Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and Hawaii public-safety context.
Reported violent-crime rate230.3 per 100k2024 · #39 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate2,058.2 per 100k2024 · #11 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage100%2024 · #1 of 50 · highest first
Hawaii over time
Explore Hawaii readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Hawaii officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Hawaii effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Hawaii change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Reported violent-crime rate Hawaii · source units
HawaiiPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
10 of 10 reviewed Hawaii actions match · 9 date markers shown. 34 major events shown separately.
Hawaii · 2024: 230.3 per 100k · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Hawaii's returned average monthly population coverage was 100% throughout this series; coverage measures participating-agency population, not whether every crime was reported. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Hawaii · state comparison
Reported crime over time
Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.
Hawaii · 2024230.3 per 100k
Hawaii rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Reported violent-crime rate
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Hawaii's returned average monthly population coverage was 100% throughout this series; coverage measures participating-agency population, not whether every crime was reported. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Hawaii
2024 · Hawaii: 230.3 per 100k · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Hawaii Reported violent-crime rate history
Period
Hawaii
Compare
2015
246.6 per 100k
2016
241.6 per 100k
2017
250.6 per 100k
2018
261.4 per 100k
2019
270.1 per 100k
2020
263.7 per 100k
2021
269.9 per 100k
2022
276 per 100k
2023
244.5 per 100k
2024
230.3 per 100k
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Hawaii stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Hawaii has a dark outline.
Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Hawaii · 230.3 per 100k2024 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Hawaii with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Mexico
744.7 per 100k
—
#2
Alaska
731.9 per 100k
—
#3
Tennessee
604.3 per 100k
—
#4
Arkansas
589.6 per 100k
—
#5*
Louisiana
504.5 per 100k
82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6
Colorado
486.8 per 100k
—
#7
California
478.4 per 100k
—
#8
Kansas
474.7 per 100k
—
#9
Missouri
472.7 per 100k
—
#10
Michigan
442.6 per 100k
—
#11
South Carolina
440.8 per 100k
—
#12
Arizona
433 per 100k
—
#13
Oklahoma
429.3 per 100k
—
#14
Montana
428 per 100k
—
#15
Maryland
425.9 per 100k
—
#16
Nevada
408.6 per 100k
—
#17
Texas
397.8 per 100k
—
#18
New York
392.2 per 100k
—
#19
North Carolina
382.9 per 100k
—
#20
Alabama
380.8 per 100k
—
#21
Delaware
368.4 per 100k
—
#22*
South Dakota
356.9 per 100k
89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*
Indiana
349.2 per 100k
87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24
Oregon
341.1 per 100k
—
#25
Washington
331.8 per 100k
—
#26
Georgia
328 per 100k
—
#27
Massachusetts
317.9 per 100k
—
#28
Ohio
311.9 per 100k
—
#29
Illinois
294.5 per 100k
—
#30
Wisconsin
287.6 per 100k
—
#31
West Virginia
263.8 per 100k
—
#32*
Florida
262 per 100k
81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33
Minnesota
259.4 per 100k
—
#34
North Dakota
258 per 100k
—
#35
Pennsylvania
251.3 per 100k
—
#36
Iowa
247.2 per 100k
—
#37
Utah
237.8 per 100k
—
#38
Idaho
236.6 per 100k
—
#39
Hawaii · your comparison
230.3 per 100k
—
#40
Vermont
227.1 per 100k
—
#41
Kentucky
226.7 per 100k
—
#42
Nebraska
224.6 per 100k
—
#43
Virginia
223.7 per 100k
—
#44
New Jersey
221.9 per 100k
—
#45*
Mississippi
219.6 per 100k
65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*
Wyoming
212.5 per 100k
89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47
Rhode Island
154.9 per 100k
—
#48
Connecticut
139.2 per 100k
—
#49
New Hampshire
112.3 per 100k
—
#50
Maine
102.6 per 100k
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
Hawaii's returned average monthly population coverage was 100% throughout this series; coverage measures participating-agency population, not whether every crime was reported.
Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 100%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
Hawaii's returned average monthly population coverage was 100% throughout this series; coverage measures participating-agency population, not whether every crime was reported.
Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 100%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.
Hawaii · 202456
Hawaii rank#49among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Firearm deaths
Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.
Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Hawaii stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Hawaii has a dark outline.
Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Hawaii · 562024 · Rank #49 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Hawaii with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
4,389
—
#2
Florida
3,191
—
#3
California
2,853
—
#4
Georgia
1,985
—
#5
North Carolina
1,835
—
#6
Ohio
1,745
—
#7
Pennsylvania
1,624
—
#8
Illinois
1,563
—
#9
Tennessee
1,448
—
#10
Arizona
1,331
—
#11
Missouri
1,234
—
#12
Michigan
1,228
—
#13
Alabama
1,212
—
#14
Indiana
1,196
—
#15
Virginia
1,153
—
#16
South Carolina
1,064
—
#17
Louisiana
1,031
—
#18
Colorado
961
—
#19
Washington
915
—
#20
New York
896
—
#21
Kentucky
870
—
#22
Mississippi
810
—
#23
Oklahoma
794
—
#24
Wisconsin
735
—
#25
Maryland
716
—
#26
Oregon
663
—
#27
Arkansas
638
—
#28
Minnesota
582
—
#28
Nevada
582
—
#30
New Mexico
563
—
#31
Utah
454
—
#32
Kansas
446
—
#33
New Jersey
393
—
#34
Iowa
389
—
#35
Idaho
331
—
#36
Massachusetts
287
—
#37
West Virginia
281
—
#38
Montana
247
—
#39
Connecticut
224
—
#40
Nebraska
218
—
#41
Alaska
182
—
#42
Maine
181
—
#43
South Dakota
159
—
#44
New Hampshire
152
—
#45
Wyoming
143
—
#46
Delaware
123
—
#47
North Dakota
95
—
#48
Vermont
76
—
#49
Hawaii · your comparison
56
—
#50
Rhode Island
55
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
10 of 10 reviewed Hawaii actions · newest first
Jun 25, 2026 · HB 1839 · RELATING TO IMMIGRATION. · SignedGovernor · HB 1839
RELATING TO IMMIGRATION.
Jun 25, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Josh Green · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Josh Green signed HB 1839. HB 1839 requires a written consent form before a civil-immigration interview with someone in law-enforcement custody, explaining that the interview is voluntary and may be declined or conditioned on an attorney’s presence. The form is free, with translations and accommodations, and a signed copy must be provided and retained. On request, the person must receive reasonable telephone access and an opportunity to consult their attorney; juveniles also have an opportunity to contact a parent, guardian or legal custodian. Agencies must log interview requests and notify the detained person about hold, notification or transfer requests; release notices shared with federal authorities must also be provided in writing within two business days to the person and their attorney or designated representative. The specified federal-access records are public despite the usual chapter 92F exemptions, with detained persons’ identifying information redacted. An aggrieved person who is or was in custody may seek injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorney fees for violations of the consent-form or language/copy requirements. It does not create a general right to appointed immigration counsel.
