Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.
High school or higher87.1%2020–2024 · #48 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher36.1%2020–2024 · #47 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher25.1%2020–2024 · #49 of 50 · highest first
Mississippi over time
Explore Mississippi readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Mississippi officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Mississippi effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Mississippi change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Grade 4 reading Mississippi · source units
MississippiPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
4 of 4 reviewed Mississippi actions match · 3 date markers shown. 20 major events shown separately.
Mississippi · 2024: 218.5 · Rank #9 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215
FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Mississippi. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Mississippi · state comparison
Adult educational attainment
Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.
Mississippi · 2020–202487.1%
Mississippi rank#48among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
High school or higher
Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.
Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Mississippi stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Mississippi has a dark outline.
Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Mississippi · 87.1%2020–2024 · Rank #48 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Mississippi with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Vermont
94.9%
—
#2
Maine
94.8%
—
#3
Montana
94.6%
—
#4
New Hampshire
94.4%
—
#5
Wyoming
94.2%
—
#6
North Dakota
94%
—
#7
Minnesota
93.9%
—
#8
Wisconsin
93.6%
—
#9
Alaska
93.6%
—
#10
Utah
93.4%
—
#11
Iowa
93.3%
—
#12
South Dakota
93.2%
—
#13
Hawaii
93.2%
—
#14
Colorado
92.9%
—
#15
Washington
92.3%
—
#16
Nebraska
92.2%
—
#17
Pennsylvania
92.1%
—
#18
Michigan
92.1%
—
#19
Kansas
92%
—
#20
Idaho
91.9%
—
#21
Missouri
91.9%
—
#22
Oregon
91.8%
—
#23
Ohio
91.8%
—
#24
Delaware
91.7%
—
#25
Virginia
91.6%
—
#26
Connecticut
91.5%
—
#27
Massachusetts
91.4%
—
#28
Maryland
91.1%
—
#29
New Jersey
90.7%
—
#30
Illinois
90.5%
—
#31
Indiana
90.4%
—
#32
North Carolina
90.1%
—
#33
South Carolina
90.1%
—
#34
Tennessee
90%
—
#35
Florida
89.9%
—
#36
Rhode Island
89.7%
—
#37
Oklahoma
89.4%
—
#38
Arizona
89.4%
—
#39
West Virginia
89.3%
—
#40
Georgia
89.2%
—
#41
Kentucky
88.9%
—
#42
Arkansas
88.7%
—
#43
Alabama
88.6%
—
#44
New Mexico
88%
—
#45
New York
88%
—
#46
Nevada
87.5%
—
#47
Louisiana
87.3%
—
#48
Mississippi · your comparison
87.1%
—
#49
Texas
86%
—
#50
California
84.7%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Share of Mississippi residents age 25 and older whose reported attainment is a regular high school diploma or equivalent (including GED or an alternative credential), some college, or an associate’s or higher degree.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.
This is an adult educational-attainment measure, not a current high-school graduation rate or a measure of school quality.
A statewide estimate can obscure differences across communities and demographic groups.
NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.
Mississippi · 2024218.5
Mississippi rank#9among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Grade 4 reading
FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Mississippi. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.
NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Mississippi
2024 · Mississippi: 218.5 · Rank #9 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Mississippi Grade 4 reading history
Period
Mississippi
Compare
2003
205.5
2005
204.4
2007
207.8
2009
210.5
2011
209.2
2013
208.5
2015
214.1
2017
215.2
2019
219.3
2022
217.2
2024
218.5
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Mississippi stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Mississippi has a dark outline.
Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Mississippi · 218.52024 · Rank #9 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Mississippi with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Massachusetts
224.8
—
#2
Wyoming
221.9
—
#3
New Jersey
221.6
—
#4
New Hampshire
221.5
—
#5
Colorado
220.9
—
#6
Indiana
220.1
—
#7
Utah
219.3
—
#8
Connecticut
219.2
—
#9
Mississippi · your comparison
218.5
—
#10
Florida
218.2
—
#11
Kentucky
218
—
#12
Montana
217.2
—
#13
Rhode Island
216.3
—
#14
Louisiana
216
—
#14
Ohio
216
—
#16
Hawaii
215.8
—
#16
Pennsylvania
215.8
—
#18
Idaho
215.7
—
#18
Washington
215.7
—
#20
Maryland
215.6
—
#21
North Dakota
215.5
—
#22
Wisconsin
215.3
—
#23
Tennessee
215.1
—
#24
South Carolina
214.9
—
#25
Iowa
214.6
—
#25
New York
214.6
—
#27
Georgia
214.4
—
#27
Minnesota
214.4
—
#29
Illinois
214.2
—
#30
South Dakota
214.1
—
#30
Virginia
214.1
—
#32
North Carolina
213.4
—
#33
Alabama
213.2
—
#34
Kansas
213.1
—
#34
Nevada
213.1
—
#36
Vermont
212.7
—
#37
Missouri
211.9
—
#37
Texas
211.9
—
#39
California
211.7
—
#39
Nebraska
211.7
—
#41
Arkansas
209.7
—
#42
Maine
209.6
—
#43
Delaware
209.5
—
#44
Michigan
209.1
—
#45
Arizona
208.1
—
#46
Oklahoma
207.3
—
#47
Oregon
207
—
#48
West Virginia
205.9
—
#49
Alaska
201.6
—
#50
New Mexico
200.6
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.
