Arkansas · individual fact

Arkansas energy and electricity

Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.

Residential electricity price12.32¢/kWh2024 · #43 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.605/gal2026-08 · #43 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$129.132024 · #32 of 50 · highest first

Arkansas over time

Explore Arkansas readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Arkansas officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Arkansas effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Arkansas change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Residential electricity price Arkansas · source units
ArkansasPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Residential electricity price2024: 12.32¢/kWh8.8¢/kWh13.14¢/kWh17.48¢/kWhArkansas, 2015: 9.82¢/kWhArkansas, 2016: 9.92¢/kWhArkansas, 2017: 10.28¢/kWhArkansas, 2018: 9.81¢/kWhArkansas, 2019: 9.8¢/kWhArkansas, 2020: 10.41¢/kWhArkansas, 2021: 11.27¢/kWhArkansas, 2022: 12.05¢/kWhArkansas, 2023: 12.25¢/kWhArkansas, 2024: 12.32¢/kWh201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 50National context · Energy Policy Act expands federal energy programs · 2005-08-08Energy Policy ActNational context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Energy law strengthens fuel economy, biofuels and efficiency · 2007-12-19Fuel / efficiency lawNational context · Global oil and energy prices surge · 2008-07-15Oil-price surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Recovery Act funds grid modernization and clean energy · 2009-02-17Recovery Act energyNational context · EPA signs greenhouse-gas endangerment finding · 2009-12-07GHG findingNational context · Deepwater Horizon explosion and oil spill · 2010-04-20Deepwater HorizonNational context · Fukushima accident prompts U.S. nuclear safety response · 2011-03-11Fukushima safetyNational context · Global demand and Middle East unrest pressure oil prices · 2011-04-112011 oil pressuresNational context · Hurricane Sandy disrupts electricity and fuel distribution · 2012-10-29Hurricane SandyNational context · Polar vortex strains gas supplies and power systems · 2014-01-07Polar vortexNational context · Oil supply growth and OPEC decision deepen price collapse · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Clean Power Plan announced; implementation later stayed · 2015-08-03Clean Power PlanNational context · Congress lifts longstanding crude-oil export restrictions · 2015-12-18Crude export rulesNational context · First LNG export cargo from the Lower 48 · 2016-02-24Lower 48 LNG exportsNational context · Shale development transforms U.S. oil supply · 2016-03-15Shale expansionNational context · Natural gas overtakes coal in annual electricity generation · 2016-12-31Gas overtakes coalNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · Attacks on Saudi oil facilities interrupt global supply · 2019-09-14Saudi oil attacksNational context · United States becomes an annual net total energy exporter · 2019-12-31Net energy exporterNational context · COVID-19 sharply reduces energy demand · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Expiring WTI oil futures settle below zero · 2020-04-20Negative WTI futuresNational context · Western heat wave leads to California rotating outages · 2020-08-14California outagesNational context · OPEC+ supply cuts help rebalance the pandemic oil market · 2020-09-23OPEC+ supply cutsNational context · Severe winter weather disrupts Texas and regional energy systems · 2021-02-08Winter Storm UriNational context · Cyberattack interrupts Colonial Pipeline fuel deliveries · 2021-05-07Colonial PipelineNational context · Infrastructure law funds grid and energy projects · 2021-11-15Infrastructure energyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Large Strategic Petroleum Reserve release announced · 2022-03-31SPR releaseNational context · Freeport LNG fire shuts a major export terminal · 2022-06-08Freeport LNG outageNational context · Inflation Reduction Act expands energy incentives · 2022-08-16IRA energy incentivesNational context · Winter Storm Elliott disrupts gas and power supplies · 2022-12-21Winter Storm ElliottNational context · Renewables exceed coal in annual electric power sector generation · 2022-12-31Renewables pass coalNational context · Vogtle expansion adds new nuclear generation · 2023-07-31Vogtle nuclear unitsNational context · Red Sea attacks reroute oil and gas shipping · 2024-02-01Red Sea shippingNational context · EPA finalizes new power-plant greenhouse-gas rules · 2024-04-25Power-plant GHG ruleNational context · FERC adopts long-term regional transmission planning rule · 2024-05-13Transmission planningNational context · DOE report documents growing data-center electricity demand · 2024-12-20Data-center demandNational context · President declares energy emergency and directs policy changes · 2025-01-20Energy emergencyNational context · U.S. tariff announcement changes energy trade context · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · EPA proposes repeal of power-sector greenhouse-gas rules · 2025-06-11Power-rule proposalNational context · Tax law accelerates several energy-credit expirations · 2025-07-04Energy tax changesNational context · EPA finalizes endangerment and vehicle GHG standard rescission · 2026-02-12Vehicle GHG repealNational context · EPA announces repeal of 2024 power-plant air-toxics amendments · 2026-02-20Air-toxics amendmentsNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shockNational context · IEA members agree to emergency oil-stock release · 2026-03-11Emergency oil stocksNational context · FERC and NERC report improved winter grid preparedness · 2026-09-10Winter grid reviewArkansas · DOE selects Basin Electric Power Cooperative grid-upgrade application · 2026-09-24Basin Electric Power Cooperative · SPARK selectionArkansas · DOE selects Entergy Mississippi, LLC grid-upgrade application · 2026-09-24Entergy Mississippi, LLC · SPARK selection● Arkansas Legislature · 1● U.S. Congress · Arkansas delegation · 2◆ Governor · 1■ Arkansas agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-09-30

4 of 4 reviewed Arkansas actions match · 4 date markers shown. 50 major events shown separately.

Arkansas · 2024: 12.32¢/kWh · Rank #43 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Arkansas, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Arkansas Residential electricity price · source units
PeriodArkansasRankU.S. benchmark
202412.32¢/kWh#43 of 5016.48¢/kWh
202312.25¢/kWh#41 of 50Not available
202212.05¢/kWh#40 of 50Not available
202111.27¢/kWh#40 of 50Not available
202010.41¢/kWh#46 of 50Not available
20199.8¢/kWh#48 of 50Not available
20189.81¢/kWh#48 of 50Not available
201710.28¢/kWh#47 of 50Not available
20169.92¢/kWh#48 of 50Not available
20159.82¢/kWh#47 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Arkansas · state comparison

Household energy prices

Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.

