Compare Michigan’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.
BLS does not publish a statewide Michigan CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.
All-items price level96.22024 · #27 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level962024 · #36 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level82.32024 · #28 of 50 · highest first
Michigan over time
Explore Michigan readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Michigan officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Michigan effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Michigan change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
All-items price level Michigan · source units
MichiganPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
13 of 13 reviewed Michigan actions match · 12 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.
Michigan · 2024: 96.2 · Rank #27 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100
BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Michigan with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Michigan · state comparison
How does Michigan’s cost of living compare?
The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.
Michigan · 202496.2
Michigan rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
All-items price level
BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.
Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Michigan with the published U.S. category value shown.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Michigan
2024 · Michigan: 96.2 · Rank #27 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Michigan All-items price level history
Period
Michigan
Compare
2014
95.5
2015
93.7
2016
93.6
2017
92.7
2018
94.5
2019
95.4
2020
94.4
2021
94.3
2022
93.6
2023
94.3
2024
96.2
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Michigan · 96.22024 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
110.7
—
#2
Hawaii
110
—
#3
New Jersey
108.8
—
#4
New York
107.9
—
#5
Washington
107
—
#6
Massachusetts
105.8
—
#7
Maryland
105
—
#8
New Hampshire
104.2
—
#9
Connecticut
103.6
—
#10
Florida
103.4
—
#11
Oregon
103.4
—
#12
Colorado
103.1
—
#13
Alaska
102.4
—
#14
Rhode Island
102.3
—
#15
Virginia
101.1
—
#16
Arizona
100.7
—
#17
Nevada
100
—
#18
Illinois
100
—
#19
Delaware
99.8
—
#20
Utah
98.9
—
#21
Minnesota
98.6
—
#22
Vermont
98
—
#23
Pennsylvania
97.6
—
#24
Texas
97.1
—
#25
Maine
97.1
—
#26
Georgia
96.3
—
#27
Michigan · your comparison
96.2
—
#28
Idaho
95.5
—
#29
Montana
94.6
—
#30
North Carolina
94.3
—
#31
Wisconsin
94.1
—
#32
South Carolina
93.7
—
#33
Indiana
93.3
—
#34
Ohio
92.8
—
#35
Wyoming
92.7
—
#36
New Mexico
92.2
—
#37
Tennessee
91.9
—
#38
Missouri
90.8
—
#39
Kentucky
90.2
—
#40
Nebraska
90.1
—
#41
Kansas
90.1
—
#42
West Virginia
89.5
—
#43
North Dakota
89
—
#44
Alabama
88.8
—
#45
South Dakota
88.6
—
#46
Louisiana
88.2
—
#47
Oklahoma
87.8
—
#48
Iowa
87.8
—
#49
Mississippi
87
—
#50
Arkansas
86.9
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.
Michigan · 20244.7%
Michigan rank#5among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Annual change in regional price deflator
Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.
An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Michigan
2024 · Michigan: 4.7% · Rank #5 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Michigan Annual change in regional price deflator history
Period
Michigan
Compare
2015
-1.7%
2016
0.9%
2017
0.8%
2018
4%
2019
2.3%
2020
0.1%
2021
3.9%
2022
5.8%
2023
4.6%
2024
4.7%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Michigan · 4.7%2024 · Rank #5 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Montana
6.7%
—
#2
Idaho
6.2%
—
#3
Utah
6%
—
#4
Nevada
4.8%
—
#5
Michigan · your comparison
4.7%
—
#6
New Mexico
4%
—
#7
Indiana
4%
—
#8
Wyoming
3.9%
—
#9
Illinois
3.9%
—
#10
Colorado
3.8%
—
#11
Delaware
3.7%
—
#12
Ohio
3.6%
—
#13
Wisconsin
3.6%
—
#14
North Dakota
3.5%
—
#15
Vermont
3.5%
—
#16
South Dakota
3.1%
—
#17
Maryland
3%
—
#18
Minnesota
3%
—
#19
Kentucky
2.9%
—
#20
South Carolina
2.9%
—
#21
Hawaii
2.9%
—
#22
Rhode Island
2.8%
—
#23
Mississippi
2.8%
—
#24
Kansas
2.8%
—
#25
Pennsylvania
2.8%
—
#26
Arkansas
2.8%
—
#27
New York
2.7%
—
#28
Arizona
2.6%
—
#29
North Carolina
2.5%
—
#30
Texas
2.5%
—
#31
New Jersey
2.5%
—
#32
West Virginia
2.5%
—
#33
Nebraska
2.4%
—
#34
Georgia
2.4%
—
#35
Florida
2.4%
—
#36
Virginia
2.4%
—
#37
Tennessee
2.4%
—
#38
Alabama
2.3%
—
#39
Missouri
2.3%
—
#40
Louisiana
2%
—
#41
Connecticut
2%
—
#42
Alaska
1.7%
—
#43
Maine
1.7%
—
#44
Oklahoma
1.6%
—
#45
Iowa
1.5%
—
#46
New Hampshire
1.4%
—
#47
Washington
1.3%
—
#48
California
1.3%
—
#49
Oregon
1.2%
—
#50
Massachusetts
0.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.
