Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and California public-safety context.
Reported violent-crime rate478.4 per 100k2024 · #7 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate1,992.6 per 100k2024 · #16 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage99.7%2024 · #14 of 50 · highest first
California over time
Explore California readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. California officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a California effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a California change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Reported violent-crime rate California · source units
CaliforniaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
312 of 312 reviewed California actions match · 250 date markers shown. 34 major events shown separately.
California · 2024: 478.4 per 100k · Rank #7 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. California's 2021 point has very low reporting coverage and should not be treated as a comparable statewide rate. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
California Reported violent-crime rate · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
California · state comparison
Reported crime over time
Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.
California · 2024478.4 per 100k
California rank#7among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Reported violent-crime rate
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. California's 2021 point has very low reporting coverage and should not be treated as a comparable statewide rate. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
California
2024 · California: 478.4 per 100k · Rank #7 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
California Reported violent-crime rate history
Period
California
Compare
2015
426.2 per 100k
2016
445.4 per 100k
2017
451.8 per 100k
2018
447.4 per 100k
2019
440.7 per 100k
2020
442.1 per 100k
2021
354.4 per 100k
2022
502.8 per 100k
2023
526.6 per 100k
2024
478.4 per 100k
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. California stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. California has a dark outline.
Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
California · 478.4 per 100k2024 · Rank #7 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare California with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Mexico
744.7 per 100k
—
#2
Alaska
731.9 per 100k
—
#3
Tennessee
604.3 per 100k
—
#4
Arkansas
589.6 per 100k
—
#5*
Louisiana
504.5 per 100k
82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6
Colorado
486.8 per 100k
—
#7
California · your comparison
478.4 per 100k
—
#8
Kansas
474.7 per 100k
—
#9
Missouri
472.7 per 100k
—
#10
Michigan
442.6 per 100k
—
#11
South Carolina
440.8 per 100k
—
#12
Arizona
433 per 100k
—
#13
Oklahoma
429.3 per 100k
—
#14
Montana
428 per 100k
—
#15
Maryland
425.9 per 100k
—
#16
Nevada
408.6 per 100k
—
#17
Texas
397.8 per 100k
—
#18
New York
392.2 per 100k
—
#19
North Carolina
382.9 per 100k
—
#20
Alabama
380.8 per 100k
—
#21
Delaware
368.4 per 100k
—
#22*
South Dakota
356.9 per 100k
89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*
Indiana
349.2 per 100k
87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24
Oregon
341.1 per 100k
—
#25
Washington
331.8 per 100k
—
#26
Georgia
328 per 100k
—
#27
Massachusetts
317.9 per 100k
—
#28
Ohio
311.9 per 100k
—
#29
Illinois
294.5 per 100k
—
#30
Wisconsin
287.6 per 100k
—
#31
West Virginia
263.8 per 100k
—
#32*
Florida
262 per 100k
81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33
Minnesota
259.4 per 100k
—
#34
North Dakota
258 per 100k
—
#35
Pennsylvania
251.3 per 100k
—
#36
Iowa
247.2 per 100k
—
#37
Utah
237.8 per 100k
—
#38
Idaho
236.6 per 100k
—
#39
Hawaii
230.3 per 100k
—
#40
Vermont
227.1 per 100k
—
#41
Kentucky
226.7 per 100k
—
#42
Nebraska
224.6 per 100k
—
#43
Virginia
223.7 per 100k
—
#44
New Jersey
221.9 per 100k
—
#45*
Mississippi
219.6 per 100k
65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*
Wyoming
212.5 per 100k
89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47
Rhode Island
154.9 per 100k
—
#48
Connecticut
139.2 per 100k
—
#49
New Hampshire
112.3 per 100k
—
#50
Maine
102.6 per 100k
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Violent crimes reported by California law-enforcement agencies per 100,000 residents under the state's criminal-justice statistical program.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Other reported 2025 crime rates
Property crime
1,785.8 per 100,000
Homicide
3.5 per 100,000
Method and limitations
California Department of Justice compilation of law-enforcement agency reports, converted to population rates.
Reported crime excludes incidents not reported to or recorded by law enforcement.
Not every law-enforcement agency submitted a complete 12 months of 2025 data; DOJ accepted both legacy summary and incident-based reports during the reporting transition.
