Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price28.75¢/kWh2024 · #4 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$4.023/gal2026-08 · #18 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$199.662024 · #2 of 50 · highest first
Connecticut over time
Explore Connecticut readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Connecticut officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Connecticut effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Connecticut change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price Connecticut · source units
ConnecticutPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
5 of 5 reviewed Connecticut actions match · 5 date markers shown. 50 major events shown separately.
Connecticut · 2024: 28.75¢/kWh · Rank #4 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Connecticut, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Connecticut Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Connecticut · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
Connecticut · 202428.75¢/kWh
Connecticut rank#4among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Connecticut, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Connecticut
2024 · Connecticut: 28.75¢/kWh · Rank #4 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Connecticut Residential electricity price history
Period
Connecticut
Compare
2015
20.94¢/kWh
2016
20.01¢/kWh
2017
20.29¢/kWh
2018
21.2¢/kWh
2019
21.87¢/kWh
2020
22.71¢/kWh
2021
21.91¢/kWh
2022
24.61¢/kWh
2023
29.88¢/kWh
2024
28.75¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Connecticut · 28.75¢/kWh2024 · Rank #4 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut · your comparison
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's New England region, including taxes. The region contains Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent EIA observations
Prior week
$4.026/gal
Weekly change
+7.0¢
One year earlier
$3.070/gal
Change from one year earlier
+102.6¢
Method and limitations
FactVote uses EIA’s New England series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes Connecticut. Changes are calculated from the published August 24, 2026 (prior week), and September 1, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.
EIA does not publish a current Connecticut statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This New England regional estimate should not be read as Connecticut’s statewide average.
The regional average combines Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Connecticut community.
Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
Connecticut · 2024$199.66
Connecticut rank#2among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Connecticut
2024 · Connecticut: $199.66 · Rank #2 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Connecticut Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
Connecticut
Compare
2010
$144.33
2011
$134.07
2012
$126.75
2013
$132.07
2014
$144.1
2015
$153.13
2016
$142.19
2017
$139.97
2018
$153.46
2019
$150.71
2020
$161.55
2021
$156.21
2022
$176.1
2023
$202.74
2024
$199.66
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Connecticut · $199.662024 · Rank #2 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut · your comparison
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
Connecticut · 202446.2 TWh
Connecticut rank#33among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Connecticut, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Connecticut
2024 · Connecticut: 46.2 TWh · Rank #33 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Connecticut Total electricity generation history
Period
Connecticut
Compare
2015
37.5 TWh
2016
36.5 TWh
2017
34.6 TWh
2018
39.5 TWh
2019
40.1 TWh
2020
41.2 TWh
2021
44.1 TWh
2022
43.1 TWh
2023
40.7 TWh
2024
46.2 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Connecticut · 46.2 TWh2024 · Rank #33 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut · your comparison
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation
58.2%2024
Natural-gas generation as a share of Connecticut's total in-state electric-industry net generation.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
EIA generation totals
Natural-gas generation
26,036,343 MWh
Total net generation
44,761,412 MWh
Selected generation shares
Natural gas
58.2%
Nuclear
37.7%
Solar
1.1%
Other
0.9%
Other biomass
0.8%
Hydroelectric
0.8%
Method and limitations
FactVote divides the 26,036,343 MWh of natural-gas generation in U.S. Energy Information Administration Table 5 by 44,761,412 MWh of total in-state net generation and rounds to one decimal place.
The selected shares round EIA's source-specific generation totals to one decimal place and do not list every small source.
In-state generation is not the same as electricity consumed in Connecticut because power crosses state lines.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
Connecticut · 2024152.8 min/year
Connecticut rank#41among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Connecticut
2024 · Connecticut: 152.8 min/year · Rank #41 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Connecticut Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
Connecticut
Compare
2023
193.4 min/year
2024
152.8 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Connecticut · 152.8 min/year2024 · Rank #41 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut · your comparison
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
Connecticut · 2024235.3 trillion Btu
Connecticut rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Connecticut · 235.3 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut · your comparison
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
Connecticut · 202437.09 Mt CO₂
Connecticut rank#41among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Connecticut · 37.09 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #41 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut · your comparison
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
5 of 5 reviewed Connecticut actions · newest first
Jun 4, 2026 · HB 5340 · AN ACT CONCERNING RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION. · EnactedConnecticut Legislature · HB 5340
AN ACT CONCERNING RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION.