Michigan · 2024$53,569
Michigan rank#40among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Real personal income per person
Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.
Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Michigan
2024 · Michigan: $53,569 · Rank #40 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Michigan Real personal income per person history
Period
Michigan
Compare
2014
$44,089
2015
$47,218
2016
$48,000
2017
$48,928
2018
$48,921
2019
$49,306
2020
$53,586
2021
$55,679
2022
$53,454
2023
$53,903
2024
$53,569
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Michigan · $53,5692024 · Rank #40 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Wyoming
$75,501
—
#2
Connecticut
$74,254
—
#3
Massachusetts
$71,629
—
#4
South Dakota
$69,153
—
#5
Nebraska
$65,297
—
#6
North Dakota
$65,271
—
#7
Colorado
$65,223
—
#8
New Hampshire
$64,632
—
#9
Washington
$64,421
—
#10
New York
$64,153
—
#11
New Jersey
$63,142
—
#12
California
$63,028
—
#13
Minnesota
$62,039
—
#14
Virginia
$61,914
—
#15
Maryland
$61,111
—
#16
Illinois
$60,333
—
#17
Alaska
$60,272
—
#18
Iowa
$60,144
—
#19
Montana
$59,203
—
#20
Kansas
$59,172
—
#21
Vermont
$58,893
—
#22
Oklahoma
$58,692
—
#23
Pennsylvania
$58,620
—
#24
Tennessee
$58,582
—
#25
Wisconsin
$58,273
—
#26
Texas
$58,219
—
#27
Missouri
$57,850
—
#28
Maine
$57,480
—
#29
Florida
$57,131
—
#30
Louisiana
$56,789
—
#31
Nevada
$56,503
—
#32
North Carolina
$56,310
—
#33
Ohio
$56,232
—
#34
Rhode Island
$55,878
—
#35
Indiana
$55,562
—
#36
Oregon
$55,451
—
#37
Arkansas
$55,219
—
#38
Delaware
$55,185
—
#39
Utah
$55,116
—
#40
Michigan · your comparison
$53,569
—
#41
Georgia
$52,952
—
#42
Arizona
$52,890
—
#43
Idaho
$52,816
—
#44
South Carolina
$52,463
—
#45
Kentucky
$52,290
—
#46
Hawaii
$52,272
—
#47
Alabama
$52,216
—
#48
New Mexico
$51,121
—
#49
West Virginia
$50,051
—
#50
Mississippi
$48,465
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
13 of 13 reviewed Michigan actions · newest first
Apr 14, 2026 · Executive Order 2026-6 · Declaration of a State of Energy Emergency · Temporary order expiredGovernor · Executive Order 2026-6
Declaration of a State of Energy Emergency
Apr 14, 2026 · Temporary order expired
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
Executive Order 2026-6 temporarily eased driver-hours rules to maintain gasoline and diesel deliveries after flooding disrupted a northern Michigan petroleum terminal.
The order took effect April 14, 2026 and could remain in force no later than May 12, 2026 unless extended.
Why this record is included
Executive Order 2026-6 temporarily relaxed driver-hours rules for gasoline and diesel deliveries after flooding delayed barge service to the Cheboygan petroleum terminal. It addressed short-term supply logistics in northern Michigan, not the statewide tax or market price, and expired months before the August 2026 regional observation.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The order exempted motor carriers and drivers transporting gasoline and diesel fuel from specified hours-of-service rules until no later than May 12, 2026.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 2, 2026 · Executive Order 2026-4 · Declaration of State of Energy Emergency · Temporary order expiredGovernor · Executive Order 2026-4
Declaration of State of Energy Emergency
Apr 2, 2026 · Temporary order expired
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
Executive Order 2026-4 temporarily broadened the gasoline blends available in eight southeast Michigan counties during a fuel-price and supply emergency.
