Kansas · individual fact

Kansas crime

Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and Kansas public-safety context.

Reported violent-crime rate474.7 per 100k2024 · #8 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate2,174.4 per 100k2024 · #6 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage96.1%2024 · #39 of 50 · highest first

Kansas over time

Explore Kansas readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Kansas officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Kansas effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Kansas change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Reported violent-crime rate Kansas · source units
KansasPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Reported violent-crime rate2024: 474.7 per 100k378.2 per 100k431.6 per 100k485 per 100kKansas, 2015: 404.6 per 100kKansas, 2016: 388.5 per 100kKansas, 2017: 408.9 per 100kKansas, 2018: 444.3 per 100kKansas, 2019: 430.8 per 100kKansas, 2020: 447.6 per 100kKansas, 2021: 463.1 per 100kKansas, 2022: 448.7 per 100kKansas, 2023: 435.8 per 100kKansas, 2024: 474.7 per 100k201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 38National context · Booker makes federal sentencing guidelines advisory · 2005-01-12Federal sentencingNational context · Adam Walsh Act establishes new registration standards · 2006-07-27Adam Walsh ActNational context · Survey changes disrupt the 2006 victimization comparison · 2006-12-312006 survey breakNational context · Congress strengthens firearm background-check records · 2008-01-08NICS records lawNational context · Second Chance Act expands reentry support · 2008-04-09Second Chance ActNational context · Heller recognizes an individual firearm right · 2008-06-26Heller decisionNational context · Financial crisis deepens during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Shepard–Byrd Act expands federal hate-crime law · 2009-10-28Federal hate-crime lawNational context · McDonald applies the firearm right to the states · 2010-06-28McDonald decisionNational context · Fair Sentencing Act changes federal crack penalties · 2010-08-03Fair Sentencing ActNational context · FBI expands the rape definition · 2013-01-01Rape definition expandsNational context · Violence Against Women Act reauthorized · 2013-03-07VAWA reauthorizationNational context · DOJ publishes Ferguson policing findings · 2015-03-04Ferguson investigationNational context · Murder rates rise in 2015 and 2016 · 2016-12-312015–2016 murder riseNational context · First Step Act enacted · 2018-12-21First Step ActNational context · FBI launches national use-of-force data collection · 2019-01-01Use-of-force reportingNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · George Floyd is killed by a Minneapolis police officer · 2020-05-25George Floyd killedKansas · Commission on Racial Equity and Justice · 2020-06-24Commission on Racial Equity and JusticeNational context · Murder rises sharply while property crime declines · 2020-12-312020 murder surgeNational context · FBI transitions to incident-based reporting · 2021-01-01NIBRS transitionNational context · COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act improves review and reporting · 2021-05-20Hate-crime reportingNational context · Executive order sets federal policing safeguards · 2022-05-25Federal policing orderNational context · Bruen changes the test for firearm restrictions · 2022-06-23Bruen decisionNational context · Bipartisan Safer Communities Act enacted · 2022-06-25Safer Communities ActKansas · South Central Regional Psychiatric Hospital advisory panel · 2023-08-25South Central Regional Psychiatric Hospital advisory panelNational context · FBI annual report again includes summary submissions · 2023-10-16Reporting coverage growsNational context · Vehicle theft rises while total property crime falls · 2023-12-31Vehicle-theft surgeNational context · Victimization survey tests a redesigned questionnaire · 2024-01-01NCVS redesign beginsKansas · Psychiatric-hospital panel reporting deadline amendment · 2024-05-15Psychiatric-hospital panel reporting deadline amendmentNational context · Supreme Court rejects ATF’s bump-stock classification · 2024-06-14Bump-stock rulingNational context · Rahimi upholds disarmament for a credible domestic threat · 2024-06-21Domestic-threat rulingNational context · Federal policing executive order is revoked · 2025-01-20Policing order revokedNational context · Court sustains ATF’s rule covering some firearm kits · 2025-03-26Firearm-kit rulingKansas · Kansas child-care law signed · 2025-04-24Kansas child-care law signedNational context · Executive order redirects federal law-enforcement support · 2025-04-282025 policing policyKansas · Kansas child-care law general effective date · 2025-07-01Kansas child-care law general effective dateNational context · FBI publishes 2025 annual crime estimates · 2026-08-142025 crime data release● Kansas Legislature · 3● U.S. Congress · Kansas delegation · 2◆ Governor · 1323■ Kansas agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-01-012026-08-31

18 of 18 reviewed Kansas actions match · 15 date markers shown. 38 major events shown separately.

