Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price12.79¢/kWh2024 · #39 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.893/gal2026-08 · #26 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$133.812024 · #26 of 50 · highest first
Kentucky over time
Explore Kentucky readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Kentucky officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Kentucky effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Kentucky change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price Kentucky · source units
KentuckyPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
8 of 8 reviewed Kentucky actions match · 8 date markers shown. 48 major events shown separately.
Kentucky · 2024: 12.79¢/kWh · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Kentucky, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Kentucky Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Kentucky · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
Kentucky · 202412.79¢/kWh
Kentucky rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Kentucky, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Kentucky
2024 · Kentucky: 12.79¢/kWh · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Kentucky Residential electricity price history
Period
Kentucky
Compare
2015
10.24¢/kWh
2016
10.49¢/kWh
2017
10.85¢/kWh
2018
10.6¢/kWh
2019
10.8¢/kWh
2020
10.87¢/kWh
2021
11.5¢/kWh
2022
12.91¢/kWh
2023
12.65¢/kWh
2024
12.79¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kentucky · 12.79¢/kWh2024 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky · your comparison
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's Midwest region, including taxes. The region contains Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent EIA observations
Prior week
$3.934/gal
Weekly change
-8.7¢
One year earlier
$3.088/gal
Change from one year earlier
+75.9¢
Method and limitations
FactVote uses EIA’s Midwest series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes Kentucky. Changes are calculated from the published August 24, 2026 (prior week), and September 1, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.
EIA does not publish a current Kentucky statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This Midwest regional estimate should not be read as Kentucky’s statewide average.
The regional average combines Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Kentucky community.
Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
Kentucky · 2024$133.81
Kentucky rank#26among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Kentucky
2024 · Kentucky: $133.81 · Rank #26 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Kentucky Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
Kentucky
Compare
2010
$107.77
2011
$108.16
2012
$106.54
2013
$112.95
2014
$119.66
2015
$114.72
2016
$117.65
2017
$114.15
2018
$123.57
2019
$120.08
2020
$116.62
2021
$124.67
2022
$141.23
2023
$125.8
2024
$133.81
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kentucky · $133.812024 · Rank #26 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky · your comparison
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
Kentucky · 202467.1 TWh
Kentucky rank#23among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Kentucky, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Kentucky
2024 · Kentucky: 67.1 TWh · Rank #23 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Kentucky Total electricity generation history
Period
Kentucky
Compare
2015
83.5 TWh
2016
80.3 TWh
2017
73.2 TWh
2018
78.8 TWh
2019
71.8 TWh
2020
63.5 TWh
2021
69.9 TWh
2022
69.1 TWh
2023
63.2 TWh
2024
67.1 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kentucky · 67.1 TWh2024 · Rank #23 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky · your comparison
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
Kentucky · 2024537.7 min/year
Kentucky rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Kentucky
2024 · Kentucky: 537.7 min/year · Rank #16 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Kentucky Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
Kentucky
Compare
2023
861.5 min/year
2024
537.7 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kentucky · 537.7 min/year2024 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky · your comparison
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
Kentucky · 2024319 trillion Btu
Kentucky rank#24among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kentucky · 319 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #24 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky · your comparison
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
Kentucky · 2024106.87 Mt CO₂
Kentucky rank#13among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kentucky · 106.87 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #13 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky · your comparison
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
8 of 8 reviewed Kentucky actions · newest first
May 5, 2026 · Executive Order 2026-0235 · Gas-price emergency, conditional motor-fuel tax reduction and price-gouging provisions · IssuedGovernor · Executive Order 2026-0235
Gas-price emergency, conditional motor-fuel tax reduction and price-gouging provisions
May 5, 2026 · Issued
Gov. Andy Beshear · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
Andy Beshear ordered emergency motor-fuel price-gouging protections, subject to statutory cost exceptions, and a 10-cent-per-gallon state fuel-tax reduction effective May 11, 2026, conditioned on attorney-general approval. The same official filing includes Russell Coleman’s May 7 written approval of the statutory suspension for a period consistent with KRS 39A.090(2). That satisfies the stated approval condition; it does not establish later extensions, continued operation in September, actual retail pass-through, or a fall in the Midwest regional price.
Executive order issued. This is the historical order; implementation, later amendments, and current enforceability are not inferred.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Midwest regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee and Wisconsin. Kentucky policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Kentucky statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
1. Pursuant to KRS 39A.180(2)(b), KRS 138.220(1)(a) and (4) shall be suspended, and the State tax on all gasoline, diesel fuel and other special fuels shall be reduced by 10 cents ($0.10) for the duration of the State of Emergency and any extensions of the State of Emergency. This part shall take effect on May 11, 2026, if the Attorney General signs off on this suspension of statutes to help save Kentuckians about $27 million per month at the pump. 2. Pursuant to KRS Chapters 367 and 39A, I hereby implement the provisions of KRS 367.372, et seq. as to the sale of goods and services, specifically gasoline or other motor fuels, as follows: a. No person, within the meaning of KRS 446.010, shall sell or offer to sell gasoline or other motor fuels, see KRS 367.374(1)(b)1, at a price grossly in excess of the price prior to the declaration of this State of Emergency; b. The foregoing is subject to the qualifications and limitations set forth otherwise in KRS 367.372, et seq., with regard to increased costs to sellers inter alia; c. Any person who violates the provisions of KRS 367.372, et seq., as implemented by this Order, shall be subject to the penalties set forth in KRS 367.378 or other applicable law; and d. The Division of Emergency Management shall immediately notify the public and those registered with the Division for the purpose of receiving notice of the implementation, renewal, or termination of the provisions of this Order relating to KRS 367.374. The Division shall notify the public by any means available, including the Division's website, news media, and electronic mail. Any person or trade association may register with the Division for the purpose of receiving notification. This order shall be effective May 11, 2026. […] NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority vested in me by KRS 39A.180(2)(b), I, Russell Coleman, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, do hereby APPROVE the suspension of KRS 138.220(1)(a) and (4) as reflected in Executive Order 2026-235 for a period consistent with KRS 39A.090(2). So ORDERED this the 7th day of May, 2026.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 14, 2026 · SB 100 · AN ACT relating to the Energy Planning and Inventory Commission and declaring an emergency. · EnactedKentucky Legislature · SB 100
AN ACT relating to the Energy Planning and Inventory Commission and declaring an emergency.