Agency reporting practices and later revisions can affect the totals; the statewide rate is not an individual's probability of victimization.
Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
California Department of Justice compilation of law-enforcement agency reports, converted to population rates.
Reported crime excludes incidents not reported to or recorded by law enforcement.
Not every law-enforcement agency submitted a complete 12 months of 2025 data; DOJ accepted both legacy summary and incident-based reports during the reporting transition.
Agency reporting practices and later revisions can affect the totals; the statewide rate is not an individual's probability of victimization.
Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.
California · 20242,853
California rank#3among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Firearm deaths
Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.
Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. California stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. California has a dark outline.
Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
California · 2,8532024 · Rank #3 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare California with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
4,389
—
#2
Florida
3,191
—
#3
California · your comparison
2,853
—
#4
Georgia
1,985
—
#5
North Carolina
1,835
—
#6
Ohio
1,745
—
#7
Pennsylvania
1,624
—
#8
Illinois
1,563
—
#9
Tennessee
1,448
—
#10
Arizona
1,331
—
#11
Missouri
1,234
—
#12
Michigan
1,228
—
#13
Alabama
1,212
—
#14
Indiana
1,196
—
#15
Virginia
1,153
—
#16
South Carolina
1,064
—
#17
Louisiana
1,031
—
#18
Colorado
961
—
#19
Washington
915
—
#20
New York
896
—
#21
Kentucky
870
—
#22
Mississippi
810
—
#23
Oklahoma
794
—
#24
Wisconsin
735
—
#25
Maryland
716
—
#26
Oregon
663
—
#27
Arkansas
638
—
#28
Minnesota
582
—
#28
Nevada
582
—
#30
New Mexico
563
—
#31
Utah
454
—
#32
Kansas
446
—
#33
New Jersey
393
—
#34
Iowa
389
—
#35
Idaho
331
—
#36
Massachusetts
287
—
#37
West Virginia
281
—
#38
Montana
247
—
#39
Connecticut
224
—
#40
Nebraska
218
—
#41
Alaska
182
—
#42
Maine
181
—
#43
South Dakota
159
—
#44
New Hampshire
152
—
#45
Wyoming
143
—
#46
Delaware
123
—
#47
North Dakota
95
—
#48
Vermont
76
—
#49
Hawaii
56
—
#50
Rhode Island
55
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
312 of 312 reviewed California actions · newest first
Jul 7, 2026 · Policy proposal · Attorney General Bonta Releases 5-Year Strategic Plan to Reduce Gun Violence in California · Proposed policyCalifornia agencies · Policy proposal
Attorney General Bonta Releases 5-Year Strategic Plan to Reduce Gun Violence in California
Jul 7, 2026 · Proposed policy
Rob Bonta · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
SACRAMENTO — California Attorney General Bonta today announced the final release of a Strategic Plan to Sustain California’s Record Progress Against Gun Violence. Assembly Bill 1252, authored by Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, required the Attorney General’s Office of Gun Violence Prevention (OGVP) to publish a strategic plan report outlining recommendations on “new legislation, improvements to statutory implementation, and increased programmatic funding necessary to achieve sustained reductions in gun violence in California” over the next five years. The OGVP published two reports for that strategic plan:
Published by the official office
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Assembly Bill 1252, authored by Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, required the Attorney General’s Office of Gun Violence Prevention (OGVP) to publish a strategic plan report outlining recommendations on “new legislation, improvements to statutory implementation, and increased programmatic funding necessary to achieve sustained reductions in gun violence in California” over the next five years.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 6, 2026 · ACR 191 · National Gun Violence Awareness Day. · Resolution adoptedCalifornia Legislature · ACR 191
National Gun Violence Awareness Day.
Jul 6, 2026 · Resolution adopted
Asm. Catherine Stefani · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This measure would declare June 5, 2026, to be National Gun Violence Awareness Day.
The official California Legislative Information record shows this action on July 6, 2026: Chaptered.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
This measure would declare June 5, 2026, to be National Gun Violence Awareness Day.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 2, 2026 · AB 1753 · Protective orders: firearms and ammunition: notice and procedures. · Amended SenateCalifornia Legislature · AB 1753
Protective orders: firearms and ammunition: notice and procedures.
