacant units, mortgage performance, and borrowing rates are different measures.

Mississippi · 20258,405
Mississippi rank#36among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1,431,616Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total housing units authorized

New privately owned housing units authorized by building permits; final annual, not seasonally adjusted.

A permit is authorization, not a start or completed home. Absolute counts reflect the size of a state. Units in permit-issuing places; excludes public housing.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Mississippi stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Mississippi has a dark outline.

Lower value · 848Higher value · 210,217Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Mississippi · 8,4052025 · Rank #36 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Mississippi with every state · 50 ranked
Total housing units authorized · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas210,217—
#2Florida178,297—
#3California103,856—
#4North Carolina86,167—
#5Georgia61,196—
#6Arizona51,532—
#7South Carolina45,862—
#8Tennessee43,374—
#9New York38,667—
#10Washington34,913—
#11Colorado33,754—
#12Ohio33,640—
#13Virginia33,094—
#14Indiana29,076—
#15New Jersey27,661—
#16Utah26,775—
#17Pennsylvania25,709—
#18Wisconsin25,569—
#19Michigan23,075—
#20Minnesota20,947—
#21Alabama19,061—
#22Illinois18,551—
#23Nevada18,540—
#24Idaho17,944—
#25Missouri17,474—
#26Oklahoma15,513—
#27Arkansas15,492—
#28Kentucky14,940—
#29Oregon14,839—
#30Louisiana14,203—
#31Iowa13,664—
#32Maryland13,358—
#33Massachusetts12,477—
#34Nebraska10,596—
#35Kansas10,299—
#36Mississippi · your comparison8,405—
#37New Mexico7,747—
#38Connecticut7,273—
#39Maine6,979—
#40Delaware6,468—
#41South Dakota5,305—
#42Montana5,258—
#43New Hampshire5,030—
#44West Virginia3,962—
#45Hawaii3,708—
#46North Dakota2,440—
#47Vermont2,294—
#48Wyoming2,238—
#49Rhode Island1,738—
#50Alaska848—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs from FactVote’s Mississippi candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

11 statements from 2 candidates

2026 Mississippi U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 4 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · MS

Housing & homeownership

While most Americans picture a long-term unsheltered individual when they think of homelessness, the reality is that most people experience it temporarily due to a lost job or medical crisis. For this reason, and for the overall health of our economy, the United States must expand rental and mortgag…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and reproductive policy

Candidate campaign source

While most Americans picture a long-term unsheltered individual when they think of homelessness, the reality is that most people experience it temporarily due to a lost job or medical crisis. For this reason, and for the overall health of our economy, the United States must expand rental and mortgage assistance nationwide. When families are no longer burdened by housing insecurity, more income will flow through local communities and create greater financial stability. However, chronic homelessness also remains a persistent issue. For these individuals, stable housing must come first because the practical reality of their situation often traps them in addiction and makes it nearly impossible for them to hold a job. The chronically homeless need a permanent residence that provides safety, for themselves and others, and the foundation needed to address mental health and addiction. Homelessness is a solvable problem that can be addressed with coordinated investment. By making housing security a national priority, we can strengthen communities and build a more productive society.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael A. Chiaradio — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 3 more statements from Michael A. Chiaradio
Housing & homeownership

Prioritize housing without preconditions

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Prioritize housing without preconditions

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael A. Chiaradio — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Housing & homeownership

Expand housing assistance

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Expand housing assistance

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael A. Chiaradio — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Housing & homeownership

The United States can grow stronger through well-managed immigration but only if we first invest in the infrastructure to support it. Past failures in domestic and foreign policy have left our economy less prepared to handle growth, with insufficient housing, schools, and healthcare to support new a…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Learn more by clicking the dropdown menu:

Candidate campaign source

The United States can grow stronger through well-managed immigration but only if we first invest in the infrastructure to support it. Past failures in domestic and foreign policy have left our economy less prepared to handle growth, with insufficient housing, schools, and healthcare to support new arrivals.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael A. Chiaradio — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Mississippi U.S. Senate — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 7 statements

