Massachusetts · individual fact

Massachusetts crime

Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and Massachusetts public-safety context.

Reported violent-crime rate317.9 per 100k2024 · #27 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate1,126.9 per 100k2024 · #47 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage99.7%2024 · #14 of 50 · highest first

Massachusetts over time

Explore Massachusetts readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Massachusetts officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Massachusetts effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Massachusetts change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Reported violent-crime rate Massachusetts · source units
MassachusettsPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Reported violent-crime rate2024: 317.9 per 100k292 per 100k345.8 per 100k399.6 per 100kMassachusetts, 2015: 389.2 per 100kMassachusetts, 2016: 379.8 per 100kMassachusetts, 2017: 358.2 per 100kMassachusetts, 2018: 341.5 per 100kMassachusetts, 2019: 330 per 100kMassachusetts, 2020: 311.8 per 100kMassachusetts, 2021: 302.4 per 100kMassachusetts, 2022: 325.7 per 100kMassachusetts, 2023: 327.3 per 100kMassachusetts, 2024: 317.9 per 100k201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 33National context · Booker makes federal sentencing guidelines advisory · 2005-01-12Federal sentencingNational context · Adam Walsh Act establishes new registration standards · 2006-07-27Adam Walsh ActNational context · Survey changes disrupt the 2006 victimization comparison · 2006-12-312006 survey breakNational context · Congress strengthens firearm background-check records · 2008-01-08NICS records lawNational context · Second Chance Act expands reentry support · 2008-04-09Second Chance ActNational context · Heller recognizes an individual firearm right · 2008-06-26Heller decisionNational context · Financial crisis deepens during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Shepard–Byrd Act expands federal hate-crime law · 2009-10-28Federal hate-crime lawNational context · McDonald applies the firearm right to the states · 2010-06-28McDonald decisionNational context · Fair Sentencing Act changes federal crack penalties · 2010-08-03Fair Sentencing ActNational context · FBI expands the rape definition · 2013-01-01Rape definition expandsNational context · Violence Against Women Act reauthorized · 2013-03-07VAWA reauthorizationNational context · DOJ publishes Ferguson policing findings · 2015-03-04Ferguson investigationNational context · Murder rates rise in 2015 and 2016 · 2016-12-312015–2016 murder riseNational context · First Step Act enacted · 2018-12-21First Step ActNational context · FBI launches national use-of-force data collection · 2019-01-01Use-of-force reportingNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · George Floyd is killed by a Minneapolis police officer · 2020-05-25George Floyd killedNational context · Murder rises sharply while property crime declines · 2020-12-312020 murder surgeNational context · FBI transitions to incident-based reporting · 2021-01-01NIBRS transitionNational context · COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act improves review and reporting · 2021-05-20Hate-crime reportingNational context · Executive order sets federal policing safeguards · 2022-05-25Federal policing orderNational context · Bruen changes the test for firearm restrictions · 2022-06-23Bruen decisionNational context · Bipartisan Safer Communities Act enacted · 2022-06-25Safer Communities ActNational context · FBI annual report again includes summary submissions · 2023-10-16Reporting coverage growsNational context · Vehicle theft rises while total property crime falls · 2023-12-31Vehicle-theft surgeNational context · Victimization survey tests a redesigned questionnaire · 2024-01-01NCVS redesign beginsNational context · Supreme Court rejects ATF’s bump-stock classification · 2024-06-14Bump-stock rulingNational context · Rahimi upholds disarmament for a credible domestic threat · 2024-06-21Domestic-threat rulingNational context · Federal policing executive order is revoked · 2025-01-20Policing order revokedNational context · Court sustains ATF’s rule covering some firearm kits · 2025-03-26Firearm-kit rulingNational context · Executive order redirects federal law-enforcement support · 2025-04-282025 policing policyNational context · FBI publishes 2025 annual crime estimates · 2026-08-142025 crime data release● Massachusetts Legislature · 2305171226326921510225857225218268218● U.S. Congress · Massachusetts delegation · 85◆ Governor · 1■ Massachusetts agencies · 92005-01-012026-08-31

248 of 248 reviewed Massachusetts actions match · 70 date markers shown. 33 major events shown separately.

