California · individual fact

California crime

Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and California public-safety context.

Reported violent-crime rate478.4 per 100k2024 · #7 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate1,992.6 per 100k2024 · #16 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage99.7%2024 · #14 of 50 · highest first

California over time

Explore California readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. California officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a California effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a California change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Reported violent-crime rate California · source units
CaliforniaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Reported violent-crime rate2024: 478.4 per 100k333.7 per 100k440.5 per 100k547.3 per 100kCalifornia, 2015: 426.2 per 100kCalifornia, 2016: 445.4 per 100kCalifornia, 2017: 451.8 per 100kCalifornia, 2018: 447.4 per 100kCalifornia, 2019: 440.7 per 100kCalifornia, 2020: 442.1 per 100kCalifornia, 2021: 354.4 per 100kCalifornia, 2022: 502.8 per 100kCalifornia, 2023: 526.6 per 100kCalifornia, 2024: 478.4 per 100k201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 34National context · Booker makes federal sentencing guidelines advisory · 2005-01-12Federal sentencingNational context · Adam Walsh Act establishes new registration standards · 2006-07-27Adam Walsh ActNational context · Survey changes disrupt the 2006 victimization comparison · 2006-12-312006 survey breakNational context · Congress strengthens firearm background-check records · 2008-01-08NICS records lawNational context · Second Chance Act expands reentry support · 2008-04-09Second Chance ActNational context · Heller recognizes an individual firearm right · 2008-06-26Heller decisionNational context · Financial crisis deepens during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Shepard–Byrd Act expands federal hate-crime law · 2009-10-28Federal hate-crime lawNational context · McDonald applies the firearm right to the states · 2010-06-28McDonald decisionNational context · Fair Sentencing Act changes federal crack penalties · 2010-08-03Fair Sentencing ActNational context · FBI expands the rape definition · 2013-01-01Rape definition expandsNational context · Violence Against Women Act reauthorized · 2013-03-07VAWA reauthorizationNational context · DOJ publishes Ferguson policing findings · 2015-03-04Ferguson investigationNational context · Murder rates rise in 2015 and 2016 · 2016-12-312015–2016 murder riseNational context · First Step Act enacted · 2018-12-21First Step ActNational context · FBI launches national use-of-force data collection · 2019-01-01Use-of-force reportingNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · George Floyd is killed by a Minneapolis police officer · 2020-05-25George Floyd killedNational context · Murder rises sharply while property crime declines · 2020-12-312020 murder surgeNational context · FBI transitions to incident-based reporting · 2021-01-01NIBRS transitionNational context · COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act improves review and reporting · 2021-05-20Hate-crime reportingNational context · Executive order sets federal policing safeguards · 2022-05-25Federal policing orderNational context · Bruen changes the test for firearm restrictions · 2022-06-23Bruen decisionNational context · Bipartisan Safer Communities Act enacted · 2022-06-25Safer Communities ActNational context · FBI annual report again includes summary submissions · 2023-10-16Reporting coverage growsNational context · Vehicle theft rises while total property crime falls · 2023-12-31Vehicle-theft surgeNational context · Victimization survey tests a redesigned questionnaire · 2024-01-01NCVS redesign beginsNational context · Supreme Court rejects ATF’s bump-stock classification · 2024-06-14Bump-stock rulingNational context · Rahimi upholds disarmament for a credible domestic threat · 2024-06-21Domestic-threat rulingCalifornia · California directs enforcement coordination in evacuated fire neighborhoods · 2025-01-19Fire-area enforcement planNational context · Federal policing executive order is revoked · 2025-01-20Policing order revokedNational context · Court sustains ATF’s rule covering some firearm kits · 2025-03-26Firearm-kit rulingNational context · Executive order redirects federal law-enforcement support · 2025-04-282025 policing policyNational context · FBI publishes 2025 annual crime estimates · 2026-08-142025 crime data release● California Legislature · 1766323522321121142224325● U.S. Congress · California delegation · 1722◆ Governor · 7■ California agencies · 1122322005-01-012026-08-31

312 of 312 reviewed California actions match · 250 date markers shown. 34 major events shown separately.

