Alaska · individual fact

Alaska income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Alaska’s tax structure.

Median household income$92.79K2020–2024 · #12 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$46.57K2020–2024 · #13 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$60.27K2024 · #17 of 50 · highest first

Alaska over time

Explore Alaska readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Alaska officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Alaska effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Alaska change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person Alaska · source units
AlaskaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $60,272$46.15K$53.97K$61.79KAlaska, 2014: $55,480Alaska, 2015: $56,528Alaska, 2016: $54,411Alaska, 2017: $54,022Alaska, 2018: $55,403Alaska, 2019: $56,834Alaska, 2020: $58,522Alaska, 2021: $57,677Alaska, 2022: $58,413Alaska, 2023: $58,204Alaska, 2024: $60,272201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 69National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawAlaska · Southcentral Alaska earthquake disrupts homes, schools and infrastructure · 2018-11-30Southcentral Alaska earthquake disrupts homes, schools and infrastructureAlaska · Walker declares an earthquake disaster emergency · 2018-11-30Walker declares an earthquake disaster emergencyAlaska · Walker requests concurrence for earthquake disaster spending · 2018-12-02Earthquake spending requestAlaska · Walker signs the written earthquake disaster declaration · 2018-12-02Written earthquake declarationAlaska · Alaska announces state earthquake assistance registration · 2018-12-03Alaska announces state earthquake assistance registrationAlaska · Dunleavy requests federal earthquake recovery assistance · 2019-01-03Dunleavy requests federal earthquake recovery assistanceAlaska · Alaska reports the state assistance deadline extended to February 28 · 2019-01-28Alaska reports the state assistance deadline extended to February 28Alaska · Federal major disaster declaration authorizes Alaska earthquake assistance · 2019-01-31Federal major disaster declaration authorizes Alaska earthquake assistanceAlaska · SBA makes earthquake loans available to Alaska businesses and residents · 2019-01-31SBA makes earthquake loans available to Alaska businesses and residentsAlaska · Earthquake finance plan estimates recovery costs · 2019-02-01Recovery finance estimateAlaska · Alaska and FEMA explain separate earthquake-assistance applications · 2019-02-14Alaska and FEMA explain separate earthquake-assistance applicationsAlaska · Alaska reports earthquake-assistance registrations and loan approvals · 2019-03-07Alaska reports earthquake-assistance registrations and loan approvalsAlaska · Earthquake unemployment-assistance notice sets a March 14 deadline · 2019-03-09Earthquake unemployment-assistance notice sets a March 14 deadlineAlaska · Senate Finance adopts the SB38 disaster-funding substitute · 2019-03-14Senate Finance adopts the SB38 disaster-funding substituteAlaska · Alaska explains reconsideration for existing earthquake-assistance applicants · 2019-03-15Alaska explains reconsideration for existing earthquake-assistance applicantsAlaska · Dunleavy requests a FEMA earthquake-registration extension to May 31 · 2019-03-18Dunleavy requests a FEMA earthquake-registration extension to May 31Alaska · Senate Finance reports the SB38 substitute · 2019-03-19Senate Finance reports the SB38 substituteAlaska · FEMA approves Alaska earthquake registration through May 31 · 2019-03-22FEMA approves Alaska earthquake registration through May 31Alaska · Alaska Senate passes SB38 · 2019-03-25Alaska Senate passes SB38Alaska · House Finance reports the SB38 substitute · 2019-03-28House Finance reports the SB38 substituteAlaska · Alaska Legislature passes SB38 disaster funding · 2019-03-29Alaska Legislature passes SB38 disaster fundingAlaska · Dunleavy approves SB38 disaster and fire-suppression appropriations · 2019-04-05Dunleavy approves SB38 disaster and fire-suppression appropriationsAlaska · SB38 disaster appropriations take effect · 2019-04-06SB38 disaster appropriations take effectAlaska · Alaska urges spring-thaw home inspections and claim reconsideration · 2019-04-25Alaska urges spring-thaw home inspections and claim reconsiderationAlaska · Alaska earthquake report distinguishes FEMA grants and SBA loan approvals · 2019-05-01Alaska earthquake report distinguishes FEMA grants and SBA loan approvalsAlaska · SBA reports $60,132,500 in Alaska earthquake loan approvals · 2019-05-01SBA reports $60,132,500 in Alaska earthquake loan approvalsAlaska · Recovery report separates FEMA grants and SBA loans · 2019-05-28Recovery report separates FEMA grants and SBA loansAlaska · Alaska earthquake recovery guidance separates continuing help from closed applications · 2019-06-05Alaska earthquake recovery guidance separates continuing help from closed applicationsAlaska · Dunleavy declares the Mat-Su and Kenai wildfire disaster · 2019-08-23Dunleavy declares the Mat-Su and Kenai wildfire disasterAlaska · Dunleavy sets the initial wildfire disaster-fund spending limit · 2019-08-23Dunleavy sets the initial wildfire disaster-fund spending limitAlaska · SBA declares disaster-loan assistance for Alaska’s McKinley fire · 2019-10-01SBA declares disaster-loan assistance for Alaska’s McKinley fireAlaska · Alaska reports wildfire state-assistance applications open through October 22 · 2019-10-03Alaska reports wildfire state-assistance applications open through October 22Alaska · SBA opens economic-injury loans for Alaska’s Swan Lake fire · 2019-10-08SBA opens economic-injury loans for Alaska’s Swan Lake fireAlaska · SBA fixes the Swan Lake fire loan incident period without changing the deadline · 2019-11-19SBA fixes the Swan Lake fire loan incident period without changing the deadlineNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings funding● Alaska Legislature · 3● U.S. Congress · Alaska delegation · 1◆ Governor · 822■ Alaska agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-09-012026-07-31

