Personal income tax
NoneFlorida does not impose a personal income tax.
Florida income and taxes
Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Florida’s tax structure.
Median household income$74.57K2020–2024 · #33 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$42.61K2020–2024 · #24 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$57.13K2024 · #29 of 50 · highest first
Florida over time
Explore Florida readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Florida officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Florida effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Florida change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Real personal income per person Florida · source units
FloridaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
17 of 17 reviewed Florida actions match · 17 date markers shown. 40 major events shown separately.
Florida · 2024: $57,131 · Rank #29 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195
BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
| Period | Florida | Rank | U.S. benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | $57,131 | #29 of 50 | $59,195 |
| 2023 | $56,138 | #29 of 50 | $58,088 |
| 2022 | $55,163 | #30 of 50 | $57,104 |
| 2021 | $56,789 | #29 of 50 | $59,365 |
| 2020 | $53,897 | #32 of 50 | $56,514 |
| 2019 | $52,128 | #26 of 50 | $53,683 |
| 2018 | $49,935 | #31 of 50 | $52,242 |
| 2017 | $48,141 | #32 of 50 | $51,006 |
| 2016 | $46,126 | #37 of 50 | $49,828 |
| 2015 | $45,693 | #37 of 50 | $49,396 |
| 2014 | $43,812 | #37 of 50 | $47,661 |
How major events are selected
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Florida milestones include its constitutional wage schedule, fuel-tax holiday, housing and education laws, health and energy legislation, theft-law changes, budget approval and pandemic directives, where relevant to this topic. Statutory amounts and national estimates are not observed changes in Florida readings.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Household resources
Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.
Florida · 2020–2024$74,568
Florida rank#33among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Median household income
Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.
2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Florida stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Florida has a dark outline.
Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Florida with every state · 50 ranked
| Rank | State | Value | Comparison notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Massachusetts | $103,960 | 90% CI: 103433–104487 |
| #2 | Maryland | $103,678 | 90% CI: 103081–104275 |
| #3 | New Jersey | $103,556 | 90% CI: 103043–104069 |
| #4 | Hawaii | $100,389 | 90% CI: 99268–101510 |
| #5 | California | $99,122 | 90% CI: 98812–99432 |
| #6 | New Hampshire | $99,031 | 90% CI: 97908–100154 |
| #7 | Washington | $98,141 | 90% CI: 97727–98555 |
| #8 | Connecticut | $95,781 | 90% CI: 95049–96513 |
| #9 | Colorado | $95,470 | 90% CI: 94892–96048 |
| #10 | Utah | $95,166 | 90% CI: 94392–95940 |
| #11 | Virginia | $93,170 | 90% CI: 92712–93628 |
| #12 | Alaska | $92,788 | 90% CI: 91556–94020 |
| #13 | Minnesota | $89,062 | 90% CI: 88653–89471 |
| #14 | Rhode Island | $87,796 | 90% CI: 86587–89005 |
| #15 | New York | $85,974 | 90% CI: 85572–86376 |
| #16 | Delaware | $84,954 | 90% CI: 83703–86205 |
| #17 | Illinois | $83,390 | 90% CI: 83028–83752 |
| #18 | Oregon | $83,011 | 90% CI: 82438–83584 |
| #19 | Vermont | $81,203 | 90% CI: 79864–82542 |
| #20 | Arizona | $79,964 | 90% CI: 79557–80371 |
| #21 | Texas | $78,476 | 90% CI: 78213–78739 |
| #22 | Nevada | $78,260 | 90% CI: 77664–78856 |
| #23 | Pennsylvania | $77,971 | 90% CI: 77629–78313 |
| #24 | Idaho | $77,800 | 90% CI: 77057–78543 |
| #25 | Wisconsin | $77,485 | 90% CI: 77030–77940 |
| #26 | Georgia | $77,353 | 90% CI: 76946–77760 |
| #27 | North Dakota | $76,657 | 90% CI: 75494–77820 |
| #28 | Nebraska | $76,475 | 90% CI: 75842–77108 |
| #29 | Wyoming | $76,176 | 90% CI: 75008–77344 |
