Connecticut · individual fact

Connecticut energy and electricity

Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.

Residential electricity price28.75¢/kWh2024 · #4 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$4.023/gal2026-08 · #18 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$199.662024 · #2 of 50 · highest first

Connecticut over time

Explore Connecticut readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Connecticut officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Connecticut effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Connecticut change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Residential electricity price Connecticut · source units
ConnecticutPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Residential electricity price2024: 28.75¢/kWh14.87¢/kWh23.18¢/kWh31.49¢/kWhConnecticut, 2015: 20.94¢/kWhConnecticut, 2016: 20.01¢/kWhConnecticut, 2017: 20.29¢/kWhConnecticut, 2018: 21.2¢/kWhConnecticut, 2019: 21.87¢/kWhConnecticut, 2020: 22.71¢/kWhConnecticut, 2021: 21.91¢/kWhConnecticut, 2022: 24.61¢/kWhConnecticut, 2023: 29.88¢/kWhConnecticut, 2024: 28.75¢/kWh201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 50National context · Energy Policy Act expands federal energy programs · 2005-08-08Energy Policy ActNational context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Energy law strengthens fuel economy, biofuels and efficiency · 2007-12-19Fuel / efficiency lawNational context · Global oil and energy prices surge · 2008-07-15Oil-price surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Recovery Act funds grid modernization and clean energy · 2009-02-17Recovery Act energyNational context · EPA signs greenhouse-gas endangerment finding · 2009-12-07GHG findingNational context · Deepwater Horizon explosion and oil spill · 2010-04-20Deepwater HorizonNational context · Fukushima accident prompts U.S. nuclear safety response · 2011-03-11Fukushima safetyNational context · Global demand and Middle East unrest pressure oil prices · 2011-04-112011 oil pressuresNational context · Hurricane Sandy disrupts electricity and fuel distribution · 2012-10-29Hurricane SandyNational context · Polar vortex strains gas supplies and power systems · 2014-01-07Polar vortexNational context · Oil supply growth and OPEC decision deepen price collapse · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Clean Power Plan announced; implementation later stayed · 2015-08-03Clean Power PlanNational context · Congress lifts longstanding crude-oil export restrictions · 2015-12-18Crude export rulesNational context · First LNG export cargo from the Lower 48 · 2016-02-24Lower 48 LNG exportsNational context · Shale development transforms U.S. oil supply · 2016-03-15Shale expansionNational context · Natural gas overtakes coal in annual electricity generation · 2016-12-31Gas overtakes coalNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · Attacks on Saudi oil facilities interrupt global supply · 2019-09-14Saudi oil attacksNational context · United States becomes an annual net total energy exporter · 2019-12-31Net energy exporterNational context · COVID-19 sharply reduces energy demand · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Expiring WTI oil futures settle below zero · 2020-04-20Negative WTI futuresNational context · Western heat wave leads to California rotating outages · 2020-08-14California outagesNational context · OPEC+ supply cuts help rebalance the pandemic oil market · 2020-09-23OPEC+ supply cutsNational context · Severe winter weather disrupts Texas and regional energy systems · 2021-02-08Winter Storm UriNational context · Cyberattack interrupts Colonial Pipeline fuel deliveries · 2021-05-07Colonial PipelineNational context · Infrastructure law funds grid and energy projects · 2021-11-15Infrastructure energyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Large Strategic Petroleum Reserve release announced · 2022-03-31SPR releaseNational context · Freeport LNG fire shuts a major export terminal · 2022-06-08Freeport LNG outageNational context · Inflation Reduction Act expands energy incentives · 2022-08-16IRA energy incentivesNational context · Winter Storm Elliott disrupts gas and power supplies · 2022-12-21Winter Storm ElliottNational context · Renewables exceed coal in annual electric power sector generation · 2022-12-31Renewables pass coalNational context · Vogtle expansion adds new nuclear generation · 2023-07-31Vogtle nuclear unitsNational context · Red Sea attacks reroute oil and gas shipping · 2024-02-01Red Sea shippingNational context · EPA finalizes new power-plant greenhouse-gas rules · 2024-04-25Power-plant GHG ruleNational context · FERC adopts long-term regional transmission planning rule · 2024-05-13Transmission planningNational context · DOE report documents growing data-center electricity demand · 2024-12-20Data-center demandNational context · President declares energy emergency and directs policy changes · 2025-01-20Energy emergencyNational context · U.S. tariff announcement changes energy trade context · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · EPA proposes repeal of power-sector greenhouse-gas rules · 2025-06-11Power-rule proposalNational context · Tax law accelerates several energy-credit expirations · 2025-07-04Energy tax changesNational context · EPA finalizes endangerment and vehicle GHG standard rescission · 2026-02-12Vehicle GHG repealNational context · EPA announces repeal of 2024 power-plant air-toxics amendments · 2026-02-20Air-toxics amendmentsNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shockNational context · IEA members agree to emergency oil-stock release · 2026-03-11Emergency oil stocksConnecticut · Connecticut expands consultation on its comprehensive energy strategy · 2026-06-02Connecticut energy-strategy consultationNational context · FERC and NERC report improved winter grid preparedness · 2026-09-10Winter grid reviewConnecticut · DOE selects Eversource Energy Service Corporation d/b/a Eversource Energy grid-upgrade application · 2026-09-24Eversource Energy Service Corporation d/b/a Eversource Energy · SPARK selection● Connecticut Legislature · 2● U.S. Congress · Connecticut delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 3■ Connecticut agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-09-30

5 of 5 reviewed Connecticut actions match · 5 date markers shown. 50 major events shown separately.

