Arkansas · individual fact

Arkansas income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Arkansas’s tax structure.

Median household income$60.77K2020–2024 · #47 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$34.23K2020–2024 · #48 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$55.22K2024 · #37 of 50 · highest first

Arkansas over time

Explore Arkansas readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Arkansas officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Arkansas effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Arkansas change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person Arkansas · source units
ArkansasPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $55,219$42.24K$51.72K$61.2KArkansas, 2014: $44,078Arkansas, 2015: $45,415Arkansas, 2016: $45,881Arkansas, 2017: $46,861Arkansas, 2018: $48,487Arkansas, 2019: $48,246Arkansas, 2020: $51,212Arkansas, 2021: $55,184Arkansas, 2022: $53,291Arkansas, 2023: $54,094Arkansas, 2024: $55,219201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 36National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingArkansas · Arkansas approves income-tax legislation · 2026-05-06Arkansas income taxesNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings funding● Arkansas Legislature · 42● U.S. Congress · Arkansas delegation · 6◆ Governor · 62■ Arkansas agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-09-012026-07-31

16 of 16 reviewed Arkansas actions match · 14 date markers shown. 36 major events shown separately.

Arkansas · 2024: $55,219 · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Arkansas Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodArkansasRankU.S. benchmark
2024$55,219#37 of 50$59,195
2023$54,094#38 of 50$58,088
2022$53,291#37 of 50$57,104
2021$55,184#41 of 50$59,365
2020$51,212#43 of 50$56,514
2019$48,246#41 of 50$53,683
2018$48,487#37 of 50$52,242
2017$46,861#40 of 50$51,006
2016$45,881#39 of 50$49,828
2015$45,415#38 of 50$49,396
2014$44,078#35 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Arkansas · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

Arkansas · 2020–2024$60,773
Arkansas rank#47among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · $60,7732020–2024 · Rank #47 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $60,306 – $61,240Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas · your comparison$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$60,7732020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by Arkansas households, expressed in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • Income is not take-home pay and does not directly measure taxes, wealth, prices, or purchasing power.
  • A statewide median obscures regional and household differences.
Arkansas · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

Arkansas · 2024$55,219
Arkansas rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Arkansas
Real personal income per person history in Arkansas$41.78K$51.72K$61.66K20142024
2024 · Arkansas: $55,219 · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Arkansas Real personal income per person history
PeriodArkansasCompare
2014$44,078
2015$45,415
2016$45,881
2017$46,861
2018$48,487
2019$48,246
2020$51,212
2021$55,184
2022$53,291
2023$54,094
2024$55,219

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · $55,2192024 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas · your comparison$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arkansas · state comparison

How Arkansas raises taxes

Arkansas's top marginal individual-income-tax rate is 3.9% for tax year 2025; lower-income schedules and credits can change actual liability. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

Arkansas · FY2024$2.76B
Arkansas rank#31among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · $2.76BFY2024 · Rank #31 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky$5.02B—
#24Louisiana$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma$4.51B—
#27Kansas$4.5B—
#28Iowa$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas · your comparison$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska$2.48B—
#34Maine$2.4B—
#35Mississippi$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding Arkansas income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The Arkansas ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Arkansas candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

42 statements from 10 candidates

2026 Arkansas Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Colt Shelby

1 statement

Libertarian · Governor · AR

Taxes & tax policy

Colt has managed hundreds of millions in contracts with zero waste. He will bring that same discipline to the state budget — your tax dollars deserve accountability.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Colt has managed hundreds of millions in contracts with zero waste. He will bring that same discipline to the state budget — your tax dollars deserve accountability.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Colt Shelby — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Republican · Governor · AR

Taxes & tax policy

Cut State Income Taxes and Eliminate the Grocery Tax

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: 2026 Re-Election Record and Priorities

Candidate campaign source

Cut State Income Taxes and Eliminate the Grocery Tax

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Sarah Huckabee Sanders — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗
View 1 more statement from Sarah Huckabee Sanders
Taxes & tax policy

Governor Sarah Sanders: “I eliminated the grocery tax, cut the income tax by 25% and will keep fighting to get it to zero.”