Kansas · 2024: 474.7 per 100k · Rank #8 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Kansas coverage fell below 90% from 2016 through 2020 (87.0%–88.1%), so those five years are flagged as partial reporting. Coverage reached 90.7% in 2021 and 96.1% in 2024. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Kansas Reported violent-crime rate · source units
PeriodKansasRankU.S. benchmark
2024474.7 per 100k#8 of 50Not available
2023435.8 per 100k#14 of 50Not available
2022448.7 per 100k#13 of 50Not available
2021463.1 per 100k#11 of 50Not available
2020447.6 per 100k#15 of 50Not available
2019430.8 per 100k#14 of 50Not available
2018444.3 per 100k#15 of 50Not available
2017408.9 per 100k#20 of 50Not available
2016388.5 per 100k#21 of 50Not available
2015404.6 per 100k#20 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Kansas · state comparison

Reported crime over time

Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.

Kansas · 2024474.7 per 100k
Kansas rank#8among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Reported violent-crime rate

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Kansas coverage fell below 90% from 2016 through 2020 (87.0%–88.1%), so those five years are flagged as partial reporting. Coverage reached 90.7% in 2021 and 96.1% in 2024. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kansas
Reported violent-crime rate history in Kansas375.6 per 100k431.6 per 100k487.6 per 100k20152024
2024 · Kansas: 474.7 per 100k · Rank #8 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kansas Reported violent-crime rate history
PeriodKansasCompare
2015404.6 per 100k
2016388.5 per 100k
2017408.9 per 100k
2018444.3 per 100k
2019430.8 per 100k
2020447.6 per 100k
2021463.1 per 100k
2022448.7 per 100k
2023435.8 per 100k
2024474.7 per 100k

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · 474.7 per 100k2024 · Rank #8 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Mexico744.7 per 100k—
#2Alaska731.9 per 100k—
#3Tennessee604.3 per 100k—
#4Arkansas589.6 per 100k—
#5*Louisiana504.5 per 100k82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6Colorado486.8 per 100k—
#7California478.4 per 100k—
#8Kansas · your comparison474.7 per 100k—
#9Missouri472.7 per 100k—
#10Michigan442.6 per 100k—
#11South Carolina440.8 per 100k—
#12Arizona433 per 100k—
#13Oklahoma429.3 per 100k—
#14Montana428 per 100k—
#15Maryland425.9 per 100k—
#16Nevada408.6 per 100k—
#17Texas397.8 per 100k—
#18New York392.2 per 100k—
#19North Carolina382.9 per 100k—
#20Alabama380.8 per 100k—
#21Delaware368.4 per 100k—
#22*South Dakota356.9 per 100k89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*Indiana349.2 per 100k87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24Oregon341.1 per 100k—
#25Washington331.8 per 100k—
#26Georgia328 per 100k—
#27Massachusetts317.9 per 100k—
#28Ohio311.9 per 100k—
#29Illinois294.5 per 100k—
#30Wisconsin287.6 per 100k—
#31West Virginia263.8 per 100k—
#32*Florida262 per 100k81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33Minnesota259.4 per 100k—
#34North Dakota258 per 100k—
#35Pennsylvania251.3 per 100k—
#36Iowa247.2 per 100k—
#37Utah237.8 per 100k—
#38Idaho236.6 per 100k—
#39Hawaii230.3 per 100k—
#40Vermont227.1 per 100k—
#41Kentucky226.7 per 100k—
#42Nebraska224.6 per 100k—
#43Virginia223.7 per 100k—
#44New Jersey221.9 per 100k—
#45*Mississippi219.6 per 100k65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*Wyoming212.5 per 100k89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47Rhode Island154.9 per 100k—
#48Connecticut139.2 per 100k—
#49New Hampshire112.3 per 100k—
#50Maine102.6 per 100k—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Reported violent-crime rate

474.7 per 100,0002024

Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • Kansas coverage fell below 90% from 2016 through 2020 (87.0%–88.1%), so those five years are flagged as partial reporting. Coverage reached 90.7% in 2021 and 96.1% in 2024.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 96.1%; this is not complete statewide reporting.

Reported property-crime rate

2,174.4 per 100,0002024

Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • Kansas coverage fell below 90% from 2016 through 2020 (87.0%–88.1%), so those five years are flagged as partial reporting. Coverage reached 90.7% in 2021 and 96.1% in 2024.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 96.1%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Kansas · state comparison

Firearm mortality

Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.

Kansas · 2024446
Kansas rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Firearm deaths

Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.

Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · 4462024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas4,389—
#2Florida3,191—
#3California2,853—
#4Georgia1,985—
#5North Carolina1,835—
#6Ohio1,745—
#7Pennsylvania1,624—
#8Illinois1,563—
#9Tennessee1,448—
#10Arizona1,331—
#11Missouri1,234—
#12Michigan1,228—
#13Alabama1,212—
#14Indiana1,196—
#15Virginia1,153—
#16South Carolina1,064—
#17Louisiana1,031—
#18Colorado961—
#19Washington915—
#20New York896—
#21Kentucky870—
#22Mississippi810—
#23Oklahoma794—
#24Wisconsin735—
#25Maryland716—
#26Oregon663—
#27Arkansas638—
#28Minnesota582—
#28Nevada582—
#30New Mexico563—
#31Utah454—
#32Kansas · your comparison446—
#33New Jersey393—
#34Iowa389—
#35Idaho331—
#36Massachusetts287—
#37West Virginia281—
#38Montana247—
#39Connecticut224—
#40Nebraska218—
#41Alaska182—
#42Maine181—
#43South Dakota159—
#44New Hampshire152—
#45Wyoming143—
#46Delaware123—
#47North Dakota95—
#48Vermont76—
#49Hawaii56—
#50Rhode Island55—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Firearm deaths

4462024 final data

Deaths in which firearm injury was recorded as the underlying cause, with the rate age-adjusted per 100,000 residents.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Population-adjusted measure

Age-adjusted firearm death rate
15.2 per 100,000
Method and limitations

CDC National Vital Statistics System death-certificate data published through CDC WONDER and Stats of the States.

  • The total combines firearm homicides, suicides, accidents, legal-intervention deaths, and deaths of undetermined intent.
  • Mortality data do not measure nonfatal firearm injuries, defensive uses, gun ownership, or the effect of any specific policy.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s Kansas candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

18 statements from 7 candidates

2026 Kansas Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 7 statements

Chris Mann

7 statements

Democratic · Attorney General · KS

Policing & criminal justice context

The Attorney General’s office hosts training for local law enforcement throughout the year. Most of these are held in Topeka, and many of the smaller departments across Kansas cannot afford to send their staff without sacrificing emergency response coverage in their communities. As Attorney General,…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce development

Candidate campaign source

The Attorney General’s office hosts training for local law enforcement throughout the year. Most of these are held in Topeka, and many of the smaller departments across Kansas cannot afford to send their staff without sacrificing emergency response coverage in their communities. As Attorney General, Chris will commit to hosting training sessions throughout the state and expanding online options to increase access for all of our law enforcement, not just those in the northeast corner.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Chris Mann — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 6 more statements from Chris Mann
Policing & criminal justice context

As Chris has traveled the state, he has heard from local law enforcement that the number of drug cases in their communities has skyrocketed. As Attorney General, Chris will work to increase access to resources and strengthen intercounty cooperation and coordination to ensure law enforcement has the …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice

Candidate campaign source

As Chris has traveled the state, he has heard from local law enforcement that the number of drug cases in their communities has skyrocketed. As Attorney General, Chris will work to increase access to resources and strengthen intercounty cooperation and coordination to ensure law enforcement has the resources needed to investigate and prosecute these crimes and get dangerous drugs off our streets.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Chris Mann — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

As Attorney General, Chris will hold quarterly meetings across the state with all local law enforcement leaders to increase communication and identify emerging crime trends that may require additional resources or support. These meetings will be held in every corner of the state and online to reduce…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice

Candidate campaign source

As Attorney General, Chris will hold quarterly meetings across the state with all local law enforcement leaders to increase communication and identify emerging crime trends that may require additional resources or support. These meetings will be held in every corner of the state and online to reduce barriers to law enforcement getting the support they need.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Chris Mann — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

Chris will partner with federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies to share intelligence and strengthen the state-level approach to fraud and scam prevention, particularly when it comes to the rise in cybercrimes. Working in collaboration with other agencies will streamline the Office of the…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice

Candidate campaign source

Chris will partner with federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies to share intelligence and strengthen the state-level approach to fraud and scam prevention, particularly when it comes to the rise in cybercrimes. Working in collaboration with other agencies will streamline the Office of the Attorney General’s ability to investigate when Kansans report scams and stop them before more money is lost.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Chris Mann — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

Chris will work with the Elder and Dependent Adult Abuse Prevention Council, which is part of the Attorney General’s office, to develop recommendations for relevant state agencies and law enforcement to improve statewide fraud education and training on identifying and prosecuting these cases.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce development

Candidate campaign source

Chris will work with the Elder and Dependent Adult Abuse Prevention Council, which is part of the Attorney General’s office, to develop recommendations for relevant state agencies and law enforcement to improve statewide fraud education and training on identifying and prosecuting these cases.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Chris Mann — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