| #30 | South Dakota | $75,081 | 90% CI: 74193–75969 |
| #31 | Iowa | $75,059 | 90% CI: 74641–75477 |
| #32 | Maine | $74,733 | 90% CI: 73938–75528 |
| #33 | Florida · your comparison | $74,568 | 90% CI: 74284–74852 |
| #34 | Kansas | $74,275 | 90% CI: 73800–74750 |
| #35 | Michigan | $72,875 | 90% CI: 72582–73168 |
| #36 | Montana | $72,509 | 90% CI: 71748–73270 |
| #37 | North Carolina | $72,388 | 90% CI: 72064–72712 |
| #38 | Indiana | $71,957 | 90% CI: 71605–72309 |
| #39 | Ohio | $71,389 | 90% CI: 71068–71710 |
| #40 | Missouri | $70,702 | 90% CI: 70377–71027 |
| #41 | Tennessee | $69,595 | 90% CI: 69166–70024 |
| #42 | South Carolina | $69,324 | 90% CI: 68754–69894 |
| #43 | Oklahoma | $65,039 | 90% CI: 64600–65478 |
| #44 | New Mexico | $64,059 | 90% CI: 63251–64867 |
| #45 | Alabama | $63,999 | 90% CI: 63600–64398 |
| #46 | Kentucky | $63,726 | 90% CI: 63297–64155 |
| #47 | Arkansas | $60,773 | 90% CI: 60306–61240 |
| #48 | Louisiana | $60,756 | 90% CI: 60348–61164 |
| #49 | West Virginia | $59,608 | 90% CI: 58917–60299 |
| #50 | Mississippi | $56,447 | 90% CI: 55908–56986 |
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Is income keeping up with prices?
Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.
Florida · 2024$57,131
Florida rank#29among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Real personal income per person
BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.
Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Florida
View history and select a period
| Period | Florida | Compare |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | $43,812 | |
| 2015 | $45,693 | |
| 2016 | $46,126 | |
| 2017 | $48,141 | |
| 2018 | $49,935 | |
| 2019 | $52,128 | |
| 2020 | $53,897 | |
| 2021 | $56,789 | |
| 2022 | $55,163 | |
| 2023 | $56,138 | |
| 2024 | $57,131 |
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Florida stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Florida has a dark outline.
Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Florida with every state · 50 ranked
| Rank | State | Value | Comparison notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Wyoming | $75,501 | — |
| #2 | Connecticut | $74,254 | — |
| #3 | Massachusetts | $71,629 | — |
| #4 | South Dakota | $69,153 | — |
| #5 | Nebraska | $65,297 | — |
| #6 | North Dakota | $65,271 | — |
| #7 | Colorado | $65,223 | — |
| #8 | New Hampshire | $64,632 | — |
| #9 | Washington | $64,421 | — |
| #10 | New York | $64,153 | — |
| #11 | New Jersey | $63,142 | — |
| #12 | California | $63,028 | — |
| #13 | Minnesota | $62,039 | — |
| #14 | Virginia | $61,914 | — |
| #15 | Maryland | $61,111 | — |
| #16 | Illinois | $60,333 | — |
| #17 | Alaska | $60,272 | — |
| #18 | Iowa | $60,144 | — |
| #19 | Montana | $59,203 | — |
| #20 | Kansas | $59,172 | — |
| #21 | Vermont | $58,893 | — |
| #22 | Oklahoma | $58,692 | — |
| #23 | Pennsylvania | $58,620 | — |
| #24 | Tennessee | $58,582 | — |
| #25 | Wisconsin | $58,273 | — |
| #26 | Texas | $58,219 | — |
| #27 | Missouri | $57,850 | — |
| #28 | Maine | $57,480 | — |
| #29 | Florida · your comparison | $57,131 | — |
| #30 | Louisiana | $56,789 | — |
| #31 | Nevada | $56,503 | — |
| #32 | North Carolina | $56,310 | — |
| #33 | Ohio | $56,232 | — |
| #34 | Rhode Island | $55,878 | — |
| #35 | Indiana | $55,562 | — |
| #36 | Oregon | $55,451 | — |
| #37 | Arkansas | $55,219 | — |
| #38 | Delaware | $55,185 | — |
| #39 | Utah | $55,116 | — |
| #40 | Michigan | $53,569 | — |
| #41 | Georgia | $52,952 | — |
| #42 | Arizona | $52,890 | — |
| #43 | Idaho | $52,816 | — |
| #44 | South Carolina | $52,463 | — |
| #45 | Kentucky | $52,290 | — |
| #46 | Hawaii | $52,272 | — |
| #47 | Alabama | $52,216 | — |
| #48 | New Mexico | $51,121 | — |
| #49 | West Virginia | $50,051 | — |
| #50 | Mississippi | $48,465 | — |
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
How Florida raises taxes
Florida does not levy a personal income tax. State revenue comparisons below rank dollars collected, not statutory rates or the tax burden of a particular household.