California · 2024: 478.4 per 100k · Rank #7 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. California's 2021 point has very low reporting coverage and should not be treated as a comparable statewide rate. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
California Reported violent-crime rate · source units
PeriodCaliforniaRankU.S. benchmark
2024478.4 per 100k#7 of 50Not available
2023526.6 per 100k#6 of 50Not available
2022502.8 per 100k#7 of 50Not available
2021354.4 per 100k#22 of 50Not available
2020442.1 per 100k#19 of 50Not available
2019440.7 per 100k#12 of 50Not available
2018447.4 per 100k#14 of 50Not available
2017451.8 per 100k#16 of 50Not available
2016445.4 per 100k#16 of 50Not available
2015426.2 per 100k#15 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

California · state comparison

Reported crime over time

Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.

California · 2024478.4 per 100k
California rank#7among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Reported violent-crime rate

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. California's 2021 point has very low reporting coverage and should not be treated as a comparable statewide rate. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

California
Reported violent-crime rate history in California328.6 per 100k440.5 per 100k552.4 per 100k20152024
2024 · California: 478.4 per 100k · Rank #7 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
California Reported violent-crime rate history
PeriodCaliforniaCompare
2015426.2 per 100k
2016445.4 per 100k
2017451.8 per 100k
2018447.4 per 100k
2019440.7 per 100k
2020442.1 per 100k
2021354.4 per 100k
2022502.8 per 100k
2023526.6 per 100k
2024478.4 per 100k

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. California stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. California has a dark outline.

Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

California · 478.4 per 100k2024 · Rank #7 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare California with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Mexico744.7 per 100k—
#2Alaska731.9 per 100k—
#3Tennessee604.3 per 100k—
#4Arkansas589.6 per 100k—
#5*Louisiana504.5 per 100k82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6Colorado486.8 per 100k—
#7California · your comparison478.4 per 100k—
#8Kansas474.7 per 100k—
#9Missouri472.7 per 100k—
#10Michigan442.6 per 100k—
#11South Carolina440.8 per 100k—
#12Arizona433 per 100k—
#13Oklahoma429.3 per 100k—
#14Montana428 per 100k—
#15Maryland425.9 per 100k—
#16Nevada408.6 per 100k—
#17Texas397.8 per 100k—
#18New York392.2 per 100k—
#19North Carolina382.9 per 100k—
#20Alabama380.8 per 100k—
#21Delaware368.4 per 100k—
#22*South Dakota356.9 per 100k89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*Indiana349.2 per 100k87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24Oregon341.1 per 100k—
#25Washington331.8 per 100k—
#26Georgia328 per 100k—
#27Massachusetts317.9 per 100k—
#28Ohio311.9 per 100k—
#29Illinois294.5 per 100k—
#30Wisconsin287.6 per 100k—
#31West Virginia263.8 per 100k—
#32*Florida262 per 100k81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33Minnesota259.4 per 100k—
#34North Dakota258 per 100k—
#35Pennsylvania251.3 per 100k—
#36Iowa247.2 per 100k—
#37Utah237.8 per 100k—
#38Idaho236.6 per 100k—
#39Hawaii230.3 per 100k—
#40Vermont227.1 per 100k—
#41Kentucky226.7 per 100k—
#42Nebraska224.6 per 100k—
#43Virginia223.7 per 100k—
#44New Jersey221.9 per 100k—
#45*Mississippi219.6 per 100k65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*Wyoming212.5 per 100k89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47Rhode Island154.9 per 100k—
#48Connecticut139.2 per 100k—
#49New Hampshire112.3 per 100k—
#50Maine102.6 per 100k—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Reported violent-crime rate

431.1 per 100,0002025

Violent crimes reported by California law-enforcement agencies per 100,000 residents under the state's criminal-justice statistical program.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Other reported 2025 crime rates

Property crime
1,785.8 per 100,000
Homicide
3.5 per 100,000
Method and limitations

California Department of Justice compilation of law-enforcement agency reports, converted to population rates.

