Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and Idaho public-safety context.
Reported violent-crime rate236.6 per 100k2024 · #38 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate758.3 per 100k2024 · #50 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage99.6%2024 · #18 of 50 · highest first
Idaho over time
Explore Idaho readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Idaho officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Idaho effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Idaho change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Reported violent-crime rate Idaho · source units
IdahoPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
10 of 10 reviewed Idaho actions match · 8 date markers shown. 33 major events shown separately.
Idaho · 2024: 236.6 per 100k · Rank #38 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Idaho's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 97.5% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Idaho · state comparison
Reported crime over time
Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.
Idaho · 2024236.6 per 100k
Idaho rank#38among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Reported violent-crime rate
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Idaho's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 97.5% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Idaho
2024 · Idaho: 236.6 per 100k · Rank #38 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Idaho Reported violent-crime rate history
Period
Idaho
Compare
2015
216.2 per 100k
2016
228.6 per 100k
2017
242.6 per 100k
2018
238.4 per 100k
2019
237.8 per 100k
2020
258.1 per 100k
2021
248.1 per 100k
2022
251.6 per 100k
2023
243.2 per 100k
2024
236.6 per 100k
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Idaho stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Idaho has a dark outline.
Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Idaho · 236.6 per 100k2024 · Rank #38 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Idaho with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Mexico
744.7 per 100k
—
#2
Alaska
731.9 per 100k
—
#3
Tennessee
604.3 per 100k
—
#4
Arkansas
589.6 per 100k
—
#5*
Louisiana
504.5 per 100k
82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6
Colorado
486.8 per 100k
—
#7
California
478.4 per 100k
—
#8
Kansas
474.7 per 100k
—
#9
Missouri
472.7 per 100k
—
#10
Michigan
442.6 per 100k
—
#11
South Carolina
440.8 per 100k
—
#12
Arizona
433 per 100k
—
#13
Oklahoma
429.3 per 100k
—
#14
Montana
428 per 100k
—
#15
Maryland
425.9 per 100k
—
#16
Nevada
408.6 per 100k
—
#17
Texas
397.8 per 100k
—
#18
New York
392.2 per 100k
—
#19
North Carolina
382.9 per 100k
—
#20
Alabama
380.8 per 100k
—
#21
Delaware
368.4 per 100k
—
#22*
South Dakota
356.9 per 100k
89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*
Indiana
349.2 per 100k
87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24
Oregon
341.1 per 100k
—
#25
Washington
331.8 per 100k
—
#26
Georgia
328 per 100k
—
#27
Massachusetts
317.9 per 100k
—
#28
Ohio
311.9 per 100k
—
#29
Illinois
294.5 per 100k
—
#30
Wisconsin
287.6 per 100k
—
#31
West Virginia
263.8 per 100k
—
#32*
Florida
262 per 100k
81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33
Minnesota
259.4 per 100k
—
#34
North Dakota
258 per 100k
—
#35
Pennsylvania
251.3 per 100k
—
#36
Iowa
247.2 per 100k
—
#37
Utah
237.8 per 100k
—
#38
Idaho · your comparison
236.6 per 100k
—
#39
Hawaii
230.3 per 100k
—
#40
Vermont
227.1 per 100k
—
#41
Kentucky
226.7 per 100k
—
#42
Nebraska
224.6 per 100k
—
#43
Virginia
223.7 per 100k
—
#44
New Jersey
221.9 per 100k
—
#45*
Mississippi
219.6 per 100k
65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*
Wyoming
212.5 per 100k
89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47
Rhode Island
154.9 per 100k
—
#48
Connecticut
139.2 per 100k
—
#49
New Hampshire
112.3 per 100k
—
#50
Maine
102.6 per 100k
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
Idaho's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 97.5% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 99.6%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
Idaho's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 97.5% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 99.6%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.
Idaho · 2024331
Idaho rank#35among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Firearm deaths
Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.
Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Idaho stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Idaho has a dark outline.
Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Idaho · 3312024 · Rank #35 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Idaho with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
4,389
—
#2
Florida
3,191
—
#3
California
2,853
—
#4
Georgia
1,985
—
#5
North Carolina
1,835
—
#6
Ohio
1,745
—
#7
Pennsylvania
1,624
—
#8
Illinois
1,563
—
#9
Tennessee
1,448
—
#10
Arizona
1,331
—
#11
Missouri
1,234
—
#12
Michigan
1,228
—
#13
Alabama
1,212
—
#14
Indiana
1,196
—
#15
Virginia
1,153
—
#16
South Carolina
1,064
—
#17
Louisiana
1,031
—
#18
Colorado
961
—
#19
Washington
915
—
#20
New York
896
—
#21
Kentucky
870
—
#22
Mississippi
810
—
#23
Oklahoma
794
—
#24
Wisconsin
735
—
#25
Maryland
716
—
#26
Oregon
663
—
#27
Arkansas
638
—
#28
Minnesota
582
—
#28
Nevada
582
—
#30
New Mexico
563
—
#31
Utah
454
—
#32
Kansas
446
—
#33
New Jersey
393
—
#34
Iowa
389
—
#35
Idaho · your comparison
331
—
#36
Massachusetts
287
—
#37
West Virginia
281
—
#38
Montana
247
—
#39
Connecticut
224
—
#40
Nebraska
218
—
#41
Alaska
182
—
#42
Maine
181
—
#43
South Dakota
159
—
#44
New Hampshire
152
—
#45
Wyoming
143
—
#46
Delaware
123
—
#47
North Dakota
95
—
#48
Vermont
76
—
#49
Hawaii
56
—
#50
Rhode Island
55
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
10 of 10 reviewed Idaho actions · newest first
Mar 31, 2026 · HB 803 · EXECUTION – Amends existing law to provide that procedures used in an execution shall not be subject to certain provisions of law. · Enacted · Chapter 225Idaho Legislature · HB 803
EXECUTION – Amends existing law to provide that procedures used in an execution shall not be subject to certain provisions of law.
