California · individual fact

California education

Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.

High school or higher84.7%2020–2024 · #50 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher45%2020–2024 · #21 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher37.1%2020–2024 · #15 of 50 · highest first

California over time

Explore California readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. California officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a California effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a California change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Grade 4 reading California · source units
CaliforniaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Grade 4 reading2024: 211.7203.6214.1224.5California, 2003: 205.6California, 2005: 206.5California, 2007: 208.5California, 2009: 209.8California, 2011: 211.4California, 2013: 212.5California, 2015: 212.7California, 2017: 215.4California, 2019: 216.5California, 2022: 214.4California, 2024: 211.7200320132024
✦ Major events & context · 21National context · Student-aid law ends new FFEL lending and expands Pell funding · 2010-03-30Student-aid reformNational context · Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act signed · 2014-07-22Workforce and adult educationNational context · Every Student Succeeds Act signed · 2015-12-10ESSA signedNational context · Career and technical education law reauthorized · 2018-07-31Perkins V signedNational context · FUTURE Act continues support for minority-serving institutions · 2019-12-19FUTURE Act signedNational context · Pandemic education relief through the CARES Act · 2020-03-27COVID-19 education reliefNational context · Additional pandemic relief for colleges and students · 2020-12-27Second education relief lawNational context · American Rescue Plan expands education relief · 2021-03-11Education recovery fundingNational context · Supreme Court rejects Harvard and UNC race-conscious admissions programs · 2023-06-29College-admissions rulingNational context · Supreme Court rejects the 2022 student-loan cancellation plan · 2023-06-30Student-loan rulingNational context · Pell eligibility restored for qualifying prison education programs · 2023-07-01Prison education Pell accessNational context · Federal student-loan payments resume after pandemic pause · 2023-10-01Student-loan payments resumeCalifornia · California provides school flexibility for Los Angeles fire recovery · 2025-01-14Fire-affected schoolsNational context · Executive order directs steps toward closing the Education Department · 2025-03-20Federal education orderNational context · 2025 law changes federal student aid and creates Workforce Pell · 2025-07-04Student-aid law signedNational context · Education and Treasury announce student-aid partnership · 2026-03-19Student-aid partnershipNational context · Education announces final student-loan and repayment regulations · 2026-04-30Student-loan final ruleNational context · Education Department announces Workforce Pell final rule · 2026-05-18Workforce Pell ruleNational context · Education announces earnings-accountability final rule · 2026-06-29College earnings accountabilityNational context · Main student-loan limits and new repayment plans take effect · 2026-07-01Student-loan changes beginNational context · First Workforce Pell program approved · 2026-08-04First Workforce Pell approval● California Legislature · 4732222● U.S. Congress · California delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 7■ California agencies · 72003-12-012026-08-31

61 of 61 reviewed California actions match · 55 date markers shown. 21 major events shown separately.

California · 2024: 211.7 · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in California. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
California Grade 4 reading · source units
PeriodCaliforniaRankU.S. benchmark
2024211.7#39 of 50215
2022214.4#32 of 50217.5
2019216.5#40 of 50220.5
2017215.4#43 of 50221.9
2015212.7#49 of 50222.5
2013212.5#46 of 50221.8
2011211.4#46 of 50221.2
2009209.8#48 of 50220.9
2007208.5#48 of 50221
2005206.5#49 of 50219
2003205.6#47 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

California · state comparison

Adult educational attainment

Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.

California · 2020–202484.7%
California rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

High school or higher

Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.

Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. California stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. California has a dark outline.

Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

California · 84.7%2020–2024 · Rank #50 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare California with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont94.9%—
#2Maine94.8%—
#3Montana94.6%—
#4New Hampshire94.4%—
#5Wyoming94.2%—
#6North Dakota94%—
#7Minnesota93.9%—
#8Wisconsin93.6%—
#9Alaska93.6%—
#10Utah93.4%—
#11Iowa93.3%—
#12South Dakota93.2%—
#13Hawaii93.2%—
#14Colorado92.9%—
#15Washington92.3%—
#16Nebraska92.2%—
#17Pennsylvania92.1%—
#18Michigan92.1%—
#19Kansas92%—
#20Idaho91.9%—
#21Missouri91.9%—
#22Oregon91.8%—
#23Ohio91.8%—
#24Delaware91.7%—
#25Virginia91.6%—
#26Connecticut91.5%—
#27Massachusetts91.4%—
#28Maryland91.1%—
#29New Jersey90.7%—
#30Illinois90.5%—
#31Indiana90.4%—
#32North Carolina90.1%—
#33South Carolina90.1%—
#34Tennessee90%—
#35Florida89.9%—
#36Rhode Island89.7%—
#37Oklahoma89.4%—
#38Arizona89.4%—
#39West Virginia89.3%—
#40Georgia89.2%—
#41Kentucky88.9%—
#42Arkansas88.7%—
#43Alabama88.6%—
#44New Mexico88%—
#45New York88%—
#46Nevada87.5%—
#47Louisiana87.3%—
#48Mississippi87.1%—
#49Texas86%—
#50California · your comparison84.7%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Adults with at least a high school diploma

84.7%2020–2024 estimate

Share of California residents age 25 and older whose reported attainment is a regular high school diploma or equivalent (including GED or an alternative credential), some college, or an associate’s or higher degree.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts estimate derived from the American Community Survey.

  • This is adult educational attainment, not the current public-school graduation rate.
  • It combines people educated in different states, countries, and time periods.
California · state comparison

Are students learning?

NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.

California · 2024211.7
California rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Grade 4 reading

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in California. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.

NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

California
Grade 4 reading history in California203.1214.1225.120032024
2024 · California: 211.7 · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
California Grade 4 reading history
PeriodCaliforniaCompare
2003205.6
2005206.5
2007208.5
2009209.8
2011211.4
2013212.5
2015212.7
2017215.4
2019216.5
2022214.4
2024211.7

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. California stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. California has a dark outline.

Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

California · 211.72024 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare California with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts224.8—
#2Wyoming221.9—
#3New Jersey221.6—
#4New Hampshire221.5—
#5Colorado220.9—
#6Indiana220.1—
#7Utah219.3—
#8Connecticut219.2—
#9Mississippi218.5—
#10Florida218.2—
#11Kentucky218—
#12Montana217.2—
#13Rhode Island216.3—
#14Louisiana216—
#14Ohio216—
#16Hawaii215.8—
#16Pennsylvania215.8—
#18Idaho215.7—
#18Washington215.7—
#20Maryland215.6—
#21North Dakota215.5—
#22Wisconsin215.3—
#23Tennessee215.1—
#24South Carolina214.9—
#25Iowa214.6—
#25New York214.6—
#27Georgia214.4—
#27Minnesota214.4—
#29Illinois214.2—
#30South Dakota214.1—
#30Virginia214.1—
#32North Carolina213.4—
#33Alabama213.2—
#34Kansas213.1—
#34Nevada213.1—
#36Vermont212.7—
#37Missouri211.9—
#37Texas211.9—
#39California · your comparison211.7—
#39Nebraska211.7—
#41Arkansas209.7—
#42Maine209.6—
#43Delaware209.5—
#44Michigan209.1—
#45Arizona208.1—
#46Oklahoma207.3—
#47Oregon207—
#48West Virginia205.9—
#49Alaska201.6—
#50New Mexico200.6—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

California · state comparison

Where does school funding go?

Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.

California · FY2024$20,791
California rank#13among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Current spending per pupil

Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.

Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. California stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. California has a dark outline.

Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

California · $20,791FY2024 · Rank #13 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare California with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$31,918—
#2Vermont$28,818—
#3New Jersey$27,234—
#4Connecticut$26,316—
#5Massachusetts$24,429—
#6Hawaii$23,878—
#7New Hampshire$22,978—
#8Delaware$22,201—
#9Rhode Island$22,110—
#10Illinois$21,776—
#11Pennsylvania$21,091—
#12Alaska$21,004—
#13California · your comparison$20,791—
#14Wyoming$20,521—
#15Maryland$20,208—
#16Maine$19,962—
#17Washington$18,564—
#18Michigan$18,314—
#19Oregon$18,083—
#20New Mexico$17,664—
#21Ohio$17,257—
#22Virginia$17,104—
#23North Dakota$17,102—
#24Minnesota$17,098—
#25Nebraska$16,147—
#26Wisconsin$15,952—
#27Colorado$15,908—
#28Georgia$15,833—
#29West Virginia$15,640—
#30Louisiana$15,581—
#31Kansas$15,558—
#32South Carolina$15,060—
#33Nevada$14,812—
#34Kentucky$14,596—
#35Iowa$14,369—
#36Missouri$14,241—
#37Arkansas$13,873—
#38Montana$13,656—
#39Alabama$13,627—
#40Indiana$13,622—
#41North Carolina$12,995—
#42Texas$12,895—
#43Tennessee$12,882—
#44South Dakota$12,828—
#45Florida$12,693—
#46Mississippi$12,324—
#47Oklahoma$12,162—
#48Arizona$12,003—
#49Utah$11,347—
#50Idaho$11,060—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

California · state comparison

Are students finishing school?

The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.

California · 2021–2287%
California rank#19among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark87%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Federal public-school cohort graduation rate

Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.

Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

California
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history in California77.8%83%88.2%2011–122021–22
2021–22 · California: 87% · Rank #19 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 87% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
California Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
PeriodCaliforniaCompare
2011–1279%
2012–1380%
2013–1481%
2014–1582%
2015–1683%
2016–1783%
2017–1883%
2018–1985%
2019–2084%
2020–2184%
2021–2287%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. California stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. California has a dark outline.

Lower value · 77%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

California · 87%2021–22 · Rank #19 of 48, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare California with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2021–22 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1West Virginia91%—
#2Iowa90%—
#2Kentucky90%—
#2Massachusetts90%—
#2Missouri90%—
#2Tennessee90%—
#2Texas90%—
#2Wisconsin90%—
#9Connecticut89%—
#9Kansas89%—
#9Mississippi89%—
#9Virginia89%—
#13Alabama88%—
#13Arkansas88%—
#13Delaware88%—
#13Indiana88%—
#13New Hampshire88%—
#13Utah88%—
#19California · your comparison87%—
#19Florida87%—
#19Illinois87%—
#19Nebraska87%—
#19New York87%—
#19Pennsylvania87%—
#25Hawaii86%—
#25Maine86%—
#25Maryland86%—
#25Montana86%—
#25North Carolina86%—
#25Ohio86%—
#31New Jersey85%—
#31North Dakota85%—
#33Georgia84%—
#33Minnesota84%—
#33South Carolina84%—
#33Washington84%—
#37Louisiana83%—
#37Rhode Island83%—
#37Vermont83%—
#40Colorado82%—
#40Nevada82%—
#40South Dakota82%—
#40Wyoming82%—
#44Michigan81%—
#44Oregon81%—
#46Idaho80%—
#47Alaska78%—
#48Arizona77%—
—New MexicoNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—OklahomaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

California · state comparison

College costs, attendance, and earnings

Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.

California · 2022–23$8,637
California rank#36among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Public four-year in-state tuition and fees

Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.

2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. California stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. California has a dark outline.

Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

California · $8,6372022–23 · Rank #36 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare California with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont$17,600—
#2New Hampshire$17,019—
#3Pennsylvania$16,217—
#4Connecticut$15,763—
#5New Jersey$15,265—
#6Illinois$14,921—
#7Virginia$14,825—
#8Rhode Island$14,744—
#9Michigan$14,718—
#10Massachusetts$14,345—
#11Minnesota$12,873—
#12South Carolina$12,604—
#13Oregon$12,424—
#14Delaware$11,922—
#15Arizona$11,768—
#16Kentucky$11,299—
#17Alabama$11,081—
#18Ohio$10,922—
#19Maine$10,813—
#20Hawaii$10,484—
#21Tennessee$10,437—
#22Iowa$10,121—
#23Maryland$10,041—
#24Missouri$9,926—
#25Indiana$9,886—
#26Louisiana$9,843—
#27Colorado$9,798—
#28North Dakota$9,728—
#29Kansas$9,274—
#30Mississippi$9,120—
#31South Dakota$9,079—
#32Wisconsin$8,974—
#33Arkansas$8,879—
#34Nebraska$8,862—
#35West Virginia$8,715—
#36California · your comparison$8,637—
#37New York$8,575—
#38Oklahoma$8,519—
#39Alaska$8,291—
#40Texas$8,195—
#41Washington$8,006—
#42Idaho$7,640—
#43New Mexico$7,526—
#44North Carolina$7,327—
#45Montana$7,299—
#46Utah$7,215—
#47Georgia$7,075—
#48Nevada$6,723—
#49Wyoming$5,100—
#50Florida$4,540—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s California candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

322 statements from 94 candidates

2026 California Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Michael E. Gates

3 statements

Republican · Attorney General · CA

Schools & education

We need a new Attorney General. According to FBI data, California ranks 6th highest in the nation for violent crime. Every Californian deserves to feel safe—in their neighborhoods, at school, walking to the store. Too many families don’t feel that way today. Fentanyl is taking our kids. Retail theft…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Fully enforce Proposition 36

Government-published candidate material

We need a new Attorney General. According to FBI data, California ranks 6th highest in the nation for violent crime. Every Californian deserves to feel safe—in their neighborhoods, at school, walking to the store. Too many families don’t feel that way today. Fentanyl is taking our kids. Retail theft is closing the stores we count on. Nearly half of all homeless Americans live in California. And crime always hits working families hardest. I am a husband of 30 years and father of five. I have spent my career trying cases in courtrooms, not politics, as a trial attorney and prosecutor. I enforced Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Justice and am admitted to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court. As a City Attorney, I built a local prosecution program that cut crime by double digits in its first year and made Huntington Beach one of California’s safest cities. I brought residents, leaders, and law enforcement together, and I will do the same as your Attorney General. Californians voted for Prop. 36 overwhelmingly to restore accountability for repeat theft and drug offenses. I will fully enforce it and will prosecute the traffickers poisoning our communities, protect victims, help people off the streets and into treatment, and make sure your tax dollars are spent honestly and effectively. Safe streets and equal justice belong to every community, whatever your zip code or last name. Public safety is not a partisan issue, and I will never treat it like one. www.Gates4AG.com

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026

Attorney General Candidate Statements | Official Voter Information Guide | California Secretary of State ↗
View 2 more statements from Michael E. Gates
Schools & education

While he was City Attorney of Huntington Beach, Michael led the charge to protect the parents and children by drafting a "Parents' Right To Know" Ordinance, which was adopted by City Council. He also sued the State of California challenging the AB 1955 - a new state law that mandated teachers and ed…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Defend parental notification and speech

Candidate campaign source

While he was City Attorney of Huntington Beach, Michael led the charge to protect the parents and children by drafting a "Parents' Right To Know" Ordinance, which was adopted by City Council. He also sued the State of California challenging the AB 1955 - a new state law that mandated teachers and educators keep secrets from parents regarding their children's gender issues.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026

Michael Gates for Attorney General ↗
Schools & education

Enforce Title IX statewide in all sports and education

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Restrict participation in girls’ sports

Candidate campaign source

Enforce Title IX statewide in all sports and education

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026

Michael Gates for Attorney General ↗

2026 California Board of Equalization Member District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Nelson Esparza

3 statements

Democratic · Board of Equalization Member District 1 · CA

Schools & education

Nelson Esparza is a dedicated public servant and proven champion for California’s working families and small business owners. Raised in California’s Central Valley, Nelson’s life and career have been shaped by a deep commitment to opportunity, fairness, and economic prosperity for all. Nelson is run…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Close loopholes and enforce tax collection

