Kentucky · individual fact

Kentucky unemployment rate

State unemployment, employed residents, broader underutilization, and employment growth.

Annual unemployment rate4.8%2024 · #4 of 50 · highest first
Civilian employed residents1,994,5392024 · #27 of 50 · highest first
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer1.5%2025 · 11-month average · #22 of 50 · highest first

Kentucky over time

Explore Kentucky readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Kentucky officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Kentucky effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Kentucky change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Annual unemployment rate Kentucky · source units
KentuckyPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Annual unemployment rate2024: 4.8%3%5.3%7.5%Kentucky, 2015: 5.3%Kentucky, 2016: 5.1%Kentucky, 2017: 4.8%Kentucky, 2018: 4.2%Kentucky, 2019: 4.1%Kentucky, 2020: 6.5%Kentucky, 2021: 4.4%Kentucky, 2022: 4%Kentucky, 2023: 4.2%Kentucky, 2024: 4.8%201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 15National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · CARES Act expands unemployment support · 2020-03-27CARES unemployment aidNational context · First U.S. COVID-19 vaccine authorization · 2020-12-11COVID vaccine authorizationNational context · American Rescue Plan extends pandemic unemployment benefits · 2021-03-11Pandemic benefits extendedNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic benefits expireNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Silicon Valley Bank failure and banking stress · 2023-03-10Banking stress / SVBNational context · UAW strikes begin at the three Detroit automakers · 2023-09-15UAW auto strikesNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-18Fed rate cuts beginNational context · Hurricanes Helene and Milton · 2024-09-26Helene & MiltonNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts unemployment data · 2025-10-01Federal shutdown / data gapNational context · BLS reports federal payroll decline as deferred resignations take effect · 2025-12-16Federal payroll departuresNational context · Federal Reserve raises rates in September 2026 · 2026-09-16September 2026 rate rise● Kentucky Legislature · 4● U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · 3◆ Governor · 3■ Kentucky agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2015-12-012026-09-30

10 of 10 reviewed Kentucky actions match · 10 date markers shown. 15 major events shown separately.

Kentucky · 2024: 4.8% · Rank #4 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4%

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages. LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Kentucky Annual unemployment rate · source units
PeriodKentuckyRankU.S. benchmark
20244.8%#4 of 504%
20234.2%#6 of 50Not available
20224%#11 of 50Not available
20214.4%#30 of 50Not available
20206.5%#29 of 50Not available
20194.1%#9 of 50Not available
20184.2%#13 of 50Not available
20174.8%#11 of 50Not available
20165.1%#16 of 50Not available
20155.3%#23 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Kentucky · state comparison

Employment and unemployment over time

LAUS annual averages measure state residents. Compare unemployment rates or the number of employed residents.

Kentucky · 20244.8%
Kentucky rank#4among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual unemployment rate

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages.

LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kentucky
Annual unemployment rate history in Kentucky3.6%5.3%6.9%20152024
2024 · Kentucky: 4.8% · Rank #4 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kentucky Annual unemployment rate history
PeriodKentuckyCompare
20155.3%
20165.1%
20174.8%
20184.2%
20194.1%
20206.5%
20214.4%
20224%
20234.2%
20244.8%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · 1.8%Higher value · 5.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · 4.8%2024 · Rank #4 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Annual unemployment rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Nevada5.4%—
#2California5.3%—
#3Illinois5%—
#4Kentucky · your comparison4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Jersey4.6%—
#7Alaska4.5%—
#7Washington4.5%—
#9Ohio4.4%—
#10Louisiana4.3%—
#10Oregon4.3%—
#12New York4.2%—
#12Rhode Island4.2%—
#14Colorado4.1%—
#14New Mexico4.1%—
#14South Carolina4.1%—
#14Texas4.1%—
#14West Virginia4.1%—
#19Indiana4%—
#19Massachusetts4%—
#21Delaware3.9%—
#22Pennsylvania3.8%—
#23Arizona3.7%—
#23Missouri3.7%—
#23North Carolina3.7%—
#26Idaho3.6%—
#27Arkansas3.5%—
#27Kansas3.5%—
#29Florida3.4%—
#29Georgia3.4%—
#29Tennessee3.4%—
#32Connecticut3.3%—
#32Utah3.3%—
#34Iowa3.2%—
#34Maryland3.2%—
#34Mississippi3.2%—
#34Oklahoma3.2%—
#38Minnesota3.1%—
#38Wyoming3.1%—
#40Alabama3%—
#40Maine3%—
#40Montana3%—
#40Wisconsin3%—
#44Virginia2.9%—
#45Hawaii2.8%—
#46Nebraska2.7%—
#47New Hampshire2.6%—
#48North Dakota2.4%—
#49Vermont2.3%—
#50South Dakota1.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kentucky · state comparison