Mississippi · FY2024$12,324
Mississippi rank#46among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Current spending per pupil
Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.
Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Mississippi stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Mississippi has a dark outline.
Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Mississippi · $12,324FY2024 · Rank #46 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Mississippi with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New York
$31,918
—
#2
Vermont
$28,818
—
#3
New Jersey
$27,234
—
#4
Connecticut
$26,316
—
#5
Massachusetts
$24,429
—
#6
Hawaii
$23,878
—
#7
New Hampshire
$22,978
—
#8
Delaware
$22,201
—
#9
Rhode Island
$22,110
—
#10
Illinois
$21,776
—
#11
Pennsylvania
$21,091
—
#12
Alaska
$21,004
—
#13
California
$20,791
—
#14
Wyoming
$20,521
—
#15
Maryland
$20,208
—
#16
Maine
$19,962
—
#17
Washington
$18,564
—
#18
Michigan
$18,314
—
#19
Oregon
$18,083
—
#20
New Mexico
$17,664
—
#21
Ohio
$17,257
—
#22
Virginia
$17,104
—
#23
North Dakota
$17,102
—
#24
Minnesota
$17,098
—
#25
Nebraska
$16,147
—
#26
Wisconsin
$15,952
—
#27
Colorado
$15,908
—
#28
Georgia
$15,833
—
#29
West Virginia
$15,640
—
#30
Louisiana
$15,581
—
#31
Kansas
$15,558
—
#32
South Carolina
$15,060
—
#33
Nevada
$14,812
—
#34
Kentucky
$14,596
—
#35
Iowa
$14,369
—
#36
Missouri
$14,241
—
#37
Arkansas
$13,873
—
#38
Montana
$13,656
—
#39
Alabama
$13,627
—
#40
Indiana
$13,622
—
#41
North Carolina
$12,995
—
#42
Texas
$12,895
—
#43
Tennessee
$12,882
—
#44
South Dakota
$12,828
—
#45
Florida
$12,693
—
#46
Mississippi · your comparison
$12,324
—
#47
Oklahoma
$12,162
—
#48
Arizona
$12,003
—
#49
Utah
$11,347
—
#50
Idaho
$11,060
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.
Mississippi · 2021–2289%
Mississippi rank#9among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark87%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate
Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.
Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Mississippi
2021–22 · Mississippi: 89% · Rank #9 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 87% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Mississippi Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
Period
Mississippi
Compare
2011–12
75%
2012–13
76%
2013–14
78%
2014–15
81%
2015–16
82%
2016–17
83%
2017–18
84%
2018–19
85%
2019–20
88%
2020–21
88%
2021–22
89%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Mississippi stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Mississippi has a dark outline.
Lower value · 77%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Mississippi · 89%2021–22 · Rank #9 of 48, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Mississippi with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2021–22 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
West Virginia
91%
—
#2
Iowa
90%
—
#2
Kentucky
90%
—
#2
Massachusetts
90%
—
#2
Missouri
90%
—
#2
Tennessee
90%
—
#2
Texas
90%
—
#2
Wisconsin
90%
—
#9
Connecticut
89%
—
#9
Kansas
89%
—
#9
Mississippi · your comparison
89%
—
#9
Virginia
89%
—
#13
Alabama
88%
—
#13
Arkansas
88%
—
#13
Delaware
88%
—
#13
Indiana
88%
—
#13
New Hampshire
88%
—
#13
Utah
88%
—
#19
California
87%
—
#19
Florida
87%
—
#19
Illinois
87%
—
#19
Nebraska
87%
—
#19
New York
87%
—
#19
Pennsylvania
87%
—
#25
Hawaii
86%
—
#25
Maine
86%
—
#25
Maryland
86%
—
#25
Montana
86%
—
#25
North Carolina
86%
—
#25
Ohio
86%
—
#31
New Jersey
85%
—
#31
North Dakota
85%
—
#33
Georgia
84%
—
#33
Minnesota
84%
—
#33
South Carolina
84%
—
#33
Washington
84%
—
#37
Louisiana
83%
—
#37
Rhode Island
83%
—
#37
Vermont
83%
—
#40
Colorado
82%
—
#40
Nevada
82%
—
#40
South Dakota
82%
—
#40
Wyoming
82%
—
#44
Michigan
81%
—
#44
Oregon
81%
—
#46
Idaho
80%
—
#47
Alaska
78%
—
#48
Arizona
77%
—
—
New Mexico
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—
Oklahoma
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.