The reviewed HB 803 provisions exempt execution procedures determined by the corrections director from Idaho Administrative Procedure Act requirements and expand confidentiality to specified participants involved in planning, training or performing executions. Sections 1 and 3 took effect upon passage and approval on March 31, 2026; section 2 took effect July 1, 2026. The confidentiality provision concerns the listed participants’ identities, including specified medical, escort and firing-squad personnel, technical assistants and execution-supply providers. Its July 1 version carries forward the firing-squad-first method enacted separately in 2025; HB 803 did not create that earlier policy. The connection is limited to punishment for capital murder, an offense covered by the separate capital-sentencing statute, and does not claim that executions themselves are counted in these homicide or violent-crime statistics or that the policy prevents killings.
Signed by Governor on 2026-03-31, Chapter 225 of the 2026 regular session. Signing, effectiveness, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
CDC homicide mortality is based on resident death certificates and is distinct from police-reported crime. Execution procedures concern punishment for a subset of murder offenses. Legal execution is distinct from the homicide deaths measured here, and the connection does not establish prevention. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Idaho evidence context: Homicide deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. That Section 19-2716, Idaho Code, as amended by Section 1, Chapter 36, Laws of 2025, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 19-2716. METHODS OF EXECUTION. (1) The punishment of death shall be inflicted by the following methods: (a) Firing squad; or (b) Continuous, intravenous administration of a lethal quantity of a substance or substances approved by the director of the Idaho department of correction until death is pronounced by a coroner or a deputy coroner. (2) Not later than five (5) days after the issuance of a death warrant, the director of the Idaho department of correction must determine, and certify by affidavit to the court that issued the death warrant, whether execution by firing squad, as described in subsection (1)(a) of this section, is available. (3) If the director certifies that firing squad is available, the method of execution shall be firing squad. (4) If the director does not certify that firing squad is available or fails to file a certification as required pursuant to subsection (2) of this section, the method of execution shall be lethal injection, as described in subsection (1)(b) of this section. (5) If a court holds that firing squad is unconstitutional, on its face or as applied, or otherwise determines that lethal injection is a constitutionally required method of execution, the method of execution shall be lethal injection. (6) The director shall determine the procedures to be used in any execution. Such procedures shall not be subject to the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code. (7) The provisions of this section shall apply to all executions carried out on and after the effective date of this enactment, irrespective of the date sentence was imposed. SECTION 3. That Section 19-2716A, Idaho Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 19-2716A. PRACTICE OF MEDICINE AND POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED SUB- STANCES -- EXEMPTION -- EXCEPTIONS TO GOVERNMENTAL LIABILITY -- CONFI- DENTIALITY -- LICENSURE. (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, infliction of the punishment of death in the manner required by section 19-2716, Idaho Code, shall not be construed as the practice of medicine. The director of the department of correction and all persons authorized by him to participate in an execution, as provided in section 19-2716, Idaho Code, shall be exempt from all laws, rules and regulations governing the practice of medicine. (2) For the purposes of carrying out the provisions of section 19-2716, Idaho Code, any pharmacy, prescriber, manufacturer, wholesale distributor or other entity authorized by law to possess controlled substances may distribute controlled substances to the director or his designees and shall not be subject to criminal or civil liability for the death of the condemned person. (3) For the purposes of carrying out the provisions of section 19-2716, Idaho Code, the director and his designees may obtain, possess, store and administer controlled substances and are exempt from all laws, rules and regulations governing pharmacies and controlled substances, notwithstanding any other provision of law. Any employee of the state of Idaho participating in an execution pursuant to section 19-2716, Idaho Code, shall be presumed to be acting within the course and scope of his employment and without malice or criminal intent for purposes of section 6-903, Idaho Code. Any employee, agent or contractor of the state of Idaho participating in an execution pursuant to section 19-2716, Idaho Code, shall not be subject to criminal or civil liability for the death of the condemned person. (4) For purposes of carrying out the provisions of section 19-2716, Idaho Code, the identities of any of the following persons or entities involved in the planning, training, or performance of an execution shall be confidential, shall not be subject to disclosure, and shall not be admissible as evidence or discoverable in any proceeding before any court, tribunal, board, agency, or person: (a) The on-site emergency medical personnel, any member of the escort team , medical team, or firing squad, and any person or entity that provides technical assistance during the execution process; and (b) Any person or entity who compounds, synthesizes, tests, sells, supplies, manufactures, stores, transports, procures, dispenses, or prescribes the chemicals or substances for use in an execution or that provides the medical supplies or medical equipment for the execution process. (5) If any person who participates or performs ancillary functions in an execution is licensed by a board, the licensing board shall not suspend or revoke the person's license, or take disciplinary action against the person, because of the person's participation in an execution. SECTION 4. An emergency existing therefor, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, Sections 1 and 3 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after passage and approval. Section 2 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 2026.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 31, 2026 · HB 803 · EXECUTION – Amends existing law to provide that procedures used in an execution shall not be subject to certain provisions of law. · SignedGovernor · HB 803
EXECUTION – Amends existing law to provide that procedures used in an execution shall not be subject to certain provisions of law.
Mar 31, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Brad Little · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Brad Little signed HB 803. The reviewed HB 803 provisions exempt execution procedures determined by the corrections director from Idaho Administrative Procedure Act requirements and expand confidentiality to specified participants involved in planning, training or performing executions. Sections 1 and 3 took effect upon passage and approval on March 31, 2026; section 2 took effect July 1, 2026. The confidentiality provision concerns the listed participants’ identities, including specified medical, escort and firing-squad personnel, technical assistants and execution-supply providers. Its July 1 version carries forward the firing-squad-first method enacted separately in 2025; HB 803 did not create that earlier policy. The connection is limited to punishment for capital murder, an offense covered by the separate capital-sentencing statute, and does not claim that executions themselves are counted in these homicide or violent-crime statistics or that the policy prevents killings.