Arkansas · 202412.32¢/kWh
Arkansas rank#43among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential electricity price

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside Arkansas, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Arkansas
Residential electricity price history in Arkansas8.8¢/kWh13.14¢/kWh17.48¢/kWh20152024
2024 · Arkansas: 12.32¢/kWh · Rank #43 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Arkansas Residential electricity price history
PeriodArkansasCompare
20159.82¢/kWh
20169.92¢/kWh
201710.28¢/kWh
20189.81¢/kWh
20199.8¢/kWh
202010.41¢/kWh
202111.27¢/kWh
202212.05¢/kWh
202312.25¢/kWh
202412.32¢/kWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · 12.32¢/kWh2024 · Rank #43 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii42.86¢/kWh—
#2California31.97¢/kWh—
#3Massachusetts29.35¢/kWh—
#4Connecticut28.75¢/kWh—
#5Rhode Island28.65¢/kWh—
#6Alaska24.82¢/kWh—
#7New York24.43¢/kWh—
#8Maine24.29¢/kWh—
#9New Hampshire23.4¢/kWh—
#10Vermont21.9¢/kWh—
#11New Jersey19.34¢/kWh—
#12Michigan19.3¢/kWh—
#13Maryland17.86¢/kWh—
#14Pennsylvania17.77¢/kWh—
#15Wisconsin17.18¢/kWh—
#16Delaware16.57¢/kWh—
#17Ohio15.99¢/kWh—
#18Illinois15.87¢/kWh—
#19Minnesota15.45¢/kWh—
#20Alabama15.18¢/kWh—
#21West Virginia15.07¢/kWh—
#22Nevada15¢/kWh—
#23Texas14.94¢/kWh—
#24Colorado14.92¢/kWh—
#25Arizona14.91¢/kWh—
#26Indiana14.77¢/kWh—
#27Oregon14.7¢/kWh—
#28Virginia14.41¢/kWh—
#29South Carolina14.23¢/kWh—
#30New Mexico14.2¢/kWh—
#31Kansas14.15¢/kWh—
#32Florida14.14¢/kWh—
#33North Carolina14.13¢/kWh—
#34Georgia14.08¢/kWh—
#35Iowa13.4¢/kWh—
#36Mississippi13.39¢/kWh—
#37Missouri12.91¢/kWh—
#38South Dakota12.86¢/kWh—
#39Kentucky12.79¢/kWh—
#40Montana12.66¢/kWh—
#41Wyoming12.47¢/kWh—
#42Tennessee12.42¢/kWh—
#43Arkansas · your comparison12.32¢/kWh—
#44Oklahoma12.24¢/kWh—
#45Utah12.22¢/kWh—
#46Washington11.9¢/kWh—
#47Louisiana11.73¢/kWh—
#48Nebraska11.53¢/kWh—
#49Idaho11.52¢/kWh—
#50North Dakota11.51¢/kWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Gulf Coast regular gasoline price

$3.62/galWeek of August 31, 2026

Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's Gulf Coast region, including taxes. The region contains Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Texas.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Recent EIA observations

Prior week
$3.638/gal
Weekly change
-2.0¢
One year earlier
$2.765/gal
Change from one year earlier
+85.3¢
Method and limitations

FactVote uses EIA’s Gulf Coast series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes Arkansas. Changes are calculated from the published August 24, 2026 (prior week), and September 1, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.

  • EIA does not publish a current Arkansas statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This Gulf Coast regional estimate should not be read as Arkansas’s statewide average.
  • The regional average combines Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Texas, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Arkansas community.
  • Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
  • Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Arkansas · state comparison

What are households paying for electricity?

Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.

Arkansas · 2024$129.13
Arkansas rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Average monthly residential electricity bill

State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.

Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Arkansas
Average monthly residential electricity bill history in Arkansas$98.42$123.2$147.9820102024
2024 · Arkansas: $129.13 · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Arkansas Average monthly residential electricity bill history
PeriodArkansasCompare
2010$107.28
2011$106.27
2012$104.14
2013$108.64
2014$108.63
2015$110.22
2016$107.44
2017$105.64
2018$113.36
2019$109.46
2020$110.33
2021$123.69
2022$133.78
2023$128.51
2024$129.13

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · $129.132024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii$212.12—
#2Connecticut$199.66—
#3Alabama$173.5—
#4Massachusetts$167.2—
#5Maryland$165.87—
#6Texas$163.72—
#7Rhode Island$162.4—
#8California$160.86—
#9Arizona$160.24—
#10Florida$156.09—
#11Mississippi$154.83—
#12West Virginia$154.76—
#13Georgia$151.25—
#14Delaware$150.87—
#15South Carolina$149.51—
#16Virginia$148.77—
#17Pennsylvania$145.17—
#18New Hampshire$144.87—
#19Alaska$143.54—
#20North Carolina$143.5—
#21Tennessee$143.32—
#22Louisiana$140.96—
#23New York$139.53—
#24Nevada$139.39—
#25Ohio$135.16—
#26Kentucky$133.81—
#27Maine$133.6—
#28Indiana$133.06—
#29Oklahoma$132.05—
#30Oregon$129.62—
#31Missouri$129.18—
#32Arkansas · your comparison$129.13—
#33New Jersey$128.13—
#34South Dakota$127.81—
#35Vermont$125.66—
#36Kansas$123.9—
#37Michigan$119.31—
#38North Dakota$118.38—
#39Washington$113.68—
#40Iowa$111.54—
#41Wisconsin$110.87—
#42Nebraska$110.28—
#43Minnesota$110.06—
#44Illinois$109.99—
#45Idaho$108.73—
#46Montana$107.91—
#47Wyoming$107.65—
#48Colorado$100.57—
#49Utah$94.57—
#50New Mexico$92.88—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arkansas · state comparison

What generates Arkansas electricity?

Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.