Connecticut · 2024: 28.75¢/kWh · Rank #4 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Connecticut, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Connecticut Residential electricity price · source units
PeriodConnecticutRankU.S. benchmark
202428.75¢/kWh#4 of 5016.48¢/kWh
202329.88¢/kWh#2 of 50Not available
202224.61¢/kWh#5 of 50Not available
202121.91¢/kWh#6 of 50Not available
202022.71¢/kWh#2 of 50Not available
201921.87¢/kWh#4 of 50Not available
201821.2¢/kWh#4 of 50Not available
201720.29¢/kWh#3 of 50Not available
201620.01¢/kWh#3 of 50Not available
201520.94¢/kWh#2 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Connecticut · state comparison

Household energy prices

Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.

Connecticut · 202428.75¢/kWh
Connecticut rank#4among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential electricity price

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside Connecticut, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Connecticut
Residential electricity price history in Connecticut14.47¢/kWh23.18¢/kWh31.89¢/kWh20152024
2024 · Connecticut: 28.75¢/kWh · Rank #4 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Connecticut Residential electricity price history
PeriodConnecticutCompare
201520.94¢/kWh
201620.01¢/kWh
201720.29¢/kWh
201821.2¢/kWh
201921.87¢/kWh
202022.71¢/kWh
202121.91¢/kWh
202224.61¢/kWh
202329.88¢/kWh
202428.75¢/kWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Connecticut · 28.75¢/kWh2024 · Rank #4 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii42.86¢/kWh—
#2California31.97¢/kWh—
#3Massachusetts29.35¢/kWh—
#4Connecticut · your comparison28.75¢/kWh—
#5Rhode Island28.65¢/kWh—
#6Alaska24.82¢/kWh—
#7New York24.43¢/kWh—
#8Maine24.29¢/kWh—
#9New Hampshire23.4¢/kWh—
#10Vermont21.9¢/kWh—
#11New Jersey19.34¢/kWh—
#12Michigan19.3¢/kWh—
#13Maryland17.86¢/kWh—
#14Pennsylvania17.77¢/kWh—
#15Wisconsin17.18¢/kWh—
#16Delaware16.57¢/kWh—
#17Ohio15.99¢/kWh—
#18Illinois15.87¢/kWh—
#19Minnesota15.45¢/kWh—
#20Alabama15.18¢/kWh—
#21West Virginia15.07¢/kWh—
#22Nevada15¢/kWh—
#23Texas14.94¢/kWh—
#24Colorado14.92¢/kWh—
#25Arizona14.91¢/kWh—
#26Indiana14.77¢/kWh—
#27Oregon14.7¢/kWh—
#28Virginia14.41¢/kWh—
#29South Carolina14.23¢/kWh—
#30New Mexico14.2¢/kWh—
#31Kansas14.15¢/kWh—
#32Florida14.14¢/kWh—
#33North Carolina14.13¢/kWh—
#34Georgia14.08¢/kWh—
#35Iowa13.4¢/kWh—
#36Mississippi13.39¢/kWh—
#37Missouri12.91¢/kWh—
#38South Dakota12.86¢/kWh—
#39Kentucky12.79¢/kWh—
#40Montana12.66¢/kWh—
#41Wyoming12.47¢/kWh—
#42Tennessee12.42¢/kWh—
#43Arkansas12.32¢/kWh—
#44Oklahoma12.24¢/kWh—
#45Utah12.22¢/kWh—
#46Washington11.9¢/kWh—
#47Louisiana11.73¢/kWh—
#48Nebraska11.53¢/kWh—
#49Idaho11.52¢/kWh—
#50North Dakota11.51¢/kWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New England regular gasoline price

$4.10/galWeek of August 31, 2026

Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's New England region, including taxes. The region contains Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Recent EIA observations

Prior week
$4.026/gal
Weekly change
+7.0¢
One year earlier
$3.070/gal
Change from one year earlier
+102.6¢
Method and limitations

FactVote uses EIA’s New England series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes Connecticut. Changes are calculated from the published August 24, 2026 (prior week), and September 1, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.

  • EIA does not publish a current Connecticut statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This New England regional estimate should not be read as Connecticut’s statewide average.
  • The regional average combines Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Connecticut community.
  • Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
  • Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Connecticut · state comparison

What are households paying for electricity?

Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.

Connecticut · 2024$199.66
Connecticut rank#2among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Average monthly residential electricity bill

State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.

Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Connecticut
Average monthly residential electricity bill history in Connecticut$92.96$155.01$217.0620102024
2024 · Connecticut: $199.66 · Rank #2 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Connecticut Average monthly residential electricity bill history
PeriodConnecticutCompare
2010$144.33
2011$134.07
2012$126.75
2013$132.07
2014$144.1
2015$153.13
2016$142.19
2017$139.97
2018$153.46
2019$150.71
2020$161.55
2021$156.21
2022$176.1
2023$202.74
2024$199.66

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.

Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Connecticut · $199.662024 · Rank #2 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii$212.12—
#2Connecticut · your comparison$199.66—
#3Alabama$173.5—
#4Massachusetts$167.2—
#5Maryland$165.87—
#6Texas$163.72—
#7Rhode Island$162.4—
#8California$160.86—
#9Arizona$160.24—
#10Florida$156.09—
#11Mississippi$154.83—
#12West Virginia$154.76—
#13Georgia$151.25—
#14Delaware$150.87—
#15South Carolina$149.51—
#16Virginia$148.77—
#17Pennsylvania$145.17—
#18New Hampshire$144.87—
#19Alaska$143.54—
#20North Carolina$143.5—
#21Tennessee$143.32—
#22Louisiana$140.96—
#23New York$139.53—
#24Nevada$139.39—
#25Ohio$135.16—
#26Kentucky$133.81—
#27Maine$133.6—
#28Indiana$133.06—
#29Oklahoma$132.05—
#30Oregon$129.62—
#31Missouri$129.18—
#32Arkansas$129.13—
#33New Jersey$128.13—
#34South Dakota$127.81—
#35Vermont$125.66—
#36Kansas$123.9—
#37Michigan$119.31—
#38North Dakota$118.38—
#39Washington$113.68—
#40Iowa$111.54—
#41Wisconsin$110.87—
#42Nebraska$110.28—
#43Minnesota$110.06—
#44Illinois$109.99—
#45Idaho$108.73—
#46Montana$107.91—
#47Wyoming$107.65—
#48Colorado$100.57—
#49Utah$94.57—
#50New Mexico$92.88—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Connecticut · state comparison

What generates Connecticut electricity?

Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.

Connecticut · 202446.2 TWh
Connecticut rank#33among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total electricity generation

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside Connecticut, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Connecticut
Total electricity generation history in Connecticut32.8 TWh40.4 TWh48 TWh20152024
2024 · Connecticut: 46.2 TWh · Rank #33 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Connecticut Total electricity generation history
PeriodConnecticutCompare
201537.5 TWh
201636.5 TWh
201734.6 TWh
201839.5 TWh
201940.1 TWh
202041.2 TWh
202144.1 TWh
202243.1 TWh
202340.7 TWh
202446.2 TWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Connecticut · 46.2 TWh2024 · Rank #33 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas571.5 TWh—
#2Florida270.7 TWh—
#3California245.9 TWh—
#4Pennsylvania242.5 TWh—
#5Illinois186.7 TWh—
#6Ohio143.3 TWh—
#7Alabama142.9 TWh—
#8Georgia140.4 TWh—
#9North Carolina135.9 TWh—
#10New York133.5 TWh—
#11Michigan124.5 TWh—
#12Arizona121.5 TWh—
#13Virginia103.7 TWh—
#14Washington103 TWh—
#15South Carolina101.1 TWh—
#16Louisiana100 TWh—
#17Indiana97.4 TWh—
#18Oklahoma94.3 TWh—
#19Mississippi77.4 TWh—
#20Tennessee76.3 TWh—
#21Iowa70.9 TWh—
#22Missouri67.6 TWh—
#23Kentucky67.1 TWh—
#24Wisconsin65.6 TWh—
#25Oregon65.3 TWh—
#26New Jersey63.6 TWh—
#27Arkansas62.1 TWh—
#28Colorado60.8 TWh—
#29Minnesota59 TWh—
#30Kansas57.9 TWh—
#31West Virginia50.7 TWh—
#32Nevada47.6 TWh—
#33Connecticut · your comparison46.2 TWh—
#34North Dakota42.6 TWh—
#35Wyoming40.7 TWh—
#36New Mexico40.5 TWh—
#37Nebraska37.3 TWh—
#38Maryland36.9 TWh—
#39Utah36.1 TWh—
#40Montana27 TWh—
#41Massachusetts25 TWh—
#42South Dakota20.9 TWh—
#43Idaho20.3 TWh—
#44New Hampshire17.3 TWh—
#45Maine15.7 TWh—
#46Hawaii10.7 TWh—
#47Rhode Island10.1 TWh—
#48Alaska6.7 TWh—
#49Delaware5 TWh—
#50Vermont2.5 TWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation

58.2%2024

Natural-gas generation as a share of Connecticut's total in-state electric-industry net generation.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

EIA generation totals

Natural-gas generation
26,036,343 MWh
Total net generation
44,761,412 MWh

Selected generation shares

Natural gas
58.2%
Nuclear
37.7%
Solar
1.1%
Other
0.9%
Other biomass
0.8%
Hydroelectric
0.8%
Method and limitations

FactVote divides the 26,036,343 MWh of natural-gas generation in U.S. Energy Information Administration Table 5 by 44,761,412 MWh of total in-state net generation and rounds to one decimal place.

  • The selected shares round EIA's source-specific generation totals to one decimal place and do not list every small source.
  • In-state generation is not the same as electricity consumed in Connecticut because power crosses state lines.
Connecticut · state comparison

Affordability, reliability, emissions, and demand

Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.

Connecticut · 2024152.8 min/year
Connecticut rank#41among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Outage minutes per customer · all events

EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.

Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Connecticut
Outage minutes per customer · all events history in Connecticut76.3 min/year407.7 min/year739.1 min/year20232024
2024 · Connecticut: 152.8 min/year · Rank #41 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Connecticut Outage minutes per customer · all events history
PeriodConnecticutCompare
2023193.4 min/year
2024152.8 min/year

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.

Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Connecticut · 152.8 min/year2024 · Rank #41 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1South Carolina3,155 min/year—
#2Maine1,748.6 min/year—
#3Texas1,614.3 min/year—
#4North Carolina1,518.1 min/year—
#5Florida1,487.6 min/year—
#6Georgia1,208.1 min/year—
#7West Virginia1,165.5 min/year—
#8Virginia962.1 min/year—
#9Vermont895.8 min/year—
#10New Hampshire735.5 min/year—
#11Nebraska697.8 min/year—
#12Washington643.5 min/year—
#13Louisiana630.6 min/year—
#14Mississippi607.3 min/year—
#15Oregon579.3 min/year—
#16Kentucky537.7 min/year—
#17Arkansas527.8 min/year—
#18Ohio511 min/year—
#19Michigan481.7 min/year—
#20New York477.3 min/year—
#21Hawaii382.6 min/year—
#22Pennsylvania353.1 min/year—
#23Montana341.7 min/year—
#24Alaska323.2 min/year—
#25Indiana310 min/year—
#26Wisconsin296.8 min/year—
#27Kansas289.8 min/year—
#28Tennessee289.3 min/year—
#29California285 min/year—
#30New Mexico272.6 min/year—
#31Colorado257 min/year—
#32Minnesota222.4 min/year—
#33Oklahoma220.7 min/year—
#34Missouri212.6 min/year—
#35Idaho204.4 min/year—
#36Iowa200.3 min/year—
#37Alabama197.7 min/year—
#38New Jersey173.3 min/year—
#39Nevada158.9 min/year—
#40Illinois158 min/year—
#41Connecticut · your comparison152.8 min/year—
#42Wyoming137.8 min/year—
#43Maryland118.1 min/year—
#44Delaware117.9 min/year—
#45Utah115.4 min/year—
#46Rhode Island104.3 min/year—
#47Massachusetts103.7 min/year—
#48North Dakota102.7 min/year—
#49South Dakota85.6 min/year—
#50Arizona83.6 min/year—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Connecticut · state comparison

Who uses energy?

Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.

Connecticut · 2024235.3 trillion Btu
Connecticut rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential energy consumption

Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).

2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.

Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Connecticut · 235.3 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas1,514 trillion Btu—
#2Florida1,183.3 trillion Btu—
#3California1,147.1 trillion Btu—
#4New York968.3 trillion Btu—
#5Pennsylvania819.3 trillion Btu—
#6Illinois817.1 trillion Btu—
#7Ohio767.4 trillion Btu—
#8Georgia717.1 trillion Btu—
#9North Carolina662.2 trillion Btu—
#10Michigan661.4 trillion Btu—
#11New Jersey550.1 trillion Btu—
#12Virginia526 trillion Btu—
#13Tennessee492 trillion Btu—
#14Indiana475.6 trillion Btu—
#15Missouri459 trillion Btu—
#16Arizona413.7 trillion Btu—
#17Massachusetts379 trillion Btu—
#18Wisconsin375.9 trillion Btu—
#19South Carolina370.7 trillion Btu—
#20Maryland357.2 trillion Btu—
#21Minnesota346.2 trillion Btu—
#22Alabama331.6 trillion Btu—
#23Washington330.2 trillion Btu—
#24Kentucky319 trillion Btu—
#25Colorado311.9 trillion Btu—
#26Louisiana282.6 trillion Btu—
#27Connecticut · your comparison235.3 trillion Btu—
#28Oklahoma231 trillion Btu—
#29Arkansas209.5 trillion Btu—
#30Utah190.7 trillion Btu—
#31Mississippi179.7 trillion Btu—
#32Oregon173.1 trillion Btu—
#33Kansas166.4 trillion Btu—
#34Iowa162 trillion Btu—
#35Nevada153.3 trillion Btu—
#36West Virginia141 trillion Btu—
#37Nebraska128.9 trillion Btu—
#38Idaho111.2 trillion Btu—
#39New Mexico98.1 trillion Btu—
#40New Hampshire91.8 trillion Btu—
#41Maine80.5 trillion Btu—
#42Montana73.9 trillion Btu—
#43Delaware62.6 trillion Btu—
#44North Dakota61.3 trillion Btu—
#45Rhode Island61 trillion Btu—
#46Alaska49.1 trillion Btu—
#47Wyoming45.5 trillion Btu—
#48South Dakota44.2 trillion Btu—
#49Vermont32.7 trillion Btu—
#50Hawaii29.5 trillion Btu—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Connecticut · state comparison

Energy-related carbon emissions

Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.

Connecticut · 202437.09 Mt CO₂
Connecticut rank#41among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total energy-related CO₂ emissions

Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.

2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.

Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Connecticut · 37.09 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #41 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas679.93 Mt CO₂—
#2California315.98 Mt CO₂—
#3Florida230.85 Mt CO₂—
#4Pennsylvania201.57 Mt CO₂—
#5Louisiana186.89 Mt CO₂—
#6Ohio186.34 Mt CO₂—
#7Illinois163.98 Mt CO₂—
#8New York163.69 Mt CO₂—
#9Indiana152.3 Mt CO₂—
#10Michigan143.11 Mt CO₂—
#11Georgia127.83 Mt CO₂—
#12North Carolina119.07 Mt CO₂—
#13Kentucky106.87 Mt CO₂—
#14Alabama104.32 Mt CO₂—
#15Virginia99.24 Mt CO₂—
#16Missouri98.03 Mt CO₂—
#17Tennessee90.46 Mt CO₂—
#18Oklahoma88.56 Mt CO₂—
#19New Jersey87.84 Mt CO₂—
#20Wisconsin85.12 Mt CO₂—
#21Arizona82.2 Mt CO₂—
#22Colorado79.57 Mt CO₂—
#23Minnesota77.89 Mt CO₂—
#24Washington73.81 Mt CO₂—
#25West Virginia72.28 Mt CO₂—
#26South Carolina70.81 Mt CO₂—
#27Iowa65.23 Mt CO₂—
#28Mississippi64.75 Mt CO₂—
#29Arkansas58.42 Mt CO₂—
#30Massachusetts58.07 Mt CO₂—
#31North Dakota55.15 Mt CO₂—
#32Kansas55.09 Mt CO₂—
#33Utah55.03 Mt CO₂—
#34Wyoming50 Mt CO₂—
#35Maryland48.77 Mt CO₂—
#36Alaska44.01 Mt CO₂—
#37Nebraska43.54 Mt CO₂—
#38New Mexico41.63 Mt CO₂—
#39Nevada39.28 Mt CO₂—
#40Oregon38.94 Mt CO₂—
#41Connecticut · your comparison37.09 Mt CO₂—
#42Montana27.16 Mt CO₂—
#43Idaho21.11 Mt CO₂—
#44Hawaii17.96 Mt CO₂—
#45Maine15.99 Mt CO₂—
#46South Dakota15.11 Mt CO₂—
#47New Hampshire13.6 Mt CO₂—
#48Delaware11.52 Mt CO₂—
#49Rhode Island11.05 Mt CO₂—
#50Vermont5.36 Mt CO₂—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Connecticut candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

18 statements from 10 candidates

2026 Connecticut Attorney General — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

John Bolton

2 statements

Republican · Attorney General · CT

Energy & electricity

Connecticut families deserve relief from some of the highest utility costs in the nation. I will challenge policies that unfairly drive up energy prices, advocate for affordable and reliable energy, and fight for consumers every step of the way.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and ratepayer protection

Candidate campaign source

Connecticut families deserve relief from some of the highest utility costs in the nation. I will challenge policies that unfairly drive up energy prices, advocate for affordable and reliable energy, and fight for consumers every step of the way.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

John Bolton — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from John Bolton
Energy & electricity

Connecticut families deserve relief from some of the highest utility costs in the nation. As your next Attorney General, I will fight to lower energy costs by making utility rate cases before the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) a top priority, ensuring PURA fulfills its legal mission to…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and ratepayer protection

Candidate campaign source

Connecticut families deserve relief from some of the highest utility costs in the nation. As your next Attorney General, I will fight to lower energy costs by making utility rate cases before the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) a top priority, ensuring PURA fulfills its legal mission to protect consumers, and standing up for Connecticut ratepayers every step of the way.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

John Bolton — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

William Tong

1 statement

Democratic · Attorney General · CT

Energy & electricity

Attorney General Tong works every day to safeguard our civil rights and freedoms, fighting alongside state attorneys general nationwide to protect the rights of women, minority communities, immigrants and the LGBTQ+ community. He has vowed to fight in any court, in any state, anywhere access to repr…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care

Candidate campaign source

Attorney General Tong works every day to safeguard our civil rights and freedoms, fighting alongside state attorneys general nationwide to protect the rights of women, minority communities, immigrants and the LGBTQ+ community. He has vowed to fight in any court, in any state, anywhere access to reproductive healthcare is under threat. He is aggressively defending Connecticut’s post- Sandy Hook gun laws against challenges by out of state gun lobbies. Under his leadership, Connecticut has sued ExxonMobil to end its ongoing, systematic campaign of lies around fossil fuels and climate change.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

William Tong — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

2026 Connecticut Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 6 statements

Ned Lamont

3 statements

Democratic · Governor · CT

Energy & electricity

Achieve a 100% zero-carbon grid by 2040 and net-zero emissions by 2050 targets. To get there, we will continue a balanced, responsive expansion of utility-scale solar, paired with small-scale and residential deployments. We will continue looking for opportunities to install more wind power and deplo…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and ratepayer protection

Candidate campaign source

Achieve a 100% zero-carbon grid by 2040 and net-zero emissions by 2050 targets. To get there, we will continue a balanced, responsive expansion of utility-scale solar, paired with small-scale and residential deployments. We will continue looking for opportunities to install more wind power and deploy innovative solutions like geothermal.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ned Lamont — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 2 more statements from Ned Lamont
Energy & electricity

Governor Lamont is taking on one of the biggest challenges facing Connecticut families: the high cost of electricity. His plan puts ratepayers first by holding utilities accountable, encouraging competition, and driving down costs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and ratepayer protection

Candidate campaign source

Governor Lamont is taking on one of the biggest challenges facing Connecticut families: the high cost of electricity. His plan puts ratepayers first by holding utilities accountable, encouraging competition, and driving down costs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ned Lamont — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Energy & electricity

Climate change represents an existential crisis for our state and our nation. Governor Lamont’s forward agenda will continue to advance Connecticut towards carbon-free future, making our communities more resilient to extreme weather, while reducing energy and transportation costs to our families.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and ratepayer protection

