Kentucky · individual fact

Kentucky income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Kentucky’s tax structure.

Median household income$63.73K2020–2024 · #46 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$35.82K2020–2024 · #45 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$52.29K2024 · #45 of 50 · highest first

Kentucky over time

Explore Kentucky readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Kentucky officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Kentucky effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Kentucky change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person Kentucky · source units
KentuckyPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $52,290$40.08K$50.75K$61.43KKentucky, 2014: $42,144Kentucky, 2015: $43,986Kentucky, 2016: $44,214Kentucky, 2017: $45,005Kentucky, 2018: $45,925Kentucky, 2019: $46,956Kentucky, 2020: $50,641Kentucky, 2021: $53,512Kentucky, 2022: $50,765Kentucky, 2023: $51,428Kentucky, 2024: $52,290201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 35National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings funding● Kentucky Legislature · 63● U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · 62◆ Governor · 5■ Kentucky agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-09-012026-08-31

17 of 17 reviewed Kentucky actions match · 14 date markers shown. 35 major events shown separately.

Kentucky · 2024: $52,290 · Rank #45 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Kentucky Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodKentuckyRankU.S. benchmark
2024$52,290#45 of 50$59,195
2023$51,428#44 of 50$58,088
2022$50,765#44 of 50$57,104
2021$53,512#44 of 50$59,365
2020$50,641#44 of 50$56,514
2019$46,956#46 of 50$53,683
2018$45,925#45 of 50$52,242
2017$45,005#43 of 50$51,006
2016$44,214#43 of 50$49,828
2015$43,986#41 of 50$49,396
2014$42,144#42 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Kentucky · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

Kentucky · 2020–2024$63,726
Kentucky rank#46among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · $63,7262020–2024 · Rank #46 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $63,297 – $64,155Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky · your comparison$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$63,7262020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by Kentucky households, expressed in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • Income is not take-home pay and does not directly measure taxes, wealth, prices, or purchasing power.
  • A statewide median obscures regional and household differences.
Kentucky · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

Kentucky · 2024$52,290
Kentucky rank#45among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kentucky
Real personal income per person history in Kentucky$39.56K$50.75K$61.95K20142024
2024 · Kentucky: $52,290 · Rank #45 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kentucky Real personal income per person history
PeriodKentuckyCompare
2014$42,144
2015$43,986
2016$44,214
2017$45,005
2018$45,925
2019$46,956
2020$50,641
2021$53,512
2022$50,765
2023$51,428
2024$52,290

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · $52,2902024 · Rank #45 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky · your comparison$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kentucky · state comparison

How Kentucky raises taxes

Kentucky's flat individual-income-tax rate is 3.5% for tax year 2026. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

Kentucky · FY2024$5.02B
Kentucky rank#23among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · $5.02BFY2024 · Rank #23 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky · your comparison$5.02B—
#24Louisiana$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma$4.51B—
#27Kansas$4.5B—
#28Iowa$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska$2.48B—
#34Maine$2.4B—
#35Mississippi$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding Kentucky income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The Kentucky ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Kentucky candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

42 statements from 15 candidates

2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 6 statements

James R. Comer

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · KY

Taxes & tax policy

Unleashing economic growth begins with reducing taxes and reining in government regulations that make it more difficult for Americans to start businesses, compete globally and grow jobs here at home. We must continue to build on the success of the historic tax reform legislation and deregulation to …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation

Candidate campaign source

Unleashing economic growth begins with reducing taxes and reining in government regulations that make it more difficult for Americans to start businesses, compete globally and grow jobs here at home. We must continue to build on the success of the historic tax reform legislation and deregulation to help American families, businesses and entrepreneurs achieve their dreams.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

James R. Comer campaign source 2 ↗

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · KY

Taxes & tax policy

If your wealth is growing by tens to hundreds of millions of dollars a year, you should not be able to legally pay zero in taxes just because you never sell anything.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: TAX POLICY FOR THE EVERYDAY AMERICAN PALN

Candidate campaign source

If your wealth is growing by tens to hundreds of millions of dollars a year, you should not be able to legally pay zero in taxes just because you never sell anything.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

John "Drew" Williams — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
View 4 more statements from John "Drew" Williams
Taxes & tax policy