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Governor Sarah Sanders: “I eliminated the grocery tax, cut the income tax by 25% and will keep fighting to get it to zero.”

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Sarah Huckabee Sanders — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗

2026 Arkansas Lieutenant Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 9 statements

Michael Kalagias

9 statements

Libertarian · Lieutenant Governor · AR

Taxes & tax policy

Reduce state-government size and spending to make additional tax relief sustainable.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Government Size

Candidate campaign source

Reduce state-government size and spending to make additional tax relief sustainable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Michael Kalagias — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 8 more statements from Michael Kalagias
Taxes & tax policy

The national standard deduction for income taxes is $15,750. In Arkansas the standard deduction is only $2,470. I propose that we increase the state standard deduction for each filer and dependent to the same $15,750 used for federal tax filers. This would be a substantial savings for working class …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

The national standard deduction for income taxes is $15,750. In Arkansas the standard deduction is only $2,470. I propose that we increase the state standard deduction for each filer and dependent to the same $15,750 used for federal tax filers. This would be a substantial savings for working class families in Arkansas, and would require a very minimal change to the tax code.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Michael Kalagias — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Spending Because we are so overtaxed and running up surpluses every year, we can implement some tax cuts without needing spending cuts. But that isn’t a sustainable policy and it is vitally important that we shrink government and cut spending to support even greater tax cuts. I would start with the …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: On The Issues

Candidate campaign source

Spending Because we are so overtaxed and running up surpluses every year, we can implement some tax cuts without needing spending cuts. But that isn’t a sustainable policy and it is vitally important that we shrink government and cut spending to support even greater tax cuts. I would start with the mega-prison boondoggle. That’s a $billion pork project that should never have seen the light of day, and ending it will save the taxpayers a considerable amount of money.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Michael Kalagias — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Eliminate local sales taxes on food, diapers, and feminine-hygiene products.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Essential Goods

Candidate campaign source

Eliminate local sales taxes on food, diapers, and feminine-hygiene products.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Michael Kalagias — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Because we are so overtaxed and running up surpluses every year, we can implement some tax cuts without needing spending cuts. But that isn’t a sustainable policy and it is vitally important that we shrink government and cut spending to support even greater tax cuts. I would start with the mega-pris…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Because we are so overtaxed and running up surpluses every year, we can implement some tax cuts without needing spending cuts. But that isn’t a sustainable policy and it is vitally important that we shrink government and cut spending to support even greater tax cuts. I would start with the mega-prison boondoggle. That’s a $billion pork project that should never have seen the light of day, and ending it will save the taxpayers a considerable amount of money.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Michael Kalagias — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Tax Relief I support giving real significant tax relief to Arkansans, not the token $10 per year the GOP has been touting. Arkansas has the second highest state and local sales tax rate in the US. Worse than New York or California. That’s inexcusable. I propose that we lower the state sales tax rate…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: On The Issues

Candidate campaign source

Tax Relief I support giving real significant tax relief to Arkansans, not the token $10 per year the GOP has been touting. Arkansas has the second highest state and local sales tax rate in the US. Worse than New York or California. That’s inexcusable. I propose that we lower the state sales tax rate from 6.5% to a more reasonable 5%. That’s small but real and noticeable savings on utility bills, clothing, school supplies, etc…, nearly everything we purchase. Furthermore I would also propose we remove the local sales tax on food, diapers, and feminine hygiene products; a savings for Arkansas families that would be considerably greater than the minuscule 1/8th of a percent cut on food passed last year. The national standard deduction for income taxes is $15,750. In Arkansas the standard deduction is only $2,470. I propose that we increase the state standard deduction for each filer and dependent to the same $15,750 used for federal tax filers. This would be a substantial savings for working class families in Arkansas, and would require a very minimal change to the tax code.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Michael Kalagias — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Arkansas has the second highest state and local sales tax rate in the US. Worse than New York or California. That’s inexcusable. I propose that we lower the state sales tax rate from 6.5% to a more reasonable 5%. That’s small but real and noticeable savings on utility bills, clothing, school supplie…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Arkansas has the second highest state and local sales tax rate in the US. Worse than New York or California. That’s inexcusable. I propose that we lower the state sales tax rate from 6.5% to a more reasonable 5%. That’s small but real and noticeable savings on utility bills, clothing, school supplies, etc…, nearly everything we purchase. Furthermore I would also propose we remove the local sales tax on food, diapers, and feminine hygiene products; a savings for Arkansas families that would be considerably greater than the minuscule 1/8th of a percent cut on food passed last year.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Michael Kalagias — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Reduce Arkansas's state sales-tax rate from 6.5 percent to 5 percent.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sales Tax