Signed by Governor on 2026-03-31, Chapter 225 of the 2026 regular session. Signing, effectiveness, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
CDC homicide mortality is based on resident death certificates and is distinct from police-reported crime. Execution procedures concern punishment for a subset of murder offenses. Legal execution is distinct from the homicide deaths measured here, and the connection does not establish prevention. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Idaho evidence context: Homicide deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. That Section 19-2716, Idaho Code, as amended by Section 1, Chapter 36, Laws of 2025, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 19-2716. METHODS OF EXECUTION. (1) The punishment of death shall be inflicted by the following methods: (a) Firing squad; or (b) Continuous, intravenous administration of a lethal quantity of a substance or substances approved by the director of the Idaho department of correction until death is pronounced by a coroner or a deputy coroner. (2) Not later than five (5) days after the issuance of a death warrant, the director of the Idaho department of correction must determine, and certify by affidavit to the court that issued the death warrant, whether execution by firing squad, as described in subsection (1)(a) of this section, is available. (3) If the director certifies that firing squad is available, the method of execution shall be firing squad. (4) If the director does not certify that firing squad is available or fails to file a certification as required pursuant to subsection (2) of this section, the method of execution shall be lethal injection, as described in subsection (1)(b) of this section. (5) If a court holds that firing squad is unconstitutional, on its face or as applied, or otherwise determines that lethal injection is a constitutionally required method of execution, the method of execution shall be lethal injection. (6) The director shall determine the procedures to be used in any execution. Such procedures shall not be subject to the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code. (7) The provisions of this section shall apply to all executions carried out on and after the effective date of this enactment, irrespective of the date sentence was imposed. SECTION 3. That Section 19-2716A, Idaho Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 19-2716A. PRACTICE OF MEDICINE AND POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED SUB- STANCES -- EXEMPTION -- EXCEPTIONS TO GOVERNMENTAL LIABILITY -- CONFI- DENTIALITY -- LICENSURE. (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, infliction of the punishment of death in the manner required by section 19-2716, Idaho Code, shall not be construed as the practice of medicine. The director of the department of correction and all persons authorized by him to participate in an execution, as provided in section 19-2716, Idaho Code, shall be exempt from all laws, rules and regulations governing the practice of medicine. (2) For the purposes of carrying out the provisions of section 19-2716, Idaho Code, any pharmacy, prescriber, manufacturer, wholesale distributor or other entity authorized by law to possess controlled substances may distribute controlled substances to the director or his designees and shall not be subject to criminal or civil liability for the death of the condemned person. (3) For the purposes of carrying out the provisions of section 19-2716, Idaho Code, the director and his designees may obtain, possess, store and administer controlled substances and are exempt from all laws, rules and regulations governing pharmacies and controlled substances, notwithstanding any other provision of law. Any employee of the state of Idaho participating in an execution pursuant to section 19-2716, Idaho Code, shall be presumed to be acting within the course and scope of his employment and without malice or criminal intent for purposes of section 6-903, Idaho Code. Any employee, agent or contractor of the state of Idaho participating in an execution pursuant to section 19-2716, Idaho Code, shall not be subject to criminal or civil liability for the death of the condemned person. (4) For purposes of carrying out the provisions of section 19-2716, Idaho Code, the identities of any of the following persons or entities involved in the planning, training, or performance of an execution shall be confidential, shall not be subject to disclosure, and shall not be admissible as evidence or discoverable in any proceeding before any court, tribunal, board, agency, or person: (a) The on-site emergency medical personnel, any member of the escort team , medical team, or firing squad, and any person or entity that provides technical assistance during the execution process; and (b) Any person or entity who compounds, synthesizes, tests, sells, supplies, manufactures, stores, transports, procures, dispenses, or prescribes the chemicals or substances for use in an execution or that provides the medical supplies or medical equipment for the execution process. (5) If any person who participates or performs ancillary functions in an execution is licensed by a board, the licensing board shall not suspend or revoke the person's license, or take disciplinary action against the person, because of the person's participation in an execution. SECTION 4. An emergency existing therefor, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, Sections 1 and 3 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after passage and approval. Section 2 of this act shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 2026.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 26, 2026 · HB 573 · ENHANCED LICENSES TO CARRY CONCEALED WEAPONS – Amends existing law to provide that certain persons may provide instruction on Idaho law regarding firearms and the use of deadly force. · SignedGovernor · HB 573
ENHANCED LICENSES TO CARRY CONCEALED WEAPONS – Amends existing law to provide that certain persons may provide instruction on Idaho law regarding firearms and the use of deadly force.
Mar 26, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Brad Little · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Brad Little signed HB 573. HB 573 adds an NRA-certified or equivalent instructor with at least eight years of experience teaching an approved enhanced concealed-carry course to the people who may teach its Idaho-law and deadly-force portion. The reviewed course requirements still include at least eight hours, face-to-face teaching, handgun safety, self-defense and live-fire training of at least 98 rounds. This is an instructor-qualification change, not evidence of fewer firearm deaths.
Signed by Governor on 2026-03-26, Chapter 159 of the 2026 regular session. Signing, effectiveness, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality series includes deaths across intents, including homicide and suicide. Transfer procedures and concealed-carry instruction concern firearm access or training; they do not establish an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Idaho evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The sheriff must accept as a qualifying handgun course a personal protection course offered by the national rifle association or an equivalent, provided that all personal protection or equivalent courses must meet the following requirements: (i) The course instructor is certified by the national rifle association, or by another nationally recognized organization that customarily certifies firearms instructors, as an instructor in personal protection with handguns, or the course instructor is certified by the Idaho peace officers standards and training council as a firearms instructor; (ii) The course is at least eight (8) hours in duration; (iii) The course is taught face to face and not by electronic or other means; and (iv) The course includes instruction in: 1. Idaho law relating to firearms and the use of deadly force, provided that such instruction is delivered by any of the following whose name and credential must appear on the certificate: (A) An active, senior or emeritus member of the Idaho state bar; (B) A law enforcement officer, active or retired, who currently possesses or possessed at the time of his retirement an intermediate or higher Idaho peace officers standards and training certificate; or (C) An instructor certified by the national rifle association, or equivalent, who has instructed an approved course for enhanced concealed carry for at least eight (8) years; 2. The basic concepts of the safe and responsible use of handguns; 3. Self-defense principles; and 4. Live fire training, including the firing of at least ninety-eight (98) rounds by the student. An instructor must provide a copy of the syllabus and a written description of the course of fire used in a qualifying handgun course that includes the name of the individual instructing the legal portion of the course to the sheriff upon request.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 26, 2026 · HB 573 · ENHANCED LICENSES TO CARRY CONCEALED WEAPONS – Amends existing law to provide that certain persons may provide instruction on Idaho law regarding firearms and the use of deadly force. · Enacted · Chapter 159Idaho Legislature · HB 573
ENHANCED LICENSES TO CARRY CONCEALED WEAPONS – Amends existing law to provide that certain persons may provide instruction on Idaho law regarding firearms and the use of deadly force.