Jun 4, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Aundre Bumgardner · Co-sponsored / Rep. Mary M. Mushinsky · Co-sponsored / Rep. Joseph P. Gresko · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael "MJ" Shannon · Co-sponsored / Rep. Josh Elliott · Co-sponsored / Rep. Nick Gauthier · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kate Farrar · Co-sponsored / Rep. Patricia A. Dillon · Co-sponsored / Rep. Fred Gee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kerry S. Wood · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael D. Quinn · Co-sponsored / Sen. Julie Kushner · Co-sponsored / Sen. Martha Marx · Co-sponsored / Rep. Stephen R. Meskers · Co-sponsored / Rep. Savet Constantine · Co-sponsored / Rep. Melissa Osborne · Co-sponsored / Sen. Derek Slap · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jane M. Garibay · Co-sponsored / Rep. Hector Arzeno · Co-sponsored / Rep. Geraldo C. Reyes · Co-sponsored / Rep. Amy Morrin Bello · Co-sponsored / Rep. Gary A. Turco · Co-sponsored / Rep. Lucy Dathan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Frank Smith · Co-sponsored / Rep. Laurie Sweet · Co-sponsored / Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Steven Winter · Co-sponsored / Rep. Nicholas Menapace · Co-sponsored / Rep. Anthony L. Nolan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Eleni Kavros DeGraw · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jason Doucette · Co-sponsored / Rep. Aimee Berger-Girvalo · Co-sponsored / Rep. Geoff Luxenberg · Co-sponsored / Rep. Farley Santos · Co-sponsored / Rep. John-Michael Parker · Co-sponsored / Rep. Roland J. Lemar · Co-sponsored / Rep. Maryam Khan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Anne M. Hughes · Co-sponsored / Rep. Sarah Keitt · Co-sponsored / Rep. Robin E. Comey · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bobby G. Gibson · Co-sponsored / Sen. Matthew L. Lesser · Co-sponsored / Rep. David DeFronzo · Co-sponsored / Rep. John Santanella · Co-sponsored / Rep. Hilda E. Santiago · Co-sponsored / Rep. Iris N Sanchez · Co-sponsored / Sen. MD Rahman · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jaime S. Foster · Co-sponsored / Sen. John A. Kissel · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 5340 requires PURA to initiate a successor residential renewable-generation proceeding by August 1, 2026 and issue a final order by December 1, 2027. Utilities must offer tariffs from January 1, 2028, with terms of up to 20 years, for qualifying nonpolluting resources on customer premises rated at most 25 kW per dwelling, subject to load-based sizing and other conditions. Renewable production is an alternative component of in-state generation; these deadlines do not establish installed capacity or a measured reduction in natural-gas share.
Signed by Ned Lamont on 2026-06-04. Public Act No. 26-127. Approval, statutory effective dates, and implementation are distinct; this entry does not establish current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Natural-gas share is the portion of Connecticut in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Connecticut evidence context: Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(b) On or before August 1, 2026, the authority shall initiate a proceeding to establish a successor program to the Residential Renewable Energy Solutions program established by the authority pursuant to section 16-244z of the general statutes, as amended b y this act. In establishing such successor program, the authority shall establish (1) tariffs for each electric distribution company, (2) a rate for such tariffs, and (3) tariff terms and conditions consistent with the requirements of this section. Any suc h tariff shall be for a term not to exceed twenty years. In such proceeding, the authority shall consider the findings of the study of the value of distributed energy resources House Bill No. 5340 Public Act No. 26-127 3 of 40 conducted pursuant to section 16a -3o of the general statutes, the recommendations of the Integrated Resources Plan developed pursuant to section 16a-3a of the general statutes and the Comprehensive Energy Strategy developed pursuant to section 16a -3d of th e general statutes, the system efficiency and utilization goal established pursuant to section 16a-3v of the general statutes and the impact of distributed energy resources on the state's goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to section 22a-200a of the general statutes. The authority shall issue a final order in such proceeding on or before December 1, 2027. (c) In establishing rates for tariffs pursuant to this section, the authority shall set such rates based on the electric system benefits received by all ratepayers from the distributed energy resource based on time of production, equitable distribution of participant benefits, the Comprehensive Energy Strategy adopted pursuant to section 16a -3d of the general statutes, the Integrated Resources Plan developed pursuant to section 16a -3a of the general statutes, the system efficiency and utilization goal estab lished pursuant to section 16a -3v of the general statutes and the value or benefits of distributed energy resources to the reliability of the electric grid in the state. The authority shall assess whether to incorporate time -varying rates or other dynamic pricing methods. In addition to a tariff rate applicable to any residential customer, the authority shall authorize a separate tariff rate for (1) low- income customers and residential customers in a multifamily development as described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subdivision (8) of subsection (a) of this section, and (2) residential customers that reside in a distressed municipality, as defined in section 32 -9p of the general statutes. (d) (1) On and after January 1, 2028, in compliance with the program established under this section, each electric distribution company shall offer tariffs with terms not to exceed twenty years, to any residential customer for the purchase of energy produc ts and renewable energy House Bill No. 5340 Public Act No. 26-127 4 of 40 certificates generated from a distributed energy resource that (A) emits no pollutants, (B) is located on a customer's premises, and (C) has a nameplate capacity rating of twenty -five kilowatts or less per dwelling unit located on such premises. (2) Tariffs offered pursuant to this section shall be: (A) For the purchase of any energy at the rate established by the authority pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, and any renewable energy certificates generated by such energy resource, on a cen ts-per-kilowatt-hour basis, and (B) for the purchase of any energy produced and not consumed in a period of time established by the authority, and any renewable energy certificates generated by such renewable energy resource, on a cents - per-kilowatt-hour b asis. A residential customer may not select more than one tariff offered pursuant to this section for the same premises. (3) Any tariff offered pursuant to this section shall be subject to tariff terms, conditions or other stipulations adopted by the authority, including, but not limited to, stipulations regarding the capacity rights of the distributed energy resource. (e) To be eligible for program participation, a distributed energy resource shall be sized to not exceed the annual load at the customer's individual electric meter or, in the case of a multifamily development described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subdivision (8) of subsection (a) of this section, the annual load of the premises, from the electric distribution company providing service to such customer, pursuant to any rules established by the authority and as determined by such electric distribution company. For purposes of this section, in the case of a multifamily development consisting of five or more dwelling units, a distributed energy resource shall only qualify for participation in the program if each dwelling unit receives an appropriate share of the benefits from such energy resource and no greater than an appropriate share of the benefits from such energy resource is used to offset any energy usage attributable to a common area in such development. The House Bill No. 5340 Public Act No. 26-127 5 of 40 Public Utilities Regulatory Authority shall initiate an uncontested proceeding to implement any distribution of the benefits from the distributed energy resource necessary pursuant to subsection (d) of this section or this subsection.
