Louisiana · individual fact

Louisiana income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Louisiana’s tax structure.

Median household income$60.76K2020–2024 · #48 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$35.04K2020–2024 · #47 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$56.79K2024 · #30 of 50 · highest first

Louisiana over time

Explore Louisiana readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Louisiana officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Louisiana effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Louisiana change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person Louisiana · source units
LouisianaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $56,789$44.28K$52.63K$60.98KLouisiana, 2014: $46,949Louisiana, 2015: $47,113Louisiana, 2016: $45,897Louisiana, 2017: $47,192Louisiana, 2018: $49,191Louisiana, 2019: $49,920Louisiana, 2020: $52,747Louisiana, 2021: $55,469Louisiana, 2022: $52,781Louisiana, 2023: $55,235Louisiana, 2024: $56,789201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 35National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings funding● Louisiana Legislature · 52● U.S. Congress · Louisiana delegation · 722◆ Governor · 92■ Louisiana agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-09-012026-07-31

21 of 21 reviewed Louisiana actions match · 17 date markers shown. 35 major events shown separately.

Louisiana · 2024: $56,789 · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Louisiana Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodLouisianaRankU.S. benchmark
2024$56,789#30 of 50$59,195
2023$55,235#34 of 50$58,088
2022$52,781#39 of 50$57,104
2021$55,469#40 of 50$59,365
2020$52,747#37 of 50$56,514
2019$49,920#36 of 50$53,683
2018$49,191#34 of 50$52,242
2017$47,192#35 of 50$51,006
2016$45,897#38 of 50$49,828
2015$47,113#31 of 50$49,396
2014$46,949#26 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Louisiana · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

Louisiana · 2020–2024$60,756
Louisiana rank#48among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Louisiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Louisiana has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Louisiana · $60,7562020–2024 · Rank #48 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $60,348 – $61,164Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Louisiana with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana · your comparison$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$60,7562020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by Louisiana households, expressed in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • Income is not take-home pay and does not directly measure taxes, wealth, prices, or purchasing power.
  • A statewide median obscures regional and household differences.
Louisiana · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

Louisiana · 2024$56,789
Louisiana rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Louisiana
Real personal income per person history in Louisiana$43.88K$52.63K$61.39K20142024
2024 · Louisiana: $56,789 · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Louisiana Real personal income per person history
PeriodLouisianaCompare
2014$46,949
2015$47,113
2016$45,897
2017$47,192
2018$49,191
2019$49,920
2020$52,747
2021$55,469
2022$52,781
2023$55,235
2024$56,789

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Louisiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Louisiana has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Louisiana · $56,7892024 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Louisiana with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana · your comparison$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Louisiana · state comparison

How Louisiana raises taxes

For taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, Louisiana applies a flat 3% individual-income-tax rate. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

Louisiana · FY2024$4.88B
Louisiana rank#24among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Louisiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Louisiana has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Louisiana · $4.88BFY2024 · Rank #24 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Louisiana with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky$5.02B—
#24Louisiana · your comparison$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma$4.51B—
#27Kansas$4.5B—
#28Iowa$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska$2.48B—
#34Maine$2.4B—
#35Mississippi$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding Louisiana income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The Louisiana ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Louisiana candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

27 statements from 12 candidates

2026 Louisiana U.S. House District 1 — Open Primary

2 candidates with matching statements · 5 statements

Lauren Jewett

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · LA

Taxes & tax policy

The crisis of Social Security is looming. Social Security is the promise this country made to every worker: pay in your whole life, and you'll have something to retire on. That promise is now on a clock because the trust fund is projected to run dry by the end of 2032, triggering an automatic 22% be…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Social Security, Medicare, and retirement

