Hawaii · individual fact

Hawaii crime

Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and Hawaii public-safety context.

Reported violent-crime rate230.3 per 100k2024 · #39 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate2,058.2 per 100k2024 · #11 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage100%2024 · #1 of 50 · highest first

Hawaii over time

Explore Hawaii readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Hawaii officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Hawaii effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Hawaii change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Reported violent-crime rate Hawaii · source units
HawaiiPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Reported violent-crime rate2024: 230.3 per 100k224.8 per 100k253.1 per 100k281.5 per 100kHawaii, 2015: 246.6 per 100kHawaii, 2016: 241.6 per 100kHawaii, 2017: 250.6 per 100kHawaii, 2018: 261.4 per 100kHawaii, 2019: 270.1 per 100kHawaii, 2020: 263.7 per 100kHawaii, 2021: 269.9 per 100kHawaii, 2022: 276 per 100kHawaii, 2023: 244.5 per 100kHawaii, 2024: 230.3 per 100k201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 34National context · Booker makes federal sentencing guidelines advisory · 2005-01-12Federal sentencingNational context · Adam Walsh Act establishes new registration standards · 2006-07-27Adam Walsh ActNational context · Survey changes disrupt the 2006 victimization comparison · 2006-12-312006 survey breakNational context · Congress strengthens firearm background-check records · 2008-01-08NICS records lawNational context · Second Chance Act expands reentry support · 2008-04-09Second Chance ActNational context · Heller recognizes an individual firearm right · 2008-06-26Heller decisionNational context · Financial crisis deepens during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Shepard–Byrd Act expands federal hate-crime law · 2009-10-28Federal hate-crime lawNational context · McDonald applies the firearm right to the states · 2010-06-28McDonald decisionNational context · Fair Sentencing Act changes federal crack penalties · 2010-08-03Fair Sentencing ActNational context · FBI expands the rape definition · 2013-01-01Rape definition expandsNational context · Violence Against Women Act reauthorized · 2013-03-07VAWA reauthorizationNational context · DOJ publishes Ferguson policing findings · 2015-03-04Ferguson investigationNational context · Murder rates rise in 2015 and 2016 · 2016-12-312015–2016 murder riseNational context · First Step Act enacted · 2018-12-21First Step ActNational context · FBI launches national use-of-force data collection · 2019-01-01Use-of-force reportingNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · George Floyd is killed by a Minneapolis police officer · 2020-05-25George Floyd killedNational context · Murder rises sharply while property crime declines · 2020-12-312020 murder surgeNational context · FBI transitions to incident-based reporting · 2021-01-01NIBRS transitionNational context · COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act improves review and reporting · 2021-05-20Hate-crime reportingNational context · Executive order sets federal policing safeguards · 2022-05-25Federal policing orderNational context · Bruen changes the test for firearm restrictions · 2022-06-23Bruen decisionNational context · Bipartisan Safer Communities Act enacted · 2022-06-25Safer Communities ActNational context · FBI annual report again includes summary submissions · 2023-10-16Reporting coverage growsNational context · Vehicle theft rises while total property crime falls · 2023-12-31Vehicle-theft surgeNational context · Victimization survey tests a redesigned questionnaire · 2024-01-01NCVS redesign beginsNational context · Supreme Court rejects ATF’s bump-stock classification · 2024-06-14Bump-stock rulingNational context · Rahimi upholds disarmament for a credible domestic threat · 2024-06-21Domestic-threat rulingNational context · Federal policing executive order is revoked · 2025-01-20Policing order revokedNational context · Court sustains ATF’s rule covering some firearm kits · 2025-03-26Firearm-kit rulingHawaii · Hawaii approves firearm-storage rules and purchaser notices · 2025-04-22Firearm-storage lawNational context · Executive order redirects federal law-enforcement support · 2025-04-282025 policing policyNational context · FBI publishes 2025 annual crime estimates · 2026-08-142025 crime data release● Hawaii Legislature · 72● U.S. Congress · Hawaii delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 3■ Hawaii agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-01-012026-08-31

10 of 10 reviewed Hawaii actions match · 9 date markers shown. 34 major events shown separately.

Hawaii · 2024: 230.3 per 100k · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Hawaii's returned average monthly population coverage was 100% throughout this series; coverage measures participating-agency population, not whether every crime was reported. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Hawaii Reported violent-crime rate · source units
PeriodHawaiiRankU.S. benchmark
2024230.3 per 100k#39 of 50Not available
2023244.5 per 100k#37 of 50Not available
2022276 per 100k#38 of 50Not available
2021269.9 per 100k#35 of 50Not available
2020263.7 per 100k#40 of 50Not available
2019270.1 per 100k#37 of 50Not available
2018261.4 per 100k#37 of 50Not available
2017250.6 per 100k#38 of 50Not available
2016241.6 per 100k#41 of 50Not available
2015246.6 per 100k#38 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Hawaii · state comparison

Reported crime over time

Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.

Hawaii · 2024230.3 per 100k
Hawaii rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Reported violent-crime rate

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Hawaii's returned average monthly population coverage was 100% throughout this series; coverage measures participating-agency population, not whether every crime was reported. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Hawaii
Reported violent-crime rate history in Hawaii223.4 per 100k253.2 per 100k282.9 per 100k20152024
2024 · Hawaii: 230.3 per 100k · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Hawaii Reported violent-crime rate history
PeriodHawaiiCompare
2015246.6 per 100k
2016241.6 per 100k
2017250.6 per 100k
2018261.4 per 100k
2019270.1 per 100k
2020263.7 per 100k
2021269.9 per 100k
2022276 per 100k
2023244.5 per 100k
2024230.3 per 100k

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Hawaii stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Hawaii has a dark outline.

Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Hawaii · 230.3 per 100k2024 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Hawaii with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Mexico744.7 per 100k—
#2Alaska731.9 per 100k—
#3Tennessee604.3 per 100k—
#4Arkansas589.6 per 100k—
#5*Louisiana504.5 per 100k82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6Colorado486.8 per 100k—
#7California478.4 per 100k—
#8Kansas474.7 per 100k—
#9Missouri472.7 per 100k—
#10Michigan442.6 per 100k—
#11South Carolina440.8 per 100k—
#12Arizona433 per 100k—
#13Oklahoma429.3 per 100k—
#14Montana428 per 100k—
#15Maryland425.9 per 100k—
#16Nevada408.6 per 100k—
#17Texas397.8 per 100k—
#18New York392.2 per 100k—
#19North Carolina382.9 per 100k—
#20Alabama380.8 per 100k—
#21Delaware368.4 per 100k—
#22*South Dakota356.9 per 100k89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*Indiana349.2 per 100k87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24Oregon341.1 per 100k—
#25Washington331.8 per 100k—
#26Georgia328 per 100k—
#27Massachusetts317.9 per 100k—
#28Ohio311.9 per 100k—
#29Illinois294.5 per 100k—
#30Wisconsin287.6 per 100k—
#31West Virginia263.8 per 100k—
#32*Florida262 per 100k81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33Minnesota259.4 per 100k—
#34North Dakota258 per 100k—
#35Pennsylvania251.3 per 100k—
#36Iowa247.2 per 100k—
#37Utah237.8 per 100k—
#38Idaho236.6 per 100k—
#39Hawaii · your comparison230.3 per 100k—
#40Vermont227.1 per 100k—
#41Kentucky226.7 per 100k—
#42Nebraska224.6 per 100k—
#43Virginia223.7 per 100k—
#44New Jersey221.9 per 100k—
#45*Mississippi219.6 per 100k65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*Wyoming212.5 per 100k89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47Rhode Island154.9 per 100k—
#48Connecticut139.2 per 100k—
#49New Hampshire112.3 per 100k—
#50Maine102.6 per 100k—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Reported violent-crime rate

230.3 per 100,0002024

Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • Hawaii's returned average monthly population coverage was 100% throughout this series; coverage measures participating-agency population, not whether every crime was reported.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 100%; this is not complete statewide reporting.

Reported property-crime rate

2,058.2 per 100,0002024

Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • Hawaii's returned average monthly population coverage was 100% throughout this series; coverage measures participating-agency population, not whether every crime was reported.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 100%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Hawaii · state comparison

Firearm mortality

Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.

Hawaii · 202456
Hawaii rank#49among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Firearm deaths

Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.

Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Hawaii stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Hawaii has a dark outline.

Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Hawaii · 562024 · Rank #49 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Hawaii with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas4,389—
#2Florida3,191—
#3California2,853—
#4Georgia1,985—
#5North Carolina1,835—
#6Ohio1,745—
#7Pennsylvania1,624—
#8Illinois1,563—
#9Tennessee1,448—
#10Arizona1,331—
#11Missouri1,234—
#12Michigan1,228—
#13Alabama1,212—
#14Indiana1,196—
#15Virginia1,153—
#16South Carolina1,064—
#17Louisiana1,031—
#18Colorado961—
#19Washington915—
#20New York896—
#21Kentucky870—
#22Mississippi810—
#23Oklahoma794—
#24Wisconsin735—
#25Maryland716—
#26Oregon663—
#27Arkansas638—
#28Minnesota582—
#28Nevada582—
#30New Mexico563—
#31Utah454—
#32Kansas446—
#33New Jersey393—
#34Iowa389—
#35Idaho331—
#36Massachusetts287—
#37West Virginia281—
#38Montana247—
#39Connecticut224—
#40Nebraska218—
#41Alaska182—
#42Maine181—
#43South Dakota159—
#44New Hampshire152—
#45Wyoming143—
#46Delaware123—
#47North Dakota95—
#48Vermont76—
#49Hawaii · your comparison56—
#50Rhode Island55—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Firearm deaths

562024 final data

Deaths in which firearm injury was the underlying cause, with the rate age-adjusted per 100,000 residents.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Population-adjusted measure

Age-adjusted firearm death rate
3.7 per 100,000
Method and limitations

CDC National Vital Statistics System death-certificate data.

  • The total combines firearm deaths across intents, including suicide, homicide, legal intervention, and unintentional or undetermined injury.
  • It does not measure nonfatal injuries, firearm ownership, defensive uses, or policy effects; small counts can produce unstable rates.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s Hawaii candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

5 statements from 3 candidates

2026 Hawaii Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Daniel Anthony

2 statements

Republican · Lieutenant Governor · HI

Policing & criminal justice context

Ensure police, fire, emergency medical personnel, dispatchers, and disaster response teams have the staffing, equipment, training, and resources they need.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and disaster preparedness

Candidate campaign source

Ensure police, fire, emergency medical personnel, dispatchers, and disaster response teams have the staffing, equipment, training, and resources they need.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
View 1 more statement from Daniel Anthony
Policing & criminal justice context

Focus state resources on housing that serves local families, teachers, nurses, firefighters, law enforcement officers, tradespeople, farmers, and essential workers.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing and cost of living

Candidate campaign source

Focus state resources on housing that serves local families, teachers, nurses, firefighters, law enforcement officers, tradespeople, farmers, and essential workers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗

2026 Hawaii U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Brenton Awa

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · HI

Policing & criminal justice context

Temporary deployment of National Guard units to support local law enforcement in high crime areas identified by crime data and local requests, focused on restoring public safety.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice

Candidate campaign source

Temporary deployment of National Guard units to support local law enforcement in high crime areas identified by crime data and local requests, focused on restoring public safety.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Brenton Awa — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Jill N. Tokuda

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · HI

Crime & victimization

My commitment to fighting for safer communities through effective and innovative gun reform legislation remains unwavering. We must take decisive action to ensure public safety and prevent further tragedies caused by gun violence.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and gun policy

Candidate campaign source

My commitment to fighting for safer communities through effective and innovative gun reform legislation remains unwavering. We must take decisive action to ensure public safety and prevent further tragedies caused by gun violence.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jill N. Tokuda — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from Jill N. Tokuda
Crime & victimization

