Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.
High school or higher91.9%2020–2024 · #20 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher41.5%2020–2024 · #36 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher31.8%2020–2024 · #35 of 50 · highest first
Idaho over time
Explore Idaho readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Idaho officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Idaho effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Idaho change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Grade 4 reading Idaho · source units
IdahoPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
4 of 4 reviewed Idaho actions match · 4 date markers shown. 20 major events shown separately.
Idaho · 2024: 215.7 · Rank #18 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215
FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Idaho. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Idaho · state comparison
Adult educational attainment
Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.
Idaho · 2020–202491.9%
Idaho rank#20among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
High school or higher
Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.
Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Idaho stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Idaho has a dark outline.
Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Idaho · 91.9%2020–2024 · Rank #20 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Idaho with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Vermont
94.9%
—
#2
Maine
94.8%
—
#3
Montana
94.6%
—
#4
New Hampshire
94.4%
—
#5
Wyoming
94.2%
—
#6
North Dakota
94%
—
#7
Minnesota
93.9%
—
#8
Wisconsin
93.6%
—
#9
Alaska
93.6%
—
#10
Utah
93.4%
—
#11
Iowa
93.3%
—
#12
South Dakota
93.2%
—
#13
Hawaii
93.2%
—
#14
Colorado
92.9%
—
#15
Washington
92.3%
—
#16
Nebraska
92.2%
—
#17
Pennsylvania
92.1%
—
#18
Michigan
92.1%
—
#19
Kansas
92%
—
#20
Idaho · your comparison
91.9%
—
#21
Missouri
91.9%
—
#22
Oregon
91.8%
—
#23
Ohio
91.8%
—
#24
Delaware
91.7%
—
#25
Virginia
91.6%
—
#26
Connecticut
91.5%
—
#27
Massachusetts
91.4%
—
#28
Maryland
91.1%
—
#29
New Jersey
90.7%
—
#30
Illinois
90.5%
—
#31
Indiana
90.4%
—
#32
North Carolina
90.1%
—
#33
South Carolina
90.1%
—
#34
Tennessee
90%
—
#35
Florida
89.9%
—
#36
Rhode Island
89.7%
—
#37
Oklahoma
89.4%
—
#38
Arizona
89.4%
—
#39
West Virginia
89.3%
—
#40
Georgia
89.2%
—
#41
Kentucky
88.9%
—
#42
Arkansas
88.7%
—
#43
Alabama
88.6%
—
#44
New Mexico
88%
—
#45
New York
88%
—
#46
Nevada
87.5%
—
#47
Louisiana
87.3%
—
#48
Mississippi
87.1%
—
#49
Texas
86%
—
#50
California
84.7%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Share of Idaho residents age 25 and older whose reported attainment is a regular high school diploma or equivalent (including GED or an alternative credential), some college, or an associate’s or higher degree.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.
This is an adult educational-attainment measure, not a current high-school graduation rate or a measure of school quality.
A statewide estimate can obscure differences across communities and demographic groups.
NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.
Idaho · 2024215.7
Idaho rank#18among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Grade 4 reading
FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Idaho. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.
NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Idaho
2024 · Idaho: 215.7 · Rank #18 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Idaho Grade 4 reading history
Period
Idaho
Compare
2003
218.3
2005
221.9
2007
223.4
2009
221
2011
220.8
2013
219.3
2015
221.7
2017
222.8
2019
222.5
2022
214.9
2024
215.7
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Idaho stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Idaho has a dark outline.
Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Idaho · 215.72024 · Rank #18 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Idaho with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Massachusetts
224.8
—
#2
Wyoming
221.9
—
#3
New Jersey
221.6
—
#4
New Hampshire
221.5
—
#5
Colorado
220.9
—
#6
Indiana
220.1
—
#7
Utah
219.3
—
#8
Connecticut
219.2
—
#9
Mississippi
218.5
—
#10
Florida
218.2
—
#11
Kentucky
218
—
#12
Montana
217.2
—
#13
Rhode Island
216.3
—
#14
Louisiana
216
—
#14
Ohio
216
—
#16
Hawaii
215.8
—
#16
Pennsylvania
215.8
—
#18
Idaho · your comparison
215.7
—
#18
Washington
215.7
—
#20
Maryland
215.6
—
#21
North Dakota
215.5
—
#22
Wisconsin
215.3
—
#23
Tennessee
215.1
—
#24
South Carolina
214.9
—
#25
Iowa
214.6
—
#25
New York
214.6
—
#27
Georgia
214.4
—
#27
Minnesota
214.4
—
#29
Illinois
214.2
—
#30
South Dakota
214.1
—
#30
Virginia
214.1
—
#32
North Carolina
213.4
—
#33
Alabama
213.2
—
#34
Kansas
213.1
—
#34
Nevada
213.1
—
#36
Vermont
212.7
—
#37
Missouri
211.9
—
#37
Texas
211.9
—
#39
California
211.7
—
#39
Nebraska
211.7
—
#41
Arkansas
209.7
—
#42
Maine
209.6
—
#43
Delaware
209.5
—
#44
Michigan
209.1
—
#45
Arizona
208.1
—
#46
Oklahoma
207.3
—
#47
Oregon
207
—
#48
West Virginia
205.9
—
#49
Alaska
201.6
—
#50
New Mexico
200.6
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.