Government-published candidate material

Nelson Esparza is a dedicated public servant and proven champion for California’s working families and small business owners. Raised in California’s Central Valley, Nelson’s life and career have been shaped by a deep commitment to opportunity, fairness, and economic prosperity for all. Nelson is running for the State Board of Equalization to ensure a fair tax system for all Californians. Nelson will fight to close tax loopholes and crack down on tax evaders so that our local governments can continue to invest in public safety, infrastructure, education, healthcare, and economic development. As a long-time educator and economist, Nelson will bring real-world financial expertise to California’s state tax board. On the Fresno City Council, he serves as Chair of the Finance & Audit Committee, where he deals with complex financial issues every day. Additionally, he has secured hundreds of millions in investment for our communities. Nelson will oppose new taxes on middle class and working class families as well as small businesses that are already struggling to make ends meet. He’ll fight for more transparency in our tax system, and for fair impartial property tax assessments. Nelson is supported by local law enforcement, teachers, nurses, construction workers, and leaders at the local, state, and federal levels across California—because they know that he has the experience and the drive to protect our tax dollars and our public services. By November 3rd, Vote Nelson Esparza for State Board of Equalization. Learn more at nelsonesparza.com.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Board of Equalization Candidate Statements | Official Voter Information Guide | California Secretary of State ↗
View 2 more statements from Nelson Esparza
Schools & education

Now, Nelson is running for the California Board of Equalization to protect the people of California, our values and tax dollars, so that our state can invest in our people, from education, to healthcare, public safety to economic development, and more.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Invest tax dollars in public services

Candidate campaign source

Now, Nelson is running for the California Board of Equalization to protect the people of California, our values and tax dollars, so that our state can invest in our people, from education, to healthcare, public safety to economic development, and more.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

HOME | Nelson Esparza for Board of Equalization ↗
Schools & education

Protect public revenue so California can invest in education, health care, public safety, and economic development.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public Investment

Candidate campaign source

Protect public revenue so California can invest in education, health care, public safety, and economic development.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

ABOUT | Nelson Esparza ↗

Shannon Grove

1 statement

Republican · Board of Equalization Member District 1 · CA

Schools & education

Isn't it time normal people had a voice when they needed help from our state government in Sacramento? That's why I'm running for the Board of Equalization. It's an office you may have never heard of that is tasked with helping people when they think the government has unfairly taxed them. First, a …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Help taxpayers contest unfair taxation

Government-published candidate material

Isn't it time normal people had a voice when they needed help from our state government in Sacramento? That's why I'm running for the Board of Equalization. It's an office you may have never heard of that is tasked with helping people when they think the government has unfairly taxed them. First, a little about me. I grew up in Kern County. After high school, I joined the U.S. Army, then after my service, I started a small business that helps local people find good-paying jobs. As a business owner, I've had my share of trying to work through endless government regulations and red tape. Later, I ran for and won a seat in the Assembly, and later, the State Senate. In the legislature, I was known for being a strong, bipartisan voice for public safety. Specifically, I led the charge to make sex trafficking children a felony. This was signed into law and now helps protect our most vulnerable Californians. I've also been a voice for small business owners, farmers, and ranchers. These businesses, often run by families, are the heart of our state. I've worked hard to reduce unfair rules, taxes, and fees, and make it easier for businesses to start, to grow, and to hire more people. As your representative on the Board of Equalization, my goal is clear: to make sure that you have somewhere to turn when you believe you were unfairly taxed and need some help. That's my pledge to you.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Board of Equalization Candidate Statements | Official Voter Information Guide | California Secretary of State ↗

2026 California Board of Equalization Member District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Sally J. Lieber

2 statements

Democratic · Board of Equalization Member District 2 · CA

Schools & education

I am honored to serve as your representative and as Chair of the State Board of Equalization, California’s elected property tax oversight board. On the Board, I have worked to expand access to property tax relief, including tax credits for Veterans and low-income families, increased public informati…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Ensure equitable assessments and taxpayer assistance