As a member of the Gun Violence Prevention Task Force, I’ve advocated for nationwide gun reform measures including banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, mandating comprehensive background checks for all gun purchases and transfers, addressing the proliferation of “ghost guns,” and imp…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and gun policy

Candidate campaign source

As a member of the Gun Violence Prevention Task Force, I’ve advocated for nationwide gun reform measures including banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, mandating comprehensive background checks for all gun purchases and transfers, addressing the proliferation of “ghost guns,” and implementing Red Flag Laws to enable the removal of guns from individuals in crisis.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jill N. Tokuda — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published Hawaii candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Hawaii incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Hawaii legislators and Hawaii’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Hawaii’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

56 matching sponsorships or proposals · 40 Hawaii incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Adrian K. Tam

Hawaii House of Representatives, District 24 · D–HI

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Adrian K. Tam
Hawaii Legislature · HB 1839

RELATING TO IMMIGRATION.

Jun 25, 2026 · Enacted · Act 161

Rep. Greggor Ilagan · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Hussey · Sponsored / Rep. Matthias Kusch · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Marten · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Dee Morikawa · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Mahina Poepoe · Sponsored / Rep. Kanani Souza · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored / Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1839 requires a written consent form before a civil-immigration interview with someone in law-enforcement custody, explaining that the interview is voluntary and may be declined or conditioned on an attorney’s presence. The form is free, with translations and accommodations, and a signed copy must be provided and retained. On request, the person must receive reasonable telephone access and an opportunity to consult their attorney; juveniles also have an opportunity to contact a parent, guardian or legal custodian. Agencies must log interview requests and notify the detained person about hold, notification or transfer requests; release notices shared with federal authorities must also be provided in writing within two business days to the person and their attorney or designated representative. The specified federal-access records are public despite the usual chapter 92F exemptions, with detained persons’ identifying information redacted. An aggrieved person who is or was in custody may seek injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorney fees for violations of the consent-form or language/copy requirements. It does not create a general right to appointed immigration counsel.

Act 161, approved 2026-06-25. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens, lawful noncitizens and people without lawful status. Immigration enforcement provisions concern subsets of this population and do not establish any individual’s status or change birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 2. Chapter 353C, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§353C- Immigration; civil immigration interviews; due process and transparency; requirements. (a) Before any civil immigration interview between a federal immigration authority and an individual in law enforcement agency custody regarding civil immigration violations may commence, the law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with a written consent form that: (1) Explains: (A) The rights afforded under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, including the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present if represented; (B) The interview is voluntary; and (C) The individual may either: (i) Decline to be interviewed; or (ii) Choose to be interviewed only with the individual's attorney present; and (2) Clearly provides a space for the individual to indicate that they: (A) Consent to the interview; (B) Consent to the interview with the individual's attorney present; or (C) Do not consent to the interview. (b) The written consent form required under subsection (a) shall be provided at no cost and shall be available in the languages that the office of language access provides translations for, including but not limited to: (1) Chinese Mandarin or Cantonese; (2) Chuukese; (3) English; (4) Ilokano; (5) Japanese; (6) Korean; (7) Olelo Hawaii; (8) Marshallese; (9) Samoan; (10) Spanish; (11) Tagalog; (12) Thai; (13) Vietnamese; and (14) Visayan; provided that other accommodations shall be made for individuals who speak languages that the office of language access cannot provide translation. The law enforcement agency shall provide the individual, the individual's attorney, or the individual's designated representative with a copy of the signed written consent form and retain a copy of each written consent form. (c) Upon request, a law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with reasonable access to a telephone and a reasonable opportunity to consult with the individual's attorney before any civil immigration interview; provided that juveniles in law enforcement agency custody shall also have a reasonable opportunity to contact a parent, guardian, or legal custodian. (d) Law enforcement agencies shall log each civil immigration interview request, including the following: (1) Date and time of the civil immigration interview request; (2) Whether the written consent form under subsection (a) was provided to the individual; (3) The language used in the written consent form; (4) Whether consent was given to a civil immigration interview; (5) If consent was given, whether counsel was present at the interview; and (6) If consent was given, the date and time of the civil immigration interview. (e) Upon receiving any immigration hold, notification, or transfer request from a federal immigration authority, a law enforcement agency shall provide a copy of the request to the individual and inform the individual whether the law enforcement agency intends to comply with the request. If a law enforcement agency provides a federal immigration authority with notification that an individual is being, or will be, released on a certain date, the law enforcement agency shall promptly provide the same notification in writing within two business days to the individual and the individual's attorney or the individual's designated representative. (f) All records relating to a federal immigration authority's access to a detained individual provided by a law enforcement agency, including all communication with the federal immigration authority, shall be public records for purposes of chapter 92F, and the exemptions provided in chapter 92F shall not apply; provided that personal identifying information of a detained individual shall be redacted before public disclosure pursuant to section 92F-13(1). Records relating to federal immigration authority access to a detained individual shall include but not be limited to: (1) Logs maintained by the law enforcement agency pursuant to subsection (d); (2) The date the federal immigration authority was provided the access; and (3) Whether the federal immigration authority's access was provided through an immigration hold, notification request, or transfer, or other means. (g) The department of the attorney general, the county prosecuting attorneys, or an agency with separate enforcement authority may receive and investigate complaints of violations of this section and issue findings and corrective orders. (h) Any person who is or was in custody and aggrieved by a violation of this section may bring an action seeking injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorneys' fees against a law enforcement agency that has violated the requirements of subsection (a) or (b). (i) For the purposes of this section: "Civil immigration interview" means any interview by federal immigration authorities concerning civil immigration matters of a person in the custody of a law enforcement agency. "Federal immigration authority" means the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the United States Customs and Border Protection, or any other federal agency or component authorized to conduct civil immigration enforcement or civil immigration interviews under federal law. "Immigration hold" means an immigration detainer issued pursuant to title 8 Code of Federal Regulations section 287.7, or any similar request from federal immigration authorities for detention of an individual suspected of violating civil immigration law. "Law enforcement agency" means any agency of the State or any of its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies, that is authorized to enforce criminal laws; operate correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities; or maintain custody of individuals in correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities. "Law enforcement agency" does not include any federal agency or its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies." SECTION 3. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Hawaii Legislature · HB 125

Hawaii approves firearm-storage rules and purchaser notices

Apr 22, 2025 · Enacted · Act 22

Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Luke A. Evslin · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Kitagawa · Sponsored / Rep. Nicole E. Lowen · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Jackson D. Sayama · Sponsored / Rep. Gregg Takayama · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored

Reviewed final Hawaii law

The storage offense, purchaser notice and civil-liability rules address firearm safety and criminal justice. These provisions do not establish a decline in crime. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review.