Behind the unemployment rate

The reviewed 2025 CPS snapshot includes both U-3 and the broader U-6 measure. It is separate from the LAUS annual history.

Kentucky · 2025 · 11-month average1.5%
Kentucky rank#22among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer

Unemployed 15 weeks or longer as a share of the civilian labor force.

2025 CPS averages exclude October because data were not collected during the federal shutdown. Not strictly comparable with other-year averages. These directly surveyed CPS estimates differ from LAUS model-based estimates. All states use the same 11 months here.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.6%Higher value · 2.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · 1.5%2025 · 11-month average · Rank #22 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer · 2025 · 11-month average · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California2.4%—
#2Oregon2.2%—
#3Illinois2.1%—
#3New York2.1%—
#5Connecticut2%—
#5Rhode Island2%—
#5Washington2%—
#8Massachusetts1.9%—
#8Nevada1.9%—
#8New Jersey1.9%—
#11Delaware1.8%—
#11Virginia1.8%—
#13Louisiana1.7%—
#13Michigan1.7%—
#13West Virginia1.7%—
#16Alaska1.6%—
#16Florida1.6%—
#16Mississippi1.6%—
#16New Mexico1.6%—
#16Ohio1.6%—
#16Pennsylvania1.6%—
#22Colorado1.5%—
#22Kentucky · your comparison1.5%—
#22Maryland1.5%—
#22Texas1.5%—
#26Arizona1.4%—
#26Georgia1.4%—
#28Arkansas1.3%—
#28Iowa1.3%—
#28North Carolina1.3%—
#28Oklahoma1.3%—
#28South Carolina1.3%—
#33Kansas1.2%—
#33Minnesota1.2%—
#33New Hampshire1.2%—
#33Wisconsin1.2%—
#37Tennessee1.1%—
#37Utah1.1%—
#39Idaho1%—
#39Indiana1%—
#39Nebraska1%—
#42Alabama0.9%—
#42Maine0.9%—
#42Missouri0.9%—
#42Wyoming0.9%—
#46Hawaii0.7%—
#46Montana0.7%—
#46South Dakota0.7%—
#46Vermont0.7%—
#50North Dakota0.6%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kentucky · state comparison

Output and jobs

Annual real output growth and BEA job growth provide economic context. Neither is the unemployment rate.

Kentucky · 20253%
Kentucky rank#7among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.3%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual real GDP growth

Change in annual real GDP from the prior year.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kentucky
Annual real GDP growth history in Kentucky-4%1.8%7.6%20152025
2025 · Kentucky: 3% · Rank #7 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.3% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kentucky Annual real GDP growth history
PeriodKentuckyCompare
20151.4%
20160.8%
20171.3%
20181.2%
20192.8%
2020-2.7%
20214.6%
20222.5%
20233.5%
20241.8%
20253%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · -0.4%Higher value · 5.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · 3%2025 · Rank #7 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Annual real GDP growth · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Delaware5.1%—
#2Alaska4.7%—
#3California3.5%—
#4South Carolina3.3%—
#5Washington3.2%—
#6Idaho3.1%—
#7Kentucky · your comparison3%—
#8Georgia2.9%—
#9Texas2.8%—
#10West Virginia2.8%—
#11Florida2.8%—
#12Rhode Island2.8%—
#13Utah2.7%—
#14Illinois2.6%—
#15New York2.5%—
#16Connecticut2.5%—
#17Ohio2.4%—
#18Virginia2.3%—
#19Oklahoma2.2%—
#20Michigan2.2%—
#21Tennessee2.1%—
#22New Jersey2%—
#23Nevada2%—
#24Montana2%—
#25Alabama2%—
#26Vermont1.9%—
#27Colorado1.9%—
#28Indiana1.9%—
#29Pennsylvania1.8%—
#30North Carolina1.8%—
#31New Mexico1.8%—
#32South Dakota1.8%—
#33New Hampshire1.7%—
#34Louisiana1.5%—
#35Hawaii1.5%—
#36Arizona1.5%—
#37Maine1.4%—
#38Oregon1.4%—
#39Massachusetts1.3%—
#40Mississippi1.3%—
#41Nebraska1.3%—
#42Missouri1.2%—
#43Kansas1%—
#44Arkansas0.9%—
#45Wisconsin0.8%—
#46Maryland0.8%—
#47Minnesota0.7%—
#48North Dakota0.5%—
#49Wyoming0.1%—
#50Iowa-0.4%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kentucky · state comparison