The Attorney General’s office has a Victims Services division dedicated to supporting victims and survivors throughout Kansas through state and local programs aimed at reducing violence and providing aid. This includes more than $2.5 million in annual grants to provide direct resources to victims an…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Address rising domestic violence lethality

Candidate campaign source

The Attorney General’s office has a Victims Services division dedicated to supporting victims and survivors throughout Kansas through state and local programs aimed at reducing violence and providing aid. This includes more than $2.5 million in annual grants to provide direct resources to victims and develop community-level violence prevention programs. As Attorney General, Chris will work diligently to ensure these resources are allocated as efficiently as possible so our local shelters receive the support they need to protect survivors.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Chris Mann — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

There has been a dramatic spike in overdose cases throughout our state, and more than 2,000 Kansans have died from fentanyl overdoses. As Attorney General, Chris will be laser-focused on public safety solutions that confront this crisis head-on, including targeting drug traffickers, supporting local…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and public health

Candidate campaign source

There has been a dramatic spike in overdose cases throughout our state, and more than 2,000 Kansans have died from fentanyl overdoses. As Attorney General, Chris will be laser-focused on public safety solutions that confront this crisis head-on, including targeting drug traffickers, supporting local and state law enforcement in getting dangerous drugs off our streets, ensuring all communities have Naloxone readily available, and strengthening prevention and treatment programs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Chris Mann — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Kansas Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Ty Masterson

1 statement

Republican · Governor · KS

Crime & victimization

Violent crime is rising — and weak leaders look the other way. I’ll fund the police and fight for safer streets across Kansas.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice

Candidate campaign source

Violent crime is rising — and weak leaders look the other way. I’ll fund the police and fight for safer streets across Kansas.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Ty Masterson — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

2026 Kansas Secretary of State — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Pat Proctor

2 statements

Republican · Secretary of State · KS

Policing & criminal justice context

In addition to chairing the House Elections Committee, I am also an assistant professor at Wichita State University teaching courses on the threats to our homeland and the techniques we can employ to secure the operations of our Kansas government. New challenges arise constantly from nefarious forei…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Elections, ethics, and government accountability

Candidate campaign source

In addition to chairing the House Elections Committee, I am also an assistant professor at Wichita State University teaching courses on the threats to our homeland and the techniques we can employ to secure the operations of our Kansas government. New challenges arise constantly from nefarious foreign and domestic actors to affect the integrity of our elections. As Secretary of State I will be ever vigilant regarding these threats and know how to effectively engage law enforcement and our partners in other states and the federal government. I am also a member of the U.S. Elections Assistance Commission Board of Advisors, providing input on national election security matters. And, as the Chairman of the Kansas Security Committee, I provide oversight of the state’s efforts to secure critical infrastructure and keep Kansans safe

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Pat Proctor — candidate-owned primary source ↗
View 1 more statement from Pat Proctor
Policing & criminal justice context

Continuously assess foreign and domestic election threats and coordinate with law enforcement and state and federal partners.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Election Security

Candidate campaign source

Continuously assess foreign and domestic election threats and coordinate with law enforcement and state and federal partners.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Pat Proctor — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published Kansas candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Kansas incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Kansas legislators and Kansas’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Kansas’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

43 matching sponsorships or proposals · 41 Kansas incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Allen Reavis

Kansas House of Representatives, District 63 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Allen Reavis
Kansas Legislature · HB 2444

Providing that jail credit when consecutive sentences are imposed shall not apply to more than one case, creating special sentencing rules when a felony is committed by certain offenders while on probation, parole or postrelease supervision for a prior felony and requiring secured minimum bonds for certain defendants who commit a new felony while on probation, parole, postrelease supervision or bond for a prior felony unless the court makes certain findings.

Apr 6, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Kyle McNorton · Sponsored / Rep. Avery Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Bradley Barrett · Sponsored / Rep. Doug Blex · Sponsored / Rep. Lewis "Bill" Bloom · Sponsored / Rep. Lauren Bohi · Sponsored / Rep. Sherri Brantley · Sponsored / Rep. Ron Bryce · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Butler · Sponsored / Rep. Carolyn Caiharr · Sponsored / Rep. Shawn Chauncey · Sponsored / Rep. Kenneth Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Duane Droge · Sponsored / Rep. Ronald Ellis · Sponsored / Rep. Dale Helwig · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Marty Long · Sponsored / Rep. Jim Minnix · Sponsored / Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. Allen Reavis · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Rhiley · Sponsored / Rep. Angelina Roeser · Sponsored / Rep. Webster T. Roth · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney Sappington · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Schwertfeger · Sponsored / Rep. Joe Seiwert · Sponsored / Rep. Chuck Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Megan Steele · Sponsored / Rep. Angela Stiens · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Sutton · Sponsored / Rep. Sean Tarwater · Sponsored / Rep. Chip VanHouden · Sponsored / Rep. Barb Wasinger · Sponsored / Rep. Gary White · Sponsored / Rep. Kristey Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Greg Wilson · Sponsored / Rep. Dawn Wolf · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed section 1(d) of HB 2444 provides that a day of custody attributable to more than one case is credited only once against consecutive sentences, while allowing allocation among cases. It states application to sentences before, on or after July 1, 2026 and specified pending or later proceedings. Sentence credit concerns time in custody; the provision does not quantify the KDOC population.