Mississippi · 2022–23$9,120
Mississippi rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees
Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.
2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Mississippi stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Mississippi has a dark outline.
Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Mississippi · $9,1202022–23 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Mississippi with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Vermont
$17,600
—
#2
New Hampshire
$17,019
—
#3
Pennsylvania
$16,217
—
#4
Connecticut
$15,763
—
#5
New Jersey
$15,265
—
#6
Illinois
$14,921
—
#7
Virginia
$14,825
—
#8
Rhode Island
$14,744
—
#9
Michigan
$14,718
—
#10
Massachusetts
$14,345
—
#11
Minnesota
$12,873
—
#12
South Carolina
$12,604
—
#13
Oregon
$12,424
—
#14
Delaware
$11,922
—
#15
Arizona
$11,768
—
#16
Kentucky
$11,299
—
#17
Alabama
$11,081
—
#18
Ohio
$10,922
—
#19
Maine
$10,813
—
#20
Hawaii
$10,484
—
#21
Tennessee
$10,437
—
#22
Iowa
$10,121
—
#23
Maryland
$10,041
—
#24
Missouri
$9,926
—
#25
Indiana
$9,886
—
#26
Louisiana
$9,843
—
#27
Colorado
$9,798
—
#28
North Dakota
$9,728
—
#29
Kansas
$9,274
—
#30
Mississippi · your comparison
$9,120
—
#31
South Dakota
$9,079
—
#32
Wisconsin
$8,974
—
#33
Arkansas
$8,879
—
#34
Nebraska
$8,862
—
#35
West Virginia
$8,715
—
#36
California
$8,637
—
#37
New York
$8,575
—
#38
Oklahoma
$8,519
—
#39
Alaska
$8,291
—
#40
Texas
$8,195
—
#41
Washington
$8,006
—
#42
Idaho
$7,640
—
#43
New Mexico
$7,526
—
#44
North Carolina
$7,327
—
#45
Montana
$7,299
—
#46
Utah
$7,215
—
#47
Georgia
$7,075
—
#48
Nevada
$6,723
—
#49
Wyoming
$5,100
—
#50
Florida
$4,540
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
4 of 4 reviewed Mississippi actions · newest first
Apr 8, 2026 · HB 538 · Sanctuary policies; prohibit certain government entities and employees from adopting or interfering with federal immigration enforcement. · EnactedMississippi Legislature · HB 538
Sanctuary policies; prohibit certain government entities and employees from adopting or interfering with federal immigration enforcement.
Apr 8, 2026 · Enacted
Lee Yancey · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 538 broadens the prohibition on sanctuary policies, requires specified state and local entities and employees to cooperate with lawful federal immigration enforcement, and directs Attorney General investigation and enforcement. The text includes immigration detainers and information sharing. It does not establish particular detentions, removals or current enforceability.
Approved by Governor on 2026-04-08. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and both lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. The reviewed immigration provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or determine any particular resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Mississippi evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. Section 25-1-119, Mississippi Code of 1972, is amended as follows: 25-1-119. (1) No * * * agency * * * or department * * * of this state; county, municipality or any other political subdivision of this state * * *; university, college, community college or junior college * * *; or any agent, employee * * *, officer or law enforcement agency thereof shall adopt, * * * implement or have in effect a policy, order * * *, ordinance, practice or procedure, that (a) limits, restricts, bans or interferes with the enforcement of lawful federal immigration laws by any person; ( * * *b) limits or prohibits any person from communicating or cooperating with federal agencies or officials to verify or report the immigration status of any person; or ( * * *c) grants to any person the right to lawful presence or status within the state, or a county * * *, municipality or any other political subdivision of the state, or the campus of a university, college, community college or junior college in violation of state or federal law. (2) Any policy, order * * *, ordinance practice or procedure, adopted in violation of this section shall be invalid and void from the date of its adoption or enactment and shall have no force or effect. (3) All agencies and departments of this state; counties, municipalities and any other political subdivisions of this state; universities, colleges, community colleges and junior colleges; and all agents, employees, officers and law enforcement agencies thereof shall cooperate to the fullest extent possible with the federal government and other state and local governments in enforcing lawful federal immigration laws, complying with any immigration detainer request issued by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and providing information on all aliens within the state when requested by federal and other state and local government agencies, departments and law enforcement officials. (4) The Attorney General shall investigate any agency or department of this state; county, municipality or any other political subdivision of this state; university, college, community college or junior college; or any agent, employee, officer or law enforcement agency thereof alleged to be in violation of this section and upon finding a violation, the Attorney General shall: (i) Bring an action for declaratory or injunctive relief to compel compliance; (ii) Seek any other relief authorized by law to enforce this section; and (iii) Pursue enforcement against any state or local official or employee to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 8, 2026 · HB 538 · Sanctuary policies; prohibit certain government entities and employees from adopting or interfering with federal immigration enforcement. · SignedGovernor · HB 538
Sanctuary policies; prohibit certain government entities and employees from adopting or interfering with federal immigration enforcement.