Candidate campaign source

Climate change represents an existential crisis for our state and our nation. Governor Lamont’s forward agenda will continue to advance Connecticut towards carbon-free future, making our communities more resilient to extreme weather, while reducing energy and transportation costs to our families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ned Lamont — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Ryan Fazio

3 statements

Republican · Governor · CT

Energy & electricity

Limit any long-term contract for electricity to no more than 100% above the market rate for power, protecting ratepayers from bad deals.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut Your Electricity Bills

Candidate campaign source

Limit any long-term contract for electricity to no more than 100% above the market rate for power, protecting ratepayers from bad deals.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ryan Fazio — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
View 2 more statements from Ryan Fazio
Energy & electricity

Expand natural gas pipeline capacity from Pennsylvania and open the Killingly natural gas plant that Governor Lamont blocked — providing affordable, reliable power while reducing reliance on expensive oil peaker plants.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and ratepayer protection

Candidate campaign source

Expand natural gas pipeline capacity from Pennsylvania and open the Killingly natural gas plant that Governor Lamont blocked — providing affordable, reliable power while reducing reliance on expensive oil peaker plants.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ryan Fazio — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Energy & electricity

Connecticut has the second-highest electricity rates in the continental United States. Ryan Fazio has a real plan to cut electricity bills by 20% — by ending hidden taxes, expanding reliable supply, and removing the mandates driving up costs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: cut Energy Costs

Candidate campaign source

Connecticut has the second-highest electricity rates in the continental United States. Ryan Fazio has a real plan to cut electricity bills by 20% — by ending hidden taxes, expanding reliable supply, and removing the mandates driving up costs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ryan Fazio — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Connecticut Lieutenant Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Matt Corey

1 statement

Republican · Lieutenant Governor · CT

Energy & electricity

We must tackle the high cost of energy — one of the biggest burdens on Connecticut families and job creators. That means expanding access to natural gas and investing in portable nuclear energy solutions to make our state more competitive and reliable.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and ratepayer protection

Candidate campaign source

We must tackle the high cost of energy — one of the biggest burdens on Connecticut families and job creators. That means expanding access to natural gas and investing in portable nuclear energy solutions to make our state more competitive and reliable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Matt Corey — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Connecticut candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Connecticut incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Connecticut legislators and Connecticut’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Connecticut’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

5 matching sponsorships or proposals · 5 Connecticut incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Jason Rojas

Connecticut House of Representatives, District 9 · D–CT

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Jason Rojas
Connecticut Legislature · HB 5501

AN ACT SUSPENDING CERTAIN GAS TAXES AND SALES AND USE TAXES ON CERTAIN CLOTHING AND ALLOCATING FUNDS FOR FREE PUBLIC BUS SERVICES.

Mar 24, 2022 · Enacted

Rep. Matthew Ritter · Sponsored / Sen. Martin M. Looney · Sponsored / Rep. Jason Rojas · Sponsored / Sen. Bob Duff · Sponsored / Rep. Vincent J. Candelora · Sponsored / Rep. Mitch Bolinsky · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael D. Quinn · Co-sponsored / Rep. Dave W. Yaccarino · Co-sponsored / Rep. Devin R. Carney · Co-sponsored / Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Trenee McGee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Hilda E. Santiago · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bob Godfrey · Co-sponsored / Rep. Patrick S. Boyd · Co-sponsored / Sen. John A. Kissel · Co-sponsored / Sen. Heather S. Somers · Co-sponsored / Sen. Saud Anwar · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 5501 temporarily suspended the specified Connecticut gasoline and gasohol excise tax for April 1 through June 30, 2022 and required retailers to pass the reduction through to per-gallon prices. It did not suspend the listed propane, natural-gas, or diesel taxes. This historical provision does not establish a tax suspension or a price effect in the August 2026 New England observation.

Signed by Ned Lamont on 2022-03-24. Special Act No. 22-2. Approval, statutory effective dates, and implementation are distinct; this entry does not establish current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA New England regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. Connecticut policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Connecticut statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Connecticut evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. (Effective April 1, 2022) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes, from April 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022, inclusive, the tax imposed under said subparagraphs shall not apply to fuels or gasohol sold or used by a distributor in this state. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the tax due pursuant to subparagraphs (C) to (E), inclusive, of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes on propane, natural gas or diesel sold or used by a distributor in this state. As used in this section, "distributor" and "fuels" have the same meanings as provided in section 12-455a of the general statutes and "gasohol" has the same meaning as provided in section 14-1 of the general statutes. (b) During the period set forth in subsection (a) of this section, each retail dealer shall reduce the per-gallon price of fuels or gasohol sold by such retail dealer in an amount equal to the amount of the reduction in such tax pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. House Bill No. 5501 Special Act No. 22-2 2 of 9 (c) A violation of subsection (b) of this section shall be deemed an unfair or deceptive trade practice under subsection (a) of section 42-110b of the general statutes. Any retail dealer that is alleged to have violated subsection (b) of this section may avail themselves of the affirmative defenses set forth in subdivision (4) of subsection (c) of section 14 -332a of the general statutes.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Matthew Ritter

Connecticut House of Representatives, District 1 · D–CT

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Matthew Ritter
Connecticut Legislature · HB 5501

AN ACT SUSPENDING CERTAIN GAS TAXES AND SALES AND USE TAXES ON CERTAIN CLOTHING AND ALLOCATING FUNDS FOR FREE PUBLIC BUS SERVICES.

