Louisiana · individual fact

Louisiana prices and inflation

Compare Louisiana’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide Louisiana CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level88.22024 · #46 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level93.72024 · #48 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level63.12024 · #45 of 50 · highest first

Louisiana over time

Explore Louisiana readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Louisiana officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Louisiana effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Louisiana change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level Louisiana · source units
LouisianaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 88.286.894.1101.4Louisiana, 2014: 93.4Louisiana, 2015: 92.8Louisiana, 2016: 93.6Louisiana, 2017: 92.4Louisiana, 2018: 90.8Louisiana, 2019: 91.2Louisiana, 2020: 91.1Louisiana, 2021: 91.4Louisiana, 2022: 90.5Louisiana, 2023: 88.7Louisiana, 2024: 88.2201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 27National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shock● Louisiana Legislature · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.● U.S. Congress · Louisiana delegation · 1◆ Governor · 2■ Louisiana agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-02-28

3 of 3 reviewed Louisiana actions match · 3 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.

Louisiana · 2024: 88.2 · Rank #46 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Louisiana with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Louisiana All-items price level · source units
PeriodLouisianaRankU.S. benchmark
202488.2#46 of 50100
202388.7#45 of 50100
202290.5#38 of 50100
202191.4#37 of 50100
202091.1#40 of 50100
201991.2#44 of 50100
201890.8#43 of 50100
201792.4#36 of 50100
201693.6#34 of 50100
201592.8#35 of 50100
201493.4#33 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Louisiana · state comparison

How does Louisiana’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

Louisiana · 202488.2
Louisiana rank#46among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Louisiana with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Louisiana
All-items price level history in Louisiana86.494.1101.820142024
2024 · Louisiana: 88.2 · Rank #46 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Louisiana All-items price level history
PeriodLouisianaCompare
201493.4
201592.8
201693.6
201792.4
201890.8
201991.2
202091.1
202191.4
202290.5
202388.7
202488.2

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Louisiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Louisiana has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Louisiana · 88.22024 · Rank #46 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Louisiana with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana · your comparison88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Louisiana · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Louisiana · 20242%
Louisiana rank#40among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Louisiana
Annual change in regional price deflator history in Louisiana-1.5%3.1%7.6%20152024
2024 · Louisiana: 2% · Rank #40 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Louisiana Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodLouisianaCompare
2015-0.4%
20161.8%
20170.4%
20180.3%
20191.9%
20201.1%
20214.4%
20225.5%
20231.7%
20242%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Louisiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Louisiana has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Louisiana · 2%2024 · Rank #40 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Louisiana with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana · your comparison2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Louisiana · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

Louisiana · 2024$56,789
Louisiana rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Louisiana
Real personal income per person history in Louisiana$43.88K$52.63K$61.39K20142024
2024 · Louisiana: $56,789 · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Louisiana Real personal income per person history
PeriodLouisianaCompare
2014$46,949
2015$47,113
2016$45,897
2017$47,192
2018$49,191
2019$49,920
2020$52,747
2021$55,469
2022$52,781
2023$55,235
2024$56,789

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Louisiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Louisiana has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Louisiana · $56,7892024 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Louisiana with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana · your comparison$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Louisiana candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

22 statements from 8 candidates

2026 Louisiana U.S. House District 1 — Open Primary

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Steve Scalise

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · LA

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Advanced the Lower Energy Costs Act at the start of the 118th Congress.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy Legislation

Candidate campaign source

Advanced the Lower Energy Costs Act at the start of the 118th Congress.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Steve Scalise — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Steve Scalise
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Steve also knows the importance of American energy dominance and development – both to our country and to the state of Louisiana. On day one of the 118th Congress, Steve committed to lowering energy costs with the Lower Energy Costs Act; streamlining energy production and the permitting process, and…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Steve also knows the importance of American energy dominance and development – both to our country and to the state of Louisiana. On day one of the 118th Congress, Steve committed to lowering energy costs with the Lower Energy Costs Act; streamlining energy production and the permitting process, and reducing American dependence on China. Steve will continue to fight for a national energy strategy that enhances energy production, increases innovation, and reduces our dependence on foreign nations.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Steve Scalise — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Louisiana U.S. House District 3 — Open Primary

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

John Day

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · LA

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Lower gas and utility bills for families

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Lower gas and utility bills for families

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

John Day — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from John Day
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Lower energy costs. Protect jobs. Power the future.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Lower energy costs. Protect jobs. Power the future.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

John Day — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Louisiana U.S. House District 4 — Open Primary