Ned Lamont signed HB 5340. HB 5340 requires PURA to initiate a successor residential renewable-generation proceeding by August 1, 2026 and issue a final order by December 1, 2027. Utilities must offer tariffs from January 1, 2028, with terms of up to 20 years, for qualifying nonpolluting resources on customer premises rated at most 25 kW per dwelling, subject to load-based sizing and other conditions. Renewable production is an alternative component of in-state generation; these deadlines do not establish installed capacity or a measured reduction in natural-gas share.
Signed by Ned Lamont on 2026-06-04. Public Act No. 26-127. Approval, statutory effective dates, and implementation are distinct; this entry does not establish current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Natural-gas share is the portion of Connecticut in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Connecticut evidence context: Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(b) On or before August 1, 2026, the authority shall initiate a proceeding to establish a successor program to the Residential Renewable Energy Solutions program established by the authority pursuant to section 16-244z of the general statutes, as amended b y this act. In establishing such successor program, the authority shall establish (1) tariffs for each electric distribution company, (2) a rate for such tariffs, and (3) tariff terms and conditions consistent with the requirements of this section. Any suc h tariff shall be for a term not to exceed twenty years. In such proceeding, the authority shall consider the findings of the study of the value of distributed energy resources House Bill No. 5340 Public Act No. 26-127 3 of 40 conducted pursuant to section 16a -3o of the general statutes, the recommendations of the Integrated Resources Plan developed pursuant to section 16a-3a of the general statutes and the Comprehensive Energy Strategy developed pursuant to section 16a -3d of th e general statutes, the system efficiency and utilization goal established pursuant to section 16a-3v of the general statutes and the impact of distributed energy resources on the state's goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to section 22a-200a of the general statutes. The authority shall issue a final order in such proceeding on or before December 1, 2027. (c) In establishing rates for tariffs pursuant to this section, the authority shall set such rates based on the electric system benefits received by all ratepayers from the distributed energy resource based on time of production, equitable distribution of participant benefits, the Comprehensive Energy Strategy adopted pursuant to section 16a -3d of the general statutes, the Integrated Resources Plan developed pursuant to section 16a -3a of the general statutes, the system efficiency and utilization goal estab lished pursuant to section 16a -3v of the general statutes and the value or benefits of distributed energy resources to the reliability of the electric grid in the state. The authority shall assess whether to incorporate time -varying rates or other dynamic pricing methods. In addition to a tariff rate applicable to any residential customer, the authority shall authorize a separate tariff rate for (1) low- income customers and residential customers in a multifamily development as described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subdivision (8) of subsection (a) of this section, and (2) residential customers that reside in a distressed municipality, as defined in section 32 -9p of the general statutes. (d) (1) On and after January 1, 2028, in compliance with the program established under this section, each electric distribution company shall offer tariffs with terms not to exceed twenty years, to any residential customer for the purchase of energy produc ts and renewable energy House Bill No. 5340 Public Act No. 26-127 4 of 40 certificates generated from a distributed energy resource that (A) emits no pollutants, (B) is located on a customer's premises, and (C) has a nameplate capacity rating of twenty -five kilowatts or less per dwelling unit located on such premises. (2) Tariffs offered pursuant to this section shall be: (A) For the purchase of any energy at the rate established by the authority pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, and any renewable energy certificates generated by such energy resource, on a cen ts-per-kilowatt-hour basis, and (B) for the purchase of any energy produced and not consumed in a period of time established by the authority, and any renewable energy certificates generated by such renewable energy resource, on a cents - per-kilowatt-hour b asis. A residential customer may not select more than one tariff offered pursuant to this section for the same premises. (3) Any tariff offered pursuant to this section shall be subject to tariff terms, conditions or other stipulations adopted by the authority, including, but not limited to, stipulations regarding the capacity rights of the distributed energy resource. (e) To be eligible for program participation, a distributed energy resource shall be sized to not exceed the annual load at the customer's individual electric meter or, in the case of a multifamily development described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subdivision (8) of subsection (a) of this section, the annual load of the premises, from the electric distribution company providing service to such customer, pursuant to any rules established by the authority and as determined by such electric distribution company. For purposes of this section, in the case of a multifamily development consisting of five or more dwelling units, a distributed energy resource shall only qualify for participation in the program if each dwelling unit receives an appropriate share of the benefits from such energy resource and no greater than an appropriate share of the benefits from such energy resource is used to offset any energy usage attributable to a common area in such development. The House Bill No. 5340 Public Act No. 26-127 5 of 40 Public Utilities Regulatory Authority shall initiate an uncontested proceeding to implement any distribution of the benefits from the distributed energy resource necessary pursuant to subsection (d) of this section or this subsection.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 2, 2026 · SB306 · SB 306 — Comprehensive Energy Strategy consultation and reporting · Signed by governorGovernor · SB306
SB 306 — Comprehensive Energy Strategy consultation and reporting
Jun 2, 2026 · Signed by governor
Ned Lamont · Signed
Reviewed topic context
Public Act 26-121 added consultation with economic-development, agriculture, housing, transportation, consumer, utility-regulatory and Green Bank officials to the Comprehensive Energy Strategy process. It added the commerce committee to legislative reporting and revised the timing and consultation language for heating-fuel analysis. The act revises an existing planning process. Its retained rate-impact and public-comment provisions do not constitute an approved utility-rate reduction, a new energy project or measured economic growth.
