Compare Massachusetts’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.
BLS does not publish a statewide Massachusetts CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.
All-items price level105.82024 · #6 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level98.82024 · #14 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level128.12024 · #3 of 50 · highest first
Massachusetts over time
Explore Massachusetts readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Massachusetts officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Massachusetts effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Massachusetts change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
All-items price level Massachusetts · source units
MassachusettsPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
166 of 166 reviewed Massachusetts actions match · 63 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.
Massachusetts · 2024: 105.8 · Rank #6 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100
BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Massachusetts with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Massachusetts All-items price level · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Massachusetts · state comparison
How does Massachusetts’s cost of living compare?
The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.
Massachusetts · 2024105.8
Massachusetts rank#6among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
All-items price level
BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.
Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Massachusetts with the published U.S. category value shown.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Massachusetts
2024 · Massachusetts: 105.8 · Rank #6 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Massachusetts All-items price level history
Period
Massachusetts
Compare
2014
104.5
2015
105.1
2016
108.2
2017
107.4
2018
107.4
2019
107.2
2020
109.1
2021
106.7
2022
109.4
2023
107.7
2024
105.8
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Massachusetts stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Massachusetts has a dark outline.
Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Massachusetts · 105.82024 · Rank #6 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Massachusetts with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
110.7
—
#2
Hawaii
110
—
#3
New Jersey
108.8
—
#4
New York
107.9
—
#5
Washington
107
—
#6
Massachusetts · your comparison
105.8
—
#7
Maryland
105
—
#8
New Hampshire
104.2
—
#9
Connecticut
103.6
—
#10
Florida
103.4
—
#11
Oregon
103.4
—
#12
Colorado
103.1
—
#13
Alaska
102.4
—
#14
Rhode Island
102.3
—
#15
Virginia
101.1
—
#16
Arizona
100.7
—
#17
Nevada
100
—
#18
Illinois
100
—
#19
Delaware
99.8
—
#20
Utah
98.9
—
#21
Minnesota
98.6
—
#22
Vermont
98
—
#23
Pennsylvania
97.6
—
#24
Texas
97.1
—
#25
Maine
97.1
—
#26
Georgia
96.3
—
#27
Michigan
96.2
—
#28
Idaho
95.5
—
#29
Montana
94.6
—
#30
North Carolina
94.3
—
#31
Wisconsin
94.1
—
#32
South Carolina
93.7
—
#33
Indiana
93.3
—
#34
Ohio
92.8
—
#35
Wyoming
92.7
—
#36
New Mexico
92.2
—
#37
Tennessee
91.9
—
#38
Missouri
90.8
—
#39
Kentucky
90.2
—
#40
Nebraska
90.1
—
#41
Kansas
90.1
—
#42
West Virginia
89.5
—
#43
North Dakota
89
—
#44
Alabama
88.8
—
#45
South Dakota
88.6
—
#46
Louisiana
88.2
—
#47
Oklahoma
87.8
—
#48
Iowa
87.8
—
#49
Mississippi
87
—
#50
Arkansas
86.9
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.
Massachusetts · 20240.8%
Massachusetts rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Annual change in regional price deflator
Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.
An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Massachusetts
2024 · Massachusetts: 0.8% · Rank #50 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Massachusetts Annual change in regional price deflator history
Period
Massachusetts
Compare
2015
0.7%
2016
4%
2017
1%
2018
2.1%
2019
1.2%
2020
3%
2021
1.8%
2022
9.3%
2023
2.1%
2024
0.8%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Massachusetts stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Massachusetts has a dark outline.
Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Massachusetts · 0.8%2024 · Rank #50 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Massachusetts with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Montana
6.7%
—
#2
Idaho
6.2%
—
#3
Utah
6%
—
#4
Nevada
4.8%
—
#5
Michigan
4.7%
—
#6
New Mexico
4%
—
#7
Indiana
4%
—
#8
Wyoming
3.9%
—
#9
Illinois
3.9%
—
#10
Colorado
3.8%
—
#11
Delaware
3.7%
—
#12
Ohio
3.6%
—
#13
Wisconsin
3.6%
—
#14
North Dakota
3.5%
—
#15
Vermont
3.5%
—
#16
South Dakota
3.1%
—
#17
Maryland
3%
—
#18
Minnesota
3%
—
#19
Kentucky
2.9%
—
#20
South Carolina
2.9%
—
#21
Hawaii
2.9%
—
#22
Rhode Island
2.8%
—
#23
Mississippi
2.8%
—
#24
Kansas
2.8%
—
#25
Pennsylvania
2.8%
—
#26
Arkansas
2.8%
—
#27
New York
2.7%
—
#28
Arizona
2.6%
—
#29
North Carolina
2.5%
—
#30
Texas
2.5%
—
#31
New Jersey
2.5%
—
#32
West Virginia
2.5%
—
#33
Nebraska
2.4%
—
#34
Georgia
2.4%
—
#35
Florida
2.4%
—
#36
Virginia
2.4%
—
#37
Tennessee
2.4%
—
#38
Alabama
2.3%
—
#39
Missouri
2.3%
—
#40
Louisiana
2%
—
#41
Connecticut
2%
—
#42
Alaska
1.7%
—
#43
Maine
1.7%
—
#44
Oklahoma
1.6%
—
#45
Iowa
1.5%
—
#46
New Hampshire
1.4%
—
#47
Washington
1.3%
—
#48
California
1.3%
—
#49
Oregon
1.2%
—
#50
Massachusetts · your comparison
0.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.
Massachusetts · 2024$71,629
Massachusetts rank#3among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Real personal income per person
Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.
Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Massachusetts
2024 · Massachusetts: $71,629 · Rank #3 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Massachusetts Real personal income per person history
Period
Massachusetts
Compare
2014
$57,330
2015
$60,284
2016
$59,839
2017
$61,657
2018
$63,248
2019
$65,383
2020
$68,048
2021
$72,466
2022
$67,331
2023
$69,372
2024
$71,629
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Massachusetts stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Massachusetts has a dark outline.
Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Massachusetts · $71,6292024 · Rank #3 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Massachusetts with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Wyoming
$75,501
—
#2
Connecticut
$74,254
—
#3
Massachusetts · your comparison
$71,629
—
#4
South Dakota
$69,153
—
#5
Nebraska
$65,297
—
#6
North Dakota
$65,271
—
#7
Colorado
$65,223
—
#8
New Hampshire
$64,632
—
#9
Washington
$64,421
—
#10
New York
$64,153
—
#11
New Jersey
$63,142
—
#12
California
$63,028
—
#13
Minnesota
$62,039
—
#14
Virginia
$61,914
—
#15
Maryland
$61,111
—
#16
Illinois
$60,333
—
#17
Alaska
$60,272
—
#18
Iowa
$60,144
—
#19
Montana
$59,203
—
#20
Kansas
$59,172
—
#21
Vermont
$58,893
—
#22
Oklahoma
$58,692
—
#23
Pennsylvania
$58,620
—
#24
Tennessee
$58,582
—
#25
Wisconsin
$58,273
—
#26
Texas
$58,219
—
#27
Missouri
$57,850
—
#28
Maine
$57,480
—
#29
Florida
$57,131
—
#30
Louisiana
$56,789
—
#31
Nevada
$56,503
—
#32
North Carolina
$56,310
—
#33
Ohio
$56,232
—
#34
Rhode Island
$55,878
—
#35
Indiana
$55,562
—
#36
Oregon
$55,451
—
#37
Arkansas
$55,219
—
#38
Delaware
$55,185
—
#39
Utah
$55,116
—
#40
Michigan
$53,569
—
#41
Georgia
$52,952
—
#42
Arizona
$52,890
—
#43
Idaho
$52,816
—
#44
South Carolina
$52,463
—
#45
Kentucky
$52,290
—
#46
Hawaii
$52,272
—
#47
Alabama
$52,216
—
#48
New Mexico
$51,121
—
#49
West Virginia
$50,051
—
#50
Mississippi
$48,465
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
166 of 166 reviewed Massachusetts actions · newest first
Sep 4, 2026 · Current Massachusetts gasoline excise · Massachusetts gasoline excise rate · Current rate in effectMassachusetts agencies · Current Massachusetts gasoline excise
Massachusetts gasoline excise rate
Sep 4, 2026 · Current rate in effect
Commissioner Geoffrey E. Snyder · Acted
FactVote reviewed summary
Massachusetts DOR administers the state's 24-cent-per-gallon gasoline excise.