12 of 12 reviewed Alaska actions match · 10 date markers shown. 69 major events shown separately.

Alaska · 2024: $60,272 · Rank #17 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Alaska Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodAlaskaRankU.S. benchmark
2024$60,272#17 of 50$59,195
2023$58,204#20 of 50$58,088
2022$58,413#18 of 50$57,104
2021$57,677#24 of 50$59,365
2020$58,522#16 of 50$56,514
2019$56,834#12 of 50$53,683
2018$55,403#11 of 50$52,242
2017$54,022#12 of 50$51,006
2016$54,411#9 of 50$49,828
2015$56,528#6 of 50$49,396
2014$55,480#5 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Alaska · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

Alaska · 2020–2024$92,788
Alaska rank#12among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alaska · $92,7882020–2024 · Rank #12 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $91,556 – $94,020Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska · your comparison$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$92,7882020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by Alaska households, expressed in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • Income is not take-home pay and does not directly measure taxes, wealth, prices, or purchasing power.
  • A statewide median obscures regional and household differences.
Alaska · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

Alaska · 2024$60,272
Alaska rank#17among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alaska
Real personal income per person history in Alaska$45.77K$53.97K$62.16K20142024
2024 · Alaska: $60,272 · Rank #17 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alaska Real personal income per person history
PeriodAlaskaCompare
2014$55,480
2015$56,528
2016$54,411
2017$54,022
2018$55,403
2019$56,834
2020$58,522
2021$57,677
2022$58,413
2023$58,204
2024$60,272

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alaska · $60,2722024 · Rank #17 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska · your comparison$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alaska · state comparison

How Alaska raises taxes

Alaska does not levy a State personal income tax. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

Alaska · FY2024$0
Alaska rank#45among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alaska · $0FY2024 · Rank #45 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky$5.02B—
#24Louisiana$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma$4.51B—
#27Kansas$4.5B—
#28Iowa$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska$2.48B—
#34Maine$2.4B—
#35Mississippi$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska · your comparison$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding Alaska income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The Alaska ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Alaska candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

61 statements from 17 candidates

2026 Alaska Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 8 statements

Dave Bronson

5 statements

Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Taxes & tax policy

Adopt a 10-year rolling average oil price to set state revenue assumptions for budgeting purposes. Each year’s budget would use: • The average realized oil price from the prior 10 years • Actual production volumes • Existing tax and royalty structures No forecasts of next year’s oil price.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Base oil-revenue budgets on a ten-year average price