Mar 24, 2022 · Enacted

Rep. Matthew Ritter · Sponsored / Sen. Martin M. Looney · Sponsored / Rep. Jason Rojas · Sponsored / Sen. Bob Duff · Sponsored / Rep. Vincent J. Candelora · Sponsored / Rep. Mitch Bolinsky · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael D. Quinn · Co-sponsored / Rep. Dave W. Yaccarino · Co-sponsored / Rep. Devin R. Carney · Co-sponsored / Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Trenee McGee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Hilda E. Santiago · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bob Godfrey · Co-sponsored / Rep. Patrick S. Boyd · Co-sponsored / Sen. John A. Kissel · Co-sponsored / Sen. Heather S. Somers · Co-sponsored / Sen. Saud Anwar · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 5501 temporarily suspended the specified Connecticut gasoline and gasohol excise tax for April 1 through June 30, 2022 and required retailers to pass the reduction through to per-gallon prices. It did not suspend the listed propane, natural-gas, or diesel taxes. This historical provision does not establish a tax suspension or a price effect in the August 2026 New England observation.

Signed by Ned Lamont on 2022-03-24. Special Act No. 22-2. Approval, statutory effective dates, and implementation are distinct; this entry does not establish current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA New England regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. Connecticut policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Connecticut statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Connecticut evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. (Effective April 1, 2022) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes, from April 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022, inclusive, the tax imposed under said subparagraphs shall not apply to fuels or gasohol sold or used by a distributor in this state. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the tax due pursuant to subparagraphs (C) to (E), inclusive, of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes on propane, natural gas or diesel sold or used by a distributor in this state. As used in this section, "distributor" and "fuels" have the same meanings as provided in section 12-455a of the general statutes and "gasohol" has the same meaning as provided in section 14-1 of the general statutes. (b) During the period set forth in subsection (a) of this section, each retail dealer shall reduce the per-gallon price of fuels or gasohol sold by such retail dealer in an amount equal to the amount of the reduction in such tax pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. House Bill No. 5501 Special Act No. 22-2 2 of 9 (c) A violation of subsection (b) of this section shall be deemed an unfair or deceptive trade practice under subsection (a) of section 42-110b of the general statutes. Any retail dealer that is alleged to have violated subsection (b) of this section may avail themselves of the affirmative defenses set forth in subdivision (4) of subsection (c) of section 14 -332a of the general statutes.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Vincent J. Candelora

Connecticut House of Representatives, District 86 · R–CT

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Vincent J. Candelora
Connecticut Legislature · HB 5501

AN ACT SUSPENDING CERTAIN GAS TAXES AND SALES AND USE TAXES ON CERTAIN CLOTHING AND ALLOCATING FUNDS FOR FREE PUBLIC BUS SERVICES.

Mar 24, 2022 · Enacted

Rep. Matthew Ritter · Sponsored / Sen. Martin M. Looney · Sponsored / Rep. Jason Rojas · Sponsored / Sen. Bob Duff · Sponsored / Rep. Vincent J. Candelora · Sponsored / Rep. Mitch Bolinsky · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael D. Quinn · Co-sponsored / Rep. Dave W. Yaccarino · Co-sponsored / Rep. Devin R. Carney · Co-sponsored / Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Trenee McGee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Hilda E. Santiago · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bob Godfrey · Co-sponsored / Rep. Patrick S. Boyd · Co-sponsored / Sen. John A. Kissel · Co-sponsored / Sen. Heather S. Somers · Co-sponsored / Sen. Saud Anwar · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 5501 temporarily suspended the specified Connecticut gasoline and gasohol excise tax for April 1 through June 30, 2022 and required retailers to pass the reduction through to per-gallon prices. It did not suspend the listed propane, natural-gas, or diesel taxes. This historical provision does not establish a tax suspension or a price effect in the August 2026 New England observation.

Signed by Ned Lamont on 2022-03-24. Special Act No. 22-2. Approval, statutory effective dates, and implementation are distinct; this entry does not establish current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA New England regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. Connecticut policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Connecticut statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Connecticut evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. (Effective April 1, 2022) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes, from April 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022, inclusive, the tax imposed under said subparagraphs shall not apply to fuels or gasohol sold or used by a distributor in this state. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the tax due pursuant to subparagraphs (C) to (E), inclusive, of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes on propane, natural gas or diesel sold or used by a distributor in this state. As used in this section, "distributor" and "fuels" have the same meanings as provided in section 12-455a of the general statutes and "gasohol" has the same meaning as provided in section 14-1 of the general statutes. (b) During the period set forth in subsection (a) of this section, each retail dealer shall reduce the per-gallon price of fuels or gasohol sold by such retail dealer in an amount equal to the amount of the reduction in such tax pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. House Bill No. 5501 Special Act No. 22-2 2 of 9 (c) A violation of subsection (b) of this section shall be deemed an unfair or deceptive trade practice under subsection (a) of section 42-110b of the general statutes. Any retail dealer that is alleged to have violated subsection (b) of this section may avail themselves of the affirmative defenses set forth in subdivision (4) of subsection (c) of section 14 -332a of the general statutes.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Bob Duff

Connecticut Senate, District 25 · D–CT

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Bob Duff
Connecticut Legislature · HB 5501

AN ACT SUSPENDING CERTAIN GAS TAXES AND SALES AND USE TAXES ON CERTAIN CLOTHING AND ALLOCATING FUNDS FOR FREE PUBLIC BUS SERVICES.

