Arkansas · individual fact

Arkansas housing and borrowing

Home values, gross rent, homeownership, housing cost burdens, and the pressure from prices and incomes.

Median owner-occupied home value$188K2020–2024 · #48 of 50 · highest first
Median gross rent$9472020–2024 · #48 of 50 · highest first
Homeownership rate66.4%2020–2024 · #36 of 50 · highest first

Arkansas over time

Explore Arkansas readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Arkansas officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Arkansas effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Arkansas change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Home-price growth since 2016 Arkansas · source units
ArkansasPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Home-price growth since 20162025: +80.8%-9.7%+40.4%+90.5%Arkansas, 2016: +0%Arkansas, 2017: +2.7%Arkansas, 2018: +6.4%Arkansas, 2019: +10.2%Arkansas, 2020: +14.8%Arkansas, 2021: +28.7%Arkansas, 2022: +50.4%Arkansas, 2023: +61.1%Arkansas, 2024: +70.1%Arkansas, 2025: +80.8%201620202025
✦ Major events & context · 26National context · Housing downturn and the Great Recession · 2007-12-01Great RecessionNational context · Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac conservatorships announced · 2008-09-07Mortgage conservatorshipNational context · Federal Reserve announces agency mortgage-bond purchases · 2008-11-25Mortgage-bond purchasesNational context · Making Home Affordable modification guidelines released · 2009-03-04Mortgage relief guidelinesNational context · Federal Reserve announces another round of mortgage-bond purchases · 2012-09-13Further mortgage supportNational context · Federal Reserve announces slower bond purchases · 2013-12-18Bond purchases slowNational context · Ability-to-Repay mortgage standards take effect · 2014-01-10Mortgage lending standardsNational context · Federal Reserve raises its target above the near-zero range · 2015-12-16Rates leave near zeroNational context · Pandemic shock and emergency mortgage-market support · 2020-03-15COVID-19 / Fed responseNational context · CARES Act introduces mortgage and renter protections · 2020-03-27CARES housing reliefNational context · CDC eviction moratorium takes effect · 2020-09-04CDC eviction protectionsNational context · Treasury launches Emergency Rental Assistance · 2021-01-05Rental assistance launchesNational context · American Rescue Plan funds additional housing assistance · 2021-03-11Additional housing reliefNational context · Supreme Court blocks the renewed CDC eviction moratorium · 2021-08-26CDC moratorium blockedNational context · Federal Reserve begins the 2022 rate-increase cycle · 2022-03-16Rate increases beginNational context · Federal Reserve begins reducing its securities holdings · 2022-06-01Fed holdings begin shrinkingNational context · Freddie Mac changes mortgage-rate measurement · 2022-11-17Mortgage survey updateNational context · Average 30-year mortgage rate reaches 7.79% · 2023-10-26Mortgage rates reach 7.79%National context · Federal Reserve lowers its policy-rate target · 2024-09-18Policy-rate cutNational context · Federal Reserve ends the reduction of total securities holdings · 2025-12-01Fed runoff endsNational context · Federal Reserve cuts its target to 3.50–3.75% · 2025-12-10Further policy-rate cutNational context · Executive order targets federal support for institutional home purchases · 2026-01-20Institutional-buyer orderNational context · Executive order directs review of home-construction barriers · 2026-03-13Home-construction reviewNational context · Executive order directs review of mortgage-credit rules · 2026-03-13Mortgage-credit reviewNational context · 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act becomes law · 2026-07-11ROAD housing lawNational context · Federal Reserve holds its target at 3.50–3.75% · 2026-07-29Policy rate held steady● Arkansas Legislature · 1● U.S. Congress · Arkansas delegation · 2◆ Governor · 1■ Arkansas agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2007-12-012026-07-31

4 of 4 reviewed Arkansas actions match · 4 date markers shown. 26 major events shown separately.

Arkansas · 2025: +80.8% · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016. This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Arkansas Home-price growth since 2016 · source units
PeriodArkansasRankU.S. benchmark
2025+80.8%#32 of 50Not available
2024+70.1%#33 of 50Not available
2023+61.1%#33 of 50Not available
2022+50.4%#34 of 50Not available
2021+28.7%#35 of 50Not available
2020+14.8%#36 of 50Not available
2019+10.2%#36 of 50Not available
2018+6.4%#35 of 50Not available
2017+2.7%#37 of 50Not available
2016+0%#1 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Arkansas · state comparison

Home values, rent, and homeownership

Census values are estimates for occupied housing, rather than current listing or sale prices.

