Minnesota · individual fact

Minnesota prices and inflation

Compare Minnesota’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide Minnesota CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level98.62024 · #21 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level100.52024 · #10 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level91.32024 · #22 of 50 · highest first

Minnesota over time

Explore Minnesota readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Minnesota officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Minnesota effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Minnesota change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level Minnesota · source units
MinnesotaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 98.695.798.4101Minnesota, 2014: 98.3Minnesota, 2015: 97.7Minnesota, 2016: 97.2Minnesota, 2017: 96.7Minnesota, 2018: 99.6Minnesota, 2019: 98.8Minnesota, 2020: 97.8Minnesota, 2021: 98.4Minnesota, 2022: 97.5Minnesota, 2023: 98.3Minnesota, 2024: 98.6201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 27National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shock● Minnesota Legislature · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.● U.S. Congress · Minnesota delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ Minnesota agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-02-28

0 of 0 reviewed Minnesota actions match · 0 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.

Minnesota · 2024: 98.6 · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Minnesota with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Minnesota All-items price level · source units
PeriodMinnesotaRankU.S. benchmark
202498.6#21 of 50100
202398.3#19 of 50100
202297.5#21 of 50100
202198.4#19 of 50100
202097.8#21 of 50100
201998.8#20 of 50100
201899.6#18 of 50100
201796.7#26 of 50100
201697.2#24 of 50100
201597.7#23 of 50100
201498.3#20 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Minnesota · state comparison

How does Minnesota’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

Minnesota · 202498.6
Minnesota rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Minnesota with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Minnesota
All-items price level history in Minnesota96.298.4100.520142024
2024 · Minnesota: 98.6 · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Minnesota All-items price level history
PeriodMinnesotaCompare
201498.3
201597.7
201697.2
201796.7
201899.6
201998.8
202097.8
202198.4
202297.5
202398.3
202498.6

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Minnesota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Minnesota has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Minnesota · 98.62024 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Minnesota with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota · your comparison98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Minnesota · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Minnesota · 20243%
Minnesota rank#18among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Minnesota
Annual change in regional price deflator history in Minnesota-1.5%3%7.6%20152024
2024 · Minnesota: 3% · Rank #18 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Minnesota Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodMinnesotaCompare
2015-0.5%
20160.5%
20171.3%
20185.1%
20190.6%
20200.1%
20214.8%
20225.5%
20234.7%
20243%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Minnesota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Minnesota has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Minnesota · 3%2024 · Rank #18 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Minnesota with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota · your comparison3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Minnesota · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

Minnesota · 2024$62,039
Minnesota rank#13among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Minnesota
Real personal income per person history in Minnesota$45.32K$55.45K$65.58K20142024
2024 · Minnesota: $62,039 · Rank #13 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Minnesota Real personal income per person history
PeriodMinnesotaCompare
2014$51,761
2015$54,124
2016$54,535
2017$55,771
2018$55,408
2019$56,749
2020$60,139
2021$63,244
2022$61,533
2023$61,394
2024$62,039

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Minnesota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Minnesota has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Minnesota · $62,0392024 · Rank #13 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Minnesota with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota · your comparison$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Minnesota candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

28 statements from 11 candidates

2026 Minnesota Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 10 statements

Amy Klobuchar

5 statements

Democratic-Farmer-Labor · Governor · MN

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

As our U.S. Senator, Amy Klobuchar has fought to lower health care costs by leading the fight for the law that finally allowed Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices, and fighting anti-competitive practices that keep affordable generics off pharmacy shelves and raise prices for prescri…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: 1. Lower Health Care Costs

Candidate campaign source

As our U.S. Senator, Amy Klobuchar has fought to lower health care costs by leading the fight for the law that finally allowed Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices, and fighting anti-competitive practices that keep affordable generics off pharmacy shelves and raise prices for prescription drugs. As Governor, she will build on that work to lower prescription drug costs by expanding state bulk purchasing of drugs and prioritizing lower-cost generics and biosimilars. Klobuchar will also bring down premiums, strengthen reinsurance to hold down premiums, support small businesses in covering their employees, and help Minnesotans without employer coverage afford insurance.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amy Klobuchar — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 4 more statements from Amy Klobuchar
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Minnesota has a shortage of approximately 100,000 homes. The fastest way to lower housing costs is to build and rehabilitate homes to reduce that shortage. As Governor, Amy Klobuchar is committed to filling the housing gap by putting us on a path to build at least 100,000 homes, condos, and apartmen…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Build More Homes, Faster

Candidate campaign source

Minnesota has a shortage of approximately 100,000 homes. The fastest way to lower housing costs is to build and rehabilitate homes to reduce that shortage. As Governor, Amy Klobuchar is committed to filling the housing gap by putting us on a path to build at least 100,000 homes, condos, and apartments.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amy Klobuchar — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Klobuchar and Schierer know that one-size-fits-all solutions don’t work for rural communities. Together they will make it easier for farmers to grow and produce more products, work with rural Minnesotans to find new markets, and support Minnesotans who are inventing things and exporting to the world…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: A plan to expand Minnesota’s rural and agricultural economy.