Mar 24, 2022 · Enacted

Rep. Matthew Ritter · Sponsored / Sen. Martin M. Looney · Sponsored / Rep. Jason Rojas · Sponsored / Sen. Bob Duff · Sponsored / Rep. Vincent J. Candelora · Sponsored / Rep. Mitch Bolinsky · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael D. Quinn · Co-sponsored / Rep. Dave W. Yaccarino · Co-sponsored / Rep. Devin R. Carney · Co-sponsored / Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Trenee McGee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Hilda E. Santiago · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bob Godfrey · Co-sponsored / Rep. Patrick S. Boyd · Co-sponsored / Sen. John A. Kissel · Co-sponsored / Sen. Heather S. Somers · Co-sponsored / Sen. Saud Anwar · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 5501 temporarily suspended the specified Connecticut gasoline and gasohol excise tax for April 1 through June 30, 2022 and required retailers to pass the reduction through to per-gallon prices. It did not suspend the listed propane, natural-gas, or diesel taxes. This historical provision does not establish a tax suspension or a price effect in the August 2026 New England observation.

Signed by Ned Lamont on 2022-03-24. Special Act No. 22-2. Approval, statutory effective dates, and implementation are distinct; this entry does not establish current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA New England regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. Connecticut policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Connecticut statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Connecticut evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. (Effective April 1, 2022) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes, from April 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022, inclusive, the tax imposed under said subparagraphs shall not apply to fuels or gasohol sold or used by a distributor in this state. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the tax due pursuant to subparagraphs (C) to (E), inclusive, of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes on propane, natural gas or diesel sold or used by a distributor in this state. As used in this section, "distributor" and "fuels" have the same meanings as provided in section 12-455a of the general statutes and "gasohol" has the same meaning as provided in section 14-1 of the general statutes. (b) During the period set forth in subsection (a) of this section, each retail dealer shall reduce the per-gallon price of fuels or gasohol sold by such retail dealer in an amount equal to the amount of the reduction in such tax pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. House Bill No. 5501 Special Act No. 22-2 2 of 9 (c) A violation of subsection (b) of this section shall be deemed an unfair or deceptive trade practice under subsection (a) of section 42-110b of the general statutes. Any retail dealer that is alleged to have violated subsection (b) of this section may avail themselves of the affirmative defenses set forth in subdivision (4) of subsection (c) of section 14 -332a of the general statutes.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Martin M. Looney

Connecticut Senate, District 11 · D–CT

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Martin M. Looney
Connecticut Legislature · HB 5501

AN ACT SUSPENDING CERTAIN GAS TAXES AND SALES AND USE TAXES ON CERTAIN CLOTHING AND ALLOCATING FUNDS FOR FREE PUBLIC BUS SERVICES.

Mar 24, 2022 · Enacted

Rep. Matthew Ritter · Sponsored / Sen. Martin M. Looney · Sponsored / Rep. Jason Rojas · Sponsored / Sen. Bob Duff · Sponsored / Rep. Vincent J. Candelora · Sponsored / Rep. Mitch Bolinsky · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael D. Quinn · Co-sponsored / Rep. Dave W. Yaccarino · Co-sponsored / Rep. Devin R. Carney · Co-sponsored / Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Trenee McGee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Hilda E. Santiago · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bob Godfrey · Co-sponsored / Rep. Patrick S. Boyd · Co-sponsored / Sen. John A. Kissel · Co-sponsored / Sen. Heather S. Somers · Co-sponsored / Sen. Saud Anwar · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 5501 temporarily suspended the specified Connecticut gasoline and gasohol excise tax for April 1 through June 30, 2022 and required retailers to pass the reduction through to per-gallon prices. It did not suspend the listed propane, natural-gas, or diesel taxes. This historical provision does not establish a tax suspension or a price effect in the August 2026 New England observation.

Signed by Ned Lamont on 2022-03-24. Special Act No. 22-2. Approval, statutory effective dates, and implementation are distinct; this entry does not establish current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA New England regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. Connecticut policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Connecticut statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Connecticut evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. (Effective April 1, 2022) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes, from April 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022, inclusive, the tax imposed under said subparagraphs shall not apply to fuels or gasohol sold or used by a distributor in this state. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the tax due pursuant to subparagraphs (C) to (E), inclusive, of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-458 of the general statutes on propane, natural gas or diesel sold or used by a distributor in this state. As used in this section, "distributor" and "fuels" have the same meanings as provided in section 12-455a of the general statutes and "gasohol" has the same meaning as provided in section 14-1 of the general statutes. (b) During the period set forth in subsection (a) of this section, each retail dealer shall reduce the per-gallon price of fuels or gasohol sold by such retail dealer in an amount equal to the amount of the reduction in such tax pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. House Bill No. 5501 Special Act No. 22-2 2 of 9 (c) A violation of subsection (b) of this section shall be deemed an unfair or deceptive trade practice under subsection (a) of section 42-110b of the general statutes. Any retail dealer that is alleged to have violated subsection (b) of this section may avail themselves of the affirmative defenses set forth in subdivision (4) of subsection (c) of section 14 -332a of the general statutes.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Connecticut officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Connecticut statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.