Candidate campaign source

Reduce Arkansas's state sales-tax rate from 6.5 percent to 5 percent.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Michael Kalagias — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

I support giving real significant tax relief to Arkansans, not the token $10 per year the GOP has been touting.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

I support giving real significant tax relief to Arkansans, not the token $10 per year the GOP has been touting.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Michael Kalagias — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Arkansas U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · AR

Income & wages

Increase the federal minimum wage so paid work provides greater economic security.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Minimum Wage

Candidate campaign source

Increase the federal minimum wage so paid work provides greater economic security.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Terri Yarbrough Green — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Arkansas candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Arkansas incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Arkansas legislators and Arkansas’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Arkansas’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

13 matching sponsorships or proposals · 11 Arkansas incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Aaron Pilkington

Arkansas House of Representatives, District 45 · R–AR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Aaron Pilkington
Arkansas Legislature · SB 241

AN ACT TO AMEND THE UNIFORM ATTENDANCE AND LEAVE POLICY ACT; TO GRANT PAID LEAVE TO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES IN THE EVENT OF THE DEATH OF A PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S FAMILY MEMBER OR CHILD; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

Apr 18, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Jamie Scott · Sponsored / Rep. Aaron Pilkington · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 241 permits a catastrophic-leave administrator to grant up to 40 hours of paid leave per calendar year within four weeks after an immediate family member’s death. The definition includes grandparents, grandchildren, in-laws, a person acting as parent or guardian, and specified biological, unborn, step, adopted or foster children. Leave is conditional on the administrator granting it and the applicable eligibility and documentation rules. Recipients need not exhaust sick or annual leave first, do not accrue leave while using it, and must run it concurrently with FMLA leave if applicable. Unused hours do not carry over or become compensable at termination or retirement.

Signed by Sarah Huckabee Sanders on 2025-04-18; Act 885 of 2025. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2)(A) As used in this section, "immediate family member" means the father, mother, sister, brother, husband, wife, child, grandmother, grandfather, grandchild, in-laws, or any individual acting as parent or guardian of the employee. (B) As used in subdivision (c)(2)(A) of this section, "child" means: (i) A biological child; (ii) An unborn child; (iii) A stepchild; (iv) An adoptive child; or (v) A child in foster care who has been placed in the home of the employee. […] (C)(i) An employee on catastrophic leave for maternity purposes or for the death of an immediate family member is not required to exhaust sick or annual leave before being granted catastrophic leave. (ii) An employee on catastrophic leave for maternity purposes or for the death of an immediate family member does not accrue any leave; (4) An acceptable medical certificate from […] the treating physician or acceptable documentation of the death of an immediate family member supporting the continued absence is on file; and (5) The employee has not been disciplined for any leave abuse during the past year from the time of application. […] (f)(1)(A) If the administrator of a catastrophic leave program elects to grant catastrophic leave to an employee under subsection (c)(1)(B) of this section, the employee shall be eligible for up to forty (40) hours of catastrophic leave with pay each calendar year for the death of an immediate family member. (B) An employee shall be eligible for leave under subdivision (f)(1) of this section only within the first four (4) weeks after the death of an immediate family member. (C) After the expiration of the forty (40) hours of leave under subdivision (f)(1) of this section, an employee may use his or her accrued sick leave for the death of an immediate family member. (2) Catastrophic leave for the death of an immediate family member under subdivision (f)(1) of this section shall run concurrently with leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, Pub. L. No. 103-3, if applicable. (3)(A) Unused catastrophic leave granted under this subsection shall not be carried over to the next calendar year. (B) Upon termination or retirement, catastrophic leave granted under this subsection is not compensable to the employee.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Andrew Collins

