Compare Louisiana’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.
BLS does not publish a statewide Louisiana CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.
All-items price level88.22024 · #46 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level93.72024 · #48 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level63.12024 · #45 of 50 · highest first
Louisiana over time
Explore Louisiana readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Louisiana officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Louisiana effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Louisiana change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
All-items price level Louisiana · source units
LouisianaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
3 of 3 reviewed Louisiana actions match · 3 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.
Louisiana · 2024: 88.2 · Rank #46 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100
BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Louisiana with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Louisiana · state comparison
How does Louisiana’s cost of living compare?
The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.
Louisiana · 202488.2
Louisiana rank#46among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
All-items price level
BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.
Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Louisiana with the published U.S. category value shown.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Louisiana
2024 · Louisiana: 88.2 · Rank #46 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Louisiana All-items price level history
Period
Louisiana
Compare
2014
93.4
2015
92.8
2016
93.6
2017
92.4
2018
90.8
2019
91.2
2020
91.1
2021
91.4
2022
90.5
2023
88.7
2024
88.2
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Louisiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Louisiana has a dark outline.
Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Louisiana · 88.22024 · Rank #46 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Louisiana with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
110.7
—
#2
Hawaii
110
—
#3
New Jersey
108.8
—
#4
New York
107.9
—
#5
Washington
107
—
#6
Massachusetts
105.8
—
#7
Maryland
105
—
#8
New Hampshire
104.2
—
#9
Connecticut
103.6
—
#10
Florida
103.4
—
#11
Oregon
103.4
—
#12
Colorado
103.1
—
#13
Alaska
102.4
—
#14
Rhode Island
102.3
—
#15
Virginia
101.1
—
#16
Arizona
100.7
—
#17
Nevada
100
—
#18
Illinois
100
—
#19
Delaware
99.8
—
#20
Utah
98.9
—
#21
Minnesota
98.6
—
#22
Vermont
98
—
#23
Pennsylvania
97.6
—
#24
Texas
97.1
—
#25
Maine
97.1
—
#26
Georgia
96.3
—
#27
Michigan
96.2
—
#28
Idaho
95.5
—
#29
Montana
94.6
—
#30
North Carolina
94.3
—
#31
Wisconsin
94.1
—
#32
South Carolina
93.7
—
#33
Indiana
93.3
—
#34
Ohio
92.8
—
#35
Wyoming
92.7
—
#36
New Mexico
92.2
—
#37
Tennessee
91.9
—
#38
Missouri
90.8
—
#39
Kentucky
90.2
—
#40
Nebraska
90.1
—
#41
Kansas
90.1
—
#42
West Virginia
89.5
—
#43
North Dakota
89
—
#44
Alabama
88.8
—
#45
South Dakota
88.6
—
#46
Louisiana · your comparison
88.2
—
#47
Oklahoma
87.8
—
#48
Iowa
87.8
—
#49
Mississippi
87
—
#50
Arkansas
86.9
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.
Louisiana · 20242%
Louisiana rank#40among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Annual change in regional price deflator
Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.
An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Louisiana
2024 · Louisiana: 2% · Rank #40 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Louisiana Annual change in regional price deflator history
Period
Louisiana
Compare
2015
-0.4%
2016
1.8%
2017
0.4%
2018
0.3%
2019
1.9%
2020
1.1%
2021
4.4%
2022
5.5%
2023
1.7%
2024
2%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Louisiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Louisiana has a dark outline.
Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Louisiana · 2%2024 · Rank #40 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Louisiana with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Montana
6.7%
—
#2
Idaho
6.2%
—
#3
Utah
6%
—
#4
Nevada
4.8%
—
#5
Michigan
4.7%
—
#6
New Mexico
4%
—
#7
Indiana
4%
—
#8
Wyoming
3.9%
—
#9
Illinois
3.9%
—
#10
Colorado
3.8%
—
#11
Delaware
3.7%
—
#12
Ohio
3.6%
—
#13
Wisconsin
3.6%
—
#14
North Dakota
3.5%
—
#15
Vermont
3.5%
—
#16
South Dakota
3.1%
—
#17
Maryland
3%
—
#18
Minnesota
3%
—
#19
Kentucky
2.9%
—
#20
South Carolina
2.9%
—
#21
Hawaii
2.9%
—
#22
Rhode Island
2.8%
—
#23
Mississippi
2.8%
—
#24
Kansas
2.8%
—
#25
Pennsylvania
2.8%
—
#26
Arkansas
2.8%
—
#27
New York
2.7%
—
#28
Arizona
2.6%
—
#29
North Carolina
2.5%
—
#30
Texas
2.5%
—
#31
New Jersey
2.5%
—
#32
West Virginia
2.5%
—
#33
Nebraska
2.4%
—
#34
Georgia
2.4%
—
#35
Florida
2.4%
—
#36
Virginia
2.4%
—
#37
Tennessee
2.4%
—
#38
Alabama
2.3%
—
#39
Missouri
2.3%
—
#40
Louisiana · your comparison
2%
—
#41
Connecticut
2%
—
#42
Alaska
1.7%
—
#43
Maine
1.7%
—
#44
Oklahoma
1.6%
—
#45
Iowa
1.5%
—
#46
New Hampshire
1.4%
—
#47
Washington
1.3%
—
#48
California
1.3%
—
#49
Oregon
1.2%
—
#50
Massachusetts
0.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.
