Kentucky · individual fact

Kentucky crime

Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and Kentucky public-safety context.

Reported violent-crime rate226.7 per 100k2024 · #41 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate1,400.5 per 100k2024 · #39 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage100%2024 · #1 of 50 · highest first

Kentucky over time

Explore Kentucky readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Kentucky officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Kentucky effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Kentucky change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Reported violent-crime rate Kentucky · source units
KentuckyPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Reported violent-crime rate2024: 226.7 per 100k216.3 per 100k247.8 per 100k279.3 per 100kKentucky, 2015: 223.7 per 100kKentucky, 2016: 235.6 per 100kKentucky, 2017: 235.4 per 100kKentucky, 2018: 222.4 per 100kKentucky, 2019: 226.5 per 100kKentucky, 2020: 273.2 per 100kKentucky, 2021: 272.5 per 100kKentucky, 2022: 223.3 per 100kKentucky, 2023: 232.3 per 100kKentucky, 2024: 226.7 per 100k201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 33National context · Booker makes federal sentencing guidelines advisory · 2005-01-12Federal sentencingNational context · Adam Walsh Act establishes new registration standards · 2006-07-27Adam Walsh ActNational context · Survey changes disrupt the 2006 victimization comparison · 2006-12-312006 survey breakNational context · Congress strengthens firearm background-check records · 2008-01-08NICS records lawNational context · Second Chance Act expands reentry support · 2008-04-09Second Chance ActNational context · Heller recognizes an individual firearm right · 2008-06-26Heller decisionNational context · Financial crisis deepens during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Shepard–Byrd Act expands federal hate-crime law · 2009-10-28Federal hate-crime lawNational context · McDonald applies the firearm right to the states · 2010-06-28McDonald decisionNational context · Fair Sentencing Act changes federal crack penalties · 2010-08-03Fair Sentencing ActNational context · FBI expands the rape definition · 2013-01-01Rape definition expandsNational context · Violence Against Women Act reauthorized · 2013-03-07VAWA reauthorizationNational context · DOJ publishes Ferguson policing findings · 2015-03-04Ferguson investigationNational context · Murder rates rise in 2015 and 2016 · 2016-12-312015–2016 murder riseNational context · First Step Act enacted · 2018-12-21First Step ActNational context · FBI launches national use-of-force data collection · 2019-01-01Use-of-force reportingNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · George Floyd is killed by a Minneapolis police officer · 2020-05-25George Floyd killedNational context · Murder rises sharply while property crime declines · 2020-12-312020 murder surgeNational context · FBI transitions to incident-based reporting · 2021-01-01NIBRS transitionNational context · COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act improves review and reporting · 2021-05-20Hate-crime reportingNational context · Executive order sets federal policing safeguards · 2022-05-25Federal policing orderNational context · Bruen changes the test for firearm restrictions · 2022-06-23Bruen decisionNational context · Bipartisan Safer Communities Act enacted · 2022-06-25Safer Communities ActNational context · FBI annual report again includes summary submissions · 2023-10-16Reporting coverage growsNational context · Vehicle theft rises while total property crime falls · 2023-12-31Vehicle-theft surgeNational context · Victimization survey tests a redesigned questionnaire · 2024-01-01NCVS redesign beginsNational context · Supreme Court rejects ATF’s bump-stock classification · 2024-06-14Bump-stock rulingNational context · Rahimi upholds disarmament for a credible domestic threat · 2024-06-21Domestic-threat rulingNational context · Federal policing executive order is revoked · 2025-01-20Policing order revokedNational context · Court sustains ATF’s rule covering some firearm kits · 2025-03-26Firearm-kit rulingNational context · Executive order redirects federal law-enforcement support · 2025-04-282025 policing policyNational context · FBI publishes 2025 annual crime estimates · 2026-08-142025 crime data release● Kentucky Legislature · 5● U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · 4◆ Governor · 42■ Kentucky agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-01-012026-08-31

13 of 13 reviewed Kentucky actions match · 12 date markers shown. 33 major events shown separately.

Kentucky · 2024: 226.7 per 100k · Rank #41 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Kentucky's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 99.7% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Kentucky Reported violent-crime rate · source units
PeriodKentuckyRankU.S. benchmark
2024226.7 per 100k#41 of 50Not available
2023232.3 per 100k#41 of 50Not available
2022223.3 per 100k#44 of 50Not available
2021272.5 per 100k#34 of 50Not available
2020273.2 per 100k#39 of 50Not available
2019226.5 per 100k#42 of 50Not available
2018222.4 per 100k#41 of 50Not available
2017235.4 per 100k#43 of 50Not available
2016235.6 per 100k#44 of 50Not available
2015223.7 per 100k#42 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Kentucky · state comparison

Reported crime over time

Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.