- Restores the original 1913 $3,000 tax exemption, adjusted to today’s dollars and indexed to inflation, which is roughly $100,000.- Ensures low- and middle-income families owe nothing on basic living income, putting more money in their pocket until they start to see real dividends in their own comm…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

- Restores the original 1913 $3,000 tax exemption, adjusted to today’s dollars and indexed to inflation, which is roughly $100,000.- Ensures low- and middle-income families owe nothing on basic living income, putting more money in their pocket until they start to see real dividends in their own communities.- Creates a balancing system that if the Federal Government wants to tax American income then they need to work to create economic and social service systems that improve wages for more Americans.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

John "Drew" Williams — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

No one should owe federal income tax just for trying to survive, so we restore the original tax-free income floor that existed when the income tax was first created.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

No one should owe federal income tax just for trying to survive, so we restore the original tax-free income floor that existed when the income tax was first created.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

John "Drew" Williams — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
Income & wages

The goal is to create a cost-of-living based Wage System that reflects regional realities, with tiered exemptions for Microbusinesses”As businesses scale, so should the pay of their employees”

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

The goal is to create a cost-of-living based Wage System that reflects regional realities, with tiered exemptions for Microbusinesses”As businesses scale, so should the pay of their employees”

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

John "Drew" Williams — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

- Tax rates increase smoothly from 1% at $100,000 to 35% at $1 million, and continues up to continual higher marginal incomes with no jumps or cliffs.- Eliminates gaming, timing tricks, and artificial income shifting, with the scale continuing upward and higher income earners paying for the governme…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

- Tax rates increase smoothly from 1% at $100,000 to 35% at $1 million, and continues up to continual higher marginal incomes with no jumps or cliffs.- Eliminates gaming, timing tricks, and artificial income shifting, with the scale continuing upward and higher income earners paying for the governmental services and benefits of American prosperity that they obviously benefit from at a greater share.- Makes the system simpler, fairer, and harder to manipulate by simplifying the tax code.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

John "Drew" Williams — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗

2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Megan Wingfield

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · KY

Income & wages

✅ End period poverty by providing free menstrual products in schools, prisons, and public spaces.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Term Limits Now

Candidate campaign source

✅ End period poverty by providing free menstrual products in schools, prisons, and public spaces.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Megan Wingfield — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 6 statements

Morgan McGarvey

5 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · KY

Taxes & tax policy

Use federal spending and tax incentives to expand renewable-energy development.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Renewable Energy

Candidate campaign source

Use federal spending and tax incentives to expand renewable-energy development.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Morgan McGarvey — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
View 4 more statements from Morgan McGarvey
Taxes & tax policy

Fund electric-vehicle infrastructure and provide tax incentives for union-made, American-made electric vehicles.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Electric Vehicles

Candidate campaign source

Fund electric-vehicle infrastructure and provide tax incentives for union-made, American-made electric vehicles.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Morgan McGarvey — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
Income & wages

Raise the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour and index it to inflation.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Wages

Candidate campaign source

Raise the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour and index it to inflation.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Morgan McGarvey — Part 88 verified source ↗
Taxes & tax policy

I support federal spending and tax incentives to dramatically expand renewable energy buildout in the United States, infrastructure spending to speed the deployment of electric vehicles, and tax incentives for consumer purchase of union-made and American-made electric vehicles. I support a federal c…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Coal, energy, and Appalachian economic development

Candidate campaign source

I support federal spending and tax incentives to dramatically expand renewable energy buildout in the United States, infrastructure spending to speed the deployment of electric vehicles, and tax incentives for consumer purchase of union-made and American-made electric vehicles. I support a federal clean energy standard that incentivizes investor-owned electric utilities to achieve greenhouse gas emissions reductions while creating millions of good-paying jobs to build the clean energy infrastructure necessary to make this transition. And I will fight for federal spending to incentivize rural electric cooperatives to transition to clean, renewable energy by relieving debt associated with coal-fired power plants, and conditioning such relief upon the coop’s investment in a clean energy transition.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Morgan McGarvey — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Make the federal Child Tax Credit permanent.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Child Tax Credit

Candidate campaign source

Make the federal Child Tax Credit permanent.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Morgan McGarvey — Part 88 verified source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Kentucky candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Kentucky incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Kentucky legislators and Kentucky’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Kentucky’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

12 matching sponsorships or proposals · 9 Kentucky incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Andy Barr

U.S. House of Representatives, Kentucky District 6 · R–KY

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Andy Barr
U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · HR 10070

Border Patrol Overtime Parity Act

Aug 10, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Andy Barr · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would remove the GS-12 grade restriction from a special Border Patrol overtime-pay provision. It concerns wages for a defined federal workforce and does not determine Kentucky’s median household income.