Jul 2, 2026 · Amended Senate
Asm. Catherine Stefani · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
(1)Existing law establishes procedures by which a person may petition the court for certain protective or restraining orders, including civil harassment restraining orders, domestic violence restraining orders, elder or dependent adult abuse restraining orders, gun violence restraining orders, postsecondary school restraining orders, and workplace violence restraining orders, to enjoin a restrained person from taking specified actions.
The latest official California Legislative Information version records this action on July 2, 2026: Amended Senate.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(1)Existing law establishes procedures by which a person may petition the court for certain protective or restraining orders, including civil harassment restraining orders, domestic violence restraining orders, elder or dependent adult abuse restraining orders, gun violence restraining orders, postsecondary school restraining orders, and workplace violence restraining orders, to enjoin a restrained person from taking specified actions.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 2, 2026 · AB 458 · Public contracts: firearms, ammunition, and firearm accessories. · Amended SenateCalifornia Legislature · AB 458
Public contracts: firearms, ammunition, and firearm accessories.
Jul 2, 2026 · Amended Senate
Asm. Catherine Stefani · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Existing law generally regulates contracts entered into by any state agency for the acquisition of goods and requires public contracts to be awarded by competitive bidding pursuant to specified procedures. This bill would require, no later than July 1, 2027, the Department of General Services, in consultation with the Department of Justice, to develop model guidelines for offices, officers, departments, divisions, boards, bureaus, and commissions of the state on the procurement of firearms, ammunition, and firearm accessories.
The latest official California Legislative Information version records this action on July 2, 2026: Amended Senate.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Public contracts: firearms, ammunition, and firearm accessories.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 2, 2026 · AB 2047 · Firearms: 3-dimensional printing blocking technology. · Amended SenateCalifornia Legislature · AB 2047
Existing law makes it a crime to knowingly or willfully cause another person to engage in the unlawful manufacture of firearms or knowingly or willfully aiding, abetting, prompting, or facilitating the unlawful manufacture of firearms, including the manufacture of assault weapons or .50 BMG rifles or the manufacture of any firearm using a 3-dimensional printer, as specified. This bill would require, on or before September 1, 2028, the department to publish written guidance on performance standards for firearm blueprint detection algorithm for use by 3-dimensional printer manufacturers, as specified.
The latest official California Legislative Information version records this action on July 2, 2026: Amended Senate.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
This bill would require, on or before September 1, 2028, the department to publish written guidance on performance standards for firearm blueprint detection algorithm for use by 3-dimensional printer manufacturers, as specified.
Existing law requires any person who purchases or receives a firearm to possess a firearm safety certificate. Existing law also prohibits a person from selling or transferring a firearm to any person who does not possess a firearm safety certificate. A violation of either of these provisions is punishable as a misdemeanor.
The latest official California Legislative Information version records this action on July 2, 2026: Amended Assembly.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
This bill would extend the above-described time period to within 180 days and would also require that personal firearm importer to obtain a valid firearm safety certificate and include a copy of the valid firearm safety certificate within the report and make a violation of this provision a misdemeanor.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified California officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s California candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
113 statements from 65 candidates
2026 California Attorney General — General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 7 statements
We need a new Attorney General. According to FBI data, California ranks 6th highest in the nation for violent crime. Every Californian deserves to feel safe—in their neighborhoods, at school, walking to the store. Too many families don’t feel that way today. Fentanyl is taking our kids. Retail theft…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Fully enforce Proposition 36
Government-published candidate material
We need a new Attorney General. According to FBI data, California ranks 6th highest in the nation for violent crime. Every Californian deserves to feel safe—in their neighborhoods, at school, walking to the store. Too many families don’t feel that way today. Fentanyl is taking our kids. Retail theft is closing the stores we count on. Nearly half of all homeless Americans live in California. And crime always hits working families hardest. I am a husband of 30 years and father of five. I have spent my career trying cases in courtrooms, not politics, as a trial attorney and prosecutor. I enforced Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Justice and am admitted to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court. As a City Attorney, I built a local prosecution program that cut crime by double digits in its first year and made Huntington Beach one of California’s safest cities. I brought residents, leaders, and law enforcement together, and I will do the same as your Attorney General. Californians voted for Prop. 36 overwhelmingly to restore accountability for repeat theft and drug offenses. I will fully enforce it and will prosecute the traffickers poisoning our communities, protect victims, help people off the streets and into treatment, and make sure your tax dollars are spent honestly and effectively. Safe streets and equal justice belong to every community, whatever your zip code or last name. Public safety is not a partisan issue, and I will never treat it like one. www.Gates4AG.com