Florida · FY2024$0
Florida rank#45among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Personal income-tax collections
Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Florida stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Florida has a dark outline.
Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Florida with every state · 50 ranked
| Rank | State | Value | Comparison notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | California | $123.1B | — |
| #2 | New York | $53.84B | — |
| #3 | Illinois | $22.63B | — |
| #4 | Massachusetts | $22.13B | — |
| #5 | New Jersey | $18.88B | — |
| #6 | Virginia | $17.64B | — |
| #7 | Pennsylvania | $17.08B | — |
| #8 | North Carolina | $16.66B | — |
| #9 | Georgia | $16.02B | — |
| #10 | Minnesota | $13.27B | — |
| #11 | Michigan | $11.56B | — |
| #12 | Maryland | $10.65B | — |
| #13 | Connecticut | $10.03B | — |
| #14 | Ohio | $10.02B | — |
| #15 | Oregon | $9.54B | — |
| #16 | Wisconsin | $9.49B | — |
| #17 | Indiana | $8.1B | — |
| #18 | Missouri | $7.75B | — |
| #19 | Colorado | $7.52B | — |
| #20 | South Carolina | $6.15B | — |
| #21 | Utah | $5.72B | — |
| #22 | Alabama | $5.28B | — |
| #23 | Kentucky | $5.02B | — |
| #24 | Louisiana | $4.88B | — |
| #25 | Arizona | $4.81B | — |
| #26 | Oklahoma | $4.51B | — |
| #27 | Kansas | $4.5B | — |
| #28 | Iowa | $3.76B | — |
| #29 | Hawaii | $3.28B | — |
| #30 | Idaho | $2.89B | — |
| #31 | Arkansas | $2.76B | — |
| #32 | Delaware | $2.53B | — |
| #33 | Nebraska | $2.48B | — |
| #34 | Maine | $2.4B | — |
| #35 | Mississippi | $2.33B | — |
| #36 | West Virginia | $2.27B | — |
| #37 | Montana | $2.25B | — |
| #38 | New Mexico | $2.17B | — |
| #39 | Rhode Island | $1.59B | — |
| #40 | Vermont | $1.24B | — |
| #41 | North Dakota | $356.48M | — |
| #42 | Washington | $350.45M | — |
| #43 | New Hampshire | $183.36M | — |
| #44 | Tennessee | $2.12M | — |
| #45 | Alaska | $0 | — |
| #45 | Florida · your comparison | $0 | — |
| #45 | Nevada | $0 | — |
| #45 | South Dakota | $0 | — |
| #45 | Texas | $0 | — |
| #45 | Wyoming | $0 | — |
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
General sales tax
6%State rate; many counties add a discretionary sales surtax.
Corporate income tax
5.5%Rate for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2022, after the $50,000 exemption and applicable adjustments.
Property tax
Local rates varyCounties, municipalities, school districts, and special districts set millage rates; this is not a statewide tax rate.
How federal income taxes work
A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.