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Expansion of eligibility for certain overtime pay for border patrol agentsSection 5550(h) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— (1)in the subsection heading, by striking GS–12; and (2)in paragraph (1), by striking encumbering a position at grade GS–12.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · HR 8956

Border Patrol Supervisors Retention Act

May 21, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Andy Barr · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would expand special Border Patrol overtime-pay eligibility from GS-12 to grades GS-12 through GS-15. It concerns compensation for a defined workforce, not a change to immigration status.

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Establishment of higher rates of regularly scheduled overtime pay for certain U.S. Border Patrol agentsSection 5550(h) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— (1)in the subsection heading, by striking GS–12 Border Patrol agents and inserting Border Patrol agents classified from grade GS–12 through GS–15; and (2)in paragraph (1), by striking a position at grade GS–12 and inserting a position from grade GS–12 through GS–15.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. David Meade

Kentucky House of Representatives, District 80 · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. David Meade
Kentucky Legislature · HB 669

AN ACT relating to child welfare.

Apr 14, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. David Meade · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law requires screening children entering state care for earned federal benefits, including Social Security survivor or dependent benefits, within 60 days and applying when eligible. When the cabinet is representative payee, it must conserve the child’s benefits instead of reimbursing care costs and provide accounting and transition safeguards. VA benefits are a separate part of the law, not Social Security beneficiaries.

04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 162). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 162) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact counts Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Benefit administration concerns a component of that population; SSI, Medicare, and state pensions are separate programs. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 605 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) (a) For all children in the care and custody of the cabinet, the cabinet shall determine within sixty (60) days after entry into care whether each child is receiving or eligible for earned federal benefits administered by the United States Social Security Administration or the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, including survivor or dependent benefits. (b) If the cabinet determines that a child is eligible or may be eligible for such earned benefits, the cabinet shall apply for the benefits on behalf of the child in accordance with federal law. (2) If a child began receiving earned federal benefits before entering the cabinet's care and custody, or if the cabinet applies for benefits on behalf of the child, the cabinet shall, in consultation with the child and the child’s attorney, identify an appropriate representative payee consistent with 20 C.F.R. secs. 404.2021 and 416.621 and may apply to become the representative payee only if no other suitable candidate is available. (3) If the cabinet is appointed to serve as the representative payee, the cabinet shall: (a) Not use any of the child’s earned federal benefits, savings, or assets to pay for or reimburse the cabinet or the Commonwealth for any cost of the child’s care, maintenance, supervision, or services; (b) Establish and maintain an account to conserve the child’s earned federal benefits in the child ’s best interests and consistent with federal and state asset and resource limits. Acceptable account types shall include: 1. A special needs trust; 2. A pooled special needs trust; 3. An Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) account established pursua nt to 26 U.S.C. sec. 529A; or 4. Any other account or trust vehicle determined not to interfere with eligibility for public benefits; (c) Provide an annual accounting of the use, application, or conservation of the child’s earned federal benefits to the ch ild, the child’s attorney, and, if parental rights have not been terminated, to the child’s parents or guardians; and (d) Periodically review whether another qualified person or entity could serve as representative payee in the child’s best interests and, if so, shall assist in transferring that role. (4) The cabinet shall review each case annually to determine whether a child in care and custody has become newly eligible for earned federal benefits after the cabinet’s initial determination pursuant to subs ection (1) of this section. (5) The cabinet shall develop and implement a plan for each child in care and custody with conserved earned federal benefits to be called the Success Sequence Savings and Disbursement Plan. The plan shall allow a child who has completed a cabinet -approved financial literacy or savings readiness program to access a portion of conserved benefits upon completion of at least one (1) specific milestone that promotes independence and financial readiness, including but not limited to: (a) Obtaining a driver’s license or state identification card; (b) Graduating from high school or receiving a recognized equivalent; (c) Enrolling in a postsecondary education, vocational training, or apprenticeship program; or (d) Maintaining verified employment for at least six (6) consecutive months. (6) The cabinet shall: ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 (a) Determine reasonable disbursement thresholds and amounts for each milestone to promote long - term savings while rewarding progress toward self-sufficiency; and (b) Ensure that all children participating in the program have access to financial literacy instruction and counseling to support effective use of milestone payments and long -term asset building. (7) Upon termination of the cabinet’s care and custody for the child, the cab inet shall release any remaining conserved funds to: (a) The child, if the child is at least eighteen (18) years of age or emancipated; or (b) The person responsible for the child, if the child remains a minor and is not emancipated. (8) The cabinet shall promulgate administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A and applicable federal laws to implement this section that include but are not limited to rules governing account management, milestone disbursements, reporting, financial literacy ed ucation, and oversight.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Emily Callaway