Apr 14, 2026 · Enacted
Sen. Robby Mills · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law permits the Energy Planning and Inventory Commission’s executive director to submit a separate report on proposed power-plant retirements and requires the Public Service Commission to consider the submitted findings. This concerns review of generation retirements, not an order to close or operate a particular coal plant.
04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 157). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 157) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Coal share is the portion of Kentucky in-state electricity net generation supplied by coal. Coal-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2. The executive committee shall provide the executive director with all information, records, and data considered in the proposal to retire and shall include the executive director in all associated deliberations. Within one hundred eighty (180) days of the utility filing notice of the proposed activity, the executive director may submit his or her own written report with findings and recommendations, a written statement of position, or dissenting findings and recommendations to the Public Service Commission and the utility. (h) The executive committee's written report, the executive director's written report or position statement, and any dissenting statements provided to the Public Service Commission and the utility , shall be included in any retirement application made to the Public Service Commission under KRS 278.264, and the Public Service Commissio n shall not approve any retirement application without considering all information received from the executive committee , the executive director, or any member of the executive committee. Any order of the Public Service Commission in a proceeding under KRS 278.264 shall contain specific written findings of fact or conclusions of law addressing whether the executive committee's and the executive director's findings and recommendations , position statements, and dissenting statements were considered by the Public Service Commission. ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 8 (i) No retirement application to the Public Service Commission under KRS 278.264 shall be deemed administratively complete unless it includes the executive committee's and the executive director's report, position statemen ts, and dissenting statements submitted pursuant to this section or evidence that more than one hundred eighty (180) days have passed since notice was submitted to the commission as required in paragraph (b) of this subsection and no executive committee or executive director report, position statement, or dissenting statement has been provided to the Public Service Commission or the utility.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 13, 2026 · SB 100 · AN ACT relating to the Energy Planning and Inventory Commission and declaring an emergency. · VetoedGovernor · SB 100
AN ACT relating to the Energy Planning and Inventory Commission and declaring an emergency.
Apr 13, 2026 · Vetoed
Gov. Andy Beshear · Vetoed
FactVote reviewed summary
Andy Beshear vetoed the energy-planning bill in full, objecting to transferring two commission appointments to the attorney general and the resulting institutional roles. The legislature overrode the veto. The veto concerns governance of the power-plant retirement review body.
The original governor message verifies a full-bill veto. The General Assembly overrode the veto; the bill is recorded separately as enacted. 04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 157). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 157) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The governor’s objection concerns transferring two appointments to the attorney general and a claimed institutional conflict. This is an indirect governance connection to review of generating-unit retirements, not opposition to a particular coal plant or a measured generation change. The legislature overrode the veto.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Senate Bill 100 of the 2026 Regular Session of the General Assembly in its entirety. Senate Bill 100 violates the Kentucky Constitution by giving the Governor's authority to appoint two members of the executive committee of the Energy Planning and Inventory Commission to the Attorney General. Unlike the Governor, the Attorney General plays no constitutional role in the oversight of the Commission. In addition, allowing the Attorney General to make appointments to the executive committee creates a conflict of interest with his role in representing ratepayers before the Public Service Commission. For these reasons, I am vetoing Senate Bill 100.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 12, 2026 · HB 398 · AN ACT relating to decommissioning costs for electric generating units. · EnactedKentucky Legislature · HB 398
AN ACT relating to decommissioning costs for electric generating units.
Apr 12, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Wade Williams · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law clarifies that utilities may seek recovery of generating-unit decommissioning, removal, salvage, and depreciation costs before retirement authorization. Cost recovery does not itself approve retirement or its timing. The bill became law without the governor’s signature.
04/12/26: became law without Governor's Signature (Acts Ch. 95). Latest official history entry: became law without Governor's Signature (Acts Ch. 95) (2026-04-12). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Coal share is the portion of Kentucky in-state electricity net generation supplied by coal. Coal-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(6) (a) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, this section shall not be construed as limiting the commission's authority to approve a utility's right to record and seek, prior to retirement authorization, the recovery of any electric generating unit's decommissioning, removal and salvage costs, and depreciation expenses through rates over the electric generating unit's estimated depreciable life. (b) Approval to recover any costs or expenses und er this subsection shall not be considered approval of, or support for, retirement or approval of timing of retirement of an electric generating unit in any proceeding considering a retirement application filed pursuant to subsection (1) of this section.
The law creates the Nuclear Reactor Site Readiness Pilot Program. On the authority’s recommendation, the General Assembly may award up to one third of actual costs of applying for and procuring qualifying federal permits or licenses, capped at $25 million per project. It requires a nuclear-ready community designation, security for repayment, and repayment when specified application or construction deadlines are missed, with certain extensions available. This supports potential nuclear generation; it is not an award of funds or an operating reactor.