Act 161, approved 2026-06-25. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens, lawful noncitizens and people without lawful status. Immigration enforcement provisions concern subsets of this population and do not establish any individual’s status or change birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Hawaii evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. Chapter 353C, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§353C- Immigration; civil immigration interviews; due process and transparency; requirements. (a) Before any civil immigration interview between a federal immigration authority and an individual in law enforcement agency custody regarding civil immigration violations may commence, the law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with a written consent form that: (1) Explains: (A) The rights afforded under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, including the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present if represented; (B) The interview is voluntary; and (C) The individual may either: (i) Decline to be interviewed; or (ii) Choose to be interviewed only with the individual's attorney present; and (2) Clearly provides a space for the individual to indicate that they: (A) Consent to the interview; (B) Consent to the interview with the individual's attorney present; or (C) Do not consent to the interview. (b) The written consent form required under subsection (a) shall be provided at no cost and shall be available in the languages that the office of language access provides translations for, including but not limited to: (1) Chinese Mandarin or Cantonese; (2) Chuukese; (3) English; (4) Ilokano; (5) Japanese; (6) Korean; (7) Olelo Hawaii; (8) Marshallese; (9) Samoan; (10) Spanish; (11) Tagalog; (12) Thai; (13) Vietnamese; and (14) Visayan; provided that other accommodations shall be made for individuals who speak languages that the office of language access cannot provide translation. The law enforcement agency shall provide the individual, the individual's attorney, or the individual's designated representative with a copy of the signed written consent form and retain a copy of each written consent form. (c) Upon request, a law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with reasonable access to a telephone and a reasonable opportunity to consult with the individual's attorney before any civil immigration interview; provided that juveniles in law enforcement agency custody shall also have a reasonable opportunity to contact a parent, guardian, or legal custodian. (d) Law enforcement agencies shall log each civil immigration interview request, including the following: (1) Date and time of the civil immigration interview request; (2) Whether the written consent form under subsection (a) was provided to the individual; (3) The language used in the written consent form; (4) Whether consent was given to a civil immigration interview; (5) If consent was given, whether counsel was present at the interview; and (6) If consent was given, the date and time of the civil immigration interview. (e) Upon receiving any immigration hold, notification, or transfer request from a federal immigration authority, a law enforcement agency shall provide a copy of the request to the individual and inform the individual whether the law enforcement agency intends to comply with the request. If a law enforcement agency provides a federal immigration authority with notification that an individual is being, or will be, released on a certain date, the law enforcement agency shall promptly provide the same notification in writing within two business days to the individual and the individual's attorney or the individual's designated representative. (f) All records relating to a federal immigration authority's access to a detained individual provided by a law enforcement agency, including all communication with the federal immigration authority, shall be public records for purposes of chapter 92F, and the exemptions provided in chapter 92F shall not apply; provided that personal identifying information of a detained individual shall be redacted before public disclosure pursuant to section 92F-13(1). Records relating to federal immigration authority access to a detained individual shall include but not be limited to: (1) Logs maintained by the law enforcement agency pursuant to subsection (d); (2) The date the federal immigration authority was provided the access; and (3) Whether the federal immigration authority's access was provided through an immigration hold, notification request, or transfer, or other means. (g) The department of the attorney general, the county prosecuting attorneys, or an agency with separate enforcement authority may receive and investigate complaints of violations of this section and issue findings and corrective orders. (h) Any person who is or was in custody and aggrieved by a violation of this section may bring an action seeking injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorneys' fees against a law enforcement agency that has violated the requirements of subsection (a) or (b). (i) For the purposes of this section: "Civil immigration interview" means any interview by federal immigration authorities concerning civil immigration matters of a person in the custody of a law enforcement agency. "Federal immigration authority" means the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the United States Customs and Border Protection, or any other federal agency or component authorized to conduct civil immigration enforcement or civil immigration interviews under federal law. "Immigration hold" means an immigration detainer issued pursuant to title 8 Code of Federal Regulations section 287.7, or any similar request from federal immigration authorities for detention of an individual suspected of violating civil immigration law. "Law enforcement agency" means any agency of the State or any of its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies, that is authorized to enforce criminal laws; operate correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities; or maintain custody of individuals in correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities. "Law enforcement agency" does not include any federal agency or its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies." SECTION 3. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
Rep. Greggor Ilagan · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Hussey · Sponsored / Rep. Matthias Kusch · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Marten · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Dee Morikawa · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Mahina Poepoe · Sponsored / Rep. Kanani Souza · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored / Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1839 requires a written consent form before a civil-immigration interview with someone in law-enforcement custody, explaining that the interview is voluntary and may be declined or conditioned on an attorney’s presence. The form is free, with translations and accommodations, and a signed copy must be provided and retained. On request, the person must receive reasonable telephone access and an opportunity to consult their attorney; juveniles also have an opportunity to contact a parent, guardian or legal custodian. Agencies must log interview requests and notify the detained person about hold, notification or transfer requests; release notices shared with federal authorities must also be provided in writing within two business days to the person and their attorney or designated representative. The specified federal-access records are public despite the usual chapter 92F exemptions, with detained persons’ identifying information redacted. An aggrieved person who is or was in custody may seek injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorney fees for violations of the consent-form or language/copy requirements. It does not create a general right to appointed immigration counsel.
Act 161, approved 2026-06-25. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens, lawful noncitizens and people without lawful status. Immigration enforcement provisions concern subsets of this population and do not establish any individual’s status or change birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Hawaii evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. Chapter 353C, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§353C- Immigration; civil immigration interviews; due process and transparency; requirements. (a) Before any civil immigration interview between a federal immigration authority and an individual in law enforcement agency custody regarding civil immigration violations may commence, the law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with a written consent form that: (1) Explains: (A) The rights afforded under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, including the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present if represented; (B) The interview is voluntary; and (C) The individual may either: (i) Decline to be interviewed; or (ii) Choose to be interviewed only with the individual's attorney present; and (2) Clearly provides a space for the individual to indicate that they: (A) Consent to the interview; (B) Consent to the interview with the individual's attorney present; or (C) Do not consent to the interview. (b) The written consent form required under subsection (a) shall be provided at no cost and shall be available in the languages that the office of language access provides translations for, including but not limited to: (1) Chinese Mandarin or Cantonese; (2) Chuukese; (3) English; (4) Ilokano; (5) Japanese; (6) Korean; (7) Olelo Hawaii; (8) Marshallese; (9) Samoan; (10) Spanish; (11) Tagalog; (12) Thai; (13) Vietnamese; and (14) Visayan; provided that other accommodations shall be made for individuals who speak languages that the office of language access cannot provide translation. The law enforcement agency shall provide the individual, the individual's attorney, or the individual's designated representative with a copy of the signed written consent form and retain a copy of each written consent form. (c) Upon request, a law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with reasonable access to a telephone and a reasonable opportunity to consult with the individual's attorney before any civil immigration interview; provided that juveniles in law enforcement agency custody shall also have a reasonable opportunity to contact a parent, guardian, or legal custodian. (d) Law enforcement agencies shall log each civil immigration interview request, including the following: (1) Date and time of the civil immigration interview request; (2) Whether the written consent form under subsection (a) was provided to the individual; (3) The language used in the written consent form; (4) Whether consent was given to a civil immigration interview; (5) If consent was given, whether counsel was present at the interview; and (6) If consent was given, the date and time of the civil immigration interview. (e) Upon receiving any immigration hold, notification, or transfer request from a federal immigration authority, a law enforcement agency shall provide a copy of the request to the individual and inform the individual whether the law enforcement agency intends to comply with the request. If a law enforcement agency provides a federal immigration authority with notification that an individual is being, or will be, released on a certain date, the law enforcement agency shall promptly provide the same notification in writing within two business days to the individual and the individual's attorney or the individual's designated representative. (f) All records relating to a federal immigration authority's access to a detained individual provided by a law enforcement agency, including all communication with the federal immigration authority, shall be public records for purposes of chapter 92F, and the exemptions provided in chapter 92F shall not apply; provided that personal identifying information of a detained individual shall be redacted before public disclosure pursuant to section 92F-13(1). Records relating to federal immigration authority access to a detained individual shall include but not be limited to: (1) Logs maintained by the law enforcement agency pursuant to subsection (d); (2) The date the federal immigration authority was provided the access; and (3) Whether the federal immigration authority's access was provided through an immigration hold, notification request, or transfer, or other means. (g) The department of the attorney general, the county prosecuting attorneys, or an agency with separate enforcement authority may receive and investigate complaints of violations of this section and issue findings and corrective orders. (h) Any person who is or was in custody and aggrieved by a violation of this section may bring an action seeking injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorneys' fees against a law enforcement agency that has violated the requirements of subsection (a) or (b). (i) For the purposes of this section: "Civil immigration interview" means any interview by federal immigration authorities concerning civil immigration matters of a person in the custody of a law enforcement agency. "Federal immigration authority" means the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the United States Customs and Border Protection, or any other federal agency or component authorized to conduct civil immigration enforcement or civil immigration interviews under federal law. "Immigration hold" means an immigration detainer issued pursuant to title 8 Code of Federal Regulations section 287.7, or any similar request from federal immigration authorities for detention of an individual suspected of violating civil immigration law. "Law enforcement agency" means any agency of the State or any of its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies, that is authorized to enforce criminal laws; operate correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities; or maintain custody of individuals in correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities. "Law enforcement agency" does not include any federal agency or its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies." SECTION 3. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
Josh Green signed SB 2057. SB 2057 prohibits state and county law-enforcement immigration-enforcement agreements and limits status inquiries, information sharing, custodial interviews, hold requests, transfers and use of resources. The defined immigration-enforcement scope includes federal civil immigration law and specified federal criminal laws concerning presence, entry, reentry or employment; the residual resource-use prohibition concerns civil enforcement. Custodial interviews may proceed with the person’s written consent or as required by law or court order. Transfer requires a judicial warrant or judicial probable-cause determination, subject to the law-required exception. The statute preserves state criminal-law duties, judicial warrants, court orders, subpoenas and information or assistance required by federal or state law. This concerns enforcement procedures for subsets of foreign-born residents.