Louisiana · 2024$56,789
Louisiana rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Real personal income per person
Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.
Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Louisiana
2024 · Louisiana: $56,789 · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Louisiana Real personal income per person history
Period
Louisiana
Compare
2014
$46,949
2015
$47,113
2016
$45,897
2017
$47,192
2018
$49,191
2019
$49,920
2020
$52,747
2021
$55,469
2022
$52,781
2023
$55,235
2024
$56,789
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Louisiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Louisiana has a dark outline.
Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Louisiana · $56,7892024 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Louisiana with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Wyoming
$75,501
—
#2
Connecticut
$74,254
—
#3
Massachusetts
$71,629
—
#4
South Dakota
$69,153
—
#5
Nebraska
$65,297
—
#6
North Dakota
$65,271
—
#7
Colorado
$65,223
—
#8
New Hampshire
$64,632
—
#9
Washington
$64,421
—
#10
New York
$64,153
—
#11
New Jersey
$63,142
—
#12
California
$63,028
—
#13
Minnesota
$62,039
—
#14
Virginia
$61,914
—
#15
Maryland
$61,111
—
#16
Illinois
$60,333
—
#17
Alaska
$60,272
—
#18
Iowa
$60,144
—
#19
Montana
$59,203
—
#20
Kansas
$59,172
—
#21
Vermont
$58,893
—
#22
Oklahoma
$58,692
—
#23
Pennsylvania
$58,620
—
#24
Tennessee
$58,582
—
#25
Wisconsin
$58,273
—
#26
Texas
$58,219
—
#27
Missouri
$57,850
—
#28
Maine
$57,480
—
#29
Florida
$57,131
—
#30
Louisiana · your comparison
$56,789
—
#31
Nevada
$56,503
—
#32
North Carolina
$56,310
—
#33
Ohio
$56,232
—
#34
Rhode Island
$55,878
—
#35
Indiana
$55,562
—
#36
Oregon
$55,451
—
#37
Arkansas
$55,219
—
#38
Delaware
$55,185
—
#39
Utah
$55,116
—
#40
Michigan
$53,569
—
#41
Georgia
$52,952
—
#42
Arizona
$52,890
—
#43
Idaho
$52,816
—
#44
South Carolina
$52,463
—
#45
Kentucky
$52,290
—
#46
Hawaii
$52,272
—
#47
Alabama
$52,216
—
#48
New Mexico
$51,121
—
#49
West Virginia
$50,051
—
#50
Mississippi
$48,465
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
3 of 3 reviewed Louisiana actions · newest first
Jun 24, 2025 · Executive Order JML25-072 · EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER JML 25-072 UNLEASHING LOUISIANA'S ENERGY PRODUCTION · IssuedGovernor · Executive Order JML25-072
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER JML 25-072 UNLEASHING LOUISIANA'S ENERGY PRODUCTION
Jun 24, 2025 · Issued
Gov. Jeff Landry · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
Governor Jeff Landry directed development and consideration of a plan for reducing state mineral royalties to encourage oil and gas production. The order calls for a plan; it does not itself prove royalty reductions, production increases, or lower regional gasoline prices.