04/08/26: signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 56). Latest official history entry: signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 56) (2026-04-08). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Coal share is the portion of Kentucky in-state electricity net generation supplied by coal. Coal-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 164 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) As used in this section: (a) "Affiliate" means any person, partnership, or corporation that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, a utility; (b) "Authority" means the Kentucky Nuclear Energy Development Authority established in Section 4 of this Act; (c) "Combined operating license" means a license issued b y the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission pursuant to 10 C.F.R. sec. 52.71 et seq., or other licensing frameworks as may be adopted in federal regulations by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for advanced nuclear generating reactors, that enables its holder to construct and operate a nuclear power plant at a specific site; (d) "Construction permit" means a permit issued by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission pursuant to 10 C.F.R. pt. 50 that enables its holder to construct a nuclear power plant at a specific site; (e) "Early site permit" means a permit issued by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission pursuant to 10 C.F.R. sec. 52.12 et seq. that enables its holder to secure federal site approval for a nuclear power plant site prior to seeking an operating reactor license from the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission; (f) "Eligible applicant" means any utility or any affiliate of a utility and any current or prospective customer of a utility that is acting in partnership or collaboration with the utility or the affiliate; (g) "Generation III Plus" means the generation of nuclear reactor design following Generation III that incorporates passive and other safety measures and design improvements not included in pre vious nuclear reactor designs; (h) "Generation IV" means the nuclear reactor designs identified and selected by the Generation IV International Forum as follows: 1. Sodium-cooled fast reactors; 2. Gas-cooled fast reactors; 3. Lead-cooled fast reactors; 4. Molten salt reactors; 5. Supercritical water-cooled reactors; and 6. Very high temperature reactors; (i) "Nuclear energy generating facility" means a facility containing a nuclear reactor of Generation III Plus, Generation IV, or later design that produces electricity, at least some of which is sold to the public; and (j) "Utility" means a person, firm, corporation, association, cooperative corporation, federally owned electric utility corporation, or municipal corporation who owns, controls, operat es, or manages any facility used or to be used for or in connection with the generation, production, transmission, or distribution of electricity to or for the public for compensation. (2) (a) The authority shall create and implement the Nuclear Reactor Si te Readiness Pilot Program to facilitate the application for and procurement of early site permits, construction permits, or combined ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 operating licenses from the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the siting of new nuclear energy generating facilities in the Commonwealth. (b) Upon recommendation of the authority, the General Assembly may award eligible applicants grant funding of up to one -third (1/3) of the actual costs incurred in applying for and procuring an early site permit, construction permit, or combined operating license, not to exceed twenty -five million dollars ($25,000,000) per project. (c) The authority shall: 1. Create grant applications; 2. Establish grant applicant eligibility requirements; 3. Establish objective scoring criteria to evaluate grant applications; 4. Review any partnership agreement between eligible applicants for validity and completeness and to ensure that the agreement provides for the surety bonding or similar security requirements required under subsection (4 ) of this section and repayment responsibilities for all partners in the event that forfeiture and repayment of grant funding is required under subsection (5) of this section; and 5. Make determinations on applicant eligibility and evaluate and score each eligible applicant's grant application, in consultation with the Energy and Environment Cabinet's Office of Energy Policy and the Cabinet for Economic Development, according to the following criteria: a. The location, suitability, and previous use of the s ite for which the early site permit, construction permit, or combined operating license is sought; b. The economic condition of the region where the new nuclear energy generating facility would be located; c. The economic impact that the siting of a new nu clear energy generating facility would have in the region; d. Whether, in relation to other pending or past grant applications or awards under this section, the proposed site would be located in a geographically diverse region of the Commonwealth; e. The amount of additional investment being made in the proposed project by the eligible applicant or applicants or other sources; and f. Any other criteria the authority deems appropriate to evaluate. (d) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any information, data, or records provided as part of an application for grant funding under this section shall be confidential and exempt from disclosure under the requirements of KRS 61.870 to 61.884. (3) (a) To be eligible to apply for grant funding under this section, eligible applicants must demonstrate that: 1. The community where the proposed site of the new nuclear energy generating facility would be located has applied for a nuclear-ready community designation under KRS 164.2804; and 2. There would be material benefits, including but not limited to the provision of electric utility service, job creation, and return on investment to the ratepayers and the impacted community to be served by the proposed new nuclear energy generating facility. (b) To be e ligible to be awarded grant funding under this section, eligible applicants must demonstrate that the community where the proposed site of the new nuclear energy generating facility would be located has received a nuclear-ready community designation under KRS 164.2804. (4) In exchange for any grant funding authorized by the General Assembly under this section, the utility or the affiliate and any partners it may have shall procure a surety bond or other similar security acceptable to the authority in the am ount of the grant funding to be awarded. The surety bond or similar security shall bind the principal or principals and the surety to the Commonwealth to repay all grant moneys forfeited pursuant to subsection (5) of this section. The surety bond or other similar security shall be continuous and remain in effect until the completion of the construction of the nuclear energy generating facility for which the permit or license was issued or upon the repayment of all forfeited grant funds pursuant to subsectio n (5) of this section. Any cancellation of the bond or similar security shall not occur until thirty (30) days written notice is provided by the provider of the surety bond or other similar security to the authority. (5) A grant funding recipient and all o f its partners shall forfeit and repay all grant funding awarded under this section within sixty (60) days of: (a) If it has not already done so, failing to apply to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for an early site permit within one (1) year of receiving any grant funding under this section; (b) Failing to apply to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a construction permit or combined operating license for a nuclear energy generating facility, or for a necessary license iss ued under other licensing frameworks that may be adopted in federal regulations by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for advanced nuclear generating reactors, for which an early site permit was awarded within five (5) years of obtaining the e arly site permit. The authority may approve extensions of the deadline established by this paragraph in one (1) year increments for good cause shown; (c) Failing to commence construction of the nuclear energy generating facility for which all necessary permits or licenses have been awarded by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission within ten (10) years of obtaining all necessary permits or licenses. The authority may approve extensions of the deadline established by this paragraph in one (1) year increments for good cause shown; or (d) The transferring of the entirety of a utility's or affiliate's interest in the early site permit, the construction permit, or the combined operating license to an entity other than another utility prior to the commenc ement of construction of the nuclear energy generating facility for which a permit or license was awarded, unless the authority finds that the transfer is in the best interest of the Commonwealth.
Andy Beshear signed SB 57. The law creates the Nuclear Reactor Site Readiness Pilot Program. On the authority’s recommendation, the General Assembly may award up to one third of actual costs of applying for and procuring qualifying federal permits or licenses, capped at $25 million per project. It requires a nuclear-ready community designation, security for repayment, and repayment when specified application or construction deadlines are missed, with certain extensions available. This supports potential nuclear generation; it is not an award of funds or an operating reactor.
