Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price19.3¢/kWh2024 · #12 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.893/gal2026-08 · #26 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$119.312024 · #37 of 50 · highest first
Michigan over time
Explore Michigan readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Michigan officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Michigan effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Michigan change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price Michigan · source units
MichiganPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
69 of 69 reviewed Michigan actions match · 61 date markers shown. 48 major events shown separately.
Michigan · 2024: 19.3¢/kWh · Rank #12 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
FactVote combines EIA annual utility-scale generation with estimated small-scale solar generation, then groups sources into seven categories. For 2016 Michigan, EIA marked the industrial small-scale estimate and the all-sector total as not meaningful; FactVote adds the published residential and commercial estimates and does not impute the undisclosed industrial value. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour. Generation is electricity produced inside Michigan, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. Michigan's 2016 solar and total-generation values omit an undisclosed industrial small-scale estimate that EIA marked not meaningful because of a large relative standard error or excessive percentage change. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Michigan Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Michigan · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
Michigan · 202419.3¢/kWh
Michigan rank#12among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
FactVote combines EIA annual utility-scale generation with estimated small-scale solar generation, then groups sources into seven categories. For 2016 Michigan, EIA marked the industrial small-scale estimate and the all-sector total as not meaningful; FactVote adds the published residential and commercial estimates and does not impute the undisclosed industrial value. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour.
Generation is electricity produced inside Michigan, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. Michigan's 2016 solar and total-generation values omit an undisclosed industrial small-scale estimate that EIA marked not meaningful because of a large relative standard error or excessive percentage change. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Michigan
2024 · Michigan: 19.3¢/kWh · Rank #12 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Michigan Residential electricity price history
Period
Michigan
Compare
2015
14.42¢/kWh
2016
15.22¢/kWh
2017
15.4¢/kWh
2018
15.45¢/kWh
2019
15.74¢/kWh
2020
16.26¢/kWh
2021
17.54¢/kWh
2022
17.86¢/kWh
2023
18.84¢/kWh
2024
19.3¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Michigan · 19.3¢/kWh2024 · Rank #12 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan · your comparison
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations, including taxes, in EIA's Midwest petroleum district. The district includes Michigan and 14 other states.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent weekly prices
Prior week
$3.934/gal
Weekly change
−8.7¢
One year earlier
$3.088/gal
Change from one year earlier
+75.9¢
Method and limitations
U.S. Energy Information Administration weekly retail motor-gasoline survey estimate for the Midwest region. FactVote displays the published dollars-per-gallon value and calculates changes from EIA's published prior-week and nearest year-earlier weekly observations.
EIA does not publish a current Michigan statewide weekly gasoline-price series; this Midwest regional estimate should not be read as Michigan's statewide average.
The regional estimate combines 15 states and does not represent the price at every station or in every Michigan community.
The series is nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns, and weekly estimates can be revised.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
Michigan · 2024$119.31
Michigan rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Michigan
2024 · Michigan: $119.31 · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Michigan Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
Michigan
Compare
2010
$84.82
2011
$90.63
2012
$95.5
2013
$96.95
2014
$94.52
2015
$93.61
2016
$101.64
2017
$97.41
2018
$103.59
2019
$100.23
2020
$109.86
2021
$117.57
2022
$116.49
2023
$113.62
2024
$119.31
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Michigan · $119.312024 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan · your comparison
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
Michigan · 2024124.5 TWh
Michigan rank#11among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
FactVote combines EIA annual utility-scale generation with estimated small-scale solar generation, then groups sources into seven categories. For 2016 Michigan, EIA marked the industrial small-scale estimate and the all-sector total as not meaningful; FactVote adds the published residential and commercial estimates and does not impute the undisclosed industrial value. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour.