Apr 8, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Tate Reeves · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Tate Reeves signed HB 538. HB 538 broadens the prohibition on sanctuary policies, requires specified state and local entities and employees to cooperate with lawful federal immigration enforcement, and directs Attorney General investigation and enforcement. The text includes immigration detainers and information sharing. It does not establish particular detentions, removals or current enforceability.
Approved by Governor on 2026-04-08. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and both lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. The reviewed immigration provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or determine any particular resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Mississippi evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. Section 25-1-119, Mississippi Code of 1972, is amended as follows: 25-1-119. (1) No * * * agency * * * or department * * * of this state; county, municipality or any other political subdivision of this state * * *; university, college, community college or junior college * * *; or any agent, employee * * *, officer or law enforcement agency thereof shall adopt, * * * implement or have in effect a policy, order * * *, ordinance, practice or procedure, that (a) limits, restricts, bans or interferes with the enforcement of lawful federal immigration laws by any person; ( * * *b) limits or prohibits any person from communicating or cooperating with federal agencies or officials to verify or report the immigration status of any person; or ( * * *c) grants to any person the right to lawful presence or status within the state, or a county * * *, municipality or any other political subdivision of the state, or the campus of a university, college, community college or junior college in violation of state or federal law. (2) Any policy, order * * *, ordinance practice or procedure, adopted in violation of this section shall be invalid and void from the date of its adoption or enactment and shall have no force or effect. (3) All agencies and departments of this state; counties, municipalities and any other political subdivisions of this state; universities, colleges, community colleges and junior colleges; and all agents, employees, officers and law enforcement agencies thereof shall cooperate to the fullest extent possible with the federal government and other state and local governments in enforcing lawful federal immigration laws, complying with any immigration detainer request issued by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and providing information on all aliens within the state when requested by federal and other state and local government agencies, departments and law enforcement officials. (4) The Attorney General shall investigate any agency or department of this state; county, municipality or any other political subdivision of this state; university, college, community college or junior college; or any agent, employee, officer or law enforcement agency thereof alleged to be in violation of this section and upon finding a violation, the Attorney General shall: (i) Bring an action for declaratory or injunctive relief to compel compliance; (ii) Seek any other relief authorized by law to enforce this section; and (iii) Pursue enforcement against any state or local official or employee to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Feb 3, 2026 · SB 2815 · Storage of a firearm; create minimum duty of care and criminalize negligent storage. · Died in committeeMississippi Legislature · SB 2815
Storage of a firearm; create minimum duty of care and criminalize negligent storage.
Feb 3, 2026 · Died in committee
Angela Turner Ford · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 2815 would require reasonable care to prevent unauthorized minor access to a firearm outside the owner’s immediate control. The proposed misdemeanor requires knowing or reckless unsecured storage, access without lawful permission, and subsequent discharge, threatening/injuring use, or transport to school or another prohibited location. It exempts secured guns accessed through unlawful entry or theft, specified lawful activities with parental permission and supervision, and a minor under the owner’s immediate control at access. It creates no private cause of action, permits no home inspections and disclaims strict liability absent negligent conduct. The bill died in committee.