DOR's current guidance lists the Massachusetts gasoline excise at 24 cents per gallon.
Why this record is included
Massachusetts DOR lists the gasoline excise at 24 cents per gallon and states that it is included in the retail price. The excise is a direct component of the tax-inclusive statewide price, but it does not set wholesale, distribution, or retail margins.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
DOR's official motor-fuel excise guidance lists gasoline at 24 cents per gallon and says the tax is included in the retail price.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Aug 6, 2026 · H.5641 · An Act establishing a temporary moratorium on large scale photovoltaic installations and battery energy storage systems (BESS) in the town of Becket · IntroducedMassachusetts Legislature · H.5641
An Act establishing a temporary moratorium on large scale photovoltaic installations and battery energy storage systems (BESS) in the town of Becket
Aug 6, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Leigh Davis · Sponsored / Sen. Paul Mark · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
By Representative Davis of Great Barrington and Senator Mark, a joint petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 5641) of Leigh Davis (by vote of the town) that the town of Becket be authorized to establish a temporary moratorium on large scale photovoltaic installations and battery energy storage systems in said town. Municipalities and Regional Government. [Local Approval Received.]
The latest official Massachusetts General Court record shows this action on August 6, 2026: Senate concurred.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
By Representative Davis of Great Barrington and Senator Mark, a joint petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 5641) of Leigh Davis (by vote of the town) that the town of Becket be authorized to establish a temporary moratorium on large scale photovoltaic installations and battery energy storage systems in said town. Municipalities and Regional Government. [Local Approval Received.]
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 16, 2026 · Legal action · AG Campbell Issues Notices Of Intent To Sue Trump Administration For Cancelling Offshore Wind Leases · Official action recordedMassachusetts agencies · Legal action
AG Campbell Issues Notices Of Intent To Sue Trump Administration For Cancelling Offshore Wind Leases
Jul 16, 2026 · Official action recorded
Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
Trump Administration’s Unlawful Attempt to Cancel Bluepoint and Invenergy Wind Projects Threaten Massachusetts’s Economy, Energy Grid, and Climate Goals
The official Massachusetts Attorney General record documents this action on July 16, 2026.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
AG Campbell Issues Notices Of Intent To Sue Trump Administration For Cancelling Offshore Wind Leases Trump Administration’s Unlawful Attempt to Cancel Bluepoint and Invenergy Wind Projects Threaten Massachusetts’s Economy, Energy Grid, and Climate Goals
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 9, 2026 · S.1927 · An Act relative to the separation of agricultural land for renewable energy purposes · IntroducedMassachusetts Legislature · S.1927
An Act relative to the separation of agricultural land for renewable energy purposes
Jul 9, 2026 · Introduced
Sen. Michael Brady · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
By Mr. Brady, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1927) of Michael D. Brady, Kathleen R. LaNatra, Christopher Richard Flanagan and Norman J. Orrall for legislation relative to the separation of agricultural land for renewable energy purposes. Revenue.
The latest official Massachusetts General Court record shows this action on July 9, 2026: Accompanied a new draft, see S3150.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
By Mr. Brady, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1927) of Michael D. Brady, Kathleen R. LaNatra, Christopher Richard Flanagan and Norman J. Orrall for legislation relative to the separation of agricultural land for renewable energy purposes. Revenue.