  • Reported crime excludes incidents not reported to or recorded by law enforcement.
  • Not every law-enforcement agency submitted a complete 12 months of 2025 data; DOJ accepted both legacy summary and incident-based reports during the reporting transition.
  • Agency reporting practices and later revisions can affect the totals; the statewide rate is not an individual's probability of victimization.

Reported property-crime rate

1,785.8 per 100,0002025

Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

California Department of Justice compilation of law-enforcement agency reports, converted to population rates.

  • Reported crime excludes incidents not reported to or recorded by law enforcement.
  • Not every law-enforcement agency submitted a complete 12 months of 2025 data; DOJ accepted both legacy summary and incident-based reports during the reporting transition.
  • Agency reporting practices and later revisions can affect the totals; the statewide rate is not an individual's probability of victimization.
California · state comparison

Firearm mortality

Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.

California · 20242,853
California rank#3among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Firearm deaths

Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.

Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. California stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. California has a dark outline.

Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

California · 2,8532024 · Rank #3 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare California with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas4,389—
#2Florida3,191—
#3California · your comparison2,853—
#4Georgia1,985—
#5North Carolina1,835—
#6Ohio1,745—
#7Pennsylvania1,624—
#8Illinois1,563—
#9Tennessee1,448—
#10Arizona1,331—
#11Missouri1,234—
#12Michigan1,228—
#13Alabama1,212—
#14Indiana1,196—
#15Virginia1,153—
#16South Carolina1,064—
#17Louisiana1,031—
#18Colorado961—
#19Washington915—
#20New York896—
#21Kentucky870—
#22Mississippi810—
#23Oklahoma794—
#24Wisconsin735—
#25Maryland716—
#26Oregon663—
#27Arkansas638—
#28Minnesota582—
#28Nevada582—
#30New Mexico563—
#31Utah454—
#32Kansas446—
#33New Jersey393—
#34Iowa389—
#35Idaho331—
#36Massachusetts287—
#37West Virginia281—
#38Montana247—
#39Connecticut224—
#40Nebraska218—
#41Alaska182—
#42Maine181—
#43South Dakota159—
#44New Hampshire152—
#45Wyoming143—
#46Delaware123—
#47North Dakota95—
#48Vermont76—
#49Hawaii56—
#50Rhode Island55—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Firearm deaths

2,8532024 final data

Deaths in California for which a firearm injury was recorded as the cause of death, across intents including suicide, homicide, and other categories.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Population-adjusted measure

Age-adjusted firearm death rate
7.0 per 100,000
Method and limitations

CDC National Vital Statistics System mortality data published through CDC WONDER; the displayed rate is age-adjusted.

  • This is a mortality measure, not a count of shootings or crimes.
  • The total combines multiple intents and does not by itself explain causes or policy effects.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s California candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

113 statements from 65 candidates

2026 California Attorney General — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 7 statements

Michael E. Gates

3 statements

Republican · Attorney General · CA

Crime & victimization

We need a new Attorney General. According to FBI data, California ranks 6th highest in the nation for violent crime. Every Californian deserves to feel safe—in their neighborhoods, at school, walking to the store. Too many families don’t feel that way today. Fentanyl is taking our kids. Retail theft…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Fully enforce Proposition 36

Government-published candidate material

We need a new Attorney General. According to FBI data, California ranks 6th highest in the nation for violent crime. Every Californian deserves to feel safe—in their neighborhoods, at school, walking to the store. Too many families don’t feel that way today. Fentanyl is taking our kids. Retail theft is closing the stores we count on. Nearly half of all homeless Americans live in California. And crime always hits working families hardest. I am a husband of 30 years and father of five. I have spent my career trying cases in courtrooms, not politics, as a trial attorney and prosecutor. I enforced Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Justice and am admitted to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court. As a City Attorney, I built a local prosecution program that cut crime by double digits in its first year and made Huntington Beach one of California’s safest cities. I brought residents, leaders, and law enforcement together, and I will do the same as your Attorney General. Californians voted for Prop. 36 overwhelmingly to restore accountability for repeat theft and drug offenses. I will fully enforce it and will prosecute the traffickers poisoning our communities, protect victims, help people off the streets and into treatment, and make sure your tax dollars are spent honestly and effectively. Safe streets and equal justice belong to every community, whatever your zip code or last name. Public safety is not a partisan issue, and I will never treat it like one. www.Gates4AG.com