Executive order issued. This is the historical order; implementation, later amendments, and current enforceability are not inferred.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Louisiana policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Louisiana statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Louisiana evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1: DENR shall develop, in coordination with the Board, a plan consistent with law to reduce royalties governed by State mineral leases so as to meaningfully incentivize and encourage exploration and production of the State's minerals. Section 2: DENR shall also provide clear and timely guidance ahead of October 1, 2025, detailing how recent legislative changes - including severance tax reductions and departmental reorganization - will strategically and proactively address orphan wells in state waters, thereby promoting responsible resource development, fiscal sustainability, and environmental stewardship. Section 3: Upon development of the royalty reduction plan required in Section 1, the Board shall consider the plan for approval at its next scheduled Board meeting.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jan 16, 2025 · S 109 · Offshore Energy Security Act of 2025 · In CongressU.S. Congress · Louisiana delegation · S 109
Offshore Energy Security Act of 2025
Jan 16, 2025 · In Congress
Sen. Bill Cassidy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would require a schedule of offshore oil and gas lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico. Leasing concerns potential petroleum supply; it does not establish actual production or a change in the six-state Gulf Coast gasoline price.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Louisiana policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Louisiana statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Louisiana evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(c)RequirementNotwithstanding the 2024–2029 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program, the Secretary shall—(1)conduct not fewer than 20 offshore lease sales, as described under subsection (d), during the 10-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act; and(2)to the maximum extent practicable, carry out a lease sale under this subsection in accordance with the Record of Decision approved by the Secretary on January 17, 2017, and described in the notice of availability of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management entitled Record of Decision for the 2017–2022 Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement; MMAA104000 (82 Fed. Reg. 6643 (January 19, 2017)). (d)TimingIn conducting the offshore lease sales under subsection (c), the Secretary shall conduct a lease sale under this section not later than each of the following dates:(1)March 31, 2026.(2)August 31, 2026.(3)March 31, 2027.(4)August 31, 2027.(5)March 31, 2028.(6)August 31, 2028.(7)March 31, 2029.(8)August 31, 2029.(9)March 31, 2030.(10)August 31, 2030.(11)March 31, 2031.(12)August 31, 2031.(13)March 31, 2032.(14)August 31, 2032.(15)March 31, 2033.(16)August 31, 2033.(17)March 31, 2034.(18)August 31, 2034.(19)March 31, 2035.(20)August 31, 2035.(e)Area offered for lease(1)AcreageThe Secretary shall offer not fewer than 74,000,000 acres for each offshore lease sale conducted under subsection (c).(2)LocationAn offshore lease sale conducted under subsection (c) shall be in the Gulf of Mexico Region Program Area as identified in Figure S–1 of the 2017–2022 Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program published on November 18, 2016 by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (as announced in the notice of availability of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management entitled Notice of Availability of the 2017–2022 Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program (81 Fed. Reg. 84612 (November 23, 2016))).
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Feb 5, 2024 · Executive Order JML24-017 · State of Louisiana EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER JMIL 24-17 Streamlining Permitting Processes in the Oil and Gas Industry · IssuedGovernor · Executive Order JML24-017
State of Louisiana EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER JMIL 24-17 Streamlining Permitting Processes in the Oil and Gas Industry
Feb 5, 2024 · Issued
Gov. Jeff Landry · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
Governor Jeff Landry directed coordination, timelines, and performance measures for oil and gas permitting while maintaining environmental standards. This historical order expressly sunset January 1, 2025. It concerns potential petroleum supply, not proof of a change in the regional gasoline price.
Executive order issued. This is the historical order; implementation, later amendments, and current enforceability are not inferred.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Louisiana policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Louisiana statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Louisiana evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
NOW THEREFORE, I, JEFF LANDRY, Governor of the State of Louisiana, by virtue of the authority vested by the Constitution do hereby order and direct the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources and the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality to promote the streamlining of permitting processes associated with the Oil and Gas Industry as follows: A. Establish clear and concise guidelines to expedite the permitting processes, ensuring a timely and efficient approval mechanism. B. Identify areas where agencies can enhance coordination and collaboration to eliminate duplication, reduce inefficiencies, and ensure a seamless permitting process. C. Explore and implement innovative technologies and approaches to streamline permitting, and eliminate duplication between agencies while maintaining environmental standards. D. Engage in public outreach to provide detailed information and customer-friendly guidance to applicants on the required documentation, procedures, and criteria needed at the beginnirg of the permitting process, and communicate changes in the permitting process. E. Develop and utilize performance metrics to accurately assess the permitting process. F. No later than December 31, 2024, the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources and the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality shall report to the Office of the Governor the steps taken to comply with this Order. G. This Executive Order is effective upon signature and shall continue in force and effect until January 1, 2025 unless amended, modified, terminated or rescinded by the Governor.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Louisiana officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Louisiana candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