Mar 26, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 159
Charlie Shepherd · Floor sponsor / Kelly Arthur Anthon · Floor sponsor
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 573 adds an NRA-certified or equivalent instructor with at least eight years of experience teaching an approved enhanced concealed-carry course to the people who may teach its Idaho-law and deadly-force portion. The reviewed course requirements still include at least eight hours, face-to-face teaching, handgun safety, self-defense and live-fire training of at least 98 rounds. This is an instructor-qualification change, not evidence of fewer firearm deaths.
Signed by Governor on 2026-03-26, Chapter 159 of the 2026 regular session. Signing, effectiveness, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality series includes deaths across intents, including homicide and suicide. Transfer procedures and concealed-carry instruction concern firearm access or training; they do not establish an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Idaho evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The sheriff must accept as a qualifying handgun course a personal protection course offered by the national rifle association or an equivalent, provided that all personal protection or equivalent courses must meet the following requirements: (i) The course instructor is certified by the national rifle association, or by another nationally recognized organization that customarily certifies firearms instructors, as an instructor in personal protection with handguns, or the course instructor is certified by the Idaho peace officers standards and training council as a firearms instructor; (ii) The course is at least eight (8) hours in duration; (iii) The course is taught face to face and not by electronic or other means; and (iv) The course includes instruction in: 1. Idaho law relating to firearms and the use of deadly force, provided that such instruction is delivered by any of the following whose name and credential must appear on the certificate: (A) An active, senior or emeritus member of the Idaho state bar; (B) A law enforcement officer, active or retired, who currently possesses or possessed at the time of his retirement an intermediate or higher Idaho peace officers standards and training certificate; or (C) An instructor certified by the national rifle association, or equivalent, who has instructed an approved course for enhanced concealed carry for at least eight (8) years; 2. The basic concepts of the safe and responsible use of handguns; 3. Self-defense principles; and 4. Live fire training, including the firing of at least ninety-eight (98) rounds by the student. An instructor must provide a copy of the syllabus and a written description of the course of fire used in a qualifying handgun course that includes the name of the individual instructing the legal portion of the course to the sheriff upon request.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 26, 2026 · SB 1260 · IMMIGRATION COOPERATION AND ENFORCEMENT ACT – Amends existing law to revise provisions regarding illegal entry, to remove provisions regarding illegal entry, and to provide for certain affirmative defenses. · SignedGovernor · SB 1260
IMMIGRATION COOPERATION AND ENFORCEMENT ACT – Amends existing law to revise provisions regarding illegal entry, to remove provisions regarding illegal entry, and to provide for certain affirmative defenses.
Mar 26, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Brad Little · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Brad Little signed SB 1260. The reviewed sections of SB 1260 revise the state illegal-entry offense by tying it to entry into the United States in violation of the specified federal smuggling provisions, 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1) or (a)(2). The entry offense concerns noncitizens age 18 or older who knowingly enter or attempt to enter Idaho, or are present in Idaho, after the specified U.S. entry; a first conviction is a misdemeanor and a subsequent conviction a felony. The bill defines that violation to include a federal conviction or acts meeting the provisions without a charge or conviction. Enforcement remains limited to detention or investigation for an independent crime in the specified Idaho titles, and affirmative defenses include federal permission to remain and the absence of the specified independent-crime investigation, charge or conviction. The foreign-born population is much broader than people covered by this offense; this review does not establish enforcement or current enforceability.
Signed by Governor on 2026-03-26, Chapter 165 of the 2026 regular session. Signing, effectiveness, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens, lawful noncitizens and people without lawful status. Immigration enforcement provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or establish any individual resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Idaho evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. That Section 18-9002, Idaho Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 18-9002. DEFINITIONS. As used in this chapter: (1) "Alien" has the meaning assigned by 8 U.S.C. 1101, as that provision existed on January 1, 2023. (2) "Custodial authority" means the director of the department of correction, county sheriffs, city chiefs of police, and any of their subordinates with the power to confine or detain a person under color of law. (3) "Dangerous crime" means any felony crime as described in Idaho Code or in similar state or federal code, any offense for which an extended term of imprisonment may be imposed pursuant to section 19-2520B, Idaho Code, or any offense requiring sex offender registration as set forth in section 18-8304, Idaho Code. (4) "Dangerous illegal alien" means an illegal alien who has previously been convicted or found guilty, by judgment or withheld judgment, of a dangerous crime in this state or in any other state or nation. (5) "DHS" means the United States department of homeland security and its subordinate agencies and divisions. (6) "Illegal alien" means a person eighteen (18) years of age or older who is verified by the federal government to be present in the United States in violation of the federal immigration and nationality act, 8 U.S.C., and federal rules promulgated in accordance therewith. (7) "Immigration detainer" means a notice or other documentation issued by United States immigration and customs enforcement requesting that a custodial authority or law enforcement official maintain temporary custody of an illegal alien, including a DHS form I-247 document or a similar successor form. (8) "Law enforcement official" means all state, county, and local law enforcement officers, prosecuting attorneys, and city attorneys. (9) "Port of entry" means a port of entry in the United States pursuant to 19 CFR 101. (10) "Violation of 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1) or 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(2)" means a conviction in federal court of violating 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1) or 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(2) or, in the absence of a charge or conviction, committing acts that would be a violation of 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1) or 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(2). SECTION 2. That Section 18-9003, Idaho Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 18-9003. ILLEGAL ENTRY . (1) A person who is an alien and is eighteen (18) years of age or older commits an offense if the person knowingly enters or attempts to enter this state or is at any time present in this state after having entered the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1) or 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(2). (2) A violation of this section shall be a misdemeanor upon a first conviction. A second or subsequent conviction shall be a felony. (3) Law enforcement officers may enforce the provisions of this section only when a person is detained or investigated for suspected commission of an independent crime under title 18, Idaho Code, excluding this chapter, or under chapter 27, title 37, Idaho Code. (4) It shall be an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that: (a) The federal government has affirmatively granted the defendant permission to remain in the United States under a provision of the immigration and nationality act or other federal statute; or (b) The defendant was not investigated for, charged with, or convicted of committing the independent crime for which the defendant was detained or investigated pursuant to subsection (3) of this section . (5) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a defendant shall not be eligible for deferred adjudication or a withheld judgment if the defendant is charged with or convicted of an offense pursuant to this section.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 26, 2026 · SB 1260 · IMMIGRATION COOPERATION AND ENFORCEMENT ACT – Amends existing law to revise provisions regarding illegal entry, to remove provisions regarding illegal entry, and to provide for certain affirmative defenses. · Enacted · Chapter 165Idaho Legislature · SB 1260
IMMIGRATION COOPERATION AND ENFORCEMENT ACT – Amends existing law to revise provisions regarding illegal entry, to remove provisions regarding illegal entry, and to provide for certain affirmative defenses.