Arkansas · 202462.1 TWh
Arkansas rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total electricity generation

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside Arkansas, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Arkansas
Total electricity generation history in Arkansas52.6 TWh61.3 TWh70 TWh20152024
2024 · Arkansas: 62.1 TWh · Rank #27 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Arkansas Total electricity generation history
PeriodArkansasCompare
201555.6 TWh
201660.4 TWh
201760.8 TWh
201868 TWh
201964.4 TWh
202054.6 TWh
202161.1 TWh
202265.9 TWh
202363.2 TWh
202462.1 TWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · 62.1 TWh2024 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas571.5 TWh—
#2Florida270.7 TWh—
#3California245.9 TWh—
#4Pennsylvania242.5 TWh—
#5Illinois186.7 TWh—
#6Ohio143.3 TWh—
#7Alabama142.9 TWh—
#8Georgia140.4 TWh—
#9North Carolina135.9 TWh—
#10New York133.5 TWh—
#11Michigan124.5 TWh—
#12Arizona121.5 TWh—
#13Virginia103.7 TWh—
#14Washington103 TWh—
#15South Carolina101.1 TWh—
#16Louisiana100 TWh—
#17Indiana97.4 TWh—
#18Oklahoma94.3 TWh—
#19Mississippi77.4 TWh—
#20Tennessee76.3 TWh—
#21Iowa70.9 TWh—
#22Missouri67.6 TWh—
#23Kentucky67.1 TWh—
#24Wisconsin65.6 TWh—
#25Oregon65.3 TWh—
#26New Jersey63.6 TWh—
#27Arkansas · your comparison62.1 TWh—
#28Colorado60.8 TWh—
#29Minnesota59 TWh—
#30Kansas57.9 TWh—
#31West Virginia50.7 TWh—
#32Nevada47.6 TWh—
#33Connecticut46.2 TWh—
#34North Dakota42.6 TWh—
#35Wyoming40.7 TWh—
#36New Mexico40.5 TWh—
#37Nebraska37.3 TWh—
#38Maryland36.9 TWh—
#39Utah36.1 TWh—
#40Montana27 TWh—
#41Massachusetts25 TWh—
#42South Dakota20.9 TWh—
#43Idaho20.3 TWh—
#44New Hampshire17.3 TWh—
#45Maine15.7 TWh—
#46Hawaii10.7 TWh—
#47Rhode Island10.1 TWh—
#48Alaska6.7 TWh—
#49Delaware5 TWh—
#50Vermont2.5 TWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation

39.8%2024

Natural-gas generation as a share of electricity generated at Arkansas facilities, including estimated small-scale solar in the statewide denominator.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

EIA generation totals

Natural gas
24,725,307 MWh
Total, including small-scale solar
62,053,722 MWh

Other major shares

Coal
25.2%
Nuclear
23.8%
Solar
4.6%
Method and limitations

Calculated from EIA's 2024 Arkansas workbook: Table 5 natural-gas generation divided by Table 5 total electric-industry generation plus Table 19 estimated small-scale solar generation, rounded to one decimal place.

  • The shares are calculated from annual generation and rounded to one decimal; the displayed categories do not show every source.
  • In-state generation is not the same as electricity consumed in Arkansas because power crosses state lines.
Arkansas · state comparison

Affordability, reliability, emissions, and demand

Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.

Arkansas · 2024527.8 min/year
Arkansas rank#17among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Outage minutes per customer · all events

EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.

Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Arkansas
Outage minutes per customer · all events history in Arkansas284.3 min/year640.9 min/year997.6 min/year20232024
2024 · Arkansas: 527.8 min/year · Rank #17 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Arkansas Outage minutes per customer · all events history
PeriodArkansasCompare
2023915.3 min/year
2024527.8 min/year

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · 527.8 min/year2024 · Rank #17 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1South Carolina3,155 min/year—
#2Maine1,748.6 min/year—
#3Texas1,614.3 min/year—
#4North Carolina1,518.1 min/year—
#5Florida1,487.6 min/year—
#6Georgia1,208.1 min/year—
#7West Virginia1,165.5 min/year—
#8Virginia962.1 min/year—
#9Vermont895.8 min/year—
#10New Hampshire735.5 min/year—
#11Nebraska697.8 min/year—
#12Washington643.5 min/year—
#13Louisiana630.6 min/year—
#14Mississippi607.3 min/year—
#15Oregon579.3 min/year—
#16Kentucky537.7 min/year—
#17Arkansas · your comparison527.8 min/year—
#18Ohio511 min/year—
#19Michigan481.7 min/year—
#20New York477.3 min/year—
#21Hawaii382.6 min/year—
#22Pennsylvania353.1 min/year—
#23Montana341.7 min/year—
#24Alaska323.2 min/year—
#25Indiana310 min/year—
#26Wisconsin296.8 min/year—
#27Kansas289.8 min/year—
#28Tennessee289.3 min/year—
#29California285 min/year—
#30New Mexico272.6 min/year—
#31Colorado257 min/year—
#32Minnesota222.4 min/year—
#33Oklahoma220.7 min/year—
#34Missouri212.6 min/year—
#35Idaho204.4 min/year—
#36Iowa200.3 min/year—
#37Alabama197.7 min/year—
#38New Jersey173.3 min/year—
#39Nevada158.9 min/year—
#40Illinois158 min/year—
#41Connecticut152.8 min/year—
#42Wyoming137.8 min/year—
#43Maryland118.1 min/year—
#44Delaware117.9 min/year—
#45Utah115.4 min/year—
#46Rhode Island104.3 min/year—
#47Massachusetts103.7 min/year—
#48North Dakota102.7 min/year—
#49South Dakota85.6 min/year—
#50Arizona83.6 min/year—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arkansas · state comparison

Who uses energy?

Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.

Arkansas · 2024209.5 trillion Btu
Arkansas rank#29among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential energy consumption

Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).