02/03 (S) Died In Committee. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
The mortality series includes firearm deaths across intents, including suicide and homicide. Storage rules and firearm regulation concern possible components of injury prevention without proving an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Mississippi evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. As used in this act: (a) "Immediate control" means a firearm carried on a person or within such proximity that a person can prevent access by a minor. (b) "Securely stored firearm" means a firearm that is stored in a manner that a reasonable person would believe prevents unauthorized access by a minor, including, but not limited to, a locked container, gun safe, or mechanical locking device. SECTION 2. (1) Any person who owns, possesses, or controls a firearm shall exercise reasonable care to prevent access to the firearm by a minor when the firearm is not under the person's immediate control. (2) This section establishes a minimum standard of care and does not create a private cause of action. SECTION 3. (1) A person commits the offense of negligent storage of a firearm if: (a) The person knowingly or recklessly stores or leaves a firearm unsecured; and (b) A minor gains access to the firearm without lawful permission; and (c) The minor discharges the firearm, uses the firearm to threaten or injure any person, or transports the firearm onto school property or any other location where possession of a firearm is unlawful. (2) A person convicted under subsection (1) of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) or imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed six (6) months, or by both fine and imprisonment. SECTION 4. There shall be no civil or criminal liability under Section 2 or 3 of this act where: (a) The firearm was secured but accessed through unlawful entry or theft; (b) The minor was using the firearm in lawful hunting, sporting or agricultural activity with parental permission and supervision; or (c) The minor was under immediate control of the owner at the time of the access. SECTION 5. Nothing in this act shall authorize the inspection of private residences, impose strict liability absent negligent conduct, or be construed to infringe upon the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution or Article 3, Section 12 of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Feb 3, 2026 · HB 163 · Hope Program; establish and develop system to re-enroll high school dropouts in programs leading to a high school diploma. · Died in committeeMississippi Legislature · HB 163
Hope Program; establish and develop system to re-enroll high school dropouts in programs leading to a high school diploma.
Feb 3, 2026 · Died in committee
Omeria Scott · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed opening provisions of HB 163 would establish the HOPE program to re-enroll high-school dropouts through age 21, with grants subject to appropriation and possible district, college and community partnerships. Participants seeking diplomas would still have to meet district graduation requirements. The bill died in committee and does not establish enrollment or future diploma attainment.
02/03 (H) Died In Committee. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
The fact measures diploma-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. Programs for younger students concern a possible future component of adult attainment rather than the previously measured population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Mississippi evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. (1) There is established the Hope and Opportunity Pathways through Education (HOPE) Program. The State Department of Education shall implement and administer the HOPE Program. The goal of the HOPE Program is to develop a comprehensive system in this state to re—enroll significant numbers of high school dropouts in programs that will enable them to earn their high school diploma. (2) Through the HOPE Program, the State Department of Education shall award grants, subject to appropriation for this purpose, to school districts to assist in establishing instructional programs and other services designed to re—enroll high school dropouts. The HOPE Program may provide incentive grant funds for a school district to develop partnerships with other school districts, public community colleges and community groups to build comprehensive plans to re—enroll high school dropouts in their regions or districts. Programs funded through the HOPE Program must allow high school dropouts, up to and including persons twenty-one (21) years of age, to re-enroll in an educational program in conformance with rules adopted by the State Board of Education. Programs may include, without limitation, comprehensive year—round programming, evening school, summer school, community college courses, adult education, vocational training, work experience, programs to enhance self-concept and parenting courses. Any student in the HOPE Program who wishes to earn a high school diploma must meet the prerequisites to receiving a high school diploma and any other graduation requirements of the student's school district of residence. Any student who successfully completes the requirements for his or her graduation must be awarded a diploma identifying the student as graduating from his or her school district of residence.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Mississippi officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s Mississippi candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
36 statements from 9 candidates
2026 Mississippi U.S. House — District 1 — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements
Now, at the MacArthur Justice Center at the University of Mississippi Law School, Cliff works to reform a broken criminal legal system that punishes the poor and too often makes us less safe. He's shut down debtors’ prisons where poor people have been jailed illegally because they simply cannot affo…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Standing Up for Us
Candidate campaign source
Now, at the MacArthur Justice Center at the University of Mississippi Law School, Cliff works to reform a broken criminal legal system that punishes the poor and too often makes us less safe. He's shut down debtors’ prisons where poor people have been jailed illegally because they simply cannot afford the misdemeanor fines, successfully fought to end the unconstitutional practice of locking poor Mississippians up for months and years without a lawyer, and took on a private prison on behalf of hundreds of correctional officers forced to clock out but go back to work without pay.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
We must stop the brain drain by enacting policies that retain our students and best talent. We cannot afford to be left behind as the world moves forward. Foster wants the next generation of Mississippians to have a seat at the table - rather than being told “wait your turn”. It’s time for right rep…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Foster Our Future
Candidate campaign source