Kentucky House of Representatives, District 37 · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Emily Callaway
Kentucky Legislature · HB 185

AN ACT relating to employment and declaring an emergency.

Apr 10, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Emily Callaway · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law expressly permits employer-mandated as well as voluntary tip pools and revises the tipped-employee definition to include specified service-support work. Pools may include tipped employees but exclude salaried employees, managers, and supervisors. Custodial pool accounts must be segregated and open to participants; employers may require remittance of gratuities only for legally required withholding. Tips can be a component of household money income.

04/10/26: signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 72). Latest official history entry: signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 72) (2026-04-10). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(d) "Tipped employee" means any employee engaged in an occupation in which he or she : 1. Customarily and regularly receives more than thirty dollars ($30) per month in tips; and 2. Performs work that: a. Directly supports or is itself the service function for which a customer would tip, regardless of whether the employee performs the service function; or b. Directly supports the service function that involves any amount of direct customer interaction or is performed in the direct line of sight of customers; and […] Section 7. KRS 337.065 is amended to read as follows: ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 6 (1) No employer s hall require an employee to remit to the employer any gratuity, or any portion thereof, except for the purpose of withholding amounts required by federal or state law. The amount withheld from such gratuity shall not exceed the amount required by federal or state law. (2) As used in this section, "gratuity" means voluntary monetary contribution received by an employee from a guest, patron, or customer for services rendered. (3) An employer may provide custodial services for the safekeeping of funds placed i n a tip pool mandated by the employer or voluntarily entered into amongst the employees, if the account is properly identified and segregated from his other business records and open to examination by pool participants. (4) A tip pooling arrangement may in clude tipped employees. A tip pooling arrangement shall not include salaried employees, managers, or supervisors.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Ken Fleming

Kentucky House of Representatives, District 48 · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Ken Fleming
Kentucky Legislature · HB 2

AN ACT relating to Medicaid, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring an emergency.

Apr 14, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Ken Fleming · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law requires Medicaid community-engagement eligibility rules by January 1, 2027: the preceding month for an initial application and three months since the last determination for continued enrollment at redetermination, subject to the specified federal framework and exceptions. Notices begin by September 1, 2026, and a delay request requires legislative authorization. If federal requirements are diminished, the separate fallback depends on federal waiver approval. The legislature overrode line-item vetoes. This cannot explain the earlier uninsured rate.

