Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and Kentucky public-safety context.
Reported violent-crime rate226.7 per 100k2024 · #41 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate1,400.5 per 100k2024 · #39 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage100%2024 · #1 of 50 · highest first
Kentucky over time
Explore Kentucky readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Kentucky officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Kentucky effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Kentucky change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Reported violent-crime rate Kentucky · source units
KentuckyPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
13 of 13 reviewed Kentucky actions match · 12 date markers shown. 33 major events shown separately.
Kentucky · 2024: 226.7 per 100k · Rank #41 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Kentucky's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 99.7% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Kentucky Reported violent-crime rate · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Kentucky · state comparison
Reported crime over time
Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.
Kentucky · 2024226.7 per 100k
Kentucky rank#41among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Reported violent-crime rate
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Kentucky's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 99.7% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Kentucky
2024 · Kentucky: 226.7 per 100k · Rank #41 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Kentucky Reported violent-crime rate history
Period
Kentucky
Compare
2015
223.7 per 100k
2016
235.6 per 100k
2017
235.4 per 100k
2018
222.4 per 100k
2019
226.5 per 100k
2020
273.2 per 100k
2021
272.5 per 100k
2022
223.3 per 100k
2023
232.3 per 100k
2024
226.7 per 100k
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.
Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kentucky · 226.7 per 100k2024 · Rank #41 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Mexico
744.7 per 100k
—
#2
Alaska
731.9 per 100k
—
#3
Tennessee
604.3 per 100k
—
#4
Arkansas
589.6 per 100k
—
#5*
Louisiana
504.5 per 100k
82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6
Colorado
486.8 per 100k
—
#7
California
478.4 per 100k
—
#8
Kansas
474.7 per 100k
—
#9
Missouri
472.7 per 100k
—
#10
Michigan
442.6 per 100k
—
#11
South Carolina
440.8 per 100k
—
#12
Arizona
433 per 100k
—
#13
Oklahoma
429.3 per 100k
—
#14
Montana
428 per 100k
—
#15
Maryland
425.9 per 100k
—
#16
Nevada
408.6 per 100k
—
#17
Texas
397.8 per 100k
—
#18
New York
392.2 per 100k
—
#19
North Carolina
382.9 per 100k
—
#20
Alabama
380.8 per 100k
—
#21
Delaware
368.4 per 100k
—
#22*
South Dakota
356.9 per 100k
89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*
Indiana
349.2 per 100k
87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24
Oregon
341.1 per 100k
—
#25
Washington
331.8 per 100k
—
#26
Georgia
328 per 100k
—
#27
Massachusetts
317.9 per 100k
—
#28
Ohio
311.9 per 100k
—
#29
Illinois
294.5 per 100k
—
#30
Wisconsin
287.6 per 100k
—
#31
West Virginia
263.8 per 100k
—
#32*
Florida
262 per 100k
81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33
Minnesota
259.4 per 100k
—
#34
North Dakota
258 per 100k
—
#35
Pennsylvania
251.3 per 100k
—
#36
Iowa
247.2 per 100k
—
#37
Utah
237.8 per 100k
—
#38
Idaho
236.6 per 100k
—
#39
Hawaii
230.3 per 100k
—
#40
Vermont
227.1 per 100k
—
#41
Kentucky · your comparison
226.7 per 100k
—
#42
Nebraska
224.6 per 100k
—
#43
Virginia
223.7 per 100k
—
#44
New Jersey
221.9 per 100k
—
#45*
Mississippi
219.6 per 100k
65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*
Wyoming
212.5 per 100k
89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47
Rhode Island
154.9 per 100k
—
#48
Connecticut
139.2 per 100k
—
#49
New Hampshire
112.3 per 100k
—
#50
Maine
102.6 per 100k
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
Kentucky's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 99.7% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 100%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
Kentucky's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 99.7% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 100%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.
Kentucky · 2024870
Kentucky rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Firearm deaths
Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.
Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.
Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kentucky · 8702024 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
4,389
—
#2
Florida
3,191
—
#3
California
2,853
—
#4
Georgia
1,985
—
#5
North Carolina
1,835
—
#6
Ohio
1,745
—
#7
Pennsylvania
1,624
—
#8
Illinois
1,563
—
#9
Tennessee
1,448
—
#10
Arizona
1,331
—
#11
Missouri
1,234
—
#12
Michigan
1,228
—
#13
Alabama
1,212
—
#14
Indiana
1,196
—
#15
Virginia
1,153
—
#16
South Carolina
1,064
—
#17
Louisiana
1,031
—
#18
Colorado
961
—
#19
Washington
915
—
#20
New York
896
—
#21
Kentucky · your comparison
870
—
#22
Mississippi
810
—
#23
Oklahoma
794
—
#24
Wisconsin
735
—
#25
Maryland
716
—
#26
Oregon
663
—
#27
Arkansas
638
—
#28
Minnesota
582
—
#28
Nevada
582
—
#30
New Mexico
563
—
#31
Utah
454
—
#32
Kansas
446
—
#33
New Jersey
393
—
#34
Iowa
389
—
#35
Idaho
331
—
#36
Massachusetts
287
—
#37
West Virginia
281
—
#38
Montana
247
—
#39
Connecticut
224
—
#40
Nebraska
218
—
#41
Alaska
182
—
#42
Maine
181
—
#43
South Dakota
159
—
#44
New Hampshire
152
—
#45
Wyoming
143
—
#46
Delaware
123
—
#47
North Dakota
95
—
#48
Vermont
76
—
#49
Hawaii
56
—
#50
Rhode Island
55
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
13 of 13 reviewed Kentucky actions · newest first
May 13, 2026 · HR 2267 · NICS Data Reporting Act of 2026 · In CongressU.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · HR 2267
NICS Data Reporting Act of 2026
May 13, 2026 · In Congress
Rep. Thomas Massie · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The House-passed bill would require annual demographic reports on firearm-purchase denials and overturned denials in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. It concerns administration of firearm access; it has not become law.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.NICS reportNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Attorney General shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report containing, with respect to the preceding year, the demographic data of persons who were determined to be ineligible to purchase a firearm based on a background check performed by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, which shall include, disaggregated by the reason for the determination of ineligibility, the following:(1)The race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, age, disability, average annual income, and English language proficiency, if available.(2)In the case of each person whose determination of ineligibility was overturned on appeal, the race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, age, dis-ability, average annual income, and English language proficiency, if available.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 14, 2026 · HB 312 · AN ACT relating to concealed firearms and deadly weapons. · EnactedKentucky Legislature · HB 312
AN ACT relating to concealed firearms and deadly weapons.