Kentucky · 2024226.7 per 100k
Kentucky rank#41among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Reported violent-crime rate

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Kentucky's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 99.7% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kentucky
Reported violent-crime rate history in Kentucky214.8 per 100k247.8 per 100k280.8 per 100k20152024
2024 · Kentucky: 226.7 per 100k · Rank #41 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kentucky Reported violent-crime rate history
PeriodKentuckyCompare
2015223.7 per 100k
2016235.6 per 100k
2017235.4 per 100k
2018222.4 per 100k
2019226.5 per 100k
2020273.2 per 100k
2021272.5 per 100k
2022223.3 per 100k
2023232.3 per 100k
2024226.7 per 100k

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · 226.7 per 100k2024 · Rank #41 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Mexico744.7 per 100k—
#2Alaska731.9 per 100k—
#3Tennessee604.3 per 100k—
#4Arkansas589.6 per 100k—
#5*Louisiana504.5 per 100k82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6Colorado486.8 per 100k—
#7California478.4 per 100k—
#8Kansas474.7 per 100k—
#9Missouri472.7 per 100k—
#10Michigan442.6 per 100k—
#11South Carolina440.8 per 100k—
#12Arizona433 per 100k—
#13Oklahoma429.3 per 100k—
#14Montana428 per 100k—
#15Maryland425.9 per 100k—
#16Nevada408.6 per 100k—
#17Texas397.8 per 100k—
#18New York392.2 per 100k—
#19North Carolina382.9 per 100k—
#20Alabama380.8 per 100k—
#21Delaware368.4 per 100k—
#22*South Dakota356.9 per 100k89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*Indiana349.2 per 100k87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24Oregon341.1 per 100k—
#25Washington331.8 per 100k—
#26Georgia328 per 100k—
#27Massachusetts317.9 per 100k—
#28Ohio311.9 per 100k—
#29Illinois294.5 per 100k—
#30Wisconsin287.6 per 100k—
#31West Virginia263.8 per 100k—
#32*Florida262 per 100k81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33Minnesota259.4 per 100k—
#34North Dakota258 per 100k—
#35Pennsylvania251.3 per 100k—
#36Iowa247.2 per 100k—
#37Utah237.8 per 100k—
#38Idaho236.6 per 100k—
#39Hawaii230.3 per 100k—
#40Vermont227.1 per 100k—
#41Kentucky · your comparison226.7 per 100k—
#42Nebraska224.6 per 100k—
#43Virginia223.7 per 100k—
#44New Jersey221.9 per 100k—
#45*Mississippi219.6 per 100k65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*Wyoming212.5 per 100k89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47Rhode Island154.9 per 100k—
#48Connecticut139.2 per 100k—
#49New Hampshire112.3 per 100k—
#50Maine102.6 per 100k—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Reported violent-crime rate

226.7 per 100,0002024

Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • Kentucky's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 99.7% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 100%; this is not complete statewide reporting.

Reported property-crime rate

1,400.5 per 100,0002024

Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • Kentucky's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 99.7% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 100%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Kentucky · state comparison

Firearm mortality

Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.

Kentucky · 2024870
Kentucky rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Firearm deaths

Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.

Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · 8702024 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas4,389—
#2Florida3,191—
#3California2,853—
#4Georgia1,985—
#5North Carolina1,835—
#6Ohio1,745—
#7Pennsylvania1,624—
#8Illinois1,563—
#9Tennessee1,448—
#10Arizona1,331—
#11Missouri1,234—
#12Michigan1,228—
#13Alabama1,212—
#14Indiana1,196—
#15Virginia1,153—
#16South Carolina1,064—
#17Louisiana1,031—
#18Colorado961—
#19Washington915—
#20New York896—
#21Kentucky · your comparison870—
#22Mississippi810—
#23Oklahoma794—
#24Wisconsin735—
#25Maryland716—
#26Oregon663—
#27Arkansas638—
#28Minnesota582—
#28Nevada582—
#30New Mexico563—
#31Utah454—
#32Kansas446—
#33New Jersey393—
#34Iowa389—
#35Idaho331—
#36Massachusetts287—
#37West Virginia281—
#38Montana247—
#39Connecticut224—
#40Nebraska218—
#41Alaska182—
#42Maine181—
#43South Dakota159—
#44New Hampshire152—
#45Wyoming143—
#46Delaware123—
#47North Dakota95—
#48Vermont76—
#49Hawaii56—
#50Rhode Island55—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Firearm deaths

8702024 final data

Deaths in which firearm injury was the underlying cause, with the rate age-adjusted per 100,000 residents.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Population-adjusted measure

Age-adjusted firearm death rate
18.5 per 100,000
Method and limitations

CDC National Vital Statistics System death-certificate data.