Signed on 2026-06-02. Approved June 2, 2026; the original public act specifies October 1, 2026 for effectiveness. Preparation, public review and approval of an energy strategy are separate steps. The act revises an existing planning process. Its retained rate-impact and public-comment provisions do not constitute an approved utility-rate reduction, a new energy project or measured economic growth.
Why this record is included
Public Act 26-121 added consultation with economic-development, agriculture, housing, transportation, consumer, utility-regulatory and Green Bank officials to the Comprehensive Energy Strategy process. It added the commerce committee to legislative reporting and revised the timing and consultation language for heating-fuel analysis. The act revises an existing planning process. Its retained rate-impact and public-comment provisions do not constitute an approved utility-rate reduction, a new energy project or measured economic growth. This topic relationship does not establish an effect on a state statistic.
Retained Connecticut evidence context: energy · reviewed policy-topic context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
AN ACT CONCERNING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND COMPREHENSIVE ENERGY STRATEGY.
Approved June 2, 2026
Governor Lamont signed the following legislation of the 2026 Regular Session on June 2:
AN ACT CONCERNING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND COMPREHENSIVE ENERGY STRATEGY.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 24, 2022 · HB 5501 · AN ACT SUSPENDING CERTAIN GAS TAXES AND SALES AND USE TAXES ON CERTAIN CLOTHING AND ALLOCATING FUNDS FOR FREE PUBLIC BUS SERVICES. · EnactedConnecticut Legislature · HB 5501
AN ACT SUSPENDING CERTAIN GAS TAXES AND SALES AND USE TAXES ON CERTAIN CLOTHING AND ALLOCATING FUNDS FOR FREE PUBLIC BUS SERVICES.
Mar 24, 2022 · Enacted
Rep. Matthew Ritter · Sponsored / Sen. Martin M. Looney · Sponsored / Rep. Jason Rojas · Sponsored / Sen. Bob Duff · Sponsored / Rep. Vincent J. Candelora · Sponsored / Rep. Mitch Bolinsky · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael D. Quinn · Co-sponsored / Rep. Dave W. Yaccarino · Co-sponsored / Rep. Devin R. Carney · Co-sponsored / Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Trenee McGee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Hilda E. Santiago · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bob Godfrey · Co-sponsored / Rep. Patrick S. Boyd · Co-sponsored / Sen. John A. Kissel · Co-sponsored / Sen. Heather S. Somers · Co-sponsored / Sen. Saud Anwar · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 5501 temporarily suspended the specified Connecticut gasoline and gasohol excise tax for April 1 through June 30, 2022 and required retailers to pass the reduction through to per-gallon prices. It did not suspend the listed propane, natural-gas, or diesel taxes. This historical provision does not establish a tax suspension or a price effect in the August 2026 New England observation.
Signed by Ned Lamont on 2022-03-24. Special Act No. 22-2. Approval, statutory effective dates, and implementation are distinct; this entry does not establish current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA New England regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. Connecticut policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Connecticut statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Connecticut evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. (Effective April 1, 2022) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes, from April 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022, inclusive, the tax imposed under said subparagraphs shall not apply to fuels or gasohol sold or used by a distributor in this state. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the tax due pursuant to subparagraphs (C) to (E), inclusive, of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes on propane, natural gas or diesel sold or used by a distributor in this state. As used in this section, "distributor" and "fuels" have the same meanings as provided in section 12-455a of the general statutes and "gasohol" has the same meaning as provided in section 14-1 of the general statutes. (b) During the period set forth in subsection (a) of this section, each retail dealer shall reduce the per-gallon price of fuels or gasohol sold by such retail dealer in an amount equal to the amount of the reduction in such tax pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. House Bill No. 5501 Special Act No. 22-2 2 of 9 (c) A violation of subsection (b) of this section shall be deemed an unfair or deceptive trade practice under subsection (a) of section 42-110b of the general statutes. Any retail dealer that is alleged to have violated subsection (b) of this section may avail themselves of the affirmative defenses set forth in subdivision (4) of subsection (c) of section 14 -332a of the general statutes.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 24, 2022 · HB 5501 · AN ACT SUSPENDING CERTAIN GAS TAXES AND SALES AND USE TAXES ON CERTAIN CLOTHING AND ALLOCATING FUNDS FOR FREE PUBLIC BUS SERVICES. · SignedGovernor · HB 5501
AN ACT SUSPENDING CERTAIN GAS TAXES AND SALES AND USE TAXES ON CERTAIN CLOTHING AND ALLOCATING FUNDS FOR FREE PUBLIC BUS SERVICES.