The official record verifies a governor signing. Approval, legislative-entry dates, effective dates, and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Coal share is the portion of Kentucky in-state electricity net generation supplied by coal. Coal-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 164 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) As used in this section: (a) "Affiliate" means any person, partnership, or corporation that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, a utility; (b) "Authority" means the Kentucky Nuclear Energy Development Authority established in Section 4 of this Act; (c) "Combined operating license" means a license issued b y the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission pursuant to 10 C.F.R. sec. 52.71 et seq., or other licensing frameworks as may be adopted in federal regulations by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for advanced nuclear generating reactors, that enables its holder to construct and operate a nuclear power plant at a specific site; (d) "Construction permit" means a permit issued by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission pursuant to 10 C.F.R. pt. 50 that enables its holder to construct a nuclear power plant at a specific site; (e) "Early site permit" means a permit issued by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission pursuant to 10 C.F.R. sec. 52.12 et seq. that enables its holder to secure federal site approval for a nuclear power plant site prior to seeking an operating reactor license from the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission; (f) "Eligible applicant" means any utility or any affiliate of a utility and any current or prospective customer of a utility that is acting in partnership or collaboration with the utility or the affiliate; (g) "Generation III Plus" means the generation of nuclear reactor design following Generation III that incorporates passive and other safety measures and design improvements not included in pre vious nuclear reactor designs; (h) "Generation IV" means the nuclear reactor designs identified and selected by the Generation IV International Forum as follows: 1. Sodium-cooled fast reactors; 2. Gas-cooled fast reactors; 3. Lead-cooled fast reactors; 4. Molten salt reactors; 5. Supercritical water-cooled reactors; and 6. Very high temperature reactors; (i) "Nuclear energy generating facility" means a facility containing a nuclear reactor of Generation III Plus, Generation IV, or later design that produces electricity, at least some of which is sold to the public; and (j) "Utility" means a person, firm, corporation, association, cooperative corporation, federally owned electric utility corporation, or municipal corporation who owns, controls, operat es, or manages any facility used or to be used for or in connection with the generation, production, transmission, or distribution of electricity to or for the public for compensation. (2) (a) The authority shall create and implement the Nuclear Reactor Si te Readiness Pilot Program to facilitate the application for and procurement of early site permits, construction permits, or combined ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 operating licenses from the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the siting of new nuclear energy generating facilities in the Commonwealth. (b) Upon recommendation of the authority, the General Assembly may award eligible applicants grant funding of up to one -third (1/3) of the actual costs incurred in applying for and procuring an early site permit, construction permit, or combined operating license, not to exceed twenty -five million dollars ($25,000,000) per project. (c) The authority shall: 1. Create grant applications; 2. Establish grant applicant eligibility requirements; 3. Establish objective scoring criteria to evaluate grant applications; 4. Review any partnership agreement between eligible applicants for validity and completeness and to ensure that the agreement provides for the surety bonding or similar security requirements required under subsection (4 ) of this section and repayment responsibilities for all partners in the event that forfeiture and repayment of grant funding is required under subsection (5) of this section; and 5. Make determinations on applicant eligibility and evaluate and score each eligible applicant's grant application, in consultation with the Energy and Environment Cabinet's Office of Energy Policy and the Cabinet for Economic Development, according to the following criteria: a. The location, suitability, and previous use of the s ite for which the early site permit, construction permit, or combined operating license is sought; b. The economic condition of the region where the new nuclear energy generating facility would be located; c. The economic impact that the siting of a new nu clear energy generating facility would have in the region; d. Whether, in relation to other pending or past grant applications or awards under this section, the proposed site would be located in a geographically diverse region of the Commonwealth; e. The amount of additional investment being made in the proposed project by the eligible applicant or applicants or other sources; and f. Any other criteria the authority deems appropriate to evaluate. (d) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any information, data, or records provided as part of an application for grant funding under this section shall be confidential and exempt from disclosure under the requirements of KRS 61.870 to 61.884. (3) (a) To be eligible to apply for grant funding under this section, eligible applicants must demonstrate that: 1. The community where the proposed site of the new nuclear energy generating facility would be located has applied for a nuclear-ready community designation under KRS 164.2804; and 2. There would be material benefits, including but not limited to the provision of electric utility service, job creation, and return on investment to the ratepayers and the impacted community to be served by the proposed new nuclear energy generating facility. (b) To be e ligible to be awarded grant funding under this section, eligible applicants must demonstrate that the community where the proposed site of the new nuclear energy generating facility would be located has received a nuclear-ready community designation under KRS 164.2804. (4) In exchange for any grant funding authorized by the General Assembly under this section, the utility or the affiliate and any partners it may have shall procure a surety bond or other similar security acceptable to the authority in the am ount of the grant funding to be awarded. The surety bond or similar security shall bind the principal or principals and the surety to the Commonwealth to repay all grant moneys forfeited pursuant to subsection (5) of this section. The surety bond or other similar security shall be continuous and remain in effect until the completion of the construction of the nuclear energy generating facility for which the permit or license was issued or upon the repayment of all forfeited grant funds pursuant to subsectio n (5) of this section. Any cancellation of the bond or similar security shall not occur until thirty (30) days written notice is provided by the provider of the surety bond or other similar security to the authority. (5) A grant funding recipient and all o f its partners shall forfeit and repay all grant funding awarded under this section within sixty (60) days of: (a) If it has not already done so, failing to apply to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for an early site permit within one (1) year of receiving any grant funding under this section; (b) Failing to apply to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a construction permit or combined operating license for a nuclear energy generating facility, or for a necessary license iss ued under other licensing frameworks that may be adopted in federal regulations by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for advanced nuclear generating reactors, for which an early site permit was awarded within five (5) years of obtaining the e arly site permit. The authority may approve extensions of the deadline established by this paragraph in one (1) year increments for good cause shown; (c) Failing to commence construction of the nuclear energy generating facility for which all necessary permits or licenses have been awarded by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission within ten (10) years of obtaining all necessary permits or licenses. The authority may approve extensions of the deadline established by this paragraph in one (1) year increments for good cause shown; or (d) The transferring of the entirety of a utility's or affiliate's interest in the early site permit, the construction permit, or the combined operating license to an entity other than another utility prior to the commenc ement of construction of the nuclear energy generating facility for which a permit or license was awarded, unless the authority finds that the transfer is in the best interest of the Commonwealth.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Kentucky officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Kentucky candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
11 statements from 7 candidates
2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 3 — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements
I support federal spending and tax incentives to dramatically expand renewable energy buildout in the United States, infrastructure spending to speed the deployment of electric vehicles, and tax incentives for consumer purchase of union-made and American-made electric vehicles. I support a federal c…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Coal, energy, and Appalachian economic development