  • The total combines firearm deaths across intents, including suicide, homicide, legal intervention, and unintentional or undetermined injury.
  • It does not measure nonfatal injuries, firearm ownership, defensive uses, or policy effects.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s Kentucky candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

10 statements from 6 candidates

2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

James R. Comer

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · KY

Policing & criminal justice context

I also do not have jurisdiction in matters pertaining to civil or criminal cases. Due to House ethics rules, I must refrain from involvement in any legal proceedings including family court matters such as child custody, child support, and divorce issues. I cannot give legal advice or intervene in le…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: State and Local Issues & Legal Matters

Candidate campaign source

I also do not have jurisdiction in matters pertaining to civil or criminal cases. Due to House ethics rules, I must refrain from involvement in any legal proceedings including family court matters such as child custody, child support, and divorce issues. I cannot give legal advice or intervene in legal disputes. I would encourage you to reach out to local law enforcement if you are aware of criminal behavior or activity. Information regarding Kentucky State Police locations and how to contact them is available at the following website: http://www.kentuckystatepolice.org/post.html.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

James R. Comer campaign source 4 ↗

2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 4 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 5 statements

Jeremy Todd

5 statements

Libertarian · U.S. House District 4 · KY

Policing & criminal justice context

I believe Americans are intelligent enough to think for themselves. We do not need “truth police” deciding what information we are allowed to see or discuss. We do not need government agencies coordinating with corporations or media organizations to influence public opinion behind closed doors. A fr…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: THE AMERICA FIRST CANDIDATEanti-war, anti-spending, anti-establishment

Candidate campaign source

I believe Americans are intelligent enough to think for themselves. We do not need “truth police” deciding what information we are allowed to see or discuss. We do not need government agencies coordinating with corporations or media organizations to influence public opinion behind closed doors. A free society depends on the open exchange of ideas, even difficult or unpopular ones, because truth is not something handed down by authority, it is something discovered through honest conversation, debate, evidence, and individual experience.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jeremy Todd campaign source 7 ↗
View 4 more statements from Jeremy Todd
Policing & criminal justice context

I believe the problem in America is not guns, it’s a culture that has become disconnected, dependent, and increasingly taught to rely on the government for protection instead of personal responsibility and strong communities. Decades ago, there were more guns in American households than there are to…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

I believe the problem in America is not guns, it’s a culture that has become disconnected, dependent, and increasingly taught to rely on the government for protection instead of personal responsibility and strong communities. Decades ago, there were more guns in American households than there are today, yet mass violence was exponentially lower. The issue is not law-abiding citizens exercising their rights. The issue is a society that has lost trust, accountability, and respect for individual responsibility.The reality is that no government agency can guarantee your safety. The courts themselves have repeatedly affirmed that police officers do not have a legal duty to protect individual citizens. That means every American must recognize a simple truth: you are your own first line of defense. I believe every responsible, peaceable citizen has the right to protect themselves, their family, and their property without unnecessary government interference.As a Libertarian, I fully support the plain language of the Second Amendment: “shall not be infringed.” Our constitutional rights are not privileges handed out by bureaucrats, they are rights that belong to the people. Law-abiding Americans should not be punished, restricted, or treated like criminals for choosing to exercise those rights. Instead of disarming responsible citizens, we should be focused on addressing the cultural decline, broken communities, and failures that lead individuals toward violence in the first place.I also believe many of the policies pushed in the name of “gun safety” have failed to make Americans safer. So-called “gun-free zones” have too often become targets for those who seek to do harm, while endless regulations continue to burden responsible gun owners rather than criminals. Americans deserve the freedom to defend themselves and the confidence that they are trusted by their own government, not feared by it.A safer America will not come from stripping rights away from peaceful citizens. It will come from rebuilding a culture of responsibility, freedom, strong families, and self-reliance: the values that made this country strong in the first place.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jeremy Todd campaign source 6 ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

The reality is that no government agency can guarantee your safety. The courts themselves have repeatedly affirmed that police officers do not have a legal duty to protect individual citizens. That means every American must recognize a simple truth: you are your own first line of defense. I believe …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: THE AMERICA FIRST CANDIDATEanti-war, anti-spending, anti-establishment