Apr 14, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Savannah Maddox · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law establishes provisional concealed-carry licenses for otherwise qualifying people age 18 through 20. Licenses last until age 21 unless suspended or revoked, and conversion to a standard license requires an application and eligibility checks. This is a licensing pathway, not a permitless-carry provision.
04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 173). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 173) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 237 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) As used in this section: (a) "Provisional license" means a license to carry concealed firearms or other deadly weapons issued pursuant to this section; and (b) "Standard license" means a license to carry concealed firearms o r other deadly weapons issued pursuant to KRS 237.110. (2) The Department of Kentucky State Police shall issue provisional licenses to carry concealed firearms or other deadly weapons, or a combination thereof, to persons who: (a) Are eighteen (18) years of age but younger than twenty-one (21) years of age; and (b) Notwithstanding KRS 237.110(4)(c), otherwise meet the criteria set forth in KRS 237.110(4) and the requirements of KRS 237.110(3). (3) (a) Except as provided in this section, the issuance and reg ulation of provisional licenses to carry concealed firearms and deadly weapons shall be governed by KRS 237.110. (b) Any reference in the Kentucky Revised Statutes to a license issued pursuant to KRS 237.110 shall also be considered a reference to a provisional license issued pursuant to this section. (4) A provisional license issued pursuant to this section shall: (a) Be valid throughout the Commonwealth and, except as provided in other specific sections of the Kentucky Revised Statutes or federal law, per mit the holder of the provisional license to carry firearms, ammunition, other deadly weapons, or a combination thereof, at any location in the Commonwealth; (b) Unless revoked or suspended as provided by law, be valid until the holder turns twenty -one (21) years of age; (c) Authorize the holder of the provisional license to carry a concealed firearm, other deadly weapon, or a combination thereof, on or about his or her person; and (d) Authorize the holder of the provisional license to carry ammunition for a firearm on or about his or her person. (5) A provisional license issued under this section shall be readily distinguishable from a standard license issued pursuant to KRS 237.110. (6) (a) Not less than ninety (90) days before the expiration of the provisional license, the Department of Kentucky State Police shall mail to the holder of the provisional license a written notice of the expiration and an application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license. The application to switch fro m a provisional license to a standard license shall be in a format prescribed by the Department of Kentucky State Police. (b) The outside of the envelope shall bear only the name and address of the applicant. No other information relating to the applicant shall appear on the outside of the envelope sent to the applicant. (c) The holder of a provisional license may apply for a standard license by: 1. Filing with the sheriff of his or her county of residence the paper application form under this subsection, o r filing with the Department of Kentucky State Police an electronic application form in lieu of a paper application form; 2. Stating that he or she remains qualified pursuant to the criteria specified in KRS 237.110(3) and (4); and ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 3. Paying an application fee prescribed by the Department of Kentucky State Police. (d) The sheriff shall issue to the applicant a receipt for the paper application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license and shall date the receipt. The Department of Kentucky S tate Police shall issue to the applicant a receipt for an electronic application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license and shall date the receipt. (e) A standard license under KRS 237.110 shall be issued to a qualified applicant upon: 1. Receipt of the completed application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license; 2. Records check as specified in KRS 237.110(3); 3. Determination that the applicant is not ineligible for a standard license as specified in KRS 237.110(4); and 4. Appropriate payment of fees. Upon issuance of the standard license, the provisional license shall be destroyed by the sheriff. (f) The holder of a provisional license who fails to submit an application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license within six (6) months of the expiration of the provisional license shall be required to submit an application under KRS 237.110. (g) A standard license issued under this subsection shall not be valid until an applicant is twenty -one (21) yea rs of age. A provisional licensee who applies for a standard license under this subsection shall not be required to retake the firearms training described in KRS 237.110(4). (7) A provisional license which has expired shall be void and shall not be valid f or any purpose other than surrender to the sheriff in exchange for a standard license. (8) The Department of Kentucky State Police may promulgate any necessary administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A to administer this section.