Candidate campaign source

The crisis of Social Security is looming. Social Security is the promise this country made to every worker: pay in your whole life, and you'll have something to retire on. That promise is now on a clock because the trust fund is projected to run dry by the end of 2032, triggering an automatic 22% benefit cut unless Congress acts. This timeline was accelerated by 2025 tax cuts that drained trust fund revenue. This isn't hypothetical for LA-01. In fact, it's a district full of retirees or people nearing retirement, and a 22% cut would hit a senior in Terrebonne or Lafourche just as hard whether they worked a rig, a classroom, or a shrimp boat. Social Security is what many families in our district rely on as their primary source of retirement income. Congress keeps kicking the can down the road instead of acting while the fix is still manageable. Every year Washington waits, the fix gets more costly, more difficult to fix, and painful for retirees and for the workers paying in today. As majority leader, Steve Scalise has had more power than almost anyone in Washington to bring a real fix to the floor, and he hasn't.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Lauren Jewett — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
View 1 more statement from Lauren Jewett
Income & wages

Oppose treating poverty, addiction, and homelessness as crimes when what people need is treatment and housing.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Oppose treating poverty, addiction, and homelessness as crimes when what people need is treatment and housing.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Lauren Jewett — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗

Steve Scalise

3 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · LA

Taxes & tax policy

Helped shepherd the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act through the House.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Tax Policy Record

Candidate campaign source

Helped shepherd the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act through the House.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Steve Scalise — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from Steve Scalise
Taxes & tax policy

A proven conservative, Steve believes in upholding the Constitution. He has always exercised fiscal discipline, pushed for lower taxes, and believed in balancing our nation’s checkbook. He is committed to fighting for secure borders and working to undo the Biden administration’s pro-amnesty policies…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: CONSERVATIVE VALUES

Candidate campaign source

A proven conservative, Steve believes in upholding the Constitution. He has always exercised fiscal discipline, pushed for lower taxes, and believed in balancing our nation’s checkbook. He is committed to fighting for secure borders and working to undo the Biden administration’s pro-amnesty policies that put the safety of our nation’s communities in jeopardy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Steve Scalise — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Lower federal taxes.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes

Candidate campaign source

Lower federal taxes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Steve Scalise — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Louisiana U.S. House District 3 — Open Primary

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · LA

Income & wages

Caleb will fight for wages and pay raises that keep pace with today’s economy, so hardworking people can afford rising costs and build financial security.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Caleb will fight for wages and pay raises that keep pace with today’s economy, so hardworking people can afford rising costs and build financial security.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Caleb "With a C" Walker — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 2 more statements from Caleb "With a C" Walker
Income & wages

Affordability means ensuring Louisiana families can earn enough to keep up with today’s economy. Caleb will fight to lower the cost of groceries, housing, insurance, healthcare, and other everyday necessities while supporting better wages that allow hardworking people to provide for their families, …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Affordability means ensuring Louisiana families can earn enough to keep up with today’s economy. Caleb will fight to lower the cost of groceries, housing, insurance, healthcare, and other everyday necessities while supporting better wages that allow hardworking people to provide for their families, build savings, and get ahead.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Caleb "With a C" Walker — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Caleb will fight to increase teacher pay and make the first $50,000 of every educator’s salary exempt from federal income tax.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Caleb will fight to increase teacher pay and make the first $50,000 of every educator’s salary exempt from federal income tax.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Caleb "With a C" Walker — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Louisiana U.S. House District 4 — Open Primary

3 candidates with matching statements · 9 statements

"Matt" Gromlich

3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 4 · LA

Income & wages

Louisiana is one of only 5 states that does not have a state minimum wage. The minimum wage in the United States has been $7.25 an hour since 2009. Adjusted for inflation, minimum wage would be $10.95 today. Mike Johnson has opposed raising the minimum wage both in 2019 and 2021 – while he makes $22…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Louisiana is one of only 5 states that does not have a state minimum wage. The minimum wage in the United States has been $7.25 an hour since 2009. Adjusted for inflation, minimum wage would be $10.95 today. Mike Johnson has opposed raising the minimum wage both in 2019 and 2021 – while he makes $223,500 a year. Increasing the minimum wage to $15 is not the final goal. But it is a good first step to help people in states that do not have their own state minimum wage.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

"Matt" Gromlich — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 2 more statements from "Matt" Gromlich
Taxes & tax policy

Our tax dollars should come back to our communities, and not disappear into wasteful spending, corporate giveaways, or broken systems that leave working people behind. I will fight to make sure public dollars are used to strengthen healthcare, infrastructure, education, jobs, and services that direc…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure

Candidate campaign source

Our tax dollars should come back to our communities, and not disappear into wasteful spending, corporate giveaways, or broken systems that leave working people behind. I will fight to make sure public dollars are used to strengthen healthcare, infrastructure, education, jobs, and services that directly improve people’s lives.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

"Matt" Gromlich — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Income & wages

What is your plan to address inflation and the rising cost of living? The cost of living is one of the biggest challenges families are facing right now. My focus is on strengthening the foundations people rely on; making sure families have access to affordable healthcare, stable housing, a living wa…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

What is your plan to address inflation and the rising cost of living? The cost of living is one of the biggest challenges families are facing right now. My focus is on strengthening the foundations people rely on; making sure families have access to affordable healthcare, stable housing, a living wage, and reliable childcare. When people have stability in these areas, it strengthens the workforce, improves quality of life, and creates a more resilient economy overall. Addressing cost of living isn’t about one quick fix, it’s about building systems that allow people to thrive, not just get by.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

"Matt" Gromlich — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Conrad Cable

4 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 4 · LA

Income & wages

Increase the Minimum Wage Louisiana has never set its own minimum wage. Workers are stuck at $7.25 an hour, the same as in 2009. Most families in District 4 don’t earn enough to cover basic needs.A living wage in Shreveport-Bossier is over $15 an hour for a single adult and over $30 an hour for a pa…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Increase the Minimum Wage Louisiana has never set its own minimum wage. Workers are stuck at $7.25 an hour, the same as in 2009. Most families in District 4 don’t earn enough to cover basic needs.A living wage in Shreveport-Bossier is over $15 an hour for a single adult and over $30 an hour for a parent with one child. Many full-time workers live in poverty despite working hard every day.We can do better. The Raise the Wage Act of 2025 would raise the minimum to $17 by 2030, but that is not enough. Workers deserve a wage that rises with inflation each year, so no one has to struggle to survive.Source: Census Reporter

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Conrad Cable — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 3 more statements from Conrad Cable
Income & wages

The system encourages wage theft and unequal pay. Women and people of color are affected the most, often facing harassment and exploitation. Too many politicians have ignored these problems, leaving workers to struggle for fairness. In a district where a third of the population is African American a…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

The system encourages wage theft and unequal pay. Women and people of color are affected the most, often facing harassment and exploitation. Too many politicians have ignored these problems, leaving workers to struggle for fairness. In a district where a third of the population is African American and half are women, we must ensure a living wage for all workers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Conrad Cable — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Income & wages

The current FMLA doesn’t guarantee paid leave, leaving families struggling. We support fair minimum standards for parental leave for both parents, plus flexible schedules. Under this plan, mothers would get at least 14 weeks of paid maternity leave. Fathers or second parents would get at least 10 pa…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

The current FMLA doesn’t guarantee paid leave, leaving families struggling. We support fair minimum standards for parental leave for both parents, plus flexible schedules. Under this plan, mothers would get at least 14 weeks of paid maternity leave. Fathers or second parents would get at least 10 paid days. After the minimum, parents could also share up to four months of general parental leave between them.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Conrad Cable — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Income & wages

Protect the Right to Unionize Unions help workers get fair pay, benefits, and safe workplaces. When union membership was at its peak in America, we saw growth, prosperity, and stronger communities. Strong unions give workers a real voice.Unions let workers negotiate openly, instead of leaving decisi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Protect the Right to Unionize Unions help workers get fair pay, benefits, and safe workplaces. When union membership was at its peak in America, we saw growth, prosperity, and stronger communities. Strong unions give workers a real voice.Unions let workers negotiate openly, instead of leaving decisions about wages, hours, and safety to corporations behind closed doors. This puts power in the hands of the people who actually make the economy run.Louisiana laws have long been stacked against workers. Wages are too low, hours are cut, benefits are stripped. Leaders who put corporations first instead of workers have let this continue for too long.It doesn’t have to stay this way. Together, we can protect union rights, strengthen worker protections, and make work fair, safe, and dignified for everyone.Source: Congress

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Conrad Cable — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Gordon Heslop

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 4 · LA

Income & wages

Increase the minimum wage

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Increase the minimum wage

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gordon Heslop — candidate-owned primary source ↗
View 1 more statement from Gordon Heslop
Taxes & tax policy