Act 22, approved 2025-04-22. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The storage offense, purchaser notice and civil-liability rules address firearm safety and criminal justice. These provisions do not establish a decline in crime. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review. The chart does not isolate this action’s effect.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Firearm deaths · crime · reviewed Hawaii policy context · health · reviewed Hawaii policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of a violation and fined no more than $500;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Amy A. Perruso

Hawaii House of Representatives, District 46 · D–HI

3 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Amy A. Perruso
Hawaii Legislature · HB 1839

RELATING TO IMMIGRATION.

Jun 25, 2026 · Enacted · Act 161

Rep. Greggor Ilagan · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Hussey · Sponsored / Rep. Matthias Kusch · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Marten · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Dee Morikawa · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Mahina Poepoe · Sponsored / Rep. Kanani Souza · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored / Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1839 requires a written consent form before a civil-immigration interview with someone in law-enforcement custody, explaining that the interview is voluntary and may be declined or conditioned on an attorney’s presence. The form is free, with translations and accommodations, and a signed copy must be provided and retained. On request, the person must receive reasonable telephone access and an opportunity to consult their attorney; juveniles also have an opportunity to contact a parent, guardian or legal custodian. Agencies must log interview requests and notify the detained person about hold, notification or transfer requests; release notices shared with federal authorities must also be provided in writing within two business days to the person and their attorney or designated representative. The specified federal-access records are public despite the usual chapter 92F exemptions, with detained persons’ identifying information redacted. An aggrieved person who is or was in custody may seek injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorney fees for violations of the consent-form or language/copy requirements. It does not create a general right to appointed immigration counsel.

Act 161, approved 2026-06-25. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens, lawful noncitizens and people without lawful status. Immigration enforcement provisions concern subsets of this population and do not establish any individual’s status or change birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 2. Chapter 353C, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§353C- Immigration; civil immigration interviews; due process and transparency; requirements. (a) Before any civil immigration interview between a federal immigration authority and an individual in law enforcement agency custody regarding civil immigration violations may commence, the law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with a written consent form that: (1) Explains: (A) The rights afforded under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, including the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present if represented; (B) The interview is voluntary; and (C) The individual may either: (i) Decline to be interviewed; or (ii) Choose to be interviewed only with the individual's attorney present; and (2) Clearly provides a space for the individual to indicate that they: (A) Consent to the interview; (B) Consent to the interview with the individual's attorney present; or (C) Do not consent to the interview. (b) The written consent form required under subsection (a) shall be provided at no cost and shall be available in the languages that the office of language access provides translations for, including but not limited to: (1) Chinese Mandarin or Cantonese; (2) Chuukese; (3) English; (4) Ilokano; (5) Japanese; (6) Korean; (7) Olelo Hawaii; (8) Marshallese; (9) Samoan; (10) Spanish; (11) Tagalog; (12) Thai; (13) Vietnamese; and (14) Visayan; provided that other accommodations shall be made for individuals who speak languages that the office of language access cannot provide translation. The law enforcement agency shall provide the individual, the individual's attorney, or the individual's designated representative with a copy of the signed written consent form and retain a copy of each written consent form. (c) Upon request, a law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with reasonable access to a telephone and a reasonable opportunity to consult with the individual's attorney before any civil immigration interview; provided that juveniles in law enforcement agency custody shall also have a reasonable opportunity to contact a parent, guardian, or legal custodian. (d) Law enforcement agencies shall log each civil immigration interview request, including the following: (1) Date and time of the civil immigration interview request; (2) Whether the written consent form under subsection (a) was provided to the individual; (3) The language used in the written consent form; (4) Whether consent was given to a civil immigration interview; (5) If consent was given, whether counsel was present at the interview; and (6) If consent was given, the date and time of the civil immigration interview. (e) Upon receiving any immigration hold, notification, or transfer request from a federal immigration authority, a law enforcement agency shall provide a copy of the request to the individual and inform the individual whether the law enforcement agency intends to comply with the request. If a law enforcement agency provides a federal immigration authority with notification that an individual is being, or will be, released on a certain date, the law enforcement agency shall promptly provide the same notification in writing within two business days to the individual and the individual's attorney or the individual's designated representative. (f) All records relating to a federal immigration authority's access to a detained individual provided by a law enforcement agency, including all communication with the federal immigration authority, shall be public records for purposes of chapter 92F, and the exemptions provided in chapter 92F shall not apply; provided that personal identifying information of a detained individual shall be redacted before public disclosure pursuant to section 92F-13(1). Records relating to federal immigration authority access to a detained individual shall include but not be limited to: (1) Logs maintained by the law enforcement agency pursuant to subsection (d); (2) The date the federal immigration authority was provided the access; and (3) Whether the federal immigration authority's access was provided through an immigration hold, notification request, or transfer, or other means. (g) The department of the attorney general, the county prosecuting attorneys, or an agency with separate enforcement authority may receive and investigate complaints of violations of this section and issue findings and corrective orders. (h) Any person who is or was in custody and aggrieved by a violation of this section may bring an action seeking injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorneys' fees against a law enforcement agency that has violated the requirements of subsection (a) or (b). (i) For the purposes of this section: "Civil immigration interview" means any interview by federal immigration authorities concerning civil immigration matters of a person in the custody of a law enforcement agency. "Federal immigration authority" means the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the United States Customs and Border Protection, or any other federal agency or component authorized to conduct civil immigration enforcement or civil immigration interviews under federal law. "Immigration hold" means an immigration detainer issued pursuant to title 8 Code of Federal Regulations section 287.7, or any similar request from federal immigration authorities for detention of an individual suspected of violating civil immigration law. "Law enforcement agency" means any agency of the State or any of its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies, that is authorized to enforce criminal laws; operate correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities; or maintain custody of individuals in correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities. "Law enforcement agency" does not include any federal agency or its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies." SECTION 3. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Hawaii Legislature · HB 610

RELATING TO COLD CASE INVESTIGATIONS.