Mar 26, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 165
Todd M. Lakey · Floor sponsor / Bruce D. Skaug · Floor sponsor
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed sections of SB 1260 revise the state illegal-entry offense by tying it to entry into the United States in violation of the specified federal smuggling provisions, 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1) or (a)(2). The entry offense concerns noncitizens age 18 or older who knowingly enter or attempt to enter Idaho, or are present in Idaho, after the specified U.S. entry; a first conviction is a misdemeanor and a subsequent conviction a felony. The bill defines that violation to include a federal conviction or acts meeting the provisions without a charge or conviction. Enforcement remains limited to detention or investigation for an independent crime in the specified Idaho titles, and affirmative defenses include federal permission to remain and the absence of the specified independent-crime investigation, charge or conviction. The foreign-born population is much broader than people covered by this offense; this review does not establish enforcement or current enforceability.
Signed by Governor on 2026-03-26, Chapter 165 of the 2026 regular session. Signing, effectiveness, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens, lawful noncitizens and people without lawful status. Immigration enforcement provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or establish any individual resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Idaho evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. That Section 18-9002, Idaho Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 18-9002. DEFINITIONS. As used in this chapter: (1) "Alien" has the meaning assigned by 8 U.S.C. 1101, as that provision existed on January 1, 2023. (2) "Custodial authority" means the director of the department of correction, county sheriffs, city chiefs of police, and any of their subordinates with the power to confine or detain a person under color of law. (3) "Dangerous crime" means any felony crime as described in Idaho Code or in similar state or federal code, any offense for which an extended term of imprisonment may be imposed pursuant to section 19-2520B, Idaho Code, or any offense requiring sex offender registration as set forth in section 18-8304, Idaho Code. (4) "Dangerous illegal alien" means an illegal alien who has previously been convicted or found guilty, by judgment or withheld judgment, of a dangerous crime in this state or in any other state or nation. (5) "DHS" means the United States department of homeland security and its subordinate agencies and divisions. (6) "Illegal alien" means a person eighteen (18) years of age or older who is verified by the federal government to be present in the United States in violation of the federal immigration and nationality act, 8 U.S.C., and federal rules promulgated in accordance therewith. (7) "Immigration detainer" means a notice or other documentation issued by United States immigration and customs enforcement requesting that a custodial authority or law enforcement official maintain temporary custody of an illegal alien, including a DHS form I-247 document or a similar successor form. (8) "Law enforcement official" means all state, county, and local law enforcement officers, prosecuting attorneys, and city attorneys. (9) "Port of entry" means a port of entry in the United States pursuant to 19 CFR 101. (10) "Violation of 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1) or 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(2)" means a conviction in federal court of violating 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1) or 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(2) or, in the absence of a charge or conviction, committing acts that would be a violation of 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1) or 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(2). SECTION 2. That Section 18-9003, Idaho Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 18-9003. ILLEGAL ENTRY . (1) A person who is an alien and is eighteen (18) years of age or older commits an offense if the person knowingly enters or attempts to enter this state or is at any time present in this state after having entered the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1) or 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(2). (2) A violation of this section shall be a misdemeanor upon a first conviction. A second or subsequent conviction shall be a felony. (3) Law enforcement officers may enforce the provisions of this section only when a person is detained or investigated for suspected commission of an independent crime under title 18, Idaho Code, excluding this chapter, or under chapter 27, title 37, Idaho Code. (4) It shall be an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that: (a) The federal government has affirmatively granted the defendant permission to remain in the United States under a provision of the immigration and nationality act or other federal statute; or (b) The defendant was not investigated for, charged with, or convicted of committing the independent crime for which the defendant was detained or investigated pursuant to subsection (3) of this section . (5) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a defendant shall not be eligible for deferred adjudication or a withheld judgment if the defendant is charged with or convicted of an offense pursuant to this section.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Idaho officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s Idaho candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
21 statements from 8 candidates
2026 Idaho Attorney General — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
The Attorney General should advocate for adequate funding of our justice system, including law enforcement, courts, public defenders, and corrections, in accordance with the Constitution. The AG’s office should promote legislative fixes to problems impeding the work of that important system.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Safeguard Our Elections
Candidate campaign source
The Attorney General should advocate for adequate funding of our justice system, including law enforcement, courts, public defenders, and corrections, in accordance with the Constitution. The AG’s office should promote legislative fixes to problems impeding the work of that important system.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
As Governor I will never allow the National Guard to participate in an unjust or unconstitutional war. Would the Idaho commanders follow me, or a wrongful President and Congress? Unjust war is murder.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, and veterans
Candidate campaign source
As Governor I will never allow the National Guard to participate in an unjust or unconstitutional war. Would the Idaho commanders follow me, or a wrongful President and Congress? Unjust war is murder.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