Arkansas House of Representatives, District 73 · D–AR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Andrew Collins
Arkansas Legislature · HB 1017

AN ACT TO AMEND THE LAW REGARDING PAID MATERNITY LEAVE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES; TO REQUIRE THE DIVISION OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION TO PAY FOR ALL INCURRED COSTS FOR APPROVED PAID MATERNITY LEAVE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

Apr 21, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Andrew Collins · Sponsored / Sen. Breanne Davis · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1017 changes the state share of incurred costs for approved public-school maternity leave from 50% to 100% and removes the school participation election from employee eligibility. Eligibility remains limited to female full-time employees meeting the act’s service requirements who have not been disciplined for leave abuse during the preceding year. Up to twelve weeks may be used within the first twelve weeks after birth or placement of an adopted or foster child under age one. A second twelve-week period is not available for adoption after leave for the same child’s foster placement. This concerns covered school employees, not statewide household income.

Signed by Sarah Huckabee Sanders on 2025-04-21; Act 904 of 2025. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. Arkansas Code § 6-17-122 is amended to read as follows: 6-17-122. Paid maternity leave — Definitions. (a)(1) […] An employee of a public school district or an open-enrollment public charter school […] shall be eligible for up to twelve (12) weeks of paid maternity leave when the employee: (A) Has been employed by a public school district or an open-33 enrollment public charter school for one (1) year or more; (B) Is female, and the leave is to be used for maternity purposes following the: As Engrossed: H1/16/25 H1/23/25 H3/31/25 HB1017 2 03-31-2025 12:22:16 TNL026 (i) Birth of the employee's biological child; (ii) Placement of an adopted child under one (1) year of age in the home of the employee; or (iii) Foster placement of an infant under one (1) year of age; and (C) Has not been disciplined for any leave abuse during the past year from the time of application. (2) An employee shall not be eligible for an additional twelve (12) weeks of paid maternity leave under this section following the adoption of a child if the employee took twelve (12) weeks of paid maternity leave under this section after the initial foster placement of the same child in the employee's home. (b) As used in this section: […] (2)(1) […] "Employee" means an individual employed full-time by a public school district or an open-enrollment public charter school in Arkansas for more than one (1) year; and (3)(2) “Maternity leave” means partially or fully compensated time away from work within the first twelve (12) weeks following the: (A) Birth of a biological child to an […] employee; or (B) Placement of an […] adopted child under one (1) year of age in the home of an […] employee; or (C) Foster placement of an infant under one (1) year of age in the home of an employee. (c)(1) The Division of Elementary and Secondary Education shall create and sign a standard […] agreement for paid maternity leave expenses […] paid by the division […] to a public school district or an open-32 enrollment public charter school […] (2) […] The agreement required under subdivision (c)(1) of this section shall obligate the […] division to pay one hundred percent (100%) of incurred costs for approved paid maternity leave. (3) The division shall promulgate rules outlining: (A) Management of […] the agreement required under subdivision (c)(1) of this section; (B) Reimbursement processes; and (C) Other related procedures required to implement this section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Howard M. Beaty, Jr.

Arkansas House of Representatives, District 95 · R–AR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Howard M. Beaty, Jr.
Arkansas Legislature · HB 1894

AN ACT TO ESTABLISH A METHOD OF VALUATION FOR REAL PROPERTY USED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING; TO ESTABLISH A METHOD OF VALUATION FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY UNDER ARKANSAS CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 16, § 5; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

Apr 17, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Howard M. Beaty, Jr. · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1894 directs property-assessment rules for housing subject to rent limits or operating restrictions tied to specified federal affordable-housing programs, including low-income housing credits, HOME and rural rental housing. This concerns the property-cost framework for restricted rental housing. It does not create a rent cap, set an assessment value, prove a tax reduction, or show a change in median gross rent. Initial rules were due for filing by January 1, 2026, or as soon as practicable after required legislative approval if it had not occurred by that date; this review does not establish that rules were adopted.