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026

Attorney General Candidate Statements | Official Voter Information Guide | California Secretary of State ↗
View 2 more statements from Michael E. Gates
Policing & criminal justice context

California families deserve to be safe again. Crime is rising, homelessness is out of control, fraud with taxpayer dollars is rampant, and our children—especially young girls—are not being protected. The Office of Attorney General should be focused on enforcing the law and keeping families safe, not…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Support voter identification — primary statement

Government-published candidate material

California families deserve to be safe again. Crime is rising, homelessness is out of control, fraud with taxpayer dollars is rampant, and our children—especially young girls—are not being protected. The Office of Attorney General should be focused on enforcing the law and keeping families safe, not playing politics. I'm a husband and father of five, and like every parent, I want our children to grow up in safe communities. That's why public safety has always been my top priority. As the City Attorney for Huntington Beach, I fought for the people. I created a city criminal prosecutor program that prosecuted quality-of-life crimes and reduced crime by double digits. We proved that when the law is enforced, communities thrive. As Attorney General, I will make crime illegal again by prosecuting all crimes, including enforcing Proposition 36, and use the law to address homelessness by holding criminals accountable while getting people off our streets and into treatment. I will stand up for police, support law enforcement and defend them when they are unfairly attacked. I will also bring proven programs that lowered crime and homelessness in Huntington Beach to cities across California. I will aggressively prosecute fraud and corruption in Sacramento, protect parents' rights, enforce laws that keep boys out of girls' sports and support Voter ID. This is a serious office. I will fight for everyday Californians and bring accountability and safety back to California. Learn more at www.Gates4AG.com.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026

Attorney General Candidate Statements | Official Voter Information Guide | California Secretary of State ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

Defend the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Californians Oppose unconstitutional attacks on the right to keep and bear arms Streamline processes for CCWs Focus enforcement on violent criminals, gangs and repeat offenders – not responsible gun owners Support law enforcement efforts to get illeg…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Defend gun rights and streamline carry permits

Candidate campaign source

Defend the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Californians Oppose unconstitutional attacks on the right to keep and bear arms Streamline processes for CCWs Focus enforcement on violent criminals, gangs and repeat offenders – not responsible gun owners Support law enforcement efforts to get illegal guns out of the hands of criminals Fight back against Sacramento politicians who use public safety as an excuse to weaken constitutional rights

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026

Michael Gates for Attorney General ↗

Rob Bonta

4 statements

Democratic · Attorney General · CA

Crime & victimization

The fight is far from over — but together we’ll keep standing up to stop unlawful power grabs by the federal government, defend our immigrant communities, protect reproductive freedom, hold greedy corporations accountable, keep our communities safe from gun violence and fentanyl trafficking, safegua…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Challenge federal abuses of power

Candidate campaign source

The fight is far from over — but together we’ll keep standing up to stop unlawful power grabs by the federal government, defend our immigrant communities, protect reproductive freedom, hold greedy corporations accountable, keep our communities safe from gun violence and fentanyl trafficking, safeguard our environment, and so much more.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026

Re-elect Rob Bonta Attorney General of Californiahamburger menu_alternativehamburger menu_alternative ↗
View 3 more statements from Rob Bonta
Crime & victimization

Attorney General Bonta is defending California’s first-in-class gun safety laws like the assault weapons ban from attacks by the NRA and the gun lobbying. As states across the country saw increased gun violence during the pandemic, Attorney General Bonta’s Department of Justice is expanding proven p…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Defend gun laws and violence prevention