We believe that an elected sheriff could, and should, protect his citizens against unconstitutional and immoral laws and edicts by so-called higher authorities. The sheriff should stop baby murder (abortion), protect gun rights, prevent wrongful arrest, etc. However, almost no sheriffs believe they …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care and reproductive policy
Candidate campaign source
We believe that an elected sheriff could, and should, protect his citizens against unconstitutional and immoral laws and edicts by so-called higher authorities. The sheriff should stop baby murder (abortion), protect gun rights, prevent wrongful arrest, etc. However, almost no sheriffs believe they have this authority.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
General criminal law jurisdiction, constitutionally, belongs with the states. Pre-born baby murder, homosexual marriage, transgender issues, etc. should never be decided by federal courts. In truth, almost all laws belong in state jurisdiction. When federal judges accept cases that belong in state j…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care and reproductive policy
Candidate campaign source
General criminal law jurisdiction, constitutionally, belongs with the states. Pre-born baby murder, homosexual marriage, transgender issues, etc. should never be decided by federal courts. In truth, almost all laws belong in state jurisdiction. When federal judges accept cases that belong in state jurisdiction, they should be impeached and removed. Very few Americans want to accept this constitutional truth regarding jurisdiction.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Immunization passports are evil, like in "mark of the beast." I will never allow 'shot' passports. The Idaho Legislature would have to pass a law over my veto to make vax passports legal, and then ask for my recall election, because I would fight this to the end, just like I would on the question of…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care and reproductive policy
Candidate campaign source
Immunization passports are evil, like in "mark of the beast." I will never allow 'shot' passports. The Idaho Legislature would have to pass a law over my veto to make vax passports legal, and then ask for my recall election, because I would fight this to the end, just like I would on the question of baby murder and other basic principles.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
We will never vote for candidates who refuse to treat abortion as murder. When sperm meets egg, a new person is on earth and this equals personhood in the eyes of God. We should have laws punishing all willing participants in these murders. IVF (in vitro-fertilization) causes many children to be fer…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care and reproductive policy
Candidate campaign source
We will never vote for candidates who refuse to treat abortion as murder. When sperm meets egg, a new person is on earth and this equals personhood in the eyes of God. We should have laws punishing all willing participants in these murders. IVF (in vitro-fertilization) causes many children to be fertilized at one time from one mother. One of these tiny children is then chosen to be implanted on the mother's uterus and the rest are murdered or frozen for future use. The freezing of these little people who have adult spirits or souls is a horrendous crime. God and His angels are crying out about this most horrible crime against God and nature. We must join our voices with God to stop the freezing and murdering of these new people. Google 'snowflake babies.'
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Baby murder will not end, nor will it slow down, until everyone allowing and encouraging these murders is punished with the same intensity as regular murder. This includes the mother, especially the mother. Having knowledge of a mother planning or committing baby murder should be punishable by churc…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care and reproductive policy
Candidate campaign source
Baby murder will not end, nor will it slow down, until everyone allowing and encouraging these murders is punished with the same intensity as regular murder. This includes the mother, especially the mother. Having knowledge of a mother planning or committing baby murder should be punishable by church and government. All of us become complicit if we do not tell her that she will be committing murder. Birth control pills and morning-after chemicals are common instruments of baby murder. Legal personhood begins (in God's eyes) when sperm meets egg. All of these murders should be determined (in government jurisdiction) by juries. Some baby murders are committed by force by family members on other family members. If our culture accepted abortion as murder then this forced baby murder would end.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
If I become Governor in 2026, by my order, all baby murder facilities will remain closed and no abortifacients will be sold. This emergency order will remain as long as I am Governor. Birth control pills are abortifacients just like 'morning-after' pills. Morning-after chemicals are large doses of r…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care and reproductive policy
Candidate campaign source
If I become Governor in 2026, by my order, all baby murder facilities will remain closed and no abortifacients will be sold. This emergency order will remain as long as I am Governor. Birth control pills are abortifacients just like 'morning-after' pills. Morning-after chemicals are large doses of regular birth control chemicals. Also by my order there will be no transgender activity for any age in Idaho. The determination of crimes are in the jurisdiction of the Legislature, but as Governor I will not allow baby murder or body mutilations and chemical alterations for any age. My executive orders would force the Legislature to process these issues. Likely, the Legislature would falsely claim these issues are not in their jurisdiction and they would let the State or Federal courts make the decision. Or, they might seek to remove me from office via recall. Why do Christians vote for these peer-pressure politicians?
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
On the life question, the commonly used birth control pill is an abortifacient (murder by chemical), so therefore, any governmental outlawing of surgical abortion should also outlaw the sale and possession of birth control pills and 'morning after' chemicals. Birth control pills cause a woman's body…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care and reproductive policy
Candidate campaign source
On the life question, the commonly used birth control pill is an abortifacient (murder by chemical), so therefore, any governmental outlawing of surgical abortion should also outlaw the sale and possession of birth control pills and 'morning after' chemicals. Birth control pills cause a woman's body to have a false pregnancy, therefore a real child cannot attach to the uterus and dies. D&C procedures should be made illegal in rape cases. Legal personhood, if we follow science, begins at fertilization (when sperm meets egg).