Dec 8, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Kanani Souza · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Elle Cochran · Sponsored / Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Mahina Poepoe · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 610 proposed an attorney-general cold-case unit to assist investigations tied to Hawaii, including unsolved homicides and sexual offenses. Eligible cases require that the crime occurred in Hawaii or the victim was a Hawaii resident. A cold case means investigative leads are exhausted, physical evidence examined and witnesses interviewed, with the case closed for a significant period and no active leads. Its carried-over House draft leaves funding amounts blank and states a July 1, 3000 effective date. It did not become law in the 2026 regular session; it establishes no operating unit, solved cases or change in crime or mortality rates.

Carried over to 2026 Regular Session. The regular session ended May 8, 2026 without this bill becoming law. The displayed date is the latest official event, including a carryover entry where applicable.

Why this record is included

The CDC homicide fact uses resident death certificates. Investigating unsolved homicides concerns response to fatal violence; investigative caseloads, missing-person cases and criminal classifications do not equal that mortality series. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Homicide deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 2. Chapter 28, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new part to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "Part . COLD CASE INVESTIGATION UNIT §28- Cold case investigation unit. (a) There shall be established in the department of the attorney general a cold case investigation unit. (b) The cold case investigation unit shall employ attorneys, investigators, and other personnel as necessary to promote the effective and efficient conduct of the unit's activities. Except for the attorneys, all other employees of the unit shall be subject to chapter 76. (c) The purpose of the cold case investigation unit shall be to assist federal, state, county, and tribal law enforcement agencies, and cold case units within the office of a prosecutor, including law enforcement agencies and cold case units in other states, in investigating unsolved cases where the crime took place in this State or where the victim was a resident of this State. (d) Cases investigated by the cold case investigation unit may include unsolved homicides, sexual offenses, sexually motivated offenses, missing persons, and cases of unidentified remains. (e) The cold case investigation unit may accept investigation requests and may proactively offer assistance to a law enforcement agency or cold case unit. (f) For the purpose of this section, "cold case" means a case where all investigative leads have been exhausted, all physical evidence examined, and all witnesses interviewed to the point where the case has been closed for a significant period of time without any active leads." SECTION 3. There is appropriated out of the general revenues of the State of Hawaii the sum of $ or so much thereof as may be necessary for fiscal year 2025-2026 and the same sum or so much thereof as may be necessary for fiscal year 2026-2027 for the establishment and operation of a cold case investigation unit within the department of the attorney general. The sums appropriated shall be expended by the department of the attorney general for the purposes of this Act. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Hawaii Legislature · HB 125

Hawaii approves firearm-storage rules and purchaser notices

Apr 22, 2025 · Enacted · Act 22

Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Luke A. Evslin · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Kitagawa · Sponsored / Rep. Nicole E. Lowen · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Jackson D. Sayama · Sponsored / Rep. Gregg Takayama · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored

Reviewed final Hawaii law

The storage offense, purchaser notice and civil-liability rules address firearm safety and criminal justice. These provisions do not establish a decline in crime. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review.

Act 22, approved 2025-04-22. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The storage offense, purchaser notice and civil-liability rules address firearm safety and criminal justice. These provisions do not establish a decline in crime. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review. The chart does not isolate this action’s effect.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Firearm deaths · crime · reviewed Hawaii policy context · health · reviewed Hawaii policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of a violation and fined no more than $500;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Christopher L. Muraoka

Hawaii House of Representatives, District 45 · R–HI

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Christopher L. Muraoka
Hawaii Legislature · HB 1759

RELATING TO THEFT.

Feb 17, 2026 · Not enacted

Rep. Joe Gedeon · Sponsored / Rep. David Alcos III · Sponsored / Rep. Diamond Garcia · Sponsored / Rep. Lauren Matsumoto · Sponsored / Rep. Christopher L. Muraoka · Sponsored / Rep. Elijah Pierick · Sponsored / Rep. Julie Reyes Oda · Sponsored / Rep. Garner M. Shimizu · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1759 proposed an organized retail-theft offense for specified coordinated theft or handling of stolen merchandise, felony tiers based on merchandise value, increased penalties for leadership roles and an attorney-general task force. The offense requires intentional action with at least one other person: theft with intent to sell, exchange or dispose of merchandise for value, or receiving/handling merchandise explicitly represented as stolen. The specified tiers are a class C felony at $200 to less than $750 and a class B felony at $750 or more, using value or aggregate value; specified leadership conduct raises the offense one category. The draft states a task-force appointment deadline of 60 days after effectiveness but a report deadline 20 days before the 2027 session, which is inconsistent with its far-future effective date. Its House draft uses a July 1, 3000 effective date. It did not become law in the 2026 regular session and does not establish these penalties or a reduction in property crime.

Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1 and referred to the committee(s) on JHA with Representative(s) Amato, Takayama voting aye with reservations; Representative(s) Perruso voting no (1) and Representative(s) Cochran, Lee, M., Poepoe excused (3). The regular session ended May 8, 2026 without this bill becoming law. The displayed date is the latest official event, including a carryover entry where applicable.