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026
California families deserve to be safe again. Crime is rising, homelessness is out of control, fraud with taxpayer dollars is rampant, and our children—especially young girls—are not being protected. The Office of Attorney General should be focused on enforcing the law and keeping families safe, not…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Support voter identification — primary statement
Government-published candidate material
California families deserve to be safe again. Crime is rising, homelessness is out of control, fraud with taxpayer dollars is rampant, and our children—especially young girls—are not being protected. The Office of Attorney General should be focused on enforcing the law and keeping families safe, not playing politics. I'm a husband and father of five, and like every parent, I want our children to grow up in safe communities. That's why public safety has always been my top priority. As the City Attorney for Huntington Beach, I fought for the people. I created a city criminal prosecutor program that prosecuted quality-of-life crimes and reduced crime by double digits. We proved that when the law is enforced, communities thrive. As Attorney General, I will make crime illegal again by prosecuting all crimes, including enforcing Proposition 36, and use the law to address homelessness by holding criminals accountable while getting people off our streets and into treatment. I will stand up for police, support law enforcement and defend them when they are unfairly attacked. I will also bring proven programs that lowered crime and homelessness in Huntington Beach to cities across California. I will aggressively prosecute fraud and corruption in Sacramento, protect parents' rights, enforce laws that keep boys out of girls' sports and support Voter ID. This is a serious office. I will fight for everyday Californians and bring accountability and safety back to California. Learn more at www.Gates4AG.com.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026
Defend the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Californians
Oppose unconstitutional attacks on the right to keep and bear arms
Streamline processes for CCWs
Focus enforcement on violent criminals, gangs and repeat offenders – not responsible gun owners
Support law enforcement efforts to get illeg…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Defend gun rights and streamline carry permits
Candidate campaign source
Defend the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Californians
Oppose unconstitutional attacks on the right to keep and bear arms
Streamline processes for CCWs
Focus enforcement on violent criminals, gangs and repeat offenders – not responsible gun owners
Support law enforcement efforts to get illegal guns out of the hands of criminals
Fight back against Sacramento politicians who use public safety as an excuse to weaken constitutional rights
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026
The fight is far from over — but together we’ll keep standing up to stop unlawful power grabs by the federal government, defend our immigrant communities, protect reproductive freedom, hold greedy corporations accountable, keep our communities safe from gun violence and fentanyl trafficking, safegua…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Challenge federal abuses of power
Candidate campaign source
The fight is far from over — but together we’ll keep standing up to stop unlawful power grabs by the federal government, defend our immigrant communities, protect reproductive freedom, hold greedy corporations accountable, keep our communities safe from gun violence and fentanyl trafficking, safeguard our environment, and so much more.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026
Attorney General Bonta is defending California’s first-in-class gun safety laws like the assault weapons ban from attacks by the NRA and the gun lobbying. As states across the country saw increased gun violence during the pandemic, Attorney General Bonta’s Department of Justice is expanding proven p…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Defend gun laws and violence prevention
Candidate campaign source
Attorney General Bonta is defending California’s first-in-class gun safety laws like the assault weapons ban from attacks by the NRA and the gun lobbying. As states across the country saw increased gun violence during the pandemic, Attorney General Bonta’s Department of Justice is expanding proven programs that bring community leaders, law enforcement and youth together to interrupt gang violence before it causes gun deaths. He is expanding the use of gun violence restraining orders that take guns away from people with a history of domestic abuse and those who are prohibited from owning them.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026
Attorney General Bonta is taking on transnational criminal organizations that traffic in guns, drugs, and people. A longtime advocate for crime victims, he is working with law enforcement to expand programs that support victims of crime. He is increasing resources to clear the rape kit backlog at la…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Combat trafficking and support victims
Candidate campaign source
Attorney General Bonta is taking on transnational criminal organizations that traffic in guns, drugs, and people. A longtime advocate for crime victims, he is working with law enforcement to expand programs that support victims of crime. He is increasing resources to clear the rape kit backlog at law enforcement agencies across the state, and Attorney General Bonta has expanded human trafficking and sexual predator response units across the state.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026
By its size alone, California’s Department of Justice is the country’s largest civil rights practice. he will strongly enforce California’s civil rights code and fight for racial justice and equity. As hate crimes rise across California, he will take on the forces of hate and build bridges between l…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Enforce civil rights and address hate
Candidate campaign source