Candidate campaign source

Adopt a 10-year rolling average oil price to set state revenue assumptions for budgeting purposes. Each year’s budget would use: • The average realized oil price from the prior 10 years • Actual production volumes • Existing tax and royalty structures No forecasts of next year’s oil price.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Stabilized Revenue Budgeting for Alaska — Bronson–Church campaign document ↗
View 4 more statements from Dave Bronson
Taxes & tax policy

Safeguards • Periodic structural review (e.g., every 5 years) to account for long-term production decline or tax changes • Savings rules remain intact to handle true structural gaps • Legislature retains authority over spending priorities within stable revenue bounds

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Direct excess oil revenue to savings or debt reduction

Candidate campaign source

Safeguards • Periodic structural review (e.g., every 5 years) to account for long-term production decline or tax changes • Savings rules remain intact to handle true structural gaps • Legislature retains authority over spending priorities within stable revenue bounds

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Stabilized Revenue Budgeting for Alaska — Bronson–Church campaign document ↗
Income & wages

Prioritize programs tied to documented workforce shortages • Expand accelerated, practical programs for working adults and career changers • Increase transparency around job placement, wages, and in-state employment outcomes • Align state funding with results that serve Alaska’s workforce needs

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Align higher education funding and programs with workforce needs

Candidate campaign source

Prioritize programs tied to documented workforce shortages • Expand accelerated, practical programs for working adults and career changers • Increase transparency around job placement, wages, and in-state employment outcomes • Align state funding with results that serve Alaska’s workforce needs

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

AK 10/10 Plan - Workforce First Public Education — Bronson–Church campaign document ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Develop Alaska’s abundant natural resources — oil, gas, mining, critical minerals, and timber — to create jobs, power America, and strengthen our state’s finances, without raising taxes.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Develop natural resources without raising taxes

Candidate campaign source

Develop Alaska’s abundant natural resources — oil, gas, mining, critical minerals, and timber — to create jobs, power America, and strengthen our state’s finances, without raising taxes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dave Bronson for Alaska Governor | Built For This ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Expand high-quality charter schools with clear performance expectations • Support school choice, including vouchers, so families can select the learning environment that best fits their child • Increase education tax credits within the BBB framework to $3,000 per student, up from roughly $1,700, to …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Expand charter schools and vouchers and propose education tax credits

Candidate campaign source

Expand high-quality charter schools with clear performance expectations • Support school choice, including vouchers, so families can select the learning environment that best fits their child • Increase education tax credits within the BBB framework to $3,000 per student, up from roughly $1,700, to support private schools, charters, homeschooling, tutoring, and supplemental education • Encourage innovation and competition while maintaining transparency and accountability

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

AK 10/10 Plan - Workforce First Public Education — Bronson–Church campaign document ↗

Democrat · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Taxes & tax policy

Ensure that Alaskans get a fair share from our state’s oil wealth. All Alaska oil and gas producers should contribute to the Alaska budget by paying corporate income tax. Hilcorp should pay its fair share just the way ConocoPhillips does.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Require all Alaska oil and gas producers to pay corporate income tax

Candidate campaign source

Ensure that Alaskans get a fair share from our state’s oil wealth. All Alaska oil and gas producers should contribute to the Alaska budget by paying corporate income tax. Hilcorp should pay its fair share just the way ConocoPhillips does.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins — campaign platform ↗
View 2 more statements from Jonathan S. “JKT” Kreiss-Tomkins
Taxes & tax policy

Prevent tax dollars from going to glitzy megaprojects that don’t serve our critical needs and rarely materialize.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Oppose funding megaprojects that do not serve critical needs

Candidate campaign source

Prevent tax dollars from going to glitzy megaprojects that don’t serve our critical needs and rarely materialize.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins — campaign platform ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Create mechanisms to tax “dark homes” — second homes and vacation homes owned by nonresidents — as a means to create a housing market more friendly for Alaskans who live here.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Propose taxes on second and vacation homes owned by nonresidents

Candidate campaign source

Create mechanisms to tax “dark homes” — second homes and vacation homes owned by nonresidents — as a means to create a housing market more friendly for Alaskans who live here.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins — campaign platform ↗