Idaho · FY2024$11,060
Idaho rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Current spending per pupil
Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.
Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Idaho stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Idaho has a dark outline.
Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Idaho · $11,060FY2024 · Rank #50 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Idaho with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New York
$31,918
—
#2
Vermont
$28,818
—
#3
New Jersey
$27,234
—
#4
Connecticut
$26,316
—
#5
Massachusetts
$24,429
—
#6
Hawaii
$23,878
—
#7
New Hampshire
$22,978
—
#8
Delaware
$22,201
—
#9
Rhode Island
$22,110
—
#10
Illinois
$21,776
—
#11
Pennsylvania
$21,091
—
#12
Alaska
$21,004
—
#13
California
$20,791
—
#14
Wyoming
$20,521
—
#15
Maryland
$20,208
—
#16
Maine
$19,962
—
#17
Washington
$18,564
—
#18
Michigan
$18,314
—
#19
Oregon
$18,083
—
#20
New Mexico
$17,664
—
#21
Ohio
$17,257
—
#22
Virginia
$17,104
—
#23
North Dakota
$17,102
—
#24
Minnesota
$17,098
—
#25
Nebraska
$16,147
—
#26
Wisconsin
$15,952
—
#27
Colorado
$15,908
—
#28
Georgia
$15,833
—
#29
West Virginia
$15,640
—
#30
Louisiana
$15,581
—
#31
Kansas
$15,558
—
#32
South Carolina
$15,060
—
#33
Nevada
$14,812
—
#34
Kentucky
$14,596
—
#35
Iowa
$14,369
—
#36
Missouri
$14,241
—
#37
Arkansas
$13,873
—
#38
Montana
$13,656
—
#39
Alabama
$13,627
—
#40
Indiana
$13,622
—
#41
North Carolina
$12,995
—
#42
Texas
$12,895
—
#43
Tennessee
$12,882
—
#44
South Dakota
$12,828
—
#45
Florida
$12,693
—
#46
Mississippi
$12,324
—
#47
Oklahoma
$12,162
—
#48
Arizona
$12,003
—
#49
Utah
$11,347
—
#50
Idaho · your comparison
$11,060
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.
Idaho · 2021–2280%
Idaho rank#46among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark87%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate
Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.
Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Idaho
2021–22 · Idaho: 80% · Rank #46 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 87% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Idaho Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
Period
Idaho
Compare
2011–12
Not available
2012–13
Not available
2013–14
77%
2014–15
79%
2015–16
80%
2016–17
80%
2017–18
81%
2018–19
81%
2019–20
82%
2020–21
80%
2021–22
80%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Idaho stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Idaho has a dark outline.
Lower value · 77%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Idaho · 80%2021–22 · Rank #46 of 48, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Idaho with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2021–22 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
West Virginia
91%
—
#2
Iowa
90%
—
#2
Kentucky
90%
—
#2
Massachusetts
90%
—
#2
Missouri
90%
—
#2
Tennessee
90%
—
#2
Texas
90%
—
#2
Wisconsin
90%
—
#9
Connecticut
89%
—
#9
Kansas
89%
—
#9
Mississippi
89%
—
#9
Virginia
89%
—
#13
Alabama
88%
—
#13
Arkansas
88%
—
#13
Delaware
88%
—
#13
Indiana
88%
—
#13
New Hampshire
88%
—
#13
Utah
88%
—
#19
California
87%
—
#19
Florida
87%
—
#19
Illinois
87%
—
#19
Nebraska
87%
—
#19
New York
87%
—
#19
Pennsylvania
87%
—
#25
Hawaii
86%
—
#25
Maine
86%
—
#25
Maryland
86%
—
#25
Montana
86%
—
#25
North Carolina
86%
—
#25
Ohio
86%
—
#31
New Jersey
85%
—
#31
North Dakota
85%
—
#33
Georgia
84%
—
#33
Minnesota
84%
—
#33
South Carolina
84%
—
#33
Washington
84%
—
#37
Louisiana
83%
—
#37
Rhode Island
83%
—
#37
Vermont
83%
—
#40
Colorado
82%
—
#40
Nevada
82%
—
#40
South Dakota
82%
—
#40
Wyoming
82%
—
#44
Michigan
81%
—
#44
Oregon
81%
—
#46
Idaho · your comparison
80%
—
#47
Alaska
78%
—
#48
Arizona
77%
—
—
New Mexico
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—
Oklahoma
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.