Approved by Governor on Monday, April 6, 2026. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact counts adults in KDOC facilities at a point in time. Sentence-credit and parole rules concern time in custody or release; county jails, juvenile detention, federal custody and people on parole are outside the reported facility count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Adults in state correctional facilities. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(d) (1) When consecutive sentences are imposed on a defendant, days spent in custody that are attributable to more than one case shall be credited only once against the aggregated consecutive term. The sentencing court may allocate such days to one case or apportion such days among cases, but the same days shall not be applied more than once to reduce multiple portions of consecutive terms. (2) The provisions of this subsection shall apply to: (A) All sentences, whether pronounced before, on or after July 1, 2026, and to all computations of jail credit by the department of HOUSE BILL No. 2444—page 2 corrections and the courts; and (B) any case posture, including, but not limited to, direct appeals, probation revocation proceedings, motions to correct illegal sentence, habeas corpus actions and actions under K.S.A. 60-1507, and amendments thereto, pending on or filed after July 1, 2026. (3) Any judicial interpretations regarding application of jail time credit to consecutive sentences in conflict with or inconsistent with this section and the amendments to this section by this act are superseded to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Angela Stiens

Kansas House of Representatives, District 39 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Angela Stiens
Kansas Legislature · HB 2444

Providing that jail credit when consecutive sentences are imposed shall not apply to more than one case, creating special sentencing rules when a felony is committed by certain offenders while on probation, parole or postrelease supervision for a prior felony and requiring secured minimum bonds for certain defendants who commit a new felony while on probation, parole, postrelease supervision or bond for a prior felony unless the court makes certain findings.

Apr 6, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Kyle McNorton · Sponsored / Rep. Avery Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Bradley Barrett · Sponsored / Rep. Doug Blex · Sponsored / Rep. Lewis "Bill" Bloom · Sponsored / Rep. Lauren Bohi · Sponsored / Rep. Sherri Brantley · Sponsored / Rep. Ron Bryce · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Butler · Sponsored / Rep. Carolyn Caiharr · Sponsored / Rep. Shawn Chauncey · Sponsored / Rep. Kenneth Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Duane Droge · Sponsored / Rep. Ronald Ellis · Sponsored / Rep. Dale Helwig · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Marty Long · Sponsored / Rep. Jim Minnix · Sponsored / Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. Allen Reavis · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Rhiley · Sponsored / Rep. Angelina Roeser · Sponsored / Rep. Webster T. Roth · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney Sappington · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Schwertfeger · Sponsored / Rep. Joe Seiwert · Sponsored / Rep. Chuck Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Megan Steele · Sponsored / Rep. Angela Stiens · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Sutton · Sponsored / Rep. Sean Tarwater · Sponsored / Rep. Chip VanHouden · Sponsored / Rep. Barb Wasinger · Sponsored / Rep. Gary White · Sponsored / Rep. Kristey Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Greg Wilson · Sponsored / Rep. Dawn Wolf · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed section 1(d) of HB 2444 provides that a day of custody attributable to more than one case is credited only once against consecutive sentences, while allowing allocation among cases. It states application to sentences before, on or after July 1, 2026 and specified pending or later proceedings. Sentence credit concerns time in custody; the provision does not quantify the KDOC population.