Signed by Sarah Huckabee Sanders on 2025-04-17; Act 842 of 2025. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Arkansas’s median rent. The provision concerns valuation rules for properties with qualifying affordable-housing restrictions, a potential owner-cost component. It does not impose new tenant rent limits. This connection does not establish causation or a change in the earlier measured value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 2. Arkansas Code § 26-26-1202, concerning valuation procedures for property, is amended to add an additional subsection to read as follows: (j) The Assessment Coordination Division shall promulgate rules, including guidelines, for the fair and equitable assessment of real property that has federally imposed or state-imposed restrictions that use rent limitations, operations requirements, or any other restrictions on the real As Engrossed: H4/8/25 HB1894 2 04-08-2025 09:46:36 JLL321 property that are connected to: (1) The real property being eligible for an income tax credit under 26 U.S.C. § 42; (2) Real property constructed with the use of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development HOME Investment Partnerships Program; or (3) Real property constructed with the use of incentives provided by the United States Department of Agriculture under 42 U.S.C. § 1485. SECTION 3. DO NOT CODIFY. Rules. (a) When adopting the initial rules required under this act, the Assessment Coordination Division shall file the final rules with the Secretary of State for adoption under § 25-15-204(f): (1) On or before January 1, 2026; or (2) If approval under § 10-3-309 has not occurred by January 1, 2026, as soon as practicable after approval under § 10-3-309. (b) The division shall file the proposed rules with the Legislative Council under § 10-3-309(c) sufficiently in advance of January 1, 2026, so that the Legislative Council may consider the rules for approval before January 1, 2026.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. J. French Hill

U.S. House of Representatives, Arkansas District 2 · R–AR

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. J. French Hill
U.S. Congress · Arkansas delegation · HR 6644

21st Century ROAD to Housing Act

Jul 11, 2026 · Enacted · Public Law 119-101

Rep. J. French Hill · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Section 405 of enacted HR 6644 allows qualifying passed physical inspections within the preceding 12 months under specified tax-credit, HOME or Rural Housing Service programs to satisfy voucher-inspection requirements when the housing agency performed the inspection or can obtain its results, as applicable. A new landlord who has never entered a covered housing-assistance-payment contract for any unit may request early inspection; the resulting approval qualifies if a lease is signed within 60 days. HUD may allow thorough remote or video inspections in rural or small areas subject to accuracy and safety-standard conditions. These are administration changes, not guaranteed rent reductions.

