Home values, gross rent, homeownership, housing cost burdens, and the pressure from prices and incomes.
Median owner-occupied home value$218.2K2020–2024 · #40 of 50 · highest first
Median gross rent$1.06K2020–2024 · #37 of 50 · highest first
Homeownership rate70.6%2020–2024 · #12 of 50 · highest first
Indiana over time
Explore Indiana readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Indiana officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Indiana effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Indiana change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Home-price growth since 2016 Indiana · source units
IndianaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
15 of 15 reviewed Indiana actions match · 14 date markers shown. 29 major events shown separately.
Indiana · 2025: +94.5% · Rank #15 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available
FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016. This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Indiana Home-price growth since 2016 · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Indiana · state comparison
Home values, rent, and homeownership
Census values are estimates for occupied housing, rather than current listing or sale prices.
Indiana · 2020–2024$218,200
Indiana rank#40among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$332,700Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Median owner-occupied home value
Median reported value of owner-occupied housing.
2024 dollars; a higher value can benefit owners and make buying harder.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Indiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Indiana has a dark outline.
Lower value · $162.6KHigher value · $839.1KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Indiana · $218,2002020–2024 · Rank #40 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Indiana with every state · 50 ranked
Median owner-occupied home value · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$839,100
—
#2
California
$734,700
—
#3
Washington
$564,600
—
#4
Massachusetts
$562,100
—
#5
Colorado
$539,400
—
#6
Utah
$489,400
—
#7
Oregon
$477,600
—
#8
New Jersey
$454,400
—
#9
Nevada
$435,400
—
#10
New York
$423,800
—
#11
Maryland
$419,900
—
#12
Idaho
$418,600
—
#13
Rhode Island
$404,200
—
#14
New Hampshire
$402,500
—
#15
Arizona
$394,500
—
#16
Virginia
$383,700
—
#17
Montana
$375,800
—
#18
Connecticut
$366,900
—
#19
Florida
$359,000
—
#20
Alaska
$352,900
—
#21
Delaware
$352,000
—
#22
Minnesota
$329,300
—
#23
Vermont
$316,600
—
#24
Wyoming
$309,700
—
#25
Georgia
$303,300
—
#26
Maine
$296,600
—
#27
North Carolina
$288,900
—
#28
Tennessee
$286,700
—
#29
Texas
$283,800
—
#30
Wisconsin
$266,500
—
#31
Illinois
$263,300
—
#32
South Carolina
$259,000
—
#33
South Dakota
$257,400
—
#34
Pennsylvania
$254,500
—
#35
North Dakota
$249,900
—
#36
New Mexico
$248,100
—
#37
Nebraska
$238,600
—
#38
Michigan
$231,600
—
#39
Missouri
$230,300
—
#40
Indiana · your comparison
$218,200
—
#41
Kansas
$217,200
—
#42
Louisiana
$216,500
—
#43
Ohio
$214,800
—
#44
Alabama
$209,900
—
#45
Iowa
$208,000
—
#46
Kentucky
$205,600
—
#47
Oklahoma
$199,800
—
#48
Arkansas
$188,000
—
#49
Mississippi
$169,800
—
#50
West Virginia
$162,600
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Median monthly gross rent for renter-occupied housing units paying cash rent, including contract rent plus estimated average utility and fuel costs paid by the renter.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate and expressed in 2024 dollars.
This is a multi-year statewide estimate, not a current asking-rent measure.
The median obscures differences by location, unit size, housing quality, and renter circumstances.
Compare moderate-or-severe and severe housing cost burdens for three distinct housing groups.
Indiana · 2020–202448.1%
Indiana rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark51.1%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Renters · spending at least 30% of income
Housing costs as a share of household income, excluding households for which a ratio cannot be computed.
Renters and owners have separate denominators. Ratios use the Census computed-income universe.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Indiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Indiana has a dark outline.