Approved by Governor on Monday, April 6, 2026. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact counts adults in KDOC facilities at a point in time. Sentence-credit and parole rules concern time in custody or release; county jails, juvenile detention, federal custody and people on parole are outside the reported facility count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Adults in state correctional facilities. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(d) (1) When consecutive sentences are imposed on a defendant, days spent in custody that are attributable to more than one case shall be credited only once against the aggregated consecutive term. The sentencing court may allocate such days to one case or apportion such days among cases, but the same days shall not be applied more than once to reduce multiple portions of consecutive terms. (2) The provisions of this subsection shall apply to: (A) All sentences, whether pronounced before, on or after July 1, 2026, and to all computations of jail credit by the department of HOUSE BILL No. 2444—page 2 corrections and the courts; and (B) any case posture, including, but not limited to, direct appeals, probation revocation proceedings, motions to correct illegal sentence, habeas corpus actions and actions under K.S.A. 60-1507, and amendments thereto, pending on or filed after July 1, 2026. (3) Any judicial interpretations regarding application of jail time credit to consecutive sentences in conflict with or inconsistent with this section and the amendments to this section by this act are superseded to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Angelina Roeser

Kansas House of Representatives, District 67 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Angelina Roeser
Kansas Legislature · HB 2444

Providing that jail credit when consecutive sentences are imposed shall not apply to more than one case, creating special sentencing rules when a felony is committed by certain offenders while on probation, parole or postrelease supervision for a prior felony and requiring secured minimum bonds for certain defendants who commit a new felony while on probation, parole, postrelease supervision or bond for a prior felony unless the court makes certain findings.

Apr 6, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Kyle McNorton · Sponsored / Rep. Avery Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Bradley Barrett · Sponsored / Rep. Doug Blex · Sponsored / Rep. Lewis "Bill" Bloom · Sponsored / Rep. Lauren Bohi · Sponsored / Rep. Sherri Brantley · Sponsored / Rep. Ron Bryce · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Butler · Sponsored / Rep. Carolyn Caiharr · Sponsored / Rep. Shawn Chauncey · Sponsored / Rep. Kenneth Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Duane Droge · Sponsored / Rep. Ronald Ellis · Sponsored / Rep. Dale Helwig · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Marty Long · Sponsored / Rep. Jim Minnix · Sponsored / Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. Allen Reavis · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Rhiley · Sponsored / Rep. Angelina Roeser · Sponsored / Rep. Webster T. Roth · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney Sappington · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Schwertfeger · Sponsored / Rep. Joe Seiwert · Sponsored / Rep. Chuck Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Megan Steele · Sponsored / Rep. Angela Stiens · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Sutton · Sponsored / Rep. Sean Tarwater · Sponsored / Rep. Chip VanHouden · Sponsored / Rep. Barb Wasinger · Sponsored / Rep. Gary White · Sponsored / Rep. Kristey Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Greg Wilson · Sponsored / Rep. Dawn Wolf · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed section 1(d) of HB 2444 provides that a day of custody attributable to more than one case is credited only once against consecutive sentences, while allowing allocation among cases. It states application to sentences before, on or after July 1, 2026 and specified pending or later proceedings. Sentence credit concerns time in custody; the provision does not quantify the KDOC population.

Approved by Governor on Monday, April 6, 2026. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact counts adults in KDOC facilities at a point in time. Sentence-credit and parole rules concern time in custody or release; county jails, juvenile detention, federal custody and people on parole are outside the reported facility count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Adults in state correctional facilities. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(d) (1) When consecutive sentences are imposed on a defendant, days spent in custody that are attributable to more than one case shall be credited only once against the aggregated consecutive term. The sentencing court may allocate such days to one case or apportion such days among cases, but the same days shall not be applied more than once to reduce multiple portions of consecutive terms. (2) The provisions of this subsection shall apply to: (A) All sentences, whether pronounced before, on or after July 1, 2026, and to all computations of jail credit by the department of HOUSE BILL No. 2444—page 2 corrections and the courts; and (B) any case posture, including, but not limited to, direct appeals, probation revocation proceedings, motions to correct illegal sentence, habeas corpus actions and actions under K.S.A. 60-1507, and amendments thereto, pending on or filed after July 1, 2026. (3) Any judicial interpretations regarding application of jail time credit to consecutive sentences in conflict with or inconsistent with this section and the amendments to this section by this act are superseded to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Avery Anderson

Kansas House of Representatives, District 72 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Avery Anderson
Kansas Legislature · HB 2444

Providing that jail credit when consecutive sentences are imposed shall not apply to more than one case, creating special sentencing rules when a felony is committed by certain offenders while on probation, parole or postrelease supervision for a prior felony and requiring secured minimum bonds for certain defendants who commit a new felony while on probation, parole, postrelease supervision or bond for a prior felony unless the court makes certain findings.