04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 179). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 179) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. KRS 205.5371 is amended to read as follows: (1) (a) The cabinet shall, no later than January 1, 2027, for applicable individuals as defined in 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx)(9), condition eligibility for enrollment or continued enrollment in the Medicaid program on demonstrated community engagement as defined in and required under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx) . (b) In the case of an applicable individual who is applying for enrollment in the Medicaid program, in order to be eligible for enrollment the individual shall be requir ed to demonstrate community engagement for the month immediately preceding the month during which the individual applies for enrollment. (c) In the case of an applicable individual who is enrolled and receiving Medicaid benefits, in order to remain eligibl e for continued enrollment, at the time of eligibility redetermination, the individual shall be required to demonstrate community engagement for three (3) months during the period of time since the individual's most recent eligibility determination or redetermination. (2) Notwithstanding any provision of state law to the contrary, the cabinet shall not request an exemption, waiver, or any other delay, including but not limited to a good -faith-effort exemption, in implementing the requirements of 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx) or subsection (1) of this section that may be available to the state under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx)(11) unless specifically authorized by the General Assembly to do so . (3) The cabinet shall begin, no later than September 1, 2026, providing notice to all applicable individuals, as defined in 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx)(9) , of the requirement to demonstrate community engagement as established under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx) and subsection (1) of this section. Notice provided under this subsection shall comply with the requirements of 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx)(8) . (4) If at any time on or after the effective date of this Act, the federal community engagement requirements established in 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx) are abolished, repealed, or otherwise diminished, the cabinet shall: (a) Immediately prepare and submit a waiver application to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services seeking authorization to condition the eligibility of applicable individuals, as ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 defined in subsection (5) of this section, to enroll or continue to be enrolled in the Medicaid program on demonstrated community engagement, as defined in subsection (5) of this section; and (b) For applicable individuals, a s defined in subsection (5) of this section, and in accordance with subsection (1)(b) and (c) of this section, condition eligibility for enrollment or continued enrollment in the Medicaid program on demonstrated community engagement, as defined in subsecti on (5) of this section, if authorized to do so by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (5) As used in subsection (4) of this section : (a) "Applicable individual" means an individual who is: 1. At least nineteen (19) years of age but less than sixty-five (65) years of age; 2. Eligible for enrollment or currently enrolled in the Medicaid program under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(a)(10)(A)(i)(VIII) or a waiver that provides coverage that is equivalent to minimum essential coverage as described in Section 5000A(f)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and 3. Not: a. Currently, or was not previously, placed in the foster care system if the individual is under twenty-six (26) years of age; b. Eligible for coverage under the Indian Health Service; c. A parent, guardian, caretaker relative, or family caregiver, as defined in the RAISE Family Caregivers Act, Pub. L. No. 115 -119, of a dependent child thirteen (13) years of age or under or a disabled individual; d. A disabled veteran with a disability rated as total under 38 U.S.C. sec. 1155; e. Medically frail or otherwise has special medical needs, including an individual: i. Who is blind or disabled; ii. With a substance use disorder; iii. With a disabling mental condition; iv. With a physical, intellectual, or developmental disability that significantly impairs his or her ability to perform one (1) or more activities of daily living; or v. With a serious or complex medical condition; f. An individual subject to work or community engagement requirements imposed under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, if the individual is in compliance with such requirements; g. An individual participating in a drug addiction or alcohol addiction recovery program recognized by the secretary through the promulgation of administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A; h. An inmate at a public institution; i. Pregnant or eligible for coverage under KRS 205.592; or j. An individual experiencing a short -term hardship as defined by the secretary through the promulgation of administrative regu lations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A; and (b) "Demonstrated community engagement" means satisfying one (1) or more of the following conditions on a monthly basis: 1. Working, as defined in 7 C.F.R. sec. 273.24, not less than eighty (80) hours; 2. Completing not less than eighty (80) hours of community service; 3. Participating in a work program, as defined in 7 C.F.R. sec. 273.24, for not less than eighty (80) hours; 4. Participating at least half -time in an education program recognized by the secreta ry through the promulgation of administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A; 5. Engaging in any combination of activities described in subparagraphs 1., 2., 3., and 4. of this paragraph for a total of not less than eighty (80) hours; 6. Having a verifiable monthly income that is not less than applicable state minimum wage established in KRS 337.275 multiplied by eighty (80) hours; or 7. Having a verifiable average monthly income over the previous six (6) months that is not less than applicable state minimum wage established in KRS 337.275 multiplied by eighty (80) hours if the individual is a seasonal worker as described in Section 45R(d)(5)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Michael Sarge Pollock

Kentucky House of Representatives, District 51 · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Michael Sarge Pollock
Kentucky Legislature · HB 333

AN ACT relating to housing.

Apr 7, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Michael Sarge Pollock · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law permits qualifying affordable-housing developments of 24 or fewer units on religious-institution property owned before January 1, 2026, subject to location, aggregate-unit, and other requirements. Units must serve households at or below 80 percent of area median income and retain affordability for 15 years. This concerns housing supply; it does not specify rental tenure for every unit or set median rent.