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
As Governor I would not allow arrests by Federal officers unless they had contacted the county sheriff prior to the arrest. This of course would not apply to National Parks, Monuments, etc. I would remind county sheriffs that almost all law enforcment decisions should be made by elected sheriffs. A …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
As Governor I would not allow arrests by Federal officers unless they had contacted the county sheriff prior to the arrest. This of course would not apply to National Parks, Monuments, etc. I would remind county sheriffs that almost all law enforcment decisions should be made by elected sheriffs. A sheriff also has a right to ignore the Governor. At present, city councils hire police, and if the police misbehave, the voters have to go to the Mayor and Council for redress. Greater accountability could be achieved if law enforcement was directed by the elected sheriff.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Laws regarding free speech, e.g., "free speech, only in a free speech zone," are wrong. 'Disturbing-the-peace-laws', along with jury decisions, should give law enforcement the tools to handle First Amendment disputes. Police want 'well defined laws' so they do not have to exercise discernment. Law e…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
Laws regarding free speech, e.g., "free speech, only in a free speech zone," are wrong. 'Disturbing-the-peace-laws', along with jury decisions, should give law enforcement the tools to handle First Amendment disputes. Police want 'well defined laws' so they do not have to exercise discernment. Law enforcement should develop discernment, patience, and skills to resolve conflicts without violating natural rights. Our law enforcement culture is confused on this issue and will remain so, until we, through law, give law enforcement the responsibility to discern situational free speech. If a protester is lying 'and he knows it'- it is not protected free speech.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Community safety is about trust, not talking points. I stand with law enforcement, firefighters, and first responders, ensuring they have the training, mental health support, and community partnerships to protect and serve effectively. Idaho doesn’t need partisan fear tactics; we need real partnersh…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
Community safety is about trust, not talking points. I stand with law enforcement, firefighters, and first responders, ensuring they have the training, mental health support, and community partnerships to protect and serve effectively. Idaho doesn’t need partisan fear tactics; we need real partnerships that make every neighborhood safer.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
In our growing state, Lt. Governor Bedke supports local and state law enforcement in their courageous efforts to keep Idaho safe. Idaho backs the blue. When first responders play a more active role in their communities, the rate of crime goes down. Lt. Governor Bedke is in favor of competitively pay…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Promoting Public Safety
Candidate campaign source
In our growing state, Lt. Governor Bedke supports local and state law enforcement in their courageous efforts to keep Idaho safe. Idaho backs the blue. When first responders play a more active role in their communities, the rate of crime goes down. Lt. Governor Bedke is in favor of competitively paying our law enforcement officials and providing more training opportunities for critical situations, so they can continue to protect every Idahoan.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
For my efforts supporting law enforcement, I was proud to be named “Legislator of the Year” by the Fraternal Order of Police. As Lieutenant Governor, I will continue fighting to stop liberal efforts to defund the police, work to secure America’s borders, and keep Idaho families safe.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: STANDING WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT
Candidate campaign source
For my efforts supporting law enforcement, I was proud to be named “Legislator of the Year” by the Fraternal Order of Police. As Lieutenant Governor, I will continue fighting to stop liberal efforts to defund the police, work to secure America’s borders, and keep Idaho families safe.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
For my efforts supporting law enforcement, I was proud to be named “Legislator of the Year” by the Fraternal Order of Police. As your Lieutenant Governor, I continue fighting to stop liberal efforts to defund the police, to secure America’s borders, and to keep Idaho families safe.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
For my efforts supporting law enforcement, I was proud to be named “Legislator of the Year” by the Fraternal Order of Police. As your Lieutenant Governor, I continue fighting to stop liberal efforts to defund the police, to secure America’s borders, and to keep Idaho families safe.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published Idaho candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Idaho incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Idaho legislators and Idaho’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Idaho’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
2 matching sponsorships or proposals · 2 Idaho incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Russ Fulcher
U.S. House of Representatives, Idaho District 1 · R–ID
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Russ FulcherU.S. Congress · Idaho delegation · HR 613
ATF Transparency Act
Jan 22, 2025 · In Congress
Rep. Russ Fulcher · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposed ATF Transparency Act would create administrative appeals for certain denied National Firearms Act transfer applications, provide reimbursement of reasonable and necessary attorney fees after successful appeals, and deem covered transfer or making applications approved if ATF does not decide before 90 calendar days after original filing. The reviewed amendments would apply to applications filed or pending on or after enactment. These are proposed transfer and registration procedures, not current rules or evidence of an effect on firearm deaths.
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality series includes deaths across intents, including homicide and suicide. Transfer procedures and concealed-carry instruction concern firearm access or training; they do not establish an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Idaho evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Administrative relief for denial of firearm transfer application (a)In generalSection 5812 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (c)Administrative relief (1)In generalWith respect to any application described in subsection (a) for the transfer and registration of a firearm which is denied by the Secretary based on a determination that transferring the firearm to the transferee would violate subsection (d) of section 922 of title 18, United States Code, or receipt of the firearm by the transferee would violate subsection (g) or (n) of that section or State, local, or tribal law, the Secretary shall— (A)provide the transferee with the relevant NICS transaction number with respect to such application, (B)permit such transferee to appeal such denial to the Secretary in a manner similar to the process for appeals provided under section 25.10 of title 28, Code of Federal Regulations, and (C)permit such transferee to provide information to the Secretary to prevent any subsequent erroneous denial or extended delay by NICS pursuant to a program (as established by the Secretary) similar to the Voluntary Appeal File program described in section 25.10(g) of title 28, Code of Federal Regulations. (2)Attorney feesIn the case of any successful appeal by the transferee pursuant to the process described in paragraph (1)(B), the Secretary shall reimburse the transferee for any reasonable and necessary attorney fees incurred with respect to such appeal. (3)NICSFor purposes of this subsection, the term NICS means the national instant criminal background check system established under section 103 of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (34 U.S.C. 40901).. (b)Effective dateThe amendment made by this section shall apply to applications for the transfer and registration of a firearm which are filed or pending on or after the date of enactment of this Act. 3.Timely processing of applications (a)Transfer of firearmsSection 5812 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended by section 2, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d)Processing of applicationsNotwithstanding subsection (a), if an application described in such subsection with respect to the transfer and registration of a firearm has been filed with the Secretary and the Secretary fails to make a