Lower value · 38.9%Higher value · 60.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Indiana · 48.1%2020–2024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Indiana with every state · 50 ranked
Renters · spending at least 30% of income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Florida
60.1%
—
#2
Hawaii
56.7%
—
#3
Nevada
55.9%
—
#4
California
55.3%
—
#5
Louisiana
54.8%
—
#6
Colorado
52.9%
—
#7
Connecticut
52.6%
—
#8
Oregon
52.5%
—
#9
Georgia
52.4%
—
#10
South Carolina
52.1%
—
#11
New York
52.1%
—
#12
Massachusetts
51.8%
—
#13
Texas
51.7%
—
#14
New Jersey
51.6%
—
#15
Maryland
51.5%
—
#16
Arizona
51.4%
—
#17
Mississippi
51.3%
—
#18
Michigan
50.4%
—
#19
New Mexico
50.2%
—
#20
Washington
49.9%
—
#21
Delaware
49.6%
—
#22
North Carolina
48.9%
—
#23
West Virginia
48.9%
—
#24
Tennessee
48.8%
—
#25
Alabama
48.8%
—
#26
Virginia
48.5%
—
#27
Maine
48.4%
—
#28
Vermont
48.4%
—
#29
New Hampshire
48.2%
—
#30
Pennsylvania
48.2%
—
#31
Minnesota
48.1%
—
#32
Indiana · your comparison
48.1%
—
#33
Rhode Island
48%
—
#34
Illinois
47.9%
—
#35
Utah
47.2%
—
#36
Idaho
46.9%
—
#37
Oklahoma
46.3%
—
#38
Ohio
45.9%
—
#39
Missouri
45.6%
—
#40
Kentucky
45.4%
—
#41
Nebraska
45.1%
—
#42
Arkansas
44.8%
—
#43
Montana
44.8%
—
#44
Alaska
44.6%
—
#45
Iowa
43.9%
—
#46
Wisconsin
43.7%
—
#47
Kansas
43.5%
—
#48
Wyoming
43.1%
—
#49
South Dakota
39.8%
—
#50
North Dakota
38.9%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Both series start at 100 in 2016. The gap describes price pressure; it is not a mortgage payment or a price-to-income ratio.
Indiana · 2025+94.5%
Indiana rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Home-price growth since 2016
FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016.
This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Indiana
2025 · Indiana: +94.5% · Rank #15 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Indiana Home-price growth since 2016 history
Period
Indiana
Compare
2016
+0%
2017
+3.9%
2018
+10.1%
2019
+16.3%
2020
+23%
2021
+39.7%
2022
+60.7%
2023
+72.5%
2024
+83.8%
2025
+94.5%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Indiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Indiana has a dark outline.
Lower value · +38.2%Higher value · +141.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Indiana · +94.5%2025 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at the index base (0% growth); #1 means the highest value.
Compare Indiana with every state · 50 ranked
Home-price growth since 2016 · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Idaho
+141.7%
—
#2
Florida
+114.5%
—
#3
Maine
+113.7%
—
#4
Utah
+113.6%
—
#5
Tennessee
+112.4%
—
#6
Arizona
+112.3%
—
#7
New Hampshire
+110.1%
—
#8
Rhode Island
+108%
—
#9
Georgia
+107.6%
—
#10
North Carolina
+107.1%
—
#11
Montana
+106.7%
—
#12
Nevada
+106.1%
—
#13
South Carolina
+105.5%
—
#14
Washington
+100.2%
—
#15
Indiana · your comparison
+94.5%
—
#16
Wisconsin
+94%
—
#17
Michigan
+93.7%
—
#18
Ohio
+93.3%
—
#19
Vermont
+92.6%
—
#20
New Jersey
+88.9%
—
#21
Missouri
+86.9%
—
#22
New York
+85.9%
—
#23
Nebraska
+84.6%
—
#24
Massachusetts
+84.3%
—
#24
South Dakota
+84.3%
—
#26
Texas
+83.3%
—
#27
Kentucky
+83.2%
—
#28
Colorado
+83.1%
—
#29
Kansas
+82.5%
—
#30
New Mexico
+82.3%
—
#31
Alabama
+81.3%
—
#32
Arkansas
+80.8%
—
#33
Connecticut
+79.8%
—
#34
Pennsylvania
+78.4%
—
#35
Virginia
+76.5%
—
#36
Delaware
+75.4%
—
#37
Oregon
+74.7%
—
#38
California
+72.7%
—
#39
Oklahoma
+71.9%
—
#40
Minnesota
+70%
—
#41
Wyoming
+69.3%
—
#42
Illinois
+65.3%
—
#43
Iowa
+64.2%
—
#44
Mississippi
+63.9%
—
#45
Hawaii
+63%
—
#46
Maryland
+59.4%
—
#47
West Virginia
+58.6%
—
#48
Alaska
+51.9%
—
#49
North Dakota
+45.9%
—
#50
Louisiana
+38.2%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
State building activity, vacant units, mortgage performance, and borrowing rates are different measures.