2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · 209.5 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #29 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas1,514 trillion Btu—
#2Florida1,183.3 trillion Btu—
#3California1,147.1 trillion Btu—
#4New York968.3 trillion Btu—
#5Pennsylvania819.3 trillion Btu—
#6Illinois817.1 trillion Btu—
#7Ohio767.4 trillion Btu—
#8Georgia717.1 trillion Btu—
#9North Carolina662.2 trillion Btu—
#10Michigan661.4 trillion Btu—
#11New Jersey550.1 trillion Btu—
#12Virginia526 trillion Btu—
#13Tennessee492 trillion Btu—
#14Indiana475.6 trillion Btu—
#15Missouri459 trillion Btu—
#16Arizona413.7 trillion Btu—
#17Massachusetts379 trillion Btu—
#18Wisconsin375.9 trillion Btu—
#19South Carolina370.7 trillion Btu—
#20Maryland357.2 trillion Btu—
#21Minnesota346.2 trillion Btu—
#22Alabama331.6 trillion Btu—
#23Washington330.2 trillion Btu—
#24Kentucky319 trillion Btu—
#25Colorado311.9 trillion Btu—
#26Louisiana282.6 trillion Btu—
#27Connecticut235.3 trillion Btu—
#28Oklahoma231 trillion Btu—
#29Arkansas · your comparison209.5 trillion Btu—
#30Utah190.7 trillion Btu—
#31Mississippi179.7 trillion Btu—
#32Oregon173.1 trillion Btu—
#33Kansas166.4 trillion Btu—
#34Iowa162 trillion Btu—
#35Nevada153.3 trillion Btu—
#36West Virginia141 trillion Btu—
#37Nebraska128.9 trillion Btu—
#38Idaho111.2 trillion Btu—
#39New Mexico98.1 trillion Btu—
#40New Hampshire91.8 trillion Btu—
#41Maine80.5 trillion Btu—
#42Montana73.9 trillion Btu—
#43Delaware62.6 trillion Btu—
#44North Dakota61.3 trillion Btu—
#45Rhode Island61 trillion Btu—
#46Alaska49.1 trillion Btu—
#47Wyoming45.5 trillion Btu—
#48South Dakota44.2 trillion Btu—
#49Vermont32.7 trillion Btu—
#50Hawaii29.5 trillion Btu—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arkansas · state comparison

Energy-related carbon emissions

Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.

Arkansas · 202458.42 Mt CO₂
Arkansas rank#29among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total energy-related CO₂ emissions

Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.

2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · 58.42 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #29 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas679.93 Mt CO₂—
#2California315.98 Mt CO₂—
#3Florida230.85 Mt CO₂—
#4Pennsylvania201.57 Mt CO₂—
#5Louisiana186.89 Mt CO₂—
#6Ohio186.34 Mt CO₂—
#7Illinois163.98 Mt CO₂—
#8New York163.69 Mt CO₂—
#9Indiana152.3 Mt CO₂—
#10Michigan143.11 Mt CO₂—
#11Georgia127.83 Mt CO₂—
#12North Carolina119.07 Mt CO₂—
#13Kentucky106.87 Mt CO₂—
#14Alabama104.32 Mt CO₂—
#15Virginia99.24 Mt CO₂—
#16Missouri98.03 Mt CO₂—
#17Tennessee90.46 Mt CO₂—
#18Oklahoma88.56 Mt CO₂—
#19New Jersey87.84 Mt CO₂—
#20Wisconsin85.12 Mt CO₂—
#21Arizona82.2 Mt CO₂—
#22Colorado79.57 Mt CO₂—
#23Minnesota77.89 Mt CO₂—
#24Washington73.81 Mt CO₂—
#25West Virginia72.28 Mt CO₂—
#26South Carolina70.81 Mt CO₂—
#27Iowa65.23 Mt CO₂—
#28Mississippi64.75 Mt CO₂—
#29Arkansas · your comparison58.42 Mt CO₂—
#30Massachusetts58.07 Mt CO₂—
#31North Dakota55.15 Mt CO₂—
#32Kansas55.09 Mt CO₂—
#33Utah55.03 Mt CO₂—
#34Wyoming50 Mt CO₂—
#35Maryland48.77 Mt CO₂—
#36Alaska44.01 Mt CO₂—
#37Nebraska43.54 Mt CO₂—
#38New Mexico41.63 Mt CO₂—
#39Nevada39.28 Mt CO₂—
#40Oregon38.94 Mt CO₂—
#41Connecticut37.09 Mt CO₂—
#42Montana27.16 Mt CO₂—
#43Idaho21.11 Mt CO₂—
#44Hawaii17.96 Mt CO₂—
#45Maine15.99 Mt CO₂—
#46South Dakota15.11 Mt CO₂—
#47New Hampshire13.6 Mt CO₂—
#48Delaware11.52 Mt CO₂—
#49Rhode Island11.05 Mt CO₂—
#50Vermont5.36 Mt CO₂—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Arkansas candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

10 statements from 6 candidates

2026 Arkansas Commissioner of State Lands — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

2026 Arkansas Lieutenant Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Michael Kalagias

2 statements

Libertarian · Lieutenant Governor · AR

Energy & electricity

Tax Relief I support giving real significant tax relief to Arkansans, not the token $10 per year the GOP has been touting. Arkansas has the second highest state and local sales tax rate in the US. Worse than New York or California. That’s inexcusable. I propose that we lower the state sales tax rate…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: On The Issues

Candidate campaign source

Tax Relief I support giving real significant tax relief to Arkansans, not the token $10 per year the GOP has been touting. Arkansas has the second highest state and local sales tax rate in the US. Worse than New York or California. That’s inexcusable. I propose that we lower the state sales tax rate from 6.5% to a more reasonable 5%. That’s small but real and noticeable savings on utility bills, clothing, school supplies, etc…, nearly everything we purchase. Furthermore I would also propose we remove the local sales tax on food, diapers, and feminine hygiene products; a savings for Arkansas families that would be considerably greater than the minuscule 1/8th of a percent cut on food passed last year. The national standard deduction for income taxes is $15,750. In Arkansas the standard deduction is only $2,470. I propose that we increase the state standard deduction for each filer and dependent to the same $15,750 used for federal tax filers. This would be a substantial savings for working class families in Arkansas, and would require a very minimal change to the tax code.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Michael Kalagias — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Michael Kalagias
Energy & electricity

Arkansas has the second highest state and local sales tax rate in the US. Worse than New York or California. That’s inexcusable. I propose that we lower the state sales tax rate from 6.5% to a more reasonable 5%. That’s small but real and noticeable savings on utility bills, clothing, school supplie…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Arkansas has the second highest state and local sales tax rate in the US. Worse than New York or California. That’s inexcusable. I propose that we lower the state sales tax rate from 6.5% to a more reasonable 5%. That’s small but real and noticeable savings on utility bills, clothing, school supplies, etc…, nearly everything we purchase. Furthermore I would also propose we remove the local sales tax on food, diapers, and feminine hygiene products; a savings for Arkansas families that would be considerably greater than the minuscule 1/8th of a percent cut on food passed last year.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Michael Kalagias — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Arkansas U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Chris Jones