The law revises child-fatality review procedures, including closed discussion with the investigating agency after final judgment or a decision not to prosecute, confidentiality, and limits on using agency employees’ statements as evidence. The connection concerns investigation and review of abuse-related child deaths; not every reviewed fatality is a homicide.
04/10/26: signed by Governor (Acts Ch.68). Latest official history entry: signed by Governor (Acts Ch.68) (2026-04-10). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact counts deaths whose underlying cause is homicide. The provision addresses a defined prevention, investigation, measurement, or homicide-offense mechanism; a general criminal penalty or post-offense benefit alone does not demonstrate homicide prevention. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Homicide deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(14) (a) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the portions of the external child fatality and near fatality review panel meetings during which an individual child fatality or near fatality case is reviewed or discussed by panel members may be a closed session and subject to the provisions of KRS 61.815(1) and shall only occur following the conclusion of an open session. At the conclusion of the closed session, the panel shall immediately convene an open session and give a summary of what occurred during the closed session. (b) The external child fatality and near fatality review panel shall develop a procedure for discussion of cases that are being reviewed by the panel with th e agency that was responsible for the investigation of the case and shall include the following requirements: 1. Any discussions about a case shall be held in a closed session; 2. Anything said by an employee of the investigating agency shall not be used a s evidence in any civil, criminal, or administrative hearing; 3. Any employee of the investigating agency may attend with the employee or employees who investigated the case being discussed; and 4. The investigating agency shall not be asked to attend unti l after final judgment was entered by the court in that case or the Commonwealth declined to prosecute the case. (15) Each member of the external child fatality and near fatality review panel, any person attending a closed panel session, and any pers on presenting information or records on an individual child fatality or near fatality shall not release information or records not available under the Kentucky Open Records Act, KRS 61.870 to 61.884 to the public.
Andy Beshear signed HB 778. The law revises child-fatality review procedures, including closed discussion with the investigating agency after final judgment or a decision not to prosecute, confidentiality, and limits on using agency employees’ statements as evidence. The connection concerns investigation and review of abuse-related child deaths; not every reviewed fatality is a homicide.
The official record verifies a governor signing. Approval, legislative-entry dates, effective dates, and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The fact counts deaths whose underlying cause is homicide. The provision addresses a defined prevention, investigation, measurement, or homicide-offense mechanism; a general criminal penalty or post-offense benefit alone does not demonstrate homicide prevention. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Homicide deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(14) (a) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the portions of the external child fatality and near fatality review panel meetings during which an individual child fatality or near fatality case is reviewed or discussed by panel members may be a closed session and subject to the provisions of KRS 61.815(1) and shall only occur following the conclusion of an open session. At the conclusion of the closed session, the panel shall immediately convene an open session and give a summary of what occurred during the closed session. (b) The external child fatality and near fatality review panel shall develop a procedure for discussion of cases that are being reviewed by the panel with th e agency that was responsible for the investigation of the case and shall include the following requirements: 1. Any discussions about a case shall be held in a closed session; 2. Anything said by an employee of the investigating agency shall not be used a s evidence in any civil, criminal, or administrative hearing; 3. Any employee of the investigating agency may attend with the employee or employees who investigated the case being discussed; and 4. The investigating agency shall not be asked to attend unti l after final judgment was entered by the court in that case or the Commonwealth declined to prosecute the case. (15) Each member of the external child fatality and near fatality review panel, any person attending a closed panel session, and any pers on presenting information or records on an individual child fatality or near fatality shall not release information or records not available under the Kentucky Open Records Act, KRS 61.870 to 61.884 to the public.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 2, 2026 · HB 78 · AN ACT relating to firearms liability protections and declaring an emergency. · VetoedGovernor · HB 78
AN ACT relating to firearms liability protections and declaring an emergency.
Apr 2, 2026 · Vetoed
Gov. Andy Beshear · Vetoed
FactVote reviewed summary
Andy Beshear vetoed the firearm civil-liability bill in full, objecting to its protections for manufacturers and sellers and its treatment of claims by victims. The legislature overrode the veto.
The original governor message verifies a full-bill veto. The General Assembly overrode the veto; the bill is recorded separately as enacted. 04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 177). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 177) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The governor vetoed the whole firearm civil-liability bill, objecting to barriers to victim claims and the protection of manufacturers and sellers. This records his stated rationale concerning accountability for firearm injuries, not measured prevention. The legislature overrode the veto.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
House Bill 78 of the 2026 Regular Session of the General Assembly in its entirety. Instead of working to reduce gun violence, the General Assembly passed House Bill 78 to shield firearms manufacturers and sellers from liability for gun violence committed by their customers. House Bill 78 then punishes victims who attempt to bring a lawsuit in violation of the Act. Justice for victims requires our courts and our legal process to bring the facts to light so that anyone with responsibility for violent acts may be held accountable. House Bill 78 prioritizes immunity for gun dealers over the safety of the Commonwealth's citizens. In honor of my friend Tommy Elliott and the four other victims whose lives were claimed in a mass shooting in the Commonwealth just three short years ago, I am vetoing this bill. For these reasons, I am vetoing House Bill 78.
AN ACT relating to concealed firearms and deadly weapons.
Apr 2, 2026 · Vetoed
Gov. Andy Beshear · Vetoed
FactVote reviewed summary
Andy Beshear vetoed the provisional concealed-carry licensing bill for people ages 18 through 20 in full, citing concerns about the age threshold and gun violence. The legislature overrode the veto.