By Mr. Driscoll, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 2262) of William J. Driscoll, Jr. for legislation relative to approval for solar and energy storage permit applications. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
The latest official Massachusetts General Court record shows this action on June 25, 2026: Accompanied H5175.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
By Mr. Driscoll, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 2262) of William J. Driscoll, Jr. for legislation relative to approval for solar and energy storage permit applications. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 25, 2026 · S.2282 · An Act advancing the clean energy transition · IntroducedMassachusetts Legislature · S.2282
An Act advancing the clean energy transition
Jun 25, 2026 · Introduced
Sen. Dylan Fernandes · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
By Mr. Fernandes, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 2282) of Dylan A. Fernandes and Steven Owens for legislation to create new divisions with the Division of Energy Resources to advance clean energy transition. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
The latest official Massachusetts General Court record shows this action on June 25, 2026: Accompanied H5175.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
By Mr. Fernandes, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 2282) of Dylan A. Fernandes and Steven Owens for legislation to create new divisions with the Division of Energy Resources to advance clean energy transition. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Massachusetts officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Massachusetts candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
24 statements from 14 candidates
2026 Massachusetts Governor General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 6 statements
Massachusetts should not have contracts with ICE, and we deserve a governor who will ban data centers and focus instead on lowering utility costs and promoting green energy solutions.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Defending Our Neighbors:
Candidate campaign source
Massachusetts should not have contracts with ICE, and we deserve a governor who will ban data centers and focus instead on lowering utility costs and promoting green energy solutions.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Independent/Unaffiliated · U.S. House District 1 · MA
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context
Nadia will work to stop price gouging, close corporate tax loopholes, and use that revenue to lower costs for working people. She will fight to bring Social Security benefits in line with today’s cost of living so seniors can afford to live with dignity.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Tax Relief for Working Families
Candidate campaign source
Nadia will work to stop price gouging, close corporate tax loopholes, and use that revenue to lower costs for working people. She will fight to bring Social Security benefits in line with today’s cost of living so seniors can afford to live with dignity.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Massachusetts candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Massachusetts incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Massachusetts legislators and Massachusetts’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Massachusetts’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
167 matching sponsorships or proposals · 67 Massachusetts incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Aaron Saunders
Massachusetts House of Representatives, 7th Hampden · D–MA
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Aaron SaundersMassachusetts Legislature · H.2331
An Act allowing municipalities to reasonably regulate solar siting
Aug 14, 2025 · Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on House Ways and Means
Rep. Aaron Saunders · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
By Representative Saunders of Belchertown, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2331) of Aaron L. Saunders relative to zoning ordinances for the regulation of the installation of solar energy systems. Municipalities and Regional Government.
The latest official Massachusetts General Court record shows this action on August 14, 2025: Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on House Ways and Means.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
By Representative Saunders of Belchertown, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2331) of Aaron L. Saunders relative to zoning ordinances for the regulation of the installation of solar energy systems. Municipalities and Regional Government.
An Act allowing municipalities to reasonably regulate solar siting
Mar 28, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Aaron Saunders · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
By Representative Saunders of Belchertown, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3230) of Aaron L. Saunders, Lindsay N. Sabadosa and Michael P. Kushmerek relative to zoning ordinances for the regulation of the installation of solar energy systems. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on March 28, 2024: Senate concurred. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
By Representative Saunders of Belchertown, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3230) of Aaron L. Saunders, Lindsay N. Sabadosa and Michael P. Kushmerek relative to zoning ordinances for the regulation of the installation of solar energy systems. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Massachusetts House of Representatives, 1st Suffolk · D–MA
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Adrian MadaroMassachusetts Legislature · H.2882
An Act promoting housing affordability through tax relief
Sep 12, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Adrian Madaro · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
By Representative Madaro of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2882) of Adrian C. Madaro relative to promoting housing affordability through tax relief. Revenue.
The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on September 12, 2024: Accompanied a study order, see H5045. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses residential rent, tenant protections, eviction, rental assistance, or housing supply and affordability. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's median gross rent.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
By Representative Madaro of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2882) of Adrian C. Madaro relative to promoting housing affordability through tax relief. Revenue.