The order took effect April 2, 2026 and could remain in force no later than July 1, 2026 unless extended by the Legislature.
Why this record is included
Executive Order 2026-4 temporarily suspended Michigan's lower summer gasoline vapor-pressure requirement in eight southeast counties to align with an EPA waiver and broaden available supply. It addressed a blend and supply constraint rather than setting pump prices, and it expired before EIA's August 31 regional observation.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The order temporarily suspended state Reid vapor-pressure restrictions and allowed gasoline meeting EPA's emergency waiver to be distributed and sold.
Michigan Treasury applied the enacted formula and set the 2026 motor-fuel tax at 52.4 cents per gallon.
The 52.4-cent-per-gallon rate applies from January 1 through December 31, 2026.
Why this record is included
The Department of Treasury applied Public Act 20's statutory formula and calculated a 52.4-cent-per-gallon gasoline tax for calendar year 2026. That tax is a direct Michigan component of retail gasoline prices; it does not set the wholesale, refining, distribution, or marketing components or the 15-state regional average.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Treasury multiplied the 51-cent base by 1.027 and rounded 52.377 cents up to a 52.4-cent-per-gallon rate for 2026.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Oct 7, 2025 · HB 4180 · Sales tax: exemptions; motor fuel sales; exempt. Amends secs. 6a & 25 of 1933 PA 167 (MCL 205.56a & 205.75) & adds sec. 4gg. TIE BAR WITH: HB 4181'25, HB 4182'25, HB 4183'25, SB 0578'25 · Enacted · Public Act 17 of 2025Michigan Legislature · HB 4180
Sales tax: exemptions; motor fuel sales; exempt. Amends secs. 6a & 25 of 1933 PA 167 (MCL 205.56a & 205.75) & adds sec. 4gg. TIE BAR WITH: HB 4181'25, HB 4182'25, HB 4183'25, SB 0578'25
Oct 7, 2025 · Enacted · Public Act 17 of 2025
Rep. Donni Steele · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 4180 removed Michigan's sales tax from motor-fuel purchases beginning January 1, 2026, as part of the enacted road-funding tax swap.
Governor Whitmer approved HB 4180 on October 7, 2025; its motor-fuel sales-tax exemption took effect January 1, 2026.
Why this record is included
HB 4180 exempted motor fuel from Michigan's sales tax beginning January 1, 2026, as one side of the state's fuel-tax swap. The exemption directly changed the state-tax component of Michigan pump prices, but it does not govern the other market components or explain EIA's 15-state Midwest average.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Public Act 17 of 2025 ended prepaid sales tax on motor fuel purchased on or after January 1, 2026.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Oct 7, 2025 · HB 4183 · Transportation: motor fuel tax; motor fuel tax; increase. · Enacted · Public Act 20 of 2025Michigan Legislature · HB 4183
Transportation: motor fuel tax; motor fuel tax; increase.
Oct 7, 2025 · Enacted · Public Act 20 of 2025
Rep. Tom Kunse · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 4183 reset Michigan's motor-fuel-tax base for 2026 and retained an annual inflation adjustment, as part of the enacted road-funding tax swap.
Governor Whitmer approved HB 4183 on October 7, 2025; the new rate formula applied beginning January 1, 2026.
Why this record is included
HB 4183 established a 51-cent-per-gallon base for Michigan's 2026 motor-fuel tax and continued annual inflation adjustments, yielding a 52.4-cent rate for 2026. The motor-fuel tax is a direct component of Michigan's tax-inclusive retail gasoline price, while the law neither sets non-tax costs nor explains the full Midwest average.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Public Act 20 of 2025 sets the 2026 rate as 51 cents multiplied by one plus the lesser of 5% or the statutory inflation rate, rounded up to one-tenth of a cent.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Sep 26, 2025 · H.R.5612 · Cost-of-Living Fairness Act · IntroducedU.S. Congress · Michigan delegation · H.R.5612
Cost-of-Living Fairness Act
Sep 26, 2025 · Introduced
Rep. Rashida Tlaib · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses rental housing, tenant protections, housing assistance, homelessness, or housing supply.