Mar 24, 2022 · Signed
Gov. Ned Lamont · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Ned Lamont signed HB 5501. HB 5501 temporarily suspended the specified Connecticut gasoline and gasohol excise tax for April 1 through June 30, 2022 and required retailers to pass the reduction through to per-gallon prices. It did not suspend the listed propane, natural-gas, or diesel taxes. This historical provision does not establish a tax suspension or a price effect in the August 2026 New England observation.
Signed by Ned Lamont on 2022-03-24. Special Act No. 22-2. Approval, statutory effective dates, and implementation are distinct; this entry does not establish current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA New England regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. Connecticut policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Connecticut statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Connecticut evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. (Effective April 1, 2022) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes, from April 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022, inclusive, the tax imposed under said subparagraphs shall not apply to fuels or gasohol sold or used by a distributor in this state. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the tax due pursuant to subparagraphs (C) to (E), inclusive, of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes on propane, natural gas or diesel sold or used by a distributor in this state. As used in this section, "distributor" and "fuels" have the same meanings as provided in section 12-455a of the general statutes and "gasohol" has the same meaning as provided in section 14-1 of the general statutes. (b) During the period set forth in subsection (a) of this section, each retail dealer shall reduce the per-gallon price of fuels or gasohol sold by such retail dealer in an amount equal to the amount of the reduction in such tax pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. House Bill No. 5501 Special Act No. 22-2 2 of 9 (c) A violation of subsection (b) of this section shall be deemed an unfair or deceptive trade practice under subsection (a) of section 42-110b of the general statutes. Any retail dealer that is alleged to have violated subsection (b) of this section may avail themselves of the affirmative defenses set forth in subdivision (4) of subsection (c) of section 14 -332a of the general statutes.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Connecticut officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Connecticut candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
18 statements from 10 candidates
2026 Connecticut Attorney General — General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements
Connecticut families deserve relief from some of the highest utility costs in the nation. I will challenge policies that unfairly drive up energy prices, advocate for affordable and reliable energy, and fight for consumers every step of the way.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and ratepayer protection
Candidate campaign source
Connecticut families deserve relief from some of the highest utility costs in the nation. I will challenge policies that unfairly drive up energy prices, advocate for affordable and reliable energy, and fight for consumers every step of the way.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Connecticut families deserve relief from some of the highest utility costs in the nation. As your next Attorney General, I will fight to lower energy costs by making utility rate cases before the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) a top priority, ensuring PURA fulfills its legal mission to…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and ratepayer protection
Candidate campaign source
Connecticut families deserve relief from some of the highest utility costs in the nation. As your next Attorney General, I will fight to lower energy costs by making utility rate cases before the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) a top priority, ensuring PURA fulfills its legal mission to protect consumers, and standing up for Connecticut ratepayers every step of the way.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Attorney General Tong works every day to safeguard our civil rights and freedoms, fighting alongside state attorneys general nationwide to protect the rights of women, minority communities, immigrants and the LGBTQ+ community. He has vowed to fight in any court, in any state, anywhere access to repr…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care
Candidate campaign source
Attorney General Tong works every day to safeguard our civil rights and freedoms, fighting alongside state attorneys general nationwide to protect the rights of women, minority communities, immigrants and the LGBTQ+ community. He has vowed to fight in any court, in any state, anywhere access to reproductive healthcare is under threat. He is aggressively defending Connecticut’s post- Sandy Hook gun laws against challenges by out of state gun lobbies. Under his leadership, Connecticut has sued ExxonMobil to end its ongoing, systematic campaign of lies around fossil fuels and climate change.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Achieve a 100% zero-carbon grid by 2040 and net-zero emissions by 2050 targets. To get there, we will continue a balanced, responsive expansion of utility-scale solar, paired with small-scale and residential deployments. We will continue looking for opportunities to install more wind power and deplo…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and ratepayer protection
Candidate campaign source
Achieve a 100% zero-carbon grid by 2040 and net-zero emissions by 2050 targets. To get there, we will continue a balanced, responsive expansion of utility-scale solar, paired with small-scale and residential deployments. We will continue looking for opportunities to install more wind power and deploy innovative solutions like geothermal.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Governor Lamont is taking on one of the biggest challenges facing Connecticut families: the high cost of electricity. His plan puts ratepayers first by holding utilities accountable, encouraging competition, and driving down costs.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and ratepayer protection
Candidate campaign source