2026 Alaska Governor and Lieutenant Governor — Top-Four Primary

5 candidates with matching statements · 13 statements

Click Bishop

1 statement

Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Income & wages

A lifelong Republican, Click is an Alaskan first, and knows that leading is about bringing people together to get things done. To change course from the current outmigration trend, Alaska must ensure our kids and grandkids have reasons to stay—strong schools, good jobs, and wages to support their fa…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

A lifelong Republican, Click is an Alaskan first, and knows that leading is about bringing people together to get things done. To change course from the current outmigration trend, Alaska must ensure our kids and grandkids have reasons to stay—strong schools, good jobs, and wages to support their families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Click Bishop — identity-verified candidate website 2 ↗

Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Taxes & tax policy

ACES Tax Structure: Repeal SB21 and return to Alaska's Clear and Equitable Share.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Government-published candidate material

ACES Tax Structure: Repeal SB21 and return to Alaska's Clear and Equitable Share.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

James W. “JP4” Parkin — official 2026 candidate-authored pamphlet statement ↗
View 3 more statements from James W. “JP4” Parkin
Taxes & tax policy

Remove SB21 and return an ACES model of oil taxes- This will return 2 to 3 billion per year in tax money to our states budget. This money has been going to the oil companies since 2014. That amounts to around 30 billion dollars in lost budget revenue. The legislature has allowed this much money to l…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Remove SB21 and return an ACES model of oil taxes- This will return 2 to 3 billion per year in tax money to our states budget. This money has been going to the oil companies since 2014. That amounts to around 30 billion dollars in lost budget revenue. The legislature has allowed this much money to leave the budget and used their Constitutional Budget Reserve (CBR) and the people's PFD to make up the losses. Let's not give anymore money to the rich oil companies. Let's give it back to the people of Alaska in full PFDs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

James W. “JP4” Parkin — identity-verified candidate website 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Build the Alaska Resource Development Cooperative Corporation (ARDCC-arctic)- Arctic will be owned and operated by the people of Alaska. It will operate independently of our state government, the PFD and any other state run corporation. It will operate like every other cooperative corporation in the…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Build the Alaska Resource Development Cooperative Corporation (ARDCC-arctic)- Arctic will be owned and operated by the people of Alaska. It will operate independently of our state government, the PFD and any other state run corporation. It will operate like every other cooperative corporation in the state and will be entitled to the same benefits and protections. Every Alaskan will be a shareholder entitled to corporate dividends that the legislator could not touch. Arctic would allow us to take on jobs that we are interested in like a state refinery to bring down the cost of fuel for Alaskans. For the projects it takes on, it could provide 100% Alaskan jobs, control over production, and operations. But, the most important benefit of having ARDCC would be in negotiations with other corporations. With Arctic, when an outside company suggests that it will not be able to create jobs for us or increase production without tax breaks, we can say "Not a problem. We will see if Arctic is interested. Have a nice day.) We can say goodby to corporate extortion.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

James W. “JP4” Parkin — identity-verified candidate website 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Future negotiations- There will be many opportunities for future development. In the future we will negotiate for profit shares, taxes and the promise of jobs. Historically Alaska has traded its natural resources for the promise of jobs only. We can and will do better!

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

Future negotiations- There will be many opportunities for future development. In the future we will negotiate for profit shares, taxes and the promise of jobs. Historically Alaska has traded its natural resources for the promise of jobs only. We can and will do better!

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

James W. “JP4” Parkin — identity-verified candidate website 3 ↗

Matt A. Heilala

3 statements

Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Taxes & tax policy

I will fix Alaska’s finances without new taxes, audit every agency, and protect the Permanent Fund for future generations.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Government-published candidate material

I will fix Alaska’s finances without new taxes, audit every agency, and protect the Permanent Fund for future generations.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Matt A. Heilala — official 2026 candidate-authored pamphlet statement ↗
View 2 more statements from Matt A. Heilala
Taxes & tax policy

Alaska needs a governor who will fight for limited government and more local control. A governor who will veto taxes and remove regulatory roadblocks, so the private sector can grow our economy.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Why I'm Running