SOCIAL SECURITY: Social security must be fixed immediately to avoid an approaching shortage of funds. In keeping with my policy of the middle class not paying a higher rate of tax than higher income earners I would do the following: remove the current limit on earnings subject to social security tax…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Social Security, Medicare, and retirement

Candidate campaign source

SOCIAL SECURITY: Social security must be fixed immediately to avoid an approaching shortage of funds. In keeping with my policy of the middle class not paying a higher rate of tax than higher income earners I would do the following: remove the current limit on earnings subject to social security tax of $184,500 which produces a tax of $11,439. I suggest taxing all income for social security just as is currently done on all income at a rate of 1.45% for Medicare - the other part of the current 7.65% total tax. Under this policy, someone with an income of $50 million (there are some) would pay $3.1 million in social security tax instead of $11,439. Obviously, most incomes are less than this, but everyone earning more than $184,500 would now pay the same tax rate as the middle class does.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gordon Heslop — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Louisiana candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Louisiana incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Louisiana legislators and Louisiana’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Louisiana’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

12 matching sponsorships or proposals · 7 Louisiana incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Delisha Boyd

Louisiana House of Representatives, District 102 · D–LA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Delisha Boyd
Louisiana Legislature · HB 209

EMPLOYMENT/WAGES-MINIMUM: Provides relative to the state minimum wage (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Mar 9, 2026 · Not enacted

Rep. Delisha Boyd · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would set a $10 hourly minimum wage in 2027 and $12 in 2029, with listed exceptions. Its 2031 clause says both a $14 minimum and a $12 employer-payment floor; that inconsistency is not resolved here. The proposal did not become law.

Current Status: Pending House Labor and Industrial Relations - Considered 4/9/26. Latest official history entry: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations. (2026-03-09). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Louisiana evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

§671. Minimum wage; establishment A. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the state minimum wage is established and set as follows: (1) Beginning January 1, 2027, the minimum wage shall be set at ten dollars per hour. Every employer in the state shall pay to each employee wages at a rate of not less than ten dollars per hour for hours worked in a pay period, regardless of how the time at work is measured. (2) Beginning January 1, 2029, the minimum wage shall be set at twelve dollars per hour. Every employer in the state shall pay to each employee wages at a rate of not less than twelve dollars per hour for hours worked in a pay period, regardless of how the time at work is measured. (3) Beginning January 1, 2031, the minimum wage shall be set at fourteen dollars per hour. Every employer in the state shall pay to each employee wages at a rate of not less than twelve dollars per hour for hours worked in a pay period, regardless of how the time at work is measured. B. If, at any time, the federal minimum hourly wage rate set by Section 6 of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, or a successor federal law, is raised to a rate higher than the state minimum wage rate, then the state minimum wage rate shall be increased to the rate of the federal minimum wage rate. HB NO. 209 […] §676. Exceptions The provisions of this Chapter do not apply to the following: (1) Student employees of private employers. (2) Tipped employees and agricultural employees as defined by the federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, or a successor federal law.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Tony Bacala

Louisiana House of Representatives, District 59 · R–LA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Tony Bacala
Louisiana Legislature · HB 181

MEDICAID: Provides for Medicaid fraud detection and prevention (EN SEE FISC NOTE SG EX See Note)

Jun 2, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Tony Bacala · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law permits the legislative auditor to obtain individual state income-tax data for Medicaid and SNAP eligibility accuracy and fraud detection, with use and disclosure restrictions. The insurance connection is the Medicaid eligibility check, not the separate food-benefit program.