The original governor message verifies a full-bill veto. The General Assembly overrode the veto; the bill is recorded separately as enacted. 04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 173). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 173) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
House Bill 312 of the 2026 Regular Session of the General Assembly in its entirety. While I believe in the Second Amendment, Kentuckians under age 21 cannot rent a car, cannot buy alcohol, cannot buy tobacco products, cannot consume medical cannabis through vapor devices, and cannot be a State Representative or Senator. Under another bill filed this session they would not be able to place a sports bet. Kentuckians are also allowed to stay on their parents' health insurance policies until they are 26 years old. Laws setting these minimum age limits are meant to protect our youth. Yet under House Bill 312, minors under age 21 could carry concealed deadly weapons, even though federal law restricts their ability to buy handguns. Tonight, I'm remembering my friend Tommy Elliott, who was murdered along with four other children of God three years ago in an act of gun violence. I'm vetoing this bill in his honor. For these reasons, I am vetoing House Bill 312.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Kentucky officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s Kentucky candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
10 statements from 6 candidates
2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 1 — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
I also do not have jurisdiction in matters pertaining to civil or criminal cases. Due to House ethics rules, I must refrain from involvement in any legal proceedings including family court matters such as child custody, child support, and divorce issues. I cannot give legal advice or intervene in le…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: State and Local Issues & Legal Matters
Candidate campaign source
I also do not have jurisdiction in matters pertaining to civil or criminal cases. Due to House ethics rules, I must refrain from involvement in any legal proceedings including family court matters such as child custody, child support, and divorce issues. I cannot give legal advice or intervene in legal disputes. I would encourage you to reach out to local law enforcement if you are aware of criminal behavior or activity. Information regarding Kentucky State Police locations and how to contact them is available at the following website: http://www.kentuckystatepolice.org/post.html.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
I believe Americans are intelligent enough to think for themselves. We do not need “truth police” deciding what information we are allowed to see or discuss. We do not need government agencies coordinating with corporations or media organizations to influence public opinion behind closed doors. A fr…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: THE AMERICA FIRST CANDIDATEanti-war, anti-spending, anti-establishment
Candidate campaign source
I believe Americans are intelligent enough to think for themselves. We do not need “truth police” deciding what information we are allowed to see or discuss. We do not need government agencies coordinating with corporations or media organizations to influence public opinion behind closed doors. A free society depends on the open exchange of ideas, even difficult or unpopular ones, because truth is not something handed down by authority, it is something discovered through honest conversation, debate, evidence, and individual experience.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
I believe the problem in America is not guns, it’s a culture that has become disconnected, dependent, and increasingly taught to rely on the government for protection instead of personal responsibility and strong communities. Decades ago, there were more guns in American households than there are to…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Candidate statement
Candidate campaign source
I believe the problem in America is not guns, it’s a culture that has become disconnected, dependent, and increasingly taught to rely on the government for protection instead of personal responsibility and strong communities. Decades ago, there were more guns in American households than there are today, yet mass violence was exponentially lower. The issue is not law-abiding citizens exercising their rights. The issue is a society that has lost trust, accountability, and respect for individual responsibility.The reality is that no government agency can guarantee your safety. The courts themselves have repeatedly affirmed that police officers do not have a legal duty to protect individual citizens. That means every American must recognize a simple truth: you are your own first line of defense. I believe every responsible, peaceable citizen has the right to protect themselves, their family, and their property without unnecessary government interference.As a Libertarian, I fully support the plain language of the Second Amendment: “shall not be infringed.” Our constitutional rights are not privileges handed out by bureaucrats, they are rights that belong to the people. Law-abiding Americans should not be punished, restricted, or treated like criminals for choosing to exercise those rights. Instead of disarming responsible citizens, we should be focused on addressing the cultural decline, broken communities, and failures that lead individuals toward violence in the first place.I also believe many of the policies pushed in the name of “gun safety” have failed to make Americans safer. So-called “gun-free zones” have too often become targets for those who seek to do harm, while endless regulations continue to burden responsible gun owners rather than criminals. Americans deserve the freedom to defend themselves and the confidence that they are trusted by their own government, not feared by it.A safer America will not come from stripping rights away from peaceful citizens. It will come from rebuilding a culture of responsibility, freedom, strong families, and self-reliance: the values that made this country strong in the first place.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
The reality is that no government agency can guarantee your safety. The courts themselves have repeatedly affirmed that police officers do not have a legal duty to protect individual citizens. That means every American must recognize a simple truth: you are your own first line of defense. I believe …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: THE AMERICA FIRST CANDIDATEanti-war, anti-spending, anti-establishment
Candidate campaign source