Became Public Law No: 119-101. Implementation and current legal effect are distinct from enactment.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Arkansas’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SEC. 405. CHOICE IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACT.(a) Satisfaction of Inspection Requirements Through Participation in Other Housing Programs.—Section 8(o)(8) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(8)) is amended by adding at the end the following:“(I) Time period.Satisfaction of inspection requirements through participation in other housing programs.—“(i) Low-income housing tax credit-financed buildings.—A dwelling unit shall be deemed to meet the inspection requirements under this paragraph if—“(I) the dwelling unit is in a building, the acquisition, rehabilitation, or construction of which was done by a building owner who may be eligible for low-income housing credits because the building had been allocated a housing credit dollar amount under section 42(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or is described in section 42(h)(4) of such Code (concerning buildings that meet a criterion for a certain amount of tax-exempt financing); “(II) the dwelling unit, during the preceding 12-month period, was physically inspected and satisfied the suitability-for-occupancy requirement in section 42(i)(3)(B)(ii) of such Code; and “(III) the applicable public housing agency performed the inspection itself or is able to obtain the results of the inspection described in subclause (II). “(ii) Home investment partnerships program.—A dwelling shall be deemed to meet the inspection requirements under this paragraph if—“(I) the dwelling unit is assisted under the HOME Investment Partnerships Program under title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12721 et seq.); “(II) the dwelling unit was physically inspected and passed inspection as part of the program described in subclause (I) during the preceding 12-month period; and “(III) the applicable public housing agency is able to obtain the results of the inspection described in subclause (II). “(iii) Rural housing service.—A dwelling unit shall be deemed to meet the inspection requirements under this paragraph if—“(I) the dwelling unit is assisted by the Rural Housing Service of the Department of Agriculture; “(II) the dwelling unit was physically inspected and passed inspection in connection with the assistance described in subclause (I) during the preceding 12-month period; and140 STAT. 906 “(III) the applicable public housing agency is able to obtain the results of the inspection described in subclause (II). “(iv) Remote or video inspections.—When complying with inspection requirements for a housing unit located in a rural or small area using assistance under this section, the Secretary may allow a grantee to conduct a remote or video inspection of a unit if the remote or video inspection—“(I) is thorough; “(II) does not misrepresent the condition of the unit; and “(III) provides the information necessary to fully and accurately evaluate the conditions of the unit to ensure that the unit meets the relevant standards. “(v) Rule of construction.—Nothing in clause (i), (ii), (iii), or (iv) shall be construed to affect the operation of a housing program described in, or authorized under a provision of law described in, that clause.” . (b) Pre-approval of Units.—Section 8(o)(8)(A) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(8)(A)) is amended by adding at the end the following:“(iv) Initial inspection prior to lease agreement.—“(I) Definition.—In this clause, the term ‘new landlord’ means an owner of a dwelling unit who has not previously entered into a housing assistance payment contract with a public housing agency under this subsection for any dwelling unit. “(II) Determination.Early inspection.—Upon the request of a new landlord, a public housing agency may inspect the dwelling unit owned by the new landlord to determine whether the unit meets the housing quality standards under subparagraph (B) before the unit is selected by a tenant assisted under this subsection. “(III) Contracts.Deadline.Effect.—An inspection conducted under subclause (II) that determines that the dwelling unit meets the housing quality standards under subparagraph (B) shall satisfy this subparagraph and subparagraph (C) if the new landlord enters into a lease agreement with a tenant assisted under this subsection not later than 60 days after the date of the inspection. “(IV) Information when family is selected.—WhenList. a public housing agency selects a family to participate in the tenant-based assistance program under this subsection, the public housing agency shall include in the information provided to the family a list of dwelling units that have been inspected under subclause (II) and determined to meet the housing quality standards under subparagraph (B).” .140 STAT. 907
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Arkansas delegation · HR 7253

Ticket to Work Advertisement Act

Jan 27, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. J. French Hill · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HR 7253 would require the Social Security Commissioner to send Ticket to Work participation information to disabled beneficiaries within one year of enactment and every six months thereafter. Ticket to Work serves qualifying disability beneficiaries, including Title II beneficiaries within OASDI and a separate SSI population. This is program outreach, not a benefit increase or a rule covering all retirees.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact counts Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Benefit administration concerns a component of that population; SSI, Medicare, and state pensions are separate programs. The outreach concerns the Title II disability component of OASDI; the separately covered SSI population is outside this fact. It does not increase benefit amounts or cover every retiree. This connection does not establish causation or a change in the earlier measured value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Ticket to work program advertisementSection 1148(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–19(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following:(8)Program advertisementNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this paragraph, and for each 6-month period thereafter, the Commissioner of Social Security shall disseminate to each disabled beneficiary information relating to participation in the Program..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Mindy McAlindon

Arkansas House of Representatives, District 10 · R–AR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Mindy McAlindon
Arkansas Legislature · SB 596

AN ACT TO AMEND THE LAW REGARDING ENERGY; TO ESTABLISH A STATE ENERGY POLICY; TO REGULATE RETIREMENT OF DISPATCHABLE ELECTRIC GENERATION FACILITIES; TO DECLARE AN EMERGENCY; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

Apr 21, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Matt McKee · Sponsored / Rep. Mindy McAlindon · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 596 requires commission approval before a public utility retires a dispatchable generating facility of at least 100 MW located in Arkansas, including natural-gas facilities. It creates a rebuttable presumption against retirement, with replacement-capacity, reliability and cost findings, and exceptions for specified earlier litigation resolutions. It concerns the generation mix; approval requirements do not prove continued output or a change in natural gas’s measured share. The commission receives thirty days’ notice of an application and must issue an order within 180 days after receiving an administratively complete application. The act’s emergency clause made it effective upon approval on April 21, 2025; that does not establish approval of an individual retirement.