Idaho · 2022–23$7,640
Idaho rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees
Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.
2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Idaho stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Idaho has a dark outline.
Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Idaho · $7,6402022–23 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Idaho with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Vermont
$17,600
—
#2
New Hampshire
$17,019
—
#3
Pennsylvania
$16,217
—
#4
Connecticut
$15,763
—
#5
New Jersey
$15,265
—
#6
Illinois
$14,921
—
#7
Virginia
$14,825
—
#8
Rhode Island
$14,744
—
#9
Michigan
$14,718
—
#10
Massachusetts
$14,345
—
#11
Minnesota
$12,873
—
#12
South Carolina
$12,604
—
#13
Oregon
$12,424
—
#14
Delaware
$11,922
—
#15
Arizona
$11,768
—
#16
Kentucky
$11,299
—
#17
Alabama
$11,081
—
#18
Ohio
$10,922
—
#19
Maine
$10,813
—
#20
Hawaii
$10,484
—
#21
Tennessee
$10,437
—
#22
Iowa
$10,121
—
#23
Maryland
$10,041
—
#24
Missouri
$9,926
—
#25
Indiana
$9,886
—
#26
Louisiana
$9,843
—
#27
Colorado
$9,798
—
#28
North Dakota
$9,728
—
#29
Kansas
$9,274
—
#30
Mississippi
$9,120
—
#31
South Dakota
$9,079
—
#32
Wisconsin
$8,974
—
#33
Arkansas
$8,879
—
#34
Nebraska
$8,862
—
#35
West Virginia
$8,715
—
#36
California
$8,637
—
#37
New York
$8,575
—
#38
Oklahoma
$8,519
—
#39
Alaska
$8,291
—
#40
Texas
$8,195
—
#41
Washington
$8,006
—
#42
Idaho · your comparison
$7,640
—
#43
New Mexico
$7,526
—
#44
North Carolina
$7,327
—
#45
Montana
$7,299
—
#46
Utah
$7,215
—
#47
Georgia
$7,075
—
#48
Nevada
$6,723
—
#49
Wyoming
$5,100
—
#50
Florida
$4,540
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
4 of 4 reviewed Idaho actions · newest first
Apr 10, 2026 · SB 1336 · EDUCATION – Amends and adds to existing law to revise and establish provisions regarding civics education. · Enacted · Chapter 317Idaho Legislature · SB 1336
EDUCATION – Amends and adds to existing law to revise and establish provisions regarding civics education.
Apr 10, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 317
Kelly Arthur Anthon · Floor sponsor / Barbara Ehardt · Floor sponsor
FactVote reviewed summary
The amended SB 1336 revises secondary-school civics requirements beginning in the 2027–2028 school year, including a civics assessment and coursework or the specified college-credit alternative, with transcript documentation. The state superintendent or designee determines test administration. Pupils may first take the test after enrolling in grade 9 and may repeat the test, and its application to students receiving special education follows their individualized education plans. The transition exempts qualifying students graduating before January 1, 2029 who met the earlier requirement before 2026–2027. These future school requirements do not establish a change in the previously measured adult diploma-attainment rate.