Candidate campaign source

The reality is that no government agency can guarantee your safety. The courts themselves have repeatedly affirmed that police officers do not have a legal duty to protect individual citizens. That means every American must recognize a simple truth: you are your own first line of defense. I believe every responsible, peaceable citizen has the right to protect themselves, their family, and their property without unnecessary government interference.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jeremy Todd campaign source 6 ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

For too long, Americans have been caught in a constant battle over truth itself. Government agencies, political operatives, corporate interests, and media institutions have increasingly worked together to shape narratives, suppress dissenting voices, and decide which opinions are acceptable for the …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: first amendment

Candidate campaign source

For too long, Americans have been caught in a constant battle over truth itself. Government agencies, political operatives, corporate interests, and media institutions have increasingly worked together to shape narratives, suppress dissenting voices, and decide which opinions are acceptable for the public to hear. The result has been a country more divided, distrustful, and hostile toward one another than at any point in recent memory. When people are denied open access to information and honest debate, fear and manipulation rush in to fill the void.The Libertarian Party believes that free people must also be free to think, question, speak, and seek truth without interference from the government. Self-ownership means more than controlling your labor or your property, it also means owning your own mind, your own beliefs, and your own understanding of the world around you. A citizen cannot truly be free if powerful institutions are constantly filtering information, censoring discussion, or pressuring people into silence for questioning approved narratives.I believe Americans are intelligent enough to think for themselves. We do not need “truth police” deciding what information we are allowed to see or discuss. We do not need government agencies coordinating with corporations or media organizations to influence public opinion behind closed doors. A free society depends on the open exchange of ideas, even difficult or unpopular ones, because truth is not something handed down by authority, it is something discovered through honest conversation, debate, evidence, and individual experience.Under Libertarian leadership, there will be no government censorship apparatus, no manipulation disguised as “protection,” and no endless war against free expression. Americans will have the right to communicate openly, challenge institutions, share ideas freely, and arrive at their own conclusions without fear of suppression or retaliation. We believe transparency creates trust, while secrecy and propaganda destroy it.The real strength of America has always been its people. Millions of individuals with different backgrounds, beliefs, experiences, and perspectives contributing to a larger national conversation. Real truth cannot be manufactured or centrally controlled. It emerges when free people are allowed to speak honestly and engage openly with one another.We are the party of free thought, free speech, and free people. We believe in real communication, real transparency, and real accountability. That is how we build a real future, not through censorship, manipulation, endless division, or attempts to control what Americans think, know, and believe about the world around them.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jeremy Todd campaign source 7 ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

I recognize that national defense remains a top priority for millions of Americans. Freedom is valuable, and throughout history, Americans have understood that preserving it sometimes requires sacrifice and a strong national defense. However, there is a clear difference between defending our nation …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

I recognize that national defense remains a top priority for millions of Americans. Freedom is valuable, and throughout history, Americans have understood that preserving it sometimes requires sacrifice and a strong national defense. However, there is a clear difference between defending our nation and maintaining a permanent state of endless foreign intervention.Over the past several decades, our military industrial complex—along with the politicians and special interests that profit from it—has transformed America’s military mission from one of defense into one of continual global policing. Instead of focusing on protecting Americans at home, Washington has engaged in costly wars, nation-building efforts, military occupations, and interventions across the globe with little accountability and few measurable benefits to the American people.These endless wars and overseas operations have not made Americans safer. In many cases, they have done the opposite by creating instability, increasing anti-American sentiment, and expanding the number of enemies and conflicts the United States faces around the world. Meanwhile, American taxpayers are left footing the bill for a military empire that now costs well over $1 trillion annually, despite our nation facing historic debt, inflation, and economic uncertainty at home.The Libertarian Party is committed to restoring a defense-first approach to national security. We believe America should maintain a strong military capable of defending our country and responding decisively to direct threats, while ending unnecessary foreign wars and interventionist policies that drain lives, resources, and prosperity. As their candidate and your Congressman, I will work to end the permanent War State, reduce empire-building abroad, stop the reimplementation of the draft, and bring accountability back to U.S. foreign policy. By prioritizing peace, restraint, and true national defense, we can make Americans both safer and more financially secure for generations to come.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jeremy Todd campaign source 5 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published Kentucky candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Kentucky incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Kentucky legislators and Kentucky’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Kentucky’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

9 matching sponsorships or proposals · 5 Kentucky incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Jared Bauman

Kentucky House of Representatives, District 28 · R–KY

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Jared Bauman
Kentucky Legislature · HB 361

AN ACT relating to sanctuary policies.