Massachusetts · 2024: 317.9 per 100k · Rank #27 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Massachusetts' average monthly population coverage remained at or above 97.7% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Massachusetts Reported violent-crime rate · source units
PeriodMassachusettsRankU.S. benchmark
2024317.9 per 100k#27 of 50Not available
2023327.3 per 100k#27 of 50Not available
2022325.7 per 100k#28 of 50Not available
2021302.4 per 100k#29 of 50Not available
2020311.8 per 100k#33 of 50Not available
2019330 per 100k#25 of 50Not available
2018341.5 per 100k#26 of 50Not available
2017358.2 per 100k#27 of 50Not available
2016379.8 per 100k#23 of 50Not available
2015389.2 per 100k#22 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Massachusetts · state comparison

Reported crime over time

Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.

Massachusetts · 2024317.9 per 100k
Massachusetts rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Reported violent-crime rate

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Massachusetts' average monthly population coverage remained at or above 97.7% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Massachusetts
Reported violent-crime rate history in Massachusetts289.4 per 100k345.8 per 100k402.2 per 100k20152024
2024 · Massachusetts: 317.9 per 100k · Rank #27 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Massachusetts Reported violent-crime rate history
PeriodMassachusettsCompare
2015389.2 per 100k
2016379.8 per 100k
2017358.2 per 100k
2018341.5 per 100k
2019330 per 100k
2020311.8 per 100k
2021302.4 per 100k
2022325.7 per 100k
2023327.3 per 100k
2024317.9 per 100k

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Massachusetts stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Massachusetts has a dark outline.

Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Massachusetts · 317.9 per 100k2024 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Massachusetts with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Mexico744.7 per 100k—
#2Alaska731.9 per 100k—
#3Tennessee604.3 per 100k—
#4Arkansas589.6 per 100k—
#5*Louisiana504.5 per 100k82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6Colorado486.8 per 100k—
#7California478.4 per 100k—
#8Kansas474.7 per 100k—
#9Missouri472.7 per 100k—
#10Michigan442.6 per 100k—
#11South Carolina440.8 per 100k—
#12Arizona433 per 100k—
#13Oklahoma429.3 per 100k—
#14Montana428 per 100k—
#15Maryland425.9 per 100k—
#16Nevada408.6 per 100k—
#17Texas397.8 per 100k—
#18New York392.2 per 100k—
#19North Carolina382.9 per 100k—
#20Alabama380.8 per 100k—
#21Delaware368.4 per 100k—
#22*South Dakota356.9 per 100k89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*Indiana349.2 per 100k87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24Oregon341.1 per 100k—
#25Washington331.8 per 100k—
#26Georgia328 per 100k—
#27Massachusetts · your comparison317.9 per 100k—
#28Ohio311.9 per 100k—
#29Illinois294.5 per 100k—
#30Wisconsin287.6 per 100k—
#31West Virginia263.8 per 100k—
#32*Florida262 per 100k81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33Minnesota259.4 per 100k—
#34North Dakota258 per 100k—
#35Pennsylvania251.3 per 100k—
#36Iowa247.2 per 100k—
#37Utah237.8 per 100k—
#38Idaho236.6 per 100k—
#39Hawaii230.3 per 100k—
#40Vermont227.1 per 100k—
#41Kentucky226.7 per 100k—
#42Nebraska224.6 per 100k—
#43Virginia223.7 per 100k—
#44New Jersey221.9 per 100k—
#45*Mississippi219.6 per 100k65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*Wyoming212.5 per 100k89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47Rhode Island154.9 per 100k—
#48Connecticut139.2 per 100k—
#49New Hampshire112.3 per 100k—
#50Maine102.6 per 100k—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Reported violent-crime rate

317.9 per 100,0002024

Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • Massachusetts' average monthly population coverage remained at or above 97.7% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 99.7%; this is not complete statewide reporting.

Reported property-crime rate

1,126.9 per 100,0002024

Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • Massachusetts' average monthly population coverage remained at or above 97.7% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 99.7%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Massachusetts · state comparison

Firearm mortality

Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.

Massachusetts · 2024287
Massachusetts rank#36among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Firearm deaths

Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.

Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Massachusetts stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Massachusetts has a dark outline.

Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Massachusetts · 2872024 · Rank #36 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Massachusetts with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas4,389—
#2Florida3,191—
#3California2,853—
#4Georgia1,985—
#5North Carolina1,835—
#6Ohio1,745—
#7Pennsylvania1,624—
#8Illinois1,563—
#9Tennessee1,448—
#10Arizona1,331—
#11Missouri1,234—
#12Michigan1,228—
#13Alabama1,212—
#14Indiana1,196—
#15Virginia1,153—
#16South Carolina1,064—
#17Louisiana1,031—
#18Colorado961—
#19Washington915—
#20New York896—
#21Kentucky870—
#22Mississippi810—
#23Oklahoma794—
#24Wisconsin735—
#25Maryland716—
#26Oregon663—
#27Arkansas638—
#28Minnesota582—
#28Nevada582—
#30New Mexico563—
#31Utah454—
#32Kansas446—
#33New Jersey393—
#34Iowa389—
#35Idaho331—
#36Massachusetts · your comparison287—
#37West Virginia281—
#38Montana247—
#39Connecticut224—
#40Nebraska218—
#41Alaska182—
#42Maine181—
#43South Dakota159—
#44New Hampshire152—
#45Wyoming143—
#46Delaware123—
#47North Dakota95—
#48Vermont76—
#49Hawaii56—
#50Rhode Island55—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Firearm deaths

2872024 final data

Deaths in which firearm injury was the underlying cause, with the rate age-adjusted per 100,000 residents.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Population-adjusted measure

Age-adjusted firearm death rate
3.8 per 100,000
Method and limitations

CDC National Vital Statistics System death-certificate data.

  • The total combines homicide, suicide, accident, legal-intervention, and undetermined intent.
  • Mortality data do not measure nonfatal injuries, ownership, defensive uses, or policy effects.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s Massachusetts candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

16 statements from 7 candidates

2026 Massachusetts U.S. House — District 1 General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 4 statements

Richard E. Neal

4 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · MA

Crime & victimization

Oppose arming school teachers as a response to gun violence.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Gun Violence

Candidate campaign source

Oppose arming school teachers as a response to gun violence.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Richard E. Neal campaign source 6 ↗
View 3 more statements from Richard E. Neal
Crime & victimization

Allow and fund the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to research gun violence and gun-safety measures.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Gun Violence

Candidate campaign source

Allow and fund the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to research gun violence and gun-safety measures.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Richard E. Neal campaign source 6 ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

Richie knows that we must address police brutality and excessive force, which disproportionately affect people of color.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reforming Law Enforcement

Candidate campaign source

Richie knows that we must address police brutality and excessive force, which disproportionately affect people of color.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Richard E. Neal campaign source 13 ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

Pass the Justice in Policing Act to ban chokeholds and drug-case no-knock warrants, end qualified immunity, create a misconduct registry, and prohibit discriminatory profiling.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Racial Justice

Candidate campaign source

Pass the Justice in Policing Act to ban chokeholds and drug-case no-knock warrants, end qualified immunity, create a misconduct registry, and prohibit discriminatory profiling.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Richard E. Neal campaign source 13 ↗

2026 Massachusetts U.S. House — District 3 General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · MA

Crime & victimization

Create a Select Committee on Gun Violence. In Congress, Lori will advocate for creating a committee that helps investigate solutions to curb violence and also bring people together to create sensible solutions.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Create a Select Committee on Gun Violence. In Congress, Lori will advocate for creating a committee that helps investigate solutions to curb violence and also bring people together to create sensible solutions.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Lori Loureiro Trahan — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗
View 2 more statements from Lori Loureiro Trahan
Crime & victimization

Confront violence against women. Lori believes that we have a moral imperative to ensure that victims of domestic violence and assault have equitable access to the channels they need to seek justice and heal. One in five women in America is sexually assaulted while in college and twenty-two percent …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Women’s Rights & Opportunity

Candidate campaign source

Confront violence against women. Lori believes that we have a moral imperative to ensure that victims of domestic violence and assault have equitable access to the channels they need to seek justice and heal. One in five women in America is sexually assaulted while in college and twenty-two percent of women experience violence by a partner during their lifetime. Lori will help close loopholes that allow domestic abusers, both physically and emotionally, to buy a gun and also break down the barriers that exist to seek legal remedy in sexual assault and domestic violence cases.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Lori Loureiro Trahan — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Crime & victimization

Increase Funding for Support Programs: Too often, humanity gets lost in the discussion around sexual assault. Perpetrators should absolutely be dismissed, and managers held accountable for any harassment that happens under their supervision. These steps, while necessary, do not help victims recover …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Women’s Rights & Opportunity

Candidate campaign source

Increase Funding for Support Programs: Too often, humanity gets lost in the discussion around sexual assault. Perpetrators should absolutely be dismissed, and managers held accountable for any harassment that happens under their supervision. These steps, while necessary, do not help victims recover from the psychological and physical trauma of assault.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Lori Loureiro Trahan — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