We must stop the brain drain by enacting policies that retain our students and best talent. We cannot afford to be left behind as the world moves forward. Foster wants the next generation of Mississippians to have a seat at the table - rather than being told “wait your turn”. It’s time for right representation, right now. No more ball hogging while our district keeps losing. It’s time to step into our future.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
We must improve our educational system by eliminating financial waste, prioritizing the needs of our students, parents, and teachers over the agendas of politicians and special interests. We must be intentional about programs that connect students with career paths and workforce opportunities as ear…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: The Foster Four Foundation
Candidate campaign source
We must improve our educational system by eliminating financial waste, prioritizing the needs of our students, parents, and teachers over the agendas of politicians and special interests. We must be intentional about programs that connect students with career paths and workforce opportunities as early as middle school. Additionally, we must ensure our education system has feasible alternatives for students who may not learn at the same pace as others or require a different environment. We have to make sure our tax dollars are working for the student and the parent, not just the government.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Congressman Thompson has diligently fought to reverse discrimination in the higher education system of Mississippi as an original plaintiff in the Ayers Desegregation Case. He has historically used the court system as an avenue for change on the local, state, and federal levels; lawsuits include eff…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Civil Rights
Candidate campaign source
Congressman Thompson has diligently fought to reverse discrimination in the higher education system of Mississippi as an original plaintiff in the Ayers Desegregation Case. He has historically used the court system as an avenue for change on the local, state, and federal levels; lawsuits include efforts to have duly elected officials assume office, state redistricting efforts and played an instrumental role in the Black farmers case – paving the way for more than 20,000 farmers to file under the consent decree. In conclusion, Congressman Thompson believes that our courts should provide rulings of non-biased justice, that hiring and promotional practices should flow evenly and fluidly across genders lines, that small business owners should be afforded the opportunity to take advantage of expansion opportunities which will aid in their development and growth and that the everyday citizens should be able to function without the threat of encroachment or violation of their civil rights.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Congressman Thompson is committed to working to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). The primary source of federal aid to K-12 education is the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, particularly its Title I, Part A program of Education for the Disadvantaged.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Civil Rights
Candidate campaign source
Congressman Thompson is committed to working to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). The primary source of federal aid to K-12 education is the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, particularly its Title I, Part A program of Education for the Disadvantaged.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
In 1975, having firsthand knowledge of the disparity between funding, equipment, and supplies provided to historically black universities and those provided to white colleges, Thompson filed a lawsuit to increase funding at Mississippi’s historically black universities. With Thompson as lead plainti…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Bennie Thompson for Congress
Candidate campaign source
In 1975, having firsthand knowledge of the disparity between funding, equipment, and supplies provided to historically black universities and those provided to white colleges, Thompson filed a lawsuit to increase funding at Mississippi’s historically black universities. With Thompson as lead plaintiff, the case was subsequently settled for an unprecedented $503 million.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Everyday, Congressman Thompson witnesses the inequities that continue to exist in this great country of ours. His progressive, yet realistic, approach is to overcome the disparities and be the unabashed champion for civil rights, equal education, and healthcare reform not only for his constituents b…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Bennie Thompson for Congress
Candidate campaign source
Everyday, Congressman Thompson witnesses the inequities that continue to exist in this great country of ours. His progressive, yet realistic, approach is to overcome the disparities and be the unabashed champion for civil rights, equal education, and healthcare reform not only for his constituents but also for all Americans.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
While earning his Bachelor of Science and Masters of Science degrees from Tougaloo College and Jackson State University, respectively, Thompson began to develop his grassroots political activism. He joined the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), and helped to organize voter registratio…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Bennie Thompson for Congress
Candidate campaign source
While earning his Bachelor of Science and Masters of Science degrees from Tougaloo College and Jackson State University, respectively, Thompson began to develop his grassroots political activism. He joined the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), and helped to organize voter registration drives for African-Americans in the Mississippi Delta. As a product of the Civil Rights Movement, Thompson has remained committed to ensuring that all people are allowed to exercise their fundamental rights.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Education is paramount for our future as a world leader. In order for our nation to compete and lead from the front, we must raise and train the next generation of leaders, inventors, scientists, and entrepreneurs. Not only do we need to train the youth of our nation, but we also need to reform the …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Candidate statement
Candidate campaign source
Education is paramount for our future as a world leader. In order for our nation to compete and lead from the front, we must raise and train the next generation of leaders, inventors, scientists, and entrepreneurs. Not only do we need to train the youth of our nation, but we also need to reform the prison population. By reforming the prison population we can make them productive members of society.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
The MAHA ("Make America Healthy Again") movement, largely driven by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), focuses on addressing chronic disease through nutrition reform, scrutinizing environmental toxins, and overhauling public health institutions. The most widely kn…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: America's Medical System is Broken