Job openings, hires, layoffs, and worker groups

A state unemployment rate does not capture all unused labor or job-market turnover.

Kentucky · December 202592,000
Kentucky rank#26among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark6,550,000Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Openings · number

Number of jobs or monthly employment flows; published thousands converted to individual units.

Seasonally adjusted state JOLTS estimates, July–December 2025 as printed in the captured table. Recent estimates are preliminary and revisions can change ranks. Openings are a month-end stock; hires, quits, and layoffs are monthly flows, not distinct workers.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kentucky
Openings · number history in Kentucky-969,7003,631,0008,231,700July 2025December 2025
December 2025 · Kentucky: 92,000 · Rank #26 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 6,550,000 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kentucky Openings · number history
PeriodKentuckyCompare
July 2025102,000
August 202594,000
September 202596,000
October 202595,000
November 202597,000
December 202592,000

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11,000Higher value · 674,000Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · 92,000December 2025 · Rank #26 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Openings · number · December 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California674,000—
#2Texas608,000—
#3New York431,000—
#4Florida404,000—
#5Ohio287,000—
#6Georgia279,000—
#7Pennsylvania235,000—
#8Michigan221,000—
#9Virginia213,000—
#10North Carolina212,000—
#11Illinois211,000—
#12New Jersey172,000—
#13Tennessee143,000—
#14Minnesota135,000—
#15Massachusetts129,000—
#16Missouri128,000—
#17Maryland127,000—
#18Indiana123,000—
#19Arizona121,000—
#20Wisconsin115,000—
#21Washington110,000—
#22South Carolina103,000—
#23Louisiana101,000—
#23Oklahoma101,000—
#25Colorado100,000—
#26Kentucky · your comparison92,000—
#27Alabama91,000—
#28Oregon72,000—
#29Connecticut67,000—
#30Utah64,000—
#31Kansas61,000—
#32Arkansas60,000—
#33Mississippi59,000—
#34Iowa57,000—
#35Nevada52,000—
#36West Virginia42,000—
#37Nebraska38,000—
#38Idaho34,000—
#39New Mexico32,000—
#40Maine28,000—
#41Delaware23,000—
#42Montana22,000—
#42New Hampshire22,000—
#42Rhode Island22,000—
#45South Dakota20,000—
#46Hawaii19,000—
#47North Dakota18,000—
#48Alaska16,000—
#49Vermont11,000—
#49Wyoming11,000—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about unemployment, jobs and workforce issues from FactVote’s Kentucky candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

22 statements from 14 candidates

2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

James R. Comer

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · KY

Jobs & workforce context

All of America’s students deserve a high-quality, meaningful education and American employers must be able to capitalize on a motivated, highly-skilled workforce. Congress must work together to strengthen critical education programs and address the growing skills gap by providing opportunities for s…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation

Candidate campaign source

All of America’s students deserve a high-quality, meaningful education and American employers must be able to capitalize on a motivated, highly-skilled workforce. Congress must work together to strengthen critical education programs and address the growing skills gap by providing opportunities for students to achieve and workers to succeed.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

James R. Comer campaign source 2 ↗

2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

S. Brett Guthrie

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · KY

Jobs & workforce context

Passed legislation intended to improve teacher training before educators enter the workforce.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Teacher Preparation

Candidate campaign source

Passed legislation intended to improve teacher training before educators enter the workforce.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

S. Brett Guthrie — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 3 · KY

Jobs & workforce context

We strive to implement policies that will create jobs, improve healthcare access and protect our natural resources for a stable future.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