The reality is that no government agency can guarantee your safety. The courts themselves have repeatedly affirmed that police officers do not have a legal duty to protect individual citizens. That means every American must recognize a simple truth: you are your own first line of defense. I believe every responsible, peaceable citizen has the right to protect themselves, their family, and their property without unnecessary government interference.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
For too long, Americans have been caught in a constant battle over truth itself. Government agencies, political operatives, corporate interests, and media institutions have increasingly worked together to shape narratives, suppress dissenting voices, and decide which opinions are acceptable for the …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: first amendment
Candidate campaign source
For too long, Americans have been caught in a constant battle over truth itself. Government agencies, political operatives, corporate interests, and media institutions have increasingly worked together to shape narratives, suppress dissenting voices, and decide which opinions are acceptable for the public to hear. The result has been a country more divided, distrustful, and hostile toward one another than at any point in recent memory. When people are denied open access to information and honest debate, fear and manipulation rush in to fill the void.The Libertarian Party believes that free people must also be free to think, question, speak, and seek truth without interference from the government. Self-ownership means more than controlling your labor or your property, it also means owning your own mind, your own beliefs, and your own understanding of the world around you. A citizen cannot truly be free if powerful institutions are constantly filtering information, censoring discussion, or pressuring people into silence for questioning approved narratives.I believe Americans are intelligent enough to think for themselves. We do not need “truth police” deciding what information we are allowed to see or discuss. We do not need government agencies coordinating with corporations or media organizations to influence public opinion behind closed doors. A free society depends on the open exchange of ideas, even difficult or unpopular ones, because truth is not something handed down by authority, it is something discovered through honest conversation, debate, evidence, and individual experience.Under Libertarian leadership, there will be no government censorship apparatus, no manipulation disguised as “protection,” and no endless war against free expression. Americans will have the right to communicate openly, challenge institutions, share ideas freely, and arrive at their own conclusions without fear of suppression or retaliation. We believe transparency creates trust, while secrecy and propaganda destroy it.The real strength of America has always been its people. Millions of individuals with different backgrounds, beliefs, experiences, and perspectives contributing to a larger national conversation. Real truth cannot be manufactured or centrally controlled. It emerges when free people are allowed to speak honestly and engage openly with one another.We are the party of free thought, free speech, and free people. We believe in real communication, real transparency, and real accountability. That is how we build a real future, not through censorship, manipulation, endless division, or attempts to control what Americans think, know, and believe about the world around them.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
I recognize that national defense remains a top priority for millions of Americans. Freedom is valuable, and throughout history, Americans have understood that preserving it sometimes requires sacrifice and a strong national defense. However, there is a clear difference between defending our nation …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Candidate statement
Candidate campaign source
I recognize that national defense remains a top priority for millions of Americans. Freedom is valuable, and throughout history, Americans have understood that preserving it sometimes requires sacrifice and a strong national defense. However, there is a clear difference between defending our nation and maintaining a permanent state of endless foreign intervention.Over the past several decades, our military industrial complex—along with the politicians and special interests that profit from it—has transformed America’s military mission from one of defense into one of continual global policing. Instead of focusing on protecting Americans at home, Washington has engaged in costly wars, nation-building efforts, military occupations, and interventions across the globe with little accountability and few measurable benefits to the American people.These endless wars and overseas operations have not made Americans safer. In many cases, they have done the opposite by creating instability, increasing anti-American sentiment, and expanding the number of enemies and conflicts the United States faces around the world. Meanwhile, American taxpayers are left footing the bill for a military empire that now costs well over $1 trillion annually, despite our nation facing historic debt, inflation, and economic uncertainty at home.The Libertarian Party is committed to restoring a defense-first approach to national security. We believe America should maintain a strong military capable of defending our country and responding decisively to direct threats, while ending unnecessary foreign wars and interventionist policies that drain lives, resources, and prosperity. As their candidate and your Congressman, I will work to end the permanent War State, reduce empire-building abroad, stop the reimplementation of the draft, and bring accountability back to U.S. foreign policy. By prioritizing peace, restraint, and true national defense, we can make Americans both safer and more financially secure for generations to come.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published Kentucky candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Kentucky incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Kentucky legislators and Kentucky’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Kentucky’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
9 matching sponsorships or proposals · 5 Kentucky incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Jared Bauman
Kentucky House of Representatives, District 28 · R–KY
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Jared BaumanKentucky Legislature · HB 361
AN ACT relating to sanctuary policies.
Jan 21, 2026 · Not enacted
Rep. Jared Bauman · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would prohibit defined sanctuary policies and require state and local agencies to support federal immigration enforcement and specified information sharing, subject to federal-law limits. It concerns people covered by the enforcement provisions, not all foreign-born residents. It did not become law.