Act 141, approved 2026-06-24. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens, lawful noncitizens and people without lawful status. Immigration enforcement provisions concern subsets of this population and do not establish any individual’s status or change birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Hawaii evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. The Hawaii Revised Statutes is amended by adding a new chapter to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "Chapter IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT; PROHIBITIONS § -1 Definitions. As used in this chapter: "Federal immigration authority" means any federal officer, employee, or person performing immigration enforcement functions. "Hold request" means a request by any federal immigration authority that a state or county law enforcement agency maintain custody of an individual currently in its custody beyond the time the individual would otherwise be eligible for release in order to facilitate transfer to the federal immigration authority. "Immigration enforcement" includes any effort to investigate, enforce, or assist in the investigation or enforcement of: (1) Any federal civil immigration law; or (2) Any federal criminal immigration law that penalizes a person's presence in, entry into, reentry into, or employment in the United States, including but not limited to violations of title 8 United States Code sections 1253, 1304, 1306(a) and (b), 1325, or 1326. "Law enforcement agency" means any agency in the State charged with enforcing state or county laws or ordinances, operating correctional facilities or juvenile detention facilities, or maintaining custody of individuals in correctional facilities or juvenile detention facilities. "Law enforcement official" means an officer or agent of a law enforcement agency. § -2 Immigration enforcement agreements; prohibited. No law enforcement agency or law enforcement official shall enter into an agreement under title 8 United States Code section 1357(g) or any other federal law that permits state or county agencies to engage in immigration enforcement. § -3 Prohibited actions by law enforcement agencies or law enforcement officials. Except as required by federal or state law, no law enforcement agency or law enforcement official shall: (1) Inquire about the citizenship or immigration status of an individual, unless there is a connection between such information and an investigation into a violation of state or county criminal law; (2) Provide information pursuant to notification requests from federal immigration authorities for the purposes of immigration enforcement; (3) Provide non-publicly available personal information to federal immigration authorities about an individual in a noncriminal matter; (4) Allow federal immigration authorities access to interview individuals about federal immigration violations while the individuals are in custody, except as required by law or by court order, unless the individuals consent in writing to be interviewed; (5) Detain an individual on the basis of a hold request; (6) Transfer an individual to federal immigration authorities, unless authorized by a judicial warrant or judicial determination of probable cause; or (7) Otherwise assist or cooperate with or allow time, money, facilities, property, equipment, vehicles, personnel, databases, surveillance technology, communication systems, or other resources to be used to facilitate federal immigration authorities in an operation for the purpose of civil immigration enforcement. § -4 Construction; federal law. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit: (1) A law enforcement official from performing the law enforcement official's duties under state law, including investigating or enforcing state criminal laws; (2) Compliance with a judicial warrant, court order, or subpoena; or (3) The provision of information or assistance expressly required by federal or state law, including any mandatory information-sharing duty, or in accordance with title 8 United States Code sections 1373 and 1644." SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
Sen. Jarrett Keohokalole · Sponsored / Sen. Stanley Chang · Sponsored / Sen. Carol Fukunaga · Sponsored / Sen. Troy N. Hashimoto · Sponsored / Sen. Karl Rhoads · Sponsored / Sen. Herbert M. "Tim" Richards III · Sponsored / Sen. Joy A. San Buenaventura · Sponsored / Sen. Les Ihara Jr. · Sponsored / Sen. Dru Mamo Kanuha · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 2057 prohibits state and county law-enforcement immigration-enforcement agreements and limits status inquiries, information sharing, custodial interviews, hold requests, transfers and use of resources. The defined immigration-enforcement scope includes federal civil immigration law and specified federal criminal laws concerning presence, entry, reentry or employment; the residual resource-use prohibition concerns civil enforcement. Custodial interviews may proceed with the person’s written consent or as required by law or court order. Transfer requires a judicial warrant or judicial probable-cause determination, subject to the law-required exception. The statute preserves state criminal-law duties, judicial warrants, court orders, subpoenas and information or assistance required by federal or state law. This concerns enforcement procedures for subsets of foreign-born residents.
Act 141, approved 2026-06-24. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens, lawful noncitizens and people without lawful status. Immigration enforcement provisions concern subsets of this population and do not establish any individual’s status or change birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Hawaii evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. The Hawaii Revised Statutes is amended by adding a new chapter to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "Chapter IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT; PROHIBITIONS § -1 Definitions. As used in this chapter: "Federal immigration authority" means any federal officer, employee, or person performing immigration enforcement functions. "Hold request" means a request by any federal immigration authority that a state or county law enforcement agency maintain custody of an individual currently in its custody beyond the time the individual would otherwise be eligible for release in order to facilitate transfer to the federal immigration authority. "Immigration enforcement" includes any effort to investigate, enforce, or assist in the investigation or enforcement of: (1) Any federal civil immigration law; or (2) Any federal criminal immigration law that penalizes a person's presence in, entry into, reentry into, or employment in the United States, including but not limited to violations of title 8 United States Code sections 1253, 1304, 1306(a) and (b), 1325, or 1326. "Law enforcement agency" means any agency in the State charged with enforcing state or county laws or ordinances, operating correctional facilities or juvenile detention facilities, or maintaining custody of individuals in correctional facilities or juvenile detention facilities. "Law enforcement official" means an officer or agent of a law enforcement agency. § -2 Immigration enforcement agreements; prohibited. No law enforcement agency or law enforcement official shall enter into an agreement under title 8 United States Code section 1357(g) or any other federal law that permits state or county agencies to engage in immigration enforcement. § -3 Prohibited actions by law enforcement agencies or law enforcement officials. Except as required by federal or state law, no law enforcement agency or law enforcement official shall: (1) Inquire about the citizenship or immigration status of an individual, unless there is a connection between such information and an investigation into a violation of state or county criminal law; (2) Provide information pursuant to notification requests from federal immigration authorities for the purposes of immigration enforcement; (3) Provide non-publicly available personal information to federal immigration authorities about an individual in a noncriminal matter; (4) Allow federal immigration authorities access to interview individuals about federal immigration violations while the individuals are in custody, except as required by law or by court order, unless the individuals consent in writing to be interviewed; (5) Detain an individual on the basis of a hold request; (6) Transfer an individual to federal immigration authorities, unless authorized by a judicial warrant or judicial determination of probable cause; or (7) Otherwise assist or cooperate with or allow time, money, facilities, property, equipment, vehicles, personnel, databases, surveillance technology, communication systems, or other resources to be used to facilitate federal immigration authorities in an operation for the purpose of civil immigration enforcement. § -4 Construction; federal law. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit: (1) A law enforcement official from performing the law enforcement official's duties under state law, including investigating or enforcing state criminal laws; (2) Compliance with a judicial warrant, court order, or subpoena; or (3) The provision of information or assistance expressly required by federal or state law, including any mandatory information-sharing duty, or in accordance with title 8 United States Code sections 1373 and 1644." SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
Introduced by Nadine Nakamura at another party’s request, HB 2062 proposed funding for processing temporary restraining and gun-violence protective orders and for public awareness campaigns. Its final Senate draft leaves appropriation amounts blank and uses a July 1, 2055 effective date. It did not become law in the 2026 regular session and does not establish funded positions, campaigns or fewer firearm deaths.