Signed by Governor on 2026-04-10, Chapter 317 of the 2026 regular session. Signing, effectiveness, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The fact measures diploma-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. Civics requirements for secondary students concern a future component of attainment and cannot explain the earlier adult statistic. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Idaho evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(15) Starting with the 2016-2017 school year, all secondary pupils shall show that they have met the state civics and government standards for such instruction through the successful completion of the civics test, participation in a course in United States government and politics, and participation in an associated college credit-bearing examination or alternate path established by the local school district or charter school that shows the student has met the standards. Assessment of standards shall be included as part of the course at the secondary level. Students graduating prior to January 1, 2029, who have satisfied the requirement outlined in this subsection prior to the start of the 2026-2027 school year are exempt from completing the requirement provided for in subsection (16) of this section. (16) Beginning with the 2027-2028 school year, all secondary pupils shall show that they have met the state civics and government standards for such instruction through the successful completion of the civics test and participation in a course in United States government and history, or participation in an associated college credit-bearing course or examination. Assessment of standards shall be included as part of the course at the secondary level. A school district or public charter school shall document on the pupil's transcript that the pupil has passed the civics test pursuant to this subsection. The state superintendent of public instruction or the superintendent's designee shall determine the method and manner in which to administer the civics test. A pupil may take the civics test at any time after enrolling in grade 9 and may repeat the test as often as necessary to pass the test. The applicability of this subsection to a pupil who receives special education services shall be governed by such pupil's individualized education plan. For the purposes of this subsection, "civics test" means an assessment developed by the state superintendent of public instruction or the superintendent's designee with the approval of the state board of education that includes but is not limited to the following components from the Idaho content standards in American government: (a) The influence of the history of Western civilization on the founding of the American republic, including Greek democracy, Roman republicanism, and the English political and legal tradition; (b) The arguments presented in the declaration of independence; (c) The governing principles at the foundation of the United States constitution, including popular sovereignty, rule of law, federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, judicial review, and majority rule and protection of minority rights; (d) The role of the bill of rights in limiting the powers of government and protecting individual rights; (e) The enumerated powers of the United States congress, including appropriations, declarations of war, commerce, confirmations, necessary and proper clauses, and oversight and impeachment; (f) The legislative process of how a bill becomes law; (g) Article II of the United States constitution as it relates to the executive branch and the powers of the president, along with the development and growth of administrative agencies; (h) The function and development of the electoral college; (i) The power of the judiciary as conferred by article III of the United States constitution and legal precedents that developed these powers; (j) The functions, powers, interactions, and dynamic relationships among federal, state, local, and tribal governments, including the tenth amendment to the United States constitution and legal precedent; and (k) The organization and powers of state and local government as described in the constitution of the state of Idaho, including the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. (17) Components of the assessment developed pursuant to subsection (16) of this section shall be reviewed concurrently with the review of the Idaho content standards in American government. The state board of education may promulgate rules, subject to legislative approval, implementing the provisions of subsection (16) of this section.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 10, 2026 · SB 1336 · EDUCATION – Amends and adds to existing law to revise and establish provisions regarding civics education. · SignedGovernor · SB 1336
EDUCATION – Amends and adds to existing law to revise and establish provisions regarding civics education.
Apr 10, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Brad Little · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Brad Little signed SB 1336. The amended SB 1336 revises secondary-school civics requirements beginning in the 2027–2028 school year, including a civics assessment and coursework or the specified college-credit alternative, with transcript documentation. The state superintendent or designee determines test administration. Pupils may first take the test after enrolling in grade 9 and may repeat the test, and its application to students receiving special education follows their individualized education plans. The transition exempts qualifying students graduating before January 1, 2029 who met the earlier requirement before 2026–2027. These future school requirements do not establish a change in the previously measured adult diploma-attainment rate.