Candidate campaign source

Klobuchar and Schierer know that one-size-fits-all solutions don’t work for rural communities. Together they will make it easier for farmers to grow and produce more products, work with rural Minnesotans to find new markets, and support Minnesotans who are inventing things and exporting to the world. They’ll protect rural health care and support rural hospitals at risk of closing by protecting their 340B discount from efforts to restrict it, lower housing costs by working with the private sector to build more homes, and create new apprenticeships and one- to four-year degree programs and beyond, so that Minnesotans can afford to live, work, and raise a family in rural Minnesota. Because kids who grow up in rural Minnesota should be able to stay in rural Minnesota.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amy Klobuchar — candidate-owned primary source 15 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

As Governor, Amy Klobuchar will keep fighting to lower health care costs so families can afford to get the care they need. She’ll work to negotiate lower prescription drug prices. She’ll hold companies accountable and ensure what they charge actually reflects the cost of care. She’ll improve access …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Make Health Care More Affordable and Accessible

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, Amy Klobuchar will keep fighting to lower health care costs so families can afford to get the care they need. She’ll work to negotiate lower prescription drug prices. She’ll hold companies accountable and ensure what they charge actually reflects the cost of care. She’ll improve access to care by strengthening hospitals and clinics, especially in rural areas, expanding our health care workforce, and modernizing IT systems. She will always protect a woman’s right to make her own health care decisions.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amy Klobuchar — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

As governor, Amy Klobuchar will work to lower costs that have been going through the roof across the country — essentials like housing, child care, and health care. She’ll take action to build more homes for Minnesotans, supporting first-time homebuyers, renters, and growing families who need more s…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Lower Costs for Minnesotans

Candidate campaign source

As governor, Amy Klobuchar will work to lower costs that have been going through the roof across the country — essentials like housing, child care, and health care. She’ll take action to build more homes for Minnesotans, supporting first-time homebuyers, renters, and growing families who need more space. She’ll work with child care providers, employers, and schools to expand access to child care. She’ll build on her years of fighting — and beating — Big Pharma to lower prescription drug prices for Minnesotans. And she’ll hold the line on utility bills by modernizing Minnesota’s power grid and adding more affordable, renewable energy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amy Klobuchar — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Ben Schierer

5 statements

Democratic-Farmer-Labor · Lieutenant Governor · MN

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Minnesota has a shortage of approximately 100,000 homes. The fastest way to lower housing costs is to build and rehabilitate homes to reduce that shortage. As Governor, Amy Klobuchar is committed to filling the housing gap by putting us on a path to build at least 100,000 homes, condos, and apartmen…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Build More Homes, Faster

Candidate campaign source

Minnesota has a shortage of approximately 100,000 homes. The fastest way to lower housing costs is to build and rehabilitate homes to reduce that shortage. As Governor, Amy Klobuchar is committed to filling the housing gap by putting us on a path to build at least 100,000 homes, condos, and apartments.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Ben Schierer campaign source 4 ↗
View 4 more statements from Ben Schierer
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

As governor, Amy Klobuchar will work to lower costs that have been going through the roof across the country — essentials like health care, housing, child care, and utility bills. She’ll build on her years of fighting — and beating — Big Pharma to lower prescription drug prices for Minnesotans. She’…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Klobuchar–Schierer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

As governor, Amy Klobuchar will work to lower costs that have been going through the roof across the country — essentials like health care, housing, child care, and utility bills. She’ll build on her years of fighting — and beating — Big Pharma to lower prescription drug prices for Minnesotans. She’ll take action to build more homes for Minnesotans, supporting first-time homebuyers, renters, and growing families who need more space. She’ll work with child care providers, employers, and schools to expand access to child care. And she’ll hold the line on utility bills by modernizing Minnesota’s power grid and adding more affordable, renewable energy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Ben Schierer campaign source 2 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Read Amy Klobuchar’s plan to lower housing costs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Klobuchar–Schierer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Read Amy Klobuchar’s plan to lower housing costs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Ben Schierer campaign source 2 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Klobuchar and Schierer know that one-size-fits-all solutions don’t work for rural communities. Together they will make it easier for farmers to grow and produce more products, work with rural Minnesotans to find new markets, and support Minnesotans who are inventing things and exporting to the world…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: A plan to expand Minnesota’s rural and agricultural economy.