We strive to implement policies that will create jobs, improve healthcare access and protect our natural resources for a stable future.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Maria Teresa Rodriguez — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Morgan McGarvey

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · KY

Jobs & workforce context

I support federal spending and tax incentives to dramatically expand renewable energy buildout in the United States, infrastructure spending to speed the deployment of electric vehicles, and tax incentives for consumer purchase of union-made and American-made electric vehicles. I support a federal c…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Coal, energy, and Appalachian economic development

Candidate campaign source

I support federal spending and tax incentives to dramatically expand renewable energy buildout in the United States, infrastructure spending to speed the deployment of electric vehicles, and tax incentives for consumer purchase of union-made and American-made electric vehicles. I support a federal clean energy standard that incentivizes investor-owned electric utilities to achieve greenhouse gas emissions reductions while creating millions of good-paying jobs to build the clean energy infrastructure necessary to make this transition. And I will fight for federal spending to incentivize rural electric cooperatives to transition to clean, renewable energy by relieving debt associated with coal-fired power plants, and conditioning such relief upon the coop’s investment in a clean energy transition.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Morgan McGarvey — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
View 1 more statement from Morgan McGarvey
Jobs & workforce context

Establish a federal clean-energy standard that incentivizes utilities to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions and create good-paying jobs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Clean Energy Standard

Candidate campaign source

Establish a federal clean-energy standard that incentivizes utilities to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions and create good-paying jobs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Morgan McGarvey — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific unemployment, jobs and workforce issues terms in retained, attributed source text from published Kentucky candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Kentucky incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Kentucky legislators and Kentucky’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Kentucky’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

7 matching sponsorships or proposals · 7 Kentucky incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Andy Barr

U.S. House of Representatives, Kentucky District 6 · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Andy Barr
U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · HR 5618

Housing PLUS Act of 2025

Sep 30, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Andy Barr · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would protect Continuum of Care grant eligibility for programs requiring supportive services or occupancy prerequisites and for faith-based organizations, and reserve at least half of funds for entities offering wraparound services. It concerns housing assistance and occupancy conditions, not a measured change in median rent.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Kentucky’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Availability of Continuum of Care funds for grantees requiring wraparound services or applying preconditionsSubtitle C of title IV of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11381 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 436.Availability of funds for grantees requiring wraparound services or applying preconditions (a)AvailabilityNotwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may not, in making amounts available under this subtitle, prohibit, limit, or restrict the award or amount of grants made with such amounts to or for eligible entities, project sponsors, or recipients— (1)that require the provision of supportive services, such as counseling, job training, or addiction treatment, for individuals served by a program, project, or activity assisted with such amounts; (2)that require, as a condition for occupancy in a project, or assistance from a program, project, or activity, assisted with such amounts that individuals meet certain prerequisites, such as sobriety or lack of drug use; or (3)faith-based organizations. (b)Set asideNotwithstanding any other provision of law, in making available amounts under this subtitle for each fiscal year, the Secretary shall ensure that not less than 50 percent of such amounts shall be used by eligible entities, project sponsors, and recipients that provide or offer access to wraparound services. (c)AccountabilityNot later than 180 days after the completion of each fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit, to the House Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs of the Senate, for such fiscal year— (1)a written certification that the amounts made available for carrying out this subtitle were made available in compliance with subsections (a) and (b) of this section; and (2)a report specifying how the Notices of Funding Opportunity for such fiscal year for amounts made available for carrying out this subtitle evidence such compliance..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brett Guthrie

U.S. House of Representatives, Kentucky District 2 · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Brett Guthrie
U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · HR 2483

SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Reauthorization Act of 2025

Dec 1, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Brett Guthrie · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Public Law 119-44 reauthorized the Recovery Housing Pilot Program through 2030 and updated its allocation criteria. Brett Guthrie sponsored the underlying bill, H.R. 2483. This historical enactment concerns targeted housing assistance, not proof of a change in statewide median rent.