Candidate campaign source
I support federal spending and tax incentives to dramatically expand renewable energy buildout in the United States, infrastructure spending to speed the deployment of electric vehicles, and tax incentives for consumer purchase of union-made and American-made electric vehicles. I support a federal clean energy standard that incentivizes investor-owned electric utilities to achieve greenhouse gas emissions reductions while creating millions of good-paying jobs to build the clean energy infrastructure necessary to make this transition. And I will fight for federal spending to incentivize rural electric cooperatives to transition to clean, renewable energy by relieving debt associated with coal-fired power plants, and conditioning such relief upon the coop’s investment in a clean energy transition.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
Favor companies with union workforces when making federal investments in infrastructure, education, renewable energy, and electric vehicles and batteries.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Union Investment
Candidate campaign source
Favor companies with union workforces when making federal investments in infrastructure, education, renewable energy, and electric vehicles and batteries.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
Resources: Kentucky should require data centers to install solar/ battery storage/ Closed loop cooling / enact AI data process controls to allow data centers to act as a virtual battery systems enhancing our grid.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Technology and cybersecurity
Candidate campaign source
Resources: Kentucky should require data centers to install solar/ battery storage/ Closed loop cooling / enact AI data process controls to allow data centers to act as a virtual battery systems enhancing our grid.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Right now, data centers are being built without enough community input or environmental oversight, and they’re exhausting our power grid in ways that drive up energy bills for working families. Some are also polluting clean air and water and destroying fertile farmland. That’s not progress – that’s …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Technology and cybersecurity
Candidate campaign source
Right now, data centers are being built without enough community input or environmental oversight, and they’re exhausting our power grid in ways that drive up energy bills for working families. Some are also polluting clean air and water and destroying fertile farmland. That’s not progress – that’s passing the costs of corporate expansion onto the rest of us. If a community doesn’t want a data center in their backyard, they should not be forced to have one, and state, local, and county leaders should be responsive to their community’s desires. The first job of any elected official is to listen.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
In Congress, I’ll push for legislation that requires transparency and local input in data center siting decisions, holds companies accountable for their environmental impact, and makes sure Big Tech can’t offload rising energy costs onto Kentucky families. I also support commonsense AI safeguards to…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Technology and cybersecurity
Candidate campaign source
In Congress, I’ll push for legislation that requires transparency and local input in data center siting decisions, holds companies accountable for their environmental impact, and makes sure Big Tech can’t offload rising energy costs onto Kentucky families. I also support commonsense AI safeguards to protect children interacting with chat bots and make sure the newest models don’t pose major risks to our cybersecurity.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
No one fought Biden’s war on energy more than Andy Barr. Andy has a plan to bring back clean, beautiful coal, to create jobs, lower energy costs, and attract industries of the future to Kentucky. You can read his plan for Kentucky coal here.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Coal, energy, and Appalachian economic development
Candidate campaign source
No one fought Biden’s war on energy more than Andy Barr. Andy has a plan to bring back clean, beautiful coal, to create jobs, lower energy costs, and attract industries of the future to Kentucky. You can read his plan for Kentucky coal here.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Kentucky candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Kentucky incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Kentucky legislators and Kentucky’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Kentucky’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
5 matching sponsorships or proposals · 5 Kentucky incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Andy Barr
U.S. House of Representatives, Kentucky District 6 · R–KY
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Andy BarrU.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · HR 5927
Securing Reliable Power for Advanced Technologies Act
Nov 7, 2025 · In Congress
Rep. Andy Barr · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would let the president designate qualifying AI infrastructure for expedited federal review. Generation facilities must have at least 100 MW capacity, meet specified continuous-service criteria, avoid intermittent renewables as the primary energy input, and be contractually committed to qualifying AI facilities. It also provides conditional regulatory exemptions, compensation subject to appropriations, and financing provisions. This concerns proposed generation development and protection, not an operating Kentucky plant or a measured coal-share change.
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Coal share is the portion of Kentucky in-state electricity net generation supplied by coal. Coal-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Acceleration of designated critical artificial intelligence infrastructure projects (a)In generalTitle III of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4531 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 306.Acceleration of designated critical artificial intelligence infrastructure projects (a)DefinitionsIn this section: (1)Covered projectThe term covered project means a project to construct, expand, repower, or reopen critical artificial intelligence infrastructure. (2)Critical artificial intelligence infrastructureThe term critical artificial intelligence infrastructure means— (A)one or more data centers or high-performance computing facilities with a total connected electrical load of not less than 50 megawatts that is primarily dedicated to the training, development, or inference of artificial intelligence or other machine learning models; (B)any dispatchable baseload electric generation facility— (i)with a nameplate capacity of not less than 100 megawatts; (ii)capable, without regard to restrictions on use imposed solely for reasons other than engineering design or physical capability, of providing firm, dispatchable capacity and continuous electric service for not less than 85 percent of the hours in a typical calendar year; (iii)that does not derive its primary energy input from intermittent renewable sources, with or without energy storage; and (iv)is contractually committed, in whole or material part, to provide firm, dispatchable electric supply to facilities described in subparagraph (A), through the applicable retail electric utility or cooperative serving such facilities, consistent with State service laws; (C)associated high-voltage electric transmission facilities, including any network transmission upgrades necessary to reliably serve the facilities, essential to interconnect facilities described in subparagraph (A) or (B); or (D)fuel supply infrastructure essential to the operation of facilities described in subparagraph (B), including— (i)coal mines and coal preparation facilities, as defined in section 701 of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1291); (ii)natural gas gathering, processing, storage, and transportation facilities subject to the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717 et seq.); (iii)oil and gas wells and wellhead production facilities (as defined in section 3(4) of the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982 (30 U.S.C. 1702(4))), together with oil or petroleum product pipelines and related terminals (as such term relates to hazardous liquid pipeline facilities under section 60101(a)(22) of title 49, United States Code); and (iv)rail, barge, or other transportation infrastructure (as such terms are used in sections 13102(27) of title 49 and 2101(3) of title 46, United States Code) materially dedicated to the delivery of fuel to such facilities. (3)Federal authorizationThe term Federal authorization means any permit, license, approval, or other administrative decision required under Federal law to site, construct, expand, operate, or maintain a covered project. (b)Presidential designationThe President may designate one or more covered projects as priority national defense projects and publish such designation in the Federal Register. (c)Concurrent permitting (1)CoordinationFor any covered project designated under subsection (a), the President shall require each head of a Federal agency with responsibility for issuing permits, licenses, or approvals to— (A)conduct reviews concurrently to the maximum extent practicable and consistent with applicable law; and (B)adhere to a consolidated schedule established by the President in accordance with paragraph (2). (2)ScheduleThe President