Government-published candidate material

I am honored to serve as your representative and as Chair of the State Board of Equalization, California’s elected property tax oversight board. On the Board, I have worked to expand access to property tax relief, including tax credits for Veterans and low-income families, increased public information on Proposition 19, and advanced consumer protections for homeowners’ insurance. I have fought for affordable housing, supported identity theft protections for property owners, and worked to ensure that the Board is efficient, accountable and transparent. I do not accept contributions from corporate PACs and will always insist that wealthy interests pay what they owe. As a member of the Board, I have taken an oath to uphold the Constitutions of the United States and California, including Proposition13. Over the next four years, I will continue to work for accurate and equitable property tax assessments, expanded taxpayer assistance, and policies that support housing affordability, rapid disaster recovery, and economic stability for working families. Before election to the Board, I served in local, regional, and state government. In the California State Assembly, I authored legislation to raise the statewide minimum wage, protect our coast and the San Francisco Bay, expand renewable energy, increase CalGrant scholarships, and worked to preserve free community college access statewide. I am endorsed by Teachers, Nurses and Firefighters statewide, by the California Democratic Party, Planned Parenthood California, the Sierra Club California, and over forty congressional, state executive and legislative leaders. I am thankful for the support of more than 1.3 million voters in the primary election. I respectfully ask for your vote. www.sallylieber.org

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026

Board of Equalization Candidate Statements | Official Voter Information Guide | California Secretary of State ↗
View 1 more statement from Sally J. Lieber
Schools & education

Recruitment and training of future staff that will meet the needs of taxpayers is a vital priority. Working with our colleges and universities, we must ensure that we are preparing and recruiting the next generation of staff leaders that can continue a tradition of excellence and a high level of res…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Recruit future staff through colleges

Candidate campaign source

Recruitment and training of future staff that will meet the needs of taxpayers is a vital priority. Working with our colleges and universities, we must ensure that we are preparing and recruiting the next generation of staff leaders that can continue a tradition of excellence and a high level of responsiveness.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026

Sally Lieber — priorities ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 20
How statements are selected

This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published California candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

California incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current California legislators and California’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from California’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

49 matching sponsorships or proposals · 34 California incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Asm. Al Muratsuchi

California State Assembly · District 66 · D–CA

1 proposal
View proposals from Asm. Al Muratsuchi
California Legislature · AB 49

Schoolsites: immigration enforcement.

Sep 20, 2025 · Enacted

Asm. Al Muratsuchi · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

(1)Existing law prohibits, except as required by state or federal law or as required to administer a state or federally supported educational program, school officials and employees of a school district, county office of education, or charter school from collecting information or documents regarding citizenship or immigration status of pupils or their family members.

The official California Legislative Information record shows this action on September 20, 2025: Chaptered.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses immigration status, immigrant services, asylum, deportation, or immigration enforcement. It does not update or establish an effect on the displayed foreign-born population share.

Retained California evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(1)Existing law prohibits, except as required by state or federal law or as required to administer a state or federally supported educational program, school officials and employees of a school district, county office of education, or charter school from collecting information or documents regarding citizenship or immigration status of pupils or their family members.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Asm. Ash Kalra

California State Assembly · District 25 · D–CA

1 proposal
View proposals from Asm. Ash Kalra
California Legislature · AB 59

Elections: polling places: college and university campuses.

Oct 8, 2019 · Enacted

Asm. Ash Kalra · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Existing law requires the Secretary of State to annually provide every high school, community college, and California State University and University of California campus with voter registration forms. Existing law also expresses the intent of the Legislature that every eligible high school and college student receive a meaningful opportunity to register to vote.Existing law authorizes certain counties, on or after specified dates, to conduct any election as an all-mailed ballot election if, among other conditions, the county elections official permits a voter to vote a ballot at a vote center. Existing law requires a county elections official conducting an all-mailed ballot election to…

The official California Legislative Information record shows this action on October 8, 2019: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 554, Statutes of 2019..