Received notice of disagreement (Hse. Com. No. 780). The regular session ended May 8, 2026 without this bill becoming law. The displayed date is the latest official event, including a carryover entry where applicable.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality series includes deaths across intents, including suicide and homicide. Storage rules and gun-violence protective-order processing concern access and injury-prevention mechanisms, not a demonstrated mortality effect. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Hawaii evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. There is appropriated out of the general revenues of the State of Hawaii the sum of $ or so much thereof as may be necessary for fiscal year 2026-2027 for staffing and administrative costs, including the hiring of personnel in each circuit, to effectuate efficient processing of temporary restraining orders and gun violence protective orders in accordance with part IV of chapter 134, Hawaii Revised Statutes. The sum appropriated shall be expended by the judiciary for the purposes of this Act. SECTION 3. There is appropriated out of the general revenues of the State of Hawaii the sum of $ or so much thereof as may be necessary for fiscal year 2026-2027 to conduct community-based gun violence intervention initiatives, including public awareness campaigns on gun violence protective orders. The sum appropriated shall be expended by the department of law enforcement for the purposes of this Act. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2055.
Rep. Joe Gedeon · Sponsored / Rep. David Alcos III · Sponsored / Rep. Diamond Garcia · Sponsored / Rep. Lauren Matsumoto · Sponsored / Rep. Christopher L. Muraoka · Sponsored / Rep. Elijah Pierick · Sponsored / Rep. Julie Reyes Oda · Sponsored / Rep. Garner M. Shimizu · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1759 proposed an organized retail-theft offense for specified coordinated theft or handling of stolen merchandise, felony tiers based on merchandise value, increased penalties for leadership roles and an attorney-general task force. The offense requires intentional action with at least one other person: theft with intent to sell, exchange or dispose of merchandise for value, or receiving/handling merchandise explicitly represented as stolen. The specified tiers are a class C felony at $200 to less than $750 and a class B felony at $750 or more, using value or aggregate value; specified leadership conduct raises the offense one category. The draft states a task-force appointment deadline of 60 days after effectiveness but a report deadline 20 days before the 2027 session, which is inconsistent with its far-future effective date. Its House draft uses a July 1, 3000 effective date. It did not become law in the 2026 regular session and does not establish these penalties or a reduction in property crime.
Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1 and referred to the committee(s) on JHA with Representative(s) Amato, Takayama voting aye with reservations; Representative(s) Perruso voting no (1) and Representative(s) Cochran, Lee, M., Poepoe excused (3). The regular session ended May 8, 2026 without this bill becoming law. The displayed date is the latest official event, including a carryover entry where applicable.
Why this record is included
The FBI property-crime measure includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. These proposals concern theft components, not every property offense or a demonstrated change in reported crime. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Hawaii evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. Chapter 708, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§708- Organized retail theft. (1) For purposes of this section: "Retailer" means a person or business that sells or facilitates the sale of merchandise to the public for use or consumption rather than for resale. (2) A person commits the offense of organized retail theft if the person intentionally: (a) Acts in concert with one or more persons to commit theft of merchandise from one or more retailers with intent to sell, exchange, or dispose of the merchandise for value; or (b) Acts in concert with one or more persons to receive, possess, conceal, store, or purchase merchandise explicitly represented to the person as being merchandise stolen from a retailer. (3) Violation of this section is: (a) A Class C felony if the value or aggregate value of the merchandise involved in the act is $200 or more but less than $750; or (b) A Class B felony if the value or aggregate value of the merchandise involved in the act is $750 or more. (4) Violation of this section described in subsection (3) is increased to the next higher category of offense if the person recruits, coordinates, organizes, supervises, directs, manages, or finances one or more persons to engage in an act described in subsection (2). (5) There is to be established an organized retail theft task force under the department of the attorney general. (a) The task force shall consist of no more than fifteen members and shall include: (i) Four members appointed by the governor, one of whom shall be an individual who represents state or local law enforcement; (ii) President, or their designee, of the Chamber of Commerce Hawaii; (iii) President, or their designee, of the Retail Merchants of Hawaii; (iv) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the City and County of Honolulu; (v) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the County of Maui; (vi) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the County of Kauai; and (vii) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the County of Hawaii. (b) Appointments to the task force shall be made by the appointing authority no later than sixty days after the effective date of this Act. (c) The members of the task force shall serve without compensation. No member of the task force shall be made subject to section 84-17, solely because of that member's participation on the task force. The task force shall be exempt from chapter 92. (d) The task force shall submit a report of its findings and recommendations, including any proposed legislation, to the legislature no later than twenty days prior to the convening of the regular session of 2027." SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 4. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Hawaii officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s Hawaii candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
5 statements from 3 candidates
2026 Hawaii Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements
Ensure police, fire, emergency medical personnel, dispatchers, and disaster response teams have the staffing, equipment, training, and resources they need.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and disaster preparedness
Candidate campaign source
Ensure police, fire, emergency medical personnel, dispatchers, and disaster response teams have the staffing, equipment, training, and resources they need.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Focus state resources on housing that serves local families, teachers, nurses, firefighters, law enforcement officers, tradespeople, farmers, and essential workers.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing and cost of living
Candidate campaign source
Focus state resources on housing that serves local families, teachers, nurses, firefighters, law enforcement officers, tradespeople, farmers, and essential workers.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Temporary deployment of National Guard units to support local law enforcement in high crime areas identified by crime data and local requests, focused on restoring public safety.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice
Candidate campaign source
Temporary deployment of National Guard units to support local law enforcement in high crime areas identified by crime data and local requests, focused on restoring public safety.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
My commitment to fighting for safer communities through effective and innovative gun reform legislation remains unwavering. We must take decisive action to ensure public safety and prevent further tragedies caused by gun violence.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and gun policy
Candidate campaign source
My commitment to fighting for safer communities through effective and innovative gun reform legislation remains unwavering. We must take decisive action to ensure public safety and prevent further tragedies caused by gun violence.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
As a member of the Gun Violence Prevention Task Force, I’ve advocated for nationwide gun reform measures including banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, mandating comprehensive background checks for all gun purchases and transfers, addressing the proliferation of “ghost guns,” and imp…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and gun policy
Candidate campaign source
As a member of the Gun Violence Prevention Task Force, I’ve advocated for nationwide gun reform measures including banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, mandating comprehensive background checks for all gun purchases and transfers, addressing the proliferation of “ghost guns,” and implementing Red Flag Laws to enable the removal of guns from individuals in crisis.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published Hawaii candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Hawaii incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Hawaii legislators and Hawaii’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Hawaii’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
56 matching sponsorships or proposals · 40 Hawaii incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Adrian K. Tam
Hawaii House of Representatives, District 24 · D–HI
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Adrian K. TamHawaii Legislature · HB 1839
RELATING TO IMMIGRATION.
Jun 25, 2026 · Enacted · Act 161
Rep. Greggor Ilagan · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Hussey · Sponsored / Rep. Matthias Kusch · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Marten · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Dee Morikawa · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Mahina Poepoe · Sponsored / Rep. Kanani Souza · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored / Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1839 requires a written consent form before a civil-immigration interview with someone in law-enforcement custody, explaining that the interview is voluntary and may be declined or conditioned on an attorney’s presence. The form is free, with translations and accommodations, and a signed copy must be provided and retained. On request, the person must receive reasonable telephone access and an opportunity to consult their attorney; juveniles also have an opportunity to contact a parent, guardian or legal custodian. Agencies must log interview requests and notify the detained person about hold, notification or transfer requests; release notices shared with federal authorities must also be provided in writing within two business days to the person and their attorney or designated representative. The specified federal-access records are public despite the usual chapter 92F exemptions, with detained persons’ identifying information redacted. An aggrieved person who is or was in custody may seek injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorney fees for violations of the consent-form or language/copy requirements. It does not create a general right to appointed immigration counsel.
