Massachusetts · individual fact

Massachusetts prices and inflation

Compare Massachusetts’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide Massachusetts CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level105.82024 · #6 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level98.82024 · #14 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level128.12024 · #3 of 50 · highest first

Massachusetts over time

Explore Massachusetts readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Massachusetts officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Massachusetts effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Massachusetts change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level Massachusetts · source units
MassachusettsPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 105.898.9104.7110.6Massachusetts, 2014: 104.5Massachusetts, 2015: 105.1Massachusetts, 2016: 108.2Massachusetts, 2017: 107.4Massachusetts, 2018: 107.4Massachusetts, 2019: 107.2Massachusetts, 2020: 109.1Massachusetts, 2021: 106.7Massachusetts, 2022: 109.4Massachusetts, 2023: 107.7Massachusetts, 2024: 105.8201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 27National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shock● Massachusetts Legislature · 153748631621076210512322143● U.S. Congress · Massachusetts delegation · 2◆ Governor · 5■ Massachusetts agencies · 62005-08-012026-09-30

166 of 166 reviewed Massachusetts actions match · 63 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.

Massachusetts · 2024: 105.8 · Rank #6 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Massachusetts with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Massachusetts All-items price level · source units
PeriodMassachusettsRankU.S. benchmark
2024105.8#6 of 50100
2023107.7#6 of 50100
2022109.4#4 of 50100
2021106.7#6 of 50100
2020109.1#5 of 50100
2019107.2#6 of 50100
2018107.4#5 of 50100
2017107.4#5 of 50100
2016108.2#5 of 50100
2015105.1#7 of 50100
2014104.5#7 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Massachusetts · state comparison

How does Massachusetts’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

Massachusetts · 2024105.8
Massachusetts rank#6among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Massachusetts with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Massachusetts
All-items price level history in Massachusetts98.6104.7110.820142024
2024 · Massachusetts: 105.8 · Rank #6 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Massachusetts All-items price level history
PeriodMassachusettsCompare
2014104.5
2015105.1
2016108.2
2017107.4
2018107.4
2019107.2
2020109.1
2021106.7
2022109.4
2023107.7
2024105.8

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Massachusetts stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Massachusetts has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Massachusetts · 105.82024 · Rank #6 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Massachusetts with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts · your comparison105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Massachusetts · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Massachusetts · 20240.8%
Massachusetts rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Massachusetts
Annual change in regional price deflator history in Massachusetts-1.2%4.7%10.6%20152024
2024 · Massachusetts: 0.8% · Rank #50 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Massachusetts Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodMassachusettsCompare
20150.7%
20164%
20171%
20182.1%
20191.2%
20203%
20211.8%
20229.3%
20232.1%
20240.8%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Massachusetts stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Massachusetts has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Massachusetts · 0.8%2024 · Rank #50 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Massachusetts with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts · your comparison0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Massachusetts · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

Massachusetts · 2024$71,629
Massachusetts rank#3among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Massachusetts
Real personal income per person history in Massachusetts$43.94K$60.06K$76.19K20142024
2024 · Massachusetts: $71,629 · Rank #3 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Massachusetts Real personal income per person history
PeriodMassachusettsCompare
2014$57,330
2015$60,284
2016$59,839
2017$61,657
2018$63,248
2019$65,383
2020$68,048
2021$72,466
2022$67,331
2023$69,372
2024$71,629

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Massachusetts stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Massachusetts has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Massachusetts · $71,6292024 · Rank #3 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Massachusetts with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts · your comparison$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Massachusetts candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

24 statements from 14 candidates

2026 Massachusetts Governor General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 6 statements

Andrea James

3 statements

Independent · Governor · MA

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Lowering Utility Costs

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Issues

Candidate campaign source

Lowering Utility Costs

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Andrea James — Lowering Utility Costs ↗
View 2 more statements from Andrea James
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Housing Affordability

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Dignity & Economic Security

Candidate campaign source

Housing Affordability

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Andrea James — Housing Affordability ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Massachusetts should not have contracts with ICE, and we deserve a governor who will ban data centers and focus instead on lowering utility costs and promoting green energy solutions.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Defending Our Neighbors:

Candidate campaign source

Massachusetts should not have contracts with ICE, and we deserve a governor who will ban data centers and focus instead on lowering utility costs and promoting green energy solutions.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Andrea James — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

Maura Healey

3 statements

Democratic · Governor · MA

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Build 100,000 new homes to increase supply and reduce housing costs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing Supply