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses voter registration, ballots, voting access, or election administration. It does not establish an effect on California's displayed turnout rate.

Retained California evidence context: Registered-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Elections: polling places: college and university campuses.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Asm. Blanca Pacheco

California State Assembly · District 64 · D–CA

3 proposals
View proposals from Asm. Blanca Pacheco
California Legislature · ACR 42

Adult Education Week.

May 20, 2025 · Resolution adopted

Asm. Blanca Pacheco · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

This measure would proclaim the week of April 6 through April 12, 2025, as Adult Education Week, and salute the teachers, administrators, classified staff, and students of adult education programs statewide, honoring their efforts, persistence, and accomplishments.

The official California Legislative Information record shows this action on May 20, 2025: Chaptered.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses high-school completion, diploma requirements, GED credentials, or adult education. It does not establish an effect on the displayed adult attainment estimate.

Retained California evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

This measure would proclaim the week of April 6 through April 12, 2025, as Adult Education Week, and salute the teachers, administrators, classified staff, and students of adult education programs statewide, honoring their efforts, persistence, and accomplishments.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
California Legislature · ACR 157

Adult Education Week.

May 8, 2024 · Resolution adopted

Asm. Blanca Pacheco · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

This measure would proclaim the week of April 7 through April 13, 2024, as Adult Education Week, and would salute the teachers, administrators, classified staff, and students of adult education programs statewide, honoring their efforts, persistence, and accomplishments.

The official California Legislative Information record shows this action on May 8, 2024: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Res. Chapter 62, Statutes of 2024..

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses high-school completion, diploma requirements, GED credentials, or adult education. It does not establish an effect on the displayed adult attainment estimate.

Retained California evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

This measure would proclaim the week of April 7 through April 13, 2024, as Adult Education Week, and would salute the teachers, administrators, classified staff, and students of adult education programs statewide, honoring their efforts, persistence, and accomplishments.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
California Legislature · ACR 31

Adult Education Week.

May 3, 2023 · Resolution adopted

Asm. Blanca Pacheco · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

This bill would proclaim the week of March 19, 2023, to March 25, 2023, inclusive, as Adult Education Week, and would honor the teachers, administrators, classified staff, and students of adult education programs statewide for their efforts, persistence, and accomplishments.

The official California Legislative Information record shows this action on May 3, 2023: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Res. Chapter 40, Statutes of 2023..

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses high-school completion, diploma requirements, GED credentials, or adult education. It does not establish an effect on the displayed adult attainment estimate.

Retained California evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

This bill would proclaim the week of March 19, 2023, to March 25, 2023, inclusive, as Adult Education Week, and would honor the teachers, administrators, classified staff, and students of adult education programs statewide for their efforts, persistence, and accomplishments.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Asm. Catherine Stefani

California State Assembly · District 19 · D–CA

3 proposals
View proposals from Asm. Catherine Stefani
California Legislature · AB 1753

Protective orders: firearms and ammunition: notice and procedures.

Jul 2, 2026 · Amended Senate

Asm. Catherine Stefani · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

(1)Existing law establishes procedures by which a person may petition the court for certain protective or restraining orders, including civil harassment restraining orders, domestic violence restraining orders, elder or dependent adult abuse restraining orders, gun violence restraining orders, postsecondary school restraining orders, and workplace violence restraining orders, to enjoin a restrained person from taking specified actions.

The latest official California Legislative Information version records this action on July 2, 2026: Amended Senate.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.

Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(1)Existing law establishes procedures by which a person may petition the court for certain protective or restraining orders, including civil harassment restraining orders, domestic violence restraining orders, elder or dependent adult abuse restraining orders, gun violence restraining orders, postsecondary school restraining orders, and workplace violence restraining orders, to enjoin a restrained person from taking specified actions.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
California Legislature · AB 2540

Public health: public postsecondary education: student health centers: abortion by medication techniques.