Generation is electricity produced inside Michigan, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. Michigan's 2016 solar and total-generation values omit an undisclosed industrial small-scale estimate that EIA marked not meaningful because of a large relative standard error or excessive percentage change. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Michigan
2024 · Michigan: 124.5 TWh · Rank #11 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Michigan Total electricity generation history
Period
Michigan
Compare
2015
113 TWh
2016
112.1 TWh
2017
112.3 TWh
2018
115.8 TWh
2019
116.7 TWh
2020
106.6 TWh
2021
115.5 TWh
2022
117.5 TWh
2023
120.7 TWh
2024
124.5 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Michigan · 124.5 TWh2024 · Rank #11 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan · your comparison
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
Michigan · 2024481.7 min/year
Michigan rank#19among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Michigan
2024 · Michigan: 481.7 min/year · Rank #19 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Michigan Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
Michigan
Compare
2023
1,127.7 min/year
2024
481.7 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Michigan · 481.7 min/year2024 · Rank #19 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan · your comparison
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
Michigan · 2024661.4 trillion Btu
Michigan rank#10among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Michigan · 661.4 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #10 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan · your comparison
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
Michigan · 2024143.11 Mt CO₂
Michigan rank#10among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Michigan · 143.11 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #10 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan · your comparison
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
69 of 69 reviewed Michigan actions · newest first
Aug 27, 2026 · HB 6264 · Businesses: other; clean and renewable energy requirements for data centers; provide for. Creates new act. · bill electronically reproduced 08/26/2026Michigan Legislature · HB 6264
Businesses: other; clean and renewable energy requirements for data centers; provide for. Creates new act.
Aug 27, 2026 · bill electronically reproduced 08/26/2026
Rep. Brenda Carter · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated August 27, 2026 records: bill electronically reproduced 08/26/2026.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed generation mix.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Michigan electricity generation by source. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Businesses: other; clean and renewable energy requirements for data centers; provide for.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 2, 2026 · HB 6011 · Businesses: other; cybersecurity requirements for large-scale solar energy facilities; provide for. Amends 2008 PA 295 (MCL 460.1001 - 460.1232) by adding sec. 112a. · bill electronically reproduced 05/21/2026Michigan Legislature · HB 6011
Businesses: other; cybersecurity requirements for large-scale solar energy facilities; provide for. Amends 2008 PA 295 (MCL 460.1001 - 460.1232) by adding sec. 112a.
Jun 2, 2026 · bill electronically reproduced 05/21/2026
Rep. Reggie Miller · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated June 2, 2026 records: bill electronically reproduced 05/21/2026.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed generation mix.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Michigan electricity generation by source. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Businesses: other; cybersecurity requirements for large-scale solar energy facilities; provide for.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 20, 2026 · H.Res.1028 · Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States must act urgently to end the political and economic dominance of billionaire oligarchs, halt the corporate subsidies and tax advantages that fortify their power, and reinvest in the needs of the American people to defend democracy from authoritarianism. · IntroducedU.S. Congress · Michigan delegation · H.Res.1028
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States must act urgently to end the political and economic dominance of billionaire oligarchs, halt the corporate subsidies and tax advantages that fortify their power, and reinvest in the needs of the American people to defend democracy from authoritarianism.
May 20, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Rashida Tlaib · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed generation mix.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Michigan electricity generation by source. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Lee of Pennsylvania) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, Ways and Means, Education and Workforce, Energy and Commerce, Financial Services, and Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concernedRESOLUTIONExpressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United…
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 14, 2026 · HB 5711 · Energy: alternative sources; clean and renewable energy standards; eliminate. Amends title & secs. 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, 75, 77, 83, 87, 101, 173 & 191 of 2008 PA 295 (MCL 460.1001 et seq.) & repeals subpt. A of pt. 2 & sec. 179 of 2008 PA 295 (MCL 460.1022 - 460.1054 & 460.1179). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5710'26 · REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONSMichigan Legislature · HB 5711
Energy: alternative sources; clean and renewable energy standards; eliminate. Amends title & secs. 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, 75, 77, 83, 87, 101, 173 & 191 of 2008 PA 295 (MCL 460.1001 et seq.) & repeals subpt. A of pt. 2 & sec. 179 of 2008 PA 295 (MCL 460.1022 - 460.1054 & 460.1179). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5710'26
May 14, 2026 · REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
Rep. Pat Outman · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated May 14, 2026 records: REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed generation mix.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Michigan electricity generation by source. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Energy: alternative sources; clean and renewable energy standards; eliminate.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 12, 2026 · HB 5927 · Public utilities: electric utilities; net metering program for rooftop solar; provide for. Amends sec. 173 of 2008 PA 295 (MCL 460.1173) & adds sec. 173a. · Rep. Tonya Myers Phillips removed as cosponsor 04/30/2026Michigan Legislature · HB 5927
Public utilities: electric utilities; net metering program for rooftop solar; provide for. Amends sec. 173 of 2008 PA 295 (MCL 460.1173) & adds sec. 173a.