22 statements from 8 candidates
2026 Louisiana U.S. House District 1 — Open Primary
1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements
Steve also knows the importance of American energy dominance and development – both to our country and to the state of Louisiana. On day one of the 118th Congress, Steve committed to lowering energy costs with the Lower Energy Costs Act; streamlining energy production and the permitting process, and…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, water, and environment
Candidate campaign source
Steve also knows the importance of American energy dominance and development – both to our country and to the state of Louisiana. On day one of the 118th Congress, Steve committed to lowering energy costs with the Lower Energy Costs Act; streamlining energy production and the permitting process, and reducing American dependence on China. Steve will continue to fight for a national energy strategy that enhances energy production, increases innovation, and reduces our dependence on foreign nations.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
Louisiana is one of only 5 states that does not have a state minimum wage. The minimum wage in the United States has been $7.25 an hour since 2009. Adjusted for inflation, minimum wage would be $10.95 today. Mike Johnson has opposed raising the minimum wage both in 2019 and 2021 – while he makes $22…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability
Candidate campaign source
Louisiana is one of only 5 states that does not have a state minimum wage. The minimum wage in the United States has been $7.25 an hour since 2009. Adjusted for inflation, minimum wage would be $10.95 today. Mike Johnson has opposed raising the minimum wage both in 2019 and 2021 – while he makes $223,500 a year. Increasing the minimum wage to $15 is not the final goal. But it is a good first step to help people in states that do not have their own state minimum wage.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
What is your plan to address inflation and the rising cost of living? The cost of living is one of the biggest challenges families are facing right now. My focus is on strengthening the foundations people rely on; making sure families have access to affordable healthcare, stable housing, a living wa…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing affordability
Candidate campaign source
What is your plan to address inflation and the rising cost of living? The cost of living is one of the biggest challenges families are facing right now. My focus is on strengthening the foundations people rely on; making sure families have access to affordable healthcare, stable housing, a living wage, and reliable childcare. When people have stability in these areas, it strengthens the workforce, improves quality of life, and creates a more resilient economy overall. Addressing cost of living isn’t about one quick fix, it’s about building systems that allow people to thrive, not just get by.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
By strengthening and expanding existing school meal programs, this policy supports student performance, improves long-term outcomes, and provides immediate cost of living relief for working parents. Research shows that students who have consistent access to school meals perform better academically, …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
By strengthening and expanding existing school meal programs, this policy supports student performance, improves long-term outcomes, and provides immediate cost of living relief for working parents. Research shows that students who have consistent access to school meals perform better academically, attend school more regularly, and are more likely to succeed long term.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Invest in modernizing water systems, strengthening oversight, and ensuring consistent access to safe reliable drinking water, without shifting the cost onto residents through rising utility bills. In Northwest Louisiana, water infrastructure failures are not theoretical, Shreveport’s systems have re…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure
Candidate campaign source
Invest in modernizing water systems, strengthening oversight, and ensuring consistent access to safe reliable drinking water, without shifting the cost onto residents through rising utility bills. In Northwest Louisiana, water infrastructure failures are not theoretical, Shreveport’s systems have received failing grades, while residents face rising fees to maintain basic services. Since 2017, the state’s Safe Drinking Water fee has nearly quadrupled, yet many communities are still dealing with aging and failing systems, reliability issues, and ongoing public health concern due to constant water boil advisories.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Increase the Minimum Wage Louisiana has never set its own minimum wage. Workers are stuck at $7.25 an hour, the same as in 2009. Most families in District 4 don’t earn enough to cover basic needs.A living wage in Shreveport-Bossier is over $15 an hour for a single adult and over $30 an hour for a pa…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability
Candidate campaign source
Increase the Minimum Wage Louisiana has never set its own minimum wage. Workers are stuck at $7.25 an hour, the same as in 2009. Most families in District 4 don’t earn enough to cover basic needs.A living wage in Shreveport-Bossier is over $15 an hour for a single adult and over $30 an hour for a parent with one child. Many full-time workers live in poverty despite working hard every day.We can do better. The Raise the Wage Act of 2025 would raise the minimum to $17 by 2030, but that is not enough. Workers deserve a wage that rises with inflation each year, so no one has to struggle to survive.Source: Census Reporter
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Law Enforcement: For decades two of the most important professions have been underpaid – law enforcement and teaching. To remedy this, I am thinking “outside the box”. If state or local administrations won’t remedy the situation, I propose that the federal government does. I propose a national minim…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
Law Enforcement: For decades two of the most important professions have been underpaid – law enforcement and teaching. To remedy this, I am thinking “outside the box”. If state or local administrations won’t remedy the situation, I propose that the federal government does. I propose a national minimum salary of $50,000 per year for all law enforcement officers, and that it is increased each year by the increase in the consumer price index (CPI). I understand that many in law enforcement are paid more than this, but this would establish a floor. Coupled with this we should have a 10-year freeze on Congressional salaries, currently $174,000, and a provision that if Congress closes the government down, members of Congress receive no salary, with no makeup, for the duration of the shutdown.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