Became Public Law No: 119-44. Historical enactment does not establish current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Kentucky’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(b) Reauthorization of the CAREER Act; Recovery Housing Pilot Program.—139 STAT. 688 (1) In general.—Section 8071 of the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act (42 U.S.C. 5301 note; Public Law 115–271) is amended—(A) by striking the section heading and inserting “career act; recovery housing pilot program”; (B) in subsection (a), by striking “through 2023” and inserting “through 2030”; (C) in subsection (b)—(i) Deadline.in paragraph (1), by striking “not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act” and inserting “not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Reauthorization Act of 2025”; and (ii) in paragraph (2)(B)(i)—(I) in subclause (I)—(aa) by striking “for calendar years 2013 through 2017”; and (bb) by inserting “for calendar years 2018 through 2022” after “rates of unemployment”; (II) in subclause (II)—(aa) by striking “for calendar years 2013 through 2017”; and (bb) by inserting “for calendar years 2018 through 2022” after “participation rates”; and (III) by striking subclause (III) and inserting the following:“(III) The highest age-adjusted average rates of drug overdose deaths for calendar years 2018 through 2022 based on data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, including, if necessary, provisional data for calendar year 2022.” ; and (D) in subsection (f), by striking “For the 2-year period following the date of enactment of this Act, the” and inserting “The”. (2) Conforming amendment.—Subtitle F of title VIII of the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act (Public Law 115–271; 132 Stat. 4095) is amended by striking the subtitle heading and inserting the following: “Subtitle F—CAREER Act; Recovery Housing Pilot Program” .
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. David Meade

Kentucky House of Representatives, District 80 · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. David Meade
Kentucky Legislature · HB 669

AN ACT relating to child welfare.

Apr 14, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. David Meade · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law requires screening children entering state care for earned federal benefits, including Social Security survivor or dependent benefits, within 60 days and applying when eligible. When the cabinet is representative payee, it must conserve the child’s benefits instead of reimbursing care costs and provide accounting and transition safeguards. VA benefits are a separate part of the law, not Social Security beneficiaries.

04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 162). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 162) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact counts Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Benefit administration concerns a component of that population; SSI, Medicare, and state pensions are separate programs. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 605 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) (a) For all children in the care and custody of the cabinet, the cabinet shall determine within sixty (60) days after entry into care whether each child is receiving or eligible for earned federal benefits administered by the United States Social Security Administration or the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, including survivor or dependent benefits. (b) If the cabinet determines that a child is eligible or may be eligible for such earned benefits, the cabinet shall apply for the benefits on behalf of the child in accordance with federal law. (2) If a child began receiving earned federal benefits before entering the cabinet's care and custody, or if the cabinet applies for benefits on behalf of the child, the cabinet shall, in consultation with the child and the child’s attorney, identify an appropriate representative payee consistent with 20 C.F.R. secs. 404.2021 and 416.621 and may apply to become the representative payee only if no other suitable candidate is available. (3) If the cabinet is appointed to serve as the representative payee, the cabinet shall: (a) Not use any of the child’s earned federal benefits, savings, or assets to pay for or reimburse the cabinet or the Commonwealth for any cost of the child’s care, maintenance, supervision, or services; (b) Establish and maintain an account to conserve the child’s earned federal benefits in the child ’s best interests and consistent with federal and state asset and resource limits. Acceptable account types shall include: 1. A special needs trust; 2. A pooled special needs trust; 3. An Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) account established pursua nt to 26 U.S.C. sec. 529A; or 4. Any other account or trust vehicle determined not to interfere with eligibility for public benefits; (c) Provide an annual accounting of the use, application, or conservation of the child’s earned federal benefits to the ch ild, the child’s attorney, and, if parental rights have not been terminated, to the child’s parents or guardians; and (d) Periodically review whether another qualified person or entity could serve as representative payee in the child’s best interests and, if so, shall assist in transferring that role. (4) The cabinet shall review each case annually to determine whether a child in care and custody has become newly eligible for earned federal benefits after the cabinet’s initial determination pursuant to subs ection (1) of this section. (5) The cabinet shall develop and implement a plan for each child in care and custody with conserved earned federal benefits to be called the Success Sequence Savings and Disbursement Plan. The plan shall allow a child who has completed a cabinet -approved financial literacy or savings readiness program to access a portion of conserved benefits upon completion of at least one (1) specific milestone that promotes independence and financial readiness, including but not limited to: (a) Obtaining a driver’s license or state identification card; (b) Graduating from high school or receiving a recognized equivalent; (c) Enrolling in a postsecondary education, vocational training, or apprenticeship program; or (d) Maintaining verified employment for at least six (6) consecutive months. (6) The cabinet shall: ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 (a) Determine reasonable disbursement thresholds and amounts for each milestone to promote long - term savings while rewarding progress toward self-sufficiency; and (b) Ensure that all children participating in the program have access to financial literacy instruction and counseling to support effective use of milestone payments and long -term asset building. (7) Upon termination of the cabinet’s care and custody for the child, the cab inet shall release any remaining conserved funds to: (a) The child, if the child is at least eighteen (18) years of age or emancipated; or (b) The person responsible for the child, if the child remains a minor and is not emancipated. (8) The cabinet shall promulgate administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A and applicable federal laws to implement this section that include but are not limited to rules governing account management, milestone disbursements, reporting, financial literacy ed ucation, and oversight.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. James Tipton