Jan 21, 2026 · Not enacted

Rep. Jared Bauman · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would prohibit defined sanctuary policies and require state and local agencies to support federal immigration enforcement and specified information sharing, subject to federal-law limits. It concerns people covered by the enforcement provisions, not all foreign-born residents. It did not become law.

01/21/26: to Judiciary (H). Latest official history entry: to Judiciary (H) (2026-01-21). The reviewed regular session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. A provision about a particular immigration status concerns only a subset of that population; it does not change a person’s birthplace. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 61 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: As used in Sections 1 to 8 of this Act, unless context otherwise requires: (1) "Applicable criminal case" means a criminal case in which the judgment requires the defendant to be confined in a secure correctional facility and the record of the case indicates that the defendant is subject to an immigration detainer or is otherwise subject to a transfer to federal custody; (2) "Federal immigration agency" means the United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Customs and Border Protection, and any other federal agency or successor agency charged with the enforcement of immigration law; (3) "Immigration detainer" means a facially sufficient written or electronic request issued by a federal immigration agency using that agency’s official form to request that another law enforcement agency detain a person because there is probable cause to believe that the person to be detained is a removable alien under federal immigration law, including detainers issued pursuant to 8 U.S.C. secs. 1226 and 1357 along with a warrant described in paragraph (b) of this subsection. For purposes of this subsection, an immigration detainer is deemed facially sufficient if: (a) The federal immigration agency’s official form is: 1. Complete and indicates on its face that the federal immigration official has probable cause to believe that the person to be detained is a removable alien under federal immigration law; or 2. Incomplete and fails to indicate on its face that the federal immigration official has probable cause to believe that the person to be detained is a removable alien under federal immigration law, but is supported by an affidavit, order, or other official documentation that indicates that the federal immigration agency has probable cause to believe that the person to be detained is a removable alien under federal immigration law; and (b) The federal immigration agency supplies with its detention request a Form I-200 Warrant for Arrest of Alien, a Form I-205 Warrant of Removal/Deportation, or a successor warrant or other warrant authorized by federal law; (4) "Inmate" means a person in the custody of a law enforcement agency; (5) "Law enforcement agency" means: (a) Any public agency that employs a police officer as defined in KRS 15.420(2)(a) or a special law enforcement officer as defined in KRS 61.900(6)(a) to (e); (b) Any public agency that is composed of or employs other public peace officers; (c) Jailers; (d) Metropolitan correctional services departments operating under KRS Chapter 67B; (e) The Department of Corrections as organized under KRS Chapter 196 or any of its subunits; (f) A campus security authority as defined in KRS 164.948 of a public institution operating under KRS Chapter 164; and (g) Any other agency in this state charged with enforcement of state, county, municipal, or federal laws or with managing custody of detained persons in this state; (6) "Local government" means a city, county, charter county government, consolidated local government, urban-county government, or unified local government; (7) "Sanctuary policy" means a law, policy, practice, procedure, or custom adopted or allowed by a state entity or local government which prohibits or impedes a law enforcement agency from complying with 8 U.S.C. sec. 1373 or which prohibits or impedes a law enforcement agency from communicating or cooperating with a federal immigration agency that acts to limit or prohibit a law enforcement agency from: (a) Complying with an immigration detainer; (b) Complying with a request from a federal immigration agency to notify the agency before the release of an inmate or detained person in the custody of the law enforcement agency; (c) Providing a federal immigration agency access to an inmate for interview; (d) Participating in any program or agreement authorized under 8 U.S.C. sec. 1357(g); or (e) Providing a federal immigration agency with an inmate’s incarceration status or release date; and (8) "State entity" means the state or any office, board, bureau, commission, department, branch, division, cabinet, or institution thereof, including public institutions operating under KRS Chapter 164. SECTION 2. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 61 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: A state entity, law enforcement agency, or local government shall not adopt or have in effect a sanctuary policy regarding aliens unlawfully present in the United States. SECTION 3. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 61 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) A law enforcement agency shall use all resources reasonably available to it to support the enforcement of federal immigration law. (2) Except as otherwise expressly prohibited by federal law, a state entity, law enforcement agency, or local government, or an employee, agent, or representative of a state entity, law enforcement agency, or local government shall not prohibit or in any way restrict a law enforcement agency from taking any of the following actions with respect to information regarding a person's immigration status: (a) Sending to or requesting, receiving, or reviewing information from a federal immigration agency for the purposes set out in Sections 1 to 8 of this Act; (b) Recording and maintaining information for the purposes set out in Sections 1 to 8 of this Act; (c) Exchanging information with a federal immigration agency or another state entity, law enforcement agency, or local government for the purposes set out in Sections 1 to 8 this Act; (d) Using information to comply with an immigration detainer; or (e) Using information to confirm the identity of a person who is detained by a law enforcement agency. (3) This section shall apply to an official, representative, agent, or employee of a state entity, law enforcement agency, or local government only when he or she is acting within the scope of his or her official duties or employment.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Kentucky Legislature · HB 5

AN ACT relating to crimes and punishments.