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · AR

Energy & electricity

Increase the availability of safe, affordable housing options for homeowners, renters, and first-time buyers while also bringing energy costs within the home down.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: WHAT I WILL DO:

Candidate campaign source

Increase the availability of safe, affordable housing options for homeowners, renters, and first-time buyers while also bringing energy costs within the home down.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Chris Jones campaign source 4 ↗

French Hill

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · AR

Energy & electricity

To fight inflation and reduce everyday expenses, French introduced the Price Stability Act to lower costs on essentials like groceries and gasoline and to force the government to focus on reducing inflation. He also backed the Lower Healthcare Premiums for All Americans Act to reduce insurance costs…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: French on the Issues

Candidate campaign source

To fight inflation and reduce everyday expenses, French introduced the Price Stability Act to lower costs on essentials like groceries and gasoline and to force the government to focus on reducing inflation. He also backed the Lower Healthcare Premiums for All Americans Act to reduce insurance costs and make healthcare more affordable for working families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

French Hill — campaign source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Arkansas candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Arkansas incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Arkansas legislators and Arkansas’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Arkansas’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

4 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Arkansas incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Mindy McAlindon

Arkansas House of Representatives, District 10 · R–AR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Mindy McAlindon
Arkansas Legislature · SB 596

AN ACT TO AMEND THE LAW REGARDING ENERGY; TO ESTABLISH A STATE ENERGY POLICY; TO REGULATE RETIREMENT OF DISPATCHABLE ELECTRIC GENERATION FACILITIES; TO DECLARE AN EMERGENCY; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

Apr 21, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Matt McKee · Sponsored / Rep. Mindy McAlindon · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 596 requires commission approval before a public utility retires a dispatchable generating facility of at least 100 MW located in Arkansas, including natural-gas facilities. It creates a rebuttable presumption against retirement, with replacement-capacity, reliability and cost findings, and exceptions for specified earlier litigation resolutions. It concerns the generation mix; approval requirements do not prove continued output or a change in natural gas’s measured share. The commission receives thirty days’ notice of an application and must issue an order within 180 days after receiving an administratively complete application. The act’s emergency clause made it effective upon approval on April 21, 2025; that does not establish approval of an individual retirement.

Signed by Sarah Huckabee Sanders on 2025-04-21; Act 940 of 2025. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Natural-gas share is the portion of electricity generated at Arkansas facilities supplied by natural gas. Natural-gas output is the numerator and total in-state generation is the denominator. Policies concerning natural-gas or competing generation technologies can concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