Arkansas · 2020–2024$188,000
Arkansas rank#48among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$332,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median owner-occupied home value

Median reported value of owner-occupied housing.

2024 dollars; a higher value can benefit owners and make buying harder.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · $162.6KHigher value · $839.1KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · $188,0002020–2024 · Rank #48 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Median owner-occupied home value · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii$839,100—
#2California$734,700—
#3Washington$564,600—
#4Massachusetts$562,100—
#5Colorado$539,400—
#6Utah$489,400—
#7Oregon$477,600—
#8New Jersey$454,400—
#9Nevada$435,400—
#10New York$423,800—
#11Maryland$419,900—
#12Idaho$418,600—
#13Rhode Island$404,200—
#14New Hampshire$402,500—
#15Arizona$394,500—
#16Virginia$383,700—
#17Montana$375,800—
#18Connecticut$366,900—
#19Florida$359,000—
#20Alaska$352,900—
#21Delaware$352,000—
#22Minnesota$329,300—
#23Vermont$316,600—
#24Wyoming$309,700—
#25Georgia$303,300—
#26Maine$296,600—
#27North Carolina$288,900—
#28Tennessee$286,700—
#29Texas$283,800—
#30Wisconsin$266,500—
#31Illinois$263,300—
#32South Carolina$259,000—
#33South Dakota$257,400—
#34Pennsylvania$254,500—
#35North Dakota$249,900—
#36New Mexico$248,100—
#37Nebraska$238,600—
#38Michigan$231,600—
#39Missouri$230,300—
#40Indiana$218,200—
#41Kansas$217,200—
#42Louisiana$216,500—
#43Ohio$214,800—
#44Alabama$209,900—
#45Iowa$208,000—
#46Kentucky$205,600—
#47Oklahoma$199,800—
#48Arkansas · your comparison$188,000—
#49Mississippi$169,800—
#50West Virginia$162,600—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median gross rent

$947/month2020–2024 estimate

Median monthly gross rent for renter-occupied housing units paying cash rent, including contract rent plus estimated average utility and fuel costs paid by the renter.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate and expressed in 2024 dollars.

  • This is a multi-year statewide estimate, not a current asking-rent measure.
  • The median obscures differences by location, unit size, housing quality, and renter circumstances.
Arkansas · state comparison

How much income goes toward housing?

Compare moderate-or-severe and severe housing cost burdens for three distinct housing groups.

Arkansas · 2020–202444.8%
Arkansas rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark51.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Renters · spending at least 30% of income

Housing costs as a share of household income, excluding households for which a ratio cannot be computed.

Renters and owners have separate denominators. Ratios use the Census computed-income universe.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 38.9%Higher value · 60.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · 44.8%2020–2024 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Renters · spending at least 30% of income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Florida60.1%—
#2Hawaii56.7%—
#3Nevada55.9%—
#4California55.3%—
#5Louisiana54.8%—
#6Colorado52.9%—
#7Connecticut52.6%—
#8Oregon52.5%—
#9Georgia52.4%—
#10South Carolina52.1%—
#11New York52.1%—
#12Massachusetts51.8%—
#13Texas51.7%—
#14New Jersey51.6%—
#15Maryland51.5%—
#16Arizona51.4%—
#17Mississippi51.3%—
#18Michigan50.4%—
#19New Mexico50.2%—
#20Washington49.9%—
#21Delaware49.6%—
#22North Carolina48.9%—
#23West Virginia48.9%—
#24Tennessee48.8%—
#25Alabama48.8%—
#26Virginia48.5%—
#27Maine48.4%—
#28Vermont48.4%—
#29New Hampshire48.2%—
#30Pennsylvania48.2%—
#31Minnesota48.1%—
#32Indiana48.1%—
#33Rhode Island48%—
#34Illinois47.9%—
#35Utah47.2%—
#36Idaho46.9%—
#37Oklahoma46.3%—
#38Ohio45.9%—
#39Missouri45.6%—
#40Kentucky45.4%—
#41Nebraska45.1%—
#42Arkansas · your comparison44.8%—
#43Montana44.8%—
#44Alaska44.6%—
#45Iowa43.9%—
#46Wisconsin43.7%—
#47Kansas43.5%—
#48Wyoming43.1%—
#49South Dakota39.8%—
#50North Dakota38.9%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arkansas · state comparison

Home prices versus income growth

Both series start at 100 in 2016. The gap describes price pressure; it is not a mortgage payment or a price-to-income ratio.