May 12, 2026 · Rep. Tonya Myers Phillips removed as cosponsor 04/30/2026
Rep. Reggie Miller · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated May 12, 2026 records: Rep. Tonya Myers Phillips removed as cosponsor 04/30/2026.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed generation mix.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Michigan electricity generation by source. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Public utilities: electric utilities; net metering program for rooftop solar; provide for.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 30, 2026 · H.R.8609 · Vehicle Innovation Act of 2026 · IntroducedU.S. Congress · Michigan delegation · H.R.8609
Vehicle Innovation Act of 2026
Apr 30, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Debbie Dingell · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed generation mix.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Michigan electricity generation by source. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Vehicle research and development (a) Program (1) Activities The Secretary shall conduct a program of basic and applied research, development, engineering, demonstration, and commercial application activities on materials, technologies, and processes with the potential to substantially reduce petroleum use and the emissions of the passenger and commercial vehicles of the United States, including activities in the areas of— (A) electrification of vehicle systems; (B) batteries, ultracapacitors, and other energy…
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Michigan officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Michigan candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
24 statements from 10 candidates
2026 Michigan Governor of Michigan — General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 8 statements
Eliminate Solar and Wind Farms on state land to protect natural resources. Large-scale solar and wind farms damage Michigan’s forests, lakes, farms, and wildlife. Restricting these installations to rooftops safeguards our environment while still supporting renewable energy in a way that aligns with …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Policies
Candidate campaign source
Eliminate Solar and Wind Farms on state land to protect natural resources. Large-scale solar and wind farms damage Michigan’s forests, lakes, farms, and wildlife. Restricting these installations to rooftops safeguards our environment while still supporting renewable energy in a way that aligns with Michigan’s values.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026
As governor, Jocelyn will implement checks and guardrails to shape projects and ensure a transparent process approving any new projects. With clear standards and enforceable requirements, Michigan can invest in growing the jobs of the future while embracing opportunities to support our clean-energy …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Data centers and community safeguards
Candidate campaign source
As governor, Jocelyn will implement checks and guardrails to shape projects and ensure a transparent process approving any new projects. With clear standards and enforceable requirements, Michigan can invest in growing the jobs of the future while embracing opportunities to support our clean-energy and power grid buildout. Data centers and corporations that violate these guardrails will not be able to operate in Michigan.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Today, Jocelyn Benson is out with her latest statewide television ad, “Michigan First,” where she pledges to put people over profits as the next Governor — calling for a moratorium on data center projects in Michigan, an end to tax breaks for data center companies, and safeguards that ensure data ce…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Jocelyn Benson Calls for Moratorium on Data Centers in New “Michigan First” Ad
Candidate campaign source
Today, Jocelyn Benson is out with her latest statewide television ad, “Michigan First,” where she pledges to put people over profits as the next Governor — calling for a moratorium on data center projects in Michigan, an end to tax breaks for data center companies, and safeguards that ensure data centers don’t raise electricity bills for Michiganders. Jocelyn called for a moratorium on data centers until we can put strict, enforceable guardrails in place to protect Michiganders, and require them to hire Michigan union workers.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Michigan is home to twenty percent of the world's fresh surface water. It's one of our most unique advantages and preserving it is one of our most profound responsibilities. 15 million people in the Great Lakes region get their drinking water from the Great Lakes, while our recreational and northern…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Environment, water, and clean energy
Candidate campaign source
Michigan is home to twenty percent of the world's fresh surface water. It's one of our most unique advantages and preserving it is one of our most profound responsibilities. 15 million people in the Great Lakes region get their drinking water from the Great Lakes, while our recreational and northern Michigan economy is reliant on clean, resilient fresh water in those lakes. And in this era of rapid climate change, protecting our water, air, and natural resources preserves what makes Michigan special and ensures it is a safe, healthy home for all of us — for generations to come.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Caring for our environment, protecting human health, creating good-paying jobs, and lowering costs for Michigan families aren't competing priorities. They're the same fight. Clean, renewable energy is the cheapest form of energy. When we invest in clean energy, we lower utility bills. When we hold p…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Environment, water, and clean energy