23-18-1302. Definitions. As used in this subchapter: (1) “Dispatchable” means a source of electrical power generation or biomass energy that is: (A) Available on demand; (B) Not intermittent; and (C) Can either: (i) Be adjusted to increase or decrease its power output upon request of a power grid operator or otherwise upon demand or request of a power grid operator; or (ii) Have its power output adjusted in response to market or system needs; (2) "Dispatchable electric generation facility" means a facility that uses water, coal, natural gas, geothermal, biomass, or nuclear power, or a combination of equivalent fuels and technologies to generate dispatchable, reliable electricity to provide to end users; (3) "Electric generation asset" means a plant, facility, As Engrossed: S4/7/25 S4/14/25 SB596 5 04-14-2025 19:32:40 ANS459 equipment, or system that converts nonelectrical energy into electricity; (4) "Intermittent" means: (A) A source of electrical power generation from a solar photovoltaic, solar thermal heating, concentrating solar thermal collector, or other solar energy collection or generation system; (B) A source of electrical power that generates energy by harnessing wind power or energy, whether through a turbine or other device; (C) Anaerobic digestion or combined heat and power from solar, wind, or anaerobic digestion sources; (D) Any short-duration energy storage, which includes any method of storing generated electricity for later dispatch to the power grid, whether alone or in conjunction with any other intermittent sources described in this subdivision (4), that is equivalent to less than forty-eight (48) hours of the average peak generation of the unit the short-duration energy storage is used to offset; and (E) Conventional hydropower and pumped storage hydropower, unless they are capable of providing energy on demand, in which case they shall be deemed to be dispatchable; (5) “Public utility” means the same as defined in § 23-1-101; (6) "Reliability" means having adequate dispatchable electric generation capacity to safely deliver electrical energy in the quantity, with the quality, and at a time that public utility customers demand; (7) "Resilience" means having the ability to quickly and effectively respond to and recover from events that compromise power grid reliability; (8) "Retirement" means the closure or the complete and permanent cessation of operations of a dispatchable electric generation facility; and (9) "Secure" means to harden to a reasonable extent against an attack, including a cyberattack or a kinetic attack, or an extreme weather event. 23-18-1303. Retirement of dispatchable electric generation facilities. (a)(1) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the Arkansas Public Service Commission may approve or deny the retirement of a dispatchable electric generation facility owned by a public utility. (2) Before retiring a dispatchable electric generation facility, As Engrossed: S4/7/25 S4/14/25 SB596 6 04-14-2025 19:32:40 ANS459 a public utility shall: (A) Apply to the commission for an order approving the retirement; and (B) Give the commission thirty-days' notice of the application. (3) The application shall include a statement certifying the applicant's compliance with the requirements of this subchapter. (4) The commission shall enter an order within one hundred eighty (180) days of receiving an administratively complete application to approve the application for retirement to: (A) Approve the application for retirement; (B) Approve the application for retirement with conditions; or (C) Deny the application for retirement. (b)(1) There is a rebuttable presumption against the retirement of a dispatchable electric generation facility. (2) The commission shall not approve the retirement of a dispatchable electric generation facility, authorize a surcharge for the decommissioning of the dispatchable electric generation facility, or take any other action that authorizes or allows for the recovery of costs for the retirement of a dispatchable electric generation facility, including without limitation any stranded asset recovery, unless the presumption under subdivision (b)(1) of this section is rebutted by evidence sufficient for the commission to find that the retirement is in the public interest, including without limitation evidence that: (A) The public utility will replace the retired dispatchable electric generation facility with new electric generation assets that: (i) Are dispatchable by either the public utility or the regional transmission organization or independent system operator responsible for balancing load within the public utility's service area; (ii) Maintain or improve the reliability and resilience of the power grid; (iii) Maintain the minimum reserve capacity requirement established by the public utility's reliability coordinator; and (iv) Have the same or higher capacity value and net As Engrossed: S4/7/25 S4/14/25 SB596 7 04-14-2025 19:32:40 ANS459 capability, unless the public utility can demonstrate that the capacity value and net capability is not necessary to provide reliable service; (B) The retirement will not harm the public utility's ratepayers by causing the public utility to incur any net incremental costs to be recovered from ratepayers that could be avoided by continuing to operate the dispatchable electric generation facility proposed for retirement in compliance with applicable law; (C) The decision to retire the dispatchable electric generation facility is not the result of any financial incentives or benefits offered by a United States Government agency; and (D) The public utility will not commence retirement or decommissioning of the electric generating unit until the replacement generating capacity meeting the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(A) of this section is fully constructed, permitted, and in operation, unless the public utility can demonstrate that it is necessary under the circumstances to commence retirement or decommissioning of the existing electric generating unit earlier. (c) At a minimum, the public utility shall provide the commission with evidence of all known direct and indirect costs of retiring the dispatchable electric generation facility and demonstrate that cost savings will result to customers as a result of the retirement of the dispatchable electric generation facility. (d)(1) Under the commission's report under § 23-18-1104, the commission shall prepare and submit an annual supplemental report to the Joint Committee on Energy no later than December 1 of each year in which the commission issues an order on an application under this subchapter. (2) The annual supplemental report required under subdivision (d)(1) of this section shall include: (A) The number of applications by public utilities to retire dispatchable electric generation facilities, the nameplate capacity of each of the dispatchable electric generation facilities, and whether the application was approved, approved with conditions, or denied; (B) The impact of any commission-approved retirement or retirement with conditions of a dispatchable electric generation facility on the: (i) State's electric generation fuel mix; As Engrossed: S4/7/25 S4/14/25 SB596 8 04-14-2025 19:32:40 ANS459 (ii) Required capacity reserve margins for the public utility; (iii) Need for capacity additions or expansions at new or existing facilities as a result of the retirement; and (iv) Need for additional purchase power or capacity reserve arrangements; and (C) Whether or not the retirement or retirement with conditions resulted in stranded costs for the ratepayer that will be recovered by the public utility through a surcharge or some other separate charge on the ratepayer's bill. (e) This section is applicable to a dispatchable electric generation facility that is one hundred megawatts (100 MW) or larger located in Arkansas. (f) This subchapter does not apply to the retirement or repowering of a dispatchable electric generation facility under any settlement, consent decree, or other resolution of any litigation or legal proceeding executed or ordered before the effective date of this subchapter. SECTION 3. EMERGENCY CLAUSE. It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the continued unabated retirement of needed electric generating resources threatens to harm employment, tax revenue, and utility rates and is creating a crisis with respect to the state's ability to meet current and projected future energy demands; that this act will manage the retirement of needed electric generating resources for this state; and that this act is immediately necessary because continued electric generating resources are necessary for employment, tax revenue, and regular utility rates. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto. As Engrossed: S4/7/25 S4/14/25 SB596 9 04-14-2025 19:32:40 ANS459
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Matt McKee

Arkansas Senate, District 6 · R–AR

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Matt McKee
Arkansas Legislature · SB 596

AN ACT TO AMEND THE LAW REGARDING ENERGY; TO ESTABLISH A STATE ENERGY POLICY; TO REGULATE RETIREMENT OF DISPATCHABLE ELECTRIC GENERATION FACILITIES; TO DECLARE AN EMERGENCY; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

Apr 21, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Matt McKee · Sponsored / Rep. Mindy McAlindon · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 596 requires commission approval before a public utility retires a dispatchable generating facility of at least 100 MW located in Arkansas, including natural-gas facilities. It creates a rebuttable presumption against retirement, with replacement-capacity, reliability and cost findings, and exceptions for specified earlier litigation resolutions. It concerns the generation mix; approval requirements do not prove continued output or a change in natural gas’s measured share. The commission receives thirty days’ notice of an application and must issue an order within 180 days after receiving an administratively complete application. The act’s emergency clause made it effective upon approval on April 21, 2025; that does not establish approval of an individual retirement.

Signed by Sarah Huckabee Sanders on 2025-04-21; Act 940 of 2025. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Natural-gas share is the portion of electricity generated at Arkansas facilities supplied by natural gas. Natural-gas output is the numerator and total in-state generation is the denominator. Policies concerning natural-gas or competing generation technologies can concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