Why this record is included

The FBI property-crime measure includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. These proposals concern theft components, not every property offense or a demonstrated change in reported crime. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 2. Chapter 708, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§708- Organized retail theft. (1) For purposes of this section: "Retailer" means a person or business that sells or facilitates the sale of merchandise to the public for use or consumption rather than for resale. (2) A person commits the offense of organized retail theft if the person intentionally: (a) Acts in concert with one or more persons to commit theft of merchandise from one or more retailers with intent to sell, exchange, or dispose of the merchandise for value; or (b) Acts in concert with one or more persons to receive, possess, conceal, store, or purchase merchandise explicitly represented to the person as being merchandise stolen from a retailer. (3) Violation of this section is: (a) A Class C felony if the value or aggregate value of the merchandise involved in the act is $200 or more but less than $750; or (b) A Class B felony if the value or aggregate value of the merchandise involved in the act is $750 or more. (4) Violation of this section described in subsection (3) is increased to the next higher category of offense if the person recruits, coordinates, organizes, supervises, directs, manages, or finances one or more persons to engage in an act described in subsection (2). (5) There is to be established an organized retail theft task force under the department of the attorney general. (a) The task force shall consist of no more than fifteen members and shall include: (i) Four members appointed by the governor, one of whom shall be an individual who represents state or local law enforcement; (ii) President, or their designee, of the Chamber of Commerce Hawaii; (iii) President, or their designee, of the Retail Merchants of Hawaii; (iv) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the City and County of Honolulu; (v) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the County of Maui; (vi) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the County of Kauai; and (vii) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the County of Hawaii. (b) Appointments to the task force shall be made by the appointing authority no later than sixty days after the effective date of this Act. (c) The members of the task force shall serve without compensation. No member of the task force shall be made subject to section 84-17, solely because of that member's participation on the task force. The task force shall be exempt from chapter 92. (d) The task force shall submit a report of its findings and recommendations, including any proposed legislation, to the legislature no later than twenty days prior to the convening of the regular session of 2027." SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 4. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. David A. Tarnas

Hawaii House of Representatives, District 8 · D–HI

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. David A. Tarnas
Hawaii Legislature · HB 1839

RELATING TO IMMIGRATION.

Jun 25, 2026 · Enacted · Act 161

Rep. Greggor Ilagan · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Hussey · Sponsored / Rep. Matthias Kusch · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Marten · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Dee Morikawa · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Mahina Poepoe · Sponsored / Rep. Kanani Souza · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored / Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1839 requires a written consent form before a civil-immigration interview with someone in law-enforcement custody, explaining that the interview is voluntary and may be declined or conditioned on an attorney’s presence. The form is free, with translations and accommodations, and a signed copy must be provided and retained. On request, the person must receive reasonable telephone access and an opportunity to consult their attorney; juveniles also have an opportunity to contact a parent, guardian or legal custodian. Agencies must log interview requests and notify the detained person about hold, notification or transfer requests; release notices shared with federal authorities must also be provided in writing within two business days to the person and their attorney or designated representative. The specified federal-access records are public despite the usual chapter 92F exemptions, with detained persons’ identifying information redacted. An aggrieved person who is or was in custody may seek injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorney fees for violations of the consent-form or language/copy requirements. It does not create a general right to appointed immigration counsel.

Act 161, approved 2026-06-25. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens, lawful noncitizens and people without lawful status. Immigration enforcement provisions concern subsets of this population and do not establish any individual’s status or change birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 2. Chapter 353C, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§353C- Immigration; civil immigration interviews; due process and transparency; requirements. (a) Before any civil immigration interview between a federal immigration authority and an individual in law enforcement agency custody regarding civil immigration violations may commence, the law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with a written consent form that: (1) Explains: (A) The rights afforded under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, including the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present if represented; (B) The interview is voluntary; and (C) The individual may either: (i) Decline to be interviewed; or (ii) Choose to be interviewed only with the individual's attorney present; and (2) Clearly provides a space for the individual to indicate that they: (A) Consent to the interview; (B) Consent to the interview with the individual's attorney present; or (C) Do not consent to the interview. (b) The written consent form required under subsection (a) shall be provided at no cost and shall be available in the languages that the office of language access provides translations for, including but not limited to: (1) Chinese Mandarin or Cantonese; (2) Chuukese; (3) English; (4) Ilokano; (5) Japanese; (6) Korean; (7) Olelo Hawaii; (8) Marshallese; (9) Samoan; (10) Spanish; (11) Tagalog; (12) Thai; (13) Vietnamese; and (14) Visayan; provided that other accommodations shall be made for individuals who speak languages that the office of language access cannot provide translation. The law enforcement agency shall provide the individual, the individual's attorney, or the individual's designated representative with a copy of the signed written consent form and retain a copy of each written consent form. (c) Upon request, a law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with reasonable access to a telephone and a reasonable opportunity to consult with the individual's attorney before any civil immigration interview; provided that juveniles in law enforcement agency custody shall also have a reasonable opportunity to contact a parent, guardian, or legal custodian. (d) Law enforcement agencies shall log each civil immigration interview request, including the following: (1) Date and time of the civil immigration interview request; (2) Whether the written consent form under subsection (a) was provided to the individual; (3) The language used in the written consent form; (4) Whether consent was given to a civil immigration interview; (5) If consent was given, whether counsel was present at the interview; and (6) If consent was given, the date and time of the civil immigration interview. (e) Upon receiving any immigration hold, notification, or transfer request from a federal immigration authority, a law enforcement agency shall provide a copy of the request to the individual and inform the individual whether the law enforcement agency intends to comply with the request. If a law enforcement agency provides a federal immigration authority with notification that an individual is being, or will be, released on a certain date, the law enforcement agency shall promptly provide the same notification in writing within two business days to the individual and the individual's attorney or the individual's designated representative. (f) All records relating to a federal immigration authority's access to a detained individual provided by a law enforcement agency, including all communication with the federal immigration authority, shall be public records for purposes of chapter 92F, and the exemptions provided in chapter 92F shall not apply; provided that personal identifying information of a detained individual shall be redacted before public disclosure pursuant to section 92F-13(1). Records relating to federal immigration authority access to a detained individual shall include but not be limited to: (1) Logs maintained by the law enforcement agency pursuant to subsection (d); (2) The date the federal immigration authority was provided the access; and (3) Whether the federal immigration authority's access was provided through an immigration hold, notification request, or transfer, or other means. (g) The department of the attorney general, the county prosecuting attorneys, or an agency with separate enforcement authority may receive and investigate complaints of violations of this section and issue findings and corrective orders. (h) Any person who is or was in custody and aggrieved by a violation of this section may bring an action seeking injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorneys' fees against a law enforcement agency that has violated the requirements of subsection (a) or (b). (i) For the purposes of this section: "Civil immigration interview" means any interview by federal immigration authorities concerning civil immigration matters of a person in the custody of a law enforcement agency. "Federal immigration authority" means the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the United States Customs and Border Protection, or any other federal agency or component authorized to conduct civil immigration enforcement or civil immigration interviews under federal law. "Immigration hold" means an immigration detainer issued pursuant to title 8 Code of Federal Regulations section 287.7, or any similar request from federal immigration authorities for detention of an individual suspected of violating civil immigration law. "Law enforcement agency" means any agency of the State or any of its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies, that is authorized to enforce criminal laws; operate correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities; or maintain custody of individuals in correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities. "Law enforcement agency" does not include any federal agency or its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies." SECTION 3. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Hawaii Legislature · HB 125