Base standard deduction
$16,100Tax year 2026 · Single
Marginal versus effective rate
The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.
| Marginal rate | Taxable income in this band |
|---|---|
| 10% | Up to $12,400 |
| 12% | Over $12,400 through $50,400 |
| 22% | Over $50,400 through $105,700 |
| 24% | Over $105,700 through $201,775 |
| 32% | Over $201,775 through $256,225 |
| 35% | Over $256,225 through $640,600 |
| 37% | Over $640,600 |
Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.
IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗Who pays corporate income taxes?
Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.
Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.
$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
| Company-size group | Share of returns | Share of business receipts | Income tax after credits | Share of corporate income tax |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under $100,000 | 44.6% | 0.1% | $5.93B | 1.3% |
| $100,000–under $1 million | 32.9% | 0.6% | $2.31B | 0.5% |
| $1 million–under $10 million | 17.6% | 2.9% | $8.78B | 2.0% |
| $10 million–under $100 million | 3.9% | 5.6% | $21.87B | 4.9% |
| $100 million–under $1 billion | 0.8% | 10.9% | $40.78B | 9.1% |
| $1 billion and above | 0.2% | 80.0% | $368.84B | 82.2% |
All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.
How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown
The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.
S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.
FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.
IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗
The broader federal tax burden
Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.
Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.
| Income group | Individual income | Payroll | Corporate | Excise | Combined rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest fifth | −10.1% | 9.5% | 0.8% | 1.3% | 1.4% |
| Second fifth | −0.9% | 8.8% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 9.5% |
| Middle fifth | 3.1% | 8.8% | 0.9% | 0.6% | 13.4% |
| Fourth fifth | 6.8% | 9.3% | 1.0% | 0.5% | 17.6% |
| Highest fifth | 16.6% | 6.1% | 2.9% | 0.3% | 25.9% |
| All households | 10.6% | 7.5% | 2.1% | 0.4% | 20.6% |
Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.
How this comparison is measured
CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.
The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.
CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗
Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?
Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.
Real income per person
$52,849Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate
Change from prior month
+0.3%Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change
Change from a year earlier
+0.2%Jul 2025 to Jul 2026
Per personchained 2017 dollars
Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.
Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.
Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
| Period | Per person |
|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | 52,849 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jun 2026 | 52,666 chained 2017 dollars |
| May 2026 | 52,517 chained 2017 dollars |
| Apr 2026 | 52,402 chained 2017 dollars |
| Mar 2026 | 52,624 chained 2017 dollars |
| Feb 2026 | 52,694 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jan 2026 | 52,941 chained 2017 dollars |
| Dec 2025 | 52,610 chained 2017 dollars |
| Nov 2025 | 52,667 chained 2017 dollars |
| Oct 2025 | 52,684 chained 2017 dollars |
| Sep 2025 | 52,865 chained 2017 dollars |
| Aug 2025 | 52,829 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jul 2025 | 52,740 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jun 2025 | 52,529 chained 2017 dollars |
| May 2025 | 52,609 chained 2017 dollars |
| Apr 2025 | 53,077 chained 2017 dollars |
| Mar 2025 | 52,794 chained 2017 dollars |
| Feb 2025 | 52,465 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jan 2025 | 52,422 chained 2017 dollars |
| Dec 2024 | 52,376 chained 2017 dollars |
| Nov 2024 | 52,348 chained 2017 dollars |
| Oct 2024 | 52,252 chained 2017 dollars |
| Sep 2024 | 52,159 chained 2017 dollars |
| Aug 2024 | 52,136 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jul 2024 | 52,135 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jun 2024 | 52,192 chained 2017 dollars |