23-18-1302. Definitions. As used in this subchapter: (1) “Dispatchable” means a source of electrical power generation or biomass energy that is: (A) Available on demand; (B) Not intermittent; and (C) Can either: (i) Be adjusted to increase or decrease its power output upon request of a power grid operator or otherwise upon demand or request of a power grid operator; or (ii) Have its power output adjusted in response to market or system needs; (2) "Dispatchable electric generation facility" means a facility that uses water, coal, natural gas, geothermal, biomass, or nuclear power, or a combination of equivalent fuels and technologies to generate dispatchable, reliable electricity to provide to end users; (3) "Electric generation asset" means a plant, facility, As Engrossed: S4/7/25 S4/14/25 SB596 5 04-14-2025 19:32:40 ANS459 equipment, or system that converts nonelectrical energy into electricity; (4) "Intermittent" means: (A) A source of electrical power generation from a solar photovoltaic, solar thermal heating, concentrating solar thermal collector, or other solar energy collection or generation system; (B) A source of electrical power that generates energy by harnessing wind power or energy, whether through a turbine or other device; (C) Anaerobic digestion or combined heat and power from solar, wind, or anaerobic digestion sources; (D) Any short-duration energy storage, which includes any method of storing generated electricity for later dispatch to the power grid, whether alone or in conjunction with any other intermittent sources described in this subdivision (4), that is equivalent to less than forty-eight (48) hours of the average peak generation of the unit the short-duration energy storage is used to offset; and (E) Conventional hydropower and pumped storage hydropower, unless they are capable of providing energy on demand, in which case they shall be deemed to be dispatchable; (5) “Public utility” means the same as defined in § 23-1-101; (6) "Reliability" means having adequate dispatchable electric generation capacity to safely deliver electrical energy in the quantity, with the quality, and at a time that public utility customers demand; (7) "Resilience" means having the ability to quickly and effectively respond to and recover from events that compromise power grid reliability; (8) "Retirement" means the closure or the complete and permanent cessation of operations of a dispatchable electric generation facility; and (9) "Secure" means to harden to a reasonable extent against an attack, including a cyberattack or a kinetic attack, or an extreme weather event. 23-18-1303. Retirement of dispatchable electric generation facilities. (a)(1) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the Arkansas Public Service Commission may approve or deny the retirement of a dispatchable electric generation facility owned by a public utility. (2) Before retiring a dispatchable electric generation facility, As Engrossed: S4/7/25 S4/14/25 SB596 6 04-14-2025 19:32:40 ANS459 a public utility shall: (A) Apply to the commission for an order approving the retirement; and (B) Give the commission thirty-days' notice of the application. (3) The application shall include a statement certifying the applicant's compliance with the requirements of this subchapter. (4) The commission shall enter an order within one hundred eighty (180) days of receiving an administratively complete application to approve the application for retirement to: (A) Approve the application for retirement; (B) Approve the application for retirement with conditions; or (C) Deny the application for retirement. (b)(1) There is a rebuttable presumption against the retirement of a dispatchable electric generation facility. (2) The commission shall not approve the retirement of a dispatchable electric generation facility, authorize a surcharge for the decommissioning of the dispatchable electric generation facility, or take any other action that authorizes or allows for the recovery of costs for the retirement of a dispatchable electric generation facility, including without limitation any stranded asset recovery, unless the presumption under subdivision (b)(1) of this section is rebutted by evidence sufficient for the commission to find that the retirement is in the public interest, including without limitation evidence that: (A) The public utility will replace the retired dispatchable electric generation facility with new electric generation assets that: (i) Are dispatchable by either the public utility or the regional transmission organization or independent system operator responsible for balancing load within the public utility's service area; (ii) Maintain or improve the reliability and resilience of the power grid; (iii) Maintain the minimum reserve capacity requirement established by the public utility's reliability coordinator; and (iv) Have the same or higher capacity value and net As Engrossed: S4/7/25 S4/14/25 SB596 7 04-14-2025 19:32:40 ANS459 capability, unless the public utility can demonstrate that the capacity value and net capability is not necessary to provide reliable service; (B) The retirement will not harm the public utility's ratepayers by causing the public utility to incur any net incremental costs to be recovered from ratepayers that could be avoided by continuing to operate the dispatchable electric generation facility proposed for retirement in compliance with applicable law; (C) The decision to retire the dispatchable electric generation facility is not the result of any financial incentives or benefits offered by a United States Government agency; and (D) The public utility will not commence retirement or decommissioning of the electric generating unit until the replacement generating capacity meeting the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(A) of this section is fully constructed, permitted, and in operation, unless the public utility can demonstrate that it is necessary under the circumstances to commence retirement or decommissioning of the existing electric generating unit earlier. (c) At a minimum, the public utility shall provide the commission with evidence of all known direct and indirect costs of retiring the dispatchable electric generation facility and demonstrate that cost savings will result to customers as a result of the retirement of the dispatchable electric generation facility. (d)(1) Under the commission's report under § 23-18-1104, the commission shall prepare and submit an annual supplemental report to the Joint Committee on Energy no later than December 1 of each year in which the commission issues an order on an application under this subchapter. (2) The annual supplemental report required under subdivision (d)(1) of this section shall include: (A) The number of applications by public utilities to retire dispatchable electric generation facilities, the nameplate capacity of each of the dispatchable electric generation facilities, and whether the application was approved, approved with conditions, or denied; (B) The impact of any commission-approved retirement or retirement with conditions of a dispatchable electric generation facility on the: (i) State's electric generation fuel mix; As Engrossed: S4/7/25 S4/14/25 SB596 8 04-14-2025 19:32:40 ANS459 (ii) Required capacity reserve margins for the public utility; (iii) Need for capacity additions or expansions at new or existing facilities as a result of the retirement; and (iv) Need for additional purchase power or capacity reserve arrangements; and (C) Whether or not the retirement or retirement with conditions resulted in stranded costs for the ratepayer that will be recovered by the public utility through a surcharge or some other separate charge on the ratepayer's bill. (e) This section is applicable to a dispatchable electric generation facility that is one hundred megawatts (100 MW) or larger located in Arkansas. (f) This subchapter does not apply to the retirement or repowering of a dispatchable electric generation facility under any settlement, consent decree, or other resolution of any litigation or legal proceeding executed or ordered before the effective date of this subchapter. SECTION 3. EMERGENCY CLAUSE. It is found and determined by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that the continued unabated retirement of needed electric generating resources threatens to harm employment, tax revenue, and utility rates and is creating a crisis with respect to the state's ability to meet current and projected future energy demands; that this act will manage the retirement of needed electric generating resources for this state; and that this act is immediately necessary because continued electric generating resources are necessary for employment, tax revenue, and regular utility rates. Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall become effective on: (1) The date of its approval by the Governor; (2) If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the bill; or (3) If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto. As Engrossed: S4/7/25 S4/14/25 SB596 9 04-14-2025 19:32:40 ANS459
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Tom Cotton

U.S. Senate, Arkansas · R–AR

2 proposals
View proposals from Sen. Tom Cotton
U.S. Congress · Arkansas delegation · S 3034

Reliable Power Act

Apr 15, 2026 · In Congress

Sen. Tom Cotton · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 3034 would require annual long-term bulk-power reliability assessments covering the generation mix, transmission and demand. After a notice of generation inadequacy, specified federal regulations affecting generation would require FERC review and a determination about reliability before finalization. This concerns generation oversight, not a gas-generation quota or a verified change in Arkansas output. The covered regulations are those under development or consideration when the agency receives notice. Finalization requires both a written agency response and FERC’s determination that a significant negative reliability impact is unlikely.