3 candidates with matching statements · 8 statements

"Matt" Gromlich

4 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 4 · LA

CPI / inflation mention

Louisiana is one of only 5 states that does not have a state minimum wage. The minimum wage in the United States has been $7.25 an hour since 2009. Adjusted for inflation, minimum wage would be $10.95 today. Mike Johnson has opposed raising the minimum wage both in 2019 and 2021 – while he makes $22…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Louisiana is one of only 5 states that does not have a state minimum wage. The minimum wage in the United States has been $7.25 an hour since 2009. Adjusted for inflation, minimum wage would be $10.95 today. Mike Johnson has opposed raising the minimum wage both in 2019 and 2021 – while he makes $223,500 a year. Increasing the minimum wage to $15 is not the final goal. But it is a good first step to help people in states that do not have their own state minimum wage.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

"Matt" Gromlich — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 3 more statements from "Matt" Gromlich
CPI / inflation mention

What is your plan to address inflation and the rising cost of living? The cost of living is one of the biggest challenges families are facing right now. My focus is on strengthening the foundations people rely on; making sure families have access to affordable healthcare, stable housing, a living wa…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

What is your plan to address inflation and the rising cost of living? The cost of living is one of the biggest challenges families are facing right now. My focus is on strengthening the foundations people rely on; making sure families have access to affordable healthcare, stable housing, a living wage, and reliable childcare. When people have stability in these areas, it strengthens the workforce, improves quality of life, and creates a more resilient economy overall. Addressing cost of living isn’t about one quick fix, it’s about building systems that allow people to thrive, not just get by.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

"Matt" Gromlich — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

By strengthening and expanding existing school meal programs, this policy supports student performance, improves long-term outcomes, and provides immediate cost of living relief for working parents. Research shows that students who have consistent access to school meals perform better academically, …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

By strengthening and expanding existing school meal programs, this policy supports student performance, improves long-term outcomes, and provides immediate cost of living relief for working parents. Research shows that students who have consistent access to school meals perform better academically, attend school more regularly, and are more likely to succeed long term.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

"Matt" Gromlich — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Invest in modernizing water systems, strengthening oversight, and ensuring consistent access to safe reliable drinking water, without shifting the cost onto residents through rising utility bills. In Northwest Louisiana, water infrastructure failures are not theoretical, Shreveport’s systems have re…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure

Candidate campaign source

Invest in modernizing water systems, strengthening oversight, and ensuring consistent access to safe reliable drinking water, without shifting the cost onto residents through rising utility bills. In Northwest Louisiana, water infrastructure failures are not theoretical, Shreveport’s systems have received failing grades, while residents face rising fees to maintain basic services. Since 2017, the state’s Safe Drinking Water fee has nearly quadrupled, yet many communities are still dealing with aging and failing systems, reliability issues, and ongoing public health concern due to constant water boil advisories.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

"Matt" Gromlich — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Conrad Cable

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 4 · LA

CPI / inflation mention

Increase the Minimum Wage Louisiana has never set its own minimum wage. Workers are stuck at $7.25 an hour, the same as in 2009. Most families in District 4 don’t earn enough to cover basic needs.A living wage in Shreveport-Bossier is over $15 an hour for a single adult and over $30 an hour for a pa…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Increase the Minimum Wage Louisiana has never set its own minimum wage. Workers are stuck at $7.25 an hour, the same as in 2009. Most families in District 4 don’t earn enough to cover basic needs.A living wage in Shreveport-Bossier is over $15 an hour for a single adult and over $30 an hour for a parent with one child. Many full-time workers live in poverty despite working hard every day.We can do better. The Raise the Wage Act of 2025 would raise the minimum to $17 by 2030, but that is not enough. Workers deserve a wage that rises with inflation each year, so no one has to struggle to survive.Source: Census Reporter

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Conrad Cable — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Gordon Heslop

3 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 4 · LA

CPI / inflation mention

Law Enforcement: For decades two of the most important professions have been underpaid – law enforcement and teaching. To remedy this, I am thinking “outside the box”. If state or local administrations won’t remedy the situation, I propose that the federal government does. I propose a national minim…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

Law Enforcement: For decades two of the most important professions have been underpaid – law enforcement and teaching. To remedy this, I am thinking “outside the box”. If state or local administrations won’t remedy the situation, I propose that the federal government does. I propose a national minimum salary of $50,000 per year for all law enforcement officers, and that it is increased each year by the increase in the consumer price index (CPI). I understand that many in law enforcement are paid more than this, but this would establish a floor. Coupled with this we should have a 10-year freeze on Congressional salaries, currently $174,000, and a provision that if Congress closes the government down, members of Congress receive no salary, with no makeup, for the duration of the shutdown.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gordon Heslop — candidate-owned primary source ↗
View 2 more statements from Gordon Heslop
CPI / inflation mention