Act 161, approved 2026-06-25. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens, lawful noncitizens and people without lawful status. Immigration enforcement provisions concern subsets of this population and do not establish any individual’s status or change birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Hawaii evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. Chapter 353C, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§353C- Immigration; civil immigration interviews; due process and transparency; requirements. (a) Before any civil immigration interview between a federal immigration authority and an individual in law enforcement agency custody regarding civil immigration violations may commence, the law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with a written consent form that: (1) Explains: (A) The rights afforded under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, including the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present if represented; (B) The interview is voluntary; and (C) The individual may either: (i) Decline to be interviewed; or (ii) Choose to be interviewed only with the individual's attorney present; and (2) Clearly provides a space for the individual to indicate that they: (A) Consent to the interview; (B) Consent to the interview with the individual's attorney present; or (C) Do not consent to the interview. (b) The written consent form required under subsection (a) shall be provided at no cost and shall be available in the languages that the office of language access provides translations for, including but not limited to: (1) Chinese Mandarin or Cantonese; (2) Chuukese; (3) English; (4) Ilokano; (5) Japanese; (6) Korean; (7) Olelo Hawaii; (8) Marshallese; (9) Samoan; (10) Spanish; (11) Tagalog; (12) Thai; (13) Vietnamese; and (14) Visayan; provided that other accommodations shall be made for individuals who speak languages that the office of language access cannot provide translation. The law enforcement agency shall provide the individual, the individual's attorney, or the individual's designated representative with a copy of the signed written consent form and retain a copy of each written consent form. (c) Upon request, a law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with reasonable access to a telephone and a reasonable opportunity to consult with the individual's attorney before any civil immigration interview; provided that juveniles in law enforcement agency custody shall also have a reasonable opportunity to contact a parent, guardian, or legal custodian. (d) Law enforcement agencies shall log each civil immigration interview request, including the following: (1) Date and time of the civil immigration interview request; (2) Whether the written consent form under subsection (a) was provided to the individual; (3) The language used in the written consent form; (4) Whether consent was given to a civil immigration interview; (5) If consent was given, whether counsel was present at the interview; and (6) If consent was given, the date and time of the civil immigration interview. (e) Upon receiving any immigration hold, notification, or transfer request from a federal immigration authority, a law enforcement agency shall provide a copy of the request to the individual and inform the individual whether the law enforcement agency intends to comply with the request. If a law enforcement agency provides a federal immigration authority with notification that an individual is being, or will be, released on a certain date, the law enforcement agency shall promptly provide the same notification in writing within two business days to the individual and the individual's attorney or the individual's designated representative. (f) All records relating to a federal immigration authority's access to a detained individual provided by a law enforcement agency, including all communication with the federal immigration authority, shall be public records for purposes of chapter 92F, and the exemptions provided in chapter 92F shall not apply; provided that personal identifying information of a detained individual shall be redacted before public disclosure pursuant to section 92F-13(1). Records relating to federal immigration authority access to a detained individual shall include but not be limited to: (1) Logs maintained by the law enforcement agency pursuant to subsection (d); (2) The date the federal immigration authority was provided the access; and (3) Whether the federal immigration authority's access was provided through an immigration hold, notification request, or transfer, or other means. (g) The department of the attorney general, the county prosecuting attorneys, or an agency with separate enforcement authority may receive and investigate complaints of violations of this section and issue findings and corrective orders. (h) Any person who is or was in custody and aggrieved by a violation of this section may bring an action seeking injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorneys' fees against a law enforcement agency that has violated the requirements of subsection (a) or (b). (i) For the purposes of this section: "Civil immigration interview" means any interview by federal immigration authorities concerning civil immigration matters of a person in the custody of a law enforcement agency. "Federal immigration authority" means the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the United States Customs and Border Protection, or any other federal agency or component authorized to conduct civil immigration enforcement or civil immigration interviews under federal law. "Immigration hold" means an immigration detainer issued pursuant to title 8 Code of Federal Regulations section 287.7, or any similar request from federal immigration authorities for detention of an individual suspected of violating civil immigration law. "Law enforcement agency" means any agency of the State or any of its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies, that is authorized to enforce criminal laws; operate correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities; or maintain custody of individuals in correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities. "Law enforcement agency" does not include any federal agency or its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies." SECTION 3. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
Hawaii approves firearm-storage rules and purchaser notices
Apr 22, 2025 · Enacted · Act 22
Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Luke A. Evslin · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Kitagawa · Sponsored / Rep. Nicole E. Lowen · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Jackson D. Sayama · Sponsored / Rep. Gregg Takayama · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored
Reviewed final Hawaii law
The storage offense, purchaser notice and civil-liability rules address firearm safety and criminal justice. These provisions do not establish a decline in crime. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review.
Act 22, approved 2025-04-22. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The storage offense, purchaser notice and civil-liability rules address firearm safety and criminal justice. These provisions do not establish a decline in crime. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review. The chart does not isolate this action’s effect.
Retained Hawaii evidence context: Firearm deaths · crime · reviewed Hawaii policy context · health · reviewed Hawaii policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of a violation and fined no more than $500;
Hawaii House of Representatives, District 46 · D–HI
3 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Amy A. PerrusoHawaii Legislature · HB 1839
RELATING TO IMMIGRATION.
Jun 25, 2026 · Enacted · Act 161
Rep. Greggor Ilagan · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Hussey · Sponsored / Rep. Matthias Kusch · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Marten · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Dee Morikawa · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Mahina Poepoe · Sponsored / Rep. Kanani Souza · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored / Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1839 requires a written consent form before a civil-immigration interview with someone in law-enforcement custody, explaining that the interview is voluntary and may be declined or conditioned on an attorney’s presence. The form is free, with translations and accommodations, and a signed copy must be provided and retained. On request, the person must receive reasonable telephone access and an opportunity to consult their attorney; juveniles also have an opportunity to contact a parent, guardian or legal custodian. Agencies must log interview requests and notify the detained person about hold, notification or transfer requests; release notices shared with federal authorities must also be provided in writing within two business days to the person and their attorney or designated representative. The specified federal-access records are public despite the usual chapter 92F exemptions, with detained persons’ identifying information redacted. An aggrieved person who is or was in custody may seek injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorney fees for violations of the consent-form or language/copy requirements. It does not create a general right to appointed immigration counsel.