Apr 12, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. Jared Bauman · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The historical law creates a Class B felony for carjacking by force or intimidation and prevents duplicative convictions under specified robbery or theft statutes for the same act. This is a defined robbery component of violent crime; it is not ordinary motor-vehicle theft in the property-crime series.

04/12/24: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 174). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 174) (2024-04-12). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact measures reported violent offenses per 100,000 people, with incomplete and varying agency coverage. FBI violent crime includes murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. Prevention, reporting or a specified offense concerns one component; this is distinct from homicide mortality, nonviolent offenses and all unreported crime. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 9. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 515 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) A person is guilty of carjacking when he or she takes a motor vehicle in the possession of another without lawful authority or ownership, from the possessor's person or immediate presence, or from the person or immediate presence of a passenger of the motor vehicle, against the possessor's or passenger's will and with the intent to either permanently or temporarily depr ive the possessor of the motor vehicle of his or her possession, accomplished by means of force or intimidation. (2) Carjacking is a Class B felony. (3) A person shall not be convicted of a violation of this section and a violation of KRS 515.020 or KRS Chapter 514 arising from the same act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Nick Wilson

Kentucky House of Representatives, District 82 · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Nick Wilson
Kentucky Legislature · HB 778

AN ACT relating to child welfare.

Apr 10, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Nick Wilson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law revises child-fatality review procedures, including closed discussion with the investigating agency after final judgment or a decision not to prosecute, confidentiality, and limits on using agency employees’ statements as evidence. The connection concerns investigation and review of abuse-related child deaths; not every reviewed fatality is a homicide.

04/10/26: signed by Governor (Acts Ch.68). Latest official history entry: signed by Governor (Acts Ch.68) (2026-04-10). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact counts deaths whose underlying cause is homicide. The provision addresses a defined prevention, investigation, measurement, or homicide-offense mechanism; a general criminal penalty or post-offense benefit alone does not demonstrate homicide prevention. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Homicide deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(14) (a) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the portions of the external child fatality and near fatality review panel meetings during which an individual child fatality or near fatality case is reviewed or discussed by panel members may be a closed session and subject to the provisions of KRS 61.815(1) and shall only occur following the conclusion of an open session. At the conclusion of the closed session, the panel shall immediately convene an open session and give a summary of what occurred during the closed session. (b) The external child fatality and near fatality review panel shall develop a procedure for discussion of cases that are being reviewed by the panel with th e agency that was responsible for the investigation of the case and shall include the following requirements: 1. Any discussions about a case shall be held in a closed session; 2. Anything said by an employee of the investigating agency shall not be used a s evidence in any civil, criminal, or administrative hearing; 3. Any employee of the investigating agency may attend with the employee or employees who investigated the case being discussed; and 4. The investigating agency shall not be asked to attend unti l after final judgment was entered by the court in that case or the Commonwealth declined to prosecute the case. (15) Each member of the external child fatality and near fatality review panel, any person attending a closed panel session, and any pers on presenting information or records on an individual child fatality or near fatality shall not release information or records not available under the Kentucky Open Records Act, KRS 61.870 to 61.884 to the public.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Savannah Maddox

Kentucky House of Representatives, District 61 · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Savannah Maddox
Kentucky Legislature · HB 312

AN ACT relating to concealed firearms and deadly weapons.

Apr 14, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Savannah Maddox · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law establishes provisional concealed-carry licenses for otherwise qualifying people age 18 through 20. Licenses last until age 21 unless suspended or revoked, and conversion to a standard license requires an application and eligibility checks. This is a licensing pathway, not a permitless-carry provision.