Candidate campaign source

Build 100,000 new homes to increase supply and reduce housing costs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Maura Healey — Part 89 verified source ↗
View 2 more statements from Maura Healey
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Filed legislation to remove charges from energy bills and reduce ratepayer costs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Utility Bills

Candidate campaign source

Filed legislation to remove charges from energy bills and reduce ratepayer costs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Maura Healey — Part 89 verified source ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Launched an Energy Affordability Agenda providing immediate savings and longer-term reductions in energy bills.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy Costs

Candidate campaign source

Launched an Energy Affordability Agenda providing immediate savings and longer-term reductions in energy bills.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Maura Healey — Part 89 verified source ↗

2026 Massachusetts U.S. House — District 1 General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Independent/Unaffiliated · U.S. House District 1 · MA

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Nadia will work to stop price gouging, close corporate tax loopholes, and use that revenue to lower costs for working people. She will fight to bring Social Security benefits in line with today’s cost of living so seniors can afford to live with dignity.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Tax Relief for Working Families

Candidate campaign source

Nadia will work to stop price gouging, close corporate tax loopholes, and use that revenue to lower costs for working people. She will fight to bring Social Security benefits in line with today’s cost of living so seniors can afford to live with dignity.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nadia Donya Milleron — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Richard E. Neal

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · MA

CPI / inflation mention

Expand the number of drugs Medicare may negotiate and extend negotiated prices and inflation penalties to private and employer coverage.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health Care

Candidate campaign source

Expand the number of drugs Medicare may negotiate and extend negotiated prices and inflation penalties to private and employer coverage.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Richard E. Neal campaign source 7 ↗

2026 Massachusetts U.S. House — District 3 General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Gary J. Grossi

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 3 · MA

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Energy costs are crushing families.. I'll fight for affordable evidence based energy solutions that will put money back in your pocket NOW.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Affordability

Candidate campaign source

Energy costs are crushing families.. I'll fight for affordable evidence based energy solutions that will put money back in your pocket NOW.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Gary J. Grossi — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Massachusetts candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Massachusetts incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Massachusetts legislators and Massachusetts’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Massachusetts’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

167 matching sponsorships or proposals · 67 Massachusetts incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Aaron Saunders

Massachusetts House of Representatives, 7th Hampden · D–MA

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Aaron Saunders
Massachusetts Legislature · H.2331

An Act allowing municipalities to reasonably regulate solar siting

Aug 14, 2025 · Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on House Ways and Means

Rep. Aaron Saunders · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Representative Saunders of Belchertown, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2331) of Aaron L. Saunders relative to zoning ordinances for the regulation of the installation of solar energy systems. Municipalities and Regional Government.

The latest official Massachusetts General Court record shows this action on August 14, 2025: Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on House Ways and Means.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Representative Saunders of Belchertown, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2331) of Aaron L. Saunders relative to zoning ordinances for the regulation of the installation of solar energy systems. Municipalities and Regional Government.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Massachusetts Legislature · H.3230

An Act allowing municipalities to reasonably regulate solar siting

Mar 28, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Aaron Saunders · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Representative Saunders of Belchertown, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3230) of Aaron L. Saunders, Lindsay N. Sabadosa and Michael P. Kushmerek relative to zoning ordinances for the regulation of the installation of solar energy systems. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.

The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on March 28, 2024: Senate concurred. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Representative Saunders of Belchertown, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3230) of Aaron L. Saunders, Lindsay N. Sabadosa and Michael P. Kushmerek relative to zoning ordinances for the regulation of the installation of solar energy systems. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Adrian Madaro

Massachusetts House of Representatives, 1st Suffolk · D–MA

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Adrian Madaro
Massachusetts Legislature · H.2882

An Act promoting housing affordability through tax relief

Sep 12, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Adrian Madaro · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Representative Madaro of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2882) of Adrian C. Madaro relative to promoting housing affordability through tax relief. Revenue.

The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on September 12, 2024: Accompanied a study order, see H5045. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses residential rent, tenant protections, eviction, rental assistance, or housing supply and affordability. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's median gross rent.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Representative Madaro of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2882) of Adrian C. Madaro relative to promoting housing affordability through tax relief. Revenue.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Massachusetts Legislature · H.3335

An Act relative to renewable energy generation and market efficiency

Jan 3, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Adrian Madaro · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Mr. Madaro of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3335) of Adrian C. Madaro relative to renewable energy generation and market efficiency. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.