By its size alone, California’s Department of Justice is the country’s largest civil rights practice. he will strongly enforce California’s civil rights code and fight for racial justice and equity. As hate crimes rise across California, he will take on the forces of hate and build bridges between law enforcement and targeted communities.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026
Democratic · Board of Equalization Member District 1 · CA
Policing & criminal justice context
Nelson Esparza is a dedicated public servant and proven champion for California’s working families and small business owners. Raised in California’s Central Valley, Nelson’s life and career have been shaped by a deep commitment to opportunity, fairness, and economic prosperity for all. Nelson is run…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Close loopholes and enforce tax collection
Government-published candidate material
Nelson Esparza is a dedicated public servant and proven champion for California’s working families and small business owners. Raised in California’s Central Valley, Nelson’s life and career have been shaped by a deep commitment to opportunity, fairness, and economic prosperity for all. Nelson is running for the State Board of Equalization to ensure a fair tax system for all Californians. Nelson will fight to close tax loopholes and crack down on tax evaders so that our local governments can continue to invest in public safety, infrastructure, education, healthcare, and economic development. As a long-time educator and economist, Nelson will bring real-world financial expertise to California’s state tax board. On the Fresno City Council, he serves as Chair of the Finance & Audit Committee, where he deals with complex financial issues every day. Additionally, he has secured hundreds of millions in investment for our communities. Nelson will oppose new taxes on middle class and working class families as well as small businesses that are already struggling to make ends meet. He’ll fight for more transparency in our tax system, and for fair impartial property tax assessments. Nelson is supported by local law enforcement, teachers, nurses, construction workers, and leaders at the local, state, and federal levels across California—because they know that he has the experience and the drive to protect our tax dollars and our public services. By November 3rd, Vote Nelson Esparza for State Board of Equalization. Learn more at nelsonesparza.com.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Republican · Board of Equalization Member District 1 · CA
Policing & criminal justice context
Senator Grove is a strong supporter of law enforcement and for protecting California children. In 2023, she authored SB 14, the landmark legislation to establish a felony for sex trafficking children in California which was successfully signed into law. She is a strong defender of small businesses w…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Support law enforcement
Candidate campaign source
Senator Grove is a strong supporter of law enforcement and for protecting California children. In 2023, she authored SB 14, the landmark legislation to establish a felony for sex trafficking children in California which was successfully signed into law. She is a strong defender of small businesses who deserve fair, not punitive, regulation, and supporting critically important agriculture and energy production in the state of California. She resides in Bakersfield with her husband, Rick. They are parents of five children and eleven grandchildren.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
Democratic · Board of Equalization Member District 3 · CA
Policing & criminal justice context
Assemblymember Mike Gipson is a proven leader with decades of experience fighting for working families. He is running for the Board of Equalization to fight for fairness, transparency, and accountability. Mike will fight to close tax loopholes that billionaires and corporations exploit to avoid payi…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Fund healthcare, schools and social services
Government-published candidate material
Assemblymember Mike Gipson is a proven leader with decades of experience fighting for working families. He is running for the Board of Equalization to fight for fairness, transparency, and accountability. Mike will fight to close tax loopholes that billionaires and corporations exploit to avoid paying their fair share. Born and raised in Los Angeles, Mike has dedicated his life's work to public service. He has worked for service employee and public educator unions, as a local city councilmember, a former local police officer, and currently is a member of the California State Assembly. He is the longest-serving Assembly Democratic Caucus Chair in state history. As Assemblyman, Mike has championed groundbreaking laws protecting California children and families from ICE, laws to get 3-D printed “ghost guns” off of the streets and out of the hands of criminals, funding for expanded access to healthcare, education, and childcare, and Investments in mental health services. That's why Governor Gavin Newsom said, “Mike has been a bold leader for the people of our state.” Previously serving as Chief of Staff to the former Board of Equalization Chairman, Mike currently serves as Chair of the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee, which oversees the Board of Equalization. On the BOE, Gipson will bring in the funds needed to support quality healthcare, strong schools, and vital social services that sustain families and communities across our state. By June 2nd, vote Mike Gipson for Board of Equalization! Endorsed by nurses, construction workers, and classroom teachers. Visit mikegipson.net
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 14, 2026
This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published California candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
California incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current California legislators and California’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from California’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
205 matching sponsorships or proposals · 76 California incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Asm. Al Muratsuchi
California State Assembly · District 66 · D–CA
4 proposalsView proposals from Asm. Al MuratsuchiCalifornia Legislature · AB 2138
Domestic violence: probation: sobriety-monitoring pilot program.