shall ensure that a consolidated schedule described in paragraph (1)— (A)establishes interim milestones and deadlines for action by the head of a Federal agency described in paragraph (1) with respect to the designated covered project; and (B)requires completion of all necessary Federal authorizations not later than 2 years after receipt of a complete application from the owner of the covered project, unless the President determines that additional time is required due to extraordinary circumstances. (3)ConsultationThe President may consult with State, Tribal, or local permitting authorities in developing the consolidated schedule described in paragraph (2). (4)EnforcementFailure by a Federal agency to adhere to the consolidated schedule established for a designated covered project unless approved by the President shall be treated as a failure to act under section 706(1) of title 5, United States Code. (5)Dispute resolution (A)In generalThe President or a designee described in subparagraph (B) shall have exclusive authority to resolve disputes among Federal agencies regarding the scope, schedule, or terms of Federal authorizations. (B)Designee describedThe President may, for a covered project, assign a designee as follows: (i)The Secretary of Defense. (ii)After publication in the Federal Register, the head of another Federal agency. (d)Environmental reviewThe President shall designate a single Federal agency to serve as the lead agency responsible for preparing all environmental reviews and related documents for a designated covered project, which shall be deemed sufficient for such reviews required for relevant Federal authorizations. (e)Judicial review (1)Venue; limitationA civil action seeking review of a designation under subsection (b) shall be brought only in the District of Columbia Circuit. A civil action seeking review of a Federal authorization under subsection (c) shall be brought in the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the covered project is principally located. (2)Timing of civil actionsA civil action described in paragraph (1) may only be brought during the 60-day period following the date on which the applicable designation or authorization is made. (3)Expedited considerationThe United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit shall provide expedited consideration for a civil action described in paragraph (1), and shall issue a final decision on the merits not later than 60 days after date of filing of the complaint. Such decision may only be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. (4)Injunctive reliefThe United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit may not issue a preliminary injunction for a civil action described in paragraph (1) unless the court finds a designation or an authorization that is the subject of the civil action is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. Any injunctive relief shall be narrowly tailored to remedy such defect. (5)RemediesThe United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit may not vacate a designation or authorization unless the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the designation or authorization is unlawful. Relief shall be limited to the covered project that is the subject of the civil action. (f)National defense exemptionThe President may, by executive order, exempt a covered project designated under this section from the application of new emissions limitations or operational requirements promulgated under Federal law after the date of designation, if the President determines and publishes in the Federal Register that— (1)the continued operation of such project is necessary for national defense (as defined in section 702 of this Act); and (2)application of such new requirements would materially impair the ability of the project to provide critical capacity in support of national defense. (g)Compensation for Federal Regulatory Impairment (1)Right to compensationIf, after a project or facility is designated under subsection (b), any change in Federal statute, regulation, agency order, or permit condition imposed by a Federal agency prohibits or materially impairs the operation of a facility described in subsection (a)(2) for a continuous period of not less than 180 days—despite the facility’s compliance with all previously applicable Federal requirements—the United States shall pay monetary compensation to the owner or operator for the resulting loss in value and revenue, as determined under paragraph (2). (2)Determination of compensation amountThe amount of compensation shall equal the diminution in fair market value of the facility and the reasonably foreseeable loss of net revenue directly caused by the Federal action, as determined by an independent appraisal using generally accepted valuation methodologies that exclude unrelated market fluctuations or voluntary retirements. (3)ProcedureA claim shall be filed with the lead agency designated under subsection (d) within 270 days after the impairment period described in paragraph (1) is satisfied. The lead agency shall issue a final written determination within 180 days after a complete claim is filed. Failure to act within that period shall constitute final agency action for purposes of subsection (e). (4)Source of fundsCompensation under this subsection shall be paid from the Defense Production Act Fund established under section 304 of this Act, subject to the availability of appropriations. The head of the lead agency may enter into binding settlement agreements to satisfy liability under this subsection. (5)Limitations and exclusionsNo compensation shall be paid for losses attributable to— (A)gross negligence, willful misconduct, or knowing violation of law by the claimant; (B)voluntary retirement, decommissioning, or mothballing decisions not compelled by the Federal action; (C)non-Federal actions or orders; (D)routine permitting delays or conditions not rising to a material impairment; or (E)costs or losses already recovered from ratepayers or third parties, or that would result in double recovery. The claimant shall have a duty to mitigate losses reasonably. (6)Remedies and sovereign immunityThe United States waives sovereign immunity for monetary relief under this subsection, but not for punitive, exemplary, incidental, or consequential damages, and not for attorneys’ fees except as expressly provided by law. Venue, timing, expedited consideration, and standards of review shall be as set forth in subsection (e). Relief shall be limited to payment of the compensation amount. (7)SubrogationUpon payment, the United States shall be subrogated to the claimant’s rights against any third party with respect to the impairment to the extent of such payment. (h)Title III financial assistance for dispatchable baseload facilities serving designated projects (1)EligibilityA facility described in subsection (a)(2), including a coal-fueled facility meeting subsection (a)(2)(A)–(C) and contractually dedicated under subsection (a)(2)(D), shall be eligible to receive financial assistance under sections 302 and 303 of this title, including loans and loan guarantees, purchase commitments, and other instruments to expand or preserve productive capacity necessary to serve critical artificial intelligence infrastructure. (2)AdministrationThe President may carry out this subsection directly or through delegation to the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, or another appropriate officer. Electric cooperatives and their subsidiaries shall be eligible recipients on the same terms as investor-owned or municipal utilities. (3)TermsSubject to sections 302 and 303, assistance may cover up to 90 percent of reasonable project costs, with a maximum maturity of 30 years or 90 percent of the reasonably expected economic life of the financed assets, whichever is shorter. The President may require collateral, seniority, covenants, or credit support as necessary to protect the interests of the United States. (4)PriorityIn making awards, the President shall give priority to facilities that— (A)directly supply one or more projects designated under subsection (b); (B)can commence commercial operation or repower within 36 months; and (C)materially improve regional reliability margins as determined by the applicable reliability entity. (5)Use of fundsAmounts made available to carry out title III may be used to provide assistance under this subsection, including for pre-construction activities, long-lead equipment, environmental controls, and interconnection or network upgrades essential to serve designated projects. (6)GuidanceNot later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, the President (or designee) shall issue guidance establishing application procedures and standard terms for assistance under this subsection. (i)FundingAmounts made available under this title may be used to carry out the consolidated schedule described in subsection (c)(2), including for staff, technical reviews, or contracting necessary to meet the requirements of such consolidated schedule. (j)Access to fundingIn carrying out this section, the President shall ensure that rural electric cooperatives that are eligible for financing, loans, and loan guarantees available through the Rural Utilities Service of the Department of Agriculture can be designated as a covered project, including such cooperatives involved in the generation, transmission, or interconnection of facilities that support critical artificial intelligence infrastructure. . (b)Conforming amendmentSection 702(14) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4552(14)) is amended by inserting (including critical artificial intelligence infrastructure designated under section 306) after critical infrastructure protection and restoration.