The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on January 3, 2023: No further action taken. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Mr. Madaro of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3335) of Adrian C. Madaro relative to renewable energy generation and market efficiency. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Angelo Puppolo

Massachusetts House of Representatives, 12th Hampden · D–MA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Angelo Puppolo
Massachusetts Legislature · H.2918

An Act relative to solar energy

Feb 10, 2020 · Did not pass

Rep. Angelo Puppolo · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Mr. Puppolo of Springfield, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2918) of Angelo J. Puppolo, Jr., and others relative to solar energy generation facilities. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.

The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on February 10, 2020: Accompanied a study order, see H4405. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Mr. Puppolo of Springfield, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2918) of Angelo J. Puppolo, Jr., and others relative to solar energy generation facilities. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Antonio Cabral

Massachusetts House of Representatives, 13th Bristol · D–MA

4 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Antonio Cabral
Massachusetts Legislature · H.3454

An Act relative to offshore wind

Apr 6, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Antonio Cabral · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Representative Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3454) of Antonio F. D. Cabral relative to offshore wind energy generation. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.

The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on April 6, 2026: Accompanied a study order, see H5323. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Representative Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3454) of Antonio F. D. Cabral relative to offshore wind energy generation. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Massachusetts Legislature · H.3147

An Act relative to offshore wind

Mar 28, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Antonio Cabral · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Representative Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3147) of Antonio F. D. Cabral and others relative to offshore wind energy generation. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.

The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on March 28, 2024: Senate concurred. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Representative Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3147) of Antonio F. D. Cabral and others relative to offshore wind energy generation. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Massachusetts Legislature · H.3266

An Act relative to offshore wind

Aug 29, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Antonio Cabral · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Mr. Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3266) of Antonio F. D. Cabral, Christopher Hendricks and Elizabeth A. Malia relative to the offshore wind proposal bidding process. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.

The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on August 29, 2022: Accompanied a study order, see H5042. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Mr. Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3266) of Antonio F. D. Cabral, Christopher Hendricks and Elizabeth A. Malia relative to the offshore wind proposal bidding process. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Massachusetts Legislature · H.2816

An Act to promote offshore wind development

Feb 10, 2020 · Did not pass

Rep. Antonio Cabral · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Mr. Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2816) of Antonio F. D. Cabral and others relative to offshore wind development. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.

The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on February 10, 2020: Accompanied a study order, see H4405. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Mr. Cabral of New Bedford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2816) of Antonio F. D. Cabral and others relative to offshore wind development. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bradley Jones

Massachusetts House of Representatives, 20th Middlesex · R–MA

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Bradley Jones
Massachusetts Legislature · H.1531

An Act establishing a commission to study housing affordability and density reform

Nov 20, 2025 · Introduced

Rep. Bradley Jones · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Representative Jones of North Reading, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1531) of Bradley H. Jones, Jr., and others for an investigation and study by a special commission (including members of the General Court) to study housing affordability and density reform. Housing.

The latest official Massachusetts General Court record shows this action on November 20, 2025: Accompanied a new draft, see H4762.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses residential rent, tenant protections, eviction, rental assistance, or housing supply and affordability. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's median gross rent.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Representative Jones of North Reading, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1531) of Bradley H. Jones, Jr., and others for an investigation and study by a special commission (including members of the General Court) to study housing affordability and density reform. Housing.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Massachusetts Legislature · H.3328

An Act relative to energy storage

Jan 24, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Bradley Jones · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Mr. Jones of North Reading, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3328) of Bradley H. Jones, Jr., Mathew J. Muratore and Steven S. Howitt relative to energy storage. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.

The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on January 24, 2022: Accompanied a new draft, see H4348. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Mr. Jones of North Reading, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3328) of Bradley H. Jones, Jr., Mathew J. Muratore and Steven S. Howitt relative to energy storage. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Carmine Gentile

Massachusetts House of Representatives, 13th Middlesex · D–MA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Carmine Gentile
Massachusetts Legislature · H.3496

An Act ensuring solar energy access

Apr 6, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Carmine Gentile · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

By Representative Gentile of Sudbury, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3496) of Carmine Lawrence Gentile and others relative to ensuring solar energy access. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.

The official Massachusetts General Court record lists this final action on April 6, 2026: Accompanied a study order, see H5323. The measure was not enacted in that General Court.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity prices, utility bills, generation supply, clean energy, or power-grid policy. It does not establish an effect on Massachusetts's average retail electricity price.

Retained Massachusetts evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

By Representative Gentile of Sudbury, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3496) of Carmine Lawrence Gentile and others relative to ensuring solar energy access. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Massachusetts officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Massachusetts statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.