| May 2024 | 52,124 chained 2017 dollars |
| Apr 2024 | 51,946 chained 2017 dollars |
| Mar 2024 | 51,924 chained 2017 dollars |
| Feb 2024 | 51,902 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jan 2024 | 51,878 chained 2017 dollars |
| Dec 2023 | 51,637 chained 2017 dollars |
| Nov 2023 | 51,515 chained 2017 dollars |
| Oct 2023 | 51,302 chained 2017 dollars |
| Sep 2023 | 51,171 chained 2017 dollars |
| Aug 2023 | 51,195 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jul 2023 | 51,166 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jun 2023 | 51,106 chained 2017 dollars |
| May 2023 | 51,085 chained 2017 dollars |
| Apr 2023 | 50,936 chained 2017 dollars |
| Mar 2023 | 50,861 chained 2017 dollars |
| Feb 2023 | 50,594 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jan 2023 | 50,353 chained 2017 dollars |
| Dec 2022 | 49,403 chained 2017 dollars |
| Nov 2022 | 49,210 chained 2017 dollars |
| Oct 2022 | 49,165 chained 2017 dollars |
| Sep 2022 | 49,043 chained 2017 dollars |
| Aug 2022 | 48,912 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jul 2022 | 48,660 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jun 2022 | 48,071 chained 2017 dollars |
| May 2022 | 48,219 chained 2017 dollars |
| Apr 2022 | 48,312 chained 2017 dollars |
| Mar 2022 | 48,344 chained 2017 dollars |
| Feb 2022 | 48,607 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jan 2022 | 48,616 chained 2017 dollars |
| Dec 2021 | 49,845 chained 2017 dollars |
| Nov 2021 | 50,093 chained 2017 dollars |
| Oct 2021 | 50,258 chained 2017 dollars |
| Sep 2021 | 50,266 chained 2017 dollars |
| Aug 2021 | 50,857 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jul 2021 | 50,982 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jun 2021 | 50,671 chained 2017 dollars |
| May 2021 | 50,939 chained 2017 dollars |
| Apr 2021 | 52,450 chained 2017 dollars |
| Mar 2021 | 61,793 chained 2017 dollars |
| Feb 2021 | 50,288 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jan 2021 | 54,791 chained 2017 dollars |
| Dec 2020 | 49,374 chained 2017 dollars |
| Nov 2020 | 49,323 chained 2017 dollars |
| Oct 2020 | 49,907 chained 2017 dollars |
| Sep 2020 | 50,099 chained 2017 dollars |
| Aug 2020 | 49,835 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jul 2020 | 51,838 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jun 2020 | 51,388 chained 2017 dollars |
| May 2020 | 51,575 chained 2017 dollars |
| Apr 2020 | 54,304 chained 2017 dollars |
| Mar 2020 | 47,344 chained 2017 dollars |
| Feb 2020 | 47,961 chained 2017 dollars |
| Jan 2020 | 47,800 chained 2017 dollars |
Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.
BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗
Income before and after taxes and benefits
Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.
Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.
| Income group | Before | + Benefits | − Taxes | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest fifth | $26,200 | $19,000 | $400 | $44,800 |
| Second fifth | $59,100 | $9,600 | $5,600 | $63,100 |
| Middle fifth | $94,000 | $5,600 | $12,600 | $87,000 |
| Fourth fifth | $143,100 | $3,000 | $25,100 | $121,100 |
| Highest fifth | $412,600 | $1,700 | $106,700 | $307,600 |
| All households | $143,000 | $7,900 | $29,400 | $121,500 |
“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.
CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗
Tax credits and measured poverty
A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.
Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗
| Age group | Fewer people below the threshold | 90% margin of error |
|---|---|---|
| All ages | 6,768,000 | ±462,000 |
| Under 18 | 3,704,000 | ±263,000 |
| Ages 18–64 | 2,985,000 | ±224,000 |
| Ages 65+ | 79,000 | ±25,000 |
Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.
The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.
Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗
Understanding Florida income
Median, average and per person
The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.
Income, taxes and living costs
Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.
Annual and five-year estimates
The Florida ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.