Signed by Governor on 2026-04-10, Chapter 317 of the 2026 regular session. Signing, effectiveness, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The fact measures diploma-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. Civics requirements for secondary students concern a future component of attainment and cannot explain the earlier adult statistic. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Idaho evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(15) Starting with the 2016-2017 school year, all secondary pupils shall show that they have met the state civics and government standards for such instruction through the successful completion of the civics test, participation in a course in United States government and politics, and participation in an associated college credit-bearing examination or alternate path established by the local school district or charter school that shows the student has met the standards. Assessment of standards shall be included as part of the course at the secondary level. Students graduating prior to January 1, 2029, who have satisfied the requirement outlined in this subsection prior to the start of the 2026-2027 school year are exempt from completing the requirement provided for in subsection (16) of this section. (16) Beginning with the 2027-2028 school year, all secondary pupils shall show that they have met the state civics and government standards for such instruction through the successful completion of the civics test and participation in a course in United States government and history, or participation in an associated college credit-bearing course or examination. Assessment of standards shall be included as part of the course at the secondary level. A school district or public charter school shall document on the pupil's transcript that the pupil has passed the civics test pursuant to this subsection. The state superintendent of public instruction or the superintendent's designee shall determine the method and manner in which to administer the civics test. A pupil may take the civics test at any time after enrolling in grade 9 and may repeat the test as often as necessary to pass the test. The applicability of this subsection to a pupil who receives special education services shall be governed by such pupil's individualized education plan. For the purposes of this subsection, "civics test" means an assessment developed by the state superintendent of public instruction or the superintendent's designee with the approval of the state board of education that includes but is not limited to the following components from the Idaho content standards in American government: (a) The influence of the history of Western civilization on the founding of the American republic, including Greek democracy, Roman republicanism, and the English political and legal tradition; (b) The arguments presented in the declaration of independence; (c) The governing principles at the foundation of the United States constitution, including popular sovereignty, rule of law, federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, judicial review, and majority rule and protection of minority rights; (d) The role of the bill of rights in limiting the powers of government and protecting individual rights; (e) The enumerated powers of the United States congress, including appropriations, declarations of war, commerce, confirmations, necessary and proper clauses, and oversight and impeachment; (f) The legislative process of how a bill becomes law; (g) Article II of the United States constitution as it relates to the executive branch and the powers of the president, along with the development and growth of administrative agencies; (h) The function and development of the electoral college; (i) The power of the judiciary as conferred by article III of the United States constitution and legal precedents that developed these powers; (j) The functions, powers, interactions, and dynamic relationships among federal, state, local, and tribal governments, including the tenth amendment to the United States constitution and legal precedent; and (k) The organization and powers of state and local government as described in the constitution of the state of Idaho, including the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. (17) Components of the assessment developed pursuant to subsection (16) of this section shall be reviewed concurrently with the review of the Idaho content standards in American government. The state board of education may promulgate rules, subject to legislative approval, implementing the provisions of subsection (16) of this section.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 26, 2026 · HB 573 · ENHANCED LICENSES TO CARRY CONCEALED WEAPONS – Amends existing law to provide that certain persons may provide instruction on Idaho law regarding firearms and the use of deadly force. · SignedGovernor · HB 573
ENHANCED LICENSES TO CARRY CONCEALED WEAPONS – Amends existing law to provide that certain persons may provide instruction on Idaho law regarding firearms and the use of deadly force.
Mar 26, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Brad Little · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Brad Little signed HB 573. HB 573 adds an NRA-certified or equivalent instructor with at least eight years of experience teaching an approved enhanced concealed-carry course to the people who may teach its Idaho-law and deadly-force portion. The reviewed course requirements still include at least eight hours, face-to-face teaching, handgun safety, self-defense and live-fire training of at least 98 rounds. This is an instructor-qualification change, not evidence of fewer firearm deaths.
Signed by Governor on 2026-03-26, Chapter 159 of the 2026 regular session. Signing, effectiveness, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality series includes deaths across intents, including homicide and suicide. Transfer procedures and concealed-carry instruction concern firearm access or training; they do not establish an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Idaho evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The sheriff must accept as a qualifying handgun course a personal protection course offered by the national rifle association or an equivalent, provided that all personal protection or equivalent courses must meet the following requirements: (i) The course instructor is certified by the national rifle association, or by another nationally recognized organization that customarily certifies firearms instructors, as an instructor in personal protection with handguns, or the course instructor is certified by the Idaho peace officers standards and training council as a firearms instructor; (ii) The course is at least eight (8) hours in duration; (iii) The course is taught face to face and not by electronic or other means; and (iv) The course includes instruction in: 1. Idaho law relating to firearms and the use of deadly force, provided that such instruction is delivered by any of the following whose name and credential must appear on the certificate: (A) An active, senior or emeritus member of the Idaho state bar; (B) A law enforcement officer, active or retired, who currently possesses or possessed at the time of his retirement an intermediate or higher Idaho peace officers standards and training certificate; or (C) An instructor certified by the national rifle association, or equivalent, who has instructed an approved course for enhanced concealed carry for at least eight (8) years; 2. The basic concepts of the safe and responsible use of handguns; 3. Self-defense principles; and 4. Live fire training, including the firing of at least ninety-eight (98) rounds by the student. An instructor must provide a copy of the syllabus and a written description of the course of fire used in a qualifying handgun course that includes the name of the individual instructing the legal portion of the course to the sheriff upon request.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 26, 2026 · HB 573 · ENHANCED LICENSES TO CARRY CONCEALED WEAPONS – Amends existing law to provide that certain persons may provide instruction on Idaho law regarding firearms and the use of deadly force. · Enacted · Chapter 159Idaho Legislature · HB 573
ENHANCED LICENSES TO CARRY CONCEALED WEAPONS – Amends existing law to provide that certain persons may provide instruction on Idaho law regarding firearms and the use of deadly force.