Signed by Sarah Huckabee Sanders on 2025-04-21; Act 940 of 2025. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Natural-gas share is the portion of electricity generated at Arkansas facilities supplied by natural gas. Natural-gas output is the numerator and total in-state generation is the denominator. Policies concerning natural-gas or competing generation technologies can concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

23-18-1302. Definitions. As used in this subchapter: (1) “Dispatchable” means a source of electrical power generation or biomass energy that is: (A) Available on demand; (B) Not intermittent; and (C) Can either: (i) Be adjusted to increase or decrease its power output upon request of a power grid operator or otherwise upon demand or request of a power grid operator; or (ii) Have its power output adjusted in response to market or system needs; (2) "Dispatchable electric generation facility" means a facility that uses water, coal, natural gas, geothermal, biomass, or nuclear power, or a combination of equivalent fuels and technologies to generate dispatchable, reliable electricity to provide to end users; (3) "Electric generation asset" means a plant, facility, As Engrossed: S4/7/25 S4/14/25 SB596 5 04-14-2025 19:32:40 ANS459 equipment, or system that converts nonelectrical energy into electricity; (4) "Intermittent" means: (A) A source of electrical power generation from a solar photovoltaic, solar thermal heating, concentrating solar thermal collector, or other solar energy collection or generation system; (B) A source of electrical power that generates energy by harnessing wind power or energy, whether through a turbine or other device; (C) Anaerobic digestion or combined heat and power from solar, wind, or anaerobic digestion sources; (D) Any short-duration energy storage, which includes any method of storing generated electricity for later dispatch to the power grid, whether alone or in conjunction with any other intermittent sources described in this subdivision (4), that is equivalent to less than forty-eight (48) hours of the average peak generation of the unit the short-duration energy storage is used to offset; and (E) Conventional hydropower and pumped storage hydropower, unless they are capable of providing energy on demand, in which case they shall be deemed to be dispatchable; (5) “Public utility” means the same as defined in § 23-1-101; (6) "Reliability" means having adequate dispatchable electric generation capacity to safely deliver electrical energy in the quantity, with the quality, and at a time that public utility customers demand; (7) "Resilience" means having the ability to quickly and effectively respond to and recover from events that compromise power grid reliability; (8) "Retirement" means the closure or the complete and permanent cessation of operations of a dispatchable electric generation facility; and (9) "Secure" means to harden to a reasonable extent against an attack, including a cyberattack or a kinetic attack, or an extreme weather event. 23-18-1303. Retirement of dispatchable electric generation facilities. (a)(1) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the Arkansas Public Service Commission may approve or deny the retirement of a dispatchable electric generation facility owned by a public utility. (2) Before retiring a dispatchable electric generation facility, As Engrossed: S4/7/25 S4/14/25 SB596 6 04-14-2025 19:32:40 ANS459 a public utility shall: (A) Apply to the commission for an order approving the retirement; and (B) Give the commission thirty-days' notice of the application. (3) The application shall include a statement certifying the applicant's compliance with the requirements of this subchapter. (4) The commission shall enter an order within one hundred eighty (180) days of receiving an administratively complete application to approve the application for retirement to: (A) Approve the application for retirement; (B) Approve the application for retirement with conditions; or (C) Deny the application for retirement. (b)(1) There is a rebuttable presumption against the retirement of a dispatchable electric generation facility. (2) The commission shall not approve the retirement of a dispatchable electric generation facility, authorize a surcharge for the decommissioning of the dispatchable electric generation facility, or take any other action that authorizes or allows for the recovery of costs for the retirement of a dispatchable electric generation facility, including without limitation any stranded asset recovery, unless the presumption under subdivision (b)(1) of this section is rebutted by evidence sufficient for the commission to find that the retirement is in the public interest, including without limitation evidence that: (A) The public utility will replace the retired dispatchable electric generation facility with new electric generation assets that: (i) Are dispatchable by either the public utility or the regional transmission organization or independent system operator responsible for balancing load within the public utility's service area; (ii) Maintain or improve the reliability and resilience of the power grid; (iii) Maintain the minimum reserve capacity requirement established by the public utility's reliability coordinator; and (iv) Have the same or higher capacity value and net As Engrossed: S4/7/25 S4/14/25 SB596 7 04-14-2025 19:32:40 ANS459 capability, unless the public utility can demonstrate that the capacity value and net capability is not necessary to provide reliable service; (B) The retirement will not harm the public utility's