Candidate campaign source

Alaska needs a governor who will fight for limited government and more local control. A governor who will veto taxes and remove regulatory roadblocks, so the private sector can grow our economy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Matt A. Heilala — identity-verified candidate website 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

New taxes don't create new money. They take it from individuals and give it to the government. Every time you tax something you get: less work, less money, less investment, and less growth.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: No New Taxes

Candidate campaign source

New taxes don't create new money. They take it from individuals and give it to the government. Every time you tax something you get: less work, less money, less investment, and less growth.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Matt A. Heilala — identity-verified candidate website 4 ↗

Meda DeWitt

1 statement

Nonpartisan · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Taxes & tax policy

Stabilize our budget and protect our Permanent Fund Dividend by closing oil and gas tax loopholes and setting a sustainable spending cap.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Government-published candidate material

Stabilize our budget and protect our Permanent Fund Dividend by closing oil and gas tax loopholes and setting a sustainable spending cap.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Meda DeWitt — official 2026 candidate-authored pamphlet statement ↗

Shelley Hughes

4 statements

Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Taxes & tax policy

Suspend property taxes during construction phases.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Suspend property taxes during construction phases.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Shelley Hughes — identity-verified candidate website 4 ↗
View 3 more statements from Shelley Hughes
Taxes & tax policy

Oppose using an income tax to fund the PFD.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Oppose using an income tax to fund the PFD.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Shelley Hughes — identity-verified candidate website 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

“Alaskans, we can do this. And when we do, we will unleash a new era of prosperity for our great state. Why? Because people and businesses are drawn to states with stable fiscal foundations—and they avoid those that chase them away with constant new taxes and fees. Stability attracts investment; ins…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

“Alaskans, we can do this. And when we do, we will unleash a new era of prosperity for our great state. Why? Because people and businesses are drawn to states with stable fiscal foundations—and they avoid those that chase them away with constant new taxes and fees. Stability attracts investment; instability drives it out. Let’s choose fiscal stability and secure Alaska’s future.”

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Shelley Hughes — identity-verified candidate website 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Government cannot grow our economy. Growth comes from the ingenuity of individuals, the teamwork of innovators and investors, and the determination of hardworking Alaskans. The role of government is to create the conditions for success. That is why as your governor, I will be focused on accessing af…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Government cannot grow our economy. Growth comes from the ingenuity of individuals, the teamwork of innovators and investors, and the determination of hardworking Alaskans. The role of government is to create the conditions for success. That is why as your governor, I will be focused on accessing affordable energy, reducing regulatory and tax burdens, promoting innovation, and building the infrastructure our state needs. This is how we open doors to new opportunities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Shelley Hughes — identity-verified candidate website 4 ↗

2026 Alaska U.S. House — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 7 statements

Bill Hill

3 statements

Nonpartisan · U.S. House · AK

Taxes & tax policy

I support taxing the 1% and closing tax loopholes that mean my neighbors in Naknek are paying a higher tax rate than our country’s biggest corporations.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Tax the wealthiest one percent and close corporate tax loopholes

Candidate campaign source

I support taxing the 1% and closing tax loopholes that mean my neighbors in Naknek are paying a higher tax rate than our country’s biggest corporations.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Bill's Platform - Bill Hill for Alaskans ↗
View 2 more statements from Bill Hill
Taxes & tax policy

I’m running to lower our fuel costs and bring energy bills down. I will go to bat for getting the most out of our oil and natural gas, and restore tax credits to bring online new renewable projects.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Develop oil and gas and restore renewable-energy tax credits

Candidate campaign source

I’m running to lower our fuel costs and bring energy bills down. I will go to bat for getting the most out of our oil and natural gas, and restore tax credits to bring online new renewable projects.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Bill's Platform - Bill Hill for Alaskans ↗
Taxes & tax policy

I support small business and middle class tax relief.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Support tax relief for small businesses and the middle class

Candidate campaign source

I support small business and middle class tax relief.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Bill's Platform - Bill Hill for Alaskans ↗

Libertarian · U.S. House · AK

Taxes & tax policy

I’m pro-outer agency audits of how our tax dollars are being spent and yes, I’m pro eliminating any intimidation tactics employed by the IRS.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Support outside audits of tax spending and oppose IRS intimidation