Indiana · 202529,076
Indiana rank#14among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1,431,616Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total housing units authorized
New privately owned housing units authorized by building permits; final annual, not seasonally adjusted.
A permit is authorization, not a start or completed home. Absolute counts reflect the size of a state. Units in permit-issuing places; excludes public housing.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Indiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Indiana has a dark outline.
Lower value · 848Higher value · 210,217Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Indiana · 29,0762025 · Rank #14 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Indiana with every state · 50 ranked
Total housing units authorized · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
210,217
—
#2
Florida
178,297
—
#3
California
103,856
—
#4
North Carolina
86,167
—
#5
Georgia
61,196
—
#6
Arizona
51,532
—
#7
South Carolina
45,862
—
#8
Tennessee
43,374
—
#9
New York
38,667
—
#10
Washington
34,913
—
#11
Colorado
33,754
—
#12
Ohio
33,640
—
#13
Virginia
33,094
—
#14
Indiana · your comparison
29,076
—
#15
New Jersey
27,661
—
#16
Utah
26,775
—
#17
Pennsylvania
25,709
—
#18
Wisconsin
25,569
—
#19
Michigan
23,075
—
#20
Minnesota
20,947
—
#21
Alabama
19,061
—
#22
Illinois
18,551
—
#23
Nevada
18,540
—
#24
Idaho
17,944
—
#25
Missouri
17,474
—
#26
Oklahoma
15,513
—
#27
Arkansas
15,492
—
#28
Kentucky
14,940
—
#29
Oregon
14,839
—
#30
Louisiana
14,203
—
#31
Iowa
13,664
—
#32
Maryland
13,358
—
#33
Massachusetts
12,477
—
#34
Nebraska
10,596
—
#35
Kansas
10,299
—
#36
Mississippi
8,405
—
#37
New Mexico
7,747
—
#38
Connecticut
7,273
—
#39
Maine
6,979
—
#40
Delaware
6,468
—
#41
South Dakota
5,305
—
#42
Montana
5,258
—
#43
New Hampshire
5,030
—
#44
West Virginia
3,962
—
#45
Hawaii
3,708
—
#46
North Dakota
2,440
—
#47
Vermont
2,294
—
#48
Wyoming
2,238
—
#49
Rhode Island
1,738
—
#50
Alaska
848
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
15 of 15 reviewed Indiana actions · newest first
Mar 12, 2026 · HB 1210 · Department of local government finance. · Enacted · Public Law 157Indiana Legislature · HB 1210
Department of local government finance.
Mar 12, 2026 · Enacted · Public Law 157
Rep. Craig Snow · Sponsored / Sen. Ryan Mishler · Sponsored / Sen. Travis Holdman · Sponsored / Sen. Scott Baldwin · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law generally prohibits local restrictions on using privately owned residential property as rental property, subject to exceptions. The link concerns permission to supply rental housing, not its separate tax-administration provisions.
The Indiana legislative record shows the measure was enacted on March 12, 2026 as Public Law 157.
Why this record is included
The law generally prohibits local restrictions on using privately owned residential property as rental property, subject to exceptions. The link concerns permission to supply rental housing, not its separate tax-administration provisions. The fact measures cash rent plus tenant-paid utilities in occupied rental housing. No effect on the statewide median is established.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The law generally prohibits local restrictions on using privately owned residential property as rental property, subject to exceptions. The link concerns permission to supply rental housing, not its separate tax-administration provisions.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Feb 9, 2026 · H.R.7414 · Affordable Housing Bond Enhancement Act · IntroducedU.S. Congress · Indiana delegation · H.R.7414
Affordable Housing Bond Enhancement Act
Feb 9, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Rudy Yakym · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Section 3 would allow transfer or redesignation of unused bond authority for qualifying housing bonds, including qualified residential rental projects under Internal Revenue Code section 142(a)(7). Other sections concern homeowner mortgages.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why this record is included
Section 3 would allow transfer or redesignation of unused bond authority for qualifying housing bonds, including qualified residential rental projects under Internal Revenue Code section 142(a)(7). Other sections concern homeowner mortgages. The fact measures cash rent plus tenant-paid utilities in occupied rental housing. No effect on the statewide median is established.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 3 would allow transfer or redesignation of unused bond authority for qualifying housing bonds, including qualified residential rental projects under Internal Revenue Code section 142(a)(7). Other sections concern homeowner mortgages.