Governor Lamont is taking on one of the biggest challenges facing Connecticut families: the high cost of electricity. His plan puts ratepayers first by holding utilities accountable, encouraging competition, and driving down costs.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Climate change represents an existential crisis for our state and our nation. Governor Lamont’s forward agenda will continue to advance Connecticut towards carbon-free future, making our communities more resilient to extreme weather, while reducing energy and transportation costs to our families.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and ratepayer protection
Candidate campaign source
Climate change represents an existential crisis for our state and our nation. Governor Lamont’s forward agenda will continue to advance Connecticut towards carbon-free future, making our communities more resilient to extreme weather, while reducing energy and transportation costs to our families.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Expand natural gas pipeline capacity from Pennsylvania and open the Killingly natural gas plant that Governor Lamont blocked — providing affordable, reliable power while reducing reliance on expensive oil peaker plants.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and ratepayer protection
Candidate campaign source
Expand natural gas pipeline capacity from Pennsylvania and open the Killingly natural gas plant that Governor Lamont blocked — providing affordable, reliable power while reducing reliance on expensive oil peaker plants.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Connecticut has the second-highest electricity rates in the continental United States. Ryan Fazio has a real plan to cut electricity bills by 20% — by ending hidden taxes, expanding reliable supply, and removing the mandates driving up costs.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: cut Energy Costs
Candidate campaign source
Connecticut has the second-highest electricity rates in the continental United States. Ryan Fazio has a real plan to cut electricity bills by 20% — by ending hidden taxes, expanding reliable supply, and removing the mandates driving up costs.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
We must tackle the high cost of energy — one of the biggest burdens on Connecticut families and job creators. That means expanding access to natural gas and investing in portable nuclear energy solutions to make our state more competitive and reliable.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and ratepayer protection
Candidate campaign source
We must tackle the high cost of energy — one of the biggest burdens on Connecticut families and job creators. That means expanding access to natural gas and investing in portable nuclear energy solutions to make our state more competitive and reliable.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Connecticut candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Connecticut incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Connecticut legislators and Connecticut’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Connecticut’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
5 matching sponsorships or proposals · 5 Connecticut incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Jason Rojas
Connecticut House of Representatives, District 9 · D–CT
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Jason RojasConnecticut Legislature · HB 5501
AN ACT SUSPENDING CERTAIN GAS TAXES AND SALES AND USE TAXES ON CERTAIN CLOTHING AND ALLOCATING FUNDS FOR FREE PUBLIC BUS SERVICES.
Mar 24, 2022 · Enacted
Rep. Matthew Ritter · Sponsored / Sen. Martin M. Looney · Sponsored / Rep. Jason Rojas · Sponsored / Sen. Bob Duff · Sponsored / Rep. Vincent J. Candelora · Sponsored / Rep. Mitch Bolinsky · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael D. Quinn · Co-sponsored / Rep. Dave W. Yaccarino · Co-sponsored / Rep. Devin R. Carney · Co-sponsored / Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Trenee McGee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Hilda E. Santiago · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bob Godfrey · Co-sponsored / Rep. Patrick S. Boyd · Co-sponsored / Sen. John A. Kissel · Co-sponsored / Sen. Heather S. Somers · Co-sponsored / Sen. Saud Anwar · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 5501 temporarily suspended the specified Connecticut gasoline and gasohol excise tax for April 1 through June 30, 2022 and required retailers to pass the reduction through to per-gallon prices. It did not suspend the listed propane, natural-gas, or diesel taxes. This historical provision does not establish a tax suspension or a price effect in the August 2026 New England observation.
Signed by Ned Lamont on 2022-03-24. Special Act No. 22-2. Approval, statutory effective dates, and implementation are distinct; this entry does not establish current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA New England regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. Connecticut policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Connecticut statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Connecticut evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. (Effective April 1, 2022) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes, from April 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022, inclusive, the tax imposed under said subparagraphs shall not apply to fuels or gasohol sold or used by a distributor in this state. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the tax due pursuant to subparagraphs (C) to (E), inclusive, of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes on propane, natural gas or diesel sold or used by a distributor in this state. As used in this section, "distributor" and "fuels" have the same meanings as provided in section 12-455a of the general statutes and "gasohol" has the same meaning as provided in section 14-1 of the general statutes. (b) During the period set forth in subsection (a) of this section, each retail dealer shall reduce the per-gallon price of fuels or gasohol sold by such retail dealer in an amount equal to the amount of the reduction in such tax pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. House Bill No. 5501 Special Act No. 22-2 2 of 9 (c) A violation of subsection (b) of this section shall be deemed an unfair or deceptive trade practice under subsection (a) of section 42-110b of the general statutes. Any retail dealer that is alleged to have violated subsection (b) of this section may avail themselves of the affirmative defenses set forth in subdivision (4) of subsection (c) of section 14 -332a of the general statutes.
Connecticut House of Representatives, District 1 · D–CT
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Matthew RitterConnecticut Legislature · HB 5501
AN ACT SUSPENDING CERTAIN GAS TAXES AND SALES AND USE TAXES ON CERTAIN CLOTHING AND ALLOCATING FUNDS FOR FREE PUBLIC BUS SERVICES.