Apr 18, 2022 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Asm. Al Muratsuchi · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Existing law requires the court to impose specified conditions of probation for defendants convicted of domestic violence, including referral to a batterer’s program in which participation in substance abuse counseling is a standard component for defendants who are chronic users or serious abusers of drugs and alcohol. If probation is granted in domestic violence cases, existing law authorizes the probation department or the court to make provisions for a defendant to receive alcohol and drug services using the defendant’s own resources.This bill would require the court to order a person who is convicted of, and placed on probation for, a domestic violence offense to participate in a…
The 2021–2022 regular session ended on November 30, 2022. The retained bill text is dated April 18, 2022 and records: Assembly - Died - Public Safety. Its final disposition and action date still require the official bill history; this measure is not shown as currently pending.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses a violent offense, violence prevention, or safety and support for victims of violence. It does not establish an effect on California's reported violent-crime rate.
Retained California evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
If probation is granted in domestic violence cases, existing law authorizes the probation department or the court to make provisions for a defendant to receive alcohol and drug services using the defendant’s own resources.
Feb 17, 2022 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Asm. Al Muratsuchi · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Under existing law, theft of any property of a value exceeding $950 is grand theft and is punishable as either a misdemeanor or a felony. Under existing law, theft of any firearm, regardless of value, is grand theft and is punishable as a felony.Under existing law, knowingly buying or receiving stolen property, as specified, is punishable as either a misdemeanor or a felony if the value of the property exceeds $950.Existing law, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, enacted by Proposition 47, as approved by the voters at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election, requires the receipt of stolen property that does not exceed $950 to be punished as a misdemeanor, except in cases when…
The 2021–2022 regular session ended on November 30, 2022. The retained bill text is dated February 17, 2022 and records: Assembly - Died - Public Safety. Its final disposition and action date still require the official bill history; this measure is not shown as currently pending.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
This bill would, upon approval by the voters, make knowingly buying or receiving a stolen firearm, as specified, regardless of the value of the firearm, punishable as either a misdemeanor or a felony.
Under existing law, a firearms dealer or licensee means a person who has a valid federal firearms license, has a regulatory or business license, has a valid seller’s permit issued by the State Board of Equalization, has a certificate of eligibility issued by the Department of Justice, has a license granted by a duly constituted licensing authority of any city, county, or city and county, and is among those recorded in the centralized list of licensed firearms dealers kept by the department. Existing law regulates licensed firearms dealers and provides that a license is subject to forfeiture for a breach of specified prohibitions in existing law. Existing law establishes the Dealers’ Record…
The official California Legislative Information record shows this action on September 29, 2020: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 284, Statutes of 2020..
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Under existing law, a firearms dealer or licensee means a person who has a valid federal firearms license, has a regulatory or business license, has a valid seller’s permit issued by the State Board of Equalization, has a certificate of eligibility issued by the Department of Justice, has a license granted by a duly constituted licensing authority of any city, county, or city and county, and is among those recorded in the centralized list of licensed firearms dealers kept by the department.
Under existing law, a firearms dealer or licensee means a person who has a valid federal firearms license, has a regulatory or business license, has a valid seller’s permit issued by the State Board of Equalization, has a certificate of eligibility issued by the Department of Justice, has a license granted by a duly constituted licensing authority of any city, county, or city and county, and is among those recorded in the centralized list of licensed firearms dealers kept by the Department of Justice. Existing law regulates licensed firearms dealers and provides that a license is subject to forfeiture for a breach of specified prohibitions in existing law.This bill would authorize the…
The official California Legislative Information history records this action on January 31, 2020: Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution..