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses rental housing, tenant protections, housing assistance, homelessness, or housing supply. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's median gross rent.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Income determination with respect to payments for insurance policies (a) In general Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a payment made by an individual for a covered insurance policy that provides a specified benefit to the individual or a member of the household of the individual shall be deducted from the income and resources of the individual in determining the eligibility of the individual, or any member of the household of the individual, for benefits or assistance (or the amount or extent of…
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Michigan officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Michigan candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
23 statements from 13 candidates
2026 Michigan Governor of Michigan — General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements
As a mom, Jocelyn’s north star in this election is making sure Michigan is affordable for everyone so our young people, seniors, and everyone in between can stay and thrive in Michigan. She knows firsthand that government works best when it’s there when you need it, and gets out of the way when you …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: As a mom, Jocelyn’s north star in this election is making sure Michigan is affordable for everyone so our young people, seniors, and everyone in between can stay and thrive in Michigan.
Candidate campaign source
As a mom, Jocelyn’s north star in this election is making sure Michigan is affordable for everyone so our young people, seniors, and everyone in between can stay and thrive in Michigan. She knows firsthand that government works best when it’s there when you need it, and gets out of the way when you don’t. The cost of living is crushing Michiganders but Jocelyn believes that government can make life easier with the right leader as governor who will use every tool available to expand rural healthcare options, build more housing, take on the utility companies who raise our rates, make childcare free, and ensure our agencies work, so anyone can afford to live in the best place to call home.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Caring for our environment, protecting human health, creating good-paying jobs, and lowering costs for Michigan families aren't competing priorities. They're the same fight. Clean, renewable energy is the cheapest form of energy. When we invest in clean energy, we lower utility bills. When we hold p…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Environment, water, and clean energy
Candidate campaign source
Caring for our environment, protecting human health, creating good-paying jobs, and lowering costs for Michigan families aren't competing priorities. They're the same fight. Clean, renewable energy is the cheapest form of energy. When we invest in clean energy, we lower utility bills. When we hold polluters accountable, we protect the drinking water families depend on. When we lead in clean manufacturing, we create the union jobs that keep Michigan's economy strong. Every choice we make about our natural resources is a choice about what kind of state we're building — and who it's built for. If we make the right choices now, we can leave the next generation a Michigan that's more affordable, prosperous, cleaner, safer, and stronger than the one we inherited.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Utility companies ask for rate increases while Michiganders wonder where the money they are putting aside to pay these skyrocketing bills is going. Will it eliminate outages and modernize our energy grid? Or is it only going to increase the profits of corporations and CEOs?As governor I will use eve…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy and utility costs
Candidate campaign source
Utility companies ask for rate increases while Michiganders wonder where the money they are putting aside to pay these skyrocketing bills is going. Will it eliminate outages and modernize our energy grid? Or is it only going to increase the profits of corporations and CEOs?As governor I will use every tool available to me to bring our energy costs down.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Affordability is John’s top priority. He’s committed to making Michigan a place where families can thrive by tackling rising housing costs, lowering the tax burden, and addressing healthcare expenses. John’s vision for Michigan is clear and disciplined: academic excellence, economic opportunity, and…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Affordability, education, public safety, and government accountability
Candidate campaign source
Affordability is John’s top priority. He’s committed to making Michigan a place where families can thrive by tackling rising housing costs, lowering the tax burden, and addressing healthcare expenses. John’s vision for Michigan is clear and disciplined: academic excellence, economic opportunity, and safe communities where families feel secure. He’ll put kids and families first when it comes to education, cut job-killing regulations, fully fund and support law enforcement, and prioritize Michigan workers and families. In Lansing, John will audit wasteful DEI programs, eliminate foreign influence in our institutions, and rebuild trust in government.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Our district is the poster child for communities in need of the Green New Deal. It’s no secret to every person in this district that we have lead in our water and some of the most polluted air in the country. No one can be expected to raise a family without clean air & water. My grandmother, my moth…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Environmental & Climate Justice
Candidate campaign source