EDUCATION: For decades two of the most important professions have been underpaid – teaching and law enforcement. To remedy this, I am thinking “outside the box”. If state or local administrations won’t remedy the situation, I propose that the federal government does. I propose a national minimum sal…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
EDUCATION: For decades two of the most important professions have been underpaid – teaching and law enforcement. To remedy this, I am thinking “outside the box”. If state or local administrations won’t remedy the situation, I propose that the federal government does. I propose a national minimum salary of $50,000 per year for all K through 12 educators, and that it is increased each year by the increase in the consumer price index (CPI). I understand that many in education are paid more than this, but this would establish a floor. Coupled with this we should have a 10-year freeze on Congressional salaries, currently $174,000, and a provision that if Congress closes the government down, members of Congress receive no salary, with no makeup, for the duration of the shutdown. The cost of higher education in recent years has increased much faster than the general rate of inflation. A bachelor's degree needs to become a three-year degree rather than a four-year degree. This would reduce the total cost by 25%. The traditional first year can be covered in high school, as it currently is by many students. Additional cost savings could be made by decreasing the number of administrators, whose numbers have increased far faster than student numbers. This is especially true because administrators are paid much more than the instructors who actually teach the students. At the high school level, we need large numbers of students leaving high school after the 10th grade and entering trade schools or apprenticeships. We have a severe shortage of skilled trades workers. Also, income levels are higher than they are for many university graduates in low demand fields.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Agriculture: The rural economy is crucial to the U.S. This applies not only to the farms, but also the many small towns which support the rural economy. I am totally opposed to the tariffs imposed by President Trump and if elected would work in Congress to abolish them. Farmers are hurt in two ways …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Agriculture and rural policy
Candidate campaign source
Agriculture: The rural economy is crucial to the U.S. This applies not only to the farms, but also the many small towns which support the rural economy. I am totally opposed to the tariffs imposed by President Trump and if elected would work in Congress to abolish them. Farmers are hurt in two ways – once like the rest of the population with higher prices for so many everyday items – and then again with the increased costs for farm inputs such as fertilizer and also for machinery due to the increase in the cost of components.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Louisiana candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Louisiana incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Louisiana legislators and Louisiana’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Louisiana’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
1 matching sponsorship or proposal · 1 Louisiana incumbent. These filters apply only to this section.
Sen. Bill Cassidy
U.S. Senate, Louisiana · R–LA
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Bill CassidyU.S. Congress · Louisiana delegation · S 109
Offshore Energy Security Act of 2025
Jan 16, 2025 · In Congress
Sen. Bill Cassidy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would require a schedule of offshore oil and gas lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico. Leasing concerns potential petroleum supply; it does not establish actual production or a change in the six-state Gulf Coast gasoline price.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Louisiana policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Louisiana statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Louisiana evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(c)RequirementNotwithstanding the 2024–2029 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program, the Secretary shall—(1)conduct not fewer than 20 offshore lease sales, as described under subsection (d), during the 10-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act; and(2)to the maximum extent practicable, carry out a lease sale under this subsection in accordance with the Record of Decision approved by the Secretary on January 17, 2017, and described in the notice of availability of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management entitled Record of Decision for the 2017–2022 Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement; MMAA104000 (82 Fed. Reg. 6643 (January 19, 2017)). (d)TimingIn conducting the offshore lease sales under subsection (c), the Secretary shall conduct a lease sale under this section not later than each of the following dates:(1)March 31, 2026.(2)August 31, 2026.(3)March 31, 2027.(4)August 31, 2027.(5)March 31, 2028.(6)August 31, 2028.(7)March 31, 2029.(8)August 31, 2029.(9)March 31, 2030.(10)August 31, 2030.(11)March 31, 2031.(12)August 31, 2031.(13)March 31, 2032.(14)August 31, 2032.(15)March 31, 2033.(16)August 31, 2033.(17)March 31, 2034.(18)August 31, 2034.(19)March 31, 2035.(20)August 31, 2035.(e)Area offered for lease(1)AcreageThe Secretary shall offer not fewer than 74,000,000 acres for each offshore lease sale conducted under subsection (c).(2)LocationAn offshore lease sale conducted under subsection (c) shall be in the Gulf of Mexico Region Program Area as identified in Figure S–1 of the 2017–2022 Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program published on November 18, 2016 by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (as announced in the notice of availability of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management entitled Notice of Availability of the 2017–2022 Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program (81 Fed. Reg. 84612 (November 23, 2016))).
Only current Louisiana officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Louisiana statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Louisiana snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Louisiana, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.