Mar 26, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 159
Charlie Shepherd · Floor sponsor / Kelly Arthur Anthon · Floor sponsor
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 573 adds an NRA-certified or equivalent instructor with at least eight years of experience teaching an approved enhanced concealed-carry course to the people who may teach its Idaho-law and deadly-force portion. The reviewed course requirements still include at least eight hours, face-to-face teaching, handgun safety, self-defense and live-fire training of at least 98 rounds. This is an instructor-qualification change, not evidence of fewer firearm deaths.
Signed by Governor on 2026-03-26, Chapter 159 of the 2026 regular session. Signing, effectiveness, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality series includes deaths across intents, including homicide and suicide. Transfer procedures and concealed-carry instruction concern firearm access or training; they do not establish an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Idaho evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The sheriff must accept as a qualifying handgun course a personal protection course offered by the national rifle association or an equivalent, provided that all personal protection or equivalent courses must meet the following requirements: (i) The course instructor is certified by the national rifle association, or by another nationally recognized organization that customarily certifies firearms instructors, as an instructor in personal protection with handguns, or the course instructor is certified by the Idaho peace officers standards and training council as a firearms instructor; (ii) The course is at least eight (8) hours in duration; (iii) The course is taught face to face and not by electronic or other means; and (iv) The course includes instruction in: 1. Idaho law relating to firearms and the use of deadly force, provided that such instruction is delivered by any of the following whose name and credential must appear on the certificate: (A) An active, senior or emeritus member of the Idaho state bar; (B) A law enforcement officer, active or retired, who currently possesses or possessed at the time of his retirement an intermediate or higher Idaho peace officers standards and training certificate; or (C) An instructor certified by the national rifle association, or equivalent, who has instructed an approved course for enhanced concealed carry for at least eight (8) years; 2. The basic concepts of the safe and responsible use of handguns; 3. Self-defense principles; and 4. Live fire training, including the firing of at least ninety-eight (98) rounds by the student. An instructor must provide a copy of the syllabus and a written description of the course of fire used in a qualifying handgun course that includes the name of the individual instructing the legal portion of the course to the sheriff upon request.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Idaho officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s Idaho candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
54 statements from 14 candidates
2026 Idaho Attorney General — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements
As a member of the Idaho State Land Board, I will work to ensure that the State’s school endowment lands are managed responsibly. The Idaho Constitution requires the Board to secure the maximum long-term financial return from those lands for the benefit of Idaho’s public schools. The Board should co…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Support Our Justice System
Candidate campaign source
As a member of the Idaho State Land Board, I will work to ensure that the State’s school endowment lands are managed responsibly. The Idaho Constitution requires the Board to secure the maximum long-term financial return from those lands for the benefit of Idaho’s public schools. The Board should cooperate with users in carrying out its work, but the lands must remain open to use by the public.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Every Idaho family should have confidence that the next generation can build a future here and pursue opportunities close to home. We have an obligation to properly fund our public schools.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Focused on What Matters
Candidate campaign source
Every Idaho family should have confidence that the next generation can build a future here and pursue opportunities close to home. We have an obligation to properly fund our public schools.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026
It is wrong for the Legislature to grant immunity to the Governor, businesses, schools and local government for their actions regarding the state of emergency beginning in March of 2020. The Governor should have not declared an emergency, he did so to obtain huge federal emergency funds. He should n…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Democracy, ethics, and government accountability
Candidate campaign source
It is wrong for the Legislature to grant immunity to the Governor, businesses, schools and local government for their actions regarding the state of emergency beginning in March of 2020. The Governor should have not declared an emergency, he did so to obtain huge federal emergency funds. He should not have been deceived by billions of federal money, and then ordered shut downs, closed businesses, and churches. People generally were fooled by the 'scamdemic'. The sickness is real, but the establishment treatment is a scam and worse- harmful. Long Covid is the result of harm to the immune system from the Covid shot and boosters, in our opinion.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
As Governor, I would veto all bills that expand government. We are for reduced spending on education, welfare, health, and recreation- leading to the phasing-out of these functions. The above functions, many years ago, were the responsibility of faith. Faith-based organizations could have handled th…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education and workforce development
Candidate campaign source