Apr 6, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Kyle McNorton · Sponsored / Rep. Avery Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Bradley Barrett · Sponsored / Rep. Doug Blex · Sponsored / Rep. Lewis "Bill" Bloom · Sponsored / Rep. Lauren Bohi · Sponsored / Rep. Sherri Brantley · Sponsored / Rep. Ron Bryce · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Butler · Sponsored / Rep. Carolyn Caiharr · Sponsored / Rep. Shawn Chauncey · Sponsored / Rep. Kenneth Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Duane Droge · Sponsored / Rep. Ronald Ellis · Sponsored / Rep. Dale Helwig · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Marty Long · Sponsored / Rep. Jim Minnix · Sponsored / Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. Allen Reavis · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Rhiley · Sponsored / Rep. Angelina Roeser · Sponsored / Rep. Webster T. Roth · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney Sappington · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Schwertfeger · Sponsored / Rep. Joe Seiwert · Sponsored / Rep. Chuck Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Megan Steele · Sponsored / Rep. Angela Stiens · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Sutton · Sponsored / Rep. Sean Tarwater · Sponsored / Rep. Chip VanHouden · Sponsored / Rep. Barb Wasinger · Sponsored / Rep. Gary White · Sponsored / Rep. Kristey Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Greg Wilson · Sponsored / Rep. Dawn Wolf · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed section 1(d) of HB 2444 provides that a day of custody attributable to more than one case is credited only once against consecutive sentences, while allowing allocation among cases. It states application to sentences before, on or after July 1, 2026 and specified pending or later proceedings. Sentence credit concerns time in custody; the provision does not quantify the KDOC population.

Approved by Governor on Monday, April 6, 2026. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact counts adults in KDOC facilities at a point in time. Sentence-credit and parole rules concern time in custody or release; county jails, juvenile detention, federal custody and people on parole are outside the reported facility count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Adults in state correctional facilities. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(d) (1) When consecutive sentences are imposed on a defendant, days spent in custody that are attributable to more than one case shall be credited only once against the aggregated consecutive term. The sentencing court may allocate such days to one case or apportion such days among cases, but the same days shall not be applied more than once to reduce multiple portions of consecutive terms. (2) The provisions of this subsection shall apply to: (A) All sentences, whether pronounced before, on or after July 1, 2026, and to all computations of jail credit by the department of HOUSE BILL No. 2444—page 2 corrections and the courts; and (B) any case posture, including, but not limited to, direct appeals, probation revocation proceedings, motions to correct illegal sentence, habeas corpus actions and actions under K.S.A. 60-1507, and amendments thereto, pending on or filed after July 1, 2026. (3) Any judicial interpretations regarding application of jail time credit to consecutive sentences in conflict with or inconsistent with this section and the amendments to this section by this act are superseded to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Barb Wasinger

Kansas House of Representatives, District 111 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Barb Wasinger
Kansas Legislature · HB 2444

Providing that jail credit when consecutive sentences are imposed shall not apply to more than one case, creating special sentencing rules when a felony is committed by certain offenders while on probation, parole or postrelease supervision for a prior felony and requiring secured minimum bonds for certain defendants who commit a new felony while on probation, parole, postrelease supervision or bond for a prior felony unless the court makes certain findings.

Apr 6, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Kyle McNorton · Sponsored / Rep. Avery Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Bradley Barrett · Sponsored / Rep. Doug Blex · Sponsored / Rep. Lewis "Bill" Bloom · Sponsored / Rep. Lauren Bohi · Sponsored / Rep. Sherri Brantley · Sponsored / Rep. Ron Bryce · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Butler · Sponsored / Rep. Carolyn Caiharr · Sponsored / Rep. Shawn Chauncey · Sponsored / Rep. Kenneth Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Duane Droge · Sponsored / Rep. Ronald Ellis · Sponsored / Rep. Dale Helwig · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Marty Long · Sponsored / Rep. Jim Minnix · Sponsored / Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. Allen Reavis · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Rhiley · Sponsored / Rep. Angelina Roeser · Sponsored / Rep. Webster T. Roth · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney Sappington · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Schwertfeger · Sponsored / Rep. Joe Seiwert · Sponsored / Rep. Chuck Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Megan Steele · Sponsored / Rep. Angela Stiens · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Sutton · Sponsored / Rep. Sean Tarwater · Sponsored / Rep. Chip VanHouden · Sponsored / Rep. Barb Wasinger · Sponsored / Rep. Gary White · Sponsored / Rep. Kristey Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Greg Wilson · Sponsored / Rep. Dawn Wolf · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed section 1(d) of HB 2444 provides that a day of custody attributable to more than one case is credited only once against consecutive sentences, while allowing allocation among cases. It states application to sentences before, on or after July 1, 2026 and specified pending or later proceedings. Sentence credit concerns time in custody; the provision does not quantify the KDOC population.