Candidate campaign source

Attorney General Bonta is defending California’s first-in-class gun safety laws like the assault weapons ban from attacks by the NRA and the gun lobbying. As states across the country saw increased gun violence during the pandemic, Attorney General Bonta’s Department of Justice is expanding proven programs that bring community leaders, law enforcement and youth together to interrupt gang violence before it causes gun deaths. He is expanding the use of gun violence restraining orders that take guns away from people with a history of domestic abuse and those who are prohibited from owning them.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026

Issues - Re-elect Rob Bonta Attorney General of Californiahamburger menu_alternativehamburger menu_alternative ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

Attorney General Bonta is taking on transnational criminal organizations that traffic in guns, drugs, and people. A longtime advocate for crime victims, he is working with law enforcement to expand programs that support victims of crime. He is increasing resources to clear the rape kit backlog at la…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Combat trafficking and support victims

Candidate campaign source

Attorney General Bonta is taking on transnational criminal organizations that traffic in guns, drugs, and people. A longtime advocate for crime victims, he is working with law enforcement to expand programs that support victims of crime. He is increasing resources to clear the rape kit backlog at law enforcement agencies across the state, and Attorney General Bonta has expanded human trafficking and sexual predator response units across the state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026

Issues - Re-elect Rob Bonta Attorney General of Californiahamburger menu_alternativehamburger menu_alternative ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

By its size alone, California’s Department of Justice is the country’s largest civil rights practice. he will strongly enforce California’s civil rights code and fight for racial justice and equity. As hate crimes rise across California, he will take on the forces of hate and build bridges between l…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Enforce civil rights and address hate

Candidate campaign source

By its size alone, California’s Department of Justice is the country’s largest civil rights practice. he will strongly enforce California’s civil rights code and fight for racial justice and equity. As hate crimes rise across California, he will take on the forces of hate and build bridges between law enforcement and targeted communities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026

Issues - Re-elect Rob Bonta Attorney General of Californiahamburger menu_alternativehamburger menu_alternative ↗

2026 California Board of Equalization Member District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Nelson Esparza

1 statement

Democratic · Board of Equalization Member District 1 · CA

Policing & criminal justice context

Nelson Esparza is a dedicated public servant and proven champion for California’s working families and small business owners. Raised in California’s Central Valley, Nelson’s life and career have been shaped by a deep commitment to opportunity, fairness, and economic prosperity for all. Nelson is run…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Close loopholes and enforce tax collection

Government-published candidate material

Nelson Esparza is a dedicated public servant and proven champion for California’s working families and small business owners. Raised in California’s Central Valley, Nelson’s life and career have been shaped by a deep commitment to opportunity, fairness, and economic prosperity for all. Nelson is running for the State Board of Equalization to ensure a fair tax system for all Californians. Nelson will fight to close tax loopholes and crack down on tax evaders so that our local governments can continue to invest in public safety, infrastructure, education, healthcare, and economic development. As a long-time educator and economist, Nelson will bring real-world financial expertise to California’s state tax board. On the Fresno City Council, he serves as Chair of the Finance & Audit Committee, where he deals with complex financial issues every day. Additionally, he has secured hundreds of millions in investment for our communities. Nelson will oppose new taxes on middle class and working class families as well as small businesses that are already struggling to make ends meet. He’ll fight for more transparency in our tax system, and for fair impartial property tax assessments. Nelson is supported by local law enforcement, teachers, nurses, construction workers, and leaders at the local, state, and federal levels across California—because they know that he has the experience and the drive to protect our tax dollars and our public services. By November 3rd, Vote Nelson Esparza for State Board of Equalization. Learn more at nelsonesparza.com.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Board of Equalization Candidate Statements | Official Voter Information Guide | California Secretary of State ↗

Shannon Grove

1 statement

Republican · Board of Equalization Member District 1 · CA

Policing & criminal justice context

Senator Grove is a strong supporter of law enforcement and for protecting California children. In 2023, she authored SB 14, the landmark legislation to establish a felony for sex trafficking children in California which was successfully signed into law. She is a strong defender of small businesses w…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Support law enforcement