Mar 24, 2022 · Enacted
Rep. Matthew Ritter · Sponsored / Sen. Martin M. Looney · Sponsored / Rep. Jason Rojas · Sponsored / Sen. Bob Duff · Sponsored / Rep. Vincent J. Candelora · Sponsored / Rep. Mitch Bolinsky · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael D. Quinn · Co-sponsored / Rep. Dave W. Yaccarino · Co-sponsored / Rep. Devin R. Carney · Co-sponsored / Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Trenee McGee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Hilda E. Santiago · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bob Godfrey · Co-sponsored / Rep. Patrick S. Boyd · Co-sponsored / Sen. John A. Kissel · Co-sponsored / Sen. Heather S. Somers · Co-sponsored / Sen. Saud Anwar · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 5501 temporarily suspended the specified Connecticut gasoline and gasohol excise tax for April 1 through June 30, 2022 and required retailers to pass the reduction through to per-gallon prices. It did not suspend the listed propane, natural-gas, or diesel taxes. This historical provision does not establish a tax suspension or a price effect in the August 2026 New England observation.
Signed by Ned Lamont on 2022-03-24. Special Act No. 22-2. Approval, statutory effective dates, and implementation are distinct; this entry does not establish current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA New England regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. Connecticut policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Connecticut statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Connecticut evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. (Effective April 1, 2022) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes, from April 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022, inclusive, the tax imposed under said subparagraphs shall not apply to fuels or gasohol sold or used by a distributor in this state. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the tax due pursuant to subparagraphs (C) to (E), inclusive, of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes on propane, natural gas or diesel sold or used by a distributor in this state. As used in this section, "distributor" and "fuels" have the same meanings as provided in section 12-455a of the general statutes and "gasohol" has the same meaning as provided in section 14-1 of the general statutes. (b) During the period set forth in subsection (a) of this section, each retail dealer shall reduce the per-gallon price of fuels or gasohol sold by such retail dealer in an amount equal to the amount of the reduction in such tax pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. House Bill No. 5501 Special Act No. 22-2 2 of 9 (c) A violation of subsection (b) of this section shall be deemed an unfair or deceptive trade practice under subsection (a) of section 42-110b of the general statutes. Any retail dealer that is alleged to have violated subsection (b) of this section may avail themselves of the affirmative defenses set forth in subdivision (4) of subsection (c) of section 14 -332a of the general statutes.
Connecticut House of Representatives, District 86 · R–CT
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Vincent J. CandeloraConnecticut Legislature · HB 5501
AN ACT SUSPENDING CERTAIN GAS TAXES AND SALES AND USE TAXES ON CERTAIN CLOTHING AND ALLOCATING FUNDS FOR FREE PUBLIC BUS SERVICES.
Mar 24, 2022 · Enacted
Rep. Matthew Ritter · Sponsored / Sen. Martin M. Looney · Sponsored / Rep. Jason Rojas · Sponsored / Sen. Bob Duff · Sponsored / Rep. Vincent J. Candelora · Sponsored / Rep. Mitch Bolinsky · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael D. Quinn · Co-sponsored / Rep. Dave W. Yaccarino · Co-sponsored / Rep. Devin R. Carney · Co-sponsored / Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Trenee McGee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Hilda E. Santiago · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bob Godfrey · Co-sponsored / Rep. Patrick S. Boyd · Co-sponsored / Sen. John A. Kissel · Co-sponsored / Sen. Heather S. Somers · Co-sponsored / Sen. Saud Anwar · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 5501 temporarily suspended the specified Connecticut gasoline and gasohol excise tax for April 1 through June 30, 2022 and required retailers to pass the reduction through to per-gallon prices. It did not suspend the listed propane, natural-gas, or diesel taxes. This historical provision does not establish a tax suspension or a price effect in the August 2026 New England observation.
Signed by Ned Lamont on 2022-03-24. Special Act No. 22-2. Approval, statutory effective dates, and implementation are distinct; this entry does not establish current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA New England regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. Connecticut policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Connecticut statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Connecticut evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. (Effective April 1, 2022) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes, from April 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022, inclusive, the tax imposed under said subparagraphs shall not apply to fuels or gasohol sold or used by a distributor in this state. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the tax due pursuant to subparagraphs (C) to (E), inclusive, of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes on propane, natural gas or diesel sold or used by a distributor in this state. As used in this section, "distributor" and "fuels" have the same meanings as provided in section 12-455a of the general statutes and "gasohol" has the same meaning as provided in section 14-1 of the general statutes. (b) During the period set forth in subsection (a) of this section, each retail dealer shall reduce the per-gallon price of fuels or gasohol sold by such retail dealer in an amount equal to the amount of the reduction in such tax pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. House Bill No. 5501 Special Act No. 22-2 2 of 9 (c) A violation of subsection (b) of this section shall be deemed an unfair or deceptive trade practice under subsection (a) of section 42-110b of the general statutes. Any retail dealer that is alleged to have violated subsection (b) of this section may avail themselves of the affirmative defenses set forth in subdivision (4) of subsection (c) of section 14 -332a of the general statutes.
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Bob DuffConnecticut Legislature · HB 5501
AN ACT SUSPENDING CERTAIN GAS TAXES AND SALES AND USE TAXES ON CERTAIN CLOTHING AND ALLOCATING FUNDS FOR FREE PUBLIC BUS SERVICES.