2026 Massachusetts U.S. House — District 5 General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Katherine M. Clark

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 5 · MA

Crime & victimization

Too many Americans live in fear of gun violence. Democrats have proposed commonsense reforms to promote public safety and keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people. We’ll keep fighting against the gun lobby and their attempts to block these measures that a majority of Americans support.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Justice & Equity

Candidate campaign source

Too many Americans live in fear of gun violence. Democrats have proposed commonsense reforms to promote public safety and keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people. We’ll keep fighting against the gun lobby and their attempts to block these measures that a majority of Americans support.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Katherine M. Clark — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Katherine M. Clark
Crime & victimization

Passed a law to protect survivors of domestic violence and sponsored a major bill to provide justice for survivors of sexual assault.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Women’s Rights

Candidate campaign source

Passed a law to protect survivors of domestic violence and sponsored a major bill to provide justice for survivors of sexual assault.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Katherine M. Clark — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published Massachusetts candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Massachusetts incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Massachusetts legislators and Massachusetts’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Massachusetts’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

246 matching sponsorships or proposals · 61 Massachusetts incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell

Attorney General of Massachusetts · D–MA

1 proposal
View proposals from Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell
Massachusetts agencies · Proposed action

AG Campbell Urges The ATF To Expand Background Checks And Reduce Illegal Gun Trafficking

Dec 8, 2023 · Proposed action

Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell · Issued

FactVote reviewed summary

AG Campbell’s New Gun Violence Prevention Unit co-leads coalition of 21 attorneys general in support of proposed ATF rule that would broaden firearms sales license requirements and expand background check requirements for buyers

The official Massachusetts Attorney General record documents this action on December 8, 2023.

Why this record is included

The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's firearm mortality rate.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

AG Campbell Urges The ATF To Expand Background Checks And Reduce Illegal Gun Trafficking AG Campbell’s New Gun Violence Prevention Unit co-leads coalition of 21 attorneys general in support of proposed ATF rule that would broaden firearms sales license requirements and expand background check requirements for buyers
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Ayanna Pressley

U.S. representative for Massachusetts, District 7 · D–MA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Ayanna Pressley
U.S. Congress · Massachusetts delegation · H.R.4111

MASS Act

Jun 24, 2025 · Introduced

Rep. Ayanna Pressley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

provide grants to States to encourage the implementation and maintenance of firearms licensing requirements, and for other purposes

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Why this record is included

The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's firearm mortality rate.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

provide grants to States to encourage the implementation and maintenance of firearms licensing requirements, and for other purposes
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bradley Jones

Massachusetts House of Representatives, 20th Middlesex · R–MA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Bradley Jones
Massachusetts Legislature · H.3340

An Act establishing mandatory post release supervision in the Commonwealth

Nov 12, 2020 · Did not pass

Rep. Bradley Jones · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Mr. Jones of North Reading, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3340) of Bradley H. Jones, Jr., and others relative to mandatory post incarceration release supervision. The Judiciary.

The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on November 12, 2020: Accompanied a study order, see H5081. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.

Why this record is included

The official record addresses admission, sentencing, sentence credits, release, or parole relevant to Massachusetts DOC legal jurisdiction. The fact excludes county-only populations and does not measure prison services or physical placement. No effect on the displayed snapshot is established.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: MA DOC jurisdiction population. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Mr. Jones of North Reading, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3340) of Bradley H. Jones, Jr., and others relative to mandatory post incarceration release supervision. The Judiciary.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brandy Fluker-Reid

Massachusetts House of Representatives, 12th Suffolk · D–MA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Brandy Fluker-Reid
Massachusetts Legislature · H.2608

An Act relative to human rights and improved outcomes for incarcerated people

Jan 27, 2026 · Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on House Ways and Means

Rep. Brandy Fluker-Reid · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Representative Fluker-Reid of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2608) of Brandy Fluker-Reid and others for legislation to maximize out-of-cell time and opportunities for incarcerated people to attend education, training, employment, and other programs. Public Safety and Homeland Security.

The latest official Massachusetts General Court record shows this action on January 27, 2026: Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on House Ways and Means.