Kentucky House of Representatives, District 53 · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. James Tipton
Kentucky Legislature · HB 826

AN ACT relating to education.

Apr 23, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. James Tipton · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law directs at least 85 percent of general-fund money appropriated to the Office of Adult Education to its statutory mission and requires a written or paper high-school-equivalency test option. It retains the existing rule for free initial equivalency diplomas, with fees permitted for duplicate diplomas and score reports. This concerns adult diploma attainment.

04/23/26: signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 197). Latest official history entry: signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 197) (2026-04-23). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact measures diploma-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. Completion and equivalency programs address a component of attainment; rules for current students concern a potential future component of the adult population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 151B IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: No less than eighty-five percent (85%) of general fund moneys appropriated by the General Assembly to the Office of Adult Education shall be used for programs to fulfill the adult education mission and goals enumerated in KRS 151B.402, 151B.403, 1 51B.406, and 151B.408. The Office of Adult Education may utilize any remaining general fund moneys for administrative operations. Section 2. KRS 151B.403 is amended to read as follows: (1) The Office of Adult Education within the Department of Workforce Development in the Education and Labor Cabinet shall promulgate administrative regulations to establish programs aligned with the College and Career Readiness Standards for Adult Education, or any other similar standards adopted by the federal Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education, which upon successful completion, shall result in the issuance of a High School Equivalency Diploma. (2) (a) At least one (1) program authorized under subsection (1) of this section shall include a test aligned with the College and Career Readiness Standards for Adult Education, or any other standards adopted by the federal Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education, to serve as a qualifying test, which upon passing, shall entitle students to receive a High School Equivalency Diploma. (b) A qualifying test meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) of this subsection shall provide an option for students to be administered a written or paper test in lieu of an electronic administration. (3) For purposes of any publi c employment, a High School Equivalency Diploma shall be considered equal to a high school diploma issued under the provisions of KRS 158.140. (4) A High School Equivalency Diploma shall be issued without charge upon successfully completing a High School E quivalency Diploma program. A fee may be assessed by the Office of Adult Education for the issuance of a duplicate High School Equivalency Diploma and for issuance of a duplicate score report. All fees collected for duplicate diplomas and score reports shall be used to support the adult education program. (5) The Office of Adult Education is authorized to contract annually with an institution of higher education or other appropriate agency or entity for scoring High School Equivalency Diploma program examin ations. (6) On June 29, 2017, any high school equivalency diploma or external diploma previously recognized or issued by the Commonwealth shall be considered retroactively as a High School Equivalency Diploma. (7) Upon issuance, a High School Equivalency Diploma shall not be invalidated by any subsequent changes in test selection under this section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Danny Carroll

Kentucky Senate, District 2 · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Danny Carroll
Kentucky Legislature · SB 57

AN ACT relating to nuclear energy development.

Apr 8, 2026 · Enacted

Sen. Danny Carroll · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law creates the Nuclear Reactor Site Readiness Pilot Program. On the authority’s recommendation, the General Assembly may award up to one third of actual costs of applying for and procuring qualifying federal permits or licenses, capped at $25 million per project. It requires a nuclear-ready community designation, security for repayment, and repayment when specified application or construction deadlines are missed, with certain extensions available. This supports potential nuclear generation; it is not an award of funds or an operating reactor.