Act 161, approved 2026-06-25. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens, lawful noncitizens and people without lawful status. Immigration enforcement provisions concern subsets of this population and do not establish any individual’s status or change birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Hawaii evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. Chapter 353C, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§353C- Immigration; civil immigration interviews; due process and transparency; requirements. (a) Before any civil immigration interview between a federal immigration authority and an individual in law enforcement agency custody regarding civil immigration violations may commence, the law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with a written consent form that: (1) Explains: (A) The rights afforded under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, including the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present if represented; (B) The interview is voluntary; and (C) The individual may either: (i) Decline to be interviewed; or (ii) Choose to be interviewed only with the individual's attorney present; and (2) Clearly provides a space for the individual to indicate that they: (A) Consent to the interview; (B) Consent to the interview with the individual's attorney present; or (C) Do not consent to the interview. (b) The written consent form required under subsection (a) shall be provided at no cost and shall be available in the languages that the office of language access provides translations for, including but not limited to: (1) Chinese Mandarin or Cantonese; (2) Chuukese; (3) English; (4) Ilokano; (5) Japanese; (6) Korean; (7) Olelo Hawaii; (8) Marshallese; (9) Samoan; (10) Spanish; (11) Tagalog; (12) Thai; (13) Vietnamese; and (14) Visayan; provided that other accommodations shall be made for individuals who speak languages that the office of language access cannot provide translation. The law enforcement agency shall provide the individual, the individual's attorney, or the individual's designated representative with a copy of the signed written consent form and retain a copy of each written consent form. (c) Upon request, a law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with reasonable access to a telephone and a reasonable opportunity to consult with the individual's attorney before any civil immigration interview; provided that juveniles in law enforcement agency custody shall also have a reasonable opportunity to contact a parent, guardian, or legal custodian. (d) Law enforcement agencies shall log each civil immigration interview request, including the following: (1) Date and time of the civil immigration interview request; (2) Whether the written consent form under subsection (a) was provided to the individual; (3) The language used in the written consent form; (4) Whether consent was given to a civil immigration interview; (5) If consent was given, whether counsel was present at the interview; and (6) If consent was given, the date and time of the civil immigration interview. (e) Upon receiving any immigration hold, notification, or transfer request from a federal immigration authority, a law enforcement agency shall provide a copy of the request to the individual and inform the individual whether the law enforcement agency intends to comply with the request. If a law enforcement agency provides a federal immigration authority with notification that an individual is being, or will be, released on a certain date, the law enforcement agency shall promptly provide the same notification in writing within two business days to the individual and the individual's attorney or the individual's designated representative. (f) All records relating to a federal immigration authority's access to a detained individual provided by a law enforcement agency, including all communication with the federal immigration authority, shall be public records for purposes of chapter 92F, and the exemptions provided in chapter 92F shall not apply; provided that personal identifying information of a detained individual shall be redacted before public disclosure pursuant to section 92F-13(1). Records relating to federal immigration authority access to a detained individual shall include but not be limited to: (1) Logs maintained by the law enforcement agency pursuant to subsection (d); (2) The date the federal immigration authority was provided the access; and (3) Whether the federal immigration authority's access was provided through an immigration hold, notification request, or transfer, or other means. (g) The department of the attorney general, the county prosecuting attorneys, or an agency with separate enforcement authority may receive and investigate complaints of violations of this section and issue findings and corrective orders. (h) Any person who is or was in custody and aggrieved by a violation of this section may bring an action seeking injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorneys' fees against a law enforcement agency that has violated the requirements of subsection (a) or (b). (i) For the purposes of this section: "Civil immigration interview" means any interview by federal immigration authorities concerning civil immigration matters of a person in the custody of a law enforcement agency. "Federal immigration authority" means the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the United States Customs and Border Protection, or any other federal agency or component authorized to conduct civil immigration enforcement or civil immigration interviews under federal law. "Immigration hold" means an immigration detainer issued pursuant to title 8 Code of Federal Regulations section 287.7, or any similar request from federal immigration authorities for detention of an individual suspected of violating civil immigration law. "Law enforcement agency" means any agency of the State or any of its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies, that is authorized to enforce criminal laws; operate correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities; or maintain custody of individuals in correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities. "Law enforcement agency" does not include any federal agency or its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies." SECTION 3. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
HB 610 proposed an attorney-general cold-case unit to assist investigations tied to Hawaii, including unsolved homicides and sexual offenses. Eligible cases require that the crime occurred in Hawaii or the victim was a Hawaii resident. A cold case means investigative leads are exhausted, physical evidence examined and witnesses interviewed, with the case closed for a significant period and no active leads. Its carried-over House draft leaves funding amounts blank and states a July 1, 3000 effective date. It did not become law in the 2026 regular session; it establishes no operating unit, solved cases or change in crime or mortality rates.
Carried over to 2026 Regular Session. The regular session ended May 8, 2026 without this bill becoming law. The displayed date is the latest official event, including a carryover entry where applicable.
Why this record is included
The CDC homicide fact uses resident death certificates. Investigating unsolved homicides concerns response to fatal violence; investigative caseloads, missing-person cases and criminal classifications do not equal that mortality series. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Hawaii evidence context: Homicide deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. Chapter 28, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new part to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "Part . COLD CASE INVESTIGATION UNIT §28- Cold case investigation unit. (a) There shall be established in the department of the attorney general a cold case investigation unit. (b) The cold case investigation unit shall employ attorneys, investigators, and other personnel as necessary to promote the effective and efficient conduct of the unit's activities. Except for the attorneys, all other employees of the unit shall be subject to chapter 76. (c) The purpose of the cold case investigation unit shall be to assist federal, state, county, and tribal law enforcement agencies, and cold case units within the office of a prosecutor, including law enforcement agencies and cold case units in other states, in investigating unsolved cases where the crime took place in this State or where the victim was a resident of this State. (d) Cases investigated by the cold case investigation unit may include unsolved homicides, sexual offenses, sexually motivated offenses, missing persons, and cases of unidentified remains. (e) The cold case investigation unit may accept investigation requests and may proactively offer assistance to a law enforcement agency or cold case unit. (f) For the purpose of this section, "cold case" means a case where all investigative leads have been exhausted, all physical evidence examined, and all witnesses interviewed to the point where the case has been closed for a significant period of time without any active leads." SECTION 3. There is appropriated out of the general revenues of the State of Hawaii the sum of $ or so much thereof as may be necessary for fiscal year 2025-2026 and the same sum or so much thereof as may be necessary for fiscal year 2026-2027 for the establishment and operation of a cold case investigation unit within the department of the attorney general. The sums appropriated shall be expended by the department of the attorney general for the purposes of this Act. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.
Hawaii approves firearm-storage rules and purchaser notices
Apr 22, 2025 · Enacted · Act 22
Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Luke A. Evslin · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Kitagawa · Sponsored / Rep. Nicole E. Lowen · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Jackson D. Sayama · Sponsored / Rep. Gregg Takayama · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored
Reviewed final Hawaii law
The storage offense, purchaser notice and civil-liability rules address firearm safety and criminal justice. These provisions do not establish a decline in crime. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review.
Act 22, approved 2025-04-22. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The storage offense, purchaser notice and civil-liability rules address firearm safety and criminal justice. These provisions do not establish a decline in crime. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review. The chart does not isolate this action’s effect.
Retained Hawaii evidence context: Firearm deaths · crime · reviewed Hawaii policy context · health · reviewed Hawaii policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of a violation and fined no more than $500;
Hawaii House of Representatives, District 45 · R–HI
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Christopher L. MuraokaHawaii Legislature · HB 1759
RELATING TO THEFT.
Feb 17, 2026 · Not enacted
Rep. Joe Gedeon · Sponsored / Rep. David Alcos III · Sponsored / Rep. Diamond Garcia · Sponsored / Rep. Lauren Matsumoto · Sponsored / Rep. Christopher L. Muraoka · Sponsored / Rep. Elijah Pierick · Sponsored / Rep. Julie Reyes Oda · Sponsored / Rep. Garner M. Shimizu · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1759 proposed an organized retail-theft offense for specified coordinated theft or handling of stolen merchandise, felony tiers based on merchandise value, increased penalties for leadership roles and an attorney-general task force. The offense requires intentional action with at least one other person: theft with intent to sell, exchange or dispose of merchandise for value, or receiving/handling merchandise explicitly represented as stolen. The specified tiers are a class C felony at $200 to less than $750 and a class B felony at $750 or more, using value or aggregate value; specified leadership conduct raises the offense one category. The draft states a task-force appointment deadline of 60 days after effectiveness but a report deadline 20 days before the 2027 session, which is inconsistent with its far-future effective date. Its House draft uses a July 1, 3000 effective date. It did not become law in the 2026 regular session and does not establish these penalties or a reduction in property crime.
Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1 and referred to the committee(s) on JHA with Representative(s) Amato, Takayama voting aye with reservations; Representative(s) Perruso voting no (1) and Representative(s) Cochran, Lee, M., Poepoe excused (3). The regular session ended May 8, 2026 without this bill becoming law. The displayed date is the latest official event, including a carryover entry where applicable.
Why this record is included
The FBI property-crime measure includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. These proposals concern theft components, not every property offense or a demonstrated change in reported crime. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Hawaii evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. Chapter 708, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§708- Organized retail theft. (1) For purposes of this section: "Retailer" means a person or business that sells or facilitates the sale of merchandise to the public for use or consumption rather than for resale. (2) A person commits the offense of organized retail theft if the person intentionally: (a) Acts in concert with one or more persons to commit theft of merchandise from one or more retailers with intent to sell, exchange, or dispose of the merchandise for value; or (b) Acts in concert with one or more persons to receive, possess, conceal, store, or purchase merchandise explicitly represented to the person as being merchandise stolen from a retailer. (3) Violation of this section is: (a) A Class C felony if the value or aggregate value of the merchandise involved in the act is $200 or more but less than $750; or (b) A Class B felony if the value or aggregate value of the merchandise involved in the act is $750 or more. (4) Violation of this section described in subsection (3) is increased to the next higher category of offense if the person recruits, coordinates, organizes, supervises, directs, manages, or finances one or more persons to engage in an act described in subsection (2). (5) There is to be established an organized retail theft task force under the department of the attorney general. (a) The task force shall consist of no more than fifteen members and shall include: (i) Four members appointed by the governor, one of whom shall be an individual who represents state or local law enforcement; (ii) President, or their designee, of the Chamber of Commerce Hawaii; (iii) President, or their designee, of the Retail Merchants of Hawaii; (iv) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the City and County of Honolulu; (v) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the County of Maui; (vi) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the County of Kauai; and (vii) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the County of Hawaii. (b) Appointments to the task force shall be made by the appointing authority no later than sixty days after the effective date of this Act. (c) The members of the task force shall serve without compensation. No member of the task force shall be made subject to section 84-17, solely because of that member's participation on the task force. The task force shall be exempt from chapter 92. (d) The task force shall submit a report of its findings and recommendations, including any proposed legislation, to the legislature no later than twenty days prior to the convening of the regular session of 2027." SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 4. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.