EDUCATION: For decades two of the most important professions have been underpaid – teaching and law enforcement. To remedy this, I am thinking “outside the box”. If state or local administrations won’t remedy the situation, I propose that the federal government does. I propose a national minimum sal…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

EDUCATION: For decades two of the most important professions have been underpaid – teaching and law enforcement. To remedy this, I am thinking “outside the box”. If state or local administrations won’t remedy the situation, I propose that the federal government does. I propose a national minimum salary of $50,000 per year for all K through 12 educators, and that it is increased each year by the increase in the consumer price index (CPI). I understand that many in education are paid more than this, but this would establish a floor. Coupled with this we should have a 10-year freeze on Congressional salaries, currently $174,000, and a provision that if Congress closes the government down, members of Congress receive no salary, with no makeup, for the duration of the shutdown. The cost of higher education in recent years has increased much faster than the general rate of inflation. A bachelor's degree needs to become a three-year degree rather than a four-year degree. This would reduce the total cost by 25%. The traditional first year can be covered in high school, as it currently is by many students. Additional cost savings could be made by decreasing the number of administrators, whose numbers have increased far faster than student numbers. This is especially true because administrators are paid much more than the instructors who actually teach the students. At the high school level, we need large numbers of students leaving high school after the 10th grade and entering trade schools or apprenticeships. We have a severe shortage of skilled trades workers. Also, income levels are higher than they are for many university graduates in low demand fields.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gordon Heslop — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Agriculture: The rural economy is crucial to the U.S. This applies not only to the farms, but also the many small towns which support the rural economy. I am totally opposed to the tariffs imposed by President Trump and if elected would work in Congress to abolish them. Farmers are hurt in two ways …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Agriculture and rural policy

Candidate campaign source

Agriculture: The rural economy is crucial to the U.S. This applies not only to the farms, but also the many small towns which support the rural economy. I am totally opposed to the tariffs imposed by President Trump and if elected would work in Congress to abolish them. Farmers are hurt in two ways – once like the rest of the population with higher prices for so many everyday items – and then again with the increased costs for farm inputs such as fertilizer and also for machinery due to the increase in the cost of components.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gordon Heslop — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Louisiana candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Louisiana incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Louisiana legislators and Louisiana’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Louisiana’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

1 matching sponsorship or proposal · 1 Louisiana incumbent. These filters apply only to this section.

Sen. Bill Cassidy

U.S. Senate, Louisiana · R–LA

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Bill Cassidy
U.S. Congress · Louisiana delegation · S 109

Offshore Energy Security Act of 2025

Jan 16, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Bill Cassidy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would require a schedule of offshore oil and gas lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico. Leasing concerns potential petroleum supply; it does not establish actual production or a change in the six-state Gulf Coast gasoline price.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Louisiana policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Louisiana statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Louisiana evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(c)RequirementNotwithstanding the 2024–2029 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program, the Secretary shall—(1)conduct not fewer than 20 offshore lease sales, as described under subsection (d), during the 10-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act; and(2)to the maximum extent practicable, carry out a lease sale under this subsection in accordance with the Record of Decision approved by the Secretary on January 17, 2017, and described in the notice of availability of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management entitled Record of Decision for the 2017–2022 Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement; MMAA104000 (82 Fed. Reg. 6643 (January 19, 2017)). (d)TimingIn conducting the offshore lease sales under subsection (c), the Secretary shall conduct a lease sale under this section not later than each of the following dates:(1)March 31, 2026.(2)August 31, 2026.(3)March 31, 2027.(4)August 31, 2027.(5)March 31, 2028.(6)August 31, 2028.(7)March 31, 2029.(8)August 31, 2029.(9)March 31, 2030.(10)August 31, 2030.(11)March 31, 2031.(12)August 31, 2031.(13)March 31, 2032.(14)August 31, 2032.(15)March 31, 2033.(16)August 31, 2033.(17)March 31, 2034.(18)August 31, 2034.(19)March 31, 2035.(20)August 31, 2035.(e)Area offered for lease(1)AcreageThe Secretary shall offer not fewer than 74,000,000 acres for each offshore lease sale conducted under subsection (c).(2)LocationAn offshore lease sale conducted under subsection (c) shall be in the Gulf of Mexico Region Program Area as identified in Figure S–1 of the 2017–2022 Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program published on November 18, 2016 by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (as announced in the notice of availability of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management entitled Notice of Availability of the 2017–2022 Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program (81 Fed. Reg. 84612 (November 23, 2016))).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Louisiana officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Louisiana statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.