Arkansas · 2025+80.8%
Arkansas rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Home-price growth since 2016

FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016.

This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Arkansas
Home-price growth since 2016 history in Arkansas-12.1%+40.4%+92.9%20162025
2025 · Arkansas: +80.8% · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Arkansas Home-price growth since 2016 history
PeriodArkansasCompare
2016+0%
2017+2.7%
2018+6.4%
2019+10.2%
2020+14.8%
2021+28.7%
2022+50.4%
2023+61.1%
2024+70.1%
2025+80.8%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · +38.2%Higher value · +141.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · +80.8%2025 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at the index base (0% growth); #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Home-price growth since 2016 · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Idaho+141.7%—
#2Florida+114.5%—
#3Maine+113.7%—
#4Utah+113.6%—
#5Tennessee+112.4%—
#6Arizona+112.3%—
#7New Hampshire+110.1%—
#8Rhode Island+108%—
#9Georgia+107.6%—
#10North Carolina+107.1%—
#11Montana+106.7%—
#12Nevada+106.1%—
#13South Carolina+105.5%—
#14Washington+100.2%—
#15Indiana+94.5%—
#16Wisconsin+94%—
#17Michigan+93.7%—
#18Ohio+93.3%—
#19Vermont+92.6%—
#20New Jersey+88.9%—
#21Missouri+86.9%—
#22New York+85.9%—
#23Nebraska+84.6%—
#24Massachusetts+84.3%—
#24South Dakota+84.3%—
#26Texas+83.3%—
#27Kentucky+83.2%—
#28Colorado+83.1%—
#29Kansas+82.5%—
#30New Mexico+82.3%—
#31Alabama+81.3%—
#32Arkansas · your comparison+80.8%—
#33Connecticut+79.8%—
#34Pennsylvania+78.4%—
#35Virginia+76.5%—
#36Delaware+75.4%—
#37Oregon+74.7%—
#38California+72.7%—
#39Oklahoma+71.9%—
#40Minnesota+70%—
#41Wyoming+69.3%—
#42Illinois+65.3%—
#43Iowa+64.2%—
#44Mississippi+63.9%—
#45Hawaii+63%—
#46Maryland+59.4%—
#47West Virginia+58.6%—
#48Alaska+51.9%—
#49North Dakota+45.9%—
#50Louisiana+38.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arkansas · state comparison

Construction, availability, and borrowing

State building activity, vacant units, mortgage performance, and borrowing rates are different measures.

Arkansas · 202515,492
Arkansas rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1,431,616Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total housing units authorized

New privately owned housing units authorized by building permits; final annual, not seasonally adjusted.

A permit is authorization, not a start or completed home. Absolute counts reflect the size of a state. Units in permit-issuing places; excludes public housing.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 848Higher value · 210,217Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · 15,4922025 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Total housing units authorized · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas210,217—
#2Florida178,297—
#3California103,856—
#4North Carolina86,167—
#5Georgia61,196—
#6Arizona51,532—
#7South Carolina45,862—
#8Tennessee43,374—
#9New York38,667—
#10Washington34,913—
#11Colorado33,754—
#12Ohio33,640—
#13Virginia33,094—
#14Indiana29,076—
#15New Jersey27,661—
#16Utah26,775—
#17Pennsylvania25,709—
#18Wisconsin25,569—
#19Michigan23,075—
#20Minnesota20,947—
#21Alabama19,061—
#22Illinois18,551—
#23Nevada18,540—
#24Idaho17,944—
#25Missouri17,474—
#26Oklahoma15,513—
#27Arkansas · your comparison15,492—
#28Kentucky14,940—
#29Oregon14,839—
#30Louisiana14,203—
#31Iowa13,664—
#32Maryland13,358—
#33Massachusetts12,477—
#34Nebraska10,596—
#35Kansas10,299—
#36Mississippi8,405—
#37New Mexico7,747—
#38Connecticut7,273—
#39Maine6,979—
#40Delaware6,468—
#41South Dakota5,305—
#42Montana5,258—
#43New Hampshire5,030—
#44West Virginia3,962—
#45Hawaii3,708—
#46North Dakota2,440—
#47Vermont2,294—
#48Wyoming2,238—
#49Rhode Island1,738—
#50Alaska848—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs from FactVote’s Arkansas candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