Rankings and uncertainty
#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Florida candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
2026 Florida Chief Financial Officer — Democratic Primary
Earle Ford
1 statementIncome & wages
Florida must base its investment priorities entirely on fiscal responsibility, long-term stability, and securing the financial future of our communities, which includes robust, reliable pension management. Our investments should focus on infrastructure, education, and resilience projects that yield …
Read exact statement & source
Florida must base its investment priorities entirely on fiscal responsibility, long-term stability, and securing the financial future of our communities, which includes robust, reliable pension management. Our investments should focus on infrastructure, education, and resilience projects that yield tangible economic returns. Fiduciary duty and objective data, not partisan gridlock, must guide financial decisions. The financial health of the state and protecting taxpayers must always take precedence over using public funds to wage political or social battles.Earle Ford direct candidate responses ↗
2026 Florida Chief Financial Officer — General Election
Annette Taddeo
2 statementsTaxes & tax policy
Floridians deserve to know how and where our tax dollars are being spent. They deserve to know who we award contracts to for public projects. They deserve transparency from the Office of the CFO, and Annette Taddeo will make sure that happens. She’ll bring her three decades of experience running her…
Read exact statement & source
Floridians deserve to know how and where our tax dollars are being spent. They deserve to know who we award contracts to for public projects. They deserve transparency from the Office of the CFO, and Annette Taddeo will make sure that happens. She’ll bring her three decades of experience running her own business and a proven track record of public service to the fight for transparency and accountability.Annette Taddeo campaign source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from Annette Taddeo
Taxes & tax policy
Floridians have watched corruption run rampant in Tallahassee for too long: no-bid contracts going to big donors. Millions spent on political stunts with no oversight. Scandals involving our tax dollars swept under the rug. As CFO, Annette Taddeo will put Floridians, not special interests, first. Sh…
Read exact statement & source
Floridians have watched corruption run rampant in Tallahassee for too long: no-bid contracts going to big donors. Millions spent on political stunts with no oversight. Scandals involving our tax dollars swept under the rug. As CFO, Annette Taddeo will put Floridians, not special interests, first. She’ll audit politicians’ spending and demand answers on behalf of taxpayers.Annette Taddeo campaign source 3 ↗
2026 Florida Chief Financial Officer — Republican Primary
Blaise Ingoglia
1 statementTaxes & tax policy
Blaise’s commitment to lowering or eliminating property taxes is undeniable.
Read exact statement & source
Blaise’s commitment to lowering or eliminating property taxes is undeniable.On the issues ↗
Frank William Collige
1 statementTaxes & tax policy
Every Floridian deserves to know how their tax dollars are being spent. I will advocate for:
Read exact statement & source
Every Floridian deserves to know how their tax dollars are being spent. I will advocate for:Frank for Change ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 16
How statements are selected
This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Florida candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Florida legislators and Florida’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Florida’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
16 matching sponsorships or proposals · 11 Florida incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Gov. Ron DeSantis
Governor of Florida · R–FL
1 proposalView proposals from Gov. Ron DeSantis
Proposed more than $1 billion in gas-tax relief
Nov 22, 2021 · Proposed
Gov. Ron DeSantis · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
Governor DeSantis proposed a state gas-tax holiday of more than $1 billion and said it could save the average Florida family up to $200. Legislative approval was required, so the announcement itself did not reduce the tax.
The Governor announced the proposal on November 22, 2021; the announcement required legislative action and did not itself change Florida tax law.
Why this record is included
The proposal directly sought to lower consumer gasoline costs through a state gas-tax holiday. The announcement did not itself change Florida law and does not explain the August 2026 price displayed on the card.
Retained Florida evidence context: Regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
I am proposing that during session, the Florida Legislature provide more than $1 billion in gas tax relief for Florida families.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
U.S. representative for Florida, District 13 · R–FL
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
American Families Gas Tax Relief Act
May 13, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This measure would provide a fuel tax holiday.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses a gasoline-blend supply constraint or the federal gasoline tax, both components of retail fuel prices. It does not establish an effect on the displayed Florida price.
Retained Florida evidence context: Regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
119 HR 8795 IH: American Families Gas Tax Relief Act U.S.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Rep. Brian J. Mast
U.S. representative for Florida, District 21 · R–FL
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Brian J. Mast
To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to waive Reid Vapor Pressure requirements with respect to calendar year 2026, and for other purposes.
Apr 27, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Brian J. Mast · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This measure would require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to waive Reid Vapor Pressure requirements with respect to calendar year 2026, and for other purposes.
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses a gasoline-blend supply constraint or the federal gasoline tax, both components of retail fuel prices. It does not establish an effect on the displayed Florida price.