01/21/26: to Judiciary (H). Latest official history entry: to Judiciary (H) (2026-01-21). The reviewed regular session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. A provision about a particular immigration status concerns only a subset of that population; it does not change a person’s birthplace. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 61 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: As used in Sections 1 to 8 of this Act, unless context otherwise requires: (1) "Applicable criminal case" means a criminal case in which the judgment requires the defendant to be confined in a secure correctional facility and the record of the case indicates that the defendant is subject to an immigration detainer or is otherwise subject to a transfer to federal custody; (2) "Federal immigration agency" means the United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Customs and Border Protection, and any other federal agency or successor agency charged with the enforcement of immigration law; (3) "Immigration detainer" means a facially sufficient written or electronic request issued by a federal immigration agency using that agency’s official form to request that another law enforcement agency detain a person because there is probable cause to believe that the person to be detained is a removable alien under federal immigration law, including detainers issued pursuant to 8 U.S.C. secs. 1226 and 1357 along with a warrant described in paragraph (b) of this subsection. For purposes of this subsection, an immigration detainer is deemed facially sufficient if: (a) The federal immigration agency’s official form is: 1. Complete and indicates on its face that the federal immigration official has probable cause to believe that the person to be detained is a removable alien under federal immigration law; or 2. Incomplete and fails to indicate on its face that the federal immigration official has probable cause to believe that the person to be detained is a removable alien under federal immigration law, but is supported by an affidavit, order, or other official documentation that indicates that the federal immigration agency has probable cause to believe that the person to be detained is a removable alien under federal immigration law; and (b) The federal immigration agency supplies with its detention request a Form I-200 Warrant for Arrest of Alien, a Form I-205 Warrant of Removal/Deportation, or a successor warrant or other warrant authorized by federal law; (4) "Inmate" means a person in the custody of a law enforcement agency; (5) "Law enforcement agency" means: (a) Any public agency that employs a police officer as defined in KRS 15.420(2)(a) or a special law enforcement officer as defined in KRS 61.900(6)(a) to (e); (b) Any public agency that is composed of or employs other public peace officers; (c) Jailers; (d) Metropolitan correctional services departments operating under KRS Chapter 67B; (e) The Department of Corrections as organized under KRS Chapter 196 or any of its subunits; (f) A campus security authority as defined in KRS 164.948 of a public institution operating under KRS Chapter 164; and (g) Any other agency in this state charged with enforcement of state, county, municipal, or federal laws or with managing custody of detained persons in this state; (6) "Local government" means a city, county, charter county government, consolidated local government, urban-county government, or unified local government; (7) "Sanctuary policy" means a law, policy, practice, procedure, or custom adopted or allowed by a state entity or local government which prohibits or impedes a law enforcement agency from complying with 8 U.S.C. sec. 1373 or which prohibits or impedes a law enforcement agency from communicating or cooperating with a federal immigration agency that acts to limit or prohibit a law enforcement agency from: (a) Complying with an immigration detainer; (b) Complying with a request from a federal immigration agency to notify the agency before the release of an inmate or detained person in the custody of the law enforcement agency; (c) Providing a federal immigration agency access to an inmate for interview; (d) Participating in any program or agreement authorized under 8 U.S.C. sec. 1357(g); or (e) Providing a federal immigration agency with an inmate’s incarceration status or release date; and (8) "State entity" means the state or any office, board, bureau, commission, department, branch, division, cabinet, or institution thereof, including public institutions operating under KRS Chapter 164. SECTION 2. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 61 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: A state entity, law enforcement agency, or local government shall not adopt or have in effect a sanctuary policy regarding aliens unlawfully present in the United States. SECTION 3. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 61 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) A law enforcement agency shall use all resources reasonably available to it to support the enforcement of federal immigration law. (2) Except as otherwise expressly prohibited by federal law, a state entity, law enforcement agency, or local government, or an employee, agent, or representative of a state entity, law enforcement agency, or local government shall not prohibit or in any way restrict a law enforcement agency from taking any of the following actions with respect to information regarding a person's immigration status: (a) Sending to or requesting, receiving, or reviewing information from a federal immigration agency for the purposes set out in Sections 1 to 8 of this Act; (b) Recording and maintaining information for the purposes set out in Sections 1 to 8 of this Act; (c) Exchanging information with a federal immigration agency or another state entity, law enforcement agency, or local government for the purposes set out in Sections 1 to 8 this Act; (d) Using information to comply with an immigration detainer; or (e) Using information to confirm the identity of a person who is detained by a law enforcement agency. (3) This section shall apply to an official, representative, agent, or employee of a state entity, law enforcement agency, or local government only when he or she is acting within the scope of his or her official duties or employment.
The historical law creates a Class B felony for carjacking by force or intimidation and prevents duplicative convictions under specified robbery or theft statutes for the same act. This is a defined robbery component of violent crime; it is not ordinary motor-vehicle theft in the property-crime series.
04/12/24: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 174). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 174) (2024-04-12). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact measures reported violent offenses per 100,000 people, with incomplete and varying agency coverage. FBI violent crime includes murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. Prevention, reporting or a specified offense concerns one component; this is distinct from homicide mortality, nonviolent offenses and all unreported crime. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 9. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 515 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) A person is guilty of carjacking when he or she takes a motor vehicle in the possession of another without lawful authority or ownership, from the possessor's person or immediate presence, or from the person or immediate presence of a passenger of the motor vehicle, against the possessor's or passenger's will and with the intent to either permanently or temporarily depr ive the possessor of the motor vehicle of his or her possession, accomplished by means of force or intimidation. (2) Carjacking is a Class B felony. (3) A person shall not be convicted of a violation of this section and a violation of KRS 515.020 or KRS Chapter 514 arising from the same act.
Kentucky House of Representatives, District 82 · R–KY
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Nick WilsonKentucky Legislature · HB 778
AN ACT relating to child welfare.
Apr 10, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Nick Wilson · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law revises child-fatality review procedures, including closed discussion with the investigating agency after final judgment or a decision not to prosecute, confidentiality, and limits on using agency employees’ statements as evidence. The connection concerns investigation and review of abuse-related child deaths; not every reviewed fatality is a homicide.