determination regarding whether to approve or deny such application prior to the date which is 90 calendar days after the date on which such application was originally filed by the transferor, the transfer and registration of such firearm to the transferee shall be deemed to have been approved by the Secretary for purposes of this section and such transfer may be made. The Secretary shall only deny an application described in subsection (a) on the grounds that the applicable requirements under such subsection have not been satisfied, and may not deny an application solely on the grounds that a determination regarding whether to approve or deny such application could not be completed by the Secretary during the period described in the preceding sentence.. (b)Making of firearmsSection 5822 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following: Notwithstanding the preceding sentences, if a person files an application to make and register a firearm with the Secretary and the Secretary fails to make a determination regarding whether to approve or deny such application prior to the date which is 90 calendar days after the date on which such application was originally filed by such person, such application shall be deemed to have been approved by the Secretary for purposes of this section and such firearm may be made by such person. The Secretary shall only deny an application to make and register a firearm on the grounds that the applicable requirements under this section have not been satisfied, and may not deny an application solely on the grounds that a determination regarding whether to approve or deny such application could not be completed by the Secretary during the period described in the preceding sentence.. (c)Effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall apply to applications which are filed or pending on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Mike CrapoU.S. Congress · Idaho delegation · S 364
Hearing Protection Act
Feb 3, 2025 · In Congress
Sen. Mike Crapo · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposed Hearing Protection Act would remove silencers from the National Firearms Act definition, change registration and record requirements, preempt specified state silencer taxes and registration requirements, and impose a separate 10% manufacturers’ excise tax. State preemption applies to covered silencers in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce and excepts generally applicable sales or use taxes. The proposal directs destruction of the specified federal silencer registration and identifying application records within 365 days. Its NFA-definition change and excise-tax provisions use calendar quarters beginning more than 90 days after enactment; the excise tax applies to articles sold by manufacturers, producers or importers. Other title 18 provisions remain material. The bill is a proposal about silencer regulation and access, not evidence of enactment or a measured mortality effect.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality series includes deaths across intents, including homicide and suicide. Transfer procedures and concealed-carry instruction concern firearm access or training; they do not establish an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Idaho evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Equal treatment of silencers and firearms (a)In generalSection 5845(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking (7) any silencer and all that follows through ; and (8) and inserting and (7). (b)Effective dateThe amendment made by this section shall apply to calendar quarters beginning more than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 3.Treatment of certain silencersSection 5841 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following: (f)Firearm silencersA person acquiring or possessing a firearm silencer in accordance with chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, shall be treated as meeting any registration and licensing requirements of the National Firearms Act with respect to such silencer.. 4.Preemption of certain State laws in relation to firearm silencersSection 927 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, a law of a State or a political subdivision of a State that imposes a tax, other than a generally applicable sales or use tax, on making, transferring, using, possessing, or transporting a firearm silencer in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, or imposes a marking, recordkeeping, or registration requirement with respect to such a firearm silencer, shall have no force or effect.. 5.Destruction of recordsNot later than 365 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall destroy any registration of a silencer maintained in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record pursuant to section 5841 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, any application to transfer filed under section 5812 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that identifies the transferee of a silencer, and any application to make filed under section 5822 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that identifies the maker of a silencer. 6.Amendments to title 18, United States CodeChapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1)in section 921(a), by striking paragraph (25) and inserting the following: (25)The terms firearm silencer and firearm muffler mean— (A)any device designed or redesigned, made or remade, and intended— (i)to silence, muffle, or diminish the auditory report of a portable firearm; and (ii)to be attached to a portable firearm, directly or through a mount, adaptor, or other device that is not a firearm silencer or firearm muffler; or (B)the outer tube or other single part of any device that— (i)provides the primary housing or is the primary structure for internal sound-reduction components designed or redesigned, made or remade, and intended to silence, muffle, or diminish the auditory report of a portable firearm; and (ii)attaches to a portable firearm, directly or through a mount, adaptor, or other device that is not a firearm silencer or firearm muffler.; (2)in section 922(b)— (A)in paragraph (1), by striking shotgun or rifle the first place it appears and inserting shotgun, rifle, firearm silencer, or firearm muffler; and (B)in paragraph (3), by striking rifle or shotgun and inserting shotgun, rifle, firearm silencer, or firearm muffler; and (3)in section 923(i)— (A)by striking Licensed and inserting the following: (1) In the case of a firearm other than a firearm silencer or firearm muffler, licensed; and (B)by adding at the end the following: (2)In the case of a firearm silencer or firearm muffler, licensed importers and licensed manufacturers shall identify by means of a serial number engraved or cast on the outer tube or other single part that provides the primary housing or primary structure of the firearm silencer or firearm muffler, in such manner as the Attorney General shall by regulations prescribe, each firearm silencer or firearm muffler imported or manufactured by such importer or manufacturer, except that, if marking the outer tube or other single part that provides the primary housing or primary structure is impractical, licensed importers or licensed manufacturers shall submit a request for a marking variance to the Attorney General. The Attorney General shall grant such a request except on showing good cause that marking the firearm silencer or firearm muffler as requested would not further the purposes of this chapter.. 7.Imposition of tax on firearm silencers or firearm mufflers (a)In generalSection 4181 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end of the list relating to Articles taxable at 10 percent the following: Firearm silencers or firearm mufflers. (b)Firearm silencers; firearm mufflersSection 4181 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following: For purposes of this part, the terms firearm silencer and firearm muffler mean any device for silencing, muffling, or diminishing the report of a portable firearm.. (c)Conforming amendments (1)Section 4181 of such Code is amended by striking other than pistols and revolvers and inserting other than articles taxable at 10 percent under this section. (2)Section 4182(b) of such Code is amended by striking firearms, pistols, revolvers, shells, and cartridges and inserting articles described in section 4181 and. (3)Section 4182(c)(1) of such Code is amended by striking or firearm and inserting firearm, firearm silencer, or firearm muffler,. (d)Effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall apply to articles sold by the manufacturer, producer, or importer in any calendar quarter beginning more than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Only current Idaho officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Idaho statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Idaho snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Idaho, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.