Current Status: Signed by the Governor - Act 624. Latest official history entry: Effective date: 06/02/2026. (2026-06-02). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Louisiana evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Q. The legislative auditor may access individual-level state income tax return data in accordance with R.S. 47:1508(B)(44) for the limited purposes of ensuring accuracy of Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program eligibility determinations, detecting and preventing fraud in the Medicaid program and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and fulfilling all other applicable requirements of the Medical Assistance Programs Integrity Law, R.S. 46:437.1 et seq. Section 2. R.S. 47:1508(B)(44) is hereby enacted to read as follows: §1508. Confidentiality of tax records * * * B. Nothing contained in this Section shall be construed to prevent: * * * (44)(a) The secretary from disclosing individual-level state income tax return data to the legislative auditor, upon request of the legislative auditor, exclusively for the purposes specified in this Paragraph. (b) The legislative auditor shall utilize data disclosed pursuant to this Paragraph for only the following purposes: (i) Ensuring accuracy of Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program eligibility determinations. (ii) Detecting and preventing fraud in the Medicaid program and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. (iii) Fulfilling the requirements of the Medical Assistance Programs Integrity Law, R.S. 46:437.1 et seq. (c) The secretary shall enter into any memorandum of understanding, cooperative endeavor, or other type of agreement as may be necessary to facilitate the sharing of data with the legislative auditor for the purposes set forth in this Paragraph. (d) Any disclosure authorized pursuant to this Paragraph shall comply with applicable federal law, including 26 U.S.C. 6103. * * *
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Troy Hebert

Louisiana House of Representatives, District 31 · R–LA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Troy Hebert
Louisiana Legislature · HB 153

UNEMPLOYMENT COMP: Provides relative to work search requirements for unemployment benefits (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF RV See Note)

Jun 8, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Troy Hebert · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law requires at least five valid work-search actions per week for unemployment claims and adds disqualification rules for specified failures to pursue suitable work or attend interviews. It concerns access to unemployment cash benefits and took effect December 31, 2025.

Current Status: Signed by the Governor - Act 151. Latest official history entry: Effective date: 12/31/2025. (2025-06-08). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Louisiana evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

§1600. Benefit eligibility conditions An unemployed individual shall be eligible to receive benefits only if the administrator finds that: * * * (3)(a) He is able to work, available for work, and is actively seeking work by conducting no fewer than five work search actions for each week in which he makes a claim for benefits. The administrator shall, by regulation, prescribe the actions which shall be considered valid work search actions. (b)(i) For the purpose of this Section, a claimant has satisfied the requirements of making an active search for work if he is pursuing a course of action to become reemployed as contained in his eligibility review and reemployment assistance plan approved by the administrator and consistent with Subparagraph (a) of this Paragraph. The reemployment assistance plan shall not contain factors which, when judged on the basis of reasonableness for a similarly unemployed worker to follow, would be contrary to the individual's interest, taking into account the claimant's qualifications for work, the distance of his residence from employing establishments, his prior work history, and current labor market conditions related to his normal and customary occupation. * * * §1601. Disqualification for benefits An individual shall be disqualified for benefits: * * * (3) If the administrator finds that he has failed, without good cause, either to apply for available, suitable work or to accept suitable work within the time frame contained in the offer when work is offered to him, appear for a previously scheduled job interview, return to his customary self-employment, if any, or participate in an approved training program when so directed by the administrator. Such disqualification shall continue until such time as the claimant (a) can demonstrate that he has been paid wages for work subject to the Louisiana Employment Security Law or the unemployment insurance law of any other state or the United States, equivalent to at least ten times his weekly benefit amount following the week in which the disqualifying act occurred and (b) has not left his last work under disqualifying circumstances. * * * (c) The administrator shall prescribe a form that allows employers to report suspected violations of this Paragraph via online or electronic submission. The administrator shall make the form available to all employers, and, at least annually, inform employers about the importance of reporting work search violations by claimants. * * * Section 2. This Act shall become effective on December 31, 2025.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Bill Cassidy

U.S. Senate, Louisiana · R–LA

5 proposals
View proposals from Sen. Bill Cassidy
U.S. Congress · Louisiana delegation · S 2083

Pay Our Correctional Officers Fairly Act

Jun 12, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Bill Cassidy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would apply a nearby federal locality-pay rate to specified Bureau of Prisons employees otherwise in the Rest of United States pay area, subject to distance and location rules. It concerns wages for a defined employee group.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Louisiana evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Providing nearest other locality pay rate for certain Bureau of Prisons employees receiving Rest of U.S. locality rateSection 5304 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection (j) and by inserting after subsection (h) the following:(i)(1)Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, and consistent with paragraph (2), the official worksite of an employee of the Bureau of Prisons that is otherwise located in the pay locality designated as Rest of U.S. shall be considered to be located in the nearest other pay locality established pursuant to this section.(2)For purposes of carrying out paragraph (1)—(A)if more than one pay locality is within 200 miles of the official worksite of such an employee, such worksite shall be considered to be located in the pay locality with the highest comparability payment; and(B)an employee of the Bureau of Prisons shall not be subject to paragraph (1) if the official worksite of such employee is not within 200 miles of the nearest boundary of any pay locality other than Rest of U.S...
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Louisiana delegation · S 1504