12 statements from 5 candidates

2026 Arkansas Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Fred Love

2 statements

Democratic · Governor · AR

Housing & homeownership

Opportunity shouldn’t depend on your zip code.Fred is committed to building an economy that works for every corner of Arkansas—from the Delta to the Ozarks—by investing in infrastructure, workforce, and small businesses, this will allow communties to thrive. He will create regional economic hubs, re…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, utilities, and natural resources

Candidate campaign source

Opportunity shouldn’t depend on your zip code.Fred is committed to building an economy that works for every corner of Arkansas—from the Delta to the Ozarks—by investing in infrastructure, workforce, and small businesses, this will allow communties to thrive. He will create regional economic hubs, rebuild critical infrastructure like roads, water, sewer, and broadband, and expand career pathways through apprenticeships, entrepreneurship, and workforce training. His plan also includes summer youth employment tied to real career credentials and a focused effort to expand affordable housing across the state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Fred Love — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Fred Love
Housing & homeownership

Fred is committed to building an economy that works for every corner of Arkansas—from the Delta to the Ozarks—by investing in infrastructure, workforce, and small businesses, this will allow communties to thrive. He will create regional economic hubs, rebuild critical infrastructure like roads, wate…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public Safety

Candidate campaign source

Fred is committed to building an economy that works for every corner of Arkansas—from the Delta to the Ozarks—by investing in infrastructure, workforce, and small businesses, this will allow communties to thrive. He will create regional economic hubs, rebuild critical infrastructure like roads, water, sewer, and broadband, and expand career pathways through apprenticeships, entrepreneurship, and workforce training. His plan also includes summer youth employment tied to real career credentials and a focused effort to expand affordable housing across the state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Fred Love — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Arkansas U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Chris Jones

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · AR

Housing & homeownership

Increase the availability of safe, affordable housing options for homeowners, renters, and first-time buyers while also bringing energy costs within the home down.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: WHAT I WILL DO:

Candidate campaign source

Increase the availability of safe, affordable housing options for homeowners, renters, and first-time buyers while also bringing energy costs within the home down.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Chris Jones campaign source 4 ↗

French Hill

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · AR

Housing & homeownership

French has been a strong advocate for economic growth and job creation. He introduced the 21st Century Housing Bill to increase housing affordability by modernizing outdated federal programs, removing regulatory roadblocks, and giving housing developers the flexibility needed to build more homes.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: French on the Issues

Candidate campaign source

French has been a strong advocate for economic growth and job creation. He introduced the 21st Century Housing Bill to increase housing affordability by modernizing outdated federal programs, removing regulatory roadblocks, and giving housing developers the flexibility needed to build more homes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

French Hill — campaign source ↗

2026 Arkansas U.S. House — District 4 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 4 · AR

Housing & homeownership

And by adding a small tax on the super-rich—the top 0.1%—we can help end homelessness for good.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

And by adding a small tax on the super-rich—the top 0.1%—we can help end homelessness for good.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

James "Rus" Russell III — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from James "Rus" Russell III
Housing & homeownership

We should also count rent payments when people apply for a mortgage, so more folks can buy a home.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

We should also count rent payments when people apply for a mortgage, so more folks can buy a home.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

James "Rus" Russell III — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Housing & homeownership

We need to stop big companies from buying up homes and raising rent too high.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

We need to stop big companies from buying up homes and raising rent too high.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

James "Rus" Russell III — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs terms in retained, attributed source text from published Arkansas candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Arkansas incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Arkansas legislators and Arkansas’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Arkansas’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Arkansas incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Howard M. Beaty, Jr.