Jul 2, 2026 · Amended Senate

Asm. Catherine Stefani · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Existing law establishes the California Community Colleges, under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, the California State University, under the administration of the Trustees of the California State University, and the University of California, under the administration of the Regents of the University of California, as the 3 segments of public postsecondary education in the state. Existing law requires, on and after January 1, 2023, a student health center on a California State University or University of California campus to offer abortion by medication techniques, as specified.

The latest official California Legislative Information version records this action on July 2, 2026: Amended Senate.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion-related services, or Medi-Cal coverage of those services. It does not establish an effect on the displayed Medi-Cal service count.

Retained California evidence context: Medi-Cal-funded abortion-related services. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

This bill would require a student health center on a California State University or University of California campus, on or before January 1, 2028, to promote awareness of the services for abortion by medication techniques that the student health center offers, provide information on those services to students, and post the availability of those services on its internet website.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
California Legislature · AB 824

Protective orders: firearms and ammunition.

Jun 19, 2025 · Amended Senate

Asm. Catherine Stefani · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

(1)Existing law establishes procedures by which a person may petition the court for certain protective or restraining orders, including civil harassment restraining orders, domestic violence restraining orders, elder or dependent adult abuse restraining orders, gun violence restraining orders, postsecondary school restraining orders, and workplace violence restraining orders, to enjoin a restrained person from taking specified actions. Beginning January 1, 2026, upon a court’s issuance of such a protective order, existing law will require the restrained person to relinquish any firearm and ammunition in that person’s immediate possession or control, according to specified procedures.

The latest official California Legislative Information version records this action on June 19, 2025: Amended Senate.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.

Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(1)Existing law establishes procedures by which a person may petition the court for certain protective or restraining orders, including civil harassment restraining orders, domestic violence restraining orders, elder or dependent adult abuse restraining orders, gun violence restraining orders, postsecondary school restraining orders, and workplace violence restraining orders, to enjoin a restrained person from taking specified actions.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Asm. Cecilia M. Aguiar-Curry

California State Assembly · District 4 · D–CA

1 proposal
View proposals from Asm. Cecilia M. Aguiar-Curry
California Legislature · AB 1036

Elections: civic outreach and voter engagement.

Oct 13, 2019 · Vetoed

Asm. Cecilia M. Aguiar-Curry · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

(1) Existing law requires the Secretary of State to provide every high school, community college, and California State University and University of California campus with voter registration forms. Existing law also expresses the intent of the Legislature that every eligible high school and college student receive a meaningful opportunity to apply to register to vote.This bill would create the High School Voter Education Pilot Program to be conducted in Yolo County. Under the pilot program, the Yolo County Elections Office and Yolo County Office of Education would be authorized to conduct mock student government elections on designated high school campuses, using, to the extent possible, the…

The official California Legislative Information record shows the veto action on October 13, 2019.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses voter registration, ballots, voting access, or election administration. It does not establish an effect on California's displayed turnout rate.

Retained California evidence context: Registered-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(1) Existing law requires the Secretary of State to provide every high school, community college, and California State University and University of California campus with voter registration forms.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Asm. David A. Alvarez

California State Assembly · District 80 · D–CA

1 proposal
View proposals from Asm. David A. Alvarez
California Legislature · AB 1732

California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: affordable housing projects: public university or public college housing projects.

May 20, 2026 · Amended Assembly

Asm. David A. Alvarez · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect.

The latest official California Legislative Information version records this action on May 20, 2026: Amended Assembly.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses residential rent, rental housing, tenant protections, housing assistance, or housing supply. It is housing-cost context and does not establish an effect on California's median gross rent.

Retained California evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

… related to this exemption by expanding the exemption to additional projects, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. "?>CEQA, until January 1, 2033, exempts from its requirements certain actions for affordable housing projects that meet specified requirements, including confirmation by a public agency that, among other things, the project site satisfies specified requirements and a vacant project site does not contain tribal cultural resources that could be affected by the development that were…
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current California officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a California statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.