Claiming Age Clarity Act

Apr 29, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Bill Cassidy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would rename Social Security retirement-age terms to describe minimum, standard, and maximum monthly benefits. This terminology provision does not itself change retirement ages or benefit amounts.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact counts Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Benefit administration concerns a component of that population; SSI, Medicare, and state pensions are separate programs. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Louisiana evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Changes to social security terminologyNot later than January 1, 2027, the Commissioner of Social Security shall ensure that, in any rules, regulation, guidance, or other materials of the Social Security Administration, whether online or in print—(1)the term early eligibility age is replaced with the term minimum monthly benefit age;(2)the terms full retirement age and normal retirement age are replaced with the term standard monthly benefit age; and(3)the term delayed retirement credit shall not be used and any reference to age 70 as the maximum age up to which delayed retirement credits can be received shall be replaced with the term maximum monthly benefit age.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Louisiana delegation · S 1505

A bill to ensure that Social Security beneficiaries receive regular statements from the Social Security Administration, and for other purposes.

Apr 29, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Bill Cassidy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would require mailed Social Security statements at specified ages and intervals, including annual statements beginning at age sixty, with an opt-out. Online-account access would not by itself replace the mailing requirement. This concerns benefit administration, not a higher beneficiary count.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact counts Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Benefit administration concerns a component of that population; SSI, Medicare, and state pensions are separate programs. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Louisiana evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

1.Ensuring beneficiaries receive regular social security statementsNot later than January 1, 2027, the Commissioner of Social Security shall ensure that—(1)individuals with social security account numbers are mailed a paper social security statement whenever they enter the workforce or start a new job; (2)a paper social security statement is mailed to each individual with a social security account number not less frequently than—(A)once every 5 years beginning with the year in which the individual achieves age 25; (B)once every 2 years beginning with the year in which the individual achieves age 55; and(C)annually beginning with the year in which the individual achieves age 60;(3)individuals with social security account numbers are mailed paper social security statements regardless of whether they have created an online my Social Security account with the Social Security Administration; and(4)individuals are able to opt out from receiving paper social security statements (including statements otherwise required under this section).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Louisiana delegation · S 466

Fairness for Disabled Young Adults Act

Feb 6, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Bill Cassidy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would raise the disability-onset age threshold for title II child’s insurance benefits from before age twenty-two to before age twenty-six. This concerns Social Security disability eligibility; SSI is a separate program.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact counts Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Benefit administration concerns a component of that population; SSI, Medicare, and state pensions are separate programs. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Louisiana evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Increase to age threshold for child’s insurance benefits on the basis of disability(a)In generalSection 202(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(d)) is amended by striking age of 22 each place it appears and inserting age of 26.(b)Conforming amendments(1)Section 205(j)(2)(C)(vi)(II)(cc) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(j)(2)(C)(vi)(II)(cc)) is amended by striking age of 22 and inserting age of 26. (2)Section 225(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 425(a)) is amended by striking age of 22 and inserting age of 26.(3)Section 1631(a)(2)(B)(xvii)(II)(cc) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1383(a)(2)(B)(xvii)(II)(cc)) is amended by striking age of 22 and inserting age of 26.(4)Section 1634(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1383c(c)) is amended by striking age of 22 and inserting age of 26.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Louisiana delegation · S 109