Candidate campaign source
The MAHA ("Make America Healthy Again") movement, largely driven by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), focuses on addressing chronic disease through nutrition reform, scrutinizing environmental toxins, and overhauling public health institutions. The most widely known parts of the movement include: * Food and Nutrition Reform: This is a central and broadly popular aspect of MAHA. Initiatives include phasing out petroleum-based artificial food dyes and other chemical additives (like Red dye No. 3) from the U.S. food supply, overhauling the FDA's "Generally Recognized as Safe" (GRAS) loophole, and promoting whole, unprocessed foods. There is also a push to restrict ultra-processed foods, candy, and soda in federal programs like SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) and school meal plans. * Environmental Chemicals: The movement places a strong emphasis on the role of environmental toxins in chronic disease. It frequently criticizes specific pesticides like glyphosate and atrazine, and seeks to reduce exposure to chemicals like PFAS and phthalates. * Vaccine Policy and "Medical Freedom": A highly visible, though more controversial, part involves scrutinizing vaccine safety and the childhood vaccine schedule, and promoting "medical freedom" and informed consent. This includes calls for more transparency and the investigation of potential links between certain medical products (like acetaminophen and some psychiatric medications) and childhood conditions, despite a lack of consensus from mainstream scientific bodies. * Transparency and Research: A key policy goal is bringing "radical transparency" to government health data and ensuring that federally funded health research is free from conflicts of interest. * Lifestyle and Preventive Care: The movement advocates for preventive healthcare through lifestyle changes, such as physical activity initiatives (like the re-establishment of the Presidential Fitness Test) and addressing the harms of excessive screen time.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
The church and State are independent of one another. However, the church cannot be removed from the fabric of our nation. Per the US Constitution Art 4 Sec 3 via Northwest Ordinance; “Art 3 Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools, a…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education and workforce development
Candidate campaign source
The church and State are independent of one another. However, the church cannot be removed from the fabric of our nation. Per the US Constitution Art 4 Sec 3 via Northwest Ordinance; “Art 3 Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools, and the means of education shall forever be encouraged.” Read More
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
The United States can grow stronger through well-managed immigration but only if we first invest in the infrastructure to support it. Past failures in domestic and foreign policy have left our economy less prepared to handle growth, with insufficient housing, schools, and healthcare to support new a…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Learn more by clicking the dropdown menu:
Candidate campaign source
The United States can grow stronger through well-managed immigration but only if we first invest in the infrastructure to support it. Past failures in domestic and foreign policy have left our economy less prepared to handle growth, with insufficient housing, schools, and healthcare to support new arrivals.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published Mississippi candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Mississippi incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Mississippi legislators and Mississippi’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Mississippi’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Mississippi incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Storage of a firearm; create minimum duty of care and criminalize negligent storage.
Feb 3, 2026 · Died in committee
Angela Turner Ford · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 2815 would require reasonable care to prevent unauthorized minor access to a firearm outside the owner’s immediate control. The proposed misdemeanor requires knowing or reckless unsecured storage, access without lawful permission, and subsequent discharge, threatening/injuring use, or transport to school or another prohibited location. It exempts secured guns accessed through unlawful entry or theft, specified lawful activities with parental permission and supervision, and a minor under the owner’s immediate control at access. It creates no private cause of action, permits no home inspections and disclaims strict liability absent negligent conduct. The bill died in committee.
02/03 (S) Died In Committee. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
The mortality series includes firearm deaths across intents, including suicide and homicide. Storage rules and firearm regulation concern possible components of injury prevention without proving an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Mississippi evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. As used in this act: (a) "Immediate control" means a firearm carried on a person or within such proximity that a person can prevent access by a minor. (b) "Securely stored firearm" means a firearm that is stored in a manner that a reasonable person would believe prevents unauthorized access by a minor, including, but not limited to, a locked container, gun safe, or mechanical locking device. SECTION 2. (1) Any person who owns, possesses, or controls a firearm shall exercise reasonable care to prevent access to the firearm by a minor when the firearm is not under the person's immediate control. (2) This section establishes a minimum standard of care and does not create a private cause of action. SECTION 3. (1) A person commits the offense of negligent storage of a firearm if: (a) The person knowingly or recklessly stores or leaves a firearm unsecured; and (b) A minor gains access to the firearm without lawful permission; and (c) The minor discharges the firearm, uses the firearm to threaten or injure any person, or transports the firearm onto school property or any other location where possession of a firearm is unlawful. (2) A person convicted under subsection (1) of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) or imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed six (6) months, or by both fine and imprisonment. SECTION 4. There shall be no civil or criminal liability under Section 2 or 3 of this act where: (a) The firearm was secured but accessed through unlawful entry or theft; (b) The minor was using the firearm in lawful hunting, sporting or agricultural activity with parental permission and supervision; or (c) The minor was under immediate control of the owner at the time of the access. SECTION 5. Nothing in this act shall authorize the inspection of private residences, impose strict liability absent negligent conduct, or be construed to infringe upon the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution or Article 3, Section 12 of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890.