Sen. La Keisha Jackson · Co-sponsored / Sen. Shelli Yoder · Sponsored / Sen. Andrea Hunley · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Requires a local zoning ordinance to allow for residential housing developed by a religious developer as a permitted use in all residential or commercial zones if specified conditions are satisfied.
The official Indiana General Assembly record lists this final action on January 14, 2026: Senator Jackson L added as coauthor. The measure became inactive when the 2026 session ended.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses residential rent, tenant protections, eviction, rental assistance, or housing supply and affordability. It does not establish an effect on Indiana's median gross rent.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Requires a local zoning ordinance to allow for residential housing developed by a religious developer as a permitted use in all residential or commercial zones if specified conditions are satisfied.
The federal measure would rescind specified energy-efficiency standards for manufactured housing. Its link is limited to construction and tenant utility costs in manufactured rental units; it does not set rents or establish a measured price effect.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why this record is included
The federal measure would rescind specified energy-efficiency standards for manufactured housing. Its link is limited to construction and tenant utility costs in manufactured rental units; it does not set rents or establish a measured price effect. The fact measures cash rent plus tenant-paid utilities in occupied rental housing. No effect on the statewide median is established.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The federal measure would rescind specified energy-efficiency standards for manufactured housing. Its link is limited to construction and tenant utility costs in manufactured rental units; it does not set rents or establish a measured price effect.
The proposal would require specified repairs and habitable rental premises, including prompt restoration of essential services, and provide tenant remedies involving rent deposits for landlord noncompliance.
The official Indiana General Assembly record lists this final action on January 8, 2026: First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary. The measure became inactive when the 2026 session ended.
Why this record is included
The proposal would require specified repairs and habitable rental premises, including prompt restoration of essential services, and provide tenant remedies involving rent deposits for landlord noncompliance. The fact measures cash rent plus tenant-paid utilities in occupied rental housing. No effect on the statewide median is established.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The proposal would require specified repairs and habitable rental premises, including prompt restoration of essential services, and provide tenant remedies involving rent deposits for landlord noncompliance.
The proposal would require a pre-eviction notice itemizing unpaid charges and late fees and stating the intended filing date. It also addresses required repairs and health standards.
The official Indiana General Assembly record lists this final action on January 5, 2026: First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary. The measure became inactive when the 2026 session ended.
Why this record is included
The proposal would require a pre-eviction notice itemizing unpaid charges and late fees and stating the intended filing date. It also addresses required repairs and health standards. The fact measures cash rent plus tenant-paid utilities in occupied rental housing. No effect on the statewide median is established.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The proposal would require a pre-eviction notice itemizing unpaid charges and late fees and stating the intended filing date. It also addresses required repairs and health standards.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Indiana officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs from FactVote’s Indiana candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
20 statements from 7 candidates
2026 Indiana U.S. House — District 1 — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements
Frank has been proud to to deliver federal Community Project Funding to Fair Haven Northwest Indiana’s Rape Crisis Center. This funding assisted Fair Haven in providing safe and stable housing for adults fleeing domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking or stalking. Frank will continue to…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing affordability
Candidate campaign source
Frank has been proud to to deliver federal Community Project Funding to Fair Haven Northwest Indiana’s Rape Crisis Center. This funding assisted Fair Haven in providing safe and stable housing for adults fleeing domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking or stalking. Frank will continue to protect the most vulnerable populations throughout Northwest Indiana.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Frank introduced the Safe Recovery Together Act to address the lasting, adverse effects of domestic violence, including struggles with mental illness, substance use disorder, and housing instability. This program would address barriers to accessing care that survivors often face when seeking service…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
Frank introduced the Safe Recovery Together Act to address the lasting, adverse effects of domestic violence, including struggles with mental illness, substance use disorder, and housing instability. This program would address barriers to accessing care that survivors often face when seeking services in their time of need and create safe, supportive living environments for families. Frank will continue to advocate for resources to support survivors of domestic violence throughout our region.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
The ruling class has created a rigged and exploitative system of predatory lending, excessive interest rates, and harsh punishments for failures to pay within unrealistic deadlines. Drew will advocate for legislation that limits the unfair credit interest rates and predatory loans that take advantag…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Help the working class fight against predatory lending
Candidate campaign source