ratepayers by causing the public utility to incur any net incremental costs to be recovered from ratepayers that could be avoided by continuing to operate the dispatchable electric generation facility proposed for retirement in compliance with applicable law; (C) The decision to retire the dispatchable electric generation facility is not the result of any financial incentives or benefits offered by a United States Government agency; and (D) The public utility will not commence retirement or decommissioning of the electric generating unit until the replacement generating capacity meeting the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(A) of this section is fully constructed, permitted, and in operation, unless the public utility can demonstrate that it is necessary under the circumstances to commence retirement or decommissioning of the existing electric generating unit earlier. (c) At a minimum, the public utility shall provide the commission with evidence of all known direct and indirect costs of retiring the dispatchable electric generation facility and demonstrate that cost savings will result to customers as a result of the retirement of the dispatchable electric generation facility. (d)(1) Under the commission's report under § 23-18-1104, the commission shall prepare and submit an annual supplemental report to the Joint Committee on Energy no later than December 1 of each year in which the commission issues an order on an application under this subchapter. (2) The annual supplemental report required under subdivision (d)(1) of this section shall include: (A) The number of applications by public utilities to retire dispatchable electric generation facilities, the nameplate capacity of each of the dispatchable electric generation facilities, and whether the application was approved, approved with conditions, or denied; (B) The impact of any commission-approved retirement or retirement with conditions of a dispatchable electric generation facility on the: (i) State's electric generation fuel mix; As Engrossed: S4/7/25 S4/14/25 SB596 8 04-14-2025 19:32:40 ANS459 (ii) Required capacity reserve margins for the public utility; (iii) Need for capacity additions or expansions at new or existing facilities as a result of the retirement; and (iv) Need for additional purchase power or capacity reserve arrangements; and (C) Whether or not the retirement or retirement with conditions resulted in stranded costs for the ratepayer that will be recovered by the public utility through a surcharge or some other separate charge on the ratepayer's bill. (e) This section is applicable to a dispatchable electric generation facility that is one hundred megawatts (100 MW) or larger located in Arkansas. (f) This subchapter does not apply to the retirement or repowering of a dispatchable electric generation facility under any settlement, consent decree, or other resolution of any litigation or legal proceeding executed or ordered before the effective date of this subchapter. SECTION 3. EMERGENCY CLAUSE. It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the continued unabated retirement of needed electric generating resources threatens to harm employment, tax revenue, and utility rates and is creating a crisis with respect to the state's ability to meet current and projected future energy demands; that this act will manage the retirement of needed electric generating resources for this state; and that this act is immediately necessary because continued electric generating resources are necessary for employment, tax revenue, and regular utility rates. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto. As Engrossed: S4/7/25 S4/14/25 SB596 9 04-14-2025 19:32:40 ANS459
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Steve Womack

U.S. House of Representatives, Arkansas District 3 · R–AR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Steve Womack
U.S. Congress · Arkansas delegation · HR 2312

Tipped Employee Protection Act

Jan 13, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Steve Womack · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed reported text of HR 2312 would redefine a tipped employee using combined tips and cash wages over an employer-selected work period, without regard to the employee’s duties. It replaces the existing occupation and monthly-tip threshold wording with the specified federal minimum-wage comparison. It concerns wage treatment; the captured reported version is distinct from later procedural actions.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on H.R. 2312 is postponed. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Tipped employeesSection 3(t) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203(t)) is amended—(1)by striking (t) and inserting (t)(1); (2)by striking engaged in an occupation in which he customarily and regularly receives more than $30 a month in tips. and inserting , without regard to the duties of the employee, who receives tips and other cash wages for a work period described in paragraph (2) at a rate that, when combined with the cash wage required under subsection (m)(2)(A)(i), is not less than the wage in effect under section 6(a)(1).; and(3)by adding at the end the following:(2)A work period described in this paragraph is a work period that is determined by the employer of the employee, such as a work period of 1 day, 1 week, every 2 weeks, every 28 days, or every pay period..
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Arkansas officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Arkansas statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.