Mississippi House of Representatives, District 74 · R–MS
1 proposalView proposals from Lee YanceyMississippi Legislature · HB 538
Sanctuary policies; prohibit certain government entities and employees from adopting or interfering with federal immigration enforcement.
Apr 8, 2026 · Enacted
Lee Yancey · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 538 broadens the prohibition on sanctuary policies, requires specified state and local entities and employees to cooperate with lawful federal immigration enforcement, and directs Attorney General investigation and enforcement. The text includes immigration detainers and information sharing. It does not establish particular detentions, removals or current enforceability.
Approved by Governor on 2026-04-08. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and both lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. The reviewed immigration provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or determine any particular resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Mississippi evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. Section 25-1-119, Mississippi Code of 1972, is amended as follows: 25-1-119. (1) No * * * agency * * * or department * * * of this state; county, municipality or any other political subdivision of this state * * *; university, college, community college or junior college * * *; or any agent, employee * * *, officer or law enforcement agency thereof shall adopt, * * * implement or have in effect a policy, order * * *, ordinance, practice or procedure, that (a) limits, restricts, bans or interferes with the enforcement of lawful federal immigration laws by any person; ( * * *b) limits or prohibits any person from communicating or cooperating with federal agencies or officials to verify or report the immigration status of any person; or ( * * *c) grants to any person the right to lawful presence or status within the state, or a county * * *, municipality or any other political subdivision of the state, or the campus of a university, college, community college or junior college in violation of state or federal law. (2) Any policy, order * * *, ordinance practice or procedure, adopted in violation of this section shall be invalid and void from the date of its adoption or enactment and shall have no force or effect. (3) All agencies and departments of this state; counties, municipalities and any other political subdivisions of this state; universities, colleges, community colleges and junior colleges; and all agents, employees, officers and law enforcement agencies thereof shall cooperate to the fullest extent possible with the federal government and other state and local governments in enforcing lawful federal immigration laws, complying with any immigration detainer request issued by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and providing information on all aliens within the state when requested by federal and other state and local government agencies, departments and law enforcement officials. (4) The Attorney General shall investigate any agency or department of this state; county, municipality or any other political subdivision of this state; university, college, community college or junior college; or any agent, employee, officer or law enforcement agency thereof alleged to be in violation of this section and upon finding a violation, the Attorney General shall: (i) Bring an action for declaratory or injunctive relief to compel compliance; (ii) Seek any other relief authorized by law to enforce this section; and (iii) Pursue enforcement against any state or local official or employee to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Mississippi House of Representatives, District 80 · D–MS
1 proposalView proposals from Omeria ScottMississippi Legislature · HB 163
Hope Program; establish and develop system to re-enroll high school dropouts in programs leading to a high school diploma.
Feb 3, 2026 · Died in committee
Omeria Scott · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed opening provisions of HB 163 would establish the HOPE program to re-enroll high-school dropouts through age 21, with grants subject to appropriation and possible district, college and community partnerships. Participants seeking diplomas would still have to meet district graduation requirements. The bill died in committee and does not establish enrollment or future diploma attainment.
02/03 (H) Died In Committee. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
The fact measures diploma-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. Programs for younger students concern a possible future component of adult attainment rather than the previously measured population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Mississippi evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. (1) There is established the Hope and Opportunity Pathways through Education (HOPE) Program. The State Department of Education shall implement and administer the HOPE Program. The goal of the HOPE Program is to develop a comprehensive system in this state to re—enroll significant numbers of high school dropouts in programs that will enable them to earn their high school diploma. (2) Through the HOPE Program, the State Department of Education shall award grants, subject to appropriation for this purpose, to school districts to assist in establishing instructional programs and other services designed to re—enroll high school dropouts. The HOPE Program may provide incentive grant funds for a school district to develop partnerships with other school districts, public community colleges and community groups to build comprehensive plans to re—enroll high school dropouts in their regions or districts. Programs funded through the HOPE Program must allow high school dropouts, up to and including persons twenty-one (21) years of age, to re-enroll in an educational program in conformance with rules adopted by the State Board of Education. Programs may include, without limitation, comprehensive year—round programming, evening school, summer school, community college courses, adult education, vocational training, work experience, programs to enhance self-concept and parenting courses. Any student in the HOPE Program who wishes to earn a high school diploma must meet the prerequisites to receiving a high school diploma and any other graduation requirements of the student's school district of residence. Any student who successfully completes the requirements for his or her graduation must be awarded a diploma identifying the student as graduating from his or her school district of residence.
Only current Mississippi officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Mississippi statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Mississippi snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Mississippi, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.