As Governor, I would veto all bills that expand government. We are for reduced spending on education, welfare, health, and recreation- leading to the phasing-out of these functions. The above functions, many years ago, were the responsibility of faith. Faith-based organizations could have handled these necessary functions but unthinking, selfish Christians transferred these responsibilities to government. Today, we generally are a people without real faith, and government is our religion.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
We are against mandated vaccination in every jurisdiction: government, business, military, education, and family, yes, even family. We believe vaccines and especially mRNA shots to be harmful. I will by emergency, executive order, stop all mandated vaccinations including parents having their minor c…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care and reproductive policy
Candidate campaign source
We are against mandated vaccination in every jurisdiction: government, business, military, education, and family, yes, even family. We believe vaccines and especially mRNA shots to be harmful. I will by emergency, executive order, stop all mandated vaccinations including parents having their minor children vaccinated. You would have to leave Idaho for vaccines. The Idaho government should protect the child who says, "the vaccine will hurt me, I will not take it." If I become Governor, you would have to leave Idaho for vaccines, and for sure, the mRNA shots. The legislature could stop my order. The Covid shots will result in long term damage to many people and some loss of life, in my opinion. When people around the world realize that they have been deceived by politicians, media, pharmaceutical firms, and the medical establishment, then they will start following common sense, and start using natural medicine, instead of phony pharma science. Follow your conscience and not the deceiving experts. Kirsten and I had Covid and it was terrible. Covid is real, and consequently, the one-world order leaders were using it to corral us.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Under 'Education' this platform says nothing regarding States sponsoring public education. Public education is a Communist doctrine. Summary point 10 of the Communist Manifesto, (Marx and Engels, 1848), says, "Free education for all children in public schools." State governments should not sponsor p…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education and workforce development
Candidate campaign source
Under 'Education' this platform says nothing regarding States sponsoring public education. Public education is a Communist doctrine. Summary point 10 of the Communist Manifesto, (Marx and Engels, 1848), says, "Free education for all children in public schools." State governments should not sponsor public education. Public education is financed by collective theft.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
We believe in alternative medicine and we are against all vaccinations. Pro-Life said on the radio, "the only vaccination I will be given, will be on my dead body." No person should be forced to be vaccinated for employment, education, medical treatment, or any conceivable reason. We do not believe …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care and reproductive policy
Candidate campaign source
We believe in alternative medicine and we are against all vaccinations. Pro-Life said on the radio, "the only vaccination I will be given, will be on my dead body." No person should be forced to be vaccinated for employment, education, medical treatment, or any conceivable reason. We do not believe in childhood vaccination. We believe that vaccines harm immune systems.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
The state prison system needs to grow organic food for Idaho schools, prisons, and other state institutions. The Idaho Legislature needs to set nutritional standards for state institutions. We can not rehabilitate people on poor food. These standards should not allow refined sugars or flours, preser…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
The state prison system needs to grow organic food for Idaho schools, prisons, and other state institutions. The Idaho Legislature needs to set nutritional standards for state institutions. We can not rehabilitate people on poor food. These standards should not allow refined sugars or flours, preservatives, colorings, additives that are harmful to health. Our mental institutions and other institutions should have gardens and farms. Watch the lobbyists squeal over this, if it comes up.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
We should cut spending on education, welfare, recreation, health, and retirement programs commensurate with tax reduction. We should start with eliminating sales tax, then on to income taxes, then property tax. Fuel taxes are a just tax for transportation. Taxes on vehicles, tires, parts, etc. are j…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education and workforce development
Candidate campaign source
We should cut spending on education, welfare, recreation, health, and retirement programs commensurate with tax reduction. We should start with eliminating sales tax, then on to income taxes, then property tax. Fuel taxes are a just tax for transportation. Taxes on vehicles, tires, parts, etc. are justified to maintain and build roads and highways.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
A governor should have an investigative team to find people wrongfully convicted, or in jail, wrongfully, awaiting trail. Also, a good governor would spend a substantial amount of time visiting the people in prisons, reform schools, mental facilities, and disability institutions. I do not believe th…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
A governor should have an investigative team to find people wrongfully convicted, or in jail, wrongfully, awaiting trail. Also, a good governor would spend a substantial amount of time visiting the people in prisons, reform schools, mental facilities, and disability institutions. I do not believe this happens at present and our institutionalized people have been neglected for a long time.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
The Idaho Legislature needs to allow students in higher education to take guns on campus. Our present political climate is not going to allow a vote on this. Chickens in the legislature are there to roost.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Gun policy and the Second Amendment