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Under existing law, a firearms dealer or licensee means a person who has a valid federal firearms license, has a regulatory or business license, has a valid seller’s permit issued by the State Board of Equalization, has a certificate of eligibility issued by the Department of Justice, has a license granted by a duly constituted licensing authority of any city, county, or city and county, and is among those recorded in the centralized list of licensed firearms dealers kept by the Department of Justice.
1 proposalView proposals from Asm. Alex LeeCalifornia Legislature · AB 1509
Enhancements: firearms.
Apr 21, 2021 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Asm. Alex Lee · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Existing law imposes various sentence enhancements, consisting of additional and consecutive terms of imprisonment, including, among others, enhancements for being armed with a firearm during the commission of a felony, being armed with a firearm during the commission of a street gang crime, as defined, being armed with ammunition designed to penetrate armor during the commission of a felony, furnishing a firearm to another for the purpose of aiding, abetting, or enabling that person to commit a felony, and using a firearm during the commission of a felony, and the infliction of great bodily injury on any other person during the commission of a felony. This bill would repeal those…
The 2021–2022 regular session ended on November 30, 2022. The retained bill text is dated April 21, 2021 and records: Assembly - Died - Appropriations. Its final disposition and action date still require the official bill history; this measure is not shown as currently pending.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
1 proposalView proposals from Asm. Alexandra M. MacedoCalifornia Legislature · AB 1396
Crimes: sexual assault.
Apr 28, 2025 · Amended Assembly
Asm. Alexandra M. Macedo · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Existing law provides that, except as specified, a person who assaults another with the intent to commit, among other things, mayhem, rape, sodomy, or oral copulation, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for 2, 4, or 6 years. Existing law provides that a person who commits those offenses against a person under 18 years of age shall be punished by imprisonment for 5, 7, or 9 years.
The latest official California Legislative Information version records this action on April 28, 2025: Amended Assembly.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses a violent offense, violence prevention, or safety and support for victims of violence. It does not establish an effect on California's reported violent-crime rate.
Retained California evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Existing law establishes the Domestic Violence Prevention Act for the purpose of preventing acts of domestic violence, abuse, and sexual abuse and providing for a separation of the persons involved in the domestic violence for a period sufficient to enable those persons to seek a resolution of the causes of the violence. Existing law authorizes a court to issue an ex parte protective order enjoining a party from, among other things, disturbing the peace of the other party.
The latest official California Legislative Information version records this action on June 11, 2026: Amended Senate.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses a violent offense, violence prevention, or safety and support for victims of violence. It does not establish an effect on California's reported violent-crime rate.
Retained California evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
1 proposalView proposals from Asm. Avelino ValenciaCalifornia Legislature · AB 1483
Firearms: purchases.
Sep 26, 2023 · Enacted
Asm. Avelino Valencia · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Existing law, subject to exceptions, prohibits a person from making more than one application to purchase a handgun within any 30-day period. Under existing law, a violation of this prohibition is a crime. Existing law exempts from that prohibition a firearms transaction where neither of the parties is a firearms dealer if the transaction is completed through a dealer.
The official California Legislative Information record shows this action on September 26, 2023: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 246, Statutes of 2023..
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on California's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained California evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The bill would add an exemption for any private party transaction where the seller is, at the time of the transaction, required under state law or by court order to relinquish all firearms, and for any private party transaction where the seller is transferring the firearms as a result of the death of the owner of the firearms, as specified.
1 proposalView proposals from Asm. Blanca PachecoCalifornia Legislature · AB 2024
Domestic violence: restraining orders.
Sep 27, 2024 · Enacted
Asm. Blanca Pacheco · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Existing law authorizes a court to issue a restraining order to a person to prevent abuse, as specified, based on reasonable proof of a past act or acts of abuse. Existing law authorizes the order to be issued solely on the affidavit or testimony of the person requesting the restraining order. Existing law prohibits an ex parte restraining order from being denied solely because the other party was not provided notice.Existing law authorizes a court to issue ex parte protective orders enjoining a party from engaging in specified acts, including threatening or harassing the other party or disturbing the peace of the other party; excluding a party from the family dwelling, the dwelling of the…
The official California Legislative Information record shows this action on September 27, 2024: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 648, Statutes of 2024..
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses a violent offense, violence prevention, or safety and support for victims of violence. It does not establish an effect on California's reported violent-crime rate.
Retained California evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Only current California officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a California statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
California snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to California, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.