Candidate campaign source

Klobuchar and Schierer know that one-size-fits-all solutions don’t work for rural communities. Together they will make it easier for farmers to grow and produce more products, work with rural Minnesotans to find new markets, and support Minnesotans who are inventing things and exporting to the world. They’ll protect rural health care and support rural hospitals at risk of closing by protecting their 340B discount from efforts to restrict it, lower housing costs by working with the private sector to build more homes, and create new apprenticeships and one- to four-year degree programs and beyond, so that Minnesotans can afford to live, work, and raise a family in rural Minnesota. Because kids who grow up in rural Minnesota should be able to stay in rural Minnesota.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Ben Schierer — candidate-owned primary source 15 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

As governor, Amy Klobuchar will work to lower costs that have been going through the roof across the country — essentials like housing, child care, and health care. She’ll take action to build more homes for Minnesotans, supporting first-time homebuyers, renters, and growing families who need more s…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Lower Costs for Minnesotans

Candidate campaign source

As governor, Amy Klobuchar will work to lower costs that have been going through the roof across the country — essentials like housing, child care, and health care. She’ll take action to build more homes for Minnesotans, supporting first-time homebuyers, renters, and growing families who need more space. She’ll work with child care providers, employers, and schools to expand access to child care. She’ll build on her years of fighting — and beating — Big Pharma to lower prescription drug prices for Minnesotans. And she’ll hold the line on utility bills by modernizing Minnesota’s power grid and adding more affordable, renewable energy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Ben Schierer campaign source 2 ↗

2026 Minnesota U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Brad Finstad

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · MN

CPI / inflation mention

Brad ran on a simple premise: Washington, D.C. sorely needs Midwestern common sense. He rejects the D.C. culture of “going viral” and chasing 30-second soundbites, focusing instead on delivering tangible relief driving down costs for working families facing record-high inflation. He currently serves…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taking Midwestern Common Sense to Washington

Candidate campaign source

Brad ran on a simple premise: Washington, D.C. sorely needs Midwestern common sense. He rejects the D.C. culture of “going viral” and chasing 30-second soundbites, focusing instead on delivering tangible relief driving down costs for working families facing record-high inflation. He currently serves on the House Committee on Agriculture, House Committee on Small Business, and the House Armed Services Committee, ensuring that rural communities always have a seat at the table.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Brad Finstad — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

2026 Minnesota U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Matt Little

2 statements

Democratic-Farmer-Labor · U.S. House District 2 · MN

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Meanwhile, one hyperscale facility could increase Minnesota’s electricity demand by 4% – the equivalent of adding 285,000 homes. Data centers threaten to drive up energy bills for working families and businesses.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Fighting to Regulate AI and Data Centers

Candidate campaign source

Meanwhile, one hyperscale facility could increase Minnesota’s electricity demand by 4% – the equivalent of adding 285,000 homes. Data centers threaten to drive up energy bills for working families and businesses.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Matt Little — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
View 1 more statement from Matt Little
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

In the State Senate, I led the fight for affordable insulin and improved prescription drug coverage. The federal government has the power to fix this; it provides health services and has massive purchasing power. But big insurance and pharmaceutical companies are standing in the way, protecting thei…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Increasing Affordability and Accessibility

Candidate campaign source

In the State Senate, I led the fight for affordable insulin and improved prescription drug coverage. The federal government has the power to fix this; it provides health services and has massive purchasing power. But big insurance and pharmaceutical companies are standing in the way, protecting their profits. Medicare only began negotiating drug prices in 2025, but the current list of drugs is too limited. We should expand Medicare and Medicaid’s ability to negotiate for lower prices on most prescription medicines. That would not only lower costs for patients, but it would save billions in taxpayer dollars.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Matt Little — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Minnesota candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Minnesota incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Minnesota legislators and Minnesota’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Minnesota’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

0 matching sponsorships or proposals · 0 Minnesota incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

No retained proposals match these filters. A missing record does not mean an incumbent has taken no action.

What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Minnesota officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Minnesota statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.