Government-published candidate material

I’m pro-outer agency audits of how our tax dollars are being spent and yes, I’m pro eliminating any intimidation tactics employed by the IRS.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

James C. “Jim” McDermott — candidate-authored 2026 general-election pamphlet ↗

Nick Begich

3 statements

Republican · U.S. House · AK

Taxes & tax policy

Through the Working Families Tax Cuts Act, Congress reopened major opportunities for responsible energy development in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska, Coastal Plains, Cook Inlet, and other resource areas critical to Alaska’s future.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reports legislation expanding Alaska energy development opportunities

Government-published candidate material

Through the Working Families Tax Cuts Act, Congress reopened major opportunities for responsible energy development in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska, Coastal Plains, Cook Inlet, and other resource areas critical to Alaska’s future.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nick Begich — candidate-authored 2026 general-election pamphlet ↗
View 2 more statements from Nick Begich
Taxes & tax policy

In his first term in Congress, Nick Begich helped pass major tax relief for working Alaskans, including no taxes on tips, no taxes on overtime, historic tax relief for seniors, and permanent relief for small businesses.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reports tax legislation on tips, overtime, seniors and small businesses

Government-published candidate material

In his first term in Congress, Nick Begich helped pass major tax relief for working Alaskans, including no taxes on tips, no taxes on overtime, historic tax relief for seniors, and permanent relief for small businesses.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nick Begich — candidate-authored 2026 general-election pamphlet ↗
Taxes & tax policy

He helped pass major tax relief for working Alaskans, including no taxes on tips, no taxes on overtime, historic tax relief for seniors, and permanent relief for small businesses.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reports tax legislation on tips, overtime, seniors and small businesses

Candidate campaign source

He helped pass major tax relief for working Alaskans, including no taxes on tips, no taxes on overtime, historic tax relief for seniors, and permanent relief for small businesses.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nick Begich — campaign biography and Solutions for Alaska ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Alaska candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Alaska incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Alaska legislators and Alaska’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Alaska’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Alaska incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Genevieve Mina

Alaska House of Representatives · D–AK

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Genevieve Mina
Alaska Legislature · HB 156

An Act relating to disclosure of information regarding employee compensation by employers, employees, and applicants for employment.

May 14, 2025 · Pending · House Finance

Rep. Genevieve Mina · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

CSHB 156(L&C) proposes requiring employment notices and advertisements to disclose compensation, including salary or a salary range. It would prohibit employers from barring wage discussions or asking applicants about previous compensation. Applicants could still voluntarily disclose pay, and employers could consider that information; employees and applicants would not have to disclose pay, and employers would not have to disclose an individual employee’s pay unless otherwise required by law. The bill remains in House Finance. These proposed information and bargaining rules do not themselves raise wages or household income.

Official bill page lists House Finance with status date 2025-05-14. No enactment in the checked 34th-Legislature record as of September 10, 2026. Printed effective dates do not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Wages and salaries contribute to household money income. Compensation information and bargaining protections address that component, not a minimum wage increase or a demonstrated change in median household income. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Alaska evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 23.10.700. Disclosure or discussion of wages. (a) An employer who publishes a notice, advertisement, or other solicitation for employment shall include in the notice, advertisement, or other solicitation a description of the compensation, including the salary or range of salaries, for the position. (b) An employer may not (1) prohibit an employee or applicant for employment from disclosing the employee's or applicant's compensation or discussing or asking about the compensation of another; (2) ask an applicant for employment about compensation the applicant may have received from another employer; or (3) prohibit an employee or applicant for employment from helping or encouraging another individual to exercise a right under this subsection. (c) Nothing in this section (1) creates an obligation for an employee or applicant for employment to disclose information about the employee's or applicant's compensation or the compensation of another; (2) prohibits an employee or applicant for employment from voluntarily disclosing to an employer information about the employee's or applicant's compensation; (3) prohibits an employer from considering or relying on information disclosed under (2) of this subsection when determining the compensation of an employee or applicant for employment; (4) requires an employer to disclose the compensation of any individual employee, unless otherwise required by law.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Zack Fields

Alaska House of Representatives · D–AK

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Zack Fields
Alaska Legislature · HB 97

An Act relating to theft; relating to organized retail theft; relating to property crimes; relating to aggravating factors at sentencing; establishing a statewide marketplace facilitator sales tax; and establishing the organized retail theft fund in the general fund.