The ruling class has created a rigged and exploitative system of predatory lending, excessive interest rates, and harsh punishments for failures to pay within unrealistic deadlines. Drew will advocate for legislation that limits the unfair credit interest rates and predatory loans that take advantage of the American people.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Home prices have skyrocketed in the past decade, becoming completely unattainable for the working class and America’s young people. Drew will fight to establish affordable housing acts and provide relief to citizens.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing affordability
Candidate campaign source
Home prices have skyrocketed in the past decade, becoming completely unattainable for the working class and America’s young people. Drew will fight to establish affordable housing acts and provide relief to citizens.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
The cost of groceries, housing, energy, and healthcare have exploded, but our paychecks haven’t. Corporations are raising prices while political leaders focus on power instead of your bills. In Congress, I’ll fight to cap healthcare and prescription costs and push for corporate accountability to low…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
The cost of groceries, housing, energy, and healthcare have exploded, but our paychecks haven’t. Corporations are raising prices while political leaders focus on power instead of your bills. In Congress, I’ll fight to cap healthcare and prescription costs and push for corporate accountability to lower your monthly expenses.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
This section matches specific housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs terms in retained, attributed source text from published Indiana candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Indiana incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Indiana legislators and Indiana’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Indiana’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
29 matching sponsorships or proposals · 21 Indiana incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Craig Snow
Indiana House of Representatives, District 22 · R–IN
Rep. Craig Snow · Sponsored / Sen. Ryan Mishler · Sponsored / Sen. Travis Holdman · Sponsored / Sen. Scott Baldwin · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law generally prohibits local restrictions on using privately owned residential property as rental property, subject to exceptions. The link concerns permission to supply rental housing, not its separate tax-administration provisions.
The Indiana legislative record shows the measure was enacted on March 12, 2026 as Public Law 157.
Why this record is included
The law generally prohibits local restrictions on using privately owned residential property as rental property, subject to exceptions. The link concerns permission to supply rental housing, not its separate tax-administration provisions. The fact measures cash rent plus tenant-paid utilities in occupied rental housing. No effect on the statewide median is established.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The law generally prohibits local restrictions on using privately owned residential property as rental property, subject to exceptions. The link concerns permission to supply rental housing, not its separate tax-administration provisions.
U.S. representative for Indiana, District 9 · R–IN
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Erin HouchinU.S. Congress · Indiana delegation · H.R.5184
Affordable HOMES Act
Jan 12, 2026 · Passed the House
Rep. Erin Houchin · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The federal measure would rescind specified energy-efficiency standards for manufactured housing. Its link is limited to construction and tenant utility costs in manufactured rental units; it does not set rents or establish a measured price effect.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why this record is included
The federal measure would rescind specified energy-efficiency standards for manufactured housing. Its link is limited to construction and tenant utility costs in manufactured rental units; it does not set rents or establish a measured price effect. The fact measures cash rent plus tenant-paid utilities in occupied rental housing. No effect on the statewide median is established.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The federal measure would rescind specified energy-efficiency standards for manufactured housing. Its link is limited to construction and tenant utility costs in manufactured rental units; it does not set rents or establish a measured price effect.
Rep. Ethan Manning · Sponsored / Sen. Mike Gaskill · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Provides that under certain circumstances a landlord may file a petition for an emergency possessory order. Requires a court to order a tenant to return possession of a dwelling unit to the landlord if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that: (1) a tenant or the tenant's guest has committed a crime that affects the health and safety of another tenant, the landlord, or an agent of the landlord; or (2) a tenant provided materially false information to induce the landlord into leasing or giving possession of the rental unit to the tenant. Provides that nothing in the section concerning filing a petition for an emergency possessory orders shall be construed to interfere with the…
The Indiana legislative record shows the measure was enacted on May 1, 2025 as Public Law 157.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses residential rent, tenant protections, eviction, rental assistance, or housing supply and affordability. It does not establish an effect on Indiana's median gross rent.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Provides that under certain circumstances a landlord may file a petition for an emergency possessory order. Requires a court to order a tenant to return possession of a dwelling unit to the landlord if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that: (1) a tenant or the tenant's guest has committed a crime that affects the health and safety of another tenant, the landlord, or an agent of the landlord; or (2) a tenant provided materially false information to induce the landlord into leasing or giving possession of the rental unit to the tenant. Provides that nothing in the section concerning filing a petition for an emergency…
Rep. Ethan Manning · Sponsored / Sen. Mike Gaskill · Sponsored / Sen. Eric Koch · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law changes eviction dismissal and diversion procedures and requires designated landlord application processes for pandemic rental-assistance funds. It also provides for nondisclosure of specified eviction records.