Hawaii approves firearm-storage rules and purchaser notices

Apr 22, 2025 · Enacted · Act 22

Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Luke A. Evslin · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Kitagawa · Sponsored / Rep. Nicole E. Lowen · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Jackson D. Sayama · Sponsored / Rep. Gregg Takayama · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored

Reviewed final Hawaii law

The storage offense, purchaser notice and civil-liability rules address firearm safety and criminal justice. These provisions do not establish a decline in crime. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review.

Act 22, approved 2025-04-22. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The storage offense, purchaser notice and civil-liability rules address firearm safety and criminal justice. These provisions do not establish a decline in crime. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review. The chart does not isolate this action’s effect.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Firearm deaths · crime · reviewed Hawaii policy context · health · reviewed Hawaii policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of a violation and fined no more than $500;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. David Alcos III

Hawaii House of Representatives, District 41 · R–HI

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. David Alcos III
Hawaii Legislature · HB 1759

RELATING TO THEFT.

Feb 17, 2026 · Not enacted

Rep. Joe Gedeon · Sponsored / Rep. David Alcos III · Sponsored / Rep. Diamond Garcia · Sponsored / Rep. Lauren Matsumoto · Sponsored / Rep. Christopher L. Muraoka · Sponsored / Rep. Elijah Pierick · Sponsored / Rep. Julie Reyes Oda · Sponsored / Rep. Garner M. Shimizu · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1759 proposed an organized retail-theft offense for specified coordinated theft or handling of stolen merchandise, felony tiers based on merchandise value, increased penalties for leadership roles and an attorney-general task force. The offense requires intentional action with at least one other person: theft with intent to sell, exchange or dispose of merchandise for value, or receiving/handling merchandise explicitly represented as stolen. The specified tiers are a class C felony at $200 to less than $750 and a class B felony at $750 or more, using value or aggregate value; specified leadership conduct raises the offense one category. The draft states a task-force appointment deadline of 60 days after effectiveness but a report deadline 20 days before the 2027 session, which is inconsistent with its far-future effective date. Its House draft uses a July 1, 3000 effective date. It did not become law in the 2026 regular session and does not establish these penalties or a reduction in property crime.

Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1 and referred to the committee(s) on JHA with Representative(s) Amato, Takayama voting aye with reservations; Representative(s) Perruso voting no (1) and Representative(s) Cochran, Lee, M., Poepoe excused (3). The regular session ended May 8, 2026 without this bill becoming law. The displayed date is the latest official event, including a carryover entry where applicable.

Why this record is included

The FBI property-crime measure includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. These proposals concern theft components, not every property offense or a demonstrated change in reported crime. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 2. Chapter 708, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§708- Organized retail theft. (1) For purposes of this section: "Retailer" means a person or business that sells or facilitates the sale of merchandise to the public for use or consumption rather than for resale. (2) A person commits the offense of organized retail theft if the person intentionally: (a) Acts in concert with one or more persons to commit theft of merchandise from one or more retailers with intent to sell, exchange, or dispose of the merchandise for value; or (b) Acts in concert with one or more persons to receive, possess, conceal, store, or purchase merchandise explicitly represented to the person as being merchandise stolen from a retailer. (3) Violation of this section is: (a) A Class C felony if the value or aggregate value of the merchandise involved in the act is $200 or more but less than $750; or (b) A Class B felony if the value or aggregate value of the merchandise involved in the act is $750 or more. (4) Violation of this section described in subsection (3) is increased to the next higher category of offense if the person recruits, coordinates, organizes, supervises, directs, manages, or finances one or more persons to engage in an act described in subsection (2). (5) There is to be established an organized retail theft task force under the department of the attorney general. (a) The task force shall consist of no more than fifteen members and shall include: (i) Four members appointed by the governor, one of whom shall be an individual who represents state or local law enforcement; (ii) President, or their designee, of the Chamber of Commerce Hawaii; (iii) President, or their designee, of the Retail Merchants of Hawaii; (iv) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the City and County of Honolulu; (v) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the County of Maui; (vi) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the County of Kauai; and (vii) Prosecuting Attorney, or their designee, for the County of Hawaii. (b) Appointments to the task force shall be made by the appointing authority no later than sixty days after the effective date of this Act. (c) The members of the task force shall serve without compensation. No member of the task force shall be made subject to section 84-17, solely because of that member's participation on the task force. The task force shall be exempt from chapter 92. (d) The task force shall submit a report of its findings and recommendations, including any proposed legislation, to the legislature no later than twenty days prior to the convening of the regular session of 2027." SECTION 3. This Act does not affect rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred, and proceedings that were begun before its effective date. SECTION 4. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Dee Morikawa

Hawaii House of Representatives, District 17 · D–HI

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Dee Morikawa
Hawaii Legislature · HB 1839

RELATING TO IMMIGRATION.