04/08/26: signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 56). Latest official history entry: signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 56) (2026-04-08). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Coal share is the portion of Kentucky in-state electricity net generation supplied by coal. Coal-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 164 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) As used in this section: (a) "Affiliate" means any person, partnership, or corporation that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, a utility; (b) "Authority" means the Kentucky Nuclear Energy Development Authority established in Section 4 of this Act; (c) "Combined operating license" means a license issued b y the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission pursuant to 10 C.F.R. sec. 52.71 et seq., or other licensing frameworks as may be adopted in federal regulations by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for advanced nuclear generating reactors, that enables its holder to construct and operate a nuclear power plant at a specific site; (d) "Construction permit" means a permit issued by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission pursuant to 10 C.F.R. pt. 50 that enables its holder to construct a nuclear power plant at a specific site; (e) "Early site permit" means a permit issued by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission pursuant to 10 C.F.R. sec. 52.12 et seq. that enables its holder to secure federal site approval for a nuclear power plant site prior to seeking an operating reactor license from the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission; (f) "Eligible applicant" means any utility or any affiliate of a utility and any current or prospective customer of a utility that is acting in partnership or collaboration with the utility or the affiliate; (g) "Generation III Plus" means the generation of nuclear reactor design following Generation III that incorporates passive and other safety measures and design improvements not included in pre vious nuclear reactor designs; (h) "Generation IV" means the nuclear reactor designs identified and selected by the Generation IV International Forum as follows: 1. Sodium-cooled fast reactors; 2. Gas-cooled fast reactors; 3. Lead-cooled fast reactors; 4. Molten salt reactors; 5. Supercritical water-cooled reactors; and 6. Very high temperature reactors; (i) "Nuclear energy generating facility" means a facility containing a nuclear reactor of Generation III Plus, Generation IV, or later design that produces electricity, at least some of which is sold to the public; and (j) "Utility" means a person, firm, corporation, association, cooperative corporation, federally owned electric utility corporation, or municipal corporation who owns, controls, operat es, or manages any facility used or to be used for or in connection with the generation, production, transmission, or distribution of electricity to or for the public for compensation. (2) (a) The authority shall create and implement the Nuclear Reactor Si te Readiness Pilot Program to facilitate the application for and procurement of early site permits, construction permits, or combined ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 operating licenses from the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the siting of new nuclear energy generating facilities in the Commonwealth. (b) Upon recommendation of the authority, the General Assembly may award eligible applicants grant funding of up to one -third (1/3) of the actual costs incurred in applying for and procuring an early site permit, construction permit, or combined operating license, not to exceed twenty -five million dollars ($25,000,000) per project. (c) The authority shall: 1. Create grant applications; 2. Establish grant applicant eligibility requirements; 3. Establish objective scoring criteria to evaluate grant applications; 4. Review any partnership agreement between eligible applicants for validity and completeness and to ensure that the agreement provides for the surety bonding or similar security requirements required under subsection (4 ) of this section and repayment responsibilities for all partners in the event that forfeiture and repayment of grant funding is required under subsection (5) of this section; and 5. Make determinations on applicant eligibility and evaluate and score each eligible applicant's grant application, in consultation with the Energy and Environment Cabinet's Office of Energy Policy and the Cabinet for Economic Development, according to the following criteria: a. The location, suitability, and previous use of the s ite for which the early site permit, construction permit, or combined operating license is sought; b. The economic condition of the region where the new nuclear energy generating facility would be located; c. The economic impact that the siting of a new nu clear energy generating facility would have in the region; d. Whether, in relation to other pending or past grant applications or awards under this section, the proposed site would be located in a geographically diverse region of the Commonwealth; e. The amount of additional investment being made in the proposed project by the eligible applicant or applicants or other sources; and f. Any other criteria the authority deems appropriate to evaluate. (d) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any information, data, or records provided as part of an application for grant funding under this section shall be confidential and exempt from disclosure under the requirements of KRS 61.870 to 61.884. (3) (a) To be eligible to apply for grant funding under this section, eligible applicants must demonstrate that: 1. The community where the proposed site of the new nuclear energy generating facility would be located has applied for a nuclear-ready community designation under KRS 164.2804; and 2. There would be material benefits, including but not limited to the provision of electric utility service, job creation, and return on investment to the ratepayers and the impacted community to be served by the proposed new nuclear energy generating facility. (b) To be e ligible to be awarded grant funding under this section, eligible applicants must demonstrate that the community where the proposed site of the new nuclear energy generating facility would be located has received a nuclear-ready community designation under KRS 164.2804. (4) In exchange for any grant funding authorized by the General Assembly under this section, the utility or the affiliate and any partners it may have shall procure a surety bond or other similar security acceptable to the authority in the am ount of the grant funding to be awarded. The surety bond or similar security shall bind the principal or principals and the surety to the Commonwealth to repay all grant moneys forfeited pursuant to subsection (5) of this section. The surety bond or other similar security shall be continuous and remain in effect until the completion of the construction of the nuclear energy generating facility for which the permit or license was issued or upon the repayment of all forfeited grant funds pursuant to subsectio n (5) of this section. Any cancellation of the bond or similar security shall not occur until thirty (30) days written notice is provided by the provider of the surety bond or other similar security to the authority. (5) A grant funding recipient and all o f its partners shall forfeit and repay all grant funding awarded under this section within sixty (60) days of: (a) If it has not already done so, failing to apply to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for an early site permit within one (1) year of receiving any grant funding under this section; (b) Failing to apply to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a construction permit or combined operating license for a nuclear energy generating facility, or for a necessary license iss ued under other licensing frameworks that may be adopted in federal regulations by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for advanced nuclear generating reactors, for which an early site permit was awarded within five (5) years of obtaining the e arly site permit. The authority may approve extensions of the deadline established by this paragraph in one (1) year increments for good cause shown; (c) Failing to commence construction of the nuclear energy generating facility for which all necessary permits or licenses have been awarded by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission within ten (10) years of obtaining all necessary permits or licenses. The authority may approve extensions of the deadline established by this paragraph in one (1) year increments for good cause shown; or (d) The transferring of the entirety of a utility's or affiliate's interest in the early site permit, the construction permit, or the combined operating license to an entity other than another utility prior to the commenc ement of construction of the nuclear energy generating facility for which a permit or license was awarded, unless the authority finds that the transfer is in the best interest of the Commonwealth.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Mitch McConnell