The Indiana legislative record shows the measure was enacted on March 18, 2022 as Public Law 164.
Why this record is included
The law changes eviction dismissal and diversion procedures and requires designated landlord application processes for pandemic rental-assistance funds. It also provides for nondisclosure of specified eviction records. The fact measures cash rent plus tenant-paid utilities in occupied rental housing. No effect on the statewide median is established.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The law changes eviction dismissal and diversion procedures and requires designated landlord application processes for pandemic rental-assistance funds. It also provides for nondisclosure of specified eviction records.
Rep. Ethan Manning · Sponsored / Sen. Blake Doriot · Sponsored / Sen. James Buck · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Eliminates the general restriction on the authority of a county, city, town, or township concerning regulation of landlord-tenant relationship matters not specifically described by state statute. Prohibits the waiver of laws regarding retaliatory acts by a landlord.
The Indiana legislative record shows the measure was enacted on April 29, 2021 as Public Law 215.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses residential rent, tenant protections, eviction, rental assistance, or housing supply and affordability. It does not establish an effect on Indiana's median gross rent.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Eliminates the general restriction on the authority of a county, city, town, or township concerning regulation of landlord-tenant relationship matters not specifically described by state statute. Prohibits the waiver of laws regarding retaliatory acts by a landlord. LANDLORDS AND TENANTS PROPERTY
Rep. Jeffrey Thompson · Sponsored / Sen. Ryan Mishler · Sponsored / Sen. Travis Holdman · Sponsored / Sen. Chris Garten · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The enrolled budget appropriates $1 million in each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for Indiana’s Housing First Program, which provides rental assistance and supportive services. This rental-assistance appropriation supports the link; the separate homeownership tax credit does not.
The Indiana legislative record shows the measure was enacted on May 4, 2023 as Public Law 201.
Why this record is included
The enrolled budget appropriates $1 million in each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for Indiana’s Housing First Program, which provides rental assistance and supportive services. This rental-assistance appropriation supports the link; the separate homeownership tax credit does not. The fact measures cash rent plus tenant-paid utilities in occupied rental housing. No effect on the statewide median is established.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The enrolled budget appropriates $1 million in each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for Indiana’s Housing First Program, which provides rental assistance and supportive services. This rental-assistance appropriation supports the link; the separate homeownership tax credit does not.
The proposal would require specified repairs and habitable rental premises, including prompt restoration of essential services, and provide tenant remedies involving rent deposits for landlord noncompliance.
The official Indiana General Assembly record lists this final action on January 8, 2026: First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary. The measure became inactive when the 2026 session ended.
Why this record is included
The proposal would require specified repairs and habitable rental premises, including prompt restoration of essential services, and provide tenant remedies involving rent deposits for landlord noncompliance. The fact measures cash rent plus tenant-paid utilities in occupied rental housing. No effect on the statewide median is established.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The proposal would require specified repairs and habitable rental premises, including prompt restoration of essential services, and provide tenant remedies involving rent deposits for landlord noncompliance.
Stay of certain eviction actions against veterans.
Jan 5, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Renee Pack · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Provides that a court shall stay certain eviction actions for defendants who qualify and have applied for housing assistance from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs or the Indiana department of veterans' affairs.
The official Indiana General Assembly record lists this final action on January 5, 2026: First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary. The measure became inactive when the 2026 session ended.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses residential rent, tenant protections, eviction, rental assistance, or housing supply and affordability. It does not establish an effect on Indiana's median gross rent.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Provides that a court shall stay certain eviction actions for defendants who qualify and have applied for housing assistance from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs or the Indiana department of veterans' affairs.
Only current Indiana officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Indiana statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Indiana snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Indiana, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.