Jun 25, 2026 · Enacted · Act 161

Rep. Greggor Ilagan · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Hussey · Sponsored / Rep. Matthias Kusch · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Marten · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Dee Morikawa · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Mahina Poepoe · Sponsored / Rep. Kanani Souza · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored / Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1839 requires a written consent form before a civil-immigration interview with someone in law-enforcement custody, explaining that the interview is voluntary and may be declined or conditioned on an attorney’s presence. The form is free, with translations and accommodations, and a signed copy must be provided and retained. On request, the person must receive reasonable telephone access and an opportunity to consult their attorney; juveniles also have an opportunity to contact a parent, guardian or legal custodian. Agencies must log interview requests and notify the detained person about hold, notification or transfer requests; release notices shared with federal authorities must also be provided in writing within two business days to the person and their attorney or designated representative. The specified federal-access records are public despite the usual chapter 92F exemptions, with detained persons’ identifying information redacted. An aggrieved person who is or was in custody may seek injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorney fees for violations of the consent-form or language/copy requirements. It does not create a general right to appointed immigration counsel.

Act 161, approved 2026-06-25. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens, lawful noncitizens and people without lawful status. Immigration enforcement provisions concern subsets of this population and do not establish any individual’s status or change birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 2. Chapter 353C, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§353C- Immigration; civil immigration interviews; due process and transparency; requirements. (a) Before any civil immigration interview between a federal immigration authority and an individual in law enforcement agency custody regarding civil immigration violations may commence, the law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with a written consent form that: (1) Explains: (A) The rights afforded under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, including the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present if represented; (B) The interview is voluntary; and (C) The individual may either: (i) Decline to be interviewed; or (ii) Choose to be interviewed only with the individual's attorney present; and (2) Clearly provides a space for the individual to indicate that they: (A) Consent to the interview; (B) Consent to the interview with the individual's attorney present; or (C) Do not consent to the interview. (b) The written consent form required under subsection (a) shall be provided at no cost and shall be available in the languages that the office of language access provides translations for, including but not limited to: (1) Chinese Mandarin or Cantonese; (2) Chuukese; (3) English; (4) Ilokano; (5) Japanese; (6) Korean; (7) Olelo Hawaii; (8) Marshallese; (9) Samoan; (10) Spanish; (11) Tagalog; (12) Thai; (13) Vietnamese; and (14) Visayan; provided that other accommodations shall be made for individuals who speak languages that the office of language access cannot provide translation. The law enforcement agency shall provide the individual, the individual's attorney, or the individual's designated representative with a copy of the signed written consent form and retain a copy of each written consent form. (c) Upon request, a law enforcement agency shall provide the individual with reasonable access to a telephone and a reasonable opportunity to consult with the individual's attorney before any civil immigration interview; provided that juveniles in law enforcement agency custody shall also have a reasonable opportunity to contact a parent, guardian, or legal custodian. (d) Law enforcement agencies shall log each civil immigration interview request, including the following: (1) Date and time of the civil immigration interview request; (2) Whether the written consent form under subsection (a) was provided to the individual; (3) The language used in the written consent form; (4) Whether consent was given to a civil immigration interview; (5) If consent was given, whether counsel was present at the interview; and (6) If consent was given, the date and time of the civil immigration interview. (e) Upon receiving any immigration hold, notification, or transfer request from a federal immigration authority, a law enforcement agency shall provide a copy of the request to the individual and inform the individual whether the law enforcement agency intends to comply with the request. If a law enforcement agency provides a federal immigration authority with notification that an individual is being, or will be, released on a certain date, the law enforcement agency shall promptly provide the same notification in writing within two business days to the individual and the individual's attorney or the individual's designated representative. (f) All records relating to a federal immigration authority's access to a detained individual provided by a law enforcement agency, including all communication with the federal immigration authority, shall be public records for purposes of chapter 92F, and the exemptions provided in chapter 92F shall not apply; provided that personal identifying information of a detained individual shall be redacted before public disclosure pursuant to section 92F-13(1). Records relating to federal immigration authority access to a detained individual shall include but not be limited to: (1) Logs maintained by the law enforcement agency pursuant to subsection (d); (2) The date the federal immigration authority was provided the access; and (3) Whether the federal immigration authority's access was provided through an immigration hold, notification request, or transfer, or other means. (g) The department of the attorney general, the county prosecuting attorneys, or an agency with separate enforcement authority may receive and investigate complaints of violations of this section and issue findings and corrective orders. (h) Any person who is or was in custody and aggrieved by a violation of this section may bring an action seeking injunctive or declaratory relief and reasonable attorneys' fees against a law enforcement agency that has violated the requirements of subsection (a) or (b). (i) For the purposes of this section: "Civil immigration interview" means any interview by federal immigration authorities concerning civil immigration matters of a person in the custody of a law enforcement agency. "Federal immigration authority" means the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the United States Customs and Border Protection, or any other federal agency or component authorized to conduct civil immigration enforcement or civil immigration interviews under federal law. "Immigration hold" means an immigration detainer issued pursuant to title 8 Code of Federal Regulations section 287.7, or any similar request from federal immigration authorities for detention of an individual suspected of violating civil immigration law. "Law enforcement agency" means any agency of the State or any of its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies, that is authorized to enforce criminal laws; operate correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities; or maintain custody of individuals in correctional, detention, or juvenile detention facilities. "Law enforcement agency" does not include any federal agency or its political subdivisions, or any officer or individual of those agencies." SECTION 3. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Hawaii officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Hawaii statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.