Candidate campaign source

Senator Grove is a strong supporter of law enforcement and for protecting California children. In 2023, she authored SB 14, the landmark legislation to establish a felony for sex trafficking children in California which was successfully signed into law. She is a strong defender of small businesses who deserve fair, not punitive, regulation, and supporting critically important agriculture and energy production in the state of California. She resides in Bakersfield with her husband, Rick. They are parents of five children and eleven grandchildren.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Meet Shannon - Shannon Grove ↗

2026 California Board of Equalization Member District 3 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Mike Gipson

1 statement

Democratic · Board of Equalization Member District 3 · CA

Policing & criminal justice context

Assemblymember Mike Gipson is a proven leader with decades of experience fighting for working families. He is running for the Board of Equalization to fight for fairness, transparency, and accountability. Mike will fight to close tax loopholes that billionaires and corporations exploit to avoid payi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Fund healthcare, schools and social services

Government-published candidate material

Assemblymember Mike Gipson is a proven leader with decades of experience fighting for working families. He is running for the Board of Equalization to fight for fairness, transparency, and accountability. Mike will fight to close tax loopholes that billionaires and corporations exploit to avoid paying their fair share. Born and raised in Los Angeles, Mike has dedicated his life's work to public service. He has worked for service employee and public educator unions, as a local city councilmember, a former local police officer, and currently is a member of the California State Assembly. He is the longest-serving Assembly Democratic Caucus Chair in state history. As Assemblyman, Mike has championed groundbreaking laws protecting California children and families from ICE, laws to get 3-D printed “ghost guns” off of the streets and out of the hands of criminals, funding for expanded access to healthcare, education, and childcare, and Investments in mental health services. That's why Governor Gavin Newsom said, “Mike has been a bold leader for the people of our state.” Previously serving as Chief of Staff to the former Board of Equalization Chairman, Mike currently serves as Chair of the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee, which oversees the Board of Equalization. On the BOE, Gipson will bring in the funds needed to support quality healthcare, strong schools, and vital social services that sustain families and communities across our state. By June 2nd, vote Mike Gipson for Board of Equalization! Endorsed by nurses, construction workers, and classroom teachers. Visit mikegipson.net

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026

Board of Equalization Candidate Statements | Official Voter Information Guide | California Secretary of State ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 16
How statements are selected

This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published California candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

California incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current California legislators and California’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from California’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

205 matching sponsorships or proposals · 76 California incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Asm. Al Muratsuchi

California State Assembly · District 66 · D–CA

4 proposals
View proposals from Asm. Al Muratsuchi
California Legislature · AB 2138

Domestic violence: probation: sobriety-monitoring pilot program.

Apr 18, 2022 · Session ended · final outcome unverified

Asm. Al Muratsuchi · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Existing law requires the court to impose specified conditions of probation for defendants convicted of domestic violence, including referral to a batterer’s program in which participation in substance abuse counseling is a standard component for defendants who are chronic users or serious abusers of drugs and alcohol. If probation is granted in domestic violence cases, existing law authorizes the probation department or the court to make provisions for a defendant to receive alcohol and drug services using the defendant’s own resources.This bill would require the court to order a person who is convicted of, and placed on probation for, a domestic violence offense to participate in a…

The 2021–2022 regular session ended on November 30, 2022. The retained bill text is dated April 18, 2022 and records: Assembly - Died - Public Safety. Its final disposition and action date still require the official bill history; this measure is not shown as currently pending.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses a violent offense, violence prevention, or safety and support for victims of violence. It does not establish an effect on California's reported violent-crime rate.

Retained California evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

If probation is granted in domestic violence cases, existing law authorizes the probation department or the court to make provisions for a defendant to receive alcohol and drug services using the defendant’s own resources.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
California Legislature · AB 2545

Theft: receiving stolen property: firearms.