Ty Pinkins

7 statements

Independent · U.S. Senate · MS

Housing & homeownership

Right now, the United States faces a shortage of over 7 million affordable rental homes for extremely low-income families. Here in Mississippi, for every 100 families in need, there are only 58 affordable and available rental homes. That means too many of our neighbors are living in unsafe, overcrow…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Every Mississippian Deserves a Safe, Affordable Place to Call Home

Candidate campaign source

Right now, the United States faces a shortage of over 7 million affordable rental homes for extremely low-income families. Here in Mississippi, for every 100 families in need, there are only 58 affordable and available rental homes. That means too many of our neighbors are living in unsafe, overcrowded, or unstable conditions—or at risk of homelessness altogether.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ty Pinkins — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
View 6 more statements from Ty Pinkins
Housing & homeownership

My first priority is making sure that every Mississippian has access to safe, affordable housing—housing that provides basic comforts, dignity, and access to opportunity. Whether you live on the Gulf Coast, in the Delta, or anywhere in between, you should be able to find a decent home and afford you…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

My first priority is making sure that every Mississippian has access to safe, affordable housing—housing that provides basic comforts, dignity, and access to opportunity. Whether you live on the Gulf Coast, in the Delta, or anywhere in between, you should be able to find a decent home and afford your rent or mortgage without fear of losing everything.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ty Pinkins — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
Housing & homeownership

I’ll also work to cut taxes for middle-class families and push for increased federal funding for affordable housing—because no one should have to choose between paying rent and putting food on the table.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

I’ll also work to cut taxes for middle-class families and push for increased federal funding for affordable housing—because no one should have to choose between paying rent and putting food on the table.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ty Pinkins — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
Housing & homeownership

Ensure access to affordable housing that provides safety and essential comforts for all Mississippi families.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Every Mississippian Deserves a Safe, Affordable Place to Call Home

Candidate campaign source

Ensure access to affordable housing that provides safety and essential comforts for all Mississippi families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ty Pinkins — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
Housing & homeownership

After someone has served their time and paid their debt to society, they should have a real opportunity to rebuild their life and contribute to their community. That means removing unnecessary barriers to reentry—whether that’s finding work, securing housing, or getting an education. Supporting reha…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety, justice, and civil rights

Candidate campaign source

After someone has served their time and paid their debt to society, they should have a real opportunity to rebuild their life and contribute to their community. That means removing unnecessary barriers to reentry—whether that’s finding work, securing housing, or getting an education. Supporting rehabilitation doesn’t just benefit the individual—it strengthens families, reduces recidivism, and makes communities safer.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ty Pinkins — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Housing & homeownership

Update FEMA rules so that homeowners along the Gulf Coast can repair and upgrade their homes to meet safety codes and better withstand storms.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Update FEMA rules so that homeowners along the Gulf Coast can repair and upgrade their homes to meet safety codes and better withstand storms.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ty Pinkins — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
Housing & homeownership

That experience taught me something I’ve never forgotten: housing is more than just a roof over your head—it’s the foundation for everything else in life. It determines what kind of jobs you can access, which schools your children can attend, and what kind of community you live in. That’s why we mus…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Every Mississippian Deserves a Safe, Affordable Place to Call Home

Candidate campaign source

That experience taught me something I’ve never forgotten: housing is more than just a roof over your head—it’s the foundation for everything else in life. It determines what kind of jobs you can access, which schools your children can attend, and what kind of community you live in. That’s why we must get housing policy right—at both the state and federal level.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ty Pinkins — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs terms in retained, attributed source text from published Mississippi candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Mississippi incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Mississippi legislators and Mississippi’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Mississippi’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

2 matching sponsorships or proposals · 2 Mississippi incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith

U.S. Senate, Mississippi · R–MS

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. Congress · Mississippi delegation · S 470