Retained Florida evidence context: Regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Waiver Notwithstanding any other provision of law, with respect to the period beginning on May 1, 2026, and ending on September 15, 2026, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall waive the prohibition under section 211(h) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(h)) on the sale, offering for sale, dispensing, supply, offering for supply, transport, and introduction into commerce of gasoline the Reid Vapor Pressure of which exceeds the applicable standard. (b)Review official supporting evidence ↗
No Tax Breaks for Radical Corporate Activism Act
Feb 11, 2025 · Introduced
Rep. Brian J. Mast · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
No Tax Breaks for Radical Corporate Activism Act This bill disallows a business expense tax deduction for reimbursements or other amounts paid by an employer to an employee for travel expenses to obtain an abortion or expenses for any gender transition procedure for a minor child (under 18 years old) of an employee. (Under current law, a tax deduction generally is allowed for costs of operating a trade or business, subject to certain conditions and exceptions.) The bill defines gender transition procedure as any medical or surgical service (including physician services, hospital services, and prescription drugs) that seeks to (1) alter or remove physiological or anatomical characteristics…
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses abortion access, procedures, telehealth, travel expenses, notification, or pregnancy-choice information. It does not establish an effect on Florida's AHCA reported count.
Retained Florida evidence context: Reported induced terminations. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
This bill disallows a business expense tax deduction for reimbursements or other amounts paid by an employer to an employee for travel expenses to obtain an abortion or expenses for any gender transition procedure for a minor child (under 18 years old) of an employee. (Under current law, a tax deduction generally is allowed for costs of operating a trade or business, subject to certain conditions and exceptions.)Review official supporting evidence ↗
Rep. Gus M. Bilirakis
U.S. representative for Florida, District 12 · R–FL
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Gus M. Bilirakis
Commission on Sustaining Medicare and Social Security Act of 2026
Jun 2, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Gus M. Bilirakis · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This measure would establish the Commission on Sustaining Medicare and Social Security, and for other purposes.
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses Social Security benefits, beneficiary administration, the retirement earnings test, trust-fund financing, program sustainability, or scams targeting beneficiaries. It does not establish an effect on Florida's beneficiary count.
Retained Florida evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
establish the Commission on Sustaining Medicare and Social Security, and for other purposesReview official supporting evidence ↗
Rep. Kat Cammack
U.S. representative for Florida, District 3 · R–FL
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Kat Cammack
ABC Act
Mar 31, 2025 · Introduced
Rep. Kat Cammack · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Alleviating Barriers for Caregivers Act or the ABC Act This bill requires federal agencies to review and modify the administrative processes related to Medicare, Medicaid, the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and Social Security programs in order to streamline these processes for family caregivers. Specifically, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Social Security Administration (SSA) must review processes related to eligibility determinations, applications, forms, and communications for these programs and identify ways to simplify and streamline these processes for family caregivers (e.g., reducing the need for family caregivers to submit the same…
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses Social Security benefits, beneficiary administration, the retirement earnings test, trust-fund financing, program sustainability, or scams targeting beneficiaries. It does not establish an effect on Florida's beneficiary count.
Retained Florida evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Specifically, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Social Security Administration (SSA) must review processes related to eligibility determinations, applications, forms, and communications for these programs and identify ways to simplify and streamline these processes for family caregivers (e.g., reducing the need for family caregivers to submit the same information for multiple programs).Review official supporting evidence ↗
Rep. Maxwell Frost
U.S. representative for Florida, District 10 · D–FL
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Maxwell Frost
Medicare Investment and Gun Violence Prevention Act
Dec 16, 2025 · Introduced
Rep. Maxwell Frost · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This measure would amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the elimination of tax on certain firearms under the National Firearms Act and to deposit the savings into the Medicare part A trust fund.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses firearm access, storage, sales, ammunition, licensing, carry rules, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Florida's firearm mortality rate.
Retained Florida evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the elimination of tax on certain firearms under the National Firearms Act and to deposit the savings into the Medicare part A trust fundReview official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us
Only current Florida officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Florida statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 2, 2026.