Why this record is included

The bill expands access to programming that earns good-conduct sentence deductions and, in the later versions, parole-related planning. Those provisions concern the time people remain under DOC jurisdiction. It does not establish an effect on the displayed population snapshot.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: MA DOC jurisdiction population. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Representative Fluker-Reid of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2608) of Brandy Fluker-Reid and others for legislation to maximize out-of-cell time and opportunities for incarcerated people to attend education, training, employment, and other programs. Public Safety and Homeland Security.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bruce Ayers

Massachusetts House of Representatives, 1st Norfolk · D–MA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Bruce Ayers
Massachusetts Legislature · H.1459

An Act amending MGL Chapter 127 Section 119A

Jun 9, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Bruce Ayers · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Mr. Ayers of Quincy, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1459) of Bruce J. Ayers and others relative to medical parole due to a terminal illness or permanent incapacitation. The Judiciary.

The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on June 9, 2022: Accompanied a study order, see H4844. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.

Why this record is included

The official record addresses admission, sentencing, sentence credits, release, or parole relevant to Massachusetts DOC legal jurisdiction. The fact excludes county-only populations and does not measure prison services or physical placement. No effect on the displayed snapshot is established.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: MA DOC jurisdiction population. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Mr. Ayers of Quincy, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1459) of Bruce J. Ayers and others relative to medical parole due to a terminal illness or permanent incapacitation. The Judiciary.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bud Williams

Massachusetts House of Representatives, 11th Hampden · D–MA

4 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Bud Williams
Massachusetts Legislature · H.2047

An Act eliminating mandatory minimum sentences related to drug offenses

Mar 26, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Bud Williams · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Representative Williams of Springfield, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2047) of Bud L. Williams relative to eliminating mandatory minimum sentences related to drug offenses. The Judiciary.

The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on March 26, 2026: Accompanied a study order, see H5281 (under House Rule 27). The measure was not enacted in that General Court.

Why this record is included

The official record addresses admission, sentencing, sentence credits, release, or parole relevant to Massachusetts DOC legal jurisdiction. The fact excludes county-only populations and does not measure prison services or physical placement. No effect on the displayed snapshot is established.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: MA DOC jurisdiction population. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Representative Williams of Springfield, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2047) of Bud L. Williams relative to eliminating mandatory minimum sentences related to drug offenses. The Judiciary.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Massachusetts Legislature · H.1818

An Act eliminating mandatory minimum sentences related to drug offenses

Jun 5, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Bud Williams · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Representative Williams of Springfield, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1818) of Bud L. Williams relative to eliminating mandatory minimum sentences related to drug offenses. The Judiciary.

The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on June 5, 2024: Accompanied a study order, see H4517. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.

Why this record is included

The official record addresses admission, sentencing, sentence credits, release, or parole relevant to Massachusetts DOC legal jurisdiction. The fact excludes county-only populations and does not measure prison services or physical placement. No effect on the displayed snapshot is established.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: MA DOC jurisdiction population. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Representative Williams of Springfield, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1818) of Bud L. Williams relative to eliminating mandatory minimum sentences related to drug offenses. The Judiciary.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Massachusetts Legislature · H.1928

An Act eliminating mandatory minimum sentences related to drug offenses

Jun 9, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Bud Williams · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Mr. Williams of Springfield, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1928) of Bud L. Williams and Tami L. Gouveia relative to eliminating mandatory minimum sentences related to drug offenses. The Judiciary.

The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on June 9, 2022: Accompanied a study order, see H4844. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.

Why this record is included

The official record addresses admission, sentencing, sentence credits, release, or parole relevant to Massachusetts DOC legal jurisdiction. The fact excludes county-only populations and does not measure prison services or physical placement. No effect on the displayed snapshot is established.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: MA DOC jurisdiction population. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Mr. Williams of Springfield, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1928) of Bud L. Williams and Tami L. Gouveia relative to eliminating mandatory minimum sentences related to drug offenses. The Judiciary.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Massachusetts Legislature · H.1583

An Act eliminating mandatory minimum sentences related to drug offenses

Nov 12, 2020 · Did not pass

Rep. Bud Williams · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Mr. Williams of Springfield, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1583) of Bud L. Williams and others relative to eliminating mandatory minimum sentences related to drug offenses. The Judiciary.

The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on November 12, 2020: Accompanied a study order, see H5081. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.

Why this record is included

The official record addresses admission, sentencing, sentence credits, release, or parole relevant to Massachusetts DOC legal jurisdiction. The fact excludes county-only populations and does not measure prison services or physical placement. No effect on the displayed snapshot is established.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: MA DOC jurisdiction population. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Mr. Williams of Springfield, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1583) of Bud L. Williams and others relative to eliminating mandatory minimum sentences related to drug offenses. The Judiciary.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Massachusetts officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Massachusetts statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.