Respect State Housing Laws Act

Feb 6, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 470 would strike subsection 4024(c) of the CARES Act, which contains the federal notice-to-vacate requirement for covered dwellings, including its 30-day minimum. It does not itself rewrite every state eviction rule or guarantee any rent change. The bill remains pending; the linked statutory reference identifies the provision proposed for deletion.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities and fuel. Rental utility-payment duties and notice-to-vacate rules concern tenancy and housing costs without establishing a change in the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Mississippi evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Respect State Housing Laws Act. 2.ClarificationSection 4024 of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9058) is amended by striking subsection (c).
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Shanda Yates

Mississippi House of Representatives, District 64 · I–MS

1 proposal
View proposals from Shanda Yates
Mississippi Legislature · HB 1404

Fraudulent Utility Conversion; create crime when landlord fails to pay utilities and tenants' utilities are interrupted.

Mar 25, 2026 · Enacted

Shanda Yates · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1404 creates an offense for a person who receives money under a lease to pay utility bills and knowingly, willfully and unlawfully fails to apply it as required, with the failure-to-pay deadline measured as 60 days from receipt of the utility bill, or uses deception. It provides graduated penalties and restitution, with exceptions for insufficient tenant payments and specified utility-company errors. This concerns rental utility payments rather than setting rents.

Approved by Governor on 2026-03-25. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities and fuel. Rental utility-payment duties and notice-to-vacate rules concern tenancy and housing costs without establishing a change in the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Mississippi evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. (1) No person who has received money or payment in accordance with a lease contract or rental agreement to pay utility services shall knowingly, willfully and unlawfully: (a) Fail to apply the money or payment as necessary to satisfy the amount owed for the utility services within sixty (60) days of the person's receipt of the bill for utility services. (b) Use or cause an agent or employee to use any deception, false pretense, or false promise in the failure to apply the money or payment as necessary to satisfy the amount owed for the utility services. (2) (a) When the misappropriation or taking amounts to a value of Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) or more, the offender, upon conviction, shall be imprisoned for not more than twenty (20) years, fined not more than Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00), or both. (b) When the misappropriation or taking amounts to a value of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) or more, but less than a value of Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00), the offender, upon conviction, shall be imprisoned for not more than ten (10) years, fined not more than Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00), or both. (c) When the misappropriation or taking amounts to a value of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) or more, but less than a value of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), the offender, upon conviction, shall be imprisoned for not more than five (5) years, fined not more than Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00), or both. (d) (i) When the misappropriation or taking amounts to less than a value of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), the offender, upon conviction, shall be imprisoned for not more than six (6) months in the county jail, fined not more than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), or both. (ii) If the offender convicted under subparagraph (i) of this paragraph has been convicted two (2) or more times previously, upon any subsequent conviction, the offender shall be imprisoned for not more than two (2) years, fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00), or both. (e) In addition to the penalties provided in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this subsection, a person convicted under the provisions of this section shall be ordered to make full restitution to the victim and any other person who has suffered a financial loss as a result of the offense pursuant to Chapter 37, Title 99, Mississippi Code of 1972. (3) The provisions of this section shall not apply if the person who has received money or payment for utility services is unable to pay the bill for utility services because either: (a) The tenant or lessee has failed to timely pay sufficient funds to satisfy the specific amount owed in the bill for utility services. (b) The reason for the delay in receipt of either the bill or payment for utility services is due to an administrative, clerical, or technical error or omission on behalf of the company providing utility services. (4) For purposes of this section: (a) "Person" means a natural or juridical person, including, but not limited to, a sole proprietorship, corporation, company, limited liability company, partnership, limited liability partnership, trust, incorporated or unincorporated association, or any other individual or entity. "Person" shall also include any representative, director, trustee, agent, or officer of a juridical person who is authorized and responsible for making payments for utility services. (b) "Utility services" means any water, electricity, gas, heat, or sewer services, whether privately, municipally, cooperatively, or investor-owned.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Mississippi officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Mississippi statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.