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Energy. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 119-366. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Natural-gas share is the portion of electricity generated at Arkansas facilities supplied by natural gas. Natural-gas output is the numerator and total in-state generation is the denominator. Policies concerning natural-gas or competing generation technologies can concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2. Commission review and comment for covered agency actions Section 215 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 824o) is amended— (1) in subsection (g)— (A) by striking The ERO and inserting the following: (1) In general The ERO ; and (B) by adding at the end the following: (2) Annual long-term assessment The assessments under paragraph (1) shall include an annual long-term assessment, which shall include— (A) an analysis of the ability of the bulk-power system to supply sufficient electric energy to maintain an adequate level of reliability, taking into account— (i) generation resource mix; (ii) transmission development; and (iii) electric energy demand trends; (B) an analysis of— (i) the risk of future electric energy supply shortfalls under normal and extreme weather conditions; and (ii) the risk of any such shortfalls within each region of the bulk-power system; and (C) a determination of whether additional generation resources are necessary to supply sufficient electric energy to maintain an adequate level of reliability during the assessment period. (3) Notice of generation inadequacy In conducting a long-term assessment under paragraph (2), if the ERO determines that the bulk-power system is at risk of not having adequate generation resources to supply sufficient electric energy to maintain an adequate level of reliability, the ERO shall publicly notify the Commission that the bulk-power system is in a state of generation inadequacy. (4) Data collection To conduct a long-term assessment under paragraph (2), the ERO may collect information and data from users, owners, and operators of the bulk-power system. ; (2) by redesignating subsections (h) through (k) as subsections (i) through (l), respectively; and (3) by inserting after subsection (g) the following: (h) Commission review and comment for covered agency actions (1) Definitions In this subsection: (A) Covered agency action The term covered agency action means a regulation that— (i) relates to, or otherwise directly affects, any generation resource in the bulk-power system; and (ii) on the date on which the applicable Federal agency receives notice from the Commission under paragraph (2)— (I) is under development to be proposed; or (II) is otherwise under consideration in a rulemaking proceeding. (B) Federal agency The term Federal agency means an Executive department (as defined in section 101 of title 5, United States Code) or any other Executive agency the head of which holds a Cabinet-level position. (2) Notice to Federal agencies If the ERO notifies the Commission under subsection (g)(3) that the bulk-power system is in a state of generation inadequacy, the Commission shall promptly notify the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, and any other Federal agency the Commission determines appropriate of that state of generation inadequacy. (3) Submission of covered agency actions to the Commission (A) In general Not later than the applicable date described in subparagraph (B), the head of each Federal agency that receives a notification under paragraph (2) shall submit to the Commission for review and comment any covered agency action of the Federal agency. (B) Date described The date referred to in subparagraph (A) is— (i) the first date on which the applicable covered agency action is provided to the Office of Management and Budget or any other Federal agency for review and comment; (ii) if the applicable covered agency action is not provided to the Office of Management and Budget or any other Federal agency for review and comment, the date that is 90 days before the date on which the covered agency action is published in the Federal Register or otherwise made available for public inspection or comment; or (iii) if, as of the date on which the Federal agency receives the applicable notification under paragraph (2), the covered agency action has already been provided to the Office of Management and Budget or any other Federal agency for review and comment, or has already been published in the Federal Register or otherwise made available for public inspection or comment, the date that is 60 days after the date on which the Federal agency received the notification. (4) Commission comments The Commission, in consultation with the ERO and transmission organizations, shall, by order, provide to the Federal agency head that submitted to the Commission a covered agency action under paragraph (3)— (A) comments on the covered agency action, which may include an assessment of the effect of the covered agency action on rates, terms, and conditions for services pursuant to the authority of the Commission under sections 201 and 206; and (B) if applicable, recommendations for modifications to the covered agency action to prevent a significant negative impact on the ability of the bulk-power system to supply sufficient electric energy to maintain an adequate level of reliability. (5) Agency response The head of a Federal agency may not finalize a covered agency action that is submitted to the Commission under paragraph (3) until— (A) the agency head responds in writing to the Commission with an explanation of how the agency head modified, or why the agency head determined not to modify, the covered agency action in response to any comments and recommendations provided by the Commission under paragraph (4); and (B) the Commission determines that the covered agency action is not likely to have a significant negative impact on the ability of the bulk-power system to supply sufficient electric energy to maintain an adequate level of reliability. (6) Public availability of comments and responses A Federal agency head shall include any comments, recommendations, and responses relating to the covered agency action under paragraphs (4) and (5) in— (A) any submission of the covered agency action to the Federal Register for publication; and (B) any other place in which the covered agency action is otherwise made available for public inspection or comment. .
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Arkansas delegation · S 4158

A bill to temporarily suspend the clean electricity production credit to support the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

Mar 20, 2026 · In Congress

Sen. Tom Cotton · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 4158 would suspend the section 45Y clean-electricity production credit for electricity produced from October 1, 2025 through September 30, 2027, and direct amounts equal to the resulting federal revenue increase into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Petroleum Account. The proposal concerns generation incentives and petroleum reserves; it does not order a gasoline-price reduction or prove an actual reserve purchase.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Natural-gas share is the portion of electricity generated at Arkansas facilities supplied by natural gas. Natural-gas output is the numerator and total in-state generation is the denominator. Policies concerning natural-gas or competing generation technologies can concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. The proposal changes incentives for competing electricity generation and therefore concerns the denominator of natural gas’s share, without establishing measured output. This connection does not establish causation or a change in the earlier measured value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Natural-gas share of in-state electricity generation · Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

1.Temporary suspension of clean electricity production credit(a)In generalSection 45Y of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following:(i)Suspension during fiscal years 2026 and 2027This section shall not apply with respect to any electricity produced during the period beginning on October 1, 2025, and ending on September 30, 2027..(b)Transfer to SPR petroleum accountThe Secretary of the Treasury shall deposit into the SPR Petroleum Account established under section 167(a) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6247(a)) amounts equal to the increase in revenues to the Treasury by reason of the amendment made by subsection (a).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Arkansas officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Arkansas statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.