Our district is the poster child for communities in need of the Green New Deal. It’s no secret to every person in this district that we have lead in our water and some of the most polluted air in the country. No one can be expected to raise a family without clean air & water. My grandmother, my mother, my brother, and I all have the same asthmatic cough that is all too common for anyone who grew up in the shadow of our city’s smokestacks and factories. I’m not willing to let another generation of my family or yours suffer the same fate that we have while the fossil fuel companies who are driving this crisis — like DTE and Consumers Energy — raise our utility prices, make record profits year after year, and buy our politicians’ inaction. It’s time to break the cycle and understand that we need a solution as large as the climate crisis itself. A Green New Deal transitioning to 100% clean and renewable energy, would protect our planet’s future and create millions of good-paying green union jobs in Michigan. It’s also a more efficient and sustainable source of energy that will lower energy requirements and consumer costs, while improving our community’s health and cleaning our air & water. And one critical aspect of that for us in metro Detroit is investment to build and expand public transit, so people have the freedom and mobility to get to work, go to the supermarket, and pick up their kids without having to buy a car and pay some of the highest car insurance rates in the country. We deserve choices that corporations won’t let us have. We’re paying the price for this crisis built by greedy CEOs — but they’re the ones who should be paying to fix it.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Michigan families deserve a state where hard work goes further and the cost of living is lower. I believe making Michigan more affordable starts with policies that let families keep more of what they earn, reduce unnecessary government costs, ensure reliable and affordable energy, and create an envi…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Affordability, taxes, energy, and economic growth
Candidate campaign source
Michigan families deserve a state where hard work goes further and the cost of living is lower. I believe making Michigan more affordable starts with policies that let families keep more of what they earn, reduce unnecessary government costs, ensure reliable and affordable energy, and create an environment where businesses can grow, invest, and create good-paying jobs. Growth is driven by free markets, lower taxes, responsible spending, reduced regulations, and policies that encourage innovation, entrepreneurship, and investment in American workers and manufacturers.That’s why I supported the Working Families Tax Cuts, which put more money back into the pockets of hardworking Michiganders by making the 2017 tax cuts permanent, eliminating taxes on tips and overtime, expanding the child tax credit, enhancing tax relief for seniors, and boosting domestic energy production to help lower costs for families. These policies help make Michigan a more affordable place to live, work, raise a family, and build a future. Under President Trump’s leadership, I look forward to continuing to fight for lower taxes and increased opportunity for Michigan families.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Michigan candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Michigan incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Michigan legislators and Michigan’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Michigan’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Michigan incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Sales tax: exemptions; motor fuel sales; exempt. Amends secs. 6a & 25 of 1933 PA 167 (MCL 205.56a & 205.75) & adds sec. 4gg. TIE BAR WITH: HB 4181'25, HB 4182'25, HB 4183'25, SB 0578'25
Oct 7, 2025 · Enacted · Public Act 17 of 2025
Rep. Donni Steele · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 4180 removed Michigan's sales tax from motor-fuel purchases beginning January 1, 2026, as part of the enacted road-funding tax swap.
Governor Whitmer approved HB 4180 on October 7, 2025; its motor-fuel sales-tax exemption took effect January 1, 2026.
Why this record is included
HB 4180 exempted motor fuel from Michigan's sales tax beginning January 1, 2026, as one side of the state's fuel-tax swap. The exemption directly changed the state-tax component of Michigan pump prices, but it does not govern the other market components or explain EIA's 15-state Midwest average.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Public Act 17 of 2025 ended prepaid sales tax on motor fuel purchased on or after January 1, 2026.
U.S. representative for Michigan, District 12 · D–MI
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Rashida TlaibU.S. Congress · Michigan delegation · H.R.5612
Cost-of-Living Fairness Act
Sep 26, 2025 · Introduced
Rep. Rashida Tlaib · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses rental housing, tenant protections, housing assistance, homelessness, or housing supply.
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses rental housing, tenant protections, housing assistance, homelessness, or housing supply. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's median gross rent.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Income determination with respect to payments for insurance policies (a) In general Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a payment made by an individual for a covered insurance policy that provides a specified benefit to the individual or a member of the household of the individual shall be deducted from the income and resources of the individual in determining the eligibility of the individual, or any member of the household of the individual, for benefits or assistance (or the amount or extent of…
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Tom KunseMichigan Legislature · HB 4183
Transportation: motor fuel tax; motor fuel tax; increase.
Oct 7, 2025 · Enacted · Public Act 20 of 2025
Rep. Tom Kunse · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 4183 reset Michigan's motor-fuel-tax base for 2026 and retained an annual inflation adjustment, as part of the enacted road-funding tax swap.
Governor Whitmer approved HB 4183 on October 7, 2025; the new rate formula applied beginning January 1, 2026.
Why this record is included
HB 4183 established a 51-cent-per-gallon base for Michigan's 2026 motor-fuel tax and continued annual inflation adjustments, yielding a 52.4-cent rate for 2026. The motor-fuel tax is a direct component of Michigan's tax-inclusive retail gasoline price, while the law neither sets non-tax costs nor explains the full Midwest average.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Public Act 20 of 2025 sets the 2026 rate as 51 cents multiplied by one plus the lesser of 5% or the statutory inflation rate, rounded up to one-tenth of a cent.
Only current Michigan officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Michigan statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Michigan snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Michigan, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.