AN ACT relating to decommissioning costs for electric generating units.
Apr 12, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Wade Williams · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law clarifies that utilities may seek recovery of generating-unit decommissioning, removal, salvage, and depreciation costs before retirement authorization. Cost recovery does not itself approve retirement or its timing. The bill became law without the governor’s signature.
04/12/26: became law without Governor's Signature (Acts Ch. 95). Latest official history entry: became law without Governor's Signature (Acts Ch. 95) (2026-04-12). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Coal share is the portion of Kentucky in-state electricity net generation supplied by coal. Coal-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(6) (a) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, this section shall not be construed as limiting the commission's authority to approve a utility's right to record and seek, prior to retirement authorization, the recovery of any electric generating unit's decommissioning, removal and salvage costs, and depreciation expenses through rates over the electric generating unit's estimated depreciable life. (b) Approval to recover any costs or expenses und er this subsection shall not be considered approval of, or support for, retirement or approval of timing of retirement of an electric generating unit in any proceeding considering a retirement application filed pursuant to subsection (1) of this section.
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Danny CarrollKentucky Legislature · SB 57
AN ACT relating to nuclear energy development.
Apr 8, 2026 · Enacted
Sen. Danny Carroll · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law creates the Nuclear Reactor Site Readiness Pilot Program. On the authority’s recommendation, the General Assembly may award up to one third of actual costs of applying for and procuring qualifying federal permits or licenses, capped at $25 million per project. It requires a nuclear-ready community designation, security for repayment, and repayment when specified application or construction deadlines are missed, with certain extensions available. This supports potential nuclear generation; it is not an award of funds or an operating reactor.
04/08/26: signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 56). Latest official history entry: signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 56) (2026-04-08). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Coal share is the portion of Kentucky in-state electricity net generation supplied by coal. Coal-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 164 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) As used in this section: (a) "Affiliate" means any person, partnership, or corporation that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, a utility; (b) "Authority" means the Kentucky Nuclear Energy Development Authority established in Section 4 of this Act; (c) "Combined operating license" means a license issued b y the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission pursuant to 10 C.F.R. sec. 52.71 et seq., or other licensing frameworks as may be adopted in federal regulations by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for advanced nuclear generating reactors, that enables its holder to construct and operate a nuclear power plant at a specific site; (d) "Construction permit" means a permit issued by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission pursuant to 10 C.F.R. pt. 50 that enables its holder to construct a nuclear power plant at a specific site; (e) "Early site permit" means a permit issued by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission pursuant to 10 C.F.R. sec. 52.12 et seq. that enables its holder to secure federal site approval for a nuclear power plant site prior to seeking an operating reactor license from the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission; (f) "Eligible applicant" means any utility or any affiliate of a utility and any current or prospective customer of a utility that is acting in partnership or collaboration with the utility or the affiliate; (g) "Generation III Plus" means the generation of nuclear reactor design following Generation III that incorporates passive and other safety measures and design improvements not included in pre vious nuclear reactor designs; (h) "Generation IV" means the nuclear reactor designs identified and selected by the Generation IV International Forum as follows: 1. Sodium-cooled fast reactors; 2. Gas-cooled fast reactors; 3. Lead-cooled fast reactors; 4. Molten salt reactors; 5. Supercritical water-cooled reactors; and 6. Very high temperature reactors; (i) "Nuclear energy generating facility" means a facility containing a nuclear reactor of Generation III Plus, Generation IV, or later design that produces electricity, at least some of which is sold to the public; and (j) "Utility" means a person, firm, corporation, association, cooperative corporation, federally owned electric utility corporation, or municipal corporation who owns, controls, operat es, or manages any facility used or to be used for or in connection with the generation, production, transmission, or distribution of electricity to or for the public for compensation. (2) (a) The authority shall create and implement the Nuclear Reactor Si te Readiness Pilot Program to facilitate the application for and procurement of early site permits, construction permits, or combined ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 operating licenses from the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the siting of new nuclear energy generating facilities in the Commonwealth. (b) Upon recommendation of the authority, the General Assembly may award eligible applicants grant funding of up to one -third (1/3) of the actual costs incurred in applying for and procuring an early site permit, construction permit, or combined operating license, not to exceed twenty -five million dollars ($25,000,000) per project. (c) The authority shall: 1. Create grant applications; 2. Establish grant applicant eligibility requirements; 3. Establish objective scoring criteria to evaluate grant applications; 4. Review any partnership agreement between eligible applicants for validity and completeness and to ensure that the agreement provides for the surety bonding or similar security requirements required under subsection (4 ) of this section and repayment responsibilities for all partners in the event that forfeiture and repayment of grant funding is required under subsection (5) of this section; and 5. Make determinations on applicant eligibility and evaluate and score each eligible applicant's grant application, in consultation with the Energy and Environment Cabinet's Office of Energy Policy and the Cabinet for Economic Development, according to the following criteria: a. The location, suitability, and previous use of the s ite for which the early site permit, construction permit, or combined operating license is sought; b. The economic condition of the region where the new nuclear energy generating facility would be located; c. The economic impact that the siting of a new nu clear energy generating facility would have in the region; d. Whether, in relation to other pending or past grant applications or awards under this section, the proposed site would be located in a geographically diverse region of the Commonwealth; e. The amount of additional investment being made in the proposed project by the eligible applicant or applicants or other sources; and f. Any other criteria the authority deems appropriate to evaluate. (d) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any information, data, or records provided as part of an application for grant funding under this section shall be confidential and exempt from disclosure under the requirements of KRS 61.870 to 61.884. (3) (a) To be eligible to apply for grant funding under this