Offshore Energy Security Act of 2025

Jan 16, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Bill Cassidy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would require a schedule of offshore oil and gas lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico. Leasing concerns potential petroleum supply; it does not establish actual production or a change in the six-state Gulf Coast gasoline price.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Louisiana policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Louisiana statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Louisiana evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(c)RequirementNotwithstanding the 2024–2029 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program, the Secretary shall—(1)conduct not fewer than 20 offshore lease sales, as described under subsection (d), during the 10-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act; and(2)to the maximum extent practicable, carry out a lease sale under this subsection in accordance with the Record of Decision approved by the Secretary on January 17, 2017, and described in the notice of availability of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management entitled Record of Decision for the 2017–2022 Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement; MMAA104000 (82 Fed. Reg. 6643 (January 19, 2017)). (d)TimingIn conducting the offshore lease sales under subsection (c), the Secretary shall conduct a lease sale under this section not later than each of the following dates:(1)March 31, 2026.(2)August 31, 2026.(3)March 31, 2027.(4)August 31, 2027.(5)March 31, 2028.(6)August 31, 2028.(7)March 31, 2029.(8)August 31, 2029.(9)March 31, 2030.(10)August 31, 2030.(11)March 31, 2031.(12)August 31, 2031.(13)March 31, 2032.(14)August 31, 2032.(15)March 31, 2033.(16)August 31, 2033.(17)March 31, 2034.(18)August 31, 2034.(19)March 31, 2035.(20)August 31, 2035.(e)Area offered for lease(1)AcreageThe Secretary shall offer not fewer than 74,000,000 acres for each offshore lease sale conducted under subsection (c).(2)LocationAn offshore lease sale conducted under subsection (c) shall be in the Gulf of Mexico Region Program Area as identified in Figure S–1 of the 2017–2022 Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program published on November 18, 2016 by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (as announced in the notice of availability of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management entitled Notice of Availability of the 2017–2022 Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program (81 Fed. Reg. 84612 (November 23, 2016))).
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Heather Cloud

Louisiana Senate, District 28 · R–LA

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Heather Cloud
Louisiana Legislature · SB 130

MEDICAID: Provides relative to Medicaid. (gov sig) (EN DECREASE GF EX See Note)

Jun 20, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Heather Cloud · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law requires independent Medicaid eligibility verification, restricts reliance solely on automatic renewals where federal law permits, limits residency self-attestation, and establishes recurring data checks. It directs withdrawal of specified renewal waivers and contains federal-law qualifications. These are coverage-eligibility rules, not a measured insurance outcome.

Current Status: Signed by the Governor - Act 427. Latest official history entry: Effective date 6/20/2025. (2025-06-20). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Louisiana evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

B. The Louisiana Department of Health shall adopt the following measures to verify ongoing eligibility for Medicaid: (1) The Louisiana Department of Health shall not accept eligibility determinations for Medicaid from any exchange established under 42 U.S.C. 18041(c). The Louisiana Department of Health may accept assessments from an exchange established under 42 U.S.C. 18041(c), but shall independently verify eligibility and make eligibility determinations. (2) Neither the Louisiana Department of Health nor any state agency that operates as a part of Medicaid may rely solely on ex parte renewals, including but not limited to any waiver granted under Section 1902(e)(14)(A) of the Social Security Act, unless expressly required by federal law. No later than January 1, 2026, the Louisiana Department of Health shall withdraw any waivers submitted to the federal government that authorize the department to determine or renew eligibility by ex parte renewal. (3) Unless required by federal law, the Louisiana Department of Health shall not accept self-attestation of Louisiana state residency for initial eligibility determinations or renewals. The Louisiana Department of Health may use technology and government data sharing to verify income, residency, household composition, or receipt of other coverage. The Louisiana Department of Health shall not request authority to waive or decline to periodically check any available income-related data sources to verify eligibility for Medicaid. (4) The Louisiana Department of Health may use an enhanced income verification platform to verify recipient eligibility. The Louisiana Department of Health may procure and enter into a contract for the platform. The platform shall meet all of the following criteria: (a) Use automated, real-time data matching and analytics to detect unreported or under reported income. (b) Consolidate overlapping data to prevent double counting of financial records. (5) The Louisiana Department of Health shall enter into the following data matching agreements to cross-check households enrolled in Medicaid with other state data sets as allowed by law: (a) On at least a monthly basis, the Louisiana Department of Health shall receive and review information from the state registrar of vital records concerning individuals enrolled in Medicaid that indicates a change in circumstances that may affect eligibility for Medicaid, including but not limited to death records. (b) On at least a quarterly basis, the Louisiana Department of Health shall receive and review information from the Louisiana Workforce Commission concerning individuals enrolled in Medicaid that indicates a change in circumstances that may affect eligibility for Medicaid, including but not limited to changes in employment or wages. (c) On at least a quarterly basis, the Louisiana Department of Health shall receive and review information from the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, office of motor vehicles concerning individuals enrolled in Medicaid that indicates a change in residency that may affect eligibility for Medicaid. (d) On at least a semi-annual basis, the Louisiana Department of Health shall receive and review information from the Louisiana Department of Revenue concerning individuals enrolled in Medicaid that indicates a change in circumstances that may affect eligibility for Medicaid, including but not limited to potential changes in income, wages, or residency as identified by tax records. (e) The Louisiana Department of Health shall implement a platform to receive and review information on at least an annual basis concerning incarceration status of individuals enrolled in Medicaid. (f) On at least a monthly basis, the Louisiana Department of Health shall receive and review information from the Social Security Administration concerning the disability status of individuals enrolled in Medicaid. (6) On at least a quarterly basis, the Louisiana Department of Health shall publish on its website, data regarding findings of noncompliance and fraud investigations in Medicaid for the following aggregate, nonconfidential, and nonpersonally identifying information: (a) The number of Medicaid cases investigated for intentional program violations or fraud. (b) Total number of Medicaid cases referred to the attorney general's office for prosecution. (c) Improper payments and expenditures. (d) Monies recovered. (e) Aggregate data concerning improper payments and ineligible recipients as a percentage of those investigated and reviewed.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. John Kennedy