Feb 17, 2022 · Session ended · final outcome unverified

Asm. Al Muratsuchi · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Under existing law, theft of any property of a value exceeding $950 is grand theft and is punishable as either a misdemeanor or a felony. Under existing law, theft of any firearm, regardless of value, is grand theft and is punishable as a felony.Under existing law, knowingly buying or receiving stolen property, as specified, is punishable as either a misdemeanor or a felony if the value of the property exceeds $950.Existing law, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, enacted by Proposition 47, as approved by the voters at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election, requires the receipt of stolen property that does not exceed $950 to be punished as a misdemeanor, except in cases when…

The 2021–2022 regular session ended on November 30, 2022. The retained bill text is dated February 17, 2022 and records: Assembly - Died - Public Safety. Its final disposition and action date still require the official bill history; this measure is not shown as currently pending.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.

Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

This bill would, upon approval by the voters, make knowingly buying or receiving a stolen firearm, as specified, regardless of the value of the firearm, punishable as either a misdemeanor or a felony.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
California Legislature · AB 2362

Firearms dealers: conduct of business.

Sep 29, 2020 · Enacted

Asm. Al Muratsuchi · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Under existing law, a firearms dealer or licensee means a person who has a valid federal firearms license, has a regulatory or business license, has a valid seller’s permit issued by the State Board of Equalization, has a certificate of eligibility issued by the Department of Justice, has a license granted by a duly constituted licensing authority of any city, county, or city and county, and is among those recorded in the centralized list of licensed firearms dealers kept by the department. Existing law regulates licensed firearms dealers and provides that a license is subject to forfeiture for a breach of specified prohibitions in existing law. Existing law establishes the Dealers’ Record…

The official California Legislative Information record shows this action on September 29, 2020: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 284, Statutes of 2020..

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.

Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Under existing law, a firearms dealer or licensee means a person who has a valid federal firearms license, has a regulatory or business license, has a valid seller’s permit issued by the State Board of Equalization, has a certificate of eligibility issued by the Department of Justice, has a license granted by a duly constituted licensing authority of any city, county, or city and county, and is among those recorded in the centralized list of licensed firearms dealers kept by the department.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
California Legislature · AB 1064

Firearms dealers: conduct of business.

Jan 31, 2020 · Died

Asm. Al Muratsuchi · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Under existing law, a firearms dealer or licensee means a person who has a valid federal firearms license, has a regulatory or business license, has a valid seller’s permit issued by the State Board of Equalization, has a certificate of eligibility issued by the Department of Justice, has a license granted by a duly constituted licensing authority of any city, county, or city and county, and is among those recorded in the centralized list of licensed firearms dealers kept by the Department of Justice. Existing law regulates licensed firearms dealers and provides that a license is subject to forfeiture for a breach of specified prohibitions in existing law.This bill would authorize the…

The official California Legislative Information history records this action on January 31, 2020: Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution..

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.

Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Under existing law, a firearms dealer or licensee means a person who has a valid federal firearms license, has a regulatory or business license, has a valid seller’s permit issued by the State Board of Equalization, has a certificate of eligibility issued by the Department of Justice, has a license granted by a duly constituted licensing authority of any city, county, or city and county, and is among those recorded in the centralized list of licensed firearms dealers kept by the Department of Justice.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Asm. Alex Lee

California State Assembly · District 24 · D–CA

1 proposal
View proposals from Asm. Alex Lee
California Legislature · AB 1509

Enhancements: firearms.

Apr 21, 2021 · Session ended · final outcome unverified

Asm. Alex Lee · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Existing law imposes various sentence enhancements, consisting of additional and consecutive terms of imprisonment, including, among others, enhancements for being armed with a firearm during the commission of a felony, being armed with a firearm during the commission of a street gang crime, as defined, being armed with ammunition designed to penetrate armor during the commission of a felony, furnishing a firearm to another for the purpose of aiding, abetting, or enabling that person to commit a felony, and using a firearm during the commission of a felony, and the infliction of great bodily injury on any other person during the commission of a felony. This bill would repeal those…

The 2021–2022 regular session ended on November 30, 2022. The retained bill text is dated April 21, 2021 and records: Assembly - Died - Appropriations. Its final disposition and action date still require the official bill history; this measure is not shown as currently pending.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.

Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Enhancements: firearms.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Asm. Alexandra M. Macedo

California State Assembly · District 33 · R–CA

1 proposal
View proposals from Asm. Alexandra M. Macedo
California Legislature · AB 1396

Crimes: sexual assault.

Apr 28, 2025 · Amended Assembly

Asm. Alexandra M. Macedo · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Existing law provides that, except as specified, a person who assaults another with the intent to commit, among other things, mayhem, rape, sodomy, or oral copulation, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for 2, 4, or 6 years. Existing law provides that a person who commits those offenses against a person under 18 years of age shall be punished by imprisonment for 5, 7, or 9 years.

The latest official California Legislative Information version records this action on April 28, 2025: Amended Assembly.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses a violent offense, violence prevention, or safety and support for victims of violence. It does not establish an effect on California's reported violent-crime rate.

Retained California evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Crimes: sexual assault.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Asm. Ash Kalra

California State Assembly · District 25 · D–CA

1 proposal
View proposals from Asm. Ash Kalra
California Legislature · AB 2534

Domestic Violence Prevention Act: forced marriage.

Jun 11, 2026 · Amended Senate

Asm. Ash Kalra · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Existing law establishes the Domestic Violence Prevention Act for the purpose of preventing acts of domestic violence, abuse, and sexual abuse and providing for a separation of the persons involved in the domestic violence for a period sufficient to enable those persons to seek a resolution of the causes of the violence. Existing law authorizes a court to issue an ex parte protective order enjoining a party from, among other things, disturbing the peace of the other party.

The latest official California Legislative Information version records this action on June 11, 2026: Amended Senate.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses a violent offense, violence prevention, or safety and support for victims of violence. It does not establish an effect on California's reported violent-crime rate.

Retained California evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Domestic Violence Prevention Act: forced marriage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Asm. Avelino Valencia

California State Assembly · District 68 · D–CA

1 proposal
View proposals from Asm. Avelino Valencia
California Legislature · AB 1483

Firearms: purchases.

Sep 26, 2023 · Enacted

Asm. Avelino Valencia · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Existing law, subject to exceptions, prohibits a person from making more than one application to purchase a handgun within any 30-day period. Under existing law, a violation of this prohibition is a crime. Existing law exempts from that prohibition a firearms transaction where neither of the parties is a firearms dealer if the transaction is completed through a dealer.

The official California Legislative Information record shows this action on September 26, 2023: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 246, Statutes of 2023..

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.

Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The bill would add an exemption for any private party transaction where the seller is, at the time of the transaction, required under state law or by court order to relinquish all firearms, and for any private party transaction where the seller is transferring the firearms as a result of the death of the owner of the firearms, as specified.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Asm. Blanca Pacheco

California State Assembly · District 64 · D–CA

1 proposal
View proposals from Asm. Blanca Pacheco
California Legislature · AB 2024

Domestic violence: restraining orders.

Sep 27, 2024 · Enacted

Asm. Blanca Pacheco · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Existing law authorizes a court to issue a restraining order to a person to prevent abuse, as specified, based on reasonable proof of a past act or acts of abuse. Existing law authorizes the order to be issued solely on the affidavit or testimony of the person requesting the restraining order. Existing law prohibits an ex parte restraining order from being denied solely because the other party was not provided notice.Existing law authorizes a court to issue ex parte protective orders enjoining a party from engaging in specified acts, including threatening or harassing the other party or disturbing the peace of the other party; excluding a party from the family dwelling, the dwelling of the…

The official California Legislative Information record shows this action on September 27, 2024: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 648, Statutes of 2024..

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses a violent offense, violence prevention, or safety and support for victims of violence. It does not establish an effect on California's reported violent-crime rate.

Retained California evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Domestic violence: restraining orders.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current California officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a California statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.