Hawaii House of Representatives, District 8 · D–HI
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. David A. TarnasHawaii Legislature · HB 1839
RELATING TO IMMIGRATION.
Jun 25, 2026 · Enacted · Act 161
Rep. Greggor Ilagan · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Hussey · Sponsored / Rep. Matthias Kusch · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Marten · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Dee Morikawa · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Mahina Poepoe · Sponsored / Rep. Kanani Souza · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored / Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1839 requires a written consent form before a civil-immigration interview with someone in law-enforcement custody, explaining that the interview is voluntary and may be declined or conditioned on an attorney’s presence. The form is free, with translations and accommodations, and a signed copy must be provided and retained. On request, the person must receive reasonable telephone access and an opportunity to consult their attorney; juveniles also have an opportunity to contact a parent, guardian or legal custodian. Agencies must log interview requests and notify the detained person about hold, notification or transfer requests; release notices shared with federal authorities must also be provided in writing within two business days to the person and their attorney or designated representative. The specified federal-access records are public despite the usual chapter 92F exemptions, with detained persons’ identifying information redacted. An aggrieved person who is or was in custody may seek injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorney fees for violations of the consent-form or language/copy requirements. It does not create a general right to appointed immigration counsel.
Act 161, approved 2026-06-25. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens, lawful noncitizens and people without lawful status. Immigration enforcement provisions concern subsets of this population and do not establish any individual’s status or change birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Hawaii evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. Chapter 353C, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§353C- Immigration; civil immigration interviews; due process and transparency; requirements. (a) Before any civil immigration interview between a federal immigration authority and an individual in law enforcement agency custody regarding civil immigration violations may commence, the law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with a written consent form that: (1) Explains: (A) The rights afforded under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, including the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present if represented; (B) The interview is voluntary; and (C) The individual may either: (i) Decline to be interviewed; or (ii) Choose to be interviewed only with the individual's attorney present; and (2) Clearly provides a space for the individual to indicate that they: (A) Consent to the interview; (B) Consent to the interview with the individual's attorney present; or (C) Do not consent to the interview. (b) The written consent form required under subsection (a) shall be provided at no cost and shall be available in the languages that the office of language access provides translations for, including but not limited to: (1) Chinese Mandarin or Cantonese; (2) Chuukese; (3) English; (4) Ilokano; (5) Japanese; (6) Korean; (7) Olelo Hawaii; (8) Marshallese; (9) Samoan; (10) Spanish; (11) Tagalog; (12) Thai; (13) Vietnamese; and (14) Visayan; provided that other accommodations shall be made for individuals who speak languages that the office of language access cannot provide translation. The law enforcement agency shall provide the individual, the individual's attorney, or the individual's designated representative with a copy of the signed written consent form and retain a copy of each written consent form. (c) Upon request, a law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with reasonable access to a telephone and a reasonable opportunity to consult with the individual's attorney before any civil immigration interview; provided that juveniles in law enforcement agency custody shall also have a reasonable opportunity to contact a parent, guardian, or legal custodian. (d) Law enforcement agencies shall log each civil immigration interview request, including the following: (1) Date and time of the civil immigration interview request; (2) Whether the written consent form under subsection (a) was provided to the individual; (3) The language used in the written consent form; (4) Whether consent was given to a civil immigration interview; (5) If consent was given, whether counsel was present at the interview; and (6) If consent was given, the date and time of the civil immigration interview. (e) Upon receiving any immigration hold, notification, or transfer request from a federal immigration authority, a law enforcement agency shall provide a copy of the request to the individual and inform the individual whether the law enforcement agency intends to comply with the request. If a law enforcement agency provides a federal immigration authority with notification that an individual is being, or will be, released on a certain date, the law enforcement agency shall promptly provide the same notification in writing within two business days to the individual and the individual's attorney or the individual's designated representative. (f) All records relating to a federal immigration authority's access to a detained individual provided by a law enforcement agency, including all communication with the federal immigration authority, shall be public records for purposes of chapter 92F, and the exemptions provided in chapter 92F shall not apply; provided that personal identifying information of a detained individual shall be redacted before public disclosure pursuant to section 92F-13(1). Records relating to federal immigration authority access to a detained individual shall include but not be limited to: (1) Logs maintained by the law enforcement agency pursuant to subsection (d); (2) The date the federal immigration authority was provided the access; and (3) Whether the federal immigration authority's access was provided through an immigration hold, notification request, or transfer, or other means. (g) The department of the attorney general, the county prosecuting attorneys, or an agency with separate enforcement authority may receive and investigate complaints of violations of this section and issue findings and corrective orders. (h) Any person who is or was in custody and aggrieved by a violation of this section may bring an action seeking injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorneys' fees against a law enforcement agency that has violated the requirements of subsection (a) or (b). (i) For the purposes of this section: "Civil immigration interview" means any interview by federal immigration authorities concerning civil immigration matters of a person in the custody of a law enforcement agency. "Federal immigration authority" means the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the United States Customs and Border Protection, or any other federal agency or component authorized to conduct civil immigration enforcement or civil immigration interviews under federal law. "Immigration hold" means an immigration detainer issued pursuant to title 8 Code of Federal Regulations section 287.7, or any similar request from federal immigration authorities for detention of an individual suspected of violating civil immigration law. "Law enforcement agency" means any agency of the State or any of its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies, that is authorized to enforce criminal laws; operate correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities; or maintain custody of individuals in correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities. "Law enforcement agency" does not include any federal agency or its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies." SECTION 3. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
Hawaii approves firearm-storage rules and purchaser notices
Apr 22, 2025 · Enacted · Act 22
Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Luke A. Evslin · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Kitagawa · Sponsored / Rep. Nicole E. Lowen · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Jackson D. Sayama · Sponsored / Rep. Gregg Takayama · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored
Reviewed final Hawaii law
The storage offense, purchaser notice and civil-liability rules address firearm safety and criminal justice. These provisions do not establish a decline in crime. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review.
Act 22, approved 2025-04-22. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The storage offense, purchaser notice and civil-liability rules address firearm safety and criminal justice. These provisions do not establish a decline in crime. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review. The chart does not isolate this action’s effect.
Retained Hawaii evidence context: Firearm deaths · crime · reviewed Hawaii policy context · health · reviewed Hawaii policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of a violation and fined no more than $500;
Hawaii House of Representatives, District 41 · R–HI
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. David Alcos IIIHawaii Legislature · HB 1759
RELATING TO THEFT.
Feb 17, 2026 · Not enacted
Rep. Joe Gedeon · Sponsored / Rep. David Alcos III · Sponsored / Rep. Diamond Garcia · Sponsored / Rep. Lauren Matsumoto · Sponsored / Rep. Christopher L. Muraoka · Sponsored / Rep. Elijah Pierick · Sponsored / Rep. Julie Reyes Oda · Sponsored / Rep. Garner M. Shimizu · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1759 proposed an organized retail-theft offense for specified coordinated theft or handling of stolen merchandise, felony tiers based on merchandise value, increased penalties for leadership roles and an attorney-general task force. The offense requires intentional action with at least one other person: theft with intent to sell, exchange or dispose of merchandise for value, or receiving/handling merchandise explicitly represented as stolen. The specified tiers are a class C felony at $200 to less than $750 and a class B felony at $750 or more, using value or aggregate value; specified leadership conduct raises the offense one category. The draft states a task-force appointment deadline of 60 days after effectiveness but a report deadline 20 days before the 2027 session, which is inconsistent with its far-future effective date. Its House draft uses a July 1, 3000 effective date. It did not become law in the 2026 regular session and does not establish these penalties or a reduction in property crime.
Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1 and referred to the committee(s) on JHA with Representative(s) Amato, Takayama voting aye with reservations; Representative(s) Perruso voting no (1) and Representative(s) Cochran, Lee, M., Poepoe excused (3). The regular session ended May 8, 2026 without this bill becoming law. The displayed date is the latest official event, including a carryover entry where applicable.
Why this record is included
The FBI property-crime measure includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. These proposals concern theft components, not every property offense or a demonstrated change in reported crime. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Hawaii evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. Chapter 708, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§708- Organized retail theft. (1) For purposes of this section: "Retailer" means a person or business that sells or facilitates the sale of merchandise to the public for use or consumption rather than for resale. (2) A person commits the offense of organized retail theft if the person intentionally: (a) Acts in concert with one or more persons to commit theft of merchandise from one or more retailers with intent to sell, exchange, or dispose of the merchandise for value; or (b) Acts in concert with one or more persons to receive, possess, conceal, store, or purchase merchandise explicitly represented to the person as being merchandise stolen from a retailer. (3) Violation of this section is: (a) A Class C felony if the value or aggregate value of the merchandise involved in the act is $200 or more but less than $750; or (b) A Class B felony if the value or aggregate value of the merchandise involved in the act is $750 or more. (4) Violation of this section described in subsection (3) is increased to the next higher category of offense if the person recruits, coordinates, organizes, supervises, directs, manages, or finances one or more persons to engage in an act described in subsection (2). (5) There is to be established an organized retail theft task force under the department of the attorney general. (a) The task force shall consist of no more than fifteen members and shall include: (i) Four members appointed by the governor, one of whom shall be an individual who represents state or local law enforcement; (ii) President, or their designee, of the Chamber of Commerce Hawaii; (iii) President, or their designee, of the Retail Merchants of Hawaii; (iv) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the City and County of Honolulu; (v) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the County of Maui; (vi) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the County of Kauai; and (vii) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the County of Hawaii. (b) Appointments to the task force shall be made by the appointing authority no later than sixty days after the effective date of this Act. (c) The members of the task force shall serve without compensation. No member of the task force shall be made subject to section 84-17, solely because of that member's participation on the task force. The task force shall be exempt from chapter 92. (d) The task force shall submit a report of its findings and recommendations, including any proposed legislation, to the legislature no later than twenty days prior to the convening of the regular session of 2027." SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 4. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.
Hawaii House of Representatives, District 17 · D–HI
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Dee MorikawaHawaii Legislature · HB 1839
RELATING TO IMMIGRATION.
Jun 25, 2026 · Enacted · Act 161
Rep. Greggor Ilagan · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Hussey · Sponsored / Rep. Matthias Kusch · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Marten · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Dee Morikawa · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Mahina Poepoe · Sponsored / Rep. Kanani Souza · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored / Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1839 requires a written consent form before a civil-immigration interview with someone in law-enforcement custody, explaining that the interview is voluntary and may be declined or conditioned on an attorney’s presence. The form is free, with translations and accommodations, and a signed copy must be provided and retained. On request, the person must receive reasonable telephone access and an opportunity to consult their attorney; juveniles also have an opportunity to contact a parent, guardian or legal custodian. Agencies must log interview requests and notify the detained person about hold, notification or transfer requests; release notices shared with federal authorities must also be provided in writing within two business days to the person and their attorney or designated representative. The specified federal-access records are public despite the usual chapter 92F exemptions, with detained persons’ identifying information redacted. An aggrieved person who is or was in custody may seek injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorney fees for violations of the consent-form or language/copy requirements. It does not create a general right to appointed immigration counsel.
Act 161, approved 2026-06-25. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens, lawful noncitizens and people without lawful status. Immigration enforcement provisions concern subsets of this population and do not establish any individual’s status or change birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Hawaii evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 2. Chapter 353C, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§353C- Immigration; civil immigration interviews; due process and transparency; requirements. (a) Before any civil immigration interview between a federal immigration authority and an individual in law enforcement agency custody regarding civil immigration violations may commence, the law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with a written consent form that: (1) Explains: (A) The rights afforded under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, including the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present if represented; (B) The interview is voluntary; and (C) The individual may either: (i) Decline to be interviewed; or (ii) Choose to be interviewed only with the individual's attorney present; and (2) Clearly provides a space for the individual to indicate that they: (A) Consent to the interview; (B) Consent to the interview with the individual's attorney present; or (C) Do not consent to the interview. (b) The written consent form required under subsection (a) shall be provided at no cost and shall be available in the languages that the office of language access provides translations for, including but not limited to: (1) Chinese Mandarin or Cantonese; (2) Chuukese; (3) English; (4) Ilokano; (5) Japanese; (6) Korean; (7) Olelo Hawaii; (8) Marshallese; (9) Samoan; (10) Spanish; (11) Tagalog; (12) Thai; (13) Vietnamese; and (14) Visayan; provided that other accommodations shall be made for individuals who speak languages that the office of language access cannot provide translation. The law enforcement agency shall provide the individual, the individual's attorney, or the individual's designated representative with a copy of the signed written consent form and retain a copy of each written consent form. (c) Upon request, a law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with reasonable access to a telephone and a reasonable opportunity to consult with the individual's attorney before any civil immigration interview; provided that juveniles in law enforcement agency custody shall also have a reasonable opportunity to contact a parent, guardian, or legal custodian. (d) Law enforcement agencies shall log each civil immigration interview request, including the following: (1) Date and time of the civil immigration interview request; (2) Whether the written consent form under subsection (a) was provided to the individual; (3) The language used in the written consent form; (4) Whether consent was given to a civil immigration interview; (5) If consent was given, whether counsel was present at the interview; and (6) If consent was given, the date and time of the civil immigration interview. (e) Upon receiving any immigration hold, notification, or transfer request from a federal immigration authority, a law enforcement agency shall provide a copy of the request to the individual and inform the individual whether the law enforcement agency intends to comply with the request. If a law enforcement agency provides a federal immigration authority with notification that an individual is being, or will be, released on a certain date, the law enforcement agency shall promptly provide the same notification in writing within two business days to the individual and the individual's attorney or the individual's designated representative. (f) All records relating to a federal immigration authority's access to a detained individual provided by a law enforcement agency, including all communication with the federal immigration authority, shall be public records for purposes of chapter 92F, and the exemptions provided in chapter 92F shall not apply; provided that personal identifying information of a detained individual shall be redacted before public disclosure pursuant to section 92F-13(1). Records relating to federal immigration authority access to a detained individual shall include but not be limited to: (1) Logs maintained by the law enforcement agency pursuant to subsection (d); (2) The date the federal immigration authority was provided the access; and (3) Whether the federal immigration authority's access was provided through an immigration hold, notification request, or transfer, or other means. (g) The department of the attorney general, the county prosecuting attorneys, or an agency with separate enforcement authority may receive and investigate complaints of violations of this section and issue findings and corrective orders. (h) Any person who is or was in custody and aggrieved by a violation of this section may bring an action seeking injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorneys' fees against a law enforcement agency that has violated the requirements of subsection (a) or (b). (i) For the purposes of this section: "Civil immigration interview" means any interview by federal immigration authorities concerning civil immigration matters of a person in the custody of a law enforcement agency. "Federal immigration authority" means the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the United States Customs and Border Protection, or any other federal agency or component authorized to conduct civil immigration enforcement or civil immigration interviews under federal law. "Immigration hold" means an immigration detainer issued pursuant to title 8 Code of Federal Regulations section 287.7, or any similar request from federal immigration authorities for detention of an individual suspected of violating civil immigration law. "Law enforcement agency" means any agency of the State or any of its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies, that is authorized to enforce criminal laws; operate correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities; or maintain custody of individuals in correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities. "Law enforcement agency" does not include any federal agency or its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies." SECTION 3. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
Only current Hawaii officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Hawaii statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Hawaii snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Hawaii, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.