An Act relative to renewable energy generation and market efficiency
Jan 3, 2023 · Did not pass
Rep. Adrian Madaro · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
By Mr. Madaro of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3335) of Adrian C. Madaro relative to renewable energy generation and market efficiency. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on January 3, 2023: No further action taken. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
By Mr. Madaro of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3335) of Adrian C. Madaro relative to renewable energy generation and market efficiency. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Massachusetts House of Representatives, 12th Hampden · D–MA
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Angelo PuppoloMassachusetts Legislature · H.2918
An Act relative to solar energy
Feb 10, 2020 · Did not pass
Rep. Angelo Puppolo · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
By Mr. Puppolo of Springfield, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2918) of Angelo J. Puppolo, Jr., and others relative to solar energy generation facilities. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on February 10, 2020: Accompanied a study order, see H4405. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
By Mr. Puppolo of Springfield, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2918) of Angelo J. Puppolo, Jr., and others relative to solar energy generation facilities. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Massachusetts House of Representatives, 13th Bristol · D–MA
4 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Antonio CabralMassachusetts Legislature · H.3454
An Act relative to offshore wind
Apr 6, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Antonio Cabral · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
By Representative Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3454) of Antonio F. D. Cabral relative to offshore wind energy generation. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on April 6, 2026: Accompanied a study order, see H5323. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
By Representative Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3454) of Antonio F. D. Cabral relative to offshore wind energy generation. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
By Representative Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3147) of Antonio F. D. Cabral and others relative to offshore wind energy generation. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on March 28, 2024: Senate concurred. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
By Representative Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3147) of Antonio F. D. Cabral and others relative to offshore wind energy generation. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
By Mr. Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3266) of Antonio F. D. Cabral, Christopher Hendricks and Elizabeth A. Malia relative to the offshore wind proposal bidding process. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on August 29, 2022: Accompanied a study order, see H5042. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
By Mr. Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3266) of Antonio F. D. Cabral, Christopher Hendricks and Elizabeth A. Malia relative to the offshore wind proposal bidding process. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
By Mr. Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2816) of Antonio F. D. Cabral and others relative to offshore wind development. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on February 10, 2020: Accompanied a study order, see H4405. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
By Mr. Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2816) of Antonio F. D. Cabral and others relative to offshore wind development. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Massachusetts House of Representatives, 20th Middlesex · R–MA
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Bradley JonesMassachusetts Legislature · H.1531
An Act establishing a commission to study housing affordability and density reform
Nov 20, 2025 · Introduced
Rep. Bradley Jones · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
By Representative Jones of North Reading, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1531) of Bradley H. Jones, Jr., and others for an investigation and study by a special commission (including members of the General Court) to study housing affordability and density reform. Housing.
The latest official Massachusetts General Court record shows this action on November 20, 2025: Accompanied a new draft, see H4762.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses residential rent, tenant protections, eviction, rental assistance, or housing supply and affordability. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's median gross rent.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
By Representative Jones of North Reading, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1531) of Bradley H. Jones, Jr., and others for an investigation and study by a special commission (including members of the General Court) to study housing affordability and density reform. Housing.
By Mr. Jones of North Reading, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3328) of Bradley H. Jones, Jr., Mathew J. Muratore and Steven S. Howitt relative to energy storage. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on January 24, 2022: Accompanied a new draft, see H4348. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
By Mr. Jones of North Reading, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3328) of Bradley H. Jones, Jr., Mathew J. Muratore and Steven S. Howitt relative to energy storage. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Massachusetts House of Representatives, 13th Middlesex · D–MA
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Carmine GentileMassachusetts Legislature · H.3496
An Act ensuring solar energy access
Apr 6, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Carmine Gentile · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
By Representative Gentile of Sudbury, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3496) of Carmine Lawrence Gentile and others relative to ensuring solar energy access. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on April 6, 2026: Accompanied a study order, see H5323. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.
Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
By Representative Gentile of Sudbury, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3496) of Carmine Lawrence Gentile and others relative to ensuring solar energy access. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Only current Massachusetts officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Massachusetts statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Massachusetts snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Massachusetts, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.