Candidate campaign source
Caring for our environment, protecting human health, creating good-paying jobs, and lowering costs for Michigan families aren't competing priorities. They're the same fight. Clean, renewable energy is the cheapest form of energy. When we invest in clean energy, we lower utility bills. When we hold polluters accountable, we protect the drinking water families depend on. When we lead in clean manufacturing, we create the union jobs that keep Michigan's economy strong. Every choice we make about our natural resources is a choice about what kind of state we're building — and who it's built for. If we make the right choices now, we can leave the next generation a Michigan that's more affordable, prosperous, cleaner, safer, and stronger than the one we inherited.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Utility companies ask for rate increases while Michiganders wonder where the money they are putting aside to pay these skyrocketing bills is going. Will it eliminate outages and modernize our energy grid? Or is it only going to increase the profits of corporations and CEOs?As governor I will use eve…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy and utility costs
Candidate campaign source
Utility companies ask for rate increases while Michiganders wonder where the money they are putting aside to pay these skyrocketing bills is going. Will it eliminate outages and modernize our energy grid? Or is it only going to increase the profits of corporations and CEOs?As governor I will use every tool available to me to bring our energy costs down.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Our district is the poster child for communities in need of the Green New Deal. It’s no secret to every person in this district that we have lead in our water and some of the most polluted air in the country. No one can be expected to raise a family without clean air & water. My grandmother, my moth…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Environmental & Climate Justice
Candidate campaign source
Our district is the poster child for communities in need of the Green New Deal. It’s no secret to every person in this district that we have lead in our water and some of the most polluted air in the country. No one can be expected to raise a family without clean air & water. My grandmother, my mother, my brother, and I all have the same asthmatic cough that is all too common for anyone who grew up in the shadow of our city’s smokestacks and factories. I’m not willing to let another generation of my family or yours suffer the same fate that we have while the fossil fuel companies who are driving this crisis — like DTE and Consumers Energy — raise our utility prices, make record profits year after year, and buy our politicians’ inaction. It’s time to break the cycle and understand that we need a solution as large as the climate crisis itself. A Green New Deal transitioning to 100% clean and renewable energy, would protect our planet’s future and create millions of good-paying green union jobs in Michigan. It’s also a more efficient and sustainable source of energy that will lower energy requirements and consumer costs, while improving our community’s health and cleaning our air & water. And one critical aspect of that for us in metro Detroit is investment to build and expand public transit, so people have the freedom and mobility to get to work, go to the supermarket, and pick up their kids without having to buy a car and pay some of the highest car insurance rates in the country. We deserve choices that corporations won’t let us have. We’re paying the price for this crisis built by greedy CEOs — but they’re the ones who should be paying to fix it.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Michigan candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Michigan incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Michigan legislators and Michigan’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Michigan’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
49 matching sponsorships or proposals · 34 Michigan incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Energy: alternative sources; renewable energy standard; increase, and establish a carbon-free energy standard. Amends title & heading to subpt. A, art 2 & secs. 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, 22, 28, 29, 45, 47 & 49 of 2008 PA 295 (MCL 460.1001 et seq.) & adds secs. 32, 34, 50, 51, 52 & 53.
Jun 15, 2023 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Rep. Betsy Coffia · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated June 15, 2023 records: bill electronically reproduced 06/15/2023. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed generation mix.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Michigan electricity generation by source. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Energy: alternative sources; renewable energy standard; increase, and establish a carbon-free energy standard.