Arkansas House of Representatives, District 95 · R–AR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Howard M. Beaty, Jr.
Arkansas Legislature · HB 1894

AN ACT TO ESTABLISH A METHOD OF VALUATION FOR REAL PROPERTY USED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING; TO ESTABLISH A METHOD OF VALUATION FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY UNDER ARKANSAS CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 16, § 5; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

Apr 17, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Howard M. Beaty, Jr. · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1894 directs property-assessment rules for housing subject to rent limits or operating restrictions tied to specified federal affordable-housing programs, including low-income housing credits, HOME and rural rental housing. This concerns the property-cost framework for restricted rental housing. It does not create a rent cap, set an assessment value, prove a tax reduction, or show a change in median gross rent. Initial rules were due for filing by January 1, 2026, or as soon as practicable after required legislative approval if it had not occurred by that date; this review does not establish that rules were adopted.

Signed by Sarah Huckabee Sanders on 2025-04-17; Act 842 of 2025. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Arkansas’s median rent. The provision concerns valuation rules for properties with qualifying affordable-housing restrictions, a potential owner-cost component. It does not impose new tenant rent limits. This connection does not establish causation or a change in the earlier measured value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 2. Arkansas Code § 26-26-1202, concerning valuation procedures for property, is amended to add an additional subsection to read as follows: (j) The Assessment Coordination Division shall promulgate rules, including guidelines, for the fair and equitable assessment of real property that has federally imposed or state-imposed restrictions that use rent limitations, operations requirements, or any other restrictions on the real As Engrossed: H4/8/25 HB1894 2 04-08-2025 09:46:36 JLL321 property that are connected to: (1) The real property being eligible for an income tax credit under 26 U.S.C. § 42; (2) Real property constructed with the use of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development HOME Investment Partnerships Program; or (3) Real property constructed with the use of incentives provided by the United States Department of Agriculture under 42 U.S.C. § 1485. SECTION 3. DO NOT CODIFY. Rules. (a) When adopting the initial rules required under this act, the Assessment Coordination Division shall file the final rules with the Secretary of State for adoption under § 25-15-204(f): (1) On or before January 1, 2026; or (2) If approval under § 10-3-309 has not occurred by January 1, 2026, as soon as practicable after approval under § 10-3-309. (b) The division shall file the proposed rules with the Legislative Council under § 10-3-309(c) sufficiently in advance of January 1, 2026, so that the Legislative Council may consider the rules for approval before January 1, 2026.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. J. French Hill

U.S. House of Representatives, Arkansas District 2 · R–AR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. J. French Hill
U.S. Congress · Arkansas delegation · HR 6644

21st Century ROAD to Housing Act

Jul 11, 2026 · Enacted · Public Law 119-101

Rep. J. French Hill · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Section 405 of enacted HR 6644 allows qualifying passed physical inspections within the preceding 12 months under specified tax-credit, HOME or Rural Housing Service programs to satisfy voucher-inspection requirements when the housing agency performed the inspection or can obtain its results, as applicable. A new landlord who has never entered a covered housing-assistance-payment contract for any unit may request early inspection; the resulting approval qualifies if a lease is signed within 60 days. HUD may allow thorough remote or video inspections in rural or small areas subject to accuracy and safety-standard conditions. These are administration changes, not guaranteed rent reductions.