04/07/26: signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 37). Latest official history entry: signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 37) (2026-04-07). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Kentucky’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(1) As used in this section: (a) "Affordable housing" means a residential dwelling unit reserved for a household whose income does not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the median income for the area as set out by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; (b) "Homeless shelter" means a facility used primarily to provide temporary shelter, including day shelters, overnight shelters, or temporary cooling or warming shelters, for the homeless, and which may provide: 1. Overnight sleeping accommodations; 2. Meals; and 3. Ancillary social, educational, or health services; (c) "Religious developer" means a religious institution or any property developer working on behalf of a religious institution; and (d) "Religious institution" means a bona fide church, religious denomination, or religious organization, determined by the Internal Revenue Service to be tax exempt pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. (2) Affordable housing developed by a religious developer shall be considered a permitted use and shall not be subject to permitting, review, or other regulation under this chapter, except for ministerial review by a planning unit for compliance with the following requirements: (a) The development is located on property owned by the religious institution; (b) The property where the development is to be located was purchased by the religious institution prior to January 1, 2026, and owned by the religious institution throughout the duration of the obligation in paragraph (g) of this subsection; (c) The development exclusively contains affordable housing; (d) The property where the development is to be located: 1. Is on a parcel in a commercial or business zone; 2. Is on a parcel in a residential zone that is adjacent to a road classified as part of the state primary road system pursuant to KRS 177.020 and is adjacent to a parcel in a commercial, business, or industrial zone; or 3. Contains a structure that was used as a school prior to the effective date of th is Act and the development is for the conversion of that structure into affordable housing; (e) The development contains twenty-four (24) or fewer units; (f) The development would not lead to more than twenty -four (24) affordable housing units being located on that parcel, any contiguous parcel owned by the religious institution, or cumulatively on parcels owned by the religious institution within one-half (1/2) mile of the development; (g) The obligation that units developed pursuant to this section are af fordable in accordance with paragraph (c) of this subsection shall: 1. Remain in place for a period of fifteen (15) years from the date of the certificate of occupancy or, if a certificate of occupancy is not required, from the date of the final building p ermit inspection; and ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 2. Be recorded in a legally binding agreement or deed restriction. The religious developer shall submit an annual report to the certifying planning unit that the requirements of this paragraph are met for the property; and (h) The re ligious developer has obtained all other permits, including building permits, as required by law. (3) If a development established pursuant to this section no longer meets the requirements in subsection (2) of this section, the property owner shall seek al l approvals for the development from the planning unit that would be required for a developer that did not qualify for ministerial review under this section. (4) The Kentucky Housing Corporation may provide technical and advisory resources to a religious d eveloper to assist with the development and management of an affordable housing development under this section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Morgan McGarvey

U.S. House of Representatives, Kentucky District 3 · D–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Morgan McGarvey
U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · HR 6756

Black Lung Benefits Improvement Act of 2025

Dec 16, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Morgan McGarvey · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would set a $10,769 annual black-lung disability benefit rate for 2026, paid monthly, and apply a specified inflation adjustment in later years. These cash benefits are separate from Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability benefits. The proposed payment schedule is not an enacted entitlement.

Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

107.Restoring adequate benefit adjustments for miners suffering from black lung disease and for their dependent family membersSection 412(a) of the Black Lung Benefits Act (30 U.S.C. 922(a)) is amended by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following: (1)In the case of total disability of a miner due to pneumoconiosis, the disabled miner shall be paid benefits during the disability— (A)for any calendar year preceding January 1, 2026, at a rate equal to 37½ percent of the monthly pay rate for Federal employees in grade GS–2, step 1; (B)for the calendar year beginning on January 1, 2026, at a rate of $10,769.00 per year, payable in 12 equal monthly payments; and (C)for each calendar year thereafter, at a rate equal to the product of the rate in effect under this paragraph for the calendar year immediately preceding such calendar year multiplied by the ratio (not less than 1) of— (i)the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, for the calendar year immediately preceding such calendar year; to (ii)such Consumer Price Index for the second calendar year preceding such calendar year..
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Kentucky officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Kentucky statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.