Approved by Governor on Monday, April 6, 2026. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact counts adults in KDOC facilities at a point in time. Sentence-credit and parole rules concern time in custody or release; county jails, juvenile detention, federal custody and people on parole are outside the reported facility count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Adults in state correctional facilities. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(d) (1) When consecutive sentences are imposed on a defendant, days spent in custody that are attributable to more than one case shall be credited only once against the aggregated consecutive term. The sentencing court may allocate such days to one case or apportion such days among cases, but the same days shall not be applied more than once to reduce multiple portions of consecutive terms. (2) The provisions of this subsection shall apply to: (A) All sentences, whether pronounced before, on or after July 1, 2026, and to all computations of jail credit by the department of HOUSE BILL No. 2444—page 2 corrections and the courts; and (B) any case posture, including, but not limited to, direct appeals, probation revocation proceedings, motions to correct illegal sentence, habeas corpus actions and actions under K.S.A. 60-1507, and amendments thereto, pending on or filed after July 1, 2026. (3) Any judicial interpretations regarding application of jail time credit to consecutive sentences in conflict with or inconsistent with this section and the amendments to this section by this act are superseded to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Barbara Ballard

Kansas House of Representatives, District 44 · D–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Barbara Ballard
Kansas Legislature · HB 2198

Enacting the gun violence restraining order act to authorize the issuance of protective orders prohibiting the acquisition and possession of firearms by certain individuals.

Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee

Rep. Barbara Ballard · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2198 would allow courts to issue firearm restraining orders when the specified risk-of-injury standards are met, barring purchase or possession for up to one year and permitting firearm seizure. The reviewed provisions distinguish ordinary orders from orders without notice and provide a route to seek a hearing. The bill died in committee.

Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide and other intents. Firearm regulation or storage concerns a possible component of injury prevention; it does not establish a change in deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 3. (a) In an action under section 2, and amendments thereto, the court may issue a gun violence restraining order if the court determines that there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant poses a significant risk of personal injury to self or others by possessing a firearm. In determining whether reasonable cause exists, the court shall consider all of the following: (1) Testimony, documents, or other evidence offered in support of the request for the gun violence restraining order; (2) whether the defendant has previously inflicted or threatened to inflict personal injury on self or others; and (3) any other facts that the court believes are relevant. (b) If the plaintiff in an action filed under section 2, and amendments thereto, is not an individual described in section (2)(a)(1) through (6), and amendments thereto, the court shall not issue the gun violence restraining order unless the court determines that the plaintiff has a close enough relationship with the defendant to justify the issuance of the order. (c) The court in an action under section 2, and amendments thereto, may issue a gun violence restraining order without written or oral notice to the defendant if the court determines that clear and convincing evidence has been submitted under oath or affirmation that irreparable injury will result from the delay required to effectuate notice or that the notice will 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 HB 2198 3 itself precipitate adverse action before a gun violence restraining order can be issued. (d) A restrained individual under an order issued under subsection (c) may file a motion to modify or rescind the order and request a hearing. The motion to modify or rescind the order must be filed within 14 days after the order is served on the restrained individual or after the restrained individual receives actual notice of the order, unless good cause is shown for filing the motion after the 14 days have elapsed. (e) The court shall conduct a hearing on a motion under subsection (d) within 14 days after the motion is filed. If the restrained individual is an individual described in section 2(d), and amendments thereto, the court shall conduct a hearing on a motion under subsection (d) within five days after the motion is filed. Sec. 4. (a) If the court determines under section 3, and amendments thereto, that a gun violence restraining order is to be issued, the court shall include all of the following provisions in the order: (1) That the restrained individual shall not purchase or possess a firearm; (2) a statement that the restrained individual may file a motion to modify or rescind the order and request a hearing within 14 days after the restrained individual is served with or receives actual notice of the order and that motion forms and filing instructions are available from the clerk of the court, if such order is issued under section 3, and amendments thereto; (3) a statement that violation of the order will subject the restrained individual to immediate arrest and the civil and criminal contempt powers of the court; and (4) an expiration date that is not more than one year from the date of issuance. (b) In the discretion of the court, a gun violence restraining order may include an order to a law enforcement agency to seize firearms in the possession of the restrained individual. An order issued under this subsection shall specifically describe the firearms to be seized. The court may also order that a law enforcement agency seizing firearms under this subsection may seize any other firearms discovered that belong to or are in the possession of the restrained individual. (c) A gun violence restraining order is effective and enforceable immediately after it is served on the restrained individual or after the restrained individual receives actual notice of the order. The order may be enforced anywhere in this state by a law enforcement agency that receives a true copy of the order, is shown a copy of it or has verified its existence.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Kansas officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Kansas statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.