Became Public Law No: 119-101. Implementation and current legal effect are distinct from enactment.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Arkansas’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SEC. 405. CHOICE IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACT.(a) Satisfaction of Inspection Requirements Through Participation in Other Housing Programs.—Section 8(o)(8) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(8)) is amended by adding at the end the following:“(I) Time period.Satisfaction of inspection requirements through participation in other housing programs.—“(i) Low-income housing tax credit-financed buildings.—A dwelling unit shall be deemed to meet the inspection requirements under this paragraph if—“(I) the dwelling unit is in a building, the acquisition, rehabilitation, or construction of which was done by a building owner who may be eligible for low-income housing credits because the building had been allocated a housing credit dollar amount under section 42(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or is described in section 42(h)(4) of such Code (concerning buildings that meet a criterion for a certain amount of tax-exempt financing); “(II) the dwelling unit, during the preceding 12-month period, was physically inspected and satisfied the suitability-for-occupancy requirement in section 42(i)(3)(B)(ii) of such Code; and “(III) the applicable public housing agency performed the inspection itself or is able to obtain the results of the inspection described in subclause (II). “(ii) Home investment partnerships program.—A dwelling shall be deemed to meet the inspection requirements under this paragraph if—“(I) the dwelling unit is assisted under the HOME Investment Partnerships Program under title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12721 et seq.); “(II) the dwelling unit was physically inspected and passed inspection as part of the program described in subclause (I) during the preceding 12-month period; and “(III) the applicable public housing agency is able to obtain the results of the inspection described in subclause (II). “(iii) Rural housing service.—A dwelling unit shall be deemed to meet the inspection requirements under this paragraph if—“(I) the dwelling unit is assisted by the Rural Housing Service of the Department of Agriculture; “(II) the dwelling unit was physically inspected and passed inspection in connection with the assistance described in subclause (I) during the preceding 12-month period; and140 STAT. 906 “(III) the applicable public housing agency is able to obtain the results of the inspection described in subclause (II). “(iv) Remote or video inspections.—When complying with inspection requirements for a housing unit located in a rural or small area using assistance under this section, the Secretary may allow a grantee to conduct a remote or video inspection of a unit if the remote or video inspection—“(I) is thorough; “(II) does not misrepresent the condition of the unit; and “(III) provides the information necessary to fully and accurately evaluate the conditions of the unit to ensure that the unit meets the relevant standards. “(v) Rule of construction.—Nothing in clause (i), (ii), (iii), or (iv) shall be construed to affect the operation of a housing program described in, or authorized under a provision of law described in, that clause.” . (b) Pre-approval of Units.—Section 8(o)(8)(A) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(8)(A)) is amended by adding at the end the following:“(iv) Initial inspection prior to lease agreement.—“(I) Definition.—In this clause, the term ‘new landlord’ means an owner of a dwelling unit who has not previously entered into a housing assistance payment contract with a public housing agency under this subsection for any dwelling unit. “(II) Determination.Early inspection.—Upon the request of a new landlord, a public housing agency may inspect the dwelling unit owned by the new landlord to determine whether the unit meets the housing quality standards under subparagraph (B) before the unit is selected by a tenant assisted under this subsection. “(III) Contracts.Deadline.Effect.—An inspection conducted under subclause (II) that determines that the dwelling unit meets the housing quality standards under subparagraph (B) shall satisfy this subparagraph and subparagraph (C) if the new landlord enters into a lease agreement with a tenant assisted under this subsection not later than 60 days after the date of the inspection. “(IV) Information when family is selected.—WhenList. a public housing agency selects a family to participate in the tenant-based assistance program under this subsection, the public housing agency shall include in the information provided to the family a list of dwelling units that have been inspected under subclause (II) and determined to meet the housing quality standards under subparagraph (B).” .140 STAT. 907
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Steve Womack

U.S. House of Representatives, Arkansas District 3 · R–AR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Steve Womack
U.S. Congress · Arkansas delegation · HR 9170

Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027

Jun 5, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Steve Womack · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed reported text of HR 9170 proposes $35.453 billion for renewal of expiring Section 8 tenant-based assistance contracts in the 2027 funding cycle, including specified special-purpose vouchers. Funding uses validated prior-year leasing and cost data, inflation adjustments, authorized-unit limits with exceptions, possible proration and specified reserve offsets and shortfall protections. The heading provides availability in October 2026 and October 2027. These are proposed national appropriations, not an Arkansas allocation or evidence of spending.

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 598. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Arkansas’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