04/10/26: signed by Governor (Acts Ch.68). Latest official history entry: signed by Governor (Acts Ch.68) (2026-04-10). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact counts deaths whose underlying cause is homicide. The provision addresses a defined prevention, investigation, measurement, or homicide-offense mechanism; a general criminal penalty or post-offense benefit alone does not demonstrate homicide prevention. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Homicide deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(14) (a) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the portions of the external child fatality and near fatality review panel meetings during which an individual child fatality or near fatality case is reviewed or discussed by panel members may be a closed session and subject to the provisions of KRS 61.815(1) and shall only occur following the conclusion of an open session. At the conclusion of the closed session, the panel shall immediately convene an open session and give a summary of what occurred during the closed session. (b) The external child fatality and near fatality review panel shall develop a procedure for discussion of cases that are being reviewed by the panel with th e agency that was responsible for the investigation of the case and shall include the following requirements: 1. Any discussions about a case shall be held in a closed session; 2. Anything said by an employee of the investigating agency shall not be used a s evidence in any civil, criminal, or administrative hearing; 3. Any employee of the investigating agency may attend with the employee or employees who investigated the case being discussed; and 4. The investigating agency shall not be asked to attend unti l after final judgment was entered by the court in that case or the Commonwealth declined to prosecute the case. (15) Each member of the external child fatality and near fatality review panel, any person attending a closed panel session, and any pers on presenting information or records on an individual child fatality or near fatality shall not release information or records not available under the Kentucky Open Records Act, KRS 61.870 to 61.884 to the public.
AN ACT relating to concealed firearms and deadly weapons.
Apr 14, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Savannah Maddox · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law establishes provisional concealed-carry licenses for otherwise qualifying people age 18 through 20. Licenses last until age 21 unless suspended or revoked, and conversion to a standard license requires an application and eligibility checks. This is a licensing pathway, not a permitless-carry provision.
04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 173). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 173) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 237 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) As used in this section: (a) "Provisional license" means a license to carry concealed firearms or other deadly weapons issued pursuant to this section; and (b) "Standard license" means a license to carry concealed firearms o r other deadly weapons issued pursuant to KRS 237.110. (2) The Department of Kentucky State Police shall issue provisional licenses to carry concealed firearms or other deadly weapons, or a combination thereof, to persons who: (a) Are eighteen (18) years of age but younger than twenty-one (21) years of age; and (b) Notwithstanding KRS 237.110(4)(c), otherwise meet the criteria set forth in KRS 237.110(4) and the requirements of KRS 237.110(3). (3) (a) Except as provided in this section, the issuance and reg ulation of provisional licenses to carry concealed firearms and deadly weapons shall be governed by KRS 237.110. (b) Any reference in the Kentucky Revised Statutes to a license issued pursuant to KRS 237.110 shall also be considered a reference to a provisional license issued pursuant to this section. (4) A provisional license issued pursuant to this section shall: (a) Be valid throughout the Commonwealth and, except as provided in other specific sections of the Kentucky Revised Statutes or federal law, per mit the holder of the provisional license to carry firearms, ammunition, other deadly weapons, or a combination thereof, at any location in the Commonwealth; (b) Unless revoked or suspended as provided by law, be valid until the holder turns twenty -one (21) years of age; (c) Authorize the holder of the provisional license to carry a concealed firearm, other deadly weapon, or a combination thereof, on or about his or her person; and (d) Authorize the holder of the provisional license to carry ammunition for a firearm on or about his or her person. (5) A provisional license issued under this section shall be readily distinguishable from a standard license issued pursuant to KRS 237.110. (6) (a) Not less than ninety (90) days before the expiration of the provisional license, the Department of Kentucky State Police shall mail to the holder of the provisional license a written notice of the expiration and an application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license. The application to switch fro m a provisional license to a standard license shall be in a format prescribed by the Department of Kentucky State Police. (b) The outside of the envelope shall bear only the name and address of the applicant. No other information relating to the applicant shall appear on the outside of the envelope sent to the applicant. (c) The holder of a provisional license may apply for a standard license by: 1. Filing with the sheriff of his or her county of residence the paper application form under this subsection, o r filing with the Department of Kentucky State Police an electronic application form in lieu of a paper application form; 2. Stating that he or she remains qualified pursuant to the criteria specified in KRS 237.110(3) and (4); and ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 3. Paying an application fee prescribed by the Department of Kentucky State Police. (d) The sheriff shall issue to the applicant a receipt for the paper application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license and shall date the receipt. The Department of Kentucky S tate Police shall issue to the applicant a receipt for an electronic application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license and shall date the receipt. (e) A standard license under KRS 237.110 shall be issued to a qualified applicant upon: 1. Receipt of the completed application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license; 2. Records check as specified in KRS 237.110(3); 3. Determination that the applicant is not ineligible for a standard license as specified in KRS 237.110(4); and 4. Appropriate payment of fees. Upon issuance of the standard license, the provisional license shall be destroyed by the sheriff. (f) The holder of a provisional license who fails to submit an application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license within six (6) months of the expiration of the provisional license shall be required to submit an application under KRS 237.110. (g) A standard license issued under this subsection shall not be valid until an applicant is twenty -one (21) yea rs of age. A provisional licensee who applies for a standard license under this subsection shall not be required to retake the firearms training described in KRS 237.110(4). (7) A provisional license which has expired shall be void and shall not be valid f or any purpose other than surrender to the sheriff in exchange for a standard license. (8) The Department of Kentucky State Police may promulgate any necessary administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A to administer this section.