May 2, 2025 · Pending · House Finance

Rep. Zack Fields · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

CSHB 97(JUD) proposes a Class A felony for a person who, in coordination with a group of two or more persons, commits two or more thefts. It would require property or services worth at least $750 on each occasion, or theft of a firearm or explosive, property taken from another person, or safety or survival equipment taken from a vessel or aircraft. This connection covers the property-taking component. The bill remains in House Finance and does not establish these penalties or fewer reported property crimes.

Official bill page lists House Finance with status date 2025-05-02. No enactment in the checked 34th-Legislature record as of September 10, 2026. Printed effective dates do not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

The FBI property-crime measure includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. The taking of property within this organized-theft proposal overlaps larceny-theft. Theft of services, wage theft and trafficking are excluded from this connection, and Alaska offense definitions do not equal FBI classifications. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Alaska evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 11.46.115. Organized theft. (a) A person commits the crime of organized theft if the person, in coordination with a group of two or more persons, commits two or more instances of theft as defined in AS 11.46.100 and (1) the value of property or services taken on each occasion is $750 or more; or (2) the property is (A) a firearm or explosive; (B) taken from the person of another; (C) taken from a vessel and is vessel safety or survival equipment; (D) taken from an aircraft and the property is aircraft safety or survival equipment. (b) Organized theft is a class A felony.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Kelly Merrick

Alaska Senate · R–AK

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Kelly Merrick
Alaska Legislature · SB 164

An Act eliminating deductions for the remittance of the motor fuel tax, tobacco taxes, and tire fees; relating to discounts on cigarette stamps; and providing for an effective date.

Jun 18, 2026 · Enacted · Without governor signature

Sen. Kelly Merrick · Sponsored / Rep. Dan Saddler · Cross-sponsored / Rep. Sara Hannan · Cross-sponsored / Rep. Andy Josephson · Cross-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 164 became Chapter 14, SLA 2026 without the governor’s signature on June 18, 2026, effective July 1. Its fuel provision removes the allowance to retain 1% of monthly motor-fuel tax and refined-fuel surcharge, capped at $100, for timely accounting and filing. Bracketed text in the excerpt is the deleted allowance. This changes remittance costs, not the per-gallon tax rate; tobacco and tire provisions are outside this gasoline connection.

Became law without the governor’s signature June 18, 2026: Chapter 14, SLA 2026. Effective July 1, 2026. The journal entry is June 19; it records a June 18 event.

Why this record is included

The gasoline fact is a West Coast excluding California proxy covering Alaska, Hawaii, Oregon and Washington. The law changes the amount Alaska fuel dealers or users retain when remitting tax and surcharge; it does not raise the per-gallon tax rate or establish that the lost allowance was passed through into pump prices or changed the four-state average. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Alaska evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

* Section 1. AS 43.40.013 is amended to read: Sec. 43.40.013. Collection of the refined fuel surcharge and the motor fuel tax. Every dealer who sells or otherwise transfers refined or motor fuel in the state shall collect the surcharge and tax required in this chapter at the time of sale, and remit the total surcharge and tax collected during each calendar month of each year to the department by the last day of each succeeding month. Every user shall likewise remit the surcharge and tax required in this chapter and accrued on fuel actually used by the user during each month. [IF THE MONTHLY RETURN IS TIMELY FILED, ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL MONTHLY SURCHARGE AND TAX DUE, LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF $100, MAY BE DEDUCTED AND RETAINED TO COVER THE EXPENSE OF ACCOUNTING AND FILING THE MONTHLY RETURN.] At the time the remittance is made, each dealer or user shall submit a statement to the department showing all fuel that the dealer or user has distributed or used during the month. […] * Sec. 6. This Act takes effect July 1, 2026.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Alaska officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Alaska statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 7, 2026.