04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 173). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 173) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 237 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) As used in this section: (a) "Provisional license" means a license to carry concealed firearms or other deadly weapons issued pursuant to this section; and (b) "Standard license" means a license to carry concealed firearms o r other deadly weapons issued pursuant to KRS 237.110. (2) The Department of Kentucky State Police shall issue provisional licenses to carry concealed firearms or other deadly weapons, or a combination thereof, to persons who: (a) Are eighteen (18) years of age but younger than twenty-one (21) years of age; and (b) Notwithstanding KRS 237.110(4)(c), otherwise meet the criteria set forth in KRS 237.110(4) and the requirements of KRS 237.110(3). (3) (a) Except as provided in this section, the issuance and reg ulation of provisional licenses to carry concealed firearms and deadly weapons shall be governed by KRS 237.110. (b) Any reference in the Kentucky Revised Statutes to a license issued pursuant to KRS 237.110 shall also be considered a reference to a provisional license issued pursuant to this section. (4) A provisional license issued pursuant to this section shall: (a) Be valid throughout the Commonwealth and, except as provided in other specific sections of the Kentucky Revised Statutes or federal law, per mit the holder of the provisional license to carry firearms, ammunition, other deadly weapons, or a combination thereof, at any location in the Commonwealth; (b) Unless revoked or suspended as provided by law, be valid until the holder turns twenty -one (21) years of age; (c) Authorize the holder of the provisional license to carry a concealed firearm, other deadly weapon, or a combination thereof, on or about his or her person; and (d) Authorize the holder of the provisional license to carry ammunition for a firearm on or about his or her person. (5) A provisional license issued under this section shall be readily distinguishable from a standard license issued pursuant to KRS 237.110. (6) (a) Not less than ninety (90) days before the expiration of the provisional license, the Department of Kentucky State Police shall mail to the holder of the provisional license a written notice of the expiration and an application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license. The application to switch fro m a provisional license to a standard license shall be in a format prescribed by the Department of Kentucky State Police. (b) The outside of the envelope shall bear only the name and address of the applicant. No other information relating to the applicant shall appear on the outside of the envelope sent to the applicant. (c) The holder of a provisional license may apply for a standard license by: 1. Filing with the sheriff of his or her county of residence the paper application form under this subsection, o r filing with the Department of Kentucky State Police an electronic application form in lieu of a paper application form; 2. Stating that he or she remains qualified pursuant to the criteria specified in KRS 237.110(3) and (4); and ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 3. Paying an application fee prescribed by the Department of Kentucky State Police. (d) The sheriff shall issue to the applicant a receipt for the paper application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license and shall date the receipt. The Department of Kentucky S tate Police shall issue to the applicant a receipt for an electronic application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license and shall date the receipt. (e) A standard license under KRS 237.110 shall be issued to a qualified applicant upon: 1. Receipt of the completed application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license; 2. Records check as specified in KRS 237.110(3); 3. Determination that the applicant is not ineligible for a standard license as specified in KRS 237.110(4); and 4. Appropriate payment of fees. Upon issuance of the standard license, the provisional license shall be destroyed by the sheriff. (f) The holder of a provisional license who fails to submit an application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license within six (6) months of the expiration of the provisional license shall be required to submit an application under KRS 237.110. (g) A standard license issued under this subsection shall not be valid until an applicant is twenty -one (21) yea rs of age. A provisional licensee who applies for a standard license under this subsection shall not be required to retake the firearms training described in KRS 237.110(4). (7) A provisional license which has expired shall be void and shall not be valid f or any purpose other than surrender to the sheriff in exchange for a standard license. (8) The Department of Kentucky State Police may promulgate any necessary administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A to administer this section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Thomas Massie

U.S. House of Representatives, Kentucky District 4 · R–KY

4 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Thomas Massie
U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · HR 2267

NICS Data Reporting Act of 2026

May 13, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Thomas Massie · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The House-passed bill would require annual demographic reports on firearm-purchase denials and overturned denials in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. It concerns administration of firearm access; it has not become law.

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.NICS reportNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Attorney General shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report containing, with respect to the preceding year, the demographic data of persons who were determined to be ineligible to purchase a firearm based on a background check performed by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, which shall include, disaggregated by the reason for the determination of ineligibility, the following:(1)The race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, age, disability, average annual income, and English language proficiency, if available.(2)In the case of each person whose determination of ineligibility was overturned on appeal, the race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, age, dis-ability, average annual income, and English language proficiency, if available.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · HR 5066

Safe Students Act

Aug 29, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Thomas Massie · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The Safe Students Act would repeal the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act provision in 18 U.S.C. 922(q). This concerns firearm-location restrictions, not high-school diploma attainment.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Repeal of the gun-free school zones act of 1990 and amendments to that act (a)In generalSection 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (q). (b)Related amendments (1)Section 921(a) of such title is amended by striking paragraphs (25) through (27) and redesignating paragraphs (28), (29), and (32) through (37) as paragraphs (25) through (32), respectively. (2)Section 924(a) of such title is amended— (A)in paragraph (1)(B), by striking (k), or (q) and inserting or (k); and (B)by striking paragraph (4) and redesignating paragraphs (5) through (8) as paragraphs (4) through (7), respectively. (3) The Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 (18 U.S.C. 921 note, 922 note; section 1702 of Public Law 101–647; 104 Stat. 4844–4845) is repealed.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · HR 1643