Mar 24, 2022 · Enacted
Rep. Matthew Ritter · Sponsored / Sen. Martin M. Looney · Sponsored / Rep. Jason Rojas · Sponsored / Sen. Bob Duff · Sponsored / Rep. Vincent J. Candelora · Sponsored / Rep. Mitch Bolinsky · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael D. Quinn · Co-sponsored / Rep. Dave W. Yaccarino · Co-sponsored / Rep. Devin R. Carney · Co-sponsored / Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Trenee McGee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Hilda E. Santiago · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bob Godfrey · Co-sponsored / Rep. Patrick S. Boyd · Co-sponsored / Sen. John A. Kissel · Co-sponsored / Sen. Heather S. Somers · Co-sponsored / Sen. Saud Anwar · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 5501 temporarily suspended the specified Connecticut gasoline and gasohol excise tax for April 1 through June 30, 2022 and required retailers to pass the reduction through to per-gallon prices. It did not suspend the listed propane, natural-gas, or diesel taxes. This historical provision does not establish a tax suspension or a price effect in the August 2026 New England observation.
Signed by Ned Lamont on 2022-03-24. Special Act No. 22-2. Approval, statutory effective dates, and implementation are distinct; this entry does not establish current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA New England regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. Connecticut policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Connecticut statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Connecticut evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. (Effective April 1, 2022) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes, from April 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022, inclusive, the tax imposed under said subparagraphs shall not apply to fuels or gasohol sold or used by a distributor in this state. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the tax due pursuant to subparagraphs (C) to (E), inclusive, of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes on propane, natural gas or diesel sold or used by a distributor in this state. As used in this section, "distributor" and "fuels" have the same meanings as provided in section 12-455a of the general statutes and "gasohol" has the same meaning as provided in section 14-1 of the general statutes. (b) During the period set forth in subsection (a) of this section, each retail dealer shall reduce the per-gallon price of fuels or gasohol sold by such retail dealer in an amount equal to the amount of the reduction in such tax pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. House Bill No. 5501 Special Act No. 22-2 2 of 9 (c) A violation of subsection (b) of this section shall be deemed an unfair or deceptive trade practice under subsection (a) of section 42-110b of the general statutes. Any retail dealer that is alleged to have violated subsection (b) of this section may avail themselves of the affirmative defenses set forth in subdivision (4) of subsection (c) of section 14 -332a of the general statutes.
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Martin M. LooneyConnecticut Legislature · HB 5501
AN ACT SUSPENDING CERTAIN GAS TAXES AND SALES AND USE TAXES ON CERTAIN CLOTHING AND ALLOCATING FUNDS FOR FREE PUBLIC BUS SERVICES.
Mar 24, 2022 · Enacted
Rep. Matthew Ritter · Sponsored / Sen. Martin M. Looney · Sponsored / Rep. Jason Rojas · Sponsored / Sen. Bob Duff · Sponsored / Rep. Vincent J. Candelora · Sponsored / Rep. Mitch Bolinsky · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael D. Quinn · Co-sponsored / Rep. Dave W. Yaccarino · Co-sponsored / Rep. Devin R. Carney · Co-sponsored / Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Trenee McGee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Hilda E. Santiago · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bob Godfrey · Co-sponsored / Rep. Patrick S. Boyd · Co-sponsored / Sen. John A. Kissel · Co-sponsored / Sen. Heather S. Somers · Co-sponsored / Sen. Saud Anwar · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 5501 temporarily suspended the specified Connecticut gasoline and gasohol excise tax for April 1 through June 30, 2022 and required retailers to pass the reduction through to per-gallon prices. It did not suspend the listed propane, natural-gas, or diesel taxes. This historical provision does not establish a tax suspension or a price effect in the August 2026 New England observation.
Signed by Ned Lamont on 2022-03-24. Special Act No. 22-2. Approval, statutory effective dates, and implementation are distinct; this entry does not establish current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA New England regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. Connecticut policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Connecticut statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Connecticut evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. (Effective April 1, 2022) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes, from April 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022, inclusive, the tax imposed under said subparagraphs shall not apply to fuels or gasohol sold or used by a distributor in this state. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the tax due pursuant to subparagraphs (C) to (E), inclusive, of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes on propane, natural gas or diesel sold or used by a distributor in this state. As used in this section, "distributor" and "fuels" have the same meanings as provided in section 12-455a of the general statutes and "gasohol" has the same meaning as provided in section 14-1 of the general statutes. (b) During the period set forth in subsection (a) of this section, each retail dealer shall reduce the per-gallon price of fuels or gasohol sold by such retail dealer in an amount equal to the amount of the reduction in such tax pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. House Bill No. 5501 Special Act No. 22-2 2 of 9 (c) A violation of subsection (b) of this section shall be deemed an unfair or deceptive trade practice under subsection (a) of section 42-110b of the general statutes. Any retail dealer that is alleged to have violated subsection (b) of this section may avail themselves of the affirmative defenses set forth in subdivision (4) of subsection (c) of section 14 -332a of the general statutes.
Only current Connecticut officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Connecticut statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Connecticut snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Connecticut, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.