U.S. Senate, Louisiana · R–LA

2 proposals
View proposals from Sen. John Kennedy
U.S. Congress · Louisiana delegation · S 3066

Pay the People Act

Oct 28, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. John Kennedy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would provide appropriations for specified federal employees, active-duty service members, and covered contractor employees during funding lapses. It concerns continuity of compensation for covered groups and does not prove this bill became law.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Louisiana evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2. Appropriations (a) Definitions In this section— (1) the term agency means each authority of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States; and (2) the term covered individual— (A) means an employee of an agency; and (B) includes— (i) a contractor who provides support to an employee described in subparagraph (A); and (ii) a member of the Armed Forces on active duty. (b) Appropriations For fiscal year 2026, and any fiscal year thereafter, for any period during which interim continuing appropriations or full-year appropriations for that fiscal year are not in effect for an agency, there are appropriated to the head of the agency, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as are necessary to provide standard rates of pay, allowances, pay differentials, benefits, and other payments otherwise payable on a regular basis to covered individuals with respect to the agency. (c) Termination Appropriations and funds made available and authority granted under subsection (b) shall be available to the head of an agency until whichever of the following first occurs: (1) The enactment into law of appropriations for the agency until the end of the applicable fiscal year (including a continuing appropriation) that provide amounts for the purposes for which amounts are made available under subsection (b). (2) The enactment into law of appropriations for the agency until the end of the applicable fiscal year (including a continuing appropriation) without any appropriation for such purposes. (d) Interim continuing appropriations Appropriations made available under subsection (b) may not be obligated by the head of an agency during any period during which continuing appropriations for the purposes for which amounts are made available under subsection (b) are in effect for the agency. (e) Charging to full-Year appropriations Obligations or expenditures made by the head of an agency pursuant to subsection (b) shall be charged to the applicable appropriation for the agency whenever a regular appropriation bill or a measure making continuing appropriations until the end of the applicable fiscal year for the agency becomes law. (f) Retroactive effective date This Act shall take effect as if enacted on September 30, 2025.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Louisiana delegation · S 3060

Paychecks for Patriots Act of 2025

Oct 28, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. John Kennedy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would provide military pay appropriations during a lapse in federal funding in fiscal year 2026. It concerns continuity of household wage income for covered service members, not the statewide median.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Louisiana evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2. Continuing appropriations for members of the Armed Forces There are hereby appropriated for fiscal year 2026, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for any period during which interim or full-year appropriations for fiscal year 2026 are not in effect, such sums as are necessary to provide pay and allowances to members of the Armed Forces, including reserve components thereof, who perform active service or inactive duty training during such period. 3. Termination Appropriations and funds made available and authority granted pursuant to this Act shall be available until the enactment into law of an appropriation (including a continuing appropriation) for any purpose for which amounts are made available in section 2.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Louisiana officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Louisiana statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.