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Brenda CarterMichigan Legislature · HB 6264
Businesses: other; clean and renewable energy requirements for data centers; provide for. Creates new act.
Aug 27, 2026 · bill electronically reproduced 08/26/2026
Rep. Brenda Carter · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated August 27, 2026 records: bill electronically reproduced 08/26/2026.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed generation mix.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Michigan electricity generation by source. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Businesses: other; clean and renewable energy requirements for data centers; provide for.
Property tax: payment in lieu of taxes; payment in lieu of taxes for certain renewable energy facilities; provide for. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: HB 4318'23
Sep 11, 2023 · Enacted · Public Act 108 of 2023
Rep. Curtis VanderWall · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
The official Michigan Legislature history entry dated September 11, 2023 records: assigned PA 108'23 with immediate effect. This is the journal entry date; the governor's approval, filing and effective dates require the complete history and act.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed generation mix.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Michigan electricity generation by source. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Property tax: payment in lieu of taxes; payment in lieu of taxes for certain renewable energy facilities; provide for.
Property tax: payment in lieu of taxes; payment in lieu of taxes for renewable energy facilities; provide for. Amends secs. 9 & 9f of 1893 PA 206 (MCL 211.9 & 211.9f). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4317'23
Aug 22, 2023 · Enacted · Public Act 109 of 2023
Rep. Cynthia Neeley · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
The official Michigan Legislature history entry dated August 22, 2023 records: assigned PA 109'23 with immediate effect. This is the journal entry date; the governor's approval, filing and effective dates require the complete history and act.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed generation mix.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Michigan electricity generation by source. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Property tax: payment in lieu of taxes; payment in lieu of taxes for renewable energy facilities; provide for.
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. David PrestinMichigan Legislature · HB 5718
Energy: alternative sources; clean energy system; expand definition of. Amends sec. 11 of 2008 PA 295 (MCL 460.1011).
Mar 18, 2026 · bill electronically reproduced 03/17/2026
Rep. David Prestin · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated March 18, 2026 records: bill electronically reproduced 03/17/2026.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed generation mix.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Michigan electricity generation by source. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Energy: alternative sources; clean energy system; expand definition of.
Energy: alternative sources; electricity generated from RICE generators; authorize use of to meet renewable and clean energy standards. Amends secs. 28, 29 & 32 of 2008 PA 295 (MCL 460.1028 et seq.) & adds sec. 34.
May 13, 2025 · REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
Rep. David Prestin · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated May 13, 2025 records: REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed generation mix.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Michigan electricity generation by source. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Energy: alternative sources; electricity generated from RICE generators; authorize use of to meet renewable and clean energy standards.
U.S. representative for Michigan, District 6 · D–MI
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Debbie DingellU.S. Congress · Michigan delegation · H.R.8609
Vehicle Innovation Act of 2026
Apr 30, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Debbie Dingell · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed generation mix.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Michigan electricity generation by source. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Vehicle research and development (a) Program (1) Activities The Secretary shall conduct a program of basic and applied research, development, engineering, demonstration, and commercial application activities on materials, technologies, and processes with the potential to substantially reduce petroleum use and the emissions of the passenger and commercial vehicles of the United States, including activities in the areas of— (A) electrification of vehicle systems; (B) batteries, ultracapacitors, and other energy…
The bill addresses postsecondary completion, adult education, tuition support, or career and technical education.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses postsecondary completion, adult education, tuition support, or career and technical education. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed adult attainment estimate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma · Michigan electricity generation by source · Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Definitions In this Act: (1) Climate change education The term climate change education means nonformal and formal interdisciplinary learning at all age levels about— (A) climate change, climate adaptation and mitigation, climate resilience, and climate justice; and (B) the effects of climate change, climate adaptation and mitigation, climate resilience, and climate justice on the environmental, energy, social, and economic systems of the United States. (2) Climate justice The term climate justice means the fair…
Only current Michigan officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Michigan statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Michigan snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Michigan, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.