TENANT-BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCEFor activities and assistance for the provision of tenant-based rental assistance authorized under the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.) (in this heading the Act), not otherwise provided for, $34,083,000,000, to remain available until expended, which shall be available on October 1, 2026 (in addition to the $4,000,000,000 previously appropriated under this heading that shall be available on October 1, 2026), and $4,000,000,000, to remain available until expended, which shall be available on October 1, 2027: Provided, That of the sums appropriated under this heading—(1)$35,453,000,000 shall be available for renewals of expiring section 8 tenant-based annual contributions contracts (including renewals of enhanced vouchers under any provision of law authorizing such assistance under section 8(t) of the Act) and including renewal of other special purpose incremental vouchers: Provided, That notwithstanding any other provision of law, from amounts provided under this paragraph and any carryover, the Secretary for the calendar year 2027 funding cycle shall provide renewal funding for each public housing agency based on validated voucher management system (VMS) or successor system leasing and cost data for the prior calendar year and by applying an inflation factor as established by the Secretary, by notice published in the Federal Register, and by making any necessary adjustments for the costs associated with the first-time renewal of vouchers under this paragraph including tenant protection and choice neighborhoods vouchers: Provided further, That none of the funds provided under this paragraph may be used to fund a total number of unit months under lease which exceeds a public housing agency's authorized level of units under contract, except for public housing agencies participating in the moving to work (MTW) demonstration, which are instead governed in accordance with the requirements of the MTW demonstration program or their MTW agreements, if any, or as necessary on a temporary basis and within available resources to facilitate the transition of residents assisted by emergency housing vouchers (Public Law 117–2; 135 Stat. 58) to tenant-based rental assistance under the housing assistance payment contract under section 8(o) of the Act: Provided further, That any leasing or associated costs authorized for emergency housing vouchers in the preceding proviso above the public housing agency’s authorized level of units under contract shall not be included in the calculation of the agency’s renewal funding allocation for any subsequent fiscal year: Provided further, That the Secretary shall, to the extent necessary to stay within the amount specified under this paragraph (except as otherwise modified under this paragraph), prorate each public housing agency's allocation otherwise established pursuant to this paragraph: Provided further, That except as provided in the following provisos, the entire amount specified under this paragraph (except as otherwise modified under this paragraph) shall be obligated to the public housing agencies based on the allocation and pro rata method described above, and the Secretary shall notify public housing agencies of their annual budget by the latter of 60 days after enactment of this Act or March 1, 2027: Provided further, That the Secretary may extend the notification period only after the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations are notified at least 10 business days in advance of the deadline: Provided further, That public housing agencies participating in the MTW demonstration shall be funded in accordance with the requirements of the MTW demonstration program or their MTW agreements, if any, and shall be subject to the same pro rata adjustments under the preceding provisos: Provided further, That the Secretary may perform a statutory offset of public housing agencies' calendar year 2027 allocations based on the excess amounts of public housing agencies' net restricted assets accounts, including HUD-held programmatic reserves (in accordance with VMS or successor system data in calendar year 2026 that is verifiable and complete), as determined by the Secretary: Provided further, That public housing agencies participating in the MTW demonstration shall also be subject to the statutory offset: Provided further, That for amounts subject to the single fund budget authority provisions of their MTW agreements, excess amounts shall be offset only to the extent permitted by section 239 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (Public Law 114–113): Provided further, That for public housing agencies in the MTW demonstration subject to single fund budget authority provisions, the Secretary shall provide not less than 60 days to appeal such offsets and shall not offset amounts that have been committed to capital improvement, development, and other repositioning activities that are scheduled to close within 12 months of enactment of this Act, as evidenced in funding applications, project schedules, or other commitments to third parties implementing such activities, to the extent that reserve amounts excluded from offset under such section 239 are insufficient to cover such commitments: Provided further, That the Secretary shall not offset any portion of a public housing agency’s excess amounts if offsetting such portion would result in a public housing agency being put in a shortfall position in calendar year 2027, as estimated by HUD prior to the offset’s implementation, as determined by the Secretary: Provided further, That the Secretary shall use any such offset amounts referred to in the preceding five provisos throughout the calendar year to prevent the termination of rental assistance for families as the result of insufficient funding, as determined by the Secretary, and to avoid or reduce the proration of renewal funding allocations: Provided further, That the Secretary may waive or specify alternative requirements for section 5A and section 8(o) of the Act or any regulation applicable to such statutes related to the administration of waiting lists, local preferences, portability, and public housing agency plan and public hearing requirements to facilitate or expedite the transition of residents assisted by emergency housing vouchers (Public Law 117–2; 135 Stat. 58) to tenant-based rental assistance under the housing assistance payment contract under section 8(o) of the Act: Provided further, That up to $200,000,000 shall be available only:(A)for vouchers that were not in use during the previous 12-month period in order to be available to meet a commitment pursuant to section 8(o)(13) of the Act, or an adjustment for a funding obligation not yet expended in the previous calendar year for a MTW-eligible activity to develop affordable housing for an agency added to the MTW demonstration under the expansion authority provided in section 239 of the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016 (division L of Public Law 114–113); (B)for adjustments for costs associated with HUD–Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD–VASH) vouchers; (C)for public housing agencies that, despite taking reasonable cost savings measures as determined by the Secretary, would otherwise be required to terminate rental assistance for families as a result of insufficient funding; Provided further, That the Secretary shall allocate amounts under the preceding proviso based on need, as determined by the Secretary;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Arkansas officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Arkansas statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.