SAFER Voter Act

Feb 27, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Thomas Massie · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The SAFER Voter Act would remove the federal licensed-dealer restriction on handgun sales to people under 21 while retaining the age-18 floor. Despite its title, the reviewed provision concerns firearms rather than voting.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Minimum age for obtaining a handgun from a Federal firearms licensee(a)In generalSection 922(b)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking , and, if the firearm, or ammunition is other than a shotgun or rifle, or ammunition for a shotgun or rifle, to any individual who the licensee knows or has reasonable cause to believe is less than twenty-one years of age.(b)Conforming amendmentSection 922(c)(1) of such title is amended by striking , in the case of any firearm other than a shotgun or a rifle, I am twenty-one years or more of age, or that, in the case of a shotgun or a rifle,.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · HR 645

National Constitutional Carry Act

Jan 23, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Thomas Massie · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would prohibit state and local penalties or barriers to public firearm carrying by U.S. citizens otherwise eligible to possess firearms under state and federal law. Its public-place definition excludes clearly posted private-property prohibitions and places with screening under state law.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

3.The right to keep and bear arms (a)In generalSection 927 of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 927.The right to keep and bear arms (a)No State or political subdivision of a State may impose a criminal or civil penalty on, or otherwise indirectly limit the carrying of firearms (including by imposing a financial or other barrier to entry) in public by residents or nonresidents of that State who are citizens of the United States and otherwise eligible to possess firearms under State and Federal law. (b)Any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of a State or a political subdivision of a State that criminalizes, penalizes, or otherwise indirectly dissuades the carrying of firearms (including by imposing a financial or other barrier to entry) in public by any resident or nonresident who is a United States citizen and otherwise eligible to possess firearms under State and Federal law, shall have no force or effect. (c)The term State as used in this section includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the possessions of the United States (not including the Canal Zone). (d)The term public as used in this section— (1)includes any place held open to the public, regardless of ownership, but in the case of a privately-owned location held open to the public, does not include a place where the owner communicates clearly and conspicuously a prohibition of firearms on the premises; and (2)does not include a place where screening for firearms is conducted under State law.. (b)Clerical amendmentThe table of sections for such chapter is amended by striking the item relating to section 927 and inserting the following: 927. The right to keep and bear arms..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Gerald A. Neal

Kentucky Senate, District 33 · D–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Gerald A. Neal
Kentucky Legislature · SB 304

AN ACT relating to firearms.

Feb 27, 2026 · Not enacted

Sen. Gerald A. Neal · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would require secure firearm storage, reporting of discovered firearm loss or theft within 24 hours, and police entry of reports in the National Crime Information Center. Ammunition sellers would also report ammunition loss or theft. The property-crime connection concerns theft reporting; simple loss is not a theft offense. The proposal did not become law.

02/27/26: to Committee on Committees (S). Latest official history entry: to Committee on Committees (S) (2026-02-27). The reviewed regular session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths · Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 237 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) As used in this section, "safe storage depository" means a safe or other secure container which, when locked, is incapable of being opened without the key, combination, or other unlocking mechanism and is capable of preventing an unauthorized person from obtaining access to and possession of its contents. (2) A person who owns or is a custodian of a firearm shall not store or otherwise leave the firearm out of his or her immediate possession or control without having first securely locked the firearm in an appropriate safe storage depository or rendered it incapable of being fired by use of a gun-locking device appropriate to that weapon. SECTION 2. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 237 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) (a) Any owner or other person lawfully in possession of a firearm who suffers the loss or theft of the firearm or any person who sells ammunition who suffers a loss or theft of ammunition shall report the facts and circumstances of the loss or theft to an appropriate law enforcement agency within twenty-four (24) hours of the discovery of the loss or theft. (b) The report required by paragraph (a) of this subsection shall contain, if known, the caliber, make, model, manufacturer’s name, and serial number, if any, and any other distinguishing number or identification mark on the firearm, or the make, type, and caliber of the ammunition. (2) A law enforcement agency that receives a report pursuant to subsection (1) of this section shall enter the reported information into the National Crime Information Center database.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Kentucky officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Kentucky statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.