U.S. House of Representatives, Kentucky District 4 · R–KY
4 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Thomas MassieU.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · HR 2267
NICS Data Reporting Act of 2026
May 13, 2026 · In Congress
Rep. Thomas Massie · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The House-passed bill would require annual demographic reports on firearm-purchase denials and overturned denials in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. It concerns administration of firearm access; it has not become law.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.NICS reportNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Attorney General shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report containing, with respect to the preceding year, the demographic data of persons who were determined to be ineligible to purchase a firearm based on a background check performed by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, which shall include, disaggregated by the reason for the determination of ineligibility, the following:(1)The race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, age, disability, average annual income, and English language proficiency, if available.(2)In the case of each person whose determination of ineligibility was overturned on appeal, the race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, age, dis-ability, average annual income, and English language proficiency, if available.
The Safe Students Act would repeal the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act provision in 18 U.S.C. 922(q). This concerns firearm-location restrictions, not high-school diploma attainment.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Repeal of the gun-free school zones act of 1990 and amendments to that act (a)In generalSection 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (q). (b)Related amendments (1)Section 921(a) of such title is amended by striking paragraphs (25) through (27) and redesignating paragraphs (28), (29), and (32) through (37) as paragraphs (25) through (32), respectively. (2)Section 924(a) of such title is amended— (A)in paragraph (1)(B), by striking (k), or (q) and inserting or (k); and (B)by striking paragraph (4) and redesignating paragraphs (5) through (8) as paragraphs (4) through (7), respectively. (3) The Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 (18 U.S.C. 921 note, 922 note; section 1702 of Public Law 101–647; 104 Stat. 4844–4845) is repealed.
The SAFER Voter Act would remove the federal licensed-dealer restriction on handgun sales to people under 21 while retaining the age-18 floor. Despite its title, the reviewed provision concerns firearms rather than voting.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Minimum age for obtaining a handgun from a Federal firearms licensee(a)In generalSection 922(b)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking , and, if the firearm, or ammunition is other than a shotgun or rifle, or ammunition for a shotgun or rifle, to any individual who the licensee knows or has reasonable cause to believe is less than twenty-one years of age.(b)Conforming amendmentSection 922(c)(1) of such title is amended by striking , in the case of any firearm other than a shotgun or a rifle, I am twenty-one years or more of age, or that, in the case of a shotgun or a rifle,.
The proposal would prohibit state and local penalties or barriers to public firearm carrying by U.S. citizens otherwise eligible to possess firearms under state and federal law. Its public-place definition excludes clearly posted private-property prohibitions and places with screening under state law.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
3.The right to keep and bear arms (a)In generalSection 927 of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 927.The right to keep and bear arms (a)No State or political subdivision of a State may impose a criminal or civil penalty on, or otherwise indirectly limit the carrying of firearms (including by imposing a financial or other barrier to entry) in public by residents or nonresidents of that State who are citizens of the United States and otherwise eligible to possess firearms under State and Federal law. (b)Any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of a State or a political subdivision of a State that criminalizes, penalizes, or otherwise indirectly dissuades the carrying of firearms (including by imposing a financial or other barrier to entry) in public by any resident or nonresident who is a United States citizen and otherwise eligible to possess firearms under State and Federal law, shall have no force or effect. (c)The term State as used in this section includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the possessions of the United States (not including the Canal Zone). (d)The term public as used in this section— (1)includes any place held open to the public, regardless of ownership, but in the case of a privately-owned location held open to the public, does not include a place where the owner communicates clearly and conspicuously a prohibition of firearms on the premises; and (2)does not include a place where screening for firearms is conducted under State law.. (b)Clerical amendmentThe table of sections for such chapter is amended by striking the item relating to section 927 and inserting the following: 927. The right to keep and bear arms..
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Gerald A. NealKentucky Legislature · SB 304
AN ACT relating to firearms.
Feb 27, 2026 · Not enacted
Sen. Gerald A. Neal · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would require secure firearm storage, reporting of discovered firearm loss or theft within 24 hours, and police entry of reports in the National Crime Information Center. Ammunition sellers would also report ammunition loss or theft. The property-crime connection concerns theft reporting; simple loss is not a theft offense. The proposal did not become law.
02/27/26: to Committee on Committees (S). Latest official history entry: to Committee on Committees (S) (2026-02-27). The reviewed regular session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths · Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 237 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) As used in this section, "safe storage depository" means a safe or other secure container which, when locked, is incapable of being opened without the key, combination, or other unlocking mechanism and is capable of preventing an unauthorized person from obtaining access to and possession of its contents. (2) A person who owns or is a custodian of a firearm shall not store or otherwise leave the firearm out of his or her immediate possession or control without having first securely locked the firearm in an appropriate safe storage depository or rendered it incapable of being fired by use of a gun-locking device appropriate to that weapon. SECTION 2. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 237 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) (a) Any owner or other person lawfully in possession of a firearm who suffers the loss or theft of the firearm or any person who sells ammunition who suffers a loss or theft of ammunition shall report the facts and circumstances of the loss or theft to an appropriate law enforcement agency within twenty-four (24) hours of the discovery of the loss or theft. (b) The report required by paragraph (a) of this subsection shall contain, if known, the caliber, make, model, manufacturer’s name, and serial number, if any, and any other distinguishing number or identification mark on the firearm, or the make, type, and caliber of the ammunition. (2) A law enforcement agency that receives a report pursuant to subsection (1) of this section shall enter the reported information into the National Crime Information Center database.
Only current Kentucky officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Kentucky statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Kentucky snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Kentucky, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.