U.S. Senate, Kentucky · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Mitch McConnell
U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · S 500

CAREER Act of 2025

Feb 10, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Mitch McConnell · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would reauthorize the Recovery Housing Pilot Program through 2030 and update its allocation criteria. It concerns housing assistance for people in recovery; it is not a high-school graduation program.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Kentucky’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

3.Reauthorization of the CAREER Act; Recovery Housing Pilot Program(a)In generalSection 8071 of the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act (42 U.S.C. 5301 note; Public Law 115–271) is amended—(1)by striking the section heading and inserting CAREER Act; Recovery Housing Pilot Program;(2)in subsection (a), by striking through 2023 and inserting through 2030;(3)in subsection (b)—(A)in paragraph (1), by striking not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act and inserting not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of the Comprehensive Addiction Recovery through Effective Employment and Reentry Act of 2025; and(B)in paragraph (2)(B)(i)—(i)in subclause (I)—(I)by striking for calendar years 2013 through 2017; and (II)by inserting for calendar years 2018 through 2022 after rates of unemployment;(ii)in subclause (II)—(I)by striking for calendar years 2013 through 2017; and(II)by inserting for calendar years 2018 through 2022 after participation rates; and(iii)by striking subclause (III) and inserting the following:(III)The highest age-adjusted average rates of drug overdose deaths for calendar years 2018 through 2022 based on data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, including, if necessary, provisional data for calendar year 2022.; and(4)in subsection (f), by striking For the 2-year period following the date of enactment of this Act, the and inserting The.(b)Conforming amendmentSubtitle F of title VIII of the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act (Public Law 115–271; 132 Stat. 4095) is amended by striking the subtitle heading and inserting the following:FCAREER Act; Recovery Housing Pilot Program.(c)Clerical amendmentsThe table of contents in section 1(b) of the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act (Public Law 115–271; 132 Stat. 3894) is amended—(1)by striking the item relating to subtitle F of title VIII and inserting the following:Subtitle F—CAREER Act; Recovery Housing Pilot Program; and(2)by striking the item relating to section 8071 and inserting the following:Sec. 8071. CAREER Act; Recovery Housing Pilot Program..
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Kentucky officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Kentucky statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.