Candidate campaign source
The Idaho Legislature needs to allow students in higher education to take guns on campus. Our present political climate is not going to allow a vote on this. Chickens in the legislature are there to roost.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
The only reason we should 'not' return to gold and silver money is because privately owned central banks own about two-thirds of the world's gold. We need to convince people that their central bank exchanged paper money for gold and silver in prior decades. These stolen precious metals must be retur…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability
Candidate campaign source
The only reason we should 'not' return to gold and silver money is because privately owned central banks own about two-thirds of the world's gold. We need to convince people that their central bank exchanged paper money for gold and silver in prior decades. These stolen precious metals must be returned to the appropriate nation, and central bank contracts repealed. We cannot go back to gold, if most of the gold is controlled by private bankers. Each nation needs to demand that these banks return their gold. Let the education begin and the decades of deceit be revealed.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Health, education, welfare, recreation, and retirement are not proper roles of government. These functions should be, and were, the responsibility of faith but Christians transferred these responsibilities to government generations ago. We now live with a weak and broken Christianity. Our churches a…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education and workforce development
Candidate campaign source
Health, education, welfare, recreation, and retirement are not proper roles of government. These functions should be, and were, the responsibility of faith but Christians transferred these responsibilities to government generations ago. We now live with a weak and broken Christianity. Our churches are just places where people receive their ordinances and marriages. These broken churches are afraid to organize to defend life, liberty, and property. A true Christian church would have leaders that would run for office, go into the streets to defend health, life, and protest sexual perversion.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
As Lieutenant Governor, Eric will carry forward the Andrus legacy of practical, principled leadership. He will champion bipartisan cooperation, rural healthcare, education, and economic opportunity for working families. He believes Idaho families deserve more than survival, they deserve a state wher…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: About Eric Myricks
Candidate campaign source
As Lieutenant Governor, Eric will carry forward the Andrus legacy of practical, principled leadership. He will champion bipartisan cooperation, rural healthcare, education, and economic opportunity for working families. He believes Idaho families deserve more than survival, they deserve a state where hard work pays off, where government serves the people, and where fairness replaces favoritism. He stands for the radical middle where most Idahoans live, and seeks to bring back balance to Idaho, through empathy and action. When asked why he’s running, Eric answers simply: “Because Idaho families shouldn’t be working harder for less. Because dignity is power, and it’s time to return both to THE PEOPLE.”
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Idaho ranks near the bottom in per-student funding and teacher pay and families feel it every day. Overcrowded classrooms, underpaid teachers, and lost opportunities are holding our kids back. It’s time to fully fund our public schools, repeal the voucher scheme that drains local classrooms, and pay…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education and workforce development
Candidate campaign source
Idaho ranks near the bottom in per-student funding and teacher pay and families feel it every day. Overcrowded classrooms, underpaid teachers, and lost opportunities are holding our kids back. It’s time to fully fund our public schools, repeal the voucher scheme that drains local classrooms, and pay teachers what they’re worth. Education should be Idaho’s strongest economic engine, connecting learning to real jobs through career pathways, trade training, and innovation hubs that keep our kids here, building Idaho’s future.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Idaho doesn’t need more slogans about tax cuts, it needs a government that actually works for the people paying the taxes. I support keeping taxes low, but you can’t keep cutting your way into oblivion. While the establishment brags about surpluses, families are working harder for less. Our roads ar…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability
Candidate campaign source
Idaho doesn’t need more slogans about tax cuts, it needs a government that actually works for the people paying the taxes. I support keeping taxes low, but you can’t keep cutting your way into oblivion. While the establishment brags about surpluses, families are working harder for less. Our roads are crumbling, our schools are underfunded, and our seniors can’t afford care. Fiscal responsibility must be balanced with fiscal humanity. As Lieutenant Governor, I’ll fight for an Idaho that invests wisely, not just cuts blindly. A surplus means nothing if our people are falling behind.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published Idaho candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Idaho incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Idaho legislators and Idaho’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Idaho’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
0 matching sponsorships or proposals · 0 Idaho incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
No retained proposals match these filters. A missing record does not mean an incumbent has taken no action.
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us
Only current Idaho officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Idaho statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Idaho snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Idaho, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.