section, eligible applicants must demonstrate that: 1. The community where the proposed site of the new nuclear energy generating facility would be located has applied for a nuclear-ready community designation under KRS 164.2804; and 2. There would be material benefits, including but not limited to the provision of electric utility service, job creation, and return on investment to the ratepayers and the impacted community to be served by the proposed new nuclear energy generating facility. (b) To be e ligible to be awarded grant funding under this section, eligible applicants must demonstrate that the community where the proposed site of the new nuclear energy generating facility would be located has received a nuclear-ready community designation under KRS 164.2804. (4) In exchange for any grant funding authorized by the General Assembly under this section, the utility or the affiliate and any partners it may have shall procure a surety bond or other similar security acceptable to the authority in the am ount of the grant funding to be awarded. The surety bond or similar security shall bind the principal or principals and the surety to the Commonwealth to repay all grant moneys forfeited pursuant to subsection (5) of this section. The surety bond or other similar security shall be continuous and remain in effect until the completion of the construction of the nuclear energy generating facility for which the permit or license was issued or upon the repayment of all forfeited grant funds pursuant to subsectio n (5) of this section. Any cancellation of the bond or similar security shall not occur until thirty (30) days written notice is provided by the provider of the surety bond or other similar security to the authority. (5) A grant funding recipient and all o f its partners shall forfeit and repay all grant funding awarded under this section within sixty (60) days of: (a) If it has not already done so, failing to apply to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for an early site permit within one (1) year of receiving any grant funding under this section; (b) Failing to apply to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a construction permit or combined operating license for a nuclear energy generating facility, or for a necessary license iss ued under other licensing frameworks that may be adopted in federal regulations by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission for advanced nuclear generating reactors, for which an early site permit was awarded within five (5) years of obtaining the e arly site permit. The authority may approve extensions of the deadline established by this paragraph in one (1) year increments for good cause shown; (c) Failing to commence construction of the nuclear energy generating facility for which all necessary permits or licenses have been awarded by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission within ten (10) years of obtaining all necessary permits or licenses. The authority may approve extensions of the deadline established by this paragraph in one (1) year increments for good cause shown; or (d) The transferring of the entirety of a utility's or affiliate's interest in the early site permit, the construction permit, or the combined operating license to an entity other than another utility prior to the commenc ement of construction of the nuclear energy generating facility for which a permit or license was awarded, unless the authority finds that the transfer is in the best interest of the Commonwealth.
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Rand PaulU.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · S 1841
Fuel Choice and Deregulation Act of 2025
May 21, 2025 · In Congress
Sen. Rand Paul · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The Fuel Choice and Deregulation Act would prohibit EPA restrictions on defined biomass fuels under the Clean Air Act. This concerns fuel supply and composition, including potential gasoline alternatives or blends; it does not set a pump price or establish a price effect.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Midwest regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee and Wisconsin. Kentucky policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Kentucky statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(b) Biomass fuels Section 211 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545) is amended by adding at the end the following: (w) Biomass fuels Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the Administrator may not prohibit or control biomass fuel (as defined in section 203 of the Biomass Energy and Alcohol Fuels Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 8802)) under this Act. .
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Robby MillsKentucky Legislature · SB 100
AN ACT relating to the Energy Planning and Inventory Commission and declaring an emergency.
Apr 14, 2026 · Enacted
Sen. Robby Mills · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law permits the Energy Planning and Inventory Commission’s executive director to submit a separate report on proposed power-plant retirements and requires the Public Service Commission to consider the submitted findings. This concerns review of generation retirements, not an order to close or operate a particular coal plant.
04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 157). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 157) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Coal share is the portion of Kentucky in-state electricity net generation supplied by coal. Coal-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Coal share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2. The executive committee shall provide the executive director with all information, records, and data considered in the proposal to retire and shall include the executive director in all associated deliberations. Within one hundred eighty (180) days of the utility filing notice of the proposed activity, the executive director may submit his or her own written report with findings and recommendations, a written statement of position, or dissenting findings and recommendations to the Public Service Commission and the utility. (h) The executive committee's written report, the executive director's written report or position statement, and any dissenting statements provided to the Public Service Commission and the utility , shall be included in any retirement application made to the Public Service Commission under KRS 278.264, and the Public Service Commissio n shall not approve any retirement application without considering all information received from the executive committee , the executive director, or any member of the executive committee. Any order of the Public Service Commission in a proceeding under KRS 278.264 shall contain specific written findings of fact or conclusions of law addressing whether the executive committee's and the executive director's findings and recommendations , position statements, and dissenting statements were considered by the Public Service Commission. ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 8 (i) No retirement application to the Public Service Commission under KRS 278.264 shall be deemed administratively complete unless it includes the executive committee's and the executive director's report, position statemen ts, and dissenting statements submitted pursuant to this section or evidence that more than one hundred eighty (180) days have passed since notice was submitted to the commission as required in paragraph (b) of this subsection and no executive committee or executive director report, position statement, or dissenting statement has been provided to the Public Service Commission or the utility.